This is a correction to: Roy C Martin, Adam Gerstenecker, Katina Hebert, Kristen Triebel, Daniel Marson, Assessment of Testamentary Capacity in Older Adults: Description and Initial Validation of a Standardized Interview Instrument, Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 2022;, acac028, https://doi.org/10.1093/arclin/acac028
In the originally published version of this manuscript, which described the development and psychometric properties of a standardized assessment measure of testamentary capacity, three errors were made which are described below.
1. Page 4, 8 lines up from the bottom of the page. ``(2)'' was an improperly formatted citation. The proper citation is: (Walsh et al. 2019).
2. Page 5, 17 lines up from the bottom of the page: ``(2,17)'' was an improperly formatted citation. The proper citation is: (Spar and Garb, 1992; Walsh et al. 2019).
3. Page 4, 9 lines down from the top of the page: The two sentences in this paragraph were mistakenly merged. As corrected, the paragraph should read:
These four TC elements were selected based on a review of the Anglo-American legal literature (Brenkel et al. 2018; Walsh et al. 2019) and in particular derive from the previously referenced seminal legal case of Banks v. Goodfellow (Banks v. Goodfellow, 1870). As discussed in more detail below, for each TCI element, the senior author developed a range of individual test questions and scoring to quantitatively assess clinically different aspects relevant to the specific TC legal element/construct.