Skip to main content
Frontiers in Microbiology logoLink to Frontiers in Microbiology
. 2022 Oct 13;13:1019599. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.1019599

Phylogenetic and genomic analyses of two new species of Clavispora (Metschnikowiaceae, Saccharomycetales) from Central China

Chun-Yue Chai 1,2, Ying Li 1, Zhen-Li Yan 3, Feng-Li Hui 1,2,*
PMCID: PMC9608443  PMID: 36312955

Abstract

Species in the genus Clavispora have previously been reported primarily in the northeast and northwest regions of China; the species diversity of Clavispora in central China is not currently clear. In this study, phylogenetic inferences of Clavispora based on sequences of a single-locus (LSU D1/D2) and a two-locus (LSU D1/D2 and ITS) were conducted. Two new species isolated from rotting wood in central China, namely Clavispora xylosa sp. nov. and Clavispora paralusitaniae sp. nov., were delimited and proposed based on morphological and molecular evidence. Cl. xylosa was closely related to C. thailandica CBS 10610T, but with 11.5% divergence in the LSU D1/D2 domains and 11.5% divergence in the ITS regions. Cl. paralusitaniae was a sister to Cl. lusitaniae CBS 6936T from which it differs with 4.7% divergence in the LSU D1/D2 domains and 5.4% divergence in the ITS regions. Description of Cl. xylosa sp. nov. and Cl. paralusitaniae sp. nov. was also supported by morphological comparisons and genomic analyses between the two new species and their closest relatives, C. thailandica CBS 10610T and Cl. lusitaniae CBS 6936T. These results indicate a potentially great diversity of Clavispora spp. inhabiting rotting wood in central China, ripe for future discovery.

Keywords: Clavispora paralusitaniae sp. nov., taxonomy, rotted wood-inhabiting yeast, genomic analyses, phylogeny, Clavispora xylosa sp. nov.

Introduction

The genus Clavispora was established by Rodrigues de Miranda and is typified by Clavispora lusitaniae, the teleomorph of Candida lusitaniae (Rodrigues de Miranda, 1979; Lachance and Phaff, 2011). Later, Lodderomyces opuntiae was reclassified as Cl. lusitaniae because its ascospore is clavate in shape (Phaff et al., 1986). Yurkov et al. (2009), identified yeasts isolated from soils and proposed a new member of the genus Clavispora, Clavispora reshetovae, based on its morphology and phylogenetic placement. In addition, due to an inability to form sexual spores, some yeast species that belong to the Clavispora clade as revealed by phylogenetic analysis based on DNA sequences were previously placed in the anamorphic genus Candida (Lu et al., 2004; Jindamorakot et al., 2007; Nguyen et al., 2007; Rosa et al., 2007; James et al., 2009; Fell et al., 2011; Groenewald et al., 2011; Lachance et al., 2011; Nakase et al., 2011; Ribeiro et al., 2011; Limtong and Kaewwichian, 2013; Zhang et al., 2014). With the implementation of the “one fungus, one name” nomenclature, the relationships between Candida and Clavispora species began to be clarified (Daniel et al., 2014; Kurtzman et al., 2018). Daniel et al. (2014) provisionally reassigned 40 Candida species that are not related to the genus Metschnikowia to the genus Clavispora, although their monophyletic origin is doubtful. Recently, Candida fructus has been transferred to Clavispora as a new combination, and Clavispora santaluciae and Candida xylosifermentans have also been included as members of the Clavispora clade (Kurtzman et al., 2018; Kaewwichian et al., 2019; Drumonde-Neves et al., 2020). The genus Clavispora belongs to the family Metschnikowiaceae in the order Saccharomycetales, and is closely related to the genus Metschnikowia based on multigene phylogenetic analyses (Kurtzman and Robnett, 2013; Kurtzman et al., 2018). To date (December 2019), the YeastIP database (Weiss et al., 2013) lists 33 members of this clade, but the actual number of species assigned to the clade has reached 35 (Kaewwichian et al., 2019; Drumonde-Neves et al., 2020): five species of the genus Clavispora and 30 asexual species still assigned to the genus Candida.

The habitats of species belonging to the Clavispora clade are very diverse and they have been found in plants (Lu et al., 2004; Rosa et al., 2007; Groenewald et al., 2011; Lachance et al., 2011; Ribeiro et al., 2011; Limtong and Kaewwichian, 2013; Zhang et al., 2014; Drumonde-Neves et al., 2020), soil (Yurkov et al., 2009; Nakase et al., 2011; Limtong and Kaewwichian, 2013), insects (Nguyen et al., 2007; Lachance et al., 2011), insect frass (Jindamorakot et al., 2007; Lachance et al., 2011; Nakase et al., 2011), fish (Lachance et al., 2011), fresh water (Fell et al., 2011), moss (Lachance et al., 2011; Kaewwichian et al., 2019), and clinical samples (Lachance and Phaff, 2011). Cl. lusitaniae can be pathogenic to humans and is responsible for about 1% of invasive candidiasis cases, particularly in pediatric and hematology–oncology patients (Merz et al., 1992; Favel et al., 2003). Some species in this clade, such as Candida akabanensis, C. xylosifermentans, and Cl opuntiae, were found to ferment D-xylose, which is the second most abundant sugar in plant cell-wall carbohydrates (Phaff et al., 1986; Lachance et al., 2011; Valinhas et al., 2018; Kaewwichian et al., 2019). The ability of yeasts to ferment D-xylose is of interest because such yeasts can be applied to bioethanol production from lignocellulosic biomass (Agbogbo and Wenger, 2007; Urbina et al., 2013). Therefore, Clavispora species are important not only due to their pathogenicity in humans, but also for their potential applications in food and biofuels.

Species in the Clavispora clade have a worldwide distribution, but most were originally identified in Asia (Lu et al., 2004; Jindamorakot et al., 2007; Lachance et al., 2011; Nakase et al., 2011; Limtong and Kaewwichian, 2013; Zhang et al., 2014; Kurtzman et al., 2018; Kaewwichian et al., 2019), Europe (Yurkov et al., 2009; Drumonde-Neves et al., 2020), North America (Nguyen et al., 2007; Fell et al., 2011; Lachance et al., 2011), or South America (Rosa et al., 2007; Groenewald et al., 2011; Ribeiro et al., 2011). Over the last several years, this clade has received a great deal of attention in Asia, with two novel species found in Japan (Lachance et al., 2011; Nakase et al., 2011) and five novel species found in Thailand (Jindamorakot et al., 2007; Nakase et al., 2011; Limtong and Kaewwichian, 2013; Kaewwichian et al., 2019). In contrast, little is known about Clavispora spp. in China. To date, only two species of the Clavispora clade have been reported in China: Candida asparagi and Candida pruni (Lu et al., 2004; Zhang et al., 2014).

The aim of the current study is to explore the species diversity of Clavispora in central China, and more importantly, to construct a more natural taxonomic system of Clavispora, based on phylogenetic analyses. In addition, genomic data that can be analyzed with tools to determine species delineation is explored.

Materials and methods

Sample collection and yeast isolation

Rotting wood samples were collected in two areas of Henan Province in central China, in the Funiu Mountain Nature Reserve (32°45′N, 113°30′E) and in the Baotianman Nature Reserve (33°27′N, 111°48′E). The predominant vegetation was characterized in those areas as a warm-temperate to subtropical forest biome. The climate was warm-temperate, with an annual precipitation volume of 885.6 mm and an average temperature of 15.2°C. Yeasts were isolated from rotting wood samples as previously described (Kaewwichian et al., 2019; Lv et al., 2020). Briefly, each wood sample (1 g) was added to 20 ml sterile D-xylose medium (yeast nitrogen base 0.67%, D-xylose 0.5%, and chloramphenicol 0.02%, pH 5.0 ± 0.2) in a 150 ml Erlenmeyer flask and then cultured at 25°C for 3–10 days on a rotary shaker. Subsequently, 0.1 ml aliquots of the enrichment culture and appropriate decimal dilutions were spread on D-xylose agar plates and then incubated at 25°C for 3–4 days. Representative colonies were selected and the yeasts were isolated through repeated plating on D-xylose agar, and then stored on yeast extract-malt extract (YM; 1% glucose, 0.5% peptone, 0.3% yeast extract, and 0.3% malt extract; pH 5.0 ± 0.2) agar slants at 4°C or in 15% glycerol at −80°C. Strains of the two new species described in this paper are listed in Table 1.

Table 1.

Novel yeast strains isolated from rotting wood.

Strain Source Location
Clavispora xylosa
NYNU 174173T Rotting wood Baotianman Nature Reserve, Henan, China
NYNU 168193 Rotting wood Funiu Mountain Nature Reserve, Henan, China
Clavispora paralusitaniae
NYNU 167235 Rotting wood Funiu Mountain Nature Reserve, Henan, China
NYNU 168424 Rotting wood Baotianman Nature Reserve, Henan, China
NYNU 161120T Rotting wood Funiu Mountain Nature Reserve, Henan, China

Phenotypic characterization

The morphological, physiological and biochemical characteristics of the two new species were determined using standard methods (Kurtzman et al., 2011). Carbon and nitrogen assimilation tests were performed using liquid media, and growth was observed for up to 4 weeks. Carbon fermentation was tested in a YP base media (1% yeast extract and 2% peptone, pH 5.0 ± 0.2), and Durham tubes were used to visualize carbon dioxide production. Growth was assessed at a range of temperatures (30, 35, 37, and 40°C) by streaking cells onto yeast extract peptone glucose (YPD) agar (2% glucose, 2% peptone, 1% yeast extract, and 2% agar) plates and incubating them for 2 weeks. Formation of true hyphae and pseudohyphae were investigated using the Dalmau plate method on both cornmeal (CM) and 5% malt extract (ME) agar plates. The beginning of the sexual stage was determined by incubating single or mixed cultures of each of the two strains on CM agar, 5% ME agar, potato-dextrose agar (PDA; 20% potato infusion, 2% glucose, 2% agar), and yeast carbon base plus 0.01% ammonium sulfate (YCBAS) agar at 15°C or 25°C for 6 weeks (Yurkov et al., 2009; Lachance and Phaff, 2011; Drumonde-Neves et al., 2020). Photomicrographs were taken using a Leica DM 2500 microscope (Leica Microsystems GmbH, Wetzlar, Germany) with a Leica DFC295 digital microscope color camera using bright field, phase contrast, and differential interference contrast (DIC) optics. Novel taxonomic descriptions and proposed names were deposited in MycoBank (http://www.mycobank.org; 12 September 2022).

DNA extraction, amplification, and sequencing

Genomic DNA was extracted from the yeasts using an Ezup Column Yeast Genomic DNA Purification Kit (Sangon Biotech, Shanghai, China) following the manufacturer’s instructions. The internal transcribed spacer (ITS) regions and the D1/D2 domains of the large subunit (LSU) rRNA gene were amplified using the primer pairs ITS1/ITS4 (White et al., 1990) and NL1/NL4 (Kurtzman and Robnett, 1998), respectively. The PCR program was as follows: initial denaturation at 95°C for 3 min; 35 cycles of 94°C for 40 s, 56°C for 45 s, and 72°C for 1 min; and a final extension of 72°C for 10 min (Shi et al., 2021). PCR products were cleaned and sequenced by Sangon Biotech Inc.

Phylogenetic analysis

Phylogenetic analyses were conducted using the novel sequences generated from the five strains isolated in this study and all reference sequences of related strains available in GenBank (Table 2). Alignments for the LSU D1/D2 and ITS loci were conducted using MAFFT v7.110 with default settings (Katoh and Standley, 2013) and manually corrected where necessary. To establish the identity of the isolates at the species level, phylogenetic analyses were conducted first with each locus individually, then using two loci (ITS and LSU D1/D2) together, that are widely used molecular “barcode” regions for fungi, with LSU D1/D2 particularly suitable for yeasts. Phylogenetic trees were constructed in MEGA11 software (Tamura et al., 2021) for each of the datasets using the maximum likelihood (ML) and neighbor-joining (NJ) methods. Saccharomyces cerevisiae CBS 1171T was used as the outgroup (Kurtzman et al., 2018; Kaewwichian et al., 2019).

Table 2.

Sequences used in molecular phylogenetic analysis.

Species name Strain no. Sample Locality GenBank accession no.
ITS LSU D1/D2
Candida akabanensis CBS 5039T Exudate Japan NR_155003 EU100744
C. asparagi CBS 9770T Fruit China NR_155004 NG_055316
C. berkhoutiae CBS 11722T Frass Thailand KY101957 DQ400372
C. blattae CBS 9871T Insect USA NR_111407 NG_055375
C. carvajalis CBS 11361T Rotten wood Ecuador KY102022 AM946644
C. dosseyi CBS 10313T Insect USA NR_111406 NG_055374
C. ezoensis CBS 11753T Soil Japan KY102082 AB462347
C. flosculorum CBS 10566T Flower Brazil NR_137682 EF137918
C. intermedia CBS 572T Feces Africa NR_111248 NG_055404
C. middelhoveniana CBS 12306T Sugarcane Brazil NR_155005 NG_060817
C. oregonensis CBS 5036T Frass USA NR_155006 NG_055406
C. phyllophila CBS 12671T Phylloplane Thailand / NG_055303
C. pruni CBS 12814T Plums China NR_159744 NG_064321
C. pseudoflosculorum CBS 8584T Flower Guyana NR_165968/ NG_055379
C. pseudointermedia CBS 6918T Fish paste Japan NR_155007 NG_055407
C. sharkensis CBS 11368T Fresh water USA MK503789 NG_055377
C. thailandica CBS 10610T Frass Thailand NR_159560 NG_064310
C. tsuchiyae CBS 7195T Moss Japan NR_155010 NG_055413
C. vitiphila CBS 12672T Phylloplane Thailand AB736148 NG_055304
C. xylosifermentans CBS11573T Moss Thailand LC440109 AB525240
Clavispora fructus CBS 6380T Banana Japan NR_111292 NG_055405
Cl. lusitaniae CBS 6936T Peel juice Israel NR_130677 NG_055408
Cl. opuntiae CBS 7068T Prickly pear Australia NR_155011 NG_055409
Cl. paralusitaniae NYNU 167235 Rotting wood China OP019831 OP019826
Cl. paralusitaniae NYNU 168424 Rotting wood China OP019833 OP019830
Cl. paralusitaniae NYNU 161120 T Rotting wood China MF136066 MF136063
Cl. reshetovae CBS 11556T Soil Germany NR_137723 NG_055376
Cl. santaluciae CBS 16465T Grapes Portugal MN967319 MN970158
Cl. xylosa NYNU 174173 T Rotting wood China MG255724 MG255710
Cl. xylosa NYNU 168193 Rotting wood China OP019828 OP019827
Metschnikowia bicuspidata CBS 5575T Fresh water USA KY104192 U44822
M. reukaufii CBS 5834T Flower Canada NR_111252 U44825
Saccharomyces cerevisiae CBS 1171T / / NR_111007 AY048154

Entries in bold are newly generated for this study.

CBS, CBS-KNAW collections, Westerdijk Fungal Biodiversity Institute, Utrecht, Netherlands. NYNU, Microbiology Lab, Nanyang Normal University, Henan, China. Ttype strain.

Analysis with the ML method was performed using the best-fit substitution model GTR+ I + G (Nei and Kumar, 2000), whereas analysis with the NJ method was performed using the Kimura 2-parameter model (Saitou and Nei, 1987). The confidence levels of the clades were estimated from 1,000 bootstrap replicates (Felsenstein, 1985).

Genome sequencing and assembly

The genomes of the type strains of C. thailandica and Cl. lusitaniae are publicly available, whereas the genomes of the novel strains NYNU 174173T and NYNU 161120T were sequenced for this study. The genomic DNA of each strain was isolated using a phenol: chloroform extraction protocol (Schwartz and Sherlock, 2016). The genomic DNA of the strains were sequenced using long-read PacBio platforms with single-molecule real-time (SMRT) technology. Sequencing libraries were constructed using TruSeq DNA PCR Free (350) kits (Illumina) and run on an Illumina NovaSeq instrument at Beijing BerryGenomics Co., Ltd. (Beijing, China).

To generate whole genome assemblies, paired-end Illumina reads were processed with the meta-assembler pipeline iWGS v1.1 (Zhou et al., 2016). Briefly, this pipeline performed quality-based read trimming followed by k-mer length optimization, then used a range of state-of-the-art assemblers to generate several genome assemblies for each strain. The quality of each assembly was assessed using QUAST v3.1 (Gurevich et al., 2013), and the best assembly for each species was chosen based on N50 statistics and genome size as calculated with Quast v5.0.2 (Gurevich et al., 2013).

Genomic analyses

The DNA G + C content was calculated and protein-coding open reading frames (ORFs) were predicted using Glimmer v3.02 (Delcher et al., 2007). We used RNAmmer v1.2 (Lagesen et al., 2007) and tRNAscan-SE v1.3.1 (Lowe and Eddy, 1997) to predict rRNAs and tRNAs, respectively. The average nucleotide identity (ANI) values were calculated between strains NYNU 174173T and NYNU 161120T genomes and those of the most closely related species using a web-based calculator (Yoon et al., 2017)1 and FastANI (Jain et al., 2018). To calculate the distances between genomes, digital DNA–DNA homology (dDDH) values were estimated using the Genome-to-Genome Distance Calculator 2.1.2 The dDDH values presented here were calculated using Formula 2 (IXY: = sum of identical base pairs over all HSPs), which estimates values based on the identities of high-scoring segment pairs (Meier-Kolthoff et al., 2013).

Results

Phylogenetic analysis

Among the yeasts isolated from rotting wood samples collected in Henan Province, central China, five strains that could not be identified as known yeast species based on the rDNA sequences were selected for further taxonomic characterization. To establish the taxonomic position of the novel strains, phylogenetic analysis was carried out with the LSU D1/D2 sequences of the five novel strains and type strains of members of the Clavispora clade. The resulting phylogenetic trees showed that the five strains represented two new members of the Clavispora clade and could be classified into two taxa (Figures 1, 2). Three strains (NUNU 167235, NUNU 168424, and NYNU 161120) in group NYNU 161120T had identical sequences in both the D1/D2 and ITS regions, which indicated that they are conspecific. Two other strains (NUNU 168193 and NYNU 174173) in group NYNU 174173T had identical sequences in both the D1/D2 and ITS regions, which indicated that they are conspecific. The two new members of the Clavispora clade clearly distinguishable from those of other species, whether undescribed or previously characterized.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Maximum likelihood (ML) phylogram of Clavispora species based on the D1/D2 domains of the LSU rRNA gene. Saccharomyces cerevisiae CBS 1171T was used as the outgroup. ML and neighbor-joining (NJ) bootstrap support values above 50% are shown at the nodes (ML/NJ). The novel strains described in this study are shown in bold.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Maximum likelihood (ML) phylogram of Clavispora species based on the combined ITS + LSU D1/D2 sequence data. Saccharomyces cerevisiae CBS 1171T was used as the outgroup. ML and neighbor-joining (NJ) bootstrap support values above 50% are shown at the nodes (ML/NJ). The novel strains described in this study are shown in bold.

Strain NYNU 174173T formed a well-delineated lineage with C. thailandica with a high bootstrap value (95% ML; 99% NJ; Figure 1) in the Candida intermedia subclade. Strain NYNU 174173T differed by 11.5% divergence (24 substitutions and four gaps) from its close relative C. thailandica CBS 10610T in the LSU D1/D2 domains and differed by 11.5% divergence (30 substitutions and 11 gaps) in the ITS regions. In accordance with the guidelines for yeast identification based on nucleotide divergences, yeast strains with 1% or more substitution in the D1/D2 domain or 1–2% nucleotide differences in the ITS region usually represent separate species (Kurtzman and Robnett, 1998; Scorzetti et al., 2002). The differences in both the LSU D1/D2 and ITS sequences were significant enough for this strain to be considered a novel species. The close relationship between strain NYNU 174173T and C. thailandica CBS 10610T was further confirmed by the combined ITS and LSU D1/D2 dataset (84% ML; 85% NJ; Figure 2).

Strain NYNU 161120T clustered with Cl. lusitaniae with strong bootstrap support (88% ML; 99% NJ; Figure 1) in the Cl. lusitaniae subclade. Its nearest phylogenetic neighbor was Cl. lusitaniae CBS 6936T, from which strain NYNU 161120T differed by 4.7% divergence (14 substitutions and two gaps) in the LSU D1/D2 domains and 5.4% divergence (24 substitutions and four gaps) in the ITS regions. According to the criteria mentioned above, the relatively low sequence similarity indicated that strain NYNU 161120T and Cl. lusitaniae CBS 6936T were distinct Clavispora species. The phylogenetic relationships between strain NYNU 161120T and the previously described Clavispora species were further confirmed by the phylogenetic tree built from the combined ITS and LSU D1/D2 dataset (100% ML; 100% NJ; Figure 2).

Phenotypic characterization

Phenotypic characterization was carried out for strains NYNU 174173T and NYNU 161120T using standard methods (Kurtzman et al., 2011). The yeasts shared similar phenotypic characteristics with other species in the Clavispora clade. Colonies were white to cream-colored, buttery, convex, and had an entire margin (Figure 3A, 4A). Cells were ovoid to elongate, proliferated by multilateral budding (Figure 3B, 4B), and formed pseudohyphae but not hyphae (Figure 3C, 4C). They were fermentative and could not assimilate nitrate as a nitrogen source. Their growth in vitamin-free medium was inconsistent with previous descriptions of the Clavispora clade (Jindamorakot et al., 2007; Yurkov et al., 2009; Lachance and Phaff, 2011), but studies of other closely related species demonstrated that this trait must be considered variable in this clade. Neither conjugation nor ascospores were observed in single or mixed cultures on sporulation media, suggesting that these strains represent anamorphs of the genus Clavispora.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Morphological characteristics of Clavispora xylosa sp. nov. (CICC 33277, holotype). (A) Colony morphology on YM agar after growth for 3 days at 25°C. (B) Budding cells after growth for 3 d in YM broth at 25°C. (C) Pseudohyphae with blastoconidia on CM agar after growth for 7 days at 25°C. Scale bars = 10 μm.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Morphological characteristics of Clavispora paralusitaniae sp. nov. (CICC 33276, holotype). (A) Colony morphology on YM agar after growth for 3 days at 25°C. (B) Budding cells after growth for 3 days in YM broth at 25°C. (C) Pseudohyphae with blastoconidia on CM agar after growth for 7 days at 25°C. Scale bars = 10 μm.

Phenotypic characteristics that differed between strains NYNU 174173T and NYNU 161120T and closely related species in the Clavispora clade are shown in Table 3. Strain NYNU 174173T could be differentiated from the most closely related known species, C. thailandica CBS 10610T (Jindamorakot et al., 2007), based on fermentation of D-xylose; growth at 35°C; ability to assimilate L-arabinose and L-rhamnose; inability to assimilate D-arabinose, 2-keto-D-gluconate, DL-lactate, or cadaverine; and the inability to grow in 0.01% cycloheximide. Strain NYNU 161120T could be morphologically differentiated from its nearest phylogenetic neighbor, Cl. lusitaniae CBS 6936T (Lachance and Phaff, 2011), by the inability to produce one or two clavate ascospores in a liberated ascus. Physiologically, strain NYNU 161120T could be differentiated from Cl. lusitaniae CBS 6936T based on the ability to assimilate inulin; the inability to assimilate ethanol; and the inability to grow in 10% NaCl with 5% glucose and in 0.01% cycloheximide (Table 3).

Table 3.

Phenotypic characteristics that differed between the novel strains NYNU 174173T and NYNU 161120T and their closely related taxa.

Characteristics NYNU
174173T
C. thailandica CBS 10610T* NYNU
161120T
Cl. lusitaniae
CBS 6936T*
Fermentation of D-xylose w n
Assimilation of
L-Arabinose +
D-Arabinose + v
L-Rhamnose + + +
Inulin w
2-Keto-D-giuconate + + +
DL-Lactate + w v
Ethanol +
Cadaverine + + +
Growth tests
10%Nacl/5%glucose +
0.01% Cycloheximide + +
Growth at 35°C + + +

+, positive reaction; −, negative reaction; w, weakly positive; v, variable reaction; n, data not available. All data from this study, except* which were obtained from the original description (Phaff et al., 1986; Jindamorakot et al., 2007).

Genomic analyses

The genomes of strains NYNU 174173T and NYNU 161120T were assembled and compared with those of the closest related species, C. thailandica CBS 10610T and Cl. lusitaniae CBS 6936T, respectively. The detailed characteristics of these genomes are shown in Table 4. The genome of strain NYNU 174173T is 15,305,418 bp in size, consisting of 10 scaffolds with an N50 length of 2,408,949 bp, and maximum and minimum scaffold lengths of 3,517,412 and 56,211 bp, respectively. The genome of strain NYNU 161120T is 12,617,314 bp in size, consisting of eight scaffolds with an N50 length of 1,920,963 bp, and maximum and minimum scaffold lengths of 2,542,591 and 780,161 bp, respectively. A total of 4,930 genes, 4,647 ORFs, and 283 RNAs are predicted in strain NYNU 174173T, and a total of 5,085 genes, 4,774 ORFs, and 311 rRNAs are predicted in strain NYNU 161120T. The genomic G + C contents are 50.87 and 44.51% for strains NYNU 174173T and NYNU 161120T, respectively; this is much higher than the G + C content in C. thailandica CBS 10610 T and Cl. lusitaniae CBS 6936T (Table 4).

Table 4.

Genome properties for strains NYNU 174173T and NYNU 161120T and for the type strains of the most closely related species in the Clavispora clade.

Attributes NYNU 174173T C. thailandica CBS 10610T* NYNU 161120T Cl. lusitaniae CBS 6936T*
Genome size (Mb) 15,305,418 16,310,147 12,617,314 11,992,787
Number of scaffolds 10 8 8 53
Scaffold N50 (bp) 2,408,949 2,767,786 1,920,963 699,681
Maximum scaffold size (bp) 3,517,412 3,371,249 2,542,591 1,779,567
Minimum scaffold size (bp) 56,211 594,379 780,161 1,006
GC content (mol%, genome) 50.87% 45.96% 44.51% 44.46%
Number of genes 4,930 5,782 5,085 5,740
Number of ORFs
Protein-coding genes
4,647 5,516 4,774 5,537
Number of RNAs 283 266 311 201

All data from this study, except* which were obtained from GenBank (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/).

In yeast systematics, genomic data can be analyzed with tools that calculate genome-wide genetic distances between a novel taxon and its closest relatives to determine species delineation (Libkind et al., 2011; Lachance and Lee, 2020; Cadež et al., 2021). For estimation of genetic distances between strains NYNU 174173T and NYNU 161120T and their closest relatives, we used two tools that are available as web interfaces: the ANI calculator and the Genome-to-Genome Distance Calculator. The ANI and DDH values between the strain NYNU 174173T and C. thailandica CBS 10610T were 77.78 and 30.70%, respectively (Table 5); the ANI and DDH values between the strain NYNU 161120T and Cl. lusitaniae CBS 6936T were 94.72 and 53.50%, respectively. All these percentages were lower than 95 and 70%, respectively, which are the defined cut-off limits for species delineation (Lachance and Lee, 2020; Cadež et al., 2021), and further support the inclusion of these two strains as novel taxa in the Clavispora clade.

Table 5.

Matrix of in silico DNA–DNA hybridization (DDH) and Ortho average nucleotide identity (OrthoANI) percentages between the genomes of strains NYNU 174173T and NYNU 161120T and the type strains of the most closely related species in the Clavispora clade.

ANI
In silico DDH
NYNU
174173T
C. thailandica CBS 10610T NYNU
161120T
Cl. lusitaniae CBS 6936T
NYNU 174173T 77.78% 71.69% 71.42%
C. thailandica CBS 10610T 30.70% 71.68% 71.51%
NYNU 161120T 32.50% 30.70% 94.72%
Cl. lusitaniae CBS 6936T 28.80% 26.90% 53.50%

Taxonomy

Clavispora xylosa F.L. Hui & C.Y. Chai sp. nov. (Figure 3).

Mycobank No.: 845627.

Type. China, Henan Province, Baotianman Nature Reserve, rotting wood, 3 August, 2016, NYNU 174173 (holotype CICC 33277, culture ex-type CBS 15236).

Etymology. Clavispora xylosa (xy.lo’sa. N.L. masc. adj. xylosa, of or pertaining to xylose, because the type strain can assimilate D-xylose).

Description. In YM broth after 3 days at 25°C, cells are ovoid to elongate (2–5.5 × 3.5–7 μm) and occur singly or in pairs (Figure 3B). Budding is multilateral. In YM broth after a month, a sediment is formed, but a pellicle is not observed. On YM agar after 3 days at 25°C, colonies are white to cream-colored, buttery, convex, and smooth, with entire margins (Figure 3A). After 7 days at 25°C on a Dalmau plate culture with CM agar, hyphae are not produced, but pseudohyphae are present (Figure 3C). Asci or signs of conjugation were not observed on sporulation media.

Glucose, galactose, trehalose and D-xylose (weak) are fermented. Glucose, galactose, L-sorbose, D-glucosamine, D-xylose, L-arabinose, L-rhamnose, sucrose, maltose, trehalose, methyl α-D-glucoside, cellobiose, salicin, arbutin, lactose, melezitose, ribitol, xylitol, D-glucitol, D-mannitol, galactitol, D-glucono-1, 5-lactone, D-gluconate, succinate, and citrate are assimilated. No growth was observed in D-ribose, D-arabinose, melibiose, raffinose, inulin, glycerol, erythritol, myo-inositol, 2-Keto-D-gluconate, D-glucuronate, DL-lactate, methanol or ethanol. In nitrogen-assimilation tests, growth is present on ethylamine, L-lysine, glucosamine, and D-tryptophan, while growth is absent on nitrate, nitrite, cadaverine, creatine, creatinine, and imidazole. Growth is observed at 35°C but not at 37°C. Growth in vitamin-free medium is present, but growth in the presence of 0.01% cycloheximide, 10% NaCl with 5% glucose and 1% acetic acid is absent. Starch-like compounds are not produced. Urease activity and diazonium blue B reactions are negative. The G + C content of the genome of the strain NYNU 174173T is 50.87 mol%, its approximate size is 15.3 Mbp.

Note. Members of Cl. xylosa have intraspecific variability in phenotypic characteristics. Strain NYNU 174173T is able to assimilate maltose, salicin and ribitol, while strain NYNU 168193 do not.

Clavispora paralusitaniae F.L. Hui & C.Y. Chai sp. nov. (Figure 4).

Mycobank No.: 845628.

Type. China, Henan Province, Funiu Mountain Nature Reserve, rotting wood, 2 August, 2016, NYNU 161120 (holotype CICC 33276, culture ex-type CBS 15234).

Etymology. Clavispora paralusitaniae (pa.ra.lu.si.ta.ni’ae. N.L. gen. n. paralusitaniae, similar to lusitaniae, referring to the close relationship to Clavispora lusitaniae).

Description. In YM broth after 3 days at 25°C, cells are ovoid to elliptical (2–7 × 2–8 μm) and occur singly or in pairs (Figure 4B). Budding is multilateral. In YM broth after a month, a sediment is formed, but a pellicle is not observed. On YM agar after 3 days at 25°C, colonies are white to cream-colored, buttery, raised, and smooth, with entire margins (Figure 4A). After 7 days at 25°C on a Dalmau plate culture with CM agar, hyphae are not produced, but pseudohyphae are present (Figure 4C). Asci or signs of conjugation were not observed on sporulation media.

Glucose, galactose, maltose (weak), sucrose, trehalose (weak), and cellobiose are fermented. Glucose, galactose, l-sorbose, D-glucosamine, D-xylose, L-rhamnose, sucrose, maltose, trehalose, methyl α-D-glucoside, cellobiose, salicin, arbutin, melezitose, inulin (weak), glycerol, ribitol, xylitol, D-glucitol, D-mannitol, D-glucono-1, 5-lactone, 2-keto-D-gluconate (weak), D-gluconate, DL-lactate, succinate, and citrate are assimilated. No growth was observed in D-ribose, L-arabinose, D-arabinose, melibiose, lactose, raffinose, erythritol, galactitol, myo-inositol, D-glucuronate, methanol or ethanol. In nitrogen-assimilation tests, growth is present on ethylamine, L-lysine, cadaverine, glucosamine, and D-tryptophan, while growth is absent on nitrate, nitrite, creatine, creatinine, and imidazole. Growth is observed at 37°C but not at 40°C. Growth in vitamin-free medium is present, but growth in the presence of 0.01% cycloheximide, 10% NaCl with 5% glucose and 1% acetic acid is absent. Starch-like compounds are not produced. Urease activity and diazonium blue B reactions are negative. The G + C content of the genome of the strain NYNU 161120T is 44.51 mol%, its approximate size is 12.6 Mbp.

Note. Strains of Cl. paralusitaniae exhibits minor differences in phenotypic characteristics. Strain NYNU 168424 assimilates D-arabinose but strains NYNU 161120T and NYNU 167235 do not. Additionally, fermentation of galactose is positive for two strain NYNU 161120T and NYNU 167235, while that of strain NYNU 168424 is negative.

Discussion

In this study, we isolated five novel yeast strains from rotting wood samples collected in Henan Province, central China. Phylogenetic analyses based on a single-locus (LSU D1/D2) and a two-locus (ITS and LUS D1/D2) approach showed that the five strains formed two robust groups, represented by strains NYNU 174173T and NYNU 161120T, together with their relatives (C. thailandica CBS 10610T and Cl. lusitaniae CBS 6936T), and were obviously separate from other type strains in the Clavispora clade. Pairwise sequence comparison of the LSU D1/D2 domains and the ITS regions of the two novel strains with related species showed that they had lower similarity values than the common threshold for species differentiation in yeast (Kurtzman and Robnett, 1998; Scorzetti et al., 2002). In addition, they shared similar physiological and biochemical characteristics with species in the Clavispora clade, but clearly differed from the closest known species, C. thailandica CBS 10610T and Cl. lusitaniae CBS 6936T (Table 3). Thus, the two isolates represented two novel species in the genus Clavispora. This distinction was supported by genomic analyses. Based on genomic G + C content, strains NYNU 174173T and NYNU 161120T were clearly distinct from C. thailandica CBS 10610T and Cl. lusitaniae CBS 6936T, respectively (Table 4). When strains NYNU 174173T and NYNU 161120T were compared with each other or with their closest relatives, the genomic relatedness with ANI and DDH values was lower than the proposed threshold value for species delineation (Table 5; Lachance and Lee, 2020; Cadež et al., 2021). These results, together with the robust phylogenetic positions and the differences in phenotypic characteristics, indicated that the two isolated strains represented two novel species in the genus Clavispora. We therefore propose two new species, namely Clavispora xylosa sp. nov. and Clavispora paralusitaniae sp. nov., to accommodate these yeasts.

Data availability statement

The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found in the article/Supplementary material.

Author contributions

C-YC and YL isolated the strains and performed the taxonomic characterization and genomic analyses. C-YC prepared the draft manuscript, and the tables and figures. Z-LY and F-LH designed the study and revised the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Project no. 31570021) and the State Key Laboratory of Motor Vehicle Biofuel Technology, Henan Tianguan Enterprise Group Co., Ltd., China (no. 2018001).

Conflict of interest

Z-LY was employed by the company Henan Tianguan Enterprise Group Co., Ltd.

The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Acknowledgments

The authors are very grateful to their colleagues at the School of Life Science and Agricultural Engineering, Nanyang Normal University, including Lin Zhang, Kai-Fang Liu, and Zhi-Wen Xi for providing specimens; to Ting Lei for help with phylogenetic analysis; and to Ran-Ran Jia and Wen-Ting Hu for help with morphological observations.

Footnotes

References

  1. Agbogbo F. K., Wenger K. S. (2007). Production of ethanol from corn Stover hemicellulose hydrolyzate using Pichia stipitis. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 34, 723–727. doi: 10.1007/s10295-007-0247-z, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Cadež N., Bellora N., Ulloa R., Tome M., Petković H., Groenewald M., et al. (2021). Hanseniaspora smithiae sp. nov., a novel apiculate yeast species from Patagonian forests that lacks the typical genomic domestication signatures for fermentative environments. Front. Microbiol. 12:679894. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2021.679894, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Daniel H. M., Lachance M. A., Kurtzman C. P. (2014). On the reclassification of species assigned to Candida and other anamorphic ascomycetous yeast genera based on phylogenetic circumscription. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 106, 67–84. doi: 10.1007/s10482-014-0170-z, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Delcher A. L., Bratke K. A., Powers E. C., Salzberg S. L. (2007). Identifying bacterial genes and endosymbiont DNA with glimmer. Bioinformatics 23, 673–679. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm009, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Drumonde-Neves J., Čadež N., Reyes-Domíngue Y., Gallmetzer A., Schuller D., Lima T., et al. (2020). Clavispora santaluciae f.a., sp. nov., a novel ascomycetous yeast species isolated from grapes. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 70, 6307–6312. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.004531, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Favel A., Michel-Nguyen A., Peyron F., Martin C., Thomachot L., Datry A., et al. (2003). Colony morphology switching of Candida lusitaniae and acquisition of multidrug resistance during treatment of a renal infection in a newborn: case report and review of the literature. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 47, 331–339. doi: 10.1016/s0732-8893(03)00094-4, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Fell J. W., Statzell-Tallman A., Scorzetti G., Gutiérrez M. H. (2011). Five new species of yeasts from fresh water and marine habitats in the Florida Everglades. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 99, 533–549. doi: 10.1007/s10482-010-9521-6, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Felsenstein J. (1985). Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39, 783–791. doi: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1985.tb00420.x, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Groenewald M., Robert V., Smith M. T. (2011). Five novel Wickerhamomyces- and Metschnikowia-related yeast species, Wickerhamomyces chaumierensis sp. nov., Candida pseudoflosculorum sp. nov., Candida danieliae sp. nov., Candida robnettiae sp. nov. and Candida eppingiae sp. nov., isolated from plants. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 61, 2015–2022. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.026062-0, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Gurevich A., Saveliev V., Vyahhi N., Tesler G. (2013). QUAST: quality assessment tool for genome assemblies. Bioinformatics 29, 1072–1075. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt086, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Jain C., Rodriguez-R L. M., Phillippy A. M., Konstantinidis K. T., Aluru S. (2018). High throughput ANI analysis of 90K prokaryotic genomes reveals clear species boundaries. Nat. Commun. 9:5114. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-07641-9, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. James S. A., Barriga E. J. C., Bond C. J., Cross K., Núñez N. C., Portero P. B., et al. (2009). Candida carvajalis sp. nov., an ascomycetous yeast species from the Ecuadorian Amazon jungle. FEMS Yeast Res. 9, 784–788. doi: 10.1111/j.1567-1364.2009.00518.x, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Jindamorakot S., Limtong S., Yongmanitchai W., Tuntirungkij M., Potacharoen W., Kawasaki H., et al. (2007). Two new anamorphic yeasts, Candida thailandica sp. nov. and Candida lignicola sp. nov., isolated from insect frass in Thailand. FEMS Yeast Res. 7, 1409–1414. doi: 10.1111/j.1567-1364.2007.00305.x, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Kaewwichian R., Khunnamwong P., Am-In S., Jindamorakot S., Groenewald M., Savitree Limtong S. (2019). Candida xylosifermentans sp. nov., a D-xylose-fermenting yeast species isolated in Thailand. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 69, 2674–2680. doi: 10.1099/ijsem.0.003505, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Katoh K., Standley D. M. (2013). MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30, 772–780. doi: 10.1093/molbev/mst010, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Kurtzman C. P., Fell J. W., Boekhout T., Robert V. (2011). “Methods for isolation, phenotypic characterization and maintenance of yeasts” in The Yeasts–A Taxonomic Study. eds. Innis K., CP F., JW B.. 5th ed (Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier; ), 87–110. [Google Scholar]
  17. Kurtzman C. P., Robnett C. J. (1998). Identification and phylogeny of ascomycetous yeasts from analysis of nuclear large subunit (26S) ribosomal DNA partial sequences. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 73, 331–371. doi: 10.1023/a:1001761008817, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Kurtzman C. P., Robnett C. J. (2013). Relationships among genera of the Saccharomycotina (Ascomycota) from multigene phylogenetic analysis of type species. FEMS Yeast Res. 13, 23–33. doi: 10.1111/1567-1364.12006, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Kurtzman C. P., Robnett C. J., Basehoar E., Ward T. J. (2018). Four new species of Metschnikowia and the transfer of seven Candida species to Metschnikowia and Clavispora as new combinations. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 111, 2017–2035. doi: 10.1007/s10482-018-1095-8, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Lachance M. A., Boekhout T., Scorzetti G., Fell J. W., Kurtzman C. P. (2011). “Candida Berkhout (1923),” in The yeasts – A taxonomic study. eds. Innis K., CP F., JW B.. 5th ed (Amsterdam: Elsevier; ), 987–1278. [Google Scholar]
  21. Lachance M. A., Lee D. K. (2020). Tom Hsiang delineating yeast species with genome average nucleotide identity: a calibration of ANI with haplontic, heterothallic Metschnikowia species. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 113, 2097–2106. doi: 10.1007/s10482-020-01480-9, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Lachance M. A., Phaff H. J. (2011). “Clavispora Rodrigues de Miranda (1979)” in The yeasts – A taxonomic study. eds. Innis K., CP F., JW B.. 5th ed (Amsterdam: Elsevier; ), 349–353. [Google Scholar]
  23. Lagesen K., Hallin P., Rødland E. A., Staerfeldt H. H., Rognes T., Ussery D. W. (2007). RNAmmer: consistent and rapid annotation of ribosomal RNA genes. Nucleic Acids Res. 35, 3100–3108. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkm160, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Libkind D., Tognetti C., Ruffini A., Sampaio J. P., van Broock M. R. (2011). Xanthophyllomyces dendrorhous (Phaffia rhodozyma) on stromata of Cyttaria hariotii in Patagonian Nothofagus forests. Rev. Argent. Microbiol. 43, 226–232. doi: 10.1590/S0325-75412011000300011, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Limtong S., Kaewwichian R. (2013). Candida phyllophila sp. nov. and Candida vitiphila sp. nov., two novel yeast species from grape phylloplane in Thailand. J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol. 59, 191–197. doi: 10.2323/jgam.59.191, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Lowe T. M., Eddy S. R. (1997). tRNAscan-SE: a program for improved detection of transfer RNA genes in genomic sequence. Nucleic Acids Res. 25, 955–964. doi: 10.1093/nar/25.5.955, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Lu H. Z., Jia J. H., Wang Q. M., Bai F. Y. (2004). Candida asparagi sp. nov., Candida diospyri sp. nov. and Candida qinlingensis sp. nov., novel anamorphic, ascomycetous yeast species. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 54, 1409–1414. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.03055-0, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Lv S. L., Chai C. Y., Wang Y., Yan Z. L., Hui F. L. (2020). Five new additions to the genus Spathaspora (Saccharomycetales, Debaryomycetaceae) from Southwest China. MycoKeys 75, 31–49. doi: 10.3897/mycokeys.75.57192, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Meier-Kolthoff J. P., Auch A. F., Klenk H. P., Göker M. (2013). Genome sequence-based species delimitation with confidence intervals and improved distance functions. BMC Bioinform. 14:60. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-14-60, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Merz W. G., Khazan U., Jabra-Rizk M. A., Wu L. C., Osterhout G. J., Lehmann P. F. (1992). Strain delineation and epidemiology of Candida (Clavispora) lusitaniae. J. Clin. Microbiol. 30, 449–454. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.2.449-454.1992, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Nakase T., Jindamorakot S., Am-In S., Lee C. F., Imanishi Y., Limtong S. (2011). Three novel species of the anamorphic yeast genus Candida in the Candida intermedia clade found in Japan, Thailand and Taiwan. J. Gen. Appl. Microbiol. 57, 73–81. doi: 10.2323/jgam.57.73, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Nei M., Kumar S. (2000). Molecular Evolution and Phylogenetics. Oxford University Press: New York, NY. [Google Scholar]
  33. Nguyen N. H., Suh S. Q., Blackwell M. (2007). Five novel Candida species in insect-associated yeast clades isolated from Neuroptera and other insects. Mycologia 99, 842–858. doi: 10.3852/mycologia.99.6.842, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Phaff H. J., Miranda M., Starmer W. T., Tredick J., Barker J. S. F. (1986). Clavispora opuntiae, a new heterothallic yeast occurring in necrotic tissue of Opuntia species. Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 36, 372–379. doi: 10.1099/00207713-36-3-372 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  35. Ribeiro J. R. A., Carvalho P. M. B., Cabral A. S., Macrae A., Mendonça-Hagler L. C. S., Berbara R. L. L., et al. (2011). Candida middelhoveniana sp. nov., a new yeast species found on the rhizoplane of organically cultivated sugarcane. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 100, 341–347. doi: 10.1007/s10482-011-9589-7, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Rodrigues de Miranda L. (1979). Clavispora, a new genus of the Saccharomycetales. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 45, 479–483. doi: 10.1007/BF00443285, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Rosa C. A., Pagnocca F. C., Lachance M. A., Ruivo C. C. C., Medeiros A. O., Pimentel M. R. C., et al. (2007). Candida flosculorum and Candida floris, two novel yeast species associated with tropical flowers. Int. J. Syst. Evol. Microbiol. 57, 2970–2974. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.65230-0, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Saitou N., Nei M. (1987). The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 4, 406–425. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040454, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Schwartz K., Sherlock G. (2016). Preparation of yeast DNA sequencing libraries. Cold Spring Harb. Protoc. 2016:88930. doi: 10.1101/pdb.prot088930, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Scorzetti G., Fell J. W., Fonseca A., Statzell-Tallman A. (2002). Systematics of basidiomycetous yeasts: a comparison of large subunit D1/D2 and internal transcribed spacer rDNA regions. FEMS Yeast Res. 2, 495–517. doi: 10.1111/j.1567-1364.2002.tb00117.x, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Shi C. F., Zhang K. H., Chai C. Y., Yan Z. L., Hui F. L. (2021). Diversity of the genus Sugiyamaella and description of two new species from rotting wood in China. MycoKeys 77, 27–39. doi: 10.3897/mycokeys.77.60077, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Tamura K., Stecher G., Kumar S. (2021). MEGA11: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 11. Mol. Biol. Evol. 38, 3022–3027. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msab120, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Urbina H., Frank R., Blackwell M. (2013). Scheffersomyces cryptocercus: a new xylose-fermenting yeast associated with the gut of wood roaches and new combinations in the Sugiyamaella yeast clade. Mycologia 105, 650–660. doi: 10.3852/12-094, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Valinhas R. V., Pantoja L. A., Maia A. C. F., Miguel M. G. C. P., Vanzela A. P. F. C., Nelson D. L., et al. (2018). Xylose fermentation to ethanol by new Galactomyces geotrichum and Candida akabanensis strains. Peer J. 6:e4673. doi: 10.7717/peerj.4673, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Weiss S., Samson F., Navarro D., Casaregola S. (2013). YeastIP: a database for identification and phylogeny of ascomycetous yeasts. FEMS Yeast Res. 13, 117–125. doi: 10.1111/1567-1364.12017, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. White T. J., Bruns T., Lee S., Taylor J. (1990). “Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics” in PCR protocols: A guide to methods and applications. eds. Innis M. A., Gelfand D. H., Sninsky J. J., White T. J. (San Diego, CA: Academic Press; ), 315–322. [Google Scholar]
  47. Yoon S. H., Ha S. M., Lim J. M., Kwon S. J., Chun J. (2017). A large-scale evaluation of algorithms to calculate average nucleotide identity. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 110, 1281–1286. doi: 10.1007/s10482-017-0844-4, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Yurkov A., Schäfer A. M., Begerow D. (2009). Clavispora reshetovae a. Yurkov, a.M. Schäfer & Begerow, sp. nov. fungal planet 35. Persoonia 23, 182–183. doi: 10.3767/persoonia.2021.46.11 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  49. Zhang D., Lu C., Zhang T., Spadaro D., Liu D., Liu W. (2014). Candida pruni sp. nov. is a new yeast species with antagonistic potential against brown rot of peaches. Arch. Microbiol. 196, 525–530. doi: 10.1007/s00203-014-0999-6, PMID: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Zhou X. F., Peris D., Kominek J., Kurtzman C. P., Hittinger C. T., Rokas A. (2016). In silico whole genome sequencer and analyzer (iWGS): a computational pipeline to guide the design and analysis of de novo genome sequencing studies. G3-genes Genom. Genet. 6, 3655–3662. doi: 10.1534/g3.116.034249, PMID: [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets presented in this study can be found in online repositories. The names of the repository/repositories and accession number(s) can be found in the article/Supplementary material.


Articles from Frontiers in Microbiology are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES