Key Points
CEACAM1 is a novel cell surface marker of ex vivo expanded LT-HSCs.
Sorting umbilical cord blood cells based on CEACAM1 and known HSC marker expression allows purification of LT-HSCs with improved purity.
Visual Abstract
Introduction
Long-term reconstituting hematopoietic stem cells (LT-HSCs) reside at the apex of the hematopoiesis hierarchy and are responsible for the maintenance of blood cell production throughout the lifespan of animals. LT-HSCs are distinct from other blood cell types, displaying both self-renewal and multipotency properties, making them an attractive model for cell- and gene-based therapies.1 As such, HSC transplantation is part of the therapeutic strategy for multiple hematological disorders. Umbilical cord blood (UCB) as a stem cell source for transplantation presents several advantages over bone marrow or mobilized peripheral blood, including increased tolerance for human leukocyte antigen mismatches and reduced incidence of chronic graft versus host disease.2 The therapeutic potential of UCB HSCs, therefore, prompted the discovery of strategies for the ex vivo expansion of these cells, as stem cell doses in UCB units are notoriously low compared with other types of grafts. Molecules like SR1 and UM171, showing the ability to promote HSC expansion ex vivo,3-5 are currently being exploited in clinical settings to improve the outcome of UCB HSC transplantation. A recent phase 1/2 clinical trial indeed demonstrated the safety and feasibility of UM171-mediated UCB stem cell expansion for transplantation, indicating that the advantages of UCB grafts can be exploited for the treatment of hematological diseases.6 Furthermore, with the emergence of gene editing strategies involving programmable nucleases, UM171-mediated UCB HSC expansion represents a promising avenue for stem cell editing for therapeutic purposes.7 Multiple studies characterized HSCs using combinations of markers,8-11 however, we and others have demonstrated discrepancies between the immuno-phenotype of freshly isolated UCB HSCs and UCB HSCs introduced in culture.12-15 All of the above underline the need for better characterization of ex vivo expanded UCB cells. Our group identified EPCR12 and ITGA316 as two culture-compatible HSC markers, which, when combined with currently known markers, identify LT-HSCs in expanded UCB cell cultures. In this article, we report CEACAM1 as a novel LT-HSC marker that further refines the immuno-phenotype of expanded LT-HSCs. CEACAM1 has been implicated in multiple cellular processes, including cell motility, apoptosis, cell proliferation, and certain immune cell functions.17,18
Methods
Human CD34+ UCB cell isolation and culture
UCB cells were collected from consenting mothers based on an ethically approved protocol at Charles-LeMoyne Hospital (Greenfield Park, Canada). The use of UCB specimens was approved by the Research Ethics Boards of the University of Montreal and Charles LeMoyne Hospital. Human CD34+ UCB cells were isolated and cultured as described.16 When indicated, media was supplemented with 35nM UM171.
Flow cytometry, cell sorting, and functional assays
Cells were stained using anti-CEACAM1 (PE, R&D Systems, catalog number FAB2244P) and indicated antibodies (see supplemental Materials and Methods) and analyzed by flow cytometry and/or sorted as described.16 Transplantation and assays on MS5 stroma were also performed as described.16
Results and discussion
CEACAM1 expression identifies a phenotypically primitive HSC subpopulation
Our group reported the ability of the ITGA3 marker to discriminate between short-term HSCs (ITGA3-) and LT-HSCs (ITGA3+) in the HSC-enriched CD34+CD45RA-CD90+CD133+EPCR+ ex vivo expanded UCB-derived population.16 Nevertheless, the ITGA3+ population remains heterogeneous, with an LT-HSC frequency of 1 in 38 cells.16 To define the immuno-phenotype of ex vivo expanded UCB LT-HSCs more precisely, we performed comparative transcriptomic analysis of ITGA3+ and ITGA3- populations sorted from CD34+CD45RA-CD90+CD133+EPCR+ UM171-expanded UCB cells. Transcript levels of the cell adhesion molecule CEACAM1 were found to be higher in CD34+CD45RA-EPCR+ cells compared with CD34+CD45RA-EPCRmed/low counterparts12 (Figure 1A, left). Similarly, CEACAM1 transcript levels were higher in LT–HSC-enriched in ITGA3+ cells compared with the ITGA3- fraction (Figure 1A, right).16 Integrated transcriptome analysis of aforementioned populations by our group also recently identified CEACAM1 as one of the top genes with LT–HSC-associated expression.19
To validate that CEACAM1 cell surface expression (supplemental Figure 1B,C) associates with the currently known LT-HSC immunophenotype, we analyzed CEACAM1 expression in various expanded UCB-derived cell populations by flow cytometry. These experiments revealed a higher proportion of CEACAM1+ cells in CD34+EPCR+ and CD34+EPCR+ITGA3+ populations compared with CD34+EPCR- and CD34+EPCR+ITGA3- subsets, respectively (Figure 1B). Moreover, CEACAM1+ cells were overrepresented in CD34+CD45RA-CD90+EPCR+ as well as in CD34+CD45RA-CD90+EPCR+ITGA3+ populations compared with CEACAM1- cells, irrespective of expansion conditions (Figure 1C; supplemental Figure 1A). CD34+CEACAM1+ UM171-expanded cells also expressed higher levels of EPCR, ITGA3, and CD90, as well as of other HSC markers such as GPR56,20 CD133,21 and CD318,22 compared with CD34+CEACAM1- cells (supplemental Figure 1D). Likewise, the CD34+CEACAM1+ population was identified in UM171-expanded human mobilized peripheral blood and bone marrow cells, and CD34+CEACAM1+ populations showed a higher proportion of CD90+EPCR+ cells compared with CD34+CEACAM1- subsets (supplemental Figure 1E).
To functionally characterize CEACAM1-expressing cells in vitro, CD34+ UCB cells were expanded with UM171, and CD34+CD45RA-CD90+EPCR+ cells were sorted based on ITGA3 and CEACAM1 expression (Figure 1D). The resulting fractions were then reintroduced in culture for 7 additional days, and immuno-phenotypic analysis of the progeny of sorted populations showed that only CEACAM1+ cells demonstrate the ability to fully recreate the cellular heterogeneity observed before sorting (Figure 1E). In addition, the progeny of CEACAM1+ITGA3+ cells were more enriched in CD34+CD45RA- cells as well as in CD90- and EPCR-expressing cells compared with that of CEACAM1+ITGA3- cells (supplemental Figure 2A,B). In vitro limiting dilution cocultures with mouse stromal cells (MS5), however, revealed similar frequencies of clonogenic cells for the CEACAM1+ITGA3+ and CEACAM1-ITGA3+ subsets (Figure 1F). Altogether, these results point to CEACAM1 as a novel marker of expanded HSCs with the ability to further dissect the CD34+CD45RA-CD90+EPCR+ITGA3+ subset.
CEACAM1 expression identifies functional LT-HSCs within the CD34+CD45RA-CD90+EPCR+ITGA3+ subset
To determine if CEACAM1 expression identifies functional LT-HSCs, CD34+CD45RA-CD90+EPCR+ expanded UCB cells were sorted based on ITGA3 and CEACAM1 expression, and resulting fractions were transplanted in immunocompromised mice (Figure 2A). Assessment of long-term repopulation potential of fractions was performed 24 weeks after transplantation, which resulted in CEACAM1+ITGA3+ cells showing reconstitution levels similar to those of parental and unsorted cells, albeit with a 10-fold enrichment, whereas CEACAM1-ITGA3+ cells showed significantly decreased reconstitution ability (Figure 2B). Sorting CEACAM1-expressing cells from the CD34+CD45RA-CD90+EPCR+ITGA3+ subset provided a long-term engraftment advantage over nonexpressing cells (supplemental Figure 3B), and CEACAM1+ITGA3+ cells displayed robust multilineage differentiation potential (Figure 2C; supplemental Figure 3A). Limiting dilution assays allowed to estimate the LT-HSC frequency in the CEACAM1+ITGA3+ population to 1 in 27, approximately five-fold higher than that of the CEACAM1-ITGA3+ population (Figure 2D; supplemental Figure 3C). Importantly, secondary transplantation experiments (Figure 2A) showed serial reconstitution activity for CEACAM1+ITGA3+ cells, with repopulation levels similar to those observed for parental cells (Figure 2E; supplemental Figure 3D). Characterization of the CEACAM1-expressing HSC population in nonexpanded UCB revealed a tendency for better reconstitution ability for CEACAM1+ cells compared with CEACAM1- cells (supplemental Figure 4). Altogether, these results suggest that CEACAM1 expression identifies functional LT-HSCs within the CD34+CD45RA-CD90+EPCR+ITGA3+ population and further refines the LT-HSC immuno-phenotype.
In conclusion, we identified CEACAM1 as a robust novel marker of ex vivo expanded UCB LT-HSCs. Sorting CEACAM1+ cells from expanded CD34+CD45RA-CD90+EPCR+ITGA3+ UCB allows for the purification of an HSC-enriched population with the highest LT-HSC frequency reported to date. CEACAM1, therefore, represents an invaluable tool to isolate expanded LT-HSCs with improved purity, opening the door to the improvement of HSC transplantation and editing strategies for clinical applications.
Supplementary Material
The full-text version of this article contains a data supplement.
Acknowledgments
The authors thank M. Frechette and V. Blouin-Chagnon for animal care and assistance with in vivo experiments; I. Boivin, A. Durand, and D. Gracias for CD34+ UCB cells purification; S.Corneau for CD34+ BM and mPB cell purification; and A. Gosselin and A. Bellemare-Pelletier at the Institute for Research in Immunology and Cancer for technical support with flow cytometry sorts. The authors also thank Charles-le Moyne Hospital for providing human UCB units.
This work was supported by a CIHR grant (PJT 152995) and a CIHR Foundation Grant (FDN143286). U.A. was supported by scholarships from the Fonds de recherche du Québec and IRIC. E.T. was supported by a fellowship from the Cole Foundation.
Authorship
Contribution: U.A. designed and performed experiments, analyzed results, and wrote the manuscript; E.T. contributed to CEACAM1 identification, experimental design, and project supervision; J.C. helped with experiment design and interpretation of results; B.L. helped with bioinformatic analysis and interpretation of results; N.M. provided assistance with the in vivo studies; M.-E.B. contributed to project supervision and cowrote the manuscript; P.P.R. contributed to project supervision; and G.S. supervised all aspects of the project and edited the manuscript.
Conflict-of-interest disclosure: The authors declare no competing financial interests.
Correspondence: Guy Sauvageau, Institute for Research in Immunology and Cancer (IRIC), P.O. Box 6128, Downtown Station, Montreal, QC, Canada, H3C 3J7; e-mail: guy.sauvageau@umontreal.ca.
References
- 1.Seita J, Weissman IL. Hematopoietic stem cell: self-renewal versus differentiation. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Syst Biol Med. 2010;2(6):640-653. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Barker JN. Umbilical cord blood (UCB) transplantation: an alternative to the use of unrelated volunteer donors? Hematology (Am Soc Hematol Educ Program). 2007;2007(1):55-61. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Walasek MA, van Os R, de Haan G. Hematopoietic stem cell expansion: challenges and opportunities. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2012;1266(1):138-150. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Boitano AE, Wang J, Romeo R, et al. Aryl hydrocarbon receptor antagonists promote the expansion of human hematopoietic stem cells. Science. 2010;329(5997):1345-1348. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Fares I, Chagraoui J, Gareau Y, et al. Cord blood expansion. Pyrimidoindole derivatives are agonists of human hematopoietic stem cell self-renewal. Science. 2014;345(6203):1509-1512. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Cohen S, Roy J, Lachance S, et al. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation using single UM171-expanded cord blood: a single-arm, phase 1-2 safety and feasibility study. Lancet Haematol. 2020;7(2):e134-e145. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Dever DP, Porteus MH. The changing landscape of gene editing in hematopoietic stem cells: a step towards Cas9 clinical translation. Curr Opin Hematol. 2017;24(6):481-488. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Notta F, Doulatov S, Laurenti E, Poeppl A, Jurisica I, Dick JE. Isolation of single human hematopoietic stem cells capable of long-term multilineage engraftment. Science. 2011;333(6039):218-221. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Craig W, Kay R, Cutler RL, Lansdorp PM. Expression of Thy-1 on human hematopoietic progenitor cells. J Exp Med. 1993;177(5):1331-1342. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Mayani H, Dragowska W, Lansdorp PM. Characterization of functionally distinct subpopulations of CD34+ cord blood cells in serum-free long-term cultures supplemented with hematopoietic cytokines. Blood. 1993;82(9):2664-2672. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Hao Q-L, Shah AJ, Thiemann FT, Smogorzewska EM, Crooks GM. A functional comparison of CD34+ CD38-cells in cord blood and bone marrow. Blood. 1995;86(10):3645-3753. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Fares I, Chagraoui J, Lehnertz B, et al. EPCR expression marks UM171-expanded CD34+ cord blood stem cells. Blood. 2017;129(25): 3344-3351. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Dorrell C, Gan OI, Pereira DS, Hawley RG, Dick JE. Expansion of human cord blood CD34(+)CD38(-) cells in ex vivo culture during retroviral transduction without a corresponding increase in SCID repopulating cell (SRC) frequency: dissociation of SRC phenotype and function. Blood. 2000;95(1):102-110. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Shin JY, Hu W, Naramura M, Park CY. High c-Kit expression identifies hematopoietic stem cells with impaired self-renewal and megakaryocytic bias. J Exp Med. 2014;211(2):217-231. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ito CY, Kirouac DC, Madlambayan GJ, Yu M, Rogers I, Zandstra PW. The AC133+CD38-, but not the rhodamine-low, phenotype tracks LTC-IC and SRC function in human cord blood ex vivo expansion cultures. Blood. 2010;115(2):257-260. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Tomellini E, Fares I, Lehnertz B, et al. Integrin-α3 is a functional marker of ex vivo expanded human long-term hematopoietic stem cells. Cell Rep. 2019;28(4):1063-1073.e5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Kim WM, Huang Y-H, Gandhi A, Blumberg RS. CEACAM1 structure and function in immunity and its therapeutic implications. Semin Immunol. 2019;42:101296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Gray-Owen SD, Blumberg RS. CEACAM1: contact-dependent control of immunity. Nat Rev Immunol. 2006;6(6):433-446. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Lehnertz B, Chagraoui J, MacRae T, et al. HLF expression defines the human hematopoietic stem cell state. Blood. 2021;138(25):2642-2654. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Rao TN, Marks-Bluth J, Sullivan J, et al. High-level Gpr56 expression is dispensable for the maintenance and function of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells in mice. Stem Cell Res (Amst). 2015;14(3):307-322. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Yin AH, Miraglia S, Zanjani ED, et al. AC133, a novel marker for human hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells. Blood. 1997;90(12):5002-5012. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Takeda H, Fujimori Y, Kai S, Ogawa H, Nakano T. CD318/CUB-domain-containing protein 1 expression on cord blood hematopoietic progenitors. Exp Ther Med. 2010;1(3):497-501. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Pimentel H, Bray NL, Puente S, Melsted P, Pachter L. Differential analysis of RNA-seq incorporating quantification uncertainty. Nat Methods. 2017;14(7):687-690. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.