Abstract
Background: As Japan undergoes population aging, nursing care workers play an important role in supporting older adults in the community, which has been particularly critical during COVID-19 pandemic. However, the knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) among nursing care workers regarding COVID-19 have not been fully elucidated. Methods: A self-administered questionnaire survey was conducted in June 2020 among 481 nursing care workers in the nursing care facilities in Aichi, Japan. We assessed COVID-19-related KAP scores of nursing care workers, and compared them by age, sex, and years of experience. Results: A total of 481 nursing care workers responded to the survey. Out of a maximum of 10 points, the mean (standard deviations) knowledge, attitude, and practice scores were 6.86 (1.45), 7.11 (1.42), and 7.40 (1.89), respectively. Comparisons between the KAP scores revealed significantly higher knowledge scores among older workers (p < 0.001) and significantly higher knowledge scores (p = 0.002) and practice scores (p = 0.033) among workers with more than 20 years of working experience. Conclusions: The findings revealed that older age and a longer duration of experience were associated with higher COVID-19-related knowledge and practice scores. To better support older adults, it is essential to improve the education system for care workers and to provide environments for delivering necessary information rapidly.
Keywords: COVID-19, knowledge attitudes practices survey, nursing care workers, older adults
1. Introduction
As the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) continues to spread around the world, public health crisis prevention has involved the adoption of behavioral restrictions in daily life to avoid infection [1]. However, the unintended negative effects of this behavior change have included decreased physical activity and increased mental distress [2], in addition to the deterioration of mental health among children and adolescents [3]. Various secondary health effects of the COVID-19 pandemic have been observed in all generations living in the community. Among these effects, decreased physical activity in older adults has been reported in a systematic review [4] and is directly related to worsening frailty. In addition, frailty has been reported to be associated with mortality risks [5].
In Japan’s aging society, in which 28.7% of the population in 2020 was older than 65 years [6], care workers at nursing homes are among the professionals with whom older adults most often interact. Japanese nursing care workers practice care that supports dignity and independence while interacting with older adults. These workers not only provide physical support but also psychological and social support. Regardless of whether an older adult lives in a facility or at home, this psychological and social care helps to support older adults’ quality of life. Nursing care workers are responsible for assisting with various aspects of the daily lives of older adults. This has included providing information about COVID-19 prevention methods and infection-related problems. It is also important to consider ways of improving COVID-19 knowledge and creating a place and framework [7] within which to do this. Thus, understanding the COVID-19-related knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) of nursing care workers is crucial for ensuring the quality of life of older adults. This understanding may also be useful for developing COVID-19 countermeasures. However, to the best of our knowledge, no previous studies have investigated COVID-19 KAP among nursing care workers in Japan [8].
The present study examined whether nursing care workers in Japan had sufficient levels of KAP regarding COVID-19 for taking care of older adults during the pandemic. In the early stages of the pandemic in Japan, approximately 1200 new laboratory-confirmed cases were reported per week, with approximately 19,000 cumulative cases. We sought to determine whether nursing care workers had sufficient KAP to assist in reducing the risks of infection and infection-related problems for older adults in nursing and healthcare facilities under the conditions of the COVID-19 pandemic.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Study Design, Study Site, Participants, and Data Collection
This cross-sectional study used a self-administered questionnaire survey. The participants were nursing care workers who worked for a social welfare corporation, consisting of nursing homes, a geriatric health services facility, and a support facility for disabled older adults in Aichi, Japan, at the time of the study. The study site contained 550 nursing care workers. Based on previous studies [9,10], we calculated the required sample size for this study as 227 participants, with a total population of 550 persons, a confidence level of 95%, an error of 5%, and a response distribution of 50%. We recruited participants using posters at the facilities. To protect participants’ personal information and to avoid sharing question information, participants posted the questionnaire in a designated box installed in a facility that could only be accessed by specific researchers after completing the questionnaire.
The study was approved by the ethical review committee of Showa Pharmaceutical University (Approval No. 2020-12) and by the institutional review board of Choju Medical Institute, Fukushimura Hospital (Approval No. 419). Written informed consent was obtained from the study participants.
2.2. KAP Survey Methodology
We conducted a KAP survey from 1 June to 30 June 2020 using a self-administered questionnaire. The questionnaire was designed by the study investigators based on “Risk communication and community engagement action plan guidance for COVID-19 preparedness and response” [11], “A guide to developing knowledge, attitude, and practice surveys” [12] published by the World Health Organization, and on previous related studies [9,10,11,12,13,14,15] (Questionnaire S1). The questionnaire was designed to assess COVID-19-related KAPs. In addition, we collected information about participant characteristics, including age, sex, nationality, academic background, number of people in household, and underlying diseases. The questions were either multiple choice or closed-ended, and participants chose their responses from a provided set of answers (Yes/No, True/False, or Agree/Disagree/Undecided). The questions were scored using a 3-point Likert scale: 3 points = “agree”, representing a positive attitude; 2 points = “undecided”; 1 point = “disagree”. In the case of multiple choice questions, 1 point was assigned for each correct choice. For knowledge-related responses, cutoff points were set according to the number of correct answers, with 0 to 3 points assigned according to the number of correct answers [16,17]. For responses regarding practice, 1 point was given depending on the respondents showing correct practice behavior. The KAP scores were calculated from the answers using factor analysis, adjusted to give a total score of 10 points being the highest possible score [10]. The KAP scores were compared by demographic group (age, sex, and years of working experience). We conducted a pilot study using a preliminary questionnaire and confirmed that there were no problems with it. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient for internal consistency in the KAP scores was 0.747.
2.3. Statistical Analysis
The collected data were expressed as the mean and standard deviation (SD) or the median and interquartile range (IQR) for continuous variables. Comparisons between groups were made using Student’s t-test or the Kruskal–Wallis test for continuous variables and the χ2 test or Fisher’s exact test for categorical variables. If any variables were missing from participants’ responses, we reduced the number of participants and performed another comparison of the groups. For all analyses, the significance levels were two-tailed and p < 0.05 was considered to indicate statistical significance. The analyses were carried out using IBM SPSS, version 28.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA).
3. Results
3.1. General Characteristics of the Participants
Of the 538 nursing care workers recruited from the social welfare corporation facilities, 481 (89.4%) agreed to participate in the study and completed the self-administered questionnaire. The general characteristics of participants are shown in Table 1.
Table 1.
Participants’ characteristics.
| Participants, n (%) (n = 481) |
|
|---|---|
| Demographic information | |
| Age, median (IQR) | 45 (35–53) |
| Sex, n (%) | |
| Male | 123 (25.6) |
| Female | 358 (74.4) |
| Nationality, n (%) | |
| Japanese | 428 (89.4) |
| Non-Japanese | 51 (10.6) |
| Academic background, n (%), n = 475 | |
| Junior high school | 20 (4.2) |
| High school | 234 (49.3) |
| Junior college/Technical school | 115 (24.2) |
| University | 89 (18.7) |
| Graduate school | 14 (2.9) |
| Number of people in household, n (%) | |
| Living alone | 77 (16.2) |
| 2 | 110 (23.2) |
| 3 | 96 (20.2) |
| 4 | 103 (21.7) |
| 5 | 58 (12.2) |
| ≥6 | 31 (6.5) |
| Underlying disease *, n (%), n = 467 | |
| None | 367 (78.6) |
| Cerebral infarction | 4 (0.9) |
| Angina/Arrhythmia | 9 (1.9) |
| Hypertension | 31 (6.6) |
| Diabetes | 21 (4.5) |
| COPD/Asthma | 6 (1.3) |
| Others | 42 (9.0) |
| Years of experiences as a nursing care worker, median (IQR) (n = 425) | 7 (3–13) |
| Have you ever attend a seminar or conference regarding COVID-19?—Yes (%), n = 478 | 35 (7.3) |
| Have you ever cared for a patient with COVID-19?—Yes, n = 479 | 1 (0.2) |
| Have you ever been infected with COVID-19?—Yes | 2 (0.4) |
Abbreviations: IQR—interquartile range; COPD—chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. * Multiple choice question.
Of the 481 participants, the median age was 45 years and the median number of years of experience as a nursing care worker was 7 years. Women accounted for 74.4% of participants. The academic background of the participants was mainly high school (48.6%) and most participants had no comorbidities (76.3%).
3.2. Knowledge Relating to COVID-19 among the Nursing Care Workers
The results relating to COVID-19 knowledge are shown in Table 2.
Table 2.
Knowledge relating to COVID-19 among nursing care workers.
| Participants, n (%) (n = 481) |
|
|---|---|
| Having enough information about COVID-19, n (%) | 46 (9.6) |
| What do you know about COVID-19 *, n (%), n = 477 | |
| Do not know anything about COVID-19 | 27 (5.7) |
| Infection protection measures | 326 (68.3) |
| Symptoms of infected people | 357 (74.8) |
| Route of infection | 189 (39.6) |
| Actions to be taken at the onset of infection | 286 (60.0) |
| Asymptomatic cases in COVID-19 | 333 (69.8) |
| Risks of severity | 266 (55.8) |
| Required medical care system for COVID-19 patients | 90 (18.9) |
| Risks for mortality | 181 (37.9) |
| Infect by droplets such as coughing and sneezing, n = 479 | 465 (97.1) |
| There are no antiviral drugs that are effective against COVID-19, n (%), n = 480 | 201 (41.9) |
| There are no vaccines against COVID-19, n (%), n = 480 | 303 (63.1) |
| Is this the proper way as the prevention measure against COVID-19? *, n = 478 | |
| Avoid being bitten by mosquitoes | 24 (5.0) |
| Hand wash using soap and running water | 436 (91.4) |
| Wear a mask where there are people | 453 (94.8) |
| Avoid direct contact with a person with high fever | 411 (86.0) |
| Ventilate the room | 455 (95.2) |
| Stay in the room as much as possible | 150 (31.4) |
| Eat well-balanced meals | 319 (66.7) |
| Eat meals alone | 58 (12.1) |
| Sleep well | 378 (79.1) |
| Is this the major symptom of COVID-19? *, n (%) n = 479 | |
| Fever | 463 (96.7) |
| Cough | 396 (82.7) |
| Breathlessness | 442 (92.3) |
| Myalgia | 140 (29.2) |
| Headache | 212 (44.3) |
| Diarrhea | 106 (22.1) |
| Fatigue | 359 (74.9) |
* Multiple choice question.
In terms of COVID-19-related knowledge, 74.8% of participants had knowledge about “symptoms of COVID-19 infection”, 69.8% had knowledge about the occurrence of “asymptomatic patients”, and 68.3% had knowledge about “how to respond to prevent infection”. Almost all participants (97.1%) knew that the disease is transmitted by droplets from coughing and sneezing, but a lower proportion had knowledge about the risk of death (37.9%) or the medical care system required for COVID-19 patients (18.9%). Only 9.6% of participants felt that they had sufficient information about COVID-19. The most commonly reported COVID-19 symptoms were fever (96.7%), breathlessness (92.3%), cough (82.7%), and fatigue (81.6%). Less than half of the participants answered that myalgia, headache, and diarrhea could be symptoms.
3.3. Information Resources Regarding COVID-19 among Nursing Care Workers
The primary sources of COVID-19 information used by participants are presented in Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Information resources regarding COVID-19 among nursing care workers.
The main resources of COVID-19-related information among the nursing care workers were television (94.8%), the internet (69.6%), and friends/colleagues (40.4%), while announcements from international organizations (6.3%) and academic conferences (1.5%) were less often used.
The results of a two-group comparison by age (45 years or older vs. 44 years or younger) regarding COVID-19-related information resources are shown in Figure S1. Compared with the younger age group, the older age group was significantly more likely to use government notices as a resource (19.9%, p = 0.002). However, television (96.5%, p = 0.050) was used by a proportion of participants in both groups. The younger age group was significantly more likely than the older group to use the internet (81.3%, p < 0.001) and family (31.8%, p = 0.012) as resources of information. A comparison by years of nursing care experience indicated that the group with more years of experience contained significantly more participants who used television (98.2%, p = 0.004) as a resource of information compared with the group with less experience (Figure S2).
3.4. Attitudes Relating to COVID-19 among Nursing Care Workers
The results relating to COVID-19 attitudes are shown in Table 3.
Table 3.
Attitudes relating to COVID-19 among nursing care workers.
| Participants, n (%) (n = 481) |
|
|---|---|
| My job holds a high risk against COVID-19 infection, n (%), n = 480 | |
| Agree | 301 (62.7) |
| Disagree | 57 (11.9) |
| Neither agree/disagree | 122 (25.4) |
| I feel a possibility of infection, n (%) n = 456 | 405 (88.8) |
| How threatened do you feel by COVID-19? n (%), n = 468 | |
| Very threatened | 310 (66.2) |
| Threatened | 145 (31.0) |
| Not so threatened | 13 (2.8) |
| What is the cause of feeling threatened by COVID-19? *, n (%), n = 478 | |
| I may infect | 405 (84.7) |
| I may let someone infect me | 401 (83.9) |
| I may die | 282 (59.0) |
| I may be quarantined if infected | 189 (39.5) |
| My work and daily life may be limited | 309 (64.6) |
| Currently, there are no effective medications or vaccinations | 304 (63.6) |
| I will feel embarrassed if I become infected with COVID-19, n (%) n = 450 | 176 (39.1) |
| I think COVID-19 will converge, n (%) | |
| Agree | 131 (27.2) |
| Disagree | 98 (20.4) |
| Neither agree/disagree | 252 (52.4) |
| The infection control measures in the workplace where I work are sufficient, n (%) | |
| Agree | 212 (44.1) |
| Disagree | 54 (11.2) |
| Neither agree/disagree | 215 (44.7) |
| I want to keep my current job despite the high risk of COVID-19 infection, n (%) n = 445 | 382 (85.8) |
| I am proud of my job, n (%) n = 451 | 402 (89.1) |
| COVID-19 is a preventable disease, n (%) n = 476 | |
| Agree | 184 (38.7) |
| Disagree | 41 (8.6) |
| Neither agree/disagree | 251 (52.7) |
| Influenza is a preventable disease, n (%) n = 476 | |
| Agree | 343 (72.1) |
| Disagree | 41 (8.6) |
| Neither agree/disagree | 92 (19.3) |
* Multiple choice question.
Overall, 62.7% of participants felt that their occupation as nursing care workers put them “at high risk of infection with COVID-19”. The reasons for feeling threatened by COVID-19 included “I might be infected” (84.7%) and “I might pass it on to someone else” (83.9%).
The percentage of respondents who felt embarrassed about being infected with COVID-19 was 39.1%. Despite the high risk of COVID-19 infection, 85.8% of the participants wanted to keep their current jobs and 89.1% were proud of their jobs. Among the participants, 72.1% thought that influenza was a preventable disease, but only 38.7% thought that COVID-19 was preventable. The attitude questions revealed that most of the nursing care workers were fearful of becoming infected with COVID-19; however, they were proud to continue working.
When asked which infectious disease was the most frightening, the most common responses were COVID-19 (69.6%), HIV/AIDS (10.3%), and Ebola (7.8%) (Figure 2).
Figure 2.
Most-feared infectious diseases among nursing care workers.
3.5. Practices Relating to COVID-19 among Nursing Care Workers
The results relating to COVID-19 practices are shown in Table 4.
Table 4.
Practices relating to COVID-19 among nursing care workers.
| Participants, n (%) (n = 481) |
|
|---|---|
| What was the issue that affected your preventable behavior? *, n (%), n = 473 | |
| State of emergency by the government | 377 (79.7) |
| Deceleration of pandemic by WHO | 116 (24.5) |
| Face of the news for death of celebrities | 248 (52.4) |
| Infection of close person | 15 (3.2) |
| Death of close person due to COVID-19 | 8 (1.7) |
| Media news about the infection for famous people | 144 (30.4) |
| What do you do if you or a family member has symptoms that suggest COVID-19 infection *, n (%) n = 475 | |
| Seek medical care immediately | 192 (40.4) |
| Call the health center for advice | 415 (87.4) |
| Contact the workplace | 384 (80.8) |
| Talk to family | 261 (54.9) |
| Talk to a friend or colleague | 92 (19.4) |
| Consult the family doctor | 180 (37.9) |
| Go to the pharmacy and consult a pharmacist | 4 (0.8) |
| Do not tell anyone | 8 (1.7) |
| Do not go out from the house | 294 (61.9) |
| Infection measures I actually do for COVID-19 *, n (%) n = 480 | |
| Wear a mask where there are other people | 475 (99.0) |
| Hand hygiene | 455 (94.8) |
| Gargle | 366 (76.3) |
| Ventilate the room regularly | 435 (90.6) |
| Room cleaning and disinfection | 276 (57.5) |
| Stay home on holidays | 367 (76.5) |
| Avoid contact with people as much as possible | 314 (65.4) |
| Eat well-balanced meals | 264 (55.0) |
| Sleep well | 293 (61.0) |
| Do nothing | 1 (0.2) |
| Infection control measures that you implemented in the workplace *, n (%) n = 476 | |
| Disinfect indoor items and equipment | 340 (71.4) |
| Ventilate the room regularly | 438 (92.0) |
| Alert and educate patients about COVID-19 | 115 (24.2) |
* Multiple choice question.
The event that most commonly influenced self-restraint behaviors was the “declaration of a state of emergency by the government” (79.7%), followed by the “death of a celebrity” (52.4%), and “news media about the infection of famous people” (30.4%).
The most common actions taken by the respondents or their family members when they suspected COVID-19 infection were “call the health center for advice” (87.4%) and “contact the workplace” (80.8%). Regarding COVID-19 infection control measures, “wearing a mask when around other people”, “hand hygiene”, and “ventilate the room regularly” were implemented by more than 90% of the participants. Infection control measures implemented in the workplace were “ventilate the room regularly” (92.0%), “disinfecting indoor items and equipment” (71.4%), and “alerting and educating patients about COVID-19” (24.2%). These results revealed that basic infection control measures were widely practiced by the respondents themselves and in their workplaces, but fewer education and interventions were given to the older adults.
3.6. Differences in COVID-19-Related KAP Scores among Demographic Groups
We calculated COVID-19-related KAP scores based on the responses to the questionnaire items and assessed them by demographic group (Table 5).
Table 5.
Differences in COVID-19-related knowledge, attitudes, and practices scores among nursing care worker demographic groups.
| n = 389 | Group | No. of Sample | Knowledge Score | Attitude Score | Practice Score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Score * (SD) | p Value | 95% CI of Mean Difference | Score * (SD) | p Value | 95% CI of Mean Difference | Score * (SD) | p Value | 95% CI of Mean Difference | |||
| Total | 389 | 6.86 (1.45) | 7.11 (1.42) | 7.40 (1.89) | |||||||
| Age † | ≤44 | 171 | 6.54 (1.55) | <0.001 | −0.863–−0.291 | 7.13 (1.46) | 0.820 | −0.252–0.318 | 7.21 (2.02) | 0.073 | −0.736–0.033 |
| ≥45 | 218 | 7.11 (1.32) | 7.09 (1.39) | 7.56 (1.77) | |||||||
| Sex † | Male | 106 | 5.85 (1.41) | 0.968 | −0.332–0.318 | 7.12 (1.58) | 0.924 | −0.325–0.359 | 7.24 (1.82) | 0.282 | −0.654–−0.191 |
| Female | 283 | 6.86 (1.47) | 7.10 (1.36) | 7.47 (1.91) | |||||||
| Years of working experience ‡ | ≤5 years | 145 | 6.64 (1.59) | 0.002 | 7.11 (1.45) | 0.600 | 7.22 (2.10) | 0.033 | |||
| 6–19 years | 179 | 6.94 (1.30) | 7.07 (1.46) | 7.34 (1.73) | |||||||
| ≥20 years | 25 | 7.64 (1.35) | 7.39 (1.22) | 8.31 (1.37) | |||||||
Abbreviations: CI—confidence interval; SD—standard deviation. * A total score of 10 points being the highest possible score. † Comparisons between groups were made using Student’s t-test. ‡ Comparisons between groups were made using the Kruskal–Wallis test.
Out of the maximum attainable scores of 10 points, the mean (standard deviations) knowledge, attitude, and practice scores of nursing care workers in the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic were, 6.86 (1.45), 7.11 (1.42), and 7.40 (1.89), respectively. The COVID-19 knowledge score was significantly higher in the older group (45 years and older) than in the younger group and was the highest in the group with 20 years or more of experience (p < 0.001 and p = 0.002, respectively). There were no significant differences in attitude scores among the groups, but the practice score was highest in the group with 20 years or more of experience (p = 0.033).
4. Discussion
This study was conducted in the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic and indicated that nursing care workers in Japan generally had a basic knowledge of COVID-19. Additionally, as age and years of experience increased, COVID-19-related KAP scores also increased. These results suggest that nursing care workers with a basic knowledge of COVID-19 can help patients avoid infection and are familiar sources of information for older adults, and that nursing care workers with extensive practical experience may play a particularly important role in infection prevention.
Nursing care workers work closely with older adults, assisting them with exercise, eating, and bathing. They also engage older adults in conversation about various topics to prevent cognitive decline. In this way, nursing care workers are essential workers who are instrumental in the lives and health of older adults living in facilities. In the care sector, as in the medical sector, it is not possible to completely avoid being in close proximity to other people and it is not possible to carry out the necessary tasks via telework. Therefore, nursing care workers must take care to not become infected with COVID-19 and to not pass it on to their patients. Despite the fear surrounding COVID-19 and the anxiety regarding being infected without showing symptoms, these workers continued to collaborate with their colleagues to support their patients and their patients’ families and to be comfortable and happy.
The results of the knowledge questionnaire revealed that the workers had a general and basic knowledge of COVID-19. However, only 9.6% of participants reported that they had sufficient knowledge of COVID-19. The main sources of COVID-19 information were television and the internet, with considerably less information obtained from international organizations and academic conferences. These results are similar to those of a survey conducted in Japan regarding community pharmacists’ COVID-19 knowledge, in which the main resources of information were the internet and television, with less use of academic conferences and other resources [16]. The COVID-19 pandemic has led to a flood of information being disseminated via the internet. Misinformation has been found to have a substantial influence on decision making [17,18], and there is evidence that it can contribute to mental disorders and other health problems [19]. To avoid the negative outcomes caused by misinformation, we believe that it is necessary to develop a system to provide accurate and up-to-date information regarding COVID-19 for care workers and an environment in which to implement educational programs on emerging infectious diseases. The current results revealed that more experienced and older nursing care workers were more likely to watch television and be aware of government notices, which suggests that they actively seek information about COVID-19 (Figures S1 and S2). Because we conducted the present study in the early stages of the pandemic, the rate of attendance of COVID-19-related conferences was low among the participants. Therefore, conference attendance was not reflected in participants’ KAP scores. However, if they have additional opportunities to participate in seminars, increasing these opportunities may help them to improve their knowledge and to provide better care to older adults. Knowledge scores were higher for nursing care workers who were older and those who were more experienced, indicating that information and means of easy access for older adults may affect the scores. A previous study that examined the effect of educational intervention among residents regarding avian influenza H5N1 infection in Vietnam showed an increase in “healthcare workers” as an information resource after the educational program provided by the healthcare workers [9]. Although it has been suggested that increasing knowledge about COVID-19 is important for the nursing care workers themselves, it is also useful for increasing knowledge and appropriate behaviors for preventing infection among older adults who are receiving care from the nursing care workers. In addition, at the time of the influenza H1N1pdm09 pandemic, a study in Mexico indicated that one of the risk factors of hospitalization was a lack of information regarding the importance of early access to health care [20]. The Mexican government has used taxi windows to distribute information and to encourage people to seek medical care early and to announce that there was a free medical care program. Thus, it is crucial to consider information resources, to ensure that people receive the necessary information about unfamiliar issues, such as emerging infectious diseases.
The attitude-related results indicated that nursing care workers felt threatened by COVID-19 and were concerned not only about becoming infected but also about infecting others. They were also aware that their job entailed a high risk of infection, yet they wanted to continue to carry out their responsibilities with pride. It is reassuring for older adults living in the community and in nursing care facilities to have access to dedicated and reliable nursing care workers. The provision of appropriate advice to older adults by care workers is valuable for reducing the risk of COVID-19 infection and related problems.
Of all infectious diseases, nursing care workers stated that COVID-19 was the one they feared most. This may have been because of the uncertainty in the early stages of the pandemic when little was known about the virus and understanding was limited. In addition, a substantial proportion of respondents selected rabies as their most-feared infectious disease, which may have been because rabies was still being reported in the district at the time of the survey.
In Japan, the government’s declaration of a state of emergency strongly influenced people’s behaviors, but it seems to have gradually lost its perceived importance because a state of emergency has been declared many times. In contrast, in Sweden, which is based on the autonomy of the people in Europe, a high degree of trust in the government and a high degree of adherence to infection control measures have been reported [21]. This may be because of differences in the cultural context and the infection situation. To change people’s behavior in response to COVID-19, it is essential that they have accurate knowledge that is based on scientific information and the ability to understand, accept, and act on this information. In terms of the impact on personal behaviors, significantly more nursing care workers in the older age group cited the “death of a celebrity” and “reports of infectious diseases in celebrities” as influencing factors. Such reports may represent fear mongering, which could prevent people from recognizing the true risk and acting appropriately. Misinformation about COVID-19 quickly spread through social media, causing confusion and fear, which made it difficult for people to deal with the pandemic [22].
Many nursing care workers were familiar with basic infection control practices for themselves and their facilities; however, they were less involved in alerting and educating others about COVID-19. This suggests the importance of education and shows that there is a need for an education program and an environment in which care workers can obtain the necessary knowledge. A meta-analysis of COVID-19-related KAP, which evaluated KAP in approximately 200,000 members of the general population, also revealed that education affected practice scores and that “knowledge and attitudes” also affected practice [8]. A systematic review reported that educational interventions for healthcare workers implemented in response to severe acute respiratory syndrome, Middle East respiratory syndrome, Ebola virus, and COVID-19 improved care worker attitudes and improved their knowledge and skills, indicating that these interventions were effective [23]. The educational interventions presented in the studies were related to training during a viral epidemic. Although the interventions varied in content, design, and mode of delivery, we believe that such educational strategies could be useful for nursing care workers who have frequent contact with older adults. Educational interventions among healthcare workers have led to improved satisfaction and experience [24,25,26], modification of learner attitudes, and increased confidence [27]. Additionally, there are reports of reduced infection rates among healthcare workers [28] and reduced mortality rates among extracorporeal membrane oxygenation patients [29] when healthcare workers participate in training programs. Thus, programs to support the education of healthcare professionals have a variety of positive effects. To be adequately prepared for the next emerging infectious disease pandemic, it is necessary to develop and implement evidence-based training programs that are easily adaptable to nursing care workers. Nursing care workers in Japan’s super-aging society need to improve their knowledge of COVID-19 and need to contribute to the care of the older adults. At the same time, the current conditions may constitute an opportunity for nursing care workers to consider a new place for knowledge creation [7], including what kind of knowledge is required for nursing care workers to properly care for the older adults during the COVID-19 pandemic.
The present study involved several limitations. The participating nursing care workers all worked at one institution; therefore, their responses may differ from those of nursing care workers nationwide. Because this study was conducted during the early stage of the COVID-19 pandemic, the results may differ from current KAP scores among nursing care workers. However, the relationship between nursing care workers and older adults has not changed, even after the pandemic has passed, and this will be valuable information for developing countermeasures against infection among older adults in the current stage of the COVID-19 pandemic. Furthermore, the results of this study will serve as basic data for countermeasures against older adults in the early stages of the pandemic and will be useful for countermeasures against emerging infectious diseases that may occur again in the future.
5. Conclusions
Nursing care workers had high levels of knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding COVID-19. The current results revealed that, as the age and experience of nursing care workers increased, their COVID-19-related knowledge and practice scores also increased. The findings also suggested that these workers play an important role in supporting the health of older adults. Providing accurate and timely information and education to nursing care workers will be important for supporting older adults and for reducing the risk of infection among this vulnerable population. Sharing the experiences of nursing care workers in the super-aging society of Japan with those in other countries is crucial in the era of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to express their sincere appreciation to all of the study participants, especially considering the unusually challenging conditions during the COVID-19 pandemic. We also thank the staff in Sawarabi Group for conducting the present study, as well as Katherine Thieltges and Benjamin Knight, for editing a draft of this manuscript.
Supplementary Materials
The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ijerph192012993/s1, Figure S1: Resources of COVID-19-related information among nursing care workers by age group; Figure S2: Resources of COVID-19-related information among nursing care workers by years of work experience; Questionnaire S1: Questionnaire used in the study; Dataset S1: Dataset for the study.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, D.K. and T.M.; methodology, D.K. and T.M.; formal analysis, D.K.; investigation, D.K., T.M. and H.A.; data curation, D.K., T.M., M.H. and H.A.; writing—original draft preparation, D.K.; supervision, T.M. and H.A.; funding acquisition, T.M. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Institutional Review Board Statement
The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Ethical Review Committee of Showa Pharmaceutical University (Approval No. 2020-12) and by the institutional review board of Choju Medical Institute, Fukushimura Hospital (Approval No. 419).
Informed Consent Statement
Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.
Data Availability Statement
All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files (Dataset S1).
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Funding Statement
The study was supported by grants from the Sugiura Memorial Foundation, the Japan Science and Technology (JST) Mirai Program (#20345310), and the Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research (KAKENHI, Promotion of Joint International Research B, 20KK0218). These funders had no role in the design, methods, participant recruitment, data collection, analysis, or preparation of the paper.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Miyah Y., Benjelloun M., Lairini S., Lahrichi A. COVID-19 Impact on Public Health, Environment, Human Psychology, Global Socioeconomy, and Education. Sci. World J. 2022;2022:5578284. doi: 10.1155/2022/5578284. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Violant-Holz V., Gallego-Jiménez M.G., González-González C.S., Muñoz-Violant S., Rodríguez M.J., Sansano-Nadal O., Guerra-Balic M. Psychological Health and Physical Activity Levels during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Systematic Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2020;17:9419. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17249419. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Panchal U., de Pablo G.S., Franco M., Moreno C., Parellada M., Arango C., Fusar-Poli P. The impact of COVID-19 lockdown on child and adolescent mental health: Systematic review. Eur. Child. Adolesc. Psychiatry. 2021:1–27. doi: 10.1007/s00787-021-01856-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Oliveira M.R., Sudati I.P., Konzen V.D.M., de Campos A.C., Wibelinger L.M., Correa C., Miguel F.M., Silva R.N., Borghi-Silva A. COVID-19 and the impact on the physical activity level of elderly people: A systematic review. Exp. Gerontol. 2022;159:111675. doi: 10.1016/j.exger.2021.111675. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Zhang X.-M., Jiao J., Cao J., Huo X.-P., Zhu C., Wu X.-J., Xie X.-H. Frailty as a predictor of mortality among patients with COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Geriatr. 2021;21:186. doi: 10.1186/s12877-021-02138-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Statistics Bureau of Japan: Statistical Data, Statistical Topics, Population in Older Adults 2020. (In Japanese) [(accessed on 12 February 2022)]. Available online: https://www.stat.go.jp/data/topics/topi1261.html.
- 7.Nonaka I., Konno N. The Concept of “Ba”: Building a Foundation for Knowledge Creation. Calif. Manag. Rev. 1998;40:40–54. doi: 10.2307/41165942. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Siddiquea B.N., Shetty A., Bhattacharya O., Afroz A., Billah B. Global epidemiology of COVID-19 knowledge, attitude and practice: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2021;11:e051447. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051447. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Manabe T., Pham T.P., Vu V.C., Takasaki J., Dinh T.T., Nguyen T.M., Shimbo T., Bui T.T., Izumi S., Tran T.H., et al. Impact of educational intervention concerning awareness and behaviors relating to avian influenza (H5N1) in a high-risk population in Vietnam. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e23711. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0023711. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Manabe T., Hanh T.T., Lam D.M., Van D.T.H., Thuy P.T.P., Huyen D.T.T., Phuong T.T.M., Minh D.H., Takasaki J., Chau N.Q., et al. Knowledge, attitudes, practices and emotional reactions among residents of avian influenza (H5N1) hit communities in Vietnam. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e47560. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0047560. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.World Health Organization Risk Communication and Community Engagement (RCCE) Action Plan Guidance for COVID-19 Preparedness and Response. [(accessed on 1 February 2022)]. Available online: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/risk-communication-and-community-engagement-(rcce)-action-plan-guidance.
- 12.World Health Organization A Guide to Developing Knowledge, Attitude and Practice Surveys. [(accessed on 1 February 2022)]. Available online: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/43790/9789241596176_eng.pdf?sequence=1.
- 13.Ngo C.Q., Manabe T., Van Vu G., Chu H.T., Vu T.T.T., Tran T.T., Doan L.T.P., Takasaki J., Kudo K. Difficulties in tuberculosis infection control in a general hospital of Vietnam: A knowledge, attitude, and practice survey and screening for latent tuberculosis infection among health professionals. BMC Infect. Dis. 2019;19:951. doi: 10.1186/s12879-019-4593-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Chan E.Y., Cheng C.K., Tam G., Huang Z., Lee P. Knowledge, attitudes, and practices of Hong Kong population towards human A/H7N9 influenza pandemic preparedness, China, 2014. BMC Public Health. 2015;15:943. doi: 10.1186/s12889-015-2245-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Leslie T., Billaud J., Mofleh J., Mustafa L., Yingst S. Knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding avian influenza (H5N1), Afghanistan. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2008;14:1459–1461. doi: 10.3201/eid1409.071382. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kambayashi D., Manabe T., Kawade Y., Hirohara M. Knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding COVID-19 among pharmacists partnering with community residents: A national survey in Japan. PLoS ONE. 2021;16:e0258805. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0258805. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Rovetta A., Castaldo L. Influence of Mass Media on Italian Web Users During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Infodemiological Analysis. JMIRx Med. 2021;2:e32233. doi: 10.2196/32233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Bangalee A., Bangalee V. Fake news and fallacies: Exploring vaccine hesitancy in South Africa. S. Afr. Fam. Pr. 2021;63:e1–e3. doi: 10.4102/safp.v63i1.5345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Rocha Y.M., de Moura G.A., Desidério G.A., de Oliveira C.H., Lourenço F.D., de Figueiredo Nicolete L.D. The impact of fake news on social media and its influence on health during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review. Z. Gesundh Wiss. 2021:1–10. doi: 10.1007/s10389-021-01658-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Manabe T., Higuera Iglesias A.L., Vazquez Manriquez M.E., Martinez Valadez E.L., Ramos L.A., Izumi S., Takasaki J., Kudo K. Socioeconomic factors influencing hospitalized patients with pneumonia due to influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 in Mexico. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e40529. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0040529. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Helsingen L.M., Refsum E., Gjøstein D.K., Løberg M., Bretthauer M., Kalager M., Emilsson L., Clinical Effectiveness Research Group The COVID-19 pandemic in Norway and Sweden-threats, trust, and impact on daily life: A comparative survey. BMC Public Health. 2020;20:1597. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09615-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Depoux A., Martin S., Karafillakis E., Preet R., Wilder-Smith A., Larson H. The pandemic of social media panic travels faster than the COVID-19 outbreak. J. Travel Med. 2020;27:taaa031. doi: 10.1093/jtm/taaa031. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Nayahangan L.J., Konge L., Russell L., Andersen S. Training and education of healthcare workers during viral epidemics: A systematic review. BMJ Open. 2021;11:e044111. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Abrahamson S.D., Canzian S., Brunet F. Using simulation for training and to change protocol during the outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome. Crit. Care. 2006;10:R3. doi: 10.1186/cc3916. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Brazzi L., Lissoni A., Panigada M., Bottino N., Patroniti N., Pappalardo F., Gattinoni L. Simulation-based training of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation during H1N1 influenza pandemic: The Italian experience. Simul. Healthc. 2012;7:32–34. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0b013e31823ebccb. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Aiello A., Khayeri M.Y.-E., Raja S., Peladeau N., Romano D., Leszcz M., Maunder R., Rose M., Adam M.A., Pain C., et al. Resilience training for hospital workers in anticipation of an influenza pandemic. J. Contin. Educ. Health Prof. 2011;31:15–20. doi: 10.1002/chp.20096. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Carvalho E., Castro P., León E., Del Río A., Crespo F., Trigo L., Fernández S., Trilla A., Varela P., Nicolás J.M. Multi-professional simulation and risk perception of health care workers caring for Ebola-infected patients. Nurs. Crit. Care. 2019;24:256–262. doi: 10.1111/nicc.12396. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Bemah P., Baller A., Cooper C., Massaquoi M., Skrip L., Rude J.M., Twyman A., Moses P., Seifeldin R., Udhayashankar K., et al. Strengthening healthcare workforce capacity during and post Ebola outbreaks in Liberia: An innovative and effective approach to epidemic preparedness and response. Pan Afr. Med. J. 2019;33:9. doi: 10.11604/pamj.supp.2019.33.2.17619. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Kim G.-W., Koh Y., Lim C.-M., Huh J.W., Jung S.H., Kim J.B., Hong S.-B. The effect of an improvement of experience and training in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation management on clinical outcomes. Korean J. Intern. Med. 2018;33:121–129. doi: 10.3904/kjim.2015.027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files (Dataset S1).