Skip to main content
GigaByte logoLink to GigaByte
. 2020 Nov 27;2020:gigabyte9. doi: 10.46471/gigabyte.9

The female urinary microbiota in relation to the reproductive tract microbiota

Chen Chen 1,2,5,, Lilan Hao 1,2,, Weixia Wei 3,4,, Fei Li 1, Liju Song 1,2, Xiaowei Zhang 1,2, Juanjuan Dai 3,4, Zhuye Jie 1,2,6, Jiandong Li 1,2, Xiaolei Song 1, Zirong Wang 1, Zhe Zhang 1,2, Liping Zeng 3,4, Hui Du 3,4, Huiru Tang 3,4, Tao Zhang 1,2, Huanming Yang 1,7, Jian Wang 1,7, Susanne Brix 8, Karsten Kristiansen 1,5, Xun Xu 1,2, Ruifang Wu 3,4,*, Huijue Jia 1,2,6,9,*
PMCID: PMC9632005  PMID: 36824591

Abstract

Human urine is traditionally considered to be sterile, and whether the urine harbours distinct microbial communities has been a matter of debate. Potential links between female urine and reproductive tract microbial communities is currently not clear. Here, we collected urine samples from 147 Chinese women of reproductive age and explored the nature of colonization by 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing, quantitative real-time PCR, and live bacteria culture. To demonstrate the utility of this approach, the intra-individual Spearman’s correlation was used to explore the relationship between urine and multiple sites of the female reproductive tract. PERMANOVA was also performed to explore potential correlations between the lifestyle and various clinical factors and urinary bacterial communities. Our data demonstrated distinct bacterial communities in urine, indicative of a non-sterile environment. Streptococcus-dominated, Lactobacillus-dominated, and diverse type were the three most common urinary bacterial community types in the cohort. Detailed comparison of the urinary microbiota with multiple sites of the female reproductive tract microbiota demonstrated that the urinary microbiota were more similar to the microbiota in the cervix and uterine cavity than to those of the vagina in the same women. Our data demonstrate the potential connectivity among microbiota in the female urogenital system and provide insight and resources for exploring diseases of the urethra and genital tract.

Data Description

Purpose of data acquisition

The role of microbiota in the vaginal environment has received a lot of attention over the past decade, while the female upper reproductive tract was traditionally believed to be sterile and mostly studied in the context of infections or incontinence [1]. Despite continued controversy, the presence of microorganisms beyond the cervix (i.e. the female upper reproductive tract) is increasingly recognized even in non-infectious conditions [2]. Like the female upper reproductive tract, the sterile hypothesis of urine has also been overturned by emerging evidence that indicates the existence of microorganisms in the urinary tract by culturing or sequencing approaches [3, 4]. A recent study using an expanded quantitative urine culture in combination with whole-genome sequencing has isolated and sequenced the genomes of 149 bacterial strains from catheterized urine of both symptomatic and asymptomatic peri-menopausal women [5]. It also showed highly similar strains of commensal bacteria in both the bladder and vagina of the same individual [5]. Another study analysed the urinary microbiota of 189 individuals using 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing and suggested that the urethra and bladder can harbour microbial communities distinct from the vagina [6]. However, the relationship between female urine microbiota and the upper reproductive tract microbiota has so far not been studied.

Here, we present a dataset of the urinary microbiota for a relatively large cohort of 147 women of reproductive age. Together with our recently published study of peritoneal fluid, uterine, and vaginal samples from the same individuals [2], this data shows that although urinary microbiota contain larger populations of Lactobacillus and Streptococcus, they are more similar to the microbiota of the cervix and uterine cavity, in accordance with the anatomical opening of the bladder. Together with a wealth of metadata, we demonstrate that these data are useful for exploring the potential of the urinary microbiota for clinical diagnosis.

Methods

A protocol collection including methods for DNA extraction, bioinformatics analysis and quantitative real-time PCR is available via protocols.io (Figure 1) [7].

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Protocol collection for sequencing and analysing female urinary microbiota. https://www.protocols.io/widgets/doi?uri=dx.doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.bp3wmqpe

Sample collection

In this study, a total of 147 reproductive age women (age 22–48) were recruited by Peking University Shenzhen Hospital [8]. All participants were reproductive age women who underwent hysteroscopy and/or laparoscopy for conditions without infections, such as hysteromyoma, adenomyosis, endometriosis, or salpingemphraxis. Subjects with other related diseases, such as vaginal inflammation, severe pelvic adhesion, endocrine or autoimmune disorders were removed. Pregnant women, breastfeeding women, and menstruating women at the time of sampling were also excluded. None of the subjects received any antibiotic treatments or vaginal medications within two weeks of sampling. In addition, no cervical treatment was performed within the previous 7 days, no vaginal douching was performed within 5 days, and no sexual activity was performed within at least 2 days.

137 self-sampling morning mid-stream urine samples were collected between December 2013 and July 2014 prior to the surgery (sample_metadata.csv [8]), and then stored at −80 °C until they were transported on dry ice to BGI-Shenzhen for sequencing. The samples from an additional 10 women were collected for validation purposes by a doctor during the surgery in July 2017. For each operation, a urine catheter was inserted into the disinfected urethra to collect mid-stream urine. For each sample of urine collected through a catheter, an identical volume of saline solution was set as the control sample. The samples were then placed at 4 °C, transported to BGI-Shenzhen, and processed within 6 hours. A portion of each sample was used for culturing live bacteria and the rest was used for sequencing.

DNA extraction and 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing

Genomic DNA extraction was carried out following the protocol [9]. The primers 515F and 907R were utilized for PCR amplification of the hypervariable regions V4-V5 of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene. The 907R primer includes a unique barcoded fusion. The primer sequences were: 515F: 5-GTGCCAGCMGCCGCGGTAA-3 and 907R: 5-CCGTCAATTCMTTTRAGT-3, where M denotes A or C and R denotes purine. The conditions for PCR amplification were: 3 min of denaturation at 94 °C, followed by 25 cycles of 45 s at 94 °C (denaturing), 60 s at 50 °C (annealing), and 90 s at 72 °C (elongation), followed by a final elongation for 10 min at 72 °C. The amplification products were purified by the AxyPrep™ Mag PCR Clean-Up Kit (Axygen, USA). The amplicon libraries were constructed with an Ion Plus Fragment Library Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc.) [10], then sequenced by the Ion PGM™ Sequencer with the Ion 318™ Chip v2 with a read length of 400 bp (Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc., Ion PGM™ Hi-Q™ OT2 Kit, Cat.No: A27739; Ion PGM™ Hi-Q™ Sequencing Kit, Cat.No: A25592) [11]. All experiments were performed in the laboratory of BGI-Shenzhen.

Processing of sequencing reads

The raw sequencing reads were first subjected to Mothur (Mothur, RRID:SCR_011947; V1.33.3) [12] for filtering out the low-quality reads meeting the following criteria: (1) reads shorter than 200 bp; (2) reads not matching the degenerated PCR primers for up to two errors; (3) reads with an average quality score less than 25. A total of 8,812,607 reads, with an average of 57,225 reads per sample (a minimum of 1113 reads and a maximum of 194,564 reads) were obtained. Subsequently, the sequences with identity greater than 97% were clustered into Operational Taxonomic Units (OTUs) using the QIIME (QIIME, RRID:SCR_008249; V1.8.0) uclust programme [13], where each cluster was thought of as representing a species. The seed sequences of each OTU were aligned against the Greengene reference sequences (gg_13_8_otus) for annotation using Mothur. The detailed analysis workflow was deposited in protocols.io [14].

We also calculated the Unifrac distance using QIIME based on taxonomic abundance profiles at the OTU level [11].

PERMANOVA on the influence of phenotypes

Permutational multivariate analysis of variance (PERMANOVA) was used to assess the effect of different covariates based on the relative abundances of OTUs of the samples [15, 16] using Bray-Curtis and UniFrac distance and 9999 permutations from the vegan package (vegan, RRID:SCR_011950) in R [16, 17].

Quantitative real-time PCR

We quantified the four Lactobacillus species, including L.iners, L jensenii, L. crispatus and L. gasseri using the modified qPCR protocol [18]. SYBR Premix Ex Taq GC (TAKARA) was used and the reactions were run on a StepOnePlus Real-time PCR System (Life Technologies). Each PCR reaction mixture contained 10 μl of 2×SYBR Premix Ex Taq GC, 0.2 μM forward primer, 0.2 μM reverse primer, 1.6 μl of DNA sample, and 8.2 μl of ultrapure water to make up the final reaction volume of 20 μl. Each run included a standard curve and all samples were amplified in triplicate. Ultrapure water was used as the blank control template.

To construct the standard curves, the sequencing-confirmed plasmids of four species were used after quantification with a Qubit Fluorometer and serial 10-fold dilutions. The amplification efficiency was (100 ±10)% and linearity values were all ≥0.99. The detailed procedure was deposited in protocols.io [19].

Bacterial culturing

The urine samples and controls from 10 additional subjects were cultivated in the laboratory by spreading 100 μl of sample on different agars containing 5% horse blood, such as PYG agar (DSMZ 104 medium), BHI agar, and EG agar. The plates were incubated in both aerobic and anaerobic conditions at 37 °C for 72 hours. To keep the medium anaerobically during culture, resazurin and cysteine-HCl were added as reducing agents. The genomic DNA of the isolates was extracted by the Bacterial DNA Kit (OMEGA) and then underwent 16S rRNA gene amplification using the universal primers 27F/1492R [20]. The amplicons were purified and sent for Sanger sequencing. The generated sequences were then submitted to BLAST on the EzBioCloud [21] for identification.

Preliminary analysis and validation

Microbiota composition of the urine

To explore the urinary microbiota in this dataset, morning midstream urine (UR) was self-collected prior to surgery from an exploratory cohort of 137 Chinese women recruited for the study (median age 31.6, range 22–48). As with our previous vagino-uterine microbiota study [2], all volunteers had conditions that were not known to involve infections [8]. From 95 women in the cohort, six locations within the female reproductive tract, including the lower third of the vagina (CL), the posterior fornix (CU), cervical mucus (CV), endometrium (ET), left and right fallopian tubes (FLL and FRL), and peritoneal fluid (PF) were also sampled. Their vagino-uterine microbiota information have been published previously [2]. After 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing, the sequencing reads were pre-processed for quality control and filtering, then clustered into OTUs (Methods, Table 1 and OTU_table_urine.biom.hdf5 [8]).

Table 1.

Sequencing and annotation of the 137 samples from the exploratory cohort.

Sample name Sequencing amount % of reads annotated to taxa Archive accession number
#raw reads #clean reads #filtered reads Genus Species
C001UR 52506 11326 9347 100.00% 75.51% SAMEA5042945
C002UR 55955 14529 5930 100.00% 65.36% SAMEA5042987
C003UR 61367 21181 16831 100.00% 91.06% SAMEA5043040
C004UR 54585 18506 3325 100.00% 41.59% SAMEA5042979
C005UR 52177 22856 20683 100.00% 92.62% SAMEA5043003
C007UR 50766 15468 8737 100.00% 71.10% SAMEA5043001
C008UR 53748 14062 6169 100.00% 64.05% SAMEA5043004
C009UR 53383 12247 11327 100.00% 96.97% SAMEA5043046
C011UR 47814 13058 11292 100.00% 66.76% SAMEA5042941
C012UR 55279 16923 7484 100.00% 55.46% SAMEA5042938
C014UR 55713 15175 8818 100.00% 64.31% SAMEA5043060
C016UR 73372 22054 17669 100.00% 57.04% SAMEA5043009
C018UR 69142 26505 23581 100.00% 12.12% SAMEA5043006
C019UR 72249 17868 14440 100.00% 44.63% SAMEA5043054
C020UR 54574 19391 5452 100.00% 63.83% SAMEA5042942
C021UR 58118 17294 12123 100.00% 55.33% SAMEA5042998
C023UR 47476 18452 16795 100.00% 16.09% SAMEA5042947
C026UR 46583 16741 3267 100.00% 83.96% SAMEA5042969
C028UR 88245 26955 19268 100.00% 19.93% SAMEA5042984
C033UR 90431 31998 26496 100.00% 66.99% SAMEA5043062
C035UR 63773 27044 24115 100.00% 97.31% SAMEA5043037
C038UR 55562 10165 9208 100.00% 84.56% SAMEA5042972
C039UR 77957 18891 15748 100.00% 33.38% SAMEA5042963
C040UR 58940 12555 5438 100.00% 69.49% SAMEA5043021
C041UR 60028 15361 9366 100.00% 78.38% SAMEA5043000
C042UR 74086 14402 11088 100.00% 67.53% SAMEA5042955
C043UR 74146 23691 18730 100.00% 60.19% SAMEA5043032
C045UR 61249 17801 10367 100.00% 2.96% SAMEA5043048
C047UR 47742 11940 3506 100.00% 54.25% SAMEA5043024
C048UR 35550 1100 816 100.00% 62.75% SAMEA5042931
C050UR 51565 18902 290 100.00% 72.76% SAMEA5042936
C051UR 58783 10403 8234 100.00% 50.77% SAMEA5042983
C053UR 32311 1653 26 100.00% 73.08% SAMEA5043035
C055UR 45054 13326 6184 100.00% 56.40% SAMEA5043016
C056UR 69173 24652 8282 100.00% 86.78% SAMEA5043023
C057UR 64417 27033 24444 100.00% 98.11% SAMEA5043059
C058UR 42089 1415 912 100.00% 4.28% SAMEA5042935
C059UR 53642 12618 577 100.00% 74.70% SAMEA5042930
C060UR 73930 22110 19192 100.00% 20.17% SAMEA5043008
C062UR 63220 19932 17112 100.00% 79.58% SAMEA5043012
C063UR 44974 1201 790 100.00% 53.42% SAMEA5043039
C064UR 63505 15051 7134 100.00% 82.38% SAMEA5042981
C065UR 53884 15094 13794 100.00% 52.97% SAMEA5043027
C066UR 63269 16157 12090 100.00% 45.86% SAMEA5042985
C067UR 55812 19047 2481 100.00% 86.86% SAMEA5042986
C068UR 54396 17456 15352 100.00% 86.72% SAMEA5042937
T000UR 57607 11995 9166 100.00% 37.51% SAMEA5043045
T001UR 47924 13474 2849 100.00% 48.58% SAMEA5043014
T002UR 63839 18381 3623 100.00% 49.71% SAMEA5042975
T003UR 70242 19166 5255 100.00% 51.67% SAMEA5042988
T004UR 67280 20578 2947 100.00% 57.24% SAMEA5042943
T005UR 52820 12868 4931 100.00% 57.92% SAMEA5043019
T006UR 79409 19472 13710 100.00% 19.58% SAMEA5043017
T007UR 34173 1403 797 100.00% 50.06% SAMEA5042999
T008UR 30074 1346 1044 100.00% 84.77% SAMEA5043031
T009UR 58440 10386 7936 100.00% 81.92% SAMEA5042950
T010UR 65382 17191 9801 100.00% 47.54% SAMEA5042967
T011UR 38550 1163 464 100.00% 65.52% SAMEA5043061
T012UR 75848 21956 4605 100.00% 52.62% SAMEA5043049
T013UR 26872 1383 203 100.00% 74.38% SAMEA5042996
T014UR 23298 1741 518 100.00% 93.44% SAMEA5043042
T015UR 40653 2052 1470 100.00% 29.25% SAMEA5042953
T016UR 58448 16261 3993 100.00% 58.75% SAMEA5043053
T017UR 58703 19270 1929 100.00% 54.12% SAMEA5042990
T018UR 54726 12668 7152 100.00% 17.18% SAMEA5042970
T019UR 67711 14153 1606 100.00% 58.90% SAMEA5042954
T020UR 89936 22579 17919 100.00% 68.74% SAMEA5043052
T021UR 66094 14761 5276 100.00% 29.66% SAMEA5042951
T022UR 28712 803 422 100.00% 74.88% SAMEA5042940
T023UR 27738 1338 385 100.00% 30.65% SAMEA5042961
T024UR 19345 824 55 100.00% 90.91% SAMEA5042948
T025UR 29739 1578 1214 100.00% 76.85% SAMEA5042995
T026UR 79923 17606 6269 100.00% 37.09% SAMEA5042959
T027UR 61145 10093 6169 100.00% 59.51% SAMEA5042949
T028UR 71755 19529 16118 100.00% 7.61% SAMEA5042965
T029UR 58776 11505 8300 100.00% 6.04% SAMEA5043018
T030UR 57098 7000 5119 100.00% 70.23% SAMEA5042966
T031UR 49283 16113 1636 100.00% 38.63% SAMEA5043063
T032UR 46822 15041 1187 100.00% 53.24% SAMEA5042927
T033UR 63044 14272 10097 100.00% 80.89% SAMEA5043043
T035UR 50618 12403 1122 100.00% 76.20% SAMEA5043002
T036UR 78781 22492 17075 100.00% 84.36% SAMEA5042982
T038UR 73752 15237 11784 100.00% 1.14% SAMEA5043022
T039UR 58904 22286 19836 100.00% 95.82% SAMEA5043015
T040UR 77039 15332 8059 100.00% 40.76% SAMEA5043028
T041UR 58382 13735 11893 100.00% 97.26% SAMEA5043056
T042UR 53948 17112 1392 100.00% 29.74% SAMEA5043026
T043UR 72662 15446 10584 100.00% 16.18% SAMEA5042956
T044UR 59818 19779 724 100.00% 73.48% SAMEA5042993
T045UR 63627 21438 19282 100.00% 39.34% SAMEA5043033
T046UR 58142 20606 912 100.00% 56.69% SAMEA5042991
T047UR 24190 736 26 100.00% 73.08% SAMEA5042978
T048UR 10255 441 53 100.00% 79.25% SAMEA5043036
T049UR 63640 22520 20236 100.00% 98.73% SAMEA5043010
T051UR 22322 1066 101 100.00% 77.23% SAMEA5042997
T052UR 57909 11757 6419 100.00% 67.85% SAMEA5043058
T053UR 63637 24574 21178 100.00% 99.17% SAMEA5043034
T054UR 59194 18986 17148 100.00% 15.87% SAMEA5042929
T055UR 70744 14983 2724 100.00% 84.07% SAMEA5042962
T056UR 58876 19486 846 100.00% 65.84% SAMEA5043051
T057UR 53598 13889 12456 100.00% 96.76% SAMEA5042939
T058UR 18302 739 45 100.00% 64.44% SAMEA5043044
T059UR 59974 15542 12378 100.00% 23.53% SAMEA5042964
T060UR 21736 500 203 100.00% 89.16% SAMEA5042946
T061UR 33002 1153 503 100.00% 56.46% SAMEA5043011
T062UR 64983 10519 6302 100.00% 52.19% SAMEA5042933
T063UR 53347 12793 4023 100.00% 40.00% SAMEA5043041
T064UR 68122 23665 21094 100.00% 79.99% SAMEA5042934
T065UR 51210 17070 1242 100.00% 65.30% SAMEA5042977
T066UR 64589 26532 1911 100.00% 56.04% SAMEA5042968
T067UR 67938 16248 4974 100.00% 50.12% SAMEA5043005
T068UR 70192 28890 3698 100.00% 40.37% SAMEA5043013
T069UR 60564 21236 17683 100.00% 43.97% SAMEA5042957
T070UR 83453 20755 5034 100.00% 44.18% SAMEA5043038
T071UR 80077 36770 29224 100.00% 97.68% SAMEA5043007
T072UR 73469 29671 19787 100.00% 87.68% SAMEA5042992
T073UR 73167 17577 3914 100.00% 54.09% SAMEA5042989
T074UR 59084 23906 21347 100.00% 89.11% SAMEA5042973
T075UR 60263 17726 15250 100.00% 70.37% SAMEA5042976
T076UR 37428 809 514 100.00% 63.42% SAMEA5042960
T078UR 76834 17034 4220 100.00% 66.75% SAMEA5042958
T080UR 12172 609 61 100.00% 52.46% SAMEA5042932
T081UR 63432 14841 6915 100.00% 86.49% SAMEA5043029
T082UR 26941 693 609 100.00% 2.96% SAMEA5043047
T083UR 69149 34307 30270 100.00% 95.45% SAMEA5043055
T084UR 59304 25863 22866 100.00% 89.34% SAMEA5042928
T085UR 65565 20426 1344 100.00% 78.57% SAMEA5043030
T086UR 66605 23828 21243 100.00% 95.16% SAMEA5043025
T087UR 62480 16656 6414 100.00% 76.55% SAMEA5043057
T088UR 82733 32538 3794 100.00% 71.09% SAMEA5042994
T089UR 110227 27223 11761 100.00% 24.49% SAMEA5042944
T090UR 70526 29296 1917 100.00% 71.62% SAMEA5043020
T091UR 27973 913 739 100.00% 27.74% SAMEA5042952
T092UR 69694 10825 7894 100.00% 55.26% SAMEA5043050
T093UR 58492 14656 7272 100.00% 84.27% SAMEA5042980
T094UR 194564 59268 35224 100.00% 37.26% SAMEA5042971
T095UR 42681 1009 560 100.00% 45.00% SAMEA5042974

Due to anatomical structures, voided urine samples from women were considered to be easily contaminated by microbiota from the surrounding vulvovaginal region [22]. Most vaginal communities (88%) in this cohort were dominated by one genus with >50% relative abundance within data from individuals. In contrast, the urinary microbiota in this study showed more heterogeneity. 56.93% of the cohort harboured a diverse type represented significantly by bacteria, including Streptococcus, Lactobacillus, Pseudomonas, Staphylococcus, Acinetobacter, and Vagococcus, though none of these species were dominant, i.e. reached >50% relative abundance (Figure 2). In addition, 22.63% of the women harboured >50% Streptococcus, and 13.87% of the women harboured >50% Lactobacillus (Figure 2A, B). Rare subtypes such as Enterococcus (2.19%), Bifidobacteriaceae (1.46%), Prevotella (0.73%), Enterobacteriaceae (0.73%), Coriobacteriaceae (0.73%), and Veillonella (0.73%) were also detected in this cohort (Figure 2A, B). Notably, the median relative abundances of Lactobacillus, Pseudomonas, and Acinetobacter in the urine samples were more similar to the uterus samples (Figure 2C) [2]. At the phylum level, urinary microbiota were dominated by Firmicutes and Proteobacteria (Figure 2C).

Figure 2.

Figure 2.

Urinary microbiota of the initial cohort of 137 Chinese reproductive-age women. (A) The relative abundances of genera detected in each individual are shown in the bar chart. The dendrogram is a result of a centroid linkage hierarchical clustering based on Euclidean distances between the microbial composition proportion of urinary bacterial communities. (B) The ratio of different urinary microbiota types. The genus whose relative abundance accounted for >50% in an individual was selected as an identified type. The genera that accounted for <50% of the microbiota in an individual were identified as diverse type. (C) Pie chart for the urinary microbial genera according to their median relative abundance. Genera that took up less than 1% of the microbiota are labelled together as ‘others’. The outer ring indicates the distribution of microbiota at the phylum level.

Cultivation of live bacteria from transurethral catheterized urine

The question of whether bacterial DNA signals have originated from live bacteria or fragments in the urine samples has been a subject of much debate [22]. To demonstrate the utility of the data for addressing this question, we performed a validation study using live bacteria cultures from urine samples provided by an additional cohort of 10 women.

We tried to culture and isolate bacterial colonies from freshly collected urine samples. Urine samples were serial diluted and spread on three different kinds of agar plates and incubated under both aerobic and anaerobic conditions. Six different positive isolates belonging to 5 genera, including Lactobacillus, Staphylococcus, Clostridium, Enterococcus, and Propionibacterium were obtained from 3 out of 10 subjects (Table 2). The 5 genera were also found as dominant in our 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing data and consistent with previous cultivation results of published papers [2326] (Table 2). Reassuringly, no isolates were detected from the negative controls (sterile saline and ultrapure water). Therefore, these data verified the existence of live bacteria in the urine by obtaining isolates using conventional culturing methods.

Table 2.

Identification of cultured microbial isolates from urine of the 10 additional women by sequencing of partial 16S rRNA gene.

Sample ID Condition Medium 16S rRNA gene-PCR Identification Accessions Identity (%) Supported by previous cultivation
S001U Anaerobic, 37 °C EG Clostridium cochlearium LR761333.1 99.26 Meijer-Severs et al. [24]
S001U Anaerobic, 37 °C 104 Streptococcus sp. (S. tigurinus/S. mitis) LR761334.1 99.72 Hilt et al. [23]
S003U Anaerobic, 37 °C BHI Enterococcus faecalis LR761335.1 99.91 Hilt et al. [23], Guzmàn et al. [25], Fraimow et al. [26],
S003U Anaerobic, 37 °C 104 Lactobacillus crispatus LR761337.1 99.82 Hilt et al. [23]
S003U Anaerobic, 37 °C 104 Propionibacterium granulosum LR761336.1 99.02 Ormerod et al. [27]
S008U Anaerobic, 37 °C 104, BHI, EG Streptococcus agalactiae LR761340.1, LR761339.1, LR761338.1 99.65, 99.35, 99.52 Hilt et al. [23]

Considerable bacterial biomass revealed by qPCR

To provide additional evidence of the bacterial communities in the urine, a species-specific quantitative real-time PCR method was utilized to focus on the four common vaginal Lactobacillus species, i.e. L. crispatus, L. iners, L. jensenii and L. gasseri (QPCR Lactobacillus.csv [8]). The Lactobacillus species we examined presented a similar distribution and abundance along the female reproductive tract, and the corresponding urinary Lactobacillus ranged between the upper and lower reproductive tracts (Figure 3A). Among them, L. iners occurred most frequently (59%) in the urine samples, while L. crispatus only occurred in 26% of women sampled (Figure 3B). L. iners was reported far less protective against bacterial and viral infections compared to L. crispatus [28]. 80% of the cohort was detected to harbour at least one of these four Lactobacillus species (Figure 3B). The occurrence rate of Lactobacillus in the genus level of 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing data was 94% (Figure 2A). The total bacterial biomass is approximated by the ratio of the copy number from the result of qPCR to the relative abundance according to the result of 16S rRNA gene sequencing of the same sample (QPCR bacterial_biomass.csv [8]). The result gave an estimation of 107 copies/sample, placing the urinary bacterial biomass between the vaginal-cervical sites (1010–1011 copies/sample) and the endometrium (ET) samples (106–107 copies/sample) [2] (Figure 3A), all of which were orders of magnitude above potential background noise [29]. These results were interestingly consistent with a weakly acidic pH of the urine, in comparison to pH < 4.5 in the vagina or pH ∼ 8 in the peritoneal fluid [30].

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

The concentrations of the dominant Lactobacillus species at urine and the reproductive tract. Samples derive from the initial cohort of 137 Chinese reproductive-age women. (A) The abundance of L. iners, L. jensenii, L. crispatus and L. gasseri calculated by qPCR results in different samples. Boxes denote the interquartile range (IQR) between the first and third quartiles (25th and 75th percentiles, respectively), and the lines inside the boxes denote the median. The whiskers denote the lowest and highest values within 1.5 times the IQR from the first and third quartiles, respectively. (B) The frequency of the respective Lactobacillus detected in all urine sample.

Intra-individual similarity in the urine-reproductive tract microbiota

To further assess the microbiota relationship between the urine and the six positions of the female reproductive tract, we computed intra-individual correlation between the microbial profiles in the urine and those found in different sites of the reproductive tract, and then clustered the individuals into 4 groups (Spearman’s correlation coefficient, Figure 4A, relative_abundance_correlation.csv [8]). Interestingly, the microbiota of group 3, which accounted for 41% of the cohort, showed significant correlation between the urine samples and the female reproductive tract samples, of which the coefficient increased gradually along the anatomical site from CL to CV, ET, and PF (Figure 4B). In contrast, 9% of women in group 1 presented a reverse trend. In group 2 (22%) and group 4 (27%), there appeared to be a weak relationship between the microbiota of the urine and female reproductive tract. Taken together, we observed the most similar distribution of microbiota between urine and CV/ET (Figure 4A). The principal coordinate analyses (PCoA) of the weighted and unweighted intra-individual UniFrac distance further corroborated our conclusion that there is an intra-individual similarity of the microbiota between the urine and the upper sites of female reproductive tract, especially the junction sites (CV and ET) (Figure 5).

Figure 4.

Figure 4.

Similarity of the urine-reproductive tract microbiota within individuals. (A) Heatmap for the intra-individual Spearman’s correlation coefficient between microbiota identified in the urine and at different sites in the reproductive tract (relative_abundance_correlation.csv [8]). Samples derived from the initial cohort of 95 Chinese reproductive-age women, who collected both the urine and reproductive tract samples. As the number of samples from fallopian tubes (FLL, FRL) is too small, the correlation between microbiota in the urine and those in fallopian tubes are not shown. The dendrogram is a result of a centroid linkage hierarchical clustering based on Euclidean distances between the intra-individual Spearman’s correlation coefficient of different body sites. The colored squares illustrate the subtypes found within the urinary microbiome. (B) Spearman’s correlation coefficient between microbiota found in the urine and those from different sites of the reproductive tract. The Wilcoxon ranked sum test was used to calculate the difference. Boxes denote the interquartile range (IQR) between the first and third quartiles (25th and 75th percentiles, respectively), and the line inside the boxes denote the median. The whiskers denote the lowest and highest values within 1.5 times the IQR from the first and third quartiles, respectively. An asterisk denotes p <0.05, two asterisks denote p <0.01, three asterisks denote p <0.001.

Figure 5.

Figure 5.

PCoA on the samples based on Unweighted-UniFrac (A) and Weighted-UniFrac (B) distances. Samples were taken from UR, CL, CU, and CV before operation, and from ET and PF during operation. Samples were derived from the initial cohort of 137 Chinese reproductive-age women. Each dot represents one sample (n =94 CL, 95 CU, 95 CV, 80 ET, 93 PF, 9 FLL, 10 FRL, and 137 UR).

Lifestyle and clinical factors influencing the urinary microbiota

The human microbiome is dynamic and highly affected by its host environment. Age, menstrual cycle, benign conditions such as adenomyosis, and infertility due to endometriosis have previously been reported to shape the vagino-uterine microbiota [2]. With our comprehensive collection of demographic and baseline clinical characteristics from women of reproductive age (sample_metadata.csv [8]), such variations in the urinary microbiota can be explored in this dataset. Urinary microbial composition was significantly associated with these factors, such as age, surgical history, abortion, vaginal deliveries, experience of given birth (multipara vs. nullipara), infertility due to endometriosis, and hysteromyoma (PERMANOVA, P <0.05, q <0.05, Table 3). Although the urinary microbiota also correlated with some other factors, such as menstrual phase, contraception, endometriosis, pelvic adhesiolysis, and anemia, statistical significance was not achieved after controlling for multiple testing (PERMANOVA, P <0.05 but q >0.05, Table 3). The initial results here indicate a close link between the urinary microbiota and the general and diseased physiological conditions, and this link could be further understood by exploring this data more deeply.

Table 3.

PERMANOVA for the influence of phenotypes on the urinary microbiota.

Phenotype Bray-Curtis Unweighted-UniFrac Weighted-UniFrac
R2 P value Fdr R2 P value Fdr R2 P value Fdr
Age 0.018 0.005 0.049 0.010 0.178 0.541 0.019 0.026 0.419
Age-2 groups 0.013 0.050 0.236 0.011 0.116 0.429 0.016 0.042 0.452
Age-3 groups 0.032 0.026 0.150 0.025 0.228 0.577 0.030 0.135 0.539
Pulses 0.015 0.019 0.131 0.010 0.159 0.505 0.015 0.072 0.456
Frequent colds 0.011 0.080 0.270 0.011 0.108 0.429 0.021 0.017 0.419
Antibiotics 0.014 0.036 0.194 0.012 0.108 0.429 0.007 0.525 0.782
Constipation 0.011 0.114 0.325 0.014 0.039 0.400 0.018 0.033 0.419
Surgical history 0.018 0.005 0.049 0.018 0.006 0.172 0.034 0.001 0.091
Abdominal surgical history 0.010 0.187 0.418 0.007 0.466 0.755 0.019 0.030 0.419
Menstrual cycle 0.009 0.200 0.421 0.018 0.005 0.172 0.015 0.065 0.455
Menstrual phase (lower) 0.018 0.260 0.468 0.024 0.048 0.408 0.020 0.207 0.623
Menstrual phase (upper) 0.018 0.006 0.056 0.018 0.009 0.172 0.014 0.096 0.456
Contraception 0.044 0.010 0.086 0.038 0.098 0.429 0.029 0.470 0.782
Vaginal deliveries 0.018 0.003 0.049 0.016 0.014 0.172 0.016 0.051 0.455
Abortion 0.028 0.004 0.049 0.014 0.239 0.585 0.016 0.198 0.623
Multipara / nullipara 0.019 0.003 0.049 0.017 0.014 0.172 0.013 0.091 0.456
Infertility due to endometriosis 0.045 0.000 0.008 0.029 0.013 0.172 0.019 0.181 0.599
Endometriosis 0.014 0.022 0.141 0.011 0.095 0.429 0.005 0.644 0.857
Pelvic adhesiolysis 0.008 0.346 0.572 0.013 0.042 0.400 0.006 0.489 0.782
Anemia 0.016 0.012 0.090 0.008 0.354 0.740 0.006 0.511 0.782
Hysteromyoma 0.018 0.003 0.049 0.012 0.057 0.429 0.021 0.014 0.419

Potential uses

As a large-scale cohort for studying the female urinary microbiota, our data provide a useful baseline and reference dataset in women of reproductive age. We also explored the association between the composition of urinary microbiota and that of the female reproductive tract microbiota. It is valuable to note that a higher intra-individual compositional similarity was observed between the microbiota of the urine and those of the cervical canal/uterus than between the microbiota of the urine and those of the vagina. This finding indicates that sampling of midstream urine (the least invasive and the easiest way) could be potentially used to survey the micro-environment of the cervical canal and uterus in the general population. This is relevant to the demonstrated associations between the urinary microbiota and various uterine-related diseases, such as hysteromyoma and infertility due to endometriosis. Our data provide a reference for clinical diagnosis and warrants further detailed exploration.

There are three limitations for this study. Firstly, as it was not possible to directly sample the upper reproductive tract of perfectly healthy women, we have included women who underwent minimally invasive laparoscopy or laparotomy for conditions that are not known to involve infection. This was the best proxy for sampling the upper reproductive tract in healthy women. Nevertheless, the relevance of the urinary microbiota between healthy women and women in our cohort would require further comparison. Secondly, for the low bacterial biomass of urine samples, a more comprehensive sampling process should be taken into consideration in subsequent studies, such as disinfection of the urethra and vulvovaginal region with 75% alcohol before urine self-collection, including a sample of sterile saline with the self-collection kit as a negative control and asking participants to fill another vial with it immediately following urine collection. A comparison of the microbial composition between the catheter-collected and self-collected specimens in the same individual would also require further inspection. Together, we hope that this dataset helps promote a new round of accelerated discoveries, including a novel scientific explanation for uterine-related diseases via longitudinal studies on the microbiota of the urinary and reproductive tracts.

Acknowledgements

The study was supported by the Shenzhen Municipal Government (No. SZXK027 and No. SZSM202011016), Shenzhen Peacock Plan (No. KQTD20150330171505310), and the Medical Scientific Research Foundation of Guangdong (No. A2019035). The authors really appreciate colleagues at BGI-Shenzhen for DNA extraction, library construction, and sequencing.

Funding Statement

The study was supported by the Shenzhen Municipal Government (No. SZXK027 and No. SZSM202011016), Shenzhen Peacock Plan (No. KQTD20150330171505310), and the Medical Scientific Research Foundation of Guangdong (No. A2019035).

Declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board of BGI-Shenzhen (No. BGI-IRB 17219) and Peking University Shenzhen Hospital (Version 1.0.20140301). All participants gave written informed consent prior to their recruitment into the study.

Data availability

The sequence reads generated by 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing have been deposited in both the European Nucleotide Archive with the accession number PRJEB29341 and the CNSA (https://db.cngb.org/cnsa/) of CNGB database with accession code CNP0000166. Additional data, result and a STORMS (Strengthening The Organizing and Reporting of Microbiome Studies) checklist are available from the GigaScience GigaDB repository [8]. The sequences of bacterial isolates have been deposited in the European Nucleotide Archive with the accession number PRJEB36743.

Author contributions

H.J. and R.W. organized this study. W.W., J.D., H.D., L.Z., H.T., T.W., and R.W. performed the sample collection, and phenotypic information collection. F.L., L.S., C.C., and J.L. performed the molecular biology experiments. C.C., L.H., and F.L. performed the bioinformatic analyses. C.C., X.Z., F.L., and H.J., wrote the manuscript.

Competing interests

There were no competing financial interests.

References

  • 1.Whiteside Sa, Razvi H, Dave S, Reid G, Burton JP, . The microbiome of the urinary tract — A role beyond infection. Nat. Rev. Urol., 2015; 81–90. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Chen C, Song X, Wei W, Zhong H, Dai J, Lan Z et al. . The microbiota continuum along the female reproductive tract and its relation to uterine-related diseases. Nat. Commun., 2017; 8: 875. doi:10.1038/s41467-017-00901-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Siddiqui H, Nederbragt AJ, Lagesen K, Jeansson SL, Jakobsen KS., . Assessing diversity of the female urine microbiota by high throughput sequencing of 16S rDNA amplicons. BMC Microbiol., 2011; 11: 244. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Wolfe AJ, Toh E, Shibata N, Rong R, Kenton K, FitzGerald MP et al. . Evidence of uncultivated bacteria in the adult female bladder. J. Clin. Microbiol., 2012; 50: 1376–1383. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Thomas-White K, Forster SC, Kumar N, Van Kuiken M, Putonti C, Stares MD et al. . Culturing of female bladder bacteria reveals an interconnected urogenital microbiota. Nat Commun., 2018; 9: 1557. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Gottschick C, Deng ZL, Vital M, Masur C, Abels C, Pieper DH et al. . The urinary microbiota of men and women and its changes in women during bacterial vaginosis and antibiotic treatment. Microbiome, 2017; 5: 99. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Hao L, . Protocols for “The female urinary microbiota in relation to the reproductive tract microbiota”. 2020; 10.17504/protocols.io.bpyumpww. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 8.Chen C, Hao L, Wei W, Li F, Song X, Zhang X et al. . Data from the female urinary microbiota. 2020, GigaScience Database; 10.5524/100754. [DOI]
  • 9.Hao L, . DNA extraction for human microbe samples. protocols.io 2020; 10.17504/protocols.io.bcmriu56. [DOI]
  • 10.Prepare Amplicon Libraries without Fragmentation Using the Ion Plus Fragment Library Kit. https://assets.thermofisher.com/TFS-Assets/LSG/manuals/MAN0006846_PrepAmpliconLibr_using_IonPlusFragLibraryKit_UB.pdf.
  • 11.Ion Personal Genome Machine™ (PGM™) System REFERENCE GUIDE. https://tools.thermofisher.com/content/sfs/manuals/MAN0009783_IonPGM_RefGuide.pdf.
  • 12.Schloss PD, Westcott SL, Ryabin T, Hall JR, Hartmann M, Hollister EB et al. . Introducing mothur: Open-source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities. Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 2009; 75: 7537–7541. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Caporaso JG, Kuczynski J, Stombaugh J, Bittinger K, Bushman FD, Costello EK et al. . QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat. Methods, 2010; 7: 335–336. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Hao L, . A Bioinformatics Analysis workflow for 16S rRNA Amplicon Sequencing data. protocols.io 2020; 10.17504/protocols.io.bntpmemn. [DOI]
  • 15.Anderson MJ, . A new method for non-parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Aust. Ecol., 2001; 26: 32–46. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Feng Q, Liang S, Jia H, Stadlmayr A, Tang L, Lan Z et al. . Gut microbiome development along the colorectal adenoma-carcinoma sequence. Nat. Commun., 2015; 6: 6528. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Zapala MA, Schork NJ, . Multivariate regression analysis of distance matrices for testing associations between gene expression patterns and related variables. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 2006; 103: 19430–19435. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.De Backer E, Verhelst R, Verstraelen H, Alqumber M a, Burton JP, Tagg JR et al. . Quantitative determination by real-time PCR of four vaginal Lactobacillus species, Gardnerella vaginalis and Atopobium vaginae indicates an inverse relationship between L. gasseri and L. iners. BMC Microbiol., 2007; 7: 115. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Chen C, . Quantitative real-time PCR for the four Lactobacillus species. protocols.io 2020; 10.17504/protocols.io.bps2mnge. [DOI]
  • 20.Augustinos AA, Kyritsis GA, Papadopoulos NT, Abd-Alla AMM, Cáceres C, Bourtzis K, . Exploitation of the medfly gut microbiota for the enhancement of sterile insect technique: Use of Enterobacter sp. in larval diet-based probiotic applications. PLoS One, 2015; 10: 1–17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.EzBioCloud. https://www.ezbiocloud.net/.
  • 22.Karstens L, Asquith M, Caruso V, Rosenbaum JT, Fair DA, Braun J et al. . Community profiling of the urinary microbiota: considerations for low-biomass samples. Nat. Rev. Urol., 2018; 15: 735–749. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Hilt EE, McKinley K, Pearce MM, Rosenfeld AB, Zilliox MJ, Mueller ER et al. . Urine is not sterile: Use of enhanced urine culture techniques to detect resident bacterial flora in the adult female bladder. J. Clin. Microbiol., 2014; 52: 871–876. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Meijer-Severs GJ, Aarnoudse JG, Mensink WFA, Dankert J., . The presence of antibody-coated anaerobic bacteria in asymptomatic bacteriuria during pregnancy. J. Infect. Dis., 1979; 140: 653–658. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Guzmàn CA, Pruzzo C, LiPira G, Calegari L, . Role of adherence in pathogenesis of Enterococcus faecalis urinary tract infection and endocarditis. Infect. Immun., 1989; 57: 1834–1838. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Fraimow HS, Jungkind DL, Lander DW, Delso DR, Dean JL, . Urinary tract infection with an Enterococcus faecalis isolate that requires vancomycin for growth. Ann. Intern. Med., 1994; 121: 22–26. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Ormerod AD, Petersen J, Hussey JK et al. . Immune complex glomerulonephritis and chronic anaerobic urinary infection–complications of filariasis. Postgrad. Med. J., 1983; 59: 730–733. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Petricevic L, Domig KJ, Nierscher FJ, Sandhofer MJ, Fidesser M, Krondorfer I et al. . Characterisation of the vaginal Lactobacillus microbiota associated with preterm delivery. 2014;1–6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 29.Salter SJ, Cox MJ, Turek EM, Calus ST, Cookson WO, Moffatt MF et al. . Reagent and laboratory contamination can critically impact sequence-based microbiome analyses. BMC Biol., 2014; 12: 87. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.O’Hanlon DE, Come RA, Moench TR, . Vaginal pH measured in vivo: lactobacilli determine pH and lactic acid concentration. BMC Microbiol., 2019; 19: 13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
GigaByte. 2020 Nov 27;2020:gigabyte9.

Article Submission

Lilan Hao
GigaByte.

Assign Handling Editor

Editor: Scott Edmunds
GigaByte.

Review MS

Editor: Chris Hunter

Reviewer name and names of any other individual's who aided in reviewer Chris Hunter
Do you understand and agree to our policy of having open and named reviews, and having your review included with the published papers. (If no, please inform the editor that you cannot review this manuscript.) Yes
Is the language of sufficient quality? Yes
Please add additional comments on language quality to clarify if needed
Are all data available and do they match the descriptions in the paper? No
Additional Comments line 96-97 "In this study, a total of 147 reproductive age women (age 22-48) were recruited by Peking University Shenzhen Hospital (Supplementary Table 1)." B utSup. table 1 has only 137 samples. Revise text to explain only 137 samples were used for the main analysis, with the 10 extra for validation. Line 103 -104 "None of the subjects received any hormone treatments, antibiotics or vaginal medications within a month of sampling." Sup Table 1 has a column for "Antibiotic use True/False", 41 samples have "T"? this needs explaining. Its possible the spreadsheet True is referring to a longer time period, but thats not explained anywhere. line 110-112 "The samples from an additional 10 women were collected for validation purposes by a doctor during the surgery in July 2017." Where are these metadata? they are not included in Sup table 1. The data presented and discussed in "additional-findings.docx" are not included in the data files (yet), these should either be removed (as not included in the main article), or expand upon the methods (to include negative control details) and add this to main text.
Are the data and metadata consistent with relevant minimum information or reporting standards? See GigaDB checklists for examples &lt;a href="http://gigadb.org/site/guide" target="_blank"&gt;http://gigadb.org/site/guide&lt;/a&gt; Yes
Additional Comments The supplemental tables need some better legends/descriptions to help readers understand what data is in them.
Is the data acquisition clear, complete and methodologically sound? Yes
Additional Comments The wet and bioinformatics methods could benefit from being included in protocols.io
Is there sufficient detail in the methods and data-processing steps to allow reproduction? Yes
Additional Comments
Is there sufficient data validation and statistical analyses of data quality? Yes
Additional Comments
Is the validation suitable for this type of data? Yes
Additional Comments
Is there sufficient information for others to reuse this dataset or integrate it with other data? Yes
Additional Comments The Figure appear to be mixed up, whats displayed as Figure 1 in the manuscript appears to relate to the legend given for Figure 2, Figure 2 relates to legend of Figure 3, and Figure 3 relates to the legend of Fig 1!!! line 69 -Chen et al. no citation number link provided line 74 -Thomas-White et al. (2018) no citation number link provided line 79 -Gottschick et al. (2017) no citation number link provided line 246-248 "The initial results here indicate a close link between the urinary microbiota with the general and diseased physiological conditions,... " As this study is looking at "Healthy" individuals I do not believe there is sufficient evidence to back up this statement about the "diseased" physiological conditions. line 274-275 "The sequences of bacterial isolates have been deposited in the European Nucleotide Archive with the accession number PRJEB36743" this accession is not public so I am unable to see whats included here. If available we would like to see the Real-Time PCR Data from the experiments made available in Real-Time PCR Data Markup Language (RDML). The additional cohort of 10 women is almost a different study, it didn't have the same 16s RNA amplicon sequencing done, and was only a validation that some live bacteria can be cultured from urine in a small number of cases (3/10). If it is to be included table S5 should be updated to include the specific INSDC accessions for the submitted sequences. (title of Table S5 in file is currently saying Table 1)
Any Additional Overall Comments to the Author
Recommendation Minor Revision
GigaByte.

Review MS

Editor: Levi Waldron

Upload additional files DRR-20201006/form/Urine_cc20200910_review.docx
Reviewer name and names of any other individual's who aided in reviewer levi Waldron
Do you understand and agree to our policy of having open and named reviews, and having your review included with the published papers. (If no, please inform the editor that you cannot review this manuscript.) Yes
Is the language of sufficient quality? Yes
Please add additional comments on language quality to clarify if needed
Are all data available and do they match the descriptions in the paper? Yes
Additional Comments
Are the data and metadata consistent with relevant minimum information or reporting standards? See GigaDB checklists for examples &lt;a href="http://gigadb.org/site/guide" target="_blank"&gt;http://gigadb.org/site/guide&lt;/a&gt; No
Additional Comments See report
Is the data acquisition clear, complete and methodologically sound? Yes
Additional Comments
Is there sufficient detail in the methods and data-processing steps to allow reproduction? Yes
Additional Comments
Is there sufficient data validation and statistical analyses of data quality? Yes
Additional Comments
Is the validation suitable for this type of data? Yes
Additional Comments
Is there sufficient information for others to reuse this dataset or integrate it with other data? Yes
Additional Comments See uploaded report of review.
Any Additional Overall Comments to the Author
Recommendation Major Revision
GigaByte.

Editor Decision

Editor: Scott Edmunds
GigaByte.

Final Data Preparation

Editor: Christopher Hunter
GigaByte.

Accept

Editor: Scott Edmunds

Comments to the Author Thanks again for your submission, and we are very happy with the revisions now.
GigaByte.

Export to Production

Editor: Scott Edmunds

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Data Availability Statement

    The sequence reads generated by 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing have been deposited in both the European Nucleotide Archive with the accession number PRJEB29341 and the CNSA (https://db.cngb.org/cnsa/) of CNGB database with accession code CNP0000166. Additional data, result and a STORMS (Strengthening The Organizing and Reporting of Microbiome Studies) checklist are available from the GigaScience GigaDB repository [8]. The sequences of bacterial isolates have been deposited in the European Nucleotide Archive with the accession number PRJEB36743.


    Articles from GigaByte are provided here courtesy of Gigascience Press

    RESOURCES