Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Oct 8.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet. 2022 Oct 8;190(3):325–343. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.c.32006

Disease Mechanisms of Monogenic Congenital Anomalies of the Kidney and Urinary Tract American Journal of Medical Genetics Part C

Dervla M Connaughton 1,2, Friedhelm Hildebrandt 3
PMCID: PMC9618346  NIHMSID: NIHMS1839681  PMID: 36208064

Abstract

Congenital Anomalies of the Kidney and Urinary Tract (CAKUT) is a developmental disorder of the kidney and/or genito-urinary tract, which results in end stage kidney disease (ESKD) in up to 50% of children. Despite the congenital nature of the disease, CAKUT accounts for almost 10% of adult onset ESKD. Multiple lines of evidence suggest that CAKUT is a Mendelian disorder including the observation of familial clustering of CAKUT. Pathogenesis in CAKUT is embryonic in origin with disturbances of kidney and urinary tract development resulting in a heterogenous range of disease phenotypes. Despite polygenic and environmental factors being implicated, a significant proportion of CAKUT is monogenic in origin with studies demonstrating single gene defects in 10–20% of patients with CAKUT. Here we review monogenic disease causation with emphasis on the etiological role of gene developmental pathways in CAKUT.

Keywords: Congenital Anomalies of the Kidney and Urinary Tract (CAKUT), Monogenic disease causation, Renal developmental gene

Introduction

Congenital Anomalies of the Kidney and Urinary Tract (CAKUT) is a developmental disorder of the kidney and/or genito-urinary tract. It has an estimated prevalence of 1 in every 500 live birth and constitutes 20% of all congenital malformation (Talati et al., 2019). CAKUT is the most common reason for end stage kidney disease (ESKD) in the first three decades of life, accounting for almost 50% of pediatric and 7% for adult onset ESKD (Talati et al., 2019). In adulthood CAKUT is thought to predispose to early onset hypertension and cardiovascular disease (Song & Yosypiv, 2011).

Classification of the CAKUT phenotype

CAKUT is defined as any abnormality in the size, shape, position, number, or function of either the kidney(s) and/ or genitourinary tract. The CAKUT phenotypes can be classified based on anatomic position or by the functional defects observed (Table 1). Histological classification, as seen in other subcategories of kidney disease are largely avoided, as histological diagnosis is generally not required to confirm the diagnosis. More recently it has been suggested that reduced nephron number according to the Barker hypothesis (Hales & Barker, 2001) is part of the phenotypic spectrum of patients with CAKUT, especially in those who present in later life (Murugapoopathy & Gupta, 2020).

Table 1.

Major CAKUT phenotypes based on anatomical position listed from a cranial to caudal position

Kidney phenotypes
Renal agenesis
Renal hypodysplasia
Multicystic-dysplastic kidney
Horseshoe kidney
Duplex kidney
Ureteric phenotypes
Hydronephrosis
Uteropelvic junction obstruction
Hydroureter/ Megaureter
Duplex/ Bifid ureter (partial or complete)
Utero-vesical junction obstruction
Vesico-urethral reflux
Lower urinary tract phenotypes
Bladder exstrophy
Bladder agenesis
Posterior urethral valve
Urethral agenesis
Genito-urinary phenotypes
Cryptorchidism

Diagnosis of CAKUT

With increasing availability of pre-natal ultrasound, many cases of CAKUT are now being diagnosed during the second trimester anatomic examination, where defects in either the kidney and/or genito-urinary tract are observed. Alternatively, the consequence of reduced urinary output, name oligohydramnios, can be observed raising the suspicion of a developmental defect in the kidneys. CAKUT, in particular the reduced nephron dose phenotype, may have a delayed diagnosis into adulthood, especially if prior imaging of the urinary tract has not been performed. Often these patients present with hypertension and chronic kidney disease with subsequent imaging of the kidneys revealing a CAKUT phenotype.

Although ultrasound imaging has a high yield in confirming a diagnosis, certain subtypes of CAKUT particularly involving the lower urinary tract may require additional imaging modalities to confirm the diagnosis. For example, in posterior urethral valve, cystoscopy is the gold standard for diagnosis, although the secondary consequence of the phenotype, namely obstruction with hydronephrosis, may still be detected on ultrasound examination of the kidneys (Nasir et al., 2011).

Prognosis in CAKUT

Prognosis in CAKUT is largely dependent on the age at presentation and type of anomaly present (Sanna-Cherchi et al., 2009). Favorable outcomes have been observed in patients with isolated uni- or bilateral hydronephrosis detected on prenatal ultrasound, whereas high risk features such as oligohydramnios and bilateral anomalies are associated with an increased need of surgery and/or chronic kidney disease (Nef et al., 2016).

Familial Clustering in CAKUT

Familial clustering in CAKUT has been characterized in many studies. For example, a Turkish study of 218 patients with CAKUT revealed familial clustering in over half of cases, following ultrasonographic confirmation of CAKUT in first degree relatives of affected individuals (Bulum et al., 2013). Overall it is estimated that anywhere between 10% to 50% of children with CAKUT will report a family history of kidney or urinary tract anomalies consistent with the diagnosis of CAKUT (Bulum et al., 2013; Connaughton et al., 2015).

Screening for CAKUT

Routine screening for CAKUT is controversial and there are currently no consensus guidelines on who and when to screen. There is however mounting evidence that certain risk factors should prompt consideration of post-natal ultrasound (USS) screening for CAKUT. For example, a recent prospective study from China of 4,877 infants identified 268 cases (5.5%) of CAKUT by primary screening and 92 cases (1.9%) by tertiary screening. This study devised a predictive model incorporating high risk factors, namely male gender, preterm birth, antenatal abnormal ultrasound findings, gestational hypothyroidism, and oligohydramnios all which increase the risk of CAKUT (Liu et al., 2022).

Routine screening in asymptomatic family members is not currently recommended, however studies increasingly show that familial screening maybe beneficial. For example, in first-degree relatives of children with non-syndromic CAKUT, the incidence of CAKUT is 6% (9 out of 149 family members), which is significantly higher than the risk in the general population. Interestingly, most of the CAKUT phenotypes detected in biologically related individuals were discordant to the index case (88.8%) (Viswanathan et al., 2021). In another study, familial occurrence of CAKUT was noted in 7.9% of the 138 families using either renal ultrasonogram, radionuclide diuretic renogram or micturating cystourethrogram in family members of the index case (Manoharan et al., 2020). In a retrospective review, Gok et al. found a frequency of familial CAKUT of 14.4%, with the highest rate in those with renal agenesis (Suman Gök et al., 2020).

Given the non-invasive nature of USS screening and the high likelihood of familial occurrence of CAKUT, all patients with CAKUT should at minimum have extended pedigree analysis performed with ultrasonography in at risk individuals. In addition, because of the association with extra-renal manifestations of disease (A. van der Ven et al., 2018), patients with CAKUT should have a comprehensive multi-system clinical examination with specialist referral as indicated clinically.

Depending on the associated clinical features, chromosomal microarray should be offered if there is a suspicion for multi-system involvement with syndromic features. If negative, sequencing analysis can be performed either through gene panel testing or whole exome/ genome analysis looking for monogenic causes of disease. In all cases, trio analysis should be considered particularly if both parents are asymptomatic given the potential for de novo disease. However, given the high prevalence of incomplete penetrance and variable expressivity, ultrasonographic examination in nominally unaffected family members should be considered.

Embryonic development of the kidney and genito-urinary tract

CAKUT arises following disturbances of the normal development of the kidney and/or urinary tract. The upper urinary system, the gonads and sexual ducts arises from two structures; the nephric ducts (ND) and the nephric cord (NC), both of which arise from the intermediate mesoderm (Figure 1A).

Figure 1. Diagrammatic representation of embryonic development of the kidney.

Figure 1

A. Nephric duct elongation and induction of the metanephric mesenchyme.

The nephric ducts (ND) and the nephric cord (NC) arise from the intermediate mesoderm. The ND elongates caudally and fuses with the cloaca. The metanephric mesenchyme (MM) expresses GDNF which provides the signal to the ND to induce the ureteric bud (UB).

B. Ureteric bud outgrowth/ Induction of cap mesenchyme.

The UB is an outgrowth of the ND, that sprouts in the direction of the MM. The MM forms the cap mesenchyme (CM).

C. Ureteric bud branching morphogenesis.

Following induction from the UB, a portion of the CM then undergoes mesenchymal to epithelial transition (MET) progresses through various morphological stages including the comma-shaped body followed by the S-shaped body to form a nephron. The S-shaped body ultimately fuses with the collecting ducts. The UB tips continue to branch whilst the renal vesicle continues to mature into a nephron.

The ND is an epithelial tube from which an epithelial outgrowth called the ureteric bud (UB) arises (Figure 1B). The ND itself elongates caudally and ultimately fuses with the cloacal epithelium, which is a precursor of the urinary bladder. The metanephric mesenchyme (MM) arises from mesenchymal cells in the posterior intermediate mesoderm. At the early stages of kidney development, a subset of cell in the MM provides signaling to the ND to induce the UB. The UB then invades the adjacent MM and later forms the collecting duct system. The UB induces nephron formation. The portion of the MM that come in closest proximity to the UB forms the cap mesenchyme (CM) (Figure 1B). Following induction from the UB, a portion of the CM then undergoes mesenchymal to epithelial transition (MET) with formation of the renal vesicle (Figure 1C). The remainder of the cells in the CM continues to proliferate, thereby providing a pool of progenitor cells throughout kidney development that are required for nephron induction (Kagan et al., 2022).

The renal vesicle progresses through various morphologically distinct stages including comma- and S-shaped bodies to generate all epithelial components of the nephron: The Bowman’s capsule (including podocytes) at the proximal end and the distal tubular system (proximal and distal tubule and intervening loop of Henle) (Figure 1C). Throughout nephrogenesis the UB repeatedly branches largely stimulated by the MM-derived signal (branching morphogenesis), a process which is maintained by the reciprocal induction between the MM and the UB. The bladder is primarily derived from the cloaca, which in early embryonic development (approximately 4 weeks gestation) divides into two sections, the rectum and urogenital sinus, that latter which ultimately forms the bladder and part of the infra-vesical urethra. The distal aspect of the UB and its surrounding mesenchyme proliferate and differentiate into the urothelium, the specialized epithelium of the urinary drainage system, and a fibromuscular wall capable of peristaltic contractions, respectively. Connectivity of the ureter with the bladder is achieved in a complex developmental program. Following caudal extension of the ND and fusion with the cloaca, the distal portion of the ND (the so-called common ND) is eliminated by apoptosis. The distal aspect of the ureter lies down on the bladder and is eliminated by apoptosis as well ultimately resulting in insertion of the distal ureter into the anterior aspect of the dorsal bladder wall (Uetani & Bouchard, 2009). This entire process is governed by a number of developmental genes, which if defective, can result in a CAKUT phenotype as described below (A. T. van der Ven et al., 2018).

Molecular basis of CAKUT

The molecular basis of CAKUT is hypothesized to range from monogenic to polygenic with environmental factors during embryogenesis also implicated in the pathogenesis (Dart et al., 2015; Groen In ‘t Woud et al., 2016; Hsu et al., 2014; Lee et al., 2012; Nicolaou et al., 2015; Parikh et al., 2002; Ven et al., 2018).

Here we focus on monogenic causation, however knowledge of potential environmental factors can provide insights into monogenic disease causation and potential gene developmental pathways. For example, Vitamin A exposure during embryogenesis has been implicated as an environmental factor in CAKUT pathogenesis (Das et al., 2014; Lee et al., 2012). Interestingly, retinoic acid, the active metabolite of Vitamin A has been implicated in abnormal murine kidney development (Batourina et al., 2002; Batourina et al., 2001; Batourina et al., 2005; Chia et al., 2011; Mendelsohn et al., 1999; Rosselot et al., 2010). It is hypothesized that during embryonic development retinoic acid regulates the insertion of the ND into the cloaca and later branching morphogenesis of the UB (Batourina et al., 2001; Chia et al., 2011; A. T. van der Ven et al., 2018). Mouse models with mutations in genes regulating intracellular retinoic acid, namely Retinol Dehydrogenase 10 (Rdh10) (Rhinn et al., 2011), Aldehyde Dehydrogenase 1 Family Member A2 (Ald1a2) (Rosselot et al., 2010), Cytochrome P450 Family 26 Subfamily A Member 1 (Cyp26a1) (Abu-Abed et al., 2001; Sakai et al., 2001), develop phenotypes in the CAKUT disease spectrum. In humans, heterozygous truncating mutations in the gene Nuclear Receptor Interacting Protein 1 (NRIP1) have been detected in patients with CAKUT (Vivante, Mann, et al., 2017; Zheng et al., 2022). Interestingly, NRIP1 encodes a nuclear receptor transcriptional cofactor that directly interacts with the retinoic acid receptors to modulate retinoic acid transcriptional signaling (Vivante, Mann, et al., 2017).

Monogenic causation in CAKUT

With the expansion of next generation sequencing technology, now 45 monogenic causes of isolated CAKUT (Table 2) and over 150 monogenic causes of syndromic CAKUT (Table 3) have been described (Connaughton & Hildebrandt, 2019; Connaughton et al., 2019; Ven et al., 2018). Monogenic causation of CAKUT has long been suspected as evidenced by a) monogenic mouse models which exhibit CAKUT phenotypes, b) familial clustering of CAKUT, c) the fact that CAKUT occurs in conjunction with multi-organ syndromes, d) the involvement of developmental gene pathways in CAKUT pathogenesis, e) the congenital nature of CAKUT (Vivante & Hildebrandt, 2016; Vivante et al., 2014). CAKUT due to single gene disorders follows a Mendelian pattern of inheritance with either an autosomal dominant, autosomal recessive, and X-linked pattern of inheritance. Mutations in the transcription factors PAX2 and HNF1B represent the most prevalent forms of monogenic CAKUT (Ahn et al., 2020; Hwang et al., 2014). However with the ever-expanding use of next-generation sequencing technology in clinical medicine, other single gene disorder are increasingly identified in cohorts with CAKUT phenotypes (Kagan et al., 2022). Moreover, significant clinical and genetic heterogenicity exists with both intra- and interfamilial variability. Despite reports suggesting gene-phenotype correlation for some subtypes of CAKUT (i.e. PAX2 and renal hypoplasia (Sanyanusin et al., 1995)), emerging data now suggests that even identical variants in the CAKUT causing genes can result in varying CAKUT phenotypes with intra-individual and even intra-familial variability (Ven et al., 2018).

Table 2.

45 genes that represent monogenic causes of human isolated CAKUT, if mutated. (Sorted alphabetically by mode of inheritance).

Gene Protein Reference Mode of inheritance Phenotype OMIM #
ACE Angiotensin I-converting enzyme Gribouval Nat Genet 37:964, 2005 AR Renal tubular dysgenesis # 267430
AGT Angiotensinogen Gribouval Nat Genet 37:964, 2005 AR Renal tubular dysgenesis # 267430
AGTR1 Angiotensin II receptor, type 1 Gribouval Nat Genet 37:964, 2005 AR Renal tubular dysgenesis # 267430
CHRM3 Muscarinic acetylcholine receptor M3 Weber AJHG 19:634, 2011 AR Prune belly syndrome # 100100
ETV4 ETS translocation variant 4, E1A enhancer binding protein Chen IJPCH 4:61, 2016 AR NA * 600711
FRAS1 Extracellular matrix protein FRAS1 Kohl JASN 25:1917, 2014 AR Fraser syndrome 1 # 219000
FREM1 FRAS1 related extracellular matrix protein 1 Kohl JASN 25:1917, 2014 AR Manitoba oculotrichoanal syndrome # 248450
FREM2 FRAS1 related extracellular matrix protein 2 Kohl JASN 25:1917, 2014 AR Fraser syndrome 2 # 617666
FOXA2 Forkhead Box A2 Zheng NDT 2021 online ahead of print doi:10.1093/ndt/gfab253 AR Horseshoe Kidney * 600288
GRIP1 Glutamate receptor interacting protein 1 Kohl JASN 25:1917, 2014 AR Fraser syndrome 3 # 617667
HOXA11 Homobox A11 Saygili Clin. Genet. 93(4):390, 2020 AR CAKUT * 1429958
HPSE2 Heparanase 2 (Inactive) Bulum Nephron 130:54, 2015 AR Urofacial syndrome 1 # 236730
ITGA8 Integrin α8 Humbert AJHG 189:1260, 2014 AR Renal hypodysplasia/ aplasia 1 # 191830
NPNT Nephronectin Al-Hamed Clin. Genetics. Online ahead print AT Bilateral renal hypodysplasia * 610306
REN Renin Gribouval Nat Genet 37:964, 2005 AR Renal tubular dysgenesis # 267430
TRAP1 Heat-shock protein 75 (also known as TNF receptor-associated protein 1) Saisawat Kid Int 85:880, 2014 AR NA * 606219
FGF20 Fibroblast Growth Factor 20 Barak Dev Cell 22:1191, 2012 AR Renal hypodysplasia/ aplasia 2 # 615721
WNT9B Wingless Type MMTV Integration Site Family Lemire AJMG 185(10):2005,2021 AR Bilateral renal agenesis/ hypoplasia/ dysplasia * 602864
BMP4 Bone morphogenic protein 4 Weber JASN 19:891, 2008 AD Microphthalmia, syndromic 6 # 607932
CHD1L Chromodomain helicase DNA binding protein 1-like Brockschmidt NDT 27:2355, 2012 AD NA * 613039
CRKL CRK Like Proto-Oncogene, adaptor protein Lopez-Rivera NEJM 376:742, 2017 AD NA * 602007
DSTYK Dual serine/threonine and tyrosine protein kinase Sanna-Cherchi NEJM 369:621, 2013 AD Congenital anomalies of kidney and urinary tract 1 # 610805
EYA1 Eyes absent homolog 1 Abdelhak Nat Genet 15:157, 1997 AD Branchiootorenal syndrome 1, with or without cataracts # 113650
FOXC1 Forkhead Box C1 Wu Genet. Med. 22(10):1673, 2020 AD CAKUT * 601090
FOXA3 Forkhead Transcription Factor 3 Zheng NDT 2021 online ahead of print doi:10.1093/ndt/gfab253 AD Uretero-pelvic junction obstruction * 602295
FOXL2 Forkhead Transcription Factor 2 Zheng NDT 2021 online ahead of print doi:10.1093/ndt/gfab253 AD Uretero-pelvic junction obstruction and eyelid abnormalities * 605597
GATA3 GATA binding protein 3 Pandolfi Nat Genet 11:40, 1995; Van Esch Nature 406:419, 2000 AD Hypoparathyroidism, sensorineural deafness, and renal dysplasia # 146255
GREB1L Growth Regulation By Estrogen In Breast Cancer 1 Like Brophy Genetics 207:215, 2017, Sanna-Cherchi AJHG 101:1034, 2017 AD Renal hypodysplasia/ aplasia 3 # 617805
HNF1B HNF homeobox B Lindner Hum Mol Genet 24:263, 1999 AD Renal cysts and diabetes syndrome # 137920
MUC1 Mucin 1 Kirby Nat Genet 45:299, 2013 AD Medullary cystic kidney disease 1 # 174000
NRIP1 Nuclear Receptor Interacting Protein 1 Vivante JASN 28:2364, 2107 AD NA * 602490
PAX2 Paired box 2 Sanyanusin Hum Mol Genet 4:2183, 1995 AD Papillorenal syndrome # 120330
PBX1 PBX Homeobox 1 Heidet JASN 28:2901, 2017 AD Congenital anomalies of kidney and urinary tract syndrome with or without hearing loss, abnormal ears, or developmental delay # 617641
RET Proto-oncogene tyrosine-protein kinase receptor Ret Skinner AJHG 82:344, 2008 AD Multiple OMIM classifications * 164761
ROBO2 Roundabout, axon guidance receptor, homolog 2 (Drosophila) Hwang Hum Genet 134:905, 2015; Lu AJHG 80:616, 2007 AD Vesicoureteral reflux 2 # 610878
SALL1 Sal-like protein 1 (also known as spalt-like transcription factor 1) Kohlhase Nat Genet 18:81, 1998 AD Townes-Brocks syndrome 1 # 107480
SIX1 SIX homeobox 1 Ruf PNAS 101: 8090, 2004 AD Branchio-otic syndrome 3 # 608389
SIX2 SIX homeobox 2 Weber JASN 19:891, 2008 AD NA * 604994
SIX5 SIX homeobox 5 Hoskins AJHG 80:800, 2007 AD Branchiootorenal syndrome 2 # 610896
SLIT2 Slit homolog 2 Hwang Hum Genet 134:905, 2015 AD NA * 603746
SOX17 Transcription factor SIX-17 Gimelli Hum Mut 31:1352, 2010 AD Vesicoureteral reflux 3 # 613674
SRGAP1 SLIT-ROBO Rho GTPase activating protein 1 Hwang Hum Genet 134:905, 2015 AD NA * 606523
TBX18 T-Box transcription factor Vivante AJHG 97:291, 2015 AD Congenital anomalies of kidney and urinary tract 2 # 143400
TNXB Tenascin XB Gbadegesin JASN 24:1313, 2013 AD Vesicoureteral reflux 8 # 615963
UPK3A Uroplakin 3A Jenkins JASN 16:2141, 2005 AD NA * 611559
WNT4 Protein Wnt-4 Biason-Lauber NEJM 351:792, 2004; Mandel AJHG 82:39, 2008; Vivante JASN 24:550, 2013 AD Mullerian aplasia and hyperandrogenism # 158330
KAL1 Anosmin 1 Hardelin PNAS 89:8190, 1992 XL Hypogonadotropic hypogonadism 1 with or without anosmia (Kallmann syndrome 1) # 308700

AR, autosomal recessive; AD, autosomal dominant; NA, not available; OMIM, Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man; XL; X-linked

#,

phenotype MIM number

*

gene/ locus MIM number if not phenotype MIM number available.

Table 3.

155 genes that represent monogenic causes of human syndromic CAKUT, if mutated. (Sorted alphabetically by mode of inheritance).

Gene Protein Reference Mode of inheritance Phenotype OMIM number
B3GALTL Beta 3-Glucosyltransferase Lesnik Oberstein AJHG 79:562, 2006 AR Peters-plus syndrome # 261540
BSCL2 BSCL2, Seipin Lipid Droplet Biogenesis Associated Haghighi Clin Genet 89: 434, 2016 AR Multiple classifications # 608594
# 269700
# 600794
# 615924
# 270685
CD151 CD151 Molecule (Raph Blood Group) Karamatic Blood 104:2217, 2004 AR NA * 602243
CD96 CD96 Molecule Kaname AJHG 81:835, 2007 AR C syndrome # 211750
CHRNG Cholinergic Receptor Nicotinic Gamma Subunit Vogt J Med Genet 49:21, 2012 AR Escobar syndrome # 265000
CISD2 CDGSH Iron Sulfur Domain 2 Amr AJHG 81:673, 2007 AR Wolfram syndrome 2 # 604928
CTU2 Cytosolic Thiouridylase, subunit 2 Shaheen AJMG 170:3222, 2016 AR Microcephaly, facial dysmorphism, renal agenesis, and ambiguous genitalia syndrome # 618142
CYP21 Cytochrome P450 Family 21 Martul Arch Dis Child 55:324, 1980 AR Hyperandrogenism, nonclassic type, due to 21-hydroxylase deficiency # 201910
DACH1 Dachshund Family Transcription Factor 1 Schild NDT 28:227, 2013 AR NA * 603803
DHCR7 7-Dehydrocholesterol Reductase Löffler AJHG 13;95:174, 2000 AR Smith-Lemli-Opitz syndrome # 270400
DIS3L2 DIS3 Like 3’–5’ Exoribonuclease 2 Astuti Nat Genet 5;44:277, 2012 AR Perlman syndrome # 267000
EMG1 EMG1, N1-Specific Pseudouridine Methyltransferase Armistead AJHG 84:728, 2009 AR Bowen-Conradi syndrome # 211180
ERCC8 Excision repair cross-complementing, group 8 Bertola J Hum Genet 51:701, 2006 AR Cockayne syndrome, type A # 216400
ESCO2 Establishment Of Sister Chromatid Cohesion N-Acetyltransferase 2 Vega J Med Genet 47:30, 2010 AR Roberts syndrome # 268300
ETFA Electron Transfer Flavoprotein Alpha Subunit Lehnert Eur J Pediatr 139:56, 1982 AR Glutaric acidemia IIA # 231680
ETFB Electron Transfer Flavoprotein Beta Subunit Lehnert Eur J Pediatr 139:56, 1982 AR Glutaric acidemia IIB # 231680
ETFDH Electron Transfer Flavoprotein Dehydrogenase Lehnert Eur J Pediatr 139:56, 1982 AR Glutaric acidemia IIC # 231680
FANCA Fanconi Anemia Complementation Group A Joenje & Patel Nat Rev Genet 2:466, 2001 AR Fanconi anemia, complementation group A # 227650
FANCB Fanconi Anemia Complementation Group B McCauley AJMG 155A:2370, 2011 AR Fanconi anemia, complementation group B # 300514
FANCD2 Fanconi Anemia Complementation Group D2 Kalb AJHG 80:895, 2007 AR Fanconi anemia, complementation group D2 # 227646
FANCE Fanconi Anemia Complementation Group E Wegner Clin Genet 50:479, 1996 AR Fanconi anemia, complementation group E # 600901
FANCI Fanconi Anemia Complementation Group I Savage AJMG 170A:386, 2015 AR Fanconi anemia, complementation group I # 609053
FANCL Fanconi Anemia Complementation Group L Vetro Hum Mutat 36:562, 2015 AR Fanconi anemia, complementation group L # 614083
FAT4 FAT Atypical Cadherin 4 Alders Hum Genet 133:1161, 2014 AR Van Maldergem syndrome 2 # 615546
FOXP1 Forkhead Box P1 Bekheirnia Genet Med 19:412, 2017 AR NA * 605515
HES7 Hes Family BHLH Transcription Factor 7 Sparrow Hum Mol Genet 17:3761, 2008 AR NA * 608059
HYLS1 HYLS1, Centriolar And Ciliogenesis Associated Paetau J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 67:750, 2008 AR Hydrolethalus syndrome # 236680
ICK Intertinal cell kinase Lahiry AJHG 84:822, 2009 AR NA * 612325
IFT46 Intraflagellar Transport 46 Lee Dev Biol 400:248, 2015 AR Short-rib thoracic dysplasia 16 with or without polydactyly # 617102
IFT74 Intraflagellar Transport 74 Cevik PLoS GeneT 9:e1003977, 2013 AR Bardet-Biedl syndrome 20 # 617119
ITGA3 Integrin Subunit Alpha 3 Yalcin Hum Mol Genet 24:3679, 2015 AR Interstitial lung disease, nephrotic syndrome, and epidermolysis bullosa, congenital # 614748
JAM3 Junctional Adhesion Molecule 3 Mochida AJHG 10;87:882, 2010 AR Hemorrhagic destruction of the brain, subependymal calcification, and cataracts # 613730
LMNA Lamin A/C Klupa Endocrine 36:518, 2009 AR Multiple OMIM classification * 150330
LRIG2 Leucione rich repeats and immunoglobulin like domains containing protein 2 Stuart AJHG 92:259, 2013 AR Urofacial syndrome 2 # 615112
LRP2 LDL Receptor Related Protein 2 Kantarci Nat Genet 39:957, 2007 AR Donnai-Barrow syndrome # 222448
LRP4 LDL Receptor Related Protein 4 Li Am J Hum Genet 86:696, 2010 AR Cenani-Lenz syndactyly syndrome # 212780
MESP2 Mesoderm Posterior BHLH Transcription Factor 2 George-Abraham AJMG A 158A:1971, 2012 AR NA * 605195
MKS3 Meckel Syndrome Type 3 Protein Baala AJHG 80:186, 2007 AR Meckel syndrome 3 # 607361
PEX5 Peroxisomal Biogenesis Factor 5 Sundaram Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol 5:456, 2008 AR Peroxisome biogenesis disorder 2A (Zellweger) # 214110
PMM2 Phosphomannomutase 2 Horslen Arch Dis Child 66:1027, 1991 AR Congenital disorder of glycosylation, type Ia # 212065
POC1A POC1 centriolar protein Shaheen AJHG 91:330, 2012 AR Short stature, onychodysplasia, facial dysmorphism, and hypotrichosis # 614813
PROK2 Prokineticin 2 Madan Mol Genet Metab Rep 12:57, 2017 AR Hypogonadotropic hypogonadism 4 with or without anosmia # 610628
RECQL4 RecQ Like Helicase 4 Siitonen Eur J Hum Genet 17:151, 2009 AR Baller-Gerold syndrome # 218600
ROR2 Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Like Orphan Receptor 2 Wiens Clin Genet 37:481, 1990 AR Robinow syndrome # 268310
RPS19 Ribosomal Protein S19 Hoefele Pediatr Nephrol 25:1255, 2010 AR NA * 603474
SCARF2 Scavenger Receptor Class F Member 2 Anastasio AJHG 87:553, 2010 AR Van den Ende-Gupta syndrome # 600920
STRA6 Stimulated By Retinoic Acid 6 Golzio AJHG 80:1179, 2007 AR Microphthalmia, syndromic 9 Microphthalmia, isolated, with coloboma 8 # 601186
TMCO1 Transmembrane And Coiled-Coil Domains 1 Xin PNAS 107:258, 2010 AR Craniofacial dysmorphism, skeletal anomalies, and mental retardation syndrome # 213980
UBR1 Ubiquitin Protein Ligase E3 Component N-Recognin 1 Vanlieferinghen Genet Couns 14:105, 2003 AR Johanson-Blizzard syndrome # 243800
PEX1 Peroxisomal Biogenesis Factor 1 Crane Hum Mutat 26:167, 2005 AR Peroxisome biogenesis disorder 1A (Zellweger) # 214100
PIGL Phosphatidylinositol Glycan Anchor Biosynthesis Class L Schnur AJMG 72:24, 1997 AR CHIME syndrome # 280000
PIGO Phosphatidylinositol Glycan Anchor Biosynthesis Class O Krawitz AJHG 91:146, 2012 AR Hyperphosphatasia with mental retardation syndrome 2 # 614749
PIGN Phosphatidylinositol Glycan Anchor Biosynthesis Class N Ohba Neurogenetics 15:85, 2014 AR Multiple congenital anomalies-hypotonia-seizures syndrome 1 # 614080
PIGT Phosphatidylinositol Glycan Anchor Biosynthesis Class T Nakashima Neurogenetics 15:193, 2014 AR Multiple congenital anomalies-hypotonia-seizures syndrome 3 # 615398
PIGV Phosphatidylinositol Glycan Anchor Biosynthesis Class V Horn Eur J Hum Genet 22:762, 2014 AR NA * 610274
PIGY Phosphatidylinositol Glycan Anchor Biosynthesis Class Y Ilkovski Hum Mol Genet 24:6146, 2015 AR Hyperphosphatasia with mental retardation syndrome 6 # 616809
PTF1A Pancreas Specific Transcription Factor, 1a Gurung Mol Med Rep 12:1579, 2015 AR NA * 607194
ROBO1 Roundabout Guidance Receptor 1 Kidney Int. S0085–2538(22) 157–0, 2022 AR Kidney and genitourinary defects, neurodevelopmental defects, eye anomalies, and cardiac defects. * 602430
WFS1 Wolframin ER Transmembrane Glycoprotein Salih Acta Paediatr Scand 80:567, 1991 AR Wolfram syndrome 1 # 222300
WNT3 Wnt Family Member 3 Niemann AJHG 74:558, 2004 AR Tetra-amelia syndrome 1 # 273395
ZMPSTE24 Zinc Metallopeptidase STE24 Chen AJMG A 149A:1550, 2009 AR Restrictive dermopathy, lethal # 275210
ACTB Actin Beta Rivière Nat Genet 44:440, 2012 AD Baraitser-Winter syndrome 1 # 243310
ACTG1 Actin Gamma 1 Rivière Nat Genet 44:440, 2012 AD Baraitser-Winter syndrome 1 # 243310
AIFM3 Apoptosis Inducing Factor, Mitochondria Associated 3 Lopez-Rivera NEJM 376:742, 2017 AD NA * 617298
ARID1B AT-Rich Interaction Domain 1B Levy J Med Genet 28, 1991 AD Coffin-Siris syndrome 1 # 135900
ATXN10 Ataxin 10 Matsuura Nat Genet 26:191, 2000 AD Spinocerebellar ataxia 10 # 603516
BICC1 BicC Family RNA Binding Protein 1 Kraus Hum Mutat 33:86, 2012 AD Renal cystic/ dysplasia # 601331
BMP7 Bone Morphogenetic Protein 7 Hwang Kidney Int 85:1429, 2014 AD NA * 112267
BRAF B-Raf Proto-Oncogene, Serine/Threonine Kinase Sarkozy Hum Mutat 30:695, 2009 AD Cardiofaciocutaneous syndrome # 115150
CDC5L Cell Division Cycle 5 Like Groenen Genomics 49:218, 1998 AD NA * 602868
CREBBP CREB Binding Protein Kanjilal J Med Genet 29:669, 1992 AD Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome 1 # 180849
DACT1 Dishevelled Binding Antagonist Of Beta Catenin 1 Webb Hum Mutat 38:373, 2017 AD Townes-Brocks syndrome 2 # 617466
EP300 E1A Binding Protein P300 Roelfsema AJHG 76:572, 2005 AD Rubinstein-Taybi syndrome 2 # 613684
ESRRG Estrogen Related Receptor Gamma Harewood PLoS One 5:e12375, 2010 AD NA * 602969
FBN1 Fibrillin 1 Tokhmafshan Pediatr Nephrol 32:565, 2017 AD Marfan syndrome # 154700
FGFR1 Fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 Farrow AJHG 140A:537, 2006 AD Multiple OMIM classifications # 615465
# 147950
# 123150
# 166250
# 101600
# 190440
FGFR3 Fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 Rohmann Nat Genet 38:495, 2006 AD LADD syndrome # 149730
FGF10 Fibroblast Growth Factor 10 Milunsky Clin Genet 69:349, 2006; Bamforth AJMG 43:932, 1992 AD LADD syndrome # 149730
FGF8 Fibroblast Growth Factor 8 Falardeau J Clin Invest 118:2822 2008 AD Hypogonadotropic hypogonadism 6 with or without anosmia # 612702
FGFR2 Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor 2 LeHeup Eur J Pediatr 154:130, 1995 AD Multiple OMIM classifications * 176943
FGFRL2 Forkhead Box C1 LeHeup Eur J Pediatr 154:130, 1995 AD Antley-Bixler syndrome without genital anomalies or disordered steroidogenesis # 207410
FMN1 Formin 1 Dimitrov J Med Genet 47:569, 2010 AD NA * 136535
FOXF1 Forkhead Box F1 Hilger Hum Mutat 36:1150, 2015 AD Alveolar capillary dysplasia with misalignment of pulmonary veins # 265380
GDF3 Growth Differentiation Factor 3 Karaca AJMG A 167A:2795, 2015 AD Klippel-Feil syndrome 3 # 613702
GDNF Glial cell line derived neurotrophic factor Pini Prato Medicine (Baltimore) 88:83, 2009 AD Susceptibility Hirschsprung Disease # 613711
GFRA1 GDNF Family Receptor Alpha 1 Chatterjee Hum Genet 131:1725, 2013 AD NA * 601496
GLI2 GLI Family Zinc Finger 2 Carmichael J Urol 190:1884, 2013 AD Culler-Jones syndrome, Holoprosencephaly 9 # 615849
# 610829
HOXA13 Homeobox A13 Halal AJMG 30:793, 1998 AD Hand-foot-uterus syndrome # 140000
HOXD13 Homeobox D13 Garcia-Barceló AJMG A146A:3181, 2008 AD NA * 142989
JAG1 Jagged 1 Kamath Nat Rev Nephrol 9:409, 2013 AD Alagille syndrome 1 # 118450
KAT6B Lysine Acetyltransferase 6B Campeau AJMG 90:282, 2012 AD Genitopatellar syndrome # 606170
KCTD1 Potassium Channel Tetramerization Domain Containing 1 Marneros AJMG 92:621, 2013 AD Scalp-ear-nipple syndrome # 181270
KCNH2 Potassium Voltage-Gated Channel Subfamily H Member 2 Caselli AJMG 146A:1195, 2008 AD Scalp-ear-nipple syndrome * 152427
KRAS KRAS Proto-Oncogene, GTPase Schubbert Nat Gene 38:331, 2006 AD Noonan syndrome 3 # 609942
LMX1B LIM Homeobox Transcription Factor 1 Beta Dreyer Nat Genet 19:47, 1998 AD Nail-patella syndrome # 161200
LPP LIM Domain Containing Preferred Translocation Partner In Lipoma Hernández-García AJMG A 158A:1785, 2012 AD NA * 600700
MAP2K1 Mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase 1 Schulz Clin Genet 73:62, 2007 AD Cardiofaciocutaneous syndrome 3 # 615279
MAP2K2 Mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase 2 Schulz Clin Genet 73:62, 2007 AD Cardiofaciocutaneous syndrome 4 # 615280
MLL2/ KMT2D Myeloid/Lymphoid Or Mixed-Lineage Leukemia Protein 2 Banka Eur J Hum Genet 20:381, 2012 AD Kabuki syndrome 1 # 147920
MYCN Feingold Syndrome Marcelis Hum Mut 29:1125, 2006 AD Feingold syndrome 1 # 164280
NOTCH2 Notch 2 Kamath Nat Rev Nephrol 9:409, 2013 AD Alagille syndrome 2, Hajdu-Cheney syndrome # 610205
# 102500
PKD1 Polycystin 1, Transient Receptor Potential Channel Interacting Rossetti JASN 18:2143, 2007 AD Polycystic kidney disease 1 # 173900
PKD2 Polycystin 2, Transient Receptor Potential Cation Channel Rossetti JASN 18:2143, 2007 AD Polycystic kidney disease 2 # 613095
PROKR2 Prokineticin Receptor 2 Sarfati Front Horm Res 39:121, 2010 AD Hypogonadotropic hypogonadism 3 with or without anosmia # 244200
PTPN11 Protein Tyrosine Phosphatase, Non-Receptor Type 11 Bertola AJMG 130A:378, 2004 AD LEOPARD syndrome 1 # 151100
RAF1 Raf-1 Proto-Oncogene, Serine/Threonine Kinase Razzaque Nat Genet 39:1013, 2007 AD Noonan syndrome 5 # 611553
RAI1 Retinoic Acid Induced 1 Vilboux PLoS One 6:e22861, 2011 AD Smith-Magenis syndrome # 182290
SALL4 Spalt Like Transcription Factor 4 Kohlhase GeneReviews®Book Section, 1993 AD Duane-radial ray syndrome # 607323
SEMA3A Semaphorin 3A Young Hum Reprod 27:1460, 2012 AD Hypogonadotropic hypogonadism 16 with or without anosmia # 614897
SEMA3E Semaphorin 3E Lalani J Med Genet 41:e94, 2004 AD CHARGE syndrome # 214800
SETBP1 SET Binding Protein 1 Schinzel AJMG 1:361, 1978 AD Schinzel-Giedion midface retraction syndrome # 269150
SHH Sonic Hedgehog Lurie AJMG 35:286, 1990 AD Holoprosencephaly 3 # 142945
SF3B4 Splicing Factor 3b Subunit 4 Bernier AJMG 90:925, 2012 AD Acrofacial dysostosis 1, Nager type # 154400
SNAP29 Synaptosome Associated Protein 29 Lopez-Rivera NEJM 376:742, 2017 AD Di George syndrome * 604202
SOS1 SOS Ras/Rac Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factor 1 Ferrero Eur J Med Genet 51:566, 2008 AD Noonan syndrome 4 # 610733
SOX9 SRY-Box 9 Airik Hum Mol Genet 19:4918, 2010 AD Campomelic dysplasia # 114290
SRCAP Snf2 Related CREBBP Activator Protein Hood AJHG 90:308, 2012 AD Floating-Harbor syndrome # 136140
TBX1 T-Box 1 Kujat AJMG A 140:1601, 2006 AD Di George syndrome # 188400
TBX3 T-Box 3 Meneghini Eur J Med Genet 49:151, 2006 AD Ulnar-mammary syndrome # 181450
TBX6 T-Box 3 Yang Kidney Int. 98(4):1020, 2020 AD CAKUT * 602427
TFAP2A Transcription Factor AP-2 Alpha Milunsky AJHG 82:1171, 2008 AD Branchiooculofacial syndrome # 113620
TP63 Tumor Protein P63 Celli Cell 99:143, 1999 AD Multiple OMIM classifications * 603273
TRPS1 Zinc finger transcription factor; Trichorhinophalangeal syndrome Tasic Ren Fail 36:619, 2014 AD Trichorhinophalangeal syndrome # 190350
# 190351
TSC1 Tuberous Sclerosis 1 Curatolo Lancet 372:657, 2008 AD Tuberous sclerosis-1 # 191100
TSC2 Tuberous Sclerosis 2 Kumar Hum Mol Genet 4:1471, 1995 AD Tuberous sclerosis-2 # 613254
TWIST2 Twist Family BHLH Transcription Factor 2 Stevens AJMG 107:30, 2002 AD Ablepharon-macrostomia syndrome # 200110
WNT5A Wnt Family Member 5A Roifman Clin Genet 87:34, 2015; Person Dev Dyn 239:327, 2010 AD Robinow syndrome # 180700
ZMYM2 Zinx finger MYM-type 2 Connaughton AJHG 10794):727, 2020 AD/ de novo Neurodevelopmental-craniofacial syndrome with variable renal and cardiac anomalies # 619522
GDF6 Growth Differentiation Factor 6 Tassabehji Hum Mutat 29:1017, 2008 AD/ AR Multiple OMIM classifications * 601147
GLI3 GLI Family Zinc Finger 3 Cain PLoS One 4:e7313, 2009 AD/ AR Multiple OMIM classifications * 165240
PCSK5 Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin & Kexin Type 5 Nakamura BMC Res Notes 8:228, 2015 AD/ AR NA * 600488
PTEN Phosphatase And Tensin Homolog Reardon J Med Genet 38:820, 2001 AD/ AR Multiple OMIM classifications * 601728
RPS24 Ribosomal Protein S24 Yetgin Turk J Pediatr 36:239, 1994 AD/ AR Aase-Smith syndrome * 602412
VANGL1 VANGL Planar Cell Polarity Protein 1 Bartsch Mol Syndromol 3:76, 2012 AD/ AR Caudal regression syndrome # 600145
AXIN1 Axin 1 Oates AJHG 79:155, 2006 De novo Caudal duplication anomaly # 607864
H19 H19, Imprinted Maternally Expressed Transcript (Non-Protein Coding) Hur PNAS 113:10938, 2016 De novo Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome # 130650
KCNQ1OT1 KCNQ1 Opposite Strand & Antisense Transcript 1 (Non-Protein Coding) Chiesa Hum Mol Genet 21:10, 2012 De novo Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome # 130650
NIPBL NIPBL, Cohesin Loading Factor Rohatgi AJMG 152A:1641, 2010 De novo Cornelia de Lange syndrome 1 # 122470
CDKN1C Cyclin Dependent Kinase Inhibitor 1C Mussa Pediatr Nephrol 27:397, 2012 De novo Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome # 130650
CHD7 Chromodomain Helicase DNA Binding Protein 7 Janssen Hum Mutat 33:1149 2012 De novo CHARGE syndrome # 214800
AMER1 APC Membrane Recruitment Protein 1 Pellegrino AJMG 16:159, 1997 XL Osteopathia striata with cranial sclerosis # 300373
ATP7A ATPase Copper Transporting Alpha Vulpe Nat Genet 3:7, 1993 XL Menkes disease # 309400
BCOR BCL6 Corepressor Ng Nat Genet 36:411, 2004 XL Microphthalmia, syndromic 2 # 300166
DLG3 Disc large, drosphilia, homologue of 3 Philips Orphanet J Rare Dis 9:49, 2014 XL Mental retardation, X-linked 90 # 300850
FAM58A Family With Sequence Similarity 58 Member A Green J Med Genet 33:594, 1996; Unger Nat Genet 40:287, 2008 XL STAR syndrome # 300707
FLNA Filamin A Robertson AJMG A 140:1726, 2006 XL Multiple OMIM classifications * 300017
GPC3 Glypican 3 Cottereau AJMG C Semin Med Genet 163:92, 2013 XL Simpson-Golabi-Behmel syndrome, type 1 # 312870
MID1 Midline 1 Preiksaitiene Clin Dysmorphol 24:7, 2015 XL Opitz GBBB syndrome, type I # 300000
NSDHL NAD(P) Dependent Steroid Dehydrogenase-Like König J Am Acad Dermatol 46:594, 2002 XL CHILD syndrome # 308050
PIGA Phosphatidylinositol Glycan Anchor Biosynthesis Class A Johnston AJHG 90:295, 2012 XL Multiple congenital anomalies-hypotonia-seizures syndrome 2 # 300868
PORCN Porcupine O-Acyltransferase Suskan Pediatr Dermatol 7:283, 1990 XL Focal dermal hypoplasia # 305600
SMC1A Structural Maintenance Of Chromosomes 1A Deardorff GeneReviews® Book Section Seattle(WA), 1993 XL Cornelia de Lange syndrome 2 # 300590
UPF3B UPF3B, Regulator Of Nonsense Mediated MRNA Decay Lynch Eur J Med Genet 55:476, 2012 XL NA * 300298
ZIC3 Zic Family Member 3 Chung AJMG 155:1123, 2011 XL VACTERL association # 314390
OSR1 Odd-Skipped Related Transciption Factor 1 Zhang Hum Mol Genet 20:4167, 2011 Unknown NA * 608891
SH2B1 SH2B Adaptor Protein 1 Sampson AJMG 152:2618, 2010 Unknown NA * 608937

AR, autosomal recessive; AD, autosomal dominant; NA, not available; OMIM, Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man; XL; X-linked

#,

phenotype MIM number; Unknown, mode of inheritance not clearly characterized;

*

gene/ locus MIM number if not phenotype MIM number available.

Recent studies demonstrate an estimated prevalence of monogenic causation in CAKUT between 10% to 20% (Ahn et al., 2020; Capone et al., 2017; Kagan et al., 2022; Ven et al., 2018) however prevalence can vary depending on the population under study, the CAKUT subtypes included in the analysis, and the method of analysis. For example, in a population of fetuses with bilateral kidney anomalies, high through-put next generation sequencing, identified a monogenic cause in 11 of 56 (20%) (Rasmussen et al., 2018). In a pediatric cohort of 100 children with renal hypodysplasia, Weber detected a monogenic cause in 17% of affected individuals (Weber et al., 2006). In a heterogenous pediatric cohort of 232 families encompassing a variety of subtypes of CAKUT, monogenic causation was observed in 14% (Ven et al., 2018). In a Korean population of children with CAKUT, targeted exome sequencing identified genetic causes in 13.8% of the 94 pathogenic variants in either HNF1B, PAX2, EYA1, UPK3A, and FRAS1 (Ahn et al., 2020). More recently, we demonstrated that in a large cohort of 731 families with CAKUT a single-gene cause for CAKUT was identified in 11.4% of families (Seltzsam et al., 2022). Copy number variants (CNVs) result from either deletions or duplications of chromosomal regions. The resulting change in gene dosage can result in CAKUT if the involved genes are known to be pathogenic in CAKUT. For example, pathogenic CNVs in HNF1B, EYA1, and CHD1L, have been described in patients with CAKUT (Ahn et al., 2020; Sanna-Cherchi et al., 2012). It is estimated that a further ~10–15% of cases of CAKUT are due to CNVs. Recent data demonstrates that the detection rate may be significantly higher in patients with syndromic CAKUT, where a detection rate of 29.4% was observed in patients with renal hypodysplasia and extra-renal features (i.e. non-isolated RHD) versus patients with isolated RHD (9.7% detection rate, p=0.060) (Cai et al., 2020).

Renal agenesis and the GDNF-RET signaling pathway

Renal agenesis is defined as absence of one (unilateral) or both (bilateral) kidneys. Despite the obvious similarities, these CAKUT phenotypes carry a vastly different prognosis: bilateral agenesis is often detected on pre-natal ultrasonography and is largely incompatible with life while unilateral renal agenesis may be entirely asymptomatic with many cases only detected as an incidental finding following abdominal imaging. The incidence of bilateral renal agenesis is estimated at 0.1–0.3 per 100 births while unilateral agenesis is estimated at 1 per 1000 live births. Renal agenesis is hypothesized to develop due to defects in ND formation, establishment of the MM, or disturbed GDNF expression and/or signaling (Figure 1) (Davis et al., 2014; Ichikawa et al., 2002; Schedl, 2007; Short & Smyth, 2016).

This process is tightly regulated by the GDNF-RET signaling pathway. GDNF is initially released from the MM and binds to its co-receptor GDNF Family Receptor Alpha 1 (GFRα1) (Chia et al., 2011; Davis et al., 2014). RET is a tyrosine kinase receptor that is expressed in the UB (Davis et al., 2014; A. T. van der Ven et al., 2018), that is activated by this GDNF-GFRα1-RET complex through phosphorylation of specific tyrosine residues. Mutations in genes that function either up-stream or downstream of the GDNF-GFRα1-RET pathway have been implicated in both human and murine CAKUT. For example, mutations in RET have been implicated in patients with CAKUT specifically those with renal agenesis (Chatterjee et al., 2012; Skinner et al., 2008). Mutations in GDNF regulatory genes EYA1 (Abdelhak et al., 1997), SIX1 (Ruf et al., 2004) and SIX5 (Hoskins et al., 2007) have also, been implicated in patients with syndromic CAKUT namely Brachio–Oto–Renal syndrome (OMIM #113650) (Krug et al., 2011), which is characterized by defects in branchial arch, ear and renal development. Regulation of both, the level and expression of GDNF, have also been associated with CAKUT with mutations in transcription factors PAX2, GATA3, and SALL1 implicated in disease pathogenesis. Heterozygous mutations in SALL1 are implicated in Townes–Brocks syndrome (OMIM # 107480), characterized by external ear anomalies with sensorineural hearing loss, limb anomalies, and renal and anorectal malformations (Kohlhase et al., 1998), while heterozygous mutations in GATA3 have been described in patients with DiGeorge-like phenotype (OMIM #146255) that includes hypoparathyroidism, heart defects, immune deficiency, deafness and renal malformations (Hwang et al., 2014; Van Esch et al., 2000).

Renal Hypodysplasia (RHD)

Both quantitative and qualitative abnormal development of the kidneys can result in a kidney(s) of reduced size (renal hypoplasia) with/without abnormal renal tissue (renal dysplasia). RHD can again, be unilateral or bilateral occurring a frequency of 1 in 1,000 and 1 in 5,000, respectively (Winyard & Chitty, 2008). One of the proposed pathways for the development of RHD is, as described above, abnormal interaction between RET, a receptor in UB and its ligand GDNF. This interaction is critical for the initial induction and out sprouting of the UB from the ND. GDNF acts a chemotactic factor for the UB, and is governed by several transcription factors many of which have been implicated in renal hypodysplasia (PAX2, EYA1, HOXD11 and SIX2) (Kagan et al., 2022; Vivante & Hildebrandt, 2016). Most notably, heterozygous mutations in the transcription factor, Paired-Box gene 2 (PAX2), are known to cause monogenic CAKUT (Thomas et al., 2011) and are described in families with Renal Coloboma Syndrome (OMIM # 120330) (Sanyanusin et al., 1995).

Multicystic dysplastic kidney (MCDK)

Multicystic dysplastic kidney is characterized by multiple irregular cysts randomly distributed in a dysplastic kidney (Spence, 1955). MCDK is often classified within the category of renal cystic disease (RCD) however due to the developmental origin, it falls within the CAKUT spectrum of disease (Raina et al., 2021). For the purpose of this review, we have excluded other forms of renal cystic disease including polycystic kidney disease, ciliopathies including nephronophthisis and cystic disease in cancer syndrome as the etiology and pathogenesis does not fall within the CAKUT spectrum. MCDK is a form of dysplasia of the kidney with cyst developing as a results of abnormal kidney development, which contrast from other forms of renal cystic disease which result from a primary ciliary disorder (nephronophthisis and polycystic kidney disease). MCDK has an incidence of 1 in 4,300 and is frequently associated with other CAKUT phenotypes such as VUR (Schreuder et al., 2009). Multiple genes have been implicated in the MCDK phenotype, including Hepatocyte nuclear factor 1-beta (HNF1B) and PAX2, however many of the genes implicated in CAKUT (Table 2 and Table 3) have also been implicated in this subtype of CAKUT. Heterozygous mutations in HNF1B have been identified in patients with renal cysts and diabetes syndrome (OMIM #137920) and maturity-onset diabetes of the young type 5 (OMIM #606391). Equally, HNF1B associated disease can present with multiple CAKUT phenotypes including renal agenesis, RHD and MCDK. The reason for the cystic phenotype may be related to abnormal interaction between HNF1B and the PKHD1 gene, which when mutated causes autosomal recessive polycystic kidney disease (OMIM #263200). HNF1B, which is a transcription factor, binds to the proximal promoter of the PKHD1 gene to stimulate gene transcription (Hiesberger et al., 2004). Copy number variants on chromosome 17 which involve the HNF1B gene, including whole gene deletions, have also been described in patient with CAKUT and diabetes since the HNF1B gene is located on chromosome 17 (Mefford et al., 2007; Sanna-Cherchi et al., 2012). Together mutations in the transcription factors PAX2 or HNF1B, both of which are associated with an autosomal dominant mode of inheritance, constitute the most common mutations found in patients with CAKUT (Thomas et al., 2011).

Vesico-ureteric reflux (VUR)

VUR is a functional disorder of the bladder ureter connectivity which results in retrograde passage of urine from the bladder to the ureter and/or kidneys. Both genetic and environmental triggers are hypothesized to contribute to defective function of this valve. Valvular function is regulated by both the anatomical structure of the valve, such as the length of the submucosal ureter, the width of the ureteric opening, the muscles of the trigone and ureter, and ureteric peristalsis (Tokhmafshan et al., 2017; Williams et al., 2008). Ultimately this retrograde flow of urine can result in chronic infections and scarring of the kidney tissue which is often referred to as “reflux nephropathy”. In utero abnormal interaction between the UB and MM are again implicated in VUR (Figure 1B) (Bertoli-Avella et al., 2008), with mutations in genes such as ROBO2 implicated in VUR in both mice and humans (Lu et al., 2007). For example, heterozygous mutations in ROBO2, with subsequent reduction in ROBO2 gene dosage have been detected in patients with VUR (Hwang et al., 2014). ROBO2 is a transmembrane receptor that binds to its SLIT2 ligand and together have been implicated in regulating GDNF-RET signaling pathway (Bertoli-Avella et al., 2008; Hwang et al., 2015).

Hydronephrosis and bladder pathology

Hydronephrosis can result from any pathology that results in the impedance of normal urinary flow in either the upper or lower urinary tract and subsequent backpressure on the kidney and urinary tract. The clinical manifestation in most cases is ultrasonographic evidence of either hydronephrosis or hydroureter. The primary sites of obstruction within the urinary tract are either the ureter-pelvic or ureter-bladder junction. Both structural malformations and functional abnormalities in the ureteric smooth muscle can lead to obstruction within the urinary tract. Ureter-pelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) is one of the primary causes of hydronephrosis particularly in the neonatal period and is hypothesized to be caused by congenital absence of peristaltic contraction ability within the ureter. Loss of this peristaltic contractility is thought to be related to inappropriate smooth muscle difference in the ureteral wall (Bohnenpoll & Kispert, 2014). TBX18, a transcription factor expressed in undifferentiated mesenchymal cells surrounding the distal ureter stalk. Defects in this gene have been implicated in abnormal smooth muscle differentiation in the ureteral wall, thus leading to UPJO. In fact, heterozygous Tbx18 mice have been shown to develop UPJO while in human with heterozygous mutations in TBX18 have UPJO with hydronephrosis (Airik et al., 2006; Vivante et al., 2015).

The other source of obstruction within the genitourinary tract is the bladder. Recently, Mann et al. demonstrated that disruption of the neural pathways innervating the bladder can lead to bladder dysfunction ultimately leading to hydronephrosis (N Mann et al., 2019). Genes involved in the regulation of smooth muscle formation and contraction, neuronal patterning, and synaptic neuronal transmission in the bladder such as CHRM3 (Weber et al., 2011), ACTG2 (Thorson et al., 2014), ACTA2 (Milewicz et al., 2010), MYH11 (Kloth et al., 2019), MYLK (Halim et al., 2017), HPSE2 (Bulum et al., 2015), LRIG2 (Stuart et al., 2013) and most recently CHRNA3 (N Mann et al., 2019) have been shown to cause ureteral and bladder dysfunction leading to obstructive changes in the urinary tract.

Syndromic CAKUT and the Fraser Complex

CAKUT may occur in isolation as a monogenic disorder or as part of a syndromic disorder. For example, Fraser Syndrome (OMIM # 219000) is a rare autosomal recessive form of CAKUT characterized by renal anomalies with extra-renal features including syndactyly, cryptophthalmos, and abnormalities of the respiratory tract (van Haelst et al., 2008). The Fraser Complex (FC) is an extracellular matrix complex composed of a group of related protein, which include FRAS1, FREM2, FREM1 and GRIP1. The function of the FC once assembled is to stabilizes interaction between the UB and the MM (Figure 1). Both the assembly and maintenance of FC is governed by FC genes (FRAS1, FREM2 FREM1 and GRIP1) (Kiyozumi et al., 2006; Pavlakis et al., 2011; Takamiya et al., 2004) and have already been described in patients with CAKUT (Jadeja et al., 2005; McGregor et al., 2003; Nathanson et al., 2013; Slavotinek et al., 2006; Takamiya et al., 2004; van Haelst et al., 2008). Interestingly the FC gene developmental pathway has also been shown to regulate GDNF expression in the MM, which as outlined above is important in the GDNF-RET signaling pathway, demonstrating the link between various developmental pathways during kidney development. The loss of integrity of the FC due to pathogenic mutations in FRAS1, FREM2, FREM1 and GRIP1 can therefore lead to impaired interaction between the UB and MM (Pitera et al., 2008). In addition, the cytosolic protein GRIP1 has been shown to interact with FRAS1 facilitating appropriate trafficking and targeting in the UB (Takamiya et al., 2004).

Nephronectin (Npnt) is an extracellular matrix protein which is expressed during kidney development including the UB. The FC once assembled at the epithelial-mesenchymal interface of the UB, directly interacts with Npnt. Very recently, a pathologic homozygous frameshift variant in NPNT was detected in a family with 3 cases of bilateral renal agenesis. Pathogenicity was confirmed of this biallelic loss-of-function variant in a knock-in mouse model (Dai et al., 2021). At the UB, Npnt serves as an adaptor for other proteins expressed in the MM such as Integrin Subunit Alpha 8 (ITGA8) and Integrin Subunit Beta 1 (ITGB1) (Brandenberger et al., 2001; Kiyozumi et al., 2012; Linton et al., 2007), the former which has also been implicated in human disease (OMIM # 191830) (Humbert et al., 2014; Kohl S, 2014). ITGA8 is also an upstream activator of GDNF, which again, as outlined above is involved in the tyrosine kinase signaling pathway (Kiyozumi et al., 2012; Linton et al., 2007).

Another regulator in the interaction between the UB and MM, which occurs at the level of the extra-cellular matrix are the heparin sulphate proteoglycans (HSPGs) (Bonnans et al., 2014; Patel et al., 2017; Steer et al., 2004). HPSE2 encodes the Heparanase 2 enzyme which is an endoglycosidase that degrades heparin sulphate proteoglycans (Levy-Adam et al., 2010). Uro-facial syndrome (also known as Ochoa syndrome, OMIM # 236730) is an autosomal recessive disorder due to mutations in HPSE2 and is characterized by syndromic facial features, where there is a crying facial expression when attempting to smile along with features of the CAKUT disease spectrum including hydronephrosis, hydroureter, and posterior urethral valve (Vivante, Hwang, et al., 2017).

VACTERL association

VACTERL association or VATER syndrome describes a sequence of anomalies that includes Vertebral anomalies, Anorectal malformations, Cardiac defects, Trachea-esophageal fistula and/or Esophageal atresia, Renal anomalies, and Limb defects. This is a rare disease entity with an estimated prevalence of between 1 in 10,000 to 1 in 40,000 births. Genetic causation in VACTERL similar to CAKUT, is suspected due to a number of factors: a) familial cluster of the disease with increased prevalence in first degree relative of affected individuals, b) high concordance between monozygotic twins and, c) the existence of murine knock-out models of disease (Reutter et al., 2016). Both chromosomal anomalies and single gene disorder have been detected in patients with VACTERL with mutations in the genes TRAP1 and ZIC3 implicated in human disease (Chung et al., 2011; Saisawat et al., 2014). A recent exome sequencing study in 21 families with VACTERL, revealed a candidate variant in 6 families (21%). The variants included biallelic and X-chromosomal hemizygous variants in the following genes: B9D1, FREM1, ZNF157, SP8, ACOT9, and TTLL11 (Kolvenbach et al., 2021), however further work is still required to confirm if these possible candidate genes are indeed disease causing.

Conclusion

Current data indicates that when a patient presents with CAKUT, genetic testing will reveal a monogenic cause of disease in 10 to 20% of individuals (N. Mann et al., 2019; Rasmussen et al., 2018; Seltzsam et al., 2022; Ven et al., 2018; Weber et al., 2006). This percentages increases in the presence of extra-renal features of disease and patients with so-called syndromic CAKUT. Ongoing novel gene discovery has led to the identification of almost 200 monogenic causes of both isolated and syndromic CAKUT (Table 2 and Table 3). With the ever-expanding use of high through-put sequencing techniques, many of the newly identified genes have started to converge on overlapping signaling pathways, such as the GDNF-RET signaling pathway, the Fraser complex pathways and more recently the retinoic acid metabolism pathway (A. T. van der Ven et al., 2018). Mutations in implicated genes are hypothesized to lead to various levels of disruptions in the interaction between the ureteric bud and the metanephric mesenchyme or subsequent branching morphogenesis and nephrogenesis in utero. Further work is necessary to determine the exact interplay between these signaling pathways in CAKUT pathogenesis.

Acknowledgements

D.M.C is funded by the Eugen Drewlo Chair for Kidney Research and Innovation at the Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry at Western University, London, Ontario, Canada, the Department of Medicine, Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Western Ontario and the Innovation Fund of the Alternative Funding Plan of the Academic Health Sciences Centre of Ontario (AMOSO).

F.H. is the William E. Harmon Professor of Pediatrics at Harvard Medical School. His research is supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (DK076683).

Footnotes

Conflict of Interest Statement

F.H. is a cofounder and Scientific Advisory Committee member of and holds stocks in Goldfinch-Bio. D.M.C declares no conflicts of interest.

REFERENCES

  1. Abdelhak S, Kalatzis V, Heilig R, Compain S, Samson D, Vincent C, . . . Petit C. (1997). A human homologue of the Drosophila eyes absent gene underlies branchio-oto-renal (BOR) syndrome and identifies a novel gene family. Nature Genetics, 15(2), 157–164. 10.1038/ng0297-157 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Abu-Abed S, Dolle P, Metzger D, Beckett B, Chambon P, & Petkovich M (2001). The retinoic acid-metabolizing enzyme, CYP26A1, is essential for normal hindbrain patterning, vertebral identity, and development of posterior structures. Genes Dev, 15(2), 226–240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ahn Y, Lee C, Kim N, Park E, Kang H, Ha I, . . . Cheong H. (2020). Targeted Exome Sequencing Provided Comprehensive Genetic Diagnosis of Congenital Anomalies of the Kidney and Urinary Tract. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 9(3), 751. 10.3390/jcm9030751 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Airik R, Bussen M, Singh M, Petry M, & Kispert A (2006). Tbx18 regulates the development of the ureteral mesenchyme. The Journal of Clinical Investigation, 116(3), 663–674. 10.1172/JCI26027 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Batourina E, Choi C, Paragas N, Bello N, Hensle T, Costantini FD, . . . Mendelsohn CL. (2002). Distal ureter morphogenesis depends on epithelial cell remodeling mediated by vitamin A and Ret. Nature Genetics, 32(1), 109–115. 10.1038/ng952 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Batourina E, Gim S, Bello N, Shy M, Clagett-Dame M, Srinivas S, . . . Mendelsohn C (2001). Vitamin A controls epithelial/mesenchymal interactions through Ret expression. Nature Genetics, 27(1), 74–78. 10.1038/83792 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Batourina E, Tsai S, Lambert S, Sprenkle P, Viana R, Dutta S, . . . Mendelsohn CL. (2005). Apoptosis induced by vitamin A signaling is crucial for connecting the ureters to the bladder. Nat Genet, 37(10), 1082–1089. 10.1038/ng1645 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Bertoli-Avella A, Conte M, Punzo F, de Graaf B, Lama G, La Manna A, . . . Perrotta S. (2008). ROBO2 gene variants are associated with familial vesicoureteral reflux. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology : JASN, 19(4), 825–831. 10.1681/ASN.2007060692 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Bohnenpoll T, & Kispert A (2014). Ureter growth and differentiation. Seminars in Cell & Developmental Biology, 36, 21–30. 10.1016/j.semcdb.2014.07.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Bonnans C, Chou J, & Werb Z (2014). Remodelling the extracellular matrix in development and disease. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, 15(12), 786–801. 10.1038/nrm3904 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Brandenberger R, Schmidt A, Linton J, Wang D, Backus C, Denda S, . . . Reichardt LF. (2001). Identification and characterization of a novel extracellular matrix protein nephronectin that is associated with integrin alpha8beta1 in the embryonic kidney. J Cell Biol, 154(2), 447–458. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Bulum B, Ozcakar ZB, Duman D, Cengiz FB, Kavaz A, Burgu B, . . . Yalcinkaya F. (2015). HPSE2 mutations in urofacial syndrome, non-neurogenic neurogenic bladder and lower urinary tract dysfunction. Nephron, 130(1), 54–58. 10.1159/000381465 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Bulum B, Ozçakar Z, Ustüner E, Düşünceli E, Kavaz A, Duman D, . . . Yalçınkaya F. (2013). High frequency of kidney and urinary tract anomalies in asymptomatic first-degree relatives of patients with CAKUT. Pediatric Nephrology, 28(11), 2143–2147. 10.1007/s00467-013-2530-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Cai M, Lin N, Su L, Wu X, Xie X, Li Y, . . . Xu L. (2020). Copy number variations associated with fetal congenital kidney malformations. Molecular Cytogenetics, 13(11), eCollection 2020. 10.1186/s13039-020-00481-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Capone V, Morello W, Taroni F, & Montini G (2017). Genetics of Congenital Anomalies of the Kidney and Urinary Tract: The Current State of Play. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 18(4), 796. 10.3390/ijms18040796 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. Chatterjee R, Ramos E, Hoffman M, VanWinkle J, Martin D, Davis T, . . . Jain S. (2012). Traditional and targeted exome sequencing reveals common, rare and novel functional deleterious variants in RET-signaling complex in a cohort of living US patients with urinary tract malformations. Human Genetics, 131(11), 1725–1738. 10.1007/s00439-012-1181-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Chia I, Grote D, Marcotte M, Batourina E, Mendelsohn C, & Bouchard M (2011). Nephric duct insertion is a crucial step in urinary tract maturation that is regulated by a Gata3-Raldh2-Ret molecular network in mice. Development, 138(10), 2089–2097. 10.1242/dev.056838 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Chung B, Shaffer LG, Keating S, Johnson J, Casey B, & Chitayat D (2011). From VACTERL-H to heterotaxy: variable expressivity of ZIC3-related disorders. Am J Med Genet A, 155a(5), 1123–1128. 10.1002/ajmg.a.33859 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Connaughton DM, Bukhari S, Conlon P, Cassidy E, O’Toole M, Mohamad M, . . . Conlon P. (2015). The Irish Kidney Gene Project - Prevalence of Family History in Patients with Kidney Disease in Ireland. Nephron, 130(4), 293–301. 10.1159/000436983 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Connaughton DM, & Hildebrandt F (2019). Personalized medicine in chronic kidney disease by detection of monogenic mutations. Nephrol Dial Transplant, 35(3), 390–397. 10.1093/ndt/gfz028 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Connaughton DM, Kennedy C, Shril S, Mann N, Murray SL, Williams PA, . . . Hildebrandt F. (2019). Monogenic causes of chronic kidney disease in adults. Kidney International, 95(4), 914–928. 10.1016/j.kint.2018.10.031 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Dai L, Li J, Xie L, Wang W, Lu Y, Xie M, . . . Zhang W. (2021). A Biallelic Frameshift Mutation in Nephronectin Causes Bilateral Renal Agenesis in Humans. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 32(8), 1871–1879. 10.1681/ASN.2020121762 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Dart AB, Ruth CA, Sellers EA, Au W, & Dean HJ (2015). Maternal diabetes mellitus and congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract (CAKUT) in the child. Am J Kidney Dis, 65(5), 684–691. 10.1053/j.ajkd.2014.11.017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Das BC, Thapa P, Karki R, Das S, Mahapatra S, Liu TC, . . . Evans T. (2014). Retinoic acid signaling pathways in development and diseases. Bioorg Med Chem, 22(2), 673–683. 10.1016/j.bmc.2013.11.025 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Davis TK, Hoshi M, & Jain S (2014). To bud or not to bud: the RET perspective in CAKUT. Pediatr Nephrol, 29(4), 597–608. 10.1007/s00467-013-2606-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Groen In ‘t Woud S, Renkema K, Schreuder M, Wijers C, van der Zanden L, Knoers N, . . . IA v. R. (2016). Maternal risk factors involved in specific congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract: A case-control study. Birth Defects Research. Part A, Clinical and Molecular Teratology, 106(7), 596–603. 10.1002/bdra.23500 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Hales C, & Barker D (2001). The thrifty phenotype hypothesis. British Medical Bulletin, 60, 5–20. 10.1093/bmb/60.1.5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Halim D, Brosens E, Muller F, Wangler M, Beaudet A, Lupski J, . . . Alves M. (2017). Loss-of-Function Variants in MYLK Cause Recessive Megacystis Microcolon Intestinal Hypoperistalsis Syndrome. American Journal of Human Genetics, 101(1), 123–129. 10.1016/j.ajhg.2017.05.011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Hiesberger T, Bai Y, Shao X, McNally B, Sinclair A, Tian X, . . . Igarashi P. (2004). Mutation of hepatocyte nuclear factor-1beta inhibits Pkhd1 gene expression and produces renal cysts in mice. The Journal of Clinical Investigation, 113(6), 814–825. 10.1172/JCI20083 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Hoskins B, Cramer C, Silvius D, Zou D, Raymond R, Orten D, . . . Hildebrandt F. (2007). Transcription factor SIX5 is mutated in patients with branchio-oto-renal syndrome. American Journal of Human Genetics, 80(4), 800–804. 10.1086/513322 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Hsu CW, Yamamoto KT, Henry RK, De Roos AJ, & Flynn JT (2014). Prenatal risk factors for childhood CKD. Journal of American Society Nephrology, 25(9), 2105–2111. 10.1681/ASN.2013060582 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Humbert C, Silbermann F, Morar B, Parisot M, Zarhrate M, Masson C, . . . Jeanpierre C. (2014). Integrin alpha 8 recessive mutations are responsible for bilateral renal agenesis in humans. Am J Hum Genet, 94(2), 288–294. 10.1016/j.ajhg.2013.12.017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Hwang DY, Dworschak GC, Kohl S, Saisawat P, Vivante A, Hilger AC, . . . Hildebrandt F. (2014). Mutations in 12 known dominant disease-causing genes clarify many congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract. Kidney Int, 85(6), 1429–1433. 10.1038/ki.2013.508 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. Hwang DY, Kohl S, Fan X, Vivante A, Chan S, Dworschak GC, . . . Hildebrandt F. (2015). Mutations of the SLIT2-ROBO2 pathway genes SLIT2 and SRGAP1 confer risk for congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract. Hum Genet, 134(8), 905–916. 10.1007/s00439-015-1570-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Ichikawa I, Kuwayama F, Pope J. C. t., Stephens FD, & Miyazaki Y (2002). Paradigm shift from classic anatomic theories to contemporary cell biological views of CAKUT. Kidney Int, 61(3), 889–898. 10.1046/j.1523-1755.2002.00188.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Jadeja S, Smyth I, Pitera JE, Taylor MS, van Haelst M, Bentley E, . . . Scambler PJ. (2005). Identification of a new gene mutated in Fraser syndrome and mouse myelencephalic blebs. Nature Genetics, 37(5), 520–525. 10.1038/ng1549 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Kagan M, Pleniceanu O, & Vivante A (2022). The genetic basis of congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract. Pediatric Nephrology, Online ahead of print. 10.1007/s00467-021-05420-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Kiyozumi D, Sugimoto N, & Sekiguchi K (2006). Breakdown of the reciprocal stabilization of QBRICK/Frem1, Fras1, and Frem2 at the basement membrane provokes Fraser syndrome-like defects. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 103(32), 11981–11986. 10.1073/pnas.0601011103 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Kiyozumi D, Takeichi M, Nakano I, Sato Y, Fukuda T, & Sekiguchi K (2012). Basement membrane assembly of the integrin alpha8beta1 ligand nephronectin requires Fraser syndrome-associated proteins. J Cell Biol, 197(5), 677–689. 10.1083/jcb.201203065 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Kloth K, Rennerm S, Burmester G, Steinemann D, Pabst B, Lorenz B, . . . Rosenberger G. (2019). 16p13.11 microdeletion uncovers loss-of-function of a MYH11 missense variant in a patient with megacystis-microcolon-intestinal-hypoperistalsis syndrome. Clinical geneticG, 96(1), 85–90. 10.1111/cge.13557 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Kohl S, D. H, Dworschak GC, Hilger AC, Saisawat P, Vivante A, Stajic N, Bogdanovic R, Reutter HM, Kehinde EO, Tasic V, Hildebrandt. (2014). Mild recessive mutations in six Fraser syndrome-related genes cause isolated congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract. Journal American Society of Nephrology, 25(9), 1917–1922. 10.1681/ASN.2013101103 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Kohlhase J, Wischermann A, Reichenbach H, Froster U, & Engel W (1998). Mutations in the SALL1 putative transcription factor gene cause Townes-Brocks syndrome. Nature Genetics, 18(1), 81–83. 10.1038/ng0198-81 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Kolvenbach C, van der Ven A, Kause F, Shril S, Scala M, Connaughton D, . . . Hildebrandt F. (2021). Exome survey of individuals affected by VATER/VACTERL with renal phenotypes identifies phenocopies and novel candidate genes. American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part A, 185(12), 3784–3792. 10.1002/ajmg.a.62447 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Krug P, Morinière V, Marlin S, Koubi V, Gabriel H, Colin E, . . . Heidet L. (2011). Mutation screening of the EYA1, SIX1, and SIX5 genes in a large cohort of patients harboring branchio-oto-renal syndrome calls into question the pathogenic role of SIX5 mutations. Human Mutation, 32(2), 183–190. 10.1002/humu.21402 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Lee L, Leung C, Tang W, Choi H, Leung Y, McCaffery P, . . . Shum A. (2012). A paradoxical teratogenic mechanism for retinoic acid. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109(34), 13668–13673. 10.1073/pnas.1200872109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Levy-Adam F, Feld S, Cohen-Kaplan V, Shteingauz A, Gross M, Arvatz G, . . . Vlodavsky I. (2010). Heparanase 2 interacts with heparan sulfate with high affinity and inhibits heparanase activity. J Biol Chem, 285(36), 28010–28019. 10.1074/jbc.M110.116384 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Linton JM, Martin GR, & Reichardt LF (2007). The ECM protein nephronectin promotes kidney development via integrin alpha8beta1-mediated stimulation of Gdnf expression. Development, 134(13), 2501–2509. 10.1242/dev.005033 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Liu Y, Shi H, Yu X, Xiang T, Fang Y, Xie X, . . . Rao J. (2022). Risk Factors Associated With Renal and Urinary Tract Anomalies Delineated by an Ultrasound Screening Program in Infants. Frontiers in Pediatrics, 9, 728548. 10.3389/fped.2021.728548 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Lu W, van Eerde A, Fan X, Quintero-Rivera F, Kulkarni S, Ferguson H, . . . Maas R. (2007). Disruption of ROBO2 is associated with urinary tract anomalies and confers risk of vesicoureteral reflux. American Journal of Human Genetics, 80(4), 616–632. 10.1086/512735 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Mann N, Braun DA, Amann K, Tan W, Shril S, Connaughton DM, . . . Hildebrandt F. (2019). Whole-Exome Sequencing Enables a Precision Medicine Approach for Kidney Transplant Recipients. J Am Soc Nephrol, 30(2), 201–215. 10.1681/asn.2018060575 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Mann N, Kause F, Henze E, Gharpure A, Shril S, Connaughton D, . . . Hildebrandt F. (2019). CAKUT and Autonomic Dysfunction Caused by Acetylcholine Receptor Mutations. American journal of human genetics, 105(6), 1286–1293. 10.1016/j.ajhg.2019.10.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Manoharan A, Krishnamurthy S, Sivamurukan P, Ananthakrishnan R, & Jindal B (2020). Screening for Renal and Urinary Tract Anomalies in Asymptomatic First Degree Relatives of Children with Congenital Anomalies of the Kidney and Urinary Tract (CAKUT). Indian Journal of Pediatrics, 87(9), 686–691. 10.1007/s12098-020-03262-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. McGregor L, Makela V, Darling SM, Vrontou S, Chalepakis G, Roberts C, . . . Scambler PJ. (2003). Fraser syndrome and mouse blebbed phenotype caused by mutations in FRAS1/Fras1 encoding a putative extracellular matrix protein. Nat Genet, 34(2), 203–208. 10.1038/ng1142 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Mefford H, Clauin S, Sharp A, Moller R, Ullmann R, Kapur R, . . . Bellanne-Chantelot C. (2007). Recurrent reciprocal genomic rearrangements of 17q12 are associated with renal disease, diabetes, and epilepsy. American Journal of Human Genetics, 81(5), 1057–1069. 10.1086/522591 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Mendelsohn C, Batourina E, Fung S, Gilbert T, & Dodd J (1999). Stromal cells mediate retinoid-dependent functions essential for renal development. Development, 126(6), 1139–1148. 10.1242/dev.126.6.1139 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Milewicz D, Østergaard J, Ala-Kokko L, Khan N, Grange D, Mendoza-Londono R, . . . Regalado E. (2010). De novo ACTA2 mutation causes a novel syndrome of multisystemic smooth muscle dysfunction. American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part A, 152A(10), 2437–2443. 10.1002/ajmg.a.33657 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Murugapoopathy V, & Gupta I (2020). A Primer on Congenital Anomalies of the Kidneys and Urinary Tracts (CAKUT). Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 15(5). 10.2215/CJN.12581019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Nasir AA, Ameh EA, Abdur-Rahman LO, Adeniran JO, & Abraham MK (2011). Posterior urethral valve. World J Pediatr, 7(3), 205–216. 10.1007/s12519-011-0289-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Nathanson J, Swarr DT, Singer A, Liu M, Chinn A, Jones W, . . . Slavotinek A. (2013). Novel FREM1 mutations expand the phenotypic spectrum associated with Manitoba-oculo-tricho-anal (MOTA) syndrome and bifid nose renal agenesis anorectal malformations (BNAR) syndrome. Am J Med Genet A, 161A(3), 473–478. 10.1002/ajmg.a.35736 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Nef S, Neuhaus T, Spartà G, Weitz M, Buder K, Wisser J, . . . Laube G. (2016). Outcome after prenatal diagnosis of congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract. European Journal of Pediatrics, 175(5), 667–676. 10.1007/s00431-015-2687-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Nicolaou N, Renkema K, Bongers E, Giles R, & Knoers N (2015). Genetic, environmental, and epigenetic factors involved in CAKUT. Nature Reviews Nephrology, 11(12), 720–731. 10.1038/nrneph.2015.140 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Parikh C, McCall D, Engelman C, & Schrier R (2002). Congenital renal agenesis: case-control analysis of birth characteristics. American Journal of Kidney Diseases, 39(4), 689–694. 10.1053/ajkd.2002.31982 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Patel VN, Pineda DL, & Hoffman MP (2017). The function of heparan sulfate during branching morphogenesis. Matrix Biol, 57–58, 311–323. 10.1016/j.matbio.2016.09.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Pavlakis E, Chiotaki R, & Chalepakis G (2011). The role of Fras1/Frem proteins in the structure and function of basement membrane. Int J Biochem Cell Biol, 43(4), 487–495. 10.1016/j.biocel.2010.12.016 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Pitera JE, Scambler PJ, & Woolf AS (2008). Fras1, a basement membrane-associated protein mutated in Fraser syndrome, mediates both the initiation of the mammalian kidney and the integrity of renal glomeruli. Hum Mol Genet, 17(24), 3953–3964. 10.1093/hmg/ddn297 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Raina R, Chakraborty R, Sethi S, Kumar D, Gibson K, & Bergmann C (2021). Diagnosis and Management of Renal Cystic Disease of the Newborn. American Journal of Kidney Diseases, 78(1), 125–141. 10.1053/j.ajkd.2020.10.021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Rasmussen M, Sunde L, Nielsen ML, Ramsing M, Petersen A, Hjortshoj TD, . . . Lildballe DL. (2018). Targeted gene sequencing and whole-exome sequencing in autopsied fetuses with prenatally diagnosed kidney anomalies. Clin Genet, 93(4), 860–869. 10.1111/cge.13185 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Reutter H, Hilger AC, Hildebrandt F, & Ludwig M (2016). Underlying genetic factors of the VATER/VACTERL association with special emphasis on the “Renal” phenotype. Pediatr Nephrol, 31(11), 2025–2033. 10.1007/s00467-016-3335-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Rhinn M, Schuhbaur B, Niederreither K, & Dolle P (2011). Involvement of retinol dehydrogenase 10 in embryonic patterning and rescue of its loss of function by maternal retinaldehyde treatment. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 108(40), 16687–16692. 10.1073/pnas.1103877108 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Rosselot C, Spraggon L, Chia I, Batourina E, Riccio P, Lu B, . . . Mendelsohn C. (2010). Non-cell-autonomous retinoid signaling is crucial for renal development. Development, 137(2), 283–292. 10.1242/dev.040287 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Ruf RG, Xu PX, Silvius D, Otto EA, Beekmann F, Muerb UT, . . . Hildebrandt F. (2004). SIX1 mutations cause branchio-oto-renal syndrome by disruption of EYA1-SIX1-DNA complexes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 101(21), 8090–8095. 10.1073/pnas.0308475101 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Saisawat P, Kohl S, Hilger AC, Hwang DY, Yung Gee H, Dworschak GC, . . . Hildebrandt F. (2014). Whole-exome resequencing reveals recessive mutations in TRAP1 in individuals with CAKUT and VACTERL association. Kidney Int, 85(6), 1310–1317. 10.1038/ki.2013.417 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Sakai Y, Meno C, Fujii H, Nishino J, Shiratori H, Saijoh Y, . . . Hamada H. (2001). The retinoic acid-inactivating enzyme CYP26 is essential for establishing an uneven distribution of retinoic acid along the anterio-posterior axis within the mouse embryo. Genes & Development, 15(2), 213–225. 10.1101/gad.851501 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Sanna-Cherchi S, Kiryluk K, Burgess KE, Bodria M, Sampson MG, Hadley D, . . . Gharavi AG. (2012). Copy-number disorders are a common cause of congenital kidney malformations. Am J Hum Genet, 91(6), 987–997. 10.1016/j.ajhg.2012.10.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Sanna-Cherchi S, Ravani P, Corbani V, Parodi S, Haupt R, Piaggio G, . . . Ghiggeri G. (2009). Renal outcome in patients with congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract. Kidney International, 76(5), 528–533. 10.1038/ki.2009.220 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Sanyanusin P, Schimmenti LA, McNoe LA, Ward TA, Pierpont ME, Sullivan MJ, . . . Eccles MR. (1995). Mutation of the PAX2 gene in a family with optic nerve colobomas, renal anomalies and vesicoureteral reflux. Nature Genetics, 9(4), 358–364. 10.1038/ng0495-358 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Schedl A (2007). Renal abnormalities and their developmental origin. Nat Rev Genet, 8(10), 791–802. 10.1038/nrg2205 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Schreuder M, Westland R, & van Wijk J (2009). Unilateral multicystic dysplastic kidney: a meta-analysis of observational studies on the incidence, associated urinary tract malformations and the contralateral kidney. Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, 24(6), 1810–1818. 10.1093/ndt/gfn777 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Seltzsam S, Wang C, Zheng B, Mann N, Connaughton D, Wu C, . . . Hildebrandt F. (2022). Reverse phenotyping facilitates disease allele calling in exome sequencing of patients with CAKUT. Genetics in Medicine, 24(2), 307–318. 10.1016/j.gim.2021.09.010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Short KM, & Smyth IM (2016). The contribution of branching morphogenesis to kidney development and disease. Nat Rev Nephrol, 12(12), 754–767. 10.1038/nrneph.2016.157 10.1038/nrneph.2016.157. Epub 2016 Nov 7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Skinner M, Safford S, Reeves J, Jackson M, & Freemerman A (2008). Renal aplasia in humans is associated with RET mutations. Am J Hum Genet, 82(2), 344–351. 10.1016/j.ajhg.2007.10.008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Slavotinek A, Li C, Sherr EH, & Chudley AE (2006). Mutation analysis of the FRAS1 gene demonstrates new mutations in a propositus with Fraser syndrome. Am J Med Genet A, 140(18), 1909–1914. 10.1002/ajmg.a.31399 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Song R, & Yosypiv I (2011). Genetics of Congenital Anomalies of the Kidney and Urinary Tract. Pediatric Nephrology, 26(3), 353–364. 10.1007/s00467-010-1629-4 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Spence H (1955). Congenital unilateral multicystic kidney: an entity to be distinguished from polycystic kidney disease and other cystic disorders. The Journal of Urology, 74(6), 693–706. 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)67338-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Steer DL, Shah MM, Bush KT, Stuart RO, Sampogna RV, Meyer TN, . . . Nigam SK. (2004). Regulation of ureteric bud branching morphogenesis by sulfated proteoglycans in the developing kidney. Dev Biol, 272(2), 310–327. 10.1016/j.ydbio.2004.04.029 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Stuart HM, Roberts NA, Burgu B, Daly SB, Urquhart JE, Bhaskar S, . . . Newman WG. (2013). LRIG2 mutations cause urofacial syndrome. Am J Hum Genet, 92(2), 259–264. 10.1016/j.ajhg.2012.12.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Suman Gök E, Ayvacı A, Ağbaş A, Adaletli İ, Canpolat N, Sever L, & Çalışkan S. (2020). The Frequency of Familial Congenital Anomalies of the Kidney and Urinary Tract: Should We Screen Asymptomatic First-Degree Relatives Using Urinary Tract Ultrasonography? Nephron, 144(4), 170–175. 10.1159/000505402 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Takamiya K, Kostourou V, Adams S, Jadeja S, Chalepakis G, Scambler PJ, . . . Adams RH. (2004). A direct functional link between the multi-PDZ domain protein GRIP1 and the Fraser syndrome protein Fras1. Nat Genet, 36(2), 172–177. 10.1038/ng1292 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Talati A, Webster C, & Vora N (2019). Prenatal genetic considerations of congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract (CAKUT). Prenatal Diagnosis, 39(9), 679–692. 10.1002/pd.5536 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Thomas R, Sanna-Cherchi S, Warady BA, Furth SL, Kaskel FJ, & Gharavi AG (2011). HNF1B and PAX2 mutations are a common cause of renal hypodysplasia in the CKiD cohort. Pediatr Nephrol, 26(6), 897–903. 10.1007/s00467-011-1826-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Thorson W, Diaz-Horta O, Foster J, Spiliopoulos M, Quintero R, Farooq A, . . . Tekin M. (2014). De novo ACTG2 mutations cause congenital distended bladder, microcolon, and intestinal hypoperistalsis. Human Genetics, 133(6), 737–742. 10.1007/s00439-013-1406-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Tokhmafshan F, Brophy PD, Gbadegesin RA, & Gupta IR (2017). Vesicoureteral reflux and the extracellular matrix connection. Pediatr Nephrol, 32(4), 565–576. 10.1007/s00467-016-3386-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Uetani N, & Bouchard M (2009). Plumbing in the embryo: developmental defects of the urinary tracts. Clinical Genetics, 75(4), 307–317. 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2009.01175.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. van der Ven A, Shril S, Ityel H, Vivante A, Chen J, Hwang D, . . . Hildebrandt F. (2018). Whole-Exome Sequencing Reveals FAT4 Mutations in a Clinically Unrecognizable Patient with Syndromic CAKUT: A Case Report. Molecular Syndromology, 8(5), 272–277. 10.1159/000477750 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. van der Ven AT, Vivante A, & Hildebrandt F (2018). Novel Insights into the Pathogenesis of Monogenic Congenital Anomalies of the Kidney and Urinary Tract. J Am Soc Nephrol, 29(1), 36–50. 10.1681/asn.2017050561 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Van Esch H, Groenen P, Nesbit M, Schuffenhauer S, Lichtner P, Vanderlinden G, . . . Devriendt K. (2000). GATA3 haplo-insufficiency causes human HDR syndrome. Nature, 406(6794), 419–422. 10.1038/35019088 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. van Haelst MM, Maiburg M, Baujat G, Jadeja S, Monti E, Bland E, . . . Scambler PJ. (2008). Molecular study of 33 families with Fraser syndrome new data and mutation review. Am J Med Genet A, 146A(17), 2252–2257. 10.1002/ajmg.a.32440 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Ven A. T. v. d., Connaughton DM, Ityel H, Mann N, Nakayama M, Chen J, . . . Hildebrandt F (2018). Whole-Exome Sequencing Identifies Causative Mutations in Families with Congenital Anomalies of the Kidney and Urinary Tract. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 29(9), 2348–2361. 10.1681/ASN.2017121265 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Viswanathan A, Dawman L, Tiewsoh K, Saxena A, Dutta S, & Suri D (2021). Screening of renal anomalies in first-degree relatives of children diagnosed with non-syndromic congenital anomalies of kidney and urinary tract. Clinical and Experimental Nephrology, 25(2), 184–190. 10.1007/s10157-020-01977-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. Vivante A, & Hildebrandt F (2016). Genetics of Congenital Anomalies of the Kidneys and Urinary Tract. In Barakat A & Rushton H (Eds.), Congenital Anomalies of the Kidneys and Urinary Tract (pp. 303–322). Springer, Cham. 10.1007/978-3-319-29219-9_15 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  101. Vivante A, Hwang DY, Kohl S, Chen J, Shril S, Schulz J, . . . Hildebrandt F. (2017). Exome Sequencing Discerns Syndromes in Patients from Consanguineous Families with Congenital Anomalies of the Kidneys and Urinary Tract. J Am Soc Nephrol, 28(1), 69–75. 10.1681/asn.2015080962 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  102. Vivante A, Kleppa MJ, Schulz J, Kohl S, Sharma A, Chen J, . . . Hildebrandt F. (2015). Mutations in TBX18 Cause Dominant Urinary Tract Malformations via Transcriptional Dysregulation of Ureter Development. Am J Hum Genet, 97(2), 291–301. 10.1016/j.ajhg.2015.07.001 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  103. Vivante A, Kohl S, Hwang D, Dworschak G, & Hildebrandt F (2014). Single-gene causes of congenital anomalies of the kidney and urinary tract (CAKUT) in humans. Pediatr Nephrol, 29(4), 695–704. 10.1007/s00467-013-2684-4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  104. Vivante A, Mann N, Yonath H, Weiss AC, Getwan M, Kaminski MM, . . . Hildebrandt F. (2017). A Dominant Mutation in Nuclear Receptor Interacting Protein 1 Causes Urinary Tract Malformations via Dysregulation of Retinoic Acid Signaling. J Am Soc Nephrol, 28(3), 2364–2376. 10.1681/ASN.2016060694 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  105. Weber S, Moriniere V, Knuppel T, Charbit M, Dusek J, Ghiggeri GM, . . . Salomon R. (2006). Prevalence of mutations in renal developmental genes in children with renal hypodysplasia: results of the ESCAPE study. J Am Soc Nephrol, 17(10), 2864–2870. 10.1681/ASN.2006030277 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  106. Weber S, Thiele H, Mir S, Toliat MR, Sozeri B, Reutter H, . . . Woolf AS. (2011). Muscarinic Acetylcholine Receptor M3 Mutation Causes Urinary Bladder Disease and a Prune-Belly-like Syndrome. Am J Hum Genet, 89(5), 668–674. 10.1016/j.ajhg.2011.10.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  107. Williams G, Fletcher J, Alexander S, & Craig J (2008). Vesicoureteral reflux. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology, 19(5), 847–852. 10.1681/ASN.2007020245 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  108. Winyard P, & Chitty L (2008). Dysplastic Kidneys. Seminars in Fetal & Neonatal Medicine, 13(3), 142–151. 10.1016/j.siny.2007.10.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  109. Zheng B, Wang C, Seltzsam S, Schneider S, Schierbaum L, Wu W, . . . Hildebrandt F. (2022). A truncating NRIP1 variant in an Arabic family with congenital anomalies of the kidneys and urinary tract. American Journal of Medical Genetics. Part A, 188(1), 310–313. 10.1002/ajmg.a.62502 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES