Abstract
Aims
The transcriptome of different dissociated pancreatic islet cells has been described in enzymatically isolated islets in both health and disease. However, the isolation, culturing, and dissociation procedures likely affect the transcriptome profiles, distorting the biological conclusions. The aim of the current study was to characterize the cells of the islets of Langerhans from subjects with and without type 1 diabetes in a way that reflects the in vivo situation to the highest possible extent.
Methods
Islets were excised using laser capture microdissection directly from frozen pancreatic tissue sections obtained from organ donors with (n = 7) and without (n = 8) type 1 diabetes. Transcriptome analysis of excised samples was performed using AmpliSeq. Consecutive pancreatic sections were used to estimate the proportion of beta-, alpha-, and delta cells using immunofluorescence and to examine the presence of CD31 positive endothelial regions using immunohistochemistry.
Results
The proportion of beta cells in islets from subjects with type 1 diabetes was reduced to 0% according to both the histological and transcriptome data, and several alterations in the transcriptome were derived from the loss of beta cells. In total, 473 differentially expressed genes were found in the islets from subjects with type 1 diabetes. Functional enrichment analysis showed that several of the most upregulated gene sets were related to vasculature and angiogenesis, and histologically, vascular density was increased in subjects with type 1 diabetes. Downregulated in type 1 diabetes islets was the gene set epithelial mesenchymal transition.
Conclusion
A number of transcriptional alterations are present in islets from subjects with type 1 diabetes. In particular, several gene sets related to vasculature and angiogenesis are upregulated and there is an increased vascular density, suggesting an altered microvasculature in islets from subjects with type 1 diabetes. By studying pancreatic islets extracted directly from snap-frozen pancreatic tissue, this study reflects the in vivo situation to a high degree and gives important insights into islet pathophysiology in type 1 diabetes.
Introduction
In type 1 diabetes (T1D) endogenous insulin-secretion is lost due to beta-cell destruction and affected subjects are dependent on exogenous insulin administration. Beta-cells make up the islet of Langerhans together with alpha-, delta-, PP- and ghrelin cells that are involved in glucose homeostasis, regulation of food intake and metabolism [1–3]. Several studies have been conducted in order to describe the different pancreatic cell types in subjects with [4, 5] and without diabetes [6–8]. However, in these studies the pancreatic islets have been obtained through a rough isolation process that separates them from their natural environment [9]. Although the islets remain functional and usable for transplantation [9], both the islet isolation process and culturing of islets affect the transcriptome of the cells [10, 11]. Furthermore, to analyze individual cells, the islets must be dissociated into single-cells and go through a cell-sorting process, likely increasing the risk of introducing alterations in the transcriptome which in the end may distort the biological conclusions.
Laser capture microdissection (LCM) ensures excision of islets directly from their natural environment–i.e. while still being encased in the pancreas. An advantage with this choice of method for tissue analysis is that the cells have not endured exposure to the islet isolation and dissociation process. By using LCM, the purpose of this study was to characterize islets in donors with a long duration of T1D and matched non-diabetic subjects, reflecting the in vivo situation to as high degree as possible, and thus enable uncovering of important transcriptional alterations.
Materials and methods
Human pancreatic specimens
Pancreases from heart-beating organ donors treated as for organ transplantation were procured through the Nordic Network for clinical Islet Transplantation (https://nordicislets.medscinet.com/en.aspx). Consent for organ donation was obtained verbally from the deceased’s next of kin by the attending physician and was documented in accordance with Swedish law and approved by the Regional Ethics Committee (DNR 2015/444). The pancreases were dissected, and biopsies were immediately snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen and subsequently stored at -80°C. At the time of the study, the biobank contained biopsies from 12 donors with long-standing T1D, and more than 2000 non-diabetic donors. Selection of biopsies, stainings, sectioning strategy and LCM was performed as described in Granlund et. al. [12]. Briefly, the donors with longstanding T1D were age-, sex- and BMI-matched to non-diabetic donors, and all biopsies were evaluated for immune infiltration by staining for CD45 and synaptophysin. Donors with a pronounced immune cell infiltration, or biopsies consisting mainly of fibrotic or adipose tissue were excluded from the study (described in Granlund et. al. [12]). Out of 24 donors examined (12 donors with long-standing T1D and 12 matched controls), 15 donors passed the screening and were included in the study. The characteristics of these are shown in Table 1.
Table 1. Clinical characteristics of the donors that passed the screening.
Donor No. | Age | Sex | BMI (kg/m2) | HbA1c (mmol/mol) | Pancreas region frozen biopsies | IA2A | GADA | Cause of death | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NDs | ND-1 | 13 | M | 16 | 40 | tail | na | na | Celebral anoxia due to cardiac arrest |
ND-2 | 35 | F | 24.7 | na | body | - | - | Hypoxemia due to cardiac arrest | |
ND-3 | 57 | F | 22.7 | 45 | tail | na | na | Subarachnoid hemorrage | |
ND-4 | 45 | F | 25.4 | 38.8 | tail | - | - | Infarction in the cerebellum | |
ND-5 | 21 | M | 28 | 38.8 | tail | - | - | Head trauma | |
ND-6 | 17 | F | 28.9 | na | body | na | na | Traumatic subarachnoid hemorrage | |
ND-7 | 63 | M | 24 | 39.9 | tail | - | - | Subarachnoid hemorrage | |
ND-8 | 13 | M | 19.7 | 33 | tail | - | - | Strangulation | |
Mean | 33 | 23.7 | 39.3 | ||||||
T1Ds | T1D-1 | 16 | M | 21.9 | na | tail | na | na | Trauma subarachnoid hemorrage |
T1D-2 | 36 | F | 20.9 | 55.2 | tail | na | na | Intracranial hemorrage | |
T1D-3 | 60 | F | 23.9 | 66.1 | tail | + | + | Subarachnoid hemorrage | |
T1D-4 | 47 | F | 27.6 | 57.4 | body | - | - | Cardiac arrest | |
T1D-5 | 24 | M | 27.5 | 67.2 | tail | + | - | Trauma | |
T1D-6 | 25 | F | 26.7 | 54.1 | tail | - | - | Cerebral edema due to hypoglycemia | |
T1D-7 | 65 | M | 24.2 | na | tail | na | na | Trauma by fall | |
Mean | 39 | 24.7 | 60 |
During the screening, donors with a pronounced immune cell infiltration, or biopsies consisting mainly of fibrotic or adipose tissue were excluded from the study. All islets in donors with T1D were insulin-negative. NDs: Non-diabetic subjects, T1Ds: Type 1 diabetic subjects. Na: not available. +: present, -: not present.
Sectioning strategy of biopsies and immunofluorescent staining of endocrine cells
Frozen biopsies were sectioned and consecutive sections were alternately used for immunofluorescence (IF), LCM or immunohistochemistry (IHC), as described in Granlund et al. [12]. The sections intended for IF were stained for insulin, glucagon and somatostatin (S1 Table) and the slides were scanned on a confocal microscope (LSM700, Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) and used to locate islets that were microdissected on the consecutive PEN membranes. The methodology was designed to only extract and study insulin-negative islets in T1D subjects, but it was discovered that all islets were insulin-negative and therefore no selection of islets was necessary. To estimate the proportion of alpha, beta and delta cells, the cells of ten randomly chosen islets (in one section/donor) were annotated and the area in px2 was determined for alpha- beta- and delta cells respectively using the polygon tool in Qupath software (0.1.2). The area in px2 was converted to μm2 (0.8 pixels/μm). The average obtained by two independent investigators was calculated for each donor.
Immunohistochemistry of endothelial cells
The consecutive sections were stained for CD31 and synaptophysin. Primary antibodies (S1 Table) were added and thereafter visualized using Dako EnVision Doublestain system (DAB+/Permanent Red). Sections were counterstained with hematoxylin (Histolab) and photographed using a Zeiss Palm Microbeam Ⅳ microscope at 20× magnification. The CD31 positive regions within islets was evaluated with assistance of ImageJ software. Ten islets per donor was analyzed; the islet area (μm2) and the length of all CD31 positive regions (μm) found within these islets were noted. The total length of CD31 positive regions per total islet area (vascular density) was calculated.
Laser capture microdissection (LCM)
LCM was performed as described in Granlund et al. [12]. In brief, the frozen sections were thawed and dehydrated after which they were mounted on an Arcturus XT LCM system (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Massachusetts). Islets were identified based on islet auto-fluorescence and verified by the scanned IF slides. The islets were captured on an Arcturus CapSure HS LCM Cap (LCM0215, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Massachusetts) and incubated in 1% beta-Mercaptoethanol in a heating block for 30 min at 42°C, lysing the tissue. The lysates were stored at -80°C until RNA extraction. Areas of the cut regions were noted and the diameter of the islets calculated according to (, S1 Fig).
RNA extraction and transcriptome analysis
The samples were brought to room temperature by short incubation at 37°C. All LCM extracted samples were pooled for each donor. RNA was extracted with the RNeasy Plus Micro kit (Qiagen, Sweden) according to the manufacturer’s protocol for purification of total RNA from microdissected cryosections. Samples were eluted with RNase-free water and stored at -80°C until transcriptome analysis, which was performed using the Ion AmpliSeq Transcriptome Gene Expression Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Massachusetts) and sequencing on an IonS5XL instrument, as described previously in detail [12]. Acquired reads were analyzed using the ampliSeqRNA plugin in the Torrent Suite Server version 5.10.1. The reads were aligned to hg19 AmpliSeq Transcriptome ERCC v1, quantifying expression data for 20,813 genes.
Statistical analysis
Filtering
Data was analyzed with R (v. 4.2.1) in Rstudio (v. 22.02.3) using the edgeR R package (v. 3.36.0) [13, 14] starting from raw read counts. As the islet samples were extracted, prepared and sequenced together with several samples from the exocrine portion of the pancreas, as described in more detail previously [12], the exocrine libraries were not excluded in the current data analysis. I.e. the exocrine libraries were included when creating the DGElistobject, as well as subsequent filtering, normalization and creation of the generalized linear model. Genes with more than 10 counts per million (CPM) in at least 6 samples were retained using the filterByExp function of edgeR.
Deconvolution analysis
Cell type proportions of the LCM extracted bulk data was estimated with Multi-subject Single Cell (MuSiC) deconvolution using the R package MuSiC(v. 0.2.0) [15]. The raw counts were analyzed with the E-MTAB-5061 human pancreas single-cell data as reference dataset (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/arrayexpress/experiments/E-MTAB-5061/) [7]. Results were visualized using ggplot2 (v 3.3.0).
Normalization
Raw count normalization was performed using the trimmed mean of M values (TMM) [16] method with the calcNormFactors- function of EdgeR.
Data structure
TMM- adjusted and log- normalized counts were used to visualize the data structure by principal component analysis (PCA) using the R- package PCAtools(v.2.6.0) [17].
Differential gene expression analysis
Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between islets from subjects with and without T1D were analyzed using a generalized linear model and a quasi-likelihood test with the glmQLFit and glmTreat functions of edgeR. Genes differentially expressed in T1D compared with non-diabetic subjects were assessed. FDR-adjusted P-values were calculated using the Benjamini- Hochberg method in the topTags function in edgeR. Criteria for differential expression was FDR-adjusted P-value less than 0.05 while testing for an absolute log fold change ≥ log2(1.2).
Functional enrichment—and overrepresentation analysis
Competitive gene set testing was conducted with CAMERA (Correlation Adjusted MEan RAnk test) [18] using the CAMERA function in edgeR [13, 14] and the MSigDB Hallmark set [19]. A gene set was considered significantly enriched if the FDR- adjusted p-value was <0.25. Overrepresentation analysis (ORA) was done using a hypergeometric test [20, 21]. The ORA was performed by testing the DEG (FC± log2(1.2), FDR>0.05) against gene ontology: biological processes (GO:BP) [22, 23] and REACTOME [24, 25] terms using the function g:GOSt in g:Profiler [26]. The g:SCS corrected P- values <0.05 were required for a set to be considered significantly enriched.
Comparison of vascular density in islets
The Mann–Whitney test was used in GraphPad Prism software (version 6.0h) to compare the islet vascular density in non-diabetic and T1D subjects. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
The proportion of different endocrine cells was similar in histological and transcriptional data
The median endocrine area proportion in non-diabetic subjects was histologically determined to be 26% alpha cells, 60% beta cells and 14% delta cells (Fig 1A and 1C). The median endocrine area proportion in subjects with T1D was 76% alpha cells, 0% beta cells and 24% delta cells (Fig 1B and 1D). Based on estimation from the transcriptome data through a Multi-subject Single Cell (MuSiC) analysis (Fig 1E and 1F), the proportion of the different endocrine cells was similar to the histologically estimated endocrine area proportion in non-diabetic and T1D pancreases. Islet tissue extracted by LCM had only limited contamination of exocrine tissue (acinar median 0.059%, and 0.050%, and ductal median 0% and 0% in tissue extracted from pancreases of non-diabetic and T1D subjects respectively) according to the MuSiC analysis (Fig 1E and 1F).
Gene sets related to vasculature and angiogenesis were upregulated in islets from subjects with T1D and the gene set epithelial mesenchymal transition was downregulated
A PCA of the 25% most variable genes across islets shows that islets from T1D and non-diabetes subjects clustered separately (Fig 2). The differential gene expression analysis revealed 347 DEGs that were downregulated and 126 that were upregulated in islets from subjects with T1D (S1 File). Overrepresentation analysis with g:Profiler of these DEGs identified many gene sets of diverse functions to be upregulated in T1D (g:SCS adjusted p-value <0.05) (S1 File). The top 10 enriched gene sets using Gene Ontologi: Biological Processes (GO:BP) were mostly related to vasculature, angiogenesis and anatomical structuring, whereas many of the top 10 gene sets using REACTOME were associated with insulin signalling (Table 2A). The gene sets that were downregulated in T1D (g:SCS adjusted p-value <0.05) were mainly related to synaptic- and cell signalling as well as beta-cell loss (Table 2B and S1 File). Competitive gene set testing with CAMERA, and using the MSigDB Hallmark gene set collection, showed that pancreas beta cells (Fig 3A) and epithelial mesenchymal transition (Fig 3B) were downregulated in islets from subjects with T1D.
Table 2. Top 10 enriched gene sets using g:Profiler.
A | |
Upregulated gene sets in islets from subjects with T1D | |
Gene Ontology: Biological Processes | Adjusted P-value |
Anatomical structure morphogenesis | 2.090×10−6 |
Blood vessel morphogenesis | 9.070×10−6 |
Angiogenesis | 3.769×10−5 |
Regulation of developmental process | 6.611×10−5 |
Blood vessel development | 6.953×10−5 |
Regulation of cellular process | 9.713×10−5 |
Vasculature development | 1.335×10−4 |
Circulatory system development | 1.572×10−4 |
Anatomical structure development | 1.909×10−4 |
Anatomical structure formation involved in morphogenesis | 2.708×10−4 |
Reactome | Adjusted P-value |
IRS-mediated signalling | 4.972×10−3 |
Signaling by PDGFR in disease | 6.897×10−3 |
IRS-related events triggered by IGF1R | 8.108×10−3 |
IGF1R signaling cascade | 8.108×10−3 |
Signaling by Type 1 Insulin-like Growth Factor 1 Receptor (IGF1R) | 9.090×10–3 |
Downstream signaling of activated FGFR1 | 9.200×10−3 |
Signaling by FGFR3 fusions in cancer | 9.906×10−3 |
Insulin receptor signalling cascade | 1.016×10−2 |
Downstream signaling of activated FGFR2 | 1.107×10−2 |
Biogenic amines are oxidatively deaminated to aldehydes by MAOA and MAOB | 1.370×10−2 |
B | |
Downregulated gene sets in islets from subjects with T1D | |
Gene Ontology: Biological Processes | Adjusted P-value |
Cell-cell signaling | 1.653×10−7 |
Nervous system development | 4.565×10−6 |
System development | 6.374×10−5 |
Multicellular organism development | 1.171×10−4 |
Multicellular organismal process | 2.554×10−4 |
Regulation of cell communication | 3.267×10−4 |
Anterograde trans-synaptic signaling | 3.936×10−4 |
Chemical synaptic transmission | 3.936×10−4 |
Signaling | 4.121×10−4 |
Trans-synaptic signaling | 4.545×10−4 |
Reactome | Adjusted P-value |
Regulation of gene expression in beta cells | 1.108×10−4 |
Regulation of beta-cell development | 1.038×10−3 |
Amyloid fiber formation | 4.418×10−2 |
347 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were found to be downregulated and 126 were upregulated in islets from subjects with T1D. Overrepresentation analysis on the DEGs was done using g:Profiler. Top 10 upregulated gene sets in donors with type 1 diabetes using Gene Ontology: biological processes and REACTOME is shown in (A). Top 10 downregulated gene sets in donors with type 1 diabetes using Gene Ontology: biological processes and REACTOME is shown in (B). Padj: Adjusted p-value according to g:SCS.
Vascular density in islets was increased in subjects with T1D
CD31 staining revealed an increased total endothelial length per total islet area (vascular density) in subjects with T1D compared with non-diabetic subjects (median total endothelial length per total islet area was 0.015 μm/μm2 and 0.0085 respectively) (p = 0.0263) (Fig 4). When excluding CD31+ regions shorter than 15 μm to account for the presence of possible individual macrophages, the vascular density in subjects with T1D was also increased (p = 0.0263).
Discussion
In the current study, LCM was used to microdissect and analyze islets from subjects with T1D directly from frozen well-preserved pancreatic tissue obtained from heart-beating organ donors. As such, artefacts induced by enzymatic islet isolation, dispersion into single-cells, and culture were avoided, making the analysed transcriptomes to the highest possible extent reflect the in vivo situation. A hallmark of islets from subjects with T1D is the loss of beta cells. The islets examined in the current study were devoid of beta cells as determined both by a histological and transcriptional evaluation of the islet composition. Transcriptional alterations likely derived from the beta cell loss was reflected in the data regardless of bioinformatical approach; the beta cell associated genes insulin, MAFA and PDX1, were found among the downregulated DEGs, ORA of the downregulated DEGs with REACTOME showed gene sets such as Regulation of gene expression in beta cells, and using competitive gene set testing with CAMERA, the gene set pancreas beta cells was found to be downregulated. As the beta-cell loss correlates with expected transcriptional alterations, this finding suggests that the methodology is sound.
In total, 473 DEGs were discovered in the islets from subjects with T1D. Among these, the top 5 upregulated genes; CIDEC, RSPO3, SLITRK6, TPD52L1 and FGF10, have unclear roles in islets. Interestingly, ORA of the DEGs using Gene Ontology: Biological Processes showed that the top 10 enriched gene sets in islets from subjects with T1D were mostly related to vasculature and angiogenesis. Neither these gene sets, nor versions of them, have been reported to distinguish different pancreatic cell types from each other in single-cell studies [5, 6], suggesting that these transcriptional alterations of the islets from subjects with T1D were not derived solely from the loss of beta cells. In support of the notion that the alterations seen in gene sets related to microvasculature in our study were not an effect of the beta-cell loss, these gene sets were not found to vary between different sorted islet cell types when running an ORA on the DEGs reported by Muraro et al. [6], (S2 File). However, gene sets related to anatomical structuring were upregulated in sorted alpha- and delta cells compared to other pancreatic cells [6] (S2 File), which likely explains the upregulation of these gene sets in the islets from subjects with T1D in our study.
In sections consecutive to those used for LCM, the vascular density (total CD31+ endothelial length per total islet area) was increased in T1D subjects. CD31 is also present on macrophages, but during the screening procedure, samples with a pronounced immune infiltration were excluded. Additionally, gene sets related to inflammation were not present among the upregulated gene sets, and a macrophage marker, CD68, was not present among the DEGs. This indicates that the elevated vascular density in T1D subjects was caused by an increased presence of endothelial cells. Similarly, a previous histological study reported an increase in the number of islet vessels, but with a reduced diameter [27]. The presence of upregulated gene sets related to angiogenesis as well as elevated vascular density suggests active angiogenesis and vascular remodelling in islets from subjects with T1D. Importantly, islet size is not altered in subjects with T1D despite the near total loss of beta cells [28], suggesting the increased vascular density to be due to an absolute increase in islet microvasculature. The islet endothelial cells play a crucial role in islet function and have been shown to both stimulate insulin secretion and play a role in beta cell function and proliferation [29–32]. The upregulation of gene sets related to the microvasculature may suggest an effort towards beta cell differentiation to compensate for the loss of beta cells. Another interpretation of the upregulation of genes related to microvasculature, is that it is a response to a disturbance in islet blood perfusion. If there is an insufficient blood circulation to the islet, this could contribute to the alpha-cell dysfunction reported in T1D [4, 33, 34].
There is no transcriptional variation between microvascular endothelial cells sorted from donors with or without impaired glucose metabolism (IGM) [35]. This suggests that the islet endothelial transcriptome is not per se affected as a consequence of diabetes, i.e. hyperglycemia, which mean that alterations seen in the islet microvasculature could instead be a contributing cause of T1D. However, the endothelial cells in islets from subjects with T1D could also be more severely affected than in subjects with IGM. Alternatively, differences in this cell type are only observable for study in intact, LCM-excised, islets. Indeed, microvascular epithelial cells are especially sensitive to the islet isolation process and culturing [36, 37].
Epithelial mesenchymal transition (EMT) is a biological process where epithelial cells are transitioned to mesenchymal cells, and is, among other things, important during embryogenesis and organ development as well as wound healing [38]. However, even fully differentiated epithelium can change its phenotype through activation of EMT. This enables transdifferentiation of epithelial cells to mesenchymal derivates even during adulthood, and has been shown to occur in the adult human exocrine pancreas [39, 40]. Through this process, EMT has been shown to be involved in beta cell differentiation and islet formation. Individual beta cells become insulin-positive in the progenitor epithelium, after which they lose epithelial characteristics and migrate out of the epithelial layer to form islets. As beta cells exit the epithelial progenitor cell layer, they acquire mesenchymal characteristics [41]. Vimetin, a mesenchymal cell marker, has been found in adult human islets, indicating that even mature islets might have a plasticity, which could require a mesenchymal phenotype [41]. Using competitive gene set testing with CAMERA, the gene set epithelial mesenchymal transition was found to be downregulated in islets from subjects with T1D. This could suggest that islets from donors with T1D have a lower degree of plasticity, and a less active EMT, however we cannot exclude that this is merely an effect of the lost beta cells.
In summary, a large number of transcriptional alterations were discovered in intact LCM-excised islets from subjects with T1D. Although many of these alterations likely are an effect of comparing islets devoid of beta cells in T1D with islets dominated by beta cells in non-diabetic controls, some of the discovered alterations emerge as potentially important for understanding the pathogenesis of the disease. Among these, there was an upregulation of several gene sets related to vasculature and angiogenesis, as well as an increased vascular density, demonstrating microvasculature to be altered in T1D. By studying pancreatic islets directly procured from frozen pancreatic sections, this study minimizes artifacts induced by handling the cells and uncovers potentially relevant insights into the pathophysiology of T1D.
Supporting information
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to thank everyone in the Nordic Network for Clinical Islet Transplantation involved in the procurement of pancreases. We also give our deepest gratitude to all organ donors. We also thank Sofie Ingvast for excellent technical assistance.
Data Availability
The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are available in the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus repository (accession number GSE162689).
Funding Statement
This study was supported by a junior grant to M.L. from Diabetes Wellness Sweden. The study was further supported by the Family Ernfors Foundation (O.K.), the Novo Nordisk Foundation (O.K.), the Magnus Bergvall foundation (M.L), the Åke Wiberg Foundation, the Tore Nilsson Foundation (M.L), the Swedish Diabetes Association (O.K.), Gillbergska Stiftelsen, Barndiabetesfonden (O.K., O.S., and M.L.), and the Swedish Medical Research Council (2019-01415) (O.K.). Human pancreatic biopsies and isolated islets were obtained from the Nordic Network for Clinical Islet Transplantation, supported by the Swedish national strategic research initiative Excellence of Diabetes Research in Sweden (EXODIAB), the Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation and the Helmsley Charitable Trust.
References
- 1.Röder PV, Wu B, Liu Y, Han W. Pancreatic regulation of glucose homeostasis. Exp Mol Med. 2016. Mar;48(3):e219. doi: 10.1038/emm.2016.6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Wierup N, Svensson H, Mulder H, Sundler F. The ghrelin cell: a novel developmentally regulated islet cell in the human pancreas. Regul Pept. 2002. Jul 15;107(1):63–9. doi: 10.1016/s0167-0115(02)00067-8 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Katsuura G, Asakawa A, Inui A. Roles of pancreatic polypeptide in regulation of food intake. Peptides. 2002. Feb 1;23(2):323–9. doi: 10.1016/s0196-9781(01)00604-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Brissova M, Haliyur R, Saunders D, Shrestha S, Dai C, Blodgett DM, et al. α Cell Function and Gene Expression Are Compromised in Type 1 Diabetes. Cell Rep. 2018. Mar 6;22(10):2667–76. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.02.032 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Fasolino M, Schwartz GW, Patil AR, Mongia A, Golson ML, Wang YJ, et al. Single-cell multi-omics analysis of human pancreatic islets reveals novel cellular states in type 1 diabetes. Nat Metab. 2022. Feb;4(2):284–99. doi: 10.1038/s42255-022-00531-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Muraro MJ, Dharmadhikari G, Grün D, Groen N, Dielen T, Jansen E, et al. A Single-Cell Transcriptome Atlas of the Human Pancreas. Cell Syst. 2016. Oct 26;3(4):385–394.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.cels.2016.09.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Segerstolpe Å, Palasantza A, Eliasson P, Andersson EM, Andréasson AC, Sun X, et al. Single-Cell Transcriptome Profiling of Human Pancreatic Islets in Health and Type 2 Diabetes. Cell Metab. 2016. Oct;24(4):593–607. doi: 10.1016/j.cmet.2016.08.020 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Ackermann AM, Wang Z, Schug J, Naji A, Kaestner KH. Integration of ATAC-seq and RNA-seq identifies human alpha cell and beta cell signature genes. Mol Metab. 2016. Jan 11;5(3):233–44. doi: 10.1016/j.molmet.2016.01.002 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Goto M, Eich TM, Felldin M, Foss A, Källen R, Salmela K, et al. Refinement of the automated method for human islet isolation and presentation of a closed system for in vitro islet culture. Transplantation. 2004. Nov 15;78(9):1367–75. doi: 10.1097/01.tp.0000140882.53773.dc [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Solimena M, Schulte AM, Marselli L, Ehehalt F, Richter D, Kleeberg M, et al. Systems biology of the IMIDIA biobank from organ donors and pancreatectomised patients defines a novel transcriptomic signature of islets from individuals with type 2 diabetes. Diabetologia. 2018;61(3):641–57. doi: 10.1007/s00125-017-4500-3 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Negi S, Jetha A, Aikin R, Hasilo C, Sladek R, Paraskevas S. Analysis of Beta-Cell Gene Expression Reveals Inflammatory Signaling and Evidence of Dedifferentiation following Human Islet Isolation and Culture. PLoS ONE. 2012. Jan 27;7(1):e30415. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0030415 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Granlund L, Hedin A, Wahlhütter M, Seiron P, Korsgren O, Skog O, et al. Histological and transcriptional characterization of the pancreatic acinar tissue in type 1 diabetes. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2021. May;9(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2020-002076 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.McCarthy DJ, Chen Y, Smyth GK. Differential expression analysis of multifactor RNA-Seq experiments with respect to biological variation. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012. May;40(10):4288–97. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks042 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Robinson MD, McCarthy DJ, Smyth GK. edgeR: a Bioconductor package for differential expression analysis of digital gene expression data. Bioinformatics. 2010. Jan 1;26(1):139–40. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp616 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Wang X, Park J, Susztak K, Zhang NR, Li M. Bulk tissue cell type deconvolution with multi-subject single-cell expression reference. Nat Commun. 2019. Jan 22;10(1):380. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-08023-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Robinson MD, Oshlack A. A scaling normalization method for differential expression analysis of RNA-seq data. Genome Biol. 2010;11(3):R25. doi: 10.1186/gb-2010-11-3-r25 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Blighe K. kevinblighe/PCAtools [Internet]. 2020. [cited 2020 Jul 8]. Available from: https://github.com/kevinblighe/PCAtools [Google Scholar]
- 18.Camera: a competitive gene set test accounting for inter-gene correlation | Nucleic Acids Research | Oxford Academic [Internet]. [cited 2020 Sep 29]. Available from: https://academic.oup.com/nar/article/40/17/e133/2411151 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 19.Liberzon A, Birger C, Thorvaldsdóttir H, Ghandi M, Mesirov JP, Tamayo P. The Molecular Signatures Database (MSigDB) hallmark gene set collection. Cell Syst. 2015. Dec 23;1(6):417–25. doi: 10.1016/j.cels.2015.12.004 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Mootha VK, Lindgren CM, Eriksson KF, Subramanian A, Sihag S, Lehar J, et al. PGC-1α-responsive genes involved in oxidative phosphorylation are coordinately downregulated in human diabetes. Nat Genet. 2003. Jul;34(3):267–73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Subramanian A, Tamayo P, Mootha VK, Mukherjee S, Ebert BL, Gillette MA, et al. Gene set enrichment analysis: A knowledge-based approach for interpreting genome-wide expression profiles. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005. Oct 25;102(43):15545–50. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0506580102 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Ashburner M, Ball CA, Blake JA, Botstein D, Butler H, Cherry JM, et al. Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology. Nat Genet. 2000. May;25(1):25–9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.The Gene Ontology Resource: 20 years and still GOing strong. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019. Jan 8;47(D1):D330–8. doi: 10.1093/nar/gky1055 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Fabregat A, Korninger F, Viteri G, Sidiropoulos K, Marin-Garcia P, Ping P, et al. Reactome graph database: Efficient access to complex pathway data. PLoS Comput Biol. 2018;14(1):e1005968. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005968 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Jassal B, Matthews L, Viteri G, Gong C, Lorente P, Fabregat A, et al. The reactome pathway knowledgebase. Nucleic Acids Res. 2020. 08;48(D1):D498–503. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkz1031 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Reimand J, Kull M, Peterson H, Hansen J, Vilo J. g:Profiler—a web-based toolset for functional profiling of gene lists from large-scale experiments. Nucleic Acids Res. 2007. Jul 1;35(suppl_2):W193–200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Canzano JS, Nasif LH, Butterworth EA, Fu DA, Atkinson MA, Campbell-Thompson M. Islet Microvasculature Alterations With Loss of Beta-cells in Patients With Type 1 Diabetes. J Histochem Cytochem Off J Histochem Soc. 2019. Jan;67(1):41–52. doi: 10.1369/0022155418778546 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Seiron P, Wiberg A, Kuric E, Krogvold L, Jahnsen FL, Dahl‐Jørgensen K, et al. Characterisation of the endocrine pancreas in type 1 diabetes: islet size is maintained but islet number is markedly reduced. J Pathol Clin Res. 2019. Sep 7;5(4):248–55. doi: 10.1002/cjp2.140 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Lammert E, Gu G, McLaughlin M, Brown D, Brekken R, Murtaugh LC, et al. Role of VEGF-A in Vascularization of Pancreatic Islets. Curr Biol. 2003. Jun 17;13(12):1070–4. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(03)00378-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Nikolova G, Jabs N, Konstantinova I, Domogatskaya A, Tryggvason K, Sorokin L, et al. The vascular basement membrane: a niche for insulin gene expression and Beta cell proliferation. Dev Cell. 2006. Mar;10(3):397–405. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2006.01.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Narayanan S, Loganathan G, Dhanasekaran M, Tucker W, Patel A, Subhashree V, et al. Intra-islet endothelial cell and β-cell crosstalk: Implication for islet cell transplantation. World J Transplant. 2017. Apr 24;7(2):117–28. doi: 10.5500/wjt.v7.i2.117 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Talavera-Adame D, Dafoe DC. Endothelium-derived essential signals involved in pancreas organogenesis. World J Exp Med. 2015. May 20;5(2):40–9. doi: 10.5493/wjem.v5.i2.40 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Gerich JE, Langlois M, Noacco C, Karam JH, Forsham PH. Lack of Glucagon Response to Hypoglycemia in Diabetes: Evidence for an Intrinsic Pancreatic Alpha Cell Defect. Science. 1973. Oct 12;182(4108):171–3. doi: 10.1126/science.182.4108.171 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Yosten GLC. Alpha cell dysfunction in type 1 diabetes. Peptides. 2018. Feb 1;100:54–60. doi: 10.1016/j.peptides.2017.12.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Jonsson A, Hedin A, Müller M, Skog O, Korsgren O. Transcriptional profiles of human islet and exocrine endothelial cells in subjects with or without impaired glucose metabolism. Sci Rep. 2020. Dec 18;10:22315. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-79313-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Nyqvist D, Köhler M, Wahlstedt H, Berggren PO. Donor Islet Endothelial Cells Participate in Formation of Functional Vessels Within Pancreatic Islet Grafts. Diabetes. 2005. Aug 1;54(8):2287–93. doi: 10.2337/diabetes.54.8.2287 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Mendola JF, Goity C, Fernández-Alvarez J, Saenz A, Benarroch G, Fernández-Cruz L, et al. Immunocytochemical study of pancreatic islet revascularization in islet isograft. Effect of hyperglycemia of the recipient and of in vitro culture of islets. Transplantation. 1994. Mar 15;57(5):725–30. doi: 10.1097/00007890-199403150-00015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Yang J, Antin P, Berx G, Blanpain C, Brabletz T, Bronner M, et al. Guidelines and definitions for research on epithelial–mesenchymal transition. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2020. Jun;21(6):341–52. doi: 10.1038/s41580-020-0237-9 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Kalluri R, Weinberg RA. The basics of epithelial-mesenchymal transition. J Clin Invest. 2009. Jun 1;119(6):1420–8. doi: 10.1172/JCI39104 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Fanjul M, Gmyr V, Sengenès C, Ratovo G, Dufresne M, Lefebvre B, et al. Evidence for Epithelial–Mesenchymal Transition in Adult Human Pancreatic Exocrine Cells. J Histochem Cytochem. 2010. Sep;58(9):807–23. doi: 10.1369/jhc.2010.955807 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Cole L, Anderson M, Antin PB, Limesand SW. One Process for Pancreatic β-Cell Coalescence into Islets Involves an Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition. J Endocrinol. 2009. Oct;203(1):19–31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The datasets generated and analyzed during the current study are available in the NCBI Gene Expression Omnibus repository (accession number GSE162689).