Abstract
A fluorogenic 5′ nuclease PCR assay was evaluated for its ability to specifically detect and differentiate DNA of twoOrthopoxvirusspecies. A pair of consensus primers that target a DNA segment of theOrthopoxvirushaemagglutinin gene, and two oligonucleotide probes, each labelled with a different fluorescent reporter dye and the same quencher dye, were used in a single-tube assay. The assay is based on the 5′→3′ nuclease activity ofAmpliTaqDNA polymerase that cleaves a fluorescein-labelled hybridized probe. Probe cleavage generates specific fluorescent signals whose intensity can be quantified by fluorometry. After evaluating the effects of various annealing temperatures and probe concentrations and normalizing the emission intensities of the reporter dyes, it was possible to detect and differentiate monkeypox and vaccinia virus DNAs on the basis of a single-base polymorphism. The sensitivity of the 5′ nuclease PCR assay is comparable to the sensitivity of ethidium bromide-stained gels, but the assay provides higher specificity and virtually eliminates the need for laborious post-PCR processing.
Keywords: Orthopoxvirus, PCR primers, fluorogenic probe, 5′ nuclease assay, haemagglutinin
References
REFERENCES
- 1.Fenner F., Wittek R., Dumbell K.R. The Orthopoxviruses. London: Academic Press. 1989 [Google Scholar]
- 2.Meyer H., Pfeffer M., Rziha H.-J. Sequence alterations within and downstream of the A-type inclusion protein genes allow differentiation ofOrthopoxvirus. Journal of General Virology. 1994;75:1975–1981. doi: 10.1099/0022-1317-75-8-1975. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Eis-Hubinger A.M., Gerritzen A., Schneweis, K.E. Fatal cowpox-like virus infection transmitted by cat. Lancet. 1990;ii:880. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(90)92387-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Massung, R.F., Liu L.-I., Jin Q. Analysis of the complete genome of smallpox variola major virus strain Bangladesh-1975. Virology. 1994;201:215–240. doi: 10.1006/viro.1994.1288. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Holland P.M., Abramson R.D., Watson R., Gelfand D.H. Detection of specific polymerase chain reaction product by utilizing the 5′→3′ exonuclease activity ofThermus aquaticus. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, USA. 1991;88:7276–7280. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.16.7276. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Lee, L.G., Connell C.R., Bloch W. Allelic discrimination by nick-translation PCR with fluorogenic probes. Nucleic Acids Research. 1993;21:3761–3766. doi: 10.1093/nar/21.16.3761. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Ropp, S.L., Jin Q., Knight J.C., Massung R.F., Esposito J.J. PCR strategy for identification and differentiation of smallpox and other orthopoxviruses. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. 1995;33:2069–2076. doi: 10.1128/jcm.33.8.2069-2076.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Livak K.J., Marmaro J., Todd J.A. Towards fully automated genome-wide polymorphism screening. Nature Genetics. 1995;9:341–342. doi: 10.1038/ng0495-341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Bassler H.A., Flood S.J., Livak K.J., Marmaro J., Knorr R., Batt C.A. Use of a fluorogenic probe in a CR-based assay for the detection ofListeria monocytogenes . Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 1995;61:372–378. doi: 10.1128/aem.61.10.3724-3728.1995. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]