Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Nov 3.
Published in final edited form as: Cell Rep. 2022 Oct 18;41(3):111478. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111478

Engineered human cytokine/antibody fusion proteins expand regulatory T cells and confer autoimmune disease protection

Derek VanDyke 1,2, Marcos Iglesias 3, Jakub Tomala 4, Arabella Young 5,6,7,8, Jennifer Smith 5, Joseph A Perry 9, Edward Gebara 2,10, Amy R Cross 11, Laurene S Cheung 12,13, Arbor G Dykema 12,13, Brian T Orcutt-Jahns 14, Tereza Henclová 4, Jaroslav Golias 15, Jared Balolong 5, Luke M Tomasovic 1,2, David Funda 15, Aaron S Meyer 14, Drew M Pardoll 12,13, Joanna Hester 11, Fadi Issa 11, Christopher A Hunter 9, Mark S Anderson 5, Jeffrey A Bluestone 5,6,16, Giorgio Raimondi 3, Jamie B Spangler 1,2,12,13,17,18,19,20,*
PMCID: PMC9631798  NIHMSID: NIHMS1843698  PMID: 36261022

SUMMARY

Low-dose human interleukin-2 (hIL-2) treatment is used clinically to treat autoimmune disorders due to the cytokine’s preferential expansion of immunosuppressive regulatory T cells (Tregs). However, off-target immune cell activation and short serum half-life limit the clinical potential of IL-2 treatment. Recent work showed that complexes comprising hIL-2 and the anti-hIL-2 antibody F5111 overcome these limitations by preferentially stimulating Tregs over immune effector cells. Although promising, therapeutic translation of this approach is complicated by the need to optimize dosing ratios and by the instability of the cytokine/antibody complex. We leverage structural insights to engineer a single-chain hIL-2/F5111 antibody fusion protein, termed F5111 immunocytokine (IC), which potently and selectively activates and expands Tregs. F5111 IC confers protection in mouse models of colitis and checkpoint inhibitor-induced diabetes mellitus. These results provide a roadmap for IC design and establish a Treg-biased immunotherapy that could be clinically translated for autoimmune disease treatment.

In brief

VanDyke et al. engineer a single-chain fusion protein composed of the human interleukin-2 cytokine and the anti-cytokine antibody F5111, which induces biased activation and expansion of regulatory T cells in vitro and in vivo. This protein confers protection in animal models of colitis and immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced diabetes mellitus.

Graphical Abstract

graphic file with name nihms-1843698-f0001.jpg

INTRODUCTION

Interleukin-2 (IL-2) is a pleiotropic cytokine that regulates key homeostatic functions, including proliferation, survival, and activation of both pro-inflammatory immune effector cells (Effs) (e.g., CD4+/CD8+ effector T cells, natural killer [NK] cells), and anti-inflammatory regulatory T cells (Tregs). IL-2 engages transmembrane receptors to activate signaling through the Janus kinase-signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) pathway, which regulates gene expression and functional outcomes (Malek, 2008; Stroud and Wells, 2004; Murray, 2007). IL-2 forms either an intermediate-affinity heterodimeric receptor complex, comprising the IL-2 receptor-β (IL-2Rβ, CD122) and common gamma (γc) (CD132) chains, or a high-affinity heterotrimeric receptor complex, comprising the non-signaling IL-2Rα subunit (also CD25) as well as the IL-2Rβ and γc chains (Leonard et al., 1984; Liao et al., 2013; Wang et al., 2005). IL-2Rα is highly expressed on Tregs but virtually absent from naive Effs; thus, Tregs are 100-fold more sensitive to IL-2 (Boyman and Sprent, 2012; Sakaguchi et al., 1995; Taniguchi and Minami, 1993). IL-2Rα expression is also induced in activated Effs, albeit at lower levels, and activated Effs may compete with Tregs for extracellular IL-2 (Baecher-Allan et al., 2001; Höfer et al., 2012; Schmidt et al., 2012). Hence, IL-2 promotes both pro- and anti-inflammatory responses, which has made it an attractive, albeit complex, candidate for immunotherapy.

IL-2 first received FDA approval as a pro-inflammatory agent, wherein high doses are administered to treat metastatic cancers (Alva et al., 2016; Rosenberg, 2014; Sim and Radvanyi, 2014). In contrast, low doses of IL-2 have been used to treat autoimmune conditions, such as diabetes, ulcerative colitis, graft-versus-host disease (GVHD), and allograft rejection. However, low-dose IL-2 strategies are limited by the dangerous off-target effects that result from activation of Effs and by the short serum half-life of IL-2.

Several approaches have been explored to overcome the limitations of IL-2 therapy by biasing cytokine activity (Hernandez et al., 2022), including the design of IL-2 muteins (Peterson et al., 2018; Carmenate et al., 2018; Khoryati et al., 2020; Glassman et al., 2021), PEGylated IL-2 variants (Charych et al., 2016; Dixit et al., 2021; Zhang et al., 2021), and IL-2/IL-2Rα fusion proteins (Hernandez et al., 2021; Lopes et al., 2020; Ward et al., 2018, 2020; Xie et al., 2021). In addition, since IL-15 shares IL-2Rβ and γc with the IL-2 receptor but has a distinct α chain (Waldmann, 2006), IL-15 therapies have been designed that preferentially target Effs over IL-2RαHigh Tregs (Knudson et al., 2020), for example, the current clinical candidate ALT-803 (Romee et al., 2018; Rubinstein et al., 2006; Wrangle et al., 2018; Xu et al., 2013).

Another approach, pioneered by Boyman et al. (2006), built on seminal work (Finkelman et al., 1993) in developing cytokine/antibody complexes to combine IL-2 with anti-IL-2 antibodies that bias cytokine activity. These complexes increase therapeutic efficacy and reduce toxicity of the cytokine by extending its in vivo half-life (Roopenian and Akilesh, 2007) and selectively targeting its functions toward particular immune cell subsets (Arenas-Ramirez et al., 2016; Boyman et al., 2006; De Paula et al., 2020; Karakus et al., 2020; Lee et al., 2020b; Spangler et al., 2015a; Tomala et al., 2009; Trotta et al., 2018; Yokoyama et al., 2018). Trotta et al. (2018) discovered and mechanistically described a human antibody (F5111) against hIL-2 that biases its activities toward Tregs. F5111 sterically blocks hIL-2 binding to IL-2Rβ and also allosterically reduces hIL-2 affinity for IL-2Rα. Receptor activation is gated by hIL-2/antibody dissociation, and interaction of the hIL-2/F5111 complex with IL-2Rα destabilizes cytokine/antibody interactions, leading to selective IL-2RαHigh Treg activation. This paradigm resembles the exchange/release mechanism observed for the anti-mouse IL-2 (mIL-2) antibody JES6–1 and the anti-hIL-2 antibody UFKA-20, both of which bias IL-2 toward Tregs (Boyman et al., 2006; Karakus et al., 2020; Spangler et al., 2015a). An affinity matured version of F5111 (F5111.2) preferentially expanded Tregs and ameliorated autoimmune diseases in mice (Trotta et al., 2018). However, clinical translation of cytokine/antibody complexes is complicated by the need for dosing ratio optimization and by IL-2 dissociation, which leads to off-target effects. Moreover, use of a single agent rather than a multi-component mixture facilitates the clinical approval pathway. For instance, investigational new drug-enabling nonhuman primate studies of cytokine/antibody complexes require use of the matched species cytokine, but the antibody may not cross-react with nonhuman primate cytokines.

To overcome the limitations of IL-2/antibody complexes, the cytokine has been genetically fused to anti-IL-2 antibodies (Sahin et al., 2020; Spangler et al., 2018; Tomala et al., 2013). In one example, a single-chain fusion protein (immunocytokine [IC]) comprising mIL-2 and the JES6–1 antibody led to superior autoimmune disease control in mice compared with the mIL-2/JES6–1 complex (Spangler et al., 2018). Here, we designed an IC linking hIL-2 to the F5111 antibody (termed F5111 IC) that preferentially promotes mouse and human Treg activation. By modulating the cytokine/antibody affinity, we developed IC variants with a range of immune activation potencies. The parent F5111 IC was poised at an affinity optimum and showed greater Treg bias than hIL-2/antibody complexes. Finally, we established the therapeutic promise of F5111 IC in mouse models of colitis and immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced diabetes mellitus.

RESULTS

Immunocytokine design and optimization

To advance development of F5111 IC, we first produced the F5111 human immunoglobulin G1 (IgG1) antibody. Binding studies using the yeast surface display platform (Boder and Wittrup, 1997) revealed that recombinantly expressed F5111 bound yeast-displayed hIL-2 with the expected affinity (Trotta et al., 2018), and the antibody did not cross-react with mIL-2 (Figure S1A).

F5111 IC was constructed by tethering hIL-2 to the N terminus of the light chain (LC) of the full-length human F5111 antibody with a flexible linker (Figure 1A). The mechanism of action for biased immune activation by hIL-2/antibody complexes requires cytokine dissociation, and we hypothesized that fusing the cytokine to the antibody could hinder this dissociation through enhanced avidity effects (Spangler et al., 2018). Thus, to reduce the intramolecular cytokine/antibody affinity and enhance hIL-2 release, we formulated the IC using F5111 rather than the affinity matured F5111.2. The hIL-2/F5111 complex structure (Trotta et al., 2018) shows that the F5111 LC N terminus is 43 Å from the hIL-2 C terminus (Figure 1B); therefore our initial design (denoted F5111 IC LN15) used a 15 amino acid (Gly4Ser)3 linker to enable intramolecular engagement. Constructs with 25 amino acid (Gly4Ser)5 and 35 amino acid (Gly4Ser)7 linkers were also designed (F5111 IC LN25 and F5111 IC LN35, respectively). Control IC was constructed by replacing the variable chains of the F5111 IC LN35 construct with those of an irrelevant antibody (Honegger et al., 2005) (Table S1).

Figure 1. Design and production of F5111 IC.

Figure 1.

(A) Schematic of F5111 IC design.

(B) Structure of the hIL-2/F5111 complex (PDB: 5UTZ), showing the distance between the C terminus of hIL-2 (red) and the N terminus of the F5111 antibody LC (green).

(C) SEC trace overlay of F5111 ICs.

(D) SEC trace overlay of F5111 antibody (Ab) and ICs.

(E) SEC trace of F5111 IC LN35 with peaks (P1, P2, and P3) denoted.

(F) SDS-PAGE analysis of F5111 IC LN35 P3. R, reducing; NR, non-reducing. Molecular weights (kDa) are indicated on the right. See also Figure S1 and Table S1.

ICs were produced in mammalian cells and purified via protein G affinity chromatography and size-exclusion chromatography (SEC). Compared with the F5111 antibody, which eluted as a single monodisperse peak, F5111 IC LN15 eluted earlier and showed two broader peaks (Figures 1C and 1D), suggesting possible oligomerization of F5111 IC LN15. Analysis of F5111 IC LN25 and LN35 revealed three peaks (P1, P2, and P3) (Figures 1C1E). Elution volumes suggested that P1 and P2 contained oligomeric structures, whereas P3 contained monomeric IC (Figures 1D and 1E). Higher-order oligomers likely indicate binding of linked hIL-2 to F5111 on a neighboring IC (intermolecular assembly) rather than intramolecular assembly (Figure 1E), presumably due to linker constraint of intramolecular interaction between hIL-2 and F5111. Indeed, we saw less oligomerization as we increased linker length. Control IC (which does not assemble intramolecularly or intermolecularly) eluted as a single peak that coincided with P3 of F5111 IC LN25 and LN35, further suggesting that P3 represents monomeric IC. SDS-PAGE verified IC purity (Figure 1F). Henceforth, F5111 IC LN25 and F5111 IC LN35 refer to P3 unless otherwise specified. Also, F5111 IC LN15 indicates the majority peak (Figure 1C).

F5111 ICs are intramolecularly assembled and exhibit expected binding properties

To confirm proper assembly and functionality of F5111 ICs, we measured binding to hIL-2, hIL-2Rα, and hIL-2Rβ using bio-layer interferometry. If properly assembled, F5111 IC would not engage hIL-2 since the hIL-2 within the IC is bound to the antibody. F5111 antibody bound to hIL-2 as expected (Trotta et al., 2018), whereas F5111 IC LN15, F5111 IC LN25, and F5111 IC LN35 showed impaired hIL-2 binding (Figures 2A, left, S1C, left, and S1D, left; Table S2), reflecting intramolecular assembly of the ICs. Trace hIL-2 binding to ICs suggested transient exchange between intramolecular and intermolecular interactions. hIL-2 binding decreased as linker length increased, reinforcing that longer linker lengths enhance IC assembly. The three peaks that eluted from F5111 IC LN25 showed similarly impaired hIL-2 binding (Figure S1E, left). As expected, binding was observed between hIL-2 and the hIL-2/F5111 complex (1:1 molar ratio) due to unoccupied sites on F5111 (Figure 2A, left).

Figure 2. F5111 IC blocks IL-2 binding to IL-2Rβ and biases toward Treg activation.

Figure 2.

(A) Equilibrium biolayer interferometry-based titrations of F5111 antibody (Ab), hIL-2, control IC, hIL-2/F5111 complex (Cx, 1:1 molar ratio), and F5111 IC LN35 binding to hIL-2 (left), hIL-2Rα (middle), or hIL-2Rβ (right).

(B) STAT5 phosphorylation response of IL-2Rα+ (left) and IL-2Rα (right) YT-1 cells stimulated with hIL-2, control IC, hIL-2/F5111 Cx (1:1 molar ratio), or F5111 IC LN35.

(C) STAT5 phosphorylation responses of stimulated human Treg (left), CD8+ T (middle), and TConv (right) cells. Data represent mean ± SD (n = 3). See also Figures S1 and S2; Tables S2, S3, and S4.

We expected F5111 IC to interact with hIL-2Rα since the receptor-binding epitope on hIL-2 is not directly obstructed by the antibody. F5111 ICs with varying linker lengths bound hIL-2Rα with similar affinities, all of which were >2-fold higher than those of free hIL-2 and hIL-2/F5111 complex due to bivalent cytokine presentation (Figures 2A, middle, S1C, middle, and S1D, middle; Table S2). Control IC had a 5-fold higher affinity for hIL-2Rα compared with free IL-2 (Figure 2A, middle; Table S2). A 2-fold lower hIL-2Rα affinity was observed for F5111 IC LN15 compared with F5111 IC LN25 and F5111 IC LN35, likely due to oligomerization. Indeed, among the three peaks of F5111 IC LN25, P3 had the highest and P1 had the lowest IL-2Rα affinity (Figure S1E, middle).

In contrast with hIL-2Rα, hIL-2Rβ should not bind F5111 IC since F5111 fully blocks the receptor binding epitope on hIL-2. Control IC had a 100-fold hIL-2Rβ affinity improvement over free hIL-2 due to its bivalency (Figure 2A, right; Table S2). Whereas binding to hIL-2Rβ was completely abolished for hIL-2/F5111 complex (Figure 2A, right; Table S2), F5111 IC LN15 showed similar hIL-2Rβ affinity to free hIL-2 (Figure S1C, right), indicating deficient intramolecular assembly. Lengthening the linker eliminated these issues, as F5111 IC LN25 and F5111 IC LN35 did not engage hIL-2Rβ (Figures 2A, right, S1C, right, and S1D, right; Table S2). F5111 IC LN25 P1 and F5111 IC LN25 P2 bound hIL-2Rβ weakly, whereas F5111 LN25 P3 did not bind hIL-2Rβ (Figure S1E, right). Overall, hIL-2 cytokine and receptor binding studies confirmed proper assembly and function of F5111 ICs.

F5111 ICs demonstrate Treg bias in vitro

IL-2-dependent STAT5 phosphorylation (pSTAT5) was assessed on YT-1 human NK cells that either express (Treg-like) or lack (Eff-like) IL-2Rα (Kuziel et al., 1993). ICs were compared with hIL-2/F5111 complex (1:1 molar ratio), and increasing antibody-to-cytokine ratio did not affect signaling potency (Figure S1B; Table S3).

On IL-2Rα+ (Treg-like) cells, F5111 IC LN15, F5111 IC LN25, and F5111 IC LN35 induced robust activation, similar to free hIL-2 and hIL-2/F5111 complex (Figures 2B, left, and S1F; Table S3). Control IC was more potent than free hIL-2 due to its bivalency, whereas F5111 ICs were slightly less potent due to incomplete cytokine/antibody dissociation. On IL-2Rα (Eff-like) cells, F5111 IC LN15 was 15-fold less potent than free hIL-2 and control IC, and F5111 IC LN25 and F5111 IC LN35 induced little to no activation (Figures 2B, right, and S1G; Table S3). In contrast, hIL-2/F5111 complex was only ~2-fold less potent than free hIL-2 on IL-2Rα cells, highlighting the enhanced IL-2Rα+ cell bias of ICs versus the complex. The two peaks of F5111 IC LN15 elicited ~10-fold weaker activation of IL-2Rα cells relative to free hIL-2 (Figure S1H, top; Table S3). For F5111 IC LN25, P1 and P2 EC50 values were 50- and 100-fold weaker than that of hIL-2, respectively, whereas P3 was >2,000-fold weaker (Figure S1H, bottom; Table S3). All three peaks of F5111 IC LN25 were less active on IL-2Rα cells compared with F5111 IC LN15, confirming that increased linker length improved IC assembly. The potencies of F5111 IC LN25 and F5111 IC LN35 on IL-2Rα+ and IL-2Rα cells were similar; however, less oligomerization was observed for F5111 IC LN35 (Figure 1B). Thus, we proceeded with F5111 IC LN35, hereafter denoted F5111 IC.

To confirm Treg bias in a mixed cell population, IC activity was interrogated on human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs). F5111 IC was less potent than free hIL-2 and IL-2/F5111 complex (~500-fold) as well as control IC (~1,000-fold) on Tregs due to incomplete cytokine/antibody dissociation (Figure 2C, left; Table S4). However, equivalent EMax values were achieved for all constructs. F5111 IC did not activate on CD8+ T cells, as indicated by reduced potency and ~80% reduction in EMax value compared with free hIL-2 and control IC (Figure 2C, middle; Table S4). In contrast, hIL-2/F5111 complex showed improved potency on CD8+ T cells with a milder 35% reduction in EMax relative to free IL-2 and control IC. Similarly, F5111 IC induced little to no activation of conventional CD4+ T cells (TConv), with 55% lower EMax compared with free hIL-2 and control IC (Figure 2C, right; Table S4). However, hIL-2/F5111 complex activated TConv cells with similar potency and EMax as free IL-2, presumably due to complex dissociation. Control IC was more potent than free hIL-2 due to bivalency. Collectively, PBMC studies revealed that F5111 IC, but not IL-2/F5111 complex, is strongly biased toward Treg versus Eff activation due to preferential engagement of IL-2RαHigh cell subsets.

To understand the more dramatic potency reduction for F5111 IC compared with free hIL-2 on human Tregs compared with IL-2Rα+ YT-1 cells, we quantified IL-2Rα expression on these cells. IL-2Rα mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) on Tregs was only 40-fold greater than the fluorescence minus one (FMO) control, whereas IL-2Rα MFI was 75-fold greater than FMO control for IL-2Rα+ YT-1 cells (Figure S2B, left), indicating that YT-1 cells express more IL-2Rα than Tregs. IL-2Rα MFI levels on CD8+ T, TConv, and IL-2Rα YT-1 cells were close to FMO background (Figure S2B, right). As F5111 IC binding requires IL-2Rα-dependent disruption of the cytokine/antibody interaction, lower expression of IL-2Rα on human primary cells rationalizes the weakened activity of F5111 IC on Tregs.

Tuning IC intramolecular affinity modulates IL-2 receptor binding and Treg bias

Based on our mechanistic understanding of F5111 IC activity, we hypothesized that modulating cytokine/antibody affinity would impact relative engagement of IL-2RαHigh versus IL-2RαLow cells, enabling optimization of IC bias on different cell types with various IL-2Rα expression levels. We conjectured that reducing the IL-2/F5111 interaction affinity would lead to enhanced IL-2 signaling, particularly on human Tregs. Informed by the structure of the IL-2/F5111 complex (Trotta et al., 2018), we rationally designed a panel of eight single-point alanine mutations of the F5111 antibody, including three variable LC (VL) (Y33, Y94, and S96) and five variable HC (VH) (Y35, Y52, Y54, Y60, and V103) residues at the cytokine/antibody interface (Figure 3A). Each F5111 variant and the affinity matured F5111.2 antibody (Rondon et al., 2015) were produced as ICs with 35 amino acid linkers (Figure S3A).

Figure 3. Tuning IC intramolecular affinity modulates Treg bias.

Figure 3.

(A) hIL-2/F5111 crystal structure (PDB: 5UTZ) with alanine-mutated residues shown in yellow (LC) or green (HC). Human IL-2Rα is overlaid from the IL-2 quaternary complex structure (PDB: 2B5I).

(B) Equilibrium biolayer interferometry-based titrations against hIL-2Rβ.

(C) STAT5 phosphorylation responses of stimulated human Treg (left), CD8+ T (middle), and TConv (right) cells.

(D) Schematic of multivalent binding model (left). Predicted Treg:CD8+ T (middle) and Treg:TConv (right) pSTAT5 ratios for ICs at 10 pM concentration are plotted against predicted IL2Rβ/γc KD (nM).

(E) Predicted (lines) and experimental (points) percent control IC pSTAT5 EMax on CD8+ T (left) or TConv (right) cells plotted against the predicted (lines) or experimental (points) pSTAT5 EC50 on Tregs for each IC. See also Figure S3; Tables S2 and S4.

Bio-layer interferometry studies showed that F5111 IC variants minimally engaged hIL-2, confirming their intramolecular assembly (Figure S3B; Table S2). All IC variants bound hIL-2Rα with similar affinities, comparable with the parent F5111 IC (Figure S3B; Table S2). All IC variants showed significantly weaker IL-2Rβ binding compared with free hIL-2 and control IC, indicating successful receptor blockade (Figure 3B; Table S2). However, whereas most IC variants completely ablated hIL-2Rβ binding, IC variants Y94A, Y35A, Y52A, Y54A, and Y60A detectably bound hIL-2Rβ at high concentrations, suggesting weaker cytokine/antibody interactions for these clones.

We wondered whether hIL-2Rβ binding differences between IC variants would impact IL-2 signaling bias. In human PBMC studies, all F5111 IC variants either maintained or enhanced Treg potency compared with the parent F5111 antibody (Figure 3C, left; Table S4), indicating that the mutations weakened cytokine/antibody binding, as intended. IC variants were grouped into three cohorts: the “high”-potency group (Y94A, Y35A, Y52A,Y54A, and Y60AICs), which were of similar potency to control IC; the “intermediate”-potency group (Y33A and V103A ICs), which were ~50-fold weaker than control IC; and the “low”-potency group (parent F5111 IC and the S96A IC), which were ~1,000-fold weaker than control IC. F5111.2 IC impaired the Tregpotency (>6,000-fold weaker thancontrol IC) due to reduced cytokine/antibody dissociation. As anticipated, weakened cytokine/antibody affinityalso potentiated the activity of F5111IC variants on both CD8+ T cells (Figure 3C, middle; Table S4) and TConv cells (Figure 3C, right; Table S4). However, all IC variants showed impaired Eff activation compared with free hIL-2 and control IC, meaning they retained some Treg bias. IC variants with the highest Treg potencies led to the most potent CD8+ T and TConv cell activation, and F5111.2 IC, which was the least potent on Tregs, elicited the weakest Eff activation. Moreover, signaling potency on both Treg and Effs was directly correlated with extent of hIL-2Rβ engagement, as anticipated.

F5111 IC variants represent a panel of IL-2Rα “probes,” as illustrated by IL-2Rα MFI analysis within the activated cell populations for various immune cell subsets. At saturating concentrations, the mean IL-2Rα MFIs of activated Tregs were similar following treatment with all F5111 ICs except for the significantly less potent F5111.2 IC (Figure S3C, left). This finding suggests that Treg cell IL-2Rα expression is sufficient to induce cytokine/antibody dissociation for all F5111 ICs other than F5111.2 IC, which requires more IL-2Rα to induce cytokine/antibody dissociation. On CD8+ T and TConv cells, ICs that induced more potent activation required lower levels of IL-2Rα to stimulate IL-2 signaling (Figure S3C, middle and right).

To further explore the relationship between cytokine/antibody affinity and Treg bias of ICs we developed a multivalent binding model that predicts F5111 IC signaling properties in specific immune cell subsets based on receptor affinity (Figure 3D, left). This model accurately predicted activities of the IC variants (Figures S3DS3F) and inferred hIL-2Rβ/γc affinities (Figures S3G and S3H), which we could not measure experimentally since IC variants did not reach binding saturation. We plotted the predicted affinity of each IC against the predicted Treg:CD8+ T and Treg:TConv pSTAT5 MFI ratios at a fixed concentration (Figure 3D, middle and right). As IC affinity toward hIL-2Rβ/γc decreased, Treg bias increased. Bias resulted from attenuated signaling on both CD8+ T and TConv cells but was also accompanied by decreased activation of Tregs (Figures 3C and 3E), illustrating the trade-off between Treg activation and selectivity. We selected three IC variants for further analysis that improved Treg potency while minimizing Eff activation (Y60A, Y33A, and V103A ICs).

To improve their therapeutic potential, we introduced the N297A mutation into the Fc region of all ICs. This mutation prevents glycosylation, which significantly impairs Fc γ receptor binding and thus reduces antibody effector functions (Delidakis et al., 2022; Mimura et al., 2000, 2001; Saunders, 2019; Tao et al., 1993; Wang et al., 2018). Bio-layer interferometry studies showed no differences in hIL-2, hIL-2Rα, and hIL-2Rβ binding between F5111 IC with and without the N297A mutation (Figure S4A; Table S2). Human PBMC signaling assays confirmed that N297A mutation did not affect the activity of control IC, F5111 IC, or IC variants (Figures S4B and S4C; Table S4). Thus, IC will hereafter denote the IC with the N297A mutation unless otherwise indicated.

Parent F5111 IC maximizes Treg expansion bias

We sought to determine whether the in vitro IL-2 signaling bias of our engineered ICs toward activation of Tregs would translate into selective expansion of Tregs in mice. We first evaluated IC potencies on splenocytes isolated from non-obese diabetic (NOD) mice. IC activation trends on mouse primary cells were similar to those on human PBMCs (Figures S4C and S4D; Tables S4 and S5), albeit with weaker potency due to the lower affinity of hIL-2 for mIL-2 versus hIL-2 receptors (Spangler et al., 2015a).

To inform in vivo dosing, we plotted in vitro Treg:CD8+ T and Treg:TConv pSTAT5 MFI ratios as a function of IC concentration (Figure S4E). Each IC variant exhibited a unique optimum concentration and maximum level of Treg bias, and variants that were more potent on Tregs had lower optimum concentrations and higher magnitude biases.

NOD mice were treated with each IC and immune cell subset expansion was evaluated in harvested spleens (Figure S5A). Y33A IC, V103A IC, and Y60A IC showed significant Treg bias (Figure 4A), but remarkably, the parent F5111 IC led to the most biased Treg expansion among the ICs tested, indicating that the optimum hIL-2/antibody affinity for Treg bias corresponded to that of the parent F5111 IC. This is visualized by plotting the Treg:CD8+ T cell ratio against Treg potency for each IC (Figure 4B; Table S4). If Treg activity is weak (as for F5111.2 IC), no activity is observed on any immune cell subset. If the Treg activity is too potent (as for control IC), all immune cell subsets are activated, confounding Treg bias. The optimum Treg EC50 lies between these extrema, and F5111 IC is close to this optimum. Non-negative matrix factorization was performed using a two-component analysis, revealing that F5111 IC had equivalent Treg specificity IC variants while maintaining inhibition of Eff activation (Figure 4C).

Figure 4. Parent F5111 IC induces maximum Treg expansion bias.

Figure 4.

(A) Treg:CD8+ T (left), Treg:TConv (middle), and Treg:NK (right) cell ratios in NOD mice spleens after four daily treatments with PBS (n = 4) or 8.2 μg (1.5 μg IL-2 equivalence) control IC (n = 4), Y60A IC (n = 5), V103A IC (n = 4), Y33A IC (n = 4), F5111 IC (n = 5), or F5111.2 IC (n = 4). Data represent mean + SD. Statistical significance compared with F5111 IC is shown (all data in Table S6).

(B) Plot of Treg:CD8+ T cell in vivo expansion ratio versus pSTAT5 EC50 on human Tregs (Figure S4C, left; Table S4). Data were fit to a Gaussian distribution.

(C) Non-negative matrix factorization (NNMF) loadings plot (left) and scores plot (right) of in vivo cell subset expansion studies in NOD mice. *p ≤ 0.05, **p ≤ 0.01,</p>***p ≤ 0.001, ****p ≤ 0.0001. See also Figures S4 and S5.

We also evaluated our panel of IC variants in a humanized mouse model. BALB/c Rag2−/−γc−/− H2d mice engrafted with human PBMC were treated with ICs and immune cell subset expansion in the peritoneum was measured. In contrast to NOD mouse results, optimal Treg expansion bias was observed for Y60A IC and Y33A IC (Figure S4F), which have weaker cytokine/antibody affinity than the parent F5111 IC. Thus, the optimal Treg-promoting therapy may vary between mice and humans.

To assess the impact of Fc effector function on IC-induced Treg expansion, we compared immune activation by the IC with and without the N297A mutation. F5111 IC with the N297A mutation (impaired Fc effector function) led to significantly more Treg bias and >3-fold more Treg expansion (Figure S5B); thus we elected to employ F5111 IC with impaired Fc effector function in mouse models of disease.

F5111 IC exhibits greater Treg bias than hIL-2/F5111.2 complex

We hypothesized that the IC could have stability improvements over cytokine/antibody complexes; thus, we compared the previously reported lead IL-2/antibody complex (hIL-2/F5111.2 complex) (Trotta et al., 2018) to our lead construct (F5111 IC). The N297A mutation was installed in the F5111.2 antibody for consistency with F5111 IC. Bio-layer interferometry studies showed that the F5111.2 antibody and hIL-2/F5111.2 complex (1:1 molar ratio) bound to hIL-2, whereas F5111 IC and control IC had little to no hIL-2 binding (Figure S5C, left; Table S2). hIL-2/F5111.2 complex bound hIL-2Rα with ~18-fold weaker affinity than F5111 IC and control IC and ~3-fold weaker affinity than free hIL-2 (Figure S5C, middle; Table S2), consistent with previous data (Trotta et al., 2018). Both hIL-2/F5111.2 complex and F5111 IC fully blocked binding to hIL-2Rβ (Figure S5C, right; Table S2).

On human Tregs, F5111 IC and hIL-2/F5111.2 complex (1:1 molar ratio) were ~1,700- and ~10-fold weaker than control IC on Tregs, respectively (Figure 5A, left; Table S4). On CD8+ T cells, F5111 IC and hIL-2/F5111.2 reduced the EMax by 85% and 80%, respectively, relative to control IC (Figure 5A, middle; Table S4). On TConv cells, F5111 IC was ~1,000-fold weaker with a 60% reduction in EMax, whereas hIL-2/F5111.2 complex was ~7-fold weaker with a 50% reduction in EMax relative to control IC (Figure 5A, middle; Table S4).

Figure 5. F5111 IC shows greater Treg bias than hIL-2/F5111.2 complex.

Figure 5.

(A) pSTAT5 response of stimulated human Treg (left), CD8+ T (middle), and TConv (right) cells. hIL-2/F5111.2 complex (Cx) was at a 1:1 molar ratio.

(B–E) NOD mice (n = 4 per group) were treated daily for 4 days with PBS, 1.5 μg hIL-2 with 6.6 μg F5111.2 antibody (1:2 molar ratio), or 8.2 μg (1.5 μg IL-2 equivalence) control IC or F5111 IC.

(B) Number of Treg, CD8+ T, TConv, and NK cells.

(C) MFI of FOXP3 within Tregs (left) and IL-2Rα MFI within Treg, CD8+ T, and TConv cells.

(D) Treg:CD8+ T (left), Treg:TConv (middle), and Treg:NK cell (right) ratios.

(E) Percent Tregs within the CD4+ T cell population.

(F) Percent Ki-67+ cells within Treg, CD8+ T, TConv, and NK cells from NOD mice (n = 5 per group) treated as in (B–E). Data represent mean ± SD. Statistical significance between control IC, hIL-2/F5111.2 Cx, and F5111 IC shown. *p ≤ 0.05, **p ≤ 0.01, ***p ≤ 0.001, ****p ≤ 0.0001. See also Figure S5; Table S4.

NOD mouse studies showed that both F5111 IC and hIL-2/F5111.2 complex (2:1 cytokine:antibody molar ratio) led to 15-fold increases in the total number of Tregs compared with untreated mice, and induced 3-fold more Treg expansion than control IC (Figure 5B). F5111 IC and hIL-2/F111.2 complex treatment also led to significantly less CD8+ T, TConv, and NK cell expansion compared with control IC, with the IC inducing less Eff expansion than the complex (Figure 5B). Both F5111 IC and hIL-2/F5111.2 complex elevated expression of forkhead box P3 (FOXP3) within the Treg population compared with control IC, with the IC inducing significantly more FOXP3 expression than the complex (Figure 5C). In addition, F5111 IC and hIL-2/F5111.2 complex increased IL-2Rα expression on Treg, CD8+ T, and TConv cells relative to control IC (Figure 5C). Both F5111 IC and hIL-2/F5111.2 complex augmented the Treg:CD8+ T, Treg:TConv, and Treg:NK cell ratios compared with control IC, with the IC eliciting significantly more bias than the complex (Figure 5D). Notably, F5111 IC treatment resulted in >80% Tregs within the CD4+ population, a massive expansion over the 10% Treg proportion observed in saline-treated mice (Figure 5E). F5111 IC treatment also significantly increased the percentage of Ki-67+ (proliferating) Tregs and lowered the percentage of Ki-67+ CD8+ T, TConv, and NK cells compared with hIL-2/F5111.2 complex and control IC (Figure 5F). Taken together, our in vivo data showcase the Treg-biasing capacity of F5111 IC, and demonstrate its superiority to cytokine/antibody complex.

F5111 IC induces durable expansion of functional Tregs

Dose dependence studies of F5111 IC-induced Treg expansion showed that Treg frequency within the CD4+ T cell population was consistent down to a dose of 0.5 μg IL-2 equivalence (Figure S5D). Kinetic studies revealed that Treg percentage within the CD4+ population was highest 1 day after the final of four daily F5111 IC doses, and the percentage declined monotonically for each subsequent time point but still remained elevated after 1 week (Figures 6A and 6B). Similarly, maximum Treg bias was observed 1 day after the last dose, and bias was mostly gone after 5 days (Figure 6C). Serum levels of F5111 IC in C57BL/6 mice followed a two-phase decay with a fast half-life of ~5 min and a slow half-life of 35 h (Figure 6D).

Figure 6. F5111 IC expands functional Tregs without compromising infection immunity.

Figure 6.

(A–C) C57BL/6 mice (n = 3 per group) were treated daily for 4 days (intraperitoneally) with PBS or 8.2 μg F5111 IC (1.5 μg IL-2 equivalence) and spleens were harvested at the indicated times.

(A) Representative flow plots showing Treg percentage and IL-2Rα versus FOXP3 levels in CD4+ T cells at the indicated times. (B) Percent Tregs within CD4+ T cells at the indicated times. (C) Treg:CD8+ T (left), Treg:TConv (middle), and Treg:NK (right) at the indicated times. Dashed lines show baseline values for the PBS-treated cohort harvested 1 day after the last dose.

(D) Serum half-life of F5111 IC in C57BL/6 mice (n = 5) treated retro-orbitally with 2 mg/kg F5111 IC (~0.4 mg/kg IL-2 equivalence).

(E) C57BL/6 CD45.1 RFP-FOXP3 mice were treated daily for 4 days with PBS (n = 3) or 6.2 μg F5111 IC (1.125 μg IL-2 equivalence, n = 2). Percent proliferation suppression of TConv cells from untreated C57BL/6 CD45.2 mice (n = 5) by titrating ratios of Tregs from spleens of treated mice is shown.

(F) C57BL/6 mice (n = 5 per group) were dosed on days 0, 2, and 4 with PBS or 8.2 μg (1.5 μg IL-2 equivalence) control IC or F5111 IC. Spleens were harvested on day 6. Number of cTregs (CD4+FOXP3+IL-2RαHighBCL-2High) and effector (eTregs) (CD4+FOXP3+IL-2RαLowBCL-2Low) are shown.

(G–I) C57BL/6 mice were administered 25 cysts of T. gondii on day 0. The control group was not given cysts. Starting on day 1, mice were treated daily for 5 days with PBS (control, n = 5; PBS, n = 4) or 8.2 μg (1.5 μg IL-2 equivalence) control IC (n = 5) or F5111 IC (n = 5). Mice were sacrificed on day 10. (G) Mouse weight. (H) Parasite burden. (I) Treg:T-bet+Tetramer (Tet)+ CD8+ T cell ratio in the spleen. (G–I) Mean ± SEM. All other data are mean ± SD. Statistical significance in percent initial weight on day 10 compared with F5111 IC is shown. *p ≤ 0.05, **p ≤ 0.01, ***p ≤ 0.001, ****p ≤ 0.0001. See also Figure S5.

To characterize the functional properties of Tregs expanded by F5111 IC, we conducted a suppression assay using Tregs isolated from C57BL/6 CD45.1 RFP-FOXP3 mice treated with either saline or F5111 IC. Compared with Tregs isolated from saline-treated mice, Tregs expanded by F5111 IC had equivalent suppressive capacity against naive TConv cells from C57BL/6 CD45.2 mice. (Figure 6E). We also assessed the phenotype of F5111 IC-expanded Tregs from C57BL/6 mice and found significantly increased numbers of conventional Tregs (cTregs) (CD4+FOXP3+IL-2RαHighBCL-2High) but not effector Tregs (CD4+FOXP3+IL-2RαLowBCL-2Low) (Figure 6F). Interestingly, control IC treatment resulted in a reduced number of cTregs compared with saline-treated mice, whereas eTreg numbers were not affected. This aligns with the mechanism of F5111 IC, which biases the molecule toward immune cell subsets with high levels of IL-2Rα.

F5111 IC treatment does not impair immune response to infection

A potential concern for therapeutic administration of a Treg-promoting agent, such as F5111 IC, is that it may interfere with T cell-mediated clearance of infection (Belkaid and Tarbell, 2009; Belkaid et al., 2006; Oldenhove et al., 2009; Sacks and Anderson, 2004). We therefore probed the effects of F5111 IC in a mouse model of toxoplasmosis. Treatment with either F5111 IC or control IC following Toxoplasma gondii infection conferred protection against disease-associated weight loss compared with saline treatment (Figure 6G), and no significant differences were observed in lung parasite burden (Figure 6H). Control IC and F5111 IC led to similar changes in parasite burden in the liver relative to saline treatment. Histological analysis of immune-mediated liver pathology in control IC-treated mice showed exacerbated leukophilia and necrosis compared with saline-treated mice (Figure S5E). Interestingly, despite similar parasite burden to control IC-treated animals, F5111 IC-treated mice showed an overall reduction in immunopathological changes compared with saline-treated mice (Figure S5E). Importantly, F5111 IC and control IC behaved similarly in this model even though F5111 IC significantly increased Treg numbers (Figure S5F) and skewed ratios of Tregs to both T-bet+Tetramer+ CD8+ T cells (Figure 6I) and T-bet+Tetramer+ CD4+ TConv cells (Figure S5G). Expanded Tregs showed evidence of active proliferation (Figure S5H) and upregulation of IL-2Rα (Figure S5I). Overall, this study suggests that, although F5111 IC promotes Treg expansion, it does not impair infection clearance.

F5111 IC efficacy in a mouse colitis model

To evaluate the potential for F5111 IC to prevent autoimmune disease development, we assessed its performance as a prophylactic treatment in a mouse dextran sulfate sodium (DSS)-induced mouse colitis model (Chassaing et al., 2014; Cooper et al., 1993; Okayasu et al., 1990; Spangler et al., 2015a, 2018) (Figure 7A). Both F5111 IC and hIL-2/F5111.2 complex significantly reduced the severity of weight loss and led to decreased disease activity scores on day 15 compared with saline and control IC treatment (Figures 7B, 7C, S6A, and S6B). Relative to control mice without DSS exposure, mice treated with F5111 IC and hIL-2/F5111.2 complex exhibited a less significant colon length reduction compared with mice treated with saline or control IC (Figure 7D). Colon histology analysis revealed that both F5111 IC and hIL-2/F5111.2 complex treatment led to reduced histopathological scores compared with control IC and saline treatment (Figures 7E and S6C). Overall, this colitis model illustrated the capacity of F5111 IC to confer protection against autoimmune disease pathogenesis.

Figure 7. F5111 IC confers protection in mouse models of autoimmune disease.

Figure 7.

(A) BALB/c mice (n = 6 per group) were treated daily for 7 days with PBS (control and PBS), 1.5 μg hIL-2 complexed with 6.6 μg F5111.2 antibody (1:2 molar ratio, hIL-2/F5111.2 Cx), or 8.2 μg (1.5 μg IL-2 equivalence) control IC or F5111 IC. Beginning on day 7, all groups except disease-free control received 3% DSS in their drinking water.

(B) Weight change.

(C) Disease activity index (DAI).

(D) Colon lengths on day 15 (n = 6 PBS, Cx, F5111 IC, control; n = 5 control IC).

(E) H&E-stained colons from treated mice (n = 5 control, control IC; n = 6 PBS, Cx, F5111 IC). Scale bar, 200 μm. (B–D) Mean ± SEM. Weight change and DAI plots show significance of control IC-, Cx-, and F5111 IC-treated mice versus PBS-treated mice on day 15. Colon length plot shows significance compared with control group and between PBS- and F5111 IC-treated mice.

(F–H) NOD mice (n = 10 per group) were treated with PBS (control and PBS) or 8.2 μg (1.5 μg IL-2 equivalence) control IC or F5111 IC.

(G) Blood glucose concentrations. The gray line indicates the 250 mg/dL threshold.

(H) Percent diabetes-free mice. Statistical significance compared with mice treated with PBS + anti-PD-1 is shown. *p ≤ 0.05, **p ≤ 0.01, ***p ≤ 0.001, ****p ≤ 0.0001. See also Figure S6.

F5111 IC is protective in a mouse model of immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced diabetes mellitus

To further evaluate the therapeutic potential for F5111 IC, we examined its performance in a mouse model of immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced diabetes mellitus (Ansari et al., 2003; Fife et al., 2006; Hu et al., 2020). This model mimics the etiology of a current clinical concern, in which cancer patients treated with immunotherapies are at risk of developing immune-related adverse events, including diabetes (Quandt et al., 2021; Stamatouli et al., 2018; Young et al., 2018). NOD mice were treated with saline, control IC, or F5111 IC, and then administered anti-mouse PD-1 antibody to induce disease (Figure 7F). Salinetreated mice began developing diabetes on day 12, whereas a proportion of control IC-treated mice showed accelerated diabetes onset starting on day 4 (Figures 7G and 7H). In contrast, all mice treated with F5111 IC remained diabetes free until day 22. On day 44 (before onset of spontaneous disease in the control group that did not receive anti-PD-1), 60% of mice treated with F5111 IC were diabetes free, whereas only 10% of mice in the saline-treated group were diabetes free. Disease-free survival was found to be significantly improved for F5111 IC-treated but not control IC-treated mice compared with salinetreated mice. To further assess the durability of F5111 IC therapy in this model, we performed a similar study over 175 days (Figure S6D). F5111 IC led to significant long-term protection compared with saline in immune checkpoint inhibitor-treated mice, as no additional animals developed diabetes after day 31 (Figures S6E and S6F). Control mice that did not receive anti-PD-1 antibody began developing spontaneous diabetes on day 50 and, by day 157, all mice had disease. These studies highlight that the biased Treg expansion induced by F5111 IC is protective in preventing the onset of immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced diabetes in mice and hint that therapy may also help prevent spontaneous diabetes onset in NOD mice.

DISCUSSION

Biased cytokines are of great interest as therapeutics due to their potential to harness the power of natural proteins and precisely regulate their biological effects (Spangler et al., 2015b). Ongoing efforts in cytokine targeting include mutein engineering (Peterson et al., 2018; Carmenate et al., 2018; Khoryati et al., 2020; Glassman et al., 2021), selective PEG-ylation (Charych et al., 2016; Dixit et al., 2021; Zhang et al., 2021), and cytokine/antibody complex design (Arenas-Ramirez et al., 2016; Boyman et al., 2006; De Paula et al., 2020; Karakus et al., 2020; Lee et al., 2020b; Spangler et al., 2015a; Tomala et al., 2009; Trotta et al., 2018; Yokoyama et al., 2018). Here, we built upon a Treg-biasing anti-hIL-2 antibody (Trotta et al., 2018) and engineered a single-chain hIL-2/antibody fusion protein (F5111 IC). Compared with hIL-2/antibody complexes, our IC benefits from extended serum half-life, enhanced stability, and reduced counterproductive activation of Effs. Also, the single-chain format results in a stoichiometrically balanced cytokine-to-antibody ratio and streamlines the clinical development pathway. Indeed, F5111 IC induced a more pronounced Treg bias compared with hIL-2/F5111.2 complex.

Tethering IL-2 to an anti-IL-2 antibody enhances the apparent affinity of the cytokine/antibody interaction (Spangler et al., 2018). However, the mechanism of action for biased immune activation by hIL-2/F5111.2 complex requires cytokine/antibody dissociation. We speculated that the strengthened hIL-2/F5111.2 interaction in the context of the IC would hinder cytokine dissociation, rationalizing our choice to use the weaker affinity F5111 antibody in our IC. In fact, when the F5111.2 antibody was formatted as an IC, Treg activation was severely impaired. Thus, although hIL-2/F5111.2 complex led to enhanced Treg bias compared with the hIL-2/F5111 complex, F5111 outperformed F5111.2 when formatted as ICs.

Based on this finding, as well as the differential IL-2Rα expression patterns between mouse and human immune cells, we designed a panel of F5111 IC variants with varying cytokine/antibody affinities and consequent IL-2 receptor interaction properties. Although cellular studies showed increased Treg activation potency for IC variants, this improved activity was accompanied by increased potency on Effs. The IL-2Rα affinities of IC variants were identical, and discrepancies in IL-2Rβ affinities drove differential immune cell subset engagement. Furthermore, IL-2Rα expression levels were lower within CD8+ T and TConv cell populations activated by IC variants with higher Treg potencies, indicating that these ICs have a lower threshold for activation in the presence of IL-2Rα. Insights from our affinity modulation studies thus provide a roadmap for designing biased IL-2 therapies.

We deployed our IC variants in vivo, and a clear cytokine/antibody affinity optimum emerged for the parent F5111 IC, balancing activation of Tregs with concurrent stimulation of Effs. The Treg EC50 for F5111 IC was poised at an optimum; enhanced activity on Tregs confounded bias by activating Effs as well, whereas attenuated activity on Tregs led to poor stimulation of all cell types. Importantly, IL-2 receptor expression levels differ between human and mouse cells, and the affinities of receptor subunits toward hIL-2 also vary across species (Spangler et al., 2015a). We observed that the optimal IC variant for biased Treg expansion in humanized mice differed from that in immunocompetent mice, suggesting the possibility for designing patient-specific treatments to address IL-2 receptor level heterogeneity.

F5111 IC design efforts emphasized the importance of optimizing linker length. Shorter linker lengths hindered intramolecular assembly of the cytokine and antibody, driving intermolecular interactions that resulted in higher-order oligomers. Moreover, IC variants with higher Treg potencies eluted as broad single peaks by SEC, whereas F5111.2 IC eluted as a single peak at the expected molecular weight for the monomeric IC, suggesting that stronger cytokine/antibody interactions reduce IC oligomerization. Direct comparison of ICs with intact versus impaired effector function capabilities showed that curbing antibody effector function is critical for avoiding Treg depletion via antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity (Saunders, 2019; Wang et al., 2018). Collectively, these findings will guide future IL-2 IC design, and use of the modular hIgG1 scaffold enables extension of the IC approach to other cytokines.

In vivo studies showed that F5111 IC improves autoimmune disease outcomes in mice, without compromising pathogen clearance. This represents an important translational achievement for the application of hIL-2-based therapies in autoimmune disease treatment, which is hindered by the cytokine’s short half-life, dosing complications, off-target effects, and toxicity. Deployment of an IL-2-based therapy in a mouse model of immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced diabetes showed that F5111 IC confers long-term protection against drug-induced disease and continues to protect mice even when control mice develop spontaneous disease. F5111 IC had the reverse effect of control IC, which accelerated disease development, likely due to stimulation of Effs. Acceleration of diabetes onset resonates with previous reports that IL-2 and untethered IL-2/antibody complexes can exacerbate disease pathogenesis (Dong et al., 2021; Tang et al., 2008; Wesley et al., 2010), highlighting the safety, selectivity, and efficacy advantages for our IC. Our therapeutic approach could be extended to additional autoimmune conditions, including multiple sclerosis, systemic lupus erythematosus, and GVHD (Klatzmann and Abbas, 2015; Koreth et al., 2011; Webster et al., 2009), and it could also be leveraged to suppress anti-drug immune responses or to prevent immune-related adverse events in cancer patients (June et al., 2017; Kang et al., 2021; Quandt et al., 2021; Stamatouli et al., 2018).

F5111 IC biases the activity of IL-2 while also extending its serum half-life; however, it does not target IL-2 toward specific tissues. Several recent approaches have been taken to target IL-2 and other cytokines to specific locations, such as the tumor microenvironment (Hutmacher et al., 2019; Mortara et al., 2018; Ongaro et al., 2020; Silver et al., 2021). Our approach could be integrated with these emerging technologies to bias the local immune microenvironment and enhance therapy. In addition, F5111 could be incorporated with antigen-specific immune-activating technologies to enable targeted activation of disease-protective Tregs. Overall, this work presents a stable, off-the-shelf Treg-expanding agent with potential applications as a research tool and for therapeutic design.

Limitations of the study

Certain limitations need to be addressed in future studies of F5111 IC to advance clinical translation. Mechanistic experiments will consider the comparative effects of F5111 IC on various Treg subsets. For instance, detection of Helios and Neuropilin-1 could be used to interrogate the expansion and survival of thymically versus peripherally derived Tregs (Weiss et al., 2012; Yadav et al., 2012). Additional phenotyping and RNA sequencing studies are also needed to compare the functional activity of F5111 IC-expanded Tregs relative to endogenous Tregs. It will also be important to characterize Treg persistence in disease models to better understand the long-term effects of F5111 IC.

We note that autoimmune disease models in this study used prophylactic treatment strategies due to the rapid onset of pathogenesis. Although there is evidence that preventative treatment can be effective in delaying development of type 1 diabetes (Herold et al., 2019) and that prophylactic therapy could offer benefit in rheumatoid arthritis (Dekkers et al., 2017), such early interventions are not always possible. Thus, future work will explore autoimmune disease reversal. We plan to demonstrate generality of F5111 IC through testing in additional contexts, such as GVHD and allograft rejection models and the experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis model of multiple sclerosis. Furthermore, although the DSS colitis model has been widely used to evaluate IL-2-based therapies (Abo et al., 2019; Lee et al., 2020a; Sagiv et al., 2009; Spangler et al., 2015a), colitis can also be induced in immunodeficient mice lacking T and B cells using this model (Dieleman et al., 1994; Strober et al., 2002). Therefore, it will be important to demonstrate the clinical potential of F5111 IC in other colitis models, such as the chronic T cell transfer model or 2,4,6-trinitrobenzene sulfonic acid-induced colitis.

Finally, to advance clinical development of F5111 IC, it will be important to address developability considerations. For instance, further optimization of sequence and/or linker length may be needed to increase IC purity and yield. Also, it will be critical to benchmark our molecule against other IL-2-based therapies and Treg-biased molecules. Collectively, downstream studies of the activity, therapeutic efficacy, and biophysical properties of F5111 IC will offer valuable insight into its mechanistic activities and support therapeutic translation.

STAR★METHODS

RESOURCE AVAILABILITY

Lead contact

Further information and requests for resources and reagents should be directed to and will be fulfilled by the lead contact, Jamie Spangler (jamie.spangler@jhu.edu).

Materials availability

Reagent generated in this study will be made available on request, but we may require a completed Materials Transfer Agreement.

Data and code availability

  • All data reported in this paper will be shared by the lead contact upon request.

  • This paper does not report original code.

  • Any additional information required to reanalyze the data reported in this paper is available from the lead contact upon request.

EXPERIMENTAL MODEL AND SUBJECT DETAILS

Cell lines

HEK 293F cells (ThermoFisher Scientific) were cultivated in Freestyle 293 Expression Medium (ThermoFisher Scientific) supplemented with 2 U/mL penicillin-streptomycin (Gibco). Unmodified YT-1 (Yodoi et al., 1985) and IL-2Rα+ (Kuziel et al., 1993) YT-1 human NK cells were cultured in RPMI complete medium (RPMI 1640 medium supplemented with 10% FBS, 2 mM L-glutamine, 1x minimum non-essential amino acids, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 25 mM HEPES, and 100 U/mL penicillin-streptomycin [Gibco]). All cell lines were maintained at 37°C in a humidified atmosphere with 5% CO2.

Human PBMCs

For in vitro studies containing human PBMCs, leukopaks containing de-identified whole blood were obtained from Anne Arundel Medical Blood Donor Center (Anne Arundel, Maryland, USA). For the immune cell subset expansion studies in humanized mice, PBMCs were isolated from leukocyte cones from de-identified healthy volunteers (NHS Blood and Transport, UK). Human tissue samples taken by NHS Blood and Transport with informed consent and ethical approval from the Oxfordshire Research Ethics Committee, study number 07/H0605/130.

Mice

Female NOD/ShiLt and both male and female C57BL/6 mice were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory unless otherwise specified. Mice were used at 8 weeks of age. Animals were housed in specific pathogen-free conditions and experiments conducted in accordance with National Institutes of Health guidelines, and approval by the Johns Hopkins University Animal Care and Use Committee.

For the immune cell subset expansion studies in humanized mice, male BRG mice were obtained from The Jackson Laboratory and were maintained under specific pathogen-free conditions in the Biomedical Services Unit of the University of Oxford (Oxford, United Kingdom). Mice were used at 8 weeks of age. All experiments in this study were performed using protocols approved by the Committee on Animal Care and Ethical Review at the University of Oxford and in accordance with the UK Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986.

For the in vitro Treg suppression assay, both male and female C57BL/6 CD45.1 and C57BL/6 FOXP3-IRES-mRFP mice were purchased from The Jackson Laboratory. For the C57BL/6 CD45.1; RFP-FOXP3 mice, C57BL/6 CD45.1 and C57BL/6 FOXP3-IRES-mRFP mice were bred in house to homozygosity and maintained. 8-week-old female C57BL/6 CD45.1; RFP-FOXP3 mice were used for all studies. All mice were housed and bred under specific pathogen-free conditions at Johns Hopkins University Animal Care and Use Facility in Cancer Research Building I. The Institutional Animal Care and Use Facility at Johns Hopkins University approved all animal experiments.

For the comparison of cTreg versus eTreg expansion and the Toxoplasma gondii infection mouse model, 6-week-old male C57BL/6 mice were purchased from Taconic Biosciences (Rensselaer, NY, USA) and kept in the University of Pennsylvania Department of Pathobiology vivarium until they reached 8–9 weeks of age for experimental use. CBA/Ca mice were purchased from the Jackson Laboratory and maintained kept in the University of Pennsylvania Department of Pathobiology vivarium. Mice housed in the University of Pennsylvania Department of Pathobiology vivarium were maintained under institutional guidelines of 12-hour light/dark cycles, temperature ranges of 68–77°F and humidity ranging from 35–55%. Ethical oversight of all animal use in this study was approved by the University of Pennsylvania Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.

For the DSS-induced colitis mouse model, female BALB/c mice were acquired from the colony kept at the Czech Centre for Phenogenomics, Prague, Czech Republic. Mice were used at 8 weeks of age. They were housed and handled according to the institutional committee guidelines with free access to food and water. Animal experiments were approved by the Animal Care and Use Committee of the Institute of Molecular Genetics and were in agreement with local legal requirements and ethical guidelines.

For the immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced diabetes mellitus mouse model, female NOD/ShiLtJ mice were purchased from the Jackson Laboratory and maintained in the UCSF specific pathogen-free animal facility in accordance with guidelines established by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee and Laboratory Animal Resource Center. Mice were used at 8 weeks of age.

METHOD DETAILS

Protein purification and expression

The published VH and VL sequences of F5111 (Trotta et al., 2018) were used to formulate the recombinant F5111 antibody on the human IgG1 lambda isotype platform. The heavy chain (HC) and LC of the F5111 antibody were separately cloned into the gWiz vector (Genlantis). Antibodies were expressed recombinantly in HEK 293F cells via transient co-transfection of plasmids encoding the HC and LC. HC and LC plasmids were titrated in small-scale co-transfection tests to determine optimal ratios for large-scale expression. HEK 293F cells were grown to 1.2×106 cells/mL and diluted to 1.0×106 cells/mL. Midiprepped DNA (1 mg total of HC and LC plasmids per liter of cells) and 2 mg per liter of cells of polyethyleneimine (PEI, Polysciences) were independently diluted to 0.05 and 0.1 mg/mL in OptiPro medium (ThermoFisher Scientific), respectively, and incubated at room temperature for 15 minutes. Equal volumes of DNA and PEI were mixed and incubated at room temperature for an additional 15 minutes. Subsequently, the diluted HEK 293F cells and 40 mL/L of DNA/PEI mixture were added to a shaking flask and incubated at 37°C and 5% CO2 with rotation at 125 rpm for 5 days. Secreted antibodies were purified from cell supernatants 5 days post-transfection via protein G agarose (ThermoFisher Scientific) affinity chromatography followed by SEC on a Superdex 200 Increase 10/300 GL column (GE Healthcare) on a fast protein liquid chromatography (FPLC) instrument, equilibrated in HEPES-buffered saline (HBS, 150 mM NaCl in 10 mM HEPES pH 7.3). Purity (>99%) was verified by SDS-PAGE analysis.

For F5111 IC production, the hIL-2 cytokine (residues 1–133) was fused at the N-terminus of the F5111 antibody LC, connected by either a flexible 15-amino acid (Gly4Ser)3 linker (F5111 IC LN15), a 25-amino acid (Gly4Ser)5 linker (F5111 IC LN25), or a 35-amino acid (Gly4Ser)7 linker (F5111 IC LN35). We prepared a plasmid encoding the hIL-2-fused F5111 LC into the gWiz vector (Genlantis). ICs were expressed and purified via transient co-transfection of HEK 293F cells with the F5111 HC and the hIL-2-fused F5111 LC plasmids, as described for the F5111 antibody. F5111 IC variants (all with a 35-amino acid linker) were generated in the same manner, with the indicated single-point mutation in either the HC or the hIL-2 fused LC construct. The following single-point mutations were made to the VH sequence: Y35A, Y52A, Y54A, Y60A, and V103A. The following single-point mutations were made to the VL sequence: Y33A, Y94A, and S96A. The sequence for the F5111.2 antibody and F5111.2 IC constructs was obtained from the following patent: (Rondon et al., 2015).

The Control IC was generated in the same manner as described for F5111 IC. Published VH and VL sequences of the FITC-E2 antibody (Honegger et al., 2005) were used to formulate the recombinant Control IC on the human IgG1 lambda isotype platform. hIL-2 (residues 1–133) was fused at the N-terminus of the LC, connected by a 35-amino acid (Gly4Ser)7 linker. Separate plasmids were constructed in the gWiz vector (Genlantis) encoding the Control HC and the hIL-2-fused Control LC. The Control IC was expressed via transient co-transfection of HEK 293F cells with the HC and hIL-2-fused LC plasmids. Purification proceeded as described for the F5111 antibody.

Antibody or IC constructs with Fc effector function knocked out were generated in the same manner as above, using a HC plasmid with the N297A mutation (Mimura et al., 2000, 2001; Saunders, 2019; Tao et al., 1993; Wang et al., 2018). In all studies, the F5111.2 antibody includes the N297A mutation. All in vivo studies were performed with constructs with Fc effector function knocked out unless otherwise noted.

The hIL-2 cytokine (residues 1–133) was cloned into the gWiz vector (Genlantis) with a C-terminal hexahistidine tag. Protein was expressed via transient transfection of HEK 293F cells, as detailed for antibody constructs, and purified via Ni-NTA affinity chromatography followed by SEC using a Superdex 200 Increase 10/300 GL column (GE Healthcare) on an FPLC instrument, equilibrated in HBS. Purity (>99%) was verified by SDS-PAGE analysis.

For expression of biotinylated hIL-2, and the extracellular domains of the hIL-2Rα (residues 1–217) and hIL-2Rβ (residues 1–214) receptor subunits sequences were cloned into the gWiz vector (Genlantis) with a C-terminal biotin acceptor peptide (BAP)-GLNDIFEAQKIEWHE followed by a hexahistidine tag. Proteins were expressed and purified via Ni-NTA affinity chromatography and then biotinylated with the soluble BirA ligase enzyme in 0.5 mM Bicine pH 8.3, 100 mM ATP, 100 mM magnesium acetate, and 500 mM biotin (Avidity). Excess biotin was removed by SEC on a Superdex 200 Increase 10/300 column (GE Healthcare) on an FPLC instrument, equilibrated in HBS. Complete biotinylation was verified via SDS-PAGE streptavidin shift assay.

Yeast surface binding studies

For binding studies on yeast, hIL-2 (residues 1–133) or mIL-2 (residues 1–149) were cloned into the pCT3CBN yeast display vector (a variant of pCT302 (Boder and Wittrup, 1997) with an N-terminal yeast agglutinin protein (Aga2) fusion followed by a 3C protease site, a C-terminal myc epitope tag, and BamHI/NotI gene-flanking restriction sites). After induction for 48 hours, 1×105 cells of IL-2-displaying yeast per well were transferred to a 96-well plate and incubated in PBE (PBS with 0.1% BSA and 1 mM EDTA) containing serial dilutions of recombinant F5111 antibody for 2 hours at room temperature. Cells were then washed and stained with anti-human IgG Fc APC (HP6017, BioLegend 409306, 1:50) in PBE for 15 minutes at 4°C. After a final wash, cells were analyzed for antibody binding using a CytoFLEX flow cytometer (Beckman Coulter). Background-subtracted and normalized binding curves were fitted to a first-order binding model, and KD values were determined using GraphPad Prism. Studies were performed three times with similar results.

Bio-layer interferometry binding measurements

Binding studies were performed using bio-layer interferometry on an OctetRED96® bio-layer interferometry instrument (Molecular Devices). Biotinylated hIL-2, hIL-2Rα, and hIL-2Rβ were immobilized to streptavidin-coated biosensors (Sartorius) in 0.45 μm filtered PBSA (PBS pH 7.2 containing 0.1% BSA). hIL-2 and hIL-2Rβ were immobilized at a concentration of 50 nM for 120 seconds and hIL-2Rα was immobilized at a concentration of 100 nM for 120 seconds. Once baseline measurements were collected in PBSA, binding kinetics were measured by submerging the biosensors in wells containing serial dilutions of the appropriate analyte for 300 seconds (association) followed by submerging the biosensor in wells containing only PBSA for 600 seconds (dissociation). hIL-2/F5111 or hIL-2/F5111.2 complexes were formed by incubating a 1:1 molar ratio of the F5111 antibody to hIL-2 for 60 minutes at 37°C and then diluting to the appropriate concentration. An irrelevant protein (the monoclonal antibody trastuzumab) was immobilized to a reference streptavidin biosensor for subtraction of non-specific binding. Tips were regenerated in 0.1 M glycine pH 2.7. Data was visualized and processed using the Octet® Data Analysis software version 7.1 (Molecular Devices). Equilibrium titration curve fitting and equilibrium dissociation constant (KD) value determination was implemented using GraphPad Prism, assuming all binding interactions to be first order. Experiments were reproduced two times with similar results.

YT-1 human NK cell activation studies

Approximately 2×105 IL-2Rα+ YT-1 or IL-2Rα YT-1 cells were plated in each well of a 96-well plate and resuspended in 20 μL of RPMI complete medium containing serial dilutions of either hIL-2, hIL-2/F5111 complexes, or IC. hIL-2/F5111 complexes were formed by incubating a 1:1 molar ratio of the F5111 antibody to hIL-2 for 60 minutes at 37°C and then diluting to the appropriate concentration. Cells were stimulated for 20 minutes at 37°C and immediately fixed by addition of paraformaldehyde (Electron Microscopy Sciences) to a final concentration of 1.5% and incubated for 10 minutes at room temperature. Permeabilization of cells was achieved by resuspension in 200 μL of ice-cold 100% methanol (MilliporeSigma) for 30 minutes at 4°C. Fixed and permeabilized cells were washed twice with PBSA and incubated with anti-pSTAT5 AlexaFluor 647 (pY694, BD Biosciences 562076, 1:50) diluted in 20 μL of PBSA for 2 hours at room temperature. Cells were then washed twice in PBSA and analyzed on a CytoFLEX flow cytometer (BeckmanCoulter). Dose-response curves were fitted to a logistic model and maximum values (EMax) and half maximal effective concentration (EC50) values were calculated using GraphPad Prism data analysis software after subtraction of the MFI of unstimulated cells and normalization to the maximum signal intensity. Experiments were conducted in triplicate and performed at least twice with similar results.

Human PBMC and mouse splenocyte activation studies

For IL-2 induced pSTAT5 assays in human PBMCs, leukopaks containing de-identified whole blood were obtained from Anne Arundel Medical Blood Donor Center (Anne Arundel, Maryland, USA). Human PBMCs were isolated from whole blood by density gradient centrifugation using a standard Ficoll gradient (Ficoll Paque, MilliporeSigma) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. PBMCs were subjected to ACK red blood cell lysis (Quality Biological) and resuspended in PBS. Approximately 2×106 cells/well were then plated into 96-well plate, pelleted, and resuspended in 40 μL of RPMI complete medium containing serial dilutions of the appropriate treatment. hIL-2/antibody complexes were formed by incubating a 1:1 molar ratio of hIL-2 to either the F5111 or F5111.2 antibody for 60 minutes at 37°C and then diluting to the appropriate concentration. Cells were stimulated for 20 minutes at 37°C and immediately fixed by addition of 160 μL of 1× TFP Fix/Perm buffer (Transcription Factor Phospho Buffer Set, BD Biosciences) and incubated at 4°C for 50 minutes. 40 μL 1× TFP Perm/Wash buffer (Transcription Factor Phospho Buffer Set, BD Biosciences) was then added to each well, and cells were then pelleted and washed again with 200 μL of 1× TFP Perm/Wash buffer. Permeabilization was achieved by resuspending the cells in 150 μL of Perm Buffer III (BD Biosciences) and incubating for 30 minutes at 4°C. Cells were then washed with 200 μL of 1× TFP Perm/Wash buffer and then resuspended in 50 μL of 1× TFP Perm/Wash buffer containing the following antibodies: anti-human CD3 APC-eFlour780 (UCHT1, ThermoFisher Scientific 47–0038-42, 1:50), anti-human CD4 PerCp-Cy5.5 (SK3, BD Biosciences 341654, 1:20), anti-human CD8 BV605 (SK1, BioLegend 344742, 1:50), anti-human IL-2Rα BV421 (M-A251, BD Biosciences 562442, 1:100), anti-human FOXP3 PE (236A/E7, BD Biosciences 560852, 1:50), anti-pSTAT5 AlexaFluor 647 (pY694, BD Biosciences 562076, 1:50), and anti-human CD127 Alexa Fluor 488 (eBioRDR5, ThermoFisher Scientific 53–1278-42, 1:50). Cells were incubated for 2 hours at room temperature and then washed twice with PBSA. Data were collected on a BD Biosciences LSRII flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson) and analyzed using FlowJo software (FlowJo, LLC). Tregs were gated as CD3+CD4+IL-2Rα-HighFOXP3High cells, CD8+ T cells were gated as CD3+CD8+ cells, and TConv cells were gated as CD3+CD4+ FOXP3 cells. pSTAT5 dose-response curves were fitted to a logistic model and EMax and EC50 values were calculated using GraphPad Prism data analysis software after subtraction of the MFI of unstimulated cells and normalization to the maximum signal intensity. Unless otherwise specified, PBMC activation experiments were conducted in triplicate and performed at least twice using PBMCs from independent donors.

For IL-2-induced pSTAT5 assays in murine lymphocytes, spleens from female NOD/ShiLtJ mice (The Jackson Laboratory) were collected and processed into a single-cell suspension followed by ACK red blood cell lysis (Quality Biological). Cells were seeded at 2×106 cells/well into a 96-well plate, and the same protocol as for PBMC studies was followed using a different panel of antibodies: anti-mouse CD3 BV510 (145–2C11, BioLegend 100353, 1:100), anti-mouse CD4 APC-eF780 (RM4–5, ThermoFisher Scientific 47-0042-82, 1:100), anti-mouse CD8a AlexaFluor 488 (53–6.7, BD Biosciences 557668, 1:50), anti-mouse IL-2Rα PE (PC61.5, ThermoFisher Scientific 12-0251-83, 1:100), anti-mouse FOXP3 eFlour450 (FJK-16s, ThermoFisher Scientific 48-5773-82, 1:50), and anti-pSTAT5 Alexa Fluor 647 (pY694, BD Biosciences 562076, 1:50). Mouse splenocyte activation studies were conducted in triplicate.

Quantification of IL-2Rα expression levels

Human PBMCs were isolated as described in the section “human PBMC and mouse splenocyte activation studies.” Approximately 2×106 human PBMCs/well or 0.2×106 YT-1 cells/well were resuspended in 50 μL of PBS containing LIVE/DEAD Fixable Blue Dead Cell Stain Kit (ThermoFisher Scientific L34961, 1:1000) and stained for 15 minutes at 4°C. Cells were washed with PBSA, resuspended in 40 μL of RPMI, and then fixed by addition of 160 μL of 1× TFP Fix/Perm buffer (Transcription Factor Phospho Buffer Set, BD Biosciences) and incubated at 4°C for 50 minutes. 40 μL 1× TFP Perm/Wash buffer (Transcription Factor Phospho Buffer Set, BD Biosciences) was then added to each well, and cells were then pelleted and washed again with 200 μL of 1× TFP Perm/Wash buffer. Permeabilization was achieved by resuspending the cells in 150 μL of Perm Buffer III (BD Biosciences) and incubating for 30 minutes at 4°C. Cells were then washed with 200 μL of 1× TFP Perm/Wash buffer and resuspended in 50 μL of 1× TFP Perm/Wash buffer containing the following antibodies: anti-human CD3 APC-eFlour780 (UCHT1, ThermoFisher Scientific 47-0038-42, 1:50), anti-human CD4 PerCp-Cy5.5 (SK3, BD Biosciences 566316, 1:100), anti-human CD8 BV605 (SK1, BioLegend 344742, 1:50), anti-human IL-2Rα BV421 (M-A251, BD Biosciences 562442, 1:100), and anti-human FOXP3 PE (236A/E7, BD Biosciences 560852, 1:50). For the IL-2Rα FMO control, the same panel was used minus the addition of anti-human IL-2Rα BV421. Cells were incubated for 2 hours at room temperature and then washed twice with PBSA. Data were collected on a BD Biosciences LSRII flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson) and analyzed using FlowJo software (FlowJo, LLC). Staining was conducted in triplicate and performed twice using PBMCs from independent donors.

Development of a multivalent binding model for IC signaling

The multivalent binding model used to predict cell type-specific signaling response to ICs was formulated as described in Tan et al. (Tan and Meyer, 2021). Each IL-2 molecule within the IC was assumed to bind to one free IL-2Rα and one IL-2Rβ/γc receptor; therefore, bivalent ICs were allowed to bind up to two IL-2Rα and IL-2Rβ/γc receptors each. Initial IL-2-IL-2Rα association was modeled as proceeding with the experimentally determined kinetics of monomeric ligand-receptor interaction. The affinities with which each IC initially interacted with IL-2Rβ/γc receptor dimer were inferred by fitting the binding model to our experimental in vitro pSTAT5 signaling data as described below, using least-squares fitting. Subsequent ligand-receptor binding interactions were modeled with an association constant proportional to the free receptor abundance and the monomeric affinity of receptor-ligand interaction multiplied by the scaling constant,Kx*. A single Kx* value was fit for all experiments and cell types when we fit our model to our in vitro pSTAT5 signaling data. To predict pSTAT5 response to IL-2 stimulation, we assumed that pSTAT5 is proportional to the amount of IL-2-bound IL-2Rβ/γc, as complexes which contain these species actively signal through the JAK/STAT pathway. Scaling factors converting from predicted active signaling species to pSTAT5 abundance were fit to experimental data on a per-experiment and cell type basis. The abundance of each IL-2 receptor subunit on each cell type was assumed to be equal to previously published experimental human PBMC receptor quantitation data (Farhat et al., 2021).

Immune cell subset expansion studies in NOD mice

For immune cell expansion studies in NOD mice (Tomala and Spangler, 2020), 8-week-old female NOD/ShiLtJ mice (4–5 mice per group, The Jackson Laboratory) were injected intraperitoneally (i.p.) for 4 consecutive days (Days 0, 1, 2, 3) with either 200 μL of PBS or the indicated treatment diluted in 200 μL of PBS. ICs were dosed at 8.2 μg per day (1.5 μg hIL-2 equivalence) and hIL-2/F5111.2 antibody complexes were formed by preincubating 1.5 μg hIL-2 with 6.6 μg F5111.2 antibody (1:2 antibody to cytokine molar ratio) in PBS for 60 min at 37°C. Mice were sacrificed 24 hours after the last dose (Day 4) by cervical dislocation, and spleens were harvested. Single-cell suspensions were prepared by mechanical homogenization and then subjected ACK red blood cell lysis (Quality Biological) and resuspended in PBS. Absolute count of splenocytes was assessed for each spleen. Approximately 2×106 cells were used per sample. To assess viability, cells were resuspended in 50 μL of PBS containing eBioscience Fixable Viability Dye eFluor780 (ThermoFisher Scientific 65-0865-18, 1:2000) and stained for 15 minutes at 4°C. Cells were then washed with PBSA and resuspended in 50 μL of PBSA containing the following antibodies: anti-mouse CD3 BV510 (145–2C11, BioLegend 100353, 1:50), anti-mouse CD4 eFluor450 (RM4–5, ThermoFisher Scientific 48-0042-82, 1:100), anti-mouse CD8a AlexaFluor 488 (53–6.7, BD Biosciences 557668, 1:50), anti-mouse IL-2Rα PE (PC61.5, ThermoFisher Scientific 12-0251-83, 1:100), anti-mouse CD49b PE-Cy7 (DX5, BioLegend 108992, 1:100), and anti-mouse CD16/CD32 (2.4G2, BD Biosciences 553142, 1:100). Cells were stained for 30 minutes at 4°C. Cells were then washed with PBSA and resuspended in 200 μL of 1× eBioscience Fixation/Permeabilization buffer (ThermoFisher Scientific) and incubated for 45 minutes at 4°C. 800 μL of 1× eBioscience Permeabilization buffer (ThermoFisher Scientific) was then added to each tube. Cells were subsequently resuspended in 50 μL of 1× eBioscience Permeabilization buffer containing anti-mouse FOXP3 APC (FJK-16s, ThermoFisher Scientific 17-5733-82, 1:80) and incubated for 45 minutes at 4°C. After a final wash and resuspension in PBSA, data were collected on a BD Biosciences LSRII flow cytometer (Becton Dickinson) and analyzed using FlowJo software (FlowJo, LLC). Tregs were gated as CD3+CD4+IL-2RαHighFOXP3High cells, CD8+ T cells were gated as CD3+CD8+ cells, TConv cells were gated as CD3+CD4+FOXP3 cells, and NK cells were gated as CD3CD49b+ cells. Statistical significance was determined by one-way ANOVA with Tukey post hoc test. Experiments were performed at least twice with similar results.

To quantify cell proliferation the same procedure as above was followed using the following panel: eBioscience Fixable Viability Dye eFluor780 (ThermoFisher Scientific 65-0865-18, 1:2000), CD3 BV510 (145–2C11, BioLegend 100353, 1:50), anti-mouse CD4 eFluor450 (RM4–5, ThermoFisher Scientific 48-0042-82, 1:100), anti-mouse CD8a BV570 (53–6.7, BioLegend 100739, 1:100), anti-mouse IL-2Rα PE (PC61.5, ThermoFisher Scientific 12-0251-83, 1:100), anti-mouse CD49b PE-Cy7 (DX5, BioLegend 108992, 1:100), anti-mouse CD16/CD32 (2.4G2, BD Biosciences 553142, 1:100), anti-mouse FOXP3 APC (FJK-16s, ThermoFisher Scientific 17-5733-82, 1:80), anti-mouse Ki-67 AlexaFluor 488 (16A8, BioLegend 652417, 1:100), anti-mouse CD44 PerCP-Cy5.5 (IM7, ThermoFisher Scientific 45-0441-82, 1:100), and anti-mouse Helios PE/Dazzle 594 (22F6, BioLegend 137231, 1:100). Statistical significance was determined by one-way ANOVA with Tukey post hoc test. Experiments were performed at least twice with similar results.

Non-negative matrix factorization of immune cell subset expansion studies in NOD mice

The in vivo proliferative responses induced by the ICs were visualized using non-negative matrix factorization as implemented in scikit-learn (Pedregosa et al., 2011). The replicate average number of cells measured in NOD mice after treatment with each complex or IC was assembled. The log of the experimentally determined cell number was then taken, and number of each cell type measured during control (PBS) trials was subtracted from all other experimental measurements to obtain the log-fold changes in cell counts induced by each ligand in relation to the control trial. Non-negative matrix factorization with two components was subsequently performed on the processed matrix of cellular expansion data.

Immune cell subset expansion studies in humanized mice

Human PBMCs (NHS Blood and Transport) were dyed with Violet Proliferation Dye 450 (BD Biosciences) before i.p. injection into 8-week-old male BRG mice (The Jackson Laboratory). Mice received 5×106 PBMCs on day 0 and on day 1 received a single i.p. dose of either PBS (n = 6) or 8.2 μg (1.5 μg IL-2 equivalence) Y60A IC (n = 5), Y33A IC (n = 4), F5111 IC (n = 4), or F5111.2 IC (n = 5). Mice were sacrificed on day 4 and the PBMCs were retrieved by peritoneal lavage for flow cytometry analysis.

Cell were stained with Zombie NIR Fixable Dye (BioLegend 423105, 1:8000), anti-mouse CD45 APC-Cy7 (QA17A26, BioLegend 157617, 1:400), anti-mouse TER-119 APC-Cy7 (TER-119, BioLegend 116223, 1:400), anti-human CD3 BV605 (OKT3, BioLegend 317321, 1:200), anti-human CD56 PE (TULY56, ThermoFisher Scientific 12-0566-41, 1:200), anti-human CD4 PE-eFluor610 (RPA-T4, ThermoFisher Scientific 61-0049-42, 1:200), anti-human CD8 BV711 (SK1, BioLegend 344733, 1:200), anti-human IL-2Rα PE-Cy7 (M-A251, BD Biosciences 557741, 1:200), anti-human FOXP3 (259D, BioLegend 320214, 1:200), and anti-human Ki-67 FITC (20Rag1, ThermoFisher Scientific, 1:200). The eBioscience Foxp3/Transcription Factor Staining Buffer Set (ThermoFisher Scientific) was used for intracellular staining following the manufacturers protocol. Samples were collected on an Attune NxT flow cytometer and analyzed using FlowJo software (FlowJo, LLC). Tregs were gated as CD3+CD4+IL-2RαHighFOXP3High cells, CD8+ T cells were gated as CD3+CD8+ cells, and TConv cells were gated as CD3+CD4+FOXP3 cells. Murine cell populations (mCD45+mTER-119+) were excluded from the gating. Statistical significance was determined by one-way ANOVA with Tukey post hoc test. The experiment was performed twice with similar results.

Immune cell subset expansion study dose titrations

8-week-old female C57BL/6 mice (2 mice per group, The Jackson Laboratory) were administered either 200 μL of PBS or increasing doses of F5111 diluted in 200 μL of PBS via i.p. injection daily for 4 days. The doses of F5111 IC used were 0.91 μg (0.167 μg IL-2 equivalence), 2.7 μg (0.5 μg IL-2 equivalence), 4.1 μg (0.75 μg IL-2 equivalence), 6.2 μg (1.125 μg IL-2 equivalence), and 8.2 μg (1.5 μg IL-2 equivalence). Mice were euthanized 24 hours after the last dose and spleens were harvested. Splenocytes were isolated by mechanical dissociation through 100 μm filters and subjected to ACK red blood cell lysis buffer. Cells were stained with anti-mouse CD45 PerCP-Cy5.5 (30-F11, BioLegend 103132, 1:1200), anti-mouse CD3 BV605 (17A2, BioLegend 100237, 1:80), anti-mouse CD4 APC (GK1.5, BioLegend 100411, 1:3200), anti-mouse CD8a BV786 (53–6.7, BD Biosciences 563332, 1:400), anti-mouse IL-2Rα BV421 (7D4, BD 564571, 1:200). Transcription Factor Phospho Buffer Set (BD) was used for intracellular staining following the manufacturers protocol and then stained with anti-mouse FOXP3 FITC (FJK-16s, ThermoFisher Scientific 11-5773-82, 1:200). Samples were acquired on a BD Celesta and analyzed using FlowJo (FlowJo, LLC). Tregs were gated as CD45+CD3+CD4+IL-2Rα-HighFOXP3High cells. Statistical significance was determined by one-way ANOVA with Tukey post hoc test.

Immune cell subset expansion study kinetics

8-week-old male C57BL/6 mice (3 mice per group, The Jackson Laboratory) were administered i.p. injections for 4 consecutive days (Days −3, −2, −1, 0) containing either 200 μL of PBS or 8.2 μg F5111 IC (1.5 μg hIL-2 equivalence) diluted in 200 μL of PBS. Spleens from the PBS-treated group were harvested one day post-treatment (Day 1). Spleens from the F5111 IC treated mice were harvested 1, 3, 5, and 7 days post-treatment (3 mice per harvest). The same protocol was implemented as described for the “Immune cell subset expansion studies in NOD mice” with the substitution of the following antibody panel: anti-mouse CD3 BV510 (145–2C11, BioLegend 100353, 1:100), anti-mouse NK-1.1 PerCp-Cy5.5 (PK136, BioLegend 108727, 1:100), anti-mouse CD4 eFluor450 (RM4–5, ThermoFisher Scientific 48-0042-82, 1:100), anti-mouse CD8a AlexaFluor 488 (53–6.7, BD Biosciences 557668, 1:100), anti-mouse IL-2Rα PE (PC61.5, ThermoFisher Scientific 12-0251-83, 1:100), anti-mouse FOXP3 APC (FJK-16s, ThermoFisher Scientific 17-5733-82, 1:80), and anti-mouse CD16/CD32 (2.4G2, BD Biosciences 553142, 1:100). Tregs were gated as CD3+CD4+IL-2RαHighFOXP3High cells, CD8+ T cells were gated as CD3+CD8+ cells, TConv cells were gated as CD3+CD4+FOXP3 cells, and NK cells were gated as CD3NK-1.1+ cells.

Pharmacokinetic study

F5111 IC was labeled using 10-fold molar excess of N-hydroxysuccinimide (NHS)-Rhodamine (ThermoFisher Scientific), following the manufacturer’s protocol. Non-reacted NHS-rhodamine was removed by SEC on a Superdex 200 Increase 10/300 GL column (GE Healthcare), equilibrated in HBS. Protein concentration and degree of labeling were calculated according to the manufacturer’s protocol.

Prior to treatment, a small volume of blood was collected from the tail vein of 8-week-old male C57BL/6 mice (5 mice, The Jackson Laboratory). Mice were then administered retro-orbital injections of 2 mg/kg (~0.36 mg/kg hIL-2 equivalence, ~10 μg hIL-2 total/mouse) F5111 IC diluted in 200 μL of PBS. Blood was collected from the tail vein of each mouse at 5 minutes, 20 minutes, 40 minutes, 1 hour, 2 hours, 4 hours, 8 hours, 24 hours, 48 hours, 72 hours, 96 hours, and 120 hours. At each time point, blood was collected in EDTA-coated tubes and centrifuged at 500×g for 5 minutes. The plasma was collected and stored at 4°C for later analysis. After all samples were collected, the plasma was diluted in PBS (1:10 dilution), and 100 μL of diluted sample was added to a 96 well black clear-bottom plate. Fluorescence (Excitation/Emission: 540/590 nm) was measured on a BioTek Synergy 2 instrument, and blood samples collected before treatment were used for background subtraction. Standard curves were generated from fluorescent measurements of rhodamine-labeled F5111 IC at concentrations ranging from 3 μg/mL to 0.023 μg/mL (2-fold dilutions) and this standard curve was used to determine protein concentration of the collected samples. Serum half-life was calculated using a two-phase decay model in GraphPad Prism.

In vitro Treg suppression assay

8-week-old female C57BL/6 CD45.1; RFP-FOXP3 mice (The Jackson Laboratory) were treated with either 200 μL of PBS (n = 3) or 6.2 μg F5111 IC in 200 μL of PBS (n = 2) i.p. every day for 4 days. 24 hours after the last dose, Tregs were isolated from spleens from each group for the Treg suppression assay. Spleens from female C57BL/6 CD45.2 mice (n = 5) were taken for isolation of TConv cells.

Pooled mouse spleens were digested and CD4 cells were positively selected from all mouse groups (Miltenyi, 130-117-043). CD4+ cell suspensions were stained with either a Treg isolation panel: anti-mouse CD45.1 APC-Cy7 (A20, BioLegend 110716, 1:400), anti-mouse CD45.2 PerCp-Cy5.5 (104, BioLegend 109828, 1:400), anti-mouse CD4 APC (GK1.5, BioLegend 100411, 1:3200), anti-mouse CD8a BV786 (53–6.7, BD 563332, 1:400), anti-mouse IL-2Rα BV421 (7D4, BD 564571, 1:200), or a TConv isolation panel: anti-mouse CD45.1 APC-Cy7 (A20, BioLegend 110716, 1:400), anti-mouse CD45.2 PerCp-Cy5.5 (104, BioLegend 109828, 1:400), anti-mouse CD4 APC (GK1.5, BioLegend 100411, 1:3200), anti-mouse CD8a BV786 (53–6.7, BD 563332, 1:400), anti-mouse IL-2Rα BV421 (7D4, BD 564571, 1:200), anti-mouse CD62L PE (MEL-14, BioLegend 104408, 1:200), and anti-mouse CD44 AlexaFluor 700 (IM7, BioLegend 103026, 1:400). CD45.1+CD4+CD8IL-2RαHighRFP-FOXP3+ Tregs were sorted from F5111 treated and PBS treated mice. CD45.2+CD4+CD8IL-2RαCD62LHighCD44Low naïve TConv cells were sorted for effector cells. Cell sorting occurred on a BD FACSAria.

For division tracking, TConv cells were labeled with CellTrace Violet (CTV, ThermoFisher Scientific) by incubating cells for 16 minutes at 37°C at a cell density of 106/mL in PBSA. Cells were vortexed every 4 minutes of staining. Reaction was quenched in ice cold RPMI 1640 medium (Invitrogen) with 10% FBS (MilliporeSigma).

Cells were cultured in RPMI 1640 medium (Invitrogen) supplemented with non-essential amino acids (Gibco), 1 mM sodium pyruvate (MilliporeSigma), 10 mM HEPES (Gibco), 100 U/mL Penicillin, 100 μg/mL streptomycin (Quality Biologic), 50 μM 2-mercaptoethanol (Gibco), 2 mM L-glutamine (Gibco) and 10% FBS (MilliporeSigma). Cells were incubated at 37°C in 5% CO2. The Treg suppression assay was performed as follows: 50,000 TConv cells were co-cultured with a varying ratio of Tregs in 96-well U-bottom plate. Anti-CD3/anti-CD28 coated microbeads (Dynabeads Mouse T Activator, ThermoFisher Scientific, 11452D) were added at a 1:2 (bead: cell) ratio with final number of cells in each well. Proliferation was analyzed by flow cytometry done on a BD FACSCelesta after 4 days. Cells were washed in PBS and stained with anti-mouse CD45.1 APC-Cy7 (A20, BioLegend 110716, 1:400) and anti-mouse CD45.2 PerCp-Cy5.5 (104, BioLegend 109828, 1:400) to differentiate TConv cells from Tregs. A minimum number of 20,000 CD45.2+CTV+ cells were collected and analyzed with FlowJo software (FlowJo, LLC). The percent suppression is calculated using the following formula: ((%CTV of TConv cells alone - %CTV of TConv cells treated with Treg)/%CTV of TConv cells alone)*100 (Collison and Vignali, 2011). CTV is gated on unstimulated TConv with all divisions beyond unstimulated condition considered CTV. Experiment was conducted with technical replicates and repeated twice with similar results. Statistical significance at each ratio was determined by two-tailed unpaired Student t test.

Comparison of cTreg versus eTreg expansion

8-week-old male C57BL/6 mice (5 mice per group, Taconic Biosciences) were injected i.p. every 48 hours (days 0, 2, and 4) with either 200 μL of 1× Dulbecco’s PBS (DPBS, Corning) or 8.2 μg (1.5 μg IL-2 equivalence) Control IC or F5111 IC diluted in 200 μL of 1× DPBS. The mice were sacrificed on day 6 and their splenocytes were harvested for analysis via flow cytometry. Splenocyte single cell suspensions were isolated by mechanically processing harvested spleens through 70 μm nylon filters. The suspensions were spun down at 300×g for 5 minutes, and then resuspended in 1 mL of lysis buffer (0.846% solution of NH4Cl) for 5 minutes to lyse red blood cells. The cells were then washed in 10 mL of complete RPMI and then resuspended to 30e6 cells/mL on ice for staining.

5e6 cells per sample were placed in a 96 well round bottom plate and washed with ice cold 1× DPBS. The cells were resuspended in 50 μL of Ghost Dye Violet 510 viability dye (Tonbo Biosciences 13-0870-T100, 1:200) reconstituted in 1× DPBS for 20 minutes on ice and then washed in 0.2% FACS buffer (1× DPBS, 2 g/L BSA, 0.5 M EDTA). The cells were then resuspended in 50 μL of volume of 0.2% FACS buffer containing anti-mouse CD16/CD32 (2.4G2, Bio X Cell BP0307, 1 μg/mL) and rat IgG Isotype Control (ThermoFisher Scientific 10700, 1:200) for 30 minutes on ice. The cells were washed in 0.2% FACS buffer, and then incubated for 30 minutes on ice in 50 μL volume of antibody cocktail composed of: anti-mouse CD4 BUV563 (GK1.5, BD Biosciences 612923, 1:200), anti-mouse CD8a BUV615 (53–6.7, BD Biosciences 613004, 1:200), anti-mouse CD11a BUV805 (2D7, BD Biosciences 741919, 1:200), anti-mouse IL-2Rα BV785 (PC61, BioLegend 102051, 1:200), anti-mouse CD27 BV650 (LG.3A10, BioLegend 124233, 1:200), anti-mouse CD44 BV570 (1M7, BioLegend 103037, 1:100), anti-mouse CD69 BUV737 (H1.2F3, BD Biosciences 612793, 1:200), anti-mouse IL-2Rβ BUV661 (TM-β1, BD Biosciences 741493, 1:200), anti-mouse KLRG1 BUV395 (2F1, BD Biosciences 740279, 1:300), anti-mouse ICOS APC/Fire 750 (C398.4A, BioLegend 313536, 1:200), and anti-mouse PD-1 BV421 (29F.1A12, BioLegend 135218, 1:250) in 0.2% FACS buffer supplemented with Brilliant Stain Buffer (BD Biosciences, 1:10). The cells were washed in 0.2% FACS buffer and re-suspended in 100 μL 1× eBioscience Fixation/Permeabilization buffer (ThermoFisher Scientific) for 4 hours at 4°C. The cells were then washed twice in 1× eBioscience Permeabilization buffer (ThermoFisher Scientific), and then resuspended in 50 μL of 1× eBioscience Permeabilization buffer containing: anti-mouse BCL-2 AlexaFluor 647 (BCL/10C4, BioLegend 633510, 1:200), anti-mouse CD3 BV750 (17A2, BioLegend 100249, 1:200), anti-mouse CTLA-4 APC-R700 (UC10-4F10-11, BD Biosciences 565778, 1:300), anti-mouse FOXP3 PE-Cy5.5 (FJK-16s, ThermoFisher Scientific 35-5773-82, 1:200), anti-mouse Helios PE/Dazzle 594 (22F6, BioLegend 137231, 1:200), anti-mouse Ki-67 AlexaFluor 488 (B56, BD Biosciences 558616, 1:400), and anti-mouse T-bet PE-Cy5 (4B10, ThermoFisher Scientific 15-5825-82, 1:200) for 2 hours at 4°C. The cells were then washed with 1× eBioscience Permeabilization buffer twice, and then resuspended in 500 μL 0.2% FACS buffer for flow cytometric analysis. Fluorescence minus one (FMOs) controls and individual single color controls and were created using pooled remaining splenocytes and were prepared simultaneously with experimental samples. The prepared and stained cells were analyzed using a FACS Symphony A5 (BD Biosciences) running BD FACSDiva v9.0 (BD Biosciences). Raw flow cytometry data was compensated and analyzed using FlowJo (FlowJo, LLC). cTregs were gated as CD4+FOXP3+IL-2RαHighBCL-2High and eTregs were gated as CD4+FOXP3+IL-2RαLowBCL-2Low. Statistical significance was determined separately for cTregs and eTregs by one-way ANOVA with a Tukey post hoc test.

Toxoplasma gondii infection mouse model

ME49 strain Toxoplasma gondii cysts were obtained from neural tissue harvested from chronically infected CBA/Ca mice (The Jackson Laboratory) and resuspended to 125 cysts/mL in 1× DPBS (Corning). Cohorts of male C57BL/6 mice (5 mice per group, Taconic Biosciences) were infected via i.p. injection at 8–9 weeks of age using 200 μL of diluted ME49 cysts for an infection dose of 25 cysts/mouse. The disease-free control group did not receive ME49 cysts and instead received an injection of 1× DPBS. Mice were then injected i.p. with either 200 μL of 1× DPBS (control group and PBS) or 8.2 μg (1.5 μg IL-2 equivalence) Control IC or F5111 IC diluted in 200 μL of 1× DPBS every 24 hours after infection on days 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5. The mice were sacrificed on day 10 of infection, and splenocytes were harvested for analysis via flow cytometry, the right lateral lobe of the lungs and liver were frozen at −80°C for DNA isolation, and the left lateral lobe of the liver was stored in 10% buffered formalin (Jansen Pharmaceuticals) for histological analysis.

The staining and flow cytometry analysis was performed as described in the “Comparison of cTreg versus eTreg expansion” methods except anti-mouse CD27 was excluded and the following antibodies were added to the panel: anti-mouse CXCR3 BV650 (CXCR3–173, BioLegend 126531, 1:150), anti-mouse NK-1.1 BV711 (PK136, BioLegend 108245, 1:300), and anti-mouse NKp46 BV605 (29A1.4, BioLegend 137619, 1:300). Additionally, toxoplasma-specific tetramers for CD4+ (Tetramer I-A(b) AS15 PE, NIH, AVEIHRPVPGTAPPS, 1:400) and CD8+ (Tetramer H2k(b) Tgd057 PE, NIH, SVLAFRRL, 1:400) T cells were included. Tregs were gated as CD3+CD4+IL-2RαHighFOXP3High cells, CD8+ T cells were gated as CD3+CD8+ cells, and TConv cells were gated as CD3+CD4+FOXP3 cells.

Harvested left lateral liver lobes were kept submerged in 10% buffered formalin for 48 hours then mounted in paraffin, cut, and hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained by the University of Pennsylvania Comparative Pathology Core.

Total DNA was isolated from frozen sections of the liver, heart, and lungs using a DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit (Qiagen) according to manufacturer protocol. Isolated DNA concentration was quantified via NanoDrop spectrophotometry (ThermoFisher Scientific) and then individual samples were diluted in DNase/RNase-free distilled water (ThermoFisher Scientific) to equivalent concentrations for qPCR analysis (lungs 40 ng/μL, livers 50 ng/μL). Parasite DNA quantity was assessed in triplicate from the individual prepared DNA samples via qPCR using toxoplasma specific primers: (forward) 5′-TCCCCTCTGCTGGCGAAAAGT-3′ and (reverse) 5′-AGCGTTCGTGGTCAACTATCGATTG-3′ with Power SYBR Green master mix (ThermoFisher Scientific). The reaction conditions for the qPCR were: holding phase of 2 minutes at 50°C, and then 10 minutes at 95°C (occurs only once); followed by 50 cycles of PCR phases of 15 seconds at 95°C, and 1 minute at 60°C. The qPCR reaction was performed on a ViiA 7 Real-Time PCR system operating ViiA 7™ Software. Analysis of parasite qPCR data was performed in Microsoft Excel version 2202 (Build 14931.20120).

Statistical significance was determined by one-way ANOVA with Tukey post hoc test. The experiment was performed twice with similar results.

DSS–induced colitis mouse model

Female, 8-week-old, BALB/c mice (6 mice per group, Czech Centre for Phenogenomics) were injected i.p. daily for 7 days (days 0–6) with either 200 μL of PBS (control group and PBS) or 8.2 μg (1.5 μg hIL-2 equivalence) Control IC or F5111 IC diluted in 200 μL of PBS. For the complex, 1.5 μg hIL-2 was complexed with 6.6 μg F5111.2 antibody (1:2 antibody to cytokine molar ratio) in 200 μL of PBS for 60 min at 37°C. Beginning on day 7, all groups except for the disease-free control group were administered 3% DSS (MW = 36,000–50,000; MP Biomedicals) in their drinking water to induce colitis. Mice weight, stool consistency, and rectal bleeding were measured daily and scores were assigned for each category (Cooper et al., 1993). The weight loss score was calculated based on initial weight as follows: 0 (<1% weight loss); 1 (1–5% weight loss); 2 (5–10% weight loss); 3 (10–20% weight loss); 4 (>20% weight loss). Stool consistency was scored as follows: 0 (normal stool); 2 (loose stool); 4 (diarrhea/liquid stool). Rectal bleeding was scored as follows: 0 (no presence of blood); 4 (blood observed). The disease activity index was calculated as the average of the weight loss, stool consistency, and rectal bleeding. On day 15, mice were sacrificed and entire colons were removed (from cecum to anus). Colon length was measured, and shortening was used as an indirect marker of pathological inflammation. Distal colon sections were fixed in Carnoy’s solution and embedded in paraffin. Histological scoring of paraffin-embedded and hematoxylin and eosin-stained transversal colon sections was implemented in a blinded manner using a weighted score, ranging from 0 (no signs of inflammation) to 4 (severe inflammation). Statistical significance was determined by one-way ANOVA with Tukey post hoc test. The experiment was performed two times with similar results.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor-induced diabetes mellitus mouse model

8-week-old female NOD/ShiLtJ mice (the Jackson Laboratory) were treated i.p. with either 200 μL of PBS (control group and PBS) or 8.2 μg (1.5 μg IL-2 equivalence) Control IC or F5111 IC diluted in 200 μL of PBS from day −3 to 0 prior to initiating anti-PD-1 treatment. Starting on day 0 (4 hours after the last IC treatment), mice were treated i.p. every 4 days with either PBS (control group) or 200 μg anti-PD-1 antibody (clone RMP1–14, Bio X Cell) for a total of four or five doses. Non-fasting blood glucose was monitored by using a OneTouch® Ultra® 2 glucometer. Diabetes onset was considered to have occurred when non-fasting blood glucose concentration exceeded 250 mg/dL for two consecutive measurements. Statistical significance was determined by pairwise comparisons using the Log-rank (Mantel-Cox) test.

QUANTIFICATION AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

All statistical analysis was performed using GraphPad Prism. The number of replicates, number of mice, definition of center, dispersion and precision measures, and type of analysis performed is described in each of the above sections where applicable. p ≤ 0.05 was considered significant for all experiments (*p ≤ 0.05, **p ≤ 0.01, ***p ≤ 0.001, ****p ≤ 0.0001). Significance between all groups is not always shown in figures, for full analysis see Table S6.

Supplementary Material

1
2

KEY RESOURCES TABLE.

REAGENT or RESOURCE SOURCE IDENTIFIER

Antibodies

F5111 Antibody This manuscript; see Table S1 N/A
F5111.2 Antibody (N297A) This manuscript; see Table S1 N/A
Trastuzumab Antibody This manuscript N/A
Anti-human IgG Fc APC [HP6017] BioLegend Cat# 409306; RRID: AB_11149491
Anti-mouse/human phospho-STAT5 AlexaFluor 647 [pY694] BD Biosciences Cat# 562076; RRID: AB_11154412
Anti-human CD3 APC-eFluor780 [UCHT1] ThermoFisher Scientific Cat# 47-0038-42; RRID: AB_1272042
Anti-human CD4 PerCP-Cy5.5 [SK3] BD Biosciences Cat# 341654; RRID: AB_400452
Anti-human CD8 BV605 [SK1] BioLegend Cat# 344742; RRID: AB_2566513
Anti-human IL-2Rα BV421 [M-A251] BD Biosciences Cat# 562442; RRID: AB_11154578
Anti-human FOXP3 PE [236A/E7] BD Biosciences Cat# 560852; RRID: AB_10563418
Anti-human CD127 AlexaFluor 488 [eBioRDR5] ThermoFisher Scientific Cat# 53-1278-42; RRID: AB_2744750
Anti-mouse CD3 BV510 [145-2C11] BioLegend Cat# 100353; RRID: AB_2565879
Anti-mouse CD4 APC-eF780 [RM4-5] ThermoFisher Scientific Cat# 47-0042-82; RRID: AB_1272183
Anti-mouse CD8a AlexaFluor 488 [53-6.7] BD Biosciences Cat# 557668; RRID: AB_396780
Anti-mouse IL-2Rα PE [PC61.5] ThermoFisher Scientific Cat# 12-0251-83; RRID: AB_465608
Anti-mouse FOXP3 eFluor450 [FJK-16s] ThermoFisher Scientific Cat# 48-5773-82; RRID: AB_1518812
Anti-human CD4 PerCP-Cy5.5 [SK3] BD Biosciences Cat# 566316; RRID: AB_2739678
Anti-mouse CD4 eFluor450 [RM4-5] ThermoFisher Scientific Cat# 48-0042-82; RRID: AB_1272194
Anti-mouse CD49b PE-Cy7 [DX5] BioLegend Cat# 108922; RRID: AB_2561460
Anti-mouse CD16/32 [2.4G2] BD Biosciences Cat# 553142; RRID: AB_394657
Anti-mouse FOXP3 APC [FJK-16s] ThermoFisher Scientific Cat# 17-5773-82; RRID: AB_469457
Anti-mouse CD8a BV570 [53-6.7] BioLegend Cat# 100739; RRID: AB_10897645
Anti-mouse Ki-67 AlexaFluor 488 [16A8] BioLegend Cat# 652417; RRID: AB_2564236
Anti-mouse CD44 PerCP-Cy5.5 [IM7] ThermoFisher Scientific Cat# 45-0441-82; RRID: AB_925746
Anti-mouse/human Helios PE/Dazzle 594 [22F6] BioLegend Cat# 137231; RRID: AB_2565796
Anti-mouse CD45 APC-Cy7 [QA17A26] BioLegend Cat# 157617; RRID: AB_2890720
Anti-mouse TER-119 APC-Cy7 [TER-119] BioLegend Cat# 116223; RRID: AB_2137788
Anti-human CD3 BV605[OKT3] BioLegend Cat# 317321; RRID: AB_11126166
Anti-human CD56 PE [TULY56] ThermoFisher Scientific Cat# 12-0566-41; RRID: AB_2572562
Anti-human CD4 PE-eFluor610 [RPA-T4] ThermoFisher Scientific Cat# 61-0049-42; RRID: AB_2574522
Anti-human CD8 BV711 [SK1] BioLegend Cat# 344733; RRID: AB_2565242
Anti-human IL-2Rα PE-Cy7 [M-A251] BD Biosciences Cat# 557741; RRID: AB_396847
Anti-human FOXP3 AlexaFluor 647 [259D] BioLegend Cat# 320214; RRID: AB_492984
Anti-human Ki-67 FITC [20Raj1] ThermoFisher Scientific Cat# 11-5699-42; RRID: AB_10687464
Anti-mouse CD45 PerCP-Cy5.5 [30-F11] BioLegend Cat# 103132; RRID: AB_893340
Anti-mouse CD3 BV605 [17A2] BioLegend Cat# 100237; RRID: AB_2562039
Anti-mouse CD4 APC [GK1.5] BioLegend Cat# 100411; RRID: AB_312696
Anti-mouse CD8a BV786 [53-6.7] BD Biosciences Cat# 563332; RRID: AB_2721167
Anti-mouse IL-2Rα BV421 [7D4] BD Biosciences Cat# 564571; RRID: AB_2738849
Anti-mouse FOXP3 FITC [FJK-16s] ThermoFisher Scientific Cat# 11-5773-82; RRID: AB_465243
Anti-mouse NK-1.1 PerCP-Cy5.5 [PK136] BioLegend Cat# 108727; RRID: AB_2132706
Anti-mouse CD45.1 APC-Cy7 [A20] BioLegend Cat# 110716; RRID: AB_313505
Anti-mouse CD45.2 PerCP-Cy5.5 [104] BioLegend Cat# 109828; RRID: AB_893350
Anti-mouse CD62L PE [MEL-14] BioLegend Cat# 104408; RRID: AB_313095
Anti-mouse CD44 AlexaFluor 700 [IM7] BioLegend Cat# 103026; RRID: AB_493713
Anti-mouse CD16/32 [2.4G2] Bio X Cell Cat# BP0307; RRID: AB_2736987
Rat IgG Isotype Control ThermoFisher Scientific Cat# 10700; RRID: AB_2610661
Anti-mouse CD4 BUV563 [GK1.5] BD Biosciences Cat# 612923; RRID: AB_2870208
Anti-mouse CD8a BUV615 [53-6.7] BD Biosciences Cat# 613004; RRID: AB_2870272
Anti-mouse CD11a BUV805 [2D7] BD Biosciences Cat# 741919; RRID: AB_2871232
Anti-mouse IL-2Rα BV785 [PC61] BioLegend Cat# 102051; RRID: AB_2564131
Anti-mouse CD27 BV650 [LG.3A10] BioLegend Cat# 124233; RRID: AB_2687192
Anti-mouse CD44 BV570 [IM7] BioLegend Cat# 103037; RRID: AB_10900641
Anti-mouse CD69 BUV737 [H1.2F3] BD Biosciences Cat# 612793; RRID: AB_2870120
Anti-mouse CD122 BUV661 [TM-β1] BD Biosciences Cat# 741493; RRID: AB_2870951
Anti-mouse KLRG1 BUV395 [2F1] BD Biosciences Cat# 740279; RRID: AB_2740018
Anti-mouse ICOS APC/Fire 750 [C398.4A] BioLegend Cat# 313536; RRID: AB_2632923
Anti-mouse PD-1 BV421 [29F.1A12] BioLegend Cat# 135218; RRID: AB_2561447
Anti-mouse BCL-2 AlexaFluor 647 [BCL/10C4] BioLegend Cat# 633510; RRID: AB_2274702
Anti-mouse CD3 BV570 [17A2] BioLegend Cat# 100249; RRID: AB_2734148
Anti-mouse CTLA-4 APC-R700 [UC10-4F10-11] BD Biosciences Cat# 565778; RRID: AB_2739350
Anti-mouse FOXP3 PE-Cy5.5 [FJK-16s] ThermoFisher Scientific Cat# 35-5773-82; RRID: AB_11218094
Anti-mouse Ki-67 AlexaFluor 488 [B56] BD Biosciences Cat# 558616; RRID: AB_647087
Anti-mouse T-bet PE-Cy5 [4B10] ThermoFisher Scientific Cat# 15-5825-82; RRID: AB_2815071
Anti-mouse CXCR3 BV650 [CXCR3-173] BioLegend Cat# 126531; RRID: AB_2563160
Anti-mouse NK-1.1 BV711 [PK136] BioLegend Cat# 108745; RRID: AB_2563286
Anti-mouse NKp46 BV605 [29A1.4] BioLegend Cat# 137619; RRID: AB_2562452
Anti-mouse PD-1 [RMP1-14] Bio X Cell Cat# BE0146; RRID: AB_10949053

Bacterial and virus strains

One Shot™ MAX Efficiency™ DH5α-T1R Competent Cells ThermoFisher Scientific Cat# 12297016

Biological samples

Human PBMCs Anne Arundel Medical Blood Donor Center; NHS Blood and Transport N/A

Chemicals, peptides, and recombinant proteins

Polyethylenimine, Linear, MW 25000, Transfection Grade (PEI 25K™) Polysciences Cat# 23966
OptiPRO™ SFM ThermoFisher Scientific Cat# 12309019
FreeStyle™ 293 Expression Medium ThermoFisher Scientific Cat# 12338018
Pierce™ Protein G Agarose ThermoFisher Scientific Cat# 20397
F5111 IC LN15 This manuscript; see Table S1 N/A
F5111 IC LN25 This manuscript; see Table S1 N/A
F5111 IC LN35 This manuscript; see Table S1 N/A
F5111 IC LN35 (Y35A) This manuscript; see Table S1 N/A
F5111 IC LN35 (Y52A) This manuscript; see Table S1 N/A
F5111 IC LN35 (Y54A) This manuscript; see Table S1 N/A
F5111 IC LN35 (Y60A) This manuscript; see Table S1 N/A
F5111 IC LN35 (V103A) This manuscript; see Table S1 N/A
F5111 IC LN35 (Y33A) This manuscript; see Table S1 N/A
F5111 IC LN35 (Y94A) This manuscript; see Table S1 N/A
F5111 IC LN35 (S96A) This manuscript; see Table S1 N/A
F5111.2 IC LN35 This manuscript; see Table S1 N/A
Control (FITC-E2) IC LN35 This manuscript; see Table S1 N/A
F5111 IC LN35 (N297A) This manuscript; see Table S1 N/A
F5111 IC LN35 (Y60A, N297A) This manuscript; see Table S1 N/A
F5111 IC LN35 (V103A, N297A) This manuscript; see Table S1 N/A
F5111 IC LN35 (Y33A, N297A) This manuscript; see Table S1 N/A
F5111.2 IC LN35 (N297A) This manuscript; see Table S1 N/A
Control (FITC-E2) IC LN35 (N297A) This manuscript; see Table S1 N/A
Human IL-2 This manuscript N/A
Biotinylated human IL-2 This manuscript N/A
Biotinylated human IL-2Rα This manuscript N/A
Biotinylated human IL-2Rβ This manuscript N/A
Ni-NTA Agarose Qiagen Cat# 30210
16% Paraformaldehyde (formaldehyde) aqueous solution Electron Microscopy Science Cat# 15710
Ficoll® Paque Plus MilliporeSigma Cat# GE17-1440-02
ACK Lysing Buffer Quality Biological Cat# 118-156-101
LIVE/DEAD™ Fixable Blue Dead Cell Stain Kit ThermoFisher Scientific Cat# L34961
eBioscience™ Fixable Viability Dye eFluor™ 780 ThermoFisher Scientific Cat# 65-0865-18
Violet Proliferation Dye 450 BD Biosciences Cat# 562158
Zombie NIR™ Fixable Viability Kit BioLegend Cat# 423105
NHS-Rhodamine (5/6-carboxy-tetramethyl-rhodamine succinimidyl ester), mixed isomer ThermoFisher Scientific Cat# 46406
CD4 (L3T4) MicroBeads, mouse Miltenyi Cat# 130-117-043
CellTrace™ Violet Cell Proliferation Kit ThermoFisher Scientific Cat# C34571
Dynabeads™ Mouse T-Activator CD3/CD28 for T-Cell Expansion and Activation ThermoFisher Scientific Cat# 11452D
Ghost Dye™ Violet 510 Tonbo Biosciences Cat# 13-0870-T100
Tetramer H2k(b) Tgd057 PE: SVLAFRRL NIH Tetramer Core Facility; Wilson et al., 2010 N/A
Tetramer I-A(b) AS15 PE: AVEIHRPVPGTAPPS NIH Tetramer Core Facility; Grover et al., 2012 N/A
Power SYBR™ Green PCR Master Mix ThermoFisher Scientific Cat# 4368577
Dextran sulfate sodium salt, colitis grade (36,000–50,000) MP Biomedicals Cat# 160110; Lot# S5036

Critical commercial assays

BirA biotin-protein ligase standard reaction kit Avidity Cat# BirA500
Octet® Streptavidin (SA) Biosensor Sartorius Cat# 18-5019
Transcription Factor Phospho Buffer Set BD Biosciences Cat# 565575
eBioscience™ Foxp3/Transcription Factor Staining Buffer Set ThermoFisher Scientific Cat# 00-5523-00
DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit Qiagen Cat# 69506

Experimental models: Cell lines

FreeStyle™ 293-F Cells ThermoFisher Scientific Cat# R79007
YT-1 Human NK Cells Yodoi et al., 1985 N/A
IL-2Rα+ YT-1 Human NK Cells Kuziel et al., 1993 N/A

Experimental models: Organisms/strains

Mouse: NOD/ShiLt The Jackson Laboratory Strain #:001976; RRID: IMSR_JAX:001976
Mouse: BALB/c Rag2−/− γc−/− H2d (BRG) The Jackson Laboratory Strain #: 014593 RRID: IMSR_JAX:014593
Mouse: C57BL/6 The Jackson Laboratory Strain #:000664; RRID: IMSR_JAX:000664
Mouse: C57BL/6 CD45.1 The Jackson Laboratory Strain #:002014; RRID: IMSR_JAX:002014
Mouse: C57BL/6 FOXP3-IRES-mRFP The Jackson Laboratory Strain #:008374; RRID: IMSR_JAX:008374
Mouse: C57BL/6 CD45.1; RFP-FOXP3 mice This manuscript; CD45.1 mice were bred in house to FoxP3-RFP mice to homozygosity and maintained at Johns Hopkins University Cancer Research Building 1 use facility N/A
Mouse: C57BL/6 Taconic Biosciences Model: B6-M
Toxoplasma gondii – ME49 strain N/A N/A
Mouse: CBA/Ca The Jackson Laboratory Strain #: 000654 RRID: IMSR_JAX:000654
Mouse: BALB/c Purchased from Charles River Laboratories and bred at Czech Centre for Phenogenomics Strain: 028

Oligonucleotides

qPCR primer: TCCCCTCTGCTGGCGAAAAGT (Toxoplasma gondii forward) This manuscript; Lin et al., 2000 N/A
qPCR primer: AGCGTTCGTGGTCAACTATCGATTG (Toxoplasma gondii reverse) This manuscript; Lin et al., 2000 N/A

Recombinant DNA

Human IL-2 sequence GenBank GenBank: X00695.1
Mouse IL-2 sequence GenBank GenBank: X01772.1
pCT3CBN Derived from pCT302 (Boder and Wittrup, 1997) N/A
pCT3CBN_hIL2 (Yeast display vector for human IL-2) This manuscript N/A
pCT3CBN_mIL2 (Yeast display vector for mouse IL-2) This manuscript N/A
F5111 VH and VL sequence Rondon et al., 2015 N/A
F5111.2 VH and VL sequence Rondon et al., 2015 N/A
FITC-E2 VH and VL sequence Honegger et al., 2005 N/A
Human IgG1 constant heavy chain sequence ImMunoGeneTics (IMGT) IMGT: J00228
Human IgG1 constant lambda chain sequence ImMunoGeneTics (IMGT) IMGT: J00253
Human IL-2Rα sequence (1–217) GenBank GenBank: X01057.1
Human IL-2Rβ sequence (1–214) GenBank GenBank: M26062.1
gWiz High Expression Blank Vector Genlantis P000200
gWiz_F5111_Ab_HC (Expression vector for F5111 heavy chain) This manuscript N/A
gWiz_F5111_Ab_LC (Expression vector for F5111 light chain) This manuscript N/A
gWiz_F5111.2_Ab_HC (Expression vector for F5111.2 heavy chain) This manuscript N/A
gWiz_F5111.2_Ab_LC (Expression vector for F5111.2 light chain) This manuscript N/A
gWiz_F5111_IC_LN15_LC (Expression vector for human IL-2 linked to F5111 light chain with a 15 amino acid linker) This manuscript N/A
gWiz_F5111_IC_LN25_LC (Expression vector for human IL-2 linked to F5111 light chain with a 25 amino acid linker) This manuscript N/A
gWiz_F5111_IC_LN35_LC (Expression vector for human IL-2 linked to F5111 light chain with a 35 amino acid linker) This manuscript N/A
gWiz_F5111_Ab_HC_Y35A (Expression vector for F5111 heavy chain with Y35A mutation) This manuscript N/A
gWiz_F5111_Ab_HC_Y52A (Expression vector for F5111 heavy chain with Y52A mutation) This manuscript N/A
gWiz_F5111_Ab_HC_Y54A (Expression vector for F5111 heavy chain with Y54A mutation) This manuscript N/A
gWiz_F5111_Ab_HC_Y60A (Expression vector for F5111 heavy chain with Y60A mutation) This manuscript N/A
gWiz_F5111_Ab_HC_V103A (Expression vector for F5111 heavy chain with V103A mutation) This manuscript N/A
gWiz_F5111_IC_LN35_LC_Y33A (Expression vector for human IL-2 linked to F5111 Y33A mutant light chain with a 35 amino acid linker) This manuscript N/A
gWiz_F5111_IC_LN35_LC_Y94A (Expression vector for human IL-2 linked to F5111 Y94A mutant light chain with a 35 amino acid linker) This manuscript N/A
gWiz_F5111_IC_LN35_LC_S96A (Expression vector for human IL-2 linked to F5111 S96A mutant light chain with a 35 amino acid linker) This manuscript N/A
gWiz_F5111.2_IC_LN35_LC (Expression vector for human IL-2 linked to F5111.2 light chain with a 35 amino acid linker) This manuscript N/A
gWiz_Control_IC_HC (Expression vector for FITC-E2 heavy chain) This manuscript N/A
gWiz_Control_IC_LN35_LC (Expression vector for human IL-2 linked to FITC-E2 light chain with 35 amino acid linker) This manuscript N/A
gWiz_F5111_Ab_HC_N297A (Expression vector for F5111 heavy chain with N297A mutation) This manuscript N/A
gWiz_F5111.2_Ab_HC (Expression vector for F5111.2 heavy chain with N297A mutation) This manuscript N/A
gWiz_F5111_Ab_HC_Y60A_N297A (Expression vector for F5111 heavy chain with Y60A and N297A mutations) This manuscript N/A
gWiz_F5111_Ab_HC_V103A_N297A (Expression vector for F5111 heavy chain with V103A and N297A mutations) This manuscript N/A
gWiz_Control_IC_HC_N297A (Expression vector for FITC-E2 heavy chain with N297A) This manuscript N/A
gWiz_hIL2 (Expression vector for human IL-2) This manuscript N/A
gWiz_hIL2_BH3 (Expression vector for human IL-2 with BH3 tag for biotinylation) This manuscript N/A
gWiz_hIL2Ra_BH3 (Expression vector for human IL-2Rα residues 1–217 with BH3 tag for biotinylation) This manuscript N/A
gWiz_hIL2Rb_BH3 (Expression vector for human IL-2Rβ residues 1–214 with BH3 tag for biotinylation) This manuscript N/A
gWiz_Trastuzumab_HC (Expression vector for trastuzumab heavy chain) This manuscript N/A
gWiz_Trastuzumab_LC (Expression vector for trastuzumab light chain) This manuscript N/A

Software and algorithms

GraphPad Prism 8.4.3 GraphPad https://www.graphpad.com/
FlowJo v10.7.1 FlowJo, LLC https://www.flowjo.com/solutions/flowjo
PyMOL v2.3.2 PyMOL https://pymol.org/2/
BioRender BioRender https://biorender.com/

Highlights.

  • Single-chain human interleukin-2/antibody fusion protein (immunocytokine) is designed

  • F5111 immunocytokine promotes biased Treg activation and expansion

  • Immunocytokine induces superior Treg bias compared with cytokine/antibody complex

  • F5111 immunocytokine confers protection in mouse models of autoimmune diseases

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors acknowledge funding from the NIH (K99CA246061, U01AI148119, R01AI125563, R01AI41158, and R01EB029455), DOD (W81XWH-18-1-0735, W81WH-21-1-0892, and W81XWH-21-1-0891), JDRF (1-INO-2020-923-A-N), Czech Science Foundation (20-13029S), Institute of Biotechnology of the Czech Academy of Sciences (RVO 86652036), EU Horizon project ReSHAPE, and the Mark Foundation for Cancer Research. We acknowledge the Czech Centre for Phenogenomics at the Institute of Molecular Genetics (RVO 68378050 and MEYS CR LM2018126). D.V. is an ARCS Foundation Metro-Washington Chapter Scholar and NSF Graduate Research Fellowship Program awardee. A.R.C. is an Oxford-Bristol Myers Squibb Fellow. F.I. is a Wellcome Trust CRCD Fellow (211122/Z/8). The graphical abstract and Figure 3C were created with Biorender.com.

Footnotes

DECLARATION OF INTERESTS

Johns Hopkins University has filed intellectual property on technologies herein with J.B.S. and D.V. as inventors (WO2020264318A1).

INCLUSION AND DIVERSITY

We support inclusive, diverse, and equitable conduct of research.

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

Supplemental information can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111478.

REFERENCES

  1. Abo H, Flannigan KL, Geem D, Ngo VL, Harusato A, and Denning TL (2019). Combined IL-2 immunocomplex and anti-IL-5 mAb treatment expands Foxp3+ Treg cells in the absence of Eosinophilia and ameliorates experimental colitis. Front. Immunol. 10, 459. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Alva A, Daniels GA, Wong MKK, Kaufman HL, Morse MA, McDermott DF, Clark JI, Agarwala SS, Miletello G, Logan TF, et al. (2016). Contemporary experience with high-dose interleukin-2 therapy and impact on survival in patients with metastatic melanoma and metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 65, 1533–1544. 10.1007/s00262-016-1910-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  3. Ansari MJI, Salama AD, Chitnis T, Smith RN, Yagita H, Akiba H, Yamazaki T, Azuma M, Iwai H, Khoury SJ, et al. (2003). The programmed death-1 (PD-1) pathway regulates autoimmune diabetes in nonobese diabetic (NOD) mice. J. Exp. Med. 198, 63–69. 10.1084/jem.20022125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Arenas-Ramirez N, Zou C, Popp S, Zingg D, Brannetti B, Wirth E, Calzascia T, Kovarik J, Sommer L, Zenke G, et al. (2016). Improved cancer immunotherapy by a CD25-mimobody conferring selectivity to human interleukin-2. Sci. Transl. Med. 8, 367ra166. 10.1126/scitranslmed.aag3187. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Baecher-Allan C, Brown JA, Freeman GJ, and Hafler DA (2001). CD4+CD25high regulatory cells in human peripheral blood. J. Immunol. 167, 1245–1253. 10.4049/jimmunol.167.3.1245. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Belkaid Y, and Tarbell K (2009). Regulatory T cells in the control of host-microorganism interactions. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 27, 551–589. 10.1146/annurev.immunol.021908.132723. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Belkaid Y, Blank RB, and Suffia I (2006). Natural regulatory T cells and parasites: a common quest for host homeostasis. Immunol. Rev. 212, 287–300. 10.1111/j.0105-2896.2006.00409.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Boder ET, and Wittrup KD (1997). Yeast surface display for screening combinatorial polypeptide libraries. Nat. Biotechnol. 15, 553–557. 10.1038/nbt0697-553. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Boyman O, and Sprent J (2012). The role of interleukin-2 during homeostasis and activation of the immune system. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 12, 180–190. 10.1038/nri3156. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Boyman O, Kovar M, Rubinstein MP, Surh CD, and Sprent J (2006). Selective stimulation of T cell subsets with antibody-cytokine immune complexes. Science 311, 1924–1927. 10.1126/science.1122927. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Carmenate T, Ortíz Y, Enamorado M, García-Martínez K, Avellanet J, Moreno E, Graça L, and León K (2018). Blocking IL-2 signal in vivo with an IL-2 antagonist reduces tumor growth through the control of regulatory T cells. J. Immunol. 200, 3475–3484. 10.4049/jimmunol.1700433. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Charych DH, Hoch U, Langowski JL, Lee SR, Addepalli MK, Kirk PB, Sheng D, Liu X, Sims PW, VanderVeen LA, et al. (2016). NKTR-214, an engineered cytokine with biased IL2 receptor binding, increased tumor exposure, and marked efficacy in mouse tumor models. Clin. Cancer Res. 22, 680–690. 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-15-1631. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Chassaing B, Aitken JD, Malleshappa M, and Vijay-Kumar M (2014). Dextran sulfate sodium (DSS)-Induced colitis in mice. Curr. Protoc. Immunol. 104, 15.25.1–15.25.14. 10.1002/0471142735.im1525s104. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Collison LW, and Vignali DAA (2011). In vitro Treg suppression assays. Methods Mol. Biol. 707, 21–37. 10.1007/978-1-61737-979-6_2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Cooper HS, Murthy SN, Shah RS, and Sedergran DJ (1993). Clinicopathologic study of dextran sulfate sodium experimental murine colitis. Lab. Invest. 69, 238–249. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  16. De Paula VS, Jude KM, Nerli S, Glassman CR, Garcia KC, and Sgourakis NG (2020). Interleukin-2 druggability is modulated by global conformational transitions controlled by a helical capping switch. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 117, 7183–7192. 10.1073/pnas.2000419117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Dekkers JS, Schoones JW, Huizinga TW, Toes RE, and van der Helmvan Mil AH (2017). Possibilities for preventive treatment in rheumatoid arthritis? Lessons from experimental animal models of arthritis: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 76, 458–467. 10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-209830. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Delidakis G, Kim JE, George K, and Georgiou G (2022). Improving antibody therapeutics by manipulating the Fc domain: immunological and structural considerations. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 24, 249–274. 10.1146/annurev-bioeng-082721-024500. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  19. Dieleman LA, Ridwan BU, Tennyson GS, Beagley KW, Bucy RP, and Elson CO (1994). Dextran sulfate sodium-induced colitis occurs in severe combined immunodeficient mice. Gastroenterology 107, 1643–1652. 10.1016/0016-5085(94)90803-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Dixit N, Fanton C, Langowski JL, Kirksey Y, Kirk P, Chang T, Cetz J, Dixit V, Kim G, Kuo P, et al. (2021). NKTR-358: a novel regulatory T-cell stimulator that selectively stimulates expansion and suppressive function of regulatory T cells for the treatment of autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. J. Transl. Autoimmun. 4, 100103. 10.1016/j.jtauto.2021.100103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Dong S, Hiam-Galvez KJ, Mowery CT, Herold KC, Gitelman SE, Esensten JH, Liu W, Lares AP, Leinbach AS, Lee M, et al. (2021). The effect of low-dose IL-2 and Treg adoptive cell therapy in patients with type 1 diabetes. JCI Insight 6, e147474. 10.1172/jci.insight.147474. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Farhat AM, Weiner AC, Posner C, Kim ZS, Orcutt-Jahns B, Carlson SM, and Meyer AS (2021). Modeling cell-specific dynamics and regulation of the common gamma chain cytokines. Cell Rep. 35, 109044. 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109044. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  23. Fife BT, Guleria I, Gubbels Bupp M, Eagar TN, Tang Q, Bour-Jordan H, Yagita H, Azuma M, Sayegh MH, and Bluestone JA (2006). Insulin-induced remission in new-onset NOD mice is maintained by the PD-1–PD-L1 pathway. J. Exp. Med. 203, 2737–2747. 10.1084/jem.20061577. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Finkelman FD, Madden KB, Morris SC, Holmes JM, Boiani N, Katona IM, and Maliszewski CR (1993). Anti-cytokine antibodies as carrier proteins. Prolongation of in vivo effects of exogenous cytokines by injection of cytokine-anti-cytokine antibody complexes. J. Immunol. 151, 1235–1244. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Glassman CR, Su L, Majri-Morrison SS, Winkelmann H, Mo F, Li P, Pérez-Cruz M, Ho PP, Koliesnik I, Nagy N, et al. (2021). Calibration of cell-intrinsic interleukin-2 response thresholds guides design of a regulatory T cell biased agonist. eLife 10, e65777. 10.7554/eLife.65777. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  26. Grover HS, Blanchard N, Gonzalez F, Chan S, Robey EA, and Shastri N (2012). The toxoplasma gondii peptide AS15 Elicits CD4 T cells that can control parasite burden. Infect. Immun. 80, 3279–3288. 10.1128/IAI.00425-12. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  27. Hernandez R, Toomer KH, Põder J, Santos Savio A, Hsiung S, and Malek TR (2021). Sustained IL-2R signaling of limited duration by high-dose mIL-2/mCD25 fusion protein amplifies tumor-reactive CD8+ T cells to enhance antitumor immunity. Cancer Immunol. Immunother. 70, 909–921. 10.1007/s00262-020-02722-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. Hernandez R, Põder J, LaPorte KM, and Malek TR (2022). Engineering IL-2 for immunotherapy of autoimmunity and cancer. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 72, 281–311. 10.1038/s41577-022-00680-w. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  29. Herold KC, Bundy BN, Long SA, Bluestone JA, DiMeglio LA, Dufort MJ, Gitelman SE, Gottlieb PA, Krischer JP, Linsley PS, et al. (2019). An anti-CD3 antibody, teplizumab, in relatives at risk for type 1 diabetes. N. Engl. J. Med. 381, 603–613. 10.1056/NEJMoa1902226. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Höfer T, Krichevsky O, and Altan-Bonnet G (2012). Competition for IL-2 between regulatory and effector T cells to chisel immune responses. Front. Immunol. 3, 268. 10.3389/fimmu.2012.00268. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Honegger A, Spinelli S, Cambillau C, and Plückthun A (2005). A mutation designed to alter crystal packing permits structural analysis of a tight-binding fluorescein–scFv complex. Protein Sci. 14, 2537–2549. 10.1110/ps.051520605. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Hu H, Zakharov PN, Peterson OJ, and Unanue ER (2020). Cytocidal macrophages in symbiosis with CD4 and CD8 T cells cause acute diabetes following checkpoint blockade of PD-1 in NOD mice. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 117, 31319–31330. 10.1073/pnas.2019743117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Hutmacher C, Gonzalo Núñez N, Liuzzi AR, Becher B, and Neri D (2019). Targeted delivery of IL2 to the tumor stroma potentiates the action of immune checkpoint inhibitors by preferential activation of NK and CD8+ T cells. Cancer Immunol. Res. 7, 572–583. 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-18-0566. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  34. June CH, Warshauer JT, and Bluestone JA (2017). Is autoimmunity the Achilles’ heel of cancer immunotherapy? Nat. Med. 23, 540–547. 10.1038/nm.4321. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  35. Kang JH, Bluestone JA, and Young A (2021). Predicting and preventing immune checkpoint inhibitor toxicity: targeting cytokines. Trends Immunol. 42, 293–311. 10.1016/j.it.2021.02.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Karakus U, Sahin D, Mittl PRE, Mooij P, Koopman G, and Boyman O (2020). Receptor-gated IL-2 delivery by an anti-human IL-2 antibody activates regulatory T cells in three different species. Sci. Transl. Med. 12, eabb9283. 10.1126/scitranslmed.abb9283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Khoryati L, Pham MN, Sherve M, Kumari S, Cook K, Pearson J, Bogdani M, Campbell DJ, and Gavin MA (2020). An IL-2 mutein engineered to promote expansion of regulatory T cells arrests ongoing autoimmunity in mice. Sci. Immunol. 5, eaba5264. 10.1126/sciimmunol.aba5264. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  38. Klatzmann D, and Abbas AK (2015). The promise of low-dose interleukin-2 therapy for autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 15, 283–294. 10.1038/nri3823. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Knudson KM, Hodge JW, Schlom J, and Gameiro SR (2020). Rationale for IL-15 superagonists in cancer immunotherapy. Expert Opin. Biol. Ther. 20, 705–709. 10.1080/14712598.2020.1738379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Koreth J, Matsuoka K.i., Kim HT, McDonough SM, Bindra B, Alyea EP, Armand P, Cutler C, Ho VT, Treister NS, et al. (2011). Interleukin-2 and regulatory T cells in graft-versus-host disease. N. Engl. J. Med. 365, 2055–2066. 10.1056/NEJMoa1108188. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Kuziel WA, Ju G, Grdina TA, and Greene WC (1993). Unexpected effects of the IL-2 receptor alpha subunit on high affinity IL-2 receptor assembly and function detected with a mutant IL-2 analog. J. Immunol. 150, 3357–3365. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Lee H, Son YS, Lee M-O, Ryu J-W, Park K, Kwon O, Jung KB, Kim K, Ryu TY, Baek A, et al. (2020a). Low-dose interleukin-2 alleviates dextran sodium sulfate-induced colitis in mice by recovering intestinal integrity and inhibiting AKT-dependent pathways. Theranostics 10, 5048–5063. 10.7150/thno.41534. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Lee J-Y, Lee E, Hong S-W, Kim D, Eunju O, Sprent J, Im S-H, Lee YJ, and Surh CD (2020b). TCB2, a new anti-human interleukin-2 antibody, facilitates heterodimeric IL-2 receptor signaling and improves anti-tumor immunity. Oncoimmunology 9, 1681869. 10.1080/2162402X.2019.1681869. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Leonard WJ, Depper JM, Crabtree GR, Rudikoff S, Pumphrey J, Robb RJ, Krönke M, Svetlik PB, Peffer NJ, and Waldmann TA (1984). Molecular cloning and expression of cDNAs for the human interleukin-2 receptor. Nature 311, 626–631. 10.1038/311626a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Liao W, Lin J-X, and Leonard WJ (2013). Interleukin-2 at the crossroads of effector responses, tolerance, and immunotherapy. Immunity 38, 13–25. 10.1016/j.immuni.2013.01.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  46. Lin M-H, Chen T-C, Kuo TT, Tseng C-C, and Tseng C-P (2000). Real-time PCR for quantitative detection of toxoplasma gondii. J. Clin. Microbiol. 38, 4121–4125. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  47. Lopes JE, Fisher JL, Flick HL, Wang C, Sun L, Ernstoff MS, Alvarez JC, and Losey HC (2020). ALKS 4230: a novel engineered IL-2 fusion protein with an improved cellular selectivity profile for cancer immunotherapy. J. Immunother. Cancer 8, e000673. 10.1136/jitc-2020-000673. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Malek TR (2008). The biology of interleukin-2. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 26, 453–479. 10.1146/annurev.immunol.26.021607.090357. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. Mimura Y, Church S, Ghirlando R, Ashton PR, Dong S, Goodall M, Lund J, and Jefferis R (2000). The influence of glycosylation on the thermal stability and effector function expression of human IgG1-Fc: properties of a series of truncated glycoforms. Mol. Immunol. 37, 697–706. 10.1016/S0161-5890(00)00105-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Mimura Y, Sondermann P, Ghirlando R, Lund J, Young SP, Goodall M, and Jefferis R (2001). Role of oligosaccharide residues of IgG1-Fc in FcγRIIb binding. J. Biol. Chem. 276, 45539–45547. 10.1074/jbc.M107478200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  51. Mortara L, Balza E, Bruno A, Poggi A, Orecchia P, and Carnemolla B (2018). Anti-cancer therapies employing IL-2 cytokine tumor targeting: contribution of innate, adaptive and immunosuppressive cells in the anti-tumor efficacy. Front. Immunol. 9, 2905. 10.3389/fimmu.2018.02905. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Murray PJ (2007). The JAK-STAT signaling pathway: input and output integration. J. Immunol. 178, 2623–2629. 10.4049/jimmunol.178.5.2623. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  53. Okayasu I, Hatakeyama S, Yamada M, Ohkusa T, Inagaki Y, and Nakaya R (1990). A novel method in the induction of reliable experimental acute and chronic ulcerative colitis in mice. Gastroenterology 98, 694–702. 10.1016/0016-5085(90)90290-h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  54. Oldenhove G, Bouladoux N, Wohlfert EA, Hall JA, Chou D, Dos Santos L, O’Brien S, Blank R, Lamb E, Natarajan S, et al. (2009). Decrease of Foxp3+ Treg cell number and acquisition of effector cell phenotype during lethal infection. Immunity 31, 772–786. 10.1016/j.immuni.2009.10.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  55. Ongaro T, Gouyou B, Stringhini M, Corbellari R, Neri D, and Villa A (2020). A novel format for recombinant antibody-interleukin-2 fusion proteins exhibits superior tumor-targeting properties in vivo. Oncotarget 11, 3698–3711. 10.18632/oncotarget.27726. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  56. Pedregosa F, Varoquaux G, Gramfort A, Michel V, Thirion B, Grisel O, Blondel M, Prettenhofer P, Weiss R, Dubourg V, et al. (2011). Scikit-learn: machine learning in Python. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 12, 2825–2830. 10.5555/1953048.2078195. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  57. Peterson LB, Bell CJM, Howlett SK, Pekalski ML, Brady K, Hinton H, Sauter D, Todd JA, Umana P, Ast O, et al. (2018). A long-lived IL-2 mutein that selectively activates and expands regulatory T cells as a therapy for autoimmune disease. J. Autoimmun. 95, 1–14. 10.1016/j.jaut.2018.10.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  58. Quandt Z, Young A, Perdigoto AL, Herold KC, and Anderson MS (2021). Autoimmune Endocrinopathies: an emerging complication of immune checkpoint inhibitors. Annu. Rev. Med. 72, 313–330. 10.1146/annurev-med-050219-034237. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  59. Romee R, Cooley S, Berrien-Elliott MM, Westervelt P, Verneris MR, Wagner JE, Weisdorf DJ, Blazar BR, Ustun C, DeFor TE, et al. (2018). First-in-human phase 1 clinical study of the IL-15 superagonist complex ALT-803 to treat relapse after transplantation. Blood 131, 2515–2527. 10.1182/blood-2017-12-823757. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  60. Rondon IJ, CRELLIN NK, Bessette P, Trotta E, and Bluestone JA (2015). Anti-IL-2 Antibodies and Compositions and Uses Thereof. [Google Scholar]
  61. Roopenian DC, and Akilesh S (2007). FcRn: the neonatal Fc receptor comes of age. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 7, 715–725. 10.1038/nri2155. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  62. Rosenberg SA (2014). IL-2: the first effective immunotherapy for human cancer. J. Immunol. 192, 5451–5458. 10.4049/jimmunol.1490019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  63. Rubinstein MP, Kovar M, Purton JF, Cho J-H, Boyman O, Surh CD, and Sprent J (2006). Converting IL-15 to a superagonist by binding to soluble IL-15R{alpha. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 103, 9166–9171. 10.1073/pnas.0600240103. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  64. Sacks D, and Anderson C (2004). Re-examination of the immunosuppressive mechanisms mediating non-cure of Leishmania infection in mice. Immunol. Rev. 201, 225–238. 10.1111/j.0105-2896.2004.00185.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  65. Sagiv Y, Kaminitz A, Lorberboum-Galski H, Askenasy N, and Yarkoni S (2009). A fusion protein composed of IL-2 and caspase-3 ameliorates the outcome of experimental inflammatory colitis. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1173, 791–797. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04877.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  66. Sahin D, Arenas-Ramirez N, Rath M, Karakus U, Hümbelin M, van Gogh M, Borsig L, and Boyman O (2020). An IL-2-grafted antibody immunotherapy with potent efficacy against metastatic cancer. Nat. Commun. 11, 6440. 10.1038/s41467-020-20220-1. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  67. Sakaguchi S, Sakaguchi N, Asano M, Itoh M, and Toda M (1995). Immunologic self-tolerance maintained by activated T cells expressing IL-2 receptor alpha-chains (CD25). Breakdown of a single mechanism of self-tolerance causes various autoimmune diseases. J. Immunol. 155, 1151–1164. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  68. Saunders KO (2019). Conceptual approaches to modulating antibody effector functions and circulation half-life. Front. Immunol. 10, 1296. 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01296. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  69. Schmidt A, Oberle N, and Krammer PH (2012). Molecular mechanisms of treg-mediated T cell suppression. Front. Immunol. 3, 51. 10.3389/fimmu.2012.00051. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  70. Silver AB, Leonard EK, Gould JR, and Spangler JB (2021). Engineered antibody fusion proteins for targeted disease therapy. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 42, 1064–1081. 10.1016/j.tips.2021.09.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  71. Sim GC, and Radvanyi L (2014). The IL-2 cytokine family in cancer immunotherapy. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 25, 377–390. 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2014.07.018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  72. Spangler JB, Tomala J, Luca VC, Jude KM, Dong S, Ring AM, Votavova P, Pepper M, Kovar M, and Garcia KC (2015a). Antibodies to Interleukin-2 elicit selective T cell subset potentiation through distinct conformational mechanisms. Immunity 42, 815–825. 10.1016/j.immuni.2015.04.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  73. Spangler JB, Moraga I, Mendoza JL, and Garcia KC (2015b). Insights into cytokine–receptor interactions from cytokine engineering. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 33, 139–167. 10.1146/annurev-immunol-032713-120211. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  74. Spangler JB, Trotta E, Tomala J, Peck A, Young TA, Savvides CS, Silveria S, Votavova P, Salafsky J, Pande VS, et al. (2018). Engineering a single-agent cytokine/antibody fusion that selectively expands regulatory T cells for autoimmune disease therapy. J. Immunol. 201, 2094–2106. 10.4049/jimmunol.1800578. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  75. Stamatouli AM, Quandt Z, Perdigoto AL, Clark PL, Kluger H, Weiss SA, Gettinger S, Sznol M, Young A, Rushakoff R, et al. (2018). Collateral damage: insulin-dependent diabetes induced with checkpoint inhibitors. Diabetes 67, 1471–1480. 10.2337/dbi18-0002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  76. Strober W, Fuss IJ, and Blumberg RS (2002). The immunology of mucosal models of inflammation. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 20, 495–549. 10.1146/annurev.immunol.20.100301.064816. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  77. Stroud RM, and Wells JA (2004). Mechanistic diversity of cytokine receptor signaling across cell membranes. Sci. STKE 2004, re7. 10.1126/stke.2312004re7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  78. Tan ZC, and Meyer AS (2021). A general model of multivalent binding with ligands of heterotypic subunits and multiple surface receptors. Math. Biosci. 342, 108714. 10.1016/j.mbs.2021.108714. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  79. Tang Q, Adams JY, Penaranda C, Melli K, Piaggio E, Sgouroudis E, Piccirillo CA, Salomon BL, and Bluestone JA (2008). Central role of a defective interleukin-2 production in triggering islet autoimmune destruction. Immunity 28, 687–697. 10.1016/j.immuni.2008.03.016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  80. Taniguchi T, and Minami Y (1993). The IL-2IL-2 receptor system: a current overview. Cell 73, 5–8. 10.1016/0092-8674(93)90152-G. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  81. Tao MH, Smith RI, and Morrison SL (1993). Structural features of human immunoglobulin G that determine isotype-specific differences in complement activation. J. Exp. Med. 178, 661–667. 10.1084/jem.178.2.661. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  82. Tomala J, and Spangler JB (2020). Characterization of immune cell subset expansion in response to therapeutic treatment in mice. Methods Mol. Biol. 2111, 101–114. 10.1007/978-1-0716-0266-9_9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  83. Tomala J, Chmelova H, Mrkvan T, Rihova B, and Kovar M (2009). In vivo expansion of activated naive CD8+ T cells and NK cells driven by complexes of IL-2 and anti-IL-2 monoclonal antibody as novel approach of cancer immunotherapy. J. Immunol. 183, 4904–4912. 10.4049/jimmunol.0900284. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  84. Tomala J, Kovarova J, Kabesova M, Votavova P, Chmelova H, Dvorakova B, Rihova B, and Kovar M (2013). Chimera of IL-2 linked to light chain of anti-IL-2 mAb mimics IL-2/anti-IL-2 mAb complexes both structurally and functionally. ACS Chem. Biol. 8, 871–876. 10.1021/cb3007242. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  85. Trotta E, Bessette PH, Silveria SL, Ely LK, Jude KM, Le DT, Holst CR, Coyle A, Potempa M, Lanier LL, et al. (2018). A human anti-IL-2 antibody that potentiates regulatory T cells by a structure-based mechanism. Nat. Med. 24, 1005–1014. 10.1038/s41591-018-0070-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  86. Waldmann TA (2006). The biology of interleukin-2 and interleukin-15: implications for cancer therapy and vaccine design. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 6, 595–601. 10.1038/nri1901. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  87. Wang X, Rickert M, and Garcia KC (2005). Structure of the quaternary complex of interleukin-2 with its a, b, and gc receptors. Science 310, 1159–1163. 10.1126/science.1117893. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  88. Wang X, Mathieu M, and Brezski RJ (2018). IgG Fc engineering to modulate antibody effector functions. Protein Cell 9, 63–73. 10.1007/s13238-017-0473-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  89. Ward NC, Yu A, Moro A, Ban Y, Chen X, Hsiung S, Keegan J, Arbanas JM, Loubeau M, Thankappan A, et al. (2018). IL-2/CD25: a long-acting fusion protein that promotes immune tolerance by selectively targeting the IL-2 receptor on regulatory T cells. J. Immunol. 201, 2579–2592. 10.4049/jimmunol.1800907. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  90. Ward NC, Lui JB, Hernandez R, Yu L, Struthers M, Xie J, Santos Savio A, Dwyer CJ, Hsiung S, Yu A, and Malek TR (2020). Persistent IL-2 receptor signaling by IL-2/CD25 fusion protein controls diabetes in NOD mice by multiple mechanisms. Diabetes 69, 2400–2413. 10.2337/db20-0186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  91. Webster KE, Walters S, Kohler RE, Mrkvan T, Boyman O, Surh CD, Grey ST, and Sprent J (2009). In vivo expansion of T reg cells with IL-2-mAb complexes: induction of resistance to EAE and long-term acceptance of islet allografts without immunosuppression. J. Exp. Med. 206, 751–760. 10.1084/jem.20082824. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  92. Weiss JM, Bilate AM, Gobert M, Ding Y, Curotto de Lafaille MA, Parkhurst CN, Xiong H, Dolpady J, Frey AB, Ruocco MG, et al. (2012). Neuropilin 1 is expressed on thymus-derived natural regulatory T cells, but not mucosa-generated induced Foxp3+ T reg cells. J. Exp. Med. 209, 1723–1742. 10.1084/jem.20120914. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  93. Wesley JD, Sather BD, Perdue NR, Ziegler SF, and Campbell DJ (2010). Cellular requirements for diabetes induction in DO11.10xRIPmOVA mice. J. Immunol. 185, 4760–4768. 10.4049/jimmunol.1000820. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  94. Wilson DC, Grotenbreg GM, Liu K, Zhao Y, Frickel E-M, Gubbels M-J, Ploegh HL, and Yap GS (2010). Differential regulation of effector- and central-memory responses to toxoplasma gondii infection by IL-12 revealed by tracking of tgd057-specific CD8+ T cells. PLoS Pathog. 6, e1000815. 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000815. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  95. Wrangle JM, Velcheti V, Patel MR, Garrett-Mayer E, Hill EG, Ravenel JG, Miller JS, Farhad M, Anderton K, Lindsey K, et al. (2018). ALT-803, an IL-15 superagonist, in combination with nivolumab in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: a non-randomised, open-label, phase 1b trial. Lancet Oncol. 19, 694–704. 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30148-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  96. Xie JH, Zhang Y, Loubeau M, Mangan P, Heimrich E, Tovar C, Zhou X, Madia P, Doyle M, Dudhgaonkar S, et al. (2021). Mouse IL-2/CD25 fusion protein induces regulatory T cell expansion and immune suppression in preclinical models of systemic Lupus erythematosus. J. Immunol. 207, 34–43. 10.4049/jimmunol.2100078. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  97. Xu W, Jones M, Liu B, Zhu X, Johnson CB, Edwards AC, Kong L, Jeng EK, Han K, Marcus WD, et al. (2013). Efficacy and mechanism-of-action of a novel superagonist interleukin-15: interleukin-15 receptor αSu/Fc fusion complex in syngeneic murine models of multiple myeloma. Cancer Res. 73, 3075–3086. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-12-2357. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  98. Yadav M, Louvet C, Davini D, Gardner JM, Martinez-Llordella M, Bailey-Bucktrout S, Anthony BA, Sverdrup FM, Head R, Kuster DJ, et al. (2012). Neuropilin-1 distinguishes natural and inducible regulatory T cells among regulatory T cell subsets in vivo. J. Exp. Med. 209, 1713–1722. 10.1084/jem.20120822. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  99. Yodoi J, Teshigawara K, Nikaido T, Fukui K, Noma T, Honjo T, Takigawa M, Sasaki M, Minato N, and Tsudo M (1985). TCGF (IL 2)-receptor inducing factor(s). I. Regulation of IL 2 receptor on a natural killer-like cell line (YT cells). J. Immunol. 134, 1623–1630. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  100. Yokoyama Y, Iwasaki T, Kitano S, Satake A, Nomura S, Furukawa T, Matsui K, and Sano H (2018). IL-2-Anti-IL-2 monoclonal antibody immune complexes inhibit collagen-induced arthritis by augmenting regulatory T cell functions. J. Immunol. 201, 1899–1906. 10.4049/jimmunol.1701502. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  101. Young A, Quandt Z, and Bluestone JA (2018). The balancing Act between cancer immunity and autoimmunity in response to immunotherapy. Cancer Immunol. Res. 6, 1445–1452. 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-18-0487. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  102. Zhang B, Sun J, Wang Y, Ji D, Yuan Y, Li S, Sun Y, Hou Y, Li P, Zhao L, et al. (2021). Site-specific PEGylation of interleukin-2 enhances immunosuppression via the sustained activation of regulatory T cells. Nat. Biomed. Eng. 5, 1288–1305. 10.1038/s41551-021-00797-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

1
2

Data Availability Statement

  • All data reported in this paper will be shared by the lead contact upon request.

  • This paper does not report original code.

  • Any additional information required to reanalyze the data reported in this paper is available from the lead contact upon request.

RESOURCES