Abstract
Aims/hypothesis
Metformin is increasingly used to treat gestational diabetes (GDM) and pregnancies complicated by pregestational type 2 diabetes or polycystic ovary syndrome but data regarding long-term offspring outcome are lacking in both human studies and animal models. Using a mouse model, this study investigated the effects of maternal metformin intervention during obese glucose-intolerant pregnancy on adiposity, hepatic steatosis and markers of metabolic health of male and female offspring up to the age of 12 months.
Methods
C57BL/6J female mice were weaned onto either a control diet (Con) or, to induce pre-conception obesity, an obesogenic diet (Ob). The respective diets were maintained throughout pregnancy and lactation. These obese dams were then randomised to the untreated group or to receive 300 mg/kg oral metformin hydrochloride treatment (Ob-Met) daily during pregnancy. In male and female offspring, body weights and body composition were measured from 1 month until 12 months of age, when serum and tissues were collected for investigation of adipocyte cellularity (histology), adipose tissue inflammation (histology and quantitative RT-PCR), and hepatic steatosis and fibrosis (histochemistry and modified Folch assay).
Results
At 12 months of age, male Ob and Ob-Met offspring showed increased adiposity, adipocyte hypertrophy, elevated expression of proinflammatory genes, hyperleptinaemia and hepatic lipid accumulation compared with Con offspring. Male Ob-Met offspring failed to show hyperplasia between 8 weeks and 12 months, indicative of restricted adipose tissue expansion, resulting in increased immune cell infiltration and ectopic lipid deposition. Female Ob offspring were relatively protected from these phenotypes but Ob-Met female offspring showed increased adiposity, adipose tissue inflammation, hepatic lipid accumulation, hyperleptinaemia and hyperinsulinaemia compared with Con female offspring.
Conclusions/interpretation
Maternal metformin treatment of obese dams increased offspring metabolic risk factors in a sex- and age-dependent manner. These observations highlight the importance of following up offspring of both sexes beyond early adulthood after interventions during pregnancy. Our findings illustrate the complexity of balancing short-term benefits to mother and child vs any potential long-term metabolic effects on the offspring when prescribing therapeutic agents that cross the placenta.
Graphical abstract
Supplementary Information
The online version contains peer-reviewed but unedited supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00125-022-05789-0.
Keywords: Developmental programming, Fatty liver, Gestational diabetes, Inflammation, Maternal obesity, Metformin, White adipose tissue
Introduction
Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is becoming more common, affecting over one in seven pregnancies worldwide [1]. GDM has immediate detrimental consequences for mother and neonate but is also increasingly recognised to have long-term adverse effects on exposed offspring [2]. Metformin is used as a pharmacological alternative to insulin treatment in GDM in many countries [3], with the benefits of being more affordable and easier to administer than insulin. Moreover, metformin may be continued during pregnancies complicated by type 2 diabetes and polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) [4]. Meta-analyses of RCTs comparing metformin with insulin or other treatments have found that metformin is safe for use in GDM with respect to pregnancy and early neonatal outcomes and that metformin has many immediate benefits including decreasing gestational weight gain, preventing pre-eclampsia, and decreasing incidence of macrosomia in newborns [4, 5]. However, metformin is readily transported across the placenta, so fetuses are rapidly exposed to concentrations similar to those in the maternal circulation [6], with limited knowledge of long-term consequences. A meta-analysis using data from RCTs comparing metformin with insulin in GDM showed that metformin decreases birthweight but leads to accelerated postnatal growth, ultimately resulting in increased childhood adiposity, warranting concerns into long-term metabolic consequences for offspring [5]. Lower mean birthweight and increased prevalence of small for gestational age babies were also found following gestational metformin treatment of women with type 2 diabetes, consistent with growth restriction in metformin-exposed pregnancy [7]. However, longer-term human follow-up is currently lacking: the oldest offspring of metformin-treated mothers with GDM or PCOS from which data are available are 9 or 5–10 years old, respectively [8, 9]. Model systems are therefore vital tools, and animal models with shorter lifespans are especially suited for investigating long-term outcomes of prenatal metformin treatment in offspring.
We have studied the effects of maternal metformin treatment during high-fat high-sugar diet-induced glucose-intolerant pregnancy [10, 11]. By ceasing metformin treatment immediately before delivery, this mimics the clinical management of GDM-complicated pregnancies in which metformin is discontinued after delivery when maternal hyperglycaemia generally resolves. Using this mouse model, we demonstrated that metformin transporters are expressed in both placental and fetal tissues and that fetuses are exposed to similar concentrations of metformin as their dams [11]. Metformin did not correct the growth restriction observed in offspring of obese dams despite improving maternal glucose tolerance, body composition and uterine blood flow as well as increasing gestation time [10, 11].
Several studies have previously investigated metformin interventions during rodent pregnancy (reviewed in [12]). Although these studies vary in design and findings, their results indicate that metformin has the potential to affect offspring body composition and metabolic health [12]. However, few studies looked at outcomes in aged offspring, and only in the context of lean pregnancy without diabetes [13]. No previous rodent studies have investigated offspring from obese metformin-treated pregnancies beyond the age of 5–7 months [14, 15]. In the latter studies [14, 15], metabolic phenotypes largely emerged during the second half of the study period, stressing the importance of longer follow-up; however, the effect of ageing in these studies was confounded by the introduction of a high-fat diet challenge in early adulthood. In our previous study, 8-week-old male offspring showed increased hyperplastic adiposity with adipose tissue inflammation, which was not observed in female offspring [10].
This study therefore aimed to investigate the effect of maternal metformin intervention during obese glucose-intolerant pregnancy on the body composition and metabolic health of male and female offspring until 12 months of age, using a mouse model of diet-induced obesity with impaired glucose tolerance during pregnancy.
Methods
Animal model
All mouse work was performed according to the Home Office Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 Amendment Regulations 2012, after ethical review by the University of Cambridge Animal and Welfare Ethical Review Board. All mice were housed in individually ventilated cages in a temperature- and humidity-controlled room under a normal 12 h light–dark cycle. Using a previously described mouse model of maternal diet-induced obesity [16], specific pathogen-free C57BL/6J female mice (Charles River Laboratories, UK; RRID:IMSR_JAX:000664, bred in-house) were randomly weaned (by an animal technician who had no involvement in the data analysis) onto either a standard laboratory chow (RM1; 7% sugars, 3% fat) or an obesogenic diet composed of high-fat diet pellets (10% sugars, 20% fat), both from Special Dietary Services (UK), and sweetened condensed milk (55% sugar, 8% fat; Nestle, UK) supplemented with a vitamin and mineral pre-mix (AIN-93G-MX; Special Diets Services). Randomisation involved a technician (who was blind to the study outcomes) randomly weaning half of the females from each litter onto the control diet and the other half onto the obesogenic diet. Both groups were mated for a primary pregnancy at around 6 weeks of age, at which point dams are normoglycaemic [17]. Dams remain normoglycaemic during this first pregnancy [16]. Dams were mated for the experimental second pregnancy at least 1 week after weaning of their first litter and when they exceeded (obese, >12 g) or remained below (control, <5 g) critical thresholds of fat mass measured using time-domain NMR (TD-NMR; Bruker Minispec LF series; Bruker Optik, Germany). Dams were fed their respective control or obesogenic diets ad libitum throughout the experimental pregnancy and lactation. Previous work shows that these obese dams have increased adiposity at mating [10, 11, 16] and become hyperglycaemic [18] and glucose-intolerant [11, 16] in their second pregnancy. Glucose intolerance resolves by the end of lactation [19] (see Fig. 1 for schematic timeline of glucose homeostasis). As described [10], dams fed the obesogenic diet were randomised by a technician (who was blind to the study outcomes) to the untreated group or to daily treatment with 300 mg/kg metformin hydrochloride orally (MP Biomedicals, USA) supplemented in the condensed milk (adjusted twice weekly based on intake). This dose is comparable to 1700 mg for a 70 kg human [20] and results in serum metformin concentrations within the clinical range observed in human pregnancy [11, 21]. Metformin treatment was provided 1 week pre-mating until embryonic day 18.5, 1 day before normal-term delivery. Data regarding dams that generated offspring for the current study were published previously [10]. Detailed characterisation of the maternal metformin intervention model (including improvement of maternal glucose intolerance with metformin), in a separate cohort of animals generated using an identical experimental design, has recently been published [11]. Litter size was standardised by culling to six pups per litter on postnatal day 2. Male and female offspring were weaned onto RM1 diet at 3 weeks of age and housed in same-sex littermate pairs where possible. Mice were weighed monthly; the mean littermate body weight is reported. Body composition of one sibling was assessed monthly using TD-NMR until 6 months of age. Diet intake was measured between 11 and 11.5 months. At 12 months of age (mean±SEM 367.1±0.4 days, range 351–378), in the morning one sibling was euthanised via exposure to CO2 gas in a rising concentration following a 16 h fast in a clean cage, while the other sibling was euthanised by cervical dislocation in the fed state. Tissues were weighed and formalin-fixed (fed siblings) or snap-frozen (fasted siblings) on dry ice.
mRNA levels
RNA extraction from gonadal white adipose tissue (gWAT), cDNA synthesis (from 450 ng RNA) and quantitative RT-PCR (RT-qPCR, using cDNA diluted 1:40 in nuclease-free water) were performed as described [10]. For analysis of RT-qPCR results, the comparative Ct method was used normalised against expression of Ppia, which did not differ between groups. Data are presented as expression relative to the relevant control group. Primer sequences are shown in Table 1, either obtained from the literature (Itgax [also known as Cd11c], Adgre1 [also known as F4/80], Tnf [22] and Ppia [23]) or designed using Primer-BLAST software [24] (Ccl2; also known as Mcp1).
Table 1.
Gene | Forward 5′-3′ | Reverse 5′-3′ | Origin |
---|---|---|---|
Adgre1 | CACTTCCAAGATGGGTTAACATCC | CTGCCATCAACTCATGATACCCT | Alfaradhi et al [22] |
Ccl2 | CAGATGCAGTTAACGCCCCA | TGAGCTTGGTGACAAAAACTACAG | This paper |
Itgax | TGCTGTTGGGGTTTGTTTCTTG | CGAACTCAGCACCGTCCAT | Alfaradhi et al [22] |
Ppia | GTCCAGGAATGGCAAGACCA | GGGTAAATGCCCGCAAGTC | Mennitti et al [23] |
Tnf | AAGTTCCCAAATGGCCTCCC | CACTTGGTGGTTTGCTACGA | Alfaradhi et al [22] |
Primer pair for Ccl2 was generated for this paper using Primer-BLAST software [24]
Histological analysis
Offspring gWAT and livers were formalin-fixed, processed, embedded and sectioned. H&E-stained gWAT sections (3 μm) were scanned using an Axioscan digital slide scanner (Zeiss, Germany); whole sections were examined for the presence of crown-like structures (CLS) and cells were sized using HALO software (Indica Labs, USA) as described [10]. Estimated adipocyte number and the percentage of adipocytes surrounded by CLS were calculated based on published methods [10]. H&E-stained liver sections (5μm) were analysed for lipid droplet content using HALO software and scored for steatosis by a pathologist blinded to experimental group and offspring sex, leading to classification into four grades: grade 0 (absent, <5%); grade 1 (mild, <30%); grade 2 (moderate, <60%); or grade 3 (severe, >60% lipid within hepatocytes) [25]. Similarly, Picrosirius Red-stained liver sections (5 μm) were analysed for hepatic collagen content using QuPath v.0.2.3 (University of Edinburgh, UK [26]) and sections were scored for fibrosis, leading to classification into four categories: absent; mild (only centrilobular/pericellular fibrosis); moderate (centrilobular and portal fibrosis); or severe (bridging fibrosis) [27].
Folch assay
Lipid content was measured using the modified Folch method as described [28].
Serum analysis
Cardiac puncture was performed to collect fasted terminal blood, and serum was collected after centrifugation (3000 g, 2×3 min). Serum insulin and leptin were measured using an Ultra-Sensitive Mouse Insulin ELISA Kit and Mouse Leptin ELISA Kit (Crystal Chem, USA). Serum cholesterol and triglycerides were measured by the Core Biochemical Assay Laboratory (University of Cambridge).
Statistical analysis
Data are presented as mean ± SEM and analysed using Prism v.9.0 software (GraphPad, USA) using one-way ANOVA, two-way ANOVA or non-parametric alternatives where appropriate. Correlation was assessed using two-tailed Spearman correlation in Prism v9.0. Hepatic histology results were analysed using multinomial regression analysis with absent steatosis as the referent level and offspring sex and maternal diet as model co-variates. A p value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant, with trends included in figures if p<0.1. In all cases, n refers to the number of independent litters represented, meaning one dam only contributed one male and/or female for use in a particular experiment. One mouse from the male Ob-Met group had to be culled prior to the study endpoint and was therefore excluded from analysis. The total number of mice used for this study is n=54 dams (n=18 control, n=21 obese, n=15 obese metformin-treated dams) providing n=67 male offspring and n=71 female offspring. Outliers were determined per outcome by the Grubb’s or ROUT method and excluded from analysis. Numbers and outliers for each specific outcome measure are included within the results and/or figure legends.
Results
Maternal obesity and metformin exposure lead to adiposity in offspring
Male and female offspring of obese dams showed increased fat mass from 6 months and 5 months of age, respectively (Fig. 2a,b). Metformin intervention led to earlier appearance of this adiposity, introducing increased fat mass compared with Con from 4 and 3 months of age in male and female offspring, respectively (Fig. 2a,b). There were no differences in lean mass or body weight early in life in either sex (Fig. 2c–f). However, increased body weight was noted from 9 months onwards in male Ob offspring and from 10 months onwards in male Ob-Met offspring (Fig. 2e). Female Ob-Met offspring diverged in body weight from other groups at a younger age: from 5 and 9 months of age compared with Con and Ob offspring, respectively (Fig. 2f). There was no difference in body weight between female Ob and Con offspring at any age. Food intake was not measurably different between groups (see electronic supplementary material [ESM] Table 1).
At 12 months of age, the combined absolute weight of white adipose tissue (WAT) depots (gonadal, intraperitoneal, retroperitoneal and inguinal subcutaneous) was increased by maternal obesity in male offspring (Fig. 2g) and by both maternal obesity and metformin treatment in female offspring (Fig. 2i) when compared with Con offspring. Combined WAT weights were significantly increased both by maternal obesity and metformin treatment in male and female offspring when compared with Con offspring (Fig. 2h,j). In female Ob-Met offspring adiposity was also increased compared with Ob offspring (Fig. 2i,j). These phenotypes were consistent across different WAT depots and brown adipose tissue (BAT, ESM Table 2) suggesting a global adiposity phenotype.
Maternal metformin treatment leads to gWAT inflammation in male and female 12-month-old offspring
The total area density of CLS was increased in male Ob-Met offspring, indicating macrophage infiltration into gWAT (Fig. 3a). This was related to increased CLS size as well as an increase in the number of adipocytes surrounded by CLS (Fig. 3b,c). Expression of Adgre1 (a macrophage marker), Itgax (an M1-type marker), Ccl2 (a chemokine) and Tnf (a cytokine) was also increased in male Ob-Met offspring (Fig. 3i). Male Ob offspring did not show histological evidence of enhanced macrophage infiltration (Fig. 3a–c) compared with Con offspring despite upregulated expression of Itgax and Ccl2 (Fig. 3i).
In female Ob-Met offspring, immune cell infiltration in gWAT was upregulated compared with both Con and Ob offspring (Fig. 3d). CLS size was unaffected (Fig. 3e) but the percentage of adipocytes surrounded by CLS, a marker of adipocyte death [29], was increased in female Ob-Met offspring (Fig. 3f). This was accompanied by increased expression of Itgax, Ccl2 and Tnf in gWAT (Fig. 3j).
Maternal obesity and metformin affect gWAT cellularity in a sex-specific manner
Adipocyte hypertrophy was observed in both Ob and Ob-Met male 12-month-old offspring, demonstrated by a rightward shift in the cumulative frequency distribution favouring larger adipocytes in gWAT (two-way ANOVA; Fig. 4a). Moreover, estimated number of adipocytes was increased in male Ob but not Ob-Met offspring compared with Con offspring (Fig. 4b). When comparing this to adipocyte numbers from 8-week-old mice published previously [10], there was a significant effect of age, maternal environment and an interaction between male offspring age and the maternal environment (ESM Table 3). Post hoc analysis revealed that age-related hyperplasia had taken place in Con and Ob mice; this was absent in male Ob-Met offspring, indicating that they had exhausted their gWAT hyperplastic expansion capacity early in adult life.
There were no differences in adipocyte size when comparing Con, Ob and Ob-Met female offspring (Fig. 4d). Estimated adipocyte number was increased in female Ob-Met offspring (Fig. 4e). When comparing this with female adipocyte numbers from 8-week-old mice [10], there was a significant effect of age and maternal environment (ESM Table 3). As there was no difference in adipocyte number at 8 weeks, this suggests hyperplastic expansion of the female Ob-Met gWAT depot after this age.
Hepatic lipid accumulation is increased in Ob-Met offspring of both sexes
Liver weight was increased in male (Fig. 5a) and female (Fig. 5e) Ob-Met offspring, although this did not reach statistical significance for female offspring. Total hepatic lipid content was increased in livers from both Ob and Ob-Met male offspring compared with Con offspring, and this was confirmed by histological analysis of lipid droplets (Fig. 5b–d). In female offspring, hepatic lipid accumulation was only observed in Ob-Met offspring (Fig. 5f–h). Total hepatic lipid content significantly correlated to indices of body composition, serum hormones and gWAT inflammation in male offspring, and to body weight, visceral WAT and leptin (but not serum hormones or proinflammatory gene expression) in female offspring (Table 2). Compared with female offspring, there was increased incidence of moderate/severe steatosis in male offspring (OR 4.99 [95% CI 1.39, 17.96], p<0.05). There was no difference in steatosis in Ob compared with Con offspring (both sexes combined) but there was increased incidence of both mild (OR 7.24 [95% CI 1.53, 34.30], p<0.05) and moderate/severe steatosis (OR 8.21 [95% CI 1.60, 42.06], p<0.05) in Ob-Met offspring (both sexes combined). Collagen content and hepatic fibrosis as assessed by Picrosirius Red staining was not different between groups (ESM Fig 1).
Table 2.
Variable | Male offspring | Female offspring | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
r | p | n | r | p | n | |
BW (g) | 0.8982 | <0.001 | 31 | 0.6605 | <0.001 | 34 |
VAT (g) | 0.9101 | <0.001 | 30 | 0.6726 | <0.001 | 34 |
Insulin (pmol/l) | 0.6957 | <0.001 | 28 | 0.3376 | 0.0633 | 31 |
Leptin (ng/ml) | 0.9212 | <0.001 | 30 | 0.6305 | <0.001 | 33 |
Adgre1 | 0.9018 | <0.001 | 30 | 0.2581 | 0.1405 | 34 |
Ccl2 | 0.8549 | <0.001 | 30 | 0.4835 | 0.0044 | 33 |
Itgax | 0.9159 | <0.001 | 30 | 0.4255 | 0.0152 | 32 |
Tnf | 0.8827 | <0.001 | 31 | 0.342 | 0.0514 | 33 |
Correlation was assessed using two-tailed Spearman correlation between total hepatic lipid content (measured using Folch assay) with the following variables: body weight at post mortem, weight of collected VAT (sum of gonadal, intraperitoneal and retroperitoneal depots), serum insulin levels, serum leptin levels and expression of Adgre1, Itgax, Ccl2 and Tnf in gonadal adipose tissue relative to Con offspring
BW, body weight; VAT, visceral adipose tissue
Maternal metformin treatment increases insulin levels in female but not male offspring
There were no differences in serum lipids or insulin in 12-month-old male offspring (Table 3). Serum leptin was increased in both Ob and Ob-Met male offspring compared with Con offspring, consistent with their increased adiposity. In contrast to male offspring, 12-month-old female Ob-Met offspring displayed significantly increased serum insulin compared with female Con offspring (Table 3). Serum leptin was also increased in female Ob-Met but not Ob offspring.
Table 3.
Variable | Male offspring | Female offspring | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Con (n=11 or 12) |
Ob (n=6–8) |
Ob-Met (n=9–11) |
p value (ANOVA) |
Con (n=10–12) |
Ob (n=11 or 12) |
Ob-Met (n=10 or 11) |
p value (ANOVA) |
|
Glucose (mmol/l)a | 6.9±0.3 | 7.6±0.4 | 6.8±0.2 | NS | 6.6±0.2 | 6.5±0.2 | 6.5±0.2 | NS |
Insulin (pmol/l)b | 146±14 | 198±28 | 217±41 | NS | 101±16 | 134±17 | 180±23* | 0.0227 |
Cholesterol (mmol/l)b,c | 3.1±0.1 | 3.4±0.2 | 3.6±0.3 | NS | 2.1±0.1 | 2.0±0.1 | 2.0±0.1 | NS |
Triglycerides (mmol/l)b | 1.09±0.06 | 0.99±0.07 | 1.09±0.06 | NS | 0.97±0.05 | 1.06±0.06 | 1.12±0.05 | NS |
NEFA (mmol/l) | 1.60±0.06 | 1.64±0.12 | 1.61±0.07 | NS | 1.35±0.05 | 1.28±0.05 | 1.31±0.05 | NS |
Leptin (ng/ml)d | 16.6±2.8 | 34.8±4.5* | 33.7±5.5* | <0.001 | 23.7±2.5 | 27.9±3.2 | 49.3±5.8***,† | <0.001 |
All data reflect serum from 16 h fasted mice at 12 months of age and are represented as mean ± SEM
Outliers were excluded (Grubb’s method) as follows: from male Con for insulin (396 pmol/l); from male Ob for cholesterol (5.5 mmol/l); from female Con for glucose (excluded value 9.7 mmol/l), insulin (337 pmol/l) and NEFA (2.33 mmol/l); from female Ob for NEFA (2.22 mmol/l); and from female Ob-Met for glucose (3.0 mmol/l) and for NEFA (2.32 mmol/l)
aSerum was not collected for one male Ob mouse therefore n=8 for glucose compared with n=7 for other variables
bOne sample from a male Ob-Met mouse was not analysed for cholesterol, triglycerides or insulin
cCholesterol was not detectable for one male control mouse and female control mouse (<1.3 mmol/l) and therefore these data were excluded from analysis
dOne sample from a female Ob mouse was not analysed for leptin
*p<0.05 and ***p<0.001 vs Con offspring; †p<0.01 vs Ob offspring (one-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test)
Discussion
Our study showed that maternal obesity and maternal metformin treatment during obese pregnancy caused long-term increases in offspring adiposity in an age- and sex-specific manner. Male Ob offspring showed increased adiposity, upregulated proinflammatory gene expression in gWAT, and hepatic lipid accumulation at 12 months of age. Adiposity in aged male Ob-Met offspring was associated with more severe adipocyte dysfunction (worse inflammation and early-life hyperplastic response), leading to hepatic steatosis and lipid accumulation that was correlated with adipose tissue and metabolic variables. While female Ob offspring did not show gWAT or liver dysfunction, female Ob-Met offspring had increased adiposity, gWAT inflammation and hyperplasia, hepatic steatosis, hyperinsulinaemia and hyperleptinaemia. Table 4 summarises these findings.
Table 4.
Variable | Male offspring | Female offspring | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ob vs Con |
Ob-Met vs Con |
Ob-Met vs Ob |
Con vs Ob |
Con vs Ob-Met |
Ob vs Ob-Met |
|
Adipose tissue | ||||||
Adiposity | ↑ | ↑ | ↔ | ↑ | ↑↑ | ↑ |
Hypertrophy | ↑ | ↑ | ↔ | ↔ | ↔ | ↔ |
Hyperplasia | ↑ | ↔ | ↔ | ↔ | ↑ | ↔ |
Inflammation | ↑ | ↑↑ | ↔ | ↔ | ↑ | ↑ |
Liver | ||||||
Hepatomegaly | ↔ | ↑ | ↔ | ↔ | (↑) | ↔ |
Lipid accumulation | ↑ | ↑ | ↔ | ↔ | ↑ | ↑ |
Serum | ||||||
Insulin | ↔ | ↔ | ↔ | ↔ | ↑ | ↔ |
Leptin | ↑ | ↑ | ↔ | ↔ | ↑ | ↑ |
This table summarises the sex-specific findings presented in the current manuscript
↑, upregulated; ↑↑, further upregulated; ↔, unchanged; arrows within parentheses indicate changes that do not reach statistical significance (0.05<p<0.1)
Our work demonstrates clear sex differences in the programming of obesity and fatty liver by maternal obesity, while also highlighting the importance of age to the development of programmed phenotypes. The WAT expansion in Ob male offspring was associated with increased proinflammatory gene expression at 12 months (not present at 8 weeks [10]), in accordance with ageing promoting a proinflammatory environment [30]. In contrast, female Ob offspring were protected against the development of obesity, gWAT inflammation and hepatic abnormalities. Sexual dimorphism is often described in the context of developmental programming, with the male sex generally being more vulnerable to programmed effects [31]. This could be related to biologically underpinned differences, such as male mice growing more rapidly in utero, differential effects of sex steroids or male mice ageing faster than female mice [31].
Metformin is widely used in the developed world to treat GDM [3] and has proven beneficial for treatment of other pregnancy indications including PCOS and pre-eclampsia [9, 32, 33]. It is an attractive alternative to insulin in populations where access to insulin is limited or subject to financial barriers [34] and many women prefer metformin to insulin as it does not require injection [35]. Our experimental model simulates certain features of human GDM, including impaired glucose tolerance in pregnancy [11, 16] that is no longer present after weaning [19], and our dosing protocol leads to maternal circulating metformin concentrations similar to those in humans (with equilibration to the fetal circulation) [11]. This is consistent with detection of known metformin transporters in murine and human placenta [11, 36]. However, the initiation of metformin treatment around conception may more closely resemble treatment of pregnant women with type 2 diabetes or PCOS and our offspring data are therefore also relevant to metformin use in those clinical contexts. The difference in timing of WAT development between rodents and humans could be a limitation to clinical relevance. However, adipocyte lineage commitment largely occurs in gestation in both humans and rodents, and thus may be similarly influenced by intrauterine metformin [37]. Importantly, our data parallel outcomes of human trials. Individual RCTs for GDM and PCOS pregnancies have shown increased adiposity in young metformin-exposed offspring compared with insulin and placebo groups, respectively [8, 9, 38], and these findings have been confirmed by a meta-analysis of trials in GDM [5].
The maternal metformin intervention did not correct the adiposity observed in 12-month-old male offspring exposed to maternal obesity but induced a more inflammatory gWAT phenotype. This was reflected by presence of CLS and upregulation of M1 (Itgax, Tnf) and migratory markers (Ccl2) alongside the macrophage marker Adgre1, indicating recruitment of proinflammatory macrophages to hypertrophied WAT. After macrophage infiltration, inflammation can be propagated by dysfunctional adipocytes and activated macrophages [39], potentially explaining the most severe inflammation in Ob-Met male offspring. While Con and Ob male offspring showed significant increases in adipocyte number between 8 weeks and 12 months of age, male Ob-Met offspring had more adipocytes at 8 weeks but failed to elicit compensatory hyperplasia with ageing. This suggests their limit of WAT hyperplastic expansion capacity is reached by young adulthood (further supported by WAT depot weights being lower than in male Ob offspring at 12 months). The restricted WAT expandability resulted in ectopic lipid deposition in the livers of male Ob-Met offspring. This may result from direct effects of metformin on adipocyte progenitors in utero. Metformin decreases maturation and differentiation of mouse and human pre-adipocytes in vitro [40] and directly inhibits adipocyte lineage commitment [41]. Suppression of the number of adipocyte progenitors by metformin in utero could therefore explain the restricted WAT expandability, premature reliance on hyperplastic adipose tissue expansion, and hepatic lipid deposition in metformin-exposed male offspring. Increased mesenteric adiposity, liver weight and hepatic expression of lipogenic genes was previously reported in 20-week-old male and female offspring of metformin-treated chow-fed dams [20].
Female offspring exposed in utero to metformin exhibited an adiposity phenotype characterised by hyperinsulinaemia, hyperleptinaemia, gWAT inflammation and ectopic lipid deposition. The excessive WAT expansion in Ob-Met female offspring resulted from hyperplasia rather than hypertrophy. Sexual dimorphism in ageing dynamics might explain why, unlike the male offspring, female Ob-Met offspring retained the ability to elicit hyperplasia between 8 weeks and 12 months. This compensatory hyperplasia was insufficient to cope with expansion demands, as evidenced by the hepatic steatosis and increased proinflammatory signature of WAT in female Ob-Met offspring. The increase in CLS-surrounded adipocytes indicates increased adipocyte death in female Ob-Met offspring WAT [29]. The presence of hyperinsulinaemia in female Ob-Met offspring at 12 months of age is distinct from the previously reported phenotype at 8 weeks, where no difference was observed [10]. Since obesity and increased fat mass are strongly associated with these phenotypes [42], the abnormalities in insulin homeostasis in 12-month-old female Ob-Met offspring are likely secondary to the development of obesity. The increased adiposity in female Ob-Met offspring could result from alterations in energy expenditure, energy intake or nutrient assimilation in the intestines (alterations in BAT thermogenic capacity and intestinal microbiota have been reported following early-life metformin exposure [15, 43]). We found no detectable differences in food intake in 11-month-old offspring of either sex, and did not assess energy expenditure.
A striking finding of this study is that adiposity was more strongly induced by in utero metformin in aged female offspring and accompanied by hyperinsulinaemia in female but not male Ob-Met offspring. Most previous rodent studies investigating metformin interventions reveal similar outcomes in both sexes, although few studied offspring until 12 months of age. Since our study period coincides with the onset of oestropause [44], recent loss of oestrogen’s protective anti-inflammatory and pro-adipogenic effects on WAT [45] might have exacerbated the phenotype in female Ob-Met offspring, while intervention effects in male offspring may be masked by additional programming effects induced by maternal obesity. Metformin may also affect ageing dynamics in exposed offspring in a sex-specific manner, as suggested by a study in which repeated metformin injections were administered to neonatal mice [46]. We know of only one other study that described clear sex differences, with increased susceptibility in female offspring: prenatal metformin treatment to genetically obese neuropeptide Y-overexpressing dams caused adiposity and glucose intolerance in female but not male offspring at 7 months of age [15]. Others reported sex-specific timing of in utero metformin intervention: in lean glucose-tolerant pregnancy there were beneficial effects on insulin homeostasis in young adult metformin-exposed male offspring, and these effects weakened with age; in female offspring improvements in metabolic function only appeared at 15 months [13].
To our knowledge, our model is the most clinically relevant model of metformin intervention during maternal diet-induced glucose-intolerant pregnancy that is currently reported, with treatment dose and maternal serum concentrations comparable with those in human studies [11]. The main strength is the long-term follow-up of both male and female offspring, providing causal evidence for the development of obesity beyond young adulthood. This is especially pertinent as most phenotypes emerge after 6 months of age, a common maximum endpoint in developmental programming studies. This prolonged follow-up revealed age-sensitive sexually dimorphic effects of maternal obesity and metformin intervention. Although offspring were followed up until 12 months of age, the lifespan of mice is around 2 years and therefore this equates to middle age [47]. Since the age of offspring heavily influenced metabolic outcomes, it is important that future studies assess effects beyond 12 months.
Metformin treatment during a pregnancy complicated by GDM has clear short-term beneficial effects beyond glycaemic control, including decreased gestational weight gain (benefiting a subsequent pregnancy by preventing excessive interpregnancy weight gain [48]), lower incidence of pre-eclampsia, and improved neonatal outcomes [4, 49]. However, the findings of offspring adiposity and fatty liver resulting from maternal metformin exposure are concerning, as both childhood and adult obesity are an increasing problem worldwide [50]. Therefore, the relative short-term benefits and potential adverse long-term metabolic effects must be weighed against one another. It is vital that the outcomes investigated in the current study are addressed in human trials, as we cannot exclude species-specific differences, or that the intervention might have different effects depending on clinical indication or timing of metformin prescription. Offspring follow-up beyond childhood is therefore crucial in human clinical trials.
Conclusions
Metformin exposure in utero during diet-induced obese pregnancy increased metabolic risk factors in a sex- and age-dependent manner. Our work highlights the importance of following up offspring of both sexes throughout the life course, in addition to immediate effects on mother and fetus, and illustrates the complexity of balancing short-term benefits of therapeutic agents that cross the placenta vs any long-term metabolic risks. Alternative treatment regimens or formulations that retain maternal benefits but limit fetal exposure to metformin might be promising areas of future research.
Supplementary information
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank C. Custance (Wellcome-MRC Institute of Metabolic Science-Metabolic Research Laboratories, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK) for expert technical assistance. We would also like to thank the Core Biochemical Assay Laboratory for performing the serum lipid analyses and the Histopathology Core for the use of their processing facilities (MRC Metabolic Diseases Unit, University of Cambridge).
Authors’ relationships and activities
The authors declare that there are no relationships or activities that might bias, or be perceived to bias, their work.
Contribution statement
Substantial contributions to the conception or design of the work were made by HLB, DSF-T, JMS and SEO. Data acquisition was carried out by JAT, JMS, LCP, LD, LPP and TJA. Data analysis was performed by CEA, JAT, JMS, LCP, LPP and SEO. All authors contributed to manuscript revision and approved the final manuscript prior to submission. JMS is responsible for the integrity of the work as a whole.
Abbreviations
- BAT
Brown adipose tissue
- CLS
Crown-like structures
- GDM
Gestational diabetes mellitus
- gWAT
Gonadal white adipose tissue
- PCOS
Polycystic ovary syndrome
- RT-qPCR
Quantitative RT-PCR
- TD-NMR
Time-domain NMR
- WAT
White adipose tissue
Funding
This work was funded by the British Heart Foundation (grants RG/17/12/33167, PG/13/46/30329, PG/20/11/34957, and studentship to JMS FS/16/53/32729), the Medical Research Council (MC_UU_00014/4 and MR/T016701/1), the São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP, 2019/22635-4), the Wellcome Trust (Sir Henry Wellcome Fellowship: 106026/Z/14/Z) and National Institute for Health Research (clinical lectureship: CL-2019-14-504). The Histopathology Core is funded by the Medical Research Council (MRC_MC_ UU_00014/5). The study funders were not involved in the design of the study; the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data; writing the report; and did not impose any restrictions regarding the publication of the report.
Data availability
The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Footnotes
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Contributor Information
Josca M. Schoonejans, Email: jm.schoonejans@gmail.com
Susan E. Ozanne, Email: seo10@cam.ac.uk
References
- 1.Cho NH, Shaw JE, Karuranga S, et al. IDF Diabetes Atlas: Global estimates of diabetes prevalence for 2017 and projections for 2045. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2018;138:271–281. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2018.02.023. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.McIntyre HD, Catalano P, Zhang C, et al. Gestational diabetes mellitus. Nat Rev Dis Prim. 2019;5(1):47. doi: 10.1038/s41572-019-0098-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Cesta CE, Cohen JM, Pazzagli L, et al. Antidiabetic medication use during pregnancy: An international utilization study. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2019;7:e000759. doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2019-000759. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Tarry-Adkins JL, Ozanne SE, Aiken CE. Impact of metformin treatment during pregnancy on maternal outcomes: a systematic review/meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2021;11:9240. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-88650-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Tarry-Adkins JL, Aiken CE, Ozanne SE. Neonatal, infant, and childhood growth following metformin versus insulin treatment for gestational diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS Med. 2019;16:e1002848. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002848. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Eyal S, Easterling TR, Carr D, et al. Pharmacokinetics of metformin during pregnancy. Drug Metab Dispos. 2010;38:833–840. doi: 10.1124/dmd.109.031245. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Feig DS, Donovan LE, Zinman B, et al. Metformin in women with type 2 diabetes in pregnancy (MiTy): a multicentre, international, randomised, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2020;8:834–844. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(20)30310-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Rowan JA, Rush EC, Plank LD, et al. Metformin in gestational diabetes: the offspring follow-up (MiG TOFU): body composition and metabolic outcomes at 7–9 years of age. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2018;6:e000456. doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2017-000456. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Hanem LGE, Salvesen Ø, Juliusson PB, et al. Intrauterine metformin exposure and offspring cardiometabolic risk factors (PedMet study): a 5–10 year follow-up of the PregMet randomised controlled trial. Lancet Child Adolesc Heal. 2019;3:166–174. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(18)30385-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Schoonejans JM, Blackmore HL, Ashmore TJ, et al. Maternal Metformin Intervention during Obese Glucose-Intolerant Pregnancy Affects Adiposity in Young Adult Mouse Offspring in a Sex-Specific Manner. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22:8104. doi: 10.3390/IJMS22158104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Hufnagel A, Fernandez-Twinn DS, Blackmore HL, et al. Maternal but not fetoplacental health can be improved by metformin in a murine diet-induced model of maternal obesity and glucose intolerance. J Physiol. 2022;600:903–919. doi: 10.1113/jp281902. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Schoonejans JM, Ozanne SE. Developmental programming by maternal obesity: lessons from animal models. Diabet Med. 2021;38:e14694. doi: 10.1111/dme.14694. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Gregg BE, Botezatu N, Brill JD, et al. Gestational exposure to metformin programs improved glucose tolerance and insulin secretion in adult male mouse offspring. Sci Rep. 2018;8:5745. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-23965-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Salomäki H, Heinäniemi M, Vähätalo LH, et al. Prenatal metformin exposure in a maternal high fat diet mouse model alters the transcriptome and modifies the metabolic responses of the offspring. PLoS One. 2014;9:e115778. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0115778. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Salomäki-Myftari H, Vähätalo LH, Ailanen L, et al. Neuropeptide Y overexpressing female and male mice show divergent metabolic but not gut microbial responses to prenatal metformin exposure. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0163805. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0163805. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Fernandez-Twinn DS, Gascoin G, Musial B, et al. Exercise rescues obese mothers’ insulin sensitivity, placental hypoxia and male offspring insulin sensitivity. Sci Rep. 2017;7:44650. doi: 10.1038/srep44650. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Ingvorsen C, Thysen AH, Fernandez-Twinn D, et al. Effects of pregnancy on obesity-induced inflammation in a mouse model of fetal programming. Int J Obes. 2014;38:1–28. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2014.69. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Furse S, Fernandez-Twinn DS, Chiarugi D, et al. Lipid metabolism is dysregulated before, during and after pregnancy in a mouse model of gestational diabetes. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22:7452. doi: 10.3390/ijms22147452. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Furse S, Fernandez-Twinn DS, Beeson JH, et al. A mouse model of gestational diabetes shows dysregulated lipid metabolism post-weaning, after return to euglycaemia. Nutr Diabetes. 2022;12:1–10. doi: 10.1038/s41387-022-00185-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Salomäki H, Vähätalo LH, Laurila K, et al. Prenatal Metformin Exposure in Mice Programs the Metabolic Phenotype of the Offspring during a High Fat Diet at Adulthood. PLoS One. 2013;8:e56594. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0056594. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Liao MZ, Flood Nichols SK, Ahmed M, et al. Effects of Pregnancy on the Pharmacokinetics of Metformin. Drug Metab Dispos. 2020;48:264–271. doi: 10.1124/dmd.119.088435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Alfaradhi MZ, Kusinski LC, Fernandez-Twinn DS, et al. Maternal obesity in pregnancy developmentally programs adipose tissue inflammation in young, lean male mice offspring. Endocrinology. 2016;157:4246–4256. doi: 10.1210/en.2016-1314. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Mennitti LV, Carpenter AAM, Loche E, et al. Effects of maternal diet-induced obesity on metabolic disorders and age-associated miRNA expression in the liver of male mouse offspring. Int J Obes. 2021;46:269–278. doi: 10.1038/s41366-021-00985-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Ye J, Coulouris G, Zaretskaya I, et al. Primer-BLAST: a tool to design target-specific primers for polymerase chain reaction. BMC Bioinformatics. 2012;13:134. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-13-134/FIGURES/5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Bedossa P, Poitou C, Veyrie N, et al. Histopathological algorithm and scoring system for evaluation of liver lesions in morbidly obese patients. Hepatology. 2012;56:1751–1759. doi: 10.1002/HEP.25889. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Bankhead P, Loughrey MB, Fernández JA, et al. QuPath: Open source software for digital pathology image analysis. Sci Rep. 2017;7:1–7. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-17204-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Kleiner DE, Brunt EM, Van Natta M, et al. Design and validation of a histological scoring system for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Hepatology. 2005;41:1313–1321. doi: 10.1002/HEP.20701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Alfaradhi MZ, Fernandez-Twinn DS, Martin-Gronert MS, et al. Oxidative stress and altered lipid homeostasis in the programming of offspring fatty liver by maternal obesity. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. 2014;307:R26–R34. doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00049.2014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Cinti S, Mitchell G, Barbatelli G, et al. Adipocyte death defines macrophage localization and function in adipose tissue of obese mice and humans. J Lipid Res. 2005;46:2347–2355. doi: 10.1194/jlr.M500294-JLR200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Furman D, Campisi J, Verdin E, et al. Chronic inflammation in the etiology of disease across the life span. Nat Med. 2019;25:1822–1832. doi: 10.1038/s41591-019-0675-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Dearden L, Bouret SG, Ozanne SE. Sex and gender differences in developmental programming of metabolism. Mol Metab. 2018;15:8–19. doi: 10.1016/j.molmet.2018.04.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Chiswick CA, Reynolds RM, Denison FC, et al. Effect of metformin on maternal and fetal outcomes in obese pregnant women (EMPOWaR): A randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2015;3:778–786. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(15)00219-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Cluver CA, Hiscock R, Decloedt EH, et al. Use of metformin to prolong gestation in preterm pre-eclampsia: randomised, double blind, placebo controlled trial. BMJ. 2021;374:n2103. doi: 10.1136/BMJ.N2103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Chow CK, Ramasundarahettige C, Hu W, et al. Availability and affordability of essential medicines for diabetes across high-income, middle-income, and low-income countries: a prospective epidemiological study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2018;6:798–808. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(18)30233-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Rowan J, Hague W, Gao W, et al. Metformin versus insulin for the treatment of gestational diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:2003–2015. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0707193. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Ahmadimoghaddam D, Zemankova L, Nachtigal P, et al. Organic cation transporter 3 (OCT3/SLC22A3) and multidrug and toxin extrusion 1 (MATE1/SLC47A1) transporter in the placenta and fetal tissues: Expression profile and fetus protective role at different stages of gestation. Biol Reprod. 2013;88:55–56. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod.112.105064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Ntambi JM, Young-Cheul K. Adipocyte differentiation and gene expression. J Nutr. 2000;130:3122S–3126S. doi: 10.1093/jn/130.12.3122S. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Ijäs H, Vääräsmäki M, Saarela T, et al. A follow-up of a randomised study of metformin and insulin in gestational diabetes mellitus: Growth and development of the children at the age of 18 months. BJOG An Int J Obstet Gynaecol. 2014;122:994–1000. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.12964. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Coenen KR, Gruen ML, Chait A, Hasty AH. Diet-induced increases in adiposity, but not plasma lipids, promote macrophage infiltration into white adipose tissue. Diabetes. 2007;56:564–573. doi: 10.2337/db06-1375. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Fujita K, Iwama H, Oura K, et al. Metformin-suppressed differentiation of human visceral preadipocytes: Involvement of microRNAs. Int J Mol Med. 2016;38:1135–1140. doi: 10.3892/ijmm.2016.2729. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Gu Q, Gu Y, Yang H, Shi Q. Metformin enhances osteogenesis and suppresses adipogenesis of human chorionic villous mesenchymal stem cells. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2017;241:13–19. doi: 10.1620/tjem.241.13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Eckel RH, Grundy SM, Zimmet PZ. The metabolic syndrome. Lancet. 2005;365:1415–1428. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66378-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Liang X, Yang Q, Zhang L, et al. Maternal high-fat diet during lactation impairs thermogenic function of brown adipose tissue in offspring mice. Sci Rep. 2016;6:34345. doi: 10.1038/srep34345. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Aiken CE, Ozanne SE. Sex differences in developmental programming models. Reproduction. 2013;145:145–146. doi: 10.1530/REP-11-0489. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Varghese M, Song J, Singer K. Age and Sex: Impact on adipose tissue metabolism and inflammation. Mech Ageing Dev. 2021;199:111563. doi: 10.1016/j.mad.2021.111563. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Anisimov V, Popovich IG, Zabezhinski MA, et al. Sex differences in aging, life span and spontaneous tumorigenesis in 129/Sv mice neonatally exposed to metformin. Cell Cycle. 2015;14:46–55. doi: 10.4161/15384101.2014.973308. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Ozanne SE, Hales CN. Catch-up growth and obesity in male mice. Nature. 2004;427:411–412. doi: 10.1038/427411b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Teulings NEWD, Masconi KL, Ozanne SE, et al. Effect of interpregnancy weight change on perinatal outcomes: Systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2019;19:386. doi: 10.1186/s12884-019-2566-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Butalia S, Gutierrez L, Lodha A, et al. Short- and long-term outcomes of metformin compared with insulin alone in pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Diabet Med. 2017;34:27–36. doi: 10.1111/dme.13150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Black RE, Victora CG, Walker SP, et al. Maternal and child undernutrition and overweight in low-income and middle-income countries. Lancet. 2013;382:427–451. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60937-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.