Skip to main content
Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology logoLink to Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology
. 2022 Jan 14;32(2):176–186. doi: 10.4014/jmb.2110.10048

Isolation of Dibutyl Phthalate-Degrading Bacteria and Its Coculture with Citrobacter freundii CD-9 to Degrade Fenvalerate

Min Wu 1, Jie Tang 1,*, Xuerui Zhou 1, Dan Lei 1, Chaoyi Zeng 1, Hong Ye 1, Ting Cai 1, Qing Zhang 1,*
PMCID: PMC9628840  PMID: 35058397

Abstract

Continued fenvalerate use has caused serious environmental pollution and requires large-scale remediation. Dibutyl phthalate (DBP) was discovered in fenvalerate metabolites degraded by Citrobacter freundii CD-9. Coculturing is an effective method for bioremediation, but few studies have analyzed the degradation pathways and potential mechanisms of cocultures. Here, a DBP-degrading strain (BDBP 071) was isolated from soil contaminated with pyrethroid pesticides (PPs) and identified as Stenotrophomonas acidaminiphila. The optimum conditions for DBP degradation were determined by response surface methodology (RSM) analysis to be 30.9 mg/l DBP concentration, pH 7.5, at a culture temperature of 37.2°C. Under the optimized conditions, approximately 88% of DBP was degraded within 48 h and five metabolites were detected. Coculturing C. freundii CD-9 and S. acidaminiphila BDBP 071 promoted fenvalerate degradation. When CD-9 was cultured for 16 h before adding BDBP 071, the strain inoculation ratio was 5:5 (v/v), fenvalerate concentration was 75.0 mg/l, fenvalerate was degraded to 84.37 ± 1.25%, and DBP level was reduced by 5.21 mg/l. In addition, 12 fenvalerate metabolites were identified and a pathway for fenvalerate degradation by the cocultured strains was proposed. These results provide theoretical data for further exploration of the mechanisms used by this coculture system to degrade fenvalerate and DBP, and also offer a promising method for effective bioremediation of PPs and their related metabolites in polluted environments.

Keywords: DBP, fenvalerate, coculture, Citrobacter freundii, Stenotrophomonas acidaminiphila

Introduction

Fenvalerate is a member of the type II synthetic or biomimetic pyrethroid pesticides (PPs) having broad-spectrum, highly efficacious and fast-acting properties with wide application in agriculture, forestry, and households [1 -3]. However, long-term use of fenvalerate is hazardous to the environment and food chain and it has been reported that it may adversely affect fish, aquatic insects [4], beetles [5], bees [6] and microorganisms [7]. Moreover, studies have shown that fenvalerate is cumulative [8, 9] and long-term exposure can cause chronic diseases [10, 11]. Due to the potential of serious environmental pollution and ecological damage caused by the continuous increase in fenvalerate residues, the elimination of fenvalerate residues from food processing and the environment is urgent and important. One technique, bioremediation, holds true remediation for soil contaminated by PPs over a relatively short time period [11 -14].

Pesticide metabolites have also been studied [15 -18]. Previous studies on biodegradation products have mainly focused on 3-phenoxybenzoic acid (3-PBA) due to its high toxicity [18]. However, a number of other studies have recently reported that phthalate esters (PAEs) were detected in the biodegradation metabolites of PPs, which were obtained by diaryl cleaving of 3-phenoxybenzaldehyde [19 -22], including 1,2-benzenedicarboxylic acid bis (2-methylpropyl) ester [13], 1,2-benzenedicarboxylic acid, dipropyl ester [19], 1,2-benzenedicarboxylic, butyl dacyl ester [20, 21], and dibutyl phthalate (DBP) [22]. Moreover, Wang et al. [23] showed that DBP residue reached 2.8 -14.6 mg/kg, in Mollisol regions. Liu et al. [24] found that the concentration of DBP in the soil reached 0.04 - 29.4 mg/kg, in China. Studies also have shown that DBP adversely impacts the development of the immune system [25] and the nervous system [26, 27], and can cause adult weight gain, obesity [28, 29], and diabetes [30]. Currently, DBP-degrading bacteria include Enterobacter [23], Arthrobacter [24], Bacillus [31, 32], Rhodococcus [33, 34], Sphingomonas [35], Paracoccus [36], and Pseudomonas [37]. To our knowledge, the degradation of DBP by Stenotrophomonas acidaminiphila has not been reported.

The accumulation of PPs and DBP in the environment represents a serious threat to human health and has roused public concern [23]. Most single microorganisms cannot completely mineralize PPs [38]. Several studies have described the degradation of PPs and their intermediate metabolite, 3-PBA, by single strains [20, 38 -42]. However, there is no report of synergistic simultaneous degradation of PPs and the metabolite DBP by cocultured strains. Therefore, exploring the effects of cocultures of DBP-degrading bacteria and pyrethroid-degrading bacteria is of great significance.

We previously showed that Citrobacter freundii CD-9 had a good fenvalerate degradation ability, and poor ability to degrade DBP. Thus, in this study, our objectives were as follows: (I) isolate and characterize the DBP-degrading strain, BDBP 071, from soil contaminated with PPs, (II) optimize culture conditions for degradation of DBP, and (III) identify the intermediate metabolites produced by the degradation of fenvalerate by S. acidaminiphila BDBP 071 and C. freundii CD-9 cocultures.

Materials and Methods

Chemicals and Media

DBP (98.0%) was purchased from TCI Reagent Factory (China). Fenvalerate (96.0%) was purchased from Rongcheng Chemicals (China). Chromatographic-grade methanol, dichloromethane and acetonitrile were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich Reagent Co. (China). Other chemicals were of analytical grade and purchased from Kelong Chemical Co. (China).

Liquid and solid mineral salt medium (MM) and Luria-Bertani (LB) medium were prepared as described previously [1]. Fenvalerate and DBP were dissolved in acetonitrile to make a 10 g/l stock solution concentration, which was diluted using culture medium to achieve the desired working solution concentrations.

Enrichment, Isolation, and Identification of DBP-Degrading Strain

Soil samples were collected from the tomato root soil that had been contaminated with PPs in Sichuan, China, and an enrichment culture technique to isolate DBP-degrading strains was used [14]. Enrichment and separation procedures were conducted as previously described [1]. Briefly, 1 g soil sample was added to a 250 ml Erlenmeyer flask containing 50 ml sterilized LB/MM medium and 25 mg/l DBP. The initial enrichment culture flask was incubated at 30°C and 180 rpm for 5 days. Subsequently, 5 ml medium aliquots were transferred to new Erlenmeyer flasks containing 50 ml LB/MM medium and different DBP concentrations (50, 100, 200, 400, 800, 1,600 mg/l). After six rounds of culturing, the final suspensions were diluted, plated, and incubated on MM agar plates containing 50 mg/l DBP [1] to obtain a single colony using DBP as the sole carbon and energy source. The degradation ability of the isolates was confirmed using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). The highest DBP-degrading strain BDBP 071 was selected for further study.

Strain BDBP 071 was successively identified by colony morphology, Gram staining, cell morphology, physio-biochemical tests, and 16S rRNA sequence analysis. The 16S rRNA gene was amplified using the universal primers EU27F and 1490R [1]. PCR cycling conditions were according to the previous description [22], and the PCR product was sent to Tsingke Biological Technology Co. (China) for DNA sequencing. Sequence similarity was analyzed using the NCBI’s BLAST program (https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi) and the sequence was deposited in GenBank. MEGA 7.0 software was used to construct the phylogenetic tree.

Inoculum Preparation

Strains CD-9 (GenBank Accession No. MN629225.1, Collection No. CGMCC 20106) and BDBP 071 (GenBank Accession No. MW281770; Collection No. CGMCC7.422) were stored at -50°C in 20% glycerol. Before the experiment, strains were thawed and inoculated in 100 ml Erlenmeyer flasks containing 25 ml sterile LB medium and incubated for 12 h at 37°C and 180 rpm [13]. After incubation, the culture solution was centrifuged (8, 000 ×g, 5 min at 4°C) and the bacterial cells were collected. The cell precipitate was washed three times with 0.85% sterile saline solution and resuspended in sterile saline solution to adjust the OD600 to approximately 1.0 in order to prepare a liquid inoculum [22] which was used in DBP and fenvalerate biodegradation studies.

Growth and Degradation Curves of Strain BDBP 071

Strain BDBP 071 was cultivated in liquid LB medium containing 25 mg/l DBP. Then, 6% (v/v) bacterial solution was added to the medium, and non-inoculated medium was used as the control. The experiments were conducted in triplicate. The biodegradation was performed for 3 days at 37°C and 180 rpm. The growth OD600 of the strain was monitored using a UV-spectrophotometer and the residual amount of DBP was determined using HPLC [22]. The growth kinetic equation of strain BDBP 071 and the first-order degradation kinetic equation of DBP were in accordance with equation 1 and equation 2, respectively:

X=X0eμmt/[1(X0/Xm)(1eμmt)] (1),

where X represents the cell concentration (OD600) at time t, X 0 represents the initial cell concentration (OD600), μm represents the maximum specific growth rate (h−1), t represents the culture time (h), and Xm represents the maximum cell concentration (OD600).

Ct=C0×ekt,t1/2=ln2/k (2),

where Ct is the DBP concentration at time t (mg/l), C0 is the initial DBP concentration (mg/l), k is the DBP degradation rate constant (h−1), t means the degradation time (h), and t1/2 indicates the half-life of DBP.

Optimization of DBP Biodegradation Conditions

The optimal conditions for DBP biodegradation by strain BDBP 071 were confirmed using RSM [1]. Based on the results of single-factor experiment (temperature, pH, inoculum volume, and DBP concentration) [13], critical factors of temperature (34-40°C), pH (6.5-7.5) and DBP concentration (15-35 mg/l) were selected as independent variables. Subsequently, using Box-Behnken design, 17 experiments were carried out to build quadratic models. Each treatment included three replications. An equivalent volume of sterile saline solution served as a blank control. Data were analyzed using the Design-Expert software (version 10.0, USA) and a secondary model was constructed.

Degradation of Fenvalerate by Strain Cocultures

Suspensions of strains CD-9 and BDBP 071 were prepared as described in Materials and Methods. The total inoculum volume of 6% (v/v) was cultured in LB liquid medium containing 100 mg/l concentration of fenvalerate. The effects of inoculation sequence, inoculation proportion of strains CD-9 and BDBP 071, and fenvalerate concentration on the degradation of fenvalerate were studied. To obtain the strain inoculation sequences, strain CD-9 was first inoculated in LB medium for 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 h, before inoculating strain BDBP 071. Subsequently, under the optimal inoculation sequences of strains CD-9 and BDBP 071, the efficiencies of different strain ratios (10:0, 9:1, 8:2, 7:3, 6:4, 5:5, 4:6, 3:7, 2:8, 1:9, 0:10) in fenvalerate degradation were investigated. In addition, the degradation of different concentrations of fenvalerate (5, 25, 50, 75, 100, and 200 mg/l) by the cocultured strains was also explored. Each treatment was performed in triplicate, and a separate sample without the strains served as a control.

Identification of Metabolites

Strain BDBP 071 (6.0%, v/v) was inoculated into LB medium containing 30 mg/l DBP. Strains CD-9 (3.0%, v/v) and BDBP 071 (3.0%, v/v) were added to LB medium containing fenvalerate (75 mg/l) and incubated at 37°C and 180 rpm. After 48 h, 20 ml of the culture sample was used to identify intermediate metabolites, and the metabolites were extracted using the procedure based on a previous GC-MS study by Tang et al. [22].

HPLC Conditions and Analysis

The strains were inoculated in LB liquid medium containing different concentrations of fenvalerate (DBP) to determine their degradation abilities. Extraction and detection of residual fenvalerate (DBP) were consistent with previous results described by Tang et al. [22] and Zhang et al. [31]. Fenvalerate (10 g/l) and DBP (10 g/l) were accurately diluted using acetonitrile to give a series of standard solutions with concentrations ranging from 1.0 mg/l to 200.0 mg/l. Concentrations of fenvalerate and DBP were analyzed using a Waters 2695 (Waters, USA) equipped with a ZORBAX eclipse plus C18 column (4.6 mm × 150 mm × 5 μm). Fenvalerate and DBP concentrations were quantified according to the retention time (RT) and peak area of the standards. The fenvalerate and DBP degradation rates were calculated according to the equation below:

Degradation rate(%) = (1C/C0)×100% (3),

where C and C0 represent the fenvalerate (DBP) content in inoculated and non-inoculated medium, respectively.

GC-MS Conditions and Analysis

DBP and fenvalerate intermediates were identified using a Shimadzu GC2010 Plus gas chromatograph coupled to a Shimadzu MS2010 Plus mass spectrometer in electron ionization mode (70 eV) with a DB-5 capillary column (30.0 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 mm). The operating conditions were as follows: the injection volume was l μl; injection mode was splitless at 250°C ; the temperatures of the transmission line and the ion source were 250°C and 280°C, respectively; helium (99.999%) was used as a carrier gas at a flow rate of 1.5 ml/min. The detecting conditions of DBP and fenvalerate followed the procedures of Sun et al. [23] and Tang et al. [22], respectively. The identification process was conducted three times. Compounds were identified by comparing the mass spectrum of each peak with those of authentic standards in a mass spectra library database (NIST, USA).

Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis of DBP degradation was conducted in Origin software (version 8.5). All experiments were conducted in triplicate, with no-inoculation conditions as the control, and the data were expressed as mean ± SD.

Results

Isolation and Identification of DBP-Degrading Bacteria

In this study, five strains with high DBP degradation ability were obtained: strain BDBP 015, strain BDBP 037, strain BDBP 058, strain BDBP 071, and strain BDBP 092. Strain BDBP 071 showed the highest degradation ability in liquid LB medium containing 25 mg/l DBP, degrading 58.25 ± 2.31% of DBP within 48 h. Hence, it was selected as an ideal strain for degrading DBP. The strain was grown on LB plates containing 25 mg/l DBP, producing round and yellow, opaque, smooth colonies with neat edges. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) [22] was used to observe the morphology of strain BDBP 071 (Fig. S1) and showed that BDBP 071 strain is short and rod-shaped with varying lengths and is arranged individually or in pairs. Physio-biochemical experiments showed that the strain was a gram-negative bacillus, with positive catalase, oxidase, and V-P tests but with negative indole, sportiness, hydrogen sulfide, starch hydrolysis, gelatin liquefaction, ornithine decarboxylase, lysine decarboxylase, and M.R tests (Table S1).

The BLAST search results showed that the 1446 bp sequence of the 16S rRNA gene from strain BDBP 071 shared 98% similarity with Stenotrophomonas acidaminiphila strain AMX 19 (Fig. 1) and the two strains clustered in the same clade in the phylogenetic tree. Based on the physiological and biochemical tests and 16S rRNA gene phylogenetic analysis, strain BDBP 071 was proposed to belong to S. acidaminiphila.

Fig. 1. Phylogenetic tree of the strain BDBP 071 constructed by the neighbor-joining method based on 16S rRNA sequences of BDBP 071 and related strains.

Fig. 1

The numbers at the nodes represent the bootstrap value. Bar represents sequence divergence.

Growth and Utilization of DBP by S. acidaminiphila BDBP 071

The dynamic relationship between the growth of strain BDBP 071 in LB medium containing 25 mg/l DBP and DBP degradation rate was shown in Fig. 2. The OD600 of strain BDBP 071 rose from 0.1374 ± 0.04 to 1.0068 ± 0.01. The growth kinetics equation (Eq. 1) of strain BDBP 071 was as follows: XBDBP 071 = 0.17694e0.17467t /[1-0.17666 × (1-e0.17467t )], R2 = 0.9880; among them μm = 0.17467 h-1, X0 = 0.17694, Xm = 1.00158. The first-order degradation kinetics model (Eq.2) was used to nonlinearly fit the DBP residues in the degradation process. Within 72 h, close to 60% of the 25 mg/l DBP initially added to the medium had been degraded by strain BDBP 071 and a first-order degradation kinetics equation was obtained as follows: C BDBP 071 = 23.94383e-0.01851t , k = 0.01851; t1/2 = 37.45 h, R2 = 0.9523.

Fig. 2. Degradation of DBP (25 mg/l) during growth of S. acidaminiphila BDBP 071.

Fig. 2

Error bars indicate standard deviation of three replicates.

It is worth noting that the biodegradation of DBP started rapidly at the beginning of the strain BDBP 071 incubation, without an apparent lag phase. Degradation of DBP was associated with the growth of strain BDBP 071. At logarithmic phase (0-24 h), the growth of strain BDBP 071 increased rapidly, and significant degradation of DBP was noted (nearly 40.0% of the DBP was degraded). Subsequently, strain BDBP 071 grew slowly at stationary phase (24-60 h) while the density of strain BDBP 071 increased to its maximum level within 48 h of incubation and approximately 60.0% of the DBP was degraded during this period. After 72 h incubation, the residual amount of DBP did not change noticeably. No significant change in DBP concentration was observed in the non-inoculated controls.

Optimization of Conditions for DBP degradation by Strain S. acidaminiphila BDBP 071

The single-factor test results showed that the concentration of DBP (5-200 mg/l), pH (4-12), and culture temperature (25-40°C) had significant effects on the degradation of DBP by S. acidaminiphila BDBP 071 (data not shown). Accordingly, optimizing these parameters improved the bacteria’s efficiency at degrading DBP. The interaction and effects of these three variables, observed with the help of 17 different experimental models, were presented in Table S2. The culture samples were collected at 48 h, when the highest and lowest degradation values of 87.56 ± 2.26% and 51.06 ± 1.27% were recorded. The data were analyzed using RSM and the quadratic model was employed to analyze DBP degradation. Subsequently, the experimental values obtained were fitted with the second-order polynomial equation (Eq. 4):

DBP degradation (%) = 78.58 + 6.64 pH + 2.13 temperature + 2.23 DBP concentration + 3.45 pH × temperature + 3.94 pH × DBP concentration - 5.64 temperature × DBP concentration - 0.20 pH2 - 12.41 temperature2 - 4.47 DBP concentration2 (4).

Results of analysis of variance (ANOVA) for DBP degradation showed that the model was a good fit (Table 1). The R2 (0.9841) and the R2 Adj = 0.9638 values were close to 1, indicating that the values predicted by the model were consistent with the experimental values. The high F value (F = 48.29) and extremely low p-value (p < 0.0001), show that the model had a significant regression and the equation could correctly reflect the relationship between DBP degradation and various factors. ANOVA of the regression equations showed that square terms of temperature and DBP concentration, and interaction terms of pH × temperature, pH × DBP concentration, temperature × DBP concentration, had significant effects (p < 0.05) on DBP degradation by strain BDBP 071, whereas pH2 played an insignificant role (p>0.05) in degradation.

Table 1.

Analysis of variance (ANOVA) for the fitted quadratic model for DBP biodegradation.

Source Sum of squares Degrees of freedom Mean square F-Value p-Value
Model 1430.95 9 158.99 48.29 < 0.0001
A-pH 352.58 1 352.58 107.08 < 0.0001
B-Temperature 36.38 1 36.38 11.05 0.0127
C-DBP concentration 39.74 1 39.74 12.07 0.0103
A×B 47.75 1 47.75 14.50 0.0066
A×C 62.17 1 62.17 18.88 0.0034
B×C 127.24 1 127.24 38.64 0.0004
A2 0.17 1 0.17 0.053 0.8244
B2 648.59 1 648.59 196.98 < 0.0001
C2 84.27 1 84.27 25.59 0.0015
Residual 23.05 7 3.29
Lack of fit 14.20 3 4.73 2.14 0.2382
Pure error 8.85 4 2.21
Total 1454.00 16

R2 = 0.9841, R2 adj = 0.9638, p-Value < 0.05 indicates that the model terms are significant.

The regression equation was graphically represented on a 3D response surface plot (Fig. 3). The plot had the steepest curved surface, indicating that the interaction between temperature and DBP concentration had the most significant impact on DBP degradation. The response surface plots showed the interaction of three parameters in DBP biodegradation. As a result, the optimized culture conditions for DBP degradation were pH 7.5, temperature of 37.0°C, and DBP concentration of 30.0 mg/l. Under optimal conditions, the degradation of DBP could reach 88.34 ± 1.44%, which is in agreement with the model prediction value (87.21%). The degradation rate of DBP increased by 30.09% after optimization, indicating that the design of the optimization scheme for degradation conditions is reasonable and effective.

Fig. 3. Three-dimensional plot showing the effects of (B) temperature and (C) DBP concentration on DBP degradation by strain BDBP 071. While fixing the (A) pH at the 1-coded level (pH 7.5).

Fig. 3

Degradation of Fenvalerate by Strain Cocultures

Fig. 4 shows the results of the degradation of fenvalerate by a co-culture of strains CD-9 and BDBP 071. In the culture solution of strains synergistically degrading fenvalerate, the time of inoculation of strain BDBP 071 had a greater impact on the degradation of fenvalerate. For example, when only strain CD-9 was inoculated in the media, nearly 50% fenvalerate was degraded (Fig. 4A). However, when only strain BDBP 071 was used, only approximately 30% fenvalerate was degraded, indicating that strain BDBP 071 possesses poor fenvalerate degradation ability. When strain CD-9 was cultured for 4, 8, 12, 16, 20 h, and when strain BDBP 071 was then added to the culture, the degradation rate of fenvalerate surpassed 60% within 48 h. In particular, the degradation rate of fenvalerate was most obviously improved when strain CD-9 was first cultured for 16 h and then strain BDBP 071 added, reaching 75.57 ± 0.73%. The experimental conditions were that the concentration of fenvalerate was 100 mg/l and the strain inoculation ratio was 5:5 (6%, v/v).

Fig. 4. Effect of different culture conditions on the degradation of fenvalerate.

Fig. 4

(A) inoculation sequences (0 h, 4 h, 8 h, 12 h, 16 h, 20 h, 24 h indicate that the strain CD-9 was cultured for 0 h, 4 h, 8 h, 12 h, 16 h, 20 h, 24 h, and then the strain BDBP 071 was added), (B) inoculation proportions of strains CD-9 and BDBP 071, and (C) fenvalerate concentration. Different letters (a-g) indicate significant differences among treatments (p < 0.05).

Fenvalerate degradation using 11 different inoculation proportions of strains are shown in Fig. 4B. When the inoculation proportion of strains CD-9 and BDBP 071 ranged from 6:4 to 4:6, the strains could effectively enhance the degradation rate of fenvalerate and maximum fenvalerate degradation (73.75 ± 2.19%) was observed when the inoculation proportion was 5:5. In this experiment, the concentration of fenvalerate was 100 mg/l, and the inoculation sequence used was that strain CD-9 was first cultured for 16 h before adding BDBP 071. Degradation rates for various concentrations of fenvalerate (5, 25, 50, 75, 100, and 200 mg/l) were obtained under conditions of optimal inoculation sequence and inoculation ratio (Fig. 4C). The degradation rate of different concentrations of fenvalerate by the synergistic strains exceeded 60%. In particular, the degradation rate of 75.0 mg/l fenvalerate reached 84.37 ± 1.25%.

Temporal changes in microbial biomass (OD600), fenvalerate degradation, and DBP content in 75 mg/l fenvalerate following degradation by C. freundi CD-9 are shown in Fig. 5A. The amount of DBP produced increased with the increase in the degradation rate of fenvalerate, reaching a maximum value within 12 - 20 h. The degradation rate of fenvalerate was 50.87 ± 1.58% after 48 h of culturing, while the yield of DBP reached 6.68 ± 0.28 mg/l. The degradation rate did not increase significantly when the culturing was continued beyond this point. Strain CD-9 could degrade low concentrations of DBP (Fig. S2). When the DBP concentration was 5 mg/l, the degradation rate was only 31.96 ± 1.53%. However, as the DBP concentration increased, the degradation rate dropped rapidly and when DBP concentration was 100 mg/l, the degradation rate was 2.03 ± 1.31%. This demonstrates that strain CD-9 has poor DBP degradation ability.

Fig. 5. Degradation curve of fenvalerate. (A) Growth and fenvalerate degradation curve of C. freundii CD-9. (B) Variation in fenvalerate degradation and DBP content by using coculture of strains CD-9 and BDBP 071.

Fig. 5

Cocultures of strains CD-9 and BDBP 071 were used in the fenvalerate degradation process to enhance the degradation of fenvalerate and decrease the amount of the metabolite, DBP. Here, when strain CD-9 was cultured for 16 h before adding strain BDBP 071, the strain inoculation ratio was 5:5 (v/v), and the concentration of fenvalerate was 75.0 mg/l. Thus, the degradation of fenvalerate increased by 33.5%, and the level of DBP reduced by 5.21 mg/l (Fig. 5B) compared with the degradation of monoculture strain CD-9.

Identification of DBP and Fenvalerate Biodegradation Metabolites

To explore the mechanism of DBP degradation by S. acidaminiphila BDBP 071, the metabolites generated by DBP degradation were identified using GC-MS. After 48 h incubation, five main degradation products: butyric acid (a), O-phthalaldehyde (b), benzaldehyde (c), mono-methyl phthalate (MMP, d) and DBP (e) were identified. The retention time (RT), similarity, chemical formula, characteristic ions of the mass spectra (m/z), and names were summarized in Table 2. The possible metabolic pathway of DBP in strain BDBP 071 was proposed based on the metabolites (Fig. 6A). The enzymes of alkyl ester bond hydrolysis and oxygenase played a critical role in the biodegradation process of DBP [23, 36]. In the degradation pathway of DBP, DBP is hydrolyzed by β-oxidation and de-esterification to produce MMP and n-butanol [44]. Subsequently, butyric acid is generated from n-butanol [45] and MMP is metabolized to phthalic acid (PA) by demethylation, and then further through β-oxidation before entering the TCA cycle. However, in this article, PA was not detected, while O-phthalaldehyde was found, which may provide a new biodegradation pathway for DBP.

Table 2.

Identification of intermediate metabolites of DBP using GC-MS.

Serial number RT(min) Similarity (%) Chemical formula m/z Name
a 5.180 92 C4H8O2 88 Butyric Acid
b 6.815 65 C8H6O2 134 O-Phthalaldehyde
c 6.820 66 C7H6O 106 Benzaldehyde
d 9.985 69 C9H8O4 180 Mono-Methyl phthalate
e 15.710 98 C16H22O4 278 Dibutyl phthalate

Fig. 6. Proposed biodegradation pathway of DBP and fenvalerate. (A) Proposed biodegradation pathway of DBP by BDBP 071. (B) Proposed biodegradation pathway of fenvalerate by cocultures of strains CD-9 and BDBP 071.

Fig. 6

The potential metabolic products formed during fenvalerate co-degradation by strains CD-9 and BDBP 071 were also detected using GC-MS (Table 3). Compounds A – L were identified as isovaleric acid (A), benzaldehyde (B), phenol(C), O-phthalaldehyde (D), 4-methylhexanoic acid (E), phenylacetic acid (F), anthranilic acid (G), 2-(4-chlorophenyl)-3-methylbutanoic acid (H), 3-phenoxybenzyl alcohol (I), dibutyl phthalate (J), phloroglucinol aldehyde (K), and fenvalerate (L). A potential biodegradation pathway of fenvalerate by strains CD-9 and BDBP 071 was proposed based on the metabolites obtained (Fig. 6B). In it, compounds G and K have not been reported in the biodegradation process of fenvalerate. However, 3-aminobenzoic acid has been detected in the biodegradation products of beta-cypermethrin [46]. Moreover, 3,4,5-trihydroxybenozic acid was detected in the products obtained from the degradation of 3-PBA by strain M-4 [47]. These degradation products were slightly different from those reported previously [22]. In the proposed biodegradation pathway, the ester linkage is broken by hydrolase and the fenvalerate (L) is decomposed into carboxylic acid (H) and alcohol (I), which is the core step in the biodegradation of PPs [1]. Under the hydrolysis of halogen elements, compound H is converted to compounds F, A and C. Then the benzene ring of compound F is cleaved to produce compound E. Meanwhile, compounds C and J are generated from compound I through diaryl cleavage [13]. Then, compound D is formed by hydrolyzing compound J and converted into compounds B and K by oxygenase, decarboxylase, oxidoreductase, etc., possibly.

Table 3.

Identification of intermediate metabolites of fenvalerate using GC-MS.

Serial number RT (min) Similarity (%) Chemical formula m/z Name
A 3.758 97 C5H10O2 102 Isovaleric acid
B 5.075 94 C7H6O 106 Benzaldehyde
C 5.955 71 C6H6O 94 Phenol
D 6.815 62 C8H6O2 134 O-Phthalaldehyde
E 6.958 90 C7H14O2 116 4-Methylhexanoic acid
F 11.208 97 C8H8O2 136 Phenylacetic acid
G 13.750 95 C7H7NO2 137 Anthranilic acid
H 16.808 68 C11H13Cl 212 2-(4-Chlorophenyl)-3-methylbutanoic acid
I 19.775 85 C13H12O2 200 3-Phenoxybenzyl alcohol
J 22.050 98 C16H22O4 278 Dibutyl phthalate
K 33.800 82 C7H6O4 154 Phloroglucinol aldehyde
L 37.883 94 C25H22ClNO3 419 Fenvalerate

Discussion

Microbial remediation of organic pollutants and pesticides has received significant research attention in recent years [7, 48]. In this study, a highly effective DBP-degrading strain, BDBP 071, was isolated from soil contaminated by PPs. Strain BDBP 071 was identified as S. acidaminiphila based on its morphological and biological characteristics, as well as the sequence of its 16S rRNA gene. Stenotrophomonas sp. was previously reported to degrade organophosphorus pesticides [49], chlorothalonil [50], butachlor [51], and aflatoxin B1 [52]. To our knowledge, this is the first research reporting on DBP degradation by S. acidaminiphila.

RSM was used to optimize degradation conditions [19]. At 37°C, 30.0 mg/l substrate concentration, and pH 7.5, strain BDBP 071 could degrade 88.34 ± 1.44% of 30.0 mg/l DBP in LB medium within 48 h. Several studies have reported that some bacterial strains are capable of degrading DBP [12, 21, 53, 54]. The ability of strain BDBP 071 to degrade DBP in this study is comparable to those of previously reported strains. For example, Providencia sp. 2D could degrade 84.9% of 1,000 mg/l DBP within 72 h [55], 89.74% of 5 mg/l DBP was degraded by Bacillus amyloliquefaciens subsp. strain JR20 within 96 h [56], and strain Sphingobium yanoikuyae SHJ degraded 50% of 50 mg/l DBP in 101.4 h [57]. Therefore, S. acidaminiphila BDBP 071 can enrich the repertoire of DBP-degrading strains.

Research has shown that co-metabolism with microbial strains provides a faster rate of degradation with stronger effect, making this system more suitable for environmental remediation than single bacterial culture [40, 58]. The coculture of strains CD-9 and BDBP 071 resulted in higher fenvalerate degradation efficiency than either of the single strains (increased by 33.5%), and the level of DBP decreased by 5.21 mg/l in 48 h. The conceivable reason is that strain CD-9 cannot degrade DBP efficiently as DBP restricts the activity of key enzymes in the metabolism of fenvalerate and further inhibits the metabolism process [59]. Strain BDBP 071 possesses efficient DBP degradation ability. After adding it to the degradation system, the accumulated DBP is absorbed by strain BDBP 071 as an energy source, so it reduces the content of DBP and eliminates the inhibitory effect of DBP on the metabolism of fenvalerate, thereby promoting the degradation of fenvalerate. Meanwhile, Tran et al. [60] also proved that the cocultivation of microorganisms could effectively degrade organic pollutants and their related metabolites. In addition, Zhao et al. [61] reported that Catellibacterium sp. CC-5 degraded 83% of fenvalerate within 7 days. In contrast, the cocultivation of strains CD-9 and BDBP 071 degraded 84.37 ± 1.25% of the fenvalerate in 48 h. This indicates that the co-cultivation of strains CD-9 and BDBP 071 can effectively improve the degradation of fenvalerate.

Numerous studies have demonstrated the metabolic mechanisms of single strains. However, there are few reports on the degradation pathways and mechanisms underlying microbial cocultivation. Degradation enzymes play a central role in the bioremediation of pollutants [16]. CD-9 and BDBP 071 coculture strains contain more degradation products than the fenvalerate degradation products generated by strain CD-9 [22] and the DBP degradation products generated by strain BDBP 071. It may be that the cocultivation of the strains produces more enzymes, thereby promoting the degradation of fenvalerate and DBP. Larisa et al. [62] found that the coculture of Citrobacter freundii S04 and Sphingobacterium multivorum W15 significantly increased the enzyme activity. Chen et al. [63] showed that compared to monoculture, coculture of Penicillium citrinum WXP-2 and Citrobacter freundii WXP-9 exhibited the highest microbial activity, which could enhance the degradation of pollutants. However, the mechanism used by coculture strains to promote the degradation efficiency of fenvalerate is not clear and will require additional research on related degrading enzymes. To better understand the mechanism of synergistic strains on the degradation of fenvalerate, ‘omics’ technologies, such as whole genomics, transcriptomics, and metabolomics, will be required in future research.

A DBP-degrading bacterial strain, Stenotrophomonas BDBP 071, was isolated and characterized. The optimum conditions for DBP biodegradation were determined to be 30.0 mg/l DBP concentration, initial pH of 7.5, and 37°C culture temperature, which resulted in 88.34 ± 1.44% degradation of DBP within 48 h. Furthermore, cocultivation of strains was used to enhance the degradation of fenvalerate. The concentration of fenvalerate, the inoculation sequence, and the inoculation proportion played important roles in the effective degradation of fenvalerate in coculture of strains CD-9 and BDBP 071. Finally, based on metabolites analysis, a possible biodegradation pathway of fenvalerate was proposed after strain cocultivation. In summary, the study revealed that using cocultures is an efficient approach for removal of PPs and intermediate metabolites from the contaminated environment.

Supplemental Materials

jmb-32-2-176-supple.pdf (438.2KB, pdf)

Supplementary data for this paper are available on-line only at http://jmb.or.kr.

Acknowledgments

This study was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (32102094), the Application Foundation Project of Sichuan Provincial Department of Science and Technology (2019YJ0389), the Science and Technology Support Project of Sichuan Province (No. 2019ZYZF0170), the Technological Innovation Project of Chengdu Science and Technology Bureau (2018-YF05-00522-SN), the Key Scientific Research Fund of Xihua University (Z1310525), and the Graduate Student Innovation Fund of Xihua University (ycjj2020130).

Footnotes

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no financial conflicts of interest to declare.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Tang J, Liu B, Shi Y, Zeng CY, Chen TT, Zeng L, et al. Isolation, identification, and fenvalerate-degrading potential of Bacillus licheniformis CY-012. Biotechnol. Biotechnol. Equip. 2018;32:574–582. doi: 10.1080/13102818.2018.1438210. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Cycon M, Piotrowska-Seget Z. Pyrethroid-degrading microorganisms and their potential for the bioremediation of contaminated soils: a review. Front. Microbiol. 2016;7:1463. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2016.01463. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Tripathi G, Verrna P. Fenvalerate-induced changes in a Catfish, Clariasbatrachus: metabolic enzymes, RNA and protein. Comp. Biochem. Physiol. PartC: Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2014;138:75–79. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2004.05.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Antwi FB, Reddy GVP. Toxicological effects of pyrethroids on non-target aquatic insects. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2015;40:915–923. doi: 10.1016/j.etap.2015.09.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Desneux N, Decourtye A, Delpuech JM. The sublethal effects of pesticides on beneficial arthropods. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 2007;52:81–106. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ento.52.110405.091440. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Decourtye A, Devillers J, Genecque E, Menach KL, Budzinski H, Cluzeau S, et al. Comparative sublethaltoxicity of nine pesticides on olfactory learning performances of the Honeybee Apis mellifera . Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 2005;48:242–250. doi: 10.1007/s00244-003-0262-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Das R, Das SJ, Das AC. Effect of synthetic pyrethroid insecticides on N-2-fixation and its mineralization in tea soil. Eur. J. Soil. Biol. 2016;74:9–15. doi: 10.1016/j.ejsobi.2016.02.005. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Laffin B, Chavez M, Pine M. The pyrethroid metabolites 3-phenoxy benzoic acid and 3-phenoxy benzyl alcohol do not exhibit estrogenic activity in the MCF-7 human breast carcinoma cell line or Sprague-Dawley rats . Toxicology. 2010;267:39–44. doi: 10.1016/j.tox.2009.10.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Perry MJ, Venners SA, Barr DB, Xu X. Environmental pyrethroid and organophosphorus insecticide exposures and sperm concentration. Reprod. Toxicol. 2007;23:113–118. doi: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2006.08.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Kolaczinski JH, Curtis CF. Chronic illness as a result of low-level exposure to synthetic pyrethroid insecticides: a review of the debate. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2001;42:697–706. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2003.12.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Wang BZ, Guo P, Hang BJ, Li L, He J, Li SP. Cloning of a novel pyrethroid-hydrolyzing carboxylesterase gene from Sphingobium sp. strain JZ-1 and characterization of the gene product. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2009;75:5496–5500. doi: 10.1128/AEM.01298-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Chen SH, Hu MY, Liu JJ, Zhong G, Liu Y, Rizwan M, et al. Biodegradation of beta-cypermethrin and 3-phenoxybenzoic acid by a novel Ochrobactrumlupini DG-S-01. J. Hazard. Mater. 2011;187:433–440. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.01.049. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Zhan H, Wang HS, Liao LS, Feng YM, Fan XH, Zhang LH, et al. Kinetics and novel degradation pathway of permethrin in Acinetobacter baumannii ZH-14. Front. Microbiol. 2018;9:98. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.00098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Tang J, Hu Q, Liu B, Lei D, Chen TT, Sun Q, et al. Efficient biodegradation of 3-phenoxybenzoic acid and pyrethroid pesticides by a novel strain Klebsiella pneumoniae BPBA052. Can. J. Microbiol. 2019;65:795–804. doi: 10.1139/cjm-2019-0183. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Chen SH, Hu QB, Hu MY, Luo J, Weng Q, Lai K. Isolation and characterization of a fungus able to degrade pyrethroids and 3-phenoxybenzaldehyde. Bioresour. Technol. 2011;102:8110–8116. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2011.06.055. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Zhao T, Hu K, Li J, Zhu Y, Liu S. Current insights into the microbial degradation for pyrethroids: strain safety, biochemical pathway, and genetic engineering. Chemosphere. 2021;279:130542. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.130542. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Deng WQ, Lin DR, Yao K, Yuan HY, Wang ZL, Li JL, et al. Characterization of a novel β-cypermethrin-degrading Aspergillus niger YAT strain and the biochemical degradation pathway of β-cypermethrin. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2015;99:8187–8198. doi: 10.1007/s00253-015-6690-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Huang YC, Xiao LJ, Li FY, Xiao MS, Lin DR, Long XM, et al. Microbial degradation of pesticide residues and an emphasis on the degradation of cypermethrin and 3-phenoxybenzoic acid: a review. Molecules. 2018;23:2313. doi: 10.3390/molecules23092313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Huang Y, Lin Z, Zhang WP, Pang SM, Bhatt P, Rene ER, et al. New insights into the microbial degradation of D-cyphenothrin in contaminated water/soil environments. Microorganisms. 2020;8:473. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms8040473. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Tang J, Hu Q, Lei D, Wu M, Zeng CY, Zhang Q. Characterization of deltamethrin degradation and metabolic pathway by coculture of Acinetobacter junii LH-1-1 and Klebsiella pneumoniae BPBA052. AMB Express. 2020;10:106. doi: 10.1186/s13568-020-01043-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Yang JJ, Feng YM, Zhan H, Liu J, Yang F, Zhang KY, et al. Characterization of a pyrethroid-degrading Pseudomonas fulva strain P31 and biochemical degradation pathway of D-phenothrin. Front. Microbiol. 2018;9:1003. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2018.01003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Tang J, Lei D, Wu M, Hu Q, Zhang Q. Biodegradation and metabolic pathway of fenvalerate by Citrobacter freundii CD-9. AMB Express. 2020;10:194. doi: 10.1186/s13568-020-01128-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Sun RX, Wang L, Jiao YQ, Zhang Y, Zhang X, Wu P, et al. Metabolic process of di-n-butyl phthalate (DBP) by Enterobacter sp. DNB-S2, isolated from Mollisol region in China. Environ. Pollut. 2019;255:113344. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2019.113344. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Liu TF, Li J, Qiu LQ, Zhang FM, Linhardt RJ, Zhong WH. Combined genomic and transcriptomic analysis of dibutyl phthalate metabolic pathway in Arthrobacter sp. ZJUTW. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2020;117:3712–3726. doi: 10.1002/bit.27524. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Wang IJ, Lin CC, Lin YJ, Hsieh WS, Chen PC. Early life phthalate exposure and atopic disorders in children: a prospective birth cohort study. Environ. Int. 2014;62:48–54. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2013.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Cho SC, Bhang SY, Hong YC, Shin MS, Kim BN, Kim JW, et al. Relationship between environmental phthalate exposure and the intelligence of school-age children. Environ. Health Perspect. 2010;118:1027–1032. doi: 10.1289/ehp.0901376. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Téllez-Rojo MM, Cantoral A, Cantonwine DE, Schnaas L, Peterson K, Hu H, et al. Prenatal urinary phthalate metabolites levels and neurodevelopment in children at two and three years of age. Sci. Total Environ. 2013;461:386–390. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.05.021. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Hatch EE, Nelson JW, Qureshi MM, Weinberg J, Moore LL, Singer M, et al. Association of urinary phthalate metabolite concentrations with body mass index and waist circumference: a cross-sectional study of NHANES data, 1999-2002. Environ. Health. 2008;7:1–15. doi: 10.1186/1476-069X-7-27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Stahlhut RW, Van Wijngaarden E, Dye TD, Stephen C, Shanna HS. Concentrations of urinary phthalate metabolites are associated with increased waist circumference and insulin resistance in adult U.S. males. Environ. Health Perspect. 2007;115:876–882. doi: 10.1289/ehp.9882. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Svensson K, Hernandez-Ramirez RU, Burguete-Garcia A, Cebrián ME, Carrillo LL. Phthalate exposure associated with selfreported diabetes among Mexican women. Environ. Res. 2011;111:792–796. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2011.05.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Zhang JF, Zhang CN, Zhu YP, Li JL, Li XT. Biodegradation of seven phthalate esters by Bacillus mojavensis B1811. Int Biodeter. Biodegrad. 2018;132:200–207. doi: 10.1016/j.ibiod.2018.04.006. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Yuan SY, Huang IC, Chang BV. Biodegradation of dibutyl phthalate and di-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate and microbial community changes in mangrove sediment. J. Hazard Mater. 2010;184:826–831. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.08.116. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Lu Y, Tang F, Wang Y, Zhao J, Zeng X, Luo Q, et al. Biodegradation of dimethyl phthalate, diethyl phthalate and di-n-butyl phthalate by Rhodococcus sp. L4 isolated from activated sludge. J. Hazard Mater. 2009;168:938–943. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.02.126. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Hara H, Stewart GR, Mohn WW. Involvement of a novel ABC transporter and monoalkyl phthalate ester hydrolase in phthalate ester catabolism by Rhodococcusjostii RHA1. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2010;76:1516–1523. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02621-09. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Zeng P, Moy BYP, Song YH, Tay JH. Biodegradation of dimethyl phthalate by Sphingomonas sp. isolated from phthalic-aciddegrading aerobic granules. Appl. Microbiol Biotechnol. 2008;80:899–905. doi: 10.1007/s00253-008-1632-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Xu YQ, Minhazul KAHM, Wang XC, Liu X, Li XT, Meng Q, et al. Biodegradation of phthalate esters by Paracoccus kondratievae BJQ0001 isolated from Jiuqu (Baijiu fermentation starter) and identification of the ester bond hydrolysis enzyme. Environ. Pollut. 2020;263:114506. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114506. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Yu H, Wang L, Lin YL, Liu WX, Tuyiringire D, Jiao YQ, et al. Complete metabolic study by dibutyl phthalate degrading Pseudomonas sp. DNB-S1. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2020;194:110378. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2020.110378. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Liu FF, Chi YL, Wu S, Jia DY, Yao K. Simultaneous degradation of cypermethrin and its metabolite, 3-phenoxybenzoic acid, by the cooperation of Bacillus licheniformis B-1 and Sphingomonas sp. SC-1. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2014;62:8256–8262. doi: 10.1021/jf502835n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Wang LL, Chen YY, Shang F, Liu W, Lan J, Gao P, et al. Structural insight into the carboxylesterase BioH from Klebsiella pneumoniae . Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm. 2019;520:538–543. doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2019.10.050. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Chen SH, Luo JJ, Hu MY, Lai KP, Geng P, Huang HS. Enhancement of cypermethrin degradation by a coculture of Bacillus cereus ZH-3 and Streptomyces aureus HP-S-01. Bioresour. Technol. 2012;110:97–104. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2012.01.106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Birolli WG, Arai MS, Nitschke M, André LMP. The pyrethroid (±)-lambda-cyhalothrinenantio selective biodegradation by a bacterial consortium. Pest Biochem. Physiol. 2019;156:129–137. doi: 10.1016/j.pestbp.2019.02.014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Zhao JY, Chi YL, Xu YC, Jia DY, Yao K. Co-Metabolic degradation of β-cypermethrin and 3-phenoxybenzoic acid by coculture of Bacillus licheniformis B-1 and Aspergillus oryzae M-4. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0166796. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0166796. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Holt JG, Krieg NR, Sneath PH, Staley JT, Williams ST. Bergey's manual of determinative bacteriology, 9th ed. Willian and Wilkins; Baltimore, MD, USA: 1994. [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Tang WJ, Zhang LS, Fang Y, Zhou Y, Ye BC. Biodegradation of phthalate esters by newly isolated Rhizobium sp. LMB-1 and its biochemical pathway of di- n-butyl phthalate. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2016;121:177–186. doi: 10.1111/jam.13123. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Mahajan R, Verma S, Kushwaha M, Dharam S, Yusuf A, Subhankar C. Biodegradation of di-n-butyl phthalate by psychrotolerant Sphingobium yanoikuyae strain P4 and protein structural analysis of carboxylesterase involved in the pathway. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018;122:806–816. doi: 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.10.225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Birolli WG, Dos SA, Pilau E, Pilau E, Rodrigues FE. New role for a commercially available bioinsecticide: Bacillus thuringiensis Berliner biodegrades the pyrethroid cypermethrin. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2021;55:4792–4803. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.0c06907. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Zhao JY, Jia DY, Chi YL, Yao K. Co-metabolic enzymes and pathways of 3-phenoxybenzoic acid degradation by Aspergillusoryzae M-4. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2019;189:109953. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2019.109953. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Bhatt P, Huang YH, Zhan H, Chen SH. Insight into microbial applications for the biodegradation of pyrethroid insecticides. Front. Microbiol. 2019;10:1778. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.01778. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Deng SY, Chen Y, Wang DS, Shi TZ, Wu XW, Ma X, et al. Rapid biodegradation of organophosphorus pesticides by Stenotrophomonas sp. G1. J. Hazard Mater. 2015;297:17–24. doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.04.052. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Zhang QM, Liu HY, Saleem M, Wang CX. Biotransformation of chlorothalonil by strain Stenotrophomonas acidaminiphila BJ1 isolated from farmland soil. Royal Soc. Open Sci. 2019;6:190562. doi: 10.1098/rsos.190562. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Dwivedi S, Singh BR, Al-Khedhairy AA, Alarifi S, Musarrat J. Isolation and characterization of butachlor-catabolizing bacterial strain Stenotrophomonas acidaminiphila JS-1 from soil and assessment of its biodegradation potential. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 2010;51:54–60. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-765X.2010.02854.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Cai MY, Qian YY, Chen N, Ling TJ, Wang JJ, Jiang H, et al. Detoxification of aflatoxin B1 by Stenotrophomonas sp. CW117 and characterization the thermophilic degradation process. Environ. Pollut. 2020;261:114178. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114178. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Guo P, Wang BZ, Hang BJ, Li L, Shinawar WA, He J, et al. Pyrethroid-degrading Sphingobium sp. JZ-2 and the purification and characterization of a novel pyrethroid hydrolase. Int. Biodeter. Biodegrad. 2009;63:1107–1112. doi: 10.1016/j.ibiod.2009.09.008. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Tang AX, Wang BW, Liu YY, Li QY, Tong ZF, Wei YJ. Biodegradation and extracellular enzymatic activities of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain GF31 on β-cypermethrin. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2015;22:13049–13057. doi: 10.1007/s11356-015-4545-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Zhao HM, Du H, Feng NX, Xiang L, Li YW, Li H, et al. Biodegradation of di‐n‐butyl phthalate and phthalic acid by a novel Providencia sp. 2D and its stimulation in a compost‐amended soil. Biol. Fert Soils. 2016;52:65–76. doi: 10.1007/s00374-015-1054-8. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Yuan L, Cheng J, Chu Q, Ji X, Yuan JJ, Feng FY, et al. Di‐n‐butyl phthalate degrading endophytic bacterium Bacillus amyloliquefaciens subsp. strain JR20 isolated from garlic chive and its colonization in a leafy vegetable. J. Environ. Sci. Health-Part B. 2019;54:1–9. doi: 10.1080/03601234.2019.1633211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Feng L, Lu H, Cheng D, Mao X, Wu Q. Characterization and genome analysis of a phthalate esters-degrading strain Sphingobium yanoikuyae SHJ. BioMed. Res. Int. 2018;2018:3917054. doi: 10.1155/2018/3917054. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Zhang Q, Zhang W. Microbial flora analysis for the degradation of beta-cypermethrin. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2017;24:6554–6562. doi: 10.1007/s11356-017-8370-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Nzila A. Update on the cometabolism of organic pollutants by bacteria. Environ. Pollut. 2013;178:474–482. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2013.03.042. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Tran NH, Urase T, Ngo HH, Hu JY, Ong SL. Insight into metabolic and cometabolic activities of autotrophic and heterotrophic microorganisms in the biodegradation of emerging trace organic contaminants. Bioresour. 2013;146:721–731. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.07.083. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Zhao H, Geng Y, Chen L, Tao K, Hou T. Biodegradation of cypermethrin by a novel Catellibacterium sp. strain CC-5 isolated from contaminated soil. Can. J. Microbiol. 2013;59:311–317. doi: 10.1139/cjm-2012-0580. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Larisa CT, Salles JF, Dirk V. Bacterial synergism in lignocellulose biomass degradation-complementary roles of degraders as influenced by complexity of the carbon source. Front. Microbiol. 2017;8:1628. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.01628. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Chen C, Wang ZY, Zhao M, Yuan BH, Yao JC, Chen J, et al. A fungus-bacterium co-culture synergistically promoted nitrogen removal by enhancing enzyme activity and electron transfer. Sci. Total Environ. 2021;754:142109. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142109. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

jmb-32-2-176-supple.pdf (438.2KB, pdf)

Supplementary data for this paper are available on-line only at http://jmb.or.kr.


Articles from Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology are provided here courtesy of Korean Society for Microbiology and Biotechnology

RESOURCES