Skip to main content
ACS Omega logoLink to ACS Omega
. 2022 Oct 11;7(42):37142–37163. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.2c03139

Studies of Structural, Dielectric, and Impedance Spectroscopy of KBT-Modified Sodium Bismuth Titanate Lead-Free Ceramics

Mohammed Mesrar 1,*, Abdelhalim Elbasset 1, Nor-Said Echatoui 1, Farid Abdi 1, Taj-dine Lamcharfi 1
PMCID: PMC9608426  PMID: 36312375

Abstract

graphic file with name ao2c03139_0016.jpg

Lead-free ceramic materials produced from bismuth sodium titanate (Na0.5Bi0.5TiO3, NBT)–bismuth potassium titanate (K0.5Bi0.5TiO3, KBT) have been developed through a solid-state reaction technique. The structural, dielectric, and piezoelectric characteristics of the ceramic materials were analyzed. Based on the XRD investigation, the morphotropic phase boundary (MPB) was determined for the composition (x (%) = 16 and 20). The effects of the KBT phase on the NBT lattice were examined using the charge density distribution. Furthermore, the dielectric properties indicated the presence of a negative dielectric constant (εr′) as a function of frequency between 1 kHz and 2 MHz. Negative permittivity was observed globally in the (1 – x)NBT–xKBT ceramic which reflects the effect of the dielectric resonance. The grain conduction effect is revealed through the complex impedance spectrum in the form of a semicircular arc within the Nyquist plot. In addition, the samples studied revealed a non-Debye relaxation phenomenon. The relaxation time was determined based on the Vogel-Fulcher law for all samples. DC conductivity was carried out on the ceramics material and revealed that the resistance decreases with increasing temperature indicating a negative temperature coefficient of resistance. The AC conductivity as a function of frequency for different temperatures suggests the presence of a thermally activated conduction mechanism. The activation energy has been determined based on the Arrhenius plot of the DC electrical conductivity as well as the relaxation frequency.

1. Introduction

Lead-based ceramics are the most commonly utilized piezoelectric materials for piezoelectric sensors, actuators, and transducers on account of their excellent piezoelectric characteristics.1,2 Considering the toxicity and volatility of lead oxides in materials, there is an increased demand for lead-free materials as well as biocompatible and environmentally friendly materials.3,4 Recently, several lead-free piezoceramics have been produced; within them, perovskite lead-free solid solutions which are based on K0.5Na0.5NbO3 (KNN), BaTiO3 (BT), (Na0.5Bi0.5)TiO3 (NBT), and (K0.5 Bi0.5)TiO3 (KBT) are very promising eco-friendly piezoceramics.58 Nevertheless, these solid solutions need to be analyzed to be utilized in a commercial way. The principal challenge for BT-based piezoceramics is their comparatively lower curie temperature (Tc), making the operating temperature range limited, whereas for KNN- and KBT-based piezoceramics, the difficulty lies in producing densely packed ceramics in a reliable manner.9,10 Sodium bismuth titanate ((Na0.5Bi0.5)TiO3, abbreviated as NBT)11,12 is a very well-known antiferroelectric material with a rhombohedral perovskite R3c structure. It is regarded as a great potential candidate as a primary material for lead-free piezoelectric ceramics because it is a highly ferroelectric material with a large Curie temperature (Tc = 320 °C), a highly remanent polarization (Pr = 38 μC/cm2), and a significant coercivity field (Ec = 73kV/cm) at ambient temperature. Nevertheless, because of its significant coercive field and comparatively high conductivity, NBT is not easily polarized, and its piezoelectric properties are not desirable. Hence, NBT-based solid solutions have been investigated to enhance the overall piezoelectric properties, since on one hand, it offers a larger degree of freedom to change the compositions, and on the other hand, it is significantly easier to improve the electrical and electromechanical properties.13,14 Due to its excellent piezoelectric properties, the solid solution (1 – x)(Na0.5Bi0.5)TiO3x(K0.5 Bi0.5)TiO3 is one of the most attractive and least explored systems by researchers. Kreisel et al.15 also defined the MPB region as well as the optimized composition of the binary material (1 – x)NBT–xKBT. Takenaka et al.16 and Jiang et al.17 reported that compositions in the near MPB region of 0.05–0.07 mol BT exhibit a piezoelectric constant in the range of d33 = 125pC/N and 0.16–0.20 mol KBT with d33 = 123pC/N, respectively. In particular, the piezoelectric properties can be enhanced when the solid solutions are in the morphotropic phase boundary (MPB) zone. These ceramics have attracted the interest of scientists around the world.1820 In previous research, the permittivity of ceramic materials was generally positive. In reality, it has been observed that the permittivity could be as well negative.2123 Up to now, negative permittivity generally results from the dielectric resonance of dipoles due to negative phase angle and electromechanical coupling at high frequencies.2426 NBT exhibits a diffuse phase transition nature leading from its nonpolar ferroelectric tetragonal transitions to its ferroelectric rhombohedral transitions.2729 Recently much work involved the enhancement of the electrical properties of (1 – x)NBT–xKBT by substitutions, investigation of impedance data to differentiate between the bulk contribution (grains) and the influence of the grain boundaries, and identifying the elements which are required for the conduction phenomenon in (1 – x)NBT–xKBT ceramics at high temperature.30,31 Complex impedance spectroscopy (CIS) can be used as a convenient and useful nondestructive experimental method32 which allows us to (i) study the physical processes that reveal the electrical and dielectric properties of compounds, (ii) differentiate the contributions of grains and grain boundaries to the transport properties of compounds, (iii) identify the relaxation frequency/the relaxation time of the charge carriers in the material, and (iv) further investigate conductivity, relative permittivity, and dielectric losses versus frequency.33,34 Motivated by the previous consideration, we prepared a (1 – x)NBT–xKBT system by solid-state reaction method (x(%) = 0, 12, 16, 20, 30, and 100) with compositions close to MPB. This study aims to examine in detail the influence of the addition of KBT on the generation mechanism of negative permittivity behavior, as well as the impedance and conductivity of NBT over a broad range of temperatures and frequencies. To understand the relaxor mechanism, three different methods, namely Debye, Vogel-Fulcher (V-F), and Arrhenius law, were applied in the dielectric study. This study indicates that the mechanism of NBT conductivity with KBT is mainly caused by oxygen vacancies and cation carrier hops.

2. Experimental Section

2.1. Material Synthesis and Characterization

(1 – x)NBT–xKBT samples were synthesized by a solid-state ceramic process by blending a stoichiometric amount of dried powders of high-purity (99.9 atom %) of Na2CO3, Bi2O3, K2CO3, Bi2O3, and TiO2, and subsequently heating them for 4 h at 1000 °C in air. The chemical reaction for this synthesis is represented as follows:

2.1. 1

The resulting powders were milled and blended with polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) binder solution. To perform the dielectric measurement, the powder was processed into pellets of 12 mm diameter and ∼1–2 mm thickness using pressing at a weight of 8 tons on a hydraulic press. The yellow pellets were sintered at 1100 °C for 4 h in air. The density of the pellet was determined by using the Archimedes technique, and it was revealed to be about ∼97.6% of the theoretical density of the material.

2.2. XRD Analysis

The phase formation investigation was performed using an XPERT-PRO X-ray diffractometer (XRD) with Cu-Kα radiation (λ = 1.54 Å) over the range 2θ ∼ 10–80° with a step size of 0.02°. The crystal phases were further refined from the Rietveld refinement process using the FULLPROF suite software35 and the rhombohedral perovskite (Na0.5Bi0.5)TiO3 (space group: R3c) as the model structure.

2.3. Dielectric Properties Measurement

A coating of silver paste was used on both sides, followed by heat treatment of the sample at 80 °C (30 min) for electrical measurements. The relative permittivity (εr) and dielectric loss (tan δ) values as a function of temperature were determined at different temperatures ranging from ambient to 600 °C, using an LCR-meter (Agilent 4284A) operating in the frequency range 1kHz–1 MHz.

2.4. Theory

In general, the AC impedance technique is used to characterize the electrical properties of materials. The data are analyzed using one of four complex admittance functions: complex impedance (Z*), complex permittivity (ε*), complex electric modulus (M*), and complex admittance A* (or Y*).36

2.4. 2
2.4. 3
2.4. 4

Also, ω is the angular frequency (2πf), C is the geometric capacitance of the sample and ε0 indicates the permittivity of free space (8.854 × 10–12 F/m). Complex impedance and Cole–Cole plot are utilized to distribute out the contribution of grain and grain boundary effects of the ceramics. Moreover, the temperature dependence of grain boundary influences and bulk capacitance can be investigated. As a result, in order to investigate and comprehend the experimental data, a model is required. The equivalent circuit provides a realistic description of the compound’s electrical behavior.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. X-ray Diffraction (XRD) Analysis

Figure 1 shows the X-ray powder diffraction patterns of (1 – x)(Na0.5Bi0.5)TiO3x(K0.5Bi0.5)TiO3 (x(%) = 0.0, 12, 16, 20, 30, and 100) calcined at 1000 °C for 4 h, and no secondary phase is detected. Indexation of the patterns was carried out using the software program Dicvol.35 The NBT exhibits good agreement with the rhombohedral structure referred to in JCPDS card no. 36-0340.37 Accounting for a small rhombohedral distortion, all diffraction patterns were indexed according to the pseudocubic unit cell of the perovskite. The absence of potassium-containing secondary peaks in the XRD profiles suggests that K+ ions were successfully integrated into the NBT perovskite structure up to x = 30% increase. Besides, the position of the XRD peaks shifts to lower angles as the KBT increases. This phenomenon indicates the dissolution of KBT within the structure and the formation of a binary solid solution system.37 The phase transition process will be explored in more detail in the following pages. Knowing that the radius of K+ (r = 1.33 Å) is larger than that of Na+ (r = 0.95 Å),13,38 the substitution of the relatively larger K+ for the smaller Na+ may induce an expansion of the unit cells.39 The Rietveld refinement approach with a pseudo-Voigt analytical function was employed to refine the structural and microstructural parameters of the rhombohedral phase (space group R3c) by means of the Fullprof software.35,40

Figure 1.

Figure 1

XRD patterns of (1 – x)NBT–xKBT samples (x(%) = 0.0, 12, 16, 20, 30, and 100) calcined at 1000 °C for 4 h.

The determination of the values of the lattice parameters, microstrain, particle size, etc. was performed by fitting the backgrounds of the different XRD profiles through a polynomial function of degree 6. The goodness of fit was enhanced via the Marquardt least-squares process.41 The minimization of the difference between the experimental (Ie) and calculated (Ic) data was evaluated as a report (Inline graphic) called Goodness of Fit (GoF). The two parameters of the reliability index (Rwp and Rexp) are respectively the weighted residual error and the expected residual error. The refinement was carried out until the GoF value was found to be equal to ∼1. In addition, some important parameters are refined: scale factor, including zero correction, displacement, cell parameters and Wyckoff positions, half-width parameters of U, V, and W, and computed and preset atomic site occupancy. The obtained Rietveld-refined output profiles are shown in Figure 2. Compositions with low percentages of potassium (x = 0.0 and x = 12%) show peaks indexed in a rhombohedral lattice of space group R3c, whereas samples with high percentages of potassium (x = 30% and KBT) are indexed in a tetragonal lattice of space group P4mm. Furthermore, we find that the mixing of the phases (Rh and T) is in the region of 16% ≤ x ≤ 20%. To conclude, 0.84NBT–0.16KBT exhibits a morphotropic phase boundary (MPB) at room temperature, in which rhombohedral and tetragonal symmetries coexist.42,43 Furthermore, the coexistence of tetragonal and rhombohedral phases with the P4mm and R3c space group in the morphotropic phase boundary (MPB) region at room temperature has also been reported by several authors.28,38,44,45

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Rietveld refined powder XRD profile of (1 – x)NBT–xKBT samples.

In order to calculate, for each of our samples, the respective fractions of the rhombohedral and tetragonal phases, we used the X’pert High Score Plus software.46 It should be mentioned that the crystallite size computed using the Williamson-Hall method is slightly larger than that computed by the Debye–Scherrer equation, since the broadening effect caused by the microstrain is entirely ruled out in the latter. The relative fractions of both phases are indicated in Table 1. The crystallite size, D, was calculated by the width of the X-ray diffraction peaks by means of the Williamson-Hall (W-H) method.47 The total broadening, βt, of the peaks is in fact due to the combined effects of crystallite size, βD, and microstrain, βϵ.

3.1. 5

The crystallite size is calculated on the basis of the Scherrer equation: Inline graphic, whereas the microstrain is obtained from the Stokes and Wilson formula.47βstrain = 4ε tan θ. λ = 0.154 nm is the wavelength of the X-ray employed, K = 0.89 is the Scherrer constant, θ is the diffraction angle that allows to reach the position of the peak, in radians, and D is the crystallite size. Associating these latter equations (Sherrer and Stokes and Wilson) with equation 5 and multiplying both sides by cos θ, we obtain the following total broadening:

3.1. 6

Table 1. Lattice Parameters, Strain, Phase Fraction (%), Crystallite Size, and Cell Size of the Pure and K-Doped NBTs.

Sample xKBT (%) Structure Phase fraction (%) Lattice parameter (nm) Crystallite size (D) (nm) Strain (ε) ×10–2 Cell Size (Å3) Reliability Parameters χ2 (%)
0.0 Rhombohedral R3c 100% a = b = 5.4856 131.91 0.0057 352.86 1.45
c = 13.5402
12 Rhombohedral R3c 100% a = b = 5.4963 132.17 0.0061 355.08 1.19
c = 13.5718
16 Rh+T R3c 73% a = b = 5.502 134.02 0.0065 356.090 1.42
  c = 13.5830 59.50
P4mm 27% a = b = 3.891
  c = 3.9298
20 Rh+T R3c 71.13% a = b = 5.5059 137.52 0.0067 356.74 1.45
  c = 13.5878 59.65
P4mm 28.8% a = b = 3.8897
  c = 3.9425
30 T P4mm 100% a = b = 3.9005 127.45 0.0073 60.10 1.59
c = 3.9504
100 Tetragonal P4mm 100% a = b = 3.9247 129.13 0.0079 61.37 1.71
c = 3.9844

Formula 6 allows a straight line to be drawn (y = ax + b). Thus, the average crystallite size, D, is determined from the intercept of the fitting line associated with the following values βt cos θ versus 4 sin θ (see Figure 3). The resulting crystallite size and strain from this method for (1 – x)(Na0.5Bi0.5)TiO3x(K0.5Bi0.5)TiO3 are reported in Table 1. The calculated values of strain for x(%) = 0.0, 12, 16, 20, 30, and pure KBT are 0.0057, 0.0061, 0.0065, 0.0067, 0.0073, and 0.0079, respectively. The calculated particle size of the samples as obtained ranges is from 129.13 to 137.52 nm. It is found that the value of D and the microstrain increase with increasing percentage of potassium in the solid solution and lead to the finding that due to the presence of potassium cations, the crystallites expand compared to those of the NBT sample.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Williamson-Hall plot for (1 – x)NBT–xKBT (x(%) = 0.0, 12, 16, 20, 30, and 100) composites.

This result is due to the small ionic radius of Na+ (r = 0.95Å) compared to K+ (r = 1.33Å).13 Moreover, it might be attributed to the enhanced mechanical contact among the grains of different phases.

3.2. Bonding Charge Density

Figure 4 shows the 3D view of the ((1 – x)NBT–xKBT unit cell (x(%) = 0.0, 16, and KBT) generated by Vesta software taking into account the tilt of the TiO6 octahedra, where the Ti4+ ion is in the center of the octahedron composed of six O2– ions, whereas the Na+/Bi3+/K+ ions are in the space between the TiO6 octahedra.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Three-dimensional unit cell of (1 – x)NBT–xKBT (x(%) = 0.0, 16, and 100) with TiO6 octahedra.

The octahedral tilt allows also the presence of enhanced ferroelectric properties in the compound. The appearance of a mixed phase in the specimens near the morphotropic phase boundary (x(%) = 16) suggests a complex bonding between different ions, leading ultimately to a transition in structural properties. As a result, the bond lengths and angles become significantly influenced and the crystal structure changes away from the structure of pristine NBT.48,49

Another important result obtained by the Rietveld refinement process is the mapping of the electron density by means of the GFourier program, which allows the characterization and visualization of the electron density in the unit cell. The electronic charge density reveals the nature of the chemical bonds among the ions forming the (1 – x)NBT–xKBT powders and identifies the atomic positions of the component elements in the unit cell for crystals, i.e., the heavier electron density contours indicate the position of a larger element among the principal elements in the unit cell. The diffusion density ρ(x,y,z) is usually obtained according to the equation:

3.2. 7

where ρ(x,y,z) represents the electron density at a point (x,y,z) within a unit cell of volume V, αhkl represents the phase angle of each Bragg reflection, and F(hkl) represents the amplitude of the structure factor. Figure 5 displays the obtained 2-D contour maps of the charge density distributions for all structure of (1 – x)NBT–xKBT samples in the xy plane. Two-dimensional maps are conventionally drawn using contours (and possibly color) to indicate various density layers, whereas three-dimensional maps use a “chicken-wire” mesh representing a single level. Although the regions colored from red to violet-brown indicate increasing levels of electron density about the Na/Bi cation, the zero level density contour is displayed in black. In the (1 – x)NBT–xKBT system under examination, the Ti and Na/Bi/K cations are located at (0, 0, 0.5) and (0.031, 0.28, 0.998), respectively. The electronic charge density map on all powders shows a strong charge localization along the radius of the circles about Na and Bi atoms interacting with the adjacent O atoms, which confirms the prevalence of the ionic character of the single bonds Na/K-O and Bi-O.29,50,51 This ionic bond comes from a great difference in the Pauling electronegativity of O and Ti with the Na/K and Bi elements.29,52,53 We also find that the bonding interaction of both atoms O and Bi is higher compared to that of Na/K. The maximum electron density was found for K (Z = 19) and Bi (Z = 83) which is ∼93 e/Å3 along the xy direction about K/Bi atoms, as illustrated in Figure 5. This results from the fact that the K/Bi atoms have a high atomic number compared to the other elements present in the compound.50,54

Figure 5.

Figure 5

2-D electron density map of individual atoms on the xy plane in the unit cell of (1 – x)NBT–xKBT; the electron density is measured in electrons per cubic angstrom, e/Å3.

The density map changes significantly after 30% potassium doping. The substitution of Na+ by K+ ion, that exhibits a partially filled orbital (4S1), produced an improved K–O bond length and increased the charge density for this composition. This could be possibly associated with the new diffusion center brought by higher doping concentration. Figure 6 shows 3D Fourier maps of single atoms in the unit cell for all specimens. On the 3D charge density map, the site of Na/Bi/k, Ti, and O atoms and the electron clouds surrounding them are clearly shown. The high positive peaks associated with the 2b sites for Na/Bi cations (A-site) are present in all samples. An intermediate electronic density is present between the two peaks associated with the 2a sites for the Ti4+ cation (B-site).

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Three-dimensional electron density distribution in the unit cell of (1 – x)NBT–xKBT (x(%) = 0.0, 16, and 100).

On the other hand, electron density contour maps provide insight into the relationship between conductivity and structure.55 Generally, in ABO3-type ferroelectric perovskites, the anion conduction pathway is supposed to occur via a hopping mechanism by which evolving anions go via the bottleneck or the beginning of the critical radius of a triangle via socket points which are found between the A-site and B-site ions.56 According to Singh et al,55 the oxide ion migrates around the edges of TiO6 octahedra via −O1–O1– routes, as well as through interstitials and saddle points within the crystal’s unit cell. The oxide ion migration mechanism favors the formation of a large number of defects between dopant and oxygen vacancies, which affects the conductivity of the material. This mechanism is in agreement with the conductivity behavior of our samples which will be examined in more detail later.

3.3. Study of Dielectric Properties

Figure 7 shows the real permittivity spectra of (1 – x)NBT–xKBT ceramics with different content of K+ ((x(%) = 0, 12, 16, 20, 30, and 100) as a function of frequency in the range from 1 kHz to 2 MHz. As indicated above, the dielectric constant of all specimens stays positive up to the resonant frequency (fr) and negative above this frequency.57,58 In the case of pure NBT, as the frequency increases, the dielectric constant increases steadily, then, in the vicinity of the anomaly noted A, it increases and reaches a maximum, at this frequency, which corresponds to the so-called resonance frequency (fr), and then decreases rapidly for a frequency in the vicinity of the anomaly B, known as antiresonance (fa). This particular type of peaking behavior is associated with resonance mechanisms.5961

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Relative permittivity at different temperatures for different xKBT contents in (1 – x)NBT–xKBT ceramics.

In addition, the resonance frequency obtained allows us to specify the frequency at which the dipole moment vector changes direction. This evolution reveals the presence of charged species (oxygen vacancies, grain boundary effect, etc.) unable to follow the variation of the alternating electric field for high frequencies.62 As the temperature increases, the amplitude of the dielectric constant also increases, since an increase in temperature causes the orientation of the corresponding dipoles. Moreover, the value of the anomaly A shifts to a lower frequency until a temperature of T = 350 °C, at which there is an inverse shift of the resonance frequency (fr) to a higher frequency. As the xKBT content increases, there is a slight decrease in the dielectric permittivity. However, over the morphotropic limit (MPB), the maximum dielectric permittivity increases for the xKBT rich region (x = 30% and KBT), as shown in Table 2. Furthermore, The increase in the charge density values along the Na/Bi/K-O1 and k-O1 bonds (verified previously) is good evidence for the increase of charge carriers (Na+/B3+ ions and K+ ions) in the potassium-substituted system, which can be attributed to the increase of dielectric properties over the morphotropic limit (MPB), the maximum dielectric permittivity increases for the xKBT rich region (x = 30% and KBT), and the alternative conductivity. Consequently, we observe that the addition of xKBT reduces the dielectric constant in the morphotropic zone (MPB) and promotes it beyond this zone. On the other hand, it is necessary to identify the origin of this behavior by complex impedance spectroscopy, i.e., analysis of the imaginary and real part of the complex impedance, a study of the AC conductivity, and examination of the dielectric modulus.

Table 2. Resonant Frequency and Permittivity of (1 – x)NBT–xKBT Samples at Different Temperatures.

T (°C) NBT
12%
16%
20%
30%
KBT
fr (MHz) εr fr (MHz) εr fr (MHz) εr fr (MHz) εr fr (MHz) εr fr (MHz) εr
280 1.618 3283 1.937 1928 1.998 3053 1.817 4427 1.990 3549 1.381 5559
300 1.582 3678 1.916 2747 1.977 3705 1.657 4535 1.974 4058 1.234 5380
320 1.341 4391 1.892 3137 1.875 3875 1.535 4625 1.941 4334 1.183 5299
350 1.118 5143 1.823 3598 1.830 3596 1.520 4371 1.964 3975 1.125 5189
400 1.142 3384 1.906 3422 1.881 3160 1.567 3829 1.978 2638 1.135 5110
450 1.283 3203 1.947 2511 1.945 2196 1.740 3431 1.988 1796 1.199 3138

The temperature dependence of the dielectric constant (εr) and dielectric loss (tan δ) at various frequencies for (1 – x)NBT–xKBT ceramics sintered at a temperature of 1100 °C is depicted in Figure 8. This figure displays two significant dielectric peaks of the (1 – x)NBT–xKBT ceramic materials. The first transition temperature is associated with the depolarization temperature (Td), and the second transition temperature is related to Tm and is near the maximum value of (εrmax). Jo et al. suggested that the two detected local dielectric maxima (Td and Tm) in NBT-based ceramics are not related to phase transitions, though they can be attributed to the thermal behavior of the local ferroelectric polar nanometer-size regions (PNRs) of rhombohedral R3c and tetragonal P4bm symmetries.63Td is the depolarization temperature that corresponds to the transition from a ferroelectric state to an antiferroelectric state and is related to the thermal behavior of R3c and P4bm of polar nanometer-size (PNRs), which is associated to with the transformation from classic ferroelectric to relaxor ferroelectric.64 The depolarization temperature (Td), having been proposed as a measure of the stability of ferroelectric domains, has an important role in the practical application of NBT-based ceramics.65 The temperature of dielectric maximum (Tm) is the temperature at which the transition from an antiferroelectric state to a paraelectric state occurs. At Tm, the dielectric curve exhibits broad dielectric maxima and moves toward the highest temperature along with the dielectric constant decreasing with increasing frequency. It is also the temperature at which the thermal evolution of the relaxation time distribution or correlation length distribution of polar nanometer-size regions occurs (PNRs).63,64,65,66 At these temperatures, the dielectric properties become frequency dependent, indicating that the (1 – x)NBT–xKBT materials are ferroelectric relaxors. Furthermore, upon increasing frequency, the dielectric peaks displace slightly further along the high-temperature direction, a behavior characteristic of dielectric relaxation, i.e., frequency dispersion. Similar findings have also been reported by various research groups, it has been claimed in the NBT system in the vicinity of the MPB composition that the phase region displaying P4bm symmetry with integrated nanodomains in the R3c matrix participates in the relaxor nature.6769 Dielectric losses are low between ambient temperature and 300 °C. At high temperatures, there is a sharp rise in dielectric loss that could be connected to an increase in electrical conductivity. Therefore, it is proposed that (1 – x)NBT–xKBT ceramics may be a candidate for high-temperature capacitors. This results from the inhomogeneity of the cation distribution which generates a random local field that destabilizes the long-range ferroelectric order, and the system is fragmented into polar nanoregions (PNRs).70,71

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Temperature dependences of dielectric properties for the (1 – x)NBT–xKBT ceramics over −40 °C–600 °C at various frequencies.

The relaxation nature of a system can, after all, also be verified by various methods such as the formation of polar nanometer-size regions (PNRs),67 PE loops,72 by comparing the variation of ε″, M″, and Z″ with frequency,73 Vogel-Fulcher relation,74 and from diffuse phase transition.75

In addition, many ABO3-type perovskites and ceramics based on NBT have the diffuse phase transition reported to occur when the A or B sites are occupied by at least two cations.65 The dielectric behavior of complex ferroelectrics with diffuse phase transition may be understood using the modified Curie–Weiss law.76

3.3. 8

Tm is the temperature at which r reaches its highest value, εr,max is the permittivity’s maximum value, and γ (1 < γ < 2) is a parameter that indicates the degree of phase transition diffusion. Additionally, when the diffusivity value is equal to one, we discover that samples displaying this sort of phase transition are classical ferroelectrics; relaxor ferroelectrics when the diffusivity parameter is 1< γ < 2; and ideal relaxor ferroelectrics when the diffusivity parameter is equal to two. Graphs of εr,maxr versus (TTm)γ, at 100 kHz, for (1 – x)NBT–xKBT systems sintered at 1100 °C for 4 hours are plotted in Figure 9. Equation 8 was fitted in the region of Tm in accordance with findings obtained from the experimental data for the dielectric constant. The fact that the several testing sites all neatly line up on a straight line indicates that these materials do in fact satisfy this modified law. With an increase in xKBT, the diffusivity parameter increases from 1.6 for pure NBT to 1.8 for NBT–0.20KBT, as can be seen in the findings (see Figure 9). Table 3 displays the calculated values of γ and δ. It is most probable that a disorder at the A-site (Na+/K+ and Bi3+) is what is causing the high values around the morphotropic phase boundary (MPB) (NBT–0.20KBT). In light of this, the dispersive behavior may be brought on by the cationic disorder in the A-site, which might result in relaxation. These findings back up previous dielectric measurements published in the literature.77,78

Figure 9.

Figure 9

Dielectric data fitted with Uchino’s law for (1 – xy)NBT–xKBT ceramics.

Table 3. Values of γ and δ as a Function of Potassium Content in (1 – xy)NBT–xKBT Systems.

Samples NBT KBT NBT-0.12KBT NBT-0.16KBT NBT-0.20KBT NBT-0.30KBT
γ 1.6 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.6
δ 96 110 124 127 135 125

3.4. Impedance

Cole–Cole plots for (1 – x)NBT–xKBT samples (x(%) = 0, 12, 16, 20, 30, and KBT) as a function of temperature in the range of 280 to 450 °C are presented in Figure 10. In low temperature, the Z values are extremely high, suggesting a high material resistance. The Z″ vs Z′ patterns for low temperature line up linearly with the Z″ axis (which is not shown in the Figure 10). These curves exhibit the bending of the graphs around the Z′ axis as the temperature rises, and these graphs change to almost semicircular arcs as the as a function of temperature. The area surrounded within the semicircle decreases as the temperature increases, suggesting a reduction in the resistivity of the material. The centers of the semicircular arcs found under the real axis indicate a non-Debye type of relaxation in the material.7981

Figure 10.

Figure 10

Complex impedance diagram at different temperatures for different xKBT contents in (1 – x)NBT–xKBT samples.

Table 4 displays the fitted parameters (Rg, Rgb, Cg, and Cgb) for all samples at 400 °C using an equivalent circuit consisting of a resistor and a capacitor connected in parallel. With increasing potassium doping rate, the (1 – x)NBT–xKBT system’s Rg decreases while its Cg increases. It is also discovered that as the (K+) doping rate increases, the grain boundary resistance increases. This can be explained by the introduction of potassium, which causes a decrease in grain size, resulting in an increase in the number of grain boundaries. Christie et al.82 and Badwal et al.83 observed the same behavior in rare-earth doped perovskites. It may be also observed that the value of Rg decreases with rising temperature, which confirms the negative temperature coefficient of resistance (NTCR) behavior or semiconductor behavior.30,84,85 According to M. Benyoussef et al.,84 these results confirms the materials NTCR (Negative Temperature Coefficient of Resistivity) behavior and reflects the semiconductive nature of ceramics. The reason for this is the increase of mobility of space charges with rising temperature.30,86 On the other hand, the asymmetric shrinkage of the semicircles as a function of temperature suggests an inhomogeneous distribution of the relaxation time (τ = 1/ω).18,87,88

Table 4. Values for Grain Resistance (Rg), Grain Joint Resistance (Rgb), Grain Capacity (Cg), and Grain Joint Capacity (Cgb) of the (1 – x)NBT–xKBT System.

Sample (%) Rg (KΩ) Rgb (KΩ) Cg (pF) Cgb (pF)
NBT 10.45 1.23 0.78 0.21
x = 12 9.78 1.89 0.87 0.11
x = 16 7.59. 2.74 0.92 0.48
x = 20 7.90 3.24 1.16 0.52
x = 30 7.47 5.38 1.78 0.67
KBT 6.13 2.11 1.98 0.81

Figure 11 presents the variation of the imaginary part of the impedance (Z″) with frequency at different temperatures for (1 – x)NBT–xKBT (x(%) = 0, 12, 16, 20, 30, and 100 compounds). The single curve represents the overall response of the samples. The grain boundary effects become negligible in the presence of large grains. These plots present broad curves at temperatures above 300 °C as a function of xKBT concentration, and the width of the peak was shown to increase with temperature. Furthermore, the value of the width at half-maximum (fwhm) revealed from the normalized spectrum is superior to 1.144 decades (ideal Debye relaxation). This confirms the non-Debye behavior in the (1 – x)NBT–xKBT material.89 The broad peak is associated with the cation disorder problem resulting from the random distribution of A and B site cations over the equivalent lattice positions.90 In these graphs, we can observe the effect of increasing temperature on the value of Z″. Z″ increases with frequency and reaches a maximum value at a particular frequency, which is designated as the relaxation frequency. Its associated relaxation time is determined by the following equation: ωmaxτ = 1, where ωmax is the angular frequency which corresponds to the relaxation frequency and τ is the relaxation time necessary for the emergence and disappearance of the polarization. The relaxation peak shifts toward a lower frequency with rising temperature owing to the increase in relaxation time, suggesting the presence of a temperature-dependent electrical relaxation phenomenon in the sample.91,92 The peaks broaden asymmetrically, indicating the presence of particular electrical processes within the material with a dispersed relaxation time, which will be detailed in the following section. The reason for this may be the appearance of immobile species at low temperatures and defects at high temperatures.92,93 Since these investigations are carried out at higher temperatures, it is possible that some relaxation species, such as defects, are the cause of electrical conduction in the product through the jumping of electrons/ oxygen ion vacancy/defects between the located sites present. The relaxation times are calculated from the plot of Z″ against the frequency. Moreover, the variation of τ as a function of the inverse of the absolute temperature is presented in the following section.

Figure 11.

Figure 11

Variation of Z″ with frequency for (1 – x)NBT–xKBT samples.

3.5. Model Fitting

To better understand the dispersive dielectric relaxation exhibited for (1 – x)NBT–xKBT, the distribution of relaxation time being temperature-dependent or not was examined. The relaxation time of the materials are determined by the following relationship:

3.5. 9

where τ0, KB, and Ea are pre-exponential values, Boltzmann constant, and the activation energy, respectively. The relaxation time τ is determined as follows:

3.5. 10

In which the frequency, fmax, is equal to Z″ maxima. The plot between the log τ vs 1000/T is presented in Figure 12, and the activation energies obtained from the linear fit of the graphs are reported in Table 5. Moreover, the activation energy value for relaxation decreases with increasing xKBT content in these materials. The activation energy values of the materials are in the same range as those of NBT and KBT. In the present study, disorder was gradually introduced by breaking up the long-range symmetry of the ferroelectric KBT lattice in the NBT lattice and thus observing the relaxor behavior in the (1 – x)NBT–xKBT samples. However, many researchers have proven that dipoles are not free and that there can be an interaction between dipoles.40,86,94 This interaction results in the freezing of the dipoles at a particular temperature denoted TvF (freezing temperature). This disagreement of the Debye model is accounted for in the Vogel-Fulcher (V-F) model which will be discussed in detail in the next section. The Vogel-Fulcher law was used in this work to determine the average relaxation time. (The fitting curves of ln f(Hz) versus Tm are given in Figure 13).

Figure 12.

Figure 12

Variation of relaxation time with absolute temperature (1 – x)NBT–xKBT samples.

Table 5. Variation of Activation Energies for NBT, KBT, and (1 – x)NBT–xKBT Samples.

Sample DC Activation energies (eV) AC Activation energies (eV) for conduction AC Activation energies (eV) for relaxation (τR) Activation energies (eV) for relaxation (τM)
NBT 0.56 0.97 0.90 2.11
12% 0.60 0.70 0.63 0.57
16% 0.83 0.74 0.69 0.78
20% 0.91 0.76 0.94 0.98
30% 1.02 0.67 1.08 1.21
KBT 1.05 0.68 1.19 1.27

Figure 13.

Figure 13

Variation of ln (f) with temperature (Tm) and fitted curve of Vogel-Fulcher relation for (1 – x)NBT–xKBT. (x(%) = 0, 0.12, 0.16, 0.20, 0.30, and 100 ceramics).

The relaxation behavior of the system may also be examined by means of the Vogel-Fulcher (V-F) law32 being fitted to the samples, which is illustrated in Figure 13. The nonlinear VF fit provides diverse parameters for the quantitative measurement of the relaxant characteristics of all materials. It takes into consideration the interaction between the dipoles. These interactions cause the dipoles to freeze at a specific temperature called the Vogel-Fulcher temperature. This model is due to thermally activated polarization fluctuations related to polar nanometer-size regions (PNRs).66,71

The relaxation times of the materials follow the equation

3.5. 11

In which τ0 is the pre-exponential value, kB is the Boltzmann constant, T is the temperature, Ea is the activation energy, and TvF (freezing temperature) is the temperature from which dynamic reorientation of the dipolar cluster polarization becomes thermally activated. Figure 13 displays the temperature dependence of the average relaxation time for all studied ceramics. Based on an analysis of the V-F fit, we have found the activation energy and some other parameters; among them Ea = 0.09 eV, τ0 = 1.5910–7 and T = 593 k with R2 = 0.998 indicate that NBT presents a relaxing behavior. The fitted parameters for the samples are listed in Table 6. The distribution of relaxation times and the activation energy obtained from the Vogel–Fulcher law increase when the potassium content in the ceramics increases while the freezing temperature decreases. At TTvF temperatures, glassy relaxations may actually be detected.95 It is noted that the TvF decreases by adding KBT to the ceramics. Furthermore, the difference in τ0 and Ea is coherent within a thermally activated polarization fluctuation that might originate from the large grain size difference such as an effect of the glass.96

Table 6. Vogel Fulcher Fitting Parameters for (1 – x)NBT–xKBT Samples.

Sample Freezing temperature (TvF) (K) Activation energy (Ea) (eV) Pre exponential Factor (10–8 s) Relaxation time (τ)
NBT 593 0.09 0.275 5.07 × 10–4 s
12% 589 0.12 0.389 9.98 × 10–4 s
16% 571 0.15 0.412 12.37 × 10–4 s
20% 563 0.19 0.512 4.09 × 10–4 s
30% 552 0.27 0.433 16.22 × 10–4 s
KBT 547 0.32 0.312 12.32 × 10–4 s

3.6. Electrical Conductivity

Electrical conductivity refers to the extent of charge movement within the material. The properties (insulator, semiconductor, conductor) of the product can be determined according to the movement of the charge.32 Based on the dielectric data measured, the AC conductivity (σac) was evaluated according to the following relationship:

3.6. 12

The different symbols have a common meaning. The variation of AC conductivity as a function of frequency for (1 – x)NBT–xKBT ceramics is shown in Figure 14. From this plot it can be seen that for all ceramics, the AC conductivity increases with frequency. The AC conductivity at every temperature considered has two distinct regions. For low frequencies, we can observe a first region where the conductivity remains unchanged with the frequency. In the second region (>106 Hz), the conductivity increases as the frequency increases. In addition, it was found that the conductivity increases with the potassium content. This behavior can be attributed to the effect of grain boundaries having a large number of defects and oxygen vacancies.97 These defects/gaps result in the addition of free charge carriers which can increase the conductivity at higher frequencies under the effect of the applied field. Such AC conductivity is explained according to the Jonscher’s power law.32,80,98

3.6. 13

Figure 14.

Figure 14

AC conductivity as a function of frequency at different temperatures for (1 – x)NBT–xKBT ceramics.

The σdc specifies the DC conductivity, and the second term is the frequency dependent AC conductivity. “A” refers to the polarization force, and “n” is the temperature-dependent parameter. The evolution of the parameter n as a function of temperature is employed to evaluate the conduction mechanism. The physical significance of the parameter n numerical values has been explained by Funke et al.99 For n > 1, conduction through the lattice is due to the Maxwell–Wagner (M-W) mechanism, while at n ≤ 1, it is attributed to the correlated barrier jump (CBH) mechanism. The exponent value (n) is between 0 and 1. Since we have calculated n < 1, the conduction mechanism is of the non-Debye type (Table 7). These results suggest that correlated barrier hopping (CBH) is the most adequate model to explain the mechanism of charge transport in these materials.

Table 7. Parameters Obtained from Joncher’s Plot for (1 – x)NBT–xKBT Ceramics.

Potassium content (%) Temp (°C) n
NBT 300 0.50782
350 0.46636
400 0.42786
450 0.41492
16 300 0.52114
350 0.47761
400 0.44274
450 0.40821
KBT 300 0.62171
350 0.58727
400 0.55241
450 0.54473

Figure 15 displays the variation of ln(σDC) against the inverse of temperature (1000/T), which provides the activation energy value for electrical conduction of (1 – x)NBT–xKBT ceramics at 100 kHz, determined from Arrhenius’ law.

3.6. 14

where σ0 is the pre-exponential factor, kB is the Boltzmann constant, T is the temperature (K), and Ea is the activation energy. The plots show that an increase in conductivity increases with temperature, indicating that the samples have conductive behavior. Two different activation energies were identified for (1 – x)NBT–xKBT ceramics, namely, at grains and at grain boundaries. Moreover, the activation energy of the grain is significantly higher than that of the grains’ boundaries. Here again, this indicates that the grains exhibit a higher resistance than the grains’ boundaries, as obtained earlier from the Nyquist plots (see Table 4). The value of Ea for these samples is significantly in the range ∼1.12 to ∼1.37 eV, revealing that the creation of internal defects for all samples is primarily associated with internal oxygen vacancies. Consequently, for NBT ceramics, the conductivity is essentially attributable to oxygen ion vacancies or Bi ion vacancies. Indeed, O2– ions are located in the octahedral sites of these perovskite ceramics and transport at high temperatures. Meanwhile, Bi ions are at the center of these oxygen dodecahedra, and the high size needs a high thermal energy to be activated to mobilize them.

Figure 15.

Figure 15

Conductivity ln(σDC) as a function of 1000/T for (1 – x)NBT–xKBT ceramics (a) for grains and (b) for grain boundaries at 100 kHz.

4. Conclusions

In this study, (1 – x)NBT–xKBT ceramics near the morphotropic phase boundary were synthesized by a solid-state reaction method and sintered. The structural analysis was carried out on the X-ray diffraction data employing the Rietveld refinement process. The structure factors yielded by the refinement technique were employed both to obtain the average particle diameter of various perovskite compounds, and revealed a range between 129.13 and 137.52 nm from the Williamson-Hall plot, and qualitatively and quantitatively study the charge density distribution and the nature of the bonds. Dielectric investigations reveal two anomalies marked A and B depending on the frequency for all specimens, which correspond to the frequency of resonance (fr) in A, and for a frequency near the anomaly B, the frequency is referred to as antiresonance (fa). As a function of increasing xKBT content, we find that an increase in the dielectric permittivity value is found. Nevertheless, the dielectric permittivity decreases above the morphotropic phase boundary (MPB) in the xKBT rich region (x = 30% and KBT). The imaginary part of the impedance spectra (Z″) shows that the distribution of relaxation time is temperature independent. The relaxation frequency (fmax = 1/τ) varies accordingly with the temperature as well as the composition of the xKBT. Complex impedance spectroscopy was carried out across a large frequency interval (500–2 MHz) at different temperatures to improve comprehension of the electrical properties and their relationship to the grains and grain boundaries of the ceramics. In addition, the experimental data of the Nyquist plot have been explained correctly by means of theoretical simulation, and both grains and grain boundaries have been identified as contributing to the conduction process. The V-F and power-law models were employed to investigate the activation energy anomaly. Using these models, the freezing temperature and the degree of relaxation were also obtained. The non-Debye relaxation process is confirmed by employing conductivity and impedance analyses, and the activation energy for the relaxation has been derived according to Arrhenius’ law. The Joncher power-law parameter indicates a related barrier hopping (CBH) mechanism for the charge carriers. Two different activation energy regions were identified using a fit of the Arrhenius formula at high temperatures. The activation energies that are calculated from Arrhenius’ law are usually larger than the VF activation energies.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the Innovation Centre of the University of Fez for their assistance and support in processing the samples in this work. The authors would like to sincerely thank the anonymous reviewers for their careful proofreading and valuable comments on the paper.

The authors declare no competing financial interest.

References

  1. Dorcet V.; Trolliard G. A transmission electron microscopy study of the A-site disordered perovskite Na0.5Bi0.5TiO3. Acta Mater. 2008, 56, 1753–1761. 10.1016/j.actamat.2007.12.027. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  2. Aksel E.; Jones J. L. Advances in lead-free piezoelectric materials for sensors and actuators. Sensors 2010, 10, 1935–1954. 10.3390/s100301935. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Mesrar M.; Lamcharfi T.; Echatoui N.; Abdi F.; Harrach A.; Ahjyaje F. Z. Hydrothermal synthesis, microstructure and electrical properties of (1-x)(Na0. 5Bi0. 5) TiO3-xBaTiO3 ceramics. Moroccan Journal of Quantitative and Qualitative Research 2019, 1 (1), 14–24. 10.48379/IMIST.PRSM/mjqr-v1i1.17272. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  4. Whittle K. R.; de los Reyes M.; Aughterson R. D.; Blackford M. G.; Smith K. L.; Baldo P.; Ryan E. P.; Zaluzec N. J.; Lumpkin G. R. In-situ irradiation of Ca1-xLa2/3xTiO3 defect perovskites: The role of vacancies in recovery. Materialia 2018, 3, 186–191. 10.1016/j.mtla.2018.08.016. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  5. Lu J.; Lin H.; Hong R.; Zhang D. Photocatalytic H2 evolution properties of K0.5Na0.5NbO3 (KNN) with halloysite nanotubes. Opt. Mater. (Amst). 2022, 129, 112516. 10.1016/j.optmat.2022.112516. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  6. Chu B.; Chen D.; Li G. Electrical properties of Na1/2Bi1/2TiO3-BaTiO3 ceramics. J. Eur. Ceramic Soc. 2002, 22, 2115. 10.1016/S0955-2219(02)00027-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  7. Mesrar M.; Lamcharfi T.; Echatoui N. S.; Abdi F.; Harrach A. High dielectric constant of (1-x)(Na0. 5Bi0. 5) TiO3-xBaTiO3 prepared by the hydrothermal method. Mediterranean Journal of Chemistry 2019, 8 (3), 213–219. 10.13171/mjc8319051210mm. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  8. Mesrar M.; Lamcharfi T.; Echatoui N.-S.; Abdi F. (1-x)(Na0.5Bi0.5)TiO3-x(K0.5Bi0.5)TiO3 ceramics near morphotropic phase boundary: a structural and electrical study. Materialia 2022, 22, 101404. 10.1016/j.mtla.2022.101404. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  9. Kang W.; Zheng Z.; Li Y.; Zhao R. Enhanced dielectric and piezoelectric performance of sol-gel derived (1-x) Bi0.5(Na0.78K0.22)0.5TiO3-xBaTiO3 ceramics. Ceram. Int. 2019, 45, 23078–23083. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2019.07.356. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  10. Hiruma Y.; Aoyagi R.; Nagata H.; Takenaka T. Ferroelectric and piezoelectric properties of (Bi1/2K 1/2)TiO3 ceramics. Japanese J. Appl. Physics, Part 1 Regul. Pap. Short Notes Rev. Pap. 2005, 44, 5040–5044. 10.1143/JJAP.44.5040. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  11. Kumari R.; Ahlawat N.; Agarwal A.; Sanghi S.; Sindhu M.; Ahlawat N. Phase transformation and impedance spectroscopic study of Ba substituted Na0.5Bi0.5TiO3 ceramics. J. Alloys Compd. 2016, 676, 452–460. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.03.088. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  12. Zhang H.; Chen C.; Zhao X.; Deng H.; Ren B.; Li X.; Luo H.; Li S. Structure and electrical properties of Na1/2Bi1/2TiO3-xK1/2Bi1/2TiO3 lead-free ferroelectric single crystals. Solid State Commun. 2015, 201, 125–129. 10.1016/j.ssc.2014.08.007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  13. Li Y.; Zhang Y.; Sun H.; Liu X.; Sui H.; Zhou D.; Guo Q. Phase structure and electrical properties of lead-free (1 – 2x)NBT-xKBT-xBT ceramics. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2018, 29, 7851–7856. 10.1007/s10854-018-8784-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  14. Wei M.; Huang X.; Gao C.; Cui Y.. Étude sur NBT - KBT - BT système ternaire céramique piézoélectrique sans plomb. Piezoelectr. Acoustoopt 2008. [Google Scholar]
  15. Jones G.; Kreisel J. A structural study of the (Na1–xKx)0.5Bi0.5TiO3 perovskite series as a function of substitution (x) and temperature. Powder Diffraction 2002, 17, 301. 10.1154/1.1505047. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  16. Takenaka T.; Maruyama K. I.; Sakata K. (bi1/2na1/2)tio3-bati o3 system for lead-free piezoelectric ceramics. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 1991, 30, 2236–2239. 10.1143/JJAP.30.2236. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  17. Jiang X. P.; Lin M.; Tu N.; Chen C.; Li Y. M. Synthesis of K0.5Bi0.5TiO3 nanowires and ceramics by a simple hydrothermal method. Mater. Sci. Eng., B 2010, 175, 90–93. 10.1016/j.mseb.2010.06.010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kumari R.; Ahlawat N.; Agarwal A.; Sanghi S.; Sindhu M. Structural transformation and investigation of dielectric properties of Ca substituted (Na0.5Bi0.5) 0.95–xBa0.05 Cax TiO3 ceramics. J. Alloys Compd. 2017, 695, 3282–3289. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.11.200. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  19. Yang C.; Han Y.; Feng C.; Lin X.; Huang S.; Cheng X.; Cheng Z. Toward Multifunctional Electronics: Flexible NBT-Based Film with a Large Electrocaloric Effect and High Energy Storage Property. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2020, 12, 6082–6089. 10.1021/acsami.9b21105. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Xiao H.; Luo C.; Huangfu G.; Guo Y. Boosting the Photocatalytic Ability of Bandgap Engineered (Na0.5Bi0.5)TiO3-BaTiO3by N-Ni Codoping. J. Phys. Chem. C 2020, 124, 11810–11818. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.0c02542. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  21. You D.; Tan H.; Yan Z.; Gao H.; Chen S.; Ma W.; Fan P.; Tran N.-M.-A.; Liu Y.; Salamon D.; Zhang H. Enhanced Dielectric Energy Storage Performance of 0.45Na0.5Bi0.5TiO3–0.55Sr0.7Bi0.2TiO3/AlN 0–3 Type Lead-Free Composite Ceramics. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2022, 14, 17652–17661. 10.1021/acsami.2c01406. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Mallikarjuna A.; Ramesh S.; Kumar N. S.; Naidu K. C. B.; Ratnam K. V.; Manjunatha H.; Rao B. P. Structural transformation and high negative dielectric constant behavior in (1-x) (Al0·2La0·8TiO3) + (x) (BiFeO3) (x = 0.2–0.8) nanocomposites. Phys. E Low-dimensional Syst. Nanostructures 2020, 122, 114204. 10.1016/j.physe.2020.114204. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  23. Ma R.; Cheng C.; Qu Y.; Fan R. Tailorable negative permittivity of graphene-carbon nanotube/copper calcium titanate metacomposites. Ceram. Int. 2021, 47, 9971–9978. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.12.142. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  24. Xin J.; Zong J.; Gao J.; Wang Y.; Song Y.; Zhang X. Extraction and control of permittivity of hyperbolic metamaterials with optical nonlocality. Optics Express 2021, 29 (12), 18572–18586. 10.1364/OE.426746. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Fan G.; Wang Z.; Ren H.; Liu Y.; Fan R. Dielectric dispersion of copper/rutile cermets: Dielectric resonance, relaxation, and plasma oscillation. Scr. Mater. 2021, 190, 1–6. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2020.08.027. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  26. Li Q.; Zhu G. Controlling negative permittivity and permeability behavior in LaFeO3 through sintering temperature. Ceram. Int. 2021, 47, 5244–5248. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.10.104. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  27. Wang Z.; Sun K.; Xie P.; Liu Y.; Gu Q.; Fan R.; Wang J. Epsilon-negative BaTiO3/Cu composites with high thermal conductivity and yet low electrical conductivity. J. Materiomics 2020, 6, 145. 10.1016/j.jmat.2020.01.007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  28. Otoničar M.; Škapin S. D.; Spreitzer M.; Suvorov D. Compositional range and electrical properties of the morphotropic phase boundary in the Na0.5Bi0.5TiO3-K0.5Bi0.5TiO3 system. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2010, 30, 971–979. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2009.10.006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  29. Adhikary G. D.; Khatua D. K.; Senyshyn A.; Ranjan R. Long-period structural modulation on the global length scale as the characteristic feature of the morphotropic phase boundaries in the Na0.5Bi0.5TiO3 based lead-free piezoelectrics. Acta Mater. 2019, 164, 749–760. 10.1016/j.actamat.2018.11.016. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  30. Mezilet O.; Assali A.; Meskine S.; Boukortt A.; Halati M. S. New insights into the piezoelectric, thermodynamic and thermoelectric properties of lead-free ferroelectric perovskite Na0.5Bi0.5TiO3 from Ab initio calculations. Mater. Today Commun. 2022, 31, 103371. 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.103371. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  31. Kumar A.; Rao T. D.; Katta V. S.; Kumar Raavi S. S.; Asthana S. Structural, impedance, and photoluminescence properties of Ho3+ substituted Na0·5Bi0·5TiO3. Phys. B Condens. Matter 2022, 639, 413926. 10.1016/j.physb.2022.413926. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  32. Zhang Y.; Li W.; Zhang S.; Tang X.; Liu Q.; Jiang Y.; Tang Z.; Guo X. The dielectric relaxation and impedance spectroscopy analysis of (Bi0.5Na0.5)TiO3-based ceramics. Mater. Res. Bull. 2022, 153, 111874. 10.1016/j.materresbull.2022.111874. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  33. Das R.; Choudhary R. N. P. Studies of structural, dielectric relaxor and electrical characteristics of lead-free double Perovskite:Gd2NiMnO6. Solid State Sci. 2019, 87, 1–8. 10.1016/j.solidstatesciences.2018.10.020. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  34. Singha A.; Praharaj S.; Rout D. Microstructural and impedance studies of 0.72NBT-0.2ST-0.08KNN ceramic. Mater. Today Proc. 2022, 7314. 10.1016/J.MATPR.2022.04.974. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  35. Coondoo I.; Panwar N.; Alikin D.; Bdikin I.; Islam S. S.; Turygin A.; Shur V. Y.; Kholkin A. L. A comparative study of structural and electrical properties in lead-free BCZT 38 ceramics: Influence of the synthesis method. Acta Mater. 2018, 155, 331–342. 10.1016/j.actamat.2018.05.029. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  36. Rodríguez-Carvajal J. Recent advances in magnetic structure determination by neutron powder diffraction. Phys. B Condens. Matter 1993, 192, 55–69. 10.1016/0921-4526(93)90108-I. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  37. Mesrar M.; Lamcharfi T.; Echatoui N.-S.; Abdi F.; Ahjyaje F. Z.; Haddad M. Effect of barium doping on electrical and electromechanical properties of (1-x)(Na0.5Bi0.5) TiO3-xBaTiO3. Mediterranean Journal of Chemistry 2019, 8 (3), 198–208. 10.13171/mjc8319050908mm. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  38. Li Y.; Zhang Y.; Sun H.; Liu X.; Sui H.; Zhou D.; Guo Q. Phase structure and electrical properties of lead-free (1 – 2x)NBT-xKBT-xBT ceramics. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2018, 29, 7851–7856. 10.1007/s10854-018-8784-y. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  39. Li W.L.; Cao W.P.; Xu D.; Wang W.; Fei W.D. Phase structure and piezoelectric properties of NBT-KBT-BT ceramics prepared by sol-gel flame synthetic approach. Journal of alloys and compounds, 2014, 613, 181–186. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2014.06.031. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  40. Yan H.; Zhang H.; Deng H.; Liu X.; Zhao X.; Lin D.; Li X.; Luo H.; Ko J.-H.; Ahn C. W. Enhanced piezoelectric response and thermal stability in (1 – x – y)(Na1/2Bi1/2)TiO3-y(K1/2Bi1/2)TiO3-xBaTiO3 ternary ferroelectric single crystals. Scr. Mater. 2016, 113, 43–47. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2015.10.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  41. Bellavia S.; Gratton S.; Riccietti E. A Levenberg-Marquardt method for large nonlinear least-squares problems with dynamic accuracy in functions and gradients. Numer. Math. 2018, 140. 10.1007/s00211-018-0977-z. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  42. Liu X.; Tan X. Giant strains in non-textured (Bi1/2Na1/2) TiO3-based lead-free ceramics. Advanced materials 2016, 28 (3), 574–578. 10.1002/adma.201503768. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Li G.; Shi C.; Zhu K.; Ge G.; Yan F.; Lin J.; Zhai J. Achieving synergistic electromechanical and electrocaloric responses by local structural evolution in lead-free BNT-based relaxor ferroelectrics. Chem. Eng. J. 2022, 431. 10.1016/j.cej.2021.133386. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  44. Guo Y.; Liu Y.; Withers R. L.; Brink F.; Chen H. Large electric field-induced strain and antiferroelectric behavior in (1-x)(Na0.5Bi0.5)TiO3-x BaTiO3 ceramics. Chem. Mater. 2011, 23, 219–228. 10.1021/cm102719k. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  45. Malik R. A.; Kang J.-K.; Hussain A.; Ahn C.-W.; Han H.-S.; Lee J.-S. High strain in lead-free Nb-doped Bi1/2(Na0.84K 0.16)1/2TiO3-SrTiO3 incipient piezoelectric ceramics. Appl. Phys. Express 2014, 7, 061502. 10.7567/APEX.7.061502. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  46. Tolosa J. O.; Ortiz C. A. Caracterización De Películas Delgadas Mediante El Difractometro X’Pert-PRO PANalytical (Caracterization of Thin Films by X’Pert-PRO PANalytical Diffractometer). Momento 2014, 48, 38. [Google Scholar]
  47. Kibasomba P. M.; Dhlamini S.; Maaza M.; Liu C.-P.; Rashad M. M.; Rayan D. A.; Mwakikunga B. W. Strain and grain size of TiO2 nanoparticles from TEM, Raman spectroscopy and XRD: The revisiting of the Williamson-Hall plot method. Results Phys. 2018, 9, 628–635. 10.1016/j.rinp.2018.03.008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  48. Singh O.; Kumar A.; Kumar K.; Agarwal A.; Sanghi S. Sintering time dependent structural and magnetic phase transformations in Pr doped BiFeO3 multiferroics. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2021, 519, 167412. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2020.167412. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  49. Singh O.; Agarwal A.; Sanghi S.; Singh J. Variation of crystal structure, magnetization, and dielectric properties of Nd and Ba co-doped BiFeO3 multiferroics. Int. J. Appl. Ceram. Technol. 2019, 16, 119–129. 10.1111/ijac.13052. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  50. Gaikwad V. M.; Brahma M.; Borah R.; Ravi S. Structural, optical and magnetic properties of Pr2FeCrO6 nanoparticles. J. Solid State Chem. 2019, 278, 120903. 10.1016/j.jssc.2019.120903. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  51. Israel S.; Saravanan R.; Srinivasan N.; Rajaram R. K. High resolution electron density mapping for LiF and NaF by maximum entropy method (MEM). J. Phys. Chem. Solids 2003, 64, 43–49. 10.1016/S0022-3697(02)00208-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  52. Saravanakumar S.; Saravanan R. Effect of sintering temperature on the magnetic properties and charge density distribution of nano-NiO. Chem. Pap. 2014, 68, 788–797. 10.2478/s11696-013-0519-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  53. Gowri G.; Saravanan R.; Sasikumar S.; Shameem Banu I. B. Exchange bias effect, ferroelectric property, primary bonding and charge density analysis of La1-xCexFeO3 multiferroics. Mater. Res. Bull. 2019, 118, 110512. 10.1016/j.materresbull.2019.110512. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  54. Singh P.; Pandey R.; Singh P. K.; Singh P. Effect of synthesis route on the structural and electrical properties of sodium bismuth titanate: A comparative study of solid-state and polyol mediated synthesis. Mater. Today Proc. 2021, 46, 5711–5715. 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.12.1174. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  55. Singh P.; Pandey R.; Singh P. Polyol-mediated synthesis of Bi-deficient Mg2+-doped sodium bismuth titanate and study of oxide ion migration behavior with functional properties. J. Alloys Compd. 2021, 860, 158492. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2020.158492. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  56. Li M.; Pietrowski M. J.; De Souza R. A.; Zhang H.; Reaney I. M.; Cook S. N.; Kilner J. A.; Sinclair D. C. A family of oxide ion conductors based on the ferroelectric perovskite Na0. 5Bi0. 5TiO3. Nat. Mater. 2014, 13, 31. 10.1038/nmat3782. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Nirala G.; Yadav D.; Katheriya T.; Upadhyay S. Temperature dependent negative permittivity in solid solutions Sr2Mn1-xSnxO4 (x = 0, 0.3, 0.5). J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2022, 42, 453–461. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2021.10.056. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  58. Sun K.; Yang P.; He Q.; Fan R.; Wang Z.; Tian J.; Yang X.; Duan W.; Wu X.; Wang Z. Synergistic effect of dielectric resonance and plasma oscillation on negative permittivity behavior in La1-xSrxMnO3 single-phase ceramic. Ceram. Int. 2022, 48, 8417–8422. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2021.12.049. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  59. Nfissi A.; Ababoua Y.; Sayouria S.; Mrharraba L.; Saadaouia F.; Ech-chamikhc E.; Lamcharfi T. D. Piezoelectric parameters and impedance analysis of sol gel processed ce-doped bati0.97y0.03o3 ceramics. J. Ceram. Process. Res. 2020, 21, 233–239. [Google Scholar]
  60. Belhajji M.; Moutaouaffiq A.; Nfissi A.; Sayouri S.; Lamcharfi T. Investigation of the structural, microstructural, and dielectric properties of Ho-doped PbTiO3 for piezoelectric applications. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2021, 505. 10.1007/s10854-021-07323-1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  61. Pal M.; Srinivas A.; Asthana S. Enhanced magneto-electric properties and magnetodielectric effect in lead-free (1-x)0.94Na0.5Bi0.5TiO3–0.06BaTiO3-x CoFe2O4 particulate composites. J. Alloys Compd. 2022, 900, 163487. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.163487. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  62. Yu Z.; Ang C.; Guo R.; Bhalla A. S. Ferroelectric-relaxor behavior of Ba(Ti 0.7Zr 0.3) O 3 ceramics. J. Appl. Phys. 2002, 92, 2655–2657. 10.1063/1.1495069. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  63. Jo W.; Schaab S.; Sapper E.; Schmitt L. A.; Kleebe H. J.; Bell A. J.; et Rödel J. On the phase identity and its thermal evolution of lead free (Bi 1/2Na1/2)TiO3–6 mol BaTiO3. J. Appl. Phys. 2011, 110, 074106. 10.1063/1.3645054. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  64. Shi L. N.; Wang Y. G.; Ren Z. H.; Jain A.; Jiang S. S.; et Chen F. G. Significant improvement in electrical characteristics and energy storage performance of NBT-based ceramics. Ceram. Int. 2022, 48, 26973. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.06.009. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  65. Cernea M.; Galassi C.; Vasile B. S.; Capiani C.; Berbecaru C.; Pintilie I.; Pintilie L. Structural, dielectric, and piezoelectric properties of fine-grained NBT-BT0.11 ceramic derived from gel precursor. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2012, 32, 2389–2397. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2012.02.021. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  66. Singha A.; Praharaj S.; Rout S. K.; Rout D. Composition dependent crossover from ferroelectric to relaxor-ferroelectric in NBT-ST-KNN ceramics. Curr. Appl. Phys. 2022, 36, 160–170. 10.1016/j.cap.2022.02.002. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  67. Praharaj S.; Rout D.; Anwar S.; Subramanian V. Polar nano regions in lead free (Na0.5Bi0.5)TiO3-SrTiO3-BaTiO3 relaxors: An impedance spectroscopic study. J. Alloys Compd. 2017, 706, 502–510. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.02.257. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  68. Praharaj S.; Subramanian V.; Kang S. J. L.; Rout D. Origin of relaxor behavior in 0.78(Na0.5Bi0.5)TiO3–0.2SrTiO3–0.02BaTiO3 ceramic: An electrical modulus study. Mater. Res. Bull. 2018, 106, 459–464. 10.1016/j.materresbull.2018.06.041. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  69. Liu X.; Zhai J.; Shen B.; Li F.; Zhang Y.; Li P.; Liu B. Study of temperature-induced structural evolution in (Na0.5Bi0.5)TiO3-(K0.5Bi0.5)TiO3-(K0.5Na0.5)NbO3 lead-free ceramics. Curr. Appl. Phys. 2017, 17, 774–780. 10.1016/j.cap.2017.02.023. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  70. Yan T.; Han F.; Ren S.; Deng J.; Ma X.; Ren L.; Fang L.; Liu L.; Peng B.; Elouadi B. Enhanced temperature-stable dielectric properties in oxygen annealed 0.85(K0.5Na0.5)NbO3–0.15SrZrO3 ceramic. Mater. Res. Bull. 2018, 99, 403–408. 10.1016/j.materresbull.2017.11.040. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  71. Ren S.; Chen Z.; Yan T.; Han F.; Kuang X.; Fang L.; Liu L. High temperature dielectrics and defect characteristic of (Nb, Mn, Zr) modified 0.4(Ba0.8Ca0.2)TiO3 - 0.6 Bi (Mg0.5Ti0.5) O3 ceramics. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 2018, 118, 99–108. 10.1016/j.jpcs.2018.03.006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  72. Wadgane S.R.; Alone S.T.; Karim A.; Vats G.; Shirsath S. E.; Kadam R.H. Magnetic field induced polarization and magnetoelectric effect in Na0.5Bi0.5TiO3-Co0.75 Zn0.25Cr0.2Fe1.8O4 multiferroic composite. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2019, 471, 388–393. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2018.10.011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  73. Pattanayak R.; Panigrahi S. Electric and magnetic transport analysis of Na0.5Bi0.5TiO3 nanoparticles for temperature and magnetoimpedance sensor applications. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2019, 481, 162–169. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2019.03.019. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  74. Rajani Malathi A.; Usha Praveena V.J; Sundara Murthy M.; Prasad G. Vogel Fulcher analysis of electrical studies of NBT-CT ceramic composites. Mater. Today Proc. 2022, 59, 449–458. 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.11.462. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  75. Sateesh P.; Omprakash J.; Kumar G. S.; Prasad G. Studies of phase transition and impedance behavior of Ba(Zr, Ti)O3 ceramics. Journal of Advanced Dielectrics 2015, 5 (01), 1550002. 10.1142/S2010135X15500022. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  76. Uchino K.; Nomura S. Critical Exponents Of The Dielectric Constants In Diffused- Phase-Trans Ition Crystals. Ferroelectrics 1982, 44, 55–61. 10.1080/00150198208260644. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  77. Cernea M.; Galassi C.; Vasile B. S.; Capiani C.; Berbecaru C.; Pintilie I.; Pintilie L. Structural, dielectric, and piezoelectric properties of fine-grained NBT-BT 0.11 ceramic derived from gel precursor. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2012, 32, 2389–2397. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2012.02.021. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  78. Omari L. H.; Sayouri S.; Lamcharfi T.; Hajji L. Study of dielectric relaxation and diffuseness character of sol-gel derived Pb1–xLax(Fe0.03Ti0.97)O3 ceramics synthesized at lower temperature for modern nano-technological devices. J. Electroceramics 2015, 34, 28–37. 10.1007/s10832-014-9921-5. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  79. Barick B. K.; Mishra K. K.; Arora A. K.; Choudhary R. N. P.; Pradhan D. K. Impedance and Raman spectroscopic studies of (Na0.5 Bi 0.5)TiO3. J. Phys. D. Appl. Phys. 2011, 44. [Google Scholar]
  80. Rao K. S.; Tilak B.; Varada Rajulu K. C.; Swathi A.; Workineh H. A diffuse phase transition study on Ba2+ substituted (Na 0.5Bi0.5)TiO3 ferroelectric ceramic. J. Alloys Compd. 2011, 509, 7121–7129. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2011.04.021. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  81. Abdel-Ghany A.; El-Tawil R. S.; Hashem A. M.; Mauger A.; Julien C. M. Improved electrochemical performance of LiNi0.5Mn0.5O2 by Li-enrichment and AlF3 coating. Materialia 2019, 5, 100207. 10.1016/j.mtla.2019.100207. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  82. Christie G. M.; Van Berkel F. P. F. Microstructure-ionic conductivity relationships in ceria-gadolinia electrolytes. Solid State Ionics 1996, 83 (1–2), 17–27. 10.1016/0167-2738(95)00155-7. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  83. Badwal S. P. S. Grain boundary resistivity in zirconia-based materials: effect of sintering temperatures and impurities. Solid State Ionics 1995, 76 (1–2), 67–80. 10.1016/0167-2738(94)00236-L. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  84. Benyoussef M.; Zannen M.; Belhadi J.; Manoun B.; Dellis J.-L.; Lahmar A.; El Marssi M. Complex impedance and Raman spectroscopy of Na0.5(Bi1-xDyx)0.5TiO3 ceramics. Ceram. Int. 2020, 46, 10979–10991. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.01.114. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  85. Raghavender M.; Kumar G. S.; Prasad G. A-site substitution-controlled dielectric dispersion in lead-free sodium bismuth titanate. Pramana - J. Phys. 2009, 72, 999–1009. 10.1007/s12043-009-0092-x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  86. Zhang C.; Wang X.; Wang Z.; Yan H.; Li H.; Li L. Dielectric relaxation, electric modulus and ac conductivity of Mn-doped YFeO3. Ceram. Int. 2016, 42, 19461–19465. [Google Scholar]
  87. Li Y. M.; Liao R. H.; Jiang X. P.; Zhang Y. P. Impedance spectroscopy and dielectric properties of Na0.5Bi0.5TiO3-K0.5Bi0. 5TiO3 ceramics. J. Alloys Compd. 2009, 484, 961–965. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2009.05.087. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  88. Kumar A.; Asthana S. Beneficial modification of the electrical properties of ecofriendly ferroelectric ceramic Na0.5Bi0.5TiO3 by substitution of low concentration of Ho+3. Mater. Today Proc. 2021, 42, 1065–1069. 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.12.168. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  89. Kaur R.; Sharma V.; Kumar M.; Singh M.; Singh A. Conductivity relaxation in Pb0.9Sm0.10Zr0.405Ti0.495Fe0.10O3 solid solution. J. Alloys Compd. 2018, 735, 1472–1479. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.11.254. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  90. Minussi F. B.; Reis S. P.; Araújo E. B. Effects of frequency, temperature, and dc bias electric field on the dielectric properties of methylammonium lead iodide from the perspective of a relaxor-like ferroelectric. Acta Mater. 2021, 219, 117235. 10.1016/j.actamat.2021.117235. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  91. Huanosta A.; Alvarez-Fregoso O.; Amano E.; Tabares-Muñoz C.; Mendoza-Alvarez M. E.; Mendoza-Alvarez J. G. AC impedance analysis on crystalline layered and polycrystalline bismuth titanate. J. Appl. Phys. 1991, 69, 404–408. 10.1063/1.347730. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  92. Benyoussef M.; Zannen M.; Belhadi J.; Manoun B.; Dellis J.-L.; Lahmar A.; El Marssi M. Complex impedance and Raman spectroscopy of Na0.5(Bi1-xDyx)0.5TiO3 ceramics. Ceram. Int. 2020, 46, 10979. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2020.01.114. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  93. Bahuguna Saradhi B. V; Srinivas K.; Bhimasankaram T. IMPEDANCE AND MODULUS SPECTROSCOPY OF (Na1/2Bi1/2)1-xCaxTiO3 CERAMICS IMPEDANCE AND MODULUS SPECTROSCOPY OF (Na 1/2 Bi 1/2) 1–x Ca x TiO 3 CERAMICS. Artic. Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 2002, 16, 4755–4766. 10.1142/S0217979202014747. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  94. Shanmuga Sundari S.; Kumar B.; Dhanasekaran R. Synthesis, dielectric and relaxation behavior of lead free NBT-BT ceramics. Ceram. Int. 2013, 39, 555–561. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2012.06.063. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  95. Svirskas S.; Ivanov M.; Bagdzevicius S.; Macutkevic J.; Brilingas A.; Banys J.; Dec J.; Miga S.; Dunce M.; Birks E.; Antonova M.; Sternberg A. Dielectric properties of 0.4Na0.5Bi0.5TiO3-(0.6-x)SrTiO3-xPbTiO3 solid solutions. Acta Mater. 2014, 64, 123–132. 10.1016/j.actamat.2013.11.040. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  96. Zhang S. T.; Yang B.; Cao W. The temperature-dependent electrical properties of Bi0.5Na0.5TiO3-BaTiO3-Bi0.5K0.5TiO3 near the morphotropic phase boundary. Acta Mater. 2012, 60, 469–475. 10.1016/j.actamat.2011.10.010. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  97. Barde N. P.; Shewale S. S.; Solanki P. S.; Shah N. A.; Bardapurkar P. P. Effect of silica matrix on structural, optical and electrical properties of Li0.5Fe2.5O4 nanoparticles. Scr. Mater. 2021, 194, 2–7. 10.1016/j.scriptamat.2020.113712. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  98. Bendahhou A.; Marchet P.; El Barkany S.; Abou-salama M. Structural and impedance spectroscopic study of Zn-substituted Ba5CaTi2Nb8O30 tetragonal tungsten bronze ceramics. J. Alloys Compd. 2021, 882, 160716. 10.1016/j.jallcom.2021.160716. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  99. Arcoumanis C.; Green H. G.; Whitelaw J. H. Velocity and concentration measurements in a model diesel engine. Experiments in fluids 1985, 3 (5), 270–276. 10.1007/BF00281773. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Articles from ACS Omega are provided here courtesy of American Chemical Society

RESOURCES