Abstract
We report the case of a woman in her 70s with a stage IVA small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the vagina. The patient started chemotherapy with cisplatin and etoposide followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy. Pelvic MRI after completion of treatment did not show residual disease. Three years and 8 months after definitive treatment, the patient remains on regular follow-up without evidence of disease.
Keywords: Gynecological cancer, Chemotherapy, Radiotherapy
Background
Small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (SCNC) is a highly proliferative disease. It commonly arises in the lung and only 2.5%–5% are extrapulmonary.1–3 Primary SCNC of the female genital tract constitutes less than 2% of all gynaecological cancers.4–6 It has been reported in the cervix, endometrium, ovary, vagina and vulva. SCNC of the vagina is a very rare entity with a dismal prognosis.2 The mean age at diagnosis is 59 years,6 and the most common symptom is postmenopausal bleeding.7 Due to its rarity and lack of data, there are no established treatment guidelines. We report a case of SCNC of the vagina, its treatment and follow-up.
Case presentation
We report the case of a woman in her 70s, gravida 4, para 1, stillbirth 1 and abortus 3, with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0, with a medical history of hypertension, transient ischaemic attack, peripheral vertigo and bilateral oophorectomy and hysterectomy 25 years earlier, for unknown reasons. No family history of cancer was found.
The patient presented with pruritus and vaginal bleeding for 1 month, with no pain or abnormal smell. On gynaecological examination, a haemorrhagic lesion was observed in the anterior wall of the vagina and a biopsy was performed. Pathology identified small cells with dispersed chromatin nuclei and visible nucleolus, scarce cytoplasm with undefined limits in a lobulated growth, extensive necrosis and high mitotic index (60 mitoses per 10 high-power fields), with atypical mitoses. On immunohistochemistry examination, tumour cells were positive for AE1/AE3, CD56 and synaptophysin, and negative for chromogranin, CD10, CD45, CD99, vimentin, desmin and actin. Ki67 index was >90% (figure 1). Therefore, the histology was consistent with SCNC.
Figure 1.
Histology showed a high-grade carcinoma with positive neuroendocrine markers, abundant mitotic figures and a proliferative index of >90%, consistent with SCNC. SCNC, small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma.
Rectal examination showed no involvement of the parametrium. A pelvic MRI revealed a 60 mm lesion with external bladder invasion and regional lymph nodes involvement (figure 2). Cystoscopy revealed no extramural transgression. A positron emission tomography scan showed a lesion in the vagina, enlarged bilateral external iliac lymph nodes and no evidence of metastatic disease. Therefore, the final diagnosis was a stage cT4N1M0–IVA SCNC of the vagina.
Figure 2.
Pelvic MRI with a 60 mm lesion (T2 sagittal), external bladder invasion (T2 sagittal) and regional lymph node involvement (T2 axial).
Tumour board discussion proposed concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy. The patient underwent two cycles of intravenous cisplatin 80 mg/m2 on D1 and etoposide 100 mg/m2 on D1–D3, followed by concurrent chemotherapy (two cycles of 3 weekly cisplatin and etoposide) in addition to radiation therapy with 28 external beam fractions to the tumour and lymph nodes of 1.8 Gy each and a boost of 8 fractions of 2 Gy each on the tumour. After concurrent chemoradiotherapy, the patient received two more cycles of cisplatin and etoposide.
Despite acute grade 1 asthenia and grade 1 peripheral sensory neuropathy, the treatment was well tolerated, and the patient became asymptomatic from the presenting symptoms. No dose reduction or interruption was necessary.
Outcome and follow-up
Pelvic MRI performed 6 weeks after completion of treatment did not show residual disease. She was kept on regular follow-up, with gynaecological examination every 4–6 months and pelvic MRI and chest and abdominal CT scans every 6 months. Three years and 8 months after definitive chemoradiotherapy, the patient has no evidence of disease, remaining asymptomatic with good quality of life.
Discussion
SCNC of the vagina was first reported by Scully et al in 1989.8 It is a very rare and aggressive disease with no standard treatment and the majority of the patients die within a year of diagnosis.3 Since female genital tract and lung SCNC have similar pathological features,4 treatment of non-metastatic disease often includes a combination of etoposide/platinum-based chemotherapy and radiotherapy.3 Due to its rarity, there is no consensus about the optimal therapy of SCNC of the vagina. There are other described therapeutic options according to staging, such as radiation therapy of the lung and prophylactic cranial irradiation, which may cause cognitive impairment and compromise quality of life.9
A summary of the literature regarding SCNC of the vagina is shown in table 1. Forty-nine patients with primary SCNC of the vagina have been reported in 38 English-language articles to date, with a mean age at diagnosis of 54 years. The most common symptom at presentation was bleeding (23 patients). Of the described patients, 12 were International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage I, 12 FIGO stage II, 12 FIGO stage III and 11 FIGO stage IV. Twenty-four patients died, 15 of them (63%) within 1 year of diagnosis.
Table 1.
Summary of SCNC of the vagina case reports in literature
| Literature | Year of publication | No of patients | Age range (years) |
Presentation | FIGO stage | Primary therapy | Chemotherapy used | Secondary therapy | Outcome | Survival (months) |
| Scully et al8 | 1984 | 1 | Histopathological study without clinical details | |||||||
| Peters et al10 | 1985 | 5 | 60s (mean) | ND | II (2) III (2) IV (1) |
ND | ND | Died | 12 (median) | |
| Fukushima et al11 | 1986 | 1 | 30s | II | RT | CT | Died | 12 | ||
| Ulich et al12 | 1986 | 1 | Histopathological study without clinical details | |||||||
| Hopkins et al13 | 1989 | 3 | 40s 60s 70s |
Bleeding Bleeding Mucoid discharge |
II IVB IVB |
RT, BT RT, CT CT |
Doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide cisplatin, methotrexate | CCRT | Died Died Died |
29 5 9 |
| Chafe14 | 1989 | 2 | 70s 70s |
Constipation Tenesmus bleeding |
II II |
RT RT |
CT RT |
Died Died |
15 11 |
|
| Rusthoven and Daya15 | 1990 | 1 | 60s | Bleeding | II | CT, RT | Etoposide, cisplatin | RT | Died | ≈8 |
| Joseph et al16 | 1992 | 1 | 60s | Asymptomatic | I | S, CT, BT | Vincristine, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide | Alive | 24 or more | |
| Prasad et al17 | 1992 | 1 | 30s | Asymptomatic | II | S, CT, BT | Cisplatin, etoposide | Died | 6 | |
| Miliauskas and Leong18 | 1992 | 1 | 70s | Vaginal discharge | III | S | S | Died | 10 | |
| Colleran et al19 | 1997 | 1 | 50s | Bleeding | I | CCRT | Cisplatin, etoposide | Died | 26 | |
| Mirhashemi et al20 | 1998 | 1 | 30s | Dyspareunia | III | CT, RT | Cisplatin, etoposide | Alive | 6 or more | |
| Elsaleh et al21 | 2000 | 1 | 50s | Bleeding | III | CCRT | Carboplatin, etoposide | Died | 14 | |
| Hayashi et al4 | 2000 | 1 | 50s | Bleeding | I | CT | Cyclophosphamide, pirarubicin hydrochloride, cisplatin | Alive | 41 or more | |
| Kaminski et al22 | 2003 | 1 | 60s | Spotting | I | CCRT, BT | Cisplatin, etoposide | CT | Died | 13 |
| Bing et al23 | 2004 | 3 | 70s 50s 30s |
Bleeding Spotting Rectal pain |
IVB III IVA |
CCRT S CCRT, CT, BT |
Cisplatin, etoposide cisplatin, etoposide | CT | Died Died Alive |
4 4 5 or more |
| Petru et al24 | 2005 | 1 | 50s | Bleeding | II | S, CT | Cisplatin, etoposide, epirubicin | Died | 11 | |
| Coleman et al25 | 2006 | 1 | 60s | Pain, bleeding | IVB | RT, CT | Cisplatin, etoposide | CT | Died | 8 |
| Weberpals et al26 | 2008 | 1 | 60s | Vaginal discharge, bleeding | IVB | CT | Cisplatin, etoposide | Died | 8 | |
| Bhalodia et al27 | 2011 | 1 | 50s | Difficulty in urination | I | S | ND | ND | ||
| ElNaggar et al28 | 2012 | 1 | 30s | Dyspareunia, bleeding, vaginal discharge | IVB | CT | Cisplatin, etoposide | CT, RT | Died | 11 |
| Khurana et al5 | 2013 | 1 | 30s | Bleeding | I | S, CT, RT | Cisplatin, etoposide | Alive | 12 or more | |
| Oliveira et al29 | 2013 | 1 | 40s | Vaginal discharge | III | CT, RT, BT | Cisplatin, etoposide | Alive | 5 or more | |
| Tamura et al30 | 2013 | 1 | 80s | Bleeding | I | RT | Alive | 20 or more | ||
| Jain et al31 | 2016 | 2 | 30s ND |
ND ND |
II I |
S, CT, RT S±adjuvant treatment |
Cisplatin, etoposide | Alive Alive | 67 or more 31.7 (median) |
|
| Vatankulu et al32 | 2016 | 1 | 30s | Pain, bleeding | IVA | CT | Cisplatin, etoposide | ND | ND | |
| Yan et al33 | 2016 | 1 | 40s | Vulvar mass, bleeding | IVB | CCRT, BT, CT | Paclitaxel, cisplatin | Alive | 21 or more | |
| Brzezniak et al34 | 2017 | 1 | 50s | ND | III | CCRT | Cisplatin, etoposide | IO | Died | 7.5 |
| Haykal et al35 | 2018 | 1 | 50s | Bleeding | I | CT, CCRT | Cisplatin, etoposide | Alive | Under treatment | |
| Kostamo et al7 | 2018 | 1 | 30s | Asymptomatic | II | S | CT, RT | Died | 34 | |
| Kusunoki et al36 | 2018 | 1 | 50s | Bleeding | III | CCRT, BT | Cisplatin | Alive | 17 or more | |
| He et al37 | 2019 | 1 | 40s | Mass | II | S, CT | Paclitaxel, carboplatin | Died | 77 | |
| Kombathula et al3 | 2019 | 1 | 60s | Pain | III | CT, CCRT, BT | Taxane, cisplatin, etoposide | Alive | 22 or more | |
| Shimazaki et al38 | 2020 | 1 | 50s | Bleeding | I | S, CT | Irinotecan, cisplatin | Alive | 11 or more | |
| Kitazono et al39 | 2021 | 2 | 70s 70s |
Bleeding Bleeding |
I IVB |
CCRT S to primary, CT |
Alive Alive | 8 or more 8 or more |
||
| Kumari et al2 | 2021 | 1 | 50s | Bleeding | III | RT, CCRT | Cisplatin, etoposide | BSC | Died | 14 |
| Inzani et al40 | 2022 | 1 | 40s | Bleeding | I | S | ND | ND | ||
| Mai et al41 | 2022 | 1 | Middle-aged | Mass | III | S, CCRT, CT | Cisplatin, ifosfamide, epirubicin | IO, TT | Died | 21 |
| Present study | 2022 | 1 | 70s | Pruritus, bleeding | IVA | CT, CCRT | Cisplatin, etoposide | Alive | 44 or more | |
| Total | 39 articles | 50 patients | ||||||||
BSC, best supportive care; BT, brachytherapy; CCRT, concurrent chemoradiation therapy; CT, chemotherapy; FIGO, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics; IO, immunotherapy; ND, no description; RT, radiotherapy; S, surgery; SCNC, small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma; TT, target therapy.
Cisplatin–etoposide was the most common chemotherapy regimen, used in 21 cases (42%), in the adjuvant setting, with concurrent radiotherapy or in metastatic setting. Due to the heterogeneity of the reported cases, the rarity of the disease and the absence of prospective studies, it is difficult to conclude which should be the preferred treatment.
Our patient was treated with cisplatin–etoposide chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy with an external beam radiotherapy boost. Surgery was not an option as this was a locally advanced disease with bladder invasion (FIGO stage IVA), whose cases are associated with less favourable outcomes with surgery as primary treatment modality. A radiotherapy boost was given after taking into consideration tumour size, bladder invasion and constraints in the availability of interstitial brachytherapy. Despite the locally advanced disease, she remains free of relapse after 44 months.
Learning points.
Small cell carcinoma of the vagina is a rare disease with a dismal prognosis.
There is no established standard treatment of small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the vagina.
Locally advanced small cell carcinoma of the vagina can be treated with cisplatin and etoposide concurrent chemoradiotherapy.
Footnotes
Contributors: All authors contributed extensively to the case. LL-C contributed to planning, conduct, reporting, conception and design, and acquisition of data. JG contributed to patient management, initial planning and conduction, manuscript writing and extensive review. PS and MC-N contributed to manuscript writing and review. Radiology department contributed to image selection. Pathology department contributed to histological images selection and description.
Funding: The authors have not declared a specific grant for this research from any funding agency in the public, commercial or not-for-profit sectors.
Case reports provide a valuable learning resource for the scientific community and can indicate areas of interest for future research. They should not be used in isolation to guide treatment choices or public health policy.
Competing interests: None declared.
Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Ethics statements
Patient consent for publication
Obtained.
References
- 1.van der Heijden HFM, Heijdra YF. Extrapulmonary small cell carcinoma. South Med J 2005;98:349http://sma.org/southern-medical-journal/article/extrapulmonary-small-cell-carcinoma 10.1097/01.SMJ.0000145724.40477.50 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Kumari P, Ashok Kumar A, Arun Y, et al. A case report on primary neuroendocrine cancer of vagina. Clin Med Rev Case Rep 2021;8 https://www.clinmedjournals.org/articles/cmrcr/clinical-medical-reviews-and-case-reports-cmrcr-8-360.php?jid=cmrcr 10.23937/2378-3656/1410360 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Kombathula SH, Rapole PS, Prem SS, et al. Primary small cell carcinoma of the vagina: a rare instance of prolonged survival. BMJ Case Rep 2019;12:e227100 https://casereports.bmj.com/lookup/doi/ 10.1136/bcr-2018-227100 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Hayashi M, Mori Y, Takagi Y, et al. Primary small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the vagina. Oncology 2000;58:300–4 https://www.karger.com/Article/FullText/12116 10.1159/000012116 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Khurana A, Gupta G, Gupta M, et al. Primary neuroendocrine carcinoma of the vagina with coexistent atypical vaginal adenosis: a rare entity. J Cancer Res Ther 2013;9:328 http://www.cancerjournal.net/text.asp?2013/9/2/328/113422 10.4103/0973-1482.113422 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Virarkar M, Vulasala SS, Morani AC, et al. Neuroendocrine neoplasms of the gynecologic tract. Cancers 2022;14:1835 https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6694/14/7/1835 10.3390/cancers14071835 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kostamo K, Peart M, McKenzie N, et al. Novel treatment of small-cell neuroendocrine of the vagina. Case Rep Oncol Med 2018;2018:1–3 https://www.hindawi.com/journals/crionm/2018/9157036/ 10.1155/2018/9157036 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Scully RE, Aguirre P, DeLellis RA. Argyrophilia, serotonin, and peptide hormones in the female genital tract and its tumors. Int J Gynecol Pathol 1984;3:51–70 http://journals.lww.com/00004347-198403010-00005 10.1097/00004347-198403010-00005 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Le Pechoux C. Prophylactic cranial irradiation or no prophylactic cranial irradiation after adjuvant chemotherapy in resected small cell lung cancer? Journal of Thoracic Oncology 2017;12:173–5 https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1556086416335596 10.1016/j.jtho.2016.12.002 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Peters WA, Kumar NB, Morley GW. Carcinoma of the vagina. factors influencing treatment outcome. Cancer 1985;55:892–7 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/1097-0142(19850215)55:4%3C892::AID-CNCR2820550430%3E3.0.CO;2-N 10.1002/1097-0142(19850215)55:4<892::AID-CNCR2820550430>3.0.CO;2-N [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Fukushima M, Twiggs LB, Okagaki T. Mixed intestinal adenocarcinoma-argentaffin carcinoma of the vagina. Gynecol Oncol 1986;23:387–94 https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/0090825886901435 10.1016/0090-8258(86)90143-5 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Ulich TR, Liao SY, Layfield L, et al. Endocrine and tumor differentiation markers in poorly differentiated small-cell carcinoids of the cervix and vagina. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1986;110:1054-7–7 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3022670 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Hopkins MP, Kumar NB, Lichter AS, et al. Small cell carcinoma of the vagina with neuroendocrine features. A report of three cases. J Reprod Med 1989;34:486-91–91 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2549239 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Chafe W. Neuroepithelial small cell carcinoma of the vagina. Cancer 1989;64:1948–51 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/1097-0142(19891101)64:9%3C1948::AID-CNCR2820640930%3E3.0.CO;2-I 10.1002/1097-0142(19891101)64:9<1948::AID-CNCR2820640930>3.0.CO;2-I [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Rusthoven JJ, Daya D. Small-Cell carcinoma of the vagina. A clinicopathologic study. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1990;114:728–31 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1694657 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Joseph RE, Enghardt MH, Doering DL, et al. Small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the vagina. Cancer 1992;70:784–9 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/1097-0142(19920815)70:4%3C784::AID-CNCR2820700412%3E3.0.CO;2-0 10.1002/1097-0142(19920815)70:4<784::AID-CNCR2820700412>3.0.CO;2-0 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Prasad CJ, Ray JA, Kessler S. Primary small cell carcinoma of the vagina arising in a background of atypical adenosis. Cancer 1992;70:2484–7 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/1097-0142(19921115)70:10%3C2484::AID-CNCR2820701015%3E3.0.CO;2-O 10.1002/1097-0142(19921115)70:10<2484::AID-CNCR2820701015>3.0.CO;2-O [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.MILIAUSKAS JR, LEONG AS-Y. Small cell (neuroendocrine) carcinoma of the vagina. Histopathology 1992;21:371–4 https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/ 10.1111/j.1365-2559.1992.tb00409.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Colleran KM, Burge MR, Crooks LA, et al. Small cell carcinoma of the vagina causing Cushing's syndrome by ectopic production and secretion of ACTH: a case report. Gynecol Oncol 1997;65:526–9 https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0090825897947016 10.1006/gyno.1997.4701 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Mirhashemi R, Kratz A, Weir MM, et al. Vaginal small cell carcinoma mimicking a Bartholin's gland abscess: a case report. Gynecol Oncol 1998;68:297–300 https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0090825898949599 10.1006/gyno.1998.4959 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Elsaleh H, Bydder S, Cassidy B, et al. Small cell carcinoma of the vagina. Australas Radiol 2000;44:336–7 http://doi.wiley.com/ 10.1046/j.1440-1673.2000.00826.x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Kaminski JM, Anderson PR, Han AC, et al. Primary small cell carcinoma of the vagina. Gynecol Oncol 2003;88:451–5 https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0090825802001531 10.1016/S0090-8258(02)00153-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Bing Z, Levine L, Lucci JA, et al. Primary small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the vagina: a clinicopathologic study. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2004;128:857–62 https://meridian.allenpress.com/aplm/article/128/8/857/458856/Primary-Small-Cell-Neuroendocrine-Carcinoma-of-the 10.5858/2004-128-857-PSCNCO [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Petru E, Pasterk C, Reich O, et al. Small-Cell carcinoma of the uterus and the vagina: experience with ten patients. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2005;271:316–9 http://link.springer.com/ 10.1007/s00404-004-0630-1 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Coleman NM, Smith-Zagone MJ, Tanyi J, et al. Primary neuroendocrine carcinoma of the vagina with Merkel cell carcinoma phenotype. Am J Surg Pathol 2006;30:405–10 http://journals.lww.com/00000478-200603000-00017 10.1097/01.pas.0000194737.95421.9d [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Weberpals J, Djordjevic B, Khalifa M, et al. A rare case of ectopic adrenocorticotropic hormone syndrome in small cell carcinoma of the vagina: a case report. J Low Genit Tract Dis 2008;12:140–5 https://journals.lww.com/00128360-200804000-00013 10.1097/LGT.0b013e31815cda1e [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Bhalodia JN, Kapapura DV, Parekh MN. Primary small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of vagina: a rare case report. Patholog Res Int 2011;2011:1–3 https://www.hindawi.com/journals/pri/2011/306921/ 10.4061/2011/306921 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.ElNaggar AC, Patil AS, Singh K, et al. Neuroendocrine carcinoma of the vagina in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 2012;119:445–7 https://journals.lww.com/00006250-201202001-00011 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318236ffcd [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Oliveira R, Bócoli MC, Saldanha JC, et al. Primary small cell carcinoma of the vagina. Case Rep Obstet Gynecol 2013;2013:1–4 http://www.hindawi.com/journals/criog/2013/827037/ 10.1155/2013/827037 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Tamura R, Yokoyama Y, Kobayashi A, et al. A case of small cell carcinoma of the vagina. Rare Tumors 2013;5:189–91 http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/ 10.4081/rt.2013.e58 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Jain V, Sekhon R, Giri S, et al. Role of radical surgery in early stages of vaginal Cancer-Our experience. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2016;26:1176–81 https://ijgc.bmj.com/lookup/doi/ 10.1097/IGC.0000000000000743 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Vatankulu B, Ekmekçioğlu Ö, Aksoy SY, et al. Assessment of treatment response with FDG PET/CT on a primary neuroendocrine tumor of vagina. Rev Esp Med Nucl Imagen Mol 2016;35:143-4–4 https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2253654X15001195 10.1016/j.remn.2015.08.007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Yan WX, Jia XJ, Chen YB, et al. Primary small cell carcinoma of the vagina with pulmonary metastasis: a case report. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 2016;37:129-32–32 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27048125 [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Brzezniak C, Oronsky B, Trepel J, et al. RRx-001 priming of PD-1 inhibition in the treatment of small cell carcinoma of the vagina: a rare gynecological tumor. Case Rep Oncol 2017;10:276–80 https://www.karger.com/Article/FullText/464101 10.1159/000464101 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Haykal T, Pandit T, Bachuwa G, et al. Stage 1 small cell cancer of the vagina. BMJ Case Rep 2018;2018:bcr-2018-225294 https://casereports.bmj.com/lookup/doi/10.1136/bcr-2018-225294 10.1136/bcr-2018-225294 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Kusunoki S, Fujino K, Hirayama T, et al. Primary vaginal small-cell carcinoma treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy and interstitial irradiation: a case report and review of the literature. J Gynecol Surg 2018;34:315–8 https://www.liebertpub.com/doi/ 10.1089/gyn.2018.0038 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 37.He Y, Zhao H, Li X-M, et al. A clinical analysis of small-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the gynecologic tract: report of 20 cases. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2019;299:543–9 http://link.springer.com/ 10.1007/s00404-018-4960-9 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Shimazaki I, Hashiguchi Y, Yamauchi M. Secondary small cell vaginal cancer after operative therapy for endometrial cancer. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 2020;41:3 https://www.ejgo.net/articles/ 10.31083/j.ejgo.2020.05.5429 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Kitazono I, Akahane T, Sakihama M, et al. Human papilloma virus 18-Positive submucosal small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the vagina: an immunohistochemical and genomic study. Int J Surg Pathol 2021;29:870–6 http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/ 10.1177/10668969211007569 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Inzani F, Santoro A, Angelico G, et al. Neuroendocrine tumor (net) of the vagina in the light of who 2020 2-tiered grading system: clinicopathological report of the first described case. Virchows Archiv 2022;480:687–91 https://link.springer.com/ 10.1007/s00428-021-03078-6 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Mai Y-F, Chan I-S, Lai C-R, et al. Primary poorly differentiated carcinoma of the vagina with focal neuroendocrine differentiation: a tumour with aggressive behaviour. BMJ Case Rep 2022;15. 10.1136/bcr-2021-247554. [Epub ahead of print: 08 Apr 2022] https://casereports.bmj.com/lookup/doi/10.1136/bcr-2021-247554 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]


