Skip to main content
The Journal of International Medical Research logoLink to The Journal of International Medical Research
. 2022 Oct 31;50(10):03000605221117134. doi: 10.1177/03000605221117134

Prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in the Eastern Mediterranean Region: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Alireza Heiran 1,, Seyede Pegah Azarchehry 2, Saeid Dehghankhalili 3, Mehrdad Afarid 4, Sonia Shaabani 5, Alireza Mirahmadizadeh 6
PMCID: PMC9629581  PMID: 36314851

Abstract

Objectives

Individual studies in the Eastern Mediterranean Region (EMR) have shown the high prevalence of diabetic retinopathy. We conducted a meta-analysis to yield an estimate of the prevalence of diabetic (type 1 and 2) retinopathy in the EMR. Additionally, we explored its potential modulators.

Methods

Two-step screening of relevant articles published from 1 January 2000 to 13 December 2019 was carried out. An estimation of summary proportions, subgroup analysis, meta-regression, and publication bias assessment were performed.

Results

One hundred nine articles were included in the meta-analysis, involving 280,566 patients. The prevalence of diabetic retinopathy was 31% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 28, 33). The highest and lowest diabetic retinopathy prevalence rates were observed in low human development index (HDI) countries (63.6; 95% CI = 52.4, 74.0) and very high HDI countries 22.6 (95% CI = 20.5, 24.7), respectively.

Conclusions

The prevalence of diabetic retinopathy is high in the EMR. Our results provide important information for diverse healthcare surveillance systems in the EMR to implement the modifiable risk factors, diabetes screening to decrease undiagnosed diabetes, early detection of retinopathy, and proper diabetes care to decrease untreated diabetes.

Keywords: Prevalence, epidemiology, meta-analysis, diabetic retinopathy, diabetes mellitus, diabetes complication, diabetic angiopathy, vascular disease, Eastern Mediterranean Region, systematic review

Introduction

Diabetes mellitus is one of the most prevalent metabolic disorders that has reached epidemic proportions worldwide, exerting a substantial burden on healthcare services. Based on International Diabetes Federation (IDF) reports, approximately 537 million people had diabetes in 2021, and this rate is projected to increase to 643 million people by 2030 and 783 million by 2045.1 Approximately 87.5% of people with undiagnosed diabetes live in low- and middle- income countries. Countries with a high prevalence of undiagnosed diabetes show an increased incidence of diabetic complications.1 Undiagnosed or untreated complications will inevitably affect the patients’ quality of life and become a burden for the health system.2

Diabetic retinopathy is a chronic diabetic complication and a leading cause of blindness and vision disabilities worldwide.3 This complication develops in almost all patients with type 1 by two decades after diagnosis and approximately 80% of those with type 2 diabetes.4 Different risk factors are associated with retinopathy in patients with diabetes; the most important factors are age, duration of diabetes, high blood pressure, high body mass index, hyperglycemia, and hypercholesterolemia.69

The Eastern Mediterranean Region (EMR) is a sub-community of the World Health Organization (WHO) with countries located in southwest Asia, Western Asia, and North Africa, including a range of low-, middle-, and high-income countries.1012 There is an increasing trend in the prevalence of type 2 diabetes in middle- and low-income countries.13 As the WHO stated, the EMR has the highest prevalence of diabetes worldwide, with 43 million people living with the disease in 2014 (14% versus 9% global prevalence among people aged ≥ 18 years).10 Additionally, several regional studies indicated a wide range of diabetes prevalence rates in the EMR, such as 14.1% in Iran12 and 32.8% in Saudi Arabia.15 Similarly, the prevalence of diabetes complications is dramatically increasing in the EMR.16 In a systematic review from Pakistan, the prevalence of diabetic retinopathy was 28%, ranging from 10.6% to 91.3%.17 A meta-analysis from Iran showed an overall prevalence of diabetic retinopathy of 37.8%.18 In addition, several studies from Saudi Arabia,19,20 Kuwait,21 and Jordan22 reported that diabetic retinopathy is highly prevalent (27.8% to 36.4%, 50%, and 48.4%, respectively).

One mission of surveillance services in decreasing the burden of retinopathy on the health system and patients is to provide information regarding the prevalence of diabetic retinopathy for healthcare policymaking.23 Systematic epidemiologic data are vital for government health legislation to implement early detection and efficient intervention; however, to the best of our knowledge, no study has evaluated the prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in the EMR. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of relevant studies published since 2000 to estimate the incidence of diabetic (type 1 and 2) retinopathy in the EMR.

Materials and methods

We followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guideline and checklist.24 We did not prospectively register this trial but registered it retrospectively at Research Registry (registration number: reviewregistry1362; registered on 18 May 2022). The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences (code: IR.SUMS.REC.1398.818). Because this meta-analysis used the results of published studies, which did not contain individual data, informed consent was not applicable.

Search strategy

This meta-analysis of effect estimates was designed and conducted in January 2020 to estimate the prevalence of retinopathy in patients with both type 1 and type 2 diabetes in the EMR. We searched for the relevant keywords in the title and abstract of articles from Medline/PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Web of knowledge, and Google Scholar (gray literature) to identify the target studies published from 1 January 2000 to 13 December 2019. The keywords list is provided in Appendix 1. Additionally, the references of systematic reviews and meta-analyses were manually searched to include all relevant articles. The articles list was collected in EndNote X9.

Selection criteria

The first screening was conducted based on the title, abstract, and quality assessment by two independent researchers (S.D-KH and P.A-CH). The second screening was performed by scanning the entire manuscript. An article was included if it studied the prevalence of retinopathy among patients with diabetes in a normal population. In cases of conflict, a third researcher (A.H) made the final decision whether to include or exclude an article. The Joanna Briggs Institute checklist for systematic reviews was used for methodological quality assessment (possibility of bias in design, conduct, and analysis) of included studies.25 The result of the quality assessment is presented in Appendix 2.

Data extraction

All targeted statistics were entered into a checklist prepared as a spreadsheet. This checklist included the first author’s name, publication year, recruitment time span, country, sample size, proportion (%) and upper and lower 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of retinopathy, range of participants’ age, mean duration of diabetes, and method of diagnosis.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was carried out by R (v3.4.1, www.r-project.org) using metafor26 and meta27 packages. We followed a recently published paper for the meta-analysis of proportions.28 Our codes are provided in Appendix 3.

For calculating the summary effect size, we applied the random-effects model because both between-study variance (tau;2 true effect sizes related to population characteristics) and within-study variance (due to the random sampling error) exist in most series of observational studies on a specific topic. Additionally, results obtained by the random-effects model are more generalizable. The random-effects model was carried out using the restricted maximum likelihood method. Moreover, we applied the double-arcsine transformation method to make the included studies follow a normal distribution to obtain more accurate estimates of summary proportions and statistical analyses.

Heterogeneity consists of two distinct components: the between-study variance (tau;2 real variation) and the within-study variance (sampling error). Because a considerable variation (heterogeneity) in the summary proportion usually exists, we visually inspected the output forest plot (studies with 95% CIs non-overlapping with the 95% CIs of the summary effect), performed X2 tests (general heterogeneity), and calculated I2 statistics (the proportion of heterogeneity refers to the between-study variance). It is worth noting that our estimated I2 was 99.77% (95% CI = 99.70, 99.83), which means that approximately all heterogeneity could be attributed to the between-study variance. Therefore, we carried out subgroup analyses or meta-regression to explore different potential mediators of this heterogeneity of the effect sizes, including the Human Development Index (HDI; a relative measure of the living standards in human societies)29, publication year, and mean duration of diagnosed diabetes. For subgroup analysis, the random-effects model was used to obtain summary effect sizes within each subgroup, and then a fixed-effects model was used to test whether these effects differed significantly from each other.

To visualize studies’ effects and their CIs, we generated a forest plot. It is worth noting that by visual inspection of another forest plot (Appendix 4) that sorted the studies according to their precisions (using standard error), the nine largest studies were considered outliers, which confirmed the high overall heterogeneity. However, we performed a quantitative test to determine if the outlying studies were truly outliers. It was carried out by externally studentized residuals, which consider a study as an outlier if its absolute value is larger than 3, and leave-one-out estimates for the amount of heterogeneity, which consider a study as an outlier if its exclusion leads to a considerable influence on the summary proportion. In the externally studentized residuals test, we did not find any study with an absolute value of larger than 3 (Appendix 5). Moreover, the leave-one-out diagnostic test did not find any influential outlier (Appendix 6–9).

We generated a funnel plot and carried out objective tests for publication bias, including Egger’s regression test and the rank correlation test, which are powerful for large meta-analyses involving more than 75 studies. However, it should be noticed that in epidemiology studies, papers reporting either low proportions or high proportions are likely to be published. Therefore, exploring the publication bias might not be applicable in meta-analyses of observational studies. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Search results

We initially identified 4096 citations. After discarding duplicates (automatic: 930; manually: 198) and publications before 2000, 2974 studies were screened based on the title and abstract, which resulted in 153 articles for the second round of screening. In addition, 43 studies were manually added. After reading 196 full texts, 87 papers were discarded, and 109 remaining articles were entered into the meta-analysis. The reasons for excluding the 87 articles were: (1) studies outside of the EMR (n = 21), not normal population (n = 9), not reporting the prevalence of retinopathy (n = 6), reporting the incidence of retinopathy (n = 3), review or meta-analysis study (n = 13), non-English papers (n = 7), full text unavailable (n = 5), unclear results (n = 5), and irrelevant papers (n = 18). The flowchart of data retrieval is shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Flowchart of search and screening results (PRISMA-2020-Flow-Diagram).

EMR, Eastern Mediterranean Region.

Description of the included studies

The basic characteristics of the included studies in the meta-analysis are shown in Table 1. Our dataset consisted of 109 studies that were published from 2000 to 2019 and contained population-based or secondary- or tertiary-care-based data on the prevalence of retinopathy in patients with diabetes in the EMR. The sample sizes of the included studies ranged from 51 to 64,351 patients, with a combined total of 280,566 patients. Twelve (11.01%) studies included undiagnosed subjects with type 2 diabetes, while the remaining studies were only conducted on known cases of type 2 and/or type 1 diabetes. The prevalence of diabetic retinopathy was reported for only patients with type 1 diabetes in three (2.75%) studies, only patients with type 2 diabetes in 61 (55.96%) studies, and both type 1 and 2 diabetes separately in 11 (10.09%) studies. Additionally, in 27 (24.77) studies, the prevalence of diabetic retinopathy was not provided for each type of diabetes separately, even though the study had been conducted on both types. Judgement for the remaining seven (6.42%) studies was not feasible. Furthermore, 13 (11.93%) and 7 (6.42%) studies provided the classified prevalence of diabetic retinopathy according to the stage (i.e., non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy and proliferative diabetic retinopathy) and the presence of macular edema in addition to the stage of diabetic retinopathy, respectively.

Table 1.

Basic characteristics of the studies included in the review.

# Author, Year Country, HDI Time period UDDM included Diabetes type N PDR (%) Age (year) Mean duration Diagnosis tool
Stage of DR (N)
Mild NPDR Moderate NPDR Severe NPDR PDR ME
1 Khanedkar, 200529 Oman, VH 2002 1 & 2 [Y] 2,520 14 NA NA C1,3 NA NA NA NA NA
2 Din, 200630 Pakistan, M 2002 1 & 2 [Y] 108 15.7 30–70 NA C1 6 5 2 1 3
3 Humera Ishaq, 201631 Pakistan, M 2013–2014 2 154 42.86 50.59  ±  10.24 NA C1 NA NA NA NA NA
4 Taleb, 200832 Lebanon, H 2005–2007 2 235 33 57.7 ± 10.6 8.2 ± 6.6 C1 NA NA NA NA NA
5 Harb, 201833 Lebanon, H 2006–2016 2 484 24.6 NA 8.3 ± SD? C1 30 32 14 43 81
6 Shaikh, 200834 Pakistan, M 2003 + NA 660 15.3 ≥30 NA C1 NA NA NA NA NA
7 Alaboud, 201635 Saudi Arabia, VH 2014 2 748 14.7 25–97 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
8 Al-Agha, 201536 Saudi Arabia, VH 2013–2014 1 228 4.4 10.99 ± SD? NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
9 Esteghamati, 201737 Iran, H 2015–2016 1 & 2 [N] 30,202 21.9 ≥18 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
10 Hajar, 201518 Saudi Arabia, VH 2011–2012 NA 740 27.8 ≥50 NA C1 NA NA NA NA NA
11 Alvi, 201638 Pakistan, M 2011–2012 1 & 2 [Y] 8,742 20.3 19–102 0.5 C1,2 NA NA NA NA NA
12 Ali, 201339 Pakistan, M 2011–2012 + 2 113 24.79 30–70 0.5 C1 NA NA NA NA NA
13 Memon, 201440 Pakistan, M 2009–2011 1 & 2 [Y] 10,768 24.7 53.18 ± SD? NA C1,2 1209 386 52 129 852
14 Javanbakht, 201241 Iran, H NA 2 3,472 40.4 59.4  ± 11.7 8.08 ± 6.7 NA NA NA NA NA NA
15 Hussain, 201342 Pakistan, M 2011–2012 2 300 23.9 49.04 ± 0.69 7.17 ± 0.38 C1 NA NA NA NA NA
16 Valizadeh, 201643 Iran, H 2015 2 206 45.1 60.4  ± 3 13 ± SD? NA NA NA NA NA NA
17 Janghorbani, 200344 Iran, H 1992–2001 NA 549 45.35 45.7 ± 9.3 6.9 ± 5.7 C1 NA NA NA NA NA
18 Khandekr, 201545 Saudi Arabia, VH 2013–2014 1 & 2 [Y] 51 52 24-89 3.6 ± 4.2 NA NA NA NA 5 4
19 Al-Zuabi, 200546 Kuwait, VH 2002–2004 + 2 92 7.6 ≥51 0.5 C2 NA NA NA NA NA
20 Safi, 201947 Iran, H 2018 1 & 2 [N] 604 40 53 ± 14 9 ± 7 C1,2 NA NA NA NA NA
21 Rahman khan, 201048 Saudi Arabia, VH 2007–2009 1 & 2 [Y] 473 30 ≥18 8.61 ± 5.96 C5 NA NA NA NA NA
22 Mehhana, 201749 Lebanon, H 2004 2 462 39.18 57.27 ± 10.91 8.39 ± 7.38 C1,3,5,6,7 62 18 14 8 NA
23 Katibeh, 201450 Iran, H 2012–2013 NA 529 29.5 40-80 NA C1,2,5 NA NA NA NA NA
24 Aidenloo, 201651 Iran, H 2012–2013 2 327 32.6 54.7 ± 8.4 7.3 ± 0.6 C2 NA NA NA NA NA
25 Jammal, 201352 Jordan, H 2009–2011 + 2 127 7.9 49.7 ± 10 0.5 C1 NA NA NA NA NA
26 Alberto, 201653 Saudi Arabia, VH 2012–2013 1 & 2 [N] 126 61 38-87 14.9 ± SD? NA NA NA NA NA NA
27 Ahmed, 201619 Saudi Arabia, VH 2008–2013 2 401 36.4 54.6 ± 12.3 9.2 ± SD? C2,3,5 84 29 16 17 NA
28 Ageely, 201954 Saudi Arabia, VH 2017 2 281 32.4 ≥18 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
29 Elwali, 201755 Sudan, L 2015 1 & 2 [N] 316 82.6 58.7 ± 10.5 NA C1,5 NA NA NA 126 140
30 Abro, 201956 Pakistan, M 2005–2016 2 28,601 15.8 52.5 ± 11.3 8.2 ± 7.5 C1,2 NA NA NA NA NA
31 Sultan, 201957 Pakistan, M 2017 2 709 17.5 49.93 ± 12.51 9.01 ± 7.71 C5 NA NA NA NA NA
32 Zia, 201658 Pakistan, M 2011–2012 2 678 0.56 51.81 ± 11.43 7.23 ± 6.75 NA NA NA NA NA NA
33 El-Gendi, 201859 Egypt, H 2014–2016 1 & 2 [N] 67 62.7 57 ± 12.5 NA C1,5 NA NA NA NA NA
Sudan, L 2014–2016 1 & 2 [N] 86 26.7 51.8 ± 11.1 NA C1,5 NA NA NA NA NA
Yemen, L 2014–2016 1 & 2 [N] 56 87.5 52.5 ± 12 NA C1,5 NA NA NA NA NA
34 Ahsan, 201560 Pakistan, M 2009–2010 2 366 27.3 48.5 ± 8.02 9.17 ± 6.51 C2 NA NA NA NA NA
35 Morsy, 201961 Saudi Arabia, VH 2017 1 & 2 [N] 234 27.35 12-65 NA C1 NA NA NA NA NA
36 Bamashmus, 200962 Yemen, L 2004 1 & 2 [N] 350 55 54.4 ± 11.8 9.9 ± 7.77 C1,5 NA NA 45 60 77
37 Abdelfattah, 201463 Egypt, H 2012 1 & 2 [N] 71 52.11 54.53 ± 15.03 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
38 Hyassat, 201464 Jordan, H 2011–2012 2 1,105 23 57.1 ± 10.3 5.1 ± SD? NA NA NA NA NA NA
39 Al-Otaiby, 201765 Saudi Arabia, VH 2015–2016 1 & 2 [N] 400 48.8 NA NA C1 NA NA NA NA NA
40 Al-Till, 200566 Jordan, H NA 1 & 2 [N] 986 64.1 55.3 ± 12.5 11.9 ± 6.3 C1,2,5,6,7 NA NA NA NA NA
41 Khandekar, 200967 Oman, VH 2006 1 & 2 [N] 418 7.9 52.23 ± 12.51 NA C5 NA NA NA NA NA
42 Kamaleldeen, 201868 Egypt, H 2012–2014 1 180 1.1 13.82 ± 3.23 6 ± 3.08 C1,2 NA NA NA NA NA
43 AL-Amir, 200869 Jordan, H 2006–2007 2 1,000 34.1 57.8 ± 9.9 9.6 ± 7.6 C1,5 121 71 53 96 78
44 Bamashmus, 200970 Yemen, L 2004 1 & 2 [N] 228 51.1 50.01 ± 12.0 NA C1,5 NA NA NA NA NA
45 Costanion, 201471 Lebanon, H 2008–2009 2 187 16.6 44.7 ± 14.9 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
46 El Samahy, 201572 Egypt, H 2010–2013 1 & 2 [N] 600 1.83 13.29 ± 5.05 6.37 ± 3.64 C1 NA NA NA NA NA
47 Rahman KHan, 201473 Saudi Arabia, VH 2012–2013 2 506 2.96 57.44 ± SD? 10.2 ± 5.96 C1 6 7 NA 2 NA
48 El-Shafei, 201174 Qatar, VH 2009 1 & 2 [N] 540 23.5 ≥40 12.88 ± 9.06 C1,2,5 NA NA NA NA NA
49 Kahloun, 201475 Tunisia, H 2007–2011 1 & 2 [N] 2,320 26.3 54.5 ± SD? 7.6 ± SD? C1,2,5,6,7 530 280 251 156 402
50 Rabiu, 201521 Jordan, H NA 1 & 2 [N] 1,040 48.4 ≥50 NA C1 NA NA NA NA NA
51 Heydari, 201276 Iran, H 2008–2010 1 & 2 [N] 1,022 23.6 55.7 ± 12.2 6.85 ± SD? C1,5 NA NA NA NA NA
52 Mehravar, 201677 Iran, H 2014 2 562 28.1 61.62 ± 10.49 12.82 ± 6.61 C1 NA NA NA NA NA
53 Khandekar, 200478 Oman, VH NA 1 & 2 [N] 2,063 15.07 NA NA C1,5 NA NA NA NA NA
54 Rahman, 201179 Pakistan, M NA 1 & 2 [N] 200 51 48.3 ± 13 8.5 ± 5.6 C1,4,5 NA NA NA NA NA
55 Wahab, 200880 Pakistan, M 2006 + 2 130 15 43.2 ± 10.2 0.5 C1 NA NA NA NA NA
56 Shera, 200481 Pakistan, M NA 2 500 43 55.2 ± 10.6 7 ± SD? C1 NA NA NA NA NA
57 Al-Akily, 201182 Yemen, L 2001–2005 1 & 2 [N] 694 53 53.9 ± 11.52 10.3 ± 7.7 C1,3,4,5,6 NA NA NA NA NA
58 Iqbal, 200983 Pakistan, M 2005 + 2 100 9 47 ± SD? 0.5 C1 NA NA 2 1 NA
59 Yasir, 201984 Saudi Arabia, VH 2014-2017 1 & 2 [N] 395 33.7 ≥40 NA C1,5,6 NA NA NA NA NA
60 Al-Rubeaan, 201585 Saudi Arabia, VH NA 2 50,464 19.7 59.7 ± 12.78 13.4 ± 8.24 C1,4 9.1 NA NA 5367 2880
61 Farasat, 201786 Pakistan, M 2010 + 2 200 33 50.69 0.5 C1 NA NA NA NA NA
62 Szabo, 201587 UAE, VH 2009–2011 2 150 6 58.3 ± 12.2 14.4 ± 7.7 NA NA NA NA NA NA
63 Javadi, 200988 Iran, H 2007 1 & 2 [N] 634 37 58.16 ± 11.98 NA C1,5 114 42 19 65 38
64 Al-Maskari, 200789 UAE, VH 2003–2004 1 & 2 [Y] 513 19 53.3 ± 13.01 NA C2,5,7 NA NA NA NA NA
65 Al Kahtani, 201690 Saudi Arabia, VH 2000–2010 1 & 2 [Y] 64,351 17.5 55.92 ± 14.5 13.17 ± 8.05 NA NA NA NA 6146 2914
66 Uddin, 201891 Pakistan, M 2015–2016 + 2 891 15.9 47.7 ± 10.6 0.5 C1 NA NA NA NA NA
67 Khandekar, 200392 Oman, VH 2000–2001 1 & 2 [Y] 2,249 14.39 NA NA C1,5,7 NA NA NA 67 149
68 Nizamani, 201793 Pakistan, M 2014–2015 1 & 2 [N] 1,6760 17 >15 NA C1,4 NA NA NA NA NA
69 Jelinek, 201794 UAE, VH 2014–2015 2 490 13.26 60 ± 11.3 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
70 Akhter, 201795 Pakistan, M 2014–2015 1 & 2 [N] 876 7.8 53.1 ± 11.9 7.6 ± 7.1 NA NA NA NA NA NA
71 Alfadda, 200696 Saudi Arabia, VH 2001–2003 2 99 25.3 56.6 ± 12 11.8 ± 7.7 NA NA NA NA NA NA
72 Alwakeel, 200897 Saudi Arabia, VH 1989–2004 2 1,952 16.7 58.4 ± 14.2 10.4 ± 7.5 NA NA NA NA NA NA
73 Ahmed, 201998 Sudan, L 2015 1 & 2 [N] 316 83.3 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
74 Awadalla, 201799 Sudan, L NA 2 424 72.6 20-75 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
75 Awadalla, 201799 Sudan, L NA 2 316 51.6 58 ± 10 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
76 Niroomand, 2016100 Iran, H 2014 2 200 60.5 60.17 ± 13.56 13.06 ± SD? NA NA NA NA NA NA
77 Salti, 200922 Lebanon, H 2004–2007 2 557 35 56.4 ± 11.7 9.2 ± 6.9 C1,5,7 NA NA NA 45 42
78 Azizi-Soleiman, 2015101 Iran, H 2003–2014 2 1,429 56.3 NA NA C1,5,7 NA NA NA NA NA
79 Solaymani, 2012102 Iran, H 2007–2008 2 140 36.42 53.49 ± 9.72 8.88 ± 6.06 C1,5,7 NA NA NA 8 35
80 Al-Ghamdi, 2012103 Saudi Arabia, VH NA 2 852 34.5 63.3 ± SD? NA C1,2 NA NA NA NA NA
81 Saadi, 2007104 UAE, VH 2005–2006 2 245 54.2 >18 NA C1 NA NA NA NA NA
82 Abdolghani, 2018105 Saudi Arabia, VH 2015–2016 2 360 23.3 18-75 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
83 Ghaem, 2018106 Iran, H 2015–2016 1 & 2 [N] 478 32.8 56.64 ± 12.45 11.37 ± 9 NA 82 44 18 13 NA
84 Basit, 2005107 Pakistan, M 1996–2001 2 2,199 15.9 NA NA C1 NA NA NA NA NA
85 Faghih-Amini, 2005108 Iran, H 2004 1 500 76.4 49.59 ± SD? NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
86 Shafiqur-Rahman, 2004109 Pakistan, M 2002 NA NA 185 55 48.3 ± 13.3 8.5 ± 5.6 C1 NA NA NA NA NA
87 Afghani, 2007110 Pakistan, M 1997–2001 + NA 8,227 22.29 ≥40 NA C1 NA NA NA NA NA
88 Esteghamati, 2007111 Iran, H NA 2 66 36.4 57 ± 9.5 14.44 ± 6.78 NA NA NA NA NA NA
89 Al-Adsani, 2007112 Kuwait, VH 2000–2005 2 165 40 48.99 ± 10.05 8.03 ± 7.04 C1,2 35 NA NA 5 17
90 Askarishahi, 2012113 Iran, H 2008 2 459 40.7 55 ± 9.9 10.5 ± 6.4 C1,5 NA NA NA NA NA
91 Aamir, 2012114 Pakistan, M 2011 2 2,123 38.34 57.4 ± 22 NA C1,2 NA NA NA NA NA
92 Bonakdaran, 2015115 Iran, H NA 2 235 34.8 54.8 ± 9.4 7.52 ± 6.1 C1 NA NA NA NA NA
93 Dehghan, 2015116 Iran, H NA + NA 529 29.6 54.11 ± 10.06 NA C1,2,5 67 52 24 16 25
94 Najafi, 2013117 Iran, H 2011–2012 2 243 17.69 55.8 ± 10.33 9.08 ± 7.9 NA NA NA NA NA NA
95 Amini, 2008118 Iran, H 2001–2004 + 2 710 9 48.8 ± 9.8 0.5 C1 NA NA NA NA NA
96 Hosseini, 2014119 Iran, H 2011–2012 2 305 35.7 53.9 ± 1 8.2 ± 7.1 C1 NA NA NA NA NA
97 AlamKhanzada, 2011120 Pakistan, M 2009–2010 2 244 40.94 45 ± 11.5 13 ± 4.5 C1,4,5 NA NA NA NA NA
98 Manaviat, 2004121 Iran, H 2000–2001 2 590 39.7 54.9 ± 10.2 10.2 ± 6.6 C1,4,5,6 113 71 16 32 52
99 Manaviat, 2008122 Iran, H NA 2 199 70.35 54.16 ± 11.2 NA C1,2,5 34 34 22 50 NA
100 Sohail, 2014123 Pakistan, M 2009–2010 2 202 56.9 52.9 ± 10.5 8.5 ± 5.1 C1 NA NA NA NA NA
101 Khalid, 2015124 Pakistan, M 2014–2015 2 340 17 47.55 ± 9.13 NA C1,5 23 17 10 7 NA
102 Shaikh, 2010125 Pakistan, M 2008–2010 2 200 25.5 38-70 NA C1 NA NA NA NA NA
103 Hassan, 2010126 Pakistan, M 2004–2005 2 500 41.4 NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
104 Rasoulinejad, 2015127 Iran, H 2006–2010 1 & 2 [N] 1,562 64.1 54.6 ± 10.6 9.6 ± 7 C5 NA NA NA NA NA
105 Macky, 2011128 Egypt, H 2007–2008 1 & 2 [Y] 1,325 20.5 49 ± 12.9 NA C1,5,6 NA NA NA NA NA
106 Hussain, 2011129 Pakistan, M 2008–2009 1 & 2 [Y] 1,524 12 20–70 NA C1,3,5,6 NA NA NA NA NA
107 Janghorbani, 2017130 Iran, H 2001–2004 2 1,566 36.46 50.6 ± 12.3 7.6 ± 6.9 C1,2 NA NA NA NA NA
108 Jsnghorbani, 2006131 Iran, H 2000–2003 2 810 33.38 52.7 ± 9.9 8.2 ± 6.8 C2 NA NA NA NA NA
109 Khazaei, 2010132 Iran, H 2002 + 2 200 11 NA NA C1 NA NA NA NA NA

Codes [1]: VH (very high); H (high); M (medium); L (low).

Codes [2]: C1 (Dilated fundus examination (ophthalmoscopy)); C2 (Retinal photography); C3 (Digital stereoscopic retinal imaging); C4 (Angiography); C5 (Slit lamp biomicroscopy); C6 (Visual acuity); C7 (Tonometry).

Codes [3]: D (diagnosed diabetes); nD (newly diagnosed diabetes).

Codes [4]: [Y] (P DR reported for both type I and II diabetes, separately); [N] (P DR not reported for both type I and II diabetes, separately).

Abbreviations: NPDR, non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy; PDR, proliferative diabetic retinopathy; ME, macular edema; UDDM, undiagnosed diabetes; SD, standard deviation.

Results of the meta-analysis

Heterogeneity

The output of heterogeneity analysis showed that tau2 was 0.05 (95% CI = 0.04, 0.06), I2 was 99.77% (95% CI = 99.7, 99.83), and the Q-statistic was 13,537.27 (p < 0.0001), all of which suggested a high heterogeneity in the effect sizes. Additionally, the high value of I2 indicated that almost all heterogeneity was related to the between-study variance (Figure 2).

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Forest plot of 109 studies.

CI, confidence interval.

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Continued.

Prevalence of retinopathy in diabetes

We found that the summary proportion was 0.31 (95% CI = 0.28, 0.33), which represented a 31% prevalence of diabetic retinopathy (Figure 2).

Prevalence of retinopathy in diabetes based on subgroup analysis by HDI

Low HDI countries and very high HDI countries had the highest and lowest diabetic retinopathy prevalence. Moreover, the recalculated prevalence of retinopathy was 0.254 (95% CI = 0.238, 0.270). In subgroup analysis by HDI, the summary effect proportions were 0.636 (95% CI = 0.524, 0.740), 0.240 (95% CI = 0.211, 0.269), 0.339 (95% CI = 0.292, 0.388), and 0.226 (95% CI = 0.205, 0.247) for the four subgroups (low, medium, high, and very high), respectively. As a nature of our analysis (separate random-effects models in each subgroup), within-group estimates of tau2 were 0.029 [Q (df = 8) = 280.461, p < 0.001], 0.008 [Q (df = 28) = 2231.918, p < 0.001], 0.029 [Q (df = 43) = 5009.601, p < 0.001], and 0.004 [Q (df = 28) = 1305.489, p < 0.001] for low, medium, high, and very high subgroups, respectively. We found that the difference between the four subgroup summary estimates was significant (QM (df = 3) = 0.45, p < 0.001), and HDI had a moderating effect on the prevalence of diabetic retinopathy and shared effect on the true heterogeneity in the proportion.

Results of the meta-regression

The meta-regression analysis was performed for three different variables, including HDI, publication year, and the mean duration of diagnosed diabetes.

The slope of the estimated regression line suggested that HDI had a significant negative moderating effect on the prevalence of retinopathy in diabetes (results of the test of modulators: [QM (df = 1) = 27.016, p < 0.0001]; slope coefficient: [−0.069, Z = −5.198, p < 0.0001]) (Figure 3).

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

The scatter plot of HDI and the effect sizes [Note for interpretation: Each study was represented by a circle with a size proportional to the study size.]

HDI, Human Development Index

The slope of the estimated regression line for publication year was almost horizontal, suggesting that it was not a significant modulator of the prevalence of retinopathy in diabetes (results of the test of modulators: [QM (df = 1) = 0.184, p = 0.6679]; slope coefficient: [0.001, Z = 0.429, p = 0.668]) (Figure 4).

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

The scatter plot of publication year and the effect sizes [Note for interpretation: Each study was represented by a circle with a size proportional to the study size.]

The slope of the estimated regression line for the mean duration of diagnosed diabetes suggested that it had a significant positive moderating effect on the prevalence of retinopathy in diabetes (results of the test of modulators: [QM (df = 1) = 19.752, p < 0.0001]; slope coefficient: [0.019, Z = 4.444, p < 0.0001]) (Figure 5).

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

The scatter plot of the mean duration of diagnosed diabetes and the effect sizes [Note for interpretation: Each study was represented by a circle with a size proportional to the study size.]

Importantly, in all meta-regression plots, most studies were outside the 95% CI boundaries, indicating the presence of unknown or missed parameters affecting the prevalence of retinopathy in diabetes. A zero-to-negligible value of R2, which represents the amount of between-study heterogeneity explained by a modulator, supported this claim (R2HDI = 0.00, R2publication year = 1.33%, R2mean duration of diagnosed diabetes = 0.00).

Publication bias

Visual inspection of the funnel plot of proportions against sample sizes showed that our data were asymmetrical (Figure 6). Additionally, Egger’s test showed that the funnel plot was significantly asymmetrical (Z = 2.321, p = 0.020). Furthermore, the funnel plot of proportions against sample sizes showed that a small-study effect was present in our meta-analysis (Appendix 10). However, the rank correlation test did not find any association between the sample size and the reported prevalence of diabetic retinopathy of each study (Kendall’s tau = 0.057, p = 0.375).

Figure 6.

Figure 6.

The funnel plot of effect size against standard error [Note for interpretation: Each dot denotes a study, the vertical line denotes the summary effect size, and the two limit lines denote the 95% confidence intervals of the summary effect size.]

Discussion

To our knowledge, this is the first meta-analysis on the prevalence of diabetic retinopathy, irrespective of the type of diabetes, in the EMR, including 109 population-based studies. Most studies included in the meta-analysis were from Iran (28 articles) and Pakistan (28 articles), followed by Saudi Arabia (18 articles), while we could not find any publication that matched our inclusion criteria on the prevalence of diabetic retinopathy from Afghanistan, Bahrain, Iraq, Syria, Somalia, Morocco, Palestine, Djibouti, and Libya. Based on the analysis, the high between-study heterogeneity in this study might indicate a regional difference in the prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in the EMR. In other words, the effectiveness of health surveillance and early detection in these countries vary.

On the basis of the data from 109 studies and approximately 280,000 participants with diabetes, the prevalence of diabetic retinopathy was estimated to be 31% in the EMR, which was higher than the global 25.2% estimation reported by IDF in 2019134 and the 22.27% reported in another meta-analysis in 2021.135 Furthermore, although the regional classifications by WHO (EMR) and IDF (MENA) are different despite a large overlap, our estimation was comparable to the 33.8% and 32.90% in MENA reported by the above-mentioned studies, respectively.134,135 However, these estimations did not yield a weighted (according to the country population proportions) summary prevalence of diabetic retinopathy and might be underestimated.

Based on subgroup analysis and meta-regression, HDI was negatively correlated with the prevalence of diabetic retinopathy. The very high HDI countries in the EMR, all of which were “Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC)” countries, had the lowest diabetic retinopathy prevalence rate in the EMR of 22.6%, which is similar to the estimations from Europe (18.75%) and the Western Pacific (19.20%), lower than those from North America and the Caribbean (33.30%) and Africa (35.90%), and higher than those from South East Asia (16.99%) and South and Central America (13.37%).134 In a low-income developing country with a poor healthcare system (i.e., screening and diabetes care), the risk of retinopathy would be higher in patients with diabetes. Another, perhaps counter-intuitive, point worth mentioning is that the summary proportion in the medium HDI subgroup was higher than that of the high HDI subgroup. One possible explanation may be that Pakistan was the only member in our medium HDI subgroup; therefore, we should consider the situation of the healthcare system and delivery in Pakistan. Public health resources in Pakistan are mostly located in urban regions, which provide a better quality of life in general for their citizens. In addition, owing to the cost associated with poor transportation systems, most of the rural population cannot go to these public health centers.136,137 Moreover, the majority of included studies sampled the urban community, which may influence the prevalence of diabetic retinopathy obtained for this category.

The results of meta-regression did not show a statistically significant association between the publication year and prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in the EMR. Thus, the year of study was not a cause of variability in the results. Indeed, publication year cannot properly represent the exact prevalence trend.138 The regression line is fitted on the pooled data from different countries in each publication year, which can severely introduce selection bias as this is not longitudinal, and the regression line is the result of a sum of data from variable numbers of studies from different sets of countries at each publication year. However, if we consider the publication year as a relative indicator of changes in diabetic retinopathy prevalence in the EMR, one can interpret that this apparently stable trend during the past 20 years in the EMR might imply an interplay between various opposing factors that has ultimately kept the retinopathy rate constant in the EMR. For example, although GCC countries have made progress in recent years and developed their healthcare systems, the rate of diabetes is noticeable because of the several fundamental risk factors of diabetic retinopathy, including rapid industrialization and globalization, sedentary lifestyle, and dramatically decreased physical activity levels.139 Additionally, several EMR countries have encountered serious economic and political issues because of warfare, sanctions, and refugees, which have drastically compromised the healthcare system.

Another remarkable and important point is that although the meta-regression plots demonstrated correlations of HDI, publication year, and diabetes duration with diabetic retinopathy, most studies were outside of 95% CI boundaries in all three plots. This result indicated the presence of several unknown and missed parameters that define the prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in a region and could not be considered because of the nature of our study.

It is worth noting that the asymmetry in the publication bias assessment might not necessarily indicate publication bias as other parameters that interfere with the inclusion of small studies may contribute to this asymmetry in observational studies.140 First, we previously showed a high between-study heterogeneity, and a substantial number of studies fell outside of the two limit lines in the forest plot, which confirmed the high heterogeneity. In other words, this high between-study heterogeneity might be due to particular reasons. Second, we excluded small studies in foreign languages, which may have resulted in the so-called English language bias. Third, irrespective of the sensitive search strategy, gray literature search, and manual search in references for relevant studies, citation bias might have been present.

Several studies in the EMR showed a high prevalence of undiagnosed diabetes.138,141,142 This is important because when treatment starts immediately, especially in the pre-diabetes stage of type 2 diabetes, the risk of diabetes complications decreases. These have implications for our study. In particular, most of the included studies in this meta-analysis were carried out on different sample populations of known type 2 diabetes cases. Therefore, this meta-analysis might have underestimated the prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in the EMR. Moreover, we showed that the longer the duration of diabetes, the higher the prevalence of diabetic retinopathy. The duration of diabetes is a major risk factor in developing diabetic retinopathy.143 Furthermore, the development of diabetic retinopathy is related to uncontrolled conditions, such as glycemic control, systolic hypertension, and dyslipidemia, which are prevalent in the EMR.144,145 For example, the prevalence of uncontrolled diabetes is high (about 60%) among patients with diabetes in the EMR.13,146 Taking these challenges into account, addressing the healthcare burden of this group would be difficult. In particular, although diabetic retinopathy is a well-known complication with comprehensive and universal identification and control protocols, financial barriers, insufficient health system services (all three levels), and limited skilled practitioners in most countries of the EMR are obstacles for the active and efficient follow-up of all patient populations and communications and consultations to make patients with diabetes aware of the importance of annual check-ups and follow-up protocols even at asymptomatic phases.

Conclusion

Our study provided the first pooled analysis to estimate the prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in the EMR. On the basis of the data from 109 studies and approximately 280,000 participants with diabetes, the prevalence of diabetic retinopathy was estimated to be high as 31% in the EMR. We showed that a longer duration of diagnosed diabetes and worse healthcare systems (using HDI as its proxy) were correlated with a higher rate of diabetic retinopathy. Our results implicate the importance of diabetes screening, periodic examinations for retinopathy, diabetes care, and risk factor controls.

Supplemental Material

sj-pdf-1-imr-10.1177_03000605221117134 - Supplemental material for Prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in the Eastern Mediterranean Region: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Supplemental material, sj-pdf-1-imr-10.1177_03000605221117134 for Prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in the Eastern Mediterranean Region: a systematic review and meta-analysis by Alireza Heiran, Seyede Pegah Azarchehry, Saeid Dehghankhalili, Mehrdad Afarid, Sonia Shaabani, Alireza Mirahmadizadeh in Journal of International Medical Research

sj-pdf-2-imr-10.1177_03000605221117134 - Supplemental material for Prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in the Eastern Mediterranean Region: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Supplemental material, sj-pdf-2-imr-10.1177_03000605221117134 for Prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in the Eastern Mediterranean Region: a systematic review and meta-analysis by Alireza Heiran, Seyede Pegah Azarchehry, Saeid Dehghankhalili, Mehrdad Afarid, Sonia Shaabani, Alireza Mirahmadizadeh in Journal of International Medical Research

sj-pdf-3-imr-10.1177_03000605221117134 - Supplemental material for Prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in the Eastern Mediterranean Region: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Supplemental material, sj-pdf-3-imr-10.1177_03000605221117134 for Prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in the Eastern Mediterranean Region: a systematic review and meta-analysis by Alireza Heiran, Seyede Pegah Azarchehry, Saeid Dehghankhalili, Mehrdad Afarid, Sonia Shaabani, Alireza Mirahmadizadeh in Journal of International Medical Research

sj-pdf-4-imr-10.1177_03000605221117134 - Supplemental material for Prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in the Eastern Mediterranean Region: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Supplemental material, sj-pdf-4-imr-10.1177_03000605221117134 for Prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in the Eastern Mediterranean Region: a systematic review and meta-analysis by Alireza Heiran, Seyede Pegah Azarchehry, Saeid Dehghankhalili, Mehrdad Afarid, Sonia Shaabani, Alireza Mirahmadizadeh in Journal of International Medical Research

sj-pdf-5-imr-10.1177_03000605221117134 - Supplemental material for Prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in the Eastern Mediterranean Region: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Supplemental material, sj-pdf-5-imr-10.1177_03000605221117134 for Prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in the Eastern Mediterranean Region: a systematic review and meta-analysis by Alireza Heiran, Seyede Pegah Azarchehry, Saeid Dehghankhalili, Mehrdad Afarid, Sonia Shaabani, Alireza Mirahmadizadeh in Journal of International Medical Research

sj-pdf-6-imr-10.1177_03000605221117134 - Supplemental material for Prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in the Eastern Mediterranean Region: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Supplemental material, sj-pdf-6-imr-10.1177_03000605221117134 for Prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in the Eastern Mediterranean Region: a systematic review and meta-analysis by Alireza Heiran, Seyede Pegah Azarchehry, Saeid Dehghankhalili, Mehrdad Afarid, Sonia Shaabani, Alireza Mirahmadizadeh in Journal of International Medical Research

sj-pdf-7-imr-10.1177_03000605221117134 - Supplemental material for Prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in the Eastern Mediterranean Region: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Supplemental material, sj-pdf-7-imr-10.1177_03000605221117134 for Prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in the Eastern Mediterranean Region: a systematic review and meta-analysis by Alireza Heiran, Seyede Pegah Azarchehry, Saeid Dehghankhalili, Mehrdad Afarid, Sonia Shaabani, Alireza Mirahmadizadeh in Journal of International Medical Research

sj-pdf-8-imr-10.1177_03000605221117134 - Supplemental material for Prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in the Eastern Mediterranean Region: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Supplemental material, sj-pdf-8-imr-10.1177_03000605221117134 for Prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in the Eastern Mediterranean Region: a systematic review and meta-analysis by Alireza Heiran, Seyede Pegah Azarchehry, Saeid Dehghankhalili, Mehrdad Afarid, Sonia Shaabani, Alireza Mirahmadizadeh in Journal of International Medical Research

sj-pdf-9-imr-10.1177_03000605221117134 - Supplemental material for Prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in the Eastern Mediterranean Region: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Supplemental material, sj-pdf-9-imr-10.1177_03000605221117134 for Prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in the Eastern Mediterranean Region: a systematic review and meta-analysis by Alireza Heiran, Seyede Pegah Azarchehry, Saeid Dehghankhalili, Mehrdad Afarid, Sonia Shaabani, Alireza Mirahmadizadeh in Journal of International Medical Research

sj-pdf-10-imr-10.1177_03000605221117134 - Supplemental material for Prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in the Eastern Mediterranean Region: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Supplemental material, sj-pdf-10-imr-10.1177_03000605221117134 for Prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in the Eastern Mediterranean Region: a systematic review and meta-analysis by Alireza Heiran, Seyede Pegah Azarchehry, Saeid Dehghankhalili, Mehrdad Afarid, Sonia Shaabani, Alireza Mirahmadizadeh in Journal of International Medical Research

sj-pdf-11-imr-10.1177_03000605221117134 - Supplemental material for Prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in the Eastern Mediterranean Region: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Supplemental material, sj-pdf-11-imr-10.1177_03000605221117134 for Prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in the Eastern Mediterranean Region: a systematic review and meta-analysis by Alireza Heiran, Seyede Pegah Azarchehry, Saeid Dehghankhalili, Mehrdad Afarid, Sonia Shaabani, Alireza Mirahmadizadeh in Journal of International Medical Research

Footnotes

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Funding: The authors disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: The present article was financially supported by the Shiraz University of Medical Sciences [grant number 19293-109-01-97].

Author contributions: All authors conceived the study and were responsible for designing the protocol. AH, MA, and AM designed the study. SS performed the literature search and, together with SPA and SD, selected the studies and extracted the relevant information. All authors synthesized the data. AH and SPA wrote the first draft of the paper. AH, AM, and MA provided critical guidance on the analysis and overall direction of the study. All authors critically revised successive drafts of the paper and approved the final version.

ORCID iDs

Alireza Heiran https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6567-5306

Seyede Pegah Azarchehry https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2348-9163

Mehrdad Afarid https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5894-6163

Sonia Shaabani https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1882-8183

Alireza Mirahmadizadeh https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2259-4984

References

  • 1.International Diabetes Federation. IDF Diabetes Atlas, 10th edn. Brussels, Belgium: 2021. Available at: https://www.diabetesatlas.org
  • 2.Chow EA, Foster H, Gonzalez V, et al. The disparate impact of diabetes on racial/ethnic minority populations. Clin Diabetes 2012; 30: 130–133. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Bourne RRA, Stevens GA, White RA, et al. Causes of vision loss worldwide, 1990-2010: A systematic analysis. Lancet Glob Heal 2013; 1: e339–e349. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Klein R, Klein BEK, Moss SE, et al. The Wisconsin Epidemiologic Study of Diabetic Retinopathy. II. Prevalence and risk of diabetic retinopathy when age at diagnosis is less than 30 years. Arch Ophthalmol 1984; 102: 520–526. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Klein R, Klein BEK, Moss SE, et al. The Wisconsin Epidemiologic Study of Diabetic Retinopathy. III. Prevalence and risk of diabetic retinopathy when age at diagnosis is 30 or more years. Arch Ophthalmol 1984; 102: 527–532. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.McKay R, McCarty CA, Taylor HR. Diabetic retinopathy in Victoria, Australia: the visual impairment project. Br J Ophthalmol 2000; 84: 865–870. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Henricsson M, Nyström L, Blohmé G, et al. The incidence of retinopathy 10 years after diagnosis in young adult people with diabetes: Results from the nationwide population-based Diabetes Incidence Study in Sweden (DISS). Diabetes Care 2003; 26: 349–354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Kohner EM, Aldington SJ, Stratton IM, et al. United kingdom prospective diabetes study, 30: Diabetic retinopathy at diagnosis of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and associated risk factors. Arch Ophthalmol 1998; 116: 297–303. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Gallego PH, Craig ME, Hing S, et al. Role of blood pressure in development of early retinopathy in adolescents with type 1 diabetes: Prospective cohort study. Bmj 2008; 337: 497–500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.World Health Organization Regional Office for the Eastern Mediterranean. The Work of WHO in the Eastern Mediterranean Region Annual Report of the Regional Director. 2014. Available from: http://applications.emro.who.int/dsaf/EMROPUB_2016_EN_1817.pdf?ua=1&ua=1
  • 11.WorldHealthOrganization. VIH/SIDA differences entre hommes et femmes dans la Region de la Mediterranee orientale. 2005.
  • 12.Kuper H, Polack S, Limburg H. Rapid assessment of avoidable blindness. Community Eye Heal J 2006; 19: 68–69. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Lin X, Xu Y, Pan X, et al. Global, regional, and national burden and trend of diabetes in 195 countries and territories: an analysis from 1990 to 2025. Sci Rep 2020; 10; 14790. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Mirzaei M, Rahmaninan M, Mirzaei M, et al. Epidemiology of diabetes mellitus, pre-diabetes, undiagnosed and uncontrolled diabetes in Central Iran: Results from Yazd health study. BMC Public Health 2020; 20: 166. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Meo SA. Prevalence and future prediction of type 2 diabetes mellitus in the kingdom of saudi arabia: A systematic review of published studies. J Pak Med Assoc 2016; 66: 722–725. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Alhyas L, McKay A, Majeed A. Prevalence of type 2 diabetes in the states of the co-operation council for the Arab states of the Gulf: A systematic review. PLoS One 2012; 7: e40948. Epub ahead of print. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Mumtaz SN, Fahim MF, Arslan M, et al . Prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in Pakistan: A systematic review. Pakistan J Med Sci 2018; 34: 493–500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Mohammadi M, Raiegani AAV, Jalali R, et al. The prevalence of retinopathy among type 2 diabetic patients in Iran: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Rev Endocr Metab Disord 2019; 20: 79–88. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Hajar S, Hazmi A Al, Wasli M, et al. Prevalence and causes of blindness and diabetic retinopathy in southern Saudi Arabia. Saudi Med J 2015; 36: 449–455. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Ahmed R, Khalil S, Al-Qahtani M. Diabetic retinopathy and the associated risk factors in diabetes type 2 patients in Abha, Saudi Arabia. J Fam Community Med 2016; 23: 18–24. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Al-Shammari FK, Al-meraghi O, Nasif A, et al. The prevalence of diabetic retinopathy and associated risk factors in type 2 diabetes mellitus in Al-Naeem area (Kuwait). Middle East J Fam Med 2005; 3: 3. [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Rabiu MM, Al Bdour MD, Abu Ameerh MA, et al. Prevalence of blindness and diabetic retinopathy in northern Jordan. Eur J Ophthalmol 2015; 25: 320–327. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Salti HI, Nasrallah MP, Taleb NM, et al. Prevalence and determinants of retinopathy in a cohort of Lebanese type II diabetic patients. Can J Ophthalmol 2009; 44: 308–313. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Page MJ, Moher D, Bossuyt PM, et al. PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021; 372: n160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Joanna Briggs Institute. Critical Appraisal Tools: Checklist for Systematic Reviews [Internet]. 2017. [cited 2019 December 15]. Available from: http://joannabriggs.org/assets/docs/critical-appraisal-tools/JBI_Critical_Appraisal-Checklist_for_Systematic_Reviews2017.pdf
  • 26.Viechtbauer W. Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor. J Stat Softw 2010; 36: 1–48. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Balduzzi S, Rücker G, Schwarzer G. How to perform a meta-analysis with R: A practical tutorial. Evid Based Ment Health 2019; 22: 153–160. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Wang NMA. How to Conduct a Meta-Analysis of Proportions in R: A Comprehensive Tutorial. Texas, USA: CUNY. Epub ahead of print 2018. DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.27199.00161. [Google Scholar]
  • 29.UNITEDNATIONSDEVELOPMENTPROGRAMME. Human Development Index (HDI) [Internet]. 2020, http://hdr.undp.org/en/content/human-development-index-hdi (2018, accessed 1 August 2020).
  • 30.Khandekar R, Mohammed AJ. Visual disabilities among diabetics in Oman. Saudi Med J 2005; 26: 836–841. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Jamal u D, Qureshi MB, Khan AJ, et al. Prevalence of diabetic retinopathy among individuals screened positive for diabetes in five community-based eye camps in northern Karachi, Pakistan. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad 2006; 18: 40–43. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Ishaq H, Ali M, Kazmi N, et al. Prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in type II diabetic patients in a health facility in Karachi, Pakistan. Trop J Pharm Res 2016; 15: 1069–1076. [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Taleb N, Salti H, Al-Mokaddam M, et al. Vascular complications of diabetes in Lebanon: Experience at the American University of Beirut. Br J Diabetes Vasc Dis 2008; 8: 80–83. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Harb W, Harb G, Chamoun N, et al. Severity of diabetic retinopathy at the first ophthalmological examination in the Lebanese population. Ther Adv Ophthalmol 2018; 10: 251584141879195. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Shaikh A, Shaikh F, Shaikh ZA, et al . Prevalence of diabetic retinopathy and influence factors among newly diagnosed diabetics in rural and urban areas of Pakistan: Data analysis from the Pakistan National Blindness & Visual Impairment Survey 2003. Pakistan J Med Sci 2008; 24: 774–779. [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Alaboud AF, Tourkmani AM, Alharbi TJ, et al. Microvascular and macrovascular complications of type 2 diabetic mellitus in Central,Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Saudi Med J 2016; 37: 1399–1403. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Al-Agha AE, Alafif M, Abd-Elhameed IA. Glycemic control, Complications, and associated autoimmune diseases in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. Saudi Med J 2015; 36: 26–31. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Esteghamati A, Larijani B, Aghajani MH, et al. Diabetes in Iran: Prospective analysis from first nationwide diabetes report of National Program for Prevention and Control of Diabetes (NPPCD-2016). Sci Rep 2017; 7: 13461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Alvi R, Memon MS, Shera S, et al . Visual outcome of laser treatment in diabetic macular edema: Study from an urban diabetes care center. Pakistan J Med Sci 2016; 32: 1229–1233. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Ali A, Iqbal F, Taj A, et al. Prevalence of microvascular complications in newly diagnosed patients with type 2 diabetes. Pakistan J Med Sci 2013; 29: 899–902. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Memon S, Ahsan S, Riaz Q, et al. Frequency, severity and risk indicators of retinopathy in patients with diabetes screened by fundus photographs: A study from primary health care. Pakistan J Med Sci 2014; 30: 366–372. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Javanbakht M, Abolhasani F, Mashayekhi A, et al. Health Related Quality of Life in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus in Iran: A National Survey. PLoS One 2012; 7: e44526. Epub ahead of print. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0044526. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Hussain S, Qamar MR, Iqbal MA, et al. Risk factors of retinopathy in type 2 diabetes mellitus at a tertiary care hospital, Bahawalpur Pakistan. Pakistan J Med Sci 2013; 29: 536–539. Epub ahead of print. DOI: 10.12669/pjms.292.3066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Valizadeh R, Moosazadeh M, Bahaadini K, et al. Determining the Prevalence of Retinopathy and Its Related Factors among Patients with Type 2 Diabetes in Kerman, Iran. Osong Public Heal Res Perspect 2016; 7: 296–300. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Janghorbani M, Amini M, Ghanbari H, et al. Incidence of and risk factors for diabetic retinopathy in Isfahan, Iran. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 2003; 10: 81–95. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Khandekar R, Al Hassan A, Al Dhibi H, et al. Magnitude and determinants of diabetic retinopathy among persons with diabetes registered at employee health department of a tertiary Eye Hospital of central Saudi Arabia. Oman J Ophthalmol 2015; 8: 162–165. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Al-Zuabi H, Al-Tammar Y, Al-Moataz R, et al. Retinopathy in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus. Med Princ Pract 2005; 14: 293–296. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Safi S, Ahmadieh H, Katibeh M, et al. Modeling a Telemedicine Screening Program for Diabetic Retinopathy in Iran and Implementing a Pilot Project in Tehran Suburb. J Ophthalmol 2019; 19: 1–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Khan A, Wiseberg J, Lateef ZA, et al. Prevalence and determinants of diabetic retinopathy in Al Hasa region of Saudi Arabia: primary health care centre based cross-sectional survey, 2007-2009. Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol 2010; 17: 257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Mehanna CJ, Fattah MA, Tamim H, et al. Five-year incidence and progression of diabetic retinopathy in patients with type II diabetes in a tertiary care center in Lebanon. J Ophthalmol 2017; 2017: 9805145. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 51.Katibeh, MH. Dehghan, H. Ahmadieh, R, et al. Prevalence and Risk Factors for Diabetic Retinopathy in Yazd, Iran. J Diabetes 2014; 7: 139–41. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Aidenloo NS, Mehdizadeh A, Valizadeh N, et al. Optimal glycemic and hemoglobin a1c thresholds for diagnosing diabetes based on prevalence of retinopathy in an iranian population. Iran Red Crescent Med J 2016; 18: e31254. Epub ahead of print. DOI: 10.5812/ircmj.31254. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.Jammal H, Khader Y, Alkhatib S, et al. Diabetic retinopathy in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus in Jordan: Prevalence and associated factors. J Diabetes 2013; 5: 172–179. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Galvez-Ruiz A, Schatz P. Prevalence of Diabetic Retinopathy in a Population of Diabetics From the Middle East With Microvascular Ocular Motor Palsies. J Neuroophthalmol 2016; 36: 131–133. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Ageely H. Long-term diabetes-related severe complications among individuals with T2DM in Jazan, Saudi Arabia. J Acute Dis 2019; 8: 72–77. [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Elwali ES, Almobarak AO, Hassan MA, et al . Frequency of diabetic retinopathy and associated risk factors in Khartoum, Sudan: Population based study. Int J Ophthalmol 2017; 10: 948–954. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Abro M, Zafar AB, Fawwad A, et al. Prevalence of diabetic micro vascular complications at a tertiary care unit of Karachi, Pakistan. Int J Diabetes Dev Ctries 2019; 39: 325–330. [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Sultan S, Fawwad A, Siyal NA, et al. Frequency and risk factors of diabetic retinopathy in patients with type 2 diabetes presenting at a tertiary care hospital. Int J Diabetes Dev Ctries 2019; 40; 87–92. Epub ahead of print. DOI: 10.1007/s13410-019-00756-9. [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Zia A, Bhatti A, Jalil F, et al. Prevalence of type 2 diabetes–associated complications in Pakistan. Int J Diabetes Dev Ctries 2016; 36: 179–188. [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Samy El Gendy NM, Abdel-Kader AA. Prevalence of Selected Eye Diseases Using Data Harvested from Ophthalmic Checkup Examination of a Cohort of Two Thousand Middle Eastern and North African Subjects. J Ophthalmol 2018; 2018: 8049475. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Ahsan S, Basit A, Ahmed KR, et al. Risk indicators of diabetic retinopathy in patients with type 2 diabetes screened by fundus photographs: a study from Pakistan. Int J Diabetes Dev Ctries 2015; 35: 333–338. [Google Scholar]
  • 62.Elmorsy E. Posterior segment eye diseases: prevalence, pattern, and attribution to visual impairment among adult saudi population. Ann Clin Anal Med 2019; 10: 505–509. [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Bamashmus M, Gunaid A, Khandekar R. Diabetic retinopathy, visual impairment and ocular status among patients with diabetes mellitus in Yemen: A hospital-based study. Indian J Ophthalmol 2009; 57: 293–298. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Abdelfattah NS, Amgad M, Salama AA, et al. Development of an Arabic version of the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire as a tool to study eye diseases patients in Egypt. Int J Ophthalmol 2014; 7: 891–897. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Hyassat D, Al Sitri E, Batieha A, et al. Prevalence of hypomagnesaemia among obese type 2 diabetic patients attending the National Center for Diabetes, Endocrinology and Genetics (NCDEG). Int J Endocrinol Metab 2014; 12: e17796. Epub ahead of print. DOI: 10.5812/ijem.17796. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Al-Otaibi H, Al-Otaibi MD, Khandekar R, et al. Validity, usefulness and cost of RETeval system for diabetic retinopathy screening. Transl Vis Sci Technol 2017; 6: 3. Epub ahead of print. DOI: 10.1167/tvst.6.3.3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Al-Till MI, Al-Bdour MD, Ajlouni KM. Prevalence of blindness and visual impairment among Jordanian diabetics. Eur J Ophthalmol 2005; 15: 62–68. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 68.Khandekar RB, Tirumurthy S, Al-Harby S, et al. Diabetic retinopathy and ocular co-morbidities among persons with diabetes at sumail hospital of Oman. Diabetes Technol Ther 2009; 11: 675–679. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Kamaleldeen EB, Mohammad HA, Mohamed EF, et al. Microvascular complications in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus in Assiut governorate, Egypt. Egypt Pediatr Assoc Gaz 2018; 66: 85–90. [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Al-Amer R, Khader Y, Malas S, et al. Prevalence and risk factors of diabetic retinopathy among Jordanian patients with type 2 diabetes. Digit J Ophthalmol 2008; 14: 42–49. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Bamashmus MA, Gunaid AA, Khandekar R. Regular visits to a diabetes clinic were associated with lower magnitude of visual disability and diabetic retinopathy - A hospital-based historical cohort study in Yemen. Diabetes Technol Ther 2009; 11: 45–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Costanian C, Bennett K, Hwalla N, et al. Prevalence, correlates and management of type 2 diabetes mellitus in Lebanon: Findings from a national population-based study. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2014; 105: 408–415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.El Samahy MH, Elbarbary NS, Elmorsi HM. Current status of diabetes management, glycemic control and complications in children and adolescents with diabetes in Egypt. Where do we stand now? And where do we go from here? Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2015; 107: 370–376. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Khan AR, Al Abdul Lateef ZN, Fatima S, et al. Prevalence of chronic complication among type 2 diabetics attending primary health care centers of Al Ahsa district of Saudi Arabia: a cross sectional survey. Glob J Health Sci 2014; 6: 245–253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Elshafei M, Gamra H, Khandekar R, et al. Prevalence and determinants of diabetic retinopathy among persons ≥40 years of age with diabetes in Qatar: A community-based survey. Eur J Ophthalmol 2011; 21: 39–47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Kahloun R, Jelliti B, Zaouali S, et al. Prevalence and causes of visual impairment in diabetic patients in Tunisia, North Africa. Eye 2014; 28: 986–991. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Heydari B, Yaghoubi G, Yaghoubi MA, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for diabetic retinopathy: An Iranian eye study. Eur J Ophthalmol 2012; 22: 393–397. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Mehravar F, Mansournia MA, Holakouie-Naieni K, et al. Associations between diabetes self-management and microvascular complications in patients with type 2 diabetes. Epidemiol Health 2016; 38: e2016004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Khandekar R, Zutshi R. Glaucoma among Omani diabetic patients: A cross-sectional descriptive study (Oman Diabetic Eye Study 2002). Eur J Ophthalmol 2004; 14: 19–25. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 80.Rahman S, Nawaz R, Khan GJ, et al . Frequency of diabetic retinopathy in hypertensive diabetic patients in a tertiary care hospital of Peshawar, Pakistan. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad 2011; 23: 133–135. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 81.Wahab S, Mahmood N, Shaikh Z, et al. Frequency of retinopathy in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes patients. J Pak Med Assoc 2008; 58: 557–561. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 82.Shera AS, Jawad F, Maqsood A, et al. Prevalence of Chronic Complications and Associated Factors in Type 2 Diabetes. J Pak Med Assoc 2004; 54: 54–59. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 83.Al-Akily SA, Bamashmus MA, Gunaid AA. Causes of visual impairment and blindness among Yemenis with diabetes: A hospital-based study. East Mediterr Heal J 2011; 17: 831–837. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 84.Iqbal T, Zafar J. Frequency of retinopathy in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus. Rawal Med J 2009; 34: 167–169. [Google Scholar]
  • 85.Yasir ZH, Hassan AD, Rajiv K. Diabetic retinopathy (DR) among 40 years and older Saudi population with diabetes in Riyadh governorate, Saudi Arabia – A population based survey. Saudi J Ophthalmol 2019; 33: 363–368. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 86.Al-Rubeaan K, Abu El-Asrar AM, Youssef AM, et al. Diabetic retinopathy and its risk factors in a society with a type 2 diabetes epidemic: A Saudi National Diabetes Registry-based study. Acta Ophthalmol 2015; 93: e140–e147. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 87.Farasat T, Sharif S, Manzoor F, et al. Prevalence of retinopathy detected by fundoscopy among newly diagnosed type 2 diabetic patients visiting a local hospital in Lahore. Pak J Zool 2017; 49: 367–372. [Google Scholar]
  • 88.Szabo SM, Osenenko KM, Qatami L, et al. Quality of care for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus in Dubai: A HEDIS-like assessment. Int J Endocrinol 2015; 2015: 1–8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 89.Javadi MA, Katibeh M, Rafati N, et al. Prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in Tehran province: A population-based study. BMC Ophthalmol 2009; 9: 12–19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 90.Al-Maskari F, El-Sadig M. Prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in the United Arab Emirates: A cross-sectional survey. BMC Ophthalmol 2007; 7: 11–18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 91.Al Kahtani ES, Khandekar R, Al-Rubeaan K, et al. Assessment of the prevalence and risk factors of ophthalmoplegia among diabetic patients in a large national diabetes registry cohort. BMC Ophthalmol; 16. Epub ahead of print 2016. DOI: 10.1186/s12886-016-0272-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 92.Uddin F, Ali B, Junaid N. Prevalence Of Diabetic Complications In Newly Diagnosed Type 2 Diabetes Patients In Pakistan: Findings From National Registry. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad 2018; 30: S652–S658. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 93.Khandekar R, Lawatii J Al, Mohammed AJ, et al. Diabetic retinopathy in Oman: A hospital based study. Br J Ophthalmol 2003; 87: 1061–1064. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 94.Nizamani NB, Talpur KI, Awan F, et al. Results of a community-based screening programme for diabetic retinopathy and childhood blindness in district Hyderabad, Pakistan. BMJ Open Ophthalmol 2017; 2: e000099. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 95.Jelinek HF, Osman WM, Khandoker AH, et al. Clinical profiles, comorbidities and complications of type 2 diabetes mellitus in patients from United Arab Emirates. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care 2017; 5: e000427. Epub ahead of print. DOI: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2017-000427. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 96.Akhter J, Ahmed A, Mawani M, et al. Patterns, control and complications of diabetes from a hospital based registry established in a low income country. BMC Endocr Disord 2017; 17: 30. Epub ahead of print. DOI: 10.1186/s12902-017-0179-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 97.Alfadda A, Abdulrahman KB. Assessment of care for type 2 diabetic patients at the primary care clinics of a referral hospital. J Family Community Med 2006; 13: 13–138. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 98.Alwakeel JS, Sulimani R, Al-Asaad H, et al. Diabetes complications in 1952 type 2 diabetes mellitus patients managed in a single institution. Ann Saudi Med 2008; 28: 260–266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 99.Ahmed MH, Awadalla H, Osman M, et al. Ethnicity and diabetes complications in Sudanese population: The need for further genetic population testing. Diabetes Metab Syndr Clin Res Rev 2019; 13: 430–433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 100.Awadalla H, Noor SK, Elmadhoun WM, et al. Diabetes complications in Sudanese individuals with type 2 diabetes: Overlooked problems in sub-Saharan Africa? Diabetes Metab Syndr Clin Res Rev 2017; 11: S1047–S1051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 101.Niroomand M, Ghasemi SN, Karimi-Sari H, et al. Diabetes knowledge, attitude and practice (KAP) study among Iranian in-patients with type-2 diabetes: A cross-sectional study. Diabetes Metab Syndr Clin Res Rev 2016; 10: S114–S119. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 102.Azizi-Soleiman F, Heidari-Beni M, Ambler G, et al. Iranian Risk Model as a Predictive Tool for Retinopathy in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes. Can J Diabetes 2015; 39: 358–363. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 103.Soleymani A, Moazezi Z, Gorjizadeh A. Frequency of ophthalmic complications on 140 cases of type II diabetes mellitus, Babol, Iran. Iran Red Crescent Med J 2012; 14: 704–706. [Google Scholar]
  • 104.Al Ghamdi AH, Rabiu M, Hajar S, et al. Rapid assessment of avoidable blindness and diabetic retinopathy in Taif, Saudi Arabia. Br J Ophthalmol 2012; 96: 1168–1172. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 105.Saadi H, Carruthers SG, Nagelkerke N, et al. Prevalence of diabetes mellitus and its complications in a population-based sample in Al Ain, United Arab Emirates. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2007; 78: 369–377. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 106.Abdulghani HM, AlRajeh AS, AlSalman BH, et al. Prevalence of diabetic comorbidities and knowledge and practices of foot care among diabetic patients: A cross-sectional study. Diabetes, Metab Syndr Obes Targets Ther 2018; 11: 417–425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 107.Ghaem H, Daneshi N, Riahi S, et al. The prevalence and risk factors for diabetic retinopathy in Shiraz, Southern Iran. Diabetes Metab J 2018; 42: 538–543. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 108.Basit A, Hydrie MZI, Hakeem R, et al. Glycemic control, hypertension and chronic complications in type 2 diabetic subjects attending a tertiary care centre. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad 2005; 17: 63–68. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 109.Faghihi-Amini E, Amini M, Adibi P. Silent ischemia in type I diabetic patients: a study of EKG changes. Aria J 2005; 1: 89–93. [Google Scholar]
  • 110.Shafiqur-Rahman IZ. Prevalence of microvascular complications among diabetic patients. Pakistan J Med Res 2004; 43: 1–3. [Google Scholar]
  • 111.Afghani T, Qureshi N, Chaudhry KSA. Screening for diabetic retinopathy: a comparative study between hospital and community based screening and between paying and non-paying patients. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad 2007; 19: 16–22. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 112.Esteghamati A, Rashidi A, Nikfallah A, et al. The association between urodynamic findings and microvascular complications in patients with long-term type 2 diabetes but without voiding symptoms. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2007; 78: 42–50. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 113.Al-Adsani AM. Risk factors for diabetic retinopathy in Kuwaiti type 2 diabetic patients. Saudi Med J 2007; 28: 579–583. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 114.Askarishahi M, Hajizadeh E, Afkhami-Ardekani M, et al. Estimate of the diabetic retinopathy hazard rates in type 2 diabetic patients with current status data. Int J Diabetes Dev Ctries 2012; 32: 203–208. [Google Scholar]
  • 115.Aamir AH, Jan S. Frequency of diabetic retinopathy in a tertiary care hospital using digital retinal imaging technology. J Postgrad Med Inst 2012; 26: 29–33. [Google Scholar]
  • 116.Bonakdaran S, Shoeibi N. Is there any correlation between vitamin D insufficiency and diabetic retinopathy? Int J Ophthalmol 2015; 8: 326–331. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 117.Dehghan MH, Katibeh M, Ahmadieh H, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for diabetic retinopathy in the 40 to 80 year-old population in Yazd, Iran: The Yazd Eye Study. J Diabetes 2015; 7: 139–141. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 118.Najafi L, Malek M, Valojerdi AE, et al. Dry eye and its correlation to diabetes microvascular complications in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Diabetes Complications 2013; 27: 459–462. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 119.Amini M, Aminorroaya A, Safaei H, et al. Prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes patients in Isfahan, Iran. Acta Endocrinol (Copenh) 2008; 4: 415–423. [Google Scholar]
  • 120.Hosseini MS, Rostami Z, Saadat A, et al. Anemia and microvascular complications in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Nephrourol Mon 2014; 6: 1–7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 121.Alamkhanzada M, Narsani AK, Shaikh F, et al. Frequency and types of diabetic retinopathy in type II diabetes; a hospital base study. J Liaquat Univ Med Heal Sci 2011; 10: 143–146. [Google Scholar]
  • 122.Manaviat MR, Afkhami M, Shoja MR. Retinopathy and microalbuminuria in type II diabetic patients. BMC Ophthalmol 2004; 4: 1–4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 123.Manaviat MR, Rashidi M, Afkhami-Ardekani M, et al. Prevalence of dry eye syndrome and diabetic retinopathy in type 2 diabetic patients. BMC Ophthalmol 2008; 8: 10–14. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 124.Sohail M. Prevalence of Diabetic Retinopathy among Type 2 Diabetes Patients in Pakistan Vision Registry. Pakistan J Ophthalmol 2014; 30: 204–212. [Google Scholar]
  • 125.Kahlid M, Rizwan M, Khan MIN. Frequency of diabetic retinopathy in type II diabetics presenting at DHQ hospital Sahiwal. Pakistan J Med Heal Sci 2015; 9: 1193–1196. [Google Scholar]
  • 126.Shaikh MA, Gillani S, Dur-E-Yakta. Frequency of diabetic retinopathy in patients after ten years of diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad 2010; 22: 158–160. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 127.Hassan M, Akhtar M, Akhtar N. Prevalence of retinopathy and its associated factors in type-2 diabetes mellitus patients visiting hospitals and diabetic clinics in Faisalabad, Pakistan. Pak J Zool 2010; 42: 41–46. [Google Scholar]
  • 128.Rasoulinejad SA, Hajian-Tilaki K, Mehdipour E. Associated factors of diabetic retinopathy in patients that referred to teaching hospitals in Babol. Casp J Intern Med 2015; 6: 224–228. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 129.MacKy TA, Khater N, Al-Zamil MA, et al. Epidemiology of diabetic retinopathy in Egypt: A hospital-based study. Ophthalmic Res 2011; 45: 73–78. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 130.Hussain F, Arif M, Ahmad M. The prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in Faisalabad, Pakistan: A population-based study. Turkish J Med Sci 2011; 41: 735–742. [Google Scholar]
  • 131.Janghorbani M, Amini M, Tavassoli A. Coronary heart disease in type 2 diabetes mellitus in Isfahan, Iran: prevalence and risk factors. Acta Cardiol 2017; 61: 13–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 132.Janghorbani M, Rezvanian H, Kachooei A, et al. Peripheral neuropathy in type 2 diabetes mellitus in Isfahan, Iran: Prevalence and risk factors. Acta Neurol Scand 2006; 114: 384–391. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 133.Khazai MH, Khazai B, Zargaran Z, et al. Diabetic complications and risk factors in recently diagnosed type II diabetes: a case-control study. ARYA Atheroscler 2006; 2: 79–83. [Google Scholar]
  • 134.Thomas RL, Halim S, Gurudas S, et al. IDF Diabetes Atlas: A review of studies utilising retinal photography on the global prevalence of diabetes related retinopathy between 2015 and 2018. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2019; 157: 107840. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 135.Teo ZL, Tham YC, Yu M, et al. Global Prevalence of Diabetic Retinopathy and Projection of Burden through 2045: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Ophthalmology 2021; 128: 1580–1591. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 136.Shaikh BT, Hatcher J. Health seeking behaviour and health service utilization in Pakistan: Challenging the policy makers. J Public Health (Bangkok) 2005; 27: 49–54. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 137.Shaikh BT. Private Sector in Health Care Delivery: a Reality and a Challenge in Pakistan. J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad 2015; 27: 496–498. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 138.Mirahmadizadeh A, Fathalipour M, Mokhtari AM, et al. The prevalence of undiagnosed type 2 diabetes and prediabetes in Eastern Mediterranean region (EMRO): A systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2020; 160: 107931. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 139.Hu FB. Globalization of diabetes: The role of diet, lifestyle, and genes. Diabetes Care 2011; 34: 1249–1257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 140.Hunter JP, Saratzis A, Sutton AJ, et al. In meta-analyses of proportion studies, funnel plots were found to be an inaccurate method of assessing publication bias. J Clin Epidemiol 2014; 67: 897–903. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 141.Bener A, Zirie M, Janahi IM, et al. Prevalence of diagnosed and undiagnosed diabetes mellitus and its risk factors in a population-based study of Qatar. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2009; 84: 99–106. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 142.Hadaegh F, Bozorgmanesh MR, Ghasemi A, et al. High prevalence of undiagnosed diabetes and abnormal glucose tolerance in the Iranian urban population: Tehran Lipid and Glucose Study. BMC Public Health 2008; 8: 176. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 143.Flaxel CJ, Adelman RA, Bailey ST, et al. Diabetic Retinopathy Preferred Practice Pattern®. Ophthalmology 2020; 127: P66–P145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 144.Shirani S, Kelishadi R, Sarrafzadegan N, et al. Awareness, treatment and control of hypertension, dyslipidaemia and diabetes mellitus in an Iranian population: The IHHP study. East Mediterr Heal J 2009; 15: 1455–1463. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 145.Mirzaei M, Mirzaei M, Bagheri B, et al. Awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension and related factors in adult Iranian population. BMC Public Health 2020; 20: 1–10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 146.Alzaheb RA, Altemani AH. The prevalence and determinants of poor glycemic control among adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus in Saudi Arabia. Diabetes, Metab Syndr Obes Targets Ther 2018; 11: 15–21. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

sj-pdf-1-imr-10.1177_03000605221117134 - Supplemental material for Prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in the Eastern Mediterranean Region: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Supplemental material, sj-pdf-1-imr-10.1177_03000605221117134 for Prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in the Eastern Mediterranean Region: a systematic review and meta-analysis by Alireza Heiran, Seyede Pegah Azarchehry, Saeid Dehghankhalili, Mehrdad Afarid, Sonia Shaabani, Alireza Mirahmadizadeh in Journal of International Medical Research

sj-pdf-2-imr-10.1177_03000605221117134 - Supplemental material for Prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in the Eastern Mediterranean Region: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Supplemental material, sj-pdf-2-imr-10.1177_03000605221117134 for Prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in the Eastern Mediterranean Region: a systematic review and meta-analysis by Alireza Heiran, Seyede Pegah Azarchehry, Saeid Dehghankhalili, Mehrdad Afarid, Sonia Shaabani, Alireza Mirahmadizadeh in Journal of International Medical Research

sj-pdf-3-imr-10.1177_03000605221117134 - Supplemental material for Prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in the Eastern Mediterranean Region: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Supplemental material, sj-pdf-3-imr-10.1177_03000605221117134 for Prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in the Eastern Mediterranean Region: a systematic review and meta-analysis by Alireza Heiran, Seyede Pegah Azarchehry, Saeid Dehghankhalili, Mehrdad Afarid, Sonia Shaabani, Alireza Mirahmadizadeh in Journal of International Medical Research

sj-pdf-4-imr-10.1177_03000605221117134 - Supplemental material for Prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in the Eastern Mediterranean Region: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Supplemental material, sj-pdf-4-imr-10.1177_03000605221117134 for Prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in the Eastern Mediterranean Region: a systematic review and meta-analysis by Alireza Heiran, Seyede Pegah Azarchehry, Saeid Dehghankhalili, Mehrdad Afarid, Sonia Shaabani, Alireza Mirahmadizadeh in Journal of International Medical Research

sj-pdf-5-imr-10.1177_03000605221117134 - Supplemental material for Prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in the Eastern Mediterranean Region: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Supplemental material, sj-pdf-5-imr-10.1177_03000605221117134 for Prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in the Eastern Mediterranean Region: a systematic review and meta-analysis by Alireza Heiran, Seyede Pegah Azarchehry, Saeid Dehghankhalili, Mehrdad Afarid, Sonia Shaabani, Alireza Mirahmadizadeh in Journal of International Medical Research

sj-pdf-6-imr-10.1177_03000605221117134 - Supplemental material for Prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in the Eastern Mediterranean Region: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Supplemental material, sj-pdf-6-imr-10.1177_03000605221117134 for Prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in the Eastern Mediterranean Region: a systematic review and meta-analysis by Alireza Heiran, Seyede Pegah Azarchehry, Saeid Dehghankhalili, Mehrdad Afarid, Sonia Shaabani, Alireza Mirahmadizadeh in Journal of International Medical Research

sj-pdf-7-imr-10.1177_03000605221117134 - Supplemental material for Prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in the Eastern Mediterranean Region: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Supplemental material, sj-pdf-7-imr-10.1177_03000605221117134 for Prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in the Eastern Mediterranean Region: a systematic review and meta-analysis by Alireza Heiran, Seyede Pegah Azarchehry, Saeid Dehghankhalili, Mehrdad Afarid, Sonia Shaabani, Alireza Mirahmadizadeh in Journal of International Medical Research

sj-pdf-8-imr-10.1177_03000605221117134 - Supplemental material for Prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in the Eastern Mediterranean Region: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Supplemental material, sj-pdf-8-imr-10.1177_03000605221117134 for Prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in the Eastern Mediterranean Region: a systematic review and meta-analysis by Alireza Heiran, Seyede Pegah Azarchehry, Saeid Dehghankhalili, Mehrdad Afarid, Sonia Shaabani, Alireza Mirahmadizadeh in Journal of International Medical Research

sj-pdf-9-imr-10.1177_03000605221117134 - Supplemental material for Prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in the Eastern Mediterranean Region: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Supplemental material, sj-pdf-9-imr-10.1177_03000605221117134 for Prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in the Eastern Mediterranean Region: a systematic review and meta-analysis by Alireza Heiran, Seyede Pegah Azarchehry, Saeid Dehghankhalili, Mehrdad Afarid, Sonia Shaabani, Alireza Mirahmadizadeh in Journal of International Medical Research

sj-pdf-10-imr-10.1177_03000605221117134 - Supplemental material for Prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in the Eastern Mediterranean Region: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Supplemental material, sj-pdf-10-imr-10.1177_03000605221117134 for Prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in the Eastern Mediterranean Region: a systematic review and meta-analysis by Alireza Heiran, Seyede Pegah Azarchehry, Saeid Dehghankhalili, Mehrdad Afarid, Sonia Shaabani, Alireza Mirahmadizadeh in Journal of International Medical Research

sj-pdf-11-imr-10.1177_03000605221117134 - Supplemental material for Prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in the Eastern Mediterranean Region: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Supplemental material, sj-pdf-11-imr-10.1177_03000605221117134 for Prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in the Eastern Mediterranean Region: a systematic review and meta-analysis by Alireza Heiran, Seyede Pegah Azarchehry, Saeid Dehghankhalili, Mehrdad Afarid, Sonia Shaabani, Alireza Mirahmadizadeh in Journal of International Medical Research


Articles from The Journal of International Medical Research are provided here courtesy of SAGE Publications

RESOURCES