Abstract
Purpose of review
Genetic mutations in genes within and outside of the trypsin-dependent pathologic pathway have been found to be associated with chronic pancreatitis. This review highlights recent developments.
Recent findings
CTRB1-CTRB2 has been identified as a new risk locus for chronic pancreatitis and the disease mechanism may involve trypsin degradation. Misfolding mutations in PRSS1, CPA1, and CEL, as well as environmental stress factors like tobacco and alcohol can trigger endoplasmic reticulum stress (ER-Stress).
Summary
Protein misfolding as well as enzyme activity changes due to altered autoactivation, intracellular degradation, or enzyme inhibition represent the most important pathological mechanisms of chronic pancreatitis to date. Analysis of composite risk patterns by next-generation sequencing will help elucidate complex gene interactions and identify new potential therapeutic targets.
Keywords: chronic pancreatitis, enzymatic activity, genetic risk, inherited disease, protein misfolding
INTRODUCTION
Pancreatitis, an inflammatory disorder of the pancreas not usually caused by infectious agents, is now regarded as a continuum between an acute and a chronic disease phenotype that overlap (in the form of recurrent pancreatitis) in up to 30% of patients. Its causes are manifold ranging from immoderate alcohol consumption, to gallstones passing through the papilla and triggering transient pancreatic duct obstruction [1], to exposure to cigarette smoke [2], a multitude of pharmaceutical drugs [3] and vascular pathology [4], or as part of an autoimmune disorder [5,6]. On the cellular level, it is now believed that the disease process begins in pancreatic acinar (exocrine) cells and involves the premature activation of digestive proteases, most prominently trypsin. Whether trypsin is activated by lysosomal hydrolases [7,8], or autoactivates has remained a matter of debate [9,10], but its intracellular activation makes the century-old concept of pancreatitis as an autodigestive disorder plausible. More recent studies have focused on the role of inflammatory cells in the disease’s onset [11,12], which appear to operate even without the need of prior trypsin activation [13] or can be driven directly by trypsin, without its prior activation in acinar cells [14]. The first genetic factor identified for pancreatitis was, indeed, trypsin. The discovery in 1996 that a p.R122H mutation in cationic trypsinogen gene (PRSS1) is strongly associated with an autosomal dominant variety of pancreatitis [15] must be regarded as the most convincing evidence for the protease-activation-autodigestion hypothesis of pancreatitis. As of today, most inherited risk factors of pancreatitis involve the digestive protease/antiprotease system. Whether this is due to the prevalent candidate-gene-approach still used by most investigators as opposed to hypothesis-free genome-wide association studies (GWAS) or next-generation sequencing (NGS) studies, or the preeminence of proteolytic over inflammatory disease onset mechanisms remains to be seen.
THE TRYPSIN ACTIVITY PATHWAY
The first identified p.R122H mutation deletes a fail-safe mechanism for intracellular trypsin degradation and associates with autosomal dominant forms of familial or hereditary pancreatitis [15]. The identification of further dominant acting PRSS1 mutations N29I or A16V suggested a disease mechanism of pancreatitis that is related to trypsin-activity. Enhanced or prolonged trypsin activity seems the common denominator of this pathway and the promoting effects of mutations in pancreatitis risk genes PRSS1, serine protease inhibitor Kazal type 1 (SPINK1), and chymotrypsin C (CTRC) and have recently been reviewed [16]. Their pathogenic potential relates to trypsinogen autoactivation (PRSS1), reduced protective intracellular trypsin degradation (CTRC), or impaired trypsin inhibition (SPINK1). Trypsinogen synthesis, storage, and secretion in the acinar cells are paralleled by coexpression and transport of the serine protease inhibitor SPINK1, sufficient to inhibit 2–13% of activated or secreted trypsinogen. When SPINK1 becomes depleted a second fail-safe mechanism leads to the activation of Chymotrypsinogen C, which itself is a protective intracellular trypsin degrading enzyme and in concert with trypsin results in irreversible trypsinogen degradation.
CHYMOTRYPSIN C
CTRC selectively cleaves the Leu81–Glu82 peptide bond within the Ca2+-binding loop, and further degradation is then achieved through tryptic cleavage of the Arg122–Val123 peptide bond [17]. In 2008, the association of CTRC variants with chronic pancreatitis risk has been demonstrated in two independent European studies [18,19]. Two alterations, p.R254W and a microdeletion p.K247_R254del, were significantly overrepresented in idiopathic, hereditary, alcoholic, and tropical pancreatitis. Mutations were present in 3.3% of affected individuals but only 0.7% of controls (odds ratio (OR) = 4.6). Loss-of-function variants in CTRC predispose to pancreatitis by diminishing its protective trypsin-degrading activity. LaRusch et al. [20] evaluated the occurrence of CTRC variants in individuals with recurrent acute pancreatitis (RAP), chronic pancreatitis, and controls from the North American Pancreatitis Study II cohort. Their results confirmed previously reported rare pathogenic p.A73T, p.R254W, and p.K247_R254del variants and p.G60G (c.180 C>T; rs497078). Compared with controls (minor allele frequency (MAF) = 10.8%), p.G60G was associated with chronic pancreatitis (MAF = 16.8%, P < 0.00001) but not RAP (MAF = 11.9% P = NS). Trend test indicated codominant risk for chronic pancreatitis (CT:OR = 1.36, TT: OR = 3.98). The common CTRC variant c.180T was more frequent with concurrent pathogenic CFTR variants and/or SPINK1 variants and with alcoholic vs. nonalcoholic chronic pancreatitis. The authors suggest that CTRC p.G60G may act as disease modifier that triggers the progression from recurrent acute pancreatitis to chronic pancreatitis, especially in combination with CFTR or SPINK1 variants, alcohol, or smoking.
SERINE PROTEASE INHIBITOR KAZAL TYPE 1
Evidence for a pathogenic role of loss of function SPINK1 mutations comes from association studies that identified the c.194+2T>C variant in cohorts of white and Asian chronic pancreatitis patients. The mutation locates within the splice site in intron 3 and results in markedly reduced SPINK1 mRNA expression. In the United States and Europe, the variant has been found at carrier frequencies of about 3% in patients, but rarely in controls. Higher carrier frequencies have been reported for the c.101A>G (p.N34S) mutation, which according to a recent meta-analysis is present in 9.7% of patients and 1% of controls (OR = 11) [21]. The SPINK1 c.101A>G variant represents the most frequently identified genetic risk factor for idiopathic chronic pancreatitis (ICP). Four intronic alterations associate with the N34S variant, but the causal variation associated with this risk haplotype remains elusive. Férec et al. tried to resolve this enigma and searched for variants in strong linkage disequilibrium with the p.N34S mutation. They identified another SNP (rs142703147:C>A), which disrupts a PTF1L-binding site located ~4-kb upstream of the SPINK1 promoter [22■]. Analysis of 548 French ICP patients and 562 matched controls showed that rs142703147 is in perfect linkage disequilibrium with the p.N34S mutation in the French population (r2 = 1), but not in two additionally screened cohorts of Chinese and Indian ICP patients (Chinese, r2 = 0.80; Indian, r2 = 0.59). SNP rs142703147 may only be one part of the solution to the N34S puzzle. It seems the N34S enigma awaits further strategies to unravel its role, as the inhibitory capacity of this most common SPINK1 variant is unimpaired [23].
CYSTIC FIBROSIS TRANSMEMBRANE CONDUCTANCE REGULATOR
For a number of years, it has been known that mutations in the cystic fibrosis (CF) transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene, an ATP-binding cassette transporter-type protein localized to the apical plasma membrane of epithelial cells increase the risk of developing pancreatitis [24–26]. The CFTR protein functions as a cyclic AMP-regulated anion channel and helps in maintaining the luminal hydration of secretory ducts. Anions can move across the open channel along their electrochemical potential gradient, resulting in fluid and/or electrolyte secretion. The exocrine pancreas and, in men, the wolffian ducts are most susceptible to loss of function mutations of this channel and are affected earliest. CF is an autosomal recessive syndrome which is usually caused by compound heterozygosity of two CFTR mutations that effectively eliminate chloride conductance. The relative permeability of the CFTR channel for chloride and bicarbonate anions may be dynamically regulated [27], suggesting that point mutations in the channel or in the permeability pore may affect the anion permeation properties of CFTR. LaRusch et al. [28] screened pancreatitis cases for candidate CFTRBD mutations variants and identified nine CFTR variants (R74Q, R75Q, R117H, R170H, L967S, L997F, D1152H, S1235R, and D1270N) that were not associated with typical CF but with pancreatitis (OR 1.5, P = 0.002). Although the CFTRBD variants are scattered throughout the genetic sequence, they share a specific functional defect in responding to WNK1-SPAK activation with increased bicarbonate permeability. It appears that this mechanism is critical for pancreatic duct and acinar cells and other bicarbonate-secreting cells that utilize CFTR as the primary anion channel.
ENDOPLASMIC RETICULUM STRESS
Another trypsin-independent disease mechanism seems to involve endoplasmic reticulum stress (ER-Stress) caused by mutation-induced protein misfolding of digestive enzymes. Details of this alternative pathologic pathway were recently reviewed [29■■]. The article by Kereszturi et al. was the first to demonstrate greatly reduced secretion of PRSS1 mutants p.R116C and p.C139S from transfected HEK293 cells. An accumulation of misfolded proteins within the endoplasmic reticulum leads to the initiation of inflammatory signals and activation of unfolded protein-response pathways which aim at relieving the ER-stress burden and limiting the proteotoxicity of accumulated protein aggregates by proteosomal degradation. For PRSS1 mutants p.R116C, p.C139S, and p.L104P, an activation of ER-Stress-markers XBP-1 and BIP was observed, but other PRSS1 mutants like p.R122H, p.R122C, p.N29I, or p.A16V did not trigger the ER-stress response [30]. PRSS1 mutations p.D100H, p.C139F, P.K92N, p.S124F, and p.G208A showed a diminished trypsinogen secretion that may impart a weaker risk of inducing ER-stress. PRSS1 misfolding variants are rare in comparison with the trypsin activity-altering mutations and have been found primarily in sporadic idiopathic cases of pancreatitis.
CARBOXY PEPTIDASE A1
In 2013, Witt et al. [31] published a candidate gene approach in which they sequenced all 10 CPA1 exons and analyzed association of variants with early-onset pancreatitis. Functionally impaired variants were present in 3.1% of German patients and in 0.1% of controls (OR = 24.9; P = 1.5 × 10−16). They identified 31 missense variants, one nonsense variant, one frame-shift variant, and one splice-site variant. Three of these variants were significantly enriched in patients. Strikingly, 17 of these variants had a more than 80% reduced activity in conditioned medium after activation with trypsin and CTRC. In patients, these loss of function variants were enriched, especially in early onset cases (before 10 years) and the apparent activity-loss was in 13 of the 17 variants due to a misfolding phenotype, comparable with what had previously been found in the misfolding PRSS1 variants. CPA1 misfolding variants with a diminished secretion (≥80%) induce endoplamic reticulum stress and are strong causative risk factors for early-onset chronic pancreatitis. Significantly, and in contrast with the high number of trans-heterozygotes for SPINK1 and CTRC and/or CFTR variants, only limited interaction of these variants with CPA1 variants was found. The pathogenic impact of misfolding mutations may be directly related to their intracellular retention and their specific propensity of being disposed of by proteosomal degradation via Endoplasmic-reticulum-associated protein degradation pathways. The clinical relevance of misfolding PRSS1 and CPA1 mutants may not be comparable with that of a dominant R122H and N29I mutation, still they significantly increase the risk for chronic pancreatitis and associate with inherited chronic pancreatitis.
CARBOXYLESTER LIPASE
The disease mechanism of misfolding-induced ER-stress has also recently been discussed in a pancreatitis risk gene outside of the protease-antiprotease axis. A nonallelic homologous recombination between the carboxylester lipase gene CEL and CELP, its adjacent pseudogene, was identified at a five-fold increased prevalence in patients with ICP (3.7% cases and 0.7% controls; OR = 5.2) [32]. Expression of the hybrid CEL-HYB in cellular models showed reduced lipolytic activity, impaired secretion, prominent intracellular accumulation, and induced autophagy. CEL is a remarkable gene due to its very polymorphic nature and rare CEL mutations can cause an autosomal dominant syndrome of maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY) and exocrine pancreatic dysfunction, denoted MODY8. In a recent replication study in Asian cohorts, Zou et al. [33] made the surprising discovery that all Asian CEL-HYB alleles exhibited a premature stop codon in exon 10, and this new allele was therefore designated CEL-HYB2. Surprisingly, CEL-HYB2 carrier frequencies among cases and controls were identical (1.7%) in a combined patient cohort from China, Japan, and India. Transfection experiments in HEK293 cells indicate that the CEL-HYB2 transcript is less stable than that originating from the original CEL-HYB1. Molven et al. [34■] suggested that the different C-terminal endings are responsible for the specific disease risk of the CEL variants. With MODY8, the frame-shift mutation in the VNTR creates a long protein tail with a strong tendency to form aggregates. In CEL-HYB1, the modified C-terminus is considerably shorter and has less severe influences on protein function and cellular secretion. The lack of CEL-HYB1 in Asians suggests that it is an ethnic-specific risk allele for chronic pancreatitis, whereas the presence of the CEL-HYB2 allele is not associated with an increased pancreatitis risk in the Asian population.
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS PRODUCING ENDOPLASMIC RETICULUM STRESS
Significantly, ER-stress is also a consequence of environmental risk factors such as alcohol or tobacco consumption. Alcohol feeding of mice induces upregulation of spliced X-box binding protein 1. In a recent study by Lugea et al. [35], acinar cells showed a strong activation of protein kinase R-like ER kinase and transcription factor CCAAT-enhancer-binding protein homologous protein following treatment with ethanol and cigarette smoke. It seems that cigarette smoke initiates features of pancreatitis in ethanol-sensitized acinar cells by induction of ER-stress pathways that promote acinar cell death. Pancreatitis is a known to be multifactorial disease, so it seems plausible that mutation-derived misfolded proteins as well as environmental risk factors like smoking and alcohol both contribute to increased pancreatitis risk by synergistically triggering the ER-stress level of acinar cells.
GENOME-WIDE ASSOCIATION STUDIES
Hypothesis-free approaches to identify genetic risk factors have been successfully employed for a variety of inflammatory disease including Crohn’s disease [36] or Helicobacter pylori colonization [37]. A first GWAS for pancreatitis by Whitcomb et al. [38] revealed an association of common variants in the CLDN2-MORC4 and the PRSS1-PRSS2 loci with alcoholic and nonalcoholic chronic pancreatitis. The protective PRSS1 promoter variant reduces transcription, leading to lower intrapancreatic trypsinogen levels and fits into the trypsin activity concept of pancreatitis. Neighboring genes within the CLND2 locus include MORC4, RIPPLY1, and TBC1D8B, but RIPPLY1 and TBC1D8B are not expressed in the pancreas, and MORC4 expression is not related to pancreatitis. Claudin-2 represents the most attractive candidate, because it serves as a highly regulated tight junction protein forming low-resistance, cation-selective ion and water channels between endothelial cells. The CLAUDIN 2 (CLDN2) risk allele is associated with atypical localization of claudin-2 in pancreatic acinar cells. Experimental studies have previously characterized the role of intact intercellular connections in pancreatitis [11].
A replication GWAS was performed in a large European cohort in which association was strongest in the alcoholic chronic pancreatitis group [39]. Similar observations also followed in Japanese and Indian chronic pancreatitis cohorts [40,41]. Giri et al. [42] analyzed the association with chronic pancreatitis in Indian patients by genotyping 1807 unrelated Indians of Indo-European ethnicity, including 519 patients with chronic pancreatitis and 1288 controls. The study confirmed a significant association of two variants in CLDN2 (rs4409525; rs12008279) and two variants in MORC4 (rs12688220; rs6622126) in Indian patients with chronic pancreatitis. One variant in the gene MORC4 (rs12688220) showed significant interaction with alcohol consumption, suggesting gene–environment interaction.
The European consortium also identified CTRB1-CTRB2 as a new risk locus for alcoholic and nonalcoholic chronic pancreatitis [43■■]. This locus contains two highly similar chymotrypsin genes transcribed in opposite directions. The association within the CTRB1-CTRB2 locus was linked to a 16.6-kb inversion that altered the CTRB1/CTRB2 expression ratio. The major risk allele is associated with higher relative CTRB1 expression, whereas heterozygous carriers with one minor allele express higher levels of CTRB2. In autoactivation experiments, trypsin levels were more prominently degraded by CTRB2. The inversion switches the signal-peptides of CTRB1 and CTRB2, but at the protein level, the secreted mature proenzymes remain unchanged.
GLYCOSYLATION
Notably, the CTRB1/CTRB2 locus had previously been identified by a population-based GWAS from North Germany to be associated with elevated serum lipase activities in asymptomatic individuals, but a replication in pancreatitis cohorts was not possible [44]. This study further reported that Fucosyltransferase 2 nonsecretor status and blood group B represent genetic cofactors for the development of alcoholic as well as ICP. The role of the ABO blood group in chronic pancreatitis had previously been investigated by Whitcomb et al. in the NAPS2 cohort who reported that A, B, and AB blood groups were not associated with a greater probability of developing chronic pancreatitis, but may decrease the risk of chronic pancreatitis in individuals who are very heavy drinkers [45]. Kirsten et al. also analyzed the above-mentioned FUT2 and ABO SNPs regarding association with chronic pancreatitis in a German cohort of 1458 cases and 5133 controls [46]. Their analysis revealed significant interaction effects of rs632111 in FUT2 with alcohol consumption and for rs8176693 in ABO for the subgroup of alcohol-dependent individuals but could not replicate the findings by Weiss et al. Whether the exclusion of alcohol consumers from their control group influenced the prevalence of ABO blood group and FUT nonsecretors in their study remained unclear [47].
ABO blood types vary considerably between populations ranging from 8% for blood type B in Norway to 33% in Kashmir. Identical ethnic backgrounds between cases and controls is therefore the key to a successful analysis of the ABO locus in pancreatitis, just as it was in pancreatic cancer in which blood type non-O is now recognized as a common genetic risk trait [48]. The first replication for blood type B as a pancreatitis risk allele came from a study investigating drug-induced (Azathioprine) pancreatitis in patients with inflammatory bowel disease [49].
HYPERTRIGLYCERIDEMIA
The increase in obesity worldwide is associated with an elevated incidence of metabolic diseases and hyperlipidemia, characterized by serum hypertriglyceridemia, has become a prominent cause of acute pancreatitis which contributes to 1–10% of patients with AP. Dyslipidemias can have a strong genetic component; therefore, Chen et al. performed targeted NGS of 11 hypertriglyceridemic acute pancreatitis patients to identify genetic mutations associated with hypertriglyceridemia, including apolipoprotein A-V (APOA5), APOC2, APOC3 and APOE, BLK, lipoprotein lipase (LPL), GPIHBP1, and LMF1 [50■]. Two patients with compound heterozygous mutations in APOA5 and two patients with a homozygous p.C14F variant in GPIHBP1 were detected. One had a homogeneous p.R176C mutation in APOE which was also found in heterozygosity in two other patients. Limitations of the study are the lack of a control cohort, but the findings suggest that genetic mutations in APOA5, GPIHBP1, and APOE genes may have contributed to the occurrence of hypertriglyceridemia in patients with AP.
Another study by De Castro-Orós et al. also aimed at identifying rare dysfunctional mutations in genes encoding regulators of LPL function in patients with familial and nonfamilial primary hypertriglyceridemic (HTG). They sequenced promoters, exons, and exon–intron boundaries of LPL, APOA5, LMF1, and GPIHBP1 in 118 patients with severe primary HTG and 53 normo-lipidemic controls [51]. Variant functionality was analyzed using predictive software and functional assays for mutations in regulatory regions. The study identified 29 rare variants, 10 of which had not been previously described. Overall, 20 (17.0%) of the patients carried at least one allele with a rare pathogenic variant in LPL, APOA5, LMF1, or GPIHBP1. The presence of a rare pathogenic variant was not associated with increased lipid concentrations, a family history of HTG, clinical diagnosis, or previous pancreatitis. Less than 20% of individuals with triglycerides more than 500 mg/dl and no major secondary cause for HTG may carry a rare pathogenic mutation in LPL, APOA5, LMF1, or GPIHBP1. The results support the concept that most severe HTG result from an interaction of environmental factors with minor risk alleles that have little effect on HTG. Only in a minority of cases, major genetic defects seem involved in triglyceride metabolism. Although it had previously been assumed that only lipid levels more than 1000 mg/dl confer a pancreatitis risk it has recently become evident that even mild serum triglyceride increases the probability of developing pancreatitis [52].
GENETIC TESTING IN CHILDREN
The majority of children with chronic pancreatitis report prior RAP. In comparison with genetic association studies in adults, RAP and chronic pancreatitis in children are more often associated with genetic mutations with reported rates of between 36 and 73%. In a recent article, Grabarczyk et al. analyzed CTRC mutations in a cohort of 136 Polish children. They found 4.6 and 5.3% carriers of p.R254W and p.K247_R254del mutations, respectively, indicating a significantly associated chronic pancreatitis risk in pediatric patients (OR = 19.1 and OR = 5.5) [53]. They also identified 22% homozygous carriers of the p.Gly60Gly variant (OR 23). CTRC variants, including homozygous c.180T-alleles, are strong chronic pancreatitis risk factors in pediatric patients.
A multinational cross-sectional study of children with pancreatitis has been initiated by the INSPPIRE consortium to characterize and identify risk factors associated with RAP and chronic pancreatitis in childhood. A recent report from this study analyzed unique features or disease course differences associated with age at disease onset [54]. Early-onset disease (before the age of 6) was significantly associated with mutations in PRSS1, CTRC, and a family history of acute or chronic pancreatitis. Later onset disease (between 6 and 18 years) was more likely to present with hypertriglyceridemia, ulcerative colitis, autoimmune diseases, or medication use. A total of 71% of patients in the early-onset group were found to carry at least one pancreatitis-associated gene mutation (PRSS1, CFTR, SPINK1, CTRC). On the contrary, CPA1 mutations were not evaluated by Giefer et al., but these mutations had previously been demonstrated by Witt et al. [31] to associate with early onset sporadic chronic pancreatitis. According to limited screening panels, the rate of associated mutations may presently be underestimated in this patient population. A NGS approach was performed by Xiao in a cohort of 69 Chinese children to detect nucleotide variations in PRSS1, SPINK1, CFTR, CTRC, CPA1, calcium-sensing receptor (CASR), cathepsin B (CTSB), keratin 8, CLDN2, and ATPase type 8B member 1 [55■]. They found 65% to carry at least one mutation, but 19% carried more than one mutation. Concurrent mutations were found in carriers of PRSS1 and CFTR or SPINK mutations, two with both CFTR and SPINK1, others with CTSB and CASR. The study by Xiao is one of the most comprehensive genetic testing studies to date which allows the identification of composite risk patterns and may provide insight into still obscure pathomechanisms of pancreatitis. The study also illustrates how difficult the interpretation of composite variant patterns in the absence of comprehensive functional data and corresponding clinical phenotype can be.
The question whether a genetic predisposition exists for the progression from RAP to chronic pancreatitis was analyzed by Palermo et al. [56] in a comprehensive genetic analysis of PRSS1, CFTR, SPINK1, and CTRC in children. A total of 60% of individuals were tested positive for at least one mutation, and CFTR variants were more likely in those with chronic pancreatitis compared with RAP (63 and 24%, P = 0.01). Kumar et al. [57] had reported from the INSPPIRE cohort that RAP was more common in Hispanics, chronic pancreatitis in non-Hispanics. They observed that PRSS1 or SPINK1 mutations were more frequently found in chronic pancreatitis compared with RAP (P < 0.0001 and <0.05, respectively). Whether ethnicity and mutations in CFTR, PRSS1, or SPINK1 genes influence the development of chronic pancreatitis in patients with early onset disease will have to be confirmed in larger studies.
In a Japanese study, Saito et al. recently analyzed mutations in the PRSS1, SPINK1, CTRC, and CPA1 genes in 128 Japanese children with RAP or chronic pancreatitis. A total of 39% had at least one mutation and 30% had a family history of pancreatitis [58]. The study confirms previous observations that carriers of a dominant PRSS1-R122H mutation rarely have other detectable mutations and that the penetrance of this trypsin mutation is not affected by additional SPINK1 mutations [59]. In contrast, 51.6% of carriers of SPINK1, CTRC, or CPA1 mutations were homozygous or heterozygous for a second mutation. Pediatric patients with idiopathic acute recurrent pancreatitis and chronic pancreatitis represent the patient group in which genetic analysis is highly recommended and useful for identifying the cause of pancreatitis.
CONCLUSION
Our current understanding of pancreatic patho-physiology has been dramatically improved by results from genetic association studies and the biochemical analysis of the intrapancreatic trypsin-dependent pathways. PRSS1, SPINK1, and CTRC represent the major risk genes found associated with recurrent and chronic pancreatitis and hereditary pancreatitis diagnostic screening is focused mainly on genes related to trypsin activity, its inhibition and its degradation. Although CFTR has early been recognized as one additional risk gene outside the protease-antiprotease axis, protein misfolding and ER-stress represent another pathogenic concept how genetic mutations may increase the pancreatitis risk. Smoking and alcohol may synergize with the pancreatitis risk of misfolding mutations on the level of ER-stress. A better understanding of its molecular regulation mechanisms will help elucidate the complex interaction of genetic and environmental risk and may provide new therapeutic targets. New technical developments, like massive screening technologies (NGS), will allow the identification of so far unknown or unrelated regulation pathways und further develop our understanding of pancreatic pathophysiology.
KEY POINTS.
To date, most inherited risk factors of pancreatitis involve the digestive protease/antiprotease system.
Genetic mutations that cause protein misfolding can be associated with intracellular retention and induction of ER-Stress.
Genetic and environmental risk factors, including tobacco and alcohol, may synergize on the ER-stress level.
Genome-wide association studies and next-generation sequencing analyses confirm composite risk patterns of pancreatitis and are powerful tools to identify still unknown pathomechanisms of pancreatitis.
Acknowledgements
Work of F.U.W. and M.M.L. are supported by grants from Deutsche Krebshilfe/Dr Mildred-Scheel-Stiftung (109102), the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG GRK 1947/A3), the Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF GANI-MED 03IS2061A, 0314107, 01ZZ9603, 01ZZ0103, 01ZZ0403, 03ZIK012, FKZ: 01EK1511A), the European Union (EU-FP-7: EPC-TM), V-630-S-150-2012/132/133, ESF/14-BM-A55-0045/16, TBI-V-242-VBW-084, and TBI-V-1-245-VBW-085. M.E.S. is supported by NIH/NIDDK T32DK108733.
Footnotes
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
REFERENCES AND RECOMMENDED READING
Papers of particular interest, published within the annual period of review, have been highlighted as:
■ of special interest
■■ of outstanding interest
- 1.Hernández CA, Lerch MM. Sphincter stenosis and gallstone migration through the biliary tract. Lancet 1993; 341:1371–1373. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Lowenfels AB, Maisonneuve P, Whitcomb DC, et al. Cigarette smoking as a risk factor for pancreatic cancer in patients with hereditary pancreatitis. JAMA 2001; 286:169–170. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Nitsche C, Maertin S, Scheiber J, et al. Drug-induced pancreatitis. Curr Gastroenterol Rep 2012; 14:131–138. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Weidenbach H, Lerch MM, Gress TM, et al. Vasoactive mediators and the progression from oedematous to necrotising experimental acute pancreatitis. Gut 1995; 37:434–440. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Löhr JM, Faissner R, Koczan D, et al. Autoantibodies against the exocrine pancreas in autoimmune pancreatitis: gene and protein expression profiling and immunoassays identify pancreatic enzymes as a major target of the inflammatory process. Am J Gastroenterol 2010; 105:2060–2071. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Pickartz T, Mayerle J, Lerch MM. Autoimmune pancreatitis. Nat Clin Pract Gastroenterol Hepatol 2007; 4:314–323. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Lerch MM, Saluja AK, Dawra R, et al. The effect of chloroquine administration on two experimental models of acute pancreatitis. Gastroenterology 1993; 104:1768–1779. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Hirano T, Saluja A, Ramarao P, et al. Apical secretion of lysosomal enzymes in rabbit pancreas occurs via a secretagogue regulated pathway and is increased after pancreatic duct obstruction. J Clin Invest 1991; 87:865–869. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Halangk W, Krüger B, Ruthenbürger M, et al. Trypsin activity is not involved in premature, intrapancreatic trypsinogen activation. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2002; 282:G367–G374. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Sah RP, Dudeja V, Dawra RK, Saluja AK. Cerulein-induced chronic pancreatitis does not require intra-acinar activation of trypsinogen in mice. Gastroenterology 2013; 144:1076–1085.e2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Mayerle J, Schnekenburger J, Krüger B, et al. Extracellular cleavage of E-cadherin by leukocyte elastase during acute experimental pancreatitis in rats. Gastroenterology 2005; 129:1251–1267. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Sendler M, Dummer A, Weiss FU, et al. Tumour necrosis factor alpha secretion induces protease activation and acinar cell necrosis in acute experimental pancreatitis in mice. Gut 2013; 62:430–439. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Dawra R, Sah RP, Dudeja V, et al. Intra-acinar trypsinogen activation mediates early stages of pancreatic injury but not inflammation in mice with acute pancreatitis. Gastroenterology 2011; 141:2210–2217.e2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Sendler M, Weiss FU, Golchert J, et al. Cathepsin B-mediated activation of trypsinogen in endocytosing macrophages increases severity of pancreatitis in mice. Gastroenterology 2018; 154:704–718.e10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Whitcomb DC, Gorry MC, Preston RA, et al. Hereditary pancreatitis is caused by a mutation in the cationic trypsinogen gene. Nat Genet 1996; 14:141–145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Hegyi E, Sahin-Tóth M. Genetic risk in chronic pancreatitis: the trypsin-dependent pathway. Dig Dis Sci 2017; 62:1692–1701. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Szmola R, Sahin-Tóth M. Chymotrypsin C (caldecrin) promotes degradation of human cationic trypsin: identity with Rinderknecht’s enzyme Y. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2007; 104:11227–11232. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Rosendahl J, Witt H, Szmola R, et al. Chymotrypsin C (CTRC) variants that diminish activity or secretion are associated with chronic pancreatitis. Nat Genet 2008; 40:78–82. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Masson E, Chen JM, Scotet V, et al. Association of rare chymotrypsinogen C (CTRC) gene variations in patients with idiopathic chronic pancreatitis. Hum Genet 2008; 123:83–91. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.LaRusch J, Lozano-Leon A, Stello K, et al. The common chymotrypsinogen C (CTRC) variant G60G (C.180T) increases risk of chronic pancreatitis but not recurrent acute pancreatitis in a North American population. Clin Transl Gastroenterol 2015; 6:e68. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Aoun E, Chang CC, Greer JB, et al. Pathways to injury in chronic pancreatitis: decoding the role of the high-risk SPINK1 N34S haplotype using meta-analysis. PLoS One 2008; 3:e2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.■.Boulling A, Masson E, Zou WB, et al. Identification of a functional enhancer variant within the chronic pancreatitis-associated SPINK1 c.101A>G (p.Asn34Ser)-containing haplotype. Hum Mutat 2017; 38:1014–1024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; The study identified in a French cohort a SNP in linkage disequilibrium with the p.N34S mutation which disrupts a PTF1L-binding site located ~4-kb upstream of the serine protease inhibitor Kazal type 1 promoter. However, linkage disequilibrium was incomplete in Asian repetition cohorts.
- 23.Kereszturi E, Király O, Sahin-Tóth M. Minigene analysis of intronic variants in common SPINK1 haplotypes associated with chronic pancreatitis. Gut 2009; 58:545–549. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Sharer N, Schwarz M, Malone G, et al. Mutations of the cystic fibrosis gene in patients with chronic pancreatitis. N Engl J Med 1998; 339:645–652. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Cohn JA, Friedman KJ, Noone PG, et al. Relation between mutations of the cystic fibrosis gene and idiopathic pancreatitis. N Engl J Med 1998; 339:653–658. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Weiss FU, Simon P, Bogdanova N, et al. Complete cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator gene sequencing in patients with idiopathic chronic pancreatitis and controls. Gut 2005; 54:1456–1460. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Lee MG, Ohana E, Park HW, et al. Molecular mechanism of pancreatic and salivary gland fluid and HCO3 secretion. Physiol Rev 2012; 92:39–74. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.LaRusch J, Jung J, General IJ, et al. Mechanisms of CFTR functional variants that impair regulated bicarbonate permeation and increase risk for pancreatitis but not for cystic fibrosis. PLoS Genet 2014; 10:e1004376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.■■.Sahin-Tóth M Genetic risk in chronic pancreatitis: the misfolding-dependent pathway. Curr Opin Gastroenterol 2017; 33:390–395. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; A comprehensive review about genetic mutations causing protein misfolding and how they may contribute to the development of pancreatitis.
- 30.Balázs A, Hegyi P, Sahin-Tóth M. Pathogenic cellular role of the p.L104P human cationic trypsinogen variant in chronic pancreatitis. Am J Physiol Gastrointest Liver Physiol 2016; 310:G477–G486. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Witt H, Beer S, Rosendahl J, et al. Variants in CPA1 are strongly associated with early onset chronic pancreatitis. Nat Genet 2013; 45:1216–1220. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Fjeld K, Weiss FU, Lasher D, et al. A recombined allele of the lipase gene CEL and its pseudogene CELP confers susceptibility to chronic pancreatitis. Nat Genet 2015; 47:518–522. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Zou WB, Boulling A, Masamune A, et al. No association between CEL-HYB hybrid allele and chronic pancreatitis in Asian populations. Gastroenterology 2016; 150:1558–1560.e5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.■.Molven A, Fjeld K, Lowe ME. Lipase genetic variants in chronic pancreatitis: when the end is wrong, all’s not well. Gastroenterology 2016; 150: 1515–1518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; A review how mutations affecting the CEL C-terminus are responsible for cellular retention, the induction of endoplasmic reticulum stress and the specific disease risk for maturity-onset diabetes of the young 8 or chronic pancreatitis.
- 35.Lugea A, Gerloff A, Su HY, et al. The combination of alcohol and cigarette smoke induces endoplasmic reticulum stress and cell death in pancreatic acinar cells. Gastroenterology 2017; 153:1674–1686. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Liu JZ, van Sommeren S, Huang H, et al. Association analyses identify 38 susceptibility loci for inflammatory bowel disease and highlight shared genetic risk across populations. Nat Genet 2015; 47:979–986. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Mayerle J, den Hoed CM, Schurmann C, et al. Identification of genetic loci associated with helicobacter pylori serologic status. JAMA 2013; 309: 1912–1920. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Whitcomb DC, LaRusch J, Krasinskas AM, et al. Common genetic variants in the CLDN2 and PRSS1-PRSS2 loci alter risk for alcohol-related and sporadic pancreatitis. Nat Genet 2012; 44:1349–1354. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Derikx MH, Kovacs P, Scholz M, et al. Polymorphisms at PRSS1-PRSS2 and CLDN2-MORC4 loci associate with alcoholic and nonalcoholic chronic pancreatitis in a European replication study. Gut 2016; 64: 1426–1433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Masamune A, Nakano E, Hamada S, et al. Common variants at PRSS1-PRSS2 and CLDN2-MORC4 loci associate with chronic pancreatitis in Japan. Gut 2015; 64:1345–1346. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Paliwal S, Bhaskar S, Nageshwar Reddy D, et al. Association Analysis of PRSS1-PRSS2 and CLDN2-MORC4 Variants in Nonalcoholic Chronic Pancreatitis Using Tropical Calcific Pancreatitis as Model. Pancreas 2016; 45:1153–1157. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Giri AK, Midha S, Banerjee P, et al. Common variants in CLDN2 and MORC4 genes confer disease susceptibility in patients with chronic pancreatitis. PLoS One 2016; 11:e0147345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.■■.Rosendahl J, Kirsten H, Hegyi E, et al. Genome-wide association study identifies inversion in the. Gut 2017; 1–9; doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2017-314454. [Epub ahead of print] [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; The important genome-wide association study identified CTRB1-CTRB2 as a new risk locus for pancreatitis and elucidated the underlying molecular disease mechanism.
- 44.Weiss FU, Schurmann C, Guenther A, et al. Fucosyltransferase 2 (FUT2) nonsecretor status and blood group B are associated with elevated serum lipase activity in asymptomatic subjects, and an increased risk for chronic pancreatitis: a genetic association study. Gut 2015; 64: 646–656. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Greer JB, LaRusch J, Brand RE, et al. ABO blood group and chronic pancreatitis risk in the NAPS2 cohort. Pancreas 2011; 40:1188–1194. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Kirsten H, Scholz M, Kovacs P, et al. Genetic variants of lipase activity in chronic pancreatitis. Gut 2016; 65:184–185. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Weiss FU, Schurmann C, Teumer A, et al. ABO blood type B and fucosyltransferase 2 nonsecretor status as genetic risk factors for chronic pancreatitis. Gut 2016; 65:353–373. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Amundadottir L, Kraft P, Stolzenberg-Solomon RZ, et al. Genome-wide association study identifies variants in the ABO locus associated with susceptibility to pancreatic cancer. Nat Genet 2009; 41:986–990. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Teich N, Bokemeyer B, Mohl W, et al. Blood group B is associated with azathioprine-induced acute pancreatitis in patients with IBD. Gut 2017; 66:1531–1532. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.■.Chen WJ, Sun XF, Zhang RX, et al. Hypertriglyceridemic acute pancreatitis in emergency department: typical clinical features and genetic variants. J Dig Dis 2017; 18:359–368. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; The study identifies several mutations in lipid metabolism genes in pancreatitis patients with previously unrecognized inherited lipid disorders.
- 51.De Castro-Orós I, Civeira F, Pueyo MJ, et al. Rare genetic variants with large effect on triglycerides in subjects with a clinical diagnosis of familial vs nonfamilial hypertriglyceridemia. J Clin Lipidol 2016; 10:790–797. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Pedersen SB, Langsted A, Nordestgaard BG. Nonfasting mild-to-moderate hypertriglyceridemia and risk of acute pancreatitis. JAMA Intern Med 2016; 176:1834–1842. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Grabarczyk AM, Oracz G, Wertheim-Tysarowska K, et al. Chymotrypsinogen C genetic variants, including c.180TT, are strongly associated with chronic pancreatitis in pediatric patients. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2017; 65:652–657. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Giefer MJ, Lowe ME, Werlin SL, et al. Early-onset acute recurrent and chronic pancreatitis is associated with PRSS1 or CTRC gene mutations. J Pediatr 2017; 186:95–100. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.■.Xiao Y, Yuan W, Yu B, et al. Targeted gene next-generation sequencing in Chinese children with chronic pancreatitis and acute recurrent pancreatitis. J Pediatr 2017; 191:158–163.e3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; This is one of the most comprehensive next-generation sequencing studies for known pancreatitis risk genes in children to date.
- 56.Palermo JJ, Lin TK, Hornung L, et al. Genophenotypic analysis of pediatric patients with acute recurrent and chronic pancreatitis. Pancreas 2016; 45:1347–1352. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Kumar S, Ooi CY, Werlin S, et al. Risk factors associated with pediatric acute recurrent and chronic pancreatitis: lessons from INSPPIRE. JAMA Pediatr 2016; 170:562–569. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Saito N, Suzuki M, Sakurai Y, et al. Genetic analysis of Japanese children with acute recurrent and chronic pancreatitis. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2016; 63:431–436. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Weiss FU, Simon P, Witt H, et al. SPINK1 mutations and phenotypic expression in patients with pancreatitis associated with trypsinogen mutations. J Med Genet 2003; 40:e40. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]