Abstract
Therapy-related myeloid neoplasm (tMN) is considered a direct consequence of DNA damage in hematopoietic stem cells. Despite increasing recognition that altered stroma can also drive leukemogenesis, the functional biology of the tMN microenvironment remains unknown. We performed multiomic (transcriptome, DNA damage response, cytokine secretome and functional profiling) characterization of bone marrow stromal cells from tMN patients. Critically, we also compared (i) patients with myeloid neoplasm and another cancer but without cytotoxic exposure, (ii) typical primary myeloid neoplasm, and (iii) age-matched controls to decipher the microenvironmental changes induced by cytotoxics vs. neoplasia. Strikingly, tMN exhibited a profoundly senescent phenotype with induction of CDKN1A and β-Galactosidase, defective phenotype, and proliferation. Moreover, tMN stroma showed delayed DNA repair and defective adipogenesis. Despite their dormant state, tMN stromal cells were metabolically highly active with a switch toward glycolysis and secreted multiple pro-inflammatory cytokines indicative of a senescent-secretory phenotype that inhibited adipogenesis. Critically, senolytics not only eliminated dormant cells, but also restored adipogenesis. Finally, sequential patient sampling showed senescence phenotypes are induced within months of cytotoxic exposure, well prior to the onset of secondary cancer. Our data underscores a role of senescence in the pathogenesis of tMN and provide a valuable resource for future therapeutics.
Subject terms: Myelodysplastic syndrome, Cancer microenvironment
Introduction
Therapy-related myeloid neoplasms (tMN) are associated with dismal outcomes in otherwise long-term cancer survivors and are considered to be a direct consequence of DNA damage induced in hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) by chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy (cytotoxic therapies; CT) [1]. With an aging population and increasing long-term survival of cancer patients worldwide, the incidence of tMN is rising, currently accounting for 15–20% of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) [1].
tMN is considered to be HSC-autonomous disorder, in which initiation and progression are driven by stem cell-intrinsic genetic events induced by CT [2, 3]. Recent data however indicate that tMN is likely to be a multi-factorial process, with an underlying germline predisposition syndrome contributing to pathogenesis in at least 15–20% of cases [4, 5]. Furthermore, work using murine genetic models have shown that genetic changes in the microenvironment play a critical role in initiation and evolution of myeloid neoplasia (MN), including reduced function of genes such as RAR-γ, Rb, Mib1, IκBα, Sipa1, Dicer1 and concordant loss of the Egr1, Apc, and Trp53 in non-hematopoietic cells [6–11]. Rare but notable cases of donor cell derived leukemia in clinical practice arising in patients receiving allogeneic stem cell transplantation aptly illustrates the concept of a microenvironment-driven disease [12].
A number of reports investigating stroma in MDS and AML have documented differences in osteogenic [13–16] and adipogenic potential [13, 15, 17], with diminished stem cell supportive capacity [13–15, 17, 18] but without comparison to tMN. CT causes short-term damage to the marrow (BM) microenvironment [19–21] but whether there is long-term damage and a pathogenic role for a perturbed stroma in the aetiology of tMN is unknown. Insights into stromal-derived factors that contribute to tMN are critical for preventing or delaying disease onset and targeting the interaction between HSC and microenvironment.
Here, we performed a comprehensive multi-omic characterization of BMSC from patients with tMN and found evidence of a profound pro-inflammatory senescence program and a selective defect in adipogenesis which was reversed with senolytic therapy, with implications for future strategies to delay or prevent the onset of tMN.
Materials and methods
Please refer to Supplementary Informationfor detailed “Materials and Methods” description.
Patients and control samples
Diagnostic BM samples from MN patients, and age-matched controls at the time of hip replacement were collected after informed consent. In a subset of tMN patient sequential samples were collected. The study was approved by the Ethics Committees of participating institutions (Central Adelaide Local Health Network- HREC reference number: HREC/15/RAH/496, CALHN reference number: R20151123 and Calvary Health Care Adelaide- 19-CHREC-E004) and performed in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Informed consent was obtained from all subjects.
Isolation, expansion, and characterization of BMSC
BMSC were isolated and expanded from mononuclear cells according to criteria of the International Society for Cellular Therapy including immunophenotype characteristics [22], cytoskeleton [18], proliferative potential, osteoblast and adipocyte differentiation potential [23].
Long-term culture-initiating cells assay
Stem/progenitor supportive capacity was assessed by co-culturing HSC on BMSC feeder-layer in long-term culture initiating assay for 5 weeks followed by clonogenic assay for additional 2 weeks [24].
Analysis of apoptosis, DNA damage and cellular senescence
Apoptosis and cellular senescence were assessed at third passage using Annexin-V-PE Kit (BD Biosciences) and β-Galactosidase (Cell Signaling Technology) respectively. DNA damage repair (DDR) potential was assessed by phosphorylation of γH2AX (Merck) and alkaline comet assay (Abcam). While reactive oxygen species (ROS) production was determined by measuring the formation of fluorescent dichloro fluorescein at an Excitation 485 and Emission 535 nm (Abcam).
Western immunoblotting
Response to in vitro DNA damaging radiotherapy was assessed in tMN and Healthy BMSC by assessing phosphorylation of ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM), chekpoint-2 (CHK2), p53 and p21 levels at 0.5, 1, 3, 5, 8, and 24 h following 20 Gy irradiation.
Transcriptome analysis
Transcriptome sequencing libraries were prepared with Illumina TruSeq Total RNA protocol (Illumina, San Diego) for 150 bp paired-end sequencing on a NextSeq500 instrument. Gene-set enrichment analysis was performed using Broad Institute software version 4.0 and Molecular Signature Database (MSigDB) version 7.2. Genes differentially were validated in expanded cohort by quantitative real-time PCR.
Cytokines/chemokines levels
Levels of 38 cytokines were measured with HCYTOMAG-60K MILLIPLEX MAP Human Cytokines/Chemokines magnetic bead panel.
Real-time ATP rate assay
ATP production was measured using the Seahorse XF ATP Real-Time rate assay (Agilent Technologies).
Statistical analysis
Data analysis and graphs were generated using GraphPad prism 8 software. Statistical analysis was performed using Mann–Whitney, Student’s t test, or Two-way ANOVA to determine difference between groups. Normality test was performed using GraphPad prism 8 software. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Details regarding statistical methods for transcriptome sequencing, quantitative real-time PCR, and cytokines/chemokines heatmap are explained in supplementary section.
Results
Our preliminary observations of a striking defect in the proliferative capacity of BMSC from tMN patients (n = 20) compared to MDS/AML (n = 26), as well as to healthy controls (n = 13) (Fig. S1A–C) led to further comprehensive analysis. To decipher effects specifically induced by cytotoxic therapies rather than age, we performed multi-omic profiling (RNA-sequencing, cytokines levels, proliferation potential, multilineage differentiation and DNA damage) in BMSC from four carefully selected cohorts (Fig. 1A): (i) tMN, in which a MN occurred in a cancer survivor following CT (n = 18); (ii) MN developing in unrelated cancer survivors with no prior CT (a diagnosis of primary MN and another cancer; pMN+Ca) (n = 10). For example, this group included MDS/AML occurring in patients managed with surgical resection of prostate cancer but no CT; (iii) primary MN without preceding cancer and/or CT (pMN) (n = 7) and (iv) age-matched healthy controls (Healthy) (n = 17). The critical difference between tMN and pMN+Ca is prior to CT in tMN but not in pMN+Ca. Demographic and disease parameters of each cohort are detailed in Table S1. Cytotoxic therapy details used for treating primary cancer in tMN patients are listed in Table S2.
Out of 18 tMN patients, 78% had documented previous chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy, whereas 22% received only radiotherapy. There was no significant difference in median age of Healthy (69 years, range 43–92) and MN patients (73 years, range 58–87) or expression of stromal markers (Fig. S2A).
tMN stromal cells display abnormal morphology and defective growth kinetics
The most striking difference apparent upon culturing was in morphology. tMN BMSC were significantly larger (27 ± 10 mm) than BMSC from pMN (16.8 ± 3 mm, P < 0.001), pMN+Ca (16.9 ± 2 mm, P = 0.013) and Healthy (14.5 ± 4 mm, P < 0.001) (Fig. S2B) and lost the typical spindle shape morphology (Fig. 1B), resembling a flattened senescent cell [25]. BMSC from pMN and pMN+Ca were disorganized and varied in size compared to controls but overall maintained a fibroblast-like morphology (Fig. 1B).
Overall, for all MN groups including tMN, BMSC could be cultured for significantly fewer number of passages than Healthy (6 ± 2 vs. 11 ± 4 passages, P < 0.001) (Fig. S2C). This was reflected by a decrease in maximum cumulative population doublings (CPD) (3.2 ± 2 vs. 11 ± 7 doublings, P < 0.001, Fig. 1C) and the number of fibroblast colony-forming units compared with Healthy (1.2 ± 1 vs. 4.5 ± 3 colonies, P < 0.001) (Fig. S2D). However, tMN appeared to have the greatest defect, with 28% of tMN BMSC failed to reach the first passage and only 45% could be cultured beyond passage 3, significantly lower than pMN and pMN+Ca groups (P < 0.001, P = 0.005) (Fig. S2E). CPD was significantly lower in tMN (2 ± 2) compared to pMN (5.5 ± 2) and pMN+Ca (3.7 ± 2) (P = 0.001 and P = 0.029 respectively) (Fig. 1C). Furthermore, tMN BMSC were associated with longer doubling times (27 ± 35 vs. 12 ± 7 vs. 14 ± 12 days respectively) (Fig. S2F) and decreased colony numbers compared to pMN and pMN+Ca (0.38 ± 0.8, 1.9 ± 0.4 and 2.1 ± 0.6 per 104 cells respectively, P < 0.001) (Fig. S2D).
Consistent with the observed aberrant morphology and growth defects, tMN stroma were unable to support the long-term culture of normal healthy CD34+ in long-term culture initiating assays (Fig. 1D). tMN BMSC exhibited a 12-fold decreased capacity to support Healthy CD34+ compared with Healthy BMSC (1 ± 1 vs. 12 ± 2 colonies; P < 0.001) and 3–4 folds lower than pMN (P = 0.001) and pMN+Ca (P = 0.014) (Fig. 1D). Consistently, functional enrichment of transcriptome analysis showed depletion of hematopoietic support/regulation pathways in tMN BMSC compared to Healthy and other MN (Fig. S3A–B). Moreover, CXCL12 expression, a key regulator of hematopoiesis was significantly lower in tMN BMSC compared to Healthy (P < 0.001) and pMN (P = 0.007) (Fig. S4A). Collectively, these findings demonstrate significantly impaired proliferative capacity of tMN BMSC compared to other MN groups without prior CT exposure.
tMN stromal cells exhibit a profoundly senescent phenotype
Although colony forming and proliferative capacity of tMN BMSC was significantly compromised, apoptosis rate was not significantly different as compared to Healthy and other typical MN BMSC (pMN and pMN+Ca) (Fig. 2A). Moreover, morphological indicators of senescence as measured by β-Galactosidase staining were markedly elevated in tMN (60 ± 13%) compared to pMN (31 ± 13%), pMN+Ca (28.29 ± 9%) and Healthy control (6 ± 4%) (P < 0.001) (Fig. 2B) with a corresponding increase in CDKN1A (p21) and decrease in FOS gene expression in tMN (Fig. S4B–C). Cellular senescence was higher in all MN groups compared to Healthy (45 ± 19% vs. 6 ± 4%, P < 0.001) (Fig. 2B). The level of senescence in tMN BMSC was independent of latency period, the interval between completion of CT and tMN diagnosis. High levels of senescence were evident both in tMN BMSC with short (3–4 months) and tMN with long latency reaching up to two decades following CT (Fig. 2C).
Overall, transcriptomic analysis was consistent with a severe senescent profile in tMN compared to Healthy and other MN BMSC over multiple enrichment analysis sets (Fig. 2D and Fig. S3A–B). Moreover, substantial number of the 147 genes differentially expressed between tMN and other MN BMSC were reported to be associated with cellular senescence on SenQuest (P < 0.001) (Fig. S5A) and CellAge (P < 0.001) (Fig. S5B) senescence databases. Further analysis of senescence-associated genes revealed distinct signature of tMN BMSC as compared to all other control cohorts (Fig. 2E). RT-PCR validation was performed on an extended independent cohort of tMN (n = 4), pMN (n = 3), pMN+Ca (n = 2) and Healthy (n = 4) for CDKN1A, FOS, UHRF2 and IFITM1 (Fig. S4B–E). Moreover, expression of 43 genes strongly correlated with β-Galactosidase levels including senescence-associated genes (Fig. S5C). A cardinal feature of cellular senescence is senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP), secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines, chemokines and proteases that may serve as a homeostatic signal of cellular damage [26, 27]. Indeed, multiple SASP-associated cytokines including IL-6, IFNγ, IL-7, IL-1β, IL-13, IL-15, and EGF were found to be significantly higher in conditioned media of tMN BMSC compared to Healthy (Fig. 2F). In agreement with previous reports [28–30], several SASP-associated cytokines levels were also higher in other MN (non-tMN), BMSC conditioned media compared to Healthy (Fig. S6).
tMN stromal cells have defects in DNA damage repair
The level of high senescence observed in tMN BMSC could be due to a defect in the DNA damage repair (DDR) pathway [31], resulting in irreparable DNA damage after exposure to cytotoxic therapy. To assess this, we first examined baseline DNA damage in tMN and Healthy BMSC. BMSC derived from tMN exhibited higher baseline DNA damage, as shown by alkaline comet assay, compared to Healthy BMSC (Fig. 3A and Fig. S7A). Enhanced baseline DNA damage in tMN BMSC was probably driven by higher intracellular ROS level compared to Healthy BMSC (P = 0.001) (Fig. 3B). Secondly, tMN BMSC were highly sensitive to DNA damaging CT. High number of γH2AX foci formation were evident within 4 h (8 ± 5 vs. 24 ± 10%; P < 0.001) and peaking within 12 h of in vitro exposure to 0.1 µM Doxorubicin (53 ± 11 vs. 83 ± 8%; P < 0.001) (Fig. 3C). Similar trend was observed with 1 µM Doxorubicin (Fig. S7C). Finally, tMN BMSC displayed defective DDR capacity following in vitro exposure to chemotherapeutic drug and radiation. Following 24 h in vitro exposure and drug-washout, γH2AX foci were consistently significantly higher in tMN BMSC at all time points and persistent DNA damage was evident even after 24 h of removal of genotoxic insult, compared to Healthy BMSC (27 ± 5% vs. 5 ± 2%; P < 0.001) (Fig. 3D). Similarly, tMN BMSC showed significantly impaired DDR following in vitro radiation exposure. Following in vitro radiation, number of γH2AX foci in Healthy BMSC decreased rapidly over time with only 4 ± 1% cells showing positivity by 8 h after irradiation (Fig. 3E). However, tMN BMSC showed significantly impaired repair with 21 ± 2% foci still positive at the same time point (P < 0.001) (Fig. 3E and Fig. S8A). This was also significantly greater than pMN and pMN+Ca samples (5 ± 1%, P < 0.001), indicating significantly delayed DDR response in tMN stroma compared to both Healthy and typical MN (Fig. S8A–B) and was consistent with Gene Set Enrichment (GSEA) analysis for pathways associated with DDR (FDR < 0.1, P < 0.05) (Fig. S3A–B).
Delayed DNA repair of tMN BMSC is probably driven by delayed recruitment and activation of the early responders following DNA damage. In Healthy BMSC ATM and CHK2 were activated on by serine 1981 and threonine 68 respectively within 30 min of in vitro sublethal irradiation (Fig. S9A). While, in tMN BMSC, there was a significant delay of up to 3 h in early responders, with some interpatient variability (Fig. S9B). Delayed activation was associated with late recruitment of ATM/CHK2/p53 and its crucial transcriptional target p21, a key mediator of senescence (Fig. 3F and Fig. S9). Of note, none of the 13 BMSC tested had pathogenic TP53 mutations and all samples showed evidence of intact TP53 pathway.
tMN stromal cells show a glycolytic metabolic state
While the tMN stroma was profoundly dormant, it was certainly not inactive metabolically. Our transcriptome analysis showed enrichment of multiple glycolytic gene pathways in tMN BMSC compared to controls (FDR < 0.1, P < 0.05) (Fig. 4A and Fig. S3A–B). Moreover, bioenergetic profiling showed that total ATP production was significantly higher in tMN compared to Healthy BMSC (679 ± 482.6 pmol/min/µg DNA vs. 241.6 ± 144.5 pmol/min/µg DNA, P < 0.001) (Fig. 4B). Notably, the majority of ATP in tMN BMSC was generated by glycolysis (69% vs. 36%; P < 0.001), contrasting with Healthy in which ATP was predominantly generated by mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) (64% vs. 31%) (Fig. 4B and Fig. S10A–C). Moreover, the extracellular acidification rate (ECAR), an indicator of glycolysis was increased in tMN compared to Healthy BMSC (Fig. S10B). We therefore tested whether glycolytic ATP production was hardwired in tMN stroma or could be switched to OXPHOS. As expected, glycolysis inhibitor, 2-Deoxy-D-glucose (2DG) significantly reduced glycolysis (P < 0.001) and ECAR in Healthy and tMN BMSC, but without reducing total ATP significantly (Fig. 4C–D), indicating a retained capacity to upregulate OXPHOS (Fig. S10D–I). Oxygen consumption rate (OCR) was similar in majority of Healthy and tMN BMSC, although interpatient variability was evident in tMN BMSC (Fig. S10C). In addition, glycolysis inhibitor 2DG did not affect OCR in both Healthy and tMN BMSC (Figs. S10F, S10I). Together, the data suggest that tMN senescent cells despite a low proliferation rate, exhibit a perturbed active glycolytic metabolism in normoxia, resembling a Warburg metabolic shift.
tMN stromal cells show defective adipogenesis and secrete adipogenic-inhibitory cytokines
BMSC have several possible cell fates. Adipogenesis in particular depends on a robust metabolic reprogramming and our transcriptome data suggest that genes involved in adipogenesis were downregulated in tMN (FDR < 0.1, P < 0.05) (Fig. 5A and Fig. S3A–B). Consistently, BMSC derived from tMN displayed reduced expression of genes critically involved in the early and late adipogenic differentiation, namely PPARγ and Adipsin (Fig. S11).
To assess whether tMN stroma, despite glycolytic bias, was able to undergo adipogenic differentiation, we performed adipocyte differentiation assays. Unexpectedly, we noted that quantification of lipid-laden Nile Red marked adipocytes was significantly reduced compared to pMN+Ca (P = 0.024) and Healthy (P < 0.001) (Fig. 5B). These results were validated by staining with Oil Red (Fig. 5B).
To understand the mechanism of defective adipogenesis in tMN, we first focused on known inhibitors of adipogenesis from our cytokine bead array data. We found secretion of the adipocyte-inhibitory cytokines IL-1β, IL-15, IL-6, IFNα and IFNγ were significantly higher by tMN BMSC compared to Healthy (Fig. 2F) and noted a significant overlap between adipogenesis-inhibitory cytokines and pro-inflammatory cytokines known to be cardinal SASP cytokines (P < 0.001) [26, 27] (Fig. 5C). To confirm this experimentally, treatment of Healthy BMSC with IL-1β, IFNγ, IFNα or a cocktail of seven-cytokines (IL-1β, IL-13, IL-15, IL-6, IFNα and IFNγ) profoundly inhibited adipogenesis of in vitro (P < 0.003) (Fig. 5D and Fig. S12), demonstrating a potential causative role of senescence-secreted cytokines in inhibiting adipogenesis.
Secondly, we tested experimentally whether the extreme bioenergetic phenotype observed in tMN may also contribute to the defect in adipogenesis. We noted that blockade of either mitochondrial OXPHOS (Fig. 6A and Fig. S13A) or glycolysis (Fig. 6B and Fig. S13B) in Healthy BMSC led to significantly reduced adipogenesis (P < 0.001) consistent with the metabolic requirement of adipogenesis to store glucose-derived de novo fatty acids and also perform mitochondria fatty acid β-oxidation. Not surprisingly, switching to OXPHOS did not restore adipogenesis (P = 0.730) (Fig. 6B and Fig. S13B) in tMN BMSC. Collectively these results suggest tMN stroma is profoundly senescent but metabolically active, with a defective adipogenic phenotype likely linked to the production of adipocyte-inhibitory cytokines.
tMN stromal cells have increased osteogenic differentiation potential
BMSC osteogenic differentiation potential, assessed by mineralization matrix formation, was impaired in pMN compared to Healthy BMSC (14.8 ± 23.7 vs. 53 ± 34.3 Ca2+/µg DNA, P = 0.029). In contrast to this, bone mineralization matrix capacity was significantly higher in tMN BMSC (182.7 ± 190.3 Ca2+/µg DNA) compared to Healthy controls and pMN (P = 0.013). This was further confirmed by Alizarin Red-stained mineralized deposits (Fig. S14A–B). Thus, in contrast to pMN, tMN BMSC showed enhanced osteogenesis, albeit with some interpatient variability. In addition, the mRNA expression of Osteopontin, an established marker of mature osteoblasts, was significantly upregulated in tMN BMSC compared to Healthy BMSC, whereas there was no difference in the expression of RUNX2 (Fig. S14C–D).
Senolytic therapies can reduce senescence burden and restore defective adipogenic and osteogenic differentiation of tMN BMSC
We have shown that tMN BMSC are highly senescent yet metabolically highly active and exhibit defective adipogenesis and osteogenic differentiation capacity. Hence, we assessed if senescence drives aberrant differentiation potential of tMN BMSC. Senolytic agents Dasatinib (75 ± 16 vs. 40 ± 14%, P < 0.001), Quercetin (75 ± 16 vs. 39 ± 14%, P < 0.001) alone or in combination (75 ± 16 vs. 30 ± 14%, P < 0.001) significantly reduced senescence burden of tMN BMSC (Fig. 7A). Strikingly, senolytics therapy restore adipogenic differentiation as reflected by sixfold increase in adipogenic potential (0.13 ± 0.08 to 0.64 ± 0.25, P < 0.001) (Fig. 7B). Moreover, senolytics also reduces aberrantly excessive osteogenic potential to near normal (277 ± 40 vs. 108 ± 45 Ca2+/µg DNA, P < 0.001) (Fig. 7C). Together, these results demonstrate that senolytics therapies can restore aberrant differentiation potential of tMN BMSC.
Long-term irreversible damage to BM microenvironment is induced by cytotoxic therapies
In our study, tMN BMSC were significantly abnormal compared to pMN and pMN+Ca and the only difference between these groups was prior CT exposure. To test the hypothesis that prior exposure to CT leads to long-term damage to BM microenvironment, we assessed the proliferation, cellular senescence, and differentiation potential of serial BMSC of tMN patients (n = 3) isolated at the time of primary cancer, after completion of initial CT and at tMN diagnosis (Fig. 8A).
There was striking reduction in proliferative capacity of BMSC, as assessed by CPD, after 2–3 months of CT compared to sample collected at diagnosis of primary cancer (0.47 ± 0.29 vs. 3.45 ± 0.02; P = 0.009) (Fig. 8B and Fig. S15A). Moreover, the reduced proliferative potential of BMSC was observed at tMN diagnosis (0.47 ± 0.29 vs. 0.43 ± 0.60 CPD; P = 0.993) (Fig. 8B).
Number of senescent cells from BMSC following CT were significantly higher (35 ± 19%) than among the BMSC from primary cancer (18 ± 5%; P = 0.01) and remained high at tMN diagnosis (18 ± 5% vs. 65 ± 19%; P = 0.001) (Fig. 8C; Fig. S15B).
Moreover, adipogenic potential was significantly reduced following CT compared to primary cancer diagnosis (0.13 ± 0.08 vs. 0.47 ± 0.21; P = 0.010). Reduced adipogenesis persisted at tMN diagnosis (0.13 ± 0.08 vs. 0.11 ± 0.08; P = 0.463) (Fig. 8D and Fig. S15C). In contrast, osteogenic potential was significantly increased following CT compared to primary cancer diagnosis (127.1 ± 51.85 vs. 3.54 ± 2.52 Ca2+/µg DNA; P = 0.002) and persisted at tMN diagnosis (127.1 ± 51.85 vs. 202.7 ± 112.9 Ca2+/µg DNA; P = 0.244) (Fig. 8E and Fig. S15D). Together these data suggest that CT led to irreversible damage to BMSC, which was evident many years prior to tMN diagnosis.
Discussion
Currently genetic and epigenetic alterations in HSC are considered to drive myeloid malignancies [2, 3]. Although, the microenvironment regulates the fate and maturation of normal hematopoiesis [32], its role in the pathogenesis of myeloid cancer remains an area of active research. To our knowledge, this is the first comprehensive ex-vivo study examining the role of the microenvironment in tMN patients with clinical curation and age-matched controls. Significantly, we demonstrate several novel findings: (i) tMN stromal cells are not only distinct from healthy age-matched stroma but are also distinct from other primary myeloid neoplasms, developing apart from cytotoxic exposure. (ii) tMN stromal cells are highly senescent with a characteristic flattened morphology, defective regenerative capacity, high p21 and β-Galactosidase expression and evidence of an active and ongoing senescence-associated secretory response. (iii) They exhibit a selective defect in adipocyte differentiation that was experimentally phenocopied by treating healthy BMSC with senescence-secreted cytokines IL-1β and IFNγ. (iv) tMN stroma is dormant, non-apoptotic but highly metabolically active with a bioenergetic shift toward glycolysis resembling Warburg metabolism. (v) Serial sampling shows that exposure to DNA damaging agents leads to pro-inflammatory stromal defects evident many years before the onset and diagnosis of tMN, an unexpected finding with repercussions for patients treated with chemotherapy or radiotherapy. (vi) Finally, we show that senolytic agents effectively reduced the senescence burden and restored differentiation potential, indicating a possible role of senolytic therapies in modulating tMN long term.
Cellular fate following genotoxic stress is governed by several factors including the competency of the DDR mechanism and intact TP53 function. Based on our signalling results, tMN is associated with delayed recruitment of upstream kinases such as ATM and CHK2. Classically, fibroblasts unable to repair DNA damage undergo apoptosis or cellular senescence. Here, tMN BMSC exhibited multiple features of senescence rather than apoptosis and possibly are linked to a delayed and sub-optimal DNA damage response hampering efficient repair. Tumor cells harboring wildtype TP53 are more likely to senesce in response to genotoxic therapies [33, 34], whereas cells carrying mutant TP53 (Li-Fraumeni syndrome) overcome senescence readily and are prone to develop cancer [35]. Following genotoxic stress, active TP53 halts cell-cycle progression via key mediator of senescence, cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor CDKN1A (p21). CDKN1A expression was significantly higher in tMN as compared to Healthy BMSC and increased up to 30-fold in tMN after irradiation. Together, these data suggest that delayed and incomplete DNA repair leads to high and sustained level of p21 driving cellular commitment toward senescence and thus provide evidence that the p53-p21 pathway is still intact in tMN BMSC.
We note a strong overlap between pro-inflammatory cytokines secreted by tMN stroma cells and published literature for a senescence-secretory phenotype [27]. The extent to which senescence-related cytokines contribute to the pathogenesis of tMN is an intriguing possibility and should be explore in future studies, especially in light of the data in Fig. 7 which shows senescence is acquired early in the patient journey, soon after cytotoxic treatment. Our data suggest the secretome is modifying stromal fate, in that senescence-associated cytokines IL-1β, IFNγ, IL-6, IL-7 and IL-15 significantly overlap with known inhibitors of adipogenesis [36], were abundantly secreted and strongly inhibited adipogenesis (IL-1β, IFNγ), in agreement with previous studies [37–43].
Despite their dormancy, we were surprised by the hyper-energetic glycolytic state observed in tMN stroma. In a transgenic Eµ-myc lymphoma model, senescence-inducing chemotherapy led to a hyper-catabolic phenotype with increased glycolysis and ATP production [44]. Similarly, irradiation-induced senescence has been linked to reduced tricarboxylic acid activity and a shift toward glycolysis [45]. Future work should examine flux pathways in senescent vs. non-senescent BMSC [44].
Senolytics, including Dasatinib and Quercetin, have been shown to selectively eliminate senescent cells from both human and mouse [46–50] with evidence that sufficient restoration of function may occur without eliminating all senescent cells [46, 48, 51]. Indeed, in our study, senolytics restored the defect in adipogenesis and osteogenic differentiation in tMN. These results flag further research into senolytics for regenerative approaches.
Strikingly, the reduced adipogenic differentiation of BMSC was evident within few months following cytotoxic therapies in patients subsequently progressing to tMN, as was the upregulation of β-Galactosidase. This study illustrates the abrupt and dramatic effect of in vivo cytotoxic exposure on the differentiation capacity of primary patient BMSC. It is possible but not prospectively proven, that the BMSC-derived highly pro-inflammatory SASP could initiate or promote a form of clonal hematopoiesis, eventually progressing to tMN. One limitation of our study is that the serial BMSC studies (Fig. 8), while convincingly show evidence of time-dependent causality before and after exposure to CT, were obtained exclusively from patients with multiple myeloma. Future studies should explore other primary cancer diagnoses (such as prostate or breast cancer) and determine whether specific types of cancer and cytotoxicity result in specific BMSC phenotypes.
In summary, our study provides comprehensive phenotypic, functional, and molecular profiling of tMN BMSC compared to carefully curated samples from pMN, pMN+Ca (without prior exposure to CT) and age-matched healthy control. Together, our data signals a precision approach to tMN vs. other blood cancers and underscores the presence of a pro-inflammatory but eminently targetable stromal milieu that may underly tMN pathogenesis.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank all patients and their families for their support and contribution of samples to the study. We thank Li Yan A Wee for her excellent technical assistance and critical comments, Dr Deepak Singhal and Dr Rakchha Chhetri for their clinical curation of patients and critical comments. We thank South Australian Cancer Research Biobank for provision of the patients’ samples and Australian Cancer Research Foundation Cancer Genomics Facility for performing RNA sequencing.
Author contributions
MMK design the study, performed all experiments, analyzed the data, and wrote the paper. CHK analyzed bioinformatics data and reviewed the paper. YL edited the paper and help with paper revisions (Western blot data). NT generated comet assays and edited the paper. DC contributed to sample acquisition and critically reviewed the paper. SP, CT-P, KL, DC, AA contributed to the study design and reviewed the paper. SK critically reviewed the paper and help with paper revisions. TH and DT critically reviewed the paper. DT conceived mechanistic and metabolic analysis and designed metabolic experiments. SG contributed to the design of the study, analysis, and interpretation of the data, and critically reviewed the paper. DKH design the study, secured funding, supervised the project, and edited the paper.
Funding
MMK is supported by Faculty of Health Sciences Divisional Scholarship, University of Adelaide and Dawes Top up Scholarship, Royal Adelaide Hospital, South Australia Health and Medical Research Institute. DKH is supported by National Health and Medical Research Council Medical Research Future Fund (MRFF) Investigator Grant APP1195517, Cancer Australia Grant APP2013617, Leukemia Foundation of Australia. SK is supported by National Health and Medical Research Council Investigator Grant APP2007739. DT is supported by National Health and Medical Research Council Ideas Grant APP1182564 and APP 2004288, the Australian Cancer Research Foundation (ACRF) Cancer Genomics Facility and the ACRF Discovery Accelerator, a Commonwealth Serum Laboratories Centenary Fellowship, a Leukemia & Lymphoma Society Translational Research Program, The Hospital Research Fund and the Australian Medical Research Future Fund for Rare Diseases, Rare Cancers and Unmet Need. Open Access funding enabled and organized by CAUL and its Member Institutions.
Data availability
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published paper and its Supplementary Information.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41375-022-01686-y.
References
- 1.McNerney ME, Godley LA, Le Beau MM. Therapy-related myeloid neoplasms: when genetics and environment collide. Nat Rev Cancer. 2017;17:513–27. doi: 10.1038/nrc.2017.60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Makishima H, Yoshizato T, Yoshida K, Sekeres MA, Radivoyevitch T, Suzuki H, et al. Dynamics of clonal evolution in myelodysplastic syndromes. Nat Genet. 2017;49:204–12. doi: 10.1038/ng.3742. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Singhal D, Wee LYA, Kutyna MM, Chhetri R, Geoghegan J, Schreiber AW, et al. The mutational burden of therapy-related myeloid neoplasms is similar to primary myelodysplastic syndrome but has a distinctive distribution. Leukemia. 2019;33:2842–53. doi: 10.1038/s41375-019-0479-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Singhal D, Hahn CN, Feurstein S, Wee LYA, Moma L, Kutyna MM, et al. Targeted gene panels identify a high frequency of pathogenic germline variants in patients diagnosed with a hematological malignancy and at least one other independent cancer. Leukemia. 2021;35:3245–56. doi: 10.1038/s41375-021-01246-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Churpek JE, Marquez R, Neistadt B, Claussen K, Lee MK, Churpek MM, et al. Inherited mutations in cancer susceptibility genes are common among survivors of breast cancer who develop therapy-related leukemia. Cancer. 2016;122:304–11. doi: 10.1002/cncr.29615. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Walkley CR, Olsen GH, Dworkin S, Fabb SA, Swann J, McArthur GA, et al. A microenvironment-induced myeloproliferative syndrome caused by retinoic acid receptor gamma deficiency. Cell. 2007;129:1097–110. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2007.05.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Rupec RA, Jundt F, Rebholz B, Eckelt B, Weindl G, Herzinger T, et al. Stroma-mediated dysregulation of myelopoiesis in mice lacking I kappa B alpha. Immunity. 2005;22:479–91. doi: 10.1016/j.immuni.2005.02.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Xiao P, Dolinska M, Sandhow L, Kondo M, Johansson AS, Bouderlique T, et al. Sipa1 deficiency-induced bone marrow niche alterations lead to the initiation of myeloproliferative neoplasm. Blood Adv. 2018;2:534–48. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2017013599. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Raaijmakers MH, Mukherjee S, Guo S, Zhang S, Kobayashi T, Schoonmaker JA, et al. Bone progenitor dysfunction induces myelodysplasia and secondary leukaemia. Nature. 2010;464:852–7. doi: 10.1038/nature08851. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Stoddart A, Wang J, Fernald AA, Davis EM, Johnson CR, Hu C, et al. Cytotoxic Therapy–Induced Effects on Both Hematopoietic and Marrow Stromal Cells Promotes Therapy-Related Myeloid Neoplasms. Blood Cancer Discovery. 2020;1:32–47. doi: 10.1158/2643-3230.BCD-19-0028. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Medyouf H, Mossner M, Jann JC, Nolte F, Raffel S, Herrmann C, et al. Myelodysplastic cells in patients reprogram mesenchymal stromal cells to establish a transplantable stem cell niche disease unit. Cell Stem Cell. 2014;14:824–37. doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2014.02.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Wiseman DH. Donor cell leukemia: a review. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant: J Am Soc Blood Marrow Transplant. 2011;17:771–89. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2010.10.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Geyh S, Oz S, Cadeddu RP, Frobel J, Bruckner B, Kundgen A, et al. Insufficient stromal support in MDS results from molecular and functional deficits of mesenchymal stromal cells. Leukemia. 2013;27:1841–51. doi: 10.1038/leu.2013.193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Geyh S, Rodriguez-Paredes M, Jager P, Khandanpour C, Cadeddu RP, Gutekunst J, et al. Functional inhibition of mesenchymal stromal cells in acute myeloid leukemia. Leukemia. 2016;30:683–91. doi: 10.1038/leu.2015.325. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ferrer RA, Wobus M, List C, Wehner R, Schonefeldt C, Brocard B, et al. Mesenchymal stromal cells from patients with myelodyplastic syndrome display distinct functional alterations that are modulated by lenalidomide. Haematologica. 2013;98:1677–85. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2013.083972. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Fei C, Zhao Y, Gu S, Guo J, Zhang X, Li X, et al. Impaired osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells derived from bone marrow of patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes. Tumour Biol. 2014;35:4307–16. doi: 10.1007/s13277-013-1565-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Pavlaki K, Pontikoglou CG, Demetriadou A, Batsali AK, Damianaki A, Simantirakis E, et al. Impaired proliferative potential of bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes is associated with abnormal WNT signaling pathway. Stem Cells Dev. 2014;23:1568–81. doi: 10.1089/scd.2013.0283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Fei C, Zhao Y, Guo J, Gu S, Li X, Chang C. Senescence of bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells is accompanied by activation of p53/p21 pathway in myelodysplastic syndromes. Eur J Haematol. 2014;93:476–86. doi: 10.1111/ejh.12385. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Prata Kde L, Orellana MD, De Santis GC, Kashima S, Fontes AM, Carrara Rde C, et al. Effects of high-dose chemotherapy on bone marrow multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells isolated from lymphoma patients. Exp Hematol. 2010;38:292–300. doi: 10.1016/j.exphem.2010.01.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Somaiah C, Kumar A, Sharma R, Sharma A, Anand T, Bhattacharyya J, et al. Mesenchymal stem cells show functional defect and decreased anti-cancer effect after exposure to chemotherapeutic drugs. J Biomed Sci. 2018;25:5. doi: 10.1186/s12929-018-0407-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Kemp K, Morse R, Sanders K, Hows J, Donaldson C. Alkylating chemotherapeutic agents cyclophosphamide and melphalan cause functional injury to human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells. Ann Hematol. 2011;90:777–89. doi: 10.1007/s00277-010-1141-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Horwitz EM, Le Blanc K, Dominici M, Mueller I, Slaper-Cortenbach I, Marini FC, et al. Clarification of the nomenclature for MSC: The International Society for Cellular Therapy position statement. Cytotherapy. 2005;7:393–5. doi: 10.1080/14653240500319234. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Gronthos S, Zannettino ACW, Hay SJ, Shi S, Graves SE, Kortesidis A, et al. Molecular and cellular characterisation of highly purified stromal stem cells derived from human bone marrow. J Cell Sci. 2003;116:1827–35. doi: 10.1242/jcs.00369. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Arthur A, Nguyen TM, Paton S, Zannettino ACW, Gronthos S. Loss of EfnB1 in the osteogenic lineage compromises their capacity to support hematopoietic stem/progenitor cell maintenance. Exp Hematol. 2019;69:43–53. doi: 10.1016/j.exphem.2018.10.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Zhao H, Darzynkiewicz Z. Biomarkers of cell senescence assessed by imaging cytometry. Methods Mol Biol (Clifton, NJ) 2013;965:83–92. doi: 10.1007/978-1-62703-239-1_5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Gorgoulis V, Adams PD, Alimonti A, Bennett DC, Bischof O, Bishop C, et al. Cellular senescence: defining a path forward. Cell. 2019;179:813–27. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2019.10.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Coppé J-P, Desprez P-Y, Krtolica A, Campisi J. The senescence-associated secretory phenotype: the dark side of tumor suppression. Annu Rev Pathol. 2010;5:99–118. doi: 10.1146/annurev-pathol-121808-102144. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Flores-Figueroa E, Gutierrez-Espindola G, Montesinos JJ, Arana-Trejo RM, Mayani H. In vitro characterization of hematopoietic microenvironment cells from patients with myelodysplastic syndrome. Leuk Res. 2002;26:677–86. doi: 10.1016/s0145-2126(01)00193-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Zhao Z, Wang Z, Li Q, Li W, You Y, Zou P. The different immunoregulatory functions of mesenchymal stem cells in patients with low-risk or high-risk myelodysplastic syndromes. PloS ONE. 2012;7:e45675. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0045675. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Abdul-Aziz AM, Shafat MS, Mehta TK, Di Palma F, Lawes MJ, Rushworth SA, et al. MIF-Induced Stromal PKCβ/IL8 Is Essential in Human Acute Myeloid Leukemia. Cancer Res. 2017;77:303–11. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-16-1095. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Campisi J, d’Adda di Fagagna F. Cellular senescence: when bad things happen to good cells. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2007;8:729–40. doi: 10.1038/nrm2233. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Anthony BA, Link DC. Regulation of hematopoietic stem cells by bone marrow stromal cells. Trends Immunol. 2014;35:32–7. doi: 10.1016/j.it.2013.10.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Braig M, Lee S, Loddenkemper C, Rudolph C, Peters AH, Schlegelberger B, et al. Oncogene-induced senescence as an initial barrier in lymphoma development. Nature. 2005;436:660–5. doi: 10.1038/nature03841. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Chen Z, Trotman LC, Shaffer D, Lin HK, Dotan ZA, Niki M, et al. Crucial role of p53-dependent cellular senescence in suppression of Pten-deficient tumorigenesis. Nature. 2005;436:725–30. doi: 10.1038/nature03918. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Shay JW, Tomlinson G, Piatyszek MA, Gollahon LS. Spontaneous in vitro immortalization of breast epithelial cells from a patient with Li-Fraumeni syndrome. Mol Cell Biol. 1995;15:425–32. doi: 10.1128/mcb.15.1.425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Jiang N, Li Y, Shu T, Wang J. Cytokines and inflammation in adipogenesis: an updated review. Front Med. 2019;13:314–29. doi: 10.1007/s11684-018-0625-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Delikat S, Harris RJ, Galvani DW. IL-1 beta inhibits adipocyte formation in human long-term bone marrow culture. Exp Hematol. 1993;21:31–7. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Matsuki T, Horai R, Sudo K, Iwakura Y. IL-1 plays an important role in lipid metabolism by regulating insulin levels under physiological conditions. J Exp Med. 2003;198:877–88. doi: 10.1084/jem.20030299. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Gagnon A, Foster C, Landry A, Sorisky A. The role of interleukin 1β in the anti-adipogenic action of macrophages on human preadipocytes. J Endocrinol. 2013;217:197–206. doi: 10.1530/JOE-12-0565. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Simons PJ, van den Pangaart PS, van Roomen CP, Aerts JM, Boon L. Cytokine-mediated modulation of leptin and adiponectin secretion during in vitro adipogenesis: evidence that tumor necrosis factor-alpha- and interleukin-1beta-treated human preadipocytes are potent leptin producers. Cytokine. 2005;32:94–103. doi: 10.1016/j.cyto.2005.08.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Vidal C, Bermeo S, Li W, Huang D, Kremer R, Duque G. Interferon gamma inhibits adipogenesis in vitro and prevents marrow fat infiltration in oophorectomized mice. Stem Cells (Dayt, Ohio) 2012;30:1042–8. doi: 10.1002/stem.1063. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Sullivan CB, Porter RM, Evans CH, Ritter T, Shaw G, Barry F, et al. TNFα and IL-1β influence the differentiation and migration of murine MSCs independently of the NF-κB pathway. Stem Cell Res Ther. 2014;5:104. doi: 10.1186/scrt492. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Keay S, Grossberg SE. Interferon inhibits the conversion of 3T3-L1 mouse fibroblasts into adipocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1980;77:4099–103. doi: 10.1073/pnas.77.7.4099. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Dörr JR, Yu Y, Milanovic M, Beuster G, Zasada C, Däbritz JH, et al. Synthetic lethal metabolic targeting of cellular senescence in cancer therapy. Nature. 2013;501:421–5. doi: 10.1038/nature12437. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.James EL, Michalek RD, Pitiyage GN, de Castro AM, Vignola KS, Jones J, et al. Senescent Human Fibroblasts Show Increased Glycolysis and Redox Homeostasis with Extracellular Metabolomes That Overlap with Those of Irreparable DNA Damage, Aging, and Disease. J Proteome Res. 2015;14:1854–71. doi: 10.1021/pr501221g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Zhu Y, Tchkonia T, Pirtskhalava T, Gower AC, Ding H, Giorgadze N, et al. The Achilles’ heel of senescent cells: from transcriptome to senolytic drugs. Aging Cell. 2015;14:644–58. doi: 10.1111/acel.12344. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Suvakov S, Cubro H, White WM, Butler Tobah YS, Weissgerber TL, Jordan KL, et al. Targeting senescence improves angiogenic potential of adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells in patients with preeclampsia. Biol Sex Differ. 2019;10:49. doi: 10.1186/s13293-019-0263-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Farr JN, Xu M, Weivoda MM, Monroe DG, Fraser DG, Onken JL, et al. Targeting cellular senescence prevents age-related bone loss in mice. Nat Med. 2017;23:1072–9. doi: 10.1038/nm.4385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Zhu Y, Doornebal EJ, Pirtskhalava T, Giorgadze N, Wentworth M, Fuhrmann-Stroissnigg H, et al. New agents that target senescent cells: the flavone, fisetin, and the BCL-X(L) inhibitors, A1331852 and A1155463. Aging. 2017;9:955–63. doi: 10.18632/aging.101202. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Zoico E, Nori N, Darra E, Tebon M, Rizzatti V, Policastro G, et al. Senolytic effects of quercetin in an in vitro model of pre-adipocytes and adipocytes induced senescence. Sci Rep. 2021;11:23237. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-02544-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Lewis-McDougall FC, Ruchaya PJ, Domenjo-Vila E, Shin Teoh T, Prata L, Cottle BJ, et al. Aged-senescent cells contribute to impaired heart regeneration. Aging Cell. 2019;18:e12931. doi: 10.1111/acel.12931. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published paper and its Supplementary Information.