Skip to main content
Microbiology Spectrum logoLink to Microbiology Spectrum
. 2022 Sep 13;10(5):e02465-22. doi: 10.1128/spectrum.02465-22

A DNase Type VI Secretion System Effector Requires Its MIX Domain for Secretion

Chaya Mushka Fridman a,#, Biswanath Jana a,#, Rotem Ben-Yaakov a,*, Eran Bosis b, Dor Salomon a,
Editor: Ethel Bayer-Santosc
Reviewed by: Erh-Min Laid
PMCID: PMC9602870  PMID: 36098406

ABSTRACT

Gram-negative bacteria often employ the type VI secretion system (T6SS) to deliver diverse cocktails of antibacterial effectors into rival bacteria. In many cases, even when the identity of the delivered effectors is known, their toxic activity and mechanism of secretion are not. Here, we investigate VPA1263, a Vibrio parahaemolyticus T6SS effector that belongs to a widespread class of polymorphic effectors containing a MIX domain. We reveal a C-terminal DNase toxin domain belonging to the HNH nuclease superfamily, and we show that it mediates the antibacterial toxicity of this effector during bacterial competition. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the VPA1263 MIX domain is necessary for T6SS-mediated secretion and intoxication of recipient bacteria. These results are the first indication of a functional role for MIX domains in T6SS secretion.

IMPORTANCE Specialized protein delivery systems are used during bacterial competition to deploy cocktails of toxins that target conserved cellular components. Although numerous toxins have been revealed, the activity of many remains unknown. In this study, we investigated such a toxin from the pathogen Vibrio parahaemolyticus. Our findings indicate that the toxin employs a DNase domain to intoxicate competitors. We also show that a domain used as a marker for secreted toxins is required for secretion of the toxin via a type VI secretion system.

KEYWORDS: DNase, T6SS, Vibrio, competition, effector, secretion systems

INTRODUCTION

Bacterial polymorphic toxins are modular proteins delivered by diverse secretion systems to mediate antibacterial or anti-eukaryotic activities (1, 2). They often share an N-terminal domain fused to diverse C-terminal toxin domains. The N-terminal domain, which can be used to classify these toxins, may determine which secretion system the effectors will be secreted through, e.g., the type V, VI, or VII secretion systems (T5SS, T6SS, or T7SS, respectively) (1, 36).

Many polymorphic toxins are secreted via T6SS, a contractile injection system widespread in Gram-negative bacteria (7, 8). The toxins, called effectors, decorate a secreted arrow-like structure comprising an inner tube, made of stacked Hcp hexamers, and a capping spike containing a VgrG trimer and a proline-alanine-alanine-arginine (PAAR) repeat-containing protein (912); the effector-decorated arrow is propelled outside the cell by a contracting sheath structure that engulfs the inner tube (13). Effectors can be either specialized—Hcp, VgrG, or PAAR proteins containing additional toxin domains at their C termini—or cargo effectors, which are proteins that noncovalently bind to Hcp, VgrG, or PAAR with or without the aid of an adaptor protein or a co-effector (1421). To date, three classes of polymorphic T6SS cargo effectors have been characterized, containing MIX (3), FIX (22), or Rhs (23) domains; the Rhs domain is not restricted to T6SS effectors (23).

Proteins belonging to the MIX effector class are secreted via T6SS (3, 2426). They contain a predominantly N-terminal MIX domain fused to known or predicted anti-eukaryotic or antibacterial C-terminal toxin domains; the latter precede a gene encoding a cognate immunity protein that prevents self- or kin intoxication (4, 27, 28). MIX domains can be divided into five clans that differ in their sequence conservation (3, 29). Notably, members of the MIX V clan are common in bacteria of the Vibrionaceae family (3, 29) and were suggested to be horizontally shared via mobile genetic elements (25). It remains unknown whether MIX plays a role in T6SS-mediated secretion.

In previous a work, we identified the MIX effector VPA1263 as an antibacterial effector delivered by V. parahaemolyticus RIMD 2210633 T6SS1 and its downstream encoded Vti2 as the cognate immunity protein (3) (Fig. 1A). VPA1263 belongs to the MIX V clan. It is encoded on V. parahaemolyticus island 6 (VpaI-6), a predicted mobile genomic island that is present in a subset of V. parahaemolyticus genomes (30). In this work, we aimed to investigate the toxic activity and the secretion mechanism of VPA1263. We found that VPA1263 contains a C-terminal toxin domain belonging to the HNH nuclease superfamily and showed that this domain functions as a DNase. Furthermore, we found that the MIX domain is required for secretion of VPA1263 via the T6SS, providing the first experimental validation of the hypothesis that MIX domains play a role in T6SS effector secretion.

FIG 1.

FIG 1

C-terminal domain mediation of VPA1263’s antibacterial toxicity. (A) Neighborhood of the vpa1263 gene (GenBank accession number BA000032.2). Genes are denoted by arrows indicating the direction of transcription. Locus tags (vpaxxxx) and unannotated gene names (i.e., vti2) are shown above the arrows. (B) Schematic representation of the domains identified in VPA1263 and of truncated and mutated variants examined in this figure. Green rectangles denote the position of the H837A mutation. (C to E) Toxicity of C-terminal Myc-His-tagged VPA1263 variants expressed from an arabinose-inducible expression plasmid in E. coli MG1655 streaked onto repressing (glucose) or inducing (arabinose) agar plates. In panel D, a second arabinose-inducible plasmid was used to coexpress Vti2. The results shown represent at least three independent experiments. EV, empty plasmid; PoNeBC, a PoNe domain-containing DNase from Bacillus cereus (BC3021); N-ter, N-terminal region; FL, full-length protein; FLHA, FL with conserved histidine 837 replaced by alanine; PyS, Pyocin_S domain; HNH, HNH family domain.

RESULTS

VPA1263 contains a C-terminal HNH nuclease-like toxin domain.

Analysis of the amino acid sequence of VPA1263 using the NCBI conserved domain database (31) revealed three known domains: a MIX domain (3), a peptidoglycan-binding LysM domain (32), and a Pyocin_S domain (33) (Fig. 1B). Hidden Markov modeling using HHpred (34) revealed another region at the C terminus of VPA1263 (amino acids 737 to 869) that is similar to the toxin domain found in members of the HNH nuclease superfamily, such as antibacterial S-type pyocins and colicins (3540). An iterative search using a hidden Markov model profile against the UniProt protein database indicated that the Pyocin_S and putative HNH nuclease domains located at the C terminus of VPA1263 are also found together at the C termini of specialized T6SS effectors containing PAAR, Hcp, or VgrG (see Fig. S1A in the supplemental material); they were also found together in colicins such as colicin E9 and E7, although sometimes they were separated by a receptor binding domain. Interestingly, a similar HNH nuclease-like domain was also found in effectors containing N-terminal domains such as LXG (5) and WXG100 (41), which are associated with T7SS, but without an accompanying Pyocin_S domain. A conservation logo generated by aligning the amino acid sequences of the VPA1263 C-terminal domain (737 to 869) and homologous domains found in known or predicted secreted toxins confirmed the presence of a conserved His-Gln-His motif (42) (Fig. S1B). These results led us to hypothesize that VPA1263 contains a C-terminal HNH nuclease domain that can mediate its antibacterial toxicity.

To determine the minimal region sufficient for VPA1263-mediated antibacterial toxicity, we ectopically expressed VPA1263 or its truncated versions (Fig. 1B) in Escherichia coli cells. As shown in Fig. 1C, the C-terminal end, corresponding to the predicted HNH nuclease domain (amino acids 737 to 869; HNH), was necessary and sufficient to intoxicate E. coli cells. Notably, the expression of all VPA1263 versions, except for the toxic HNH domain, was detected in immunoblots (Fig. S2A). Coexpression of the cognate immunity protein, Vti2 (3), rescued E. coli cells from the toxicity mediated by either the full-length VPA1263 or the C-terminal HNH nuclease domain (Fig. 1D), confirming that the toxicity mediated by the C-terminal HNH nuclease domain resulted from the same activity that is used by the full-length VPA1263. In addition, replacing the conserved histidine 837 with alanine (FLHA or PyS-HNHHA) abrogated VPA1263-mediated toxicity (Fig. 1E), further supporting the role of the HNH nuclease domain in VPA1263-mediated antibacterial toxicity. Notably, the expression of the mutated proteins was confirmed in immunoblots (Fig. S2B). Taken together, our results suggest that VPA1263 exerts its antibacterial toxicity via a C-terminal HNH nuclease domain.

VPA1263 is a DNase.

Since HNH nucleases target DNA, we hypothesized that VPA1263 is a DNase. To test this hypothesis, we first set out to determine whether the C-terminal domain of VPA1263 could cleave DNA in vitro and in vivo. Since we were unable to purify the minimal toxin domain (amino acids 737 to 869), possibly due to low expression levels, we purified a truncated version encompassing both the C-terminal Pyocin_S and HNH nuclease domains (amino acids 547 to 869; PyS-HNH) (Fig. S3A). As expected, this toxic region was sufficient to cleave purified E. coli genomic DNA in vitro in the presence of MgCl2, similarly to DNase I, which was used as a control (Fig. 2A). In contrast, a mutated version in which histidine 837 was replaced with alanine (PyS-HNHHA) did not cleave the DNA. Furthermore, we were only able to isolate small amounts of genomic DNA from E. coli cultures expressing an arabinose-inducible PyS-HNH or the Bacillus cereus DNase, BC3021 (PoNeBC [22]) (Fig. 2B), indicating that VPA1263 also cleaves DNA in vivo.

FIG 2.

FIG 2

VPA1263 is a DNase. (A) In vitro DNase activity. Purified E. coli genomic DNA (gDNA) was coincubated with the indicated purified protein in the presence (+) or absence (−) of MgCl2 or EDTA for 5 min at 30°C. The results shown represent two independent experiments. BSA, bovine serum albumin. (B) In vivo DNase activity. The integrity of gDNA was determined after its isolation from E. coli MG1655 cells, in which the indicated proteins were expressed from arabinose-inducible expression plasmids. The results shown represent at least three independent experiments. EV, empty plasmid; PyS-HNH, amino acids 547 to 869 of VPA1263; PyS-HNHHA, PyS-HNH with an H837A mutation; PoNeBC, a PoNe domain-containing DNase from Bacillus cereus (BC3021). (C) Quantification of the percentage in the population of V. parahaemolyticus RIMD 2210633 Δvpa1263-vti2 prey cells showing aberrant DNA morphology (no detectable DNA or DNA foci) after 3 h of competition against the indicated attacker strains. DNA was visualized by Hoechst staining. The results represent the average ± SD of three independent experiments. Statistical significance between samples, determined using an unpaired two-tailed Student’s t test, is denoted at the top of the panel. In each experiment, at least 100 prey cells were randomly selected and manually evaluated per treatment. (D) Sample fluorescence microscope images of prey cells after 3 h of competition against a Δhns attacker strain, as described for panel C. Dashed yellow shapes in the DNA channel encircle prey cells detected in the GFP channel. Bar = 1 μm. (E) Viability counts of the indicated prey strain before (0 h) and after (4 h) coincubation with the indicated V. parahaemolyticus RIMD 2210633 Δhns derivative attacker strain on MLB agar plates supplemented with l-arabinose at 30°C. Prey strains contain an empty plasmid that provides a selection marker. Data are shown as the mean ± SD; n = 3 technical replicates. Statistical significance between samples at the 4 h time point, determined using an unpaired two-tailed Student’s t test, is denoted at the top of the panel. The experiment was performed three times with similar results; the results of a representative experiment are shown.

Next, we set out to determine whether VPA1263 targets prey DNA during T6SS-mediated bacterial competition. To this end, we used fluorescence microscopy to visualize the DNA in bacterial cultures after T6SS-mediated self-competition. From a V. parahaemolyticus prey strain that constitutively expresses a green fluorescent protein (GFP; used to distinguish prey from attacker cells), we deleted vpa1263 and vti2 (to specifically sensitize it to VPA1263-mediated toxicity) and competed the strain against attacker strains with a constitutively active T6SS1 deleted for the T6SS1 repressor hns to maximize T6SS1 activity (43), with or without a deletion in vpa1263hnsvpa1263 and Δhns, respectively). Notably, these attacker strains exhibited similar growth rates (Fig. S3B), and the Δhnsvpa1263 strain retained the ability to intoxicate Vibrio natriegens prey in competition, indicating that it was able to deliver other T6SS1 effectors (3); thus, T6SS1 remained functional, even though this attacker strain was unable to intoxicate a Δvpa1263-vti2 prey strain (Fig. S3C). As shown in Fig. 2C and D and Fig. S4, VPA1263-sensitive, GFP-expressing prey cells devoid of DNA or containing DNA foci, which are probably regions of stress-induced DNA condensation (44), were only detected after competition against the VPA1263+ attacker strain (Δhns). Moreover, a plasmid for expression of VPA1263 and its cognate immunity protein, Vti2 (pVPA1263-Vti2), complemented this phenotype in a Δhnsvpa1263 attacker strain background, whereas a similar plasmid for expression of the catalytically inactive mutant, VPA1263H837A (pVPA1263H837A-Vti2), did not (Fig. 2C). Taken together with the inability of a plasmid-encoded catalytically inactive mutant to complement the VPA1263-mediated toxicity of a Δhnsvpa1263 attacker strain during bacterial competition (Fig. 2E), these results support the conclusion that VPA1263 is a T6SS1 effector that exerts its toxicity during bacterial competition via its DNase activity.

The MIX domain is necessary for T6SS-mediated secretion of VPA1263.

After determining that its toxicity is mediated by DNase activity, we next sought to investigate the role of VPA1263’s MIX domain. Since MIX domains are found at the N termini of diverse polymorphic toxins that are secreted by T6SS (3), we hypothesized that MIX plays a role in T6SS-mediated secretion. To test this, we monitored the T6SS1-mediated secretion of C-terminal Myc-His-tagged VPA1263 variants expressed from a plasmid in a V. parahaemolyticus Δhns strain with a constitutively active T6SS1 (T6SS1+) or in a Δhnshcp1 mutant with an inactive T6SS1 (T6SS1). Notably, to avoid self-intoxication of strains overexpressing VPA1263 variants containing the HNH nuclease domain, we used the catalytically inactive mutant H837A (Fig. 1E). The full-length protein (FLHA) was secreted into the growth medium in a T6SS1-dependent manner, confirming previous comparative proteomics results (3) (Fig. 3A). An N-terminal region, including the MIX and LysM domains (N-ter), retained the ability to secrete via T6SS1, whereas the C-terminal region, containing the Pyocin_S and HNH nuclease toxin domains (PyS-HNHHA), did not (Fig. 3A), indicating that the information required for T6SS1-mediated secretion is found in the N-terminal region. Remarkably, deletion of the region encoding amino acids 226 to 328 (ΔMIXHA), encompassing most of the MIX domain, resulted in the loss of T6SS1-mediated secretion. This result suggests that MIX is required for T6SS1-mediated secretion of VPA1263. In support of this conclusion, replacing residues belonging to the invariant GxxY motif in the MIX domain (3) with alanine, i.e., glycine 247 and tyrosine 250 (FLGA/HA and FLYA/HA, respectively), also eliminated VPA1263’s secretion via T6SS1. Notably, we validated that T6SS1 was functional in the strains expressing the VPA1263 variants that were not secreted by detecting the T6SS1-mediated secretion of the hallmark T6SS protein, VgrG1 (Fig. 3A). These results provide the first experimental indication that MIX is required for T6SS-mediated secretion of an effector. This conclusion was further supported by bacterial competition assays, in which VPA1263 with a mutation in the invariant glycine of the MIX domain (G247) was unable to complement the loss of prey intoxication by a Δhnsvpa1263 attacker (Fig. 3B). Attempts to determine whether the MIX domain is sufficient to mediate secretion via T6SS were inconclusive, due to the low expression level of VPA1263 truncations containing only the MIX domain region.

FIG 3.

FIG 3

MIX is required for secretion of VPA1263 via T6SS1. (A) Expression (cells) and secretion (media) of the indicated C-terminal Myc-His-tagged VPA1263 variants from V. parahaemolyticus RIMD 2210633 Δhns (T6SS1+) or ΔhnsΔhcp1 (T6SS1). Proteins were expressed from an arabinose-inducible plasmid, and samples were resolved on SDS-PAGE. VPA1263 variants and the endogenous VgrG1 were visualized using specific antibodies against Myc and VgrG1, respectively. FLHA, VPA1263 with an H387A mutation; N-ter, amino acids 1 to 546 of VPA1264; PyS-HNH, amino acids 547 to 869 of VPA1263; PyS-HNHHA, PyS-HNH with a H837A mutation; FLGA/HA, FLHA with a G247A mutation; FLYA/HA, FLHA with a Y250A mutation. Schematic representations of the expressed VPA1263 variants are shown above; denoted domains and colors correspond to Fig. 1B; stars denote point mutations in the expressed variant. Red asterisks denote the expected size of the indicated proteins in the medium fractions. Loading control (LC) is shown for total protein lysates. (B) Viability counts of the indicated prey strain before (0 h) and after (4 h) coincubation with the indicated V. parahaemolyticus RIMD 2210633 Δhns derivative attacker strains on MLB agar plates supplemented with l-arabinose at 30°C. Prey strains contain an empty plasmid that provides a selection marker. Data are shown as the mean ± SD; n = 3 technical replicates. Statistical significance between samples at the 4 h time point, determined using an unpaired two-tailed Student’s t test, is denoted at the top of the panel. The experiment was performed three times with similar results; the results of a representative experiment are shown.

DISCUSSION

In this work, we investigated the T6SS MIX effector VPA1263; we identified the roles of its C-terminal toxin domain and its MIX domain. Our results revealed that VPA1263 is a DNase toxin that requires its MIX domain for T6SS-mediated secretion.

Using a combination of toxicity assays, in vivo and in vitro biochemical assays, and fluorescence microscopy, we confirmed our computational prediction that VPA1263 has a C-terminal DNase domain that mediates its toxicity during bacterial competition. The identified toxin belongs to the widespread and diverse HNH nuclease superfamily (3540); homologs are found in various known and predicted bacterial toxins. Interestingly, in some instances, this toxin domain is preceded by a Pyocin_S domain, as is the case in VPA1263. Pyocin_S was recently suggested to mediate the transport of DNase toxins across the inner membrane, from the periplasm to the cytoplasm (45). This activity was shown to be mediated by specific inner membrane proteins that serve as receptors. It will be interesting to determine whether VPA1263 and other Pyocin_S-containing T6SS effectors require this domain for transport into the cytoplasm to mediate toxicity, since it remains unclear whether T6SS effectors are delivered directly into the recipient cell cytoplasm, periplasm, or randomly into either compartment (4648). Notably, we recently reported that VPA1263 selectively intoxicates bacterial strains when delivered via an engineered T6SS in V. natriegens (49). VPA1263-delivering attacker strains were toxic to Vibrio and Aeromonas strains but had no effect on the viability of E. coli or Salmonella prey (49). It is therefore tempting to speculate that differences in the potential inner membrane receptors of the VPA1263 Pyocin_S domain are responsible for the observed selective toxicity. If true, it may represent a previously unappreciated mode of natural resistance against T6SS effectors.

Importantly, we found that MIX is required for T6SS-mediated secretion of VPA1263; even single point mutations in the invariant GxxY motif were sufficient to abolish effector secretion and effector-mediated intoxication of sensitive recipient prey bacteria during competition. While this is the first experimental evidence of a role for MIX in secretion, the mechanism by which it contributes to secretion remains unknown. It is possible that MIX contributes toward a stable or desirable effector conformation that is required for correct loading or positioning on the T6SS. Alternatively, MIX may mediate interaction with a secreted tube or spike component. We will investigate the underlying mechanism by which MIX mediates T6SS secretion in future work.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Strains and media.

For a complete list of the strains used in this study, see Table S1 in the supplemental material. Escherichia coli strains were grown in 2xYT broth (1.6% [wt/vol] tryptone, 1% [wt/vol] yeast extract, and 0.5% [wt/vol] NaCl) or on lysogeny broth (LB) agar plates containing 1% (wt/vol) NaCl at 37°C, or at 30°C when harboring effector expression plasmids. The media were supplemented with chloramphenicol (10 μg/mL) or kanamycin (30 μg/mL) to maintain plasmids and with 0.4% (wt/vol) glucose to repress protein expression from the arabinose-inducible promoter, Pbad. To induce expression from Pbad, l-arabinose was added to media at 0.05 to 0.1% (wt/vol), as indicated.

Vibrio parahaemolyticus RIMD 2210633 (50) and its derivative strains, as well as V. natriegens ATCC 14048, were grown in MLB medium (LB medium containing 3% [wt/vol] NaCl) or on marine minimal medium (MMM) agar plates (1.5% [wt/vol] agar, 2% [wt/vol] NaCl, 0.4% [wt/vol] galactose, 5 mM MgSO4, 7 mM K2SO4, 77 mM K2HPO4, 35 mM KH2PO4, and 2 mM NH4Cl) at 30°C. When the vibrios contained a plasmid, the media were supplemented with kanamycin (250 μg/mL) or chloramphenicol (10 μg/mL) to maintain the plasmid. To induce expression from Pbad, l-arabinose was added to the media at 0.05% (wt/vol).

Plasmid construction.

For a complete list of plasmids used in this study, see Table S2. For protein expression, the coding sequences (CDS) of vpa1263 (GenBank protein accession number BAC62606.1) and vti2 (BA000032.2; chromosome 2, positions 1344453 to 1344737; this gene encodes a protein identical to GenBank accession number WP_005477334.1) were amplified from genomic DNA of V. parahaemolyticus RIMD 2210633. The amplification products were inserted into the multiple cloning site (MCS) of pBADK/Myc-His or pBAD33.1F using the Gibson assembly method (51). The plasmids were introduced into E. coli cells using electroporation. Transformants were grown on agar plates supplemented with 0.4% (wt/vol) glucose to repress unwanted expression from the Pbad promoter during the subcloning steps. The plasmids were introduced into V. parahaemolyticus cells via conjugation. The transconjugants were grown on MMM agar plates supplemented with appropriate antibiotics to maintain the plasmids.

Construction of deletion strains.

The construction of pDM4-based (52) plasmids for deletion of vpa1263, vpa1263-vti2, and hns (vp1133) was reported previously (3, 43). In-frame deletions of vpa1263, vpa1263-vti2, and hns in V. parahaemolyticus RIMD 2210633 were performed as previously described (53). Briefly, a CmROriR6K suicide plasmid, pDM4, containing ~1 kb upstream and ~1 kb downstream of the gene to be deleted in its MCS was conjugated into V. parahaemolyticus cells, and transconjugants were selected on solid medium plates supplemented with chloramphenicol. Then, bacteria were counterselected on solid medium plates containing 15% (wt/vol) sucrose for loss of the sacB-containing plasmid. Deletions were confirmed by PCR.

Toxicity in E. coli.

Bacterial toxicity assays were performed as previously described (21), with minor changes. Briefly, to assess the toxicity mediated by VPA1263 or its truncated versions, pBADK/Myc-His plasmids encoding the indicated proteins were transformed into E. coli MG1655. The E. coli transformants were streaked onto either repressing (containing 0.4% [wt/vol] glucose) or inducing (containing 0.05% [wt/vol] l-arabinose) LB agar plates supplemented with kanamycin. Chloramphenicol was also included in the medium when a pBAD33.1F-based plasmid was used. The plates were incubated at 30°C for 16 h and then imaged using a Fusion FX6 imaging system (Vilber Lourmat). The experiments were performed at least three times, with similar results.

Protein expression in E. coli.

Protein expression in E. coli was performed as previously described (21), with minor changes. Briefly, to assess the expression of C-terminal Myc-tagged proteins encoded on arabinose-inducible plasmids, overnight cultures of E. coli MG1655 containing the indicated plasmids were washed twice with fresh 2xYT broth to remove residual glucose. Following normalization to an optical density at 600 nm (OD600) of 0.5 in 3 mL of 2xYT broth supplemented with appropriate antibiotics, the cultures were grown for 2 h at 37°C. To induce protein expression, 0.05% (wt/vol) l-arabinose was added to the media. After having grown for 2 additional hours at 37°C, 0.5-OD600 units of cells were pelleted and resuspended in 2× Tris-glycine SDS sample buffer (Novex, Life Sciences). The samples were boiled for 5 min, and cell lysates were resolved on Mini-PROTEAN or Criterion TGX stain-free precast gels (Bio-Rad). For immunoblotting, α-Myc antibodies (Santa Cruz Biotechnology; 9E10; mouse monoclonal antibody (MAb); sc-40) were used at a dilution of 1:1,000. Protein signals were visualized in a Fusion FX6 imaging system (Vilber Lourmat) using enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) reagents.

Protein purification.

To purify truncated VPA1263 proteins for the in vitro DNase assays, E. coli BL21(DE3) cells harboring plasmids for arabinose-inducible expression of the indicated Myc-His-tagged VPA1263 variants and the FLAG-tagged Vti2 (the immunity protein required to antagonize the toxicity of VPA1263 variants inside bacteria) were grown for 16 h in 2xYT medium supplemented with kanamycin and chloramphenicol at 37°C. The bacterial cultures were then diluted 100-fold into fresh medium and incubated at 37°C with agitation (180 rpm). When the bacterial cultures reached an OD600 of ~1.0, l-arabinose was added to the medium (to a final concentration of 0.1% [wt/vol]) to induce protein expression, and the cultures were grown for 4 additional hours at 30°C. Cells were harvested by centrifugation at 4°C (20 min, at 13,300 × g), followed by washing with a 0.9% (wt/vol) NaCl solution to remove residual medium. Then, cells were resuspended in 3 mL lysis buffer A (20 mM Tris-Cl [pH 7.5], 500 mM NaCl, 5% [vol/vol] glycerol, 10 mM imidazole, 0.1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride [PMSF], and 8 M urea). Urea was included in the buffer to denature the proteins and thus release Vti2 from the VPA1263 variants. The cells were disrupted using a high-pressure cell disruptor (Constant Systems One Shot cell disruptor; model code, MC/AA). To remove cell debris, the lysates were centrifuged for 20 min at 13,300 × g and 4°C. Next, 250 μL Ni-Sepharose resin (50% slurry; GE Healthcare) was prewashed with lysis buffer A and then mixed with the supernatant fractions of lysed cells containing the denatured proteins. The suspensions were incubated for 1 h at 4°C with constant rotation and then loaded onto a column. The immobilized resin was washed with 10 mL wash buffer A (20 mM Tris-Cl [pH 7.5], 500 mM NaCl, 5% [vol/vol] glycerol, 40 mM imidazole, and 8 M urea). Bound proteins were eluted from the column using 1 mL elution buffer A (20 mM Tris-Cl [pH 7.5], 500 mM NaCl, 5% [vol/vol] glycerol, 500 mM imidazole, and 8 M urea). The presence and purity of the eluted Myc-His-tagged VPA1263 variants were confirmed using SDS-PAGE, using stain-free gels (Bio-Rad).

To refold the denatured, purified proteins before in vitro DNase activity assays, a refolding procedure was applied. The eluted proteins were dialyzed against DNase assay buffer (20 mM Tris-Cl [pH 7.5], 200 mM NaCl, and 5% [vol/vol] glycerol) and incubated for an hour at 4°C. The buffer was replaced twice to remove unwanted imidazole and urea. Then, the 1-mL suspension was concentrated to ~300 μL using a Spin-X ultrafiltration (UF) concentrator column (Corning; 30 kDa). The purified proteins were quantified using the Bradford method with 5× Bradford reagent (Bio-Rad). The procedure was carried out at 4°C.

In vitro DNase assays.

For determining the in vitro DNase activity, genomic DNA isolated from E. coli BL21(DE3) (200 ng) was incubated with 0.5 μg of purified VPA1263 variants for 5 min at 30°C in DNase assay buffer (20 mM Tris-Cl [pH 7.5], 200 mM NaCl, and 5% [vol/vol] glycerol) supplemented with either 2 mM EDTA (a metal chelator) or MgCl2. The total volume of the reactions was 20 μL. The reactions were stopped by adding 6.65 μg of proteinase K, and the samples were incubated for 5 min at 55°C. The samples were analyzed by 1.0% agarose-gel electrophoresis. For the positive and negative controls, 1 U DNase I (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and 0.5 μg bovine serum albumin (BSA) (Sigma) were used, respectively. The experiments were performed twice, with similar results.

In vivo DNase assays.

E. coli MG1655 strains containing the indicated pBADK/Myc-His plasmid, either empty or encoding VPA1263547-869 (PyS-HNH), VPA1263547-869/H837A (PyS-HNHHA), or PoNeBc (BC3021), were grown overnight in 2xYT medium supplemented with kanamycin and 0.4% (wt/vol) glucose. The overnight cultures were washed with 2xYT medium and normalized to an OD600 of 1.0 in 3 mL of fresh 2xYT supplemented with kanamycin and 0.1% (wt/vol) l-arabinose (to induce protein expression). The cultures were grown for 90 min with agitation (220 rpm) at 37°C before 1.0 OD600 units were pelleted. Genomic DNA was isolated from each sample using the EZ spin column genomic DNA kit (Bio Basic) and eluted with 30 μL ultrapure water (Milli-Q). Equal genomic DNA elution volumes were analyzed by 1.0% (wt/vol) agarose gel electrophoresis. The experiments were performed at least three times, with similar results.

Vibrio growth assays.

Vibrio growth assays were performed as previously described (21). Briefly, overnight cultures of V. parahaemolyticus strains were normalized to OD600 = 0.01 in MLB and transferred to 96-well plates (200 μL per well; n = 3 technical replicates). The 96-well plates were incubated in a microplate reader (BioTek SYNERGY H1) at 30°C with constant shaking at 205 cpm. OD600 reads were acquired every 10 min. The experiments were performed at least three times, with similar results.

Bacterial competition assays.

Bacterial competition assays were performed as previously described (21). Briefly, attacker and prey strains were grown overnight in MLB with the addition of antibiotics when maintenance of plasmids was required. The bacterial cultures were normalized to OD600 = 0.5 and mixed at a 4:1 attacker:prey ratio. The mixtures were spotted onto MLB agar plates and incubated for 4 h at 30°C. The plates were supplemented with 0.1% (wt/vol) l-arabinose when expression from an arabinose-inducible plasmid in the attacker strain was required. The number of CFU of the prey strain was determined by growing the mixtures on selective plates at the 0 and 4-h time points. The experiments were performed at least three times, with similar results.

Fluorescence microscopy.

Assessment of prey DNA morphology during bacterial competition was performed as previously described (22). Briefly, the indicated V. parahaemolyticus RIMD 2210633 strains were grown overnight and mixed as described above for the bacterial competition assays. The Δvpa1263-vti2 prey strain constitutively expressed GFP (from a stable, high-copy-number plasmid [54]) to distinguish them from attacker cells. The attacker-prey mixtures were spotted onto MLB agar plates and incubated at 30°C for 3 h. The plates were supplemented with 0.1% (wt/vol) l-arabinose when expression from an arabinose-inducible plasmid in the attacker strain was required. Bacteria were then scraped from the plates, washed with M9 medium, and incubated at room temperature for 10 min in M9 medium containing Hoechst 33342 (Invitrogen) DNA dye at a final concentration of 1 μg/μL. The cells were then washed and resuspended in 30 μL M9 medium. One microliter of bacterial suspension was spotted onto M9 agar (1.5% [wt/vol]) pads and allowed to dry for 2 min before the pads were placed face down into 35 mm glass bottom CELLview cell culture dishes. Bacteria were imaged using a Nikon Eclipse Ti2-E inverted motorized microscope equipped with a CFI PLAN apochromat DM 100× oil lambda PH-3 (NA, 1.45) lens objective, a Lumencor SOLA SE II 395 light source, and ET-DAPI (number 49028; used to visualize the Hoechst signals) and ET-EGFP (number 49002; used to visualize the GFP signals) filter sets. Images were acquired using a DS-Qi2 Mono cooled digital microscope camera (16 megapixel [MP]) and were postprocessed using the Fiji ImageJ suite. Cells exhibiting a normal DNA morphology or aberrant DNA morphology (i.e., DNA foci or no DNA) were manually counted (>100 GFP-expressing prey cells per treatment in each experiment). The experiment was repeated three times.

Protein secretion assays.

V. parahaemolyticus RIMD 2210633 strains were grown overnight at 30°C in MLB supplemented with kanamycin to maintain plasmids. Bacterial cultures were normalized to an OD600 value of 0.18 in 5 mL MLB supplemented with kanamycin and l-arabinose (0.05% [wt/vol]) to induce expression from Pbad promoters. After 4 h of incubation at 30°C with agitation (220 rpm), 1.0 OD600 units of cells were collected for expression fractions (cells). The cell pellets were resuspended in 2× Tris-glycine SDS sample buffer (Novex, Life Sciences). For secretion fractions (media), suspension volumes equivalent to 10 OD600 units of cells were filtered (0.22 μm), and proteins were precipitated from the media using deoxycholate and trichloroacetic acid (55). Cold acetone was used to wash the protein precipitates twice. Then, the protein precipitates were resuspended in 20 μL of 10 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8), followed by the addition of 20 μL of 2× Tris-glycine SDS sample buffer supplemented with 5% β-mercaptoethanol and 0.5 μL 1 N NaOH to maintain a basic pH. The expression and secretion samples were boiled for 5 min and then resolved on Mini-PROTEAN or Criterion TGX stain-free precast gels (Bio-Rad). For immunoblotting, primary antibodies were used at a concentration of 1:1,000. The following antibodies were used: α-Myc antibodies (Santa Cruz Biotechnology; 9E10; mouse MAb; sc-40) and custom-made α-VgrG1 (56). Protein signals were visualized in a Fusion FX6 imaging system (Vilber Lourmat) using enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) reagents.

VPA1263 domain and homolog analysis.

Domains in VPA1263 (GenBank protein accession number BAC62606.1) were identified using the NCBI conserved domain database (31) or by homology detection and structure prediction using a hidden Markov model (HMM)-HMM comparison, i.e., the HHpred tool (34). Proteins containing a specialized secretion system delivery domain or known secreted toxins bearing homology to the C-terminal HNH nuclease toxin domain of VPA1263 were identified through an iterative search against the UniProt protein sequence database using Jackhmmer (57). Homologs containing diverse secretion-associated domains (e.g., domains found in T6SS or T7SS polymorphic toxins) were selected, and their C-terminal ends were aligned using MEGA X (58) with MUSCLE (59); alignment columns not represented in VPA1263 were removed. Conserved residues were illustrated using the WebLogo v3 server (60). Amino acid numbering was based on the sequence of VPA1263.

Supplementary Material

Reviewer comments
reviewer-comments.pdf (240.1KB, pdf)

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank members of the Salomon lab for helpful discussions and suggestions and Dan Goldenberg for technical assistance.

This project received funding from the European Research Council, under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 Research and innovation program (grant agreement number 714224 to D. Salomon), and from the Israel Science Foundation (grant number 920/17 to D. Salomon and 1362/21 to D. Salomon and E. Bosis). C. M. Fridman was supported by scholarships from the Clore Israel Foundation and from the Manna Center Program in Food Safety and Security at Tel Aviv University, as well as by a scholarship for outstanding doctoral students from the Orthodox community from the Council for Higher Education.

The funders had no role in study design, data collection and interpretation, or the decision to submit the work for publication. This work was performed in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a Ph.D. degree for C. M. Fridman at the Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University.

C. M. Fridman: Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, and Writing – Original Draft. B. Jana: Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, and Writing – Review and Editing. R. Ben-Yaakov: Investigation and Methodology. E. Bosis: Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Funding Acquisition, and Writing – Review and Editing. D. Salomon: Conceptualization, Supervision, Funding Acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, and Writing – Original Draft.

We declare that we have no conflicts of interest.

Footnotes

Supplemental material is available online only.

Supplemental file 1
Supplemental file 1. Download spectrum.02465-22-s0001.pdf, PDF file, 0.8 MB (787KB, pdf)

Contributor Information

Dor Salomon, Email: dorsalomon@mail.tau.ac.il.

Ethel Bayer-Santos, University of Sao Paulo.

Erh-Min Lai, Academia Sinica.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Jamet A, Nassif X. 2015. New players in the toxin field: polymorphic toxin systems in bacteria. mBio 6:e00285-15. doi: 10.1128/mBio.00285-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Zhang D, de Souza RF, Anantharaman V, Iyer LM, Aravind L. 2012. Polymorphic toxin systems: comprehensive characterization of trafficking modes, processing, mechanisms of action, immunity and ecology using comparative genomics. Biol Direct 7:18. doi: 10.1186/1745-6150-7-18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Salomon D, Kinch LN, Trudgian DC, Guo X, Klimko JA, Grishin NV, Mirzaei H, Orth K. 2014. Marker for type VI secretion system effectors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111:9271–9276. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1406110111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Ruhe ZC, Low DA, Hayes CS. 2020. Polymorphic toxins and their immunity proteins: diversity, evolution, and mechanisms of delivery. Annu Rev Microbiol 74:497–520. doi: 10.1146/annurev-micro-020518-115638. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Whitney JC, Peterson SB, Kim J, Pazos M, Verster AJ, Radey MC, Kulasekara HD, Ching MQ, Bullen NP, Bryant D, Goo YA, Surette MG, Borenstein E, Vollmer W, Mougous JD. 2017. A broadly distributed toxin family mediates contact-dependent antagonism between Gram-positive bacteria. Elife 6:e26938. doi: 10.7554/eLife.26938. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Aoki SK, Diner EJ, de Roodenbeke CT, Burgess BR, Poole SJ, Braaten BA, Jones AM, Webb JS, Hayes CS, Cotter PA, Low DA. 2010. A widespread family of polymorphic contact-dependent toxin delivery systems in bacteria. Nature 468:439–442. doi: 10.1038/nature09490. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Pukatzki S, Ma AT, Sturtevant D, Krastins B, Sarracino D, Nelson WC, Heidelberg JF, Mekalanos JJ. 2006. Identification of a conserved bacterial protein secretion system in Vibrio cholerae using the Dictyostelium host model system. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:1528–1533. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0510322103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Boyer F, Fichant G, Berthod J, Vandenbrouck Y, Attree I. 2009. Dissecting the bacterial type VI secretion system by a genome wide in silico analysis: what can be learned from available microbial genomic resources? BMC Genomics 10:104. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-10-104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Silverman JM, Agnello DM, Zheng H, Andrews BT, Li M, Catalano CE, Gonen T, Mougous JD. 2013. Haemolysin coregulated protein is an exported receptor and chaperone of type VI secretion substrates. Mol Cell 51:584–593. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2013.07.025. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hachani A, Allsopp LP, Oduko Y, Filloux A. 2014. The VgrG proteins are “à la carte” delivery systems for bacterial type VI effectors. J Biol Chem 289:17872–17884. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M114.563429. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Burkinshaw BJ, Liang X, Wong M, Le ANH, Lam L, Dong TG. 2018. A type VI secretion system effector delivery mechanism dependent on PAAR and a chaperone-co-chaperone complex. Nat Microbiol 3:632–640. doi: 10.1038/s41564-018-0144-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Wang J, Brodmann M, Basler M. 2019. Assembly and subcellular localization of bacterial type VI secretion systems. Annu Rev Microbiol 73:621–638. doi: 10.1146/annurev-micro-020518-115420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Basler M, Pilhofer M, Henderson GP, Jensen GJ, Mekalanos JJ. 2012. Type VI secretion requires a dynamic contractile phage tail-like structure. Nature 483:182–186. doi: 10.1038/nature10846. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Jana B, Salomon D. 2019. Type VI secretion system: a modular toolkit for bacterial dominance. Future Microbiol 14:1452–1463. doi: 10.2217/fmb-2019-0194. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Jurėnas D, Journet L. 2021. Activity, delivery, and diversity of Type VI secretion effectors. Mol Microbiol 115:383–394. doi: 10.1111/mmi.14648. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Unterweger D, Kostiuk B, Ötjengerdes R, Wilton A, Diaz-Satizabal L, Pukatzki S. 2015. Chimeric adaptor proteins translocate diverse type VI secretion system effectors in Vibrio cholerae. EMBO J 34:2198–2210. doi: 10.15252/embj.201591163. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Liang X, Moore R, Wilton M, Wong MJQ, Lam L, Dong TG. 2015. Identification of divergent type VI secretion effectors using a conserved chaperone domain. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112:9106–9111. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1505317112. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Bondage DD, Lin J-S, Ma L-S, Kuo C-H, Lai E-M. 2016. VgrG C terminus confers the type VI effector transport specificity and is required for binding with PAAR and adaptor–effector complex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 113:E3931–E3940. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1600428113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Alcoforado Diniz J, Coulthurst SJ. 2015. Intraspecies competition in Serratia marcescens is mediated by type VI-secreted Rhs effectors and a conserved effector-associated accessory protein. J Bacteriol 197:2350–2360. doi: 10.1128/JB.00199-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Cianfanelli FR, Alcoforado Diniz J, Guo M, De Cesare V, Trost M, Coulthurst SJ. 2016. VgrG and PAAR proteins define distinct versions of a functional type VI secretion system. PLoS Pathog 12:e1005735. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005735. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Dar Y, Jana B, Bosis E, Salomon D. 2022. A binary effector module secreted by a type VI secretion system. EMBO Rep 23:e53981. doi: 10.15252/embr.202153981. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Jana B, Fridman CM, Bosis E, Salomon D. 2019. A modular effector with a DNase domain and a marker for T6SS substrates. Nat Commun 10:3595. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-11546-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Koskiniemi S, Lamoureux JG, Nikolakakis KC, t'Kint de Roodenbeke C, Kaplan MD, Low DA, Hayes CS. 2013. Rhs proteins from diverse bacteria mediate intercellular competition. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110:7032–7037. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1300627110. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Miyata ST, Kitaoka M, Brooks TM, McAuley SB, Pukatzki S. 2011. Vibrio cholerae requires the type VI secretion system virulence factor vasx to kill dictyostelium discoideum. Infect Immun 79:2941–2949. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01266-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Salomon D, Klimko JA, Trudgian DC, Kinch LN, Grishin NV, Mirzaei H, Orth K. 2015. Type VI secretion system toxins horizontally shared between marine bacteria. PLoS Pathog 11:e1005128. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1005128. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Ray A, Schwartz N, Souza Santos M, Zhang J, Orth K, Salomon D, de Souza Santos M, Zhang J, Orth K, Salomon D. 2017. Type VI secretion system MIX-effectors carry both antibacterial and anti-eukaryotic activities. EMBO Rep 18:1978–1990. doi: 10.15252/embr.201744226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Hood RD, Singh P, Hsu FS, Güvener T, Carl MA, Trinidad RRS, Silverman JM, Ohlson BB, Hicks KG, Plemel RL, Li M, Schwarz S, Wang WY, Merz AJ, Goodlett DR, Mougous JD. 2010. A type VI secretion system of Pseudomonas aeruginosa targets a toxin to bacteria. Cell Host Microbe 7:25–37. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2009.12.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Russell AB, Singh P, Brittnacher M, Bui NK, Hood RD, Carl MA, Agnello DM, Schwarz S, Goodlett DR, Vollmer W, Mougous JD. 2012. A widespread bacterial type VI secretion effector superfamily identified using a heuristic approach. Cell Host Microbe 11:538–549. doi: 10.1016/j.chom.2012.04.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Dar Y, Salomon D, Bosis E. 2018. The antibacterial and anti-eukaryotic type VI secretion system MIX-effector repertoire in Vibrionaceae. Mar Drugs 16:433. doi: 10.3390/md16110433. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Hurley CC, Quirke AM, Reen FJ, Boyd EF. 2006. Four genomic islands that mark post-1995 pandemic Vibrio parahaemolyticus isolates. BMC Genomics 7:104. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-7-104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Marchler-Bauer A, Anderson JB, Derbyshire MK, DeWeese-Scott C, Gonzales NR, Gwadz M, Hao L, He S, Hurwitz DI, Jackson JD, Ke Z, Krylov D, Lanczycki CJ, Liebert CA, Liu C, Lu F, Lu S, Marchler GH, Mullokandov M, Song JS, Thanki N, Yamashita RA, Yin JJ, Zhang D, Bryant SH. 2007. CDD: a conserved domain database for interactive domain family analysis. Nucleic Acids Res 35:D237–D240. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkl951. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Buist G, Steen A, Kok J, Kuipers OP. 2008. LysM, a widely distributed protein motif for binding to (peptido)glycans. Mol Microbiol 68:838–847. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2008.06211.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Michel-Briand Y, Baysse C. 2002. The pyocins of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Biochimie 84:499–510. doi: 10.1016/S0300-9084(02)01422-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Zimmermann L, Stephens A, Nam S-Z, Rau D, Kübler J, Lozajic M, Gabler F, Söding J, Lupas AN, Alva V. 2018. A completely reimplemented MPI Bioinformatics Toolkit with a new HHpred server at its core. J Mol Biol 430:2237–2243. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2017.12.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Saravanan M, Bujnicki JM, Cymerman IA, Rao DN, Nagaraja V. 2004. Type II restriction endonuclease R.KpnI is a member of the HNH nuclease superfamily. Nucleic Acids Res 32:6129–6135. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh951. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Sano Y, Matsui H, Kobayashi M, Kageyama M. 1993. Molecular structures and functions of pyocins S1 and S2 in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Bacteriol 175:2907–2916. doi: 10.1128/jb.175.10.2907-2916.1993. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Chak KF, Kuo WS, Lu FM, James R. 1991. Cloning and characterization of the ColE7 plasmid. J Gen Microbiol 137:91–100. doi: 10.1099/00221287-137-1-91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Landthaler M, Lau NC, Shub DA. 2004. Group I intron homing in Bacillus phages SPO1 and SP82: a gene conversion event initiated by a nicking homing endonuclease. J Bacteriol 186:4307–4314. doi: 10.1128/JB.186.13.4307-4314.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Stoddard BL. 2005. Homing endonuclease structure and function. Q Rev Biophys 38:49–95. doi: 10.1017/S0033583505004063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Kala S, Cumby N, Sadowski PD, Hyder BZ, Kanelis V, Davidson AR, Maxwell KL. 2014. HNH proteins are a widespread component of phage DNA packaging machines. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111:6022–6027. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1320952111. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Poulsen C, Panjikar S, Holton SJ, Wilmanns M, Song Y-H. 2014. WXG100 protein superfamily consists of three subfamilies and exhibits an α-helical C-terminal conserved residue pattern. PLoS One 9:e89313. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Klein A, Wojdyla JA, Joshi A, Josts I, McCaughey LC, Housden NG, Kaminska R, Byron O, Walker D, Kleanthous C. 2016. Structural and biophysical analysis of nuclease protein antibiotics. Biochem J 473:2799–2812. doi: 10.1042/BCJ20160544. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Salomon D, Klimko JA, Orth K. 2014. H-NS regulates the Vibrio parahaemolyticus type VI secretion system 1. Microbiology (Reading) 160:1867–1873. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.080028-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Levin-Zaidman S, Frenkiel-Krispin D, Shimoni E, Sabanay I, Wolf SG, Minsky A. 2000. Ordered intracellular RecA-DNA assemblies: a potential site of in vivo RecA-mediated activities. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:6791–6796. doi: 10.1073/pnas.090532397. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Atanaskovic I, Sharp C, Press C, Kaminska R, Kleanthous C. 2022. Bacterial competition systems share a domain required for inner membrane transport of the bacteriocin pyocin G from Pseudomonas aeruginosa. mBio 13:e0339621. doi: 10.1128/mbio.03396-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Vettiger A, Basler M. 2016. Type VI secretion system substrates are transferred and reused among sister cells. Cell 167:99–110.e12. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2016.08.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Quentin D, Ahmad S, Shanthamoorthy P, Mougous JD, Whitney JC, Raunser S. 2018. Mechanism of loading and translocation of type VI secretion system effector Tse6. Nat Microbiol 3:1142–1152. doi: 10.1038/s41564-018-0238-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Ho BT, Fu Y, Dong TG, Mekalanos JJ. 2017. Vibrio cholerae type 6 secretion system effector trafficking in target bacterial cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 114:9427–9432. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1711219114. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Jana B, Keppel K, Salomon D. 2021. Engineering a customizable antibacterial T6SS-based platform in Vibrio natriegens. EMBO Rep 22:e53681. doi: 10.15252/embr.202153681. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Makino K, Oshima K, Kurokawa K, Yokoyama K, Uda T, Tagomori K, Iijima Y, Najima M, Nakano M, Yamashita A, Kubota Y, Kimura S, Yasunaga T, Honda T, Shinagawa H, Hattori M, Iida T. 2003. Genome sequence of Vibrio parahaemolyticus: a pathogenic mechanism distinct from that of V. cholerae. Lancet 361:743–749. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)12659-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Gibson DG, Young L, Chuang RY, Venter JC, Hutchison CA, Smith HO. 2009. Enzymatic assembly of DNA molecules up to several hundred kilobases. Nat Methods 6:343–345. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1318. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.O'Toole R, Milton DL, Wolf-Watz H. 1996. Chemotactic motility is required for invasion of the host by the fish pathogen Vibrio anguillarum. Mol Microbiol 19:625–637. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2958.1996.412927.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Salomon D, Gonzalez H, Updegraff BL, Orth K. 2013. Vibrio parahaemolyticus type VI secretion system 1 is activated in marine conditions to target bacteria, and is differentially regulated from system 2. PLoS One 8:e61086. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0061086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Ritchie JM, Rui H, Zhou X, Iida T, Kodoma T, Ito S, Davis BM, Bronson RT, Waldor MK. 2012. Inflammation and disintegration of intestinal villi in an experimental model for Vibrio parahaemolyticus-induced diarrhea. PLoS Pathog 8:e1002593. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1002593. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Bensadoun A, Weinstein D. 1976. Assay of proteins in the presence of interfering materials. Anal Biochem 70:241–250. doi: 10.1016/s0003-2697(76)80064-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Li P, Kinch LN, Ray A, Dalia AB, Cong Q, Nunan LM, Camilli A, Grishin NV, Salomon D, Orth K. 2017. Acute hepatopancreatic necrosis disease-causing Vibrio parahaemolyticus strains maintain an antibacterial type VI secretion system with versatile effector repertoires. Appl Environ Microbiol 83:e00737-17. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00737-17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Potter SC, Luciani A, Eddy SR, Park Y, Lopez R, Finn RD. 2018. HMMER Web server: 2018 update. Nucleic Acids Res 46:W200–W204. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky448. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K. 2018. MEGA X: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol Biol Evol 35:1547–1549. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msy096. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Edgar RC. 2004. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res 32:1792–1797. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkh340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Crooks GE, Hon G, Chandonia J-M, Brenner SE. 2004. WebLogo: a sequence logo generator. Genome Res 14:1188–1190. doi: 10.1101/gr.849004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Reviewer comments
reviewer-comments.pdf (240.1KB, pdf)
Supplemental file 1

Supplemental file 1. Download spectrum.02465-22-s0001.pdf, PDF file, 0.8 MB (787KB, pdf)


Articles from Microbiology Spectrum are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES