Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Scientific Reports logoLink to Scientific Reports
. 2022 Oct 29;12:18228. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-23179-9

Exposure to low levels of photocatalytic TiO2 nanoparticles enhances seed germination and seedling growth of amaranth and cruciferous vegetables

Chi-Cheng Li 1,2, Sian-Ming Jhou 3,#, Yi-Chen Li 3,#, Jhih-Wei Ciou 3,#, You-Yen Lin 4, Shih-Che Hung 4,5, Jen-Hsiang Chang 6, Jen-Che Chang 7, Der-Shan Sun 4,5, Ming-Lun Chou 8, Hsin-Hou Chang 4,5,✉
PMCID: PMC9617883  PMID: 36309586

Abstract

Titanium dioxide (TiO2) is one of the most common compounds on Earth, and it is used in natural forms or engineered bulks or nanoparticles (NPs) with increasing rates. However, the effect of TiO2 NPs on plants remains controversial. Previous studies demonstrated that TiO2 NPs are toxic to plants, because the photocatalytic property of TiO2 produces biohazardous reactive oxygen species. In contrast, another line of evidence suggested that TiO2 NPs are beneficial to plant growth. To verify this argument, in this study, we used seed germination of amaranth and cruciferous vegetables as a model system. Intriguingly, our data suggested that the controversy was due to the dosage effect. The photocatalytic activity of TiO2 NPs positively affected seed germination and growth through gibberellins in a plant-tolerable range (0.1 and 0.2 mg/cm2), whereas overdosing (1 mg/cm2) induced tissue damage. Given that plants are the foundations of the ecosystem; these findings are useful for agricultural application, sustainable development and maintenance of healthy environments.

Subject terms: Nanoscale materials, Plant sciences

Introduction

Nanotechnology is an emerging technological advancement for the manipulation and synthesis of materials with a size range of 1–100 nm. Nanotechnology is a billion-dollar industry involving business and industrial investments that offer an array of tremendous applications1,2. Nanoparticles (NPs) (all abbreviations are available in the supplementary Table S1) can be categorized on the basis of their origin, such as natural, man-made, and engineered3. Environmental NPs have existed in nature from the beginning of Earth’s history and they are still found in the environment in the form of volcanic dust, lunar dust and mineral composites2. Meanwhile, thousands of tons of engineered NPs (ENPs) are produced annually, and they will inevitably be released into soil and waters and increase the load of ENPs in different environmental matrices, thereby attracting extensive attention on the potential impact of ENPs in the environment on aquatic and terrestrial organisms3–8. Once released in the environment, ENPs may contact or even enter plants, microorganisms and other organisms through the food chain. In particular, NPs have the potential to form highly reactive materials such as photocatalysts due to their highly reactive nature and large surface areas2.

Notably, among all NP categories, TiO2 is major type of NP produced globally2. TiO2 NPs are utilized in paint pigments, inks, papers, plastics and cosmetic sunscreens to provide protection against ultraviolet (UV) light2,9. In addition, natural and engineered TiO2 NPs have shown their potentials in various antimicrobial and biomedical applications10–20. As a result, scientific communities have paid extensive attentions to the interactions of TiO2 NPs with biological entities such as plants10,11. Highly sensitive to environmental factors, plants are vital life forms of all ecosystems and play a significant role in trophic transfer and the maintenance of worldwide ecological balance. Therefore, the exposure of plants to natural NPs or ENPs above particular levels may be toxic. The contact, interaction, accumulation and toxicity of NPs in plant systems are a recently formed field of research. After decades of studies, however, our current knowledge is not sufficient to formulate a detailed model of NP behavior and their fate in the environment5. For example, researchers have reported contradictory results that involve positive, negative and inconsequential effects from plants being exposed to TiO2 NPs2. From a toxicity perspective, previous studies have suggested that photocatalytic materials, such as TiO2 NPs, have negative impacts on terrestrial microorganisms and plants2. For instance, the associations of TiO2 NPs with the decrease of shoot biomass in wheat, delayed germination and root elongation in narbon bean (Vicia narbonensis L.) and Zea mays L., and DNA damage in Nicotiana tabacum and Allium cepa have been reported21–23. By contrast, treatments of TiO2 NPs are associated with increases of light absorption and photosynthetic carbon reaction in spinach and maize and improvement of nitrogen photoreduction in soybeans and spinach24–27. These positive responses of plants led to the suggestion of using TiO2 NP as a nanofertilizer26. However, the concept of nanofertilizer is mainly focused on the nutrient supplemental role of NPs26, and whether the beneficial effect to plants contributes to the photocatalytic property of TiO2 NP remains elusive.

Despite these contradictory results, Ti and TiO2 are common and naturally occur in soil and volcanic ash28–31. Soil covering European surfaces contains an average 0.02–5.5% of TiO229 and rocks in the USA contain approximately 1% of TiO230. Theoretically, plants on Earth should have evolved to adapt to the existence of TiO2 in soil. Therefore, whether and how TiO2 NP may influence plant growth should be determined. In this study, we used the seed germination and growth of vegetables, Amaranthus mangostanus, Brassica napus and Brassica rapa chinensis, as model systems. We found that treatments of TiO2 NPs with low doses (0.1 and 0.2 mg/cm2) -induced enhancing effect, while treatments with a high dose (1 mg/cm2) displayed suppressive effect on seed germination and growth. The potential mechanism, applications and relationships with the photocatalytic properties are discussed.

Materials and methods

Chemicals and NPs

Chemicals such as N-acetylcysteine (NAC) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). UV light-responsive pure TiO2 NPs (Degussa P25; Evonik, Germany) were used as previously described12,19,32. The crystal structure of P25 TiO2 was a mixture of 75% anatase and 25% rutile TiO2. The purity was at least 99.5% TiO2 and primary particle size was 21 nm ± 10 nm, with a specific surface area of 50 ± 15 m2/g. Carbon-containing TiO2 NPs [TiO2(C)] were prepared using a sol–gel method19,33. The powders were subjected to calcination at 200 °C, and named C200; the detailed preparation of C200 has been reported elsewhere19,33. By photoreduction process using H2PtCl6 and TiO2 NPs as a platinum precursor and a pristine photocatalyst, respectively, platinum-containing TiO2 NPs [TiO2(Pt)] were prepared and characterized following previously described methods13,15. The NPs of zinc oxide (ZnO; < 40 nm)9 single-walled carbon nanotubes (CNTs), and silicon dioxide (SiO2; 10–20 nm) were purchased from Sigma–Aldrich. Nanodiamond (ND) NPs, with average sizes of 5 and 100 nm9,34,35, were purchased from Kay Diamond Products (Boca Raton, FL, USA).

Seeds, soil and flowerpots

Seeds of vegetable A. mangostanus, B. napus and B. rapa chinensis were purchased from Sinon (Taichung, Taiwan). All seeds used this study were stored in an electronic dehumidifying dry cabinet (Taiwan Drytech, Taipei, Taiwan) with humidity < 40% before use, and then utilize as fresh as possible. Soil mixtures for cultivation and plastic flowerpots (diameter of 10 cm) were obtained from Green Orchids (Taipei, Taiwan). All experimental procedures are complied with national guidelines.

Analysis of seed germination and seedling growth

To analyze the seed germination and seedling growth of A. mangostanus, B. napus and B. rapa chinensis, the soil surfaces of the pots were added without or with different amounts of NPs (0.1, 0.2 or 1 mg/cm2). Each flowerpot was seeded with 10–90 seeds depending on the experimental requirement. To avoid washing away the soil-surface TiO2, the plants were placed in a tray and absorb water (without TiO2) via capillary action through the holes in the bottom of the pot. After daily sunlight illumination and water supplements for 1 week, the germination rate and root and shoot length of the seedlings were examined and quantified. In cotton substrate experiments, sterile absorbent cotton (Taiwan Cotton, Taipei, Taiwan) was placed in sterile plastic cell culture dishes (diameter of 10 cm)36,37 with daily water supply to maintain the moisture. In experiments using antioxidant NAC, 100 µL of 1 mM NAC was added to each pot per day for 7 days. In experiments with visible light illumination, pots were illuminated by visible light (1 × 104 lx) using light-emitting diode (LED) lamps (Philips Taiwan, Taipei, Taiwan) for 10 h/day for 7 days; at the same time, UV cut-off filters (400 nm; Edmund Optics, Barrington, NJ, USA)32 were used to prevent the illumination of small fractions with UV wavelength. A light meter (model LX-102; Lutron Electronic Enterprises, Taiwan)14,16 was used to examine the illumination density.

Detection of plant hormone gibberellins (gibberellic acids; GAs)

One week old seedlings of A. mangostanus treated with or without TiO2 NPs and the antioxidant NAC were harvested. The samples were freshly prepared before enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) examinations. GA extraction and purification prior to immunoassay were conducted according to previous reports38,39. The homogenized samples were extracted in 80% cold (v/v) aqueous methanol solution overnight at 4 °C (with 10 mg/L butylated hydroxytoluene to prevent oxidation). The supernatants were collected after centrifugation at 10,000×g (4 °C) for 20 min to remove the insoluble debris. The crude extract was passed through a 0.45 µm filter (Merck Millipore, Billerica, MA, USA). A 400-μl aliquot of the filtrate was dried under vacuum using a SpeedVac vacuum concentrators (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The extraction residues were dissolved, diluted in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) (0.01 M, pH 9.2), and adjusted to pH 8.5. The levels of GAs were detected using an ELISA kit purchased from MyBioSource (San Diego, CA, USA).

Electron microscopy

Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) examinations of TiO2 treated seedlings and TiO2 NPs were performed using a Hitachi H-7500 TEM (Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan) and Hitachi S-4700 SEM (Hitachi)13,15,19,32,40, respectively. The seedlings were pre-fixed with 2.5% glutaraldehyde in 0.1 M phosphate buffer (pH 7.3) for 1 h. The seedling samples were washed with 0.1 M PBS twice at a 10-min interval. The samples were post-fixed with 1% osmium for 1 h and washed with 5% sucrose. The seedling samples were dehydrated in a graded ethanol-acetone series, embedded in Spurr’s resin (Electron Microscopy Sciences, Hatfield, PA, USA), and sliced using a Ultracut-R ultramicrotome (Leica, Wetzlar, Germany). The seedling tissue sections were finally immobilized on single-well copper grids for TEM analysis.

Statistical analysis

All results were calculated from data obtained from three independent experiments. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to assess the statistical significance of differences results. The significance of the data was examined using one-way ANOVA, followed by the post hoc Bonferroni-corrected t test. A probability of type 1 error (α = 0.05) was recognized as the threshold for statistical significance. The statistical tests were carried out, and graphed using Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Taiwan, Taipei, Taiwan) and SigmaPlot (Systat Software, Point Richmond, CA, USA) software as previously described41.

Results

TiO2 NPs markedly enhanced the seed germination and seedling growth of A. mangostanus

Amaranthus is a cosmopolitan genus with species cultivated as leaf vegetables A. mangostanus was used in this study because of its small seeds, fast growth rate and potential application in agriculture. Under UV irradiation, the photocatalytic activity of anatase TiO2 nanoparticles (NPs) releases reactive oxygen species (ROS) and enables TiO2 NPs to serve as biocides12,42–44. Prior to the experiments, we hypothesized that the addition of TiO2 NPs may exert a negative impact on the seed germination and growth of A. mangostanus. Intriguingly, we found that supplemention of TiO2 NPs on the soil markedly enhanced the seed germination rate of A. mangostanus in all three dosages within 1 week (Fig. 1A–D, representative images; Fig. 1E, TiO2 untreated vs. TiO2 treated groups, *P < 0.05).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

Open in a new tab

TiO2 NPs treatments on soil enhanced the germination rate of Amaranthus mangostanus seeds. Images of 1-week-old seedlings of Amaranthus mangostanus after seeding on soil without (A) or with (B–D) addition of pure TiO2 NPs are shown. The seed germination rates of aforementioned conditions were quantified (E). *P < 0.05 vs. 0 mg/cm2 TiO2 untreated groups, †P < 0.05 vs. 0.2 mg/cm2 TiO2 groups. n = 3 (3 independent experiments; each experiment with 30 seeds). (A–D) Pot diameter: 10 cm; scale bars: 1 cm.

The high shoot length in the TiO2 groups (Fig. 1A vs. Fig. 1B,C), suggested that TiO2 NPs may also increase the growth rate of the seedlings. Further quantitative analyses of the length of shoot and root of seedlings revealed that TiO2 NPs markedly enhanced the shoot and root growth of the seedlings in low-dose treatments (Fig. 2A,B, 0 vs. 0.1 and 0.2 mg/cm2 groups; root analyses, †P < 0.05; shoot analyses, ††P < 0.01), but suppressed seedling growth at high dose treatments (Fig. 2A,B, 0 vs. 1 mg/cm2; groups, root and shoot analyses, ***P < 0.001). When the shoot length and root length of the control group (0 mg/cm2 TiO2 NPs) were plotted in a 2-dimensional (2D) graph with regression (solid) and averaged shoot and root length (dotted) lines, we found that approximately 45% of the seedlings were located at the shoothi and roothi areas (Fig. 2C, upper right quadrant, a well-grown seedling population), and the seedlings were equally distributed at both sides of the regression line (Fig. 2C, untreated control, 0 mg/cm2 group). When we applied the aforementioned dotted lines (averaged shoot and root length of normal) to the TiO2 NP-treated conditions, the 2D graphs revealed that two low-dose groups showed a higher percentage of shoothi roothi population (67 and 57% in Fig. 2D,E, respectively), whereas the high dose group showed a lower percentage of shoothi roothi population (4%, Fig. 2F). These results were in agreement with the shoot and root length analyses (Fig. 2A,B). Notably, when we overlaid these 2D graphs (Fig. 2C–F), we found that the shoothi roothi population in the TiO2 groups was almost exclusively located at the upper area above the regression line of the normal control (Fig. 2G), suggesting that the growth enhancement effect was primarily mediated through the induction of shoot growth. Consistently, quantitative analyses further indicated that the shoothi roothi populations were markedly increased in the two low-dose (Fig. 2H, 0 vs. 0.1 and 0.2 mg/cm2 groups; †P < 0.05) TiO2 groups, whereas the shoothi roothi populations were markedly suppressed in the high-dose TiO2 groups, when compared with untreated controls (Fig. 2H, 0 vs. 1 mg/cm2 groups; **P < 0.01).

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Open in a new tab

Soil TiO2 NP levels affected the seedling growth of Amaranthus mangostanus. Analyses of root (A) and shoot (B) length of 1-week-old Amaranthus mangostanus seedlings. Root–shoot 2D graphs of the seedling without (C) and with different doses of TiO2 NP treatments (D–F), and an overlay (G) are shown. The regression lines of untreated groups were indicated (C,G). The shoothi roothi population (upper-right quadrant) of seedlings in each condition was quantified (H). The vertical and horizontal dotted lines in (C–F) are the mean values of root length and shoot length of the untreated control groups (C), respectively. †P < 0.05, ††P < 0.01, *P < 0.05, ***P < 0.001 vs. 0 mg/cm2 TiO2 untreated groups; ##P < 0.01, ###P < 0.001 vs. respective 0.2 mg/cm2 TiO2 groups. n = 90 (3 independent experiments; each experiment with 30 seeds) (A,B). n = 30 (3 independent experiments; each experiment with 10 seeds) (C–G). n = 3 (3 independent experiments; each experiment with 30 seeds) (H).

ZnO NPs markedly enhanced the seed germination and seedling growth of A. mangostanus

TiO2 NP is a UV-responsive photocatalyst. To investigate whether the addition of other photocatalytic NPs to the soil is still sufficient to achieve similar effects, ZnO NP, another photocatalytic material45, was employed. Following the same approaches in TiO2 experiments, we found that supplemention of ZnO NPs to the soil also markedly increased the seed germination rate and growth of A. mangostanus (Fig. 3A–D, representative images; Fig. 1E, TiO2 untreated vs TiO2 treated groups, *P < 0.05). In addition, root and shoot length analyses revealed that ZnO NPs markedly increased the growth of both root and shoot of the seedlings (Fig. 4A,B, 0 vs. 0.2 mg/cm2 groups; root analyses, †P < 0.05; shoot analyses, ††P < 0.01), but suppressed seedling growth at high dose treatments (Fig. 4A,B, 0 vs. 1 mg/cm2; groups, root and shoot analyses, **P < 0.01). Shoot–root 2D graphs also revealed that ZnO NP treatments markedly enhanced the shoothi roothi populations of the two low-dose groups (Fig. 4H, 0 vs. 0.1 and 0.2 mg/cm2 groups; †P < 0.05), but suppressed the shoothi roothi population in the high-dose group (Fig. 4H, 0 vs. 1 mg/cm2 groups; *P < 0.05). The shoothi roothi population in the ZnO groups was exclusively located at the upper region above the regression line of normal control (Fig. 4G), suggesting that the growth enhancement effect was primarily mediated through the induction of shoot growth.

Figure 3.

Figure 3

Open in a new tab

Treatments of ZnO NPs on soil enhanced the germination rate of Amaranthus mangostanus seeds. Images of 1-week-old seedlings of Amaranthus mangostanus after seeding on soil without (A) or with (B–D) the addition of ZnO NPs are shown. The seed germination rates of aforementioned conditions were quantified (E). *P < 0.05 vs. 0 mg/cm2 ZnO untreated groups. n = 3 (3 independent experiments; each experiment with 30 seeds). (A–D) Pot diameter: 10 cm; scale bars: 1 cm.

Figure 4.

Figure 4

Open in a new tab

Soil ZnO NP levels affect the seedling growth of Amaranthus mangostanus. Analyses of root (A) and shoot (B) length of 1-week-old Amaranthus mangostanus seedlings. Root–shoot 2D graphs of the seedling without (C) and with different doses of ZnO NP treatments (D–F), and an overlay (G) are shown. The regression lines of untreated groups were indicated (C,G). The shoothi roothi population (upper-right quadrant) of seedlings in each condition was quantified (H). The vertical and horizontal dotted lines in (C–F) are the mean values of root length and shoot length of the untreated control groups (C), respectively. †P < 0.05, ††P < 0.01, *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01 vs. 0 mg/cm2 ZnO untreated groups; #P < 0.05, ##P < 0.01 vs. respective 0.2 mg/cm2 ZnO groups. n = 90 (3 independent experiments; each experiment with 30 seeds) (A,B). n = 30 (3 independent experiments; each experiment with 10 seeds) (C–G). n = 3 (3 independent experiments; each experiment with 30 seeds) (H).

TiO2 NPs markedly enhanced the seed germination and seedling growth of A. mangostanus on sterilized cotton in Petri dishes

As mentioned earlier, TiO2 NP exerts photocatalytic property and can be used as a bactericidal agent when exposed to solar UV light. Soil microbiota has been demonstrated to play a critical role in plant survival and growth46,47. The antibacterial property of photocatalytic NPs has been suggested to influence plant growth48,49. To investigate whether the aforementioned property of TiO2 NP on the enhancement of seed germination and growth is mediated through sterilization of soil bacteria, sterilized cotton and Petri dishes were employed as culture substrates. Following the same approach, we found that TiO2 NP exerted enhancing property on the seed germination and growth of A. mangostanus on sterilized substrates (Fig. 5A representative images, Fig. 5B, germination rate, 0 vs. 0.1, 0.2 and 1 mg/cm2 groups; *P < 0.05; Fig. 5C, seedling shoot growth, 0 vs. 0.1 and 0.2 mg/cm2 groups; *P < 0.05), with the typical preferential enhancement of shoot growth (Figs. 5D–H, 2D graphs; 5H, shoothi roothi population mainly located at the upper region above the regression line). Because sterilized-cotton substrates preserved the positive effect of TiO2-NPs, these results suggested that the plant enhancing property was not mediated through the antibacterial property of TiO2 NP. The seedlings grown on cotton had a relatively smaller size than the seedlings grown in soil, possibly because cotton lacks critical nutrients found in soil (Fig. 2A,B vs. Fig. 5C).

Figure 5.

Figure 5

Open in a new tab

TiO2 NP levels of sterilized cotton substrates positively affect the germination rate of Amaranthus mangostanus seeds. Analyses of image (A), seed germination rate (B) and root and shoot length (C) of 1-week-old Amaranthus mangostanus seedlings. Root–shoot 2D graphs of the seedlings without (D) and with different doses of TiO2 NP treatments (E–G), and an overlay (H) are shown. The vertical and horizontal dotted lines in (D–H) are the mean values of root length and shoot length of the untreated control groups (D), respectively. *P < 0.05 vs. 0 mg/cm2 TiO2 untreated groups. n = 3 (3 independent experiments; each experiment with 30 seeds) (B). n = 90 (3 independent experiments; each experiment with 30 seeds) (C). n = 30 (3 independent experiments; each experiment with 10 seeds) (D–H). Scale bars: 1 cm (A).

NPs without photocatalytic activity cannot exert the enhancing effect on A. mangostanus seeds

A previous report suggested that NPs may have direct enhancing property (with or without inducing photocatalytic reaction) on the stimulation of plant growth50–52. Four NPs, namely 5 nm ND (5ND-NP), 100 nm ND (100ND-NP), single-walled CNT NP (CNT-NP) and silicon dioxide NP (SiO2-NP), were employed to investigate whether those non-photocatalytic NPs are sufficient to enhance seed germination and growth. Compared with TiO2 NP, these four types of NPs did not exert considerable enhancing effects on the seed germination (Fig. 6A–D). To further investigate the involvement of photocatalytic property, we employed two visible light responsive photocatalysts, carbon-containing TiO2 NP [TiO2(C)] and platinum-containing TiO2 NP [TiO2(Pt)]13,15,18,19,33, and was compared their performance with the pure TiO2 NP (UV-responsive photocatalyst; Fig. 6E–H). Under UV irradiation, pure TiO2, TiO2(C) and TiO2(Pt) NPs all exert photocatalytic properties (Fig. 6E,F; untreated vs. TiO2-treated groups, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001). By contrast, under visible light (incandescent lamp) illumination, only TiO2(C) and TiO2(Pt) NPs can exert photocatalytic property13,19, while pure TiO2 NP cannot12,19. In this study, we found that pure TiO2, TiO2(C), and TiO2(Pt) NPs all exerted seedling enhancing property under sunlight (Fig. 6E,F; containing UV), whereas only TiO2(C) and TiO2(Pt) NPs but not pure TiO2 exerted enhancing property under visible light illumination (Fig. 6G,H; untreated vs. TiO2-treated groups, **P < 0.01). These results suggested that the photocatalysis reaction is essential for the aforementioned NPs to stimulate seed germination.

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Open in a new tab

Photocatalysis is essential for TiO2 NP-mediated enhancement of seed germination. The germination rates of Amaranthus mangostanus seeds grown on soil with supplements of 5 nm nanodiamond (ND) (A), 100 nm ND (B), carbon nanoparticle (NP) (C), SiO2 NP (D), visible light-responsive photocatalysts TiO2 (C,E,G) and TiO2(Pt) (F,H) under daily sunlight (A–F) or visible light (G,H) illumination were compared with pure TiO2 (UV-responsive photocatalyst) and then quantified. **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 vs. 0 mg/cm2 TiO2 untreated groups. n = 3 (3 independent experiments; each experiment with 30 seeds).

The enhancing property is associated with ROS-induced down-regulation of the growth hormone gibberellins

To further investigate whether such an enhancing effect on seed germination is mediated through photocatalysis produced ROS, antioxidant NAC treatment was employed. We found that NAC treatment markedly reversed TiO2—induced enhancement of seed germination (Fig. 7A experiment outline; Fig. 7B, TiO2-untreated vs. TiO2-treated groups, #P < 0.05; NAC-untreated vs. NAC-treated groups, *P < 0.05). ROS can regulate levels of plant growth hormone gibberellins (GAs)53, and GAs stimulate shoot growth54–56. Given that ROS (Fig. 7B) and shoot growth (Figs. 2, 4) are two phenomena associated with TiO2 NP-enhanced seed germination and growth, we hypothesized that GA may be involved in growth regulation in this model. In agreement with our suggestion, the analysis results revealed that the suppression effect of NAC was associated with the suppression of TiO2-induced elicitation of GAs in the seedlings (Fig. 7C, TiO2-untreated vs. TiO2-treated groups, #P < 0.05; NAC-untreated vs. NAC-treated groups, *P < 0.05).

Figure 7.

Figure 7

Open in a new tab

TiO2 NP-mediated enhancement on the seed germination is associated with ROS-modulated levels of the plant hormone gibberellins. Experimental outline (A), the seed germination rate with or without anti-ROS agent NAC treatments (B) and the expression levels of plant hormone gibberellins (C) are showed. #P < 0.05 vs. 0 mg/cm2 TiO2 untreated groups (B,C); *P < 0.05 vs. respective without anti-ROS treatment groups (-anti-ROS) (B); †P < 0.05 vs. TiO2 groups. n = 3 (3 independent experiments; each experiment with 30 seeds) (B); n = 3 (3 independent experiments; each experiment with 80 seeds).

The enhancing property of TiO2 NPs can also be applied to 2 other plants B. napus and B. rapa chinensis

To investigate whether the seedling enhancing property of TiO2 NPs can also be applied to other plants, seeds of two cruciferous vegetables B. napus and B. rapa chinensis were employed. Here we found that such an enhancing effect of TiO2 NP could indeed be applied to B. napus (Fig. 8A, representative images; Fig. 8B, germination rate, TiO2-untreated vs. TiO2-treated groups *P < 0.05; Fig. 8C, seedling shoot growth, TiO2-untreated vs. TiO2-treated groups ††P < 0.01; Figs. 8D–F, 2D graphs) and B. rapa chinensis (Fig. 9A, representative images; Fig. 9B, germination rate, TiO2-untreated vs. TiO2-treated groups *P < 0.05; Fig. 9C, seedling shoot growth, TiO2-untreated vs. TiO2-treated groups +  + P < 0.01; Figs. 9D–F, 2D graphs), with its featured shoot-preferential enhancement (Figs. 8C,9C, TiO2-untreated vs. TiO2-treated groups, ††P < 0.01).

Figure 8.

Figure 8

Open in a new tab

TiO2 NP-mediated enhancement on the seed germination and growth of soil can also be applied to Brassica napus. Analyses of image (A), seed germination rate (B) and root and shoot length (C) of 1-week-old Brassica napus seedlings. Root–shoot 2D graphs of the seedlings without (D) and with TiO2 NP treatments (E), and an overlay (F) are shown. The vertical and horizontal dotted lines in (D,E) are the mean values of root length and shoot length of the untreated control groups (D), respectively. *P < 0.05, †P < 0.05 vs. 0 mg/cm2 TiO2 untreated groups. n = 3 (3 independent experiments; each experiment with 30 seeds) (B). n = 90 (3 independent experiments; each experiment with 30 seeds) (C). n = 30 (3 independent experiments; each experiment with 10 seeds) (D-F). (A) Pot diameter: 10 cm; scale bar: 1 cm.

Figure 9.

Figure 9

Open in a new tab

TiO2 NP-mediated enhancement on the seed germination and growth of soil can also be applied to Brassica rapa chinensis. Analyses of image (A), seed germination rate (B) and root and shoot length (C) of 1-week-old Brassica rapa chinensis seedlings. Root–shoot 2D graphs of the seedlings without (D) and with TiO2 NP treatments (E), and an overlay (F) are shown. The vertical and horizontal dotted lines in (D,E) are the mean values of root length and shoot length of the untreated control groups (D), respectively. *P < 0.05, †P < 0.05 vs. 0 mg/cm2 TiO2 untreated groups. n = 3 (3 independent experiments; each experiment with 30 seeds) (B). n = 90 (3 independent experiments; each experiment with 30 seeds) (C). n = 30 (3 independent experiments; each experiment with 10 seeds) (D–F). (A) Pot diameter: 10 cm; scale bar: 1 cm.

High—dose TiO2 NP—induced tissue damage of seedlings

Although high dose treatments of TiO2 NPs exert enhancing properties on seed germination (Fig. 1), the seedling growth was also markedly suppressed (Fig. 2). Using TEM, we found that high dose treatments of TiO2 NPs induced considerable tissue damage on the outer layer of seedling samples (Fig. 10A,B, vs. Fig. 10C,D: representative images of normal vs. 1 mg/cm2 TiO2-treated; Fig. 10E, tissue section position of seedling; Fig. 10F,G, SEM and TEM images of TiO2 NPs), suggesting that photocatalysis produced ROS by high—dose TiO2 NPs was harmful to the seedlings.

Figure 10.

Figure 10

Open in a new tab

Electron microscopy analysis of high level TiO2 NP-induced tissue damages on seedlings of Amaranthus mangostanus. TEM images of root tissue samples of seedlings Amaranthus mangostanus in 0 (A,B) and 1 mg/cm2 TiO2 groups (C,D), at low (A,C) and high (B,D) magnifications are shown. The white square highlighted areas in (A,C) are shown at a higher magnification in (B,D), respectively. The section position in (A–D) is indicated in (E). The SEM and TEM images of TiO2 NPs are also shown in (F) and (G), respectively. Scale bars: (A,C) 10 µm; (B,D) 2 µm; (E) 1 mm; (F,G) 50 nm.

Discussion

TiO2 NPs-mediated negative impacts on plants have been reported in various studies21–23. By contrast, TiO2 NPs have also been shown to enhance plant growth26, whether TiO2 NP–mediated photocatalysis is involved remains uncertain. The controversy has confused researchers for years2. In this present study, our data suggested that such controversial properties of TiO2 NPs on plant growth were likely due to the dosage effect of TiO2 NPs; low dose (0.1, 0.2 mg/cm2) was beneficial, while high dose (1 mg/cm2) was harmful (Figs. 1–2). Such positive effect primarily involves TiO2 NP-mediated enhancement of germination rate and seeding growth (Figs. 1–2). Intriguingly, similar effect also observed in the ZnO treatments (Figs. 3–4). Because illumination was essential to enhance seed germination and seedling growth (Fig. 6), these results collectively suggest that the photocatalysis reaction is critical in for the photocatalytic NP-mediated enhancement. Evidences revealed that TiO2 displayed higher photocatalytic activities compared to ZnO under UV illumination57,58. Consequently, it is reasonable to observe an obvious suppressive effect on the seed germination in the high dose (1 mg/cm2) TiO2-treatments (Fig. 1E, †P < 0.05; 0.2 mg/cm2 vs. 1 mg/cm2 groups), as compared to the high dose (1 mg/cm2) ZnO-treatments (Fig. 3E, no obvious suppression 0.2 mg/cm2 vs. 1 mg/cm2 groups).

Previous studies have suggested that the small-size of natural NPs enable the positive impact on the plants59. However, here we found that treatments of TiO2 NPs are not sufficient to conduct such enhancement unless illumination with proper wavelength was provided [Fig. 6A–F vs. Fig. 6G,H, TiO2 groups; 6G and 6H, TiO2 vs. TiO2(C) and TiO2(Pt) groups]. This suggested that the treatment of NPs alone is insufficient to stimulate seed germination and growth, and the induction of photocatalysis is essential. The treatments of antioxidant NAC could reverse TiO2 NP-mediated enhancement (Fig. 7B), further indicating the involvement of photocatalysis- produced ROS is involved. The enhancing effect of TiO2 NPs and the suppressive effect of NAC on seed germination are associated with increased and suppressed GA levels, respectively (Fig. 7C), which further suggests the involvement of ROS in GA regulation.

The TiO2 NP-mediated photocatalytic reaction produces strong reducing and oxidizing electrons and electron-vacancy holes12. These electrons and holes can react with atmospheric water and oxygen (H2O and O2) to yield reactive oxygen species (ROS), such as hydroxyl radicals (● OH), superoxide anions (O2−), and hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), products are extremely reactive when in contact with organic compounds12. Treatments of TiO2 NP is a feasible model to observe the impacts of exogenous ROS, as the effect of exogenous ROS on seed germination have not yet been extensively studied. A detailed mechanism of plant physiologies regulated by endogenously produced ROS has been reported. ROS were shown to regulate seed germination60. Meanwhile, plant hormones such as GAs are sensitively regulated by ROS61. ROS also regulate GA levels53. GAs are key regulators of plant growth and development in both normal and stressed conditions61–63. Endogenous ROS accumulation is important in breaking seed dormancy, and stimulating seed germination53, a process that involves GA signaling61. ROS produced by nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate hydrogen (NADPH) oxidases promote GA biosynthesis in embryos, in which GA enhances NADPH oxidases and ROS levels in aleurone cells to induce α-amylase64. Therefore, as the reciprocal regulations of GA and ROS involve positive regulation in seed germination53,61,64, and increased GA levels can overcome photocatalytic NP-derived oxidative stress65, reasonably observed the TiO2 photocatalysis-mediated ROS-dependent enhancement of seed germination (Figs. 6, 7). Despite this observation, exogenous ROS produced by photocatalytic NPs are generally associated with an impression of biocides, with negative impacts on lifeforms8,12,66. The finding that environmental ROS can actively participate in the delicate regulation of the plant physiologies surprised us and may imply ancient environment–plant interplay, particularly because these photocatalytic NPs have existed on Earth as natural NPs for hundreds of millions of years.

TiO2 NPs are not only present in forms of ENPs, but also naturally; for example, naturally formed soil and rock on the earth contain various levels of TiO2 with a range of 0.1 to − 1.5% of total weight28–31. Some volcanic ash, rock (basalt) and andisol samples were shown to contain high TiO2 levels with over 2% of total weight67,68. Volcanic ash exerts good fertilization property to enhance plant growth 69; besides the ability to function as a supplement of essential and rare elements, our observation suggested that the TiO2 content may partly contribute to the enhancement of plant growth. This hypothesis and relevant mechanism are worthy of further investigation.

Our data revealed that the supplements of photocatalytic TiO2 and ZnO NPs in the soil induced growth of both shoot and root parts of the seedlings, in which the shoot growth was more pronounced than root growth (Figs. 2, 4). GAs are known to enhance shoot growth63, so supplements of photocatalytic TiO2 NPs somehow enhanced the GA levels (Fig. 7C). The shoots will grow into leaves, and which are the major parts used by consumers of these leafy vegetables. The supplementation of photocatalytic NPs could be a novel approach to enhance the growth of agricultural plants with economic value. In addition, new technological advancements such as green synthesis have shown great potentials of ENPs in sustainable agriculture7,10,11,70. However, the use of these photocatalytic NPs must be controlled in a proper level. As the data revealed in this study (Figs. 2, 4), the photocatalytic NPs played a dual role in seed growth. Given that excessive ROS can be detrimental, once the level of NPs is higher than an acceptable range, the plant-growth enhancing effect will turn into a toxic effect (Figs. 2, 4). Accordingly, overuse of the photocatalytic NPs on plant fertilization should be avoided to prevent plant toxicity and increased the environmental burden. As ENPs are produced with increasing amount worldwide, the environmental photocatalytic NP levels have become a critical factor for the survival of natural and agricultural plants. For sustainable development and environmental health, monitoring of the accumulation and turnover rates of photocatalytic NPs in the soil is critical.

Conclusion

In summary, we found that the photocatalytic activity of TiO2 NPs positively affected seed germination and growth through gibberellins in a plant-tolerable range (0.1 and 0.2 mg/cm2), whereas overdosing (1 mg/cm2) induced tissue damage. This positive effect of TiO2 NPs involved photocatalysis-elicited ROS and GA regulation; as treatments of antioxidant NAC can suppress both TiO2-mediated enhancements on enhance the seed germination and seedling growth and TiO2-mediated up-regulation of GA levels. Accordingly, supplementation of photocatalytic NPs could be a theoretically feasible approach in the development of sustainable plant-growth enhancing agents. On the other hand, as treatments of high doses of photocatalytic NPs can strongly suppress the seedling growth, photocatalytic NPs can also be used as herbicides. Because these photocatalytic NPs have dual (low dose: enhancing; high dose: suppressing) roles, future studies focused on the maintenance of these NPs in a desired level in the soil could be important for sustainable development and environmental health.

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Table S1. (21.7KB, docx)

Acknowledgements

The authors are grateful to the Core Facility Center, Tzu Chi University for the help on electron microscopy and confocal microscopy analyses. The authors also wish to thank the Experimental Program of Natural Science and Technology of Tzu-Chi Senior High School Affiliated with Tzu-Chi University for the collaboration on the science education. Funding: This work is supported by research funding from Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan (105-2514-S-320-001-MY3, 105-2923-B-320-001-MY3, 107-2311-B-320-002 -MY3, 111-2320-B-320-006-MY3 to HHC), and Tzu-Chi Medical Foundation (TCRD111-043 to HHC and CCL; TCMMP104-06, TCMMP108-04; TCMMP 111-01 and TC-NHRI105 to HHC and DSS). The funders have no role in the study design, in data collection, analysis and interpretation, in writing the report, and in the decision to submit the article for publication.

Author contributions

H.H.C. conceived and designed the experiments. C.C.L., H.M.C., Y.C.L., C.W.C., Y.Y.L., S.C.H., J.H.C., J.C.C., D.S.S. and M.L.C. performed the experiments. C.C.L., H.M.C., Y.C.L., C.W.C. and H.H.C. analyzed the data. H.H.C. wrote the main manuscript text. H.H.C. and C.C.L. received funding support for the project.

Data availability

The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due to potential patent filing after the report, but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Footnotes

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

These authors contributed equally: Sian-Ming Jhou, Yi-Chen Li and Jhih-Wei Ciou.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41598-022-23179-9.

References

  • 1.Weissig V, Pettinger TK, Murdock N. Nanopharmaceuticals (part 1): Products on the market. Int. J. Nanomed. 2014;9:4357–4373. doi: 10.2147/IJN.S46900. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Yadav T, Mungray AA, Mungray AK. Fabricated nanoparticles: Current status and potential phytotoxic threats. Rev. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2014;230:83–110. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-04411-8_4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Smita S, et al. Nanoparticles in the environment: Assessment using the causal diagram approach. Environ. Health. 2012;11(Suppl 1):S13. doi: 10.1186/1476-069X-11-S1-S13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Nowack B, Bucheli TD. Occurrence, behavior and effects of nanoparticles in the environment. Environ. Pollut. 2007;150:5–22. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2007.06.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Wagner S, Gondikas A, Neubauer E, Hofmann T, von der Kammer F. Spot the difference: Engineered and natural nanoparticles in the environment–release, behavior and fate. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 2014;53:12398–12419. doi: 10.1002/anie.201405050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Afsheen S, et al. Synthesis and characterization of metal sulphide nanoparticles to investigate the effect of nanoparticles on germination of soybean and wheat seeds. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2020;252:123216. doi: 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2020.123216. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Rafique M, et al. Plant-mediated green synthesis of zinc oxide nanoparticles from Syzygium Cumini for seed germination and wastewater purification. Int. J. Environ. Anal. Chem. 2020;102:1–16. [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Budhani S, Egboluche NP, Arslan Z, Yu H, Deng H. Phytotoxic effect of silver nanoparticles on seed germination and growth of terrestrial plants. J. Environ. Sci. Health C Environ. Carcinog. Ecotoxicol. Rev. 2019;37:330–355. doi: 10.1080/10590501.2019.1676600. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Wu MS, et al. Nanodiamonds protect skin from ultraviolet B-induced damage in mice. J. nanobiotechnol. 2015;13:35. doi: 10.1186/s12951-015-0094-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Nguyen NTT, et al. Recent advances on botanical biosynthesis of nanoparticles for catalytic, water treatment and agricultural applications: A review. Sci. Total Environ. 2022;827:154160. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154160. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Nguyen NTT, et al. Formation, antimicrobial activity and biomedical performance of plant-based nanoparticles: A review. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2022;20:2531–2571. doi: 10.1007/s10311-022-01425-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Liou JW, Chang HH. Bactericidal effects and mechanisms of visible light-responsive titanium dioxide photocatalysts on pathogenic bacteria. Arch. Immunol. Ther. Exp. 2012;60:267–275. doi: 10.1007/s00005-012-0178-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Tseng YH, et al. Antibacterial performance of nanoscaled visible-light responsive platinum-containing titania photocatalyst in vitro and in vivo. Biochem. Biophys. Acta. 2013;1830:3787–3795. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2013.03.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Liou JW, et al. Visible light responsive photocatalyst induces progressive and apical-terminus preferential damages on Escherichia coli surfaces. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e19982. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0019982. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Chen YL, et al. The use of nanoscale visible light-responsive photocatalyst TiO2-Pt for the elimination of soil-borne pathogens. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:e31212. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0031212. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Wong MS, Sun DS, Chang HH. Bactericidal performance of visible-light responsive titania photocatalyst with silver nanostructures. PLoS ONE. 2010;5:e10394. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0010394. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Wong MS, et al. Visible-light-induced bactericidal activity of a nitrogen-doped titanium photocatalyst against human pathogens. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2006;72:6111–6116. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02580-05. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Kau JH, et al. Role of visible light-activated photocatalyst on the reduction of anthrax spore-induced mortality in mice. PLoS ONE. 2009;4:e4167. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0004167. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Cheng CL, et al. The effects of the bacterial interaction with visible-light responsive titania photocatalyst on the bactericidal performance. J. Biomed. Sci. 2009;16:7. doi: 10.1186/1423-0127-16-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Wong MS, Sun MT, Sun DS, Chang HH. Visible-light-responsive antibacterial property of boron-doped titania films. Catalysts. 2020;10:1349. doi: 10.3390/catal10111349. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Du W, et al. TiO2 and ZnO nanoparticles negatively affect wheat growth and soil enzyme activities in agricultural soil. J. Environ. Monit. 2011;13:822–828. doi: 10.1039/c0em00611d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Castiglione MR, Giorgetti L, Geri C, Cremonini R. The effects of nano-TiO2on seed germination, development and mitosis of root tip cells of Vicia narbonensis L. and Zea mays L. J. Nanopart. Res. 2011;13:2443–2244. doi: 10.1007/s11051-010-0135-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Ghosh M, Bandyopadhyay M, Mukherjee A. Genotoxicity of titanium dioxide (TiO2) nanoparticles at two trophic levels: plant and human lymphocytes. Chemosphere. 2010;81:1253–1262. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.09.022. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Yang F, et al. The improvement of spinach growth by nano-anatase TiO2 treatment is related to nitrogen photoreduction. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2007;119:77–88. doi: 10.1007/s12011-007-0046-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Gao F, et al. Mechanism of nano-anatase TiO2 on promoting photosynthetic carbon reaction of spinach: Inducing complex of rubisco-rubisco activase. Biol. Trace Elem. Res. 2006;111:239–253. doi: 10.1385/BTER:111:1:239. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Sekhon BS. Nanotechnology in agri-food production: An overview. Nanotechnol. Sci. Appl. 2014;7:31–53. doi: 10.2147/NSA.S39406. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Gohari G, et al. Titanium dioxide nanoparticles (TiO2 NPs) promote growth and ameliorate salinity stress effects on essential oil profile and biochemical attributes of Dracocephalum moldavica. Sci. Rep. 2020;10:912. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-57794-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Borges ME, et al. Ti-containing volcanic ash as photocatalyst for degradation of phenol. Energy Environ. Sci. 2008;1:364–369. doi: 10.1039/b802187m. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Salminen, R. et al. Geochemical Atlas of Europe: Part 1—background information, methodology and maps. Report No. Geological Survey of Finland, Espoo Finland, (Geological Survey of Finland, Espoo Finland, Geological Survey of Finland, Espoo Finland, 2005).
  • 30.Hill TP, Werner MA, Horton MJ. Geological Survey Professional Paper. US Government Printing Office; 1967. [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Nakagawa M, Ohba T. Minerals in volcanic ash 1: Primary minerals and volcanic glass. Glob. Environ. Res. 2002;2002:41–51. [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Wong MS, et al. Antibacterial property of Ag nanoparticle-impregnated N-doped titania films under visible light. Sci. Rep. 2015;5:11978. doi: 10.1038/srep11978. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Sun DS, et al. Antibacterial properties of visible-light-responsive carbon-containing titanium dioxide photocatalytic nanoparticles against anthrax. Nanomaterials. 2016 doi: 10.3390/nano6120237. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Hung SC, et al. Nanodiamond-induced thrombocytopenia in mice involve P-selectin-dependent Nlrp3 inflammasome-mediated platelet aggregation pyroptosis and apoptosis. Front. Immunol. 2022;13:806686. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.806686. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Tseng PH, et al. Identification of two novel small compounds that inhibit liver cancer formation in zebrafish and analysis of their conjugation to nanodiamonds to further reduce toxicity. Adv. Ther. 2019;2:1900105. doi: 10.1002/adtp.201900105. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Sun DS, Chang HH. Differential regulation of JNK in caspase-3-mediated apoptosis of MPP(+)-treated primary cortical neurons. Cell Biol. Int. 2003;27:769–777. doi: 10.1016/S1065-6995(03)00165-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Chang HH, et al. Cell adhesion as a novel approach to determining the cellular binding motif on the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus spike protein. J. Virol. Methods. 2014;201:1–6. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2014.01.022. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Guo Y, Zhu C, Gan L, Ng D, Xia K. Effects of exogenous gibberellic acid3 on iron and manganese plaque amounts and iron and manganese uptake in rice. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0118177. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0118177. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Hao Y, et al. Carbon nanotubes filled with different ferromagnetic alloys affect the growth and development of rice seedlings by changing the C: N ratio and plant hormones concentrations. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0157264. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0157264. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Chang WK, et al. Visible light responsive core-shell structured In2O3@CaIn2O4 photocatalyst with superior bactericidal property and biocompatibility. Nanomed. Nanotechnol. Biol. Med. 2012;8:609–617. doi: 10.1016/j.nano.2011.09.016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Chuang DJ, et al. Activating transcription factor 3 protects against restraint stress-induced gastrointestinal injury in mice. Cells. 2021 doi: 10.3390/cells10123530. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Hashimoto K, Irie H, Fujishima A. TiO2 photocatalysis: A historical overview and future prospects. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2005;44:8269–8285. doi: 10.1143/JJAP.44.8269. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Kumaravel V, et al. Antimicrobial TiO2 nanocomposite coatings for surfaces, dental and orthopaedic implants. Chem. Eng. J. 2021;416:129071. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2021.129071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Tsai TM, Chang HH, Chang KC, Liu LY, Tseng CC. A comparative study of the bactericidal effect of photocatalytic oxidation by TiO2 on antibiotic-resistant and antibiotic-sensitive bacteria. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2010;85:1642–1653. doi: 10.1002/jctb.2476. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Nguyen DTC, et al. Multifunctional ZnO nanoparticles bio-fabricated from Canna indica L. flowers for seed germination, adsorption and photocatalytic degradation of organic dyes. J. hazard. Mater. 2021;420:126586. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.126586. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Tkacz A, Poole P. Role of root microbiota in plant productivity. J. Exp. Bot. 2015;66:2167–2175. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erv157. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Lareen A, Burton F, Schafer P. Plant root-microbe communication in shaping root microbiomes. Plant Mol. Biol. 2016;90:575–587. doi: 10.1007/s11103-015-0417-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Kibbey TCG, Strevett KA. The effect of nanoparticles on soil and rhizosphere bacteria and plant growth in lettuce seedlings. Chemosphere. 2019;221:703–707. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2019.01.091. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Chavan S, Sarangdhar V, Nadanathangam V. Toxicological effects of TiO2 nanoparticles on plant growth promoting soil bacteria. Emerg. Contam. 2020;6:87–92. doi: 10.1016/j.emcon.2020.01.003. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Shang Y, et al. Applications of nanotechnology in plant growth and crop protection: A review. Molecules. 2019 doi: 10.3390/molecules24142558. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Haq T, Ullah S, Ullah R. Beneficial effects of several nanoparticles on the growth of different plants species. Curr. Nanosci. 2019;15:460–470. doi: 10.2174/1573413715666190104143705. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Singh A, Singha NB, Hussain I, Singh H, Singh SC. Plant-nanoparticle interaction: An approach to improve agricultural practices and plant productivity. Int. J. Pharm. Sci. Invent. 2015;4:25–40. [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Jeevan Kumar SP, Rajendra Prasad S, Banerjee R, Thammineni C. Seed birth to death: Dual functions of reactive oxygen species in seed physiology. Ann. Bot. 2015;116:663–668. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcv098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Gupta R, Chakrabarty SK. Gibberellic acid in plant: Still a mystery unresolved. Plant Signal Behav. 2013 doi: 10.4161/psb.25504. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Kurepin LV, Pharis RP. Light signaling and the phytohormonal regulation of shoot growth. Plant Sci. 2014;229:280–289. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2014.10.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Miskolczi P, et al. Long-range mobile signals mediate seasonal control of shoot growth. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2019;116:10852–10857. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1902199116. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Barnes RJ, Molina R, Xu J, Dobson PJ, Thompson IP. Comparison of TiO2 and ZnO nanoparticles for photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue and the correlated inactivation of gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria. J. Nanopart. Res. 2013;15:1432. doi: 10.1007/s11051-013-1432-9. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Chantes, P., Jarusutthirak, C. & Danwittayakul, S. A comparison study of photocatalytic activity of TiO2 and ZnO on the degradation of real batik wastewater. International Conference on Biological, Environment and Food Engineering BEFE-2015, 8-12 (2015).
  • 59.Feizi H, Kamali M, Jafari L, Rezvani Moghaddam P. Phytotoxicity and stimulatory impacts of nanosized and bulk titanium dioxide on fennel (Foeniculum vulgare Mill) Chemosphere. 2013;91:506–511. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2012.12.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Wojtyla L, Lechowska K, Kubala S, Garnczarska M. Different modes of hydrogen peroxide action during seed germination. Front. Plant Sci. 2016;7:66. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Xia XJ, et al. Interplay between reactive oxygen species and hormones in the control of plant development and stress tolerance. J. Exp. Bot. 2015;66:2839–2856. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erv089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Rymen B, Sugimoto K. Tuning growth to the environmental demands. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2012;15:683–690. doi: 10.1016/j.pbi.2012.07.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Vanstraelen M, Benkova E. Hormonal interactions in the regulation of plant development. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 2012;28:463–487. doi: 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-101011-155741. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Ishibashi Y, et al. A role for reactive oxygen species produced by NADPH oxidases in the embryo and aleurone cells in barley seed germination. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0143173. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0143173. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Iftikhar A, et al. Effect of gibberellic acid on growth, photosynthesis and antioxidant defense system of wheat under zinc oxide nanoparticle stress. Environ. Pollut. 2019;254:113109. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Rajagopal G, Maruthamuthu S, Mohanan S, Palaniswamy N. Biocidal effects of photocatalytic semiconductor TiO2. Coll. Surf. B Biointerfaces. 2006;51:107–111. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2006.06.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Guard, F. J. Geology and Magma Emplacement at Halswell Quarry and Castle Rock, Lyttelton Volcano, Banks Peninsula. Unpublished PhD Thesis thesis, University of Canterbury (1999).
  • 68.Griggs AB, Swanson DA. Geological Survey Bulletin. US Government Printing Office; 1976. pp. 1–45. [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Lansing JS, et al. Volcanic fertilization of Balinese rice paddies. Ecol. Econ. 2001;38:383–390. doi: 10.1016/S0921-8009(01)00173-2. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Singh RP, Handa R, Manchanda G. Nanoparticles in sustainable agriculture: An emerging opportunity. J. Control Release. 2021;329:1234–1248. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2020.10.051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Table S1. (21.7KB, docx)

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are not publicly available due to potential patent filing after the report, but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Articles from Scientific Reports are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES