Skip to main content
PLOS One logoLink to PLOS One
. 2022 Oct 26;17(10):e0275902. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275902

Multi-isotopes in human hair: A tool to initiate cross-border collaboration in international cold-cases

Clément P Bataille 1,*, Saskia T M Ammer 2,3, Shelina Bhuiyan 1, Michelle M G Chartrand 1,¤, Gilles St-Jean 1, Gabriel J Bowen 4
Editor: Fabio Marzaioli5
PMCID: PMC9603990  PMID: 36288264

Abstract

Unidentified human remains have historically been investigated nationally by law enforcement authorities. However, this approach is outdated in a globalized world with rapid transportation means, where humans easily move long distances across borders. Cross-border cooperation in solving cold-cases is rare due to political, administrative or technical challenges. It is fundamental to develop new tools to provide rapid and cost-effective leads for international cooperation. In this work, we demonstrate that isotopic measurements are effective screening tools to help identify cold-cases with potential international ramifications. We first complete existing databases of hydrogen and sulfur isotopes in human hair from residents across North America by compiling or analyzing hair from Canada, the United States (US) and Mexico. Using these databases, we develop maps predicting isotope variations in human hair across North America. We demonstrate that both δ2H and δ34S values of human hair are highly predictable and display strong spatial patterns. Multi-isotope analysis combined with dual δ2H and δ34S geographic probability maps provide evidence for international travel in two case studies. In the first, we demonstrate that multi-isotope analysis in bulk hair of deceased border crossers found in the US, close to the Mexico-US border, help trace their last place of residence or travel back to specific regions of Mexico. These findings were validated by the subsequent identification of these individuals through the Pima County Office of the Medical Examiner in Tucson, Arizona. In the second case study, we demonstrate that sequential multi-isotope analysis along the hair strands of an unidentified individual found in Canada provides detailed insights into the international mobility of this individual during the last year of life. In both cases, isotope data provide strong leads towards international travel.

Introduction

The establishment of Interpol many decades ago came from the necessity for international police cooperation in response to the rise of international crime organizations. Nevertheless, such international cooperation usually remains restricted to organized crime while significant barriers impede cooperation in the resolution of cold cases [1]. Countries lack a universal language, funding and the political will to harmonize law enforcement practices and facilitate cross-border cold case investigations [1]. A significant and increasing number of cold-cases are international, particularly in areas located close to land borders where remains of migrants or trafficking victims are common [2]. The remains of individuals with a foreign origin often stay unidentified due to the absence of documents, evidence and cooperation between law enforcement agencies [2]. When DNA or fingerprint databases are available (e.g., EU, North America), they strongly favor cross-border collaboration for those cases with potential international origin [3]. However, while DNA is considered the holy grail of identification, it is often inapplicable either because the DNA is too degraded for analysis, too costly or simply not useful because there is no known reference sample (e.g., family reference sample or the decedent’s DNA profile in a database) to compare the sample of the deceased individual to. It has been found that the more socially marginalized the family of the missing is, the more obstacles the family has to face to obtain information about the loved one’s whereabouts and to submit data to the appropriate authorities [4]. The administrative, technical, and cultural barriers that limit cooperation between law enforcement agencies are unlikely to disappear in the short term. There is therefore an urgent need to develop tools that provide robust leads to facilitate cross-border implications in the resolution of cold-cases [5].

Isotopic measurements are commonly expressed in delta notation:

δ(X,sample)=(Rsample/Rstandard1)

where R is n(heavy isotope)/n(light isotope) of element X in the sample [6]. Isotope delta measurements reported in this work are relative to the following standards: Vienna Standard Mean Ocean Water-Standard Light Antarctic Precipitation (VSMOW-SLAP) for hydrogen isotope delta (δ2H) values, Vienna Canyon Diablo Troilite (VCDT) for sulfur isotope delta (δ34S) values, Vienna Peedee Belemnite (VPDB) for carbon isotope delta (δ13C) values, and AIR for nitrogen isotope delta (δ15N) values. The isotope delta values are typically reported in permil (‰), with an extraneous multiplication factor of 1,000 sometimes appearing in the equation [6]. Stable isotopes are ubiquitous intrinsic markers with the potential to contribute new and actionable evidence in cold-cases, even those involving long-term unidentified individuals [717]. Isotopes compose all organic molecules and their abundances in human tissues inform about a person’s diet, health, or mobility history providing critical information about human remains [7, 10, 16, 1822]. Isotopic data from hair have been increasingly used in investigating cold-cases because hair is easily collected and resistant [23], and isotope data in hair are usually preserved post-mortem [24, 25]. While bulk isotope data are often used in forensic cases, sequential isotope profiles along human hair can provide chronological information about the diet and location changes of an unidentified decedent at approximately monthly resolutions as hair grows at ~10 mm/month, though not continuously [7, 9, 11, 12, 16, 2633]. Isotope data in hair could provide a key screening tool to identify those cold-cases that have a potential international outlook. However, the application of this isotope geolocation technology at the international scale requires the development of cross-border databases of isotope composition in hair and models predicting the isotope patterns in the tissue of interest.

Hydrogen, carbon, nitrogen, oxygen and sulfur are assimilated into hair keratin, and are resistant to post—mortem exposure [34, 35], and are thus the ideal candidate for multi-isotope geolocation of humans from their hair. The δ2H and oxygen isotope delta (δ18O) values in human hair primarily reflects the isotopic variability in drinking water which follows systematic spatiotemporal patterns along latitude, elevation, and continentality [33, 36].When an individual moves through the landscape, their hair incorporates the isotopic composition of the drinking water consumed along the way and can thus be used to reconstruct origin and movements [36]. Though limited in the geographic resolution of the information it can provide, δ2H measurements in human hair has been used for decades in isotope geolocation studies [e.g., 32] and data are available from many countries to develop continental-scale maps of isotope variations (or isoscapes) [37].

The δ34S value in human hair is primarily integrated from the isotopic composition of the food consumed, with little isotopic fractionation [38]. Plants and crops, at the base of food systems, uptake sulfur from two main sources: sulfur-containing bedrock minerals or inorganic fertilizers, which generally have low (more negative) but variable δ34S (−15 to 15 ‰), and marine aerosols which have high (more positive) δ34S values (>15 ‰) [39]. The mixing of these two isotopically distinct sulfur sources controls a large part of δ34S variations observed in ecosystems and ancient human societies with high δ34S values in coastal environments and progressively lower δ34S moving inland [3941]. In modern times, however, the supermarket human diet mixes products from multiple distant locations and sources, complicating the interpretation of δ34S values [38, 4245]. But even in modern societies, the δ34S values in resident human hair display some differences between regions [38, 4245]. For example, hair of North American residents have distinctively lower δ34S values than those of Asians or Europeans [38, 4245]. Bataille et al. (2020) further demonstrated that, within a country, systematic and predictable δ34S gradients were present [43]. The predicted δ34S values in hair of Canadian residents could unambiguously distinguish “true” residents from “snowbirds” traveling to the tropics to escape the Canadian winter.

Both δ13C and δ15N values in human hair are resistant to post-mortem exposure [34]. Both carbon and nitrogen come primarily from diet but can, in certain cases, provide geolocation information [46]. δ13C values in human hair primarily track dietary habits of an individual, particularly the proportion of C4 vs. C3 plant-derived products consumed [13, 23, 24, 46]. This is because C3 crops including beet, barley, rice, potato, or wheat have on average more negative δ13C values (~−25‰) [47] than C4 plants including corn, millet, and cane sugar (~−12‰) [47]. However, some δ13C trends, independent of personal dietary choices, also exist at the regional up to the global scales due to the distinct mix of C4 vs. C3 products in food systems [13]. For example, in North America, more C3 crops (e.g., wheat, barley, beats) are cultivated in the north and dry continental interiors whereas more C4 crops (e.g., corn, sugar cane) are cultivated in the south and coastal regions. This spatial organization of food systems leads to distinct δ13C values in human hair transmitted through the preferential consumption of local food [43, 44, 48]. Similar spatial patterns exist for the δ15N in hair at the regional to global scale due to differences in agricultural practises [13]. However, δ15N values in human hair are mostly controlled by dietary choices with more positive δ15N values for individuals eating more seafood in coastal regions [49].

The main objective of this study is to develop a framework to use multi-isotope geolocation from modern human hair to assist in solving international cold cases. We first analyze and/or compile δ2H and δ34S values from hair of residents of Canada, the United States (US) and Mexico. We use these databases to generate maps predicting δ2H and δ34S values in hair across North America. We then analyze the δ2H, δ34S, δ13C, and δ15N values in bulk hair of deceased undocumented border-crossers (UBCs) that died at the Mexico-US border and were later identified through the Pima County Office of the Medical Examiner. We compare the predicted geographic origins from bulk hair δ2H and δ34S analysis with their known origin. We finally run a sequential analysis of δ2H, δ34S, δ13C, and δ15N values along the length of a Canadian cold case. We assess the potential mobility of the individual and the possibility of cross-border traveling.

Materials and methods

Ethics statement

The Office of Research Ethics and Integrity of the University of Ottawa approved this research program under protocol number [5819]. Specifically, all sampling and analytical methods used to collect samples and information were in accordance with these regulations. Informed written consent was obtained from all subjects or from their legal guardians in accordance with, and maintained under, IRB regulations.

Isotopic analysis of residents’ hair samples from across North America

We analyzed or compiled 692 δ34S (S1 Database) and 846 δ2H (S2 Database) of hair samples from North American residents. Out of these samples, 649 sites have both δ2H and δ34S data (S3 Database). A key pre-requisite to compare isotope data in hair measured in different laboratories is to ensure that the data are reported on the same isotope delta scale.

To ensure comparability of δ34S between the various data sets compiled in the S1 Database, all results are traceable to the VCDT scale via IAEA-S-1, IAEA-S-2 and IAEA-S-3. The first set of data was obtained from 101 Mexican residents’ hair samples collected by Dr. Ammer in 2019 following protocols described in [44]. These samples had been analyzed for δ34S values at UC Davis Stable Isotope Facility in 2018, which used 6 internal reference materials (RMs) (taurine (−2.5 ± 0.2 ‰), hair (2.7 ± 0.2 ‰), whale baleen (17.5 ± 0.2 ‰), mahi-mahi muscle (19.5 ± 0.2 ‰), seaweed (20.8 ± 0.1 ‰) and cysteine (34.2 ± 0.2 ‰)), calibrated against IAEA-S-1, IAEA-S-2 and IAEA-S-3 [50]. The long-term standard deviation for δ34S analyses at UC Davis is 0.4 ‰. The second set of δ34S data was obtained from 60 American residents’ hair samples analyzed in Valenzuela et al [38]. The hair samples from this work were analyzed at the University of Utah in 2010 and calibrated to three internal RMs: zinc sulfide (−31.9 ± 0.3 ‰), ground feathers (16.7 ± 0.4 ‰) and silver sulfide (17.9 ± 0.3 ‰), and these internal RMs were calibrated using IAEA-S-1, IAEA-S-2 and IAEA-S-3. However, no USGS42 and USGS43 samples were analyzed with these samples in 2010. As a quality check, USGS42 and USGS43 were subsequently analyzed in 2022 at the University of Utah using the same analytical protocol as [38]. The mean and standard deviation of the measured δ34S values were 7.94 ± 0.06 ‰ (n = 5; USGS42) and 10.37 ± 0.13 ‰ (n = 5; USGS43). The mean values are within the one sigma uncertainty of the certified δ34S values for USGS42 (7.84 ± 0.25 ‰) and USGS43 (10.46 ± 0.22 ‰) [51], which were in turn calibrated against IAEA-S-1, IAEA-S-2 and IAEA-S-3, showing that this dataset is comparable with the first data set. The third set of δ34S data was obtained from 592 Canadian residents’ hair samples collected by Dr. Chartrand between 2007 and 2012, and 531 of these samples were analyzed at the Jan Veizer Stable Isotope Laboratory at the University of Ottawa for δ34S values [43]. Prior to analysis, hair was first washed in a series of three baths of 2:1 solution of chloroform:methanol (CHCl3:MeOH), then dried, ground to a powder using a Retsch ball mill, and stored in glass vials until analyzed. RMs and samples were weighed into tin capsules, and analyzed for δ34S using an Elementar Isotope Cube Elemental Analyser (Elementar, Germany) with a Conflow IV (Thermo, Germany) interfaced to the Delta+XP IRMS equipped with a special 6 collector sulfur cups array (SO-SO2 (Thermo, Germany). The EA method was optimized for SO2: both N2 and CO2 were unretained, and the SO2 was trapped and subsequently released to the IRMS. RMs used for calibration were IAEA-S-1 (−0.3 ‰), IAEA-S-2 (22.7 ‰) and IAEA-S-3 (−32.6 ‰). The values used for IAEA-S-2 and IAEA-S-3 were not the same as used in the other laboratories, however, these values are within the stated uncertainty of these RMs [50]. Analytical precision, based on the reproducibility of the USGS hair standards, is better than ± 0.3 ‰. The mean and standard deviation of the measured δ34S values were 7.58 ± 0.13 ‰ (n = 3; USGS42) and 10.22 ± 0.15 ‰ (n = 3; USGS43). Those values overlapped with the certified δ34S values and uncertainties for USGS42 and USGS43 [51]. Therefore, all three datasets were deemed to be comparable with each other with respect to δ34S measurements.

The δ2H values from the 846 hair samples in the S2 Database are traceable to the VSMOW-SLAP scale. The δ2H values were compiled from three datasets. The hair samples from Mexico [44] were analysed for δ2H values at the Jan Veizer Stable Isotope Laboratory. The δ2H of the non-exchangeable hydrogen of hair was determined using the comparative analysis approach described by Wassenaar and Hobson [52]. We performed hydrogen isotopic measurements on H2 gas derived from high-temperature (1400°C) flash pyrolysis (TCEA, Thermo, Germany) of 150 ± 10 μg hair subsamples and keratin standards Caribou Hoof Standard (CBS; −157.0 ± 0.9 ‰), Kudo Horn Standard (KHS; −35.3 ± 1.1 ‰) [53], USGS42 hair (−72.9 ± 2.2 ‰) and USGS43 hair (−44.0 ± 2.0 ‰) [54] loaded into silver capsules. The resultant separated H2 flowed to a Conflow IV (Thermo, Germany) interfaced to a Delta V Plus IRMS (Thermo, Germany) for δ2H analysis. The hair samples were calibrated to three reference materials: CBS, KHS and USGS43, while USGS42 was was used as a quality check. The measured values for USGS42 (−73.3 ± 0.8, N = 4) were within the reported value and uncertainty, thus verifying this approach. Analytical precision of these measurements is based on the reproducibility of USGS42, and is better than ± 2 ‰.

The δ2H data from Ehleringer et al. (2008) [33], and 535 Canadian hair samples (δ2H values measured in 2013, results available in a non-peer-reviewed report [55]), were analyzed using older protocols and calibration standards. To ensure comparability between these two datasets and the Mexican hair measured as described above, we transformed the hair δ2H values from Ehleringer et al and Chartrand et al using the function refTrans in the assignR package to place them on the same calibration scale (calibrated to CBS and KHS), as described in detail in [37]. Although the Mexican hair measured at the Jan Veizer Stable Isotope Laboratory was calibrated using USGS43 in addition to CBS and KHS, the difference in δ2H values between these calibrations (CBS, KHS, USGS43 vs CBS, KHS) was < 0.7 ‰, and is much less than the combined uncertainties due to measurement and rescaling (~± 3 ‰ [37]).

Deceased undocumented border crossers

The remains of deceased undocumented border crossers are often found by US Border Patrol, non-governmental institutions or private citizens in the rural regions along the Mexico-US border. Remains found throughout most of southern Arizona are then transported to the Pima County Office of the Medical Examiner (PCOME). As part of Dr. Ammer’s doctoral thesis, hair samples from four deceased undocumented border crossers were collected by pulling the hair with the roots (Table 1). These individuals were found relatively rapidly after their death (<5 weeks) limiting potential effect of decomposition on the isotope values [34]. Additionally, the individuals have been tentatively identified by authorities through various means and await final confirmation. Those identifications can be used, with caution, as a mean to validate isotope-based geographic assignments. All hair samples were approximately 4 cm long, thus representing the last few months of these individuals’ lives.

Table 1. Metadata on the four deceased undocumented border crossers.
UBC # Sex, Age at Death Country, State, City of Origin Border Patrol Corridor Found Surface Management Latitude/Longitude of recovery Body condition Post Mortem Interval
UBC #1 Male, 28 Mexico, Sinaloa, Jitzamuri Goldwater Cabeza Prieta National Wildlife Refuge 32.3475;-113.3066 (precise to within ca. 300ft./100m) Decomposed w/ focal skeletonization < 3 weeks
UBC #2 Male, 61 Mexico, Tlaxcala, Tlacatecpa San Miguel Tohono Oodham Nation 31.8997;-111.769884 (precise to within ca. 300ft./100m) Decomposed w/ focal skeletonization < 3 weeks
UBC #3 Male, 27 Mexico, Guerrero, Ayulta de los Libres San Miguel Tohono Oodham Nation 31.890533;-112.163068 (precise to within ca. 300ft./100m) Decomposed w/ focal skeletonization < 3 weeks
UBC #4 Male, 20 Guatemala, Huehuetenang, San Ildefonso San Miguel Tohono Oodham Nation 31.735367/-111.835983 (precise to within ca. 300ft./100m) Skeletonization w/ mummification < 5 weeks

It is assumed that the bulk analysis of isotopes in hair of those UBCs, by and large, reflect the region of last residence. However, the journey to the border can sometimes take up to months and in rare cases, even years as some reside close to the border awaiting their chance to cross. Consequently, the isotope delta values obtained from bulk hair is comprised of a mixture of isotopic signatures of water and food from both the home region and from the travelling locations. Further, some of the individuals might have crossed the border multiple times after living in the US and being deported. Based on the investigative work and contact with the potential family of the deceased, it is thought that UBC #2 lived in the US for a few months and was subsequently deported and died during his subsequent crossing back into the US. Consequently, these mean bulk hair isotope delta values are not necessarily compatible with the individuals’ regions of origin, and due to isotopic mixing, may also suggest stays in regions where they have never been. The metadata on the four deceased undocumented border crossers can be found in Table 1.

The bulk hair from the UBCs were prepared and analyzed for δ2H at the Jan Veizer Stable Isotope Laboratory using the methods described above (Table 2 and S1 Table). The δ13C, δ15N and δ34S of bulk hair were previously analyzed at UC Davis Stable Isotope Facility and the results are available in Saskia Ammer’s doctoral thesis [56].

Table 2. Isotope results of the four deceased undocumented border crossers.
UBC # δ2H, ‰ δ34S, ‰ δ13C, ‰ δ15N, ‰
UBC #1 −51.7 6.2 −15.2 10.4
UBC #2 −57.4 3.6 −15.2 8.5
UBC #3 −51.6 5.0 −13.6 9.5
UBC #4 −57.3 3.2 −13.6 9.1
Mr. Halifax    mean ± 1sd −60.4 ± 2.6 2.9 ± 0.8 −19.1 ± 0.5 9.1 ± 0.2
            range −57.2 to −69.3 0.9 to 4.2 −19.9 to −18.0 8.6 to 9.4
Canada        mean ± 1sd −86.3 ± 12.6 1.7 ± 1 −18.5 ± 0.6 9.2 ± 0.5
            range −60.2 to −120.5 −1.4 to 4.8 −20.3 to −16.7 7.6 to 10.8
US          mean ± 1sd −69.9 ± 13.2 3.4 ± 1.1 −17.2 ± 0.8 8.9 ± 0.4
            range −37.2 to −106.2 0.9 to 5.0 −21.6 to −14.7 6.5 to 9.7
Mexico        mean ± 1sd −59.2 ± 6 4.5 ± 1.1 −15.6 ± 1 9.2 ± 0.6
            range -42 to −74 2.7 to 8.0  −18.3 to −12.8 6.8 to 10.8

Canadian cold-case

In 2008, the RCMP Halifax Detachment sent a clump of dreadlock hair to the University of Ottawa from an unidentified individual recovered on October 8, 2004 near the Halifax city airport, Nova Scotia, Canada (hereafter called Mr. Halifax; RCMP Case File #2004–3757)). Rather than analyzing the bulk hair, a chronological isotopic profile was obtained following a procedure that was developed and tested in a previous study to align, combine and sequence multiple hair [36]. However, the hair of this individual was extremely brittle which made alignment challenging. Consequently, individual locks of hair were used as the basis for alignment, combination and segmentation. The hair was washed as described previously, and a total of twenty-seven 0.5 cm segmented hair samples, each representing about half a month timeframe, were prepared. Due to the difficulty in aligning the dreadlocks, the time uncertainty and averaging represented by the isotope time-series are probably higher than in previous studies causing, in this case, a more "elastic" timeframe than usual [9, 11, 36]. We analyzed each segment for δ2H and δ34S, as described previously (S2 Table). δ13C and δ15N were previously analyzed, and the results are available in a non-peer-reviewed report [55].

Isoscapes

Geographic probability maps compare the observed isotopic value for a biological tissue (e.g., hair) with that predicted by an isoscape [57].

Sulfur hair isoscape

Bataille et al. (2020) predicted the δ34S trends of modern human hair across Canada which showed a strong gradient from coast to more inland provinces reflecting the influence of local food systems [43]. Similar trends are observed in the δ34S in hair of residents of the US [38] and, to a lesser extent, Mexico [44]. Based on these observations, we used an existing framework to generate a δ34S isoscape from hair of North American residents [40, 43]. We assembled data on selected covariates that represent the main factors that impact variability in δ34S values, including country of residence (Canada, US or Mexico), geology (age), climate (e.g., precipitation, temperature), soil proprieties (e.g., pH, clay content, organic matter), aerosol deposition (e.g., sea salt) and distance to the coast. We resampled and re-projected all the selected environmental geospatial products into WGS84-Eckert IV 1km2 resolution and used the latitude and longitude of each sampling site to extract the local values for each raster. We combined the δ34S hair compilation and the extracted covariate values at each site into a regression matrix and used generalized linear model (GLM) regression kriging to predict δ34S in hair across North America using the “caret” package [58]. We first use the Akaike information criterion (AIC) to estimate prediction error and rank the relative quality of GLM models. We then used simple kriging to map the remaining variance of the residuals (S1 Script).

Hydrogen hair isoscape

We generated a δ2H isoscape for human hair following the procedure described in the assignR package [59]. The process requires a tissue-specific isotope dataset of known-origin individuals to develop a transfer function between an isoscape and the tissue of interest. We used the compiled dataset of δ2H in hair combining the δ2H in hair of Canadian and Mexican residents analyzed in this study with published δ2H in hair of US residents (rescaled as described previously) and incorporated this dataset to the known origin sample database in the assignR package. We calibrated the hair δ2H isoscape using the calRaster function in the assignR package.

Probability maps

We used the metrics generated by the QA function in assignR to compare the quality of probability maps generated from each isoscape. We then used the continuous-surface probability framework from the assignR package [59] (i.e., pdRaster function) to estimate the most likely locations of origin of each individual from the bulk hair single (δ2H or δ34S) and dual (δ2H and δ34S) isotope data from deceased undocumented border crossers and from each segment of the Canadian cold-case (S2 Script).

Results

Sulfur isoscape

The 692 compiled and analysed δ34S data from hair of North American residents are normally distributed (Shapiro Test, p-value<0.05). δ34S values range from −1.4‰ to 8‰ and average 2.3 ‰. Some geographical regions of North America are underrepresented in the dataset: the eastern US, western US and southern US.

The best GLM model (AIC = 556) used latitude, longitude, country of origin, and distance to the coast as the dominant predictors of the δ34S values (Fig 1A). This GLM accounted for 66% of the variance with a Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) of 0.79‰ (Fig 1A). After kriging the residual values using a Gaussian variogram model (Fig 1B), the resulting regression kriging model accounts for 77% of the variance with a RMSE of 0.65 ‰ (Fig 1C). The value of 0.65‰ represents ~8% of the full range of measured δ34S values over the dataset. Latitude and country of origin are the strongest predictor of δ34S values. Going north to south, Canadian samples, on average, have lower δ34S values than US citizens and Mexicans. Distance to the coast and longitude are also key predictors with individuals living close to the coast having higher δ34S values than those living more inland.

Fig 1. Sulfur isoscape generated by regression kriging.

Fig 1

A: Cross-validation between measured and predicted δ34S values using a Generalized Linear Model (GLM) regression using distance to the coast, longitude, latitude and country as predictors. RMSE = Root Mean Square Error. The red line is the best-fit linear model. δ34Shair-obs values correspond to the measured δ34S values in human hair B: Variogram of the GLM regression residuals. Red line is a Gaussian model fit using simple kriging. C. Cross-validation between measured and predicted δ34S values using GLM regression kriging. RMSE = Root Mean Square Error. The red line is the best-fit linear model. δ34Shair-obs values correspond to the measured δ34S values in human hair D. Map of δ34S in hair of resident humans across North America with locations of collection sites from residents (including individuals from this study as well as published data) [38, 44]. Coastlines and country boundaries are from http://www.naturalearthdata.com/. The R scripts to generate these figures are available in S1 and S2 Scripts. Data are available in S1 Database.

The regression kriging produced a δ34S isoscape in human hair that displays strong spatial patterns associated with country and distance to the coast. Sites located in coastal North America have higher δ34S values (Fig 1D). The highest values are found in western coastal Mexico. Conversely, sites located in interior regions of Canada have the lowest δ34S values.

Hydrogen isoscape

The δ2H data compiled from 846 samples of hair from North American residents are normally distributed (Shapiro Test, p-value<0.05). δ2H values range from −119.8 ‰ to −37.4 ‰, with an average of −79 ‰. The produced δ2H isoscape in human hair displays strong spatial patterns (Fig 2A), with a strong correlation between δ2H values in hair and δ2H values in precipitation (Fig 2B).

Fig 2. Hydrogen isoscape generated in the assignR package.

Fig 2

A: Map of δ2H in hair of residents from North America with locations of collection sites from residents (including individuals from this study as well as published data) [33, 37, 55]. Coastlines and country boundaries are from http://www.naturalearthdata.com/. B: Calibration equation between modeled δ2H in precipitation and hair from North American residents (including individuals from this study as well as published data). The R script to generate these figures is available in S2 Script. Data are available in S2 Database.

Isotope-based probability map results

Quality evaluation of isotope-based probability maps

Quality metrics for the single- and dual-isotope probabilistic maps suggest strong potential for this method to provide accurate and specific information on the origin of human hair samples, and highlight the added power of the dual-isotope method (Fig 3). The area-exclusion plot (Fig 3A) shows that the spatial distribution of posterior probabilities is very uneven, particularly for the dual-isotope analysis. This implies that the isotopic information strongly discriminates between more- and less-likely regions and could be used to eliminate large parts of North America as a potential origin for a sample at a high level of certainty. The validation plot (Fig 3B) shows that, for hydrogen isotopes, the proportion of samples correctly assigned to origin mostly scales as expected with the probability threshold adopted for assignment, implying that this isoscape and its uncertainty appropriately represent the human hair data. The validation plots show slight deviation from the expected proportion of samples correctly assigned for δ34S and for dual isotopes (Fig 3B). For δ34S the proportion of stations included are overestimated relative to the probability quantile likely indicating that the modeled uncertainty is lower than represented in the isoscape. Surprisingly, however, the dual isotope show the opposite trend with the proportion of validation stations underestimated relative to the probability quantile indicating that the model misses the true origin of known-origin individuals more than expected (Fig 3B). This could reflect some bias in the sulfur isotope predictions associated with the regression kriging approach and/or the validation approach. This bias would be accounted for in the univariate uncertainty but leads to incorrect predictions in the multivariate case. With larger datasets with more complete spatial coverage, it might be useful to test new modeling approaches to predict δ34S variations (e.g., random forest regression). The assignment power plot (Fig 3C) uses the known origin data to test the ability of the method to correctly assign sample origin across a range of exclusion area thresholds. It shows that both single- and dual-isotope analyses have high power, though the δ2H and dual-isotope method give substantial increase in power across all area thresholds relative to δ34S. Finally, the odds ratios for the known locations of sample origin are substantially higher than the random value for all methods, but are approximately 5 time greater for the dual-isotope method than either single-isotope analysis (Fig 3D). Collectively, these results support the validity of the isoscapes as a template for interpreting human hair isotope data and suggest that assignments made using the isotopic data, particularly in the case of dual-isotope analysis, can provide accurate and specific information on the geographic origin of samples.

Fig 3. Quality evaluation of hydrogen, sulfur and dual-isotope probability maps.

Fig 3

Plots were generated using the QA function in the assignR package. A. Proportion of the study area excluded from the assignments as a function of probability threshold. Higher values indicate a potential for more specific assignments. B. Proportion of validation samples correctly assigned as a function of the probability threshold. If accurate posterior probabilities are estimated for each sample, these values should fall along the 1:1 line. C. Proportion of validation samples correctly assigned as a function of the area quantile, providing an integrated measure of assignment sensitivity. D. The distribution of odds ratios for the known origins of the validation samples relative to random quantifies the strength of isotopic support for one location relative to another. Higher odds ratios indicate more specific assignments. The R script to generate these figures is available in S2 Script.

Deceased undocumented border crossers

The hair samples of the deceased undocumented border crossers were bulk-analyzed, rather than segmented, and represent approximately the last 4 months of life of the individual. Table 2 presents the δ2H, δ34S, δ13C and δ15N isotope values (average of three measurements) for each of the four individuals. The δ13C and δ15N isotope values of the four UBCs were compared to the values previously published for residents of North America [38, 43, 44].

Based on the available δ15N data from North America, an origin from the US can be excluded for UBC #1, and all other individuals fall within the ranges reported for all three countries (Table 2). The δ13C values reported for UBC #3 and UBC #4 would exclude both the US and Canada as potential countries of origin (Table 2). The δ13C values for UBC #1 and UBC #2 fall within the higher end of the range of values found in the US and Canada but would not allow for a clear distinction. The δ34S values of UBC #2 and UBC #4 fall within the ranges reported for all three countries, while UBC #1 and UBC #3’s values are too positive to have originated from Canada (Table 2).

The δ2H values of all UBCs fall within the ranges reported for Mexico and the US but are not compatible with Canada (Table 2).

We generated single and dual isotopes probabilistic maps of provenance for each individual and compared them to the location of origin tentatively identified by authorities (Fig 4). UBC #1 probably originated from Jitzamuri, Sinaloa, Mexico. Only a few coastal regions of western Mexico are compatible with the isotope data from this individual’s hair. Among those, the region around Jitzamuri shows high probability. UBC #2 probably originates from Tlacatecpa, Tlaxcala, Mexico. The dual isotopes probabilistic maps show low probability of origin in the purported region of origin except for some coastal regions along the Gulf of Mexico. Probable regions of origin include most of the southeastern US, and coastal region around the Gulf of Mexico. UBC #3 probably originates from Ayulta de los Libres, Guerrero, Mexico. The dual isotope probabilistic maps show a high probability from this city but are not very specific as all the western coast of Mexico shows a high probability of origin with highest probability in northwestern Mexico. Most of northern Mexico and the southern US regions are also compatible with the isotope values of this individual. UBC #4 most likely originated from San Ildefonso, Huehuetenango, Guatemala. Unfortunately, our map does not extend to Guatemala. The most probable regions of potential origin within our study areas is the south-central US along the Mississippi river valley.

Fig 4. Probabilistic maps of provenance for deceased undocumented border crossers estimated from δ2H and δ34S values for bulk hair.

Fig 4

Locations where the human remains were discovered, are indicated by white circles. Locations where the remains are thought to have originated, based in independent evidence, are marked with red circles. Colours on the maps depict the predicted probability of origin based on isotopic evidence. Coastlines and country boundaries are from http://www.naturalearthdata.com/.The R script to generate these figures are available in S2 Script. Data are available in S1 Table and Table 2.

Halifax cold-case results

We compare the average δ13C (−19.1 ± 0.5 ‰) and δ15N (9.1 ± 0.3 ‰) values of Mr. Halifax’s hair with previously published δ13C and δ15N values of North American residents [38, 43, 44] (Table 2). The δ15N values are similar to the δ15N values for Canada, the US and Mexico. The profile shows two main zones of stable δ15N values with values around 9.3 ‰ between 5 and 14 months PTD and a shift to lower values 5 months PTD (Fig 5A). The average hair δ13C value from Mr. Halifax is most similar to the average bulk hair δ13C values of Canada’s western and central provinces including western Ontario, Manitoba, and the Prairies. However, the δ13C values are higher between 5–12 months PTD and would be compatible with eastern Canada or the eastern US during this interval (Fig 5B). The δ2H values of Mr. Halifax’s hair ranged between −57.2 ‰ and −69.3 ‰. Compared to the δ2H values of North American residents, Mr. Halifax’s hair δ2H value is most similar to the δ2H values of hair from the eastern Canadian provinces, including Ontario, Quebec, the Maritimes, and Newfoundland (Table 2). Except for one very low value at 6 months PTD, the δ2H values from Mr. Halifax’s hair become more positive between 5–12 months PTD (Fig 5C).

Fig 5. Isotope values in Mr. Halifax’s hair profile (complete data per hair segment available in the S2 Table).

Fig 5

A. δ15N values; B. δ13C values; C. δ2H values; D. δ34S values. Dashed lines define isotopic lines used for dual isotope probability maps in Fig 6. The R script to generate this figure is available as S2 Script. Data are available in S2 Table. Due to the difficulty in aligning the hair of Mr. Halifax, the timeframe represented by hair length is more elastic than usual [11, 36]. We used an approximate hair growth rate of 1cm per month for visualization.

We used these isotope values to generate single and dual-isotope probabilistic geographic maps from each segment of hair. We summarized in Fig 6 the map results by showing 6 individual segments corresponding to dotted lines in Fig 5. Dual δ2H and δ34S values from the base of the hair (1.5 cm, 3.5 cm and 5.5 cm) are compatible with the Canadian urban centers around the Great Lakes from Winnipeg to Sudbury and with US Midwest cities along the Mississippi river valley. At 8.5 months PTD, dual-isotope values are compatible with the southeastern US including Florida but are not compatible with regions in Canada. At 13.5 months PTD, the dual-isotope values are compatible with the Canadian Maritimes including Nova Scotia and Newfoundland but also with a broad region in the southeastern and southern US.

Fig 6. Isotope-based probabilistic maps of provenance for Mr. Halifax estimated from δ2H and δ34S values for different representative hair segments.

Fig 6

Locations where the human remains were discovered (Halifax, NS) are indicated by red points. Colours on the maps depict the predicted probability of origin. Coastlines and country boundaries are from http://www.naturalearthdata.com/.The R script to generate these figures is available in S2 Script. The data are available in S2 Table.

Discussion

Isocapes

Since the seminal work of Ehleringer et al. [33], country-scale studies analyzing isotopes in human hair of residents and/or tap water have become increasingly available providing the basis to develop isoscapes in many regions of the world [33, 4345, 6063]. Efforts to harmonize isotope analyses have also facilitated the integration of data generated from different laboratories, countries and times [37].

Sulfur isoscape

As observed in previous studies [38, 42, 43, 45], the δ34S values in human hair are distinct for different countries across North America. Average δ34S values are 1.7 ± 1.0 ‰, 3.4 ± 1.1 ‰, and 4.4 ± 1.0 ‰ for Canada, the US, and Mexico, respectively. Different countries have different food production systems, supply chains and dietary habits that give rise to distinct baseline δ34S values [43]. Within countries, particularly Canada and the US, we observe a trend between δ34S hair values and distance to the coast. δ34S in North American crops should reflect the mixture of isotopically light sulfates from the soil solution, and isotopically heavy marine aerosols [38, 43, 45, 64, 65]. As food systems become more distant from the coast, bedrock sulfur or anthropogenic sources, which tend to have lower values, dominate decreasing δ34S values. The type of underlying geology can also influence the δ34S values of food systems locally [35]. For example, the presence of volcaniclastic sediments with low δ34S values in central Mexico or the low δ34S values in igneous and sedimentary rocks in interior Canada and USA likely contribute to the low δ34S values in local food systems [38, 43, 56]. The δ34S variability in hair from North American residents follows the isotopic pattern in food systems likely because customers obtain a large part of their sulfur from locally sourced high-protein food items (e.g., meat, yogurt, cheese, eggs). Even though North American residents have a supermarket diet and homogenized dietary habits, the regional patterns in δ34S in ecosystems incorporated into human hair highlights the importance of regional food supply in sulfur intake. Eating locally has become a more powerful movement in the last decade where locally produced foods have become more available and prized. The difference in sea salt aerosol deposition between North American countries might also explain their distinct average hair δ34S values and the trend in δ34S values with latitude. Mexico receives more marine sulfate than the US and Canada, as on average populations are closer to the coast in Mexico. The δ34S isoscape developed from this regression kriging approach shows excellent predictive power and strong spatial patterns that are promising for solving cross-border cold cases.

Hydrogen isoscape

As observed in previous studies [33, 60, 66], the δ2H values in human hair follow a continuous gradient across North America (Fig 2A). When δ2H hair data are corrected to be on the same reference scale [37], we can account for 80% of the variations in δ2H hair across North America using only the isotopic signal from modeled precipitation (Fig 2B). This strong relationship between local water and hair δ2H values reflects the local nature of water sources in human societies [33]. Drinking water typically has local to regional origin depending on the source [6163]. Similarly, most beverages are derived from local to regional water sources including bottled water, coffee, tea or even soft drinks and milk [67]. Some of the residuals between precipitation and δ2H values in hair likely derive from differences between the δ2H of local precipitation and that of the consumed tap water. Tap water from different sources at one location might have different isotopic compositions. For example, tap water from shallow groundwater usually reflects an average of local precipitation δ2H [68] whereas tap water from deep aquifers, lakes or river waters might have more distant or fossil sources (e.g., glacial water) and/or might have been evaporated [61, 68]. This isotopic difference between water sources is exacerbated at the continental scale because different countries and regions rely on different water sources. For example, Mexico supplies the majority of its tap water from groundwater sources whereas Canada and the US primarily use surface water sources. Differences in dietary choices (i.e., food type), tap water sources and beverage consumption between participants living in the same area can also contribute to distinct hair δ2H values at a single location [67]. Many other factors can influence the relationship between δ2H in precipitation and in human hair, including the consumption of imported drinks with non-local δ2H values, the presence of non-local study participants, or uncertainties in the predicted precipitation δ2H values. Despite those limitations, the continental δ2H isoscape shows excellent predictive power and strong spatial patterns that are promising for solving cross-border cold cases.

Multi-isotope provenancing in international forensic studies

Stable isotopes have shown promise for provenancing unidentified decedents from cold-cases investigated by local jurisdictions [7, 9, 17, 21, 6971] or to identify remains recovered from the sites of past wars and conflicts [8, 16, 40, 41, 69, 72]. However, the development of international isotope baselines from modern residents offers new possibilities to use isotopes for contemporary cross-border forensic applications [8, 10, 72]. In our globalized world, many forensic questions have international components. Through two case studies, we show that using dual δ2H and δ34S provenancing provides critical information to facilitate international forensic collaborations.

A lack of documents, fingerprints, dental and medical records, and family members to obtain family reference samples or antemortem samples for DNA comparison all present a challenge to identify UBCs at the US-Mexico border. These difficulties are further enhanced by the inability to narrow down the search area to more probable options. The four UBCs studied here were tentatively identified using other information, and serves as a basis to test the use of dual-isotope provenancing for identification purposes. Out of the 4 UBCs studied, none showed a local origin in the western US. All the individuals have dual-isotope values that place their origin in more southern regions of North America. As we only analysed isotope values in bulk hair for these individuals, we were not expecting precise provenancing because the isotope data in hair could reflect a mixture of isotope values from their last location of reference with isotope values inherited during their journey to the border. Specifically, the durations of travel can vary greatly, from merely days to up to months, and in rare cases even years. This largely depends on the availability of funds, previous extortions through cartels, previous (negative) experiences, place of origin, health status and, among many other variables personal decision-making. Even with this temporal resolution limitation, the dual-isotope data show promising results for these cases. Both UBC #1 and UBC #4 show high isotope-based probabilities in the city/region of inferred origin of the UBCs. UBC #2 likely resided for several months in the U.S. before being deported, re-entering and perishing in the US, explaining the strong signal from the southern US. The origin of UBC #3 could not be properly inferred because our predictions did not include Guatemala. Analyzing isotope data sequentially along the hair and from other tissues (e.g., teeth and bones) could thus substantially help reconstruct a more detailed travel history for those individuals. In contrast to hair which forms a few months prior to death, bones and teeth can preserve the isotope signature of locations where the individual resided earlier in the individuals’ life. Those tissues could be a better recorder than hair to identify the place of residence or birth of these individuals.

While Mr. Halifax was found near an international airport, the forensic inquiry around this cold-case has remained national. The dual δ2H and δ34S measurements reveal that this individual traveled across large distances in the year prior to his death. Earlier in his life (i.e., 14 to 5 months PTD), the dual-isotope provenancing indicated travel and/or residence in the southeastern US. Dual isotope probability maps between 14 to 12 months PTD show some potential Canadian origin in coastal Nova Scotia or Newfoundland but are mostly compatible with the southeastern US. During the 12 to 5 months PTD interval, some probability maps of provenance are incompatible with any region in Canada. During the few months PTD, the individual lived either somewhere in eastern Canada, very likely in a municipality along the shore of the Great Lakes such as Sudbury, Sault-Saint-Marie or Winnipeg, or in the northern US Midwest region. The carbon isotope data further support the proposed dual-isotope geographic assignments. While it is challenging to use carbon isotope for producing probabilistic maps of provenance because of fractionation associated with individual physiology and diet, the δ13C trend within a hair profile does record mobility [36]. In the case of Mr. Halifax, carbon isotope trends validate the dual δ2H and δ34S geographic assignments. Between 14 to 5 months PTD, higher δ13C values earlier in life culminating at −18 ‰ are more typical of the US. Low δ13C values (~ −19 ‰) a few months PTD are compatible with regions of Ontario around the Great Lakes (i.e., western Ontario and Manitoba). Even the δ15N values, which are usually not sensitive to mobility within a given country [36], appear to record a shift from higher to lower δ15N values around 5 months PTD. The higher δ15N values a year PTD possibly reflect a shift in dietary habits between places of residence (e.g., more fish consumption in the southeastern US leading to higher δ15N values).

This study demonstrates the potential of using multi-isotope analyses, and isotope-based geographic assignments as a rapid response tool in international cold-cases. The power of isotope provenancing increases several folds when multiple isotope systems are combined. The precision of dual-isotope results varies, but in some cases, the potential areas of origin that are identified are very specific. Reconstructing the movement history and origin with isotope data provide critical leads to law enforcement agencies for cross-border collaborations. The case of UBC #4 demonstrates the importance of large-scale and continuous isoscapes that are as spatially extensive as possible. This not only applies to deceased undocumented border crossers at the US-Mexico border but also to any other case of unidentified human remains with a potentially international outlook. Incomplete isoscapes bear the risk of exclusion or inclusion of regions that may otherwise be ex/included. This can severely affect the investigative work and thus slow down the identification process.

Conclusion

In this work, we demonstrated that developing continental-scale isoscapes for δ2H and δ34S measurements in hair are feasible and yields accurate models with strong predictive potential for isotope-based provenancing. As more isotope data from human tissues are published and integrated, those models will become increasingly accurate and useful for provenance. These isoscapes are particularly useful to provide evidence for cross-border mobility in unidentified individuals. Through a first case study, we show that probabilistic maps of provenance based on the results of δ2H and δ34S analyses of bulk hair samples taken from deceased UBCs found at the US-Mexico border could help to identify their country/region of origin. Through a second case study, we show that sequential multi-isotope analysis along a hair strand combined with continuous probabilistic maps of provenance yields a detailed travel history of an unidentified individual between eastern Canada and the southeastern US. This type of evidence indicating international travel is essential to engage collaborations between law enforcement agencies. Now that the isotope baselines are established, we argue that multi-isotope profiling in human hair combined with isotope-based probabilistic provenancing provide a rapid, practical, inexpensive and powerful tool to screen current unknown deceased and cold-cases for potential international leads.

Supporting information

S1 Database. Sulfur isotope compilation from hair of North American residents.

Database containing the compiled and newly generated sulfur isotope data in hair of residents from North America. The database is formatted for compatibility with the accompanying R scripts and assignR package suborigin() function [59]. See suborigin() documentation for column names.

(CSV)

S2 Database. Hydrogen isotope compilation from hair of North American residents.

Database containing the compiled and newly generated hydrogen isotope data in hair of residents from North America. The database is formatted for compatibility with the accompanying R scripts and assignR package suborigin() function [59]. See suborigin() documentation for column names.

(CSV)

S3 Database. Combined hydrogen and sulfur isotope compilation from hair of North American residents.

Database containing all the samples with combined hydrogen and sulfur isotope data in hair of residents from North America. The database is formatted for compatibility with the accompanying R scripts and assignR package suborigin() function [59]. See suborigin() documentation for column names.

(CSV)

S1 Table. Sequential isotope data from Mr. Halifax.

Columns include the sample ID, hair length segment and corresponding isotope values and analytical precision for sulfur isotopes (“s34”, “s34.SD”), hydrogen isotopes (“d2H”, “d2H.SD”), carbon isotopes (“d13C”, “d13C.SD”) and nitrogen isotopes (“d15N”, “d15N.SD”) The table is formatted for compatibility with the accompanying R scripts.

(CSV)

S2 Table. Individual isotope data from UBC individuals.

Columns include the sample ID and corresponding isotope values and analytical precision for sulfur isotopes (“s34”, “s34.SD”) and hydrogen isotopes (“d2H”, “d2H.SD”). The table is formatted for compatibility with the accompanying R scripts.

(CSV)

S1 Script. R script to generate sulfur isoscape in hair across North America.

(R)

S2 Script. R script to generate test the quality of sulfur and hydrogen isoscapes in hair across North America and to generate probabilistic maps.

(R)

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the anonymous hair donors for supporting this research. We also thank Paul Middlestead and the University of Ottawa’s Jan Veizer Stable Isotope Laboratory for assistance in stable isotope analysis, and two anonymous reviewers and the editor for helpful comments.

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

This project was supported by the Chemical, Biological, Radiological-Nuclear and Explosives Research and Technology Initiative [Award No. CRTI08-0116RD] awarded to G.S.J., the Canadian Security and Safety Program Targeted Investment [CSSP-2018-TI-2385] awarded to C.P.B. This research was further supported by the American Academy of Forensic Sciences (AAFS) Humanitarian and Human Rights Resource Center (HHRRC) grant, supported by the AAFS and National Institute of Justice (U.S. Department of Justice), awarded to S.T.M.A. Work by G.J.B. was supported by US National Science Foundation grants DBI-1565128 and DBI-1759730.

References

  • 1.Barnett M, Coleman L. Designing police: Interpol and the study of change in international organizations. Int Stud Q. 2005;49. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2478.2005.00380.x [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Haynes DF. Used, abused, arrested and deported: Extending immigration benefits to protect the victims of trafficking and to secure the prosecution of traffickers. Hum Rights Q. 2004;26. doi: 10.1353/hrq.2004.0021 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Toom V, Granja R, Ludwig A. The Prüm Decisions as an Aspirational regime: Reviewing a Decade of Cross-Border Exchange and Comparison of Forensic DNA Data. Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2019;41. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2019.03.023 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Reineke RC. Naming the Dead: Identification and Ambiguity Along the U.S.-Mexico Border. The University of Arizona. 2016. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Goad G. Expanding Humanitarian Forensic Action: An Approach to U.S. Cold Cases. Forensic Anthropol. 2020;3. doi: 10.5744/fa.2020.1006 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Coplen TB. Guidelines and recommended terms for expression of stable-isotope-ratio and gas-ratio measurement results. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2011;25: 2538–2560. doi: 10.1002/rcm.5129 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Meier-Augenstein W, Fraser I. Forensic isotope analysis leads to identification of a mutilated murder victim. Sci Justice. 2008;48: 153–159. doi: 10.1016/j.scijus.2007.10.010 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Chesson LA, Meier‐Augenstein W, Berg GE, Bataille CP, Bartelink EJ, Richards MP. Basic principles of stable isotope analysis in humanitarian forensic science. Forensic Science and Humanitarian Action. 2020. doi: 10.1002/9781119482062.ch20 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Fauberteau AE, Chartrand MMG, Hu L, St-Jean G, Bataille CP. Investigating a cold case using high-resolution multi-isotope profiles in human hair. Forensic Chem. 2021;22. doi: 10.1016/j.forc.2020.100300 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kramer RT, Bartelink EJ, Herrmann NP, Bataille CP, Spradley K. Application of stable isotopes and geostatistics to infer region of geographical origin for deceased undocumented Latin American migrants. Forensic Science and Humanitarian Action. 2020. doi: 10.1002/9781119482062.ch27 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Lehn C, Kalbhenn EM, Rossmann A, Graw M. Revealing details of stays abroad by sequential stable isotope analyses along human hair strands. Int J Legal Med. 2019;133: 935–947. doi: 10.1007/s00414-018-1866-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Lehn C, Rossmann A, Graw M. Provenancing of unidentified corpses by stable isotope techniques—presentation of case studies. Sci Justice. 2015;55: 72–88. doi: 10.1016/j.scijus.2014.10.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Hülsemann F, Lehn C, Schneider S, Jackson G, Hill S, Rossmann A, et al. Global spatial distributions of nitrogen and carbon stable isotope ratios of modern human hair. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2015;29: 2111–2121. doi: 10.1002/rcm.7370 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Meier‐Augenstein W. Forensic stable isotope signatures: Comparing, geo‐locating, detecting linkage. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Forensic Sci. 2019;1: e1339. doi: 10.1002/wfs2.1339 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Bartelink EJ, Chesson LA. Recent applications of isotope analysis to forensic anthropology. Forensic Sci Res. 2019;4: 29–44. doi: 10.1080/20961790.2018.1549527 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Font L, Van Der Peijl G, Van Leuwen C, Van Wetten I, Davies GR. Identification of the geographical place of origin of an unidentified individual by multi-isotope analysis. Sci Justice. 2015;55: 34–42. doi: 10.1016/j.scijus.2014.06.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Lehn C, Rossmann A, Graw M, Davies GR. Identification of a female murder victim found in Burgenland, Austria in 1993. Forensic Sci Res. 2021; doi: 10.1080/20961790.2021.1924425 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Bol R, Marsh J, Heaton THE. Multiple stable isotope (18O, 13C, 15N and 24S) analysis of human hair to identify the recent migrants to a rural community in SW England. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2007;21: 2951–2954. doi: 10.1002/rcm.3168 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Emery M V., Prowse TL, Elford S, Schwarcz HP, Brickley M. Geographic origins of a War of 1812 skeletal sample integrating oxygen and strontium isotopes with GIS-based multi-criteria evaluation analysis. J Archaeol Sci Reports. Elsevier; 2017;14: 323–331. doi: 10.1016/J.JASREP.2017.06.007 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Vautour G, Poirier A, Widory D. Tracking mobility using human hair: What can we learn from lead and strontium isotopes? Sci Justice. Elsevier; 2015;55: 63–71. doi: 10.1016/j.scijus.2014.10.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Font L, Jonker G, Van Aalderen PA, Schiltmans EF, Davies GR. Provenancing of unidentified World War II casualties: Application of strontium and oxygen isotope analysis in tooth enamel. Sci Justice. 2015;55: 10–17. doi: 10.1016/j.scijus.2014.02.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Rodiouchkina K, Rodushkin I, Goderis S, Vanhaecke F. Longitudinal isotope ratio variations in human hair and nails. Sci Total Environ. 2022;808. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152059 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Petzke KJ, Boeing H, Metges CC. Choice of dietary protein of vegetarians and omnivores is reflected in their hair protein 13C and 15N abundance. Rapid Communications in Mass Spectrometry. 2005. pp. 1392–1400. doi: 10.1002/rcm.1925 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Macko SA, Engel MH, Andrusevich V, Lubec G, O’Connell TC, Hedges REMM. Documenting the diet in ancient human populations through stable isotope analysis of hair. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci. 1999;354: 65–76. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1999.0360 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Kootker LM, von Holstein ICC, Broeders J, Wescott DJ, Davies GR, Mickleburgh HL. The effects of decomposition and environment on antemortem H-Pb-Sr isotope compositions and degradation of human scalp hair: Actualistic taphonomic observations. Forensic Sci Int. 2020;312. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110336 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Meier-Augenstein W, Kemp HF. Stable Isotope Analysis: Hair and Nails. In: Jamieson A, Moenssens A, editors. Wiley Encyclopedia of Forensic Science. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2012. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Meier-Augenstein W. Stable Isotope Forensics: Methods and Forensic Applications of Stable Isotope Analysis. Developments in forensic science. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2018. [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Remien CH, Adler FR, Chesson LA, Valenzuela LO, Ehleringer JR, Cerling TE. Deconvolution of isotope signals from bundles of multiple hairs. Oecologia. 2014;175: 781–789. doi: 10.1007/s00442-014-2945-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Chau TH, Tipple BJ, Hu L, Fernandez DP, Cerling TE, Ehleringer JR, et al. Reconstruction of travel history using coupled δ18O and 87Sr/86Sr measurements of hair. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2017;31: 583–589. doi: 10.1002/rcm.7822 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Fraser I, Meier-Augenstein W, Kalin RM. Stable isotope analysis of human hair and nail samples: The effects of storage on samples. J Forensic Sci. 2008;53: 95–99. doi: 10.1111/j.1556-4029.2007.00607.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Lugli F, Cipriani A, Tavaglione V, Traversari M, Benazzi S. Transhumance pastoralism of Roccapelago (Modena, Italy) early-modern individuals: Inferences from Sr isotopes of hair strands. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2018;167: 470–483. doi: 10.1002/ajpa.23643 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Codron J, Kirkman K, Duffy KJ, Sponheimer M, Lee-thorp JA, Ganswindt A, et al. free-ranging African elephants (Loxodonta africana) reveal dietary niche differences within populations. Can J Zool. 2013;91: 124–134. doi: 10.1139/cjz-2012-0155 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Ehleringer JR, Bowen GJ, Chesson LA, West AG, Podlesak DW, Cerling TE. Hydrogen and oxygen isotope ratios in human hair are related to geography. Proc Natl Acad Sci. National Academy of Sciences; 2008;105: 2788–2793. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0712228105 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Saul TB, Chesson LA, Steadman DW, Gordon GW. Considerations for Stable Isotope Analysis of Human Hair: The Impact of Postmortem Environmental Exposure. Forensic Anthropol. 2021;4: 35. Available: https://link.gale.com/apps/doc/A689947949/AONE?u=anon~cbf1a205&sid=googleScholar&xid=df0bee2a [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Nehlich O. The application of sulphur isotope analyses in archaeological research: A review. Earth-Science Rev. 2015;142: 1–17. doi: 10.1016/j.earscirev.2014.12.002 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Hu L, Chartrand MMG, St-Jean G, Lopes M, Bataille CP. Assessing the Reliability of Mobility Interpretation From a Multi-Isotope Hair Profile on a Traveling Individual. Front Ecol Evol. 2020;8: 302. doi: 10.3389/fevo.2020.568943 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Magozzi S, Bataille CP, Hobson KA, Wunder MB, Howa JD, Contina A, et al. Calibration chain transformation improves the comparability of organic hydrogen and oxygen stable isotope data. Methods Ecol Evol. 2021; doi: 10.1111/2041-210X.13556 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Valenzuela LO, Chesson LA, O’Grady SP, Cerling TE, Ehleringer JR. Spatial distributions of carbon, nitrogen and sulfur isotope ratios in human hair across the central United States. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2011;25: 861–868. doi: 10.1002/rcm.4934 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Tcherkez G, Tea I. 32S/34S isotope fractionation in plant sulphur metabolism. New Phytol. 2013;200: 44–53. doi: 10.1111/nph.12314 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Bataille CP, Jaouen K, Milano S, Trost M, Steinbrenner S, Crubézy É, et al. Triple sulfur-oxygen-strontium isotopes probabilistic geographic assignment of archaeological remains using a novel sulfur isoscape of western Europe. PLoS One. Public Library of Science; 2021;16: e0250383. Available: doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250383 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Colleter R, Bataille CP, Dabernat H, Pichot D, Hamon P, Duchesne S, et al. The last battle of Anne of Brittany: Solving mass grave through an interdisciplinary approach (paleopathology, biological anthropology, history, multiple isotopes and radiocarbon dating). PLoS One. Public Library of Science; 2021;16: e0248086. Available: doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248086 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Valenzuela LO, Chesson LA, Bowen GJ, Cerling TE, Ehleringer JR. Dietary heterogeneity among western industrialized countries reflected in the stable isotope ratios of human hair. PLoS One. 2012;7: e34234. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0034234 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Bataille CP, Chartrand MMG, Raposo F, St-Jean G. Assessing geographic controls of hair isotopic variability in human populations: A case-study in Canada. PLoS One. 2020; doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0237105 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Ammer S, Bartelink E, Vollner J, Anderson B, Cunha E. Socioeconomic and geographic implications from carbon, nitrogen, and sulfur isotope ratios in human hair from Mexico. Forensic Sci Int. 2020;316. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110455 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Lee HS, Shim JY, Shin WJ, Choi SH, Bong YS, Lee KS. Dietary homogenization and spatial distributions of carbon, nitrogen, and sulfur isotope ratios in human hair in South Korea. PLoS One. 2021;16. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256404 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.O’Brien DM. Stable Isotope Ratios as Biomarkers of Diet for Health Research. Annu Rev Nutr. 2015;35: 565–594. doi: 10.1146/annurev-nutr-071714-034511 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.O’Leary MH. Carbon isotope fractionation in plants. Phytochemistry. 1981. doi: 10.1016/0031-9422(81)85134-5 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Tipple BJ, Valenzuela LO, Chau TH, Hu L, Bataille CP, Chesson LA, et al. Strontium isotope ratios of human hair from the United States: Patterns and aberrations. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2019;33. doi: 10.1002/rcm.8378 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Post DM. Using stable isotopes to estimate trophic position: Models, methods and assumptions. Ecology 2002. pp. 703–718. doi: 10.1890/0012-9658(2002)083[0703:USITET]2.0.CO;2 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.IAEA. Reference sheet for reference materials IAEA-S-1, IAEA-S-2 and IAEA-S-3. [Internet]. Vienna, Austria; 2020. Available: https://nucleus.iaea.org/sites/ReferenceMaterials/SharedDocuments/ReferenceMaterials/StableIsotopes/IAEA-S1-S2-S3/RS-IAEA-S-1-2-3.pdf
  • 51.Coplen TB, Qi H. USGS42 and USGS43: Human-hair stable hydrogen and oxygen isotopic reference materials and analytical methods for forensic science and implications for published measurement results. Forensic Sci Int. 2012;214. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2011.07.035 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Wassenaar LI, Hobson KA, Sisti L. An online temperature-controlled vacuum-equilibration preparation system for the measurement of δ2H values of non-exchangeable-H and of δ18O values in organic materials by isotope-ratio mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2015;29. doi: 10.1002/rcm.7118 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Soto DX, Koehler G, Wassenaar LI, Hobson KA. Re-evaluation of the hydrogen stable isotopic composition of keratin calibration standards for wildlife and forensic science applications. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2017;31. doi: 10.1002/rcm.7893 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Coplen TB, Qi H. A revision in hydrogen isotopic composition of USGS42 and USGS43 human-hair stable isotopic reference materials for forensic science. Forensic Sci Int. 2016;266: 222–225. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2016.05.029 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Chartrand M, Gilles S-J. Forensic Attribution of CBRNE Materials: A Chemical Fingerprint Database Final Status Report Defence Research and Development Canada. Ottawa; 2015; 97. Available: http://cradpdf.drdc-rddc.gc.ca/PDFS/unc200/p801299_A1b.pdf [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Ammer STM. Reiuniting the remains of undocumented border crossers with their families through isotope analysis [Internet]. Universidad de Coimbra. 2020. Available: file:///C:/Users/Clement/Downloads/Doctoral_Thesis_Saskia Ammer.pdf [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Wunder MB. Using isoscapes to model probability surfaces for determining geographic origins. Isoscapes: Understanding movement, pattern, and process on Earth through isotope mapping. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands; 2010. pp. 251–270. doi: 10.1007/978-90-481-3354-3_12 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Kuhn M. Building Predictive Models in R Using the caret Package. J Stat Softw. 2008;28: 1–26. doi: 10.1053/j.sodo.2009.03.00227774042 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Ma C, Bowen GJ. assignR: Infer Geographic Origin from Isotopic Data. 2019. [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Gautam MK, Song BY, Shin WJ, Bong YS, Lee KS. Spatial variations in oxygen and hydrogen isotopes in waters and human hair across South Korea. Sci Total Environ. 2020;726. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138365 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Wang S, Zhang M, Bowen GJ, Liu X, Du M, Chen F, et al. Water Source Signatures in the Spatial and Seasonal Isotope Variation of Chinese Tap Waters. Water Resour Res. 2018;54. doi: 10.1029/2018WR023091 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.de Wet RF, West AG, Harris C. Seasonal variation in tap water δ2H and δ18O isotopes reveals two tap water worlds. Sci Rep. 2020;10. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-70317-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Bowen GJ, Ehleringer JR, Chesson LA, Stange E, Cerling TE. Stable isotope ratios of tap water in the contiguous United States. Water Resour Res. 2007;43. doi: 10.1029/2006WR005186 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Stack P, Rock L. A δ34S isoscape of total sulphur in soils across Northern Ireland. Appl Geochemistry. 2011;26: 1478–1487. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2011.05.021 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Sparks JM, Crowley BE, Rutherford MG, Jaggernauth D. Coastal proximity, orientation, and precipitation amount drive spatial variability in δ34S values on the Caribbean island of Trinidad. Appl Geochemistry. Pergamon; 2019;108: 104372. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2019.104372 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.O’Brien DM, Wooller MJ. Tracking human travel using stable oxygen and hydrogen isotope analyses of hair and urine. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2007;21: 2422–2430. doi: 10.1002/rcm.3108 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Chesson LA, Podlesak DW, Erkkila BR, Cerling TE, Ehleringer JR. Isotopic consequences of consumer food choice: Hydrogen and oxygen stable isotope ratios in foods from fast food restaurants versus supermarkets. Food Chem. 2010;119: 1250–1256. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2009.07.046 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Bowen GJ, Guo JS, Allen ST. A 3-D groundwater isoscape of the contiguous USA for forensic and water resource science. PLoS One. 2022;17: e0261651. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261651 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Bartelink EJ, Berg GE, Beasley MM, Chesson LA. Application of stable isotope forensics for predicting region of origin of human remains from past wars and conflicts. Ann Anthropol Pract. 2014;38: 124–136. doi: 10.1111/napa.12047 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Ehleringer JR, Thompson AH, Podlesak DW, Bowen GJ, Chesson LA, Cerling TE, et al. A framework for the incorporation of isotopes and isoscapes in geospatial forensic investigations. Isoscapes: Understanding movement, pattern, and process on Earth through isotope mapping. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands; 2010. pp. 357–387. doi: 10.1007/978-90-481-3354-3_17 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Meier-Augenstein W. Stable Isotope Forensics: An Introduction to the Forensic Application of Stable Isotope Analysis. Stable Isotope Forensics: An Introduction to the Forensic Application of Stable Isotope Analysis. 2010. doi: 10.1002/9780470688762 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Bartelink EJ, Berg GE, Chesson LA, Tipple BJ, Beasley MM, Prince-Buitenhuys JR, et al. Applications of stable isotope forensics for geolocating unidentified human remains from past conflict situations and large-scale humanitarian efforts. New Perspectives in Forensic Human Skeletal Identification. 2017. doi: [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Dorothée Drucker

7 Jun 2022

PONE-D-22-13353Multi-isotopes in Human Hair: A tool to initiate Cross-border Collaboration in International Cold-CasesPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Bataille,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Both reviewers underlined the quality and interest of the submitted manuscript. Reviewer 2 raises a relevant point on the use of international and/or in-house standards to verify the validity of inter-laboratory comparisons. This needs to be added to the material and method section. Information on the time range recorded by the hair in general (in comparison to other tissues) and the sampling pattern used for the study in particular is pertinent and should be also added. Additional minor corrections are listed in both reviews.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Jul 22 2022 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Dorothée Drucker

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and 

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Please provide additional details regarding participant consent. In the ethics statement in the Methods and online submission information, please ensure that you have specified what type you obtained (for instance, written or verbal, and if verbal, how it was documented and witnessed). If your study included minors, state whether you obtained consent from parents or guardians. If the need for consent was waived by the ethics committee, please include this information.

3. Thank you for stating the following in the Acknowledgments Section of your manuscript: 

"This project was supported by the Chemical, Biological, Radiological-Nuclear and

Explosives Research and Technology Initiative [Award No. CRTI08-0116RD] awarded to

G.S.J., the Canadian Security and Safety Program Targeted Investment [CSSP-2018-TI2385] awarded to C.P.B. This research was further supported by the American Academy of

Forensic Sciences (AAFS) Humanitarian and Human Rights Resource Center (HHRRC)

grant, supported by the AAFS and National Institute of Justice (U.S. Department of Justice),

awarded to S.T.M.A. Work by G.J.B. was supported by US National Science Foundation

grants DBI-1565128 and DBI-1759730. The authors would like to thank the anonymous hair

donors for supporting this research. The authors would also like to thank Paul Middlestead

and the U of Ottawa's Jan Veizer Stable Isotope Laboratory for assistance in stable isotope

analysis. "

We note that you have provided funding information that is not currently declared in your Funding Statement. However, funding information should not appear in the Acknowledgments section or other areas of your manuscript. We will only publish funding information present in the Funding Statement section of the online submission form. 

Please remove any funding-related text from the manuscript and let us know how you would like to update your Funding Statement. Currently, your Funding Statement reads as follows: 

"This project was supported by the Chemical, Biological, Radiological-Nuclear and Explosives Research and Technology Initiative [Award No. CRTI08-0116RD] awarded to G.S.J., the Canadian Security and Safety Program Targeted Investment [CSSP-2018-TI-2385] awarded to C.P.B. This research was further supported by the American Academy of Forensic Sciences (AAFS) Humanitarian and Human Rights Resource Center (HHRRC) grant, supported by the AAFS and National Institute of Justice (U.S. Department of Justice), awarded to S.T.M.A. Work by G.J.B. was supported by US National Science Foundation grants DBI-1565128 and DBI-1759730. "

Please include your amended statements within your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

4. We note that Figures 1, 2, 4, and 6 in your submission contain [map/satellite] images which may be copyrighted. All PLOS content is published under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which means that the manuscript, images, and Supporting Information files will be freely available online, and any third party is permitted to access, download, copy, distribute, and use these materials in any way, even commercially, with proper attribution. For these reasons, we cannot publish previously copyrighted maps or satellite images created using proprietary data, such as Google software (Google Maps, Street View, and Earth). For more information, see our copyright guidelines: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/licenses-and-copyright.

We require you to either (1) present written permission from the copyright holder to publish these figures specifically under the CC BY 4.0 license, or (2) remove the figures from your submission:

a. You may seek permission from the original copyright holder of Figures 1, 2, 4, and 6 to publish the content specifically under the CC BY 4.0 license.  

We recommend that you contact the original copyright holder with the Content Permission Form (http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=7c09/content-permission-form.pdf) and the following text:

“I request permission for the open-access journal PLOS ONE to publish XXX under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CCAL) CC BY 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Please be aware that this license allows unrestricted use and distribution, even commercially, by third parties. Please reply and provide explicit written permission to publish XXX under a CC BY license and complete the attached form.”

Please upload the completed Content Permission Form or other proof of granted permissions as an ""Other"" file with your submission.

In the figure caption of the copyrighted figure, please include the following text: “Reprinted from [ref] under a CC BY license, with permission from [name of publisher], original copyright [original copyright year].”

b. If you are unable to obtain permission from the original copyright holder to publish these figures under the CC BY 4.0 license or if the copyright holder’s requirements are incompatible with the CC BY 4.0 license, please either i) remove the figure or ii) supply a replacement figure that complies with the CC BY 4.0 license. Please check copyright information on all replacement figures and update the figure caption with source information. If applicable, please specify in the figure caption text when a figure is similar but not identical to the original image and is therefore for illustrative purposes only.

The following resources for replacing copyrighted map figures may be helpful:

USGS National Map Viewer (public domain): http://viewer.nationalmap.gov/viewer/

The Gateway to Astronaut Photography of Earth (public domain): http://eol.jsc.nasa.gov/sseop/clickmap/

Maps at the CIA (public domain): https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/index.html and https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/cia-maps-publications/index.html

NASA Earth Observatory (public domain): http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/

Landsat: http://landsat.visibleearth.nasa.gov/

USGS EROS (Earth Resources Observatory and Science (EROS) Center) (public domain): http://eros.usgs.gov/#

Natural Earth (public domain): http://www.naturalearthdata.com/

5. Please include captions for your Supporting Information files at the end of your manuscript, and update any in-text citations to match accordingly. Please see our Supporting Information guidelines for more information: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/supporting-information.

6. Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: I Don't Know

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The present manuscript demonstrates the importance of international cooperation in elucidating the identity of unknown dead. The isoscapes produced illustrate the regional differences in the isotopic values of sulphur and hydrogen in hair samples from the North American population and are an important tool for getting closer to the region of origin of UBCs and other unknown individuals. In principle, however, when creating isoscapes it must be ensured that the analytical data of all database samples are comparable within the limits of measurement uncertainty. In the isotopic analysis of human hair, calibration of all database samples against the reference values of the currently available internationally recognised hair standards (USGS-42 and USGS-43) is essential.

It is not clear from the manuscript whether the isotopic values of all hair samples were calibrated against the USGS-42 and USGS-43 reference values before the isoscapes were created. Does this also apply to the sulphur isotope data of the Mexican hair samples taken from Ammer et al. 2020, because the original literature does not contain any precise information on this? Indeed, inter-laboratory comparisons show that the sulphur isotope data in hair in different laboratories can differ by several ‰ if no official or internal hair standards are taken into account as reference values.

For the regional classification of the individuals, isotope signature of their hair samples were used. The bulk analysis of hair from the UBCs yields mean values that contain information on the food and beverages consumed during the last 4 months of life. During this period of life, the individuals probably no longer stayed in their home region, but were "travelling" and exposed to more or less random food. These mean values are thus hardly compatible with the individuals' regions of origin, and may also feign stays in regions where they have never been. Ultimately, the informative value of the hair is limited to the time before death, and with the bulk analysis of a hair sample of 4 cm, it is not possible to differentiate the whereabouts (or changes of diet, health problems or starvation) during the last weeks of life, as for example with UBC#2.

Segmental analyses of the hair samples might have improved the regional allocations. A more precise regional assignment could have been expected from the examination of bones or teeth of the individuals.

Isotopic examination of these body tissues of UBCs should be the next step to get closer to their identity with the help of the isoscapes created in this work.

My special comments on the manuscript are in the PDF version.

Reviewer #2: Overall, this is an excellent paper and makes good use of existing reference data to test out on real unidentified remains cases, including a case study from Canada (where the decedent likely spent time in the US) and case studies of deceased undocumented border crossers. This paper is in excellent shape and only needs minor edits. It will make a great contribution to PLOS One and to forensic isotope literature.

Minor comments and edits:

Page 3, line 20: change "compose" to "are assimilated into keratin"

Page 3, line 25: change "it's hair inherits" to "their hair incorporates"

Page 3, line 31: change "inherited" to "assimilated"

Page 3: line 34: add values after delta-34S

Page 3, line 36: change "also composing" to "are also incorporating"

Page 4, line 4: change "in average" to "on average"

Page 4, line 5: soybeans are C3 plants (not C4)

Page 5, line 7: change to "US Border Patrol"

Page 5, line 19: change "isotope" to "isotopes"

Page 7, lines 5-6: change "Canada demonstrating" to "Canada would demonstrate"

Page 8, line 5: change "Americans" to "US Americans"

Page 10, line 20: change to "with larger datasets"

Page 10, line 21: change "approach" to "approaches"

Page 11, line 1: change to "dual isotope probabilistic maps"

In several places, "data is" is used and it should be "data are". Check to make sure plural phrasing is used. When discussing border crossers, please add the word deceased so it's clear that the samples are from decedents, not the living.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Attachment

Submitted filename: 2022-05-31 comments CL PONE-D-22-13353.pdf

PLoS One. 2022 Oct 26;17(10):e0275902. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275902.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


3 Aug 2022

PONE-D-22-13353

Multi-isotopes in Human Hair: A tool to initiate Cross-border Collaboration in International Cold-Cases

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Bataille,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Both reviewers underlined the quality and interest of the submitted manuscript. Reviewer 2 raises a relevant point on the use of international and/or in-house standards to verify the validity of inter-laboratory comparisons. This needs to be added to the material and method section. Information on the time range recorded by the hair in general (in comparison to other tissues) and the sampling pattern used for the study in particular is pertinent and should be also added. Additional minor corrections are listed in both reviews.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Jul 22 2022 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

• A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

• A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

• An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Dorothée Drucker

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

We have ensured that our manuscript followed all the PLOS ONE’s style requirements including for file naming

2. Please provide additional details regarding participant consent. In the ethics statement in the Methods and online submission information, please ensure that you have specified what type you obtained (for instance, written or verbal, and if verbal, how it was documented and witnessed). If your study included minors, state whether you obtained consent from parents or guardians. If the need for consent was waived by the ethics committee, please include this information.

We have provided this information by adding the “informed written consent”. Our study did not include minors.

3. Thank you for stating the following in the Acknowledgments Section of your manuscript:

"This project was supported by the Chemical, Biological, Radiological-Nuclear and

Explosives Research and Technology Initiative [Award No. CRTI08-0116RD] awarded to

G.S.J., the Canadian Security and Safety Program Targeted Investment [CSSP-2018-TI2385] awarded to C.P.B. This research was further supported by the American Academy of

Forensic Sciences (AAFS) Humanitarian and Human Rights Resource Center (HHRRC)

grant, supported by the AAFS and National Institute of Justice (U.S. Department of Justice),

awarded to S.T.M.A. Work by G.J.B. was supported by US National Science Foundation

grants DBI-1565128 and DBI-1759730. The authors would like to thank the anonymous hair

donors for supporting this research. The authors would also like to thank Paul Middlestead

and the U of Ottawa's Jan Veizer Stable Isotope Laboratory for assistance in stable isotope

analysis. "

We note that you have provided funding information that is not currently declared in your Funding Statement. However, funding information should not appear in the Acknowledgments section or other areas of your manuscript. We will only publish funding information present in the Funding Statement section of the online submission form.

Please remove any funding-related text from the manuscript and let us know how you would like to update your Funding Statement. Currently, your Funding Statement reads as follows:

"This project was supported by the Chemical, Biological, Radiological-Nuclear and Explosives Research and Technology Initiative [Award No. CRTI08-0116RD] awarded to G.S.J., the Canadian Security and Safety Program Targeted Investment [CSSP-2018-TI-2385] awarded to C.P.B. This research was further supported by the American Academy of Forensic Sciences (AAFS) Humanitarian and Human Rights Resource Center (HHRRC) grant, supported by the AAFS and National Institute of Justice (U.S. Department of Justice), awarded to S.T.M.A. Work by G.J.B. was supported by US National Science Foundation grants DBI-1565128 and DBI-1759730. "

Please include your amended statements within your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

We have removed the funding information from the acknowledgments. The funding information above are correct and contain all the information. We have added it to the cover letter.

4. We note that Figures 1, 2, 4, and 6 in your submission contain [map/satellite] images which may be copyrighted. All PLOS content is published under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which means that the manuscript, images, and Supporting Information files will be freely available online, and any third party is permitted to access, download, copy, distribute, and use these materials in any way, even commercially, with proper attribution. For these reasons, we cannot publish previously copyrighted maps or satellite images created using proprietary data, such as Google software (Google Maps, Street View, and Earth). For more information, see our copyright guidelines: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/licenses-and-copyright.

This is incorrect. None of the figures contain any proprietary information. All the figures were designed under CC License. The images are not satellite images they are probability maps generated by the R script given in supplementary material. All the images can be published under the CC BY 4-0. The country polygons on the maps are from Natural Earth. We added a mention: “Coastlines and country boundaries are from http://www.naturalearthdata.com/” in Figs 1,2, 4 and 6.

We require you to either (1) present written permission from the copyright holder to publish these figures specifically under the CC BY 4.0 license, or (2) remove the figures from your submission:

a. You may seek permission from the original copyright holder of Figures 1, 2, 4, and 6 to publish the content specifically under the CC BY 4.0 license.

We recommend that you contact the original copyright holder with the Content Permission Form (http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=7c09/content-permission-form.pdf) and the following text:

“I request permission for the open-access journal PLOS ONE to publish XXX under the Creative Commons Attribution License (CCAL) CC BY 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Please be aware that this license allows unrestricted use and distribution, even commercially, by third parties. Please reply and provide explicit written permission to publish XXX under a CC BY license and complete the attached form.”

Please upload the completed Content Permission Form or other proof of granted permissions as an ""Other"" file with your submission.

In the figure caption of the copyrighted figure, please include the following text: “Reprinted from [ref] under a CC BY license, with permission from [name of publisher], original copyright [original copyright year].”

b. If you are unable to obtain permission from the original copyright holder to publish these figures under the CC BY 4.0 license or if the copyright holder’s requirements are incompatible with the CC BY 4.0 license, please either i) remove the figure or ii) supply a replacement figure that complies with the CC BY 4.0 license. Please check copyright information on all replacement figures and update the figure caption with source information. If applicable, please specify in the figure caption text when a figure is similar but not identical to the original image and is therefore for illustrative purposes only.

The following resources for replacing copyrighted map figures may be helpful:

USGS National Map Viewer (public domain): http://viewer.nationalmap.gov/viewer/

The Gateway to Astronaut Photography of Earth (public domain): http://eol.jsc.nasa.gov/sseop/clickmap/

Maps at the CIA (public domain): https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/index.html and https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/cia-maps-publications/index.html

NASA Earth Observatory (public domain): http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/

Landsat: http://landsat.visibleearth.nasa.gov/

USGS EROS (Earth Resources Observatory and Science (EROS) Center) (public domain): http://eros.usgs.gov/#

Natural Earth (public domain): http://www.naturalearthdata.com/

5. Please include captions for your Supporting Information files at the end of your manuscript, and update any in-text citations to match accordingly. Please see our Supporting Information guidelines for more information: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/supporting-information.

We have modified the file naming and added the requested captions to the supporting information.

6. Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

We have verified the reference list.

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

________________________________________

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: I Don't Know

Reviewer #2: Yes

________________________________________

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

________________________________________

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

________________________________________

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The present manuscript demonstrates the importance of international cooperation in elucidating the identity of unknown dead. The isoscapes produced illustrate the regional differences in the isotopic values of sulphur and hydrogen in hair samples from the North American population and are an important tool for getting closer to the region of origin of UBCs and other unknown individuals. In principle, however, when creating isoscapes it must be ensured that the analytical data of all database samples are comparable within the limits of measurement uncertainty. In the isotopic analysis of human hair, calibration of all database samples against the reference values of the currently available internationally recognised hair standards (USGS-42 and USGS-43) is essential.

It is not clear from the manuscript whether the isotopic values of all hair samples were calibrated against the USGS-42 and USGS-43 reference values before the isoscapes were created. Does this also apply to the sulphur isotope data of the Mexican hair samples taken from Ammer et al. 2020, because the original literature does not contain any precise information on this? Indeed, inter-laboratory comparisons show that the sulphur isotope data in hair in different laboratories can differ by several ‰ if no official or internal hair standards are taken into account as reference values.

We thank the author for this excellent and critical comment. We have rewritten most of the method isotope section to detail the traceability of δ2H and δ34S isotope data. We added some information to demonstrate that all samples are traceable to the same scale. For δ34S, all results are traceable to the Vienna Canyon Diablo Triolite (VCDT) scale via IAEA-S-1, IAEA-S-2 and IAEA-S-3. We wanted to point to the reviewer that USGS42 and USGS43 are themselves calibrated to IAEA-S-1, IAEA-S-2 and IAEA-S-3. Data from Mexico were analyzed for δ34S values at UC Davis Stable Isotope Facility, which used 6 internal RMs including keratin calibrated against IAEA-S-1, IAEA-S-2 and IAEA-S-3. Data from the USA was obtained from the SIRFER Laboratory at the University of Utah and were calibrated to 3 internal RMs calibrated using IAEA-S-1, IAEA-S-2 and IAEA-S-3. As a quality check, we asked SIRFER to rerun new USGS42 and USGS43 using the same analytical protocol and the obtained values for USGS42 (7.94±0.06‰ (n=5)) and USGS43 (10.37±0.13‰ (n=5)) compare well with the expected values for USGS42 (7.84 ± 0.25 ‰) and USGS43 (10.46 ± 0.22 ‰). Again, as USGS42 and USGS43 are themselves calibrated against IAEA-S-1, IAEA-S-2 and IAEA-S-3, this analysis technically superfluous. Data from Canada (and the forensic cases) was obtained from the Veizer Stable Isotope Lab at the University of Ottawa. RMs used for calibration were IAEA-S-1 (−0.3 ‰), IAEA-S-2 (22.7 ‰) and IAEA-S-3 (−32.6 ‰). The values used for IAEA-S-2 and IAEA-S-3 were not the same as used in the other laboratories. To verify these measurement are compatible with the other measurements, both USGS42 and USGS43 were analyzed against IAEA-S-1, IAEA-S-2 and IAEA-S-3, and the measured δ34S values and one standard deviation (7.58 ± 0.13 ‰ (n=3; USGS42) and 10.22 ± 0.15 ‰ (n=3; USGS43)) overlapped with the certified δ34S values and uncertainties for USGS42 and USGS43.RMs used for calibration were directly IAEA-S-1, IAEA-S-2 and IAEA-S-3 making them directly comparable to other dataset. Again to validate the approach, we analyzed USGS42 and USGS43 as QC and obtained measured values that overlapped with the certified δ34S values and uncertainties for these standards.

For δ2H values, data from Mexico were analyzed at the Jan Veizer Stable Isotope Laboratory at the University of Ottawa using the comparative analysis approach. However, instead of using only CBS and KHS for calibration, a three-point calibration with CBS, KHS and USGS43 was used for generating these data. This three-point calibration has technically a slightly different equation as the two-point calibration using CBS and KHS only. However, the effect on the obtained δ2H values is minimal (<0.7‰) and negligible relative to analytical uncertainty. Additionally, USGS42 and USGS43 values were re-calibrated using the CBS and KHS comparative approach (Soto et al. 2017) and their values fall within analytical uncertainty of the certified values (Coplen et al. 2016). Consequently, USGS42 and USGS43 are also traceable to the VSMOW-SLAP scale. Finally, USGS42 was included as a quality check in all hair analysis sequences and the measured values were within the certified values and uncertainties. The δ2H data from the USA and Canada were analyzed using older protocols and calibration standards, and were recalibrated in a previous study (Magozzi et al. 2021). This study provides a high level of details on traceability. After uncertainty propagation the rescaled δ2H values have relatively large uncertainty ~3‰. Based on these facts, the δ2H data generated and compiled in this study are all traceable to the Vienna Standard Mean Ocean Water-Standard Light Antarctic Precipitation (VSMOW-SLAP) scale.

For the regional classification of the individuals, isotope signature of their hair samples were used. The bulk analysis of hair from the UBCs yields mean values that contain information on the food and beverages consumed during the last 4 months of life. During this period of life, the individuals probably no longer stayed in their home region, but were "travelling" and exposed to more or less random food. These mean values are thus hardly compatible with the individuals' regions of origin, and may also feign stays in regions where they have never been. Ultimately, the informative value of the hair is limited to the time before death, and with the bulk analysis of a hair sample of 4 cm, it is not possible to differentiate the whereabouts (or changes of diet, health problems or starvation) during the last weeks of life, as for example with UBC#2.

Segmental analyses of the hair samples might have improved the regional allocations. A more precise regional assignment could have been expected from the examination of bones or teeth of the individuals.

We agree with this comment and we have added some sentences in the methods and in the discussion to underline that the bulk hair analyses is not the ideal approach.

Isotopic examination of these body tissues of UBCs should be the next step to get closer to their identity with the help of the isoscapes created in this work.

Yes this has actually been done isotopes were analyzed in bones and teeth as well (see Saskia Ammer’s doctoral thesis) but we limited this paper to hair as we did not develop the bones and teeth isoscapes. We added a sentence to underline this point.

My special comments on the manuscript are in the PDF version.

We followed most of the recommendations of the reviewer in the pdf version including adding references, changing figure 4 and adding some small clarifications throughout the manuscript. The only comment we did not follow is to modify the hair growth rate to 1.4 cm per month. While this is true that 1.4 cm per month might be a better approximation of the growth rate, the age model of this individual is pretty elastic considering that we used a dreadlock and had difficulty aligning hair (this was mentioned in the method section). We added this detail in the figure caption: “Due to the difficulty in aligning the hair of Mr. Halifax, the timeframe represented by hair length is more elastic than usual [10,35]. We used an approximate hair growth rate of 1cm per month for visualization.”

Reviewer #2: Overall, this is an excellent paper and makes good use of existing reference data to test out on real unidentified remains cases, including a case study from Canada (where the decedent likely spent time in the US) and case studies of deceased undocumented border crossers. This paper is in excellent shape and only needs minor edits. It will make a great contribution to PLOS One and to forensic isotope literature.

Minor comments and edits:

Page 3, line 20: change "compose" to "are assimilated into keratin"

We modified as suggested.

Page 3, line 25: change "it's hair inherits" to "their hair incorporates"

We modified as suggested.

Page 3, line 31: change "inherited" to "assimilated"

We modified as suggested.

Page 3: line 34: add values after delta-34S

We added as suggested.

Page 3, line 36: change "also composing" to "are also incorporating"

We modified as suggested.

Page 4, line 4: change "in average" to "on average"

We modified as suggested.

Page 4, line 5: soybeans are C3 plants (not C4)

We removed soybeans as suggested.

Page 5, line 7: change to "US Border Patrol"

We changed as suggested.

Page 5, line 19: change "isotope" to "isotopes"

We modified as suggested.

Page 7, lines 5-6: change "Canada demonstrating" to "Canada would demonstrate"

We modified as suggested.

Page 8, line 5: change "Americans" to "US Americans"

We modified as suggested.

Page 10, line 20: change to "with larger datasets"

We modified as suggested.

Page 10, line 21: change "approach" to "approaches"

We modified as suggested.

Page 11, line 1: change to "dual isotope probabilistic maps"

We modified as suggested.

In several places, "data is" is used and it should be "data are". Check to make sure plural phrasing is used.

We modified as suggested.

When discussing border crossers, please add the word deceased so it's clear that the samples are from decedents, not the living.

We added as suggested.

________________________________________

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

________________________________________

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

________________________________________

In compliance with data protection regulations, you may request that we remove your personal registration details at any time. (Remove my information/details). Please contact the publication office if you have any questions.

Attachment

Submitted filename: Response_to_Reviewers.DOCX

Decision Letter 1

Fabio Marzaioli

6 Sep 2022

PONE-D-22-13353R1Multi-isotopes in Human Hair: A tool to initiate Cross-border Collaboration in International Cold-CasesPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Bataille,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Dear Author(s), I had the chance to have a read through the paper also comparing the first and the revised version  and I really con see a sensitive development of the MS. Some minor comments arises from the reviewer and I also add some comments regarding the methodological part. I will be grateful if you can try to accomodate all the issues raised.​

Please submit your revised manuscript by Oct 21 2022 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Fabio Marzaioli, Ph.D

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

Additional Editor Comments:

Dear Author(s)

I had the chance to have a read through the paper also comparing the first and the revised version (I entered later in the manuscript handling) and I really con see a sensitive development of the MS.

Anyway Ref. 1 was asking for some more work to really improve the paper.

In details Reviewer commented:

Abstract

Line37: please change „δ2H and δ34S measurements“ to „ δ2H and δ34S values“

Introduction

Line 80: please delete “to bi-monthly”. Chronological information of hair depend on the length of a hair segments, analyses of <0.5 mm segments with a 2-weekly resolution (and less) is possible (as you did for the hair samples from Mr. Halifax).

Line 81: The mean growth rate of human hair mostly is defined by 1 cm/ month. Please delete the growth rate of 0.7 mm/ month. To my knowledge, in literature this low growth rate was only mentioned in one single paper for hairs of negroid individuals, but this is most likely not the mean value for most of the human hair.

Line 82: please add reference 8 and 10.

Line 88: it is well known that C, N, H, O and S (not only H, O and S) are assimilated into hair keratin, because these are the components of the protein. References 33 and 34 should be mentioned together.

Line 97: please check the listed references. In several references δ2H in hair has not been analysed for geolocation. You may add δ18O and Sr to the sentence, or you may only list those in which δ2H has actually been analysed.

Line 117 f: This sentence could be deleted, if line 88 was changed as suggested.

Line 119: add reference 12.

Line 164: I’d like to thank the authors for their elaboration on the problem of calibrating the sulphur isotope values in the hair. However, I would like to note here again that δ34S analyses on hair samples (and especially on collagen samples) are very tricky and challenging. Therefore, a comparability check of the δ34S hair results between the UCD lab and the Veizer lab was necessary before establishing the δ34S isoscape.

In principle, especially for δ34S and δ2H analyses on human hair it is necessary to calibrate the measured values against internal reference standards that are composed of the same material as the measured sample. These reference standards could be made from human hair, or from horse or cattle tail hair, and should cover the entire range of the measured values. Thus, for a two-point, better a three point calibration, several hair standards from different parts of the world are needed which should run with each series of measurements. Furthermore, they must be recalibrated against international standards such as USGS42 and USGS43, which unfortunately do not cover the whole range of values especially with regard to sulphur (and hydrogen) isotope results.

Line 166: RMs = reference materials

Line 253: I assume that δ13C, δ15N and δ34S values of the UBCs hair were analysed at the UCD, because the values agree to those in Ammer’s thesis.

Figure 1 A and B. Please explain the abbreviation “hair-obs”.

Line 345: Pease add the references for the published δ34S data (also in Fig. 2).

Line 472: the lowest δ2H value was 6 months PTD

Line 506 f: please add that also specific geological conditions give rise to distinct baseline d34S values, in particular for Mexico the occurrence of volcanoes, leading to low δ34S values (see thesis of Ammer 2020). Even if this is not clearly visible on the maps due to the low resolution, this should be mentioned in that section.

Line 545 ff.: Not only the δ2H values of drinks, but also the δ2H values of the food most probably affect the hair δ2H values (according to the equation in Fig. 2 A). From that it can be concluded that most of the hydrogen in keratin is not from the drinking water.

Line 553: change ref 20 to ref 15.

Line 584 f: add: ... where the individual grew up and lived..., and better “the places of residence earlier in the individuals’ life” (because the place of birth cannot be identified)

Line 588 ff: For description of the living phases of Mr. Halifax I’d suggest to mention first the former and then the more recent months of life, e.g. during the 15 to 5 month PTD interval. The shift of the isotope values along the hair strand as a result of dietary changes is always from the older to the younger part of the hair. Consequently, the shift to higher δ13C values of ~-18 ‰ was between 12 and 10 months PTD, followed in turn by a decrease of the δ13C values between 10 and 5 months PTD (from that you may conclude that he possibly entered eastern US or eastern Canada about 12 months PTD). Low δ13C values (~-19 ‰) during the last 5 months PTD are compatible...

Line 607: For δ15N values in the hair strand I’d suggest to write: .... appear to record a shift from higher to lower δ15N values around 5 months PTD.

Line 631 ff: ...based on the results of δ2H and δ34S analyses of bulk hair samples taken from deceased UBCs found at the US-Mexico border could help to identify...

Line 639: Screening is also possible for current unknown deceased, not only for cold-cases.

Please note that based on the Iupac guidelines and according to Coplen 2011, “δ” should be written in italic font throughout the manuscript.

• Coplen, T. B. (2011). Guidelines and recommended terms for expression of stable‐isotope‐ratio and gas‐ratio measurement results. Rapid communications in mass spectrometry, 25(17), 2538-2560

Moreover from my side:

1) I would like to ask you to insert before utilizing delta notation its definition according to the last reference suggested by the reviewer (i.e. Coplen, T. B. (2011). Guidelines and recommended terms for expression of stable‐isotope‐ratio and gas‐ratio measurement results. Rapid communications in mass spectrometry, 25(17), 2538-2560).

2) I am curious regarding some data showed in the "Isotopic analysis of residents' hair samples from across North America" paragraph. In details for the second batch of d34S analysed in Venezuela, the authors did a sort of accuracy test (it cannot be called Quality Check because this term has a specific meaning according to sample QA/QC procedures) by comparing data measured on USGS42 and 43 with their certificates. I am a bit worried about reported uncertainties in the framework of this exercise. In details lab internal standards utilized and calibrated against IAEA S series (s1-s2-s2). Reported uncertainties affecting lab internal standards span from .3 to .4 per mil. My question regards the uncertainties affecting produced measured USGS values which are sensitively lower than the ones affecting the lab internal standards. It is a rule of thumb that measurements and data manipulation can only enlarge uncertainties but this is not the case. Can you please reply?

3) It is not clear to me where samples coming from [37] study have been analysed and why only tests performed on some analytical batches are presented (i.e. to what lab is the accuracy test referred?).

Thanks

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

********** 

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

********** 

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: I Don't Know

Reviewer #2: Yes

********** 

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

********** 

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

********** 

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The authors have done an excellent job of revising the manuscript and have thus once again significantly improved it. Below I have a few comments and suggestions that should be considered before publication:

Abstract

Line37: please change „δ2H and δ34S measurements“ to „ δ2H and δ34S values“

Introduction

Line 80: please delete “to bi-monthly”. Chronological information of hair depend on the length of a hair segments, analyses of <0.5 mm segments with a 2-weekly resolution (and less) is possible (as you did for the hair samples from Mr. Halifax).

Line 81: The mean growth rate of human hair mostly is defined by 1 cm/ month. Please delete the growth rate of 0.7 mm/ month. To my knowledge, in literature this low growth rate was only mentioned in one single paper for hairs of negroid individuals, but this is most likely not the mean value for most of the human hair.

Line 82: please add reference 8 and 10.

Line 88: it is well known that C, N, H, O and S (not only H, O and S) are assimilated into hair keratin, because these are the components of the protein. References 33 and 34 should be mentioned together.

Line 97: please check the listed references. In several references δ2H in hair has not been analysed for geolocation. You may add δ18O and Sr to the sentence, or you may only list those in which δ2H has actually been analysed.

Line 117 f: This sentence could be deleted, if line 88 was changed as suggested.

Line 119: add reference 12.

Line 164: I’d like to thank the authors for their elaboration on the problem of calibrating the sulphur isotope values in the hair. However, I would like to note here again that δ34S analyses on hair samples (and especially on collagen samples) are very tricky and challenging. Therefore, a comparability check of the δ34S hair results between the UCD lab and the Veizer lab was necessary before establishing the δ34S isoscape.

In principle, especially for δ34S and δ2H analyses on human hair it is necessary to calibrate the measured values against internal reference standards that are composed of the same material as the measured sample. These reference standards could be made from human hair, or from horse or cattle tail hair, and should cover the entire range of the measured values. Thus, for a two-point, better a three point calibration, several hair standards from different parts of the world are needed which should run with each series of measurements. Furthermore, they must be recalibrated against international standards such as USGS42 and USGS43, which unfortunately do not cover the whole range of values especially with regard to sulphur (and hydrogen) isotope results.

Line 166: RMs = reference materials

Line 253: I assume that δ13C, δ15N and δ34S values of the UBCs hair were analysed at the UCD, because the values agree to those in Ammer’s thesis.

Figure 1 A and B. Please explain the abbreviation “hair-obs”.

Line 345: Pease add the references for the published δ34S data (also in Fig. 2).

Line 472: the lowest δ2H value was 6 months PTD

Line 506 f: please add that also specific geological conditions give rise to distinct baseline d34S values, in particular for Mexico the occurrence of volcanoes, leading to low δ34S values (see thesis of Ammer 2020). Even if this is not clearly visible on the maps due to the low resolution, this should be mentioned in that section.

Line 545 ff.: Not only the δ2H values of drinks, but also the δ2H values of the food most probably affect the hair δ2H values (according to the equation in Fig. 2 A). From that it can be concluded that most of the hydrogen in keratin is not from the drinking water.

Line 553: change ref 20 to ref 15.

Line 584 f: add: ... where the individual grew up and lived..., and better “the places of residence earlier in the individuals’ life” (because the place of birth cannot be identified)

Line 588 ff: For description of the living phases of Mr. Halifax I’d suggest to mention first the former and then the more recent months of life, e.g. during the 15 to 5 month PTD interval. The shift of the isotope values along the hair strand as a result of dietary changes is always from the older to the younger part of the hair. Consequently, the shift to higher δ13C values of ~-18 ‰ was between 12 and 10 months PTD, followed in turn by a decrease of the δ13C values between 10 and 5 months PTD (from that you may conclude that he possibly entered eastern US or eastern Canada about 12 months PTD). Low δ13C values (~-19 ‰) during the last 5 months PTD are compatible...

Line 607: For δ15N values in the hair strand I’d suggest to write: .... appear to record a shift from higher to lower δ15N values around 5 months PTD.

Line 631 ff: ...based on the results of δ2H and δ34S analyses of bulk hair samples taken from deceased UBCs found at the US-Mexico border could help to identify...

Line 639: Screening is also possible for current unknown deceased, not only for cold-cases.

Please note that based on the Iupac guidelines and according to Coplen 2011, “δ” should be written in italic font throughout the manuscript.

• Coplen, T. B. (2011). Guidelines and recommended terms for expression of stable‐isotope‐ratio and gas‐ratio measurement results. Rapid communications in mass spectrometry, 25(17), 2538-2560

Reviewer #2: This manuscript is much improved over the first version. I believe the authors have addressed all the reviewer comments. I only had very minor technical edits in the attached PDF.

********** 

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Attachment

Submitted filename: 2022-05-31 comments CL PONE-D-22-13353_edits.pdf

PLoS One. 2022 Oct 26;17(10):e0275902. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0275902.r004

Author response to Decision Letter 1


14 Sep 2022

PONE-D-22-13353R1

Multi-isotopes in Human Hair: A tool to initiate Cross-border Collaboration in International Cold-Cases

PLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Bataille,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process.

Dear Author(s), I had the chance to have a read through the paper also comparing the first and the revised version and I really con see a sensitive development of the MS. Some minor comments arises from the reviewer and I also add some comments regarding the methodological part. I will be grateful if you can try to accomodate all the issues raised.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Oct 21 2022 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

• A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

• A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

• An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Fabio Marzaioli, Ph.D

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

Please review your reference list to ensure that it is complete and correct. If you have cited papers that have been retracted, please include the rationale for doing so in the manuscript text, or remove these references and replace them with relevant current references. Any changes to the reference list should be mentioned in the rebuttal letter that accompanies your revised manuscript. If you need to cite a retracted article, indicate the article’s retracted status in the References list and also include a citation and full reference for the retraction notice.

Additional Editor Comments:

Dear Author(s)

I had the chance to have a read through the paper also comparing the first and the revised version (I entered later in the manuscript handling) and I really con see a sensitive development of the MS.

Anyway Ref. 1 was asking for some more work to really improve the paper.

Moreover from my side:

1) I would like to ask you to insert before utilizing delta notation its definition according to the last reference suggested by the reviewer (i.e. Coplen, T. B. (2011). Guidelines and recommended terms for expression of stable‐isotope‐ratio and gas‐ratio measurement results. Rapid communications in mass spectrometry, 25(17), 2538-2560).

We have added an explanation of the delta notation definition in the introduction and referenced to the requested paper.

2) I am curious regarding some data showed in the "Isotopic analysis of residents' hair samples from across North America" paragraph. In details for the second batch of d34S analysed in Venezuela, the authors did a sort of accuracy test (it cannot be called Quality Check because this term has a specific meaning according to sample QA/QC procedures) by comparing data measured on USGS42 and 43 with their certificates. I am a bit worried about reported uncertainties in the framework of this exercise. In details lab internal standards utilized and calibrated against IAEA S series (s1-s2-s2). Reported uncertainties affecting lab internal standards span from .3 to .4 per mil. My question regards the uncertainties affecting produced measured USGS values which are sensitively lower than the ones affecting the lab internal standards. It is a rule of thumb that measurements and data manipulation can only enlarge uncertainties but this is not the case. Can you please reply?

We believe our writing might have been unclear and cause confusion on this point. The reported uncertainties are not a full error propagation of uncertainty in the calibrated values, they are simply one standard deviation of the replicate d34S measurements obtained from the analyses of USGS42 and USGS43 samples performed at the University of Utah. We compared the mean value to that of the certified values for these standards and showed that the measured mean values fall within the 1 sigma range of the certified value. To clarify, we have rewritten some sentences in this section to better characterize what each uncertainty represents.

3) It is not clear to me where samples coming from [37] study have been analysed and why only tests performed on some analytical batches are presented (i.e. to what lab is the accuracy test referred?).

We have added some details in the method section about where and when the different analyses were performed. We added details about the extra analysis of USGS42 and USGS43 samples performed at the University of Utah. These extra analyses of USGS42 and 43 were performed to answer the comments of reviewer 1 during the first round of review.

Thanks

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #1: All comments have been addressed

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

________________________________________

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

________________________________________

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: I Don't Know

Reviewer #2: Yes

________________________________________

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

________________________________________

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

________________________________________

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: The authors have done an excellent job of revising the manuscript and have thus once again significantly improved it. Below I have a few comments and suggestions that should be considered before publication:

Abstract

Line37: please change „δ2H and δ34S measurements“ to „ δ2H and δ34S values“

We corrected as suggested

Introduction

Line 80: please delete “to bi-monthly”. Chronological information of hair depend on the length of a hair segments, analyses of <0.5 mm segments with a 2-weekly resolution (and less) is possible (as you did for the hair samples from Mr. Halifax).

We removed as suggested

Line 81: The mean growth rate of human hair mostly is defined by 1 cm/ month. Please delete the growth rate of 0.7 mm/ month. To my knowledge, in literature this low growth rate was only mentioned in one single paper for hairs of negroid individuals, but this is most likely not the mean value for most of the human hair.

We corrected as suggested

Line 82: please add reference 8 and 10.

We corrected as suggested

Line 88: it is well known that C, N, H, O and S (not only H, O and S) are assimilated into hair keratin, because these are the components of the protein. References 33 and 34 should be mentioned together.

We modified as suggested.

Line 97: please check the listed references. In several references δ2H in hair has not been analysed for geolocation. You may add δ18O and Sr to the sentence, or you may only list those in which δ2H has actually been analysed.

We decided to change this list of citations to only one citation (e.g., Ehleringer et al. 2008)

Line 117 f: This sentence could be deleted, if line 88 was changed as suggested.

We removed that sentence

Line 119: add reference 12.

We added reference 12.

Line 164: I’d like to thank the authors for their elaboration on the problem of calibrating the sulphur isotope values in the hair. However, I would like to note here again that δ34S analyses on hair samples (and especially on collagen samples) are very tricky and challenging. Therefore, a comparability check of the δ34S hair results between the UCD lab and the Veizer lab was necessary before establishing the δ34S isoscape.

In principle, especially for δ34S and δ2H analyses on human hair it is necessary to calibrate the measured values against internal reference standards that are composed of the same material as the measured sample. These reference standards could be made from human hair, or from horse or cattle tail hair, and should cover the entire range of the measured values. Thus, for a two-point, better a three point calibration, several hair standards from different parts of the world are needed which should run with each series of measurements. Furthermore, they must be recalibrated against international standards such as USGS42 and USGS43, which unfortunately do not cover the whole range of values especially with regard to sulphur (and hydrogen) isotope results.

We agree with the reviewer, and we agree that adding this cross-lab check in response to their suggestion has improved the quality of the study. We also concur that the development of broadly available substrate-specific RMs is the way forward. Developing broadly available RMs with CNS isotope values spanning a broad range of isotopic values for keratin, chitin and other organic substrates would be important. The community should come together to develop these standards.

Line 166: RMs = reference materials

We specified this abbreviation.

Line 253: I assume that δ13C, δ15N and δ34S values of the UBCs hair were analysed at the UCD, because the values agree to those in Ammer’s thesis.

Yes thank you for noting this. We mention this line 26-263.

Figure 1 A and B. Please explain the abbreviation “hair-obs”.

We added an explanation for this abbreviation.

Line 345: Pease add the references for the published δ34S data (also in Fig. 2).

We added these references in the figure caption.

Line 472: the lowest δ2H value was 6 months PTD

We modified this as suggested.

Line 506 f: please add that also specific geological conditions give rise to distinct baseline d34S values, in particular for Mexico the occurrence of volcanoes, leading to low δ34S values (see thesis of Ammer 2020). Even if this is not clearly visible on the maps due to the low resolution, this should be mentioned in that section.

We added this point as suggested and cited Ammer 2020.

Line 545 ff.: Not only the δ2H values of drinks, but also the δ2H values of the food most probably affect the hair δ2H values (according to the equation in Fig. 2 A). From that it can be concluded that most of the hydrogen in keratin is not from the drinking water.

We modified the sentence to more explicitly point to the influence of food on hair H isotope ratios.

Line 553: change ref 20 to ref 15.

We changed as suggested.

Line 584 f: add: ... where the individual grew up and lived..., and better “the places of residence earlier in the individuals’ life” (because the place of birth cannot be identified)

We changed as suggested.

Line 588 ff: For description of the living phases of Mr. Halifax I’d suggest to mention first the former and then the more recent months of life, e.g. during the 15 to 5 month PTD interval. The shift of the isotope values along the hair strand as a result of dietary changes is always from the older to the younger part of the hair. Consequently, the shift to higher δ13C values of ~-18 ‰ was between 12 and 10 months PTD, followed in turn by a decrease of the δ13C values between 10 and 5 months PTD (from that you may conclude that he possibly entered eastern US or eastern Canada about 12 months PTD). Low δ13C values (~-19 ‰) during the last 5 months PTD are compatible...

We rewrote this paragraph as suggested.

Line 607: For δ15N values in the hair strand I’d suggest to write: .... appear to record a shift from higher to lower δ15N values around 5 months PTD.

We modified this sentence as suggested.

Line 631 ff: ...based on the results of δ2H and δ34S analyses of bulk hair samples taken from deceased UBCs found at the US-Mexico border could help to identify...

We modified as suggested.

Line 639: Screening is also possible for current unknown deceased, not only for cold-cases.

We added this sentence as suggested.

Please note that based on the Iupac guidelines and according to Coplen 2011, “δ” should be written in italic font throughout the manuscript.

• Coplen, T. B. (2011). Guidelines and recommended terms for expression of stable‐isotope‐ratio and gas‐ratio measurement results. Rapid communications in mass spectrometry, 25(17), 2538-2560

We rewrote all delta in italics throughout the manuscript.

Reviewer #2: This manuscript is much improved over the first version. I believe the authors have addressed all the reviewer comments. I only had very minor technical edits in the attached PDF.

The pdf provided to us after re-review was identical to the pdf provided in the first round of review, and we have already addressed the comments it contains. After enquiring with the editorial staff we were informed that no new marked document was available.

________________________________________

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

________________________________________

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

Decision Letter 2

Fabio Marzaioli

26 Sep 2022

Multi-isotopes in Human Hair: A tool to initiate Cross-border Collaboration in International Cold-Cases

PONE-D-22-13353R2

Dear Dr. Bataille,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Fabio Marzaioli, Ph.D

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Acceptance letter

Fabio Marzaioli

29 Sep 2022

PONE-D-22-13353R2

Multi-isotopes in Human Hair: A tool to initiate Cross-border Collaboration in International Cold-Cases

Dear Dr. Bataille:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Fabio Marzaioli

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Database. Sulfur isotope compilation from hair of North American residents.

    Database containing the compiled and newly generated sulfur isotope data in hair of residents from North America. The database is formatted for compatibility with the accompanying R scripts and assignR package suborigin() function [59]. See suborigin() documentation for column names.

    (CSV)

    S2 Database. Hydrogen isotope compilation from hair of North American residents.

    Database containing the compiled and newly generated hydrogen isotope data in hair of residents from North America. The database is formatted for compatibility with the accompanying R scripts and assignR package suborigin() function [59]. See suborigin() documentation for column names.

    (CSV)

    S3 Database. Combined hydrogen and sulfur isotope compilation from hair of North American residents.

    Database containing all the samples with combined hydrogen and sulfur isotope data in hair of residents from North America. The database is formatted for compatibility with the accompanying R scripts and assignR package suborigin() function [59]. See suborigin() documentation for column names.

    (CSV)

    S1 Table. Sequential isotope data from Mr. Halifax.

    Columns include the sample ID, hair length segment and corresponding isotope values and analytical precision for sulfur isotopes (“s34”, “s34.SD”), hydrogen isotopes (“d2H”, “d2H.SD”), carbon isotopes (“d13C”, “d13C.SD”) and nitrogen isotopes (“d15N”, “d15N.SD”) The table is formatted for compatibility with the accompanying R scripts.

    (CSV)

    S2 Table. Individual isotope data from UBC individuals.

    Columns include the sample ID and corresponding isotope values and analytical precision for sulfur isotopes (“s34”, “s34.SD”) and hydrogen isotopes (“d2H”, “d2H.SD”). The table is formatted for compatibility with the accompanying R scripts.

    (CSV)

    S1 Script. R script to generate sulfur isoscape in hair across North America.

    (R)

    S2 Script. R script to generate test the quality of sulfur and hydrogen isoscapes in hair across North America and to generate probabilistic maps.

    (R)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: 2022-05-31 comments CL PONE-D-22-13353.pdf

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: Response_to_Reviewers.DOCX

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: 2022-05-31 comments CL PONE-D-22-13353_edits.pdf

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLOS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES