Skip to main content
Turkish Journal of Orthodontics logoLink to Turkish Journal of Orthodontics
. 2022 Sep 1;35(3):157–165. doi: 10.5152/TurkJOrthod.2022.21142

Nickel Release and the Viability of Streptococcus mutans Corresponding to Low Risk of Dental Caries in Artificial Saliva Containing Orthodontic Appliances: In Vitro Study

Serap Titiz 1, Zalike Keskin Erdoğan 2, Elif Esin Hames Tuna 3, Aynur Aras 4
PMCID: PMC9623342  PMID: 36155399

Abstract

Objective:

The aims of this study were to determine the effect of different levels of Streptococcus mutans that correspond to a low risk of dental caries on nickel release and to determine the viability of S. mutans.

Methods:

Simulated fixed orthodontic appliances composed of copper nickel titanium, nickel titanium, or stainless steel were immersed in Klimek artificial saliva for 10 days with or without S. mutans inoculation on day 7. Same levels of S. mutans cultures (4 × 104 cfu/mL) were inoculated into the artificial saliva without orthodontic appliances. Nickel release was detected by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. The archwire surface was analyzed by atomic force microscopy and scanning electron microscopy.

Results:

The density of S. mutans significantly increased in the artificial saliva without orthodontic appliances (P < .05). Appliances with nickel titanium alloys showed higher nickel release in the artificial saliva with or without S. mutans than those with copper nickel titanium or stainless steel archwires (P < .05). However, S. mutans increased nickel release only in orthodontic appliances with stainless steel archwires (P < .05). Although atomic force microscopy showed that the surface of as-received stainless steel archwires was smoother than that of nickel titanium or nickel titanium archwires, S. mutans increased the surface roughness of only the SS archwires. S. mutans adhered to all archwire types.

Conclusion:

While corrosion or corrosion-related processes may have decreased the growth capacity of S. mutans, reciprocally, S. mutans influenced corrosion. Rough surfaces can also promote corrosion; therefore, the surface roughness of metal alloy orthodontic appliances should be evaluated to determine their corrosion behavior.

Keywords: Corrosion, dental caries, nickel release, orthodontic appliance, risk, Streptococcus mutans


Main Points

  • Corrosion is an inevitable natural process in fixed orthodontic appliances.

  • The observed decrease in the growth of Streptococcus mutans was likely caused by corrosion or a related process.

  • Even a low level of S. mutans represents a corrosion-promoting factor for stainless steel-based materials.

  • The corrosion behavior and biocompatibility of the studied alloys might depend on their surface roughness.

Introduction

Metals or metal alloys are corroded due to oxidation or other chemical effects, and ions are released into the environment as a result. Metals become corroded in the oral environment within 7 days, after which corrosion decreases, and then stops.1,2 This process is induced by the development of new corrosion factors. The cycle will continue depending on the microbiological, enzymatic, ionic, and thermal properties in the oral environment and can cause the metal to corrode and degrade biologically. Therefore, corrosion is an inevitable natural process in fixed orthodontic appliances. Most orthodontic treatments are implemented using fixed devices such as brackets, tubes or bands, and wires made of metal alloys. Nickel (Ni) and chromium (Cr) are the primary ions released from these alloys. Ni and Cr are post-corrosion products that can have genotoxic, mutagenic, and cytotoxic effects that could cause contact allergies, asthma, hypersensitivity, birth defects, and reproductive damage.3,4 Thus, the biocompatibility of the materials utilized in orthodontic treatments is of importance.

Streptococcus mutans is a gram-positive, facultative anaerobic bacterium found mostly in the human oral cavity and is involved in the formation of dental caries. Hence, S. mutans is graded according to the colony-forming units per milliliter (cfu/mL) in the mouth. The risk of caries is graded as high (≥106 cfu/mL), moderate (105-<106 cfu/mL), and low (≤105).5 Orthodontic treatments should be implemented after the completion of all essential dental and periodontal therapies. Difficulties with brushing the teeth and an increase in areas of retention during fixed orthodontic treatment might increase the density of S. mutans, thereby increasing the risk of caries. However, it is unlikely for patients with good oral hygiene to have a high density of S. mutans during orthodontic treatment. Studies have reported that the corrosion of alloys such as cobalt (Co), Cr and nickel-chromium (Ni/Cr), and titanium (Ti) dental implants increases in the presence of S. mutans, which increases the risk of caries.6-10 However, to the best of our knowledge, the in vitro corrosion behavior of alloys under a low risk of caries has not yet been investigated. The corrosion process during orthodontic treatment in a mouth with a relatively low risk of dental caries could inhibit the growth of S. mutans. Thus, in the present study, the primary objective was to determine the amount of Ni released by simulated orthodontic appliances with different types of archwires in vitro in the presence of S. mutans at levels that correspond to a low risk of caries and the secondary objective was to determine the growth ability of S. mutans in a corrosive environment.

Methods

This was an in vitro study. Fixed orthodontic appliances representing half of the maxillary arch consisted of 5 structurally identical brackets, a molar band, and 6-cm-long copper-nickel-titanium (CuNiTi), nickel-titanium (NiTi), or stainless steel (SS) archwires tied with elastic ligatures (Astar Orthodontics Inc., Shanghai, China). Klimek artificial saliva comprising ascorbic acid (0.002 g), glucose (0.030 g), NaCl (0.580 g), CaCl2 (0.170 g), NH4Cl (0.160 g), KCl (1.270 g), NaSCN (0.160 g), KH2PO4 (0.330 g), urea (0.200 g), Na2HPO4 (0.340 g), and mucin (2.700 g) (Bacto-Mucin Bacteriological) in 1 L of distilled water (pH 6.75) was prepared.11 In this study, there was 1 experimental group (EG) and 2 control groups (CG 1 and CG 2). The EG and CG 1 groups were subgrouped according to appliances with CuNiTi (group A), NiTi (group B), and SS (group C) archwires. All EG and CG 1 subgroups consisted of 3 replicates. All simulated fixed orthodontic appliances were immersed in 50 mL of Klimek artificial saliva. The artificial saliva in the EG (3 appliances each in group A [C], group B [C], and group C [C]) groups was inoculated with 100 µL of S. mutans (ATCC 25175; 4 × 104 cfu/mL) on day 7 of the experiment. The other half of the simulated fixed orthodontic appliances (3 appliances each in group A [C], group B [C], and group C [C]) remained submerged in the Klimek artificial saliva until day 10 without S. mutans inoculation in CG 1. The CG 2 group comprised 9 replicates; Klimek artificial saliva (without appliances) was inoculated with the same level of S. mutans under identical conditions. The samples were incubated at 37°C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere for 72 h, following which S. mutans was evaluated (cfu/mL) using the spread plate technique. The initial and final pH values of Klimek artificial saliva were measured at room temperature using an HI-1131B pH meter (Hanna Instruments Inc., Carrollton, Tex, USA). The experimental setups and sample preparation for inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) were made by S. Titiz, Z.K. Erdogan. Figure 1 shows a brief schema of the experiment.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Schema of experimental setup. Subgroups of the experimental group: appliances with archwires containing CuNiTi (group A [E]), NiTi (group B ([E]), and SS (group C [E]). Subgroups of control group 1: appliances with archwires containing CuNiTi (group A [C]), NiTi (group B [C]), and SS (group C [C]). Control group 2: artificial saliva with Streptococcus mutans inoculation

Detection of Nickel Release by Inductively Coupled Plasma Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS)

The amount of Ni released into Klimek artificial saliva was evaluated using an ELAN DRC-eICP-mass spectrometer (Perkin Elmer, Norwalk, CT, USA). Samples were placed in a 40-kHz ultrasonic water bath (ISOLAB Laborgeräte GmbH., Wertheim, Germany) for 30 min, centrifuged at 7000 rpm (Optima™ X Series centrifuge; Beckman Coulter, Brea, Calif, USA), and then passed through a 0.45-mm Millex® Syringe filter (Sigma-Aldrich Corp., St. Louis, Mo, USA). Samples of homogenized artificial saliva (500-600 μL) were weighed, immersed in 10 mL of 65% nitric acid (Sigma-Aldrich Corp.) to breakdown organic compounds, and placed in a microwave oven (1600 W, 100% power at 30° and 160 mmHg). The samples were then placed in an oven for measurement, with 50 mL of ultrapure water.

Characterization of Surface Topography

The average roughness (Ra) of the as-received and post-immersion archwires and their surface morphologies were assessed in the EG and CG 1 groups by atomic force microscopy (AFM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (Gemini SEM 300; Carl Zeiss AG., Oberkochen, Germany). Microorganisms were fixed by dehydrating the wires in a graded series of alcohol (50%, 70%, 85%, 90%, and 100%) and immersed in 10% (v/v) glutaraldehyde.

Statistical Analysis

Data are shown as number, mean, and standard deviation. Normal distribution was assessed using Shapiro−Wilk test, and variance homogeneity was evaluated using Levene test. The average Ni oscillation between independent groups satisfying the assumptions was compared using an independent samples t-test. The averages of 3 or more independent groups were compared using the one-way ANOVA if they met the assumed criteria and those of 3 independent groups that did not meet the assumption criteria were compared using Kruskal−Wallis test. Groups with differences were assessed with Bonferroni correction. Differences with a P -value < .05 were considered significant.

Results

Findings of ICP-MS

Table 1 and Figure 2a and b show a comparison of Ni-release in EG and CG1. More Ni was released by appliances with NiTi (group B) than with CuNiTi or SS archwires (group A or group C) in CG 1 and EG (P < .05). The amount of Ni released from appliances with SS and CuNiTi archwires was similar in CG 1 (P > .05), whereas more Ni was released from appliances with SS archwires in EG than from appliances with CuNiTi archwires (P < .05). Nickel release between the subgroups of CG 1 and EG was evaluated; it was found that the amount of Ni released between Groups CC and CE significantly differed (P < .05). Furthermore, S. mutans increased the rate of Ni-release from appliances with SS archwires (group C, P < .05) but did not significantly affect that from appliances with CuNiTi or NiTi archwires (group A or B; P > .05; Table 1, Figure 2b).

Table 1.

Comparison of the amounts of nickel released between the experimental groups and control group 1

Group A
Mean ± SD
Group B
Mean ± SD
Group C
Mean ± SD

P
A/B
P
B/C
P
A/C
P
CG1 42.52 ±
4.33
68.341 ±
2.657
37.97 ±
2.27
.0001* .0001* .000* .65
EG 37.40 ±
4.28
72.307 ±
5.31
52.45 ±
4.23
.000* <.0001 .006* .022*
P .219
.312
.006*

*Significant difference at P < .05. CG1, control group 1; EG, experimental group; SD, standard deviation. Appliances with CuNiTi archwires, group A (A); appliances with NiTi archwires, group B (B); appliances with SS archwires, group C (C).

Figure 2. a, b.

Figure 2. a, b.

Nickel release in groups and subgroups. (a) Amount of Ni released in subgroups AC, BC, and CC of control group 1, and AE, BE, and CE of experimental group. Appliances with archwires containing CuNiTi (group A), NiTi (group B), and SS (group C). (b) Amount of Ni released by the control group 1 and experimental group subgroups. a and b indicate statistically significant differences (P < .05) between each measurement item compared

Characterization of Surface Topography

Table 2 and Figure 3 show the comparisons of the Ra values of archwires as-received and after immersion in the EG and CG 1 groups. The surface roughness of CuNiTi and NiTi archwires as-received and after immersion in artificial saliva medium with or without S. mutans was similar (P > .05), and their Ra values were higher than those of SS archwires (P < .05). The surface roughness of the CuNiTi and NiTi archwires did not change in the artificial saliva with and without S. mutans in the EG and CG 1 groups (P > .05). The surface roughness of the SS archwires increased in artificial saliva with S. mutans in CG 1 (P < .05), and the Ra values of SS archwires in the EG group were higher than those of as-recieved and SS archwires in the CG 1 group (P < .05). The AFM findings were consistent with the surface structures visualized by SEM (Figures 46).

Table 2.

Comparison of the Ra values between as-received archwires and those in the experimental groups and control group 1

CuNiTi (A)
Mean ± SD
NiTi (B)
Mean ± SD
SS (C)
Mean ±SD

P
A/B
P
B/C
P
A/C
P
As-r 79.28 ± 1.00 78.18 ± 2.00 40.05 ± 1.00 .000* 1.000 .000* .000*
CG1 80.66 ± 2.51 81.16 ± 1.00 41.66 ± 1.52 .000* 1.000 .000* .000*
EG 81.00 ± 1.00 78.66 ± 2.77 60.04 ± 1.00 .027* .534 .025* .027*
P .354 .082 .000*
As-r/CG1 0.352
As-r/EG 0.000*
CG1/EG 0.000*

*Significant difference at P < .05. As-r, as-received; CG1, control group 1; EG, experimental group; SD, standard deviation. Appliances with CuNiTi archwires, group A (A); appliances with NiTi archwires, group B (B); appliances with SS archwires, group C (C). Paired comparisons were not performed when P (ANOVA) was not significant.

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

Comparison of the Ra values of archwires as-received and after immersion. Control group 1 (C) and experimental group (E). The first column shows the archwire type. a and b indicate statistically significant differences (P < .05) between each compared measurement item

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Scanning electron microscopy images of as-received archwires. Subgroups: CuNiTi (a, b), NiTi (c, d), and SS (e, f). Magnification: 1.00 KX (a, c, e) and 5.00 KX (b, d, f)

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

Scanning electron microscopy images of archwires in the control group 1 subgroups. Subgroups: CuNiTi (a, b), NiTi (c, d), and SS (e, f) archwires. Magnification: 1.00 KX (a, c, e) and 5.00 KX (b, d, f).

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

Scanning electron microscopy images of archwires with adherent Streptococcus mutans. S. mutans adhered to all types of archwires in the experimental group subgroups. Subgroups: CuNiTi (a, b), NiTi (c, d), and SS (e, f) archwires. Magnification: of 1.00 KX (a, c, e) and 5.00 KX (b ,d, f)

Streptococcus Mutans Cell Viability

S. mutans proliferated more in artificial saliva in the absence of appliances in the CG 2 group compared with that in the EG group (P < .05), whereas the EG subgroups did not significantly differ (P > .05; Tables 3 and 4 and Figure 7). The SEM images revealed S. mutans adhesion to all types of archwires (Figure 6). The presence of S. mutans decreased the pH in the CG 2 group (pH 4.95-4.93), but it did not affect the pH of the EG subgroups (pH 6.75-6.73).

Table 3.

Comparison of the counts of Streptococcus mutans in control group 2 and subgroups of the experimental group

Initial CG2 Group AE Group BE Group CE I/CG2
P
CG2/A
P
CG2/B
P
CG2/C
P
cfu/mL 104 106 ± 5.1 × 102 5 × 104 ± 5.19 × 102
5.3 × 104 ± 1.1 × 102 11 × 104 ± 8 × 102 .00* .00* .00* .00*

*Significant difference at P < .05. CG 2, control group 2; E, experimental; I, initial density of inoculated Streptococcus mutans cells. Appliances with CuNiTi archwires, group A; appliances with NiTi archwires, group B; appliances with SS archwires, group C.

Table 4.

Comparison of the counts of S. mutans

Groups P
Initial/group AE 1
Initial/group BE 1
Initial/group CE 0.78
Group AE/group BE 1 1
Group BE/group CE 1 1
Group AE/group CE 1 1

Significant difference at P<0.05. I, initial density of inoculated S. mutans; E: Experimental. Appliances with CuNiTi archwires, Group A; appliances with NiTi archwires, Group B; appliances with SS archwires, Group C.

Figure 7.

Figure 7.

Density of Streptococcus mutans in control group 2 and the experimental group subgroups AE, BE, and CE. I, original density of inoculated S. mutans cells

Discussion

Non-optimal conditions in the oral cavity can accelerate corrosion; thus, understanding the corrosion behavior of metals is important to evaluate their biocompatibility. Metal (Ni, Fe, Cu, and Ti) ions released into the environment as a result of corrosion might cause local or systemic adverse reactions in some patients.4 One of the most prevalent local reactions is sensitivity to Ni, which exerts systemic cytotoxic and mutagenic effects3; however, it is widely applied in dentistry. Thus, Ni-release from orthodontic appliances with NiTi, CuNiTi, or SS archwires was investigated in the presence of S. mutans. The corrosive behavior of metals or alloys is determined by estimating the number of ions passing into their liquid environment (immersion tests) or is determined electrochemically. However, electrochemically evaluating the corrosion behavior of metals can lead to significantly different results from those obtained in the oral environment.12 Therefore, the corrosive behavior of metals was determined using immersion tests. In this study, simulated orthodontic appliances composed of 5 structurally identical SS brackets and bands, elastic ligatures, and 3 types of orthodontic wires. The difference in corrosive behavior in the EG and CG 1 subgroups can be attributed to the types of orthodontic wires. Ions passing into artificial saliva can be measured in immersion tests using various devices. Hwang et al.1 and Kuhta et al.13 determined the number of corrosion products by ICP/MS as in our study. However, Barret et al.2 and Reddy14 determined the number of ions by ICP-optical emission spectroscopy (OES). While ICP-OES is widely available and reasonably cost-effective, ICP-MS requires experienced staff and is expensive; furthermore, ICP-MS is more sensitive than ICP-OES. However, both devices are used in corrosion studies with the appropriate sample preparation protocol.1,2,8,13,14

In our study, more Ni was released by orthodontic appliances with NiTi than with SS or CuNiTi archwires in the absence of S. mutans; this finding is consistent with that of Barrett et al.2 However, some study findings are controversial. Contrary to the findings of Barrett et al., Karnam and Reddy14 found no differences in the Ni-release rates of orthodontic appliances with SS, NiTi, CuNiTi or Elgiloy® archwires, and SS brackets. Moreover, Hwang et al.1 reported that more Ni ion was released by SS than by CuNiTi or Sent alloy® and BioForce® archwires, and Kuhta et al.13 found that SS archwires released the most Ni ions at pH 3.5 and 6.8 compared with thermal NiTi and NiTi archwires. The surface topography of an alloy is related to corrosion behavior.15,16 In the present study, the surface roughness of the archwires was examined. Based on the findings of previous studies,17,18 as well as our AFM and SEM findings, the surface of NiTi archwires is rougher than that of SS archwires. Increased surface roughness should be considered as a contributing factor to the corrosive behavior of orthodontic archwires by facilitating and increasing ion release.19,20 Thus, it was considered that increased Ni-release from appliances with NiTi compared with that from appliances with SS archwires was associated with the rougher surface of NiTi than that of SS archwires.

The passive protective oxide layer on the surface of a metal or alloy provides resistance to corrosion and self-repair. Protective layers comprise Cr2O3 oxide on SS archwires and TiO2 oxide on archwires that contain Ti. In alloys containing Ti, the layer of Ti-oxide is stronger than that of Cr-oxide, thus increasing corrosion resistance.21 However, other factors may increase the corrosion rate of Ti-containing alloys. Alloys containing Ti have rougher surfaces than SS archwires, which can lead to the galvanic corrosion of these alloys.22,23 Moreover, manufacturing defects in NiTi wires can be another factor that increase corrosion due to the rougher texture.22 As many factors lead to corrosion, it was considered that various brands of alloys are produced using different methods or that differences in the surface topography of alloys and study designs may have led to contradictory results.

The corrosion current of NiTi archwires is higher than that of SS wires in electrochemical tests involving oral bacteria.6,24,25 Kameda et al.8 used ICP-OES to investigate the corrosive behavior of orthodontic appliances with SS and NiTi archwires in a high-risk caries environment inoculated with S. mutans and Streptococcus sanguinis. They reported that the surface of the SS appliances became rougher, and their ICP-OES results showed that Ni is released from SS, but not from Ni-Ti appliances, when cultured with oral bacteria. Similar to the findings of Kameda et al.8 in this study, it was observed that S. mutans increased the surface roughness of SS archwires and caused Ni-release from orthodontic appliances with SS archwires. However, less Ni was released from orthodontic appliances with SS than from those with NiTi, probably due to the low abundance of S. mutans.

Biofilms produced on metal surfaces by S. mutans can lead to a localized acidic environment that promotes corrosion; therefore, the pH in an environment might not always reflect local pH changes.8 In this study, a slight infection with S. mutans did not change the pH of artificial saliva with immersed appliances. Thus, the effects of S. mutans could be ascribed to localized changes in pH, and archwires made of SS might be more sensitive to the changes in localized pH than those made of NiTi. Our findings also suggest that while oral bacteria affect the corrosion of SS appliances, galvanic corrosion might occur primarily in Ni-Ti appliances.22-23 Moreover, adding Cu to NiTi archwires increases the biocompatibility of NiTi archwires.26 In the present study, it is found that CuNiTi wires released less Ni than NiTi wires in the artificial saliva with or without S. mutans although the Ra values of CuNiTi and NiTi archwires were similar.

An investigation of the effects of 16 pure metals on S. mutans growth in vitro showed that the corrosion process significantly depends on bacteriostasis27 and that Co, CuNi, Ti, Fe, and vanadium inhibit the growth of the organism. Our findings of the effects of orthodontic alloys on the growth of S. mutans in artificial saliva in vitro were comparable with these results. Furthermore, it was found that S. mutans did not grow in the presence of corrosion.

Bacteria preferentially colonize rough surfaces over smooth surfaces.28 The degree of surface roughness does not significantly affect bacterial adhesion after 6 hours of incubation with microorganisms.29,30 Our SEM images were acquired after incubating the 3 types of archwire types with S. mutans for 3 days. Therefore, the rates of adhesion were similar even when the surface roughness of the archwires differed.

Many factors can affect corrosion, such as microbiological, enzymatic, ionic, and thermal properties in the oral environment. It is not possible to simulate the exact oral environment in vitro. However, it is important to determine the effect of the factors individually in an environment where many variables are present at the same time in order to understand the corrosion mechanism. For this reason, in vitro study is important. In this study, the density of S. mutans in an individual with good oral hygiene was considered. In order to understand the interaction between S. mutans and corrosion in a broader context, the effect of S. mutans on corrosion at different pH and different concentrations should be investigated.

Conclusion

The relationship between corrosion product formation and S. mutans is reciprocal, as corrosion inhibited the growth of S. mutans in Klimek artificial saliva. Even at a low density of S. mutans, Ni-release increased in appliances with SS archwires, indicating that S. mutans promotes corrosion. As rough surfaces can also promote corrosion, surface properties should be considered when evaluating the corrosion properties of any metal alloy.

Footnotes

Ethics Committee Approval: Ethical approval is not applicable because this article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects.

Informed Consent: Informed Consent is not applicable because this article does not contain any studies with human subjects.

Peer-review: Externally peer-reviewed.

Author Contributions: Concept - S.T.; Design - S.T.; Supervision - E.E.H.H.; Data Collection and/or Processing - S.T., Z.K.S; Analysis and/or Interpretation - S.T., Z.K.S.; Literature Review - S.T.; Writing - S.T.; A.A.; Critical Review - A.A.

Acknowledgments: The authors thank Wolters Kluwer Editage for their assistance with English language editing.

Declaration of Interests: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Funding: This study was partially supported by the Scientific Research Coordinatorship of Ege University (Reg. Number: 2750562).

References

  • 1. Hwang CJ, Shin JS, Cha JY. Metal release from simulated fixed orthodontic appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2001;120(4):383 391. 10.1067/mod.2001.117911) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2. Barrett RD, Bishara SE, Quinn JK. Biodegradation of orthodontic appliances. Part I. Biodegradation of nickel and chromium in vitro. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1993;103(1):8 14. 10.1016/0889-5406(93)70098-9) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3. Genelhu MCLS, Marigo M, Alves-Oliveira LF, Malaquias LCC, Gomez RS. Characterization of nickel-induced allergic contact stomatitis associated with fixed orthodontic appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005;128(3):378 381. 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.03.002) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4. Mikulewicz M, Chojnacka K. Trace metal release from orthodontic appliances by in vivo studies: a systematic literature review. Biol Trace Elem Res. 2010;137(2):127 138. 10.1007/s12011-009-8576-6) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5. Garg A, Madan M, Dua P.et al. Validating the usage of Cariogram in 5-and 12-year-old school-going children in paonta sahib, Himachal Pradesh, India: a 12-month prospective study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2018;11(2):110-115. 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1495) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6. Chang JC, Oshida Y, Richard GL, Andres CJ, Barco TM, Brown DT. Electrochemical study on microbiology-related corrosion of metallic dental materials. Bio Med Mater Eng. 2003;13:281 295. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7. Souza JC, Ponthiaux P, Henriques M.et al. Corrosion behaviour of titanium in the presence of Streptococcus mutans. J Dent. 2013;41(6):528 534. 10.1016/j.jdent.2013.03.008) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8. Kameda T, Oda H, Ohkuma K.et al. Microbiologically influenced corrosion of orthodontic metallic appliances. Dent Mater J. 2014;33(2):187 195. 10.4012/dmj.2013-297) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9. Zhang S, Qiu J, Ren Y, Yu W, Zhang F, Liu X. Reciprocal interaction between dental alloy biocorrosion and Streptococcus mutans virulent gene expression. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 2016;27(4):78. 10.1007/s10856-015-5645-6) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10. Lu C, Zheng Y, Zhong Q. Corrosion of dental alloys in artificial saliva with Streptococcus mutans . PLoS ONE. 2017;12(3):e0174440. 10.1371/journal.pone.0174440) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11. Souza BMD, Fernandes Neto C, Salomão PMA, Vasconcelos LRSMD, Andrade FBD, Magalhães AC. Analysis of the antimicrobial and anti-caries effects of TiF4 varnish under microcosm biofilm formed on enamel. J Appl Oral Sci. 2018;26:e20170304. 10.1590/1678-7757-2017-0304) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12. Luft S, Keilig L, Jäger A, Bourauel C. In‐vitro evaluation of the corrosion behavior of orthodontic brackets. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2009;12(1):43 51. 10.1111/j.1601-6343.2008.01436.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13. Kuhta M, Pavlin D, Slaj M, Varga S, Lapter-Varga M, Slaj M. Type of archwire and level of acidity: effects on the release of metal ions from orthodontic appliances. Angle Orthod. 2009;79(1):102 110. 10.2319/083007-401.1) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14. Karnam SK, Reddy AN, Manjith CM. Comparison of metal ion release from different bracket archwire combinations: an in vitro study. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2012;13(3):376 381. 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1154) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15. Daems J, Celis JP, Willems G. Morphological characterization of as-received and in vivo orthodontic stainless steel archwires. Eur J Orthod. 2009;31(3):260 265. 10.1093/ejo/cjn104) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16. Huang HH. Variation in corrosion resistance of nickel-titanium wires from different manufacturers. Angle Orthod. 2005;75(4):661 665. 10.1043/0003-3219(2005)75[661:VICRON]2.0.CO;2) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17. Bourauel C, Fries T, Drescher D, Plietsch R. Surface roughness of orthodontic wires via atomic force microscopy, laser specular reflectance, and profilometry. Eur J Orthod. 1998;20(1):79 92. 10.1093/ejo/20.1.79) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18. Shin JS, Oh KT, Hwang CJ. In vitro surface corrosion of stainless steel and NiTi orthodontic appliances. Aust Orthod J. 2003;19(1):13 18. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19. Faccioni F, Franceschetti P, Cerpelloni M, Fracasso ME. In vivo study on metal release from fixed orthodontic appliances and DNA damage in oral mucosa cells. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003;124(6):687 93; discussion 693. 10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.09.010) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20. Widu F, Drescher D, Junker R, Bourauel C. Corrosion and biocompatibility of orthodontic wires. J Mater Sci Mater Med. 1999;10(5):275 281. 10.1023/a:1008953412622) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21. Schiff N, Grosgogeat B, Lissac M, Dalard F. Influence of fluoride content and pH on the corrosion resistance of titanium and its alloys. Biomaterials. 2002;23(9):1995 2002. 10.1016/s0142-9612(01)00328-3) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22. Oshida Y, Sachdeva RC, Miyazaki S. Microanalytical characterization and surface modification of TiNi orthodontic archwires. Bio Med Mater Eng. 1992;2(2):51 69. 10.3233/BME-1992-2201) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23. Jacobs JJ, Gilbert JL, Urban RM. Corrosion of metal orthopaedic implants. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American Volume). 1998;80(2):268 282. 10.2106/00004623-199802000-00015) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24. Bahije L, Benyahia H, El Hamzaoui S.et al. Behavior of NiTi in the presence of oral bacteria: corrosion by Streptococcus mutans . Int Orthod. 2011;9(1):110 119. 10.1016/j.ortho.2010.12.001) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25. Maruthamuthu S, Rajasekar A, Sathiyanarayanan S, Muthukumar N, Palaniswamy N. Electrochemical behaviour of microbes on orthodontic wires. Curr Sci. 2005;89:988 996. [Google Scholar]
  • 26. Ahn HS, Kim MJ, Seol HJ, Lee JH, Kim HI, Kwon YH. Effect of pH and temperature on orthodontic NiTi wires immersed in acidic fluoride solution. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2006;79(1):7 15. 10.1002/jbm.b.30505) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27. Bundy KJ, Butler MF, Hochman RF. An investigation of the bacteriostatic properties of puremetals. J Biomed Mater Res. 1980;14(5):653 663. 10.1002/jbm.820140511) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28. Teughels W, Van Assche N, Sliepen I, Quirynen M. Effect of material characteristics and/or surface topography on biofilm development. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006;17(suppl 2):68 81. 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2006.01353.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29. Do Nascimento C, da Rocha Aguiar C, Pita MS, Pedrazzi V, De Albuquerque RF, Ribeiro RF. Oral biofilm formation on the titanium and zirconia substrates. Microsc Res Tech. 2013;76(2):126 132. 10.1002/jemt.22143) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30. Morgan TD, Wilson M. The effects of surface roughness and type of denture acrylic on biofilm formation by Streptococcus oralis in a constant depth film fermentor. J Appl Microbiol. 2001;91(1):47 53. 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2001.01338.x) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Turkish Journal of Orthodontics are provided here courtesy of Turkish Orthodontic Society

RESOURCES