Abstract
The rational engineering of photoresponsive materials, e.g., light-driven molecular motors, is a challenging task. Here, we use structure-related design rules to prepare a prototype molecular rotary motor capable of completing an entire revolution using, exclusively, the sequential absorption of two photons; i.e., a photon-only two-stroke motor. The mechanism of rotation is then characterised using a combination of non-adiabatic dynamics simulations and transient absorption spectroscopy measurements. The results show that the rotor moiety rotates axially relative to the stator and produces, within a few picoseconds at ambient T, an intermediate with the same helicity as the starting structure. We discuss how such properties, that include a 0.25 quantum efficiency, can help overcome the operational limitations of the classical overcrowded alkene designs.
Subject terms: Light harvesting, Atomistic models, Excited states, Energy transfer
Improving the efficiency of light-driven molecular rotary motors is a challenging task. Here, the authors combine theoretical modeling, synthesis and spectroscopy to prepare a prototype molecular motor capable of avoiding inefficient thermally activated motion; thus offering prospects to implement a 2-stroke photon-only molecular motor.
Introduction
The function of light-driven molecular motors is to generate unidirectional and cyclic motion, e.g., recursive translation, rotation or more complex cyclic displacements, using photons as the energy source1–7. The classical design of their rotary version is based on the concept of overcrowded alkenes8–13, where two moieties (rotor or rotator and stator) are connected by a double bond (the axle) and experience steric repulsion resulting in a helical shape (P or M helicity).
At the level of a single molecule, the operation of a classic light-driven rotary motor (LDRM; see Fig. 1) starting in a EP configuration is sketched in Fig. 2A (here we use the general term “configuration” even if the M and P labels indicate the “helicity”). Photoexcitation to the S1 electronic state results in breaking of the π-bond of the axle (EP*), which releases the strain energy and activates a counterclockwise torsional motion (CCW) (more specifically, precessional)14 motion of the rotor with respect to the stator. At nearly orthogonal configurations, the decay to the ground electronic state (S0) occurs in the vicinity of a conical intersection (CI)15–17.
Upon decay, the immediate restoration of the π-bond drives further torsional relaxation in the same direction until formation of a Z configuration displaying an opposite M helicity (ZM). Subsequently, a thermally activated helix inversion (THI) step8–10,15,16, drives the system to a ZP configuration suitable for a further light-driven CCW half-rotation8–10,15,16. In fact, after absorption of the second photon, the same two-step mechanism is activated, leading to the reconstitution of the original reactant. Thus, the complete working cycle of a classical LDRM (see Fig. 3A) comprises four distinct steps, i.e., EP ZM ZP EM EP, where two photochemical steps (power strokes) are interlaced by two THI steps8–10,15,16.
The rate-limiting event along each half-cycle is the THI step that occurs on a timescale orders of magnitude longer than the photochemical step completed within a few ps4,7,10–12,18,19. THI steps limit the applicability of LDRMs (limitation 1; L1 in Fig. 2A), since the motor operation requires a temperature sufficient to overcome energy barriers of 10–20 kcal/mol. Therefore, there is an ongoing effort to design LDRMs with working cycles avoiding the THI steps or, equivalently, avoid the formation of intermediates ZM and EM for the CCW rotating motors discussed above (see Fig. 3B).
Several theoretically designed two-stroke LDRMs can be found in the literature20–22. However, only limited progress has been reported in their synthesis. In fact, Gerwien et al.23 have reported23 a photon-only LDRM based on the hemi-thioindigo chromophore, and Boursalian et al. have described24 a phosphororganic molecule that required respectively three and four photochemical steps to complete their working cycles.
At the level of molecular ensembles, rather than a single molecule, motor operation is affected by two additional limitations (limitations 2 and 3; L2 and L3 in Fig. 2A). The first is related to the branching occurring at the CI of each photochemical step, which allows a fraction of the photoexcited molecules to return to the original conformation; i.e., to undergo an ultrafast internal conversion—see the blue circles in Fig. 2.
For alkene-based molecular motors, this branching is expressed in terms of the quantum yield of isomerisation (Φiso) and constitutes the second limitation to the construction of an efficient motor. For instance, the 3-stroke motor designed by Gerwien et al.23 does operate at low temperature, but, due to relatively low Φiso of the three photochemical steps, absorbs on average ∼1900 photons to complete a single 360° rotation23. This releases excessive heat in the device per effective rotation cycle, and limits the maximum number of rotation cycles performed before photo-degradation eventually occurs under continuous illumination.
The other additional limitation (see L3 in Fig. 2A) corresponds to a partial loss of CCW unidirectionality at the statistical level. Forces imposing a helical shape on EP* may not be sufficient to fully prevent the rotation in the CW direction, e.g., imposed by the environmental effects. In this case a fraction of the S1 population would lead, after decay at a CI, to a direct reconstitution of the same EP intermediate; thus, disrupting the rotary cycle concept.
The discussion above points to the following key properties that an efficient photon-only CCW rotating LDRM (see Fig. 2B) should have: (i) a full unidirectionality, (ii) a high Φiso, (iii) the absence of ZM and EM intermediates, (iv) a limited number of photochemical steps; i.e., ideally a two-stroke working cycle22. Presently, the highest photoisomerisation quantum yield Φiso reported for overcrowded alkene motors reaches 85% for the so-called first generation motors25, which are however characterized by a very slow THI step26. The second generation motors have a much faster THI27, but a reduced Φiso in the range 1–20%28. However, to the best of our knowledge none of these systems features the absence of the THI steps.
So far, the design of molecules that meet the requirements i–iv has been proven to be difficult13,28 because the precise “engineering rules” are still largely unknown, and systematic screening of the efficiency of multiple photon-only candidates through synthesis, photochemical, and spectroscopic characterization is highly impractical.
A viable alternative to the laboratory based screening is the use of computational quantum chemistry methods to select candidates for experimental studies. Such a virtual screening requires the mapping of the reaction paths, necessary to detect L1, and the simulation of the photoinduced population dynamics providing information on L2 and L3. As an important byproduct, theoretical modeling reveals the atomistic details of the successful candidates and, in turn, allows the formulation of novel structure-based engineering rules.
Although, in the past, accurate wavefunction-based quantum chemistry methods have been successfully used for mapping reaction paths, their use in dynamics simulations is cumbersome; especially when the simulations are carried out to screen multiple candidacies. Clearly, less demanding computational methods that can deal with both photochemical and thermal reactions in a balanced way need to be employed.
A rapid characterization of the photo and thermal reactivity of large organic molecules is accessible using the quantum-chemical SSR method29–31; see the Supplementary Notes 1 and 3 for the acronym and theoretical details. SSR employs ensemble density functional theory (eDFT)32–41 to obtain the ground and excited potential energies but incorporates the pertinent multireference characteristics of the electronic states in a fashion reminiscent of the more traditional wavefunction based methods29–31,42–44. The method has been employed to study the dynamics of photoinduced isomerisation in different retinal proteins providing support for its predictive ability45–47.
Most importantly in the present context, SSR has been used to model different LDRMs15,16,22,48–50. These studies have suggested rules for modifying the photocycle of a classic LDRM14, with the scope to overcome the limitations mentioned above22,48–51. In particular, SSR enabled the design of 1 (see Fig. 1)22, which was predicted to overcome limitation L1 as a consequence of a decrease in steric strain in the fjord region.
However, the preparation of 1 was found to be impractical22. Accordingly, the authors envisioned that a bigger but synthetically viable homologue E-3’-(2-methyl-2,3-dihydro-1H-benzo[b]cyclopenta[d]thiophen-1-ylidene)pyrrolidin-2’-one (2), here abbreviated as MTDP, could display the desired working cycle properties.
Here, we report on a combined computational and experimental study of the MTDP working cycle. We first use the SSR method for a characterization of the entire photocycle of an isolated (i.e., gas phase) MTDP with the scope of justifying successive demanding synthesis. Then, the spectroscopic study of the first half (EP ZM(?) ZP) of the working cycle of the synthesized MTDP is carried out. Finally, a set of QM/MM simulations is used to investigate the validity of the gas phase mechanism in the solvent environment.
Currently, an experimental study of the second half (ZP → EP) does not seem practically achievable due to difficulties with purification of the (meta-stable) ZP isomer from the photoequilibrium mixture. However, if the experiments confirm the validity of the computationally derived mechanism for the first half, the validity of the mechanism for the second half should follow by induction.
Results
Gas phase theoretical simulations
The computed S0 equilibrium geometries of the R enantiomer (S is, trivially, a mirror image displaying a mirror-image motion. For this reason, S is not explicitly considered here; see also the Supplementary Information) of the E-2 and Z-2 diastereomers and of the two corresponding CI’s are shown in Fig. 4A, B, respectively (see the Supplementary Information for more detail). The most stable diastereomer is EP, which is ca. 4 kcal/mol below ZP. Despite extensive attempts, no stable M-helical configuration has been found by geometry optimization. As will be further discussed below, this is attributed to two factors absent in a classic motor: (1) the strain of the 3-ethylidene-cyclopentene (ECPE) moiety incorporating the MTDP stereogenic center (see the “Discussion” section) and (2) a decrease in the steric repulsion in the MTDP fjord region.
Figure 4A displays the energy profiles computed along the S1 and S0 minimum energy paths (MEPs) that compose the EP photochemical reaction path (see Supplementary Fig. 8 of the Supplementary Information, for the complete path). The equilibrium geometry of S0 EP and the corresponding CI were used as starting points for the construction of MEPs driven by the torsion angle θ.
Photoexcitation to S1 is achieved through a π → π* transition centered around the C6=C axle. The transition corresponds to a local excitation, as confirmed by a rather low variation of the Mulliken charge on the pyrrolidinone unit, which, for EP, is ∼−0.17 in the S1 state vs. ∼−0.10 in the S0 state.
Photoexcitation breaks the π-bond of the C6=C axle, such that the initial S1 relaxation (not shown) occurs along the bond-length-alternation (BLA) stretching mode corresponding to a rapid lengthening of the C6=C bond and shortening of the former single bonds (see Supplementary Fig. 8). This enables torsion about the axle in the CCW direction induced, in principle, by the steric strain associated with the P helicity and the fjord region (see Fig. 1) and with the slope on the S1 potential energy surface (PES).
The system evolves toward CI (shown by the red filled triangle), where it decays to S0. Note that Fig. 4A, B shows MEPs on the adiabatic potential surfaces and the non-adiabatic events, such as the S1 → S0 decay, occur in the vicinity of the respective CIs and are not explicitly shown in the plots. The torsion continues on the S0 PES, where the ZP configuration is reached without encountering an M helical local minimum; the ZM species occurs only as an inflection (i.e., a flatter region) on the S0 PES. The same mechanism is obtained when the ZP diastereomer of 2 is photoexcited (see Fig. 4B). Hence, an isolated MTDP is predicted not to be affected by the limitation L1.
Notice that, consistently with the previous investigation of analogous neutral motors51, the S1 torsional relaxation induces a change in the electronic character from locally excited to charge transfer. This is demonstrated by the gradual accumulation of the negative charge on the pyrrolidinone unit from −0.17 to −0.53 and from −0.22 to −0.51 along the S1 branches of the MEP of EP-2 and ZP-2, respectively (see Supplementary Fig. 9 of the Supplementary Information). The increase in charge separation is characteristic of a so-called twist-BLA CI, and is consistent with the calculated S1 and S0 MEP coordinates that describe a rotation with no pyramidalisation at C nor C6; i.e., an axial rotation and not the precessional motion described in overcrowded alkene motors14–16.
In order to further document the S1 relaxation mode and the corresponding electronic structure changes, we computed the S0, S1 and S2 energy profiles along the EP-2 MEP using the wavefunction-based multi-state multiconfigurational XMS-CASPT2 method with different active spaces. The results shown in Fig. 4A support the consistency of the XMS-CASPT2 and SSR methods. Furthermore, the S1 and S2 energy profiles and the corresponding charge distribution variations (see the insets in Fig. 4A) reveal, consistently with the SSR charge alterations, opposite trends in the electronic character along the S2 and the S1 potential energy curves, indicating the presence of an avoided crossing between these states (here, marked by sketching two diabatic curves).
The limitations L2 and L3 have initially been evaluated under isolated conditions by SSR-based quantum-classical dynamics simulations of the time evolution of photoexcited EP-2 and ZP-2 carried out by propagating a set of surface-hop trajectories (see the Supplementary Information for details). The results predict a full unidirectional CCW rotation of the pyrrolidinone rotator (see Fig. 4C, D and the Supplementary Multimedia files) indicating the absence of L3. Both half cycles are ultrafast with S1 lifetimes of ca. 400 fs and 300 fs for EP and ZP, respectively (see Supplementary Table 4 for different evaluation methods).
The excited state motion starts with the expected BLA relaxation occurring within the first ca. 100 fs. This is followed by the onset of the double bond twisting ultimately leading to non-adiabatic decay (i.e., in the CI and CIregions) to S0 after a latency time of ca. 280 fs for EP-2 and 220 fs for ZP-2 rotation, respectively.
Consistent with the MEPs computations, the rotations appear axial (see Supplementary Movies 1 and 2), since no C6 or C pyramidalisation is detected during progression toward the CI seam. Most importantly, photoisomerisation ends up in the ZP-2 (when started in EP-2) and the EP-2 (when started in ZP-2) diastereomers, without encountering the M helical conformations. Finally, the two steps display Φiso values, computed as the fraction of trajectories reaching the photoproduct, of 0.87 and 0.91 for EP and ZP, respectively, suggesting that MTDP should also overcome the limitation L2. However, in the following, we shall see that the solvent effect can significantly decrease such a high directionality and Φiso values and that these effects are consistent with Φiso experimentally measured in methanol.
Chemical synthesis
In order to validate the computational predictions above, 2 was prepared in racemic (R + S) form by implementing the strategy suggested in ref. 22 (see Fig. 5). Accordingly, a racemate of the substrate 2-methyl-2,3-dihydro-1H-benzo[b]cyclopenta[d]thiophen-1-one19 was conjugated, through aldol condensation, with the commercially available N-Boc pyrrolidinone to obtain a mixture of diastereomers that, after treatment with trifluoroacetic acid, dehydrates and eliminates the protecting group that exclusively yields the E-2 target. Therefore, our measurements have focused on the EP → ZP transition as an experimental testbed.
The geometrical structure of E-2 was confirmed by the X-ray crystallography (see the Supplementary Note 2). Comparison of the X-ray geometry with the calculated gas phase equilibrium geometry revealed a good match between geometric parameters, with a maximum deviation of the bond lengths of only 0.014 Å; see the Supplementary Note 4. Note that, as anticipated above, in this and in the following comparisons we exclusively focus on the R enantiomer of 2; because S is a mirror image, it would display exactly the same properties but rotate in the CW, rather than CCW, direction.
Transient absorption (TA) spectroscopy
The photoisomerisation dynamics of a methanol solution of E-2 (λmax = 305 nm) was investigated by femtosecond transient absorption upon 290 nm excitation. As shown in Fig. 6A, the ground state bleach (GSB, negative signal at wavelengths λ < 340 nm), and the excited state absorption (ESA, positive signal peaking at λ = 420 nm) both rise within the experimental time resolution (−40 fs and +40 fs spectra in Fig. 6D).
During the next 200 fs, the GSB level at λ < 320 nm remains constant, suggesting that no significant S1 → S0 population transfer occurs; consistently with the computationally predicted latency time of ca. 220–280 fs. The observed simultaneous growth of a secondary ESA band at ∼350 nm accompanied by a slight decay of the 420 nm ESA band is attributed to the early motion away from the FC region, which corresponds to the predicted character change from locally excited to charge transfer. The signal is also consistent with a red shift of the stimulated emission (negative signal), which initially (at 40 fs) overlaps and masks the 350 nm ESA and later on (at 240 fs) overlaps and attenuates the 420 nm ESA band.
The further evolution in Fig. 6C shows that the GSB and 420 nm ESA bands have markedly decayed by 1 ps, indicating significant S1 to S0 decay on this time scale. Simultaneously, the 350 nm ESA band is replaced by a 340 nm band assigned to the vibrationally hot S0 photoproduct. Within the next few ps (Fig. 6B), the 420 nm ESA band rapidly decays and the photoabsorption (PA) signature relaxes, due to S0 vibrational relaxation and cooling, and partially overlaps with the residual GSB band until a stationary or “final” TA spectrum is observed after 30 ps.
The photoisomerisation time scale is revealed by the global fit52 of the TA data with multiexponential decay kinetics (see the Supplementary Note 5 for details). The results of the fit of the dataset of Fig. 6A is displayed in Fig. 6E in the form of decay-associated spectra (DAS). The fastest, resolved time constant (110 fs) describes the spectral evolution assigned to the early motion away from the FC region because, consistent with Fig. 6D, the corresponding DAS reproduces the signal growth (negative amplitude) around 360 nm and the decay (positive amplitude) around 420 nm. The 600 fs DAS clearly displays the decay of the (positive) 420 nm ESA and the (negative) GSB around 320 nm, indicative of the S1 → S0 decay. The 2.3 ps DAS mostly reveals the S0 relaxation kinetics with further refilling of GSB due to the 340 nm PA band relaxation.
Finally, the “infinite” time DAS describes the final TA spectrum, ΔA∞(λ), observed beyond 30 ps. It is proportional to the difference between the steady-state photoproduct (Z-2) and reactant (E-2) absorption spectra (see Supplementary Note 5). This means that the stable Z diastereomer is already produced after decay to S0 and subsequent vibrational cooling by ∼30 ps. — i.e., in a single step. This is in marked contrast to classic 4-stroke motors, e.g., the oxindole motor51, where the “final” TA spectrum observed by ∼50 ps corresponds to the spectrum of a metastable configuration (e.g., ZM), which relaxes on a much slower timescale of THI (μs — ms) to the spectrum of a stable configuration (e.g., ZP)51.
Although the environmental effects were missing in the non-adiabatic trajectory calculations, the predicted 280 fs latency time required for initiating the double bond torsion and the 400 fs population decay time are not far from the experimentally assigned few hundred fs S1 vibrational relaxation and ca. 600 fs lifetime in methanol solution. Most importantly, the predicted absence of a S0 metastable species is consistent with the observation of a stable spectrum less than 30 ps after S1 decay.
The Φiso for the E-to-Z photoisomerisation of MTDP in MeOH at the 290 nm excitation wavelength has been determined using the final TA spectrum ΔA∞(λ). Using definition of Φiso, one has:
1 |
where AE(λ) and AZ(λ) are the known steady-state absorbance of the E and Z species (see Supplementary Note 5), and xE is the proportion of E-2 species excited by the pump pulse, i.e., the E-2 excitation probability. Hence, Φiso can be inferred provided that xE is known.
The excitation probability xE was calibrated using trans azobenzene (t AB) as an actinometer. Two TA measurements (one for a reference methanol solution of tAB and one for a fresh methanol solution of E-2) were performed under the same pump and probe conditions. Then, from Eq. (1) and the known Φiso and absorption spectra of cAB and tAB in MeOH53–55, the excitation probability xE was calibrated and Φiso of 2-EP(Φiso = 0.25 ± 0.05) was obtained. This value is lower than the theoretical Φiso of an isolated 2-EP molecule in the gas phase; therefore, suggesting that Φiso of 2 is strongly influenced by the environment.
Multiscale QM/MM theoretical simulations
The computationally derived mechanism of CCW rotation documented above is assumed to remain invariant in the solvent environment. This assumption was tested by simulating the photoinduced dynamics of EP in a methanol solution using quantum-classical trajectory surface hopping (TSH) simulations. This has required the construction of an S0 quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics (QM/MM) model of EP in methanol. A limited set of room-temperature initial conditions have then been generated starting from the constructed model and used to initiate the trajectory propagation in S1 employing different quantum chemical (CASSCF and SSR) and surface-hop (FSSH56,57 methods and DISH-XF58–60) to ensure the general validity of the result. The details are given in Supplementary Notes 3 and 4.
The above room-temperature simulations show that the methanol environment does not alter the axial isomerisation mechanism or the electronic characteristics observed for the isolated EP model (see Supplementary Movies 4–9) but significantly alters the statistical quantities associated with the system dynamics. In fact, the number of computed trajectories (ca. 40) enables one to obtain information, from which the longer time spent in S1, the decrease in reactivity, and the longer time required to reach the final configuration (ZP) are found to be closer to the experimental observations than to the gas phase simulations. Most importantly, after the S1 → S0 relaxation, the slow progression toward the ZP configuration (see the above mentioned Supplementary Movies) was related to the existence of a solvent-solute hydrogen bond network restricting the M → P change of helicity and forcing the molecule to reside in a transient M-helical configuration for several ps (from 1 ps to over 10 ps according to a FSSH study of a set of 40 CCW trajectories). The QM/MM TSH simulations also showed that very few trajectories moved in the CW direction and that these relaxed to EP rather than reaching ZM or ZP after decay at CI (see Fig. 2A). In all cases, the simulations in solution suggest a relatively low quantum efficiency, because the majority of the CCW trajectories are found to be unproductive.
In general, we concluded that the number of CCW rotating trajectories that successfully reached the ZP isomer in methanol are substantially decreased compared to isolated conditions. This brings the theoretical simulation closer to the experiment. The results of the TSH simulations are confirmed by the QM/MM optimization of MEPs in methanol, which points (similar to the gas phase) to the absence of stable M helicity.
Discussion
The general agreement between the simulated dynamics and the spectral evolution of the photoisomerisation of the E-2 diastereomer supports the computationally derived mechanism. This implies that the CCW direction of torsion is imposed by the initial P helicity in the vicinity of the FC geometry8, while the slope of the S1 MEP drives the rotator in the CCW direction until the Z diastereomer is reached through a concerted process. Although it was currently impossible to carry out femtosecond TA studies of the Z-2 diastereoisomer, the simulations point to the same photon-only concerted mechanism for the ZP → EP photoisomerisation; hence, for the second half of the rotary cycle. Indeed an additional set of trajectories starting from the room-temperature equilibrated ZP model in methanol, display the same axially rotating photoisomerisation mechanism seen in the EP simulation (see Supplementary Movie 10). The trajectories also indicate a perfect CCW unidirectionality of rotation (no L3), a faster isomerisation process and, potentially, a higher reactivity (i.e., reduced L1 and L2) with respect to the EP half-cycle discussed above. For instance, the productive trajectory analysis (see Supplementary Movies 4, 6–8) clearly shows that the molecule spends a limited amount of time in the EM configuration before finally generating the starting diastereoisomer EP.
The experimentally confirmed photon-only EP → ZP transformation allows us to investigate the origin of the removal of the THI step in MTDP. In an LDRM, the favored helicity is defined by the absolute configuration of the ring-embedded stereogenic center of the stator (see Fig. 1)8. In fact, there is a direct relationship between the axial position of the methyl group at the R stereogenic center and the P helicity of the fjord region. Most relevantly, the ZM to ZP THI occurs concurrently with the equatorial to axial ring inversion of the methyl8.
We will now show that, in contrast to the classic motor based on a cyclohexene stator (see Fig. 1), the inclusion of the cyclopentene-based strained element ECPE in Z-2 (see Fig. 7A) leads to destabilization of the equatorial position of the methyl substituent (the unit chirality is necessary as an achiral unit will generate energetically equivalent P and M configurations). This is demonstrated by the computational search for an equatorial conformation of the ECPE model in Fig. 7B, which exclusively produced an axial conformation. This behavior, that points at the removal of THI, is attributed to the allylic 1,3-strain61,62. As documented in Supplementary Note 4, such a strain is decreased in the corresponding cyclohexene-based element found in classical motors that show stable equatorial and axial conformers and, therefore, a THI step.
The ECPE strain pushing the methyl substituent to an axial position must drive the molecule to the P-helicity. However, this can only occur if the steric repulsion in the fjord region is decreased. This is demonstrated by additional computations of the model compound 3 (see Fig. 7C). In fact, Z-3, a close analogue of Z-2, has both equatorial and axial conformers. This is attributed to the steric repulsion caused by the proximity of the carbonyl group of the rotator and the terminal phenyl group of the stator. This steric repulsion is relaxed in Z-2 due to the presence of the five-membered thiophene moiety that places the terminal stator unit at a larger distance from the rotator.
However, it should be realized that such a decrease in strain must also have an impact on the level of unidirectionality that leads to L3. This means that a trade-off between a high level of directionality and THI removal has to be achieved in the ideal two-photon candidate. Of course, a more quantitative estimate of this effect requires a larger number of TSH simulations; a goal that goes beyond the present qualitative/mechanistic study.
Conclusions
In summary, the design and preparation of MTDP-like systems and, possibly, of an entire library of prospective 2-stroke motors must be guided by engineering rules ensuring the demonstrated axial rotation, unidirectionality and absence of stable M-intermediates. As we previously reported, the first requirement can be achieved by modulating the S0 homolytic and heterolytic breaking of the central double bond (the axle). Narrowing the gap between the heterolytic (usually, disfavored) and homolytic bond breaking enables one to switch from a twist-pyramidalisation (typical in classic LDRMs) to a twist-BLA geometry at the CI; thus, achieving a nearly perfect axial rotation14,22,48,50,51. Concurrently, this enhances accessibility of the CI seam, which may lead to a faster photoisomerisation and, possibly, an enhanced quantum yield14,51. The second requirement has instead been defined in the present work in terms of the presence of a chiral strained unit (e.g., ECPE) and a stator “geometry” allowing for a decreased steric repulsion in the fjord region (e.g., including a pentalene-like unit with two fused five-membered rings). When applying the two rules above, it is recommended to combine chemical intuition with proper computational modeling performed by appropriate computational tools; such as those employed in this work.
In this work, we have provided combined computational and experimental evidence that the EP → ZP half rotary cycle of 2 has the properties of a photon-only LDRM and disentangled the structural requirements associated with such behavior. Since SSR MEP and trajectory calculations (both in isolated conditions and in the QM/MM model in solution) indicate that the complementary ZP → EP half-cycle should display the same properties, the presented results appear to open a realistic route toward the preparation of prospective photon-only 2-stroke rotary motors.
Methods
Materials
Details of the synthesis and characterization of the MTDP motor are reported in Supplementary Note 2.
Computational methods
In this work, the state-interaction state-averaged spin-restricted ensemble-referenced Kohn-Sham (SI-SA-REKS, or SSR) method29–31,48,63 is used to obtain the total energies, the forces on the nuclei, and the nonadiabatic couplings. The SSR method employs eDFT32–41 to introduce the strong non-dynamic correlation into the description of the ground and excited electronic states of molecules and to obtain the excitation energies in a time-independent fashion reminiscent of the multi-configurational methods of wavefunction theory. The use of eDFT enables a seamless incorporation of the multi-reference effects into the computations, where the results of the standard KS computations are recovered for the weakly correlated (single-reference) systems while providing a much improved description of the systems with dissociating chemical bonds, biradical and polyradical electronic states, and electronic states with pronounced charge transfer30,31. The use of ensemble representation leads to the occurrence of the fractional occupation numbers of several frontier KS orbitals, which can be used to characterize the strength of the multi-configurational correlation effects.
The decoherence induced surface hopping from exact factorization (DISH-XF) method58,64 combines the electronic equations derived from the exact factorization of the electronic-nuclear wavefunction65–69 with the conventional TSH formalism70. The exact factorization enables one to seamlessly incorporate the effect of nuclear quantum momentum, which depends on the shape of nuclear distribution, into the classical equations of motion for the nuclei. In this way, the decoherence of the nuclear trajectories is achieved seamlessly58.
All the quantum chemical computations are carried out using the local version of the GAMESS-US program (2018.v3)71,72, which implements the SSR method and the analytic derivatives formalism73. All the calculations employ the 6-31G* basis set74 and the BH&HLYP exchange-correlation density functional75–77. The geometry optimizations are performed using the DL-FIND module78 interfaced with GAMESS-US. The geometries of the CIs are optimized by the CIOpt program40 with the penalty function formalism and using the analytic energy gradients of the intersecting states. The gas-phase NAMD simulations are performed by the pyUNI-xMD program64, a standalone code which implements the DISH-XF method79. The multiscale QM/MM calculations (including the NAMD) have been performed using the MOLCAS/Tinker interface80,81. The XMS-CASPT2 calculations have been performed using OpenMolcas82.
More information on the computational methods and the detail of computations can be found in Supplementary Note 3. The results of the theoretical simulations are reported in Supplementary Note 4.
Transient absorption measurements
A fresh methanol solution of E-2 was prepared to an absorbance A = 1.1/mm at its absorption maximum of λmax = 306 nm. The sample was investigated by femtosecond TA spectroscopy with a pump-probe setup described elsewhere83. In short, we used the 800-nm, 40-fs pulse of a Ti:sapphire regenerative amplifier (amplitude, operating at 5 kHz repetition rate) to pump a commercial, tunable optical parametric amplifier (TOPAS; Light Conversion) followed by fourth harmonic generation to produce a 290-nm pump pulse. A white-light continuum was generated with the fundamental 800 nm pulse in a 2 mm thick CaF2 crystal, and used as a probe pulse offering an absorption detection window spanning from 310 to 750 nm. The polarization of the pump beam was set at the magic angle (54.7 degrees) with respect to that of the probe. Both pump and probe beams were focused and overlapped in the sample, which was circulated in a 0.5-mm-thick cuvette with a peristaltic pump. The choice of a sub-300-nm pulse enables detecting the GSB signal (GSB observed from 310 to ∼350 nm) without any experimental noise due to pump light scattering, since the pump pulse lies outside this probe detection window. The pump power is adjusted within the linear regime of excitation, corresponding to pulse energies in the range of ∼1 mJ/cm2 or below. Quantitative data analysis was performed by singular value decomposition, followed by the global fitting of the dominating four singular transients; the analysis employed a multiexponential decay convoluted by a Gaussian function modeling the instrument response function. More details about data acquisition, processing and analysis can be found in Supplementary Note 5.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
R.P. and J.L. acknowledge support from the ANR (ANR-20-CE29-0021) and from the Interdisciplinary Thematic Institute QMat, as part of the ITI 2021-2028 program of the University of Strasbourg, CNRS and Inserm, via the IdEx Unistra (ANR 10 IDEX 0002), SFRI STRAT’US (ANR 20 SFRI 0012), EUR QMAT (ANR-17-EURE-0024) and Labex NIE (ANR-11-LABX-0058-NIE) projects of the French Investments for the Future Program. M.O., A.C. and M.P. are grateful for a EU-MIUR PNRR - CN3 (2022) grant.
Source data
Author contributions
M.F. and M.P. have designed the molecule. M.F., M.H.R., N.F., X.Y., D.K., and A.B.G. performed the simulations and analyzed the results. M.P., A.C., and G.G. synthesized the compound and characterized its structure. R.P. and J.L. performed the TA data acquisitions and analysis. M.F., M.P., J.L., and M.O. have written the manuscript.
Peer review
Peer review information
Nature Communications thanks Jacopo Fregoni, and the other, anonymous, reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work.
Data availability
Crystallographic data for the structure in this paper were deposited on the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre under accession code CCDC 2150133. Copy of the data can be obtained, free of charge, on application to CCDC, 12 Union Road, Cambridge CB2 1EZ, UK; (fax: +44(0) 1223 336 033; or e-mail: deposit@ccdc.cam.ac.uk). Supplementary Movies 1 and 2 show the EP → ZP and ZP → EP gas phase trajectories, Supplementary Movie 3 shows animation of the complete working cycle of the motor, and Supplementary Movies 4–10 show the QM/MM trajectories in methanol solution. Source data are provided with this paper.
Code availability
The computer code used in this research is available from the corresponding author (M.F.) upon request.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Ethical approval
The research reported here complies with the ethics & inclusion guidelines of the Nature Portfolio Journals.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Change history
12/7/2022
A Correction to this paper has been published: 10.1038/s41467-022-35006-w
Contributor Information
Michael Filatov(Gulak), Email: mike.filatov@gmail.com.
Marco Paolino, Email: paolino3@unisi.it.
Jérémie Léonard, Email: jeremie.leonard@ipcms.unistra.fr.
Massimo Olivucci, Email: massimo.olivucci@unisi.it.
Supplementary information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41467-022-33695-x.
References
- 1.Browne W, Feringa BL. Making molecular machines work. Nat. Nanotech. 2006;1:25–35. doi: 10.1038/nnano.2006.45. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Balzani V, Credi A, Venturi M. Light powered molecular machines. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2009;38:1542–1550. doi: 10.1039/b806328c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kay ER, Leigh DA. Rise of the molecular machines. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015;54:10080–10088. doi: 10.1002/anie.201503375. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Feringa BL. The art of building small: from molecular switches to motors (nobel lecture) Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017;56:11060–11078. doi: 10.1002/anie.201702979. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kassem S, et al. Artificial molecular motors. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017;46:2592–2621. doi: 10.1039/c7cs00245a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Baroncini M, et al. Making and operating molecular machines: a multidisciplinary challenge. ChemistryOpen. 2018;7:169–179. doi: 10.1002/open.201700181. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Roke D, Wezenberg SJ, Feringa BL. Molecular rotary motors: unidirectional motion around double bonds. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2018;115:9423–9431. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1712784115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Koumura N, Zijlstra RWJ, van Delden RA, Harada N, Feringa BL. Light-driven monodirectional molecular rotor. Nature. 1999;401:152–155. doi: 10.1038/43646. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Koumura N, Geertsema EM, van Gelder MB, Meetsma A, Feringa BL. Second generation light-driven molecular motors. Unidirectional rotation controlled by a single stereogenic center with near-perfect photoequilibria and acceleration of the speed of rotation by structural modification. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2002;124:5037–5051. doi: 10.1021/ja012499i. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Pollard MM, Meetsma A, Feringa BL. A redesign of light-driven rotary molecular motor. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2008;6:507–512. doi: 10.1039/b715652a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Greb L, Lehn J-M. Light-driven molecular motors: imines as four-step or two-step unidirectional rotors. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014;136:13114–13117. doi: 10.1021/ja506034n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Greb L, Eichhöfer A, Lehn J-M. Synthetic molecular motors: thermal N inversion and directional photoinduced C=N bond rotation of camphorquinone imines. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2015;54:14345–14348. doi: 10.1002/anie.201506691. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Pooler DRS, Lubbe AS, Crespi S, Feringa BL. Designing light-driven rotary molecular motors. Chem. Sci. 2021;12:14964–14986. doi: 10.1039/d1sc04781g. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Filatov M, Olivucci M. Designing conical intersections for light-driven single molecule rotary motors: from precessional to axial motion. J. Org. Chem. 2014;79:3587–3600. doi: 10.1021/jo5004289. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Kazaryan A, et al. Understanding the dynamics behind the photoisomerization of a light-driven fluorene molecular rotary motor. J. Phys. Chem. A. 2010;114:5058–5067. doi: 10.1021/jp100609m. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kazaryan A, Lan Z, Schäfer LV, Thiel W, Filatov M. Surface hopping excited-state dynamics study of the photoisomerization of a light-driven fluorene molecular rotary motor. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2011;7:2189–2199. doi: 10.1021/ct200199w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Conyard J, et al. Ultrafast dynamics in the power stroke of a molecular rotary motor. Nat. Chem. 2012;4:547–551. doi: 10.1038/nchem.1343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Pijper D, van Delden RA, Meetsma A, Feringa BL. Acceleration of a nanomotor: electronic control of the rotary speed of a light-driven molecular rotor. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005;127:17612–17613. doi: 10.1021/ja054499e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Landaluce TF, London G, Pollard MM, Rudolf P, Feringa BL. Rotary molecular motors: a large increase in speed through a small change in design. J. Org. Chem. 2010;75:5323–5325. doi: 10.1021/jo1006976. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.García-Iriepa C, et al. Chiral Hydrogen bond environment providing unidirectional rotation in photoactive molecular motors. J. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2013;4:1389–1396. doi: 10.1021/jz302152v. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Wang J, Durbeej B. Toward fast and efficient visible-light-driven molecular motors: a minimal design. ChemistryOpen. 2018;7:583–589. doi: 10.1002/open.201800089. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Filatov M, Paolino M, Min SK, Choi CH. Design and photoisomerization dynamics of a new family of synthetic 2-stroke light driven molecular rotary motors. Chem. Commun. 2019;55:5247–5250. doi: 10.1039/c9cc01955c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Gerwien A, Mayer P, Dube H. Photon-only molecular motor with reverse temperature-dependent efficiency. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2018;140:16442–16445. doi: 10.1021/jacs.8b10660. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Boursalian GB, et al. All-photochemical rotation of molecular motors with a phosphorus stereoelement. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020;142:16868–16876. doi: 10.1021/jacs.0c08249. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Wiley TE, Konar A, Miller NA, Spears KG, Sension RJ. Primed for efficient motion: ultrafast excited state dynamics and optical manipulation of a four stage rotary molecular motor. J. Phys. Chem. A. 2018;122:7548–7558. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpca.8b06472. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.ter Wiel MKJ, van Delden RA, Meetsma A, Feringa BL. Increased speed of rotation for the smallest light-driven molecular motor. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003;125:15076–15086. doi: 10.1021/ja036782o. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Klok M, et al. MHz unidirectional rotation of molecular rotary motors. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2008;130:10484–10485. doi: 10.1021/ja8037245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Conyard J, Cnossen A, Browne WR, Feringa BL, Meech SR. Chemically optimizing operational efficiency of molecular rotary motors. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014;136:9692–9700. doi: 10.1021/ja5041368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Filatov M. Assessment of density functional methods for obtaining geometries at conical intersections in organic molecules. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2013;9:4526–4541. doi: 10.1021/ct400598b. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Filatov M. Spin-restricted ensemble-referenced Kohn-Sham method: basic principles and application to strongly correlated ground and excited states of molecules. WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci. 2015;5:146–167. [Google Scholar]
- 31.Filatov, M. In Density-Functional Methods for Excited States, Vol. 368 (eds Ferré, N., Filatov, M. & Huix-Rotllant, M.) 97–124 (Springer; 2016)
- 32.Valone SM. A one-to-one mapping between one-particle densities and some n-particle ensembles. J. Chem. Phys. 1980;73:4653–4655. [Google Scholar]
- 33.Lieb EH. Density functionals for Coulomb systems. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 1983;24:243–277. [Google Scholar]
- 34.Perdew JP, Parr RG, Levy M, Balduz Jr JL. Density-functional theory for fractional particle number: derivative discontinuities of the energy. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1982;49:1691–1694. [Google Scholar]
- 35.Englisch H, Englisch R. Hohenberg-Kohn theorem and non-V-representable densities. Physica. 1983;A121:253–268. [Google Scholar]
- 36.Englisch H, Englisch R. Exact density functionals for ground-state energies. I. General results. Phys. Stat. Sol. (b) 1984;123:711–721. [Google Scholar]
- 37.Englisch H, Englisch R. Exact density functionals for ground-state energies II. Details and remarks. Phys. Stat. Sol. (b) 1984;124:373–379. [Google Scholar]
- 38.Gross EKU, Oliveira LN, Kohn W. Rayleigh-Ritz variational principle for ensembles of fractionally occupied states. Phys. Rev. A. 1988;37:2805–2808. doi: 10.1103/physreva.37.2805. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Gross EKU, Oliveira LN, Kohn W. Density-functional theory for ensembles of fractionally occupied states. I. Basic formalism. Phys. Rev. A. 1988;37:2809–2820. doi: 10.1103/physreva.37.2809. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Oliveira LN, Gross EKU, Kohn W. Density-functional theory for ensembles of fractionally occupied states. II. Application to the He atom. Phys. Rev. A. 1988;37:2821–2833. doi: 10.1103/physreva.37.2821. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Oliveira LN, Gross EKU, Kohn W. Ensemble-density functional theory. Int. J. Quantum Chem. Quantum Chem. Symp. 1990;24:707–716. [Google Scholar]
- 42.Filatov M, Shaik S. A spin-restricted ensemble-referenced Kohn-Sham method and its application to diradicaloid situations. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1999;304:429–437. [Google Scholar]
- 43.Moreira IdPR, Costa R, Filatov M, Illas F. Restricted ensemble-referenced Kohn-Sham versus broken symmetry approaches in density functional theory: magnetic coupling in Cu binuclear complexes. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2007;3:764–774. doi: 10.1021/ct7000057. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Kazaryan A, Heuver J, Filatov M. Excitation energies from spin-restricted ensemble-referenced Kohn-Sham method: a state-average approach†. J. Phys. Chem. A. 2008;112:12980–12988. doi: 10.1021/jp8033837. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Liang R, Liu F, Martínez TJ. Nonadiabatic photodynamics of retinal protonated Schiff base in channelrhodopsin 2. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2019;10:2862–2868. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.9b00701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Yu JK, Liang R, Liu F, Martínez TJ. First-principles characterization of the elusive I fluorescent state and the structural evolution of retinal protonated Schiff base in bacteriorhodopsin. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019;141:18193–18203. doi: 10.1021/jacs.9b08941. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Liang R, Yu JK, Meisner J, Liu F, Martínez TJ. Electrostatic control of photoisomerization in channelrhodopsin 2. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021;143:5425–5437. doi: 10.1021/jacs.1c00058. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Nikiforov A, Gamez JA, Thiel W, Filatov M. Computational design of a family of light-driven rotary molecular motors with improved quantum efficiency. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2016;7:105–110. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b02575. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Paolino M, et al. Design, synthesis, and dynamics of a green fluorescent protein fluorophore mimic with an ultrafast switching function. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016;138:9807–9825. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b10812. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Filatov M, Paolino M, Min SK, Kim KS. Fulgides as light-driven molecular rotary motors: computational design of a prototype compound. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2018;9:4995–5001. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.8b02268. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Pooler DRS, et al. Effect of charge-transfer enhancement on the efficiency and rotary mechanism of an oxindole-based molecular motor. Chem. Sci. 2021;12:7486–7497. doi: 10.1039/d1sc01105g. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.van Stokkum IH, Larsen DS, van Grondelle R. Global and target analysis of time-resolved spectra. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2004;1657:82–104. doi: 10.1016/j.bbabio.2004.04.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Vetráková Ĺ, et al. The absorption spectrum of cis-azobenzene. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 2017;16:1749–1756. doi: 10.1039/c7pp00314e. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Ladányi V, et al. Azobenzene photoisomerization quantum yields in methanol redetermined. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 2017;16:1757–1761. doi: 10.1039/c7pp00315c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Quick M, et al. Photoisomerization dynamics and pathways of trans- and cis-azobenzene in solution from broadband femtosecond spectroscopies and calculations. J. Phys. Chem. B. 2014;118:8756–8771. doi: 10.1021/jp504999f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Tully JC. Molecular dynamics with electronic transitions. J. Chem. Phys. 1990;93:1061. [Google Scholar]
- 57.Granucci G, Persico M. Critical appraisal of the fewest switches algorithm for surface hopping. J. Chem. Phys. 2007;126:134114. doi: 10.1063/1.2715585. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Ha J-K, Lee IS, Min SK. Surface hopping dynamics beyond nonadiabatic couplings for quantum coherence. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2018;9:1097–1104. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.8b00060. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Min SK, Agostini F, Tavernelli I, Gross EKU. Ab initio nonadiabatic dynamics with coupled trajectories: a rigorous approach to quantum (De)coherence. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 2017;8:3048–3055. doi: 10.1021/acs.jpclett.7b01249. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Agostini F, Min SK, Abedi A, Gross EKU. Quantum-classical nonadiabatic dynamics: coupled- vs independent-trajectory methods. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2016;12:2127–2143. doi: 10.1021/acs.jctc.5b01180. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Johnson F. Allylic strain in 6-membered rings. Chem. Rev. 1968;68:375–413. [Google Scholar]
- 62.Hoffmann RW. Flexible molecules with defined shape-conformational design. Angew. Chem. 1992;31:1124–1134. [Google Scholar]
- 63.Filatov M, Martínez TJ, Kim KS. Using the GVB Ansatz to develop ensemble DFT method for describing multiple strongly correlated electron pairs. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2016;18:21040–21050. doi: 10.1039/c6cp00236f. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Lee IS, et al. PyUNIxMD: a Python-based excited state molecular dynamics package. J. Comp. Chem. 2021;42:1755–1766. doi: 10.1002/jcc.26711. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Hunter G. Conditional probability amplitudes in wave mechanics. Int. J. Quantum Chem. 1975;9:237–242. [Google Scholar]
- 66.Abedi A, Maitra NT, Gross EKU. Exact factorization of the time-dependent electron-nuclear wave function. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2010;105:123002. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.123002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Abedi A, Maitra NT, Gross EKU. Correlated electron-nuclear dynamics: exact factorization of the molecular wave-function. J. Chem. Phys. 2012;137:22A530. doi: 10.1063/1.4745836. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Abedi A, Agostini F, Suzuki Y, Gross EKU. Dynamical steps that bridge piecewise adiabatic shapes in the exact time-dependent potential energy surface. Phys. Rev. Lett. 2013;110:263001. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.263001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Agostini F, et al. The exact electronic back-reaction on classical nuclei in non-adiabatic charge transfer. J. Chem. Phys. 2015;142:084303. doi: 10.1063/1.4908133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Tully JC. Molecular dynamics with electronic transitions. J. Chem. Phys. 1990;93:1061. [Google Scholar]
- 71.Schmidt MW, et al. J. Comput. Chem. 1993;14:1347–1363. [Google Scholar]
- 72.Gordon, M. & Schmidt, M. In Theory and Applications of Computational Chemistry, the first forty years. (Eds Dykstra, C. E., Frenking, G., Kim, K. S. & Scuseria, G. E.) pp 1167–1189 (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2005).
- 73.Filatov M, Liu F, Martínez TJ. Analytical derivatives of the individual state energies in ensemble density functional theory method. I. General formalism. J. Chem. Phys. 2017;147:034113. doi: 10.1063/1.4994542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Raghavachari K, Binkley JS, Seeger R, Pople JA. Self-consistent molecular orbital methods. XX. A basis set for correlated wave functions. J. Chem. Phys. 1980;72:650–654. [Google Scholar]
- 75.Becke AD. Density-Functional Exchange-Energy Approximation with Correct Asymptotic Behavior. Phys. Rev. A. 1988;38:3098–3100. doi: 10.1103/physreva.38.3098. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Lee C, Yang W, Parr RG. Development of the Colle-Salvetti Correlation-Energy Formula into a Functional of the Electron Density. Phys. Rev. B. 1988;37:785–789. doi: 10.1103/physrevb.37.785. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Becke AD. A New Mixing of Hartree-Fock and Local Density-Functional Theories. J. Chem. Phys. 1993;98:1372–1377. [Google Scholar]
- 78.Kästner J, et al. DL-FIND: An Open-Source Geometry Optimizer for Atomistic. Simulations. J. Phys. Chem. A. 2009;113:11856–11865. doi: 10.1021/jp9028968. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Levine B, Coe JD, Martínez TJ. Optimizing conical intersections without derivative coupling vectors: application to multistate multireference second-order perturbation theory (MS-CASPT2) J. Phys. Chem. B. 2008;112:405–413. doi: 10.1021/jp0761618. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Aquilante F, et al. Molcas 8: new capabilities for multiconfigurational quantum chemical calculations across the periodic table. J. Comput. Chem. 2016;37:506–541. doi: 10.1002/jcc.24221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Ponder JW, Richards FM. Tinker molecular modeling package. J. Comput. Chem. 1987;8:1016–1024. [Google Scholar]
- 82.Fdez Galván I, et al. OpenMolcas: From Source Code to Insight. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 2019;15:5925–5964. doi: 10.1021/acs.jctc.9b00532. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Briand J, et al. Coherent ultrafast torsional motion and isomerization of a biomimetic dipolar photoswitch. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2010;12:3178–3187. doi: 10.1039/b918603d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
Crystallographic data for the structure in this paper were deposited on the Cambridge Crystallographic Data Centre under accession code CCDC 2150133. Copy of the data can be obtained, free of charge, on application to CCDC, 12 Union Road, Cambridge CB2 1EZ, UK; (fax: +44(0) 1223 336 033; or e-mail: deposit@ccdc.cam.ac.uk). Supplementary Movies 1 and 2 show the EP → ZP and ZP → EP gas phase trajectories, Supplementary Movie 3 shows animation of the complete working cycle of the motor, and Supplementary Movies 4–10 show the QM/MM trajectories in methanol solution. Source data are provided with this paper.
The computer code used in this research is available from the corresponding author (M.F.) upon request.