Skip to main content
BMJ Open logoLink to BMJ Open
. 2022 Oct 26;12(10):e064659. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064659

RAPID-2 study protocol: a cluster randomised feasibility trial of a midwife facilitated intervention for pregnant women with symptoms of mild to moderate anxiety

Kerry Evans 1,2,, Helen Spiby 2, Mike Slade 2, Julie Jomeen 3, Jacqueline Beckhelling 4
PMCID: PMC9615978  PMID: 36288833

Abstract

Introduction

Many women experience symptoms during pregnancy. Elevated and prolonged anxiety can have negative effects on the woman and baby. The RAPID intervention aims to provide suitable, timely support for women with mild-moderate anxiety. The RAPID intervention is based on social support, relational continuity, psychological and relaxation response theory, and comprises midwife facilitated group discussions, one-to-one support and directed self-help materials.

Methods and analysis

Four National Health Service Trusts in England that provide maternity care will be cluster randomised to the RAPID intervention plus usual care or usual care. At each intervention site, two midwives and two maternity support workers will facilitate the intervention over a 12-week period. Eligibility includes nulliparous women at 16–20 weeks of pregnancy (n=50) with self-report symptoms of mild-moderate anxiety. Community midwives will signpost women to the study. The aim of the study is to establish the feasibility of conducting a definitive trial to examine the effectiveness of the RAPID intervention in addition to usual care. The objectives are to assess recruitment and completion rates, and a qualitative assessment of women’s and facilitators’ experiences of participation. An estimation of change in the seven-item Generalised Anxiety Disorder scale will inform the sample size for a definitive cluster trial.

Ethics and dissemination

Ethical approval was given by East Midlands—Derby Research Ethics Committee 14 March 2022 (REC Reference: 22/EM/0018). Findings will be made available through publication in peer-reviewed journals, conferences and to participants. A final report will be submitted to HEE/NIHR ICA awards committee for publication.

Trial registration number

ISRCTN12834758.

Keywords: mental health, obstetrics, clinical trials


STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS OF THIS STUDY.

  • The intervention has been developed from current evidence and theory with sustained involvement from service user groups.

  • A mixed methods approach will be used to investigate the acceptability of the intervention and interpret the findings of the study.

  • The study is embedded within maternity care pathways and is facilitated by midwives and maternity support workers with brief additional training.

  • The study design is a cluster randomised controlled trial to minimise potential bias and contamination.

  • The study will be conducted in a single region in England which may limit the generalisability of the study findings.

Introduction

Anxiety disorders are reported as a leading cause of global health-related burden and are among the top three causes of disability-adjusted life years among females.1 During the COVID-19 pandemic period, there has been a reported increase in anxiety disorders.2 Globally, the highest rise in incidence has been reported for women of reproductive age.2

Anxiety during pregnancy is common and burdensome. Many women experience anxiety and worry during pregnancy and the prevalence of anxiety symptoms has been reported as 22.9%. Prevalence of a clinical anxiety disorder diagnosis in pregnancy has been reported as 15.2% with generalised anxiety disorder reported as 4.1%. Prevalence in pregnancy is significantly higher than reported in a general adult population.3 4 The attributes of anxiety disorders in pregnancy are similar to anxiety disorders at other times, although women’s concerns about their pregnancy may present as the predominant feature.5 6 Anxiety symptoms become problematic when they consume a large proportion of time, impact women’s ability to focus on other tasks and when symptoms significantly interfere with everyday life.7 8 Anxiety during pregnancy has been reported to have a negative impact on women’s confidence in mothering, self-perceived quality of the relationship with their infants9 and predict post-traumatic stress disorder and depression in the postnatal period.4 10 Elevated and prolonged anxiety has been associated with preterm birth, fetal growth restriction and behavioural problems in developing children.4 11 12 Costs of additional use of public services, productivity losses and quality-adjusted life year losses for women with anxiety in the perinatal period and continuing up to 10 years after birth were estimated at £35 000 for the mother and child.13

The National Health Service (NHS) long-term plan14 identifies perinatal mental health as a priority area, aiming to support 30 000 more women each year to access evidence-based specialist mental healthcare. Priority areas include increasing access to evidence-based care including psychological therapies and mental health assessment. Women who are identified with mild to moderate anxiety should be offered a choice of support to meet their individual needs.15–17 However, services to support women’s mental health are not always readily available and need to be strengthened.18 19 Many women with anxiety prefer psychological interventions to take medication during pregnancy, and non-pharmacological interventions are recommended as the initial treatment option.18 20 Non-pharmacological interventions developed specifically for pregnant women with anxiety symptoms are promising, although interventions have not been evaluated in definitive trials.21–26 In England, midwives provide care for all women throughout pregnancy, thus midwives are ideally situated to identify mental health concerns and support women’s emotional and psychological well-being.20 27 28

A feasibility and acceptability study of the intervention (RAPID-1) was completed in 2017.29 The aim of the intervention was to provide suitable, timely support and treatment to prevent an escalation of symptoms and improve women’s ability to cope. To develop the RAPID-1 intervention, two systematic reviews were completed24 29 30 which concluded that interventions specifically designed to support women with mild to moderate anxiety in pregnancy have mainly been evaluated in small scale studies. No interventions which can be directly recommended for clinical practice were located. Synthesised findings identified three components which were likely to increase the effectiveness of the intervention: (1) social support; (2) relational continuity and (3) psychological and relaxation response theory. These components were used to develop a novel intervention, comprising midwife facilitated group discussions, one-to-one support and directed self-help materials with a choice of cognitive or mind-body resources (figure 1). The systematic reviews and development of the intervention have been fully reported in peer-reviewed journals.24 29 30

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Components of the RAPID intervention.

Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, it was imperative to identify innovative ways to deliver safe, effective and equitable care. A systematic review was undertaken to identify and evaluate remotely delivered, digital or online interventions to support women with symptoms of anxiety in pregnancy.25 There was limited evidence to suggest that pregnant women may benefit from remotely delivered interventions. Interventions may be more effective when women are motivated to maintain regular participation, and motivation can be enhanced by providing regular contact with care providers or providing peer support forums. Following a series of service user engagement sessions, a flexible, hybrid method of intervention delivery (face-to-face or online) was developed. In accordance with the Medical Research Council framework for the design and evaluation of complex interventions,31 this study advances to the next stage of development, by testing the processes that will be required in a definitive cluster trial.

Methods and analysis

Overview

A feasibility study, using a two-arm, parallel, open, pragmatic, cluster randomised controlled trial comparing usual care plus a midwife facilitated intervention for women with symptoms of mild to moderate anxiety to usual care alone. The trial protocol was developed according to the Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials guidelines.32 Clusters will be four NHS maternity services in the UK. The cluster design is appropriate because the intervention will be facilitated by midwives at the level of community-based midwifery teams. There could be a high risk of contamination in an individually randomised trial from midwife facilitators also providing midwifery care to control group (usual care) participants. The four maternity sites have community and hospital-based maternity care and provide midwife and obstetric led services. The study is planned to start recruitment in September 2022 with a planned end date in January 2023.

Patient and public involvement

Six advisory events were held between 2018 and 2020 with service users from the Nottingham Maternity Research Network and East Midlands Applied Research Collaboration Centre for Ethnic Health Research group. Meetings were held to help identify ways to improve the acceptability of and recruitment to the study. In response to the potential impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, three service user digital workshops were conducted 2020–2021 to identify acceptable methods of delivery of the intervention and to help develop public facing materials. Five service users have agreed to be actively involved throughout the study period. Involvement will include informing the protocol development (intervention delivery and recruitment processes), informing analysis of the qualitative data, assisting to interpret and disseminate the study findings.

Aims and objectives

The aim of the study is to test the feasibility of conducting a future definitive trial to examine the effectiveness for pregnant women with symptoms of mild to moderate anxiety of receiving the RAPID-2 midwife facilitated intervention plus usual NHS maternity care compared with usual care alone.

The primary objectives are to:

  • Determine the number of women who are eligible and agree to participate.

  • Assess the recruitment procedures.

  • Determine retention rates for the intervention and control arms of the study

  • Conduct a qualitative assessment of women’s and facilitators’ experiences.

  • Investigate participant-related and service-level factors influencing outcomes.

  • Assess the relevance and acceptability of data collection and outcome measures.

Secondary objectives:

  • To estimate the parameters of the seven-item Generalised Anxiety Disorder scale (GAD-7)33 to inform the sample size for a definitive cluster trial.

  • To identify data collection tools for economic evaluation.

Eligibility criteria

Women will be at between 18 and 22 weeks of pregnancy at intervention start.

Inclusion criteria

  • Nulliparous pregnant women aged 18 years or older at the time of enrolment.

  • Accessing maternity care at one of the four cluster sites.

  • Self-reported symptoms of mild to moderate anxiety.

  • Able to read, write and speak the English language.

Exclusion criteria

  • Pregnant women receiving treatment for a severe and enduring mental health condition.

Sample size

Four cluster sites (two in the intervention group and two in the control group) are deemed sufficient to highlight issues relating to intervention delivery. For feasibility studies, sample sizes of between 24 and 50 have been recommended to meet the objectives of the study: (1) estimating a parameter such as an SD which will be used in a sample size calculation for the full-scale trial; (2) estimating the rate (proportion) of eligible people who are willing to participate, of participants who drop out of the trial, or of participants who comply with their allocated intervention.34 35 The sample size has been chosen to balance practicalities with the need for reasonable precision in the estimation of effects to inform the sample size for a definitive trial. A decision has been made to recruit 50 participants to the study to estimate an SD of the GAD-7 measure to inform the sample size calculation for a definitive trial.36 A sample size of 40–50 participants will enable a drop-out rate of 50% to within a 95% CI of ±15% to be estimated.36

Control group

Control group participants will receive usual NHS maternity care.37 The exact component of usual antenatal care varies across settings, but always includes routine midwife appointments to ensure that pregnant women are offered regular check-ups, information and support, and access to obstetric and specialist perinatal mental health services, as required. Components which may not be available in all sites include emotional or social support interventions and low-level psychological services.17

Intervention group

Participants in the intervention group will receive usual maternity care (as described for control group) plus the RAPID-2 intervention. The RAPID-2 intervention builds on the findings of the preliminary RAPID-1 study,29 with refinements made to the method of delivery, including additional peer-led groups and flexibility to conduct groups face-to-face or online (table 1). The intervention comprises three components:

Table 1.

Intervention group schedule of events

Initial meeting with midwife facilitator 10–15 min
Week 1–2 Group 1 (face-to-face*) facilitated 90 min
Additional one to one time Optional 15 min
Self-help resources Participant choice
Week 3–4 Group 2 (online) facilitated 90 min
Additional one to one time Optional 15 min
Self-help resources Participant choice
Week 5–6 Group 3 (face-to-face*) facilitated 90 min
Additional one to one time Optional 15 min
Self-help resources Participant choice
Week 7–8 Group 4 (online) facilitated 90 min
Additional one to one time Optional 15 min
Self-help resources Participant choice
Week 9–10 Group 5 (group choice) peer-led 90 min
Additional one to one time Optional 15 min
Self-help resources Participant choice
Week 11–12 Group 6 (group choice) peer-led 90 min
Additional one to one time Optional 15 min
Self-help resources Participant choice

*Face-to-face groups will be offered to women depending on the COVID-19 situation. These will be held in community healthcare settings. Local and national guidelines will be followed. Alternative online sessions can be arranged if required or preferred by participants. GDPR guidance for each NHS study site will be followed for online group sessions with regard to the permitted platforms and recording of meetings.

  1. One-to-one pre-group introductory meeting with the midwife facilitator.

  2. Group discussion sessions facilitated by a midwife and midwifery support worker. Four facilitated groups plus two peer-led groups will take place fortnightly over a 12-week period.

Groups will last approximately 90 min. Discussion topics will be suggested and agreed by the group. Facilitators will help to initiate discussions by asking women about their feelings and well-being during the week. Individual midwife support will be available before and after groups. Midwives and maternity support workers will provide care, support and guidance within their scope of practice. The role of facilitator in the groups is to cultivate peer support by joining in rather than leading discussions and helping women introduce discussion topics they may find difficult to introduce themselves. Facilitators will also support women’s well-being and signpost and support women to access specialist or supportive services where appropriate.

  1. A choice of self-help materials to be accessed between groups. The choice of materials is based on service user preferences and relevance in a UK healthcare context. Materials include cognitive skill and mindfulness online resources.38–40

Randomisation

Clusters will be randomly allocated to intervention groups and control groups. Randomisation will be performed by the statistical team at the Clinical Trials Support Unit. Neither the participant nor the facilitator can be blinded to group allocation status.

Recruitment and baseline procedures

Intervention facilitators will be recruited from the two randomly selected intervention study sites and will be: (1) registered midwives who have completed a preceptorship period; and (2) midwifery support workers with a minimum of 1 year’s experience in maternity care. Recruitment will be sought through expression of interest via an invitation email sent by a member of the midwifery senior leadership team at the NHS Trust site (for intervention groups only). Selection of facilitators will be agreed through discussion with the senior leadership team and the chief investigator. To allow for annual leave and unexpected absence in the intervention group sites, two midwives and two midwifery support workers will be recruited in each intervention site. One midwife and one midwifery support worker will be allocated as facilitators for a specific group and provide cover for other groups if required. Following procedures developed for RAPID-1,29 training to facilitate the intervention will be delivered by perinatal mental health professionals who have developed a facilitator study workbook and a 2-day training workshop.

Potential participants will be signposted to a study webpage by community midwives during attendance at routine midwife appointment at approximately 16–20 weeks of pregnancy (figure 2). The community midwife will provide eligible women with an information leaflet about the study containing a webpage address, QR code and contact information. The study will also be promoted via social media platforms such as Facebook, Twitter, Instagram or distributed through online research participation websites. Posters will be placed in health service and community venues. The study webpage will contain information about the study, eligibility criteria, links to a participant information sheet and contact details (via email) for asking further questions and completing an eligibility assessment.

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Participant pathway for the RAPID-2 study.

Eligibility screening will include an assessment of mild to moderate anxiety self-reporting symptoms using the GAD-7 scale. Women will be asked to complete the GAD-7 scale. Scores will be collated by a digital data management and capture system (REDCap) and women with scores of 3–14 will be advised they are suitable to participate in the study. Women will be advised to contact their general practitioner (GP) or community midwife if they feel they require further assessment and support (current practice guidelines). Participants with a GAD-7 score of 15 or more will be thanked for their interest and advised that the (type of) intervention being assessed may not be suited to them. A score of 15 or more may indicate severe anxiety33; these women will be advised to contact their GP or community midwife for further assessment and support. Women with scores of less than 3 will be advised that the study is not suited to their needs and advised to contact their midwife if they feel they need further support.

Informed consent will be sought from women who are interested and eligible to participate. After completing eligibility screening and reading the Participant Information Sheet, a potential participant will be asked to complete paper or online consent (online supplemental appendix 1). Potential participants will be asked to provide a valid email address or phone number or postal address to enable the collection of online baseline and outcome data and receive information from facilitators about attending groups (for intervention group participants). If participants agree to complete the consent form, the data will be captured on the REDCap system and the participant will be enrolled. Informed consent will be collected from each participant before they undergo any interventions (including baseline data collection) related to the study. Participants will not receive any payments, reimbursement of expenses or any other benefits or incentives for taking part in this study. The chief investigator and study sponsor will have access to the full dataset.

Supplementary data

bmjopen-2022-064659supp001.pdf (968.2KB, pdf)

Women in the intervention group will need to start the intervention no later than 22 weeks of pregnancy. To minimise the time between study entry and starting the intervention (1) facilitators will be trained in advance of the participant recruitment period; (2) study promotion activities will be conducted with community midwives in advance of recruitment; (3) two to three groups will be held at each intervention site consisting of 4–10 participants.

If a participant wishes to withdraw from the study they can contact the study team via phone, email or through the contact website page. They will be advised that no further identifiable information will be collected If they withdraw consent from the study at any time, their data up until the point of withdrawal, will remain on file and will be included in the final study analysis. Participants in the intervention group who do not attend any or all of the group sessions will not be withdrawn from the study and outcome measures will be sent as planned. Non-attendance will be reported to meet the study objectives.

Outcomes

Data will be collected to assess: (1) the number of women accessing the site and completing eligibility screening, (2) the number of eligible women and (3) the number of women who consent to participate. A qualitative evaluation will focus on women’s and facilitators’ views on participating in the intervention and assess the acceptability and experiences of random allocation to a usual care group.

Secondary outcomes

  • Self-reported symptoms of anxiety, pregnancy related anxiety and fear of childbirth.

  • Self-reported levels of social support and QoL.

  • Self-reported standardised measures of service and support use.

Measures

Self-report measures include:

  1. The GAD-7,33 recommended for consideration as part of antenatal psychological screening.17

  2. The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale, a 10-item questionnaire mainly focused on depression with an anxiety subscale.41–43

  3. The 10-item Pregnancy Related Anxiety Questionnaire-Revised.44

  4. The 12-item Short-Form Health Survey,45 a quality of life (QoL) measure with two sub-scales: a mental component and physical component summary.

  5. The 12-item Multidimensional Scale for Perceived Social Support, measures perceptions of support from three sources: family, friends, and significant other.46

  6. The Fear of Childbirth Questionnaire 20-item fear of childbirth questionnaire.47

  7. Economic evaluation: developed for the study and based on the Client Service Receipt Inventory.48 49

A subsection of participants (n=6 from the intervention group and n=6 from the control group) and all facilitators will be interviewed about their experiences of the intervention. Face-to-face semi-structured interviews will be conducted. Purposive sampling will identify cases where the most could be learnt in relation to the objectives.50 A semi-structured interview guide has been developed for intervention and control group participants and for facilitators. Topics have been developed using predefined themes from the literature and designed to facilitate emergent data to be collected51 (online supplemental appendix 2).

Supplementary data

bmjopen-2022-064659supp002.pdf (100.4KB, pdf)

Procedures

A process evaluation will follow the framework developed by Grant et al52 to explore the recruitment of clusters, the delivery of the intervention, recruitment and reach within each cluster, intervention fidelity, maintenance, context, unintended consequences and theory of change. Data reporting the number of groups attended, engagement with individual support and self-help resources will be recorded by facilitators. Intervention fidelity will be established through a structured notes review including a summary of any individual discussions and the topics covered in the groups. Group sessions will be audio recorded and analysed to describe group content and assess fidelity between groups. The degree of completion for self-report forms will be assessed and reported to meet the objectives of the study.

Quantitative data from the self-report measures will be collected at three time points: baseline (first week following enrolment at 16–20 weeks of pregnancy), mid-point (6 weeks after baseline at 22–28 weeks of pregnancy) and postintervention (14 weeks after baseline at 30–34 weeks of pregnancy). Participants will be offered a choice of completing self-report measures by hand (via post), via telephone with the researcher or through an online data entry. Participants preferred method of completion will be established at enrolment. Study data will be collected and managed using REDCap electronic data capture tools hosted at the sponsor site. Participants selecting to complete measures via the online system will be sent automated emails at enrolment (baseline), at 6 weeks and 14 weeks after baseline, the email will contain a link for completing online forms. Two reminders will be sent at 1-week interval. Participants choosing to complete measures by hand or via the telephone will be either sent forms in the post or telephoned at the three timepoints by the researchers. Data from hand completed and online forms will be entered into the electronic case report form and checked for accuracy by the chief investigator.

Data analysis

Participant baseline characteristics will be summarised using means (SD) or median (IQR) if the data were continuous or counts, respectively, or frequency (percentage). The unit of analysis will be the individual participant and the primary analysis performed using intention to treat. Outcome data will be collected from all participants, whatever their level of subsequent engagement with the allocated intervention programme. Descriptive analyses will be conducted for all of the study outcome measures. All continuous variables will be summarised using mean, SD or median and IQR as appropriate. Exploratory analysis will use independent samples t-test for the GAD-7 measure, with analysis of covariance to analyse the change in scores while controlling for baseline imbalance. To account for the cluster randomisation, mixed-effects modelling will be used for continuous outcomes to compare the two groups on self-report outcome data. Baseline measures of the outcome variables (where appropriate) will be included as individual-level covariates in the models for outcome data.

Qualitative data

Template analysis51 will be used to explore interview data for predefined themes outlined in the topic guide and themes generated from the data.

Protocol amendments

Any changes to the study protocol outlined in this paper will be approved by East Midlands—Derby Research Ethics Committee. This will be in agreement with the sponsor.

Ethics and dissemination

Ethical approval was given by East Midlands—Derby Research Ethics Committee 14 March 2022 (REC Reference: 22/EM/0018). It is considered unlikely that participants will be at risk during the study. The study website will provide information on the limitations of self-report measures: measures do not provide a diagnosis of a disorder, but they highlight when women may benefit from further discussion about their psychological health with their GP. If the participant in the intervention arm of the study is considered by midwife facilitator as being at risk of harm to themselves or others, they have a duty of care to report those concerns as per usual practice at the study sites.53 Facilitators will also be directed to inform the chief investigator within 24 hours of risk being identified. This information is detailed in the participant information sheet. Women in both the intervention and control arm of the study will access usual maternity care and will be able to access perinatal mental health services and/or psychological therapies as per usual care.

Monitoring

A Trial Steering Committee and Data Monitoring Committee will not be required for this feasibility study. A Trial Management Group will be convened and will comprise the chief investigator, and a sponsor and Clinical Research Network representative who will meet regularly to ensure all practical details of the study are progressing well and working well and everyone within the study understands them. This will include a regular review of recruitment and retention to the study.

Dissemination

Following completion of the study, the data will be analysed, and a Final Study Report prepared for submission to the HEE/NIHR ICA awards committee. The report will be published on the NIHR website. Dissemination will include written reports, briefings, executive summaries and presentations to healthcare providers, Local Maternity Systems, Integrated Care Alliances, local and national perinatal mental health networks, national and international health charities (ie, King’s Fund, Mind, Beyond Blue), Royal Colleges (ie, GPs, psychiatrists, midwives). Papers will be prepared for academic and clinical conferences and peer-reviewed journals. Participants will be offered a summary of findings to be sent via email or post.

Supplementary Material

Reviewer comments

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge and are grateful to the public and patient involvement (PPI) members and groups from the Nottingham Maternity Research Network and the East Midlands ARC Centre for Ethnic Health Research. We would also like to thank the Maternity and Perinatal Mental Healthcare professionals and researchers who participated in the study advisory group. Thanks to Derby Clinical Trials Support Unit for their help with the HEE/NIHR Clinical Lectureship application and development of the protocol. MS acknowledges the support of the NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre.

Footnotes

Contributors: All authors (KE, HS, MS, JJ, JB) contributed to the development of the protocol, writing and reviewing of the manuscript and approved the submitted version.

Funding: This work is supported by Health Education and National Institute for Health Research Clinical Lectureship (award number NIHR300376).

Competing interests: None declared.

Patient and public involvement: Patients and/or the public were involved in the design, or conduct, or reporting, or dissemination plans of this research. Refer to the Methods section for further details.

Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.

Supplemental material: This content has been supplied by the author(s). It has not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer-reviewed. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and are not endorsed by BMJ. BMJ disclaims all liability and responsibility arising from any reliance placed on the content. Where the content includes any translated material, BMJ does not warrant the accuracy and reliability of the translations (including but not limited to local regulations, clinical guidelines, terminology, drug names and drug dosages), and is not responsible for any error and/or omissions arising from translation and adaptation or otherwise.

Ethics statements

Patient consent for publication

Not applicable.

References

  • 1.Vos T, Lim SS, Abbafati C, et al. Global burden of 369 diseases and injuries in 204 countries and territories, 1990–2019: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2019. The Lancet 2020;396:1204–22. 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30925-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Santomauro DF, Mantilla Herrera AM, Shadid J, et al. Global prevalence and burden of depressive and anxiety disorders in 204 countries and territories in 2020 due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Lancet 2021;398:1700–12. 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02143-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Dennis C-L, Falah-Hassani K, Shiri R. Prevalence of antenatal and postnatal anxiety: systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Psychiatry 2017;210:315–23. 10.1192/bjp.bp.116.187179 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Grigoriadis S, Graves L, Peer M, et al. Maternal anxiety during pregnancy and the association with adverse perinatal outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Psychiatry 2018;79. 10.4088/JCP.17r12011. [Epub ahead of print: 04 09 2018]. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Bayrampour H, Ali E, McNeil DA, et al. Pregnancy-Related anxiety: a concept analysis. Int J Nurs Stud 2016;55:115–30. 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2015.10.023 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Vythilingum B. Anxiety disorders in pregnancy. Curr Psychiatry Rep 2008;10:331–5. 10.1007/s11920-008-0053-y [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Guardino CM, Dunkel Schetter C, Bower JE, et al. Randomised controlled pilot trial of mindfulness training for stress reduction during pregnancy. Psychol Health 2014;29:334–49. 10.1080/08870446.2013.852670 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Atwood A. Antenatal anxiety: origins, effects, and interventions. International Journal of Childbirth Education 2013;28:54–60. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Göbel A, Stuhrmann LY, Harder S, et al. The association between maternal-fetal bonding and prenatal anxiety: an explanatory analysis and systematic review. J Affect Disord 2018;239:313–27. 10.1016/j.jad.2018.07.024 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Shlomi Polachek I, Dulitzky M, Margolis-Dorfman L, et al. A simple model for prediction postpartum PTSD in high-risk pregnancies. Arch Womens Ment Health 2016;19:483–90. 10.1007/s00737-015-0582-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Ding X-X, Wu Y-L, Xu S-J, et al. Maternal anxiety during pregnancy and adverse birth outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective cohort studies. J Affect Disord 2014;159:103–10. 10.1016/j.jad.2014.02.027 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Field T. Prenatal anxiety effects: a review. Infant Behav Dev 2017;49:120–8. 10.1016/j.infbeh.2017.08.008 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Bauer A, Knapp M, Parsonage M. Lifetime costs of perinatal anxiety and depression. J Affect Disord 2016;192:83–90. 10.1016/j.jad.2015.12.005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.NHS England . The NHS long term plan. London: NHS England, 2019. https://www.longtermplan.nhs.uk/ [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Department of Health . Maternal mental health pathway. London: Department of Health, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Public Health England . Perinatal mental health. London: Public Health England, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.National Institute for Health and Care Excellence . Antenatal and postnatal mental health. quality standard QS115. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  • 18.NHS England, NHS Improvement . National collaborating centre for mental health education England, et al. The perinatal mental health care pathways. London: NHS England, 2018. [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Maternal Mental Health Alliance . Make all care count London: maternal mental health alliance, 2022. Available: https://maternalmentalhealthalliance.org/campaign/make-all-care-count/
  • 20.National Institute for Heath and Care Excellence . Antenatal and postnatal mental health: clinical management and service guidance. London: National Institute for Heath and Care Excellence, 2014. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Callanan F, Tuohy T, Bright A-M, et al. The effectiveness of psychological interventions for pregnant women with anxiety in the antenatal period: a systematic review. Midwifery 2022;104:103169. 10.1016/j.midw.2021.103169 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Maguire PN, Clark GI, Wootton BM. The efficacy of cognitive behavior therapy for the treatment of perinatal anxiety symptoms: a preliminary meta-analysis. J Anxiety Disord 2018;60:26–34. 10.1016/j.janxdis.2018.10.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Loughnan SA, Wallace M, Joubert AE. A systematic review of psychological treatments for clinical anxiety during the perinatal period 2018;21:481–90. 10.1007/s00737-018-0812-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Evans K, Morrell CJ, Spiby H. Systematic review and meta-analysis of non-pharmacological interventions to reduce the symptoms of mild to moderate anxiety in pregnant women. J Adv Nurs 2018;74:289–309. 10.1111/jan.13456 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Evans K, Rennick-Egglestone S, Cox S, et al. Remotely delivered interventions to support women with symptoms of anxiety in pregnancy: mixed methods systematic review and meta-analysis. J Med Internet Res 2022;24:e28093. 10.2196/28093 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Stoll K, Swift EM, Fairbrother N, et al. A systematic review of nonpharmacological prenatal interventions for pregnancy-specific anxiety and fear of childbirth. Birth 2018;45:7–18. 10.1111/birt.12316 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Viveiros CJ, Darling EK. Barriers and facilitators of accessing perinatal mental health services: the perspectives of women receiving continuity of care midwifery. Midwifery 2018;65:8–15. 10.1016/j.midw.2018.06.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Fletcher A, Murphy M, Leahy-Warren P. Midwives' experiences of caring for women's emotional and mental well-being during pregnancy. J Clin Nurs 2021;30:1403–16. 10.1111/jocn.15690 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Evans K, Spiby H, Morrell CJ. Developing a complex intervention to support pregnant women with mild to moderate anxiety: application of the medical Research Council framework. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2020;20:777. 10.1186/s12884-020-03469-8 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Evans K, Spiby H, Morrell JC. Non-Pharmacological interventions to reduce the symptoms of mild to moderate anxiety in pregnant women. A systematic review and narrative synthesis of women's views on the acceptability of and satisfaction with interventions. Arch Womens Ment Health 2020;23:11–28. 10.1007/s00737-018-0936-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Skivington K, Matthews L, Simpson SA, et al. A new framework for developing and evaluating complex interventions: update of medical Research Council guidance. BMJ 2021;374:n2061. 10.1136/bmj.n2061 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Chan A-W, Tetzlaff JM, Altman DG, et al. Spirit 2013 statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. Ann Intern Med 2013;158:200–7. 10.7326/0003-4819-158-3-201302050-00583 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JBW, et al. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch Intern Med 2006;166:1092–7. 10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Sim J, Lewis M. The size of a pilot study for a clinical trial should be calculated in relation to considerations of precision and efficiency. J Clin Epidemiol 2012;65:301–8. 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.07.011 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Julious SA. Sample size of 12 per group rule of thumb for a pilot study. Pharm Stat 2005;4:287–91. 10.1002/pst.185 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.National Institue for Health Research . Feasibility and pilot studies: a guide for NIHR research design service advisors; 2016.
  • 37.National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists . Antenatal care. London, UK: National Institute for Healrh and Care Excellence; 2021. https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/ng201/resources/antenatal-care-pdf-66143709695941 [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Moya H. Anxiety in pregnancy: a cognitive behavioural therapy self-help guide: MOYACBT, 2022. Available: http://www.moyacbt.co.uk/resources/ [Accessed 18 Feb 2022].
  • 39.Mind Garden Technology C.I.C . Self-Help APP for the mind SAM. England; 2022. [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Headspace UK . Welcome to the pregnancy pack: headspace UK, 2021. Available: https://www.headspace.com/articles/welcome-to-the-pregnancy-pack [Accessed 6 Jul 2021].
  • 41.Cox JL, Holden JM, Sagovsky R. Detection of postnatal depression. development of the 10-item Edinburgh postnatal depression scale. Br J Psychiatry 1987;150:782–6. 10.1192/bjp.150.6.782 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Jomeen J, Martin CR. Confirmation of an occluded anxiety component within the Edinburgh postnatal depression scale (EPDS) during early pregnancy. J Reprod Infant Psychol 2005;23:143–54. 10.1080/02646830500129297 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Brouwers EP, van Baar AL, Pop VJ. Does the Edinburgh postnatal depression scale measure anxiety? J Psychosom Res 2001;51:659–63. 10.1016/s0022-3999(01)00245-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Huizink AC, Delforterie MJ, Scheinin NM, et al. Adaption of pregnancy anxiety questionnaire-revised for all pregnant women regardless of parity: PRAQ-R2. Arch Womens Ment Health 2016;19:125–32. 10.1007/s00737-015-0531-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Ware J, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-Item short-form health survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care 1996;34:220–33. 10.1097/00005650-199603000-00003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Zimet GD, Dahlem NW, Zimet SG, et al. The multidimensional scale of perceived social support. J Pers Assess 1988;52:30–41. 10.1207/s15327752jpa5201_2 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Slade P, Balling K, Houghton G, et al. A new scale for fear of childbirth: the fear of childbirth questionnaire (FCQ). J Reprod Infant Psychol 2021:1–11. 10.1080/02646838.2021.1928615 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Beecham J, Knapp M. Costing psychiatric interventions. In: Thornicroft G, edMeasuring mental health needs. 2nd edition. UK: Gaskell Royal College of Psychiatrists, 2001: 200–24. [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Personal Social Services Research Unit . Client service receipt inventory (CSRI), 2021. Available: https://www.pssru.ac.uk/csri/client-service-receipt-inventory/ [Accessed 31 May 2021].
  • 50.Ritchie J, Lewis J, Elam G. Designing and selecting samples. In: Ritchie J, Lewis J, eds. Qualitative research practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  • 51.King N. Template Analyais: University of Huddersfield, 2021. Available: https://research.hud.ac.uk/research-subjects/human-health/template-analysis/what-is-template-analysis/ [Accessed 31 May 2021].
  • 52.Grant A, Treweek S, Dreischulte T, et al. Process evaluations for cluster-randomised trials of complex interventions: a proposed framework for design and reporting. Trials 2013;14:15. 10.1186/1745-6215-14-15 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Nursing and Midwifery Council . The code. professional standards of practice and behaviour for nurses, midwives and nursing associates. London: Nursing and Midwifery Council; 2018. [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary data

bmjopen-2022-064659supp001.pdf (968.2KB, pdf)

Supplementary data

bmjopen-2022-064659supp002.pdf (100.4KB, pdf)

Reviewer comments

Articles from BMJ Open are provided here courtesy of BMJ Publishing Group

RESOURCES