Dear Editor,
With great interest we have read the recent paper in the journal 'Critical Care,' titled: ‘The future of intensive care: delirium should no longer be an issue,’ by Kotfis et al. [1]. Kotfis et al. state that the major factor to prevent delirium on an intensive care unit (ICU) is an awake, non-sedated patient [1]. However, the standard mechanical ventilation support on the ICU is through positive pressure ventilation (PPV), and in the cases that this ventilation support requires intubation of the patient, sedatives are frequently administered. Sedation is a major risk factor to develop delirium [2, 3]. Delirium is harmful for the brain as it is associated with long-term cognitive impairment [3].
Kotfis et al. recommend that new technologies should be implemented for delirium prevention [1]. In response to that suggestion, we would like to draw the attention of the ICU community to the reintroduction of negative pressure respiratory support [4, 5]. Patients receiving ventilation support by negative pressure ventilation (NPV) do not require intubation, so the need for sedation is greatly reduced. Therefore, NPV will avoid one of the major risk factors for delirium: sedatives. Moreover, since patients remain conscious during negative pressure ventilation support, the medical staff and family can continue to communicate with the patients. This diminishes the risk of developing a post-intensive care syndrome (PICS), which includes not only cognitive decline but also psychiatric symptoms like depression and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) [1, 2].
By avoiding the use of sedatives negative pressure respiratory support protects the brain. NPV may prove to be a worthy addition to the current range of respiratory support strategies [4, 5].
Acknowledgements
We thank JP Zwart for writing assistance.
Abbreviations
- ICU
Intensive care unit
- NPV
Negative pressure ventilation
- PICS
Post-intensive care syndrome
- PPV
Positive pressure ventilation
- PTSD
Post-traumatic stress disorder
Author contributions
CvR, JvE and DH wrote the manuscript. MC, PP, JR and DMcK contributed to the discussions during the conception of this work. All authors added to the drafts and approved the final version.
Funding
None.
Availability of data and materials
Not applicable.
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
Prof David Howard is the voluntary, non-paid Chairman of the UK Exovent Charity. David McKeown, civil engineer, is a trustee of the UK Exovent Charity. Exovent Charity is a UK registered charity no. 1189967: 10 Queen St Pl, London EC4R 1BE, UK. All other authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Kotfis K, van Diem-Zaal I, Roberson SW, Sietnicki M, van den Boogaard M, Shehabi Y, Ely EW. The future of intensive care: delirium should no longer be an issue. Crit Care. 2022;6(1):200. doi: 10.1186/s13054-022-04077-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Schwab K, Schwitzer E, Qadir N. Postacute Sequelae of COVID-19 Critical Illness. Crit Care Clin. 2022;38(3):455–472. doi: 10.1016/j.ccc.2022.01.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Girard TD, Jackson JC, Pandharipande PP, Pun BT, Thompson JL, Shintani AK, Gordon SM, Canonico AE, Dittus RS, Bernard GR, Ely EW. Delirium as a predictor of long-term cognitive impairment in survivors of critical illness. Crit Care Med. 2010;38(7):1513–1520. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181e47be1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Howard D, Coulthard MG, Speight C, Grocott M. Negative pressure ventilation for COVID-19 respiratory failure: a phoenix from the ashes? Arab Board Med J. 2022;23(1):5–13. 10.4103/abmj.abmj_7_22.
- 5.Exovent Development Group Exovent: a study of a new negative-pressure ventilatory support device in healthy adults. Anaesthesia. 2021;76(5):623–628. doi: 10.1111/anae.15350. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Corrado A, Gorini M. Negative-pressure ventilation: is there still a role? Eur Respir J. 2002;20(1):187–197. doi: 10.1183/09031936.02.00302602. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Raymondos K, Molitoris U, Capewell M, Sander B, Dieck T, Ahrens J, Weilbach C, Knitsch W, Corrado A. Negative- versus positive-pressure ventilation in intubated patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Crit Care. 2012;16(2):R37. doi: 10.1186/cc11216. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Palmer KS, Spencer SA, Wickramasinghe YA, Wright T, Southall DP, Rolfe P. Effects of positive and negative pressure ventilation on cerebral blood volume of newborn infants. Acta Paediatr. 1995;84(2):132–139. doi: 10.1111/j.1651-2227.1995.tb13595.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Stollings JL, Kotfis K, Chanques G, Pun BT, Pandharipande PP, Ely EW. Delirium in critical illness: clinical manifestations, outcomes, and management. Intensive Care Med. 2021;47(10):1089–1103. 10.1007/s00134-021-06503-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]