Skip to main content
Frontiers in Oncology logoLink to Frontiers in Oncology
. 2022 Oct 14;12:992468. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.992468

The expression of cuproptosis-related genes in hepatocellular carcinoma and their relationships with prognosis

Xueying Zhao 1,, Jin Chen 2,, Shangqi Yin 2, Jingren Shi 2, Mei Zheng 2, Chaonan He 2, Huan Meng 2, Ying Han 2, Jinyu Han 2, Jingjing Guo 2, Zhengrong Yuan 1,*, Yajie Wang 2,*
PMCID: PMC9614267  PMID: 36313717

Abstract

Background

The mechanism of cuproptosis has recently been reported in lipoylated proteins of the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) cycle. Besides, the role of copper was previously recognized in cancer progression. We evaluated the prognostic value of cuproptosis-related gene expression in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Methods

Remarkable genes were selected both in differential expression analysis and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis from ninety-six cuproptosis-related genes using The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. The relationships between clinical characteristics and gene expression were performed with Wilcoxon signed-rank test, Kruskal-Wallis test, and logistic regression. Clinicopathologic factors correlated with overall survival in HCCs conducting univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis. Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis 2 (GEPIA2) and Human Protein Atlas (HPA) databases were utilized to verify the results. Furthermore, Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) identified the potential key pathways that dominate cuproptosis in HCC.

Results

Elevated ATP7A, SLC25A3, SCO2, COA6, TMEM199, ATP6AP1, LIPT1, DLAT, PDHA1, MTF1, ACP1, FDX2, NUBP2, CIAPIN1, ISCA2 and NDOR1 expression, as well as declined AOC1, FDX1, MT-CO1, and ACO1 expression were significantly emerged in HCC tumor tissues and were significantly associated with HCCs poor survival. The expressions of screened cuproptosis-related genes were prominently related to clinical features. GSEA analysis reported many key signaling pathways (such as natural killer cell mediated cytotoxicity, TCA cycle, glutathione metabolism, ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters, Notch signaling pathway, ErbB signaling pathway, and metabolism of xenobiotics by cytochrome p450) were differentially enriched in HCCs with varying degrees of cuproptosis-related genes expression.

Conclusions

The twenty cuproptosis-related genes might be utilized as new candidate prognostic biomarkers for HCC.

Keywords: cuproptosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, prognosis, TCGA, bioinformatics

Introduction

The incidence and mortality of liver cancer rank the sixth and third in the top 10 most common cancers in 2020 respectively (1), and the requirement of effective treatment and diagnostic strategies for liver cancer have been recognized to prevent recurrence, complexity, invasive metastasis, and advanced diagnosis issue. Although some serum biomarkers are well constructed as selection tools for liver cancer treatment, it is still urgent to develop specific biomarkers that evaluate the specific prognosis and predictability of treatment response for improving the detection of early or very early liver cancer (2). Liver cancer is divided into primary liver cancer and metastatic liver cancer and that hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the primary malignant tumor of the liver. Hereditary hemochromatosis, hepatitis C virus, and hepatitis B virus could directly create HCC in the absence of cirrhosis, whereas HCC patients with other underlying liver diseases (such as primary biliary cirrhosis, autoimmune hepatitis, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis, Wilson disease, and alpha 1-antitrypsin deficiency) often suffer from cirrhosis, so treating the potential liver diseases and reducing the progression of cirrhosis may decline the incidence of HCC (3). Currently, treatments for HCC include chemotherapy, immunotherapy, pharmacotherapy with natural compounds, and nanotechnology therapy, the latter two of which contribute to the reduction of systemic toxicity and side effects in patients for better treatment effects (4).

Cell death has been divided into accidental cell death and programmed cell death (PCD), and PCD was subsequently redefined as regulatory cell death (RCD) (5). At present, there are dozens of RCD, among which apoptosis, necroptosis, pyroptosis, and ferroptosis are extensively researched (6). However, cuproptosis, a cell death mechanism that relies on mitochondrial respiration in human cells, is different from the previous cell death mechanisms (7). Copper can induce various forms of cell death including apoptosis and autophagy, which mainly depend on the mechanisms of antiangiogenesis, proteasome inhibition, and reactive oxygen species accumulation (8). Furthermore, copper is essential in all kinds of life processes for an important auxiliary role based on a homeostasis state, while unbalanced copper homeostasis could affect tumor growth and even cause irreversible damage to cells. Copper homeostasis disorder exists in many malignancies, with simultaneously elevated copper levels that in serum and tissues are associated with cancer progression. It has been shown that higher copper levels in serum may be associated with poorer survival in liver cancer (9). Copper chelators and copper ionophores have excellent anticancer activity, as well as copper coordination compounds have also made great progress in cancer therapy, so copper-targeted anticancer drugs have broad application prospects (10). Recently, studies of cuproptosis-related genes as potential biomarkers in tumors have been confirmed in many other cancers, such as skin cutaneous melanoma (SKCM) (11), clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) (12), bladder cancer (BLCA) (13), triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) (14), lung cancer (15), and head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSC) (16).

The distribution of copper in organisms requires a variety of biological ligands and proteins. Copper transport protein 1 (CTR1, encoded by SLC31A1) allows copper to enter the cell, thereby distributing copper to different targets through metal chaperones in the cytoplasmic region of the cell. Copper chaperone for superoxide dismutase (CCS) delivers copper to superoxide dismutase 1 (SOD1), antioxidant 1 copper chaperone (ATOX1) transports copper to copper-transporting p-type adenosine triphosphatase 1 (ATP7A) and copper-transporting p-type adenosine triphosphatase 2 (ATP7B). When the copper levels in the cytoplasm are excessive, ATP7A and ATP7B are relocated to the corresponding plasma membrane to facilitate copper export from the cell (17). Chelation of copper with metallothionein (MT) or other molecules also mitigates excessive copper in cells, which is conducive to the regulation of copper homeostasis (18). The copper enzymes in mitochondria consist of cytochrome c oxidase (CCO) and SOD1, and the CuA site maturation and CuB site formation of the holoenzyme in the intermembrane space (IMS) require functions of many assembly factors, including cytochrome c oxidase copper chaperone (COX17, COX19, and COX11), synthesis of cytochrome c oxidase1 (SCO1), synthesis of cytochrome c oxidase 2 (SCO2), cytochrome c oxidase assembly factor 6 (COA6) (19). Copper is transported into mitochondria via SLC25A3 protein, and there are four main types of transporters in the inner membrane of mitochondria, namely mitochondrial carrier family (MCF/SLC25), ATP binding cassette (ABC) transporter, mitochondrial pyruvate carrier (MPC) and sideroflexin (FXN) (20). Four ABC transporters are located on mitochondria, including ABCB6, ABCB7, ABCB8 and ABCB10 (21).

Copper metabolic disorders include Wilson disease, Menkes disease, hereditary ceruloplasmin deficiency, and congenital disorders of glycosylation (CDG). CDG disease is triggered by gene defect of the coiled-coil domain containing 115 (CCDC115), transmembrane protein 199 (TMEM199), ATPase H+ transporting accessory protein 1 (ATP6AP1), and mannose phosphate isomerase (MPI), and is mainly manifested by varying degrees of liver injury, possibly leading to copper metabolism disorder by affecting the glycosylation modification of ATP7B protein (22, 23). Gene screening for the diagnosis of abnormal copper metabolism in liver diseases mainly involves genetic diseases that affect copper metabolism, such as gene defects of CDG-related disease, ABCB4 gene defect disease (progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis type 3), Adaptor related protein complex 1 subunit sigma 1 (AP1S1) gene defect disease (MEDNIK syndrome) and SLC33A1 gene defect disease (Huppke-Brendl syndrome) (24).

Cells that highly depended on mitochondrial respiration are more sensitive to cuproptosis. Elesclomol as a copper ionophore inhibits the synthesis of iron-sulfur clusters resulting in a decrease of Fe-S cluster proteins. Besides, copper combines with lipoacylated dihydrolipoamide S-acetyltransferase (DLAT) regulated by ferredoxin 1 (FDX1) to increase the insoluble oligomeric DLAT when the ionophores or transporters accumulate excessively, leading to proteotoxic stress and eventually cell death (7). Copper affects the activity and stability of CCO, the terminal enzyme of the mitochondrial respiratory chain (25), and that obstructed the transport process of copper to CCO causes many human diseases. In addition, copper chaperone COX19 in mitochondria could participate in the biogenesis of CCO in humans and regulate the dynamic balance of copper and iron in plants (26). Moreover, the experiment has shown that higher concentrations of copper will lead to copper toxicity by affecting certain complexes in the respiratory chain (27).

Proteins carrying iron-sulfur clusters are essential for the basic metabolism of all organisms. Eukaryotic iron-sulfur cluster assembly includes direct mitochondrial iron-sulfur cluster (ISC) co-assembly pathway and cytosolic iron-sulfur cluster assembly (CIA) pathway that uses active sulfur as substrate, these pathways containing protein complex (composed of cysteine desulfurase, a scaffold protein, auxiliary ISD11 protein, acyl carrier protein, frataxin, and ferredoxin), the related genes (including NFS1, ISD11, ACP1, ISCU2, FXN, FDX2, FDXR) and proteins of cytokine induced apoptosis inhibitor 1 (CIAPIN1), novel diflavin oxidoreductase 1 (NDOR1), nucleotide binding protein 2 (NUBP2), nucleotide binding protein 1 (NUBP1), iron-only hydrogenase-like protein 1 (IOP1), and Cytosolic iron-Sulfur assembly component 1 (CIAO1) (28). Generation of mitochondrial Fe-S proteins through the ISC mechanism requires scaffold protein ISCU2, chaperone HSP70, and glutaredoxin 5 (GLRX5) (29). The imbalance of copper homeostasis in mitochondria may destroy the maturation of mitochondrial Fe-S proteins, and Cu+ may affect the role of mitochondrial ISCA1/ISCA2 and GLRX5 proteins in the regulation of [4Fe-4S] cluster formation (30). It is unclear whether the reduction of iron-sulfur cluster proteins promotes cell death induced by copper, but it has been found that copper ionophore elesclomol reduces iron-sulfur cluster proteins under the regulation of FDX1 (7).

A clear potential of cuproptosis-related genes with prognostic meaning and clinical diagnosis in HCC has not yet been more comprehensively studied. Accordingly, the establishment of new biomarkers related to the copper homeostasis regulatory pathway, copper metabolism illnesses, mitochondrial respiratory, and iron-sulfur cluster proteins is crucial for the early detection and prognosis of liver cancer. The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database was used to analyze the clinical information of HCCs and the mRNA expression difference in normal and HCC tissues. Differential expression analysis and survival analysis were performed to screen the genes with significant differences from ninety-six candidate cuproptosis-related genes for subsequent correlation analysis of clinical factors, univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis. To identify the contribution of screened genes to the signaling pathway related to cuproptosis, Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA) was worked for functional enrichment analysis. Furthermore, Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis 2 (GEPIA2) and Human Protein Atlas (HPA) were applied to render verification support to our outcomes from TCGA. This study was conducive to the enormous potential of cuproptosis-related genes as a new prognostic marker of HCC in the future.

Materials and methods

The research process was shown in a workflow diagram regarding the selection of the cuproptosis-related genes from the TCGA database and the strategy of the study ( Figure 1A ).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

The workflow diagram of the study and the results of paired different expression analysis. The workflow diagram for exploring the expression of cuproptosis-related genes in hepatocellular carcinoma and their relationships with prognosis by bioinformatics analysis (A). Statistical analysis of cuproptosis-related genes using Wilcoxon signed-rank test in 58 paired HCC samples and adjacent normal liver samples from TCGA data, including ATP7A (B), SLC25A3 (C), SCO2 (D), COA6 (E), AOC1 (F), TMEM199 (G), ATP6AP1 (H), FDX1 (I), LIPT1 (J), DLAT (K), PDHA1 (L), MTF1 (M), MT-CO1 (N), ACO1 (O), ACP1 (P), FDX2 (Q), NUBP2 (R), CIAPIN1 (S), ISCA2 (T), and NDOR1 (U). (ACO1, aconitase 1; ACP1, acid phosphatase 1; AOC1, amine oxidase copper containing 1; ATP6AP1, ATPase H+ transporting accessory protein 1; ATP7A, copper-transporting p-type adenosine triphosphatase 1; CIAPIN1, cytokine induced apoptosis inhibitor 1; COA6, cytochrome c oxidase assembly factor 6; DLAT, dihydrolipoamide S-acetyltransferase; FDX1, ferredoxin 1; FDX2, ferredoxin 2; GEPIA2, Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis 2; GSEA, Gene Set Enrichment Analysis; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; HPA, Human Protein Atlas; ISCA2, iron-sulfur cluster assembly 2; LIPT1, lipoyltransferase 1; MT-CO1, mitochondrially encoded cytochrome c oxidase I; MTF1, metal regulatory transcription factor 1; NDOR1, NADPH dependent diflavin oxidoreductase 1; NUBP2, nucleotide binding protein 2; PDHA1, pyruvate dehydrogenase E1 subunit alpha 1; SCO2, synthesis of cytochrome c oxidase 2; SLC25A3, solute carrier family 25 member 3; TCGA, The Cancer Genome Atlas; TMEM199, transmembrane protein 199).

Data extraction and arrangement

The transcriptome profiling with gene expression quantification as data type (465 files, a total of 407 tumor samples and 58 normal samples, Workflow Type: HTSeq- FPKM) and relevant clinical information for 418 cases in liver cancer were collected from the TCGA Genomic Data Commons (GDC) Data Portal (https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/repository) (31). The downloaded liver cancer data in TCGA includes primary liver cancer (HCC, 374 samples) and metastatic liver cancer (cholangiocellular carcinoma, CHOL, 33 samples), and it may be instructive to consider a small number of metastatic liver cancer subset. Data were arranged in Perl (version 5.26.3) for further analyses.

Differential expression analysis and survival analysis of candidate cuproptosis-related genes in HCC from TCGA database

The details of ninety-six candidate cuproptosis-related genes involved in the copper homeostasis regulatory pathway, copper metabolism diseases, mitochondrial respiratory, and iron-sulfur cluster proteins were exhibited in Table S1 . All subsequent data analyses were performed by R software (version 3.6.3). Boxplots with scatters were applied to visualize the gene expression differences in normal and HCC tissues by Wilcoxon signed-rank test, and the R package “limma” and “beeswarm”. Only the samples with both survival status and survival time information could be used for survival analysis. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were evaluated using the log-rank test and drawn using the R package “survival”. As a complementary explanation, high and low gene expression was distinguished on the foundation of the median values. Only genes with a P-value < 0.05 both in boxplots and Kaplan-Meier survival curves could be considered as the genes with significant differences for subsequent analyses. Paired differential analysis was performed using Wilcoxon signed-rank test to demonstrate gene expression trends in HCC tissues relative to normal tissues. Heatmap was plotted in https://www.bioinformatics.com.cn (last accessed on 30 July 2022), a free online platform for data analysis and visualization.

Correlation analysis of clinical factors and univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses from TCGA database

The clinical data that removed missing information was conducted to visualize gene expression differences in clinical characteristics respectively. It was worth noting that the Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used between two groups and the Kruskal-Wallis test was carried out between multiple groups. The logistic regression was used in univariate analysis to reveal the associations between clinicopathological variables of different levels and gene expressions. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were implemented to identify independent prognosis risk factors. Only factors with entire information in age, gender, clinical stage, histologic grade, tumor stage (T classification), and gene expression were assessed for prognosis risk factors. Hazard ratio (HR) = h 1 (t)/h 0 (t) = eβ . Log scale of gene expression was used log2 (TPM+1) for graphical aesthetics. Generally, HR > 1 indicates the gene is a risk factor, and HR < 1 indicates the gene is a protective factor. All comparisons were considered statistically significant with a P-value < 0.05.

Validation in GEPIA2 and HPA databases

The GEPIA2 database (http://gepia2.cancer-pku.cn/) (32) was also performed for validating the gene expression information of screened cuproptosis-related genes for HCC in boxplots, clinical stage plots, and survival analysis. In all analyses, the gene symbol or ensemble id was input in “Gene” and liver hepatocellular carcinoma (LIHC) was selected for cancer name. “Box Plot” module: the P-value cutoff was 0.05, “Multiple Datasets” and “Match TCGA normal and GTEx data” were clicked, and log2 (TPM+1) was used for the log scale. More data from normal liver samples were increased by selecting data from the GTEx database. “Stage Plot” module: log2 (TPM+1) was used for the log scale, and the major stage was chosen for plotting. “Survival Analysis” module: “Overall Survival” and “Median” were clicked, and default values were used for other options. At the same time, each protein expression of screened cuproptosis-related genes with the same antibody in HCC tissues and normal liver tissues was checked by the HPA portal (https://www.proteinatlas.org/) (33).

Identification of relevant signaling pathways of cuproptosis-related genes by GSEA

GSEA software (version 4.1.0) was operated for functional enrichment analysis of the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) using the data from the TCGA database. The parameters of gene set parameters and run enrichment tests were set as follows. The name of each gene was selected as the expression dataset, and “c2.cp.kegg.v7.2.symbols.gmt” was chosen as the gene sets database. Setting the permutations value to default value 1000 for computing Normalized enrichment score (NES). The max size excluded larger sets and the min size excluded smaller sets were set in default values of 500 and 15, respectively. Signaling pathways with a false discovery rate (FDR) q-value < 0.05 was recognized with significant enrichment. P-value < 0.05 was used to select the enriched signaling pathways when q-value > 0.05. Adjusting the max size excluded larger sets to 600 or 700 when no signaling pathways have P-value < 0.05.

Results

Screened cuproptosis-related genes

Ninety-six genes that consulted in research involved in the copper homeostasis regulatory pathway, copper metabolism diseases, mitochondrial respiratory, and iron-sulfur cluster proteins were regarded as candidate cuproptosis-related genes ( Table S1 ). The results of differential expression analysis and survival analysis displayed that twenty-five genes with P-value < 0.05 both in boxplots and Kaplan-Meier survival curves were selected for screened cuproptosis-related genes. 26.04% of candidate cuproptosis-related genes (25 out of 96 candidate genes) were differentially expressed in HCC and normal liver tissues. Nevertheless, a few genes in the twenty-five screened cuproptosis-related genes as predictors of HCC poor prognosis had been reported by the TCGA database, containing ABCB6 (34), CDKN2A (35), CDKN3 (36), TPI1 (37), and HSPA8 (38). Ultimately, the twenty genes including ATP7A, SLC25A3, SCO2, COA6, AOC1, TMEM199, ATP6AP1, FDX1, LIPT1, DLAT, PDHA1, MTF1, MT-CO1, ACO1, ACP1, FDX2, NUBP2, CIAPIN1, ISCA2, and NDOR1 were used for eventually screened cuproptosis-related genes in later study.

The gene expression of screened cuproptosis-related genes in HCC tissues and normal tissues from TCGA

The gene expression levels of AOC1 (P = 0.008, Figure 1F ), MT-CO1 (P < 0.001, Figure 1N ), and ACO1 (P = 0.007, Figure 1O ) were significantly descended in HCC samples by comparing 58 paired HCC samples and adjacent normal liver samples in paired differential analysis, other genes were notably ascended in HCC samples ( Figure 1 ). Although FDX1 expression (P-value = 0.157) was not decreased statistically significant in HCC tumor tissues, the trend of FDX1 expression was still declined by paired differential analysis ( Figure 1I ). The gene expressions of AOC1 (P < 0.001, Figure 2E ), FDX1 (P = 0.003, Figure 2H ), MT-CO1 (P < 0.001, Figure 2M ), and ACO1 (P < 0.001, Figure 2N ) in HCC tumor tissues were remarkably lower than those in normal tissues. Whereas the gene expressions of ATP7A, SLC25A3, SCO2, COA6, TMEM199, ATP6AP1, LIPT1, DLAT, PDHA1, MTF1, ACP1, FDX2, NUBP2, CIAPIN1, ISCA2, and NDOR1 in HCC tissues were prominently higher than their surrounding tissues, and the differences were all statistically significant (P < 0.001, Figure 2 ). The heatmap showed the same results in all samples and paired samples from the TCGA ( Figure 3 ).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

The boxplot and Kaplan-Meier survival curves with mRNA expression of screened cuproptosis-related genes in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) from the TCGA database. Different expression of cuproptosis-related genes between HCC tumor and normal tissues, including ATP7A (A), SLC25A3 (B), SCO2 (C), COA6 (D), AOC1 (E), TMEM199 (F), ATP6AP1 (G), FDX1 (H), LIPT1 (I), DLAT (J), PDHA1 (K), MTF1 (L), MT-CO1 (M), ACO1 (N), ACP1 (O), FDX2 (P), NUBP2 (Q), CIAPIN1 (R), ISCA2 (S), and NDOR1 (T). The association between survival rate and expression levels of cuproptosis-related genes in HCC, including ATP7A (A), SLC25A3 (B), SCO2 (C), COA6 (D), AOC1 (E), TMEM199 (F), ATP6AP1 (G), FDX1 (H), LIPT1 (I), DLAT (J), PDHA1 (K), MTF1 (L), MT-CO1 (M), ACO1 (N), ACP1 (O), FDX2 (P), NUBP2 (Q), CIAPIN1 (R), ISCA2 (S), and NDOR1 (T). (ACO1, aconitase 1; ACP1, acid phosphatase 1; AOC1, amine oxidase copper containing 1; ATP6AP1, ATPase H+ transporting accessory protein 1; ATP7A, copper-transporting p-type adenosine triphosphatase 1; CIAPIN1, cytokine induced apoptosis inhibitor 1; COA6, cytochrome c oxidase assembly factor 6; DLAT, dihydrolipoamide S-acetyltransferase; FDX1, ferredoxin 1; FDX2, ferredoxin 2; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; ISCA2, iron-sulfur cluster assembly 2; LIPT1, lipoyltransferase 1; MT-CO1, mitochondrially encoded cytochrome c oxidase I; MTF1, metal regulatory transcription factor 1; NDOR1, NADPH dependent diflavin oxidoreductase 1; NUBP2, nucleotide binding protein 2; PDHA1, pyruvate dehydrogenase E1 subunit alpha 1; SCO2, synthesis of cytochrome c oxidase 2; SLC25A3, solute carrier family 25 member 3; TCGA, The Cancer Genome Atlas; TMEM199, transmembrane protein 199).

Figure 3.

Figure 3

The heatmap of screened cuproptosis-related genes in normal and HCC tissues from the TCGA data. Expression levels of twenty screened cuproptosis-related genes in all samples (A). Expression levels of twenty screened cuproptosis-related genes in 58 paired samples (B). (ACO1, aconitase 1; ACP1, acid phosphatase 1; AOC1, amine oxidase copper containing 1; ATP6AP1, ATPase H+ transporting accessory protein 1; ATP7A, copper-transporting p-type adenosine triphosphatase 1; CIAPIN1, cytokine induced apoptosis inhibitor 1; COA6, cytochrome c oxidase assembly factor 6; DLAT, dihydrolipoamide S-acetyltransferase; FDX1, ferredoxin 1; FDX2, ferredoxin 2; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; ISCA2, iron-sulfur cluster assembly 2; LIPT1, lipoyltransferase 1; MT-CO1, mitochondrially encoded cytochrome c oxidase I; MTF1, metal regulatory transcription factor 1; NDOR1, NADPH dependent diflavin oxidoreductase 1; NUBP2, nucleotide binding protein 2; PDHA1, pyruvate dehydrogenase E1 subunit alpha 1; SCO2, synthesis of cytochrome c oxidase 2; SLC25A3, solute carrier family 25 member 3; TCGA, The Cancer Genome Atlas; TMEM199, transmembrane protein 199).

Survival analysis of screened cuproptosis-related genes from TCGA

As shown in Figure 2 , Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed that low expression of FDX1 (P = 0.035, Figure 2H ), MT-CO1 (P = 0.004, Figure 2M ), and ACO1 (P = 0.017, Figure 2N ) possessing worse prognosis with a poor survival rate, with contradictory high expression of ATP7A, SLC25A3, SCO2, COA6, AOC1, TMEM199, ATP6AP1, LIPT1, DLAT, PDHA1, MTF1, ACP1, FDX2, NUBP2, CIAPIN1, ISCA2, and NDOR1 having more poorly prognosis with statistically significant (P < 0.05, Figure 2 ). The outcome that high expression of AOC1 (P = 0.007, Figure 2E ) that associated with poor survival rate in HCCs by survival analysis was not consistent with lower expression in HCC tumor tissues by differential expression analysis.

Relationships between the expressions of screened cuproptosis-related genes and clinicopathological parameters from TCGA

ATP7A (P = 0.009), COA6 (P = 0.009), ATP6AP1 (P = 0.036), FDX1 (P = 0.001), LIPT1 (P = 0.033), DLAT (P = 0.049) and ISCA2 (P = 0.033) expression were notably associated with clinical stage ( Figures 4A, B, D-G, I ). ATP7A (P = 0.04), COA6 (P < 0.001), TMEM199 (P < 0.001), FDX1 (P < 0.001), ACP1 (P = 0.003), ISCA2 (P = 0.037), NDOR1 (P < 0.001), AOC1 (P = 0.034) and ACO1 (P = 0.01) were significantly correlated with histologic grade ( Figures 4A-C, E, H-J ; Figures S1C, G ). ATP7A (P = 0.008), COA6 (P = 0.016), TMEM199 (P = 0.024) and FDX1 (P = 0.004) expression were significantly related to tumor stage (T classification) ( Figures 4A-C, E ). ATP7A (P = 0.007), LIPT1 (P = 0.009), DLAT (P = 0.006) and NDOR1 (P = 0.039) expression were remarkably interrelated to lymph node metastasis (N classification) ( Figures 4A, F, G, J ). Univariate analysis using logistic regression revealed that gene expressions were relevant to negative prognostic clinicopathological parameters except for SLC25A3, AOC1, PDHA1, MTF1, MT-CO1, NUBP2, and CIAPIN1 expression ( Table S2 ). Elevated SCO2, LIPT1, DLAT, ACP1, FDX2, and NDOR1 expression and reduced ACO1 expression were only significantly associated with histologic grade ( Table S2 ). High ATP6AP1 expression was only notably correlated with the clinical stage (odds ratio [OR] = 10.779 for stage IV vs. I) ( Table S2 ). Ascended ISCA2 expression was remarkably related to both the histologic grade (OR = 1.924 for G3 vs. G1) and the T classification (OR = 6.661 for stage T4 vs. T1), whereas decreased ISCA2 expression was significantly related to the histologic grade (OR = 0.259 for G4 vs. G1) ( Table S2 ). Increased ATP7A, COA6, and TMEM199 expression and diminished FDX1 expression were all remarkably associated with clinical stage, histologic grade, and T classification ( Table S2 ). These results demonstrated that patients with high SCO2, ATP7A, COA6, TMEM199, ATP6AP1, LIPT1, DLAT, ACP1, FDX2, ISCA2, and NDOR1 expression together with low ACO1 and FDX1 expression had a disposition to advanced clinical stage and histologic grade ( Table S2 ).

Figure 4.

Figure 4

The correlation between ten cuproptosis-related gene expression levels and various clinicopathological features in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients using Wilcoxon signed-rank test or Kruskal-Wallis test from the TCGA database. The correlation between various clinicopathological features and cuproptosis-related genes expression levels in HCCs, including ATP7A (A), COA6 (B), TMEM199 (C), ATP6AP1 (D), FDX1 (E), LIPT1 (F), DLAT (G), ACP1 (H), ISCA2 (I), and NDOR1 (J). (ACP1, acid phosphatase 1; ATP6AP1, ATPase H+ transporting accessory protein 1; ATP7A, copper-transporting p-type adenosine triphosphatase 1; COA6, cytochrome c oxidase assembly factor 6; DLAT, dihydrolipoamide S-acetyltransferase; FDX1, ferredoxin 1; G, histologic grade; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; ISCA2, iron-sulfur cluster assembly 2; LIPT1, lipoyltransferase 1; M, distant metastasis; N, lymph node metastasis; NDOR1, NADPH dependent diflavin oxidoreductase 1; Stage, clinical stage; T, tumor stage; TCGA, The Cancer Genome Atlas; TMEM199, transmembrane protein 199; *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001).

Hazard factors affecting patient’s survival

The univariate Cox regression analysis uncovered that the up-regulation of SCO2, ATP7A, LIPT1, DLAT, MTF1, SLC25A3, AOC1, TMEM199, COA6, ACP1, FDX2, CIAPIN1 and NDOR1 expression and low MT-CO1 expression were related to poor overall survival in HCCs ( Table 1 ). Other clinical variables associated with bad survival including clinical stage (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.672; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.359–2.056; P < 0.001) and T classification (HR: 1.652; 95% CI: 1.357–2.011; P < 0.001) ( Table 1 ). In multivariate Cox analysis, high COA6, AOC1, LIPT1, DLAT, ACP1, and NDOR1 expression, along with low MT-CO1 expression maintained an independent risk factor for overall survival among HCCs ( Figure 5 and Table 2 ).

Table 1.

Univariate Cox regression analysis for prognosis risk factors of HCC patients.

Parameter Univariate analysis
HR 95%CI Low 95%CI High P-value
Age 1.01 0.995 1.025 0.177
Gender 0.82 0.557 1.209 0.317
Clinical stage 1.672 1.359 2.056 < 0.001***
Histologic grade 1.121 0.868 1.446 0.382
Tumor stage 1.652 1.357 2.011 < 0.001***
SCO2 1.355 1.018 1.803 0.037*
ATP7A 1.824 1.132 2.94 0.014*
FDX1 0.78 0.58 1.047 0.098
LIPT1 2.028 1.209 3.401 0.007**
DLAT 1.634 1.252 2.132 < 0.001***
PDHA1 1.226 0.88 1.708 0.228
MTF1 1.657 1.03 2.664 0.037*
SLC25A3 1.471 1.002 2.159 0.049*
AOC1 1.307 1.047 1.632 0.018*
TMEM199 1.694 1.149 2.499 0.008**
ATP6AP1 1.345 0.979 1.849 0.068
MT-CO1 0.721 0.581 0.895 0.003**
ACO1 0.82 0.628 1.072 0.146
COA6 1.328 1.039 1.697 0.024*
ACP1 2.108 1.443 3.077 < 0.001***
FDX2 1.318 1.002 1.735 0.048*
NUBP2 1.203 0.828 1.746 0.332
CIAPIN1 1.468 1.043 2.067 0.028*
ISCA2 1.49 0.971 2.286 0.068
NDOR1 1.752 1.279 2.402 < 0.001***

ACO1, aconitase 1; ACP1, acid phosphatase 1; AOC1, amine oxidase copper containing 1; ATP6AP1, ATPase H+ transporting accessory protein 1; ATP7A, copper-transporting p-type adenosine triphosphatase 1; CI, confidence interval; CIAPIN1, cytokine induced apoptosis inhibitor 1; COA6, cytochrome c oxidase assembly factor 6; DLAT, dihydrolipoamide S-acetyltransferase; FDX1, ferredoxin 1; FDX2, ferredoxin 2; HR, hazard ratio; ISCA2, iron-sulfur cluster assembly 2; LIPT1, lipoyltransferase 1; MT-CO1, mitochondrially encoded cytochrome c oxidase I; MTF1, metal regulatory transcription factor 1; NDOR1, NADPH dependent diflavin oxidoreductase 1; NUBP2, nucleotide binding protein 2; PDHA1, pyruvate dehydrogenase E1 subunit alpha 1; SCO2, synthesis of cytochrome c oxidase 2; SLC25A3, solute carrier family 25 member 3; TMEM199, transmembrane protein 199; *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001.

Figure 5.

Figure 5

The forest plots of multivariate Cox analysis about screened cuproptosis-related gene expression levels among hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients from TCGA. The forest plot was generated to show the connection between clinicopathological features and the cuproptosis-related genes expression level of HCCs, including ATP7A (A), SLC25A3 (B), SCO2 (C), COA6 (D), AOC1 (E), TMEM199 (F), ATP6AP1 (G), FDX1 (H), LIPT1 (I), DLAT (J), PDHA1 (K), MTF1 (L), MT-CO1 (M), ACO1 (N), ACP1 (O), FDX2 (P), NUBP2 (Q), CIAPIN1 (R), ISCA2 (S), and NDOR1 (T). (ACO1, aconitase 1; ACP1, acid phosphatase 1; AOC1, amine oxidase copper containing 1; ATP6AP1, ATPase H+ transporting accessory protein 1; ATP7A, copper-transporting p-type adenosine triphosphatase 1; CIAPIN1, cytokine induced apoptosis inhibitor 1; COA6, cytochrome c oxidase assembly factor 6; DLAT, dihydrolipoamide S-acetyltransferase; FDX1, ferredoxin 1; FDX2, ferredoxin 2; Grade, histologic grade; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; ISCA2, iron-sulfur cluster assembly 2; LIPT1, lipoyltransferase 1; MT-CO1, mitochondrially encoded cytochrome c oxidase I; MTF1, metal regulatory transcription factor 1; NDOR1, NADPH dependent diflavin oxidoreductase 1; NUBP2, nucleotide binding protein 2; PDHA1, pyruvate dehydrogenase E1 subunit alpha 1; SCO2, synthesis of cytochrome c oxidase 2; SLC25A3, solute carrier family 25 member 3; Stage, clinical stage; T, tumor stage; TCGA, The Cancer Genome Atlas; TMEM199, transmembrane protein 199; *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001).

Table 2.

Multivariate Cox regression analysis for prognosis risk factors of HCC patients.

Gene Parameter Multivariate analysis
HR 95%CI Low 95%CI High P-value
SCO2 Age 1.01 0.995 1.025 0.188
Gender 0.962 0.647 1.431 0.849
Clinical stage 1.146 0.495 2.653 0.75
Histologic grade 1.156 0.88 1.52 0.298
Tumor stage 1.483 0.666 3.303 0.335
SCO2 1.295 0.982 1.708 0.067
ATP7A Age 1.013 0.998 1.029 0.094
Gender 0.977 0.655 1.456 0.908
Clinical stage 1.092 0.482 2.473 0.833
Histologic grade 1.191 0.907 1.563 0.208
Tumor stage 1.517 0.699 3.292 0.292
ATP7A 1.508 0.925 2.458 0.099
FDX1 Age 1.011 0.996 1.026 0.16
Gender 0.961 0.646 1.43 0.846
Clinical stage 1.133 0.493 2.606 0.768
Histologic grade 1.188 0.9 1.568 0.224
Tumor stage 1.487 0.673 3.284 0.327
FDX1 0.914 0.68 1.228 0.549
LIPT1 Age 1.011 0.996 1.027 0.142
Gender 1.031 0.687 1.545 0.884
Clinical stage 1.052 0.463 2.391 0.903
Histologic grade 1.178 0.898 1.545 0.237
Tumor stage 1.59 0.729 3.469 0.244
LIPT1 1.813 1.062 3.095 0.029*
DLAT Age 1.011 0.996 1.027 0.139
Gender 0.952 0.639 1.42 0.81
Clinical stage 1.032 0.467 2.282 0.938
Histologic grade 1.165 0.891 1.525 0.264
Tumor stage 1.582 0.747 3.352 0.231
DLAT 1.481 1.13 1.941 0.004**
PDHA1 Age 1.011 0.996 1.026 0.146
Gender 1.003 0.664 1.514 0.99
Clinical stage 1.124 0.489 2.584 0.783
Histologic grade 1.221 0.934 1.597 0.145
Tumor stage 1.512 0.684 3.342 0.307
PDHA1 1.147 0.816 1.611 0.43
MTF1 Age 1.012 0.996 1.027 0.135
Gender 0.977 0.655 1.456 0.907
Clinical stage 1.146 0.506 2.596 0.744
Histologic grade 1.198 0.915 1.568 0.189
Tumor stage 1.475 0.678 3.211 0.327
MTF1 1.519 0.942 2.451 0.087
SLC25A3 Age 1.011 0.996 1.026 0.152
Gender 0.983 0.659 1.465 0.931
Clinical stage 1.088 0.471 2.515 0.843
Histologic grade 1.203 0.921 1.572 0.175
Tumor stage 1.538 0.693 3.413 0.29
SLC25A3 1.281 0.869 1.889 0.211
AOC1 Age 1.011 0.995 1.026 0.177
Gender 0.958 0.643 1.427 0.831
Clinical stage 1.141 0.485 2.686 0.762
Histologic grade 1.29 0.981 1.697 0.068
Tumor stage 1.467 0.648 3.321 0.358
AOC1 1.31 1.038 1.653 0.023*
TMEM199 Age 1.009 0.994 1.025 0.237
Gender 0.897 0.596 1.348 0.6
Clinical stage 1.083 0.469 2.499 0.852
Histologic grade 1.169 0.891 1.534 0.258
Tumor stage 1.518 0.687 3.358 0.302
TMEM199 1.368 0.906 2.065 0.136
ATP6AP1 Age 1.011 0.996 1.027 0.137
Gender 0.93 0.623 1.39 0.724
Clinical stage 1.093 0.477 2.508 0.833
Histologic grade 1.203 0.92 1.574 0.177
Tumor stage 1.524 0.692 3.356 0.295
ATP6AP1 1.249 0.888 1.756 0.201
MT-CO1 Age 1.01 0.995 1.025 0.205
Gender 0.884 0.592 1.321 0.548
Clinical stage 1.063 0.485 2.332 0.878
Histologic grade 1.147 0.875 1.504 0.322
Tumor stage 1.574 0.748 3.314 0.232
MT-CO1 0.744 0.6 0.924 0.007**
ACO1 Age 1.011 0.996 1.026 0.15
Gender 0.943 0.633 1.405 0.774
Clinical stage 1.098 0.472 2.555 0.828
Histologic grade 1.178 0.896 1.549 0.24
Tumor stage 1.531 0.685 3.423 0.299
ACO1 0.864 0.663 1.127 0.281
COA6 Age 1.012 0.997 1.027 0.106
Gender 0.933 0.628 1.386 0.73
Clinical stage 1.106 0.475 2.577 0.815
Histologic grade 1.127 0.855 1.486 0.396
Tumor stage 1.535 0.686 3.439 0.297
COA6 1.331 1.027 1.726 0.031*
ACP1 Age 1.013 0.997 1.028 0.103
Gender 1.048 0.7 1.567 0.821
Clinical stage 1.035 0.461 2.324 0.933
Histologic grade 1.122 0.855 1.473 0.407
Tumor stage 1.574 0.731 3.387 0.246
ACP1 1.826 1.242 2.685 0.002**
FDX2 Age 1.01 0.994 1.025 0.221
Gender 0.938 0.629 1.399 0.754
Clinical stage 1.111 0.476 2.594 0.808
Histologic grade 1.185 0.903 1.555 0.222
Tumor stage 1.511 0.673 3.39 0.317
FDX2 1.166 0.888 1.53 0.269
NUBP2 Age 1.012 0.996 1.027 0.133
Gender 0.961 0.646 1.431 0.846
Clinical stage 1.144 0.494 2.651 0.753
Histologic grade 1.217 0.929 1.594 0.154
Tumor stage 1.49 0.669 3.315 0.329
NUBP2 0.958 0.652 1.408 0.828
CIAPIN1 Age 1.01 0.995 1.025 0.201
Gender 0.959 0.644 1.427 0.835
Clinical stage 1.093 0.472 2.533 0.836
Histologic grade 1.19 0.908 1.558 0.208
Tumor stage 1.525 0.686 3.391 0.3
CIAPIN1 1.228 0.864 1.745 0.252
ISCA2 Age 1.013 0.997 1.028 0.105
Gender 1.002 0.67 1.498 0.994
Clinical stage 1.093 0.482 2.481 0.831
Histologic grade 1.204 0.919 1.577 0.179
Tumor stage 1.528 0.701 3.329 0.286
ISCA2 1.334 0.87 2.046 0.186
NDOR1 Age 1.013 0.997 1.029 0.101
Gender 0.995 0.666 1.486 0.98
Clinical stage 1.12 0.513 2.444 0.777
Histologic grade 1.132 0.862 1.486 0.373
Tumor stage 1.461 0.698 3.061 0.315
NDOR1 1.586 1.153 2.182 0.005**

ACO1, aconitase 1; ACP1, acid phosphatase 1; AOC1, amine oxidase copper containing 1; ATP6AP1, ATPase H+ transporting accessory protein 1; ATP7A, copper-transporting p-type adenosine triphosphatase 1; CI, confidence interval; CIAPIN1, cytokine induced apoptosis inhibitor 1; COA6, cytochrome c oxidase assembly factor 6; DLAT, dihydrolipoamide S-acetyltransferase; FDX1, ferredoxin 1; FDX2, ferredoxin 2; HR, hazard ratio; ISCA2, iron-sulfur cluster assembly 2; LIPT1, lipoyltransferase 1; MT-CO1, mitochondrially encoded cytochrome c oxidase I; MTF1, metal regulatory transcription factor 1; NDOR1, NADPH dependent diflavin oxidoreductase 1; NUBP2, nucleotide binding protein 2; PDHA1, pyruvate dehydrogenase E1 subunit alpha 1; SCO2, synthesis of cytochrome c oxidase 2; SLC25A3, solute carrier family 25 member 3; TMEM199, transmembrane protein 199; *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001.

Validation results in GEPIA2 and HPA databases

GEPIA2 analysis showed that all survival curves and the gene expressions of screened cuproptosis-related genes in normal and LIHC tumor tissues were in accordant with the results from the TCGA database, which confirmed our findings at the gene level ( Figures S2 and S3 ). Compared with the results of the TCGA database, only the COA6 and ATP6AP1 expressions were significantly different between LIHC tumor tissues and normal tissues ( Figures S2D, E ) from the GEPIA2 database. In addition, ATP7A (P < 0.001), COA6 (P = 0.0134), ATP6AP1 (P = 0.0294), DLAT (P = 0.0484), ACP1 (P = 0.0191), NDOR1 (P = 0.00393), FDX1 (P < 0.001), PDHA1 (P = 0.02), MTF1 (P = 0.0123), and CIAPIN1 (P = 0.0392) expression were notably associated with clinical stage ( Figures S2A, D-G, J ; Figures S3C, E, F, J ). More importantly, high ATP7A, SLC25A3, SCO2, COA6, ATP6AP1, DLAT, ACP1, FDX2, ISCA2, and NDOR1 expression were correlated with poor overall survival in LIHCs ( Figure S2 ), but only low MT-CO1 expression (P = 0.0094, Figure S3G ) was associated with poor overall survival in LIHCs. The immunohistochemistry (IHC) results in the HPA database demonstrated our results that the difference in expression between HCC and normal tissues at the protein level ( Figure S4 ). However, the IHC results of SLC25A3 protein between normal and HCC tumor tissues were not existed in HPA, besides the obvious trend differences of ATP7A and ATP6AP1 expression in HCC patients were difficult to show in the HPA database.

The correlative signaling pathways of cuproptosis-related genes in GSEA

To identify signaling pathways that are distinguishingly activated in HCC, GSEA was conducted to compare the high and low gene expression datasets according to the median value. The most significantly enriched signaling pathways were chosen based on their q-value (< 0.05) or P-value (< 0.05). As shown in Figure 6 , different degrees of high ATP7A, ATP6AP1, LIPT1, DLAT, MTF1, ACP1, CIAPIN1, and NDOR1 expression were related to apoptosis, ubiquitin mediated proteolysis, glycerophospholipid metabolism, pathways in cancer, Notch signaling pathway, and ErbB signaling pathway. On the contrary, the apoptosis, pathways in cancer, and ErbB signaling pathway were merely enriched in low FDX1 expression ( Figure 6H ), the glycerophospholipid metabolism was barely enriched in low ACO1 expression ( Figure 6N ), the Notch signaling pathway was enriched in low FDX1 and ACO1 expression ( Figures 6H, N ), the ubiquitin mediated proteolysis was enriched in low FDX1 and MT-CO1 expression ( Figures 6H, M ). In addition, the pathway of proteasome demonstrated distinct degrees of high SLC25A3, SCO2, COA6, TMEM199, ATP6AP1, PDHA1, NUBP2, CIAPIN1, and ISCA2 expression, but only showed low MT-CO1 expression ( Figure 6M ). The pathway of protein export revealed various degrees of high SLC25A3, COA6, PDHA1, ACP1, and ISCA2 expression, but only displayed low MT-CO1 expression ( Figure 6M ). The janus kinase/signal transducers and activators of the transcription (JAK/STAT) signaling pathway show diverse degrees of high ATP7A, AOC1, DLAT, MTF1, and NDOR1 expression, but only exhibited low COA6 expression ( Figure 6D ). More importantly, natural killer cell mediated cytotoxicity was enriched in high ATP7A, DLAT, MTF1, CIAPIN1, and NDOR1 expression. It is noteworthy that high SLC25A3, PDHA1, and NUBP2 expression were associated with glutathione metabolism, and only high ACO1 expression was correlated with ABC transporters and phenylalanine metabolism ( Figure 6N ), with contradictory ABC transporters, was enriched in different levels of low SCO2, COA6, and FDX2 expression, phenylalanine metabolism was enriched in varying levels of low LIPT1 and FDX2 expression. The citrate cycle (tricarboxylic acid [TCA] cycle) was enriched in distinct levels of high PDHA1 and ACO1 expression, as well as low LIPT1 and FDX2 expression. Finally, gene sets of drug metabolism cytochrome p450, fatty acid metabolism, and metabolism of xenobiotics by cytochrome p450 were enriched in various levels of high FDX1 and ACO1 expression, along with low ATP7A, SLC25A3, SCO2, ATP6AP1, LIPT1, ACP1, FDX2, and NDOR1 expression.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

The enrichment plots of screened cuproptosis-related gene expression levels in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients from Gene Set Enrichment Analysis (GSEA). Functional enrichment analysis of cuproptosis-related genes expression in TCGA HCCs, including ATP7A (A), SLC25A3 (B), SCO2 (C), COA6 (D), AOC1 (E), TMEM199 (F), ATP6AP1 (G), FDX1 (H), LIPT1 (I), DLAT (J), PDHA1 (K), MTF1 (L), MT-CO1 (M), ACO1 (N), ACP1 (O), FDX2 (P), NUBP2 (Q), CIAPIN1 (R), ISCA2 (S), and NDOR1 (T). (ACO1, aconitase 1; ACP1, acid phosphatase 1; AOC1, amine oxidase copper containing 1; ATP6AP1, ATPase H+ transporting accessory protein 1; ATP7A, copper-transporting p-type adenosine triphosphatase 1; CIAPIN1, cytokine induced apoptosis inhibitor 1; COA6, cytochrome c oxidase assembly factor 6; DLAT, dihydrolipoamide S-acetyltransferase; FDX1, ferredoxin 1; FDX2, ferredoxin 2; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; ISCA2, iron-sulfur cluster assembly 2; LIPT1, lipoyltransferase 1; MT-CO1, mitochondrially encoded cytochrome c oxidase I; MTF1, metal regulatory transcription factor 1; NDOR1, NADPH dependent diflavin oxidoreductase 1; NUBP2, nucleotide binding protein 2; PDHA1, pyruvate dehydrogenase E1 subunit alpha 1; SCO2, synthesis of cytochrome c oxidase 2; SLC25A3, solute carrier family 25 member 3; TCGA, The Cancer Genome Atlas; TMEM199, transmembrane protein 199).

Discussion

Cell death plays a key role in the reproduction and development of life. Normal cell death removes potentially abnormal and harmful cells, while the occurrence of some abnormal processes in the cell death signaling pathway will lead to organismal damage and disease, such as cancer, autoimmune diseases, and degenerative diseases (39). Cell death forms unrelated to the cell cycle are immunogenic and have the potential to confer additional anti-tumor activity to the host immunity, such as necroptosis and ferroptosis (40). It has been found that ferroptosis, autophagy, and pyroptosis were closely associated with the occurrence, development, and regression of colorectal cancer (41). In addition, pyroptosis death had a dual function of promoting and inhibiting the formation of tumor and tumor microenvironment (TME), and was involved in the occurrence and development of gastric cancer, ovarian cancer, primary liver cancer, prostate cancer, and cervical cancer (42). Similarly, in studies on the regulation and therapeutic applications of liver cancer, ferroptosis and the interaction between autophagy and apoptosis have been studied more frequently (43, 44), while there is no research related to the prognostic and therapeutic regulation biomarkers based on mRNA expression of more entire cuproptosis-related genes in HCC. Studying the expression of cuproptosis-related genes in HCC and their prognostic value will provide a foundation and new latent therapeutic targets for prognosis and clinical treatment.

In the present study, we performed differential expression analysis and survival analysis of ninety-six candidate cuproptosis-related genes involved in the copper homeostasis regulatory pathway, copper metabolism diseases, mitochondrial respiratory, and iron-sulfur cluster proteins with RNA-sequencing data of liver cancer from the TCGA database. Twenty-five candidate cuproptosis-related genes expression were significantly unequal between tumor and normal liver tissues, and they were also significantly correlated with poor survival in HCCs. Previous studies have found that ABCB6 (34), CDKN2A (35), CDKN3 (36), and TPI1 (37) (catalyzing the conversion of dihydroxyacetone phosphate (DHAP) and D-type glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate (G3P)), as well as HSPA8 (38), were potential targets for the treatment of liver cancer, which is consistent with our analysis results. Subsequently, patients with elevated SCO2, LIPT1, DLAT, ACP1, FDX2, NDOR1, ATP6AP1, ISCA2, ATP7A, COA6, and TMEM199 expression together with reduced ACO1 and FDX1 expression had a disposition to advanced clinical stage and histologic grade by univariate analysis using logistic regression. In multivariate Cox analysis, increased LIPT1, DLAT, AOC1, COA6, ACP1, and NDOR1 expression, along with declined MT-CO1 expression maintained an independent risk factor for overall survival among HCCs, respectively. In addition, the LIPT1 and ISCA2 expressions were not notably associated with the clinical stage in HCCs by the GEPIA2 database against the TCGA database, whereas the PDHA1, MTF1, ACP1, CIAPIN1, and NDOR1 expressions were remarkably related to the clinical stage in HCCs in GEPIA2 database only. GEPIA2 database showed that more screened cuproptosis-related genes were prominently correlated with negative survival in HCCs. Furthermore, the protein expressions of screened cuproptosis-related genes in HCC patients and normal liver samples were testified by the HPA database.

The functions of FDX1, LIPT1, DLAT, PDHA1, MTF1, MT-CO1, ACO1, SCO2, ATP7A, SLC25A3, AOC1, COA6, TMEM199, ATP6AP1, ACP1, FDX2, NUBP2, CIAPIN1, ISCA2, and NDOR1 were investigated in HCC from TCGA data by GSEA. Some signaling pathways (such as natural killer cell mediated cytotoxicity, oxidative phosphorylation, TCA cycle, glutathione metabolism, protein export, ABC transporters, ubiquitin mediated proteolysis, apoptosis, pathways in cancer, Notch signaling pathway, JAK/STAT signaling pathway, ErbB signaling pathway, metabolism of xenobiotics by cytochrome p450, as well as complement and coagulation cascades) that differentially enriched in high or low expression of twenty screened cuproptosis-related genes were more comprehensively reported in the present study. These results suggested that FDX1, LIPT1, DLAT, PDHA1, MTF1, MT-CO1, ACO1, SCO2, ATP7A, SLC25A3, AOC1, COA6, TMEM199, ATP6AP1, ACP1, FDX2, NUBP2, CIAPIN1, ISCA2, and NDOR1 may serve as prognostic markers and potential therapeutic targets in HCC, which were not summarized in other bioinformatic analysis research of HCC.

Strict regulation of copper homeostasis not only ensures copper protein biosynthesis, but also limits the occurrence and toxicity of oxidative stress, and copper as a limiting factor in cancer development processes including growth, angiogenesis, and metastasis has attracted extensive attention (45). Chronic liver injury spontaneously developed into liver cancer for copper accumulation and MT protein induction in the liver of Long Evans Cinnamon (LEC) rats (exhibiting human Wilson’s disease), with consistently, copper accumulation may inhibit the growth of surrounding liver cells, whereas the cells in injured liver tissues escape the effects of copper toxicity by increasing MT protein induction and decreasing copper accumulation to achieve proliferation (46). Copper metabolism, as a new therapeutic biomarker and a potential target for radionuclide therapy in HCC, has potential applications in molecular imaging and targeted therapy of HCC, besides copper chelators or human copper transporter 1 (hCTR1) specific short-interference RNA that blocking copper absorption could be used to inhibit the growth of HCC in the therapy of copper regulation (47). In our study, we selected a total of 40 genes related to copper homeostasis regulation and copper metabolism diseases as candidate cuproptosis-related genes. The results showed that the expressions of SCO2, ATP7A, SLC25A3, AOC1, COA6, ABCB6, TMEM199, and ATP6AP were all differently expressed in normal and HCC tissues and were significantly correlated with the low survival rate of HCC patients. It was puzzling that the survival time of patients with low AOC1 expression was superior to high AOC1 expression, which is contrary to lower AOC1 expression in HCC tissues from the results of TCGA and GEPIA databases. Furthermore, the data for AOC1 expression was very discrete in TCGA and GEPIA databases. However, upregulated AOC1 expression in HCC tissues was associated with a poor prognosis in the study that used a large number of clinical samples (Tumor tissues and adjacent-normal tissues of 85 patients from the hospital) and highly aggregated data (48). Therefore, the more samples between tumor vs. normal tissues from the same patient and the more concentrated data distribution, the more reliable the results.

Recently, Copper death, a form of cell death that targets lipoylated proteins in the TCA cycle (7), provides a new entry point for cancer research. Mitochondrial respiration is highly correlated with cuproptosis. Tumor cells prefer aerobic glycolysis over oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS), besides, inhibition of glycolysis by gluconeogenesis and improvement of the TME could impede HCC progression (49). Copper depletion in mitochondria switches cellular metabolism from cellular respiration to glycolysis (50). The Warburg effect in HCC is mainly characterized by increased glucose uptake, elevated glycolysis, restricted mitochondrial OXPHOS, heightened glutamine catabolism, and enhanced pentose phosphate pathway in HCC cells, and is closely associated with HCC cell proliferation, migration, invasion, apoptosis, immune escape, chemotherapy suppression and treatment failure (51). Thus, the role of copper in hepatocarcinogenesis indicated that cuproptosis may be intimately associated with alleviation of mitochondrial dysfunction and reduction of glycolysis in HCC patients, providing an idea into the discovery of novel therapies related to cuproptosis for liver cancer. Other studies have also investigated the prognostic prediction of cuproptosis-related genes in HCC in terms of LncRNA signature and TME (52, 53). Twenty-nine genes associated with the TCA cycle or mitochondrial respiration were analyzed as candidate cuproptosis-related genes in this study. Reduced FDX1, MT-CO1, and ACO1 expression have existed in HCC tissues, but LIPT1, DLAT, PDHA1, MTF1, CDKN2A, CDKN3, and TPI1 expression were higher in HCC tissues than in normal liver tissues. Besides, lessened FDX1, MT-CO1, and ACO1 expression along with up-regulated LIPT1, DLAT, PDHA1, MTF1, CDKN2A, CDKN3, and TPI1 expression were significantly associated with poor survival in HCC.

A decrease in iron-sulfur cluster proteins is associated with cuproptosis, but the underlying relationship between iron-sulfur cluster proteins in the diagnosis and prognosis of HCC remains unclear. Considering the combination of targeting Fe-S cluster and other cell killing modalities, may provide new possibilities for cancer diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment (54). Significantly elevated iron-sulfur cluster proteins (ACP1, FDX2, NUBP2, CIAPIN1, ISCA2, NDOR1, and HSPA8) of HCC tissues in our study would be new potential targets of therapeutic drugs for HCC.

Conclusion

Our research found the affinitive relationship between twenty cuproptosis-related genes expression (FDX1, LIPT1, DLAT, PDHA1, MTF1, MT-CO1, ACO1, SCO2, ATP7A, SLC25A3, AOC1, COA6, TMEM199, ATP6AP1, ACP1, FDX2, NUBP2, CIAPIN1, ISCA2, and NDOR1) and the prognosis of HCC. Moreover, the natural killer cell mediated cytotoxicity, oxidative phosphorylation, TCA cycle, glutathione metabolism, protein export, ABC transporters, ubiquitin mediated proteolysis, apoptosis, pathways in cancer, Notch signaling pathway, JAK/STAT signaling pathway, ErbB signaling pathway, metabolism of xenobiotics by cytochrome p450, and complement and coagulation cascades may be the key pathways controlled by cuproptosis-related genes in HCC. Therefore, cuproptosis-related genes may become important markers and new targets for early diagnosis, precise treatment, and prognostic assessment of HCC.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/ Supplementary Material . Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Author contributions

Formal analysis, data curation, writing - original draft, validation, visualization, data analysis, and writing - review and editing were performed by XZ. Investigation, data analysis, writing - review and editing were performed by JC. Project administration and resources were performed by SY, JS, MZ, CH, HM, YH, JH, and JG. Supervision and writing - review and editing were performed by ZY and YW. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Funding

This work was funded by the Beijing High-level Public Health Technical Personnel Construction Project (Grant NO. 2022-2-014), and Wu Jieping Medical Foundation of China (Grant NO. 320.6750.19089-103 and Grant NO. 320.6750.19089-75).

Acknowledgments

Thanks for the support of the Beijing High-level Public Health Technical Personnel Construction Project (Grant NO. 2022-2-014) and Wu Jieping Medical Foundation of China (Grant NO. 320.6750.19089-103 and Grant NO. 320.6750.19089-75).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fonc.2022.992468/full#supplementary-material

References

  • 1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, et al. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin (2021) 71:209–49. doi:  10.3322/caac.21660 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Pinero F, Dirchwolf M, Pessoa MG. Biomarkers in hepatocellular carcinoma: Diagnosis, prognosis and treatment response assessment. Cells Basel (2020) 9:1370. doi:  10.3390/cells9061370 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Shiani A, Narayanan S, Pena L, Friedman M. The role of diagnosis and treatment of underlying liver disease for the prognosis of primary liver cancer. Cancer Control (2017) 24:1145164504. doi:  10.1177/1073274817729240 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Anwanwan D, Singh SK, Singh S, Saikam V, Singh R. Challenges in liver cancer and possible treatment approaches. Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer (2020) 1873:188314. doi:  10.1016/j.bbcan.2019.188314 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Galluzzi L, Vitale I, Aaronson SA, Abrams JM, Adam D, Agostinis P, et al. Molecular mechanisms of cell death: recommendations of the nomenclature committee on cell death 2018. Cell Death Differ (2018) 25:486–541. doi:  10.1038/s41418-017-0012-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Tang D, Kang R, Berghe TV, Vandenabeele P, Kroemer G. The molecular machinery of regulated cell death. Cell Res (2019) 29:347–64. doi:  10.1038/s41422-019-0164-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Tsvetkov P, Coy S, Petrova B, Dreishpoon M, Verma A, Abdusamad M, et al. Copper induces cell death by targeting lipoylated TCA cycle proteins. Science (2022) 375:1254–61. doi:  10.1126/science.abf0529 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Jiang Y, Huo Z, Qi X, Zuo T, Wu Z. Copper-induced tumor cell death mechanisms and antitumor theragnostic applications of copper complexes. Nanomed (Lond) (2022) 17:303–24. doi:  10.2217/nnm-2021-0374 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Fang AP, Chen PY, Wang XY, Liu ZY, Zhang DM, Luo Y, et al. Serum copper and zinc levels at diagnosis and hepatocellular carcinoma survival in the guangdong liver cancer cohort. Int J Cancer (2019) 144:2823–32. doi:  10.1002/ijc.31991 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Li Y. Copper homeostasis: Emerging target for cancer treatment. IUBMB Life (2020) 72:1900–8. doi:  10.1002/iub.2341 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Lv H, Liu X, Zeng X, Liu Y, Zhang C, Zhang Q, et al. Comprehensive analysis of cuproptosis-related genes in immune infiltration and prognosis in melanoma. Front Pharmacol (2022) 13:930041. doi:  10.3389/fphar.2022.930041 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Bian Z, Fan R, Xie L. A novel cuproptosis-related prognostic gene signature and validation of differential expression in clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Genes (Basel) (2022) 13:851. doi:  10.3390/genes13050851 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Song Q, Zhou R, Shu F, Fu W. Cuproptosis scoring system to predict the clinical outcome and immune response in bladder cancer. Front Immunol (2022) 13:958368. doi:  10.3389/fimmu.2022.958368 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Sha S, Si L, Wu X, Chen Y, Xiong H, Xu Y, et al. Prognostic analysis of cuproptosis-related gene in triple-negative breast cancer. Front Immunol (2022) 13:922780. doi:  10.3389/fimmu.2022.922780 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Yun Y, Wang Y, Yang E, Jing X. Cuproptosis-related gene - SLC31A1, FDX1 and ATP7B - polymorphisms are associated with risk of lung cancer. Pharmgenomics Pers Med (2022) 15:733–42. doi:  10.2147/PGPM.S372824 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Yang L, Yu J, Tao L, Huang H, Gao Y, Yao J, et al. Cuproptosis-related lncRNAs are biomarkers of prognosis and immune microenvironment in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Front Genet (2022) 13:947551. doi:  10.3389/fgene.2022.947551 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Hartwig C, Zlatic SA, Wallin M, Vrailas-Mortimer A, Fahrni CJ, Faundez V. Trafficking mechanisms of p-type ATPase copper transporters. Curr Opin Cell Biol (2019) 59:24–33. doi:  10.1016/j.ceb.2019.02.009 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Calvo J, Jung H, Meloni G. Copper metallothioneins. IUBMB Life (2017) 69:236–45. doi:  10.1002/iub.1618 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Baker ZN, Cobine PA, Leary SC. The mitochondrion: a central architect of copper homeostasis. Metallomics (2017) 9:1501–12. doi:  10.1039/c7mt00221a [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Cunningham CN, Rutter J. 20,000 picometers under the OMM: diving into the vastness of mitochondrial metabolite transport. EMBO Rep (2020) 21:e50071. doi:  10.15252/embr.202050071 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Rees DC, Johnson E, Lewinson O. ABC Transporters: the power to change. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol (2009) 10:218–27. doi:  10.1038/nrm2646 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Muriel G, Aurélia P, Monique F, Florence L, Dominique D, Marlène R, et al. CCDC115-CDG: A new rare and misleading inherited cause of liver disease. Mol Genet Metab (2018) 124:228–35. doi:  10.1016/j.ymgme.2018.05.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Wang YY, Zeng YM. Clinical manifestations of liver in congenital disorders of glycosylation. Int J Pediatrics (2021) 48:323–6. doi:  10.3760/cma.j.issn.1673-4408.2021.05.009 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Chen SR, Chong YT, Li XH. Pathogenic mechanis of hereditary abnormal copper metabolism. J Clin Hepatol (2019) 35:1667–72. doi: CNKI:SUN:LCGD.0.2019-08-003 [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Garza NM, Griffin AT, Zulkifli M, Qiu C, Kaplan CD, Gohil VM. A genome-wide copper-sensitized screen identifies novel regulators of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase activity. J Biol Chem (2021) 296:100485. doi:  10.1016/j.jbc.2021.100485 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Garcia L, Mansilla N, Ocampos N, Pagani MA, Welchen E, Gonzalez DH. The mitochondrial copper chaperone COX19 influences copper and iron homeostasis in arabidopsis. Plant Mol Biol (2019) 99:621–38. doi:  10.1007/s11103-019-00840-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Cao H, Su R, Hu G, Li C, Guo J, Pan J, et al. In vivo effects of high dietary copper levels on hepatocellular mitochondrial respiration and electron transport chain enzymes in broilers. Br Poult Sci (2016) 57:63–70. doi:  10.1080/00071668.2015.1127895 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Hinton TV, Batelu S, Gleason N, Stemmler TL. Molecular characteristics of proteins within the mitochondrial fe-s cluster assembly complex. Micron (2022) 153:103181. doi:  10.1016/j.micron.2021.103181 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Lill R, Freibert SA. Mechanisms of mitochondrial iron-sulfur protein biogenesis. Annu Rev Biochem (2020) 89:471–99. doi:  10.1146/annurev-biochem-013118-111540 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Brancaccio D, Gallo A, Piccioli M, Novellino E, Ciofi-Baffoni S, Banci L. [4Fe-4S] cluster assembly in mitochondria and its impairment by copper. J Am Chem Soc (2017) 139:719–30. doi:  10.1021/jacs.6b09567 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31. The cancer genome atlas (TCGA) genomic data commons (GDC) data portal . Available at: https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/repository (Accessed 28 February 2022).
  • 32. Gene expression profiling interactive analysis 2 (GEPIA2) database . Available at: http://gepia2.cancer-pku.cn/ (Accessed 15 May 2022).
  • 33. Human protein atlas (HPA) databases. Available at: https://www.proteinatlas.org/ (Accessed 17 May 2022).
  • 34. Wang J, Han K, Zhang C, Chen X, Li Y, Zhu L, et al. Identification and validation of ADME genes as prognosis and therapy markers for hepatocellular carcinoma patients. Biosci Rep (2021) 41:R20210583. doi:  10.1042/BSR20210583 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35. Luo JP, Wang J, Huang JH. CDKN2A is a prognostic biomarker and correlated with immune infiltrates in hepatocellular carcinoma. Biosci Rep (2021) 41:R20211103. doi:  10.1042/BSR20211103 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36. Wang J, Wang Y, Xu J, Song Q, Shangguan J, Xue M, et al. Global analysis of gene expression signature and diagnostic/prognostic biomarker identification of hepatocellular carcinoma. Sci Prog (2021) 104:311999925. doi:  10.1177/00368504211029429 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37. Wang J, Li Y, Zhang C, Chen X, Zhu L, Luo T. A hypoxia-linked gene signature for prognosis prediction and evaluating the immune microenvironment in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Transl Cancer Res (2021) 10:3979–92. doi:  10.21037/tcr-21-741 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38. Wang B, Lan T, Xiao H, Chen ZH, Wei C, Chen LF, et al. The expression profiles and prognostic values of HSP70s in hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer Cell Int (2021) 21:286. doi:  10.1186/s12935-021-01987-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39. Gao Q, Wen XB. Cell death. Chin J Anim Husbandry Vet Med (2016) 5:4–6. doi:  10.3969/J.ISSN.1671-6027.2016.07.001 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 40. Loftus LV, Amend SR, Pienta KJ. Interplay between cell death and cell proliferation reveals new strategies for cancer therapy. Int J Mol Sci (2022) 23:4723. doi:  10.3390/ijms23094723 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41. Chen BX, Tian SH, Jiang CQ. Cell death and colorectal cancer: ferroptosis, autophagy, pyroptosis. Chin J Exp Surg (2022) 39:409–17. doi:  10.3760/cma.j.cn421213-20210717-01214 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 42. Jiang SB, Zhao ZY, Zhang SJ, Huang MJ, Li A. Advances in the molecular mechanism of pyroptosis involved in the occurrence of tumors. Chin J Cell Biol (2021) 43:194–200. doi:  10.11844/cjcb.2021.01.0024 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 43. Pan YF, Guo W. Regulatory factors and potential application of ferroptosis in hepatocellular carcinoma. Chin J Of Clin Med (2021) 28:1050–5. doi:  10.12025/j.issn.1008-6358.2021.20201142 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 44. Qi XX, Liu T. Research progress of autophagy and apoptosis and their interaction in treatment of liver cancer. Med Recapitulate (2020) 26:4038–42. doi:  10.3969/j.issn.1006-2084.2020.20.016 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 45. Denoyer D, Clatworthy S, Cater MA. Copper complexes in cancer therapy. Met Ions Life Sci (2018) 18:825029522–825029554. doi:  10.1515/9783110470734-022 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46. Sawaki M, Enomoto K, Hattori A, Tsuzuki N, Sugawara N, Mori M. Role of copper accumulation and metallothionein induction in spontaneous liver cancer development in LEC rats. Carcinogenesis (1994) 15:1833–7. doi:  10.1093/carcin/15.9.1833 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47. Wachsmann J, Peng F. Molecular imaging and therapy targeting copper metabolism in hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol (2016) 22:221–31. doi:  10.3748/wjg.v22.i1.221 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48. Ding Q, Lin D, Zhou Y, Li F, Lai J, Duan J, et al. Downregulation of amine oxidase copper containing 1 inhibits tumor progression by suppressing IL-6/JAK/STAT3 pathway activation in hepatocellular carcinoma. Oncol Lett (2021) 22:857. doi:  10.3892/ol.2021.13118 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49. Tian H, Zhu X, Lv Y, Jiao Y, Wang G. Glucometabolic reprogramming in the hepatocellular carcinoma microenvironment: Cause and effect. Cancer Manag Res (2020) 12:5957–74. doi:  10.2147/CMAR.S258196 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50. Cui L, Gouw AM, LaGory EL, Guo S, Attarwala N, Tang Y, et al. Mitochondrial copper depletion suppresses triple-negative breast cancer in mice. Nat Biotechnol (2021) 39:357–67. doi:  10.1038/s41587-020-0707-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51. Chen H, Wu Q, Peng L, Cao T, Deng M, Liu Y, et al. Mechanism, clinical significance, and treatment strategy of warburg effect in hepatocellular carcinoma. J Nanomater (2021) 2021:5164100. doi:  10.1155/2021/5164100 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 52. Zhang G, Sun J, Zhang X. A novel cuproptosis-related LncRNA signature to predict prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma. Sci Rep (2022) 12:11325. doi:  10.1038/s41598-022-15251-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53. Zhang Z, Zeng X, Wu Y, Liu Y, Zhang X, Song Z. Cuproptosis-related risk score predicts prognosis and characterizes the tumor microenvironment in hepatocellular carcinoma. Front Immunol (2022) 13:925618. doi:  10.3389/fimmu.2022.925618 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54. Vernis L, El BN, Baille D, Hatem E, Heneman A, Huang ME. Fe-s clusters emerging as targets of therapeutic drugs. Oxid Med Cell Longev (2017) 2017:3647657. doi:  10.1155/2017/3647657 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/ Supplementary Material . Further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.


Articles from Frontiers in Oncology are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES