Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Front Anim Sci. 2021 Dec 8;2:788930. doi: 10.3389/fanim.2021.788930

Life Course Impact of Glucocorticoids During Pregnancy on Muscle Development and Function

Yang Liu 1, Qiyue Ding 1, Wei Guo 1,*
PMCID: PMC9624510  NIHMSID: NIHMS1815301  PMID: 36325303

Abstract

Maternal stress, such as maternal obesity, can induce severe gestational disease and hormonal disorder which may disrupt fetal organ maturation and further cause endangered early or future health in offspring. During fetal development, glucocorticoids are essential for the maturation of organ systems. For instance, in clinical applications, glucocorticoids are commonly utilized to pregnant women with the risk of preterm delivery to reduce mortality of the newborns. However, exposure of excessive glucocorticoids at embryonic and fetal developmental stages can cause diseases such as cardiovascular disease and muscle atrophy in adulthood. Effects of excessive glucocorticoids on human health are well-recognized and extensively studied. Nonetheless, effects of these hormones on farm animal growth and development, particularly on prenatal muscle development, and postnatal growth, did not attract much attention until the last decade. Here, we provided a short review of the recent progress relating to the effect of glucocorticoids on prenatal skeletal muscle development and postnatal muscle growth as well as heart muscle development and cardiovascular disease during life course.

Keywords: cardiovascular disease, fetal programming, glucocorticoids, maternal stress, muscle development

INTRODUCTION

Early life events are critical to growth performance and health throughout the life course of an animal including human beings. Unfavorable maternal environmental changes are associated with many types of abnormalities including cardiovascular disease, obesity, insulin resistance, and metabolic syndrome in offspring later life, which is known as the disease origins of adult disease or developmental programming (Barker et al., 1993; Friedrich, 2002; Boney et al., 2005). Developmental programming is defined that challenges during critical developmental windows cause deterministic consequences in developmental and health trajectory in later life. It is also called fetal programming since it occurs during embryonic and fetal development (Kwon and Kim, 2017). The study of fetal programming can be traced back to around a century ago (Cox et al., 2012), however, the concept was just defined by Dr. Barker about half century ago (Barker and Osmond, 1986). Since then, many studies in humans and animal models support the hypothesis that poor nutrition in utero, maternal stress (e.g., depression, anxiety, fatigue, toxic exposure), exogenously administered hormones (e.g., synthetic glucocorticoid, sGC), and other factors could change fetal structure, function, and metabolism, leading to a long-last effects on offspring throughout the whole life. Moreover, metabolic syndrome such as cardiovascular disease in humans and offspring growth performance in livestock are the mostly reported consequences of those adverse factors (Nathanielsz, 2006; Barker, 2007; Gicquel et al., 2008; Beauchamp et al., 2015; Sand et al., 2019; Davies et al., 2021). Therefore, understanding of the underpinning mechanisms of fetal programming could provide cues to develop intervention strategies for poor postnatal growth performance in domestic animals and adult chronic diseases in humans caused by maternal stresses (Cox et al., 2012).

Glucocorticoids are the major stress hormones secreted by the adrenal gland in response to stress, which is regulated by the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis (Gicquel et al., 2008). In the canonical signaling pathway, glucocorticoids function through binding glucocorticoid receptor (GR), which mainly localizes in the cytoplasm of cells and forms a protein complex including hsp90, hsp70, and p23 in the absence of the hormones. After binding with glucocorticoid, GR is dissociated from the complex and its nuclear localization signals are exposed. After GR is transported into nucleus, it regulates gene expression via direct binding with the glucocorticoid response element (GRE) of the targeted genes, or interacting with other transcriptional factors such as AP1, NF-κB, and STATs (Oakley and Cidlowski, 2013; Vitellius et al., 2018). Glucocorticoids play a very wide role in postnatal life including the regulation of homeostasis, growth, cell proliferation and differentiation, apoptosis, and metabolism (Fowden and Forhead, 2004; Grad and Picard, 2007; Cain and Cidlowski, 2015). However, glucocorticoids are also critically important in prenatal life in which these hormones are essential for the development and maturation of fetal organ systems such as respiratory system, neural system, endocrine system, gastrointestinal system, renal system, and muscle system (Agnew et al., 2018; Song et al., 2019a). A myriad of studies demonstrated that excessive endogenous glucocorticoids resulting from maternal stress or exogenous glucocorticoids due to antenatal treatment to reduce preterm delivery in pregnancy result in reduced birth weight, fetal growth restriction and adverse effects in adult life such as heart disease, metabolic syndrome, hypertension, and diabetes mellitus (Asztalos, 2012; Carson et al., 2016; Kemp et al., 2016; Agnew et al., 2018). In this short review, we mainly focused on discussing effects of glucocorticoids on striated muscle development and function including skeletal muscle and cardiac muscle. We first discussed the endogenous glucocorticoids synthesis and metabolism in fetuses. Then we discussed effects of glucocorticoids on prenatal skeletal muscle development and postnatal muscle growth as well as prenatal heart muscle development and adult heart function. Lastly, we summarized the mechanism of glucocorticoids in the regulation of muscle reprogramming and provided some perspectives on future directions.

GLUCOCORTICOID SYNTHESIS AND METABOLISM IN THE FETUS

Regulation of fetal glucocorticoid synthesis and metabolism is a complex process, involving the HPA axis, the catalytic enzymes and the placenta. In humans, cortisol, one of the major forms of glucocorticoids peaks at 8–9 weeks of pregnancy, and then declines until undetectable at about 14 weeks of pregnancy (Parker et al., 1995; Goto et al., 2006). The serum cortisol levels stay low until the appearance of the surge in late gestation (Mesiano et al., 1993; Parker et al., 1995; Narasaka et al., 2001; Goto et al., 2006; Solano and Arck, 2020). The first peak of serum cortisol level is corresponding to the expression of the HSD3B2, an enzyme that is responsible for the critical timing of cortisol synthesis early in gestation. The surge of serum cortisol in late gestation is a coordination of increased HSD3B2 expression, elevated fetal cortisol production, and maternal cortisol crossing the placenta (Parker et al., 1995; Narasaka et al., 2001; Busada and Cidlowski, 2017). Cortisol peak appears at earlier stage of pregnancy which is important to promote the implantation of embryo and the decidualization of the uterine wall, as well as suppresses the maternal immune rejection to embryo (Busada and Cidlowski, 2017), whereas the surge at late gestation of fetal life is vital to the maturation of lung and many other organ systems which is crucial to survive for a life after birth (Solano et al., 2016; Busada and Cidlowski, 2017).

In addition to glucocorticoid synthesis that determines the critical window of fetal glucocorticoid exposure, glucocorticoid metabolism controls gradients, or concentration of glucocorticoid in the fetus. Two enzymes 11β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 (11β-HSD1) and 2 (11β-HSD2) play a primary role in glucocorticoid metabolism and are highly expressed in the uterus, placenta and fetal tissues (Solano et al., 2016; Sand et al., 2019). The enzyme 11β-HSD1 primarily converts the inactive form of glucocorticoid 11-dehydrocorticosterone or cortisone to active form corticosterone in rodents or cortisol in human or livestock (Jamieson et al., 1995; Ricketts et al., 1998; Lamadé et al., 2021), while the 11β-HSD2 performs the opposite role as the 11β-HSD1 (Brown et al., 1993; McMullen et al., 2012; Chen et al., 2021). Interestingly, studies in mouse model showed that the 11β-HSD1 global depletion in dams did not influence fetal development, suggesting the role of 11β-HSD1 is not critical for normal fetal development (Kotelevtsev et al., 1997). However, studies in a sheep model with inhibition of 11β-HSD1 indicated that regulation of local cortisol concentration was essential for fetal development (Brooks et al., 2015). These contradictory studies in different animal models suggest that further investigation of the function of 11β-HSD1 is warranted in fetal development. In contrast, the enzyme 11β-HSD2 plays an essential role in controlling the mobilization of high gradient of maternal glucocorticoid into low concentration of serum glucocorticoid in the fetus (Krozowski et al., 1995; Meyer and Novak, 2021) (Figure 1). This gradient of glucocorticoid concentration from maternal to fetal serum allows the fetus not to be exposed to high maternal glucocorticoid level (McMullen et al., 2012). Studies showed that the defect of the 11β-HSD2 in mice usually resulted in the exposure of the fetuses to high level of corticosterone (another major form of glucocorticoids) in utero (Kotelevtsev et al., 1999), and also the chronic maternal stress such as poor maternal nutrition could facilitate maternal serum corticosterone to overcome the 11β-HSD2 barrier and elevate the fetal serum corticosterone level in a rat model (Bingham et al., 2013). The consequences of the elevated fetal corticosterone levels can lead to retarded fetal and placenta growth as well as reprogramming of the fetus to predispose to high risk of metabolic syndrome throughout the life in animal models and in humans (Ferrari et al., 1996; Bingham et al., 2013; Reynolds et al., 2013). In addition, the change of the activity of the 11β-HSD isoforms 1 and 2 in the placenta can also cause the abnormal exposure of maternal glucocorticoids and thereby lead to abnormal gene expression and altered patterns of growth and development (McMullen et al., 2012). For example, treatment of 11βHSD2 inhibitor carbenoxolone on pregnant dams in rats had the similar effect with maternal low protein diet; both treatments led to the reduced birth weight, and hypertension in offspring (Langley-Evans, 1997). The life-long trajectory of muscle growth and development could be one of the consequences regulated by antenatal glucocorticoids exposure (Jobe, 2020).

FIGURE 1 |.

FIGURE 1 |

A schematic model to illustrate the mechanism that maternal glucocorticoids impact the programming of fetus. GC, Glucocorticoid; 11β-HSD2, 11β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type2; HPA axis, hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis.

EFFECTS OF GESTATIONAL GLUCOCORTICOID ON PRENATAL MUSCLE DEVELOPMENT AND POSTNATAL MUSCLE GROWTH

Skeletal muscle is formed during embryonic development. The formation of muscle cells or muscle fibers (also known as myogenesis) is a complex process and tightly regulated by myogenic regulatory factors (Myf5, MyoD, Myogenin, Mrf4), and many other genes (e.g., paired box transcription factors 3 (Pax3) and 7 (Pax7), Meox1/2, Foxc1/2) and signaling pathways (e.g., Wnt, FGF, IGF, HGF, BMP, Shh, Notch, p38 MAPK, NFAT) (detailed information can be referred to Bryson-Richardson and Currie, 2008; Eng et al., 2013; Chal and Pourquié, 2017; Asfour et al., 2018). There are two stages of myogenesis during prenatal muscle development, primary myogenesis, and secondary myogenesis. In livestock, for example, in swine fetuses, primary myogenesis occurs within about 38 days of gestation, and the secondary myogenesis takes place between 46 and 95 days of gestation (Wigmore and Stickland, 1983). During the primary myogenesis, primary muscle fibers are formed at early gestation stage which account for about 20% of total muscle fibers formed during prenatal myogenesis. Secondary muscle fibers are formed using primary muscle fibers as templates at fetal development stage. Secondary muscle fibers take up ~80% of total muscle fibers (Yan et al., 2013b). It is widely accepted that muscle fiber numbers are fixed after birth and postnatal muscle growth is mainly dependent on hypertrophy of existing muscle fibers (Yan et al., 2013b; Reynolds et al., 2019). In this regards, reduced muscle fiber number during prenatal muscle development will negatively impact postnatal muscle growth performance.

The critical time window that affects the number of muscle fibers is during the fetal developmental stage because the majority of muscle fibers are formed during this stage (Allen et al., 1999; Yan et al., 2013b). Numerous evidence have shown that environmental changes in uterus, particularly, poor maternal nutrition influences prenatal skeletal muscle development and postnatal muscle growth in different species because skeletal muscle has less priority for nutrient partitioning by comparing to other organs like brain, heart, liver, gut, and placenta (Zhu et al., 2006; Du et al., 2010). Thus, skeletal muscle development is especially vulnerable to nutrient availability (Reynolds et al., 2019). Studies in young and old sheep demonstrated that both maternal over- and under-nutrition resulted in reduced secondary muscle fiber numbers and an increase in the secondary to primary fiber ratio in late gestation fetal lambs as well as reduced muscle mass and muscle fiber cross-section area (Zhu et al., 2004, 2006; Fahey et al., 2005; Daniel et al., 2007; Huang et al., 2010; Yan et al., 2013a; Reed et al., 2014; Hoffman et al., 2016; Gauvin et al., 2020). Studies in pigs also showed that nutrition was a major factor for birthweight and muscle mass (Karunaratne et al., 2005; Jia et al., 2016). The larger offspring resulting from sufficient nutrition had more muscle fibers (Dwyer et al., 1994; Rehfeldt and Kuhn, 2006; Musser et al., 2007; Tilley et al., 2007). Meanwhile, studies in rodents and guinea-pigs also showed the similar effects of poor maternal nutrition on muscle fiber number from young offspring (Dwyer et al., 1995). Several comprehensive reviews have summarized consequences of maternal nutrition on skeletal muscle development which will not be detailed here (Brameld and Daniel, 2008; Du et al., 2010; Rehfeldt et al., 2011).

The mechanisms of poor maternal nutrition in fetal development have been extensively studied. Some studies in sheep reported that both maternal nutrition restriction and maternal over-nutrition during early- to mid-gestation elevated fetal and newborn plasma cortisol concentrations (Smith et al., 2018; Ghnenis et al., 2021). Although glucocorticoid is a well-known catabolic protein acting on skeletal muscle, only few studies reported the effect of glucocorticoid exposure on fetal muscle growth and development. One study using rats as model showed that in utero dexamethasone (a synthetic glucocorticoid) exposure reduced fetal skeletal muscle mass (Gokulakrishnan et al., 2012). In this study, the author concluded that fetal exposure to dexamethasone reduced fetal growth independent of its effects on maternal food intake, but maternal food intake was additive, while other reports in rats indicated that the retarded fetal growth due to exposure to dexamethasone administration was because of the secondary impact of decreased maternal food intake (Woods and Weeks, 2005; Woods, 2006). Later, a follow-up study from the same group in rats found that precocious exposure to dexamethasone in utero led to the relatively lower number of Pax7+ muscle progenitor cells but not distribution of these cells. The Pax7 induces the expression of myogenic regulatory factor genes Myf5 and MyoD (Olguín and Pisconti, 2012), and starts to express in dermomyotome of mature somites. The Pax7+ cells in mouse embryonic day 12.5 restrictedly differentiate to lineage of muscle cell (Lepper and Fan, 2010). After birth, Pax7+ cells can also be activated and fused themselves to adjacent myofiber to promote hypertrophy or regeneration (Chal and Pourquié, 2017). This study concluded that the effect of in utero dexamethasone exposure on fetal myonuclear accretion was independent of mild restriction of maternal food intake (Gokulakrishnan et al., 2017). These findings demonstrate how gestational glucocorticoid contributes to postnatal muscle growth because satellite cells are important to postnatal muscle fiber hypertrophy. A recent study in pregnant ewes infused with cortisol indicated that chronic increases in maternal cortisol concentrations, as in maternal stress, altered gene expression that is associated with mitochondrial function and metabolism in skeletal muscle (Joseph et al., 2020). They did not observe significant changes of insulin signaling which is a potential target in skeletal muscle of in utero glucocorticoids exposure (Jellyman et al., 2012), but significantly changed free radicals and cell apoptotic pathways (Joseph et al., 2020). Another study in sheep showed that the gene expression of the myosin heavy chain isoform IIX, was upregulated by cortisol infusion (Davies et al., 2021). This finding implies that gestational glucocorticoids may also affect the fiber type of fetal muscle in addition to fiber number (Gicquel et al., 2008). They also observed that in mitochondrial metabolism, mitochondrial content, biogenesis markers, substrate-specific respiration rates, abundance of electron transfer system complex I and adenine nucleotide translocator in skeletal muscle were increased in a muscle-specific manner when sheep fetuses were infused with cortisol during gestation (Davies et al., 2021). Although studies have been done extensively in adult muscle development and growth, few studies have been done in regard to the effects of gestational glucocorticoid on fetal muscle development. Therefore, further investigation will be guaranteed in the field in future.

EFFECTS OF PRENATAL GLUCOCORTICOIDS ON HEART MUSCLE DEVELOPMENT AND ADULT HEART DISEASE

It is well-known that glucocorticoids are critical for the maturation of organs and tissues before birth and elevated glucocorticoid level at late gestation is essential to prepare for birth (Schwab et al., 2012; Rog-Zielinska et al., 2013a; Fowden et al., 2016). However, a handful of evidence have shown that excessive prenatal glucocorticoid exposure results in long-term adverse cardiovascular diseases (Fowden et al., 2016). Clinically, antenatal glucocorticoid therapy is commonly used in women who have the risk of preterm birth during pregnancy. Glucocorticoid treatment for preterm birth reduces respiratory distress syndrome, cerebral hemorrhage and necrotising enterocolitis as well as incidence of neonatal death (Fowden et al., 1998; Agnew et al., 2018; McGoldrick et al., 2020). Unfortunately, about half of women who had the antenatal glucocorticoid treatment did not go preterm, and conversely, they deliver babies at or near term (Razaz et al., 2015; Kemp et al., 2016; MakhiJaffet al., 2016; Grzeskowiak et al., 2018). This will cause potential exposure of babies to excessive synthetic glucocorticoids in utero, and thus result in potential short- or long-term adverse effects associated with cardiovascular function. Researches have been conducted to understand how excessive prenatal glucocorticoids (endogenous or exogenous) reprogram heart muscle and impact cardiovascular health during life course.

During normal development, the heart experiences extensive morphological and geometrical changes shortly before birth and continuously after birth through cardiomyocyte hyperplasia and hypertrophy in adaptation to increased mechanical and functional needs. Glucocorticoid is a ligand of GR, a nuclear receptor that recognizes and binds to the GREs of the targeted DNA (Oakley and Cidlowski, 2013). Activated GR in mouse fetal heart promoted cardiac morphological and geometrical changes (Rog-Zielinska et al., 2013a,b, 2015). The GR null mice developed immature and small heart that had both impaired systolic and diastolic function similar to the preterm heart (Rog-Zielinska et al., 2013a,b). Interestingly, another study with specific depletion of GR in only mouse heart and vascular smooth muscle showed that mice exhibited systolic dysfunction in late gestation with abnormal sarcomeric ultrastructure (Rog-Zielinska et al., 2013b) similar to null GR mice. However, GR specific depleted mice had a normal size heart, suggesting glucocorticoids regulate heart development and function in other different ways in addition to GR-regulated structural and functional changes. Researches also showed that excessive glucocorticoids due to antenatal synthetic glucocorticoid (dexamethasone) treatment altered feto-placental vasculature in human (Elfayomy and Almasry, 2014) which was supported by a subsequent study in the Hsd11b2 knockout mice. These mice had antenatal glucocorticoid excess and intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) and showed immature heart development and cardiac dysfunction in late gestation. Rescue of feto-placental vasculature restored cardiac function (Wyrwoll et al., 2016). Impact of glucocorticoids on fetal cardiomyocyte maturation has also been investigated with in vitro cultures. Mouse fetal cardiomyocytes treated with corticosterone or dexamethasone showed early maturation structurally and functionally (Rog-Zielinska et al., 2015). Studies in mice showed that Fetal heart development and maturation were impacted by mitochondrial metabolic capacity (Lai et al., 2008). Glucocorticoids can regulate fetal heart development and maturation through induction of PGC-1a, a key regulator for cardiac mitochondrial function through GR (Rog-Zielinska et al., 2015). Further, glucocorticoids can promote more active form of thyroid hormone T3 converted from T4 through inducing deiodinase 1 (D1) and D2 expression (Forhead and Fowden, 2014). Both glucocorticoids and thyroids are important hormones for fetal heart development and maturation by switching myofilament protein isoforms and increasing atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) (Van Tuyl et al., 2004; Chattergoon et al., 2012). According to this mechanism, elevated glucocorticoid level at early gestation stage before the HPA axis starts to produce fetal thyroid hormones may have a compromised maturation of fetal organs by glucocorticoid along, which may impact more rodent fetal development than in humans or in sheep because thyroid hormones are synthesized earlier at mid-gestation in humans or sheep than in rodents at late gestation (Forhead and Fowden, 2014). This mechanism could be another important consideration for antenatal glucocorticoid therapy with a question about whether thyroid hormone should be administered with synthetic glucocorticoids or not. In addition, transient hyperoxia in neonatal rodent causes reduced cell number and increased cell hypertrophy which leads to a high risk for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in adult life and vulnerability to pressure overload (Bertagnolli et al., 2014; Puente et al., 2014). Studies showed that glucocorticoids played a role in this process. Administration of dexamethasone to neonatal rats reduced cardiomyocyte number but increased cardiomyocyte hypertrophy (Gay et al., 2015).

The relationship between early and/or excessive exposure to glucocorticoid during pregnancy and impact of life course on cardiovascular disease is well-recognized. Also glucocorticoid is a widely accepted gatekeeper for the thrifty hypothesis of the fetal origins of diseases (Seckl and Holmes, 2007; Fowden et al., 2016). However, precise molecular and cellular mechanisms by which excessive glucocorticoid-induced cardiac remodeling and functional change in fetal development and its effects on cardiovascular disease later in life need be further explored. More information gained from the mechanistic studies will also help establish new antenatal glucocorticoid treatment protocol regarding optimal formulation, timing of dosage and efficacy at different gestational stages.

POTENTIAL MECHANISMS OF GLUCOCORTICOIDS IN FETAL MUSCLE DEVELOPMENT

Fetal glucocorticoid level change occurs in several different ways. First of all, endogenous glucocorticoids need overcome the placental barrier through 11βHSD2 expressed on the placenta from the mother to the fetus (Chapman et al., 2013). However, studies showed that maternal stress in guinea pigs resulted in elevated level of cortisol in fetal serum, which subsequently caused fetal reprogramming including muscle formation and development (Dauprat et al., 1984) (Figure 1). Due to the low affinity of placental 11βHSD2 to synthetic glucocorticoid (sGC), sGC can readily cross the placenta to increase fetal serum glucocorticoid to have direct effect on fetal organs (McCabe et al., 2001). Secondly, glucocorticoids can play a direct role in regulating placental function (Figure 1). For example, both sGC and endogenous glucocorticoids promote expression and release of corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) from the placenta. Subsequently, CRH triggers both fetal and maternal HPA axis in humans (Torricelli et al., 2011). Further, this mechanism may differ for some species that do not produce CRH in placenta, which explains species differences in response to prenatal exposure to endogenous or exogenous glucocorticoids (Moisiadis and Matthews, 2014). The third action of glucocorticoids on placenta is placental growth restriction and altered placental vascularization and structure (Braun et al., 2013). These changes due to maternal stress alter fetal serum glucocorticoid level, and thus elicit many molecular and cellular processes related to cell growth and apoptosis, metabolism, inflammation, signal transduction, and transport (Wang et al., 2004) in fetal organ or tissue development including muscles. For example, one of the glucocorticoid targeted genes, tripartite motif containing 63 (Trim63), which encodes a E3 ubiquitin ligase muscle RING finger 1 (MuRF1), were upregulated in muscle atrophy (Waddell et al., 2008), implying that MuRF1 could be a mediator in fetal programming controlled by glucocorticoid.

Epigenetics is increasingly accepted as a potential mechanism of glucocorticoid action on fetal development through the regulation of gene expression (Moisiadis and Matthews, 2014).

Over the past decades, more and more evidence show that epigenetics regulates reprogramming of fetal organ systems such as cardiovascular system. Expression of a handful of genes (e.g., Nr3c1/2, Crh, Pomc, and Hsd11b2) in regulating HPA axis can be regulated through DNA methylation and histone modification by glucocorticoids (Newell-Price, 2003; Alikhani-Koopaei et al., 2004; Weaver et al., 2004; Mueller and Bale, 2008; De Filippis et al., 2013; Ferreira et al., 2021). DNA methylation is critical for vertebrate heart development and maturation through a number of processes such as gametogenesis and hematopoiesis (Patterson et al., 2010; Smith and Meissner, 2013; Gilsbach et al., 2014; Martinez et al., 2015). For an instance, DNA methylation inhibitor 5-AZA suppressed the regulation of dexamethasone in binucleation at day 4 postnatally and proliferation at day 7 postnatally, resulting in increased cardiomyocyte number at the heart of day 14 postnatally. This study suggested the relationship between glucocorticoids and DNA methylation in muscle cell proliferation and differentiation in a developing rat heart (Gay et al., 2015). Another study in rats found that maternal stress like maternal hypoxia reduced GR expression through DNA methylation and 5-AZA treatment reversed hypoxia-induced promotor methylation and restored GR expression (Xiong et al., 2016). Subsequent study from the same group found that DNA methylation bridged prenatal hypoxia and epigenetic regulation of GR expression in adult offspring in rats (Lv et al., 2019; Song et al., 2019b). In addition to DNA methylation, glucocorticoids can also regulate histone modifications and miRNAs. Increasing evidence show that miRNAs regulate generation of glucocorticoids in adrenal gland and in contrast, glucocorticoids also regulate cell survival, proliferation, and function partially through regulation of miRNA expression (Clayton et al., 2018). For example, in humans, miRNA-30c-5p and miRNA-125b-5p regulated expression of genes involved in cardiomyogenesis or cardiac function via glucocorticoid-mediated signaling pathway (Wang et al., 2014).

In addition to epigenetic regulation, glucocorticoids also play a role in the regulation of muscle metabolism. As an energy consuming tissue, striated muscle particularly requires the normal mitochondrial activity and glucose metabolism (Figure 1). The gestational glucocorticoids level in sheep was found to be closely correlated with the increase in mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation capacity of skeletal muscle (Davies et al., 2020). Gestational exposure of glucocorticoids led to increased mitochondrial content, biogenesis markers, substrate-specific respiration rates, and abundance of electron transfer system complex I and adenine nucleotide translocator in a muscle-specific manner (Davies et al., 2021). Adverse maternal environment not only impacted the β-cell development and growth in fetal pancreas (Gicquel et al., 2008), also altered the response to insulin in other organs including cardiac and skeletal muscle through the mediation of glucocorticoids (Norris et al., 2011; Blanco et al., 2014; Ferreira et al., 2021). Muscle normally contributes around 75% of the post-prandial glucose utilization which depends on the embedding of glucose transporters 1 (GLUT1) and 4 (GLUT4) into membrane of myocytes in an insulin-sensitive manner (dos Santos et al., 2012; Blanco et al., 2014; Kondash et al., 2020). In both skeletal and cardiac muscle, expression of GLUT1 and GLUT4 was elevated after dexamethasone treatment in utero (Meyer and Zhang, 2007; Wyrwoll et al., 2008; Jellyman et al., 2012; Blanco et al., 2014), implying that the glucose metabolism of fetal muscle is impacted by glucocorticoids. However, another research in rats suggested that dexamethasone exposure indirectly restricted the glucose availability of fetus, because they found the glucose transport to the fetus had no significant change but glucose utilization of maternal tissues was competitively increased (Norris et al., 2011). Moreover, calcium-handling genes (Meyer and Zhang, 2007; Agnew et al., 2019), oxidative stress related genes (Joseph et al., 2020), the genes Mstn (Jia et al., 2016), Pik3r1 (Kuo et al., 2012), Trim63 (Waddell et al., 2008), Bmp4, Tbx3, Acadm, and Nkx2-6 (Peng et al., 2018), were all found to be regulated by altered glucocorticoid level during fetal programming. Among them, gene Pln which encodes a protein regulates the activity of cardiac muscle sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2+-ATPase (Kosmidis et al., 2015), Pik3r1, which mediates the glucose metabolism in response to insulin in myotubes (Kuo et al., 2012), and Trim63 which is associated with skeletal muscle atrophy (Waddell et al., 2008) have been proved to contain glucocorticoid response elements. Some other genes, such as Mstn (Jia et al., 2016), Bmp4, Tbx3, Acadm, and Nkx2-6 (Peng et al., 2018) are controlled by glucocorticoid through epigenetic modifications.

PERSPECTIVES AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS

Numerous evidence reported in human and livestock as well as animal models suggested that glucocorticoids are key mediators and gatekeeper in fetal programming. The altered gestational glucocorticoid levels induced by adverse maternal environment reprogram the development, growth, and function of fetal skeletal and cardiac muscle through altered HPA axis. At the molecular and cellular level, glucocorticoid action is involved in a complex signaling network including epigenetic regulation, mitochondrial activity, glucose metabolism, cell cyclin, and differentiation. However, the molecular mechanism of the life-course or even trans-generational effect in myocytes controlled by aberrant glucocorticoid level is far from being fully understood. Which co-activators of glucocorticoid receptor participate in the regulation of fetal programming remains to be defined. Regulation of posttranscriptional process in fetal programming has not been well-studied yet. A lot of work still need to be done in future studies. Understanding of these fundamental questions would help develop intervention strategies to prevent adverse offspring outcomes. Targeting to glucocorticoids and their downstream molecules may provide specific intervention methods to improve farm animal production and performance as well as human health.

FUNDING

This work was supported by the NIH HD101870, Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation (AAH4884), University of Wisconsin Foundation (AAH5964), USDA-NIFA Hatch project (WIS04005), and USDA-NIFA 2014-01982.

Footnotes

Conflict of Interest: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

REFERENCES

  1. Agnew EJ, Garcia-Burgos A, Richardson RV, Manos H, Thomson AJW, Sooy K, et al. (2019). Antenatal dexamethasone treatment transiently alters diastolic function in the mouse fetal heart. J. Endocrinol 241, 279–292. doi: 10.1530/JOE-18-0666 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Agnew EJ, Ivy JR, Stock SJ, and Chapman KE (2018). Glucocorticoids, antenatal corticosteroid therapy and fetal heart maturation. J. Mol. Endocrinol 61, R61–R73. doi: 10.1530/JME-18-0077 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Alikhani-Koopaei R, Fouladkou F, Frey FJ, and Frey BM (2004). Epigenetic regulation of 11 beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 2 expression. J. Clin. Invest 114, 1146–1157. doi: 10.1172/JCI21647 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Allen DL, Roy RR, and Edgerton VR (1999). Myonuclear domains in muscle adaptation and disease. Muscle Nerve 22, 1350–1360. doi: [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Asfour HA, Allouh MZ, and Said RS (2018). Myogenic regulatory factors: The orchestrators of myogenesis after 30 years of discovery. Exp. Biol. Med 243, 118–128. doi: 10.1177/1535370217749494 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Asztalos E (2012). Antenatal corticosteroids: a risk factor for the development of chronic disease. J. Nutr. Metab 2012:930591. doi: 10.1155/2012/930591 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Barker DJP (2007). The origins of the developmental origins theory. J. Intern. Med 261, 412–417. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2007.01809.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Barker DJP, Godfrey KM, Gluckman PD, Harding JE, Owens JA, and Robinson JS (1993). Fetal nutrition and cardiovascular disease in adult life. Lancet 341, 938–941. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)91224-A [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Barker DJP, and Osmond C (1986). Infant mortality, childhood nutrition, and ischaemic heart disease in england and wales. Lancet 327, 1077–1081. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(86)91340-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Beauchamp B, Thrush AB, Quizi J, Antoun G, McIntosh N, Al-Dirbashi OY, et al. (2015). Undernutrition during pregnancy in mice leads to dysfunctional cardiac muscle respiration in adult offspring. Biosci. Rep 35, 1–10. doi: 10.1042/BSR20150007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Bertagnolli M, Huyard F, Cloutier A, Anstey Z, Huot-Marchand JÉ, Fallaha C, et al. (2014). Transient neonatal high oxygen exposure leads to early adult cardiac dysfunction, remodeling, and activation of the Renin-Angiotensin system. Hypertension 63, 143–150. doi: 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.113.01760 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Bingham BC, Sheela Rani CS, Frazer A, Strong R, and Morilak DA (2013). Exogenous prenatal corticosterone exposure mimics the effects of prenatal stress on adult brain stress response systems and fear extinction behavior. Psychoneuroendocrinology 38, 2746–2757. doi: 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2013.07.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Blanco CL, Moreira AG, McGill-Vargas LL, Anzueto DG, Nathanielsz P, and Musi N (2014). Antenatal corticosteroids alter insulin signaling pathways in fetal baboon skeletal muscle. J. Endocrinol 221, 253–260. doi: 10.1530/JOE-13-0504 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Boney CM, Verma A, Tucker R, and Vohr BR (2005). Metabolic syndrome in childhood: Association with birth weight, maternal obesity, and gestational diabetes mellitus. Pediatrics 115, e290–e296. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1808 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Brameld JM, and Daniel ZCTR (2008). In utero effects on livestock muscle development and body composition. Aust. J. Exp. Agric 48, 921–929. doi: 10.1071/EA08017 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  16. Braun T, Challis JR, Newnham JP, and Sloboda DM (2013). Early-life glucocorticoid exposure: the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, placental function, and long-term disease risk. Endocr. Rev 34, 885–916. doi: 10.1210/er.2013-1012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Brooks K, Burns G, and Spencer TE (2015). Biological roles of hydroxysteroid (11-Beta) Dehydrogenase 1 (HSD11B1), HSD11B2, and glucocorticoid receptor (NR3C1) in sheep conceptus elongation. Biol. Reprod 93:38. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.115.130757 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Brown RW, Chapman KE, Edwards CR, and Seckl JR (1993). Human placental 11 beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase: evidence for and partial purification of a distinct NAD-dependent isoform. Endocrinology 132, 2614–2621. doi: 10.1210/endo.132.6.8504762 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Bryson-Richardson RJ, and Currie PD (2008). The genetics of vertebrate myogenesis. Nat. Rev. Genet 9, 632–646. doi: 10.1038/nrg2369 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Busada JT, and Cidlowski JA (2017). Mechanisms of glucocorticoid action during development. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol 125, 147–170. doi: 10.1016/bs.ctdb.2016.12.004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Cain DW, and Cidlowski JA (2015). Specificity and sensitivity of glucocorticoid signaling in health and disease. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab 29, 545–556. doi: 10.1016/j.beem.2015.04.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Carson R, Monaghan-Nichols AP, DeFranco DB, and Rudine AC (2016). Effects of antenatal glucocorticoids on the developing brain. Steroids 114, 25–32. doi: 10.1016/j.steroids.2016.05.012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Chal J, and Pourquié O (2017). Making muscle: skeletal myogenesis in vivo and in vitro. Dev. 144, 2104–2122. doi: 10.1242/dev.151035 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Chapman K, Holmes M, and Seckl J (2013). 11β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenases: intracellular gate-keepers of tissue glucocorticoid action. Physiol. Rev 93, 1139–1206. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00020.2012 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Chattergoon NN, Giraud GD, Louey S, Stork P, Fowden AL, and Thornburg KL (2012). Thyroid hormone drives fetal cardiomyocyte maturation. FASEB J. 26, 397–408. doi: 10.1096/fj.10-179895 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Chen Y, Xia X, Fang M, Chen G, Cao J, Qu H, et al. (2021). Maternally derived low glucocorticoid mediates adrenal developmental programming alteration in offspring induced by dexamethasone. Sci. Total Environ 797:149084. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149084 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Clayton SA, Jones SW, Kurowska-Stolarska M, and Clark AR (2018). The role of microRNAs in glucocorticoid action. J. Biol. Chem 293, 1865–1874. doi: 10.1074/jbc.R117.000366 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Cox LA, Glenn JP, Spradling KD, Nijland MJ, Garcia R, Nathanielsz PW, et al. (2012). A genome resource to address mechanisms of developmental programming: Determination of the fetal sheep heart transcriptome. J. Physiol 590, 2873–2884. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2011.222398 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Daniel ZCTR, Brameld JM, Craigon J, Scollan ND, and Buttery PJ (2007). Effect of maternal dietary restriction during pregnancy on lamb carcass characteristics and muscle fiber composition. J. Anim. Sci 85, 1565–1576. doi: 10.2527/jas.2006-743 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Dauprat P, Monin G, Dalle M, and Delost P (1984). The effects of psychosomatic stress at the end of pregnancy on maternal and fetal plasma cortisol levels and liver glycogen in guinea-pigs. Reprod. Nutr. Dev 24, 45–51. doi: 10.1051/rnd:19840105 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Davies KL, Camm EJ, Atkinson EV, Lopez T, Forhead AJ, Murray AJ, et al. (2020). Development and thyroid hormone dependence of skeletal muscle mitochondrial function towards birth. J. Physiol 598, 2453–2468. doi: 10.1113/JP279194 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Davies KL, Camm EJ, Smith DJ, Vaughan OR, Forhead AJ, Murray AJ, et al. (2021). Glucocorticoid maturation of mitochondrial respiratory capacity in skeletal muscle before birth. J. Endocrinol 251, 53–68. doi: 10.1530/JOE-21-0171 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. De Filippis B, Ricceri L, Fuso A, and Laviola G (2013). Neonatal exposure to low dose corticosterone persistently modulates hippocampal mineralocorticoid receptor expression and improves locomotor/exploratory behaviour in a mouse model of Rett syndrome. Neuropharmacology 68, 174–183. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2012.05.048 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. dos Santos JM, Benite-Ribeiro SA, Queiroz G, and Duarte JA (2012). The effect of age on glucose uptake and GLUT1 and GLUT4 expression in rat skeletal muscle. Cell Biochem. Funct 30, 191–197. doi: 10.1002/cbf.1834 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Du M, Tong J, Zhao J, Underwood KR, Zhu M, Ford SP, et al. (2010). Fetal programming of skeletal muscle development in ruminant animals. J. Anim. Sci 88:2311. doi: 10.2527/jas.2009-2311 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Dwyer CM, Madgwick AJA, Ward SS, and Stickland NC (1995). Effect of maternal undernutrition in early gestation on the development of fetal myofibres in the guinea-pig. Reprod. Fertil. Dev 7, 1285–1292. doi: 10.1071/RD9951285 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Dwyer CM, Stickland NC, and Fletcher JM (1994). The influence of maternal nutrition on muscle fiber number development in the porcine fetus and on subsequent postnatal growth. J. Anim. Sci 72, 911–917. doi: 10.2527/1994.724911x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Elfayomy AK, and Almasry SM (2014). Effects of a single course versus repeated courses of antenatal corticosteroids on fetal growth, placental morphometry and the differential regulation of vascular endothelial growth factor. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res 40, 2135–2145. doi: 10.1111/jog.12466 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Eng D, Ma H-Y, Gross MK, and Kioussi C (2013). Gene Networks during Skeletal Myogenesis. ISRN Dev. Biol 2013, 1–8. doi: 10.1155/2013/348704 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  40. Fahey AJ, Brameld JM, Parr T, and Buttery PJ (2005). The effect of maternal undernutrition before muscle differentiation on the muscle fiber development of the newborn lamb. J. Anim. Sci 83, 2564–2571. doi: 10.2527/2005.83112564x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Ferrari P, Obeyesekere VR, Li K, Wilson RC, New MI, Funder JW, et al. (1996). Point mutations abolish 11 beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type II activity in three families with the congenital syndrome of apparent mineralocorticoid excess. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol 119, 21–24. doi: 10.1016/0303-7207(96)03787-2 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Ferreira AS, Galvão S, Gaspar R, Rodrigues-Neves AC, Ambrósio AF, Matafome P, et al. (2021). Sex-specific changes in peripheral metabolism in a model of chronic anxiety induced by prenatal stress. Eur. J. Clin. Invest, 1–12. doi: 10.1111/eci.13639 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Forhead AJ, and Fowden AL (2014). Thyroid hormones in fetal growth and prepartum maturation. J. Endocrinol 221, R87–R103. doi: 10.1530/JOE-14-0025 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Fowden AL, and Forhead AJ (2004). Endocrine mechanisms of intrauterine programming. Reproduction 127, 515–526. doi: 10.1530/rep.1.00033 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Fowden AL, Li J, and Forhead AJ (1998). Glucocorticoids and the preparation for life after birth: are there long-term consequences of the life insurance? Proc. Nutr. Soc 57, 113–122. doi: 10.1079/PNS19980017 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Fowden AL, Valenzuela OA, Vaughan OR, Jellyman JK, and Forhead AJ (2016). Glucocorticoid programming of intrauterine development. Domest. Anim. Endocrinol 56, S121–S132. doi: 10.1016/j.domaniend.2016.02.014 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Friedrich MJ (2002). Epidemic of obesity expands its spread to developing countries. JAMA 287, 1382–1386. doi: 10.1001/jama.287.11.1382-JMN0320-2-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Gauvin MC, Pillai SM, Reed SA, Stevens JR, Hoffman ML, Jones AK, et al. (2020). Poor maternal nutrition during gestation in sheep alters prenatal muscle growth and development in offspring. J. Anim. Sci 98:skz388. doi: 10.1093/jas/skz388 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Gay MS, Li Y, Xiong F, Lin T, and Zhang L (2015). Dexamethasone treatment of newborn rats decreases cardiomyocyte endowment in the developing heart through epigenetic modifications. PLoS ONE 10:e0125033. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0125033 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Ghnenis AB, Odhiambo JF, Smith AM, Pankey CL, Nathanielsz PW, and Ford SP (2021). A heretical view: rather than a solely placental protective function, placental 11ß hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase 2 also provides substrate for fetal peripheral cortisol synthesis in obese pregnant ewes. J. Dev. Orig. Health Dis 12, 94–100. doi: 10.1017/S2040174420000112 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Gicquel C, El-Osta A, and Le Bouc Y (2008). Epigenetic regulation and fetal programming. Best Pract. Res. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab 22, 1–16. doi: 10.1016/j.beem.2007.07.009 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Gilsbach R, Preissl S, Grüning BA, Schnick T, Burger L, Benes V, et al. (2014). Dynamic DNA methylation orchestrates cardiomyocyte development, maturation and disease. Nat. Commun 5:5288. doi: 10.1038/ncomms6288 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Gokulakrishnan G, Chang X, Fleischmann R, and Fiorotto ML (2017). Precocious glucocorticoid exposure reduces skeletal muscle satellite cells in the fetal rat. J. Endocrinol 232, 561–572. doi: 10.1530/JOE-16-0372 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Gokulakrishnan G, Estrada IJ, Sosa HA, and Fiorotto ML (2012). In utero glucocorticoid exposure reduces fetal skeletal muscle mass in rats independent of effects on maternal nutrition. Am. J. Physiol 302:R1143–52. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00466.2011 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Goto M, Piper Hanley K, Marcos J, Wood PJ, Wright S, Postle AD, et al. (2006). In humans, early cortisol biosynthesis provides a mechanism to safeguard female sexual development. J. Clin. Invest 116, 953–960. doi: 10.1172/JCI25091 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Grad I, and Picard D (2007). The glucocorticoid responses are shaped by molecular chaperones. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol 275, 2–12. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2007.05.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  57. Grzeskowiak LE, Grieger JA, and Clifton VL (2018). Strategies towards improving pharmacological management of asthma during pregnancy. Pharmacol. Res 130, 85–92. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2017.12.019 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Hoffman ML, Peck KN, Forella ME, Fox AR, Govoni KE, and Zinn SA (2016). The effects of poor maternal nutrition during gestation on postnatal growth and development of lambs. J. Anim. Sci 94, 789–799. doi: 10.2527/jas.2015-9933 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Huang Y, Yan X, Zhao JX, Zhu MJ, McCormick RJ, Ford SP, et al. (2010). Maternal obesity induces fibrosis in fetal myocardium of sheep. Am. J. Physiol 299, 968–975. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00434.2010 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Jamieson PM, Chapman KE, Edwards CR, and Seckl JR (1995). 11 beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase is an exclusive 11 beta- reductase in primary cultures of rat hepatocytes: effect of physicochemical and hormonal manipulations. Endocrinology 136, 4754–4761. doi: 10.1210/endo.136.11.7588203 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  61. Jellyman JK, Martin-Gronert MS, Cripps RL, Giussani DA, Ozanne SE, Shen QW, et al. (2012). Effects of cortisol and dexamethasone on insulin signalling pathways in skeletal muscle of the ovine fetus during late gestation. PLoS ONE 7:0052363. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0052363 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Jia Y, Gao G, Song H, Cai D, Yang X, and Zhao R (2016). Low-protein diet fed to crossbred sows during pregnancy and lactation enhances myostatin gene expression through epigenetic regulation in skeletal muscle of weaning piglets. Eur. J. Nutr 55, 1307–1314. doi: 10.1007/s00394-015-0949-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Jobe AH (2020). Antenatal Corticosteroids-A Concern for Lifelong Outcomes. J. Pediatr 217, 184–188. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2019.09.015 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Joseph S, Alava B, Antolic A, Richards EM, Wood CE, and Keller-Wood M (2020). Fetal ovine skeletal and cardiac muscle transcriptomics are differentially altered by increased maternal cortisol during gestation. Physiol. Genomics 52, 178–190. doi: 10.1152/physiolgenomics.00096.2019 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Karunaratne JF, Ashton CJ, and Stickland NC (2005). Fetal programming of fat and collagen in porcine skeletal muscles. J. Anat 207, 763–768. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2005.00494.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Kemp MW, Newnham JP, Challis JG, Jobe AH, and Stock SJ (2016). The clinical use of corticosteroids in pregnancy. Hum. Reprod. Update 22, 240–259. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmv047 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Kondash ME, Ananthakumar A, Khodabukus A, Bursac N, and Truskey GA (2020). Glucose uptake and insulin response in tissue-engineered human skeletal muscle. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med 17, 801–813. doi: 10.1007/s13770-020-00242-y [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Kosmidis G, Bellin M, Ribeiro MC, Van Meer B, Ward-Van Oostwaard D, Passier R, et al. (2015). Altered calcium handling and increased contraction force in human embryonic stem cell derived cardiomyocytes following short term dexamethasone exposure. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun 467, 998–1005. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2015.10.026 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Kotelevtsev Y, Brown RW, Fleming S, Kenyon C, Edwards CR, Seckl JR, et al. (1999). Hypertension in mice lacking 11beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 2. J. Clin. Invest 103, 683–689. doi: 10.1172/JCI4445 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Kotelevtsev Y, Holmes MC, Burchell A, Houston PM, Schmoll D, Jamieson P, et al. (1997). 11beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 knockout mice show attenuated glucocorticoid-inducible responses and resist hyperglycemia on obesity or stress. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A 94, 14924–14929. doi: 10.1073/pnas.94.26.14924 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Krozowski Z, MaGuire JA, Stein-Oakley AN, Dowling J, Smith RE, and Andrews RK (1995). Immunohistochemical localization of the 11 beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type II enzyme in human kidney and placenta. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab 80, 2203–2209. doi: 10.1210/jcem.80.7.7608280 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Kuo T, Lew MJ, Mayba O, Harris CA, Speed TP, and Wang JC (2012). Genome-wide analysis of glucocorticoid receptor-binding sites in myotubes identifies gene networks modulating insulin signaling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A 109, 11160–11165. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1111334109 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Kwon EJ, and Kim YJ (2017). What is fetal programming?: a lifetime health is under the control of in utero health. Obstet. Gynecol. Sci 60, 506–519. doi: 10.5468/ogs.2017.60.6.506 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Lai L, Leone TC, Zechner C, Schaeffer PJ, Kelly SM, Flanagan DP, et al. (2008). Transcriptional coactivators PGC-lα and PGC-lβ control overlapping programs required for perinatal maturation of the heart. Genes Dev. 22, 1948–1961. doi: 10.1101/gad.1661708 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Lamadé EK, Hendlmeier F, Wudy SA, Witt SH, Rietschel M, Coenen M, et al. (2021). Rhythm of fetoplacental 11β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 2-fetal protection from morning maternal glucocorticoids. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab 106, 1630–1636. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgab113 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Langley-Evans SC (1997). Maternal carbenoxolone treatment lowers birthweight and induces hypertension in the offspring of rats fed a protein-replete diet. Clin. Sci 93, 423–429. doi: 10.1042/cs0930423 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Lepper C, and Fan CM (2010). Inducible lineage tracing of Pax7-descendant cells reveals embryonic origin of adult satellite cells. Genesis 48, 424–436. doi: 10.1002/dvg.20630 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Lv J, Ma Q, Dasgupta C, Xu Z, and Zhang L (2019). Antenatal hypoxia and programming of glucocorticoid receptor expression in the adult rat heart. Front. Physiol 10:323. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2019.00323 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Makhija NK, Tronnes AA, Dunlap BS, Schulkin J, and Lannon SM (2016). Antenatal corticosteroid timing: accuracy after the introduction of a rescue course protocol. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol 214, 120.e1–120.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.08.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Martinez SR, Gay MS, and Zhang L (2015). Epigenetic mechanisms in heart development and disease. Drug Discov. Today 20, 799–811. doi: 10.1016/j.drudis.2014.12.018 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. McCabe L, Marash D, Li A, and Matthews SG (2001). Repeated antenatal glucocorticoid treatment decreases hypothalamic corticotropin releasing hormone mRNA but not corticosteroid receptor mRNA expression in the fetal guinea-pig brain. J. Neuroendocrinol 13, 425–431. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2826.2001.00649.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. McGoldrick E, Stewart F, Parker R, and Dalziel SR (2020). Antenatal corticosteroids for accelerating fetal lung maturation for women at risk of preterm birth. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev 3:CD004454. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004454.pub4 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. McMullen S, Langley-Evans SC, Gambling L, Lang C, Swali A, and McArdle HJ (2012). A common cause for a common phenotype: the gatekeeper hypothesis in fetal programming. Med. Hypotheses 78, 88–94. doi: 10.1016/j.mehy.2011.09.047 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Mesiano S, Coulter CL, and Jaffe RB (1993). Localization of cytochrome P450 cholesterol side-chain cleavage, cytochrome P450 17 alpha-hydroxylase/17, 20-lyase, and 3 beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase isomerase steroidogenic enzymes in human and rhesus monkey fetal adrenal glands: reappraisal of fun. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab 77, 1184–1189. doi: 10.1210/jc.77.5.1184 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Meyer JS, and Novak MA (2021). Assessment of prenatal stress-related cortisol exposure: focus on cortisol accumulation in hair and nails. Dev. Psychobiol 63, 409–436. doi: 10.1002/dev.22021 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Meyer K, and Zhang L (2007). Fetal programming of cardiac function and disease. Reprod. Sci 14, 209–216. doi: 10.1177/1933719107302324 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Moisiadis VG, and Matthews SG (2014). Glucocorticoids and fetal programming part 2: Mechanisms. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol 10, 403–411. doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2014.74 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Mueller BR, and Bale TL (2008). Sex-specific programming of offspring emotionality after stress early in pregnancy. J. Neurosci 28, 9055–9065. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1424-08.2008 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Musser RE, Dritz SS, Davis DL, Tokach MD, Nelssen JL, Goodband RD, et al. (2007). Effects of L-carnitine in the gestating sow diet on fetal muscle development and carcass characteristics of the offspring. J. Appl. Anim. Res 31, 105–111. doi: 10.1080/09712119.2007.9706642 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  90. Narasaka T, Suzuki T, Moriya T, and Sasano H (2001). Temporal and spatial distribution of corticosteroidogenic enzymes immunoreactivity in developing human adrenal. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol 174, 111–120. doi: 10.1016/S0303-7207(00)00445-7 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Nathanielsz PW (2006). Animal models that elucidate basic principles of the developmental origins of adult diseases. ILAR J. 47, 73–82. doi: 10.1093/ilar.47.1.73 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Newell-Price J (2003). Proopiomelanocortin gene expression and DNA methylation: implications for Cushing’s syndrome and beyond. J. Endocrinol 177, 365–372. doi: 10.1677/joe.0.1770365 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Norris AW, Wang C, Yao J, Walsh SA, Sawatzke AB, Hu S, et al. (2011). Effect of insulin and dexamethasone on fetal assimilation of maternal glucose. Endocrinology 152, 255–262. doi: 10.1210/en.2010-0959 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Oakley RH, and Cidlowski JA (2013). The biology of the glucocorticoid receptor: new signaling mechanisms in health and disease. J. Allergy Clin. Immunol 132, 1033–1044. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2013.09.007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Olguín HC, and Pisconti A (2012). Marking the tempo for myogenesis: Pax7 and the regulation of muscle stem cell fate decisions. J. Cell. Mol. Med 16, 1013–1025. doi: 10.1111/j.1582-4934.2011.01348.x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Parker CRJ, Faye-Petersen O, Stankovic AK, Mason JI, and Grizzle WE (1995). Immunohistochemical evaluation of the cellular localization and ontogeny of 3 beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase/delta 5-4 isomerase in the human fetal adrenal gland. Endocr. Res 21, 69–80. doi: 10.3109/07435809509030422 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Patterson AJ, Chen M, Xue Q, Xiao D, and Zhang L (2010). Chronic prenatal hypoxia induces epigenetic programming of PKC{epsilon} gene repression in rat hearts. Circ. Res 107, 365–373. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.110.221259 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Peng J, Zhou Y, Zhang Z, Wang Z, Gao L, Zhang X, et al. (2018). The detrimental effects of glucocorticoids exposure during pregnancy on offspring’s cardiac functions mediated by hypermethylation of bone morphogenetic protein-4. Cell Death Dis. 9, 1–17. doi: 10.1038/s41419-018-0841-1 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Puente BN, Kimura W, Muralidhar SA, Moon J, Amatruda JF, Phelps KL, et al. (2014). The oxygen-rich postnatal environment induces cardiomyocyte cell-cycle arrest through DNA damage response. Cell 157, 565–579. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.03.032 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. Razaz N, Skoll A, Fahey J, Allen VM, and Joseph KS (2015). Trends in optimal, suboptimal, and questionably appropriate receipt of antenatal corticosteroid prophylaxis. Obstet. Gynecol 125, 288–296. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000000629 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  101. Reed SA, Raja JS, Hoffman ML, Zinn SA, and Govoni KE (2014). Poor maternal nutrition inhibits muscle development in ovine offspring. J. Anim. Sci. Biotechnol 5, 1–11. doi: 10.1186/2049-1891-5-43 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  102. Rehfeldt C, and Kuhn G (2006). Consequences of birth weight for postnatal growth performance and carcass quality in pigs as related to myogenesis. J. Anim. Sci 84(Suppl), E113–E123. doi: 10.2527/2006.8413_supplE113x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  103. Rehfeldt C, Te Pas MFW, Wimmers K, Brameld JM, Nissen PM, Berri C, et al. (2011). Advances in research on the prenatal development of skeletal muscle in animals in relation to the quality of muscle-based food. I. Regulation of myogenesis and environmental impact. Animal 5, 703–717. doi: 10.1017/S1751731110002089 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  104. Reynolds LP, Borowicz PP, Caton JS, Crouse MS, Dahlen CR, and Ward AK (2019). Developmental programming of fetal growth and development. Vet. Clin. North Am 35, 229–247. doi: 10.1016/j.cvfa.2019.02.006 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  105. Reynolds RM, Allan KM, Raja EA, Bhattacharya SSSS, McNeill G, Hannaford PC, et al. (2013). Maternal obesity during pregnancy and premature mortality from cardiovascular event in adult offspring: Follow-up of 1 323 275 person years. BMJ 347, 1–10. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f4539 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  106. Ricketts ML, Shoesmith KJ, Hewison M, Strain A, Eggo MC, and Stewart PM (1998). Regulation of 11 beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 in primary cultures of rat and human hepatocytes. J. Endocrinol 156, 159–168. doi: 10.1677/joe.0.1560159 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  107. Rog-Zielinska EA, Craig M-A, Manning JR, Richardson RV, Gowans GJ, Dunbar DR, et al. (2015). Glucocorticoids promote structural and functional maturation of foetal cardiomyocytes: a role for PGC-1α. Cell Death Differ. 22, 1106–1116. doi: 10.1038/cdd.2014.181 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  108. Rog-Zielinska EA, Richardson RV, Denvir MA, and Chapman KE (2013a). Glucocorticoids and foetal heart maturation; implications for prematurity and foetal programming. J. Mol. Endocrinol 52, R125–R135. doi: 10.1530/JME-13-0204 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  109. Rog-Zielinska EA, Thomson A, Kenyon CJ, Brownstein DG, Moran CM, Szumska D, et al. (2013b). Glucocorticoid receptor is required for foetal heart maturation. Hum. Mol. Genet 22, 3269–3282. doi: 10.1093/hmg/ddt182 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  110. Sand SA, Ernst A, Lunddorf LLH, Brix N, Gaml-Sørensen A, and Ramlau-Hansen CH (2019). In utero exposure to glucocorticoids and pubertal timing in sons and daughters. Sci. Rep 9:20374. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-56917-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  111. Schwab M, Coksaygan T, Rakers F, and Nathanielsz PW (2012). Glucocorticoid exposure of sheep at 0.7 to 0.75 gestation augments late-gestation fetal stress responses. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol 206, 253.e16–253.e22. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.11.006 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  112. Seckl JR, and Holmes MC (2007). Mechanisms of disease: glucocorticoids, their placental metabolism and fetal “programming” of adult pathophysiology. Nat. Clin. Pract. Endocrinol. Metab 3, 479–488. doi: 10.1038/ncpendmet0515 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  113. Smith AM, Pankey CL, Odhiambo JF, Ghnenis AB, Nathanielsz PW, and Ford SP (2018). Rapid communication: reduced maternal nutrition during early-to mid-gestation elevates newborn lamb plasma cortisol concentrations and eliminates the neonatal leptin surge. J. Anim. Sci 96, 2640–2645. doi: 10.1093/jas/sky215 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  114. Smith ZD, and Meissner A (2013). DNA methylation: roles in mammalian development. Nat. Rev. Genet 14, 204–220. doi: 10.1038/nrg3354 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  115. Solano ME, and Arck PC (2020). Steroids, pregnancy and fetal development. Front. Immunol 10, 1–13. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.03017 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  116. Solano ME, Holmes MC, Mittelstadt PR, Chapman KE, and Tolosa E (2016). Antenatal endogenous and exogenous glucocorticoids and their impact on immune ontogeny and long-term immunity. Semin. Immunopathol 38, 739–763. doi: 10.1007/s00281-016-0575-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  117. Song J, Liu Y, Da S.u, J., Yuan D, Sun F, and Zhu J (2019a). Systematic analysis of alternative splicing signature unveils prognostic predictor for kidney renal clear cell carcinoma. J. Cell. Physiol 234, 22753–22764. doi: 10.1002/jcp.28840 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  118. Song R, Hu X-Q, and Zhang L (2019b). Glucocorticoids and programming of the microenvironment in heart. J. Endocrinol 242, T121–T133. doi: 10.1530/JOE-18-0672 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  119. Tilley RE, McNeil CJ, Ashworth CJ, Page KR, and McArdle HJ (2007). Altered muscle development and expression of the insulin-like growth factor system in growth retarded fetal pigs. Domest. Anim. Endocrinol 32, 167–177. doi: 10.1016/j.domaniend.2006.02.003 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  120. Torricelli M, Novembri R, Bloise E, De Bonis M, Challis JR, and Petraglia F (2011). Changes in placental CRH, urocortins, and CRH-receptor mRNA expression associated with preterm delivery and chorioamnionitis. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab 96, 534–540. doi: 10.1210/jc.2010-1740 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  121. Van Tuyl M, Blommaart PE, De Boer PAJ, Wert SE, Ruijter JM, Islam S, et al. (2004). Prenatal exposure to thyroid hormone is necessary for normal postnatal development of murine heart and lungs. Dev. Biol 272, 104–117. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2004.03.042 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  122. Vitellius G, Trabado S, Bouligand J, Delemer B, and Lombès M (2018). Pathophysiology of Glucocorticoid Signaling. Ann. Endocrinol 79, 98–106. doi: 10.1016/j.ando.2018.03.001 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  123. Waddell DS, Baehr LM, Van Den Brandt J, Johnsen SA, Reichardt HM, Furlow JD, et al. (2008). The glucocorticoid receptor and FOXO1 synergistically activate the skeletal muscle atrophy-associated MuRF1 gene. Am. J. Physiol 295, 785–797. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00646.2007 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  124. Wang JC, Derynck MK, Nonaka DF, Khodabakhsh DB, Haqq C, and Yamamoto KR (2004). Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) scanning identifies primary glucocorticoid receptor target genes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A 101, 15603–15608. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0407008101 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  125. Wang L, Hu J, Xing H, Sun M, Wang J, Jian Q, et al. (2014). Construction of microRNA and transcription factor regulatory network based on gene expression data in cardiomyopathy. Eur. J. Med. Res 19:57. doi: 10.1186/s40001-014-0057-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  126. Weaver ICG, Cervoni N, Champagne FA, D’Alessio AC, Sharma S, Seckl JR, et al. (2004). Epigenetic programming by maternal behavior. Nat. Neurosci 7, 847–854. doi: 10.1038/nn1276 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  127. Wigmore PM, and Stickland NC (1983). Muscle development in large and small pig fetuses. J. Anat 137 (Pt 2), 235–45. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  128. Woods LL (2006). Maternal glucocorticoids and prenatal programming of hypertension. Am. J. Physiol 291, R1069–R1075. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00753.2005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  129. Woods LL, and Weeks DA (2005). Prenatal programming of adult blood pressure: Role of maternal corticosteroids. Am. J. Physiol. - Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol 289, R955–R962. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00455.2004 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  130. Wyrwoll CS, Mark PJ, Mori TA, and Waddell BJ (2008). Developmental programming of adult hyperinsulinemia, increased proinflammatory cytokine production, and altered skeletal muscle expression of SLC2A4 (GLUT4) and uncoupling protein 3. J. Endocrinol 198, 571–579. doi: 10.1677/JOE-08-0210 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  131. Wyrwoll CS, Noble J, Thomson A, Tesic D, Miller MR, Rog-Zielinska EA, et al. (2016). Pravastatin ameliorates placental vascular defects, fetal growth, and cardiac function in a model of glucocorticoid excess. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A 113, 6265–6270. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1520356113 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  132. Xiong F, Lin T, Song M, Ma Q, Martinez SR, Lv J, et al. (2016). Antenatal hypoxia induces epigenetic repression of glucocorticoid receptor and promotes ischemic-sensitive phenotype in the developing heart. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol 91, 160–171. doi: 10.1016/j.yjmcc.2016.01.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  133. Yan X, Huang Y, Zhao JX, Rogers CJ, Zhu MJ, Ford SP, et al. (2013a). Maternal obesity downregulates microRNA let-7g expression, a possible mechanism for enhanced adipogenesis during ovine fetal skeletal muscle development. Int. J. Obes 37, 568–575. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2012.69 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  134. Yan X, Zhu M-J, Dodson MV, and Du M (2013b). Developmental programming of fetal skeletal muscle and adipose tissue development. J. Genomics 1, 29–38. doi: 10.7150/jgen.3930 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  135. Zhu MJ, Ford SP, Means WJ, Hess BW, Nathanielsz PW, and Du M (2006). Maternal nutrient restriction a ects properties of skeletal muscle in offspring. J. Physiol 575, 241–250. doi: 10.1113/jphysiol.2006.112110 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  136. Zhu MJ, Ford SP, Nathanielsz PW, and Du M (2004). Effect of maternal nutrient restriction in sheep on the development of fetal skeletal muscle. Biol. Reprod 71, 1968–1973. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.104.034561 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

RESOURCES