ABSTRACT
Most commercial products cannot be used for clearance of Mycoplasma contamination from cultures of apicomplexan parasites due to the parasites’ dependence on the apicoplast, an essential organelle with DNA replication and translation machinery of cyanobacterial origin. The lone exception, mycoplasma removal agent (MRA), is relatively expensive, and some mycoplasma strains have shown resistance to clearance with MRA. Here, we report that the fluoroquinolone antibiotic sparfloxacin is a safe, effective, and inexpensive alternative for treatment of mycoplasma contamination in cultures of apicomplexan parasites. Sparfloxacin cleared both MRA-sensitive and MRA-resistant mycoplasma species from P. falciparum cultures at 1 and 4 μg/mL, respectively. We show that cultures of three different apicomplexan parasites can be maintained at concentrations of sparfloxacin required to clear mycoplasma without resulting in substantial deleterious effects on parasite growth. We also describe an alternative low-cost, in-house PCR assay for detecting mycoplasma. These findings will be useful to laboratories maintaining apicomplexan parasites in vitro, especially in low-resource environments, where the high cost of commercial products creates an economic barrier for detecting and eliminating mycoplasma from culture.
IMPORTANCE These findings will be useful to laboratories maintaining apicomplexan parasites in vitro, especially in low-resource environments, where the high cost of commercial products creates an economic barrier for detecting and eliminating Mycoplasma from culture.
KEYWORDS: Mycoplasma, contamination, Apicomplexan parasites, antibiotics, sparfloxacin, Plasmodium, Toxoplasma, Babesia
INTRODUCTION
Contamination with Mycoplasma species (class Mollicutes) is a common problem in continuous cell culture and found in 15 to 35% of cell lines (1–3), including cocultures of apicomplexan parasites and their host cells. Dozens of mycobacterial species have been found as part of the human microbiota, including skin and hair, but only a small number have been linked to human disease. With a 0.15- to 0.3-μm diameter, Mycoplasmas are some of the smallest known cellular organisms and can pass through the standard 0.2-μm filters typically used in the preparation of culture media. Contamination of cell cultures with Mycoplasma is easily missed for several reasons, including their small size, poor staining due to the absence of a cell wall, and failure to change culture turbidity or pH (4). Unlike contamination with most other bacteria or fungi, the presence of Mycoplasma rarely results in the collapse of the cell culture but can nonetheless substantially alter the properties and behavior of infected cell lines, making it a potentially important confounder in experimental comparisons.
Mycoplasma species are broadly resistant to many classes of commonly used antibiotics, including beta-lactams, glycopeptides, fosfomycin, polymyxins, sulfonamides, rifampicin, narrow-spectrum quinolones, and trimethoprim. Conversely, they remain susceptible to some tetracyclines, macrolides, and quinolones (5). These classes form the basis of commercial products aimed at eradicating Mycoplasma contamination from cell cultures, such as Bayer’s Ciprobay and PromoCell’s Biomyc-3 (both the fluoroquinolone ciprofloxacin), PromoCell’s Biomyc-1/2 and Roche’s BM-Cyclin (both are a combination of the macrolide tiamulin and the tetracycline minocycline), InvivoGen’s Plasmocin (a combination of a proprietary fluoroquinolone and a proprietary macrolide), Bayer’s Baytril (the fluoroquinolone enrofloxacin), and MP Biomedicals’ Mycoplasma removal agent (MRA; a proprietary fluoroquinolone).
Unfortunately, nearly all these products also inhibit the growth of Plasmodium falciparum (6–8) or other apicomplexan parasites (9, 10) at similar or lower concentrations than those required to effectively clear Mycoplasma (11–14). This poor selectivity is due to their effect on the parasite apicoplast, an essential chloroplast-derived organelle that retains translation and DNA replication machinery of cyanobacterial origin. The lone validated exception is Mycoplasma removal agent (MRA), which contains an undisclosed fluoroquinolone and has successfully been used to clear Mycoplasma from cultures of apicomplexan parasites, including P. falciparum (6), Toxoplasma gondii, and Neospora caninum (15). The use of MRA has some downsides: clearance of Mycoplasma with MRA can take 1 to 3 weeks at the recommended concentration of 0.5 μg/mL, and some Mycoplasma strains have shown resistance to clearance with MRA (12, 13). Furthermore, MRA is relatively expensive at $696 per liter of culture medium.
Here, we report that the fluoroquinolone sparfloxacin is a safe, effective, and low-cost alternative to MRA for treatment of Mycoplasma contamination. Sparfloxacin cleared both MRA-sensitive and MRA-resistant Mycoplasma species from P. falciparum cultures at 1 and 4 μg/mL, respectively. Furthermore, we show that cultures of three different apicomplexan parasites can be maintained without deleterious effects on parasite growth at the concentrations of sparfloxacin required to clear Mycoplasma.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Dose response of apicomplexan parasites to sparfloxacin.
To establish the maximal concentrations of sparfloxacin that cultures of apicomplexan parasites would tolerate, we measured the effect of sparfloxacin on the growth of three geographically diverse strains of Plasmodium falciparum (Fig. 1a), as well as Toxoplasma gondii and Babesia divergens (Fig. 1b), two other commonly cultured apicomplexan parasites. The 50% effective concentration (EC50) values of the tested isolates all fell within a narrow range, 3.1 to 8.6 μg/mL.
FIG 1.
Dose-response curves of apicomplexan parasites to sparfloxacin. (a) Sparfloxacin dose-response curve of Plasmodium falciparum isolates of African (NF54; green), Southeast Asian (Dd2; orange), and South American (HB3; purple) origin based on 72-h SYBR green growth assays. The estimated 50% effective concentrations (EC50) with 95% confidence intervals are indicated based on n = 2 to 3. (b) Sparfloxacin dose-response curves of B. divergens isolate Rouen 1987 and T. gondii were measured using 72-h SYBR green and 96-h luciferase growth assays, respectively. The estimated EC50 values with 95% confidence intervals are indicated based on n = 2 to 3. (c) Representative growth curves of P. falciparum NF54 maintained at 1, 2, or 4 μg/mL sparfloxacin, MRA (0.5 μg/mL), or no drug. Growth rates with 95% confidence intervals are shown in day-1 based on n = 2.
The effect of drugs inhibiting apicoplast replication does not manifest until parasites have invaded their next host cell, a phenomenon known as “delayed death” (16). Since the growth assays used for Toxoplasma and Babesia parasites covered multiple lytic cycles (Fig. 1b), these results already captured any delayed death effects of sparfloxacin on apicoplast replication. However, since P. falciparum divides by schizogony, and apicoplast replication only occurs every 48 h, our 72-h growth assays may not have fully captured any potential delayed death effects by sparfloxacin. To evaluate whether P. falciparum cultures exhibited any delayed death, we measured the effect of sparfloxacin over 4 replication cycles (Fig. 1c). The growth rates of the P. falciparum NF54 cultures were constant over 8 days at all concentrations of sparfloxacin, excluding the possibility of substantial delayed death effects, which would have resulted in a decrease of the growth rate after the first replication cycle. Compared to untreated cultures, there was a 10 to 12% decrease in the growth rate when parasites were maintained in the presence of 1 and 2 μg/mL sparfloxacin or 0.5 μg/mL MRA. Growth slowed by 31% at 4 μg/mL, but the cultures were maintained continuously for at least 3 weeks at this concentration (see Fig. 3b). While we did not quantify the effect on continuous growth, all the other P. falciparum strains, as well as the Toxoplasma and Babesia strains, were maintained at 4 μg/mL for prolonged periods.
FIG 3.
Effective clearance of mycoplasma with Sparfloxaxin. (a) Sparfloxacin reduced MRA-sensitive mycoplasma contamination in P. falciparum cultures below the level of detection of the in-house PCR assay after 1 week of treatment at all concentrations tested. (b) Sparfloxacin cleared MRA-resistant mycoplasma species from P. falciparum cultures after 1 week of treatment at 4 μg/mL, when MRA at the recommended 0.5 μg/mL failed even after 3 weeks of treatment. Mycoplasma was detected using the in-house PCR assay, and images are representative of n = 2. UT, untreated.
A low-cost, in-house PCR assay with internal controls is effective at detecting Mycoplasma contamination.
We compared the ability of an in-house PCR assay (based on universal Mycoplasma primers targeting 425 bp of the locus encoding the 16S rRNA gene [17]) to detect Mycoplasma in DNA isolated from cultures of P. falciparum to that of a commercially available Mycoplasma detection PCR kit. To provide an internal PCR control for negative Mycoplasma results, we included 100 fg of pUC18 plasmid and primers to amplify 316 bp of the plasmid backbone in the PCR master mix. The commercial PCR product was able to detect Mycoplasma in DNA extracted from Mycoplasma-positive cultures down to a 1:1,000 dilution at a per-sample cost of $6.15 (at the time of submission of this paper). The in-house PCR assay was also effective at detecting Mycoplasma, at a per-sample cost of $0.20, but the limit of detection was slightly lower at between 1:100 and 1:1,000 (Fig. 2). While the slightly lower sensitivity of the in-house assay suggests that further improvements are possible, it is still able to detect very low levels of contamination and its substantially lower cost makes it more amenable to routine use, even in resource-limited settings.
FIG 2.
Detection of mycoplasma in P. falciparum cultures with commercial or in-house PCR assays. A commercial PCR assay was able to detect mycoplasma in the DNA of mycoplasma-positive (myco+) cultures even at 1:1,000 dilution, while the limit of detection for the in-house assay was between 1:100 and 1:1,000. The results from the undiluted mycoplasma-negative (myco–) and no template (H2O) controls are also shown. Images are representative of n = 2.
Sparfloxacin is effective at clearing both MRA-sensitive and MRA-resistant Mycoplasma strains.
To evaluate the ability of sparfloxacin to clear Mycoplasma, mycoplasma-positive cultures were maintained either without treatment, with the manufacturer recommended 0.5 μg/mL of MRA, or with 1, 2, or 4 μg/mL of sparfloxacin. For most cultures, 1 week of treatment with MRA and all concentrations of sparfloxacin reduced Mycoplasma below the level of detection of the in-house PCR assay (Fig. 3a). However, Mycoplasma contamination in one culture proved to be resistant to clearance with MRA even after 3 weeks of treatment but was successfully cleared after 1 week of treatment with 4 μg/mL sparfloxacin (Fig. 3b).
Some fluoroquinolones, including sparfloxacin, can inhibit the mammalian HERG potassium channel. At higher concentrations than those used in this study, sparfloxacin was found to reduce the viability and growth of cell lines that expressed high levels of HERG (18), but sparfloxacin had no significant effect on growth of fibroblast cultures below 100 μg/ml (19).
This demonstrates that sparfloxacin can be used to treat even MRA-resistant Mycoplasma strains at concentrations that are well tolerated by a variety of apicomplexan parasites at a cost of $0.06 per liter of culture medium, making it a safe, effective, and low-cost alternative to MRA, with its cost of $696 per liter of culture medium.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Parasite strains and maintenance.
Plasmodium falciparum strains NF54, Dd2, and HB3 and Babesia divergens strain Rouen 1987 (20) were maintained using standard malaria culturing techniques (21). Toxoplasma gondii strain RHΔku80::NLuc was maintained in human foreskin fibroblasts (HFF; ATCC SCRC-1041) using standard culturing techniques (22). Briefly, HFF/T. gondii co-cultures were maintained at 37°C with 5% CO2 in D10 medium (Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium, 4.5 g/L glucose; VWR) supplemented with 10% Cosmic Calf serum (HyClone, GE Healthcare Life Sciences; SH30087.03), 10 mM HEPES, an additional 2 mM l-glutamine, and 10 mM Pen/Strep.
Mycoplasma detection.
Mycoplasma contamination was detected using the e-Myco Mycoplasma detection kit (LiliF Diagnostics) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Alternatively, Mycoplasma was detected using a custom PCR assay using the Taq polymerase manufacturer instructions and 0.4 μM of degenerate universal Mycoplasma detection primers (GTGGGGAGCAAAYAGGATTAGA/GGCATGATGATTTGACGTCRT) that target the 16S locus (17). As an internal control, each reaction also contained 100 fg of plasmid pUC18 and 0.08 μM primers (CCTGACGAGCATCACAAAAA/AGTCGTGTCTTACCGGGTTG) that amplify a 316-bp section of the plasmid backbone. The PCR master mix reagents (see Fig. 4) was comprised Taq polymerase and 10× reaction buffer (NEB; M0273S), a nucleotide mix containing 10 mM each dTTP, dATP, dGTP, and dCTP (NEB; N0446S), and 100 fg of the plasmid pUC18. pUC18 can be substituted with any other pBlueScript II-derived plasmid. Aliquots (20 μL) of the master mix were stored at −20°C until use. 5 μL of culture medium or 5 μL of DNA extractions (in TE) from cultures were added as template to bring the reaction volume to 25 μL.
FIG 4.
Mycoplasma detection PCR master mix composition (left) and cycling conditions (right). Indicated volumes are in microliters.
Dose-response assays.
Sparfloxacin (Thermo Scientific; J66358-09) was dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) to a stock concentration of 2 mg/mL. For the asexual blood stages of P. falciparum and B. divergens, the dose response to sparfloxacin was determined using the 72-h SYBR green growth assay (23) as described in detail in reference 24. For T. gondii, 1,500 RHΔku80::NLuc tachyzoites were inoculated into each well of a 96-well plate containing confluent HFF cells, and the dose response was determined using a 96-h luciferase-based growth assay as described in detail in reference 22. In brief, the NanoLuc luciferase-expressing Toxoplasma parasites were allowed to invade human foreskin fibroblasts for 4 h. Noninvaded parasites were washed off, and the medium was replaced with fresh D10 supplemented with sparfloxacin. Ten concentrations generated by 2-fold serial dilution were tested starting at 100 μg/mL. After 96-h incubation, the medium was gently aspirated, and the infected host cells were extracted with lysis buffer (100 mM MES [4-morpholineethanesulfonic acid] [pH 6.0], 1 mM CDTA [trans-1,2-diaminocyclohexane-N,N,N′,N′-tetraacetic acid], 0.5% [vol/vol] Tergitol, 0.05% [vol/vol] Mazu DF 204, 150 mM KCl, 1 mM DTT [dithiothreitol], and 35 mM thiourea) containing 12.5 μM coelenterazine H and incubated at room temperature for 10 min prior to luminescence quantification using a BioTek Synergy H1 Hybrid plate reader. The luminescence signals from the sparfloxacin-treated cells were normalized against those from infected cells grown in plain D10 medium. The 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) for each species was estimated by nonlinear fit using Prism (GraphPad).
Effect of sparfloxacin on P. falciparum growth rate.
The growth of P. falciparum cultures was followed by measuring the culture parasitemia every other day for 8 days by flow cytometry after staining the live cultures with 16 μM Hoechst 33342 solution and 200 nM thiazole orange dye for 30 min at 37°C. Cultures above 2% were diluted to 0.5%, and the actual dilution factor was determined by measuring the parasitemia again after dilution using flow cytometry. The cumulative parasitemia was calculated by multiplying the percentage of infected cells by the overall dilution factor, and the growth rate was determined by exponential fit using Prism (GraphPad).
Data availability.
No new materials were generated in this study.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported by funds from Weill Cornell Medicine (B.F.C.K.), the NIAID (1R01 AI141965, 1R21 AI166436, and 1R01 AI138499 to B.F.C.K. and 1R01 AI143707 to Z.D.), and the Frueauff Family Foundation (B.F.C.K.). The ACCESS Summer Program is supported by the Weill Cornell Graduate School of Medical Sciences. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Conceptualization, B.F.C.K. and K.K.; Methodology, B.K., K.K., Z.D.; Investigation, D.R.M.-R.; Writing – Original Draft, B.F.C.K.; Writing – Review & Editing, B.F.C.K. and K.K.; Visualization, K.K. and B.F.C.K.; Supervision, B.F.C.K., K.K., and Z.D.; Project Administration, B.F.C.K.; Funding Acquisition, B.F.C.K. and Z.D.
We declare no competing interests.
Contributor Information
Kit Kennedy, Email: kik4001@med.cornell.edu.
Björn F. C. Kafsack, Email: bjk2007@med.cornell.edu.
Vasant Muralidharan, University of Georgia.
REFERENCES
- 1.McGarrity GJ, Barile MF. 1983. Methods in mycoplasmology: diagnostic mycoplasmology, vol 2. Academic Press, New York, NY. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Drexler HG, Uphoff CC. 2002. Mycoplasma contamination of cell cultures: incidence, sources, effects, detection, elimination, prevention. Cytotechnology 39:75–90. doi: 10.1023/A:1022913015916. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.McGarrity GJ, Phillips DM, Vaidya AB. 1980. Mycoplasmal infection of lymphocyte cell cultures: infection with M. salivarium. In Vitro 16:346–356. doi: 10.1007/BF02618341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Rottem S. 2003. Interaction of Mycoplasmas with host cells. Physiol Rev 83:417–432. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00030.2002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Gautier-Bouchardon AV. 2018. Antimicrobial resistance in Mycoplasma spp. Microbiol Spectr 6. doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.ARBA-0030-2018. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Singh S, Puri SK, Srivastava K. 2008. Treatment, and control of Mycoplasma contamination in Plasmodium falciparum culture. Parasitol Res 104:181–184. doi: 10.1007/s00436-008-1181-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Mahmoudi N, Ciceron L, Franetich J-F, Farhati K, Silvie O, Eling W, Sauerwein R, Danis M, Mazier D, Derouin F. 2003. In vitro activities of 25 quinolones and fluoroquinolones against liver and blood stage Plasmodium spp. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 47:2636–2639. doi: 10.1128/AAC.47.8.2636-2639.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Pradines B, Rogier C, Fusai T, Mosnier J, Daries W, Barret E, Parzy D. 2001. In vitro activities of antibiotics against Plasmodium falciparum are inhibited by iron. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 45:1746–1750. doi: 10.1128/AAC.45.6.1746-1750.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Rizk MA, AbouLaila M, El-Sayed SAE-S, Guswanto A, Yokoyama N, Igarashi I. 2018. Inhibitory effects of fluoroquinolone antibiotics on Babesia divergens and Babesia microti, blood parasites of veterinary and zoonotic importance. Infect Drug Resist 11:1605–1615. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S159519. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Batiha GE-S, Tayebwa DS, Beshbishy AM, N'Da DD, Yokoyama N, Igarashi I. 2020. Inhibitory effects of novel ciprofloxacin derivatives on the growth of four Babesia species and Theileria equi. Parasitol Res 119:3061–3073. doi: 10.1007/s00436-020-06796-z. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Bébéar CM, Renaudin H, Schaeverbeke T, Leblanc F, Bébéar C. 1999. In-vitro activity of grepafloxacin, a new fluoroquinolone, against mycoplasmas. J Antimicrob Chemother 43:711–714. doi: 10.1093/jac/43.5.711. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Drexler HG, Gignac SM, Hu ZB, Hopert A, Fleckenstein E, Voges M, Uphoff CC. 1994. Treatment of Mycoplasma contamination in a large panel of cell cultures. In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim 30A:344–347. doi: 10.1007/BF02631456. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Uphoff CC, Denkmann S-A, Drexler HG. 2012. Treatment of Mycoplasma contamination in cell cultures with Plasmocin. J Biomed Biotechnol 2012:267678. doi: 10.1155/2012/267678. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Molla Kazemiha V, Azari S, Habibi-Anbouhi M, Amanzadeh A, Bonakdar S, Shokrgozar MA, Mahdian R. 2019. Effectiveness of Plasmocure in elimination of Mycoplasma species from contaminated cell cultures: a comparative study versus other antibiotics. Cell J 21:143–149. doi: 10.22074/cellj.2019.5996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Hudson A, Ellis JT. 2005. Culture of Neospora caninum in the presence of a Mycoplasma removal agent results in the selection of a mutant population of tachyzoites. Parasitology 130:607–610. doi: 10.1017/s0031182004007115. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kennedy K, Crisafulli EM, Ralph SA. 2019. Delayed death by plastid inhibition in apicomplexan parasites. Trends Parasitol 35:747–759. doi: 10.1016/j.pt.2019.07.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Molla Kazemiha V, Shokrgozar MA, Arabestani MR, Shojaei Moghadam M, Azari S, Maleki S, Amanzadeh A, Jeddi Tehrani M, Shokri F. 2009. PCR-based detection and eradication of Mycoplasmal infections from various mammalian cell lines: a local experience. Cytotechnology 61:117–124. doi: 10.1007/s10616-010-9252-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Gong J-H, Liu X-J, Shang B-Y, Chen S-Z, Zhen Y-S. 2010. HERG K+ channel related chemosensitivity to sparfloxacin in colon cancer cells. Oncol Rep 23:1747–1756. doi: 10.3892/or_00000820. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Boyce ST, Warden GD, Holde IA. 1995. Cytotoxicity testing of topical antimicrobial agents on human keratinocytes and fibroblasts for cultured skin grafts. J Burn Care Rehabil 16:97–103. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Gorenflot A, Brasseur P, Precigout E, L'Hostis M, Marchand A, Schrevel J. 1991. Cytological and immunological responses to Babesia divergens in different hosts: ox, gerbil, man. Parasitol Res 77:3–12. doi: 10.1007/BF00934377. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Schlichtherle M, Wahlgren M, Perlmann H, Scherf A (ed). 2000. Methods in malaria research, 3rd ed. MR4/American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA. [Google Scholar]
- 22.Key M, Bergmann A, Micchelli C, Thornton LB, Millard S, Dou Z. 2020. Determination of chemical inhibitor efficiency against intracellular Toxoplasma gondii growth using a luciferase-based growth assay. J Vis Exp 2020:e60985. doi: 10.3791/60985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Smilkstein M, Sriwilaijaroen N, Kelly JX, Wilairat P, Riscoe M. 2004. Simple and inexpensive fluorescence-based technique for high-throughput antimalarial drug screening. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 48:1803–1806. doi: 10.1128/AAC.48.5.1803-1806.2004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Kirkman LA, Zhan W, Visone J, Dziedziech A, Singh PK, Fan H, Tong X, Bruzual I, Hara R, Kawasaki M, Imaeda T, Okamoto R, Sato K, Michino M, Alvaro EF, Guiang LF, Sanz L, Mota DJ, Govindasamy K, Wang R, Ling Y, Tumwebaze PK, Sukenick G, Shi L, Vendome J, Bhanot P, Rosenthal PJ, Aso K, Foley MA, Cooper RA, Kafsack B, Doggett JS, Nathan CF, Lin G. 2018. Antimalarial proteasome inhibitor reveals collateral sensitivity from intersubunit interactions and fitness cost of resistance. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 115:E6863–E6870. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1806109115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
No new materials were generated in this study.




