Abstract
The climatic niche is a central concept for understanding species distribution, with current and past climate interpreted as strong drivers of present and historical-geographical ranges. Our aim is to understand whether Atlantic Forest snakes follow the general geographical pattern of increasing species climatic niche breadths with increasing latitude. We also tested if there is a tradeoff between temperature and precipitation niche breadths of species in order to understand if species with larger breadths of one niche dimension have stronger dispersal constraints by the other due to narrower niche breadths. Niche breadths were calculated by the subtraction of maximal and minimal values of temperature and precipitation across species ranges. We implemented Phylogenetic Generalized Least Squares to measure the relationship between temperature and precipitation niche breadths and latitude. We also tested phylogenetic signals by Lambda statistics to analyze the degree of phylogenetic niche conservatism to both niche dimensions. Temperature niche breadths were not related to latitude. Precipitation niche breadths decreased with increasing latitude and presented a high phylogenetic signal, that is, significant phylogenetic niche conservatism. We rejected the tradeoff hypotheses of temperature and precipitation niche breadths. Our results also indicate that precipitation should be an important ecological constraint affecting the geographical distribution of snake lineages across the South American Atlantic Forest. We then provide a general view of how phylogenetic niche conservatism could impact the patterns of latitudinal variation of climatic niches across this biodiversity hotspot.
Keywords: Atlantic Forest, biogeography, climatic niche, latitudinal gradient, snakes
Climate is one of the main ecological drivers of species distribution on broad scales (see MacArthur 1972; Wiens and Donoghue 2004; Chejanovski and Wiens 2014; Qian et al. 2015). The climatic tolerances of species lineages can promote restrictions of dispersal out from where the ancestors have emerged due to phylogenetic niche conservatism (Wiens and Donoghue 2004; Pyron and Burbrink 2009; Chejanovski and Wiens 2014). Phylogenetic niche conservatism is the trend for a phylogenetic lineage to retain its adaptive traits over evolutionary history (Holt and Gomulkiewicz 2004; Wiens et al. 2010). The trend to conserve evolutionary traits, including climatic tolerances, should constrain geographical distribution and, consequently, the variation in clade composition among different regions. Then, the geographical ranges of species can be determined by climatic niche breadths, or the interval between maximum and minimum values of temperature and precipitation in which lineages can occur and persist (Fisher-Reid et al. 2012; Slatyer et al. 2013; Bonetti and Wiens 2014; Chejanovski and Wiens 2014; Rolland and Salamin 2016).
Some studies have pointed out that species richness is strongly influenced by phylogenetic niche conservatism, with lineages tending to conserve ancestral climatic niche conditions along latitudinal gradients (Wiens and Donoghue 2004; Pyron and Burbrink 2009; Rivadeneira et al. 2011; Morinière et al. 2016). Phylogenetic niche conservatism generates a phylogenetic signal which can be detected when certain characters are conserved across the evolutionary history of a clade (Webb 2000; Kraft et al. 2007; Losos 2008; Cavender-Bares et al. 2009; Pausas and Verdú 2010; Mouquet et al. 2012). In this way, evolutionary drivers can limit the adaptive responses to different environmental conditions as well as restrict dispersal rates across adjacent areas (Wiens and Donoghue 2004; Pyron et al. 2015). Phylogenetic niche conservatism could also constrain the diversity along latitudinal gradients due to conserved climatic niche breadths in lineages adapted to climatic conditions in specific latitudinal ranges (Wiens and Donoghue 2004; Pyron and Burbrink 2009; Pyron et al. 2015). Thus, phylogenetic lineages can be restricted to latitudinal belts where their ancestors have emerged due to phylogenetic niche conservatism of climatic niches (Wiens and Donoghue 2004).
MacArthur (1972) suggests that species niche breadths increase with increasing latitude and decreasing climatic stability. Such niche breadth variation could be associated to lower niche overlaps in tropical regions, which in turn would support higher species richness by accelerating diversification processes in lower latitudes (MacArthur 1972; see also Kozak and Wiens 2007; Kozak and Wiens 2010; Fisher-Reid et al. 2012; Salisbury et al. 2012; Gómez-Rodríguez et al. 2015; Rolland and Salamin 2016). Kozak and Wiens (2007) pointed out 2 major influences on latitudinal gradients of species diversity: the species tolerances to climate variation along the latitudinal gradient and the isolation of lineages in mountain ranges due to smaller niche breadths (see also Janzen 1967). The Amazonian bird species demonstrated that the greater ecological specialization promotes dispersal limitation and higher speciation in lower latitudes (Salisbury et al. 2012). On the other hand, plethodontid salamanders evidenced that latitudinal variation trends should be present due to evolutionary processes regarding phylogenetic conservatism and geographical restrictions of dispersion throughout climatic zones, even in greater latitudes (Kozak and Wiens 2010). Additionally, both Salisbury et al. (2012) and Kozak and Wiens (2010) agree regarding the importance of evolutionary factors regulating latitudinal gradients. Thus, ecological and evolutionary approaches are crucial to understand latitudinal biodiversity gradients as proposed by MacArthur (1972).
Temperature could be a major influence for ectothermic vertebrate distribution along latitudinal gradients (Wiens and Donoghue 2004). Snake lineages also tend to be highly specialized on habitat use and ecological conditions such as thermal constraints (Greene and Greene 1997; Terribile et al. 2009). Moreover, a tradeoff has been suggested regarding temperature and precipitation conditions in broad-scale latitudinal gradients. While mean temperature ranges increase with latitude, the opposite must occur with precipitation, which could reflect in the species niche breadths (Currie 1991; Vázquez and Stevens 2004). In this way, even with a broad niche breadth regarding temperature, the opposite should occur with precipitation. Testing this tradeoff hypothesis on species niche data could provide foundations for understanding the influence of ecological specialization of clades and the niche axis associated with geographical restriction across different latitudes (Bonetti and Wiens 2014). Then, if species have broad niche breadths for temperature and lower niche breadths for precipitation, the major geographical constraint would be determined by precipitation niche breadths (Bonetti and Wiens 2014).
Bonetti and Wiens (2014) tested the tradeoff between temperature and precipitation niche breadths for amphibians. Those authors demonstrated that it would not be applicable to their species occurrence data, as they found congruence between temperature and precipitation niche breadths among localities. The congruence between temperature and precipitation niche breadths among such highly diversified lineages would be related to the diverse and specialized reproductive modes of amphibians (Bonetti and Wiens 2014). Terrestrial elapid snakes also present similar congruence on temperature and precipitation niche breadths related to clades’ specialization in diverse climatic regimes along the globe (Lin et al. 2019). Lizards, on the other hand, show idiosyncratic responses to climatic factors related to differential geographical distribution of clades across the Atlantic Forest in South America (Prates et al. 2016). However, there is no available literature on climatic niche breadths distribution along latitudinal gradients for snakes (but see Lin et al. 2019 for terrestrial elapids in different regions).
The Atlantic Forest is a complex morphoclimatic domain, including different ecological constraints and conditions throughout its range (Olson et al. 2001; Carnaval et al. 2014). This region harbors a very diverse and highly endemic snake fauna, with at least 252 species, including 79 endemic snakes (Barbo et al. 2021). Carnaval et al. (2014) demonstrated that climate variation affects the geographical distribution of endemic vertebrates in the Atlantic Forest, including amphibians, lizards, snakes, and Passeriformes. Moreover, Moura et al. (2017b) reinforced such findings from Carnaval et al. (2014) indicating that the phylogenetic composition of snake species is strongly influenced by climate variation along the Atlantic Forest related to a general division between southern and northern faunas. Different climatic regimes can determine the ecological influence and different lineages’ composition throughout the Atlantic Forest ecoregions, and such variation can influence the regionalization of snake diversity along the latitudinal gradient (Moura et al. 2017a, 2017b).
We tested herein if climatic niche breadths of species increase with increasing latitudes using the Atlantic Forest snakes as a model. We also tested the tradeoff between temperature and precipitation niche breadths. We implemented phylogenetic approaches to assess the phylogenetic niche conservatism for temperature and precipitation niche breadths. We hence provide a general view of how the evolutionary history of snake lineages and the possible niche conservatism could impact the patterns of latitudinal variation of climatic niches across the South American Atlantic Forest.
Materials and Methods
We analyzed the species composition of Atlantic Forest and extracted occurrence points from the most detailed voucher-based dataset of point locality records for snakes in Brazil (Nogueira et al. 2019). We estimated the phylogenetic relationships of species from 100 trees derived from fully sampled phylogenies for Squamate reptiles available in Tonini et al. (2016). From the 250 species occurring in the Atlantic Forest ecoregions (sensuOlson et al. 2001) according to Nogueira et al. (2019), we excluded species with less than 10 records, island endemics, and missing species from the phylogeny, resulting in 189 species (see the complete species list in Supplementary Materials S1).
We determined the mean latitudinal point from the non-repeated occurrence points for each species. Then, we extracted the climatic variable values at a fine resolution (1 km2) from CHELSA database (Karger et al. 2017) for each nonrepeated occurrence point of each species in the raster R package (Hijmans et al. 2015). Niche breadths were calculated by subtracting the minimum temperature of the coldest month from the maximum temperature of the warmest month, and the minimum precipitation values of the driest quarters of the year from the maximum precipitation values of the wettest quarters (see Quintero and Wiens 2013). In this way, we obtained temperature niche breadths and precipitation niche breadths for each snake species of the Atlantic Forest (available in Supplementary Material). We also tested spatial autocorrelation among latitudinal belts and niche breadths with Moran's Index (P > 0.05) in the ape R package (Paradis et al. 2015) (see Supplementary Materials S2).
We used phylogenetic generalized least squares ([PGLS]—Martins and Hansen 1997) to analyze the phylogenetic weight within the models (see also Felsenstein 1985; Garland and Ives 2000; Quintero and Wiens 2013) in the caper R Package (Orme et al. 2018). This method identifies phylogenetic correlations on the distribution of traits throughout environmental gradients, such as the distributions of climatic niche breadths across the Atlantic Forest latitudinal gradient (Quintero and Wiens 2013). The λ values were estimated by the maximum likelihood and kappa and delta fixed at 1 for all PGLS models (Lin et al. 2019).
We also calculated the Lambda statistic (Pagel 1992) to measure the degree of phylogenetic conservatism for climatic niche breadths. The lambda values vary between 0, indicating no phylogenetic signal, to 1, or maximum phylogenetic signal of the analyzed trait. All phylogenetic approaches were repeated 100 times for each phylogeny and average values were considered. All analyses were performed in R software 4.1.1 (R Development Core Team 2020).
Results
The PGLS model indicates a positive relationship between latitude and temperature niche breadths variation across the gradient, but with a low explanatory power and without phylogenetic influence in the model (R2 = 0.04, P < 0.01, slope = 2.02, λ < 0.01). Precipitation niche breadths were negatively related to latitude (R2 = 0.21, P < 0.01, slope = –30.19, λ = 0.34; Figure 1). Temperature and precipitation niche breadths showed a positive relationship in the PGLS model (R2 = 0.14, P < 0.01, slope = 2.58, λ = 0.54; Figure 2). The lambda statistics regarding the niche attributes indicated the absence of a phylogenetic signal on temperature niche breadths (λ < 0.01, P > 0.01), and a significant phylogenetic signal for precipitation niche breadths (λ = 0.61, P < 0.01).
Figure 1.
Relationship between precipitation niche breadths and mean latitude of Atlantic Forest snakes (N = 189 species) from 3 to 33° south (R2 = 0.21, P < 0.01 in the PGLS model).
Figure 2.
Relationship between temperature and precipitation niche breadths of Atlantic Forest snakes (N = 189 species) (R2 = 0.14, P < 0.01 in the PGLS model).
Discussion
We rejected both hypotheses of climatic niche breadths increasing in higher latitudes (MacArthur 1972) and the tradeoff between temperature and precipitation niche breadths as proposed by Vázquez and Stevens (2004). Actually, temperature and precipitation niche breadths were correlated for the Atlantic Forest snakes, with a significant phylogenetic weight (λ = 0.54) in the PGLS model. Our finding is in line with those from Quintero and Wiens (2013) for plethodontid salamanders, hylid frogs, and phrynosomatid lizards on the congruence of climatic niche breadths and the absence of tradeoff between them. We also provided similar results as those found for terrestrial elapid snakes from different regions of the globe (Lin et al. 2019). The latitudinal gradient of precipitation niche breadths showed a strong phylogenetic signal. This result suggests that precipitation may be an important ecological constraint restricting the distribution of snake lineages across the Atlantic Forest.
MacArthur (1972) provided evidence that places with higher climatic stability and lower niche breadths can promote higher diversification. It would be due to higher species specialization in resource use related to a higher environmental heterogeneity observed in tropical landscapes. We recorded a higher concentration of points in the southeastern region of the Atlantic Forest, between 20 and 27° south, with species showing relatively narrow climatic niche breadths (see Figure 1). This can be also correlated with the higher historical climatic stability in the southern forested refugees to the Atlantic Forest fauna during the Late Quaternary (Carnaval et al. 2014). The historical variation of climatic conditions has been considered as a significant factor generating the current lineage distribution (Quintero and Wiens 2013). For instance, plethodontid salamanders demonstrate that specific environmental conditions such as high productivity and energy can promote rapid niche evolution, mainly where the climate is stable (Kozak and Wiens 2010). In this way, evolutionary factors could restrict species distributions due to the conservation of adaptive traits in specific climatic regimes, promoting the increasing number of species even with increasing latitude.
The southern richest areas are influenced by the historical and current climate, primary productivity, and energy availability highlighting the montane moist forests (see Moura et al. 2007a; Carnaval et al. 2014). The historical climate promoted higher forest stability at highlands in higher latitudes in the Atlantic Forest, however, with great contemporary climatic heterogeneity (Carnaval et al. 2014). In this way, such climatic heterogeneity can be associated with physical and ecological factors including topography and vegetation structure in the Atlantic Forest (Moura et al. 2017a). Areas with higher historical stability and greater topographical complexity toward the south in the Atlantic Forest (Moura et al. 2017a, 2017b) would be also related to decreasing precipitation niche breadths found there. Species restricted to small geographic ranges could show limited tolerances for one climatic variable such as pluviosity, which can also promote congruence on limited temperature conditions (Lin et al. 2019). The lower tolerances for variation on climatic conditions could strengthen geographical barriers related to topographical variation along complex mountain ranges (see Kozak and Wiens 2007). Furthermore, such biogeographical barriers could favor reproductive isolation decreasing gene flow among populations and, consequently, promoting allopatric speciation (Kozak and Wiens 2007, 2010; Fisher-Reid et al. 2012; Salisbury et al. 2012; Gómez-Rodríguez et al. 2015; Rolland and Salamin 2016). The diversification rates among clades are highly related to climatic niche evolution and are associated with geographical isolation of taxa (Kozak and Wiens 2010). Such factors can also result in higher amphibian diversity on highly complex areas, highlighting the mountain ranges of southeastern Brazil (Vasconcelos et al. 2014). Such areas are also strongholds of higher species numbers of Atlantic Forest snakes and should have an important influence in our findings.
The higher number of Dipsadidae and Colubridae snake lineages in our sample (see Supplementary Appendix S1) should explain the higher phylogenetic signal effect in areas with lower precipitation niche breadths. Besides, the lambda value (λ = 0.61) does not show the maximum phylogenetic signal for precipitation and, consequently, provides evidence that phylogenetic niche conservatism would be related to younger lineages of snakes in the Atlantic Forest. The dispersal restrictions of these lineages could have generated a higher number of species specialized in specific ecological conditions regulated by climatic constraints across the latitudinal gradient. These younger lineages could be more influenced by their climatic preference of where their ancestors have emerged. In this way, these clades can be restricted to specific regions. In the case of the Atlantic Forest, this region of mountain ranges in the southeast has great environmental heterogeneity and provides conditions for allopatric speciation, which could be also regulated by phylogenetic niche conservatism (see Wiens 2004). Evolution is influenced by climate, which in turn can drive biogeographical patterns related to climatic niche breadth constraints, as already observed for amphibians and mammals (Olalla-Tárraga et al. 2011). More ancient clades of snakes, for instance, had more time to adapt to different ecological conditions, whereas more recent clades should suffer greater influence of phylogenetic niche conservatism. Thus, snakes of more recent divergences could provide better indicators of evolutionary constraints regarding climate preferences (Terribile et al. 2009).
The climatic variation in the Atlantic Forest demonstrates a simple division between northern and southern climatic regimes as 2 main “climatic spaces” (Carnaval et al. 2014) which must have influenced the snake composition (Moura et al. 2017b). Thermal constraints regulate species composition and phylogenetic beta diversity across this complex biome (Moura et al. 2017b). However, our results show that precipitation niche breadth is conserved across the evolutionary history of Atlantic Forest snakes. Precipitation should be an important ecological factor related to the geographical distribution of some lineages, possibly associated with the topographical variation and environmental heterogeneity. Thus, future approaches, exploring especially more recent lineages and different climatic dimensions, topographical and altitudinal variation along the Atlantic Forest ecoregions, could bring new insights on historical biogeography, ecology, and species richness variation across the Atlantic Forest.
We agree that snake composition throughout the Atlantic Forest range is strongly affected by sub-region variations (Moura et al. 2017a; Barbo et al. 2021). However, we complement herein the role of ecological and evolutionary drivers influencing the snake composition across this geographical domain. Our findings help to better understand how climatic factors could be related to biogeography and the evolution of the highly diversified snake fauna of the Atlantic rainforest. We emphasize that integrative approaches of such factors are important for a better understanding of the processes driving species distribution in biodiversity hotspots.
Supplementary Material
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to Cristiano de Campos Nogueira, Laura Rodrigues Vieira de Alencar, Fernando Rodrigues da Silva, Marcio Roberto Costa Martins, Josué Anderson Rêgo Azevedo, Diogo Borges Provete and Leonardo Matheus Servino for valuable comments on earlier versions of the manuscript.
Author Contributions
J.T.M.P. planned the study and analyzed the data. F.E.B. collected data. R.J.S. advised the study. All authors discussed the results and wrote the manuscript together.
Funding
This study was financed in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior—Brasil (CAPES)— Finance Code 001. JTMP received a doctoral fellowship from CAPES (Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior). This research was supported by grants from Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP procs. 2008/50068-2, 2014/23677-9 and 2020/12658-4) and Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq, 405447/2016-7). RJS thanks CNPq for the research fellowship (312795/2018-1).
Supplementary Material
“Supplementary material can be found at https://academic.oup.com/cz”.
Conflict of Interest
The corresponding author confirms on behalf of all authors that there have been no involvements that might raise the question of bias in the work reported or in the conclusions, implications, or opinions stated.
Contributor Information
José Thales da Motta Portillo, Programa de Pós-Graduação em Biologia Animal, Instituto de Biociências, Letras e Ciências Exatas, Universidade Estadual Paulista “Júlio de Mesquita Filho”, Rua Cristóvão Colombo, 2265, São José do Rio Preto, São Paulo 15054-000, Brazil.
Fausto Erritto Barbo, Laboratório de Coleções Zoológicas, Instituto Butantan, Avenida Vital Brazil, 1500, São Paulo 05503-900, Brazil.
Ricardo J Sawaya, Centro de Ciências Naturais e Humanas, Universidade Federal do ABC, Rua Arcturus, 03, São Bernardo do Campo, São Paulo 09606-070, Brazil.
References
- Barbo FE, Nogueira CC, Sawaya RJ, 2021. Vicariance and regionalization patterns in snakes of the South American Atlantic Forest Megadiverse Hotspot. J Biogeograph 48:823–382. [Google Scholar]
- Bonetti MF, Wiens JJ, 2014. Evolution of climatic niche specialization: a phylogenetic analysis in amphibians. Proc Royal Soc B 281:20133229. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Cavender-Bares J, Kozak KH, Fine PVA, Kembel SW, 2009. The merging of community ecology and phylogenetic biology. Ecol Lett 12:693–715. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Carnaval AC, Waltari E, Rodrigues MT, Rosauer D, VanDerWal J. et al., 2014. Prediction of phylogeographic endemism in an environmentally complex biome. Proc Royal Soc B 281:20141461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chejanovski ZA, Wiens JJ, 2014. Climatic niche breadth and species richness in temperate treefrogs. J Biogeograph 41:1936–1946. [Google Scholar]
- Currie DJ, 1991. Energy and large-scale patterns of animal- and plant-species richness. Am Nat 137:27–49. [Google Scholar]
- Felsenstein J, 1985. Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am Nat 125:1–15. [Google Scholar]
- Fisher-Reid MC, Kozak KH, Wiens JJ, 2012. How is the rate of climatic-niche evolution related to climatic-niche breadth? Evolution 66:3836–3851. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Garland T, Ives AR, 2000. Using the past to predict the present: confidence intervals for regression equations in phylogenetic comparative methods. Am Nat 155:346–364. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Gómez-Rodríguez C, Baselga A, Wiens JJ, 2015. Is Diversification rate related to climatic niche width? Glob Ecol Biogeograph 24:383–395. [Google Scholar]
- Greene HW, Greene A, 1997. Snakes: The Evolution of Mystery in Nature. Berkeley (CA): University of California Press. [Google Scholar]
- Hijmans RJ, Etten JV, Cheng J, Mattiuzzi M, Sumner M. et al., 2015. Package ‘raster’. R Cran 1–242. [Google Scholar]
- Holt RD, Gomulkiewicz R, 2004. Conservation implications of niche conservatism and evolution in heterogeneous environments. In: Ferriere R, Dieckmann U, Couvet D, editors. Evolutionary Conservation Biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 244–264. [Google Scholar]
- Janzen DH, 1967. Why mountain passes are higher in the tropics. Am Nat 101:233–249. [Google Scholar]
- Karger DN, Conrad O, Böhner J, Kawohl T, Kreft H. et al., 2017. Climatologies at high resolution for the earth’s land surface areas. Sci Data 4:170122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kozak KH, Wiens JJ, 2007. Climatic zonation drives latitudinal variation in speciation mechanisms. Proc Royal Soc B 274:2995–3003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kozak KH, Wiens JJ, 2010. Accelerated rates of climatic-niche evolution underlie rapid species diversification. Ecol Lett 13:1378–1389. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kraft NJB, Cornwell WK, Webb CO, Ackerly DD, 2007. Trait evolution, community assembly, and the phylogenetic structure of ecological communities. Am Nat 170:271–283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Lin LH, Zhu XM, Du Y, Fang MC, Ji X, 2019. Global, regional, and cladistic patterns of variation in climatic niche breadths in terrestrial elapid snakes. Curr Zool 65:1–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Losos JB, 2008. Phylogenetic niche conservatism, phylogenetic signal and the relationship between phylogenetic relatedness and ecological similarity among species. Ecol Lett 11:995–1003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- MacArthur RH, 1972. Geographical Ecology: Patterns in the Distribution of Species. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press. [Google Scholar]
- Martins EP, Hansen TF, 1997. Phylogenies and the comparative method: a general approach to incorporating phylogenetic information into the analysis of interspecific data. Am Nat 194:646–667. [Google Scholar]
- Morinière J, Van Dam MH, Hawlitschek O, Bergsten J, Michat MC. et al., 2016. Phylogenetic niche conservatism explains an inverse latitudinal diversity gradient in freshwater arthropods. Nature 6: 26340. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Mouquet N, Devictor V, Meynard CN, Munoz F, Bersier LF. et al., 2012. Ecophylogenetics: advances and Perspectives. Biol Rev Cambridge Philos Soc 87:769–785. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Moura MR, Argôlo AJ, Costa HC, 2017a. Historical and contemporary correlates of snake biogeographical subregions in the Atlantic forest hotspot. J Biogeograph 1:1–11. [Google Scholar]
- Moura MR, Costa HC, Argôlo AJS, Jetz W, 2017b. Environmental constraints on the compositional and phylogenetic beta-diversity of tropical forest snake assemblages. J Anim Ecol 86:1192–1204. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Nogueira CC, Argôlo AJS, Arzamendia V, Azevedo JA, Barbo FE. et al., 2019. Atlas of Brazilian snakes: verified point-locality maps to mitigate the Wallacean shortfall in a Megadiverse snake fauna. South Am J Herpetol 14:1–274. [Google Scholar]
- Olalla-Tárraga MÁ, McInnes L, Bini LM, Diniz-Filho JAF, Fritz SA. et al., 2011. Climatic niche conservatism and the evolutionary dynamics in species range boundaries: global congruence across mammals and amphibians. J Biogeograph 38:2237–2247. [Google Scholar]
- Olson DM, Dinerstein E, Wikramanayake ED, Burgess ND, Powell GVN. et al., 2001. Terrestrial ecoregions of the world: a new map of life on earth. BioScience 51:933–938. [Google Scholar]
- Orme D, Freckleton R, Thomas G, Petzoldt T, Fritz S. et al., 2018. Package ‘caper’. R Cran 1–50. [Google Scholar]
- Pagel MD, 1992. A method for the analysis of comparative data. J Theor Biol 156:431–442. [Google Scholar]
- Paradis E, Blomberg S, Bolker B, Claude J, Cuong HS. et al., 2015. Package ‘ape’. R Cran 1–263. [Google Scholar]
- Pausas JG, Verdú M, 2010. The jungle of methods for evaluating phenotypic and phylogenetic structure of communities. BioScience 60:614–625. [Google Scholar]
- Prates I, Xue AT, Brown JL, Alvarado-Serrano DF, Rodrigues MT. et al., 2016. Inferring responses to climate dynamics from historical demography in neotropical forest lizards. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 113:7978–7985. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Pyron AR, Burbrink FT, 2009. Can the tropical conservatism hypothesis explain temperate species richness patterns? An Inverse latitudinal biodiversity gradient in the New World snake tribe Lampropeltini. Glob Ecol Biogeograph 18:406–415. [Google Scholar]
- Pyron RA, Costa GC, Patten MA, Burbrink FT, 2015. Phylogenetic niche conservatism and the evolutionary basis of ecological speciation. Biol Rev 90:1248–1262. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Qian H, Wiens JJ, Zhang J, Zhang Y, 2015. Evolutionary and ecological causes of species richness patterns in North American angiosperm trees. Ecography 38:241–250. [Google Scholar]
- Quintero I, Wiens JJ, 2013. What determines the climatic niche width of species? The role of spatial and temporal climatic variation in three vertebrate clades. Glob Ecol Biogeograph 22:422–432. [Google Scholar]
- R Development Core Team, 2020. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna (Austria): R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Available from: http://www.r-project.org.
- Rivadeneira MM, Thiel M, González ER, Haye PA, 2011. An inverse latitudinal gradient of diversity of peracarid crustaceans along the pacific coast of South America: out of the deep South. Glob Ecol Biogeograph 20:437–448. [Google Scholar]
- Rolland J, Salamin N, 2016. Niche width impacts vertebrate diversification. Glob Ecol Biogeograph 25:1252–1263. [Google Scholar]
- Salisbury CL, Seddon N, Cooney CR, Tobias JA, 2012. The latitudinal gradient in dispersal constraints: ecological specialization drives diversification in tropical birds. Ecol Lett 15:847–855. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Slatyer RA, Hirst M, Sexton JP, 2013. Niche breadth predicts geographical range size: a general ecological pattern. Ecol Lett 16:1104–1114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Terribile LC, Olalla-Tárraga MÁ, Morales-Castilla I, Rueda M, Vidanes RM. et al., 2009. Global Richness patterns of venomous snakes reveal contrasting influences of ecology and history in two different clades. Oecologia 159:617–626. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Tonini JFR, Beard KH, Ferreira RB, Jetz W, Pyron RA, 2016. Fully-sampled phylogenies of squamates reveal evolutionary patterns in threat status. Biol Conserv 204:23–31. [Google Scholar]
- Vasconcelos TS, Prado VHM, Silva FR, Haddad CFB, 2014. Biogeographic distribution patterns and their correlates in the diverse frog fauna of the Atlantic forest hotspot. PLoS ONE 9:e104130. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Vázquez DP, Stevens RD, 2004. The latitudinal gradient in niche breadth: concepts and evidence. Am Nat 164:E1–E19. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Webb CO, 2000. Exploring the phylogenetic structure of ecological communities: an example for rain forest trees. Am Nat 156:145–155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wiens JJ, 2004. Speciation and ecology revisited: phylogenetic niche conservatism and the origin of species. Evolution 58:193–197. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wiens JJ, Ackerly DD, Allen AP, Anacker BL, Buckley LB. et al., 2010. Niche conservatism as an emerging principle in ecology and conservation biology. Ecol Lett 13:1310–1324. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Wiens JJ, Donoghue MJ, 2004. Historical biogeography, ecology and species richness. Trend Ecol Evol 19:639–644. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.


