Abstract
Prion diseases are a group of rare, transmissible, and invariably fatal neurodegenerative diseases that affect both humans and animals. The cause of these diseases is misfolding of the prion protein into pathological isoforms called prions. Of all human prion diseases, 10–15% of cases are genetic and the E200K mutation, which causes familial Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD), is the most prevalent. For both sporadic and genetic disease, it remains uncertain as to how initial protein misfolding is triggered. Prior studies have linked protein misfolding with oxidative stress insults, deregulated interactions with cellular cofactors, and viral infections. Our previous work developed a cerebral organoid (CO) model using human induced pluripotent stem cells containing the E200K mutation. COs are three-dimensional human neural tissues that permit the study of host genetics and environmental factors that contribute to disease onset. Isogenically matched COs with and without the E200K mutation were used to investigate the propensity of E200K PrP to misfold following cellular insults associated with oxidative stress. Since viral infections have also been associated with oxidative stress and neurodegenerative diseases, we additionally investigated the influence of Herpes Simplex Type-1 virus (HSV1), a neurotropic virus that establishes life-long latent infection in its host, on E200K PrP misfolding. While COs proved to be highly infectable with HSV1, neither acute nor latent infection, or direct oxidative stress insult, resulted in evidence of E200K prion misfolding. We conclude that misfolding into seeding-active PrP species is not readily induced by oxidative stress or HSV1 in our organoid system.
Introduction
Prion diseases are caused by the misfolding of the native prion protein (PrPC) into the pathogenic and infectious isoforms PrPSc, which oligomerize resulting in protein aggregation and vacuole formation in the brain. Disease can present as dementia, loss of motor control and psychiatric symptoms before progressing into a coma and death [1,2]. Human prion diseases include Kuru, Gerstmann-Sträussler-Scheinker syndrome (GSS), fatal familial insomnia (FFI), and Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD) [3]. Of these CJD is the most common, affecting approximately 1 person per million worldwide [1]. Genetic prion diseases account for about 10–15% of cases. The majority of these are associated with a glutamic acid to lysine mutation at codon 200 (E200K) in the PrPC gene (PRNP), which has a penetrance of up to 100% [2,4]. Despite the knowledge that PRNP E200K carriers have a very high likelihood of developing disease, the events that trigger the start of protein misfolding are unknown. The age of onset of disease is also highly variable, indicating that other genetic or environmental factors might influence the initiating events.
When considering what triggers PrPC misfolding and oligomerization, isolated experiments have implicated oxidative stress as well as dysfunctional binding of different cofactors including nucleic acids, glycosaminoglycans, and redox metals [5–9]. One hypothesis is that these perturbations may destabilize the protein enough to induce conversion [9]. Mutations within PrP have been shown to destabilize its normal folded structure [10,11], potentially rendering it more susceptible to unfolding and refolding incorrectly. Oxidation of methionine residues within E200K PrP amino acid sequence resulting from oxidative stress is associated with destabilization of PrP and occurs sequentially from methionine 213 until the inner hydrophobic core is disrupted [12,13]. Furthermore, a study by Zhang and colleagues found that PrP with the E200K mutation shows significantly altered electrostatic surface potential, which may contribute to dysregulated interactions with cofactors and other molecules [14]. Therefore, changed cellular redox balance or cofactor availability for PrP binding could be early events in prion misfolding.
Various intrinsically produced oxidative stress by-products are recognized to play a role in neurodegenerative diseases. Four-Hydroxynonenal (HNE), one of the most prevalent byproducts of lipid peroxidation, is considered a marker of oxidative stress and has been implicated in tissue damage, aging, cellular dysfunction, inflammation and other neurodegenerative diseases including Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s diseases [15]. A study done by Andreoletti and colleagues found that HNE accumulated primarily in the astrocytes of prion infected mice and caused protein adducts throughout the brain [16]. Methylglyoxal is another highly reactive by-product generated during glycolysis and is produced abundantly in the brain, due to the brain’s high energy expenditure. It has also been observed at increased levels in conditions of oxidative stress [17–20]. Similar to HNE, methylglyoxal has been linked to diabetes, cancer, inflammation, and aging, and is thought to cause cell damage and produce free radicals, which contribute to oxidative stress [20]. Byproducts of oxidative metabolism, such as the aforementioned stressors, could have the potential to destabilize E200K PrP.
There are numerous situations in the brain that might result in a burst of reactive oxygen species (ROS), such as ischemia and viral infections. As well as oxidative stress, viral infections are known to induce inflammation, and to dysregulate vital cell processes. Viruses also interact with endogenous (and introduce foreign) cellular co-factors such as nuclei acids and glycosaminoglycans [21]. Herpes Simplex Virus Type-1 (HSV-1) is highly infectious and is known to establish life-long latent infection in neurons following acute infection [22]. It is estimated to infect more than two thirds of the global population, and in some countries, more than 90% [22]. Studies have shown that active infection causes oxidative stress, damages DNA, impairs DNA repair, disrupts proapoptotic and mitochondrial biogenesis signaling, stimulates amyloid plaque deposition, induces neuroinflammation and neurotoxicity, and introduces foreign molecules which may interact negatively with PrPC [21]. Latent infection is thought to cause oxidative damage and neuroinflammation, and chronic viral reactivations from stressful triggers can result in cumulative damage [23,24]. Meta analysis has further linked HSV-1 to the development of Alzheimer’s and other neurodegenerative diseases [21]. With regard to prion diseases, intrathecally synthesized HSV antibodies were found in 3 of 25 CJD patients analysed [25]. Two case studies also found CJD with concurrent HSV infection [26]. While none of these data suggest HSV causes prion disease, its role in prion pathogenesis has not yet been investigated in this context.
Cerebral organoids (COs) are spheres of neuronal lineage tissue that can be differentiated from human induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs). COs progressively mature with neuronal populations differentiating first, then astrocytes and oligodendrocytes appearing from approximately 2–5 months old [27]. Our group has previously shown that COs can take up and propagate sporadic CJD, but do not spontaneously generate genetic prion disease despite demonstrating synaptic dysfunction [28–31]. Since cerebral organoids harboring the E200K mutation do not develop spontaneous disease [28], this offers an opportunity to examine what events can initiate misfolding. Herein, we hypothesized that cellular stress may trigger PrP misfolding in organoids with E200K PrP. To test this, we used iPSCs generated from a donor with no known disease and an asymptomatic carrier of the E200K mutation. Both iPSC lines underwent CRISPR-Cas9 cloning to generate the three possible genotypes at codon 200 (E/E, E/K, K/K), for a total of six cell lines, which were used to generate cerebral organoids. Organoids were treated short and longer-term with 4-Hydroxynonenal (HNE), methylglyoxal (MGx) and HSV1 infection and monitored for misfolded PrP. Our data indicate that these stressors are insufficient to trigger PrPSc-like misfolding in PRNP E200K organoids.
Materials and methods
Ethics
The human cells used in this study were obtained from a commercial source (Applied Stem Cell) or from skin punch biopsy of an asymptomatic donor carrying a single (heterozygous) glutamic acid to lysine prion protein gene mutation at codon 200 (methionine homozygous at codon 129). These cells and procedures have been described previously [28,29]. Briefly, cells were collected at Case Western Reserve University following the Institutional Review Board (IRB) protocol IRB No. STUDY20181189 approved and monitored by University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center and Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine. The informed consent form was signed and obtained from each donor. The skin punch biopsy samples were de-identified before being provided to the researchers at the NIH. Thus, the NIH Office of Human Subjects Research Protections (OHSRP) has determined these samples to be exempt from IRB review.
Human iPSCs and cerebral organoids
iPSCs
Two sets of human induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSCs) lines were used to generate COs, one derived from a healthy donor and one derived from an asymptomatic donor carrying the E200K mutation. Both sets of cells were homozygous for methionine at codon 129. Our healthy, no-known disease line, ASE-9209, was purchased from Applied Stem Cell. Collection of cells from the E200K carrier donor and their reprogramming was described previously [28]. ACS-1023 (ATCC) and RAH019A iPSCs (described in [29]) were used to generate organoids for trial infections. Human iPSC lines were cultured on low growth factor Matrigel (Roche) in mTeSR1 medium (Stem Cell Technologies) with 5% CO2 in a humidified incubator. Media was changed every two days and colonies were passaged at approximately 80% confluence using ReLeSR (Stemcell Technologies) reagent as described in the manufacturer’s instructions.
CRISPR
CRISPR-Cas9 cloning was carried out by Applied Stem Cell using the following guide RNA (gRNA); PRNP-g2 GCGCTCCATCATCTTAACGTCGG. gRNAs and Cas9 were transfected into the iPSCs and positive cells selected by 48 hr incubation with puromycin. After selection a small population of cells underwent genotype analysis and single cell cloning by dilution to one cell per 200 μl. Cells were allowed to grow for 4 to 6 weeks before further genotype analysis. Two clones of each genotype were finally confirmed by NGS sequencing. The cloning strategy followed by Applied Stem Cell and the quality control results can be found in the supplementary materials of Wood & Foliaki et al. [32].
Cerebral organoids
COs were generated using the Cerebral Organoid Differentiation kit (Stemcell Technologies), which follows the protocol described by Lancaster and Knoblich [33]. Organoids were routinely cultured in complete maintenance media (1× glutamax, 1× penicillin/streptomycin solution, 0.5× non-essential amino acids, 0.5% [v/v] N2, 1% (v/v) B12 with retinoic acid, 1 μL/4 mL insulin, and 1 μL/286 mL 2-Merceptoethanol in 1:1 Neurobasal:DME-F12 medium), under standard incubator conditions (5% CO2, 37°C, humidified), on an orbital shaker at 85 rpm using vented conical flasks (Corning), as described in more detail in [30]. COs were used for experiments at ~4 months of age. Trial infections were done as described previously [30,34].
Toxic compounds
A starting concentration curve of HNE and MGx was prepared to determine the optimal non-toxic dose (S1 Fig). PrestoBlue metabolic assays were done on COs prior to treatment with a range of concentrations of each compound, and then one week after treatment (one treatment on day zero, media changed on days three and five). Experimental concentrations were the highest concentration of each compound that did not cause significant changes in metabolism over the course of one week (HNE– 80 μM, Methylglyoxal– 5 mM). COs were maintained in maturation media. Media was changed twice weekly, and compounds added every other feeding.
Viruses/Infections
Virus
Stocks of KOS-GFP and McKrae-GFP HSV Type 1 were produced and provided by William Halford from Southern Illinois University and are described in [35]. Wild-type viral strains were propagated in Vero cells cultured in complete DMEM (Dulbecco’s modified Eagle medium (DMEM) supplemented with 0.15% HCO3−, 10% fetal bovine serum, 100 U/ml penicillin G, and 100 mg/ml streptomycin). Viral titers were calculated and then virus stored at -80°C until use. Mock stocks consist of uninfected Vero cell lysate.
Cell counting
Cell counting was performed using the ‘Cell Count and Viability Assay’ as per instructions with the Muse cell counter (Luminex). In short, three random COs from each line were taken and dissociated gently using Accutase (Thermo Scientific). Lysate was diluted in ‘Muse Count and Viability Kit’ reagent (Luminex) and placed in the Muse for analysis. We averaged the total cell number across the three organoids to determine approximate number of cells per organoid.
MOI
We divided the average number of cells per organoid by stock concentrations of virus to determine the amount of virus solution to be added to each organoid for a multiplicity of infection (MOI) equal to 1. We then diluted by factors of 10 to create a range of MOIs to infect COs with. Equivalent amounts of Vero cell lysates were added to respective mock infections. To confirm viral infection, we monitored COs for GFP expression using the EVOS-FL-auto light microscope (Invitrogen).
Antivirals
COs were pretreated with 30 μM (E)-5-(2-bromovinyl)-2′-deoxyuridine (Brivudine) (Sigma-Aldrich) and 125 IU/ml Human Recombinant Interferon-α A2 (IFN- α) (StemCell Technologies) 24hr before infection to induce viral latency, and treatment was continued for 2 weeks to preserve viral latency [36]. Sporadic re-activation (GFP production) was monitored using the EVOS. The virus could be reactivated by heating the CO at 45°C for ten minutes, emulating a fever [37]. Brivudine was reconstituted in methanol and IFN-α was reconstituted in sterile water. Both were added to maintenance media on the day of use and stored long term in -80°C and short term in -20°C.
Immunofluorescence
COs were fixed in 10% (w/v) neutral buffered formalin (NBF) for at least 2 days, shaking at room temperature (RT). They were washed in 1× PBS and then allowed to equilibrate in 20% and 30% (w/v) sucrose solutions, shaking at RT. COs were then coated with a blue dye for visualizing tissue, embedded in OCT (Ted Pella, Inc.) and stored at -20°C until use. COs were sectioned into 10 micron slices using a cryostat (Leica), mounted on superfrost slides (Thermo Scientific) and stored in 4°C until staining. After removing OCT, tissue was rehydrated and washed with 1× PBS. Tissue was incubated for 1 hour at RT in blocking solution (5% (w/v) BSA, 0.3 M glycine, and 0.1% Triton X-100 in 1× PBS) to prevent unspecific binding and permeabilize cells, then rinsed in 1× PBS, incubated for 5 min with 1:1000 Dapi (Invitrogen), and rinsed again in 1× PBS. Slides were treated with Prolong gold (Invitrogen), mounted with a coverslip and allowed to cure overnight at RT. Images were collected using the EVOS. GFP produced by the virus was preserved throughout the staining process.
PrestoBlue
Cell metabolism was measured using PrestoBlue Cell Viability Reagent (Thermo Scientific) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. In short, reagent was diluted 1 in 10 in warm organoid media. Organoids were cultured in 24 well plates, with one organoid per well. Existing media was removed and replaced with 500 μls per well of made-up PrestoBlue media. The plates were returned to the shaking incubator for 30 minutes. The metabolized PrestoBlue media was then removed and placed into 3 replicate wells at 150 μL aliquots for analysis. Fluorescence was measured using a ClarioStar plate reader (BMG) at 560 nm excitation and 590 nm emission.
PK digests, detergent insolubility and western blotting
COs were homogenized to 10% (w/v) in RIPA Lysis and Extraction buffer (25 mM Tris HCl pH 7.6, 150 mM NaCl, 1% NP-40, 1% sodium deoxycholate, 0.1% SDS: Thermo Scientific) or phosphate buffered saline (PBS; 10 mM phosphate, 150 mM sodium chloride, pH 7.4) by motorized pestle, cleared with a 2 minute 2000× centrifugation, and stored at -80°C until use. For protease digest, CO homogenates were thawed and 13.5 μL of each sample were added to a tube with 1.5 μL of 50 μg/ml Proteinase K (PK) in 10% Sarkosyl for a final concentration of 5 μg/ml PK and 1% Sarkosyl. Solutions were incubated for 1 hour at 37°C with 400 rpm shaking. Five μL of 4× Bolt LDS sample buffer (Invitrogen) containing 6% (v/v) β-mercaptoethanol was added to each sample and samples were boiled for 5 min. For total PrP controls, 5 μL of 10% brain homogenate was added to 10 μL of PBS and 5 μL of Bolt LDS sample buffer and boiled for 5 minutes. The detergent insolubility protocol has been described previously [28]. Briefly, lysates were treated with 300 μL of 10% (w/v) sarkosyl for 1 h at RT with mixing at 1400 rpm, then diluted into 2680 μL of H-Buffer (10 mM Tris–HCl, 1 mM EGTA, 0.8 M NaCl and 10% sucrose at pH 7.4), and centrifuged at 100,000× g for 1 h at 4°C. The pellets were resuspended in 1× sample buffer for Western blot analysis. The proteins in the supernatants were precipitated by a 5 fold excess of ice cold methanol with overnight incubation at -20˚C before centrifuging at 20,000×g for 1 h and the pellet resuspended in 1× sample buffer for Western blot analysis. Samples were boiled for 5 minutes. All samples were centrifuged briefly before loading into a gel to remove condensation. Twenty μL of each sample were loaded into wells of Bolt 4–12% Bis-Tris gels (Invitrogen) and electrophoresis carried out at 200V for approximately 20 minutes. Gels were transferred to PVDF membranes using the iBlot 2 transfer system (Invitrogen). Membranes were blocked in 5% milk in tris-buffered saline (20mM [2.42g/L] tris base and 0.15M [8.77g/L] sodium chloride, pH 7.5) with 0.05% Tween (TBST) for 30 minutes on a rotating shaker. Primary antibody 3F4 (Millipore) to detect PrP was added at a 1:10,000 dilution in 5% blocking solution at 4°C overnight. Secondary antibody (Abcam) was added at 1:5,000 in blocking solution for 2 hours room temperature. ECL Select (Amersham) was used to visualize protein bands with images collected using the iBright imaging system (Invitrogen).
RT-QuIC
Real-time quaking-induced conversion (RT-QuIC) assays to measure prion seeding activity were performed as previously reported [28,34]. In brief, COs were homogenized to 10% (w/v) in PBS by motorized pestle, cleared with a 2-minute 2000×g centrifugation, and stored at -80°C until use. After thawing, samples were serially diluted by 10 folds in 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS)/PBS/N2. Each sample was tested in quadruplicate wells of a 384 well plate (Nunc). One μL of CO dilutions was added to each well along with 49 μL of reaction mix (final concentrations of: 10 mM phosphate buffer [pH 7.4], 300 mM NaCl, 0.1 mg/mL hamster recombinant PrP 90–231, 10 μM thioflavin T (ThT), 1 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid tetrasodium salt and 0.002% (w/v) SDS. Plates were sealed and incubated in a FLUOstar Omega plate reader (BMG) at 50°C for 50 hours with cycles of 60 s of shaking (700 rpm, double orbital) and 60 s of rest. ThT fluorescence was measured every 45 minutes (excitation, 450 ± 10 nm; emission, 480 ± 10 nm [bottom read]). Wells were considered positive for seeding activity when fluorescence exceeded a threshold of 10% of the maximum value from any individual reaction wells on each plate within the 50h time cutoff. A sample was considered positive if greater than 25% of the reaction wells showed positive seeding activity. Data was plotted using GraphPad Prism 9.
Image quantification and statistical analyses
Image files saved using the EVOS imaging system were analysed using Fiji Image J 1.52n software. For each image, a region of interest was drawn around each organoid, with a second background region selected away from the organoid. The mean intensity of the background region was subtracted from that of the organoid region of interest. Plots were generated and statistical analyses performed using Graphpad Prism 8.2.0. The statistical test used is indicated in the figure legend.
Results
COs from donors carrying the PRNP E200K mutation that causes genetic CJD do not show production of spontaneous prions [28]. This provides an opportunity for investigating what stressors might trigger prion misfolding and propagation. We hypothesized that cellular insults including those associated with oxidative stress and viral infection might be sufficient to trigger misfolding. To test this, we used CRISPR-Cas9 engineering to make isogenically matched PRNP 200E/E, 200E/K and 200K/K induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs; Table 1, Fig 1A) from both an E200K carrier donor and a no-known disease (NKD) control donor. The isogenically matched cells allow us to assess any dose contribution by the K allele and provide the most appropriate controls (200E/E in the same genetic background as 200E/K or 200K/K). Organoids were differentiated from each of these iPSC lines and cultured until they were mostly populated with maturing neurons, astrocytes and oligodendrocytes (~4 months old) then exposed to the cellular insults. After this they were monitored over short and longer periods of time to look for the emergence of misfolded species (a simplified experimental plan is shown in Fig 1B). Prior to beginning the treatments, we confirmed that our E200K donor organoids were capable of propagating prions by infecting them with brain homogenate from a person who died of MM1 sCJD. Example Real-Time Quaking Induced Conversion (RT-QuIC) traces are shown in Fig 1C compared with organoids from two unrelated iPSC lines that also propagate prions from human brain homogenate (RT-QuIC positive MM1 E200K PrP is not detectable following PK digest but demonstrates increased insolubility; S1 Fig). This shows that, while the E200K organoids do not spontaneously produce prion propagation, they can propagate prions from an initiating event, which can be detected by RT-QuIC.
Table 1. iPSC CRISPR-Cas9 engineered lines.
Donor line | CRISPR-Cas9 engineered PRNP 200 genotypes | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Name | PRNP 129 genotype | PRNP 200 genotype | ||
E200K donor | M/M | E/K | E/E | K/K |
No Known Disease (NKD) donor | M/M | E/E | E/K | K/K |
HNE and MGx cellular stressors do not induce E200K PrP misfolding
As cells age or suffer stress insults, toxic byproducts of metabolism are formed. We first tested whether two such metabolites 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal (HNE), a product of lipid peroxidation, and methylglyoxyal (MGx), a toxic by-product of glycolysis, would cause E200K PrP misfolding. Cells were treated once weekly with concentrations of the insults that were below the toxicity threshold (S2 Fig). At 1 week post initial insult and 3 months of weekly insults, organoids were harvested and analyzed for the presence of misfolded PrP. To determine if PrP misfolding was occurring two assays were used; western blotting after protease digest and RT-QuIC, which detects prion seeding activity that is indicative of misfolded prions. For protease digestion before western blotting, a low quantity of proteinase K (PK: 5 μg/ml) was used to detect small levels of resistance that might occur with small or early structural changes. After one week of treatment, detection of protease resistant PrP was present only in one lane of the E200K donor organoids engineered to be homozygous for the K/K mutation that were treated with MGx (Fig 2A, *indicates band). A noticeable change was observed in the banding pattern of the undigested PrP, indicative of increased cleavage or fragmentation of the protein (Fig 2A; see S3 Fig for examples of the unstressed organoid PrP banding pattern). No seeding activity as detected by RT-QuIC was present at one week following treatment (Fig 2B). Likewise, after 3 months of weekly treatments, no seeding activity had emerged (Fig 2C). This indicates these insults were ineffective in initiating prion misfolding and seeding that produces on-going misfolded forms.
Acute HSV1 infection of E200K cerebral organoids does not initiate PrP misfolding
As the oxidative stress insult alone did not result in PrP misfolding, we hypothesized that a more complex series of cellular insults would be needed to destabilize E200K PrP. A more substantial insult is provided by neurotropic viral infection such as HSV1, which has been demonstrated to infect human COs [36,38,39]. Therefore, we selected this virus to investigate whether it could cause protein misfolding of E200K PrP. Initially, we infected organoids with two strains of HSV1 to look for protein misfolding in response to the actively proliferating virus. Both strains of HSV1 were tagged with GFP allowing us to monitor the presence of actively replicating virus by fluorescence imaging (Fig 3A & 3B). Of the two strains and six multiplicities of infection (MOI) tested, only organoids infected with the McKrae strain at the 0.00001 MOI showed viability at one week by Prestoblue assay of their metabolism (S5 Fig). This was the concentration chosen to assess the changes in PrP, however, even at this concentration, organoids looked morphologically stressed with less defined edges and greater cell debris observed after 1 week (Fig 3A) and all infected organoids were dead by three weeks (S5 Fig). Organoids were harvested at 0, 1, 3 and 7 dpi to look for protease resistant PrP or changes in protein seeding activity. None of the genotypes from either the E200K donor or the NKD donor organoids showed any evidence of protease resistant PrP (Fig 3C) apart from a couple of faint bands, which likely represented incomplete digest at the low levels of PK enzyme (as the strongest of these was observed in the E200K E/K organoid control condition). In contrast with the HNE and MGx treatments no changes were seeing in PrP banding profile of undigested PrP (S3 Fig). RT-QuIC seeding activity was also absent (Fig 3D & 3E). Thus, 7 days of acute HSV1 infection was insufficient to cause any E200K PrP misfolding.
Latent HSV1 infection does not result in PrP misfolding in E200K cerebral organoids
As the viability of the HSV1 infected organoids declined rapidly we could not monitor the effect of long-term active HSV1 infection on prion misfolding. To examine organoids infected over a longer period of time we used a latent infection system. While we trialed a number of anti-viral strategies for inducing latent infection (S6 Fig), the system developed by D’Aiuto et al. [36] appeared to produce consistent latent infection that did not spontaneously reactivate but could be readily reactivated by heat shock treatment of the organoids (Fig 4A & 4B). Organoids were treated for 24 hours with IFNα and Brivudine then infected with HSV1, and antiviral treatments were continued for a further 2 weeks after which the organoids were maintained in standard media. Organoids remained viable (and of healthy appearance) throughout the entire infection period. By three months of infection no protease resistant PrP (Fig 4C) and no changes in seeding activity (Fig 4D) were observed in either organoid set. We also followed the NKD donor lines out to six months post infection and did not observe any further changes (Fig 4E & 4F). Altogether, we conclude these insults were not sufficient to induce destabilizing changes in E200K PrP in human cerebral organoids.
Discussion
In this study, we sought to use the lack of abnormal PrP in cerebral organoids with the CJD-associated PRNP E200K mutation to ascertain whether certain cellular insults could trigger E200K PrP misfolding. For this, we treated E200K organoids (and their respective controls) with 4-Hydroxy-2-nonenal or Methylglyoxal, two byproducts of cellular stress, or infected them with neurotropic HSV1. Our data show that none of these insults was sufficient to induce changes in E200K PrP that might be associated with protein misfolding in human cerebral organoids. While we cannot conclude that these insults do not trigger PrP misfolding and disease onset in human adults, our data leads us to believe that other factors must come into play. We did however confirm our previous results that found no protease-resistant or seeding-active PrP formed spontaneously in the E200K organoids [28] and showed this is true even when both 200 alleles are lysine.
The only protease-resistant band observed in this series of experiments was in the 200K/K donor cells treated with MGx at 1 week of treatment. This had an unusual appearance, with a single band rather than three bands, and was detected at low PK levels (for comparison 100 μg/ml solutions, 20× more PK than used herein, are used to digest human brain for molecular subtyping [40]). We cannot preclude the possibility that this band represents a structural modification that is an intermediary species occurring prior to more substantial misfolding that results in on-going propagation. However, given the lack of seeding activity at this time and after 3 months incubation, it is most likely that this band represents an incomplete digest. Of interest was the changed banding pattern of the undigested PrP in HNE and MGx as this indicated the treatments were sufficient to affect the organoids. Increased cleavage or fragmentation of PrP is associated with oxidative stress [41–43] and, therefore, this banding pattern indicated that the oxidative insults were having the expected direct effect on PrP itself. However, this was not relevant to its misfolding as neither short-term RT-QuIC seeding activity was positive nor an emergence of misfolded species over a longer term was detected.
Neurotropic viruses cause significant stress, damage, and death within human cerebral organoid cultures [36,38,39,44]. A recent study reported PrP misfolding in neuroblastoma cells after infection with influenza A virus [45]. The misfolded prions produced were infectious and transmissible to mice causing death around 177 dpi with deposition of PrP, although the disease was distinct from mouse scrapie strains. HSV1 is a common neurotropic virus. Symptoms of the initial infection are typically mild but, after acute infection, HSV travels retrograde up neural axons and establishes life-long latent infection in neurons [46]. Interestingly, intrathecally synthesized antibodies against HSV have been detected in cerebrospinal fluid from a small number of CJD patients [25] and active virus has been found in two CJD patients [26]. PrPC expression has been linked with promoting HSV1 replication in mice [47,48]. Conversely, an anti-viral role of PrPC was identified in astrocytes through positive regulation of autophagy [49]. Given the links between viral infections and PrP, we tested the potential of this virus to destabilize E200K PrP causing misfolding. As with the individual oxidative insults no effect of infection, acute or latent, was observed. However, it remains possible that multiple reactivation events could be necessary to put the brain under enough pressure to trigger conversion, but we did not investigate such a possibility herein. In addition, cerebral organoids do not contain all brain cell types—they are lacking microglia and endothelial cells, which may be critical in the initial prion misfolding events. While HSV1 may not cause the initial misfolding of PrP, it is still possible that it or other neurotropic viruses might influence the onset, spread and pathogenesis of prion diseases [50]. Indeed, a recent case study found accelerated prion disease in a patient infected with Sars-Cov-2 [51]. Overall, HSV1 infection in this human brain model is not an event that causes E200K PrP misfolding.
Conclusion
Herein we have shown that oxidative stress insults and HSV1 infection, acute or latent, do not cause early destabilization and misfolding of E200K PrP or emergence of a misfolded species over a longer time in culture. We cannot conclude that these factors are not involved in the events that lead to the propagation of prions within the human brain, but they are insufficient to cause such changes to occur in human cerebral organoids with E200K PrP.
Supporting information
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Dr James Carroll and Dr Christina Orrù for critical review of the manuscript.
Data Availability
All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.
Funding Statement
This research was funded by the intramural program of NIAID (NIH). The funders had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
References
- 1.Knight RS, Will RG. Prion diseases. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2004;75 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):i36–42. Epub 2004/02/24. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2004.036137 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC1765647. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Kim MO, Takada LT, Wong K, Forner SA, Geschwind MD. Genetic PrP Prion Diseases. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2018;10(5). Epub 2017/08/06. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a033134 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5932589. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Prusiner SB. Prions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95(23):13363–83. Epub 1998/11/13. doi: 10.1073/pnas.95.23.13363 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC33918. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Minikel EV, Vallabh SM, Lek M, Estrada K, Samocha KE, Sathirapongsasuti JF, et al. Quantifying prion disease penetrance using large population control cohorts. Sci Transl Med. 2016;8(322):322ra9. Epub 2016/01/23. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.aad5169 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4774245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Daude N, Lau A, Vanni I, Kang SG, Castle AR, Wohlgemuth S, et al. Prion protein with a mutant N-terminal octarepeat region undergoes cobalamin-dependent assembly into high-molecular weight complexes. J Biol Chem. 2022;298(4):101770. Epub 2022/03/11. doi: 10.1016/j.jbc.2022.101770 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC9010764. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Haigh CL, Drew SC. Cavitation during the protein misfolding cyclic amplification (PMCA) method—The trigger for de novo prion generation? Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2015;461(3):494–500. Epub 2015/04/22. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2015.04.048 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Supattapone S. Cofactor molecules: Essential partners for infectious prions. Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci. 2020;175:53–75. Epub 2020/09/23. doi: 10.1016/bs.pmbts.2020.07.009 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7768309. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Zhang X, Pan YH, Chen Y, Pan C, Ma J, Yuan C, et al. The protease-sensitive N-terminal polybasic region of prion protein modulates its conversion to the pathogenic prion conformer. J Biol Chem. 2021;297(5):101344. Epub 2021/10/29. doi: 10.1016/j.jbc.2021.101344 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8604679. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Silva JL, Vieira TC, Gomes MP, Rangel LP, Scapin SM, Cordeiro Y. Experimental approaches to the interaction of the prion protein with nucleic acids and glycosaminoglycans: Modulators of the pathogenic conversion. Methods. 2011;53(3):306–17. Epub 2010/12/15. doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2010.12.002 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Levy Y, Becker OM. Conformational polymorphism of wild-type and mutant prion proteins: Energy landscape analysis. Proteins. 2002;47(4):458–68. Epub 2002/05/10. doi: 10.1002/prot.10095 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Swietnicki W, Petersen RB, Gambetti P, Surewicz WK. Familial mutations and the thermodynamic stability of the recombinant human prion protein. J Biol Chem. 1998;273(47):31048–52. Epub 1998/11/13. doi: 10.1074/jbc.273.47.31048 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Canello T, Frid K, Gabizon R, Lisa S, Friedler A, Moskovitz J, et al. Oxidation of Helix-3 methionines precedes the formation of PK resistant PrP. PLoS Pathog. 2010;6(7):e1000977. Epub 2010/07/14. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000977 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2895666. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Wang Z, Feng B, Xiao G, Zhou Z. Roles of methionine oxidation in E200K prion protein misfolding: Implications for the mechanism of pathogenesis in E200K linked familial Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2016;1864(4):346–58. Epub 2016/01/19. doi: 10.1016/j.bbapap.2016.01.008 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Zhang Y, Swietnicki W, Zagorski MG, Surewicz WK, Sönnichsen FD. Solution structure of the E200K variant of human prion protein. Implications for the mechanism of pathogenesis in familial prion diseases. J Biol Chem. 2000;275(43):33650–4. Epub 2000/08/24. doi: 10.1074/jbc.C000483200 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Shoeb M, Ansari NH, Srivastava SK, Ramana KV. 4-Hydroxynonenal in the pathogenesis and progression of human diseases. Curr Med Chem. 2014;21(2):230–7. Epub 2013/07/16. doi: 10.2174/09298673113209990181 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3964795. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Andreoletti O, Levavasseur E, Uro-Coste E, Tabouret G, Sarradin P, Delisle M-B, et al. Astrocytes Accumulate 4-Hydroxynonenal Adducts in Murine Scrapie and Human Creutzfeldt–Jakob Disease. Neurobiology of Disease. 2002;11(3):386–93. doi: 10.1006/nbdi.2002.0558 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.de Bari L, Scirè A, Minnelli C, Cianfruglia L, Kalapos MP, Armeni T. Interplay among Oxidative Stress, Methylglyoxal Pathway and S-Glutathionylation. Antioxidants (Basel). 2020;10(1). Epub 2021/01/01. doi: 10.3390/antiox10010019 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7824032. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Desai KM, Chang T, Wang H, Banigesh A, Dhar A, Liu J, et al. Oxidative stress and aging: is methylglyoxal the hidden enemy? Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 2010;88(3):273–84. Epub 2010/04/16. doi: 10.1139/Y10-001 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Moldogazieva NT, Mokhosoev IM, Mel’nikova TI, Porozov YB, Terentiev AA. Oxidative Stress and Advanced Lipoxidation and Glycation End Products (ALEs and AGEs) in Aging and Age-Related Diseases. Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2019;2019:3085756. Epub 2019/09/06. doi: 10.1155/2019/3085756 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6710759 publication of this paper. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Ramasamy R, Yan SF, Schmidt AM. Methylglyoxal comes of AGE. Cell. 2006;124(2):258–60. Epub 2006/01/28. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2006.01.002 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Duarte LF, Farías MA, Álvarez DM, Bueno SM, Riedel CA, González PA. Herpes Simplex Virus Type 1 Infection of the Central Nervous System: Insights Into Proposed Interrelationships With Neurodegenerative Disorders. Front Cell Neurosci. 2019;13:46. Epub 2019/03/14. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2019.00046 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6399123. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Nicoll MP, Proença JT, Efstathiou S. The molecular basis of herpes simplex virus latency. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2012;36(3):684–705. Epub 2011/12/14. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6976.2011.00320.x ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3492847. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Valyi-Nagy T, Olson SJ, Valyi-Nagy K, Montine TJ, Dermody TS. Herpes simplex virus type 1 latency in the murine nervous system is associated with oxidative damage to neurons. Virology. 2000;278(2):309–21. Epub 2000/12/19. doi: 10.1006/viro.2000.0678 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Protto V, Tramutola A, Fabiani M, Marcocci ME, Napoletani G, Iavarone F, et al. Multiple Herpes Simplex Virus-1 (HSV-1) Reactivations Induce Protein Oxidative Damage in Mouse Brain: Novel Mechanisms for Alzheimer’s Disease Progression. Microorganisms. 2020;8(7). Epub 2020/07/03. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8070972 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7409037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Jacobi C, Arlt S, Reiber H, Westner I, Kretzschmar HA, Poser S, et al. Immunoglobulins and virus-specific antibodies in patients with Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. Acta Neurol Scand. 2005;111(3):185–90. Epub 2005/02/05. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0404.2005.00330.x . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Pollak L, Shabazov E, Mendlovic S, Rabey MJ. Herpes simplex encephalitis as an initial presentation of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. Isr Med Assoc J. 2008;10(5):392–4. Epub 2008/07/09. . [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Fair SR, Julian D, Hartlaub AM, Pusuluri ST, Malik G, Summerfied TL, et al. Electrophysiological Maturation of Cerebral Organoids Correlates with Dynamic Morphological and Cellular Development. Stem Cell Reports. 2020;15(4):855–68. doi: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2020.08.017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Foliaki ST, Groveman BR, Yuan J, Walters R, Zhang S, Tesar P, et al. Pathogenic Prion Protein Isoforms Are Not Present in Cerebral Organoids Generated from Asymptomatic Donors Carrying the E200K Mutation Associated with Familial Prion Disease. Pathogens. 2020;9(6). Epub 2020/06/24. doi: 10.3390/pathogens9060482 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7350378. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Foliaki ST, Schwarz B, Groveman BR, Walters RO, Ferreira NC, Orrù CD, et al. Neuronal excitatory-to-inhibitory balance is altered in cerebral organoid models of genetic neurological diseases. Mol Brain. 2021;14(1):156. Epub 2021/10/13. doi: 10.1186/s13041-021-00864-w ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8507222. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Groveman BR, Foliaki ST, Orru CD, Zanusso G, Carroll JA, Race B, et al. Sporadic Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease prion infection of human cerebral organoids. Acta neuropathologica communications. 2019;7(1):90. Epub 2019/06/15. doi: 10.1186/s40478-019-0742-2 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6567389. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Groveman BR, Smith A, Williams K, Haigh CL. Cerebral organoids as a new model for prion disease. PLoS Pathog. 2021;17(7):e1009747. Epub 2021/07/22. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1009747 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8294539. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Wood AR, Foliaki ST, Groveman BR, Walters RO, Williams K, Yuan J, et al. Hereditary E200K mutation within the prion protein gene alters human iPSC derived cardiomyocyte function. Scientific Reports. 2022;12(1):15788. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-19631-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Lancaster MA, Knoblich JA. Generation of cerebral organoids from human pluripotent stem cells. Nat Protoc. 2014;9(10):2329–40. Epub 2014/09/05. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2014.158 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4160653. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Groveman BR, Ferreira NC, Foliaki ST, Walters RO, Winkler CW, Race B, et al. Human cerebral organoids as a therapeutic drug screening model for Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):5165. Epub 2021/03/18. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-84689-6 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7943797. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Halford WP, Balliet JW, Gebhardt BM. Re-evaluating natural resistance to herpes simplex virus type 1. J Virol. 2004;78(18):10086–95. Epub 2004/08/28. doi: 10.1128/JVI.78.18.10086-10095.2004 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC515006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.D’Aiuto L, Bloom DC, Naciri JN, Smith A, Edwards TG, McClain L, et al. Modeling Herpes Simplex Virus 1 Infections in Human Central Nervous System Neuronal Cells Using Two- and Three-Dimensional Cultures Derived from Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells. J Virol. 2019;93(9). Epub 2019/02/23. doi: 10.1128/JVI.00111-19 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6475775. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Sawtell NM, Thompson RL. Rapid in vivo reactivation of herpes simplex virus in latently infected murine ganglionic neurons after transient hyperthermia. J Virol. 1992;66(4):2150–6. Epub 1992/04/01. doi: 10.1128/JVI.66.4.2150-2156.1992 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC289007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Krenn V, Bosone C, Burkard TR, Spanier J, Kalinke U, Calistri A, et al. Organoid modeling of Zika and herpes simplex virus 1 infections reveals virus-specific responses leading to microcephaly. Cell Stem Cell. 2021;28(8):1362–79.e7. Epub 2021/04/11. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2021.03.004 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7611471. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Qiao H, Guo M, Shang J, Zhao W, Wang Z, Liu N, et al. Herpes simplex virus type 1 infection leads to neurodevelopmental disorder-associated neuropathological changes. PLoS Pathog. 2020;16(10):e1008899. Epub 2020/10/23. doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1008899 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7580908. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Klug GM, Lewis V, Collins SJ. Molecular Subtyping of PrP(res) in Human Sporadic CJD Brain Tissue. Methods Mol Biol. 2017;1658:347–54. Epub 2017/09/02. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-7244-9_23 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.McMahon HE. Prion processing: a double-edged sword? Biochem Soc Trans. 2012;40(4):735–8. Epub 2012/07/24. doi: 10.1042/BST20120031 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Altmeppen HC, Puig B, Dohler F, Thurm DK, Falker C, Krasemann S, et al. Proteolytic processing of the prion protein in health and disease. Am J Neurodegener Dis. 2012;1(1):15–31. Epub 2013/02/06. ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3560451. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Mangé A, Béranger F, Peoc’h K, Onodera T, Frobert Y, Lehmann S. Alpha- and beta- cleavages of the amino-terminus of the cellular prion protein. Biol Cell. 2004;96(2):125–32. Epub 2004/03/31. doi: 10.1016/j.biolcel.2003.11.007 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Winkler CW, Woods TA, Groveman BR, Carmody AB, Speranza EE, Martens CA, et al. Neuronal maturation reduces the type I IFN response to orthobunyavirus infection and leads to increased apoptosis of human neurons. J Neuroinflammation. 2019;16(1):229. Epub 2019/11/20. doi: 10.1186/s12974-019-1614-1 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6862864. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Hara H, Chida J, Uchiyama K, Pasiana AD, Takahashi E, Kido H, et al. Neurotropic influenza A virus infection causes prion protein misfolding into infectious prions in neuroblastoma cells. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):10109. Epub 2021/05/14. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-89586-6 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8115602. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Chayavichitsilp P, Buckwalter JV, Krakowski AC, Friedlander SF. Herpes simplex. Pediatr Rev. 2009;30(4):119–29; quiz 30. Epub 2009/04/03. doi: 10.1542/pir.30-4-119 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Thackray AM, Bujdoso R. PrP(c) expression influences the establishment of herpes simplex virus type 1 latency. J Virol. 2002;76(5):2498–509. Epub 2002/02/12. doi: ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC153799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Thackray AM, Bujdoso R. Elevated PrPC expression predisposes to increased HSV-1 pathogenicity. Antivir Chem Chemother. 2006;17(1):41–52. Epub 2006/03/18. doi: 10.1177/095632020601700106 . [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Korom M, Wylie KM, Wang H, Davis KL, Sangabathula MS, Delassus GS, et al. A proautophagic antiviral role for the cellular prion protein identified by infection with a herpes simplex virus 1 ICP34.5 mutant. J Virol. 2013;87(10):5882–94. Epub 2013/03/15. doi: 10.1128/JVI.02559-12 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3648145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Liu S, Hossinger A, Heumüller SE, Hornberger A, Buravlova O, Konstantoulea K, et al. Highly efficient intercellular spreading of protein misfolding mediated by viral ligand-receptor interactions. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):5739. Epub 2021/10/21. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-25855-2 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC8526834. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Olivo S, Furlanis G, Buoite Stella A, Fabris M, Milanic R, Zanusso G, et al. Rapidly evolving Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease in COVID-19: from early status epilepticus to fatal outcome. Acta Neurol Belg. 2022. Epub 2022/07/20. doi: 10.1007/s13760-022-02023-x . [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.