Skip to main content
Oxford University Press - PMC COVID-19 Collection logoLink to Oxford University Press - PMC COVID-19 Collection
. 2022 Oct 22:mzac085. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzac085

Outcomes among patients admitted for non-ST segment myocardial infarction in the pre pandemic and pandemic COVID-19 era – Israel Nationwide study

Elad Asher 1,2,, Mha Alexander Fardman 3,4, Hezzy Shmueli 5,6, Katia Orvin 7,8, Daniel Oren 9,10, Natalia Kofman 11,12, Jameel Mohsen 13,14, Gassan Moady 15,16, Louay Taha 17,18, Ronen Rubinshtein 19,20, Osherov Azriel 21,22, Roi Efraim 23,24, Dabbah Saleem 25,26, Philippe Taieb 27,28, Eyal Ben-Assa 29,30, Tal Cohen 31,32, Robert Klempfner 33,34, Amir Orlev 35,36, Roy Beigel 37,38, Amit Segev 39,40, Shlomi Matetzky 41,42
PMCID: PMC9620304  PMID: 36271838

Abstract

Background

Since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2019, several countries have reported a substantial drop in the number of patients admitted with non-ST segment myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). We aimed to evaluate the changes in admissions, in-hospital management and outcomes of patients with NSTEMI in the COVID-19 era in a nationwide survey.

Methods

A prospective, multicenter, observational, nationwide study involving 13 medical centers across Israel aimed to evaluate consecutive patients with NSTEMI admitted to intensive cardiac care units (ICCUs) over an 8-week period during the COVID-19 outbreak and to compare them with NSTEMI patients admitted at the same period 2 years earlier (control period).

Results

There were 624 (43%) NSTEMI patients, of them 349 (56%) hospitalized during the COVID-19 era and 275 (44%) during the control period. There were no significant differences in age, gender and other baseline characteristics between the two study periods. During the COVID-19 era, more patients arrived at the hospital via an emergency medical system (EMS) compared with the control period (p = 0.05). Time from symptom onset to hospital admission was longer in the COVID-19 era as compared with the control period [11.5 hours (IQR2.5-46.7) vs. 2.9 hours (IQR 1.7-6.8), respectively, p-value <0.001]. Nevertheless, time from hospital admission to reperfusion was similar in both groups. Rate of coronary angiography was also similar in both groups. In-hospital mortality rate was similar in both the COVID-19 era and the control period groups (2.3% vs. 4.7%, respectively, p=0.149) as was the 30-day mortality rate (3.7% vs. 5.1%, respectively, p=0.238).

Conclusions

In contrast to previous reports, admission rates of NSTEMI were similar in this nationwide survey during the COVID-19 era. With longer time from symptoms to admission, but with the same time from hospital admission to reperfusion therapy and with similar in-hospital and 30-day mortality rates. Even in times of crisis, adherence of medical systems to clinical practice guidelines, ensures the preservation of good clinical outcomes.


Articles from International Journal for Quality in Health Care are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES