Abstract
Microbial biotechnology uses microorganisms and their derivatives to generate industrial and/or environmental products that impact daily life. Modern biotechnology uses proteomics, metabolomics, quantum processors, and massive sequencing methods to yield promising results with microorganisms. However, the fundamental concepts of microbial biotechnology focus on the specific search for microorganisms from natural sources and their correct analysis to implement large-scale processes. This mini-review focuses on the methods used for the isolation and selection of microorganisms with biotechnological potential to empathize the importance of these concepts in microbial biotechnology. In this work, a review of the state of the art in recent years on the selection and characterization of microorganisms with a basic approach to understanding the importance of fundamental concepts in the field of biotechnology was carried out. The proper selection of isolation sources and the design of suitable selection criteria according to the desired activity have generated substantial changes in the development of biotechnology for more than three decades. Some examples include Taq polymerase in the PCR method and CRISPR technology. The objective of this mini review is to establish general ideas for the screening of microorganisms based on basic concepts of biotechnology that are left aside in several articles and maintain the importance of the basic concepts that this implies in the development of modern biotechnology.
Introduction
Biotechnology is an important area of research, considering its impact on everyday life. Current biotechnology research includes sustainable agriculture, vitamin and antibiotics production, COVID-19 vaccine development, and metabolite hyper-production [1–3]. Biotechnology has different origins, depending on the specific components used for its development. Plants, animals, fungi, and bacterial cells, including derivatives such as enzymes, artificial membranes, and viral particles, can all be used to apply and develop biotechnology [4–6].
For the context of this work, we focused on the concepts of microbial biotechnology which is defined as the use of microorganisms in a fermentative process for the production of metabolites of industrial interest for various applications, including industrial, medical, environmental, food, and agricultural [3, 4]. It has been observed that the evolution of biotechnology has undergone radical changes throughout history, bioinformatics tools and omics have allowed this science to acquire an unprecedented scope, however, it is contradictory to think that microbial biotechnology was an important element in the development of civilizations by the use of fermentative processes since the beginning of human history for bread and wine rudimentary production, and currently it is one of the most modern tools used to combat the current coronavirus pandemic [7, 8]. The current approach to microbial biotechnology is the use of genetic engineering to employ synthetic biology and break the physiological limits of microorganisms. Although we are not against this facet, the current research does not emphasize the potential of fermentative bases and the correct selection and characterization of microorganisms isolated from natural sources that precisely allow establishing management guidelines to improve their natural biotechnological activity. Before placing a plasmid inside E. coli for bioreactor hyper-production of amylase from some bacteria, first, it is necessary to select, isolate, and know the biotechnological potential of these microorganisms, that is where the importance of the biotechnological foundations lies, especially those used in microbial screening which, according to our experience, are not defined in current works. Opportunities for the use of microbial biotechnology are endless. Every day new uses for microorganisms are discovered or scaled to an industrial level, such as new processes for wastewater treatments or improvements in bioremediation processes and only a small percentage of microorganisms have been studied [9–12].
The current scope of biotechnology has transcended interesting borders where the works focus on maximizing production, studying new therapeutic effects or modifying metabolites of interest, however, it should be noted that basic fundamentals such as establishing the significance of identifying a correct selection pressure, characterizing microorganisms based on specific selection criteria, performing an optimal screening of microorganisms from well-chosen natural sources are as important as the most modern techniques used in the field or the hyper-production of enzymes that will fight the diseases of the future. Current work in biotechnology should not ignore these elements, since they are the basis for more comprehensive and content-rich research that will allow the exponential growth of microbial biotechnology.
Advancements in genetic engineering and the implementation and use of omics in modern biotechnology have created a revolutionary biotechnology field [13, 14]. However, the techniques of microbial biotechnology are essential for taking biotechnology to the next level. Microorganisms have physiological limitations that ultimately depends on their ecological needs, so understanding the bases of these limitations will allow us to break those restrictions in the search for more and better biotechnological applications using microorganisms.
This paper aims to demonstrate the importance that basic concepts (selection pressure, selection criteria, etc.) provide in the field of biotechnology from a review of the state of the art of recent research. Few works fundamentally address the basic concepts of biotechnology since they are often ignored in order to emphasize biotechnological applications or the use of advanced technology. We focus on defining and establishing how the basic concepts in biotechnology are used for the development of this science and its presence in current research work.
Isolation and Selection of Microorganisms with Biotechnological Potential
Natural Sources of Isolation of Fermentative Biotechnological Microorganisms
Classical microbial biotechnology relies on finding microorganisms with interesting activities isolated from natural sources. Usually, for the isolation of microorganisms with biotechnological interest, environments with particular conditions are preferred, for example, locations where selection pressures are constantly present, places where the microorganisms are in contact with certain substrates, that have extreme conditions of temperature or pH, little explored lands or with interesting microbiome due to its geographical conditions, or soils contaminated with some recalcitrant compound, etc. [15–19].
The possibilities are endless given the great variability of conditions in which microorganisms can be found naturally. In the literature, we can find many examples of natural sources of isolation from hypersaline lakes, ponds contaminated with hydrocarbons, desert lands in Mexico, arctic seas, and forest floors [17, 20–22].
Metabolites generated by microorganisms isolated from extreme environments may provide attractive biotechnological and economic advantages. Enzymes that resist extreme pH or temperatures, new antibiotics, and more potent drugs can be developed from this type of microorganism. For example, the DNA polymerase obtained from the archaea Thermophilus aquaticus isolated from a thermophilic environment made recombinant DNA technology possible. This had a substantial economic and logistical impact on industry and research [23, 24].
It is important to emphasize that when selecting an isolation source, the natural conditions for the development of microbial life must be considered. We often focus on industrial interest and ignore microbial physiology, looking for sources of isolation that are too demanding for life to develop. Complex nutrient sources, high concentrations of pollutants, absence of carbon or nitrogen sources, and low water activity are some examples of the mistakes made when selecting natural isolation sources. Although microorganisms adapt to various conditions, the probability of success for the isolation of microorganisms is reduced if we do not consider the minimum requirements necessary for growth [25].
Selection Pressure
From the point of view of this work, selection pressure can be defined as any external factor, biotic or abiotic, that affects the growth of a particular microbial population. These selection pressures can be used when choosing the isolation source or used in the laboratory under the scheme of progressive enrichment cultures to favor the growth of populations that have the activity of interest (Table 1).
Table 1.
Examples selection pressure in recent biotechnological literature
| Selection pressure | Examples | Natural sources | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| Carbon sources | |||
| Complex polymers | Starch, chitin, chitosan, lignin | Agricultural waste, fishing waste, soil, Tree bark | [16, 26, 27] |
| Xenobiotic | PHAs, dyes, herbicides | Contaminated water and soil | [17, 27, 28] |
| pH | Extremophiles | Soil, food products, industrial waste | [29–31] |
| Temperature | Extremophiles | Artic sea, deserts | [15, 21, 32, 33] |
| Osmolarity | Extremophiles | Saline lakes, saline soils, solar saltern, industrial waste | [22, 34, 35] |
| Others | Pressure, oxygen, nitrogen sources | Various sources | [36–39] |
The selection pressure depends on the desired activity of interest, the geographic conditions of the isolation, the availability of resources, and the physiology of the microorganism itself. Thanks to advances in genomic sciences, modern biotechnology can simplify the process by detecting the desired activity in a specific species of microorganisms and only isolating that specific microorganism. However, natural sources of isolation with their specific selection pressures continue to be a field of interest for biotechnology as new and better variants of microbial biotechnological activity are being discovered.
With the pressure of selection, it is also possible to enrich microbial communities that possess the desired activity. Natural samples for the isolation of microorganisms are conditioned under selection pressure. Over time, only those capable of withstanding the selection pressure proliferate. For example, a soil sample obtained from agricultural soils of rice fields can be placed in the presence of starch and hypersaline solution to isolate halophilic microorganisms that produce amylases.
Selection Criteria
The selection criteria are the quantitative and/or qualitative characteristics that reveal the activity or product of interest in a microbial community and serve as the basis for selecting a microorganism of biotechnological interest [40]. The selection criteria vary and depend on the biotechnological activity being sought. Colonial morphology, enzymatic activities, inhibition, or hydrolysis halos are some examples of selection criteria. Table 2 shows examples of selection criteria reported in the literature.
Table 2.
Selection criteria for the biotechnological activity of microorganisms
| Biotechnological activity | Microorganism | Isolation source | Selection criteria | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Probiotic | Lactobacillus and Enterococcus strains | Food, plants, and human | Resistance to gastric acidity and resistance to bile salt. Adherence to mucus and/or human epithelial cells and cell lines. Antimicrobial and antagonism activity against potentially pathogenic bacteria | [41, 42] |
| Wine production | Non-Saccharomyces Yeasts | Grapes, musts, or wines | Fermentative power, aroma profile modulation, acidity regulation | [40, 43] |
| Phytotoxic secondary metabolites with herbicidal activity | Fusarium fujikuroi | Brazilian Pampa biome | Germination in pre-emergence, phytotoxicity, plant height and root length in post-emergence, and lesions in detached leaf-punctured assay | [44] |
| Sourdough-based fermentation and bread production | Bacteria belonging to the family Lactobacillaceae | Italian sourdoughs | Tolerance to acid, salt, sucrose, and ethanol stresses, urease, amylase, and proteolytic activities | [45] |
| Microbial antagonists fungi plant pathogens | Yeast, bacteria, and fungi | Varied isolation sources | Inhibition of spore germination and radial growth | [46, 47] |
| Exopolysaccharide production | Bacteria strains. Bacillus velezensis | Soil samples from Al-Bahariya Oasis | EPS precipitation using 70% ethanol and the bacteria colony ropy strand formation | [48] |
| Polyhydroxybutyrate [PHB] production from methane | Methanotrophs | Recycled activated sludge [RAS] from the Humber wastewater treatment plant situated in Toronto, Canada | Gas consumption and PHB accumulation after enrichment culture technique | [49] |
| Protease activity | Coagulase-negative staphylococci [CNS] | Traditional Chinese fermented sausage | Hydrolysis halos revealed with coomassie blue and enzyme activity | [50] |
| Siderophores production | Azotobacter vinelandii, Bacillus megaterium, Bacillus subtilis, Pantoea allii, and Rhizobium radiobacter | Collection | Level of siderophore production determined by chrome azurol S, CAS method | [51] |
| Bacteriocin production | Bacteriocinogenic lactic acid bacteria and Bifidobacterium spp | Honeycomb filled with oregano honey | Surrounding clear zone in the MRS agar, biochemical and morphological characterization | [52] |
It is important to point out that the selection criteria must be specific according to the desired biotechnological activity, they must be easy to visualize and identify and, as far as possible, applicable to a large number of samples to facilitate the work. The most commonly used selection criteria include changes in the color of the solid medium, changes in the pH indicator, halos of hydrolysis or solubilization, among others. Figure 1 shows the selection criteria for microorganisms with biotechnological potential for the production of siderophores, enzymes, organic acids, and bioinsecticides.
Fig. 1.
Selection criteria for microorganisms with biotechnological potential. A Hydrolysis halo in Castañeda medium supplemented with 1% starch as the only carbon source. Amylase activity is observed. B Halo hydrolysis in minimal medium with colloidal chitosan as a carbon source. The activity of chitosan degradation is observed. C Micrograph of Bacillus thringiensis crystals, the crystals have activity against insects and nematodes, the selection criteria are the presence of crystals stained with Bradford's reagent. D pH indicator changes for the selection of fungi that produce organic acids in Foster medium. E Production of siderophores by filamentous fungi in CAS medium, the activity is revealed by the presence of a red halo around the colony (Color figure online)
Primary and Secondary Screening
Based on the selection criteria, there are two types of selection: primary and secondary screening. Primary screening is designed to isolate potentially interesting microorganisms. It reveals the activity or desired product based on qualitative and usually indirect selection criteria without going into detail about the desired activity. It is especially useful when there are many samples to process. In contrast, secondary screening is based on qualitative and quantitative criteria to determine the best producers of the activity of interest. It explores the activity in more depth by describing the qualitative criteria of primary screening.
While the primary screening tends to use rapid tests adapted to a large number of samples (usually in solid medium), the secondary screening must be more sensitive and specific. Therefore, it uses more precise and direct quantitative chromatographic or spectrophotometric methods (Fig. 2). The success of the primary selection depends on the source of isolation, the type of culture, and the isolation technique, among others. However, secondary screening bases the success of isolation on primary screening, so the primary selection criteria must be specific and sensitive to avoid false positives.
Fig. 2.
Secondary screening of microorganisms. A Protease-producing microorganisms. The bacterium (pink) and the fungus (white) meet the primary selection criteria (halo of hydrolysis) in a minimal medium added with casein. Secondary screening is based on quantitative methods (i.e., activity index) to determine the best producer of proteases. B Degradation of NSAIDs by different strains of filamentous fungi, the selection criterion is the high contaminant removal rate (S1) measured by HPLC (Color figure online)
Some examples of primary screening criteria are hydrolysis halos, inhibition halos, precipitation or emulsification halos, pH indicator changes, growth in solid medium, and colonial or microscopic morphology. Primary screening criteria focus on simply evaluating the presence or absence of the desired activity. In the case of secondary selection criteria, quantitative techniques are used to determine the activity of interest, for example, the enzymatic activities, the amount of the metabolite of interest is measured directly by HPLC or spectrophotometry, the amount of gas generated or carbon source is quantified, among others [32, 33, 42].
Usually, the primary and secondary screening can be carried out simultaneously. In some cases, the primary screening can be omitted. This depends on the activity that is being sought, the number of samples to analyze, and the availability of resources, among others [53, 54].
Conclusion
Microbial biotechnology has enormous scope and impact on current life. The development and innovation of biotechnology are increasing every day. As described in this work, the industrial potential of microorganisms is still unexplored and can generate enormous benefits for humanity. Although modern biotechnology uses quantum tools for its development, the bases and foundations of the search for microbial activities of interest as well as the isolation and selection of potentially biotechnological microorganisms cannot be left aside since nature continues to be a source to resources that could bring the next biotechnology revolution. The predictions of this work focus on being able to establish a starting point for future research in biotechnology and emphasize the importance that the basic concepts of microbial selection have, the technological revolution reached us and it seems that modern microbial biotechnology focuses more on the use of more advanced techniques underestimating the biochemical and physiological bases.
Acknowledgements
The group of authors would like to thank CONACyT and BEIFI for the support provided, in addition to the Academy of Industrial Microbiology and Microbial Biotechnology of the ENCB IPN as well as Elisabet Aranda and the Institute of Water Research, University of Granada for the support. Finally, the corresponding author thanks the PICPAE program of the IPN.
Author Contributions
DRO-H and GG-S: contributed to the study conception and design. CJP: contributed with the images of siderophores production, protein crystal and chitosanase activity as part of her bachelor thesis work. FS-T, CH-C, EYT-G, and GC-C: analysis, corrections and evaluation were performed. DRO-H: the first draft of the manuscript was written and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported by CONACYT (256520) and Secretaría de Investigación y Posgrado (SIP-IPN) projects 20220492 to DROH; 20220487 to GGS; and 20210821 to EYTG.
Data Availability
Not applicable
Code Availability
Not applicable
Declarations
Conflict of interest
All authors certify that they have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest or non-financial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.
Ethical Approval
Not applicable
Consent to Participate
Not applicable
Consent to Publish
Not applicable
Footnotes
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Umesha S, Singh PK, Singh RP. Chapter 6 - microbial biotechnology and sustainable agriculture. In: Singh RL, Mondal S, editors. Biotechnology for sustainable agriculture. Cambridge: Woodhead Publishing; 2018. pp. 185–205. [Google Scholar]
- 2.Brüssow H. mRNA vaccines against COVID-19: a showcase for the importance of microbial biotechnology. Microb Biotechnol. 2022;15:135–148. doi: 10.1111/1751-7915.13974. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Yadav AN, Kour D, Kaur T, Devi R, Guleria G, Rana KL, Yadav N, Rastegari AA. Chapter 18 - microbial biotechnology for sustainable biomedicine systems: current research and future challenges. In: Rastegari AA, Yadav AN, Yadav N, editors. New and future developments in microbial biotechnology and bioengineering. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2020. pp. 281–292. [Google Scholar]
- 4.Yu L-P, Wu F-Q, Chen G-Q. Next-generation industrial biotechnology-transforming the current industrial biotechnology into competitive processes. Biotechnol J. 2019;14:1800437. doi: 10.1002/biot.201800437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Hesham AE-L, Kaur T, Devi R, Kour D, Prasad S, Yadav N, Singh C, Singh J, Yadav AN. Current trends in microbial biotechnology for agricultural sustainability: conclusion and future challenges. In: Yadav AN, Singh J, Singh C, Yadav N, editors. Current trends in microbial biotechnology for sustainable agriculture. Singapore: Springer Singapore; 2021. pp. 555–572. [Google Scholar]
- 6.Zhang S, Merino N, Okamoto A, Gedalanga P. Interkingdom microbial consortia mechanisms to guide biotechnological applications. Microb Biotechnol. 2018;11:833–847. doi: 10.1111/1751-7915.13300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Timmis K, de Lorenzo V, Verstraete W, Ramos JL, Danchin A, Brüssow H, Singh BK, Timmis JK. The contribution of microbial biotechnology to economic growth and employment creation. Microb Biotechnol. 2017;10:1137–1144. doi: 10.1111/1751-7915.12845. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kayode AJ, Banji-Onisile FO, Olaniran AO, Okoh AI. An overview of the pathogenesis, transmission, diagnosis, and management of endemic human coronaviruses: a reflection on the past and present episodes and possible future outbreaks. Pathogens. 2021;10:1108. doi: 10.3390/pathogens10091108. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Timmis K, de Vos WM, Ramos JL, Vlaeminck SE, Prieto A, Danchin A, Verstraete W, de Lorenzo V, Lee SY, Brüssow H, Timmis JK, Singh BK. The contribution of microbial biotechnology to sustainable development goals. Microb Biotechnol. 2017;10:984–987. doi: 10.1111/1751-7915.12818. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Hayat K, Menhas S, Bundschuh J, Chaudhary HJ. Microbial biotechnology as an emerging industrial wastewater treatment process for arsenic mitigation: a critical review. J Clean Prod. 2017;151:427–438. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.084. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Delvigne F, Noorman H. Scale-up/Scale-down of microbial bioprocesses: a modern light on an old issue. Microb Biotechnol. 2017;10:685–687. doi: 10.1111/1751-7915.12732. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.de Carvalho CCCR. Whole cell biocatalysts: essential workers from Nature to the industry. Microb Biotechnol. 2017;10:250–263. doi: 10.1111/1751-7915.12363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.De Sousa CS, Hassan SS, Pinto AC, Silva WM, De Almeida SS, De Castro SS, Azevedo MSP, Rocha CS, Barh D, Azevedo V. Chapter 1 - microbial omics: applications in biotechnology. In: Barh D, Azevedo V, editors. Omics technologies and bio-engineering. Cambridge: Academic Press; 2018. pp. 3–20. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Poblete-Castro I, Wittmann C, Nikel PI. Biochemistry, genetics and biotechnology of glycerol utilization in Pseudomonas species. Microb Biotechnol. 2020;13:32–53. doi: 10.1111/1751-7915.13400. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Mtibaà R, Olicón-Hernández DR, Pozo C, Nasri M, Mechichi T, González J, Aranda E. Degradation of bisphenol A and acute toxicity reduction by different thermo-tolerant ascomycete strains isolated from arid soils. Ecotox Environ Safe. 2018;156:87–96. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.02.077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Dario Rafael O-H, Luis Fernándo Z-G, Abraham P-T, Pedro Alberto V-L, Guadalupe G-S, Pablo PJ. Production of chitosan-oligosaccharides by the chitin-hydrolytic system of Trichoderma harzianum and their antimicrobial and anticancer effects. Carbohyd Res. 2019;486:107836. doi: 10.1016/j.carres.2019.107836. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Olicón-Hernández DR, Camacho-Morales RL, Pozo C, González-López J, Aranda E. Evaluation of diclofenac biodegradation by the ascomycete fungus Penicillium oxalicum at flask and bench bioreactor scales. Sci Total Environ. 2019;662:607–614. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.248. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Yadav AN, Verma P, Kumar S, Kumar V, Kumar M, Kumari Sugitha TC, Singh BP, Saxena AK, Dhaliwal HS. Chapter 2 - actinobacteria from rhizosphere: molecular diversity, distributions, and potential biotechnological applications. In: Singh BP, Gupta VK, Passari AK, editors. New and future developments in microbial biotechnology and bioengineering. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2018. pp. 13–41. [Google Scholar]
- 19.Wei R, Zimmermann W. Microbial enzymes for the recycling of recalcitrant petroleum-based plastics: how far are we? Microb Biotechnol. 2017;10:1308–1322. doi: 10.1111/1751-7915.12710. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Tuesta-Popolizio DA, Velázquez-Fernández JB, Rodriguez-Campos J, Contreras-Ramos SM. Thalassobacillus, a genus of extreme to moderate environmental halophiles with biotechnological potential. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2021;37:147. doi: 10.1007/s11274-021-03116-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Urbanek AK, Rymowicz W, Mirończuk AM. Degradation of plastics and plastic-degrading bacteria in cold marine habitats. Appl Microbiol Biot. 2018;102:7669–7678. doi: 10.1007/s00253-018-9195-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Peidro-Guzmán H, Pérez-Llano Y, González-Abradelo D, Fernández-López MG, Dávila-Ramos S, Aranda E, Hernández DRO, García AO, Lira-Ruan V, Pliego OR, Santana MA, Schnabel D, Jiménez-Gómez I, Mouriño-Pérez RR, Aréchiga-Carvajal ET, del Rayo S-C, Folch-Mallol JL, Sánchez-Reyes A, Vaidyanathan VK, Cabana H, Gunde-Cimerman N, Batista-García RA. Transcriptomic analysis of polyaromatic hydrocarbon degradation by the halophilic fungus Aspergillus sydowii at hypersaline conditions. Environ Microbiol. 2021;23:3435–3459. doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.15166. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Saiki RK, Gelfand DH, Stoffel S, Scharf SJ, Higuchi R, Horn GT, Mullis KB, Erlich HA. Primer-directed enzymatic amplification of DNA with a thermostable DNA polymerase. Science (New York, NY) 1988;239(4839):487–491. doi: 10.1126/science.2448875. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Zhu H, Zhang H, Xu Y, Laššáková S, Korabečná M, Neužil P. PCR past, present and future. Biotechniques. 2020;69:317–325. doi: 10.2144/btn-2020-0057. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Pessôa MG, Vespermann KAC, Paulino BN, Barcelos MCS, Pastore GM, Molina G. Newly isolated microorganisms with potential application in biotechnology. Biotechnol Adv. 2019;37:319–339. doi: 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2019.01.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Alzagameem A, Klein SE, Bergs M, Do XT, Korte I, Dohlen S, Hüwe C, Kreyenschmidt J, Kamm B, Larkins M, Schulze M. Antimicrobial activity of lignin and lignin-derived cellulose and chitosan composites against selected pathogenic and spoilage microorganisms. Polymers. 2019;11(4):670. doi: 10.3390/polym11040670. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Bazoti SF, Golunski S, Pereira Siqueira D, Scapini T, Barrilli ÉT, Alex Mayer D, Barros KO, Rosa CA, Stambuk BU, Alves SL, Valério A, de Oliveira D, Treichel H. Second-generation ethanol from non-detoxified sugarcane hydrolysate by a rotting wood isolated yeast strain. Bioresource Technol. 2017;244:582–587. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.08.007. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Marchand C, St-Arnaud M, Hogland W, Bell TH, Hijri M. Petroleum biodegradation capacity of bacteria and fungi isolated from petroleum-contaminated soil. Int Biodeter Biodegr. 2017;116:48–57. doi: 10.1016/j.ibiod.2016.09.030. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Barman NC, Zohora FT, Das KC, Mowla MG, Banu NA, Salimullah M, Hashem A. Production, partial optimization and characterization of keratinase enzyme by Arthrobacter sp. NFH5 isolated from soil samples. AMB Express. 2017;7:181. doi: 10.1186/s13568-017-0462-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Sharma KM, Kumar R, Panwar S, Kumar A. Microbial alkaline proteases: optimization of production parameters and their properties J Genet Eng. Biotechnol. 2017;15:115–126. doi: 10.1016/j.jgeb.2017.02.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Abushelaibi A, Al-Mahadin S, El-Tarabily K, Shah NP, Ayyash M. Characterization of potential probiotic lactic acid bacteria isolated from camel milk. LWT-Food Sci Technol. 2017;79:316–325. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2017.01.041. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Hussain AA, Abdel-Salam MS, Abo-Ghalia HH, Hegazy WK, Hafez SS. Optimization and molecular identification of novel cellulose degrading bacteria isolated from Egyptian environment. J Genet Eng Biotechnol. 2017;15:77–85. doi: 10.1016/j.jgeb.2017.02.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Ottoni JR, Rodrigues e Silva T, Maia de Oliveira V, Zambrano Passarini MR. Characterization of amylase produced by cold-adapted bacteria from Antarctic samples. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol. 2020;23:101452. doi: 10.1016/j.bcab.2019.101452. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Das P, Chatterjee S, Behera BK, Dangar TK, Das BK, Mohapatra T. Isolation and characterization of marine bacteria from East Coast of India: functional screening for salt stress tolerance. Heliyon. 2019;5:e01869. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01869. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Arora S, Vanza M. Microbial approach for bioremediation of saline and sodic soils. In: Arora S, Singh AK, Singh YP, editors. Bioremediation of Salt affected soils: an Indian perspective. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2017. pp. 87–100. [Google Scholar]
- 36.Révész F, Farkas M, Kriszt B, Szoboszlay S, Benedek T, Táncsics A. Effect of oxygen limitation on the enrichment of bacteria degrading either benzene or toluene and the identification of Malikia spinosa (Comamonadaceae) as prominent aerobic benzene-, toluene-, and ethylbenzene-degrading bacterium: enrichment, isolation and whole-genome analysis. Environ Sci Pollut R. 2020;27:31130–31142. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-09277-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Madhusoodanan G, Hariharapura RC, Somashekara D. Dissolved oxygen as a propulsive parameter for polyhydroxyalkanoate production using Bacillus endophyticus cultures. Environ Dev Sustain. 2021 doi: 10.1007/s10668-021-01626-3. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Nogi Y. Microbial life in the deep sea: psychropiezophiles. In: Margesin R, editor. Psychrophiles: from biodiversity to biotechnology. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2017. pp. 133–152. [Google Scholar]
- 39.Desai M, Patel K. Isolation, optimization, and purification of extracellular levansucrase from nonpathogenic Klebsiella strain L1 isolated from waste sugarcane bagasse. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol. 2019;19:101107. doi: 10.1016/j.bcab.2019.101107. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Iris L, Antonio M, Antonia BM, Antonio S-LJ. 15 - Isolation, selection, and identification techniques for non-saccharomyces yeasts of oenological interest. In: Grumezescu AM, Holban AM, editors. Biotechnological progress and beverage consumption. Cambridge: Academic Press; 2020. pp. 467–508. [Google Scholar]
- 41.Shokryazdan P, Faseleh Jahromi M, Liang JB, Ho YW. Probiotics: from isolation to application. J Am Coll Nutr. 2017;36:666–676. doi: 10.1080/07315724.2017.1337529. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Munekata PES, Pateiro M, Zhang W, Domínguez R, Xing L, Fierro EM, Lorenzo JM. Autochthonous probiotics in meat products: selection, identification, and their use as starter culture. Microorganisms. 2020;8:1833. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8111833. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Mestre Furlani MV, Maturano YP, Combina M, Mercado LA, Toro ME, Vazquez F. Selection of non-Saccharomyces yeasts to be used in grape musts with high alcoholic potential: a strategy to obtain wines with reduced ethanol content. FEMS Yeast Res. 2017 doi: 10.1093/femsyr/fox010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Daniel JJ, Zabot GL, Tres MV, Harakava R, Kuhn RC, Mazutti MA. Fusarium fujikuroi: a novel source of metabolites with herbicidal activity. Biocatal Agric Biotechnol. 2018;14:314–320. doi: 10.1016/j.bcab.2018.04.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Reale A, Zotta T, Ianniello RG, Mamone G, Di Renzo T. Selection criteria of lactic acid bacteria to be used as starter for sweet and salty leavened baked products. LWT. 2020;133:110092. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2020.110092. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Elena G, Köhl J. Screening strategies for selection of new microbial antagonists of plant pathogens. In: De Cal A, Melgarejo P, Magan N, editors. How research can stimulate the development of commercial biological control against plant diseases. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2020. pp. 165–181. [Google Scholar]
- 47.Zepeda-Giraud LF, Olicón-Hernández DR, Pardo JP, Villanueva MGA, Guerra-Sánchez G. Biological Control of Thielaviopsis paradoxa and Colletotrichum gloeosporioides by the Extracellular Enzymes of Wickerhamomyces anomalus. Agriculture. 2020;10:325. doi: 10.3390/agriculture10080325. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Moghannem SA, Farag M, Shehab AM, Azab MS. Exopolysaccharide production from Bacillus velezensis KY471306 using statistical experimental design. Braz J Microbiol. 2018;49:452–462. doi: 10.1016/j.bjm.2017.05.012. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Salem R, Soliman M, Fergala A, Audette GF, ElDyasti A. Screening for methane utilizing mixed communities with high Polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB) production capacity using different design approaches. Polymers. 2021;13:1579. doi: 10.3390/polym13101579. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Sun J, Cao C-c, Feng M-q, Xu X-l, Zhou G-h. Technological and safety characterization of coagulase-negative staphylococci with high protease activity isolated from Traditional Chinese fermented sausages. LWT. 2019;114:108371. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2019.108371. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Ferreira CMH, Vilas-Boas Â, Sousa CA, Soares HMVM, Soares EV. Comparison of five bacterial strains producing siderophores with ability to chelate iron under alkaline conditions. AMB Express. 2019;9:78. doi: 10.1186/s13568-019-0796-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Voidarou C, Alexopoulos A, Tsinas A, Rozos G, Tzora A, Skoufos I, Varzakas T, Bezirtzoglou E. Effectiveness of bacteriocin-producing lactic acid bacteria and bifidobacterium isolated from honeycombs against spoilage microorganisms and pathogens isolated from fruits and vegetables. Appl Sci. 2020;10:7309. doi: 10.3390/app10207309. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Banoth L, Devarapalli K, Paul I, Thete KN, Pawar SV, Chand Banerjee U. Screening, isolation and selection of a potent lipase producing microorganism and its use in the kinetic resolution of drug intermediates. J Indian Chem Soc. 2021;98:100143. doi: 10.1016/j.jics.2021.100143. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Sharma R, Talukdar D, Bhardwaj S, Jaglan S, Kumar R, Kumar R, Akhtar MS, Beniwal V, Umar A. Bioremediation potential of novel fungal species isolated from wastewater for the removal of lead from liquid medium. Environ Technol Innov. 2020;18:100757. doi: 10.1016/j.eti.2020.100757. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
Not applicable
Not applicable


