ABSTRACT
Cronobacter is a foodborne pathogen associated with severe infections in restricted populations and particularly with high mortality in neonates and infants. The prevalence and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) phenotype of Cronobacter cultured from powdered infant formula and supplementary food were studied. The virulence factors, AMR genes, and genomic environments of the multidrug-resistant isolates were further studied. A total of 1,055 Cronobacter isolates were recovered from 12,105 samples of powdered infant formula and supplementary food collected from 29 provinces between 2018 and 2019 in China. Among these, 1,048 isolates were from infant supplementary food and 7 were from powdered infant formula. Regarding antimicrobial resistance susceptibility, 11 (1.0%) isolates were resistant and two showed resistance to four antimicrobials (ampicillin [AMP], tetracycline [TET], sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim [SXT], and chloramphenicol [CHL]), defined as MDR. These two MDR isolates were subsequently identified as Cronobacter sakazakii sequence type 4 (ST4) (C. sakazakii Crono-589) and ST40 (C. sakazakii Crono-684). Both MDR isolates contain 11 types of virulence genes and 7 AMR genes on their genomes. Meanwhile, the IncFIB plasmids of both MDR C. sakazakii isolates also harbored 2 types of virulence genes. Results of the genomic comparative analysis indicated that food-associated C. sakazakii could acquire antimicrobial resistance determinants through horizontal gene transfer (HGT).
IMPORTANCE As a foodborne pathogen, Cronobacter can cause serious infections in restricted populations and lead to death or chronic sequelae. Although a number of investigations showed that Cronobacter isolates are susceptible to most antimicrobial agents, MDR Cronobacter isolates, isolated mainly from clinical cases but occasionally from foods, have been reported in recent years. In this study, we successfully identified two MDR Cronobacter sakazakii isolates from infant foods based on nationwide surveillance and genome sequencing in China. Genomic analysis revealed that these two MDR C. sakazakii strains acquired resistance genes from other species via different evolution and transmission routes. It is important to monitor MDR C. sakazakii isolates in infant foods, and appropriate control measures should be taken to reduce the contamination with and transmission of this MDR bacterium.
KEYWORDS: Cronobacter sakazakii, multidrug resistance, resistant gene, genome sequencing, large-scale surveillance
INTRODUCTION
Cronobacter is a Gram-negative, facultatively anaerobic, rod-shaped, non-spore-forming opportunistic pathogen that can be fatal to neonates and immunocompromised infants (1). This organism has been recovered from various sources, including beverages, vegetables, meat, soil, and dust. The genus Cronobacter consists of seven species, including Cronobacter sakazakii, C. dublinensis, C. turicensis, C. malonaticus, C. muytjensii, C. condimenti, and C. universalis (2–5). Among these seven species, C. sakazakii is the most predominant and associated with neonatal infections, whereas C. malonaticus is associated with adult infections (6–8). All age groups can be infected by this bacterium; however, newborns and the elderly are at the highest risk for infection (7). The major clinical symptoms caused by Cronobacter in infants include meningitis, bacteremia, and necrotizing enterocolitis, with mortality ranging from 40.0% to 80.0% (9, 10).
The contamination of powdered infant formula by Cronobacter constitutes a potential risk to human beings, especially infants. The prevalence of Cronobacter in samples of powdered infant formula (PIF) collected from Chinese retail markets between 2015 and 2017 was 2.8% (56/2,020) (11). Although PIF manufacturers have continuously strengthened the supervision of production processes, Cronobacter contamination still occurs constantly, which might be due to its wide distribution in environments like soil, water, and dust (12).
According to published data, key aspects of the pathogenesis and development of the disease caused by Cronobacter include the presence of virulence factors and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) genes. To date, virulence factors identified in Cronobacter include outer membrane proteins, efflux systems, iron acquisition systems, hemolysins, and so on (13). Moreover, the occurrence of AMR genes, especially those mediated by mobile genetic elements, in Cronobacter is another concern that limits the infectious therapeutic options for clinicians and others (14). Antimicrobial therapy is a common treatment of clinical infection caused by Cronobacter (15–18), but the occurrence of AMR genes, especially mediated by mobile genetic elements, in this bacterium limits the therapeutic options for clinicians (14). In particular, it is worth noting that MDR and even mcr-1- and mcr-9-carrying Cronobacter isolates have been detected in food, clinical, and animal specimens and in samples from a dead infant fed Cronobacter-contaminated PIF (19–22). Therefore, the emergence of antimicrobial resistance, particularly MDR, in Cronobacter in infant foods has become a potential public health concern. Few data on the prevalence of MDR Cronobacter in infant foods were available in China until whole-genome sequencing (WGS) began to be widely used as a powerful tool for characterization of virulence factors and AMR genes harbored by this bacterium. Here, we report the emergence of two MDR C. sakazakii isolates obtained in a nationwide foodborne-pathogen surveillance program between 2018 and 2019 in China. The genomic features of these two isolates and related pathogenic factors are characterized.
RESULTS
Prevalence of Cronobacter contamination in PIF and supplementary foods.
In total, 1,055 Cronobacter isolates were recovered from 12,105 (8.7%; 1,055/12,105) PIF and supplementary rice-based food samples collected from 29 provinces in China (see Table S1 in the supplemental material). Regarding the prevalence of Cronobacter contamination by year, 354 Cronobacter isolates were cultured from 8,105 (4.4%; 354/8,105) samples collected in 2018 and 701 from 4,000 (17.5%; 701/4,000) samples in 2019. In terms of the prevalence of Cronobacter contamination by food category, 7 isolates were cultured from 4,050 (0.2%; 7/4,050) PIF samples and 1,048 isolates from 8,055 (13.0%; 1,048/8,055) infant supplementary food samples. Based on the data described above, the contamination of Cronobacter in supplementary rice-based food samples was much higher than that in PIF (P < 0.01).
The prevalence of Cronobacter contamination among sampling locations was different (Table S1). In 2018, nine provinces had a prevalence of Cronobacter contamination higher than 10.0% (ranging from 23.0% to 13.3%) in supplementary foods, including Yunnan, Shanxi, Jiangsu, Guangxi, Gansu, Hubei, Shaanxi, Jiangxi, and Sichuan. In 2019, eight provinces had contamination rates higher than 20.0% (ranging from 27.0% to 22.5%), including Zhejiang, Hubei, Hunan, Shandong, Shaanxi, Sichuan, Shanxi, and Tianjin. It can be seen that the prevalence of Cronobacter contamination in samples of infant supplementary foods collected in 2019 was higher than in 2018.
Antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) of Cronobacter.
Most Cronobacter isolates (92.3%; 974/1,055) were sensitive to all 12 antimicrobials tested, while 11 isolates (1.0%; 11/1,055) were resistant to at least one antimicrobial. These antimicrobial-resistant isolates were all from supplementary foods (Table 1). Among these 11 AMR isolates, 9 were resistant to a single antimicrobial (6 were resistant to chloramphenicol [CHL], and 1 each was resistant to ampicillin [AMP], nalidixic acid [NAL], and tetracycline [TET]). Furthermore, two isolates, designated Crono-589 and Crono-684, were MDR, with the resistance profile AMP-TET-SXT (sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim)-CHL.
TABLE 1.
Antimicrobial susceptibility of 1,055 Cronobacter isolates to 12 tested antimicrobial agents
Antimicrobial | No. (%) of isolates |
||
---|---|---|---|
Resistant | Intermediate | Susceptible | |
AMP | 3 (0.3) | 1 (0.1) | 1,051 (99.6) |
SAM | 0 (0) | 1 (0.1) | 1,054 (99.9) |
CTX | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1,055 (100) |
CAZ | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1,055 (100) |
IMP | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1,055 (100) |
NAL | 1 (0.1) | 0 (0) | 1,054 (99.9) |
CIP | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1,055 (100) |
TET | 3 (0.3) | 1 (0.1) | 1,051 (99.6) |
GEN | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1,055 (100) |
KAN | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 1,055 (100) |
SXT | 2 (0.2) | 0 (0) | 1,053 (99.8) |
CHL | 8 (0.8) | 68 (6.5) | 979 (92.8) |
Genomic characterization of two MDR strains.
As shown in Table 2, long-read sequencing of Cronobacter Crono-589 and Crono-684 successfully facilitated the construction of the complete genome sequence, including their chromosomes and plasmids. Both strains were identified as C. sakazakii. The total size of the chromosome in Cronobacter Crono-589 was 4,299,463 bp, with an average GC content of 56.9%, including 3,940 open reading frames (ORFs) and 109 RNAs. Two circular plasmids, identified as pCrono589-1 and pCrono589-2, were found in Crono-589. The total size of pCrono589-1 was ~158.3 kb, with an average GC content of 56.6%, including 148 ORFs, while the total size of pCrono589-2 was ~34.3 kb, with an average GC content of 47.4%, including 44 ORFs. In Crono-684, the total size of the chromosome was 4,364,183 bp, with an average GC content of 56.9%, including 3, 974 ORFs and 106 RNAs. Two circular plasmids, identified as pCrono684-1 and pCrono684-2, were also found in Cronobacter Crono-684. The total size of pCrono684-1 was ~118.1 kb, with an average GC content of 57.2%, including 111 ORFs, while the total size of pCrono684-2 was ~94.3 kb, with an average GC content of 49.6%, including 121 ORFs.
TABLE 2.
Features of the genomes and plasmids identified in two MDR C. sakazakii isolates
Strain | Location | Size (bp) | G+C content (%) | No. of ORFs | No. of RNAs | ST or Inc type | Virulence genes | AMR genes | AMR spectrum |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Crono-589 | Chromosome | 4,299,463 | 56.9 | 3,940 | 109 | 40 | cusC, fkpA, flhA, hfq, hha, higB, higB1, higB2, hlyIII, nanA, nanK, nanT, ompA, ompX, vgrG1, zpx | blaCSA-1, CRP, EF-Tu, emrB, GlpT, H-NS, msbA | AMP-TET-SXT-CHL |
Plasmid pCrono589-1 | 158,317 | 56.6 | 148 | IncFIB | cpa, iucA, iucB, iucC, iucD | aadA2, blaTEM-1, catII, dfrA12, LAP-2, mphA, qnrS1, sul1, tet(A) | |||
Plasmid pCrono589-2 | 34,303 | 47.4 | 44 | IncFIB | |||||
Crono-684 | Chromosome | 4,364,183 | 56.9 | 3,974 | 106 | 4 | cusC, fkpA, flhA, hfq, hha, higB, higB2, hlyIII, nanA, nanK, nanT, ompA, ompX, vgrG1, zpx | blaCSA-2, CRP, EF-Tu, emrB, GlpT, H-NS, msbA | AMP-TET-SXT-CHL |
Plasmid pCrono684-1 | 118,144 | 57.2 | 111 | IncFIB | cpa, iucA, iucB, iucC, iucD | ||||
Plasmid pCrono684-2 | 94,206 | 49.6 | 121 | IncY | blaTEM-135, dfrA14, floR, qnrS1, tet(A) |
Subtyping of the MDR strains.
Crono-589 and Crono-684 were further subtyped as sequence type 40 (ST40) (clonal complex CC40) and ST4 (CC4), respectively, after submission of their FASTA files to the PubMLST Cronobacter database. Crono-589 carried two IncFIB plasmids, while Crono-684 carried IncFIB and IncY plasmids.
In silico virulence gene identification.
Combined, the MDR strains harbored 13 types and 21 virulence genes (Table 2). Most of these genes were located on chromosome, including genes encoding zinc-containing metalloprotease (zpx), RNA-binding protein (hfq), outer membrane proteins (ompA and ompX), sialic acid utilization (nanAKT), macrophage infectivity potentiator (fkpA), hemolysin III (hlyIII), an IbeB homolog (cusC), expression-modulating protein (hha), valine-glycine repeat G family protein (vgrG1), members of the RelE/YieB family of bacterial toxin-antitoxins (higB and higB2), and a component of the flagellum export apparatus (flhA). Crono-589 carried another higB variant, higB1. The plasminogen activator (cpa) and iron acquisition system (iucABCD) genes were also found to be located on the IncFIB plasmids of both isolates.
In silico identification of AMR genes.
Both MDR isolates carried 7 AMR genes on their chromosomes (Table 2). Among them, msbA, GlpT, EF-Tu, emrB, blaCSA-1, and blaCSA-2 can mediate resistance to nitroimidazole, fosfomycin, elfamycin, fluoroquinolone, and cephalosporin resistance, respectively. The CRP gene confers resistance to macrolides, fluoroquinolones, and penams, while the H-NS gene can lead to macrolide, fluoroquinolone, penam, cephalosporin, cephamycin, and tetracycline resistance. Meanwhile, plasmid pCrono589-1 was found to harbor 9 AMR genes: mphA, LAP-2, blaTEM-1, sul1, dfrA12, catII, aadA2, tet(A), and qnrS1. pCrono684-2 was found to harbor 5 AMR genes: drfA14, floR, blaTEM-135, qnrS1, and tet(A). Among them, tet(A), mphA, aadA2, qnrS1, and sul1 can mediate tetracycline, macrolide, aminoglycoside, fluoroquinolone, and sulfonamide resistance, respectively. In addition, catII and floR can mediate resistance to phenicols, and dfrA12 and dfrA14 can mediate resistance to diaminopyrimidine. Three genes can mediate multiantimicrobial resistance, including the β-lactamase genes blaTEM-1 and blaTEM-135, which can mediate resistance to monobactams, cephalosporins, penams, and penems, and LAP-2, which can mediate resistance to fluoroquinolones, aminoglycosides, tetracycline and rifamycin. Moreover, no AMR genes were identified in pCrono589-2 and pCrono684-1.
Since rates of CHL-resistant (0.8%, 8/1,055) and -intermediate (6.5%, 68/1055) phenotypes were slightly higher than those for other antimicrobials, we further evaluated the presence of CHL resistance genes, including catII and floR, in all CHL nonsusceptible isolates by PCR. A total of 35 isolates (46.1%, 35/76), including 5 CHL-resistant isolates and 30 CHL-intermediate isolates, were positive for either catII or floR or both. Among these, 4.0% (3/76) carried both catII and floR, 32.9% (25/76) carried the catII gene alone, and 9.2% (7/76) carried the floR gene alone. Of the 3 isolates positive for both catII and floR, one was CHL resistant and the other 2 were intermediate. In addition, 41 phenotypically CHL-nonsusceptible isolates were negative for catII and floR; this implied that a mechanism for resistance to CHL other than AMR genes might exist.
Genomic analysis of plasmids.
Linear sequence comparison was performed using plasmid pCrono589-1 along with three C. sakazakii plasmids, including NMI5563_17 plasmid pCS-WR1 (MT759836.1), C79 plasmid pCsaC79b (CP049145.1), and GZcsf-1 plasmid pGW2 (CP028976.1), as the closest common hits of online BLAST results against the NCBI nt/nr database. The query cover values for pCrono589-1 with these reference plasmids were from 73.0% to 78.0%, and identity was >97.95%, which clearly displayed most of the ortholog regions (Fig. 1A). Notably, these four plasmids shared a similar overall genetic backbone, but only pCrono589-1 carried an MDR region (34 kb). This 34-kb MDR region was encoded by two copies of transposons (TnAs1) in the opposite direction with AMR genes flanked by insertion sequences. Downstream of TnAs1, the tetracycline resistance genes tet(A) and tet(R) were flanked by ISBsp7 upstream and ISKpn19 downstream to them, followed by the DNA invertase gene hin. Next to hin, the plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance (PMQR) gene qnrS1 was found to be flanked by ISKpn19, followed by the ISAs17-mediated Ambler class A beta-lactamase gene LAP-2, conferring resistance to quinolones. Downstream of this, another beta-lactamase gene, blaTEM, was found on the transposon TnpR, followed by the macrolide resistance gene mphA with one insertion sequence (IS26) upstream of it. Finally, the sul1, aadA2, and dfrA12 genes, conferring resistance to sulfonamides, aminoglycosides, and diaminopyrimidines, respectively, were flanked by IS6100 and hin. In addition to AMR genes, there was a qacEΔ1 gene, which mediates tolerance to acridine dye, disinfecting agents, and intercalating dyes, located between sul1 and aadA2. Comparison results showed high similarity (identity > 99%) to those in plasmids from Escherichia coli (pZF31; CP047460.1), Enterobacter cloacae (pEC27-2; CP020091.1), and Klebsiella pneumoniae (pAI2040P_P2; CP079191.1) (Fig. 1B).
FIG 1.
(A) Circular schematic map of pCrono589-1 plasmid in comparison to those in three C. sakazakii isolates used in this study. Coding sequences (CDSs) are shown as arrows. Antibiotic resistance genes are highlighted in red. Mobile gene elements are highlighted in green. Other functional genes are highlighted in blue. Antibiotic resistance regulation genes are highlighted in orange. Hypothetical proteins are highlighted in gray. Two rings represent GC skew [(G − C)/(G + C)] and GC content. The three circles represent C. sakazakii plasmids pGW2, pCS-WR1, and pCsaC79b. (B) Linear sequence comparison of the pCrono589-1 MDR region with three plasmids. Brown shading represents regions of homology. CDSs are shown as arrows. Antibiotic resistance genes are highlighted in red. Mobile gene elements are highlighted in green. Other functional genes are highlighted in blue. Antibiotic resistance regulation genes are highlighted in orange. Hypothetical proteins are highlighted in gray.
Interestingly, the plasmid pCrono684-2 showed high similarity with three plasmids from E. coli, including pTetA_020022 (CP032890.1), pNDM-M121 (CP083586.1), and pE2 (CP086663.1). The query cover values for pCrono684-2 with three reference plasmids were from 85.0% to 100.0% and the identity was >99.95% (Fig. 2A). According to the phage annotation results by PHASTER, these four plasmids were phage-like plasmids and contained an intact prophage similar to phage Escher RCS47 (NCBI Reference Sequence: NC_042128.1), which covered 99.84% of the plasmid pCrono684-2. Furthermore, pCrono684-2 has complete phage-building proteins, accompanied by multiple phage att sites (Fig. 2A). In addition, pCrono684-2 also carried a 21-kb MDR region, showing high identity (>99%) with pE2 (CP086663.1) and partial similarity with pNDM-M121 (CP083586.1) (Fig. 2B). In the 21-kb MDR region located on pCrono684-2, two copies of insertion sequences (ISKpn19) and two copies of DNA invertase genes (hin) were found upstream of the qnrS1 gene, followed by three insertion sequences (ISAs17, IS15, and IS26) and one transposon (TnpB). Next to this, the diaminopyrimidine resistance gene dfrA14 followed by the beta-lactamase gene blaTEM-135 was found to be flanked by one insertion sequence (IS15DII) and transposon (TnpR). Finally, the tetracycline resistance genes [tet(R) and tet(A)] and phenicol resistance gene (floR) were found to be flanked by one transposon (Tn3) and insertion sequence (ISVsa3).
FIG 2.
(A) Circular schematic map of pCrono684-2 plasmid in comparison to those in three E. coli isolates used in this study. CDSs are shown as arrows. Antibiotic resistance genes are highlighted in red. Mobile gene elements are highlighted in green. Other functional genes are highlighted in blue. Antibiotic resistance regulation genes are highlighted in orange. Phage-associated genes are highlighted in purple. Hypothetical proteins are highlighted in gray. Two rings represent GC skew [(G − C)/(G + C)] and GC content. The three circles are the E. coli plasmids pTetA_020022, pNDM-M121, and pE2. (B) Linear sequence comparison of pCrono684-2 MDR region with two plasmids. Brown shading represents regions of homology. CDSs are shown as arrows. Antibiotic resistance genes are highlighted in red. Mobile gene elements were highlighted in green. Other functional genes are highlighted in blue. Antibiotic resistance regulation genes are highlighted in orange. Hypothetical proteins are highlighted in gray.
DISCUSSION
In the clinical setting, Cronobacter has been isolated from feces, sputum, blood, bone marrow, and cerebrospinal fluid, with newborns younger than 12 months and the elderly being the most susceptible populations (23, 24). To date, this bacterium has been found in a wide range of environments, including water, food, and soil (25). Through new identification techniques and genomic sequencing, we have learned a great deal about the bacteria that make up this genus (26, 27). In the current study, considering the risk of contamination of Cronobacter in infant food, we investigated the prevalence and AMR phenotype as well as genotype of this bacterium cultured from infant formula and supplementary food.
The total detection rate of Cronobacter in all PIF and supplementary food samples was 8.7%, similar to those reported in Brazil (8.6%; 13/152) (28). Of note, the Cronobacter contamination in cereal-based foods (prevalence up to 27.0%) was much more severe than that in PIF. This is consistent with that reported by Carvalho et al. (17.3%) (28). The consumption of supplementary foods is mainly for infants >6 months old, whose immune systems are not fully developed. However, there is no maximum tolerance limit for Cronobacter in related supplementary foods in China. The consumption of supplementary foods contaminated by Cronobacter would lead to infection in this population. Therefore, complicated strategies, including development of new safety criteria along with hygienic control measures during food production and risk communication with varied stakeholders, need to be adopted in order to improve the safety of infant food products.
Antimicrobial abuse in agricultural and clinical settings favored the development of resistance to different antibiotics in Cronobacter and then led to the spread of antimicrobial-resistant bacteria/genes in the environment (29–32). Although Cronobacter isolates are generally susceptible to the antimicrobial agents most often used clinically, resistance to one or more antimicrobials such as cephalothin and streptomycin (33, 34) and even β-lactams or colistin (19–21) has been frequently reported recently. Our previous study showed that the resistance rate of 417 Cronobacter isolates collected from 2012 to 2014 was 1.9% (35). No AMR isolates were found among 52 Cronobacter isolates, as reported by Holý et al. (36). Among the 11 resistant isolates obtained in the present study, resistance to CHL was detected most often (8/11), followed by resistance to AMP (3/11), TET (3/11), SXT (2/11), and NAL (1/11). In addition, 68 isolates (6.5%; 68/1,055) also showed intermediate resistance to CHL. In particular, a strain of Cronobacter with intermediate resistance to CHL could exhibit a stable resistance phenotype (37). Notably, 46.1% of the CHL-nonsusceptible strains even with the intermediate resistance phonotype were also found to carry genes (catII or floR) conferring resistance to this antibiotic, suggesting that resistance to CHL might be an emerging trend in foodborne Cronobacter. Traditionally, ampicillin, chloramphenicol, tetracycline, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, to which isolates showed resistance in our study, are used for clinical treatment of infection by Enterobacteriaceae, including Cronobacter (9, 30). Hence, AMR Cronobacter poses an important, complex, and priority public health challenge.
Although the prevalence of AMR Cronobacter isolates (1.0%; 11/1,055) was relatively low in this study, two MDR isolates with the resistance profile AMP-TET-SXT-CHL were found. Recently, several cases of neonatal infection with MDR Cronobacter that caused deaths or significantly impaired mental and physical development have been reported (20, 22, 38). Consumption of these food-related MDR Cronobacter isolates in the supplementary infant foods would lead to infections in infants with failure or limited choice of clinical therapy. Therefore, our finding highlights the importance of monitoring of MDR Cronobacter along the infant food production chain to address the risks associated with development, selection, and dissemination of foodborne resistant Cronobacter and resistance determinants.
According to our previous study, C. sakazakii is also the predominant species (70.8%; 208/294) cultured from infant foods (39, 40). C. sakazakii is the major species mainly related to neonatal infections (6). In this study, the two MDR C. sakazakii isolates belonged to ST4 and ST40. ST4 is a predominant sequence type in Cronobacter clinical isolates cultured from specimens of neonate and infant with symptoms of meningitis, bacteremia and necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) (41, 42). This sequence type was also the predominant sequence type among Cronobacter isolates from PIF, while ST40 was commonly cultured from the environment, including multiple food processing facilities, and PIF, with only one isolate from a clinical case reported (25, 43–45). Up to May 2022, the Cronobacter database of PubMLST had 3,424 sequences deposited, belonging to 94 STs, among which 425 sequences were from clinical isolates, with ST4 as the most predominant (27.1%; 115/425) sequence type. Regarding the 65 ST40 isolates in PubMLST, 19 (29.2%; 19/65) were from the environment and 4 (6.2%; 4/65) from clinical samples. Therefore, these two MDR C. sakazakii isolates would have the potential to cause clinical infections once infants consumed food contaminated by them.
So far, C. sakazakii is known to cause septicemia, NEC, and meningitis. Hence, specific genes that are involved in infection attract more attention. In this study, 13 types including 21 virulence genes were identified from the genomes of both MDR C. sakazakii isolates. Of note, several virulence genes have been reported from C. sakazakii clinical isolates. The hlyIII gene, encoding hemolysin III, was found in C. sakazakii BAA-894, isolated from the neonatal intensive care unit outbreak in 2001 (46), while the proteins encoded by zpx and cusC genes, which invade human brain microvascular endothelial cells, can help bacteria cross the blood-brain barrier or cause extensive cellular destruction in neonates with NEC (47, 48), respectively. The virulence genes ompA, ompX, nanA, nanK, nanT, hha, flhA, and hfq are involved in enhancing invasion and adhesion of C. sakazakii (13, 49, 50). Furthermore, virulence genes located on the IncFIB plasmids in C. sakazakii were reported (14, 32). In this study, virulence genes, including cpa and iucABCD, which could support bacterial growth in human hosts and which were detected in isolates from clinical cases of C. sakazakii infection (51–54), were also found in the IncFIB plasmids of both MDR isolates’ genes. All the virulence genes detected in both MDR C. sakazakii isolates implied a potential infection risk for infants upon consuming food contaminated by these strains.
Regarding the in silico presence of chromosome-borne AMR genes, both MDR isolates had the same efflux genes (msbA and emrB), antibiotic efflux-modulating regulatory system genes (CRP and H-NS), and antibiotic target alteration genes (GlpT and EF-Tu) (28). Lepuschitz et al. (41) reported that of 21 C. sakazakii isolates, 12 carried msbA, emrB, CRP, H-NS, and GlpT genes. Recent studies showed that the above-mentioned AMR genes could be detected in all C. sakazakii and other Enterobacteriaceae bacteria, suggesting that these genes may be inherent AMR genes and vertically transmitted in C. sakazakii (13, 32). This aspect is particularly relevant in the context of increasing antibiotic resistance (55). For instance, fosfomycin is considered a useful antibiotic for treating MDR bacterial infections, but a GlpT gene encoding resistance to fosfomycin was also found in both MDR isolates in our study. In addition, these two MDR C. sakazakii isolates carry β-lactamase class C resistance genes (blaCSA-1 and blaCSA-2) and possess resistance to most first- and second-generation cephalosporins (32).
It is well known that resistance genes can be transmitted vertically and horizontally through mobile genetic elements (MGEs) like plasmids, integrons, transposons, and so on (56, 57). Both MDR C. sakazakii isolates had one plasmid with several AMR genes, including the TEM β-lactamase genes blaTEM-1 and blaTEM-135, the tetracycline resistance gene tet(A), the sulfonamide resistance gene sul1, the diaminopyrimidine resistance genes dfrA12 and dfrA14, and the phenicol resistance genes catII and floR. All these could explain their AMR phenotype (AMP-TET-SXT-CHL). Other AMR genes (mphA, qnrS1, and LAP-2) were also identified in the plasmids. As far as we know, the blaTEM gene-carrying plasmid in C. sakazakii is rarely reported from food isolates (20, 58). This is the first report on C. sakazakii isolates carrying blaTEM plasmids cultured from infant food in China.
In addition to the ~34-kb MDR region, the genetic backbone of plasmid pCrono589-1 showed high similarity to other plasmids harbored by C. sakazakii, indicating that this plasmid could be stably transmitted among C. sakazakii isolates, whereas the MDR region could be partially found in plasmids in other Enterobacteriaceae species, such as pZF31 in tet(X4)-positive E. coli (CP047460.1) isolated from swine feces (59), pEC27-2 (CP020091.1) in a clinical isolate of E. cloacae that was resistant to carbapenem and colistin (60), and pAI2040P_P2 (CP079181.1) in a K. pneumoniae strain that was resistant to carbapenem and was obtained from urine samples from a urinary tract infection case. Moreover, those AMR genes were found to be flanked by several insertion sequences and transposons, which could mediate genetic exchange between or within species (61). The structurally similar mobile elements contained in these reported plasmids implied that the MDR region in plasmid pCrono589-1 is more likely acquired from resistant plasmids carried in other Enterobacteriaceae species than from the same species.
Unlike pCrono589-1, the genetic backbone of pCrono684-2 was not homologous to any Cronobacter plasmids but showed high similarity to three E. coli plasmids. In particular, pCrono684-2 was nearly identical to the E. coli E2 plasmids pE2 (CP086663.1) (99.97%) and pNDM-M121 (CP093586.1) (99.95%), indicating that this plasmid may be entirely acquired from E. coli. The resistant genes in plasmid pCrono684-2 were also found to be flanked by several insertion sequence or transposons, most of which were also found in E. coli plasmids, suggesting the potential transmission of plasmids between these species. Furthermore, PHASTER analysis indicated that Crono-684-p2 is a phage-like plasmid. Phage-like plasmids were not restricted to E. coli and could represent as a new vehicle to mediate the interspecies transmission of AMR genes (62). Overall, multiple mobile genetic elements around AMR genes, including insertion sequences, transposons, and other regulators, might contribute to the transmission of AMR genes or resistance plasmids between species. The above findings with regard to plasmids pCrono589-1 and pCrono684-2 revealed two different routes by which C. sakazakii could acquire resistance from other species, which would further help investigate the resistant mechanisms of such MDR C. sakazakii isolates.
Conclusion.
In conclusion, our study revealed the prevalence of Cronobacter in infant foods across 29 provinces from 2018 to 2019 in China, with a relatively high detection rate in infant supplementary foods. Moreover, a total of 11 AMR Cronobacter isolates were identified, and two were MDR C. sakazakii isolates with the antimicrobial resistance profile AMP-TET-SXT-CHL. The sequence types of these two MDR C. sakazakii isolates were ST4 and ST40. The genomic analysis of MGEs in the plasmid-mediated MDR region of both C. sakazakii isolates revealed that isolates with similar antimicrobial resistance phenotypes may have obtained resistance genes from other species by different evolutionary and transmission routes. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of MDR C. sakazakii isolates carrying blaTEM plasmids cultured from infant foods in China. Considering the possibility that these resistances emerging in infant food may be transferred to infants via the food chain, it is important to monitor the antimicrobial susceptibility and resistance mechanisms of MDR C. sakazakii isolates along the infant food supply chain.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Bacterial isolation.
A total of 12,105 samples of powdered infant formula and cereal-based supplementary food were collected between 2018 and 2019 from 29 provinces in China. Among these samples, 8,105 (4,050 for PIF and 4,055 for cereal-based supplementary food) were from 2018 and 4,000 cereal-based supplementary food samples were from 2019. All samples were screened for contamination with Cronobacter using a modified method based on the China National Food Safety Standard (63). Briefly, a 100-g test portion sample was mixed with 900 mL buffered peptone water (BPW; Beijing Land Bridge Technology Ltd., Beijing, China) and incubated at 37°C for 18 h ± 2 h. Then, 1 mL of mixed pre-enrichment sample was transferred into a tube containing 10 mL modified lauryl sulfate tryptose broth (mLST)/vancomycin medium (Beijing Land Bridge Technology Ltd., Beijing, China) and incubated at 41.5°C for 24 h ± 2 h. A loopful of mLST/vancomycin (approximately 10 μL) culture was streaked on Brilliance Enterobacter sakazakii agar (DFI; Oxoid, England) and incubated at 41.5°C for 24 ± 2 h. Suspected colonies were selected, inoculated onto tryptone soy agar (TSA; Beijing Land Bridge Technology Ltd., Beijing, China) plates, and incubated at 37°C for 24 h. Colonies on TSA plates were further identified by both analysis on a Vitek 2 compact instrument (bioMérieux, France) and amplification of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) as previously reported (64).
Antimicrobial susceptibility testing.
All confirmed Cronobacter isolates were subjected to AST using Biofosun Gram-negative panels (Fosun Diagnostics, Shanghai, China) by the broth dilution method (65). The panel of 12 antimicrobial compounds includes the penicillin ampicillin (AMP; 0.5 to 64 μg/mL), the β-lactam–β-lactamase inhibitor combination ampicillin-sulbactam (SAM; 0.25 to 64/32 μg/mL), the cephems cefotaxime (CTX; 0.125 to 16 μg/mL) and ceftazidime (CAZ; 0.25 to 32 μg/mL), the carbapenem imipenem (IMP; 0.03 to 4 μg/mL), the aminoglycosides gentamicin (GEN; 0.5 to 64 μg/mL) and kanamycin (KAN; 0.5 to 64 μg/mL), tetracycline (TET; 0.5 to 64 μg/mL), the fluoroquinolone ciprofloxacin (CIP; 0.06 to 8 μg/mL), the quinolone nalidixic acid (NAL; 0.5 to 64 μg/mL), the folate pathway inhibitor sulfamethoxazole-trimethoprim (SXT; 0.125/2.375 to 16/304 μg/mL), and the phenicol chloramphenicol (CHL,2 to 256 μg/mL). Escherichia coli ATCC 25922 was used for quality control. All results were interpreted according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) interpretive standard M100, 29th edition.
DNA extraction and whole-genome sequencing.
Two confirmed MDR Cronobacter isolates were inoculated onto TSA plates and incubated overnight at 37°C to obtain pure clones. Genomic DNA (gDNA) was extracted and purified using a TIANamp bacterial DNA kit (DP302-02; Tiangen Biotech Co., Ltd., China) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Whole-genome sequencing was performed with a combination of the Illumina HiSeq 2000 (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) and Pacific Biosciences Sequel II sequencing platforms (Pacific Biosciences, Menlo Park, CA, USA). The sequence data from the Illumina platform were used to proofread the PacBio assembly sequence. SMRT Analysis v2.3.0, Consed v28.0, and NCBI PGAP v4.8 were used for de novo assembly, generating complete and closed chromosome or plasmid sequences and automatically annotating them, respectively. Prokka v1.14.5 (66), KOALA v2.2 (https://www.kegg.jp/blastkoala/), and the PubMLST database (http://pubmlst.org/cronobacter/) were used to perform the genome annotation.
Identification and in silico subtyping.
The species identification and multilocus sequence typing (MLST) of Cronobacter was performed in silico for both MDR isolates by uploading their whole-genome sequences (FASTA files) to the PubMLST Cronobacter database (http://pubmlst.org/cronobacter/). PlasmidFinder 2.1 was used to identify plasmid replicon types (Inc groups) (https://cge.food.dtu.dk/services/PlasmidFinder/) (67).
Identification of virulence factors, AMR genes, and prophages.
Virulence genes were selected based on a careful literature review (13, 47–53, 68–72) and were screened among the studied genomes using the BLASTN algorithm (73) with 90% minimum nucleotide identity and 90% alignment length coverage. AMR genes were identified with the Comprehensive Antimicrobial Resistance Database (CARD) (74) with 90% identity and 95% query coverage as cutoffs. Prophage sequences within plasmids were identified and annotated by PHASTER (PHAge Search Tool Enhanced Release) (75).
Genomic comparison and visualization of the genome.
Sequence comparisons were carried out with BLASTN and visualized using Easyfig v2.2.5 (76). A circular genome comparison graph was constructed with BRIG v0.95 (77).
Data availability.
The nucleotide sequences of two MDR Cronobacter isolates have been deposited in GenBank under the accession numbers CP080591 (Crono-589 chromosome), CP080592 (pCrono589-1), CP080593 (pCrono589-2), CP080594 (Crono-684 chromosome), CP080595 (pCrono684-1), CP080596 (pCrono684-2), and BioProject PRJNA752220.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2020YFF0305003).
Conceptualization, Xin Gan, Wei Wang, and Fengqin Li; Methodology, Xin Gan, Menghan Li, Shaofei Yan, Fengqin Li, and Jin Xu; Supervision, Wei Wang and Fengqin Li; Writing, Editing & Reviewing the draft, Xin Gan, Wei Wang, and Fengqin Li; Investigation, Xin Gan carried out the experiments. Formal analysis and Visualization, Xin Gan, Menghan Li and Shaofei Yan analyzed the data.
We declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Supplemental material is available online only.
Contributor Information
Wei Wang, Email: wangweiwsw@cfsa.net.cn.
Fengqin Li, Email: lifengqin@cfsa.net.cn.
Sandeep Tamber, Health Canada.
REFERENCES
- 1.Ling N, Li C, Zhang J, Wu Q, Zeng H, He W, Ye Y, Wang J, Ding Y, Chen M, Xue L, Ye Q, Guo W. 2018. Prevalence and molecular and antimicrobial characteristics of Cronobacter spp. isolated from raw vegetables in China. Front Microbiol 9:1149. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01149. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Iversen C, Lehner A, Mullane N, Bidlas E, Cleenwerck I, Marugg J, Fanning S, Stephan R, Joosten H. 2007. The taxonomy of Enterobacter sakazakii: proposal of a new genus Cronobacter gen. nov. and descriptions of Cronobacter sakazakii comb. nov. Cronobacter sakazakii subsp. sakazakii, comb. nov., Cronobacter sakazakii subsp. malonaticus subsp. nov., Cronobacter turicensis sp. nov., Cronobacter muytjensii sp. nov., Cronobacter dublinensis sp. nov. and Cronobacter genomospecies 1. BMC Evol Biol 7:64. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-7-64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Iversen C, Mullane N, McCardell B, Tall BD, Lehner A, Fanning S, Stephan R, Joosten H. 2008. Cronobacter gen. nov, a new genus to accommodate the biogroups of Enterobacter sakazakii, and proposal of Cronobacter sakazakii gen. nov., comb. nov., Cronobacter malonaticus sp. nov., Cronobacter turicensis sp. nov., Cronobacter muytjensii sp. nov., Cronobacter dublinensis sp. nov., Cronobacter genomospecies I, and of three subspecies, Cronobacter dublinensis subsp. dublinensis subsp. nov., Cronobacter dublinensis subsp. lausannensis subsp. nov. and Cronobacter dublinensis subsp. lactaridi subsp. nov. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 58:1442–1447. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.65577-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Joseph S, Cetinkaya E, Drahovska H, Levican A, Figueras MJ, Forsythe SJ. 2012. Cronobacter condiment sp. nov., isolated from spiced meat, and Cronobacter universalis sp. nov., a species designation for Cronobacter sp. genomospecies I, recovered from a leg infection, water and food ingredients. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 62:1277–1283. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.032292-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Stephan R, Grim CJ, Gopinath GR, Mammel MK, Sathyamoorthy V, Trach LH, Chase HR, Fanning S, Tall BD. 2014. Re-examination of the taxonomic status of Enterobacter helveticus, Enterobacter pulveris and Enterobacter turicensis as members of the genus Cronobacter and their reclassification in the genera Franconibacter gen. nov. and Siccibacter gen. nov. as Franconibacter helveticus comb. nov., Franconibacter pulveris comb. nov. and Siccibacter turicensis comb. nov., respectively. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 64:3402–3410. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.059832-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Forsythe SJ. 2018. Updates on the Cronobacter genus. Annu Rev Food Sci Technol 9:23–44. doi: 10.1146/annurev-food-030117-012246. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Forsythe SJ. 2018. Microbial source tracking of Cronobacter spp. Adv Appl Microbiol 103:49–101. doi: 10.1016/bs.aambs.2018.01.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Jaradat ZW, Al Mousa W, Elbetieha A, Al Nabulsi A, Tall BD. 2014. Cronobacter spp.—opportunistic foodborne pathogens. A review of their virulence and environmental-adaptive traits. J Med Microbiol 63:1023–1037. doi: 10.1099/jmm.0.073742-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Lai KK. 2001. Enterobacter sakazakii infections among neonates, infants, children, and adults. Case reports and a review of the literature. Medicine (Baltimore) 80:113–122. doi: 10.1097/00005792-200103000-00004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Patrick ME, Mahon BE, Greene SA, Rounds J, Cronquist A, Wymore K, Boothe E, Lathrop S, Palmer A, Bowen A. 2014. Incidence of Cronobacter spp. infections, United States, 2003-2009. Emerg Infect Dis 20:1520–1523. doi: 10.3201/eid2009.140545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Fei P, Jiang Y, Jiang Y, Yuan X, Yang T, Chen J, Wang Z, Kang H, Forsythe SJ. 2017. Prevalance, molecular characterization, and antibiotic susceptibility of Cronobacter sakazakii isolates from powdered infant formula collected from Chinese retail markets. Front Microbiol 8:2026. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02026. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Ueda S. 2017. The effects of temperature on the growth and heat resistance of Cronobacter spp. Biocontrol Sci 22:125–129. doi: 10.4265/bio.22.125. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Aly MA, Domig KJ, Kneifel W, Reimhult E. 2019. Whole genome sequencing-based comparison of food isolates of Cronobacter sakazakii. Front Microbiol 10:1464. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01464. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Yang J, Liu L, Feng Y, He D, Wang C, Zong Z. 2021. Potential mobilization of mcr-10 by an integrative mobile element via site-specific recombination in Cronobacter sakazakii. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 65:e01717-20. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01717-20. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Muytjens HL, Zanen HC, Sonderkamp HJ, Kollée LA, Wachsmuth IK, Farmer JJ, 3rd, 1983. Analysis of eight cases of neonatal meningitis and sepsis due to Enterobacter sakazakii. J Clin Microbiol 18:115–120. doi: 10.1128/jcm.18.1.115-120.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Biering G, Karlsson S, Clark NC, Jónsdóttir KE, Lúdvígsson P, Steingrímsson O. 1989. Three cases of neonatal meningitis caused by Enterobacter sakazakii in powdered milk. J Clin Microbiol 27:2054–2056. doi: 10.1128/jcm.27.9.2054-2056.1989. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Bar-Oz B, Preminger A, Peleg O, Block C, Arad I. 2001. Enterobacter sakazakii infection in the newborn. Acta Paediatr 90:356–358. doi: 10.1080/080352501300067857. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Block C, Peleg O, Minster N, Bar-Oz B, Simhon A, Arad I, Shapiro M. 2002. Cluster of neonatal infections in Jerusalem due to unusual biochemical variant of Enterobacter sakazakii. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 21:613–616. doi: 10.1007/s10096-002-0774-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Parra-Flores J, Holý O, Riffo F, Lepuschitz S, Ruppitsch W, Forsythe S. 2021. Draft genome sequences of seven Cronobacter sakazakii strains carrying the mcr 9.1 gene isolated in Chile. Microbiol Resour Announc 10:e00506-21. doi: 10.1128/MRA.00506-21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Zeng H, Lei T, He W, Zhang J, Liang B, Li C, Ling N, Ding Y, Wu S, Wang J, Wu Q. 2018. Novel multidrug-resistant Cronobacter sakazakii causing meningitis in neonate, China, 2015. Emerg Infect Dis 24:2121–2124. doi: 10.3201/eid2411.180718. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Liu BT, Song FJ, Zou M, Hao ZH, Shan H. 2017. Emergence of colistin resistance gene mcr-1 in Cronobacter sakazakii producing NDM-9 and in Escherichia coli from the same animal. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 61:e01444-16. doi: 10.1128/AAC.01444-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Cui JH, Yu B, Xiang Y, Zhang Z, Zhang T, Zeng YC, Cui ZG, Huo XX. 2017. Two cases of multi-antibiotic resistant Cronobacter spp. infections of infants in China. Biomed Environ Sci 30:601–605. doi: 10.3967/bes2017.079. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Hariri S, Joseph S, Forsythe SJ. 2013. Cronobacter sakazakii ST4 strains and neonatal meningitis, United States. Emerg Infect Dis 19:175–177. doi: 10.3201/eid1901.120649. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Patrick ME, Mahon BE, Greene SA, Rounds J, Cronquist A, Wymore K, Boothe E, Lathrop S, Palmer A, Bowen A. 2014. Incidence of Cronobacter spp. infections, United States, 2003–2009. Emerg Infect Dis 20:1536–1539. doi: 10.3201/eid2009.140545. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Gan X, Li M, Yan S, Wang X, Wang W, Li F. 2021. Genomic landscape and phenotypic assessment of Cronobacter sakazakii isolated from raw material, environment, and production facilities in powdered infant formula factories in China. Front Microbiol 12:686189. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.686189. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Iversen C, Druggan P, Schumacher S, Lehner A, Feer C, Gschwend K, Joosten H, Stephan R. 2008. Development of a novel screening method for the isolation of “Cronobacter” spp. (Enterobacter sakazakii). Appl Environ Microbiol 74:2550–2553. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02801-07. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Kucerova E, Clifton SW, Xia XQ, Long F, Porwollik S, Fulton L, Fronick C, Minx P, Kyung K, Warren W, Fulton R, Feng D, Wollam A, Shah N, Bhonagiri V, Nash WE, Hallsworth-Pepin K, Wilson RK, McClelland M, Forsythe SJ. 2010. Genome sequence of Cronobacter sakazakii BAA-894 and comparative genomic hybridization analysis with other Cronobacter species. PLoS One 5:e9556. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009556. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Carvalho GG, Calarga AP, Teodoro JR, Queiroz MM, Astudillo-Trujillo CA, Levy CE, Brocchi M, Kabuki DY. 2020. Isolation, comparison of identification methods and antibiotic resistance of Cronobacter spp. in infant foods. Food Res Int 137:109643. doi: 10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109643. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.McEwen SA, Collignon PJ. 2018. Antimicrobial resistance: a One Health perspective. Microbiol Spectr 6:ARBA-0009-2017. doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.ARBA-0009-2017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Kim K, Jang SS, Kim SK, Park JH, Heu S, Ryu S. 2008. Prevalence and genetic diversity of Enterobacter sakazakii in ingredients of infant foods. Int J Food Microbiol 122:196–203. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2007.11.072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Chon JW, Song KY, Kim SY, Hyeon JY, Seo KH. 2012. Isolation and characterization of Cronobacter from desiccated foods in Korea. J Food Sci 77:M354–M348. doi: 10.1111/j.1750-3841.2012.02750.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Holý O, Parra-Flores J, Lepuschitz S, Alarcón-Lavín MP, Cruz-Córdova A, Xicohtencatl-Cortes J, Mancilla-Rojano J, Ruppitsch W, Forsythe S. 2020. Molecular characterization of Cronobacter sakazakii strains isolated from powdered milk. Foods 10:20. doi: 10.3390/foods10010020. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Xu X, Li C, Wu Q, Zhang J, Huang J, Yang G. 2015. Prevalence, molecular characterization, and antibiotic susceptibility of Cronobacter spp. in Chinese ready-to-eat foods. Int J Food Microbiol 204:17–23. doi: 10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2015.03.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Li Z, Ge W, Li K, Gan J, Zhang Y, Zhang Q, Luo R, Chen L, Liang Y, Wang Q, Xi M, Xia X, Wang X, Yang B. 2016. Prevalence and characterization of Cronobacter sakazakii in retail milk-based infant and baby foods in Shaanxi, China. Foodborne Pathog Dis 13:221–227. doi: 10.1089/fpd.2015.2074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Gan X, Bai L, Yan S, Wang J, Wang W, Li Z, Zhang J, Li F, Xu J. 2015. Drug resistant analysis of Cronobacter isolated from infant foods in 2012-2014 in China. J Food Saf Qual 9:3491–3496. [Google Scholar]
- 36.Holý O, Alsonosi A, Hochel I, Röderová M, Zatloukalová S, Mlynárčik P, Kolář M, Petrželová J, Alazraq A, Chmelař D, Forsythe S. 2019. Antibiotic susceptibility of Cronobacter spp. isolated from clinical samples. Pol J Microbiol 68:5–14. doi: 10.21307/pjm-2019-001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Boyle-Vavra S, Berke SK, Lee JC, Daum RS. 2000. Reversion of the glycopeptide resistance phenotype in Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 44:272–277. doi: 10.1128/AAC.44.2.272-277.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Shi L, Liang Q, Zhan Z, Feng J, Zhao Y, Chen Y, Huang M, Tong Y, Wu W, Chen W, Li X, Yin Z, Wang J, Zhou D. 2018. Co-occurrence of 3 different resistance plasmids in a multi-drug resistant Cronobacter sakazakii isolate causing neonatal infections. Virulence 9:110–120. doi: 10.1080/21505594.2017.1356537. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Gan X, Wang W, Hu Y, Li F, Mao X, Xu J. 2017. Study on species identification of Cronobacter isolated from infant formula foods and cereal based foods and clinical diarrhea cases in 2012-2014 in China. Wei Sheng Yan Jiu 46:695–704. (In Chinese.) [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Gan X, Yang B, Wang X, Dong Y, Hu Y, Xu J, Li F. 2021. Contamination, persistence and dissemination of Cronobacter during the production of powdered infant formula in China in 2016. Qual Assur Saf Crops Foods 13:105–114. doi: 10.15586/qas.v13i1.842. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Lepuschitz S, Ruppitsch W, Pekard-Amenitsch S, Forsythe SJ, Cormican M, Mach RL, Piérard D, Allerberger F, the EUCRONI Study Group . 2019. Multicenter study of Cronobacter sakazakii infections in humans, Europe, 2017. Emerg Infect Dis 25:515–522. doi: 10.3201/eid2503.181652. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Fei P, Man C, Lou B, Forsythe SJ, Chai Y, Li R, Niu J, Jiang Y. 2015. Genotyping and source tracking of Cronobacter sakazakii and C. malonaticus isolates from powdered infant formula and an infant formula production factory in China. Appl Environ Microbiol 81:5430–5439. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01390-15. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Pightling AW, Pagotto F. 2014. Draft genome sequence of Cronobacter sakazakii clonal complex 45 strain HPB5174, isolated from a powdered infant formula facility in Ireland. Genome Announc 2:e00778-14. doi: 10.1128/genomeA.00778-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Joseph S, Forsythe SJ. 2011. Predominance of Cronobacter sakazakii sequence type 4 in neonatal infections. Emerg Infect Dis 17:1713–1715. doi: 10.3201/eid1709.110260. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Gan X, Wang W, Hu Y, Peng Z, Yan S, Xu J. 2018b. Study on pulsed field gel electrophoresis and multilocus sequence typing of Cronobacter isolated from powdered infant formula. Chin J Food Hyg 30:235–238. [Google Scholar]
- 46.Himelright I, Harris E, Lorch V, Anderson M, Jone T, Craig A, Kuehnert M, Forster T, Arduino M, Jensen B, Jernigan D. 2002. From the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Enterobacter sakazakii infections associated with the use of powdered infant formula—Tennessee, 2001. JAMA 287:2204–2205. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Eshwar AK, Wolfrum N, Stephan R, Fanning S, Lehner A. 2018. Interaction of matrix metalloproteinase-9 and Zpx in Cronobacter turicensis LMG 23827T mediated infections in the zebrafish model. Cell Microbiol 20:e12888. doi: 10.1111/cmi.12888. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Kim S, Kim YT, Yoon H, Lee JH, Ryu S. 2017. The complete genome sequence of Cronobacter sakazakii ATCC 29544T, a food-borne pathogen. Gut Pathog 9:2. doi: 10.1186/s13099-016-0150-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Singh N, Goel G, Raghav M. 2015. Insights into virulence factors determining the pathogenicity of Cronobacter sakazakii. Virulence 6:433–440. doi: 10.1080/21505594.2015.1036217. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Joseph S, Hariri S, Masood N, Forsythe S. 2013. Sialic acid utilization by Cronobacter sakazakii. Microb Inform Exp 3:3. doi: 10.1186/2042-5783-3-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Franco AA, Kothary MH, Gopinath G, Jarvis KG, Grim CJ, Hu L, Datta AR, McCardell BA, Tall BD. 2011. Cpa, the outer membrane protease of Cronobacter sakazakii, activates plasminogen and mediates resistance to serum bactericidal activity. Infect Immun 79:1578–1587. doi: 10.1128/IAI.01165-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Franco AA, Hu L, Grim CJ, Gopinath G, Sathyamoorthy V, Jarvis KG, Lee C, Sadowski J, Kim J, Kothary MH, McCardell BA, Tall BD. 2011. Characterization of putative virulence genes on the related repfib plasmids harbored by Cronobacter spp. Appl Environ Microbiol 77:3255–3267. doi: 10.1128/AEM.03023-10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Jang H, Chase HR, Gangiredla J, Grim CJ, Patel IR, Kothary MH, Jackson SA, Mammel MK, Carter L, Negrete F, Finkelstein S, Weinstein L, Yan Q, Iversen C, Pagotto F, Stephan R, Lehner A, Eshwar AK, Fanning S, Farber J, Gopinath GR, Tall BD, Pava-Ripoll M. 2020. Analysis of the molecular diversity among Cronobacter species isolated from filth flies using targeted PCR, pan genomic DNA microarray, and whole genome sequencing analyses. Front Microbiol 11:561204. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.561204. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Lachowska M, Izdebski R, Urbanowicz P, Żabicka D, Królak-Olejnik B. 2021. Infection of Cronobacter sakazakii ST1 producing SHV-12 in a premature infant born from triplet pregnancy. Microorganisms 9:1878. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9091878. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Falagas ME, Athanasaki F, Voulgaris GL, Triarides NA, Vardakas KZ. 2019. Resistance to fosfomycin: mechanisms, frequency and clinical consequences. Int J Antimicrob Agents 53:22–28. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2018.09.013. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Alanis AJ. 2005. Resistance to antibiotics: are we in the post-antibioticera? Arch Med Res 36:697–705. doi: 10.1016/j.arcmed.2005.06.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Holmes AH, Moore LS, Sundsfjord A, Steinbakk M, Regmi S, Karkey A, Guerin PJ, Piddock LJ. 2016. Understanding the mechanisms and drivers of antimicrobial resistance. Lancet 387:176–187. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00473-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Khashei R, Edalati Sarvestani F, Malekzadegan Y, Motamedifar M. 2020. The first report of Enterobacter gergoviae carrying blaNDM-1 in Iran. Iran J Basic Med Sci 23:1184–1190. doi: 10.22038/ijbms.2020.41225.9752. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Li R, Peng K, Li Y, Liu Y, Wang Z. 2020. Exploring tet(X)-bearing tigecycline-resistant bacteria of swine farming environments. Sci Total Environ 733:139306. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139306. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Le-Ha TD, Le L, Le-Vo HN, Anda M, Motooka D, Nakamura S, Tran LK, Tran PT, Iida T, Cao V. 2019. Characterization of a carbapenem- and colistin-resistant Enterobacter cloacae carrying Tn6901 in blaNDM-1 genomic context. Infect Drug Resist 12:733–739. doi: 10.2147/IDR.S194495. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Baquero F, Coque TM, Martínez JL, Aracil-Gisbert S, Lanza VF. 2019. Gene transmission in the One Health microbiosphere and the channels of antimicrobial resistance. Front Microbiol 10:2892. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02892. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Zhou W, Liu L, Feng Y, Zong Z. 2018. A P7 phage-like plasmid carrying mcr-1 in an ST15 Klebsiella pneumoniae clinical isolate. Front Microbiol 9:11. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00011. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.GB4789.40. 2010. Enterobacter sakazakii. National food safety standard, food microbiological examination.
- 64.Liu Y, Gao Q, Zhang X, Hou Y, Yang J, Huang X. 2006. PCR and oligonucleotide array for detection of Enterobacter sakazakii in infant formula. Mol Cell Probe 20:11–17. doi: 10.1016/j.mcp.2005.08.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.CLSI. 2019. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing, standard M100, 26th ed. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA. [Google Scholar]
- 66.Seemann T. 2014. Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation. Bioinformatics 30:2068–2069. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu153. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Carattoli A, Zankari E, García-Fernández A, Voldby Larsen M, Lund O, Villa L, Møller Aarestrup F, Hasman H. 2014. In silico detection and typing of plasmids using PlasmidFinder and plasmid multilocus sequence typing. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 58:3895–3903. doi: 10.1128/AAC.02412-14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Jang H, Gopinath GR, Eshwar A, Srikumar S, Nguyen S, Gangiredla J, Patel IR, Finkelstein SB, Negrete F, Woo J, Lee Y, Fanning S, Stephan R, Tall BD, Lehner A. 2020. The secretion of toxins and other exoproteins of Cronobacter: role in virulence, adaption, and persistence. Microorganisms 8:229. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8020229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Ye Y, Zhang X, Zhang M, Ling N, Zeng H, Gao J, Jiao R, Wu Q, Zhang J. 2017. Potential factors involved in virulence of Cronobacter sakazakii isolates by comparative transcriptome analysis. J Dairy Sci 100:8826–8837. doi: 10.3168/jds.2017-12801. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Paytubi S, Dietrich M, Queiroz MH, Juárez A. 2013. Role of plasmid- and chromosomally encoded Hha proteins in modulation of gene expression in E. coli O157:H7. Plasmid 70:52–60. doi: 10.1016/j.plasmid.2013.01.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Zhang Y, Xia B, Li M, Shi J, Long Y, Jin Y, Bai F, Cheng Z, Jin S, Wu W. 2018. HigB reciprocally controls biofilm formation and the expression of type III secretion system genes through influencing the intracellular c-di-GMP level in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Toxins (Basel) 10:424. doi: 10.3390/toxins10110424. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Gao JX, Li P, Du XJ, Han ZH, Xue R, Liang B, Wang S. 2017. A negative regulator of cellulose biosynthesis, bcsR, affects biofilm formation, and adhesion/invasion ability of Cronobacter sakazakii. Front Microbiol 8:1839. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01839. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ. 1990. Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 215:403–410. doi: 10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Jia B, Raphenya AR, Alcock B, Waglechner N, Guo P, Tsang KK, Lago BA, Dave BM, Pereira S, Sharma AN, Doshi S, Courtot M, Lo R, Williams LE, Frye JG, Elsayegh T, Sardar D, Westman EL, Pawlowski AC, Johnson TA, Brinkman FS, Wright GD, McArthur AG. 2017. CARD 2017: expansion and model-centric curation of the comprehensive antibiotic resistance database. Nucleic Acids Res 45:D566–D573. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw1004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Arndt D, Grant JR, Marcu A, Sajed T, Pon A, Liang Y, Wishart DS. 2016. PHASTER: a better, faster version of the PHAST phage search tool. Nucleic Acids Res 44:W16–W21. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkw387. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Sullivan MJ, Petty NK, Beatson SA. 2011. Easyfig: a genome comparison visualizer. Bioinformatics 27:1009–1010. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Alikhan NF, Petty NK, Ben Zakour NL, Beatson SA. 2011. BLAST Ring Image Generator (BRIG): simple prokaryote genome comparisons. BMC Genomics 12:402. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-12-402. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Table S1. Download spectrum.01197-22-s0001.xlsx, XLSX file, 0.01 MB (14KB, xlsx)
Data Availability Statement
The nucleotide sequences of two MDR Cronobacter isolates have been deposited in GenBank under the accession numbers CP080591 (Crono-589 chromosome), CP080592 (pCrono589-1), CP080593 (pCrono589-2), CP080594 (Crono-684 chromosome), CP080595 (pCrono684-1), CP080596 (pCrono684-2), and BioProject PRJNA752220.