Skip to main content
Nanomaterials logoLink to Nanomaterials
. 2022 Oct 12;12(20):3577. doi: 10.3390/nano12203577

Theoretical Investigation of Fast Neutron and Gamma Radiation Properties of Polycarbonate-Bismuth Oxide Composites Using Geant4

Hanan Akhdar 1
Editor: Csaba Balázsi1
PMCID: PMC9609593  PMID: 36296770

Abstract

The gamma mass (µm) and linear (µ) attenuation coefficients of polycarbonate-bismuth oxide composites (PC-Bi2O3) with different bismuth oxide weight factors were investigated theoretically using EpiXS and a Monte Carlo simulation-based toolkit and Geant4 within an energy range between 0.1 and 2 MeV. The wide energy ranges of gamma rays and neutrons were chosen to cover as many applications as possible. The attenuation coefficients were then used to compute the half-value layers. The effective atomic numbers and effective electron densities of the studied samples obtained by EpiXS were compared as well. In order to further evaluate the shielding effectiveness of the studied samples, the thicknesses of all the investigated samples equivalent to 0.5 mm lead at a gamma energy of 511 keV were compared using a Geant4 code simulating a female numerical phantom with a gamma source placed facing the chest and a cylinder-shaped shield wrapped around the trunk area. The fast neutron removal cross sections of the investigated samples were studied to evaluate the effect of the weight factor of nanocomposites on the neutron shielding capabilities of the polymer as well.

Keywords: PC-Bi2O3, Geant4, gmma, mass attenuation coefficient, half-value layer, shield, fast neutron effective removal cross section

1. Introduction

Polymers are flexible, lightweight, and nontoxic materials with low atomic numbers. Adding nano-reinforcements, especially high-density and high-atomic-number metal oxides, to polymers makes them novel gamma shielding materials with many outstanding features [1,2,3]. The photoelectric effect is dominant in high-Z elements, which is why heavy metals such as lead are usually used as a shielding material. However, lead is toxic and heavy, which made researchers try finding better alternatives with comparable shielding properties [4,5].

In this work, fast neutron and gamma attenuation properties of a novel newly introduced polycarbonate-bismuth oxide composite with different weight fractions of nano-Bi2O3 (0, 5, 10, 20, 30, 40, and 50 wt %) by Mehrara R et al. were theoretically investigated at a wide gamma energy range [1]. EpiXS, which is a Windows-based program for photon attenuation, dosimetry, and shielding, based on the EPICS2017 and EPDL9 database that allows obtaining the photon cross section data for any sample, was used in this work to estimate the attenuation coefficients, half-value layers, effective atomic numbers, and electron densities of all studied samples within the energy range of interest [6]. A Geant4 toolkit, which is based on a Monte Carlo simulation, was also used to investigate the attenuation properties of the samples of interest and compared to those results obtained from EpiXS [7]. Fast neutron removal cross sections were be investigated and compared among the samples as well.

2. Materials and Methods

Polycarbonate is a recyclable polymer with an amorphous structure that makes it a great choice when making homogeneous nanocomposites. The densities and composites of the studied samples were as mentioned in a recently published article where the fabrication of different weight percentages of a polycarbonate-bismuth oxide composite was done by Mehrara et al. using a mixed-solution method. The investigated samples are tabulated in Table 1 [1].

Table 1.

A list of the studied samples’ densities.

PC wt % Bi2O3 wt % Density (gm/cm3)
100 0 1.15
95 5 1.19
90 10 1.24
80 20 1.36
70 30 1.54
60 40 1.74
50 50 1.97

3. Theory

The mass attenuation coefficient µm is the main parameter investigated when studying the attenuation properties of any sample, and it can be calculated using Equation (1) [8]:

I=I0eμmx (1)

where (I0) is the mono-energetic incident intensity of photons and (I) is the attenuated photons intensity after passing through a mass per unit area (x) layer of a certain material. In case the sample is made of mixtures or compounds, Equation (2) can be used [8]:

μm=iwiμmi (2)

where (wi) is the weight of the ith element.

The mass attenuation coefficient is very important when it comes to choosing a shielding material. The half-value layer (HVL) is also important in predicting the required thickness of a shielding material, and it is sample thickness that reduces the radiation level by a factor of 2, as described by Equation (3).

HVL=ln2μ (3)

where μ (cm−1) is the linear attenuation coefficient of the material; the relation between the mass attenuation coefficient and the linear attenuation coefficient is given by Equation (4) [9,10].

μ=μmρ (4)

These parameters were studied and compared theoretically for all investigated samples.

Neutron attenuation is described by the neutron-removing cross section (ΣR) which is the probability of neutron reactions within the material and is given by the mixture rule for each element in the composite material as shown in Equation (5) [11]:

R=iρiR/ρi (5)

where (ρi) is partial density and (ΣR/ρ) is the mass removal cross section, which can be calculated for any compound by Equation (6) [12]:

Rρ=0.206A13Z0.294 (6)

where (A) is the atomic weight and (Z) is the atomic number. The neutron removal coefficient is found by multiplying the neutron removal coefficient by the density of the absorber.

The fast neutron removal cross section of any element can be calculated using the empirical formulas indicated by Equations (7) and (8) [13]:

ΣR=0.190Z0.743if Z8 (7)
ΣR=0.125Z0.565if Z>8 (8)

4. Monte Carlo Simulation

A Geant4 simulation code was developed and used to investigate the desired parameters of the studied samples within the studied energy range. Geant4 is a toolkit based on the Monte Carlo statistical method that simulates the passage of particles in matter [7]. Version 10.07 of Geant4 toolkit was used to develop the code used in the current work. A gamma source placed in front of the sample emitting mono-energetic gamma particles in the direction of the sample followed by a detector surrounded by a lead container. Figure 1 shows a visualization of the simulation code. The ratio between the number of gamma particles that reached the detector with and without the sample was found for each energy; then, the attenuation coefficient based on the sample’s thickness was calculated. This process was repeated for all the studied samples. The results of the Geant4 code were validated using those from the Windows based software; EpiXS.

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Simulation code visualization (green lines indicate the paths of non-charged particles and red lines indicate the paths of negatively charged particles).

5. Results and Discussion

5.1. Attenuation Coefficient

The linear and mass attenuation coefficients were obtained using EpiXS and Geant4 for all studied samples; then, the percentage difference between them was calculated using Equation (9) as shown in Table 2 and Table 3.

%Diff=100×μEpiXSμG4/μEpiXS (9)

Table 2.

Mass attenuation coefficients of the samples found by EpiXS and Geant4.

PC-Bi2O3 wt%
Energy (MeV) 0% 5% 10%
Mass attenuation coefficients (cm2 g−1)
EpiXS Geant4 Diff% EpiXS Geant4 Diff% EpiXS Geant4 Diff%
0.10 0.17684 0.15972 9.68% 0.42520 0.40872 3.88% 0.67357 0.65773 2.35%
0.15 0.14085 0.14121 −0.26% 0.22783 0.22784 −0.01% 0.31480 0.31447 0.10%
0.20 0.12444 0.12881 −3.51% 0.16526 0.16916 −2.36% 0.20607 0.20950 −1.67%
0.25 0.11373 0.11953 −5.10% 0.13632 0.14157 −3.85% 0.15891 0.16360 −2.95%
0.30 0.10576 0.11215 −6.03% 0.11969 0.12570 −5.02% 0.13362 0.13925 −4.21%
0.35 0.09932 0.10603 −6.75% 0.10858 0.11491 −5.83% 0.11785 0.12380 −5.05%
0.40 0.09406 0.10082 −7.18% 0.10055 0.10694 −6.36% 0.10705 0.11307 −5.63%
0.45 0.08949 0.09628 −7.58% 0.09424 0.10070 −6.86% 0.09898 0.10512 −6.20%
0.50 0.08561 0.09228 −7.79% 0.08920 0.09554 −7.11% 0.09278 0.09879 −6.47%
0.55 0.08213 0.08871 −8.01% 0.08491 0.09116 −7.36% 0.08769 0.09361 −6.75%
0.60 0.07906 0.08547 −8.11% 0.08124 0.08735 −7.52% 0.08343 0.08923 −6.95%
0.65 0.07626 0.08254 −8.23% 0.07800 0.08399 −7.68% 0.07974 0.08544 −7.16%
0.70 0.07374 0.07988 −8.34% 0.07514 0.08101 −7.81% 0.07654 0.08214 −7.31%
0.75 0.07143 0.07745 −8.43% 0.07258 0.07833 −7.93% 0.07372 0.07921 −7.45%
0.80 0.06931 0.07522 −8.52% 0.07025 0.07590 −8.04% 0.07119 0.07658 −7.57%
0.85 0.06733 0.07314 −8.64% 0.06810 0.07367 −8.17% 0.06887 0.07419 −7.71%
0.90 0.06551 0.07119 −8.67% 0.06615 0.07159 −8.21% 0.06680 0.07198 −7.77%
0.95 0.06384 0.06933 −8.59% 0.06437 0.06962 −8.15% 0.06490 0.06991 −7.72%
1.00 0.06225 0.06752 −8.46% 0.06269 0.06773 −8.03% 0.06313 0.06794 −7.61%
1.05 0.06074 0.06574 −8.22% 0.06111 0.06588 −7.81% 0.06147 0.06602 −7.40%
1.10 0.05936 0.06412 −8.01% 0.05966 0.06421 −7.62% 0.05996 0.06429 −7.22%
1.15 0.05802 0.06264 −7.97% 0.05827 0.06268 −7.58% 0.05851 0.06272 −7.19%
1.20 0.05683 0.06129 −7.85% 0.05703 0.06129 −7.47% 0.05724 0.06129 −7.09%
1.25 0.05565 0.06004 −7.88% 0.05583 0.06001 −7.50% 0.05600 0.05999 −7.12%
1.30 0.05454 0.05889 −7.97% 0.05469 0.05884 −7.58% 0.05483 0.05879 −7.21%
1.35 0.05349 0.05782 −8.09% 0.05361 0.05775 −7.71% 0.05374 0.05768 −7.33%
1.40 0.05252 0.05678 −8.13% 0.05263 0.05670 −7.75% 0.05274 0.05662 −7.37%
1.45 0.05155 0.05568 −8.01% 0.05165 0.05559 −7.64% 0.05175 0.05551 −7.26%
1.50 0.05070 0.05464 −7.78% 0.05079 0.05455 −7.41% 0.05088 0.05447 −7.04%
1.55 0.05058 0.05367 −6.11% 0.04995 0.05358 −7.27% 0.05004 0.05349 −6.90%
1.60 0.04974 0.05275 −6.04% 0.04913 0.05266 −7.20% 0.04922 0.05258 −6.83%
1.65 0.04897 0.05188 −5.94% 0.04835 0.05180 −7.14% 0.04844 0.05172 −6.78%
1.70 0.04825 0.05105 −5.82% 0.04761 0.05098 −7.08% 0.04770 0.05090 −6.71%
1.75 0.04758 0.05027 −5.64% 0.04692 0.05020 −6.98% 0.04702 0.05013 −6.62%
1.80 0.04694 0.04952 −5.50% 0.04624 0.04946 −6.95% 0.04634 0.04940 −6.59%
1.85 0.04633 0.04881 −5.34% 0.04560 0.04875 −6.91% 0.04571 0.04870 −6.55%
1.90 0.04579 0.04812 −5.08% 0.04502 0.04808 −6.79% 0.04513 0.04803 −6.43%
1.95 0.04526 0.04745 −4.85% 0.04444 0.04742 −6.71% 0.04456 0.04738 −6.35%
2.00 0.04474 0.04680 −4.59% 0.04386 0.04677 −6.63% 0.04399 0.04675 −6.28%
Energy (MeV) 20% 30% 40% 50%
Mass attenuation coefficients (cm2 g−1)
EpiXS Geant4 Diff% EpiXS Geant4 Diff% EpiXS Geant4 Diff% EpiXS Geant4 Diff%
0.10 1.17030 1.15574 1.24% 1.66703 1.65375 0.80% 2.16376 2.15176 0.55% 2.66049 2.64977 0.40%
0.15 0.48876 0.48774 0.21% 0.66271 0.66100 0.26% 0.83666 0.83426 0.29% 1.01061 1.00752 0.31%
0.20 0.28769 0.29020 −0.87% 0.36932 0.37089 −0.43% 0.45094 0.45158 −0.14% 0.53257 0.53228 0.05%
0.25 0.20408 0.20767 −1.76% 0.24925 0.25173 −1.00% 0.29443 0.29580 −0.47% 0.33960 0.33987 −0.08%
0.30 0.16148 0.16636 −3.02% 0.18934 0.19347 −2.18% 0.21720 0.22058 −1.56% 0.24506 0.24769 −1.08%
0.35 0.13637 0.14157 −3.81% 0.15489 0.15934 −2.87% 0.17342 0.17712 −2.13% 0.19194 0.19489 −1.54%
0.40 0.12003 0.12533 −4.41% 0.13302 0.13759 −3.44% 0.14601 0.14985 −2.63% 0.15900 0.16211 −1.96%
0.45 0.10847 0.11396 −5.06% 0.11796 0.12280 −4.10% 0.12745 0.13164 −3.29% 0.13694 0.14048 −2.59%
0.50 0.09995 0.10529 −5.34% 0.10712 0.11179 −4.37% 0.11428 0.11830 −3.51% 0.12145 0.12480 −2.76%
0.55 0.09325 0.09851 −5.64% 0.09881 0.10341 −4.66% 0.10437 0.10832 −3.78% 0.10993 0.11322 −2.99%
0.60 0.08779 0.09298 −5.91% 0.09216 0.09673 −4.96% 0.09653 0.10048 −4.10% 0.10089 0.10424 −3.32%
0.65 0.08321 0.08835 −6.17% 0.08668 0.09125 −5.27% 0.09016 0.09415 −4.43% 0.09363 0.09705 −3.66%
0.70 0.07935 0.08439 −6.36% 0.08216 0.08665 −5.47% 0.08496 0.08890 −4.64% 0.08777 0.09116 −3.86%
0.75 0.07600 0.08096 −6.53% 0.07828 0.08272 −5.66% 0.08057 0.08447 −4.85% 0.08285 0.08623 −4.08%
0.80 0.07307 0.07794 −6.67% 0.07494 0.07930 −5.81% 0.07682 0.08066 −5.00% 0.07869 0.08202 −4.22%
0.85 0.07042 0.07523 −6.83% 0.07197 0.07628 −5.99% 0.07351 0.07732 −5.18% 0.07506 0.07837 −4.40%
0.90 0.06808 0.07277 −6.90% 0.06936 0.07356 −6.06% 0.07064 0.07435 −5.26% 0.07192 0.07515 −4.48%
0.95 0.06596 0.07050 −6.88% 0.06702 0.07108 −6.07% 0.06808 0.07167 −5.28% 0.06914 0.07226 −4.51%
1.00 0.06401 0.06836 −6.79% 0.06489 0.06878 −5.99% 0.06577 0.06919 −5.21% 0.06665 0.06961 −4.45%
1.05 0.06220 0.06631 −6.60% 0.06293 0.06659 −5.82% 0.06366 0.06688 −5.06% 0.06439 0.06716 −4.31%
1.10 0.06056 0.06447 −6.45% 0.06116 0.06464 −5.69% 0.06176 0.06481 −4.95% 0.06236 0.06499 −4.22%
1.15 0.05901 0.06280 −6.42% 0.05951 0.06288 −5.66% 0.06000 0.06295 −4.92% 0.06050 0.06303 −4.19%
1.20 0.05764 0.06130 −6.34% 0.05805 0.06130 −5.59% 0.05846 0.06130 −4.86% 0.05887 0.06131 −4.14%
1.25 0.05634 0.05993 −6.37% 0.05668 0.05988 −5.63% 0.05703 0.05982 −4.90% 0.05737 0.05976 −4.18%
1.30 0.05513 0.05868 −6.46% 0.05542 0.05858 −5.71% 0.05571 0.05848 −4.98% 0.05600 0.05838 −4.25%
1.35 0.05399 0.05754 −6.58% 0.05425 0.05741 −5.83% 0.05450 0.05727 −5.09% 0.05475 0.05713 −4.35%
1.40 0.05296 0.05646 −6.61% 0.05319 0.05630 −5.87% 0.05341 0.05615 −5.12% 0.05363 0.05599 −4.39%
1.45 0.05195 0.05534 −6.52% 0.05215 0.05517 −5.78% 0.05235 0.05500 −5.04% 0.05256 0.05483 −4.32%
1.50 0.05107 0.05429 −6.30% 0.05126 0.05412 −5.57% 0.05145 0.05394 −4.84% 0.05164 0.05377 −4.12%
1.55 0.05022 0.05332 −6.17% 0.05040 0.05314 −5.45% 0.05058 0.05297 −4.73% 0.05076 0.05280 −4.01%
1.60 0.04939 0.05241 −6.11% 0.04957 0.05224 −5.39% 0.04974 0.05207 −4.67% 0.04992 0.05190 −3.97%
1.65 0.04861 0.05156 −6.05% 0.04879 0.05140 −5.34% 0.04897 0.05123 −4.63% 0.04915 0.05107 −3.92%
1.70 0.04788 0.05075 −6.00% 0.04806 0.05060 −5.28% 0.04825 0.05045 −4.57% 0.04843 0.05030 −3.87%
1.75 0.04721 0.05000 −5.91% 0.04740 0.04986 −5.20% 0.04758 0.04972 −4.50% 0.04777 0.04959 −3.80%
1.80 0.04654 0.04928 −5.88% 0.04674 0.04916 −5.17% 0.04694 0.04903 −4.47% 0.04714 0.04891 −3.77%
1.85 0.04591 0.04860 −5.84% 0.04612 0.04849 −5.13% 0.04633 0.04839 −4.43% 0.04654 0.04828 −3.74%
1.90 0.04535 0.04795 −5.72% 0.04557 0.04786 −5.02% 0.04579 0.04777 −4.32% 0.04601 0.04768 −3.63%
1.95 0.04479 0.04732 −5.64% 0.04502 0.04725 −4.94% 0.04526 0.04718 −4.25% 0.04549 0.04711 −3.56%
2.00 0.04424 0.04670 −5.57% 0.04449 0.04666 −4.87% 0.04474 0.04661 −4.18% 0.04499 0.04656 −3.49%

Table 3.

Half-value layers of the samples found by EpiXS and Geant4.

PC-Bi2O3 wt%
Energy (MeV) 0% 5% 10%
HVL (cm)
EpiXS Geant4 Diff% EpiXS Geant4 Diff% EpiXS Geant4 Diff%
0.10 3.40842 3.77378 −10.72% 1.36988 1.42512 −4.03% 0.82989 0.84988 −2.41%
0.15 4.27929 4.26831 0.26% 2.55667 2.55648 0.01% 1.77568 1.77754 −0.10%
0.20 4.84351 4.67931 3.39% 3.52472 3.44345 2.31% 2.71265 2.66818 1.64%
0.25 5.29959 5.04247 4.85% 4.27288 4.11455 3.71% 3.51773 3.41683 2.87%
0.30 5.69886 5.37462 5.69% 4.86640 4.63386 4.78% 4.18335 4.01417 4.04%
0.35 6.06855 5.68480 6.32% 5.36432 5.06889 5.51% 4.74341 4.51534 4.81%
0.40 6.40811 5.97864 6.70% 5.79278 5.44656 5.98% 5.22196 4.94362 5.33%
0.45 6.73512 6.26031 7.05% 6.18101 5.78433 6.42% 5.64742 5.31768 5.84%
0.50 7.04013 6.53130 7.23% 6.53017 6.09695 6.63% 6.02482 5.65853 6.08%
0.55 7.33883 6.79474 7.41% 6.85996 6.38978 6.85% 6.37464 5.97156 6.32%
0.60 7.62396 7.05187 7.50% 7.16968 6.66843 6.99% 6.70049 6.26494 6.50%
0.65 7.90326 7.30213 7.61% 7.46756 6.93477 7.13% 7.01037 6.54212 6.68%
0.70 8.17428 7.54537 7.69% 7.75198 7.19023 7.25% 7.30301 6.80554 6.81%
0.75 8.43770 7.78204 7.77% 8.02584 7.43623 7.35% 7.58296 7.05734 6.93%
0.80 8.69585 8.01318 7.85% 8.29134 7.67446 7.44% 7.85217 7.29962 7.04%
0.85 8.95225 8.24047 7.95% 8.55311 7.90703 7.55% 8.11608 7.53478 7.16%
0.90 9.20013 8.46633 7.98% 8.80478 8.13657 7.59% 8.36869 7.76560 7.21%
0.95 9.44089 8.69392 7.91% 9.04854 8.36637 7.54% 8.61286 7.99541 7.17%
1.00 9.68233 8.92725 7.80% 9.29128 8.60045 7.44% 8.85456 8.22817 7.07%
1.05 9.92275 9.16877 7.60% 9.53205 8.84141 7.25% 9.09348 8.46660 6.89%
1.10 10.15320 9.39993 7.42% 9.76271 9.07173 7.08% 9.32232 8.69421 6.74%
1.15 10.38880 9.62170 7.38% 9.99685 9.29254 7.05% 9.55311 8.91232 6.71%
1.20 10.60670 9.83422 7.28% 10.21340 9.50338 6.95% 9.76655 9.11991 6.62%
1.25 10.82990 10.03848 7.31% 10.43380 9.70555 6.98% 9.98243 9.31853 6.65%
1.30 11.05050 10.23518 7.38% 10.65060 9.89977 7.05% 10.19410 9.50887 6.72%
1.35 11.26860 10.42474 7.49% 10.86420 10.08626 7.16% 10.40160 9.69104 6.83%
1.40 11.47740 10.61483 7.52% 11.06810 10.27243 7.19% 10.59930 9.87208 6.86%
1.45 11.69300 10.82550 7.42% 11.27790 10.47765 7.10% 10.80200 10.07062 6.77%
1.50 11.88930 11.03077 7.22% 11.46830 10.67708 6.90% 10.98550 10.26302 6.58%
1.55 12.08910 11.23105 7.10% 11.66170 10.87120 6.78% 11.17130 10.44985 6.46%
1.60 12.29100 11.42679 7.03% 11.85650 11.06045 6.71% 11.35800 10.63157 6.40%
1.65 12.48990 11.61833 6.98% 12.04790 11.24524 6.66% 11.54090 10.80860 6.35%
1.70 12.68430 11.80603 6.92% 12.23450 11.42595 6.61% 11.71870 10.98138 6.29%
1.75 12.87060 11.99020 6.84% 12.41310 11.60296 6.53% 11.88870 11.15029 6.21%
1.80 13.06180 12.17131 6.82% 12.59570 11.77665 6.50% 12.06200 11.31572 6.19%
1.85 13.24780 12.34969 6.78% 12.77320 11.94743 6.46% 12.23020 11.47806 6.15%
1.90 13.42130 12.52575 6.67% 12.93830 12.11567 6.36% 12.38620 11.63767 6.04%
1.95 13.59950 12.70198 6.60% 13.10770 12.28374 6.29% 12.54600 11.79681 5.97%
2.00 13.78030 12.87984 6.53% 13.27900 12.45308 6.22% 12.70720 11.95690 5.90%
Energy (MeV) 20% 30% 40% 50%
HVL (cm)
EpiXS Geant4 Diff% EpiXS Geant4 Diff% EpiXS Geant4 Diff% EpiXS Geant4 Diff%
0.10 0.43550 0.44099 −1.26% 0.27000 0.27217 −0.80% 0.18411 0.18513 −0.56% 0.13225 0.13279 −0.40%
0.15 1.04279 1.04496 −0.21% 0.67918 0.68093 −0.26% 0.47613 0.47750 −0.29% 0.34816 0.34923 −0.31%
0.20 1.77157 1.75629 0.86% 1.21872 1.21356 0.42% 0.88339 0.88214 0.14% 0.66067 0.66103 −0.05%
0.25 2.49739 2.45425 1.73% 1.80578 1.78798 0.99% 1.35300 1.34672 0.46% 1.03608 1.03526 0.08%
0.30 3.15621 3.06358 2.93% 2.37720 2.32640 2.14% 1.83410 1.80595 1.53% 1.43581 1.42053 1.06%
0.35 3.73739 3.60008 3.67% 2.90583 2.82468 2.79% 2.29711 2.24914 2.09% 1.83311 1.80538 1.51%
0.40 4.24603 4.06654 4.23% 3.38364 3.27126 3.32% 2.72833 2.65839 2.56% 2.21295 2.17046 1.92%
0.45 4.69864 4.47237 4.82% 3.81563 3.66527 3.94% 3.12560 3.02614 3.18% 2.56937 2.50464 2.52%
0.50 5.09933 4.84060 5.07% 4.20200 4.02619 4.18% 3.48579 3.36752 3.39% 2.89714 2.81939 2.68%
0.55 5.46563 5.17372 5.34% 4.55520 4.35241 4.45% 3.81685 3.67780 3.64% 3.20072 3.10776 2.90%
0.60 5.80539 5.48158 5.58% 4.88390 4.65305 4.73% 4.12698 3.96442 3.94% 3.48738 3.37546 3.21%
0.65 6.12502 5.76894 5.81% 5.19238 4.93262 5.00% 4.41851 4.23108 4.24% 3.75788 3.62535 3.53%
0.70 6.42312 6.03920 5.98% 5.47859 5.19447 5.19% 4.68869 4.48076 4.43% 4.00886 3.85969 3.72%
0.75 6.70620 6.29517 6.13% 5.74965 5.44144 5.36% 4.94458 4.71595 4.62% 4.24695 4.08059 3.92%
0.80 6.97550 6.53942 6.25% 6.00597 5.67606 5.49% 5.18581 4.93895 4.76% 4.47116 4.29001 4.05%
0.85 7.23746 6.77458 6.40% 6.25419 5.90083 5.65% 5.41888 5.15203 4.92% 4.68762 4.48988 4.22%
0.90 7.48665 7.00348 6.45% 6.48944 6.11843 5.72% 5.63933 5.35758 5.00% 4.89219 4.68229 4.29%
0.95 7.72688 7.22940 6.44% 6.71596 6.33184 5.72% 5.85159 5.55827 5.01% 5.08928 4.86956 4.32%
1.00 7.96241 7.45611 6.36% 6.93649 6.54446 5.65% 6.05715 5.75710 4.95% 5.27941 5.05431 4.26%
1.05 8.19399 7.68638 6.19% 7.15247 6.75893 5.50% 6.25789 5.95656 4.82% 5.46473 5.23881 4.13%
1.10 8.41581 7.90580 6.06% 7.35945 6.96305 5.39% 6.45045 6.14625 4.72% 5.64269 5.41421 4.05%
1.15 8.63702 8.11590 6.03% 7.56395 7.15845 5.36% 6.63922 6.32783 4.69% 5.81602 5.58218 4.02%
1.20 8.84162 8.31474 5.96% 7.75318 7.34247 5.30% 6.81401 6.49814 4.64% 5.97665 5.73914 3.97%
1.25 9.04629 8.50422 5.99% 7.94065 7.51722 5.33% 6.98572 6.65936 4.67% 6.13329 5.88737 4.01%
1.30 9.24564 8.68501 6.06% 8.12217 7.68333 5.40% 7.15110 6.81212 4.74% 6.28343 6.02737 4.08%
1.35 9.43944 8.85694 6.17% 8.29731 7.84035 5.51% 7.30956 6.95572 4.84% 6.42638 6.15833 4.17%
1.40 9.62328 9.02641 6.20% 8.46280 7.99391 5.54% 7.45874 7.09513 4.87% 6.56049 6.28459 4.21%
1.45 9.81059 9.21031 6.12% 8.63035 8.15892 5.46% 7.60888 7.24348 4.80% 6.69471 6.41769 4.14%
1.50 9.97924 9.38764 5.93% 8.78042 8.31719 5.28% 7.74270 7.38509 4.62% 6.81377 6.54410 3.96%
1.55 10.14910 9.55895 5.81% 8.93087 8.46936 5.17% 7.87621 7.52053 4.52% 6.93199 6.66444 3.86%
1.60 10.31880 9.72480 5.76% 9.08031 8.61598 5.11% 8.00809 7.65045 4.47% 7.04814 6.77929 3.81%
1.65 10.48420 9.88568 5.71% 9.22510 8.75754 5.07% 8.13516 7.77528 4.42% 7.15943 6.88916 3.78%
1.70 10.64410 10.04201 5.66% 9.36437 8.89454 5.02% 8.25672 7.89556 4.37% 7.26532 6.99453 3.73%
1.75 10.79650 10.19424 5.58% 9.49669 9.02739 4.94% 8.37188 8.01174 4.30% 7.36532 7.09587 3.66%
1.80 10.95090 10.34277 5.55% 9.62994 9.15649 4.92% 8.48708 8.12413 4.28% 7.46471 7.19350 3.63%
1.85 11.10040 10.48793 5.52% 9.75861 9.28214 4.88% 8.59804 8.23307 4.24% 7.56017 7.28769 3.60%
1.90 11.23820 10.63009 5.41% 9.87654 9.40468 4.78% 8.69911 8.33884 4.14% 7.64657 7.37872 3.50%
1.95 11.37910 10.77126 5.34% 9.99668 9.52587 4.71% 8.80176 8.44299 4.08% 7.73404 7.46794 3.44%
2.00 11.52030 10.91273 5.27% 10.11640 9.64680 4.64% 8.90339 8.54649 4.01% 7.82005 7.55621 3.37%

Figure 2 and Figure 3 illustrate the mass attenuation coefficients of the studied samples using both EpiXS and Geant4. Root 6.10/04 software was used to plot them [14].

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Mass attenuation coefficients of the investigated samples at the studied energies as found by EpiXS and Geant4.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Half-value layers of the investigated samples at the studied energies as found by EpiXS and Geant4.

The results showed that increasing the weight factor of the nanocomposites in the polymer increased the ability to shield against gamma rays, which is very clear from Figure 2 and Figure 3, especially at lower energies. The mass attenuation coefficients of the studied samples were used to compute the half-value layers of the samples within the studied energy range.

5.2. Half-Value Layer (HVL)

The half-value layer is an important parameter for any radiation shielding design since it refers to the required thickness of an absorber to reduce the radiation level to half of its initial value. Table 3 summarizes all the HVLs of the studied samples.

The results showed that increasing the weight factor of the nanocomposites in the polymer decreased the half-value layer, which is very notable in Figure 3. The shielding properties of the polycarbonate-bismuth oxide composite were very promising, especially when adding the composites’ weight fractions. The mass attenuation coefficient values increased as the weight fractions of the Bi2O3 nanocomposites increased noticeably. Geant4 results showed very good agreement with those obtained from EpiXS. Further studies of different composites at different energy ranges may be necessary to fully cover the shielding capabilities of polycarbonate-bismuth oxide.

5.3. Effective Atomic Number (Zeff) and Effective Electron Density (Neff)

The effective atomic number and effective electron density of all investigated samples were found using EpiXS as shown in Table 4 and Table 5 and plotted in Figure 4 and Figure 5.

Table 4.

The effective atomic number of the investigated samples at the studied gamma energy range.

Energy (MeV) Zeff
PC-Bi2O3 wt%
0% 5% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50%
0.1 11.35382 19.29335 23.55752 29.15661 33.35804 37.05912 40.55943
0.15 10.87042 16.63430 21.07820 27.46215 32.24854 36.37394 40.21914
0.2 10.70026 14.39441 17.95276 24.29631 29.59574 34.24601 38.55636
0.25 10.62638 13.10791 15.69913 20.99781 26.21363 31.17795 35.94044
0.3 10.58977 12.40470 14.33301 18.52490 23.10089 27.90935 32.86597
0.35 10.56876 11.97727 13.50051 16.87030 20.72968 25.07236 29.86513
0.4 10.55574 11.71610 12.95348 15.76420 19.03224 22.86361 27.28675
0.45 10.54807 11.54008 12.60329 15.00345 17.84653 21.22975 25.25100
0.5 10.54304 11.41588 12.35222 14.47573 16.99372 20.01411 23.69182
0.55 10.53723 11.32242 12.16448 14.08286 16.37336 19.12569 22.50555
0.6 10.53438 11.25084 12.01780 13.78165 15.88193 18.41867 21.54421
0.65 10.53119 11.19369 11.90808 13.54577 15.49857 17.85468 20.78446
0.7 10.52890 11.15008 11.82536 13.36086 15.19569 17.42795 20.18178
0.75 10.52695 11.11416 11.75679 13.20689 14.94703 17.06603 19.69079
0.8 10.52552 11.08539 11.70145 13.08272 14.75495 16.78125 19.29234
0.85 10.52439 11.06131 11.65513 12.97922 14.59154 16.54098 18.95319
0.9 10.52345 11.04123 11.61642 12.89797 14.45406 16.33817 18.67776
0.95 10.52263 11.02365 11.58229 12.82640 14.33264 16.15801 18.43245
1 10.52200 11.00913 11.55429 12.76713 14.23135 16.00824 18.22736
1.05 10.52138 10.99676 11.52961 12.71507 14.14344 15.88412 18.04725
1.1 10.52091 10.98628 11.50758 12.66838 14.06336 15.77211 17.89013
1.15 10.52060 10.97797 11.48977 12.63043 13.99911 15.68124 17.76436
1.2 10.52050 10.97078 11.47437 12.59738 13.94562 15.60087 17.65304
1.25 10.52062 10.96537 11.46238 12.57132 13.90396 15.53763 17.56477
1.3 10.52099 10.96135 11.45323 12.55095 13.87060 15.48698 17.49407
1.35 10.52155 10.95866 11.44669 12.53596 13.84599 15.44927 17.44093
1.4 10.52229 10.95681 11.44179 12.52428 13.82658 15.41923 17.39862
1.45 10.52320 10.95581 11.43857 12.51606 13.81238 15.39702 17.36708
1.5 10.52423 10.95560 11.43684 12.51091 13.80342 15.38253 17.34551
1.55 10.52544 10.95600 11.43631 12.50817 13.79797 15.37327 17.33154
1.6 10.52679 10.95700 11.43695 12.50782 13.79625 15.36952 17.32507
1.65 10.52831 10.95859 11.43864 12.50963 13.79815 15.37105 17.32556
1.7 10.52996 10.96066 11.44129 12.51338 13.80282 15.37671 17.33183
1.75 10.53171 10.96296 11.44434 12.51787 13.80862 15.38397 17.34022
1.8 10.53365 10.96589 11.44845 12.52441 13.81777 15.39608 17.35497
1.85 10.53565 10.96893 11.45282 12.53145 13.82754 15.40910 17.37104
1.9 10.53778 10.97231 11.45776 12.53957 13.83882 15.42430 17.39003
1.95 10.54011 10.97604 11.46323 12.54860 13.85163 15.44160 17.41172
2 10.54249 10.98013 11.46940 12.55908 13.86670 15.46222 17.43783

Table 5.

The effective electron density of the investigated samples at the studied gamma energy range.

Energy (MeV) Neff (×1023 Electrons g−1)
PC-Bi2O3 wt %
0% 5% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50%
0.1 3.18135 5.19805 6.09298 6.91258 7.18955 7.18831 6.99288
0.15 3.04590 4.48164 5.45172 6.51085 6.95042 7.05541 6.93421
0.2 2.99822 3.87816 4.64335 5.76028 6.37867 6.64266 6.64753
0.25 2.97752 3.53156 4.06047 4.97826 5.64974 6.04755 6.19652
0.3 2.96726 3.34209 3.70713 4.39197 4.97886 5.41354 5.66645
0.35 2.96137 3.22693 3.49181 3.99969 4.46780 4.86325 5.14907
0.4 2.95772 3.15657 3.35032 3.73745 4.10196 4.43483 4.70453
0.45 2.95558 3.10915 3.25975 3.55709 3.84640 4.11791 4.35354
0.5 2.95417 3.07568 3.19481 3.43197 3.66260 3.88211 4.08472
0.55 2.95254 3.05051 3.14625 3.33883 3.52890 3.70979 3.88020
0.6 2.95174 3.03122 3.10831 3.26742 3.42298 3.57265 3.71445
0.65 2.95085 3.01582 3.07994 3.21149 3.34036 3.46325 3.58346
0.7 2.95020 3.00407 3.05854 3.16765 3.27508 3.38048 3.47956
0.75 2.94966 2.99439 3.04081 3.13115 3.22148 3.31028 3.39490
0.8 2.94926 2.98664 3.02650 3.10171 3.18009 3.25504 3.32621
0.85 2.94894 2.98016 3.01451 3.07717 3.14487 3.20843 3.26773
0.9 2.94868 2.97475 3.00450 3.05791 3.11524 3.16910 3.22025
0.95 2.94845 2.97001 2.99567 3.04094 3.08907 3.13415 3.17795
1 2.94827 2.96610 2.98843 3.02689 3.06724 3.10510 3.14259
1.05 2.94810 2.96276 2.98205 3.01455 3.04829 3.08102 3.11154
1.1 2.94797 2.95994 2.97635 3.00348 3.03103 3.05930 3.08445
1.15 2.94788 2.95770 2.97174 2.99448 3.01718 3.04167 3.06277
1.2 2.94785 2.95577 2.96776 2.98664 3.00565 3.02608 3.04357
1.25 2.94788 2.95431 2.96466 2.98047 2.99667 3.01381 3.02836
1.3 2.94799 2.95322 2.96229 2.97564 2.98948 3.00399 3.01617
1.35 2.94814 2.95250 2.96060 2.97209 2.98418 2.99667 3.00700
1.4 2.94835 2.95200 2.95933 2.96931 2.98000 2.99085 2.99971
1.45 2.94861 2.95173 2.95850 2.96737 2.97694 2.98654 2.99427
1.5 2.94890 2.95167 2.95806 2.96615 2.97501 2.98373 2.99055
1.55 2.94923 2.95178 2.95792 2.96550 2.97383 2.98193 2.98814
1.6 2.94961 2.95205 2.95808 2.96541 2.97346 2.98121 2.98703
1.65 2.95004 2.95248 2.95852 2.96584 2.97387 2.98150 2.98711
1.7 2.95050 2.95304 2.95921 2.96673 2.97488 2.98260 2.98819
1.75 2.95099 2.95366 2.95999 2.96780 2.97613 2.98401 2.98964
1.8 2.95154 2.95445 2.96106 2.96935 2.97810 2.98636 2.99218
1.85 2.95209 2.95527 2.96219 2.97101 2.98021 2.98888 2.99496
1.9 2.95269 2.95618 2.96347 2.97294 2.98264 2.99183 2.99823
1.95 2.95335 2.95718 2.96488 2.97508 2.98540 2.99519 3.00197
2 2.95401 2.95828 2.96648 2.97757 2.98864 2.99919 3.00647

Figure 4.

Figure 4

The effective atomic numbers of the investigated samples at the studied energies as found by EpiXS.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

The effective electron densities of the investigated samples at the studied energies as found by EpiXS.

The Zeff and Neff of the investigated samples were evaluated using EpiXS. The results showed that they both behaved in a similar way and that Zeff and Neff increased with increments of nanocomposites’ weight factors along the whole energy range studied. These results agree with previously published results that nanocomposites have an impressive shielding effect from low-energy gamma radiation, and here we conclude that this applies on a wide range of gamma radiation as well.

6. Fast Neutron Removal Cross Section

The fast neutron removal cross sections were found using a Geant4 code and then calculated for all the studied samples using Equations (5), (7) and (8) with the use of the fast neutron removal cross sections and the weight fractions of each element in each polymer [15,16,17]. Table 6 lists the Geant4-obtained fast neutron removal cross sections compared with those calculated in order to validate the obtained results.

Table 6.

Fast neutron effective removal cross sections of the samples using Geant4 compared to manually calculated ones.

Element Weight Fraction ΣR/ρ (cm2/g) Partial Density (g/cm3) ΣR (cm−1)
Calculation
ΣR (cm−1)
Genat4
Diff%
PC-Bi2O3 (0%)
C (Carbon) 0.279420 0.050187 0.321333 0.016127 0.035317 8.40%
P (Phosphorus) 0.720580 0.027066 0.828667 0.022429
0.038556
PC-Bi2O3 (5%)
C (Carbon) 0.265449 0.050187 0.315884 0.015853 0.035329 8.71%
O (Oxygen) 0.005150 0.040528 0.006129 0.000248
P (Phosphorus) 0.684551 0.027066 0.814616 0.022048
Bi (Bismuth) 0.044850 0.010295 0.053371 0.000549
0.038699
PC-Bi2O3 (10%)
C (Carbon) 0.251478 0.050187 0.311833 0.015650 0.036066 7.71%
O (Oxygen) 0.010301 0.040528 0.012773 0.000518
P (Phosphorus) 0.648522 0.027066 0.804167 0.021765
Bi (Bismuth) 0.089699 0.010295 0.111227 0.001145
0.039078
PC-Bi2O3 (20%)
C (Carbon) 0.223536 0.050187 0.304009 0.015257 0.038126 4.98%
O (Oxygen) 0.020602 0.040528 0.028019 0.001136
P (Phosphorus) 0.576464 0.027066 0.783991 0.021219
Bi (Bismuth) 0.179398 0.010295 0.243981 0.002512
0.040124
PC-Bi2O3 (30%)
C (Carbon) 0.195594 0.050187 0.301215 0.015117 0.040868 3.74%
O (Oxygen) 0.030903 0.040528 0.04759 0.001929
P (Phosphorus) 0.504406 0.027066 0.776785 0.021024
Bi (Bismuth) 0.269097 0.010295 0.414409 0.004266
0.042336
PC-Bi2O3 (40%)
C (Carbon) 0.167652 0.050187 0.291714 0.014640 0.042375 4.42%
O (Oxygen) 0.041204 0.040528 0.071695 0.002906
P (Phosphorus) 0.432348 0.027066 0.752286 0.020361
Bi (Bismuth) 0.358796 0.010295 0.624305 0.006427
0.044334
PC-Bi2O3 (50%)
C (Carbon) 0.139710 0.050187 0.275229 0.013813 0.046089 0.31%
O (Oxygen) 0.051505 0.040528 0.101464 0.004112
P (Phosphorus) 0.360290 0.027066 0.709771 0.019210
Bi (Bismuth) 0.448495 0.010295 0.883535 0.009096
0.046231

Good agreement was shown between the calculated removal cross sections and those found using Geant4 as the percentage deviation was less than 9% and the agreement became better as the weight factor of the nanocomposites increased. The fast neutron removal cross section increased as the weight fraction of the nanocomposites increased in the polymer, as can be seen from the obtained results. This concludes that the weight factor of the nanocomposites increased the neutron shielding ability of the polymer.

7. Lead-Equivalent Gamma Shield

The shielding thicknesses equivalent to 0.5 mm of lead of all studied samples were simulated using the Geant4 toolkit with a numerical female human phantom and a 511 keV gamma source placed in front of it. Table 7 summarizes the thicknesses of the studied samples equivalent to 0.5 mm of lead with a gamma energy of 511 keV.

Table 7.

Thicknesses of the samples equivalent to 0.5 mm of lead.

PC wt % Bi2O3 wt % 0.5 mm-Lead-Equivalent Thickness (cm)
100 0 0.907391
95 5 0.843263
90 10 0.779371
80 20 0.661724
70 30 0.546770
60 40 0.454661
50 50 0.378681

Figure 6 represents the simulation visualization of the phantom with the gamma source and the simulated shield covering the whole trunk area. Table 8 shows the energy deposit with and without the shields in the whole body, the head, and the trunk. Percentage of energy loss with the shield compared to that without are shown in Figure 7.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Geant4 visualization of the simulated phantom with a shield (a) wire frame; (b) solid view, (c) side view with the gamma source shooting gamma particles in the direction of the phantom.

Table 8.

Energy deposits in the head, trunk, and whole body of the phantom.

Air Pb PC-Bi2O3 wt %
0% 5% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50%
Head 6.32000 7.46590 7.33951 7.53072 7.61248 9.55394 7.49214 7.25332 8.18214
Trunk 1119.68 1109.81 1051.73 1046.49 1058.09 1030.42 1030.02 1035.96 1028.44
BODY 1432.98 1428.78 1341.16 1343.52 1352.23 1334.79 1319.8 1330.9 1330.86

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Percentages of energy deposit to the body, head, and trunk with different shields.

The energy deposit in the head of the phantom which was not shielded as well as the total energy deposit in the trunk of the phantom were both compared without and with 0.5 mm-lead-equivalent cylindrical shielding. The obtained results showed that the energy delivered to the head increased while using the shields, which may be due to scattering of the gamma rays when hitting the material of the shields. Meanwhile, the total energy delivered to the trunk was reduced when using the shields, although the detailed energy deposit in the organs may have varied. Table 8 show the energy deposit in the head, trunk, and whole body with and without the studied shields.

The results of the simulation code showed that using PC-Bi2O3 as a shield decreased the energy deposit within the protected areas even more than lead shielding did. The energy deposit of the trunk area which was fully covered by the shield was less than the energy deposit with no shield by 6 to 8%, whereas it was decreased by only 0.88% in case of a lead shield. The energy deposit of the head, which was not protected at all, increased in all cases by 14 to 29% which was due to the scattered gamma rays. The energy deposit in the whole body was decreased by 6 to 7% when using PC-Bi2O3 as a shield, while it decreased only by 0.29% when using a traditional lead shield.

8. Conclusions

The results showed that the gamma shielding properties of the studied samples became better with an increasing weight factor of the Bi2O3 nanocomposites within the PC, especially at lower gamma energies, and it became almost equal at high energies. This means that PC-Bi2O3 could be used as a replacement to toxic traditional lead shielding materials. The results of the second simulation code showed that using PC-Bi2O3 as a shield decreased the energy deposit within the protected areas as well as the whole body more than a traditional lead shield did. The fast neutron shielding capabilities of PC-Bi2O3 were increased as well when the weight factor of the Bi2O3 nanocomposites was increased.

The obtained results show that PC-Bi2O3 is a good candidate to replace traditional gamma and neutron shielding material, and further studies at other gamma and neutron energies may agree with these results. The results also show that Geant4 could be used in estimating the shielding properties of materials.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

Funding Statement

This research received no external funding.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Mehrara R., Malekie S., Kotahi S., Kashian S. Introducing a novel low energy gamma ray shield utilizing Polycarbonate Bismuth Oxide composite. Sci. Rep. 2021;11:10614. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-89773-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Mirji R., Lobo B. Study of polycarbonate–bismuth nitrate composite for shielding against gamma radiation. J. Radioanal. Nucl. Chem. 2020;324:7–19. doi: 10.1007/s10967-020-07038-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Saboori A., Dadkhah M., Fino P., Pavese M. An Overview of Metal Matrix Nanocomposites Reinforced with Graphene Nanoplatelets; Mechanical, Electrical and Thermophysical Properties. Metals. 2018;8:423. doi: 10.3390/met8060423. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Martin James E. Physics for Radiation Protection. Wiley; Weinheim, Germany: 2013. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Ambika M.R., Nagaiah N., Harish V., Lokanath N.K., Sridhar M.A., Renukappa N.M., Suman S.K. Preparation and characterisation of Isophthalic-Bi2O3 polymer composite gamma radiation shields. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2017;130:351–358. doi: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2016.09.022. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Hila F.C., Asuncion-Astronomo A., Dingle C.A.M., Jecong J.F.M., Javier-Hila A.M.V., Gili M.B.Z., Balderas C.V., Lopez G.E.P., Guillermo N.R.D., Amorsolo A.V., Jr. EpiXS: A Windows-based program for photon attenuation, dosimetry and shielding based on EPICS2017 (ENDF/B-VIII) and EPDL97 (ENDF/B-VI.8) Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2021;182:109331. doi: 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2020.109331. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Ivanchenko V. Geant4 toolkit for simulation of HEP experiments. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. Sect. A Accel. Spectrometers Detect. Assoc. Equip. 2003;502:666–668. doi: 10.1016/S0168-9002(03)00538-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Hubbell J. Photon mass attenuation and energy-absorption coefficients. Int. J. Appl. Radiat. Isot. 1982;33:1269–1290. doi: 10.1016/0020-708X(82)90248-4. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Kaewkhao J., Laopaiboon J., Chewpraditkul W. Determination of effective atomic numbers and effective electron densities for Cu/Zn alloy. J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transf. 2008;109:1260–1265. doi: 10.1016/j.jqsrt.2007.10.007. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Madhusudhan A., Narender K., Kishan G., Krishna N., Krishna R. Mass Attenuation Coefficients, Effective atomic and Electron Numbers of Alkali Halides for Multi-Energetic Photons. Res. J. Phys. Sci. 2013;1:11–16. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Olukotun S., Mann K., Gbenu S., Ibitoye F., Oladejo O., Joshi A., Tekin H., Sayyed M., Fasasi M., Balogun F., et al. Neutron-shielding behaviour investigations of some clay-materials. Nucl. Eng. Technol. 2019;51:1444–1450. doi: 10.1016/j.net.2019.03.019. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Mann K.S. Proceedings of the 3rd international Conference Advancements in Engineering and Technology. Bhai Gurdas Institute of Engineering and Technology; Sangrur, India: 2015. Toolkit for fast neutron removal cross-section. [Google Scholar]
  • 13.El Abd A., Mesbah G., Mohammed N., Ellithi A. A simple Method for Determining the Effective Removal Cross Section for Fast Neutrons. J. Radiat. Nucl. Appl. 2017;2:53–58. doi: 10.18576/jrna/020203. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Brun R., Rademakers F. ROOT—An Object Oriented Data Analysis Framework, Proceedings AIHENP’96 Workshop, Lausanne, Sep. 1996. Nucl. Inst. Methods Phys. Res. A. 1997;389:81–86. doi: 10.1016/S0168-9002(97)00048-X. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Hehn G. Principles of Radiation Shielding. Nucl. Technol. 1986;74:104–105. doi: 10.13182/NT86-A33824. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.El-Khayatt A. Calculation of fast neutron removal cross-sections for some compounds and materials. Ann. Nucl. Energy. 2010;37:218–222. doi: 10.1016/j.anucene.2009.10.022. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Abd Elwahab N., Helal N., Mohamed T., Shahin F., Ali F. New shielding composite paste for mixed fields of fast neutrons and gamma rays. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2019;233:249–253. doi: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2019.05.059. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.


Articles from Nanomaterials are provided here courtesy of Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI)

RESOURCES