Skip to main content
Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology logoLink to Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology
. 2001 May;8(3):647–651. doi: 10.1128/CDLI.8.3.647-651.2001

Characterization of a Monoclonal Antibody That Binds to an Epitope on Soluble Bacterial Peptidoglycan Fragments

Glenn J Merkel 1,*, Barbara A Scofield 1
PMCID: PMC96118  PMID: 11329475

Abstract

We employed an inhibition-type enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) to characterize a murine immunoglobulin M monoclonal antibody (MAb) that bound soluble macromolecular peptidoglycan (PG). With this ELISA, the MAb was capable of detecting soluble PG concentrations of less than 10 ng/ml. Enzymatic digestion of PG reduced binding by more than 100-fold, implying that the epitope recognized by this antibody depended on repeating subunits within the glycan backbone. Additionally, the MAb bound to epitopes on both O-acetylated and non-O-acetylated PG fragments from gram-negative bacteria, as well as PG fragments from Staphylococcus aureus and PG fragments released into the medium by a number of gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria.


Bacteremia and one of its most serious complications, the sepsis syndrome, are a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in this country, with an estimated 500,000 new cases reported each year (35) and a mortality rate that may exceed 35% (7). The actual mediators of the sepsis syndrome are host-derived cytokines, e.g., interleukin-1, interleukin-6, and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α ), whose synthesis and release are induced by bacterial lipopolysaccharides (LPS) from gram-negative bacteria and by peptidoglycan (PG) and lipoteichoic acids from gram-positive bacteria (4, 5, 9, 11, 12, 24, 32). While there is substantial experimental evidence that PG fragments do contribute to cytokine induction resulting in shock (3, 12, 13, 23), there are limited reports documenting that soluble PG fragments are released from bacteria into the systemic circulation during bacteremia. In vitro, for example, PG fragments have been detected in cultures of Staphylococcus spp. grown in the presence of antibiotics (20, 37) and in culture filtrates from Streptococcus pyogenes, Staphylococcus epidermidis, and Staphylococcus aureus (6). In vivo, PG has been detected in the spleens (10, 30) and leukocytes (18, 19) of healthy humans, in the cerebrospinal fluid of patients with pneumococcal meningitis (17), and in the urine of patients treated with antibiotics (25, 38). Using a silkworm larva plasma test that reacts to both PG and fungal cell wall glucans, Kobayashi et al. (14) recently reported an absence of PG in the blood of healthy individuals and presented evidence that PG was present in the blood of >80% of tested patients with serious bacterial infections. Those authors suggested that their assay for PG could be developed into a diagnostic test for bacterial infection.

To determine if PG actually does occur in the blood of patients with bacteremia, we used the rationale that a more specific, and perhaps more sensitive, method of detection would utilize a monoclonal antibody (MAb) that specifically recognized PGs from both gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria. Should the presence of PG in the blood of patients with bacteremia be confirmed, the highly specific MAb might then be used in the development of a rapid diagnostic test for this potentially life-threatening infection. Here we report on the characterization of such an anti-PG MAb that was produced by immunizing mice with purified soluble PG derived from Neisseria gonorrhoeae.

Purified soluble O-acetylated and non-O-acetylated PG fragments (O-PG and non-O-PG, respectively) from gram-negative bacteria were provided by Raoul Rosenthal (Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis). Soluble PG from S. aureus was provided by Roman Dziarski (Indiana University School of Medicine, Gary). The PGs supplied by these labs were purified and characterized by them as described previously (29). O-PG and non-O-PG were hydrolyzed to un-cross-linked peptide monomers and peptide-cross-linked dimers, trimers, and tetramers by overnight incubation at 37°C with N-acetylmuramidase SG (hereafter referred to as muramidase) (also provided by Raoul Rosenthal) at a final concentration of 0.5 μg/ml as previously described (28, 33). Non-O-PG was digested overnight at 37°C with chicken egg white lysozyme (Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, Mo.) at a final concentration of 5 μg/ml in 0.05 M phosphate buffer, pH 7.2. Enzymatic activity was destroyed by heating the solutions at 70°C for 30 min before use in the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) described below.

The procedures used for hybridoma development, maintenance, and MAb preparation were modified from those described previously (21, 22). BALB/c mice were administered four intraperitoneal injections of soluble O-PG derived from N. gonorrhoeae at 2-week intervals. The first injection contained 50 μg of O-PG in 0.2 ml of H2O mixed with an equal volume of Freund's complete adjuvant. The second injection contained 50 μg of O-PG in 0.2 ml of H2O mixed with an equal volume of Freund's incomplete adjuvant. The final two injections each contained 25 μg of O-PG in phosphate-buffered saline without adjuvant. Hybridomas were produced by standard procedures modified from those described by Kohler (15). Culture supernatants were screened for the presence of anti-PG antibody by the ELISA described below. Cells from wells yielding positive anti-PG reactions were cloned and expanded, and culture supernatants were retained for antibody collection. The isotype of the MAb described here (designated B10.G6) was determined to be immunoglobulin M (IgM) with a mouse antibody typing kit (The Binding Site, San Diego, Calif.). Concentrations of the IgM MAb were measured with a mouse radial immunodiffusion kit (The Binding Site).

The inhibition ELISA used here was modified from that described in our previous publication (22). ELISA plates (Costar, Corning, N.Y.) were coated overnight at 5°C with 0.5 μg of O-PG or non-O-PG per well in 0.1 ml of 50 mM carbonate buffer (pH 9.7). The wells were blocked with 20 mM TBS (Tris HCl, 500 mM NaCl [pH 7.5]), containing 1% bovine serum albumin. The MAb (1 to 3 μg per well in 0.1 ml of TBS containing 0.05% Tween 20 [TTBS]), with or without inhibitor PG, was then added and incubated at room temperature for 45 min. After the wells were washed with TTBS, binding of the MAb to the coating PG was detected by the addition of polyclonal antimouse antibody conjugated to peroxidase (diluted 1:2,000 in TTBS) (Sigma) and chromogen (0.5 mg of O-phenylenediamine per ml in 0.05 M Na-citrate buffer [pH 5.0] and H2O2 added to 0.005%). The reaction was stopped by the addition of 0.1 ml of 1 M H2SO4, and the absorbance measured at 490 nm in a multiwell plate reader. The Student t test (unpaired) was performed to assess statistical significance, and P values of <0.05 were considered to represent significant differences between values. All experiments were repeated on different days and yielded results comparable to those reported here.

In dose-response curves, determined in the absence of inhibiting PG, where the amount of anti-PG MAb increased and the amount of coating PG remained constant, maximum absorbance (∼2.5 at 490 nm) occurred at a MAb concentration of 10 to 12 μg per well. The sensitivity of the inhibition ELISA was greatest, however, when a MAb concentration that yielded an absorbance of 0.4 to 1.0 was used. To achieve this, 2 to 3 μg of MAb per well was used in all experiments. Since some variability in the binding of the MAb to the coating PG occurred between different ELISA plates, direct comparisons of affinities for different inhibiting PGs were always conducted in the same plate.

Figure 1A shows a typical inhibition ELISA, where increasing concentrations of free O-PG and non-O-PG inhibited the binding of the MAb to O-PG-coated wells. At the lowest concentration shown (0.001 μg/well), there was significant inhibition of MAb binding to the coating PG (P < 0.01 for both O- and non-O-PG). There was no significant difference between inhibition by the O- or non-O-PG (P = 0.698 at 0.001 μg/well). As described previously (2, 26, 27, 33), O acetylation prevents lysozyme from degrading the glycan backbone. This is demonstrated in Fig. 1A, where at a PG concentration of 0.001 μg/well there was no significant difference in inhibition by the lysozyme-treated and untreated O-PG (P = 0.121), indicating that the PG remained intact. As shown in Fig. 1B, however, digestion of non-O-PG with lysozyme and digestion of both O-PG and non-O-PG with muramidase resulted in a significant reduction in PG binding to the MAb. This was apparent, for example, in that there was no significant inhibition of MAb binding to the coating PG by the digested PG at 0.01 μg/well (P > 0.200 compared to controls without inhibitor). As shown in Fig. 1A, that same concentration of intact PG resulted in complete inhibition of MAb binding to the coating PG. Higher concentrations of the muramidase- and lysozyme-digested non-O-PG did result in approximately 50% inhibition, indicating some low-affinity interaction of this digested PG with the MAb. Similar results were obtained when the ELISA wells were coated with non-O-PG (data not shown). These data indicated that an intact glycan chain was necessary for optimum binding of the MAb and that MAb binding to its epitope was not affected by O acetylation. The latter observation may indicate that the epitope recognized by this MAb is actually conformational. Gyorffy and Clarke (8) reported recently that a MAb that they developed to O-acetylated PG from Proteus mirabilis also bound to an epitope on the glycan backbone, but it bound poorly to de-O-acetylated PG. Our MAb appears to be unique in that both non-O-PG and O-PG are bound with apparent equal affinity.

FIG. 1.

FIG. 1

Inhibition of MAb binding to O-PG-coated wells by soluble PG fragments. (A) Dose-response curves for intact O- and non-O-PG fragments and lysozyme-treated O-PG (Lysoz.-O-PG). (B) Dose-response curves for muramidase-treated O- and non-O-PG (Muram.-O-PG and Muram.-nonO-PG, respectively) and lysozyme-treated non-O-PG (Lysoz.-nonO-PG). The x and y axis labels are the same for panels A and B. The values shown are averages and standard deviations of duplicate determinations.

We tested the ability of other microbial products to inhibit the binding of the anti-PG MAb to the coating PG. Figure 2A shows that neither LPS from Escherichia coli, LPS from Salmonella enterica serovar Minnesota, nor lipid A from S. enterica serovar Minnesota (all from Sigma) significantly inhibited the binding of the anti-PG MAb to the coating PG at any of the concentrations tested (P > 0.1 for all tested, compared to the control without inhibitor). Additionally, Fig. 2B shows that fungal glucan (Sigma) also had no significant effect on MAb binding to the coating PG (P = 0.168 and 0.063 for 0.1 and 5.0 μg/well, respectively, compared to controls with no inhibitor). These data further support the contention that this MAb was specific for an epitope only on the PG molecule.

FIG. 2.

FIG. 2

(A) Effects of LPS and lipid A on MAb binding to O-PG-coated wells. (B) Effects of fungal glucan on MAb binding to O-PG-coated wells. The results presented in panels A and B were from experiments conducted on different days. The x and y axis labels are the same for panels A and B. The values shown are averages and standard deviations of triplicate determinations.

Figure 3 shows that this MAb reacted to a common epitope found on PGs from a diverse group of bacteria. At PG concentrations of 0.0005 μg/well, purified N. gonorrhoeae O-PG, Bacteroides fragilis PG, Bordetella pertussis PG, and S. aureus PG all significantly inhibited binding of the anti-PG MAb to the coating PG (P ≤ 0.002 for all compared to the controls with no inhibitor). At this concentration of inhibiting antigen, S. aureus PG was significantly better than all of the other PGs at inhibiting MAb binding (P ≤ 0.0005). This could have indicated the occurrence of more MAb-reactive epitopes per microgram of S. aureus PG than found on the PGs from the gram-negative bacteria.

FIG. 3.

FIG. 3

Inhibition of MAb binding to the coating O-PG by soluble PG from N. gonorrhoeae (Ng-O-PG), B. fragilis (Bf-PG), B. pertussis (Bp-PG), and S. aureus (Sa-PG). The values shown are averages and standard deviations of triplicate determinations.

These data collectively showed that our anti-PG MAb was unique compared to other anti-PG MAbs described in the literature. For example, Bahr et al. (1) reported on a MAb to synthetic muramyl dipeptide; however, whether the MAb recognized this epitope on intact soluble PG was not addressed. The MAb described by Gyorffy and Clarke (8) was reactive only to O-acetylated PG and not to de-O-acetylated PG from P. mirabilis. Those authors also reported that 20 to 40 μg of PG per ml was needed to yield 80 to 90% inhibition in their ELISA. That concentration was substantially higher than what was required in our assay to yield equivalent inhibition. The MAb described by Wergeland et al. (36) was very specific in that it reacted with the pentaglycines from only S. aureus and S. epidermidis. Likewise, Ziola et al. (39) have recently reported on the production of MAbs to the PGs from anaerobic gram-negative beer spoilage bacteria. These MAbs were again very specific for the PG associated with this group of bacteria. Additionally, Kool et al. (16) reported on the production of a MAb directed at the PG-polysaccharide complexes of intestinal bacteria. The specificity of the MAb and the nature of the epitope bound by this antibody, however, were not discussed. Finally, Shockman et al. (31) have patents on eight hybridomas that reportedly secrete MAbs to PG. There was, however, limited information about these antibodies available from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, and to our knowledge there have been no reports involving utilization of these MAbs published in the scientific literature.

Figure 4 shows that the anti-PG MAb recognized presumed PG fragments released after growth in minimal medium. For these experiments, the following bacteria (obtained from the American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, Va.) were grown 48 h at 37°C in medium composed of phosphate-buffered saline (pH 7.2) supplemented with (all wt/vol) 0.5% glucose, 0.1% (NH4)2SO4, 0.01% MgSO4 · 7H2O, and 0.5% yeast extract (Difco Laboratories, Detroit, Mich.): E. coli (ATCC 4157), Shigella sonnei (ATCC 9290), S. enterica serovar Typhimurium (ATCC 14028), S. epidermidis (ATCC 35984), Klebsiella pneumoniae (ATCC 13883), Streptococcus agalactiae (ATCC 13813), P. mirabilis (ATCC 7002), and Enterococcus faecalis (ATCC 29212). After growth for 48 h, the bacteria were removed by centrifugation, and the resulting supernatants were filter sterilized using 0.45-μm-pore-size filters. A portion of each culture filtrate was heated at 70°C for 30 min to destroy enzymatic activity. As shown in Fig. 4, all of the culture filtrates significantly inhibited MAb binding to the coating non-O-PG (P ≤ 0.002 when all were compared to the no-inhibitor control). There was no significant inhibition by the minimal medium that had not been used to grow any bacteria (P = 0.461). There was also no significant reduction in the amount of inhibition by the culture filtrates that had been heated at 70°C (data not shown), indicating that any enzymatic activity contained in the filtrates was not affecting the results. It is interesting that culture filtrates from the gram-positive bacteria were more inhibitory than those from the gram-negative bacteria. This may have reflected a difference in the amounts of PG secreted into the medium. While we have not unequivocally shown that PG was the inhibiting material in the culture filtrates, the highly specific nature of our anti-PG MAb strongly suggests that it was. Others have conducted similar experiments with culture filtrates using anti-PG antibody from humans (6). Additionally, Mattsson et al. (20) used supernatants from cultures of S. epidermidis and van Langevelde et al. (34) used supernatants from cultures of S. aureus, both grown in the presence of beta-lactam antibiotics, to induce TNF-α production from human blood cells. Both groups stated that the amounts of soluble PG and teichoic acid in the culture supernatants correlated with the extent of TNF-α production. These data, along with those presented here, indicate that PG is readily released in the growth media by a number of different bacteria.

FIG. 4.

FIG. 4

Inhibition of MAb binding to the coating non-O-PG by cell-free culture filtrates derived from various bacterial species. The values shown are averages and standard deviations of triplicate determinations.

In conclusion, we have presented evidence that our MAb binds to an epitope on the PG backbone that is common to many gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria. From the studies with enzymatically digested PG it appears that the epitope is a macromolecular segment of the glycan chain that is unaffected by O acetylation. Since it is assumed that PG is released into the blood during bacterial infections (reviewed in reference 32), our anti-PG MAb may facilitate its detection and thus may be developed as an aid in the diagnosis of bacteremia. We are currently engaged in testing this hypothesis.

Acknowledgments

We thank Raoul Rosenthal for encouraging us to undertake this project and for his many helpful suggestions while we were conducting the experiments reported here.

This work was supported by funds from the Intercampus Research Fund, Indiana University Research and the University Graduate School, and by funds from Indiana University School of Medicine, Fort Wayne.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Bahr G M, Eshhar Z, Ben-Yitzhak R, Modabber F Z, Arnon R, Sela M, Chedid L. Monoclonal antibodies to the synthetic adjuvant muramyl dipeptide: characterization of the specificity. Mol Immunol. 1983;20:745–752. doi: 10.1016/0161-5890(83)90052-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Clarke A J, Dupont C. O-acetylated peptidoglycan: its occurrence, pathobiological significance, and biosynthesis. Can J Microbiol. 1992;38:85–91. doi: 10.1139/m92-014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.De Kimpe S J, Kengatharan M, Thiemermann C, Vane J R. The cell wall components peptidoglycan and lipoteichoic acid from Staphylococcus aureus act in synergy to cause shock and multiple organ failure. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1995;92:10359–10363. doi: 10.1073/pnas.92.22.10359. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Doyle R J, Sonnenfeld E M. Properties of the cell surfaces of pathogenic bacteria. Int Rev Cytol. 1989;118:33–92. doi: 10.1016/s0074-7696(08)60872-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Dziarski R, Ulmer A J, Gupta D. Interactions of CD14 with components of gram-positive bacteria. Chem Immunol. 2000;74:83–107. doi: 10.1159/000058761. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Franken N, Seidl P H, Zauner E, Kolb H J, Schleifer K H, Weiss L. Quantitative determination of human IgG antibodies to the peptide subunit determinant of peptidoglycan by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Mol Immunol. 1985;22:573–579. doi: 10.1016/0161-5890(85)90181-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Glauser M P, Heumann D, Baumgartner J D, Cohen J. Pathogenesis and potential strategies for the prevention and treatment of septic shock: an update. Clin Infect Dis. 1994;18(Suppl. 2):S205–S216. doi: 10.1093/clinids/18.supplement_2.s205. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Gyorffy S, Clarke A J. Production and characterization of a monoclonal antibody to the O-acetylated peptidoglycan of Proteus mirabilis. J Bacteriol. 1992;174:5043–5050. doi: 10.1128/jb.174.15.5043-5050.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Heumann D, Glauser M P, Calandra T. Molecular basis of host-pathogen interaction in septic shock. Curr Opin Microbiol. 1998;1:49–55. doi: 10.1016/s1369-5274(98)80142-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hoijer M A, Melief M J, van Helden-Meeuwsen C G, Eulderink F, Hazenberg M P. Detection of muramic acid in a carbohydrate fraction of human spleen. Infect Immun. 1995;63:1652–1657. doi: 10.1128/iai.63.5.1652-1657.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Johannsen L. Biological properties of bacterial peptidoglycan. APMIS. 1993;101:337–344. doi: 10.1111/j.1699-0463.1993.tb00119.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kengatharan K M, De Kimpe S J, Thiemermann C. Role of nitric oxide in the circulatory failure and organ injury in a rodent model of gram-positive shock. Br J Pharmacol. 1996;119:1411–1421. doi: 10.1111/j.1476-5381.1996.tb16053.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kessler C M, Nussbaum E, Tuazon C U. Disseminated intravascular coagulation associated with Staphylococcus aureus septicemia is mediated by peptidoglycan-induced platelet aggregation. J Infect Dis. 1991;164:101–107. doi: 10.1093/infdis/164.1.101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kobayashi T, Tani T, Yokota T, Kodama M. Detection of peptidoglycan in human plasma using the silkworm larvae plasma test. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 2000;28:49–53. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-695X.2000.tb01456.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Kohler G. The techniques of hybridoma production. In: Lefkovits I, Pernis B, editors. Immunological methods. II. New York, N.Y: Academic Press; 1981. pp. 285–298. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Kool J, De Visser H, Gerrits-Boeye M Y, Klasen I S, Melief M J, Van Helden-Meeuwsen C G, Van Lieshout L M, Ruseler-Van Embden J G, Van Den Berg W B, Bahr G M, Hazenberg M P. Detection of intestinal flora-derived bacterial antigen complexes in splenic macrophages of rats. J Histochem Cytochem. 1994;42:1435–1441. doi: 10.1177/42.11.7930525. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Kozar M P, Krahmer M T, Fox A, Gray B M. Failure to detect muramic acid in normal rat tissues but detection in cerebrospinal fluids from patients with pneumococcal meningitis. Infect Immun. 2000;68:4688–4698. doi: 10.1128/iai.68.8.4688-4698.2000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Lehtonen L, Eerola E, Oksman P, Toivanen P. Muramic acid in peripheral blood leukocytes of healthy human subjects. J Infect Dis. 1995;171:1060–1064. doi: 10.1093/infdis/171.4.1060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Lehtonen L, Eerola E, Toivanen P. Muramic acid in human peripheral blood leucocytes in different age groups. Eur J Clin Invest. 1997;27:791–792. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2362.1997.1950732.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Mattsson E, Van Dijk H, Verhoef J, Norrby R, Rollof J. Supernatants from Staphylococcus epidermidis grown in the presence of different antibiotics induce differential release of tumor necrosis factor alpha from human monocytes. Infect Immun. 1996;64:4351–4355. doi: 10.1128/iai.64.10.4351-4355.1996. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Merkel G J, Scofield B A. The in vitro interaction of Cryptococcus neoformans with human lung epithelial cells. FEMS Immunol Med Microbiol. 1997;19:203–213. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-695X.1997.tb01089.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Merkel G J, Scofield B A. An opsonizing monoclonal antibody recognizing a noncapsular epitope expressed on Cryptococcus neoformans. Infect Immun. 1999;67:4994–5000. doi: 10.1128/iai.67.10.4994-5000.1999. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Middelveld R J, Alving K. Synergistic septicemic action of the gram-positive bacterial cell wall components peptidoglycan and lipoteichoic acid in the pig in vivo. Shock. 2000;13:297–306. doi: 10.1097/00024382-200004000-00008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Pabst J M, Beranova-Giorgianni S, Krueger J M. Effects of muramyl peptides on macrophages, monokines, and sleep. Neuroimmunomodulation. 1999;6:261–283. doi: 10.1159/000026384. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Park H, Zeiger A R, Schumacher H R. Detection of soluble peptidoglycan in urine after penicillin administration. Infect Immun. 1984;43:139–142. doi: 10.1128/iai.43.1.139-142.1984. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Rosenthal R S, Blundell J K, Perkins H R. Strain-related differences in lysozyme sensitivity and extent of O-acetylation of gonococcal peptidoglycan. Infect Immun. 1982;37:826–829. doi: 10.1128/iai.37.2.826-829.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Rosenthal R S, Folkening W J, Miller D R, Swim S C. Resistance of O-acetylated gonococcal peptidoglycan to human peptidoglycan-degrading enzymes. Infect Immun. 1983;40:903–911. doi: 10.1128/iai.40.3.903-911.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Rosenthal R S, Gfell M A, Folkening W J. Influence of protein synthesis inhibitors on regulation of extent of O-acetylation of gonococcal peptidoglycan. Infect Immun. 1985;49:7–13. doi: 10.1128/iai.49.1.7-13.1985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Rosenthal R S, Dziarski R. Isolation of peptidoglycan and soluble peptidoglycan fragments. Methods Enzymol. 1994;235:253–285. doi: 10.1016/0076-6879(94)35146-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Schrijver I A, Melief M J, Eulderink F, Hazenberg M P, Laman J D. Bacterial peptidoglycan polysaccharides in sterile human spleen induce proinflammatory cytokine production by human blood cells. J Infect Dis. 1999;179:1459–1468. doi: 10.1086/314761. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Shockman, G. D., D. E. Jackson, and W. Wong. June 1986. Monoclonal antibodies to peptidoglycan and methods of preparing the same. U.S. patent 4,596,769.
  • 32.Sriskandan S, Cohen J. Gram-positive sepsis. Mechanisms and differences from gram-negative sepsis. Infect Dis Clin N Am. 1999;13:397–412. doi: 10.1016/s0891-5520(05)70082-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Swim S C, Gfell M A, Wilde III C E, Rosenthal R S. Strain distribution in extents of lysozyme resistance and O acetylation of gonococcal peptidoglycan determined by high-performance liquid chromatography. Infect Immun. 1983;42:446–452. doi: 10.1128/iai.42.2.446-452.1983. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.van Langevelde P, van Dissel J T, Ravensbergen E, Appelmelk B J, Schrijver L A, Groeneveld P H. Antibiotic-induced release of lipoteichoic acid and peptidoglycan from Staphylococcus aureus: quantitative measurements and biological reactivities. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1998;42:3073–3078. doi: 10.1128/aac.42.12.3073. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Wenzel R P, Pinsky M R, Ulevitch R J, Young L. Current understanding of sepsis. Clin Infect Dis. 1996;22:407–413. doi: 10.1093/clinids/22.3.407. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Wergeland H I, Asbakk K B, Haaheim L R. Monoclonal antibodies evoked by the free oligopeptide (Gly)5 reacting specifically with peptidoglycan from staphylococci. J Immunol Methods. 1987;104:57–63. doi: 10.1016/0022-1759(87)90487-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Zeiger A R, Wong W, Chatterjee A N, Young F E, Tuazon C U. Evidence for the secretion of soluble peptidoglycans by clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus. Infect Immun. 1982;37:1112–1118. doi: 10.1128/iai.37.3.1112-1118.1982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Zeiger A R. Use of a synthetic peptidoglycan-precursor immunogen and its antibodies as a probe of infectious diseases in man. Dev Biol Stand. 1986;63:109–115. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Ziola B, Gares S L, Lorrain B, Gee L, Ingledew W M, Lee S Y. Epitope mapping of monoclonal antibodies specific for the directly cross-linked mesodiaminopimelic acid peptidoglycan found in the anaerobic beer spoilage bacterium Pectinatus cerevisiiphilus. Can J Microbiol. 1999;45:779–785. doi: 10.1139/w99-071. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Clinical and Diagnostic Laboratory Immunology are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES