Correction: Arthritis Res Ther 24, 155 (2022)
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13075-022-02813-x
Following publication of the original article [1], the authors reported an error in Additional files 1 and 2 as the axes on the supplemental figures were unclear. The additional files were updated.
The original article [1] has been updated.
Supplementary Information
Additional file 1: Figure S1. Proportion of Patients Reporting PRO Scores ≥ Normative Values at Baseline and weeks 12 and 24. aABA IV at day 1 and weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20 (<60 kg: 500 mg; 60–100 kg: 750 mg; >100 kg: 1,000 mg). ABA, abatacept; BL, baseline; EQ-5D-5L (index score), EQ-5D 5-Level; FACIT-F, Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue; HAQ-DI, Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index; IV, intravenous; LDA, low disease activity; MCS, Mental Component Summary; PCS, Physical Component Summary; PRO, patient-reported outcome; PtGA, Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity; SF-36, 36-Item Short Form Health Survey; UPA, upadacitinib. *P<0.05 for UPA vs ABA. †P=0.05 for UPA vs ABA.
Additional file 2: Figure S2. Proportion of Patients Reporting SF-36 Scores ≥ Normative Values at Baseline and weeks 12 and 24. aABA IV at day 1 and weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20 (<60 kg: 500 mg; 60–100 kg: 750 mg; >100 kg: 1,000 mg). ABA, abatacept; BL, baseline; BP, bodily pain; GH, general health; IV, intravenous; MH, mental health; PF, physical functioning; RE, role emotional; RP, role physical; SF, social functioning; SF-36, 36-Item Short Form Health Survey; UPA, upadacitinib; VT, vitality. *P<0.05 for UPA vs ABA.
Reference
- 1.Bergman M, Tundia N, Martin N, et al. Patient-reported outcomes of upadacitinib versus abatacept in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 12- and 24-week results of a phase 3 trial. Arthritis Res Ther. 2022;24:155. doi: 10.1186/s13075-022-02813-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Additional file 1: Figure S1. Proportion of Patients Reporting PRO Scores ≥ Normative Values at Baseline and weeks 12 and 24. aABA IV at day 1 and weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20 (<60 kg: 500 mg; 60–100 kg: 750 mg; >100 kg: 1,000 mg). ABA, abatacept; BL, baseline; EQ-5D-5L (index score), EQ-5D 5-Level; FACIT-F, Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue; HAQ-DI, Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index; IV, intravenous; LDA, low disease activity; MCS, Mental Component Summary; PCS, Physical Component Summary; PRO, patient-reported outcome; PtGA, Patient Global Assessment of Disease Activity; SF-36, 36-Item Short Form Health Survey; UPA, upadacitinib. *P<0.05 for UPA vs ABA. †P=0.05 for UPA vs ABA.
Additional file 2: Figure S2. Proportion of Patients Reporting SF-36 Scores ≥ Normative Values at Baseline and weeks 12 and 24. aABA IV at day 1 and weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, and 20 (<60 kg: 500 mg; 60–100 kg: 750 mg; >100 kg: 1,000 mg). ABA, abatacept; BL, baseline; BP, bodily pain; GH, general health; IV, intravenous; MH, mental health; PF, physical functioning; RE, role emotional; RP, role physical; SF, social functioning; SF-36, 36-Item Short Form Health Survey; UPA, upadacitinib; VT, vitality. *P<0.05 for UPA vs ABA.