Skip to main content
Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences logoLink to Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences
. 2021 Sep 10;21(4):525–530. doi: 10.2463/mrms.ici.2021-0083

Time-dependent Diffusion in Brain Abscesses Investigated with Oscillating-gradient Spin-echo

Tomoko Maekawa 1,*, Masaaki Hori 1,2, Katsutoshi Murata 3, Thorsten Feiweier 4, Kouhei Kamiya 1,2, Christina Andica 1, Akifumi Hagiwara 1, Shohei Fujita 1,5, Koji Kamagata 1, Akihiko Wada 1, Osamu Abe 5, Shigeki Aoki 1
PMCID: PMC9618933  PMID: 34511577

Abstract

Oscillating-gradient spin-echo sequences enable the measurement of diffusion weighting with a short diffusion time and can provide indications of internal structures. We report two cases of brain abscess in which the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values appear higher at short diffusion times in comparison with those at long diffusion times. Diffusion time dependence of the ADC in brain abscesses suggests not only substrate viscosity but also restricted diffusion due to the structure within the lesions.

Keywords: brain abscess, diffusion-weighted imaging, diffusion time, microstructure, oscillating-gradient spin-echo

Innovative Clinical Image

Oscillating-gradient spin-echo (OGSE) sequences can shorten diffusion times by replacing the long-lasting diffusion-sensitizing gradients used in pulsed-gradient spin-echo (PGSE) methods with rapidly oscillating gradients.13 Recently, the OGSE sequence has become available on clinical MRI scanners. If most molecules do not move far enough to interact with any obstacle during the preset diffusion time, the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) is the intrinsic diffusion coefficient of cellular water. As the diffusion time increases, molecules interact with more barriers, and the observed ADC decreases asymptotically. Therefore, it is expected that diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) with the OGSE sequence can estimate the substrate’s viscosity and spatially restricted diffusion, based on the internal structures of the lesions, from changes in the ADC values with different diffusion times.46

A brain abscess is an accumulation of pus in the brain due to infection. Brain abscesses are characterized by a markedly high signal on DWI. It is speculated that the high signal in a brain abscess is due to viscosity.79

We showed that alkanes (CnH2n+2), which are viscous liquids, are useful as isotropic diffusion phantoms and that the ADC values of alkanes do not depend on diffusion times.10 If the high signal on DWI of brain abscesses is due to viscosity, the ADC values should not change even if the diffusion time is changed. To estimate the internal structures of brain abscesses, we investigated the ADC values of brain abscesses scanned with shorter diffusion times using a prototype OGSE DWI sequence, complemented by a conventional scan with a PGSE DWI sequence.

The case of a 39-year-old woman (patient 1) with post-treatment of maxillary sinus cancer and that of a 5-year-old girl (patient 2) with a history of cardiac surgery are reported here. Patient 1 had two brain abscesses (brain abscesses I and II), and patient 2 had one brain abscess (brain abscess III). The brain abscess of patient 1 was drained. The culture showed infection with fusobacterium nucleatum, and the brain abscess was pathologically diagnosed. The brain abscess of patient 2 was drained, the culture showed microaerophilic streptococcus infection, and the brain abscess was diagnosed by intraoperative findings. The patients underwent scanning with a 3 T MR scanner (MAGNETOM Prisma; Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany) using a 20-channel head/neck coil. Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) was performed with prototype sequences using b-values of 0 and 1000 s/mm2 and six uniformly distributed directions for both OGSE and PGSE acquisitions. OGSE, using a trapezoid-cosine waveform11, was performed with an effective diffusion time (Δeff) of 6.5 ms (frequency = 30 Hz; diffusion gradient pulse duration [δ] = 7.6 ms), complemented by a PGSE with Δeff 35.2 ms (diffusion gradient separation [Δ] = 47.3 ms; δ = 36.3 ms). When the TE of the PGSE DWI sequence was set to be the same as that of the OGSE DWI sequence, the Δeff value of the PGSE sequence was 35.2 ms. For the OGSE DWI sequence, the b-value is given by

b=2Nγ2Menc2Δeff=2Nγ2G2(14ftramp2)2Δeff

where N denotes the total number of oscillation cycles, γ represents the hydrogen nuclear gyromagnetic ratio, Menc denotes the 0th moment of the first lobe of the oscillating diffusion-encoding gradients, G is the maximum gradient amplitude, f is the oscillation frequency, and tramp is the gradient ramp-up time from zero gradient to the maximum gradient value (Fig. 1). The Δeff was defined by comparison with the b-value calculation for the PGSE DWI sequence. Parameters of the OGSE DWI sequence were as follows: N = 2; G = 96.7 mT/m; f = 30 Hz; and tramp = 1.5 ms. For the PGSE acquisition with N = 1, Δeff reverts to Δ – δ/3. The parameter of the PGSE DWI sequence was as follows: G = 17.4 mT/m. Other OGSE and PGSE sequence parameters were as follows: TR, 4800 ms; TE, 101 ms; FOV, 200 × 200 mm2; matrix size, 82 × 82; slice thickness, 5 mm; and acquisition time, approximately 2 mins. ROIs were placed within the brain abscesses, surrounding hyperintensity lesions on T2-weighted image, and normal white matter contralateral to each brain abscess on DTI eigenvalues (λ1, λ2, and λ3) maps and mean diffusivity (MD) maps. For normal white matter, three circular ROIs of 330 mm3 were placed, and the averages of the values were calculated. The relative percentage change between shorter and longer diffusion times was then calculated as:

ValueΔeff=6.5msValueΔeff=35.2ms/ValueΔeff=35.2ms×100 %

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

The pulse sequence diagram for OGSE and PGSE. An OGSE method can shorten the diffusion times by replacing the long diffusion-sensitizing gradients used in PGSE methods with rapidly oscillating gradients. Menc = 0th moment of the first lobe of the oscillating diffusion-encoding gradients; G = maximum gradient amplitude; f = oscillation frequency; tramp = gradient ramp-up time from zero gradient to the maximum gradient value; δ = diffusion gradient pulse duration; Δ = diffusion gradient separation. MPG, motion probing gradient; OGSE, oscillating-gradient spin-echo; PGSE, pulsed-gradient spin-echo.

where ValueΔeff is λ1, λ2, λ3, or MD obtained using the OGSE and PGSE sequences, respectively.

Figures 2 and 3 show the DWIs, λ1, λ2, λ3, and MD maps of patient 1, and Fig. 4 shows those of patient 2. The contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images showed ring enhancement, and DWIs showed a marked internal high signal (arrows), which are typical images of brain abscesses. The brain abscesses (arrows) showed high intensity on DWI with a Δeff of 35.2 ms. On the other hand, the lesions showed decreased visualization on DWI with a Δeff value of 6.5 ms. Fig. 5 shows the λ1, λ2, λ3, and MD values and the relative percentage change between shorter and longer diffusion times for each brain abscess, surrounding hyperintensity lesions on T2-weighted image, and normal white matter contralateral to each brain abscess. The λ1, λ2, λ3, and MD values of all lesions appear higher at short Δeff values than at long Δeff values. The relative percentage change is highest for brain abscesses rather than surrounding hyperintensity lesions and normal white matter.

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2

T2WI; Gd-T1WI; DWI; and diffusion eigenvalue λ1, λ2, λ3, and MD maps with an Δeff of 35.2 ms and 6.5 ms of brain abscess I (arrows) from patient 1. The brain abscess showed high intensity on DWI with an Δeff of 35.2 ms and decreased visualization on DWI with an Δeff of 6.5 ms. λ1, λ2, λ3, and MD of brain abscess showed higher at the Δeff of 6.5 ms, compared with those at the Δeff of 35.2 ms. Δeff, effective diffusion time; DWI, diffusion-weighted images; Gd-T1WI, gadolinium contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images; MD, mean diffusivity; T2WI, T2-weighted image.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3

T2WI; Gd-T1WI; DWI; and diffusion eigenvalue λ1, λ2, λ3, and MD maps with an Δeff of 35.2 ms and 6.5 ms of brain abscess II (arrows) from patient 1. The brain abscess showed high intensity on DWI with an Δeff of 35.2 ms and decreased visualization on DWI with an Δeff of 6.5 ms. λ1, λ2, λ3, and MD of brain abscess showed higher at the Δeff of 6.5 ms, compared with those at the Δeff of 35.2 ms. Δeff, effective diffusion time; DWI, diffusion-weighted images; Gd-T1WI, gadolinium contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images; MD, mean diffusivity; T2WI, T2-weighted image.

Fig. 4.

Fig. 4

T2WI; Gd-T1WI; DWI; and diffusion eigenvalue λ1, λ2, λ3, and MD maps with an Δeff of 35.2 ms and 6.5 ms of brain abscess III (arrows) from patient 2. The brain abscess showed high intensity on DWI with an Δeff of 35.2 ms and decreased visualization on DWI with an Δeff of 6.5 ms. λ1, λ2, λ3, and MD of brain abscess showed higher at the Δeff of 6.5 ms, compared with those at the Δeff of 35.2 ms. Δeff, effective diffusion time; DWI, diffusion-weighted images; Gd-T1WI, gadolinium contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images; MD, mean diffusivity; T2WI, T2-weighted image.

Fig. 5.

Fig. 5

The diffusion eigenvalue λ1, λ2, λ3, and MD values and the relative percentage change between shorter and longer diffusion times for each brain abscess, surrounding hyperintensity lesions on T2-weighted image, and normal white matter contralateral to each brain abscess. The λ1, λ2, λ3, and MD values of all lesions appear higher at short Δeff as compared to those at long Δeff values. Δeff, effective diffusion time; MD, mean diffusivity.

So far, it has been assumed that the markedly high signal on DWI of abscesses is due to increased viscosity. If the high signal on DWI of brain abscesses is due to the viscosity of an isotropic medium, the diffusion coefficient should not change even if the diffusion time is changed. However, the lesions showed a marked diffusion-time dependence of λ1, λ2, λ3, and MD within a Δeff range of 6.5–35.2 ms used in this study. This diffusion-time dependence suggests spatially restricted diffusion.

The abscess begins as a localized host acute inflammatory response to infection. The center of the abscess contains an acute inflammatory exudate composed of inflammatory cells, necrotic tissue debris, fibrin, and bacteria.12 Maturation of the abscess involves fibroblastic proliferation and tissue repair at the abscess boundary, and formation of a fibrous capsule at the periphery. The mean square displacements of water molecule movement for Δeff of 6.5 ms and 35.2 ms are 11 μm and 25 μm, respectively, for free diffusion at the patient’s body temperature by the Einstein-Smoluchowski equation. Our results suggest that abscesses contain microstructures, such as inflammatory cells, necrotic tissue debris, fibrin, and bacteria, with hindered diffusion at mean square displacements of 11–25 μm (Fig. 6). Abscess III shows anisotropic diffusion compared to abscess I and II, and directional dependence was also observed in the relative percentage change. Presumably, abscesses I and II may have contained a higher percentage of exudate with less anisotropic diffusion, while abscess III may have contained a higher percentage of contents with anisotropic diffusions, such as necrotic tissue debris and fibrin. If we could perform investigations with Δeff values smaller than 6.5 ms and eliminate the influence of spatially restricted diffusion, we could confirm the intrinsic diffusion coefficient values due to the viscosity of the abscess, and separate diffusion coefficient contributions from substrate viscosity and spatially restricted diffusion in lesions.

Fig. 6.

Fig. 6

(a) In free water of isotropic diffusion, water molecules can be free to move around. If most molecules do not move far enough to interact with any obstacle during the preset diffusion time, the diffusion coefficient is the intrinsic diffusion coefficient of cellular water. (b) Within a viscous liquid of isotropic diffusion, the rate of movement of water molecules decreases rather than free water. Since there is no obstacle, the diffusion coefficient of viscous liquid does not change even if the diffusion time is changed. (c) In addition to the slow movement of water molecules from viscosity, the rate of movement is probably restricted by inflammatory cells, bacterium, necrotic tissue debris, and other internal structures in abscesses. As the diffusion time increases, molecules interact with more barriers, and the observed diffusion coefficient decreases asymptotically.

A previous study reported a time dependence of diffusion coefficients in the normal white matter with decreasing ADC for increasing diffusion times. Besides, the rise in ADC in response to a decrease in the diffusion time is a key feature to extract the cell size. The range of axon sizes in white matter is 1–6 μm, which is smaller than the microstructure in brain abscesses. Therefore, the spatial restriction of diffusion in white matter is stronger than that in brain abscesses, and the relative percentage change in diffusion time between 6.5 ms and 35.2 ms is lower in white matter than in brain abscesses. Moreover, the surrounding hyperintensity lesions reflect cerebral edema and inflammation. In cerebral edema and inflammation, the diffusion coefficient increases with excessive water accumulated in the intracellular and extracellular spaces. The spatial restriction of diffusion in cerebral edema and inflammation is stronger than in normal white matter due to axonal swelling, and the relative percentage change in diffusion time between 6.5 ms and 35.2 ms is slightly lower in cerebral edema and inflammation than in normal white matter.

In conclusion, the markedly high signal on DWI of abscesses is not only due to substrate viscosity but also due to restricted diffusion caused by the microstructure within the lesions.

Funding Statement

This work was supported in part by JSPS KAKENHI (grant no. 18H02772).

Footnotes

Conflicts of interest

Katsutoshi Murata is an employee of Siemens Healthcare K.K., Japan. Thorsten Feiweier is an employee of Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Germany. Thorsten Feiweier has stock ownership Siemens (Healthineers) AG. Osamu Abe receives a lecture fee from Siemens Healthcare KK and has a grant from Siemens Healthcare KK. All remaining authors declare no potential conflicts of interest associated with this work.

References

  • 1.Martin M. Measuring restriction sizes using diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging: a review. Magn Reson Insights 2013; 6:59–64. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Wu D, Martin LJ, Northington FJ, et al. Oscillating gradient diffusion MRI reveals unique microstructural information in normal and hypoxia-ischemia injured mouse brains. Magn Reson Med 2014; 72:1366–1374. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Novikov DS, Jensen JH, Helpern JA, et al. Revealing mesoscopic structural universality with diffusion. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2014; 111:5088–5093. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Andica C, Hori M, Kamiya K, et al. Spatial restriction within intracranial epidermoid cysts observed using short diffusion-time diffusion-weighted imaging. Magn Reson Med Sci 2018; 17:269–272. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Maekawa T, Kamiya K, Murata K, et al. Time-dependent diffusion in transient splenial lesion: Comparison between oscillating-gradient spin-echo measurements and monte-carlo simulation. Magn Reson Med Sci 2021; 20:227–230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Xu J. Probing neural tissues at small scales: Recent progress of oscillating gradient spin echo (OGSE) neuroimaging in humans. J Neurosci Methods 2021; 349:109024. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Desprechins B, Stadnik T, Koerts G, et al. Use of diffusion-weighted MR imaging in differential diagnosis between intracerebral necrotic tumors and cerebral abscesses. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1999; 20:1252–1257. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Tung GA, Evangelista P, Rogg JM, et al. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of rim-enhancing brain masses: is markedly decreased water diffusion specific for brain abscess? AJR Am J Roentgenol 2001; 177:709–712. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Rusakov DA, Kullmann DM. Geometric and viscous components of the tortuosity of the extracellular space in the brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1998; 95:8975–8980. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Maekawa T, Hori M, Murata K, et al. Changes in the ADC of diffusion-weighted MRI with the oscillating gradient spin-echo (OGSE) sequence due to differences in substrate viscosities. Jpn J Radiol 2018; 36:415–420. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Van AT, Holdsworth SJ, Bammer R. In vivo investigation of restricted diffusion in the human brain with optimized oscillating diffusion gradient encoding. Magn Reson Med 2014; 71:83–94. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kobayashi SD, Malachowa N, DeLeo FR. Pathogenesis of Staphylococcus aureus abscesses. Am J Pathol 2015; 185:1518–1527. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences are provided here courtesy of Japanese Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine

RESOURCES