Skip to main content
Infection and Immunity logoLink to Infection and Immunity
. 1999 Jan;67(1):410–412. doi: 10.1128/iai.67.1.410-412.1999

Differential Susceptibilities of Anopheles albimanus and Anopheles pseudopunctipennis to Infections with Coindigenous Plasmodium vivax Variants VK210 and VK247 in Southern Mexico

Lilia Gonzalez-Ceron 1, Mario H Rodriguez 2,*, Jose C Nettel 1, Cuauhtemoc Villarreal 1, Kevin C Kain 3, Juan E Hernandez 4
Editor: J M Mansfield
PMCID: PMC96324  PMID: 9864243

Abstract

The susceptibilities to coindigenous Plasmodium vivax of colonized Anopheles albimanus and Anopheles pseudopunctipennis from southern Mexico were investigated by simultaneous feeding with infected blood obtained from patients. The genes encoding circumsporozoite protein variant types (VK210 and VK247) in blood samples were determined by PCR and oligonucleotide probe hybridization. A. albimanus was more susceptible to VK210, and A. pseudopunctipennis was more susceptible to VK247.


Plasmodium vivax is the primary agent of malaria in Mexico, producing 98% of all cases (22), and the main vectors are Anopheles albimanus in the coastal areas and Anopheles pseudopunctipennis in the foothills (10). Two P. vivax variants have been identified based on the repeat units of their circumsporozoite (CS) proteins: variant VK210 [GDRA(A/D)GQPA] (1) and variant VK247 (ANGAGNQPG) (23). Both variants are distributed worldwide (5, 12), including in Mexico (11).

In a previous study, we found that all infections in patients living in the coastal plain of the state of Chiapas, Mexico, were caused by VK210, whereas 50% of the cases occurring in the foothills were caused by VK247 (13). We hypothesized that the VK247 variant was preferentially transmitted by A. pseudopunctipennis. We present herein a comparison of the susceptibilities of colonized A. albimanus and A. pseudopunctipennis to infection with both variants of coindigenous P. vivax.

Two to 6 days postemergence A. albimanus (white-striped strain) mosquitoes (4) and mosquitoes of a strain of A. pseudopunctipennis (26) were fed simultaneously, through parafilm membranes, heparinized blood from infected patients. To avoid possible effects from immune factors present in patient sera (14), the original serum was replaced with an equivalent pool of nonimmune sera from subjects with no history of malaria and without anti-Plasmodium antibodies (8). Engorged mosquitoes were maintained at 23 to 28°C and 70 to 80% relative humidity (in an air-conditioned insectary) and were provided a 10% sucrose-soaked cotton pad. Surviving mosquitoes were dissected 7 days after receiving the infective blood meal, and oocyst numbers were recorded by using a light microscope (7). All mosquitoes fed with one patient’s blood were considered as one lot.

Blood samples blotted onto Whatman no. 2 filter paper were air dried and stored at −20°C until they were shipped to The Toronto Hospital. To determine the CS protein type, a portion of the P. vivax CS gene from each sample was amplified by PCR as described previously (9, 13). Positive and negative blood and DNA samples were included in each amplification run. Cross-contamination was prevented as previously described (14). Samples of each amplification reaction mixture were slot blotted and hybridized to 32P-labeled oligonucleotide probes for VK210 and VK247 as described previously (9, 13). Genotyping analysis was performed by individuals who were blinded to the results of entomological and demographic investigations.

A logistic regression analysis was carried out to model the proportion of infected mosquitoes (mean infection rate [MIR]) by species and by CS protein variant, and a Poisson model was used to analyze the oocyst counts per mosquito (mean oocyst density [MOD]) (15). All tests were carried out at a 95% significance level (α = 0.05) by using Stata statistical software (24).

Nine of 12 simultaneous infected-blood feedings produced detectable infections in at least one of the mosquito species. Of these, four feedings corresponded to variant VK210 (infections 2 to 5 listed in Table 1), four corresponded to VK247 (infections 6 to 9), and one was a mix of both variants (infection 1), which was excluded from all calculations (Table 1).

TABLE 1.

Infection rates and infection intensity in colonized A. albimanus and A. pseudopunctipennis infected with coindigenous P. vivax VK210 and VK247a

Infection no. CS protein variant Mosquito species nb Proportion infected Mean oocyst count ± SD
1 VK210 & VK247 A. albimanus 25 1.00 82.40 ± 38.30
A. pseudopunctipennis 21 0.76 7.56 ± 8.37
2 VK210 A. albimanus 10 0.90 28.00 ± 8.85
A. pseudopunctipennis 12 0.08 1.00
3 VK210 A. albimanus 10 1.00 24.10 ± 18.63
A. pseudopunctipennis 11 0.36 8.25 ± 14.50
4 VK210 A. albimanus 20 0.35 34.85 ± 22.46
A. pseudopunctipennis 10 0.00 0.00
5 VK210 A. albimanus 10 0.50 18.50 ± 22.50
A. pseudopunctipennis 4 0.00 0.00
6 VK247 A. albimanus 25 0.08 3.00 ± 2.80
A. pseudopunctipennis 9 1.00 40.22 ± 19.63
7 VK247 A. albimanus 10 0.2 1.50 ± 0.71
A. pseudopunctipennis 3 1.00 32.70 ± 33.30
8 VK247 A. albimanus 25 0.00 0.00
A. pseudopunctipennis 2 1.00 8.00 ± 8.49
9 VK247 A. albimanus 25 0.00 0.00
A. pseudopunctipennis 13 1.00 21.23 ± 14.35
a

Results of nine experiments in which the two mosquito colonies were fed with the same infected blood. 

b

Number of mosquitoes examined. 

The number of surviving mosquitoes at day 7 after the infected blood meal varied among mosquito lots, but no differences in survival in relation to the parasite polymorph were detected (α = 0.05 and P = 0.7; likelihood ratio test) (15). Because fewer A. pseudopunctipennis mosquitoes fed in the artificial membranes, more A. albimanus mosquitoes (n = 160) than A. pseudopunctipennis mosquitoes (n = 85) were examined. Mosquito infections were associated with CS protein variants, and VK210 infected predominately A. albimanus (MIR was 0.62 and MOD ± standard deviation was 29.74 ± 17.03) but infected few A. pseudopunctipennis (MIR was 0.13 and MOD was 6.8 ± 12.96) mosquitoes. In contrast, VK247 infected all A. pseudopunctipennis (MIR was 1.0 and MOD was 27.85 ± 20.23) but few A. albimanus (MIR was 0.05 and MOD was 2.75 ± 1.89) mosquitoes.

Because all A. pseudopunctipennis mosquitoes were infected with VK247 and therefore there was no variability within this group, it was not included in the logistic model. The fitted proportions of infections with VK210 in A. albimanus and A. pseudopunctipennis (0.62 and 0.13, respectively) and the proportion of infection with VK247 in A. albimanus (0.05) obtained in the model were very close to the observed ones. The proportions infected with VK210 were different between species (P < 0.001 and α = 0.05). Also, the proportion of A. albimanus mosquitoes infected with VK247 was significantly lower than that of those infected with VK210 (P < 0.0001 and α = 0.05). The expected mean oocyst counts per mosquito in the Poisson model were also very similar to the observed ones, and there were significant differences by species and CS protein polymorphs: the counts were 29.74 and 6.79 oocysts per mosquito for A. albimanus and A. pseudopunctipennis, respectively, for VK210 infections (P < 0.0001 and α = 0.05) and 2.24 and 29.85 oocysts per mosquito, respectively, for VK247 infections (P < 0.0001 and α = 0.05).

This is the first time that the CS protein of any P. vivax strain has been associated with its infectivity to any of its documented vectors. These observations have implications for two aspects of malaria research. First, they open up new opportunities to study vector-parasite interactions in order to identify new targets for interrupting transmission by using transgenic technology (6). Second, the preferential transmission of variants provides new insights into our understanding of malaria epidemiology in the region, where malaria control has been more difficult in areas where A. pseudopunctipennis is the main vector (22).

Our results may have been influenced by the mosquitoes we used. Although the A. pseudopunctipennis strain is of recent colonization (26), the A. albimanus strain has been colonized for over 10 years and the white-striped strain has been selected for its high susceptibility to P. vivax (4). Nevertheless, their differences in susceptibility are consistent with our previous observations of higher prevalence of human infections with VK210 in the coastal areas and the presence of VK247 in the foothills (13). Also, in the present study, all patients with infections caused by VK210 were residents of coastal villages and those having infections caused by VK247 were from the foothills. This correlates with serological observations in military personnel (19) of higher prevalence of antibodiies to VK 210 in areas where A. albimanus is common (Gulf of Mexico coast and Yucatan Peninsula) and higher prevalence of antibodies to VK247 in regions where A. pseudopunctipennis is common (Pacific coast north of Chiapas). However, our initial observations should be extended to infections with (F1) wild-caught mosquitoes.

How the CS protein variant may affect mosquito infection requires further investigation. CS proteins are first detected only after parasites reach the sporoblast stage (16). Parasites devoid of the CS gene are unable to develop beyond this stage (17). In our experiments, no degenerated or encapsulated oocysts were seen in mosquitoes that failed to become infected. However, if insect immune responses (18, 25) produced parasite lysis, or if this occurred early during development, their remnants would be difficult to detect with the technique we used.

Other, not yet identified proteins present at earlier parasite stages may also be different between P. vivax polymorphs. The combination of these proteins with each mosquito species’ physiology (2, 3, 20) may determine parasite- and mosquito species-specific infectivity. These possibilities are currently under investigation.

REFERENCES

  • 1.Arnot D E, Barnwell J W, Tam J P, Nussenzweig V, Nussenzweig R S, Eneas V. Circumsporozoite protein of Plasmodium vivax: gene cloning and characterization of the immunodominant epitope. Science. 1985;230:815–818. doi: 10.1126/science.2414847. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Billingsley P F, Rudin W. The role of the mosquito perithrophic membrane in blood meal digestion and infectivity of Plasmodium species. J Parasitol. 1992;78:430–440. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Billingsley P F, Sinden R E. Determinants of malaria-mosquito specificity. Parasitol Today. 1997;13:297–301. [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Chan A S, Rodriguez M H, Torres J A, Rodriguez M C, Villarreal C. Susceptibility of three laboratory strains of Anopheles albimanus (Diptera: Culicidae) to coindigenous Plasmodium vivax in southern Mexico. J Med Entomol. 1994;31:400–403. doi: 10.1093/jmedent/31.3.400. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Cochrane A H, Nardin E H, de Arruda M, Maracic M, Clavijo P, Collins W E, Nussenzweig R S. Widespread reactivity of human sera with a variant repeat of the circumsporozoite protein of Plasmodium vivax. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1990;43:446–451. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1990.43.446. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Collins F H, Paskewitz S M. Malaria: current and future prospects for control. Annu Rev Entomol. 1995;40:195–219. doi: 10.1146/annurev.en.40.010195.001211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Eyles D E. A stain for malarial oocysts in temporary preparations. J Parasitol. 1950;36:501. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Gonzalez-Ceron L, Rodriguez M H. An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay using detergent-soluble Plasmodium vivax antigen for seroepidemiological surveys. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg. 1991;85:358–361. doi: 10.1016/0035-9203(91)90289-b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Gopinah R, Wongsrichanalai C, Cordón-Rosales C, Mirabelli L, Kyle D, Kain K C. Failure to detect a Plasmodium vivax-like malaria parasite in globally collected blood samples. J Infect Dis. 1994;170:1630–1633. doi: 10.1093/infdis/170.6.1630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hoffman C H. On Anopheles pseudopunctipennis and its relation to malaria in Mexico. South Med J. 1932;25:523–528. [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Kain K C, Brown A E, Webster H K, Wirtz R A, Keystone J S, Rodriguez M H, Kinahan J, Rowland M, Lanar D E. Circumsporozoite genotyping of global isolates of Plasmodium vivax from dried blood specimens. J Clin Microbiol. 1992;30:1863–1866. doi: 10.1128/jcm.30.7.1863-1866.1992. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Kain K C, Keystone J, Franke E D, Lanar D E. Global distribution of a variant of the circumsporozoite gene of Plasmodium vivax. J Infect Dis. 1991;164:208–210. doi: 10.1093/infdis/164.1.208. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Kain K C, Wirtz R A, Fernandez I, Franke E D, Rodriguez M H, Lanar D E. Serologic and genetic characterization of Plasmodium vivax from whole blood impregnated filter paper discs. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 1992;46:473–479. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.1992.46.473. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Kwok S, Higushi R. Avoiding false positives with PCR. Nature. 1989;339:473–479. doi: 10.1038/339237a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.McCullag P, Nelder J A. Generalized linear models. 2nd ed. New York, N.Y: Chapman and Hall; 1989. [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Meis J F G M, Croes H, Mons B, Van Belkum A, Ponnudurai T. Localization of circumsporozoite protein in the sporogonic stages of Plasmodium vivax. Parasitol Res. 1992;78:165–167. doi: 10.1007/BF00931660. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Menard R, Sultan A A, Cortes C, Altzuler R, Van Dijk M R, Janse C J, Waters A P, Nussenzweig R S, Nussenzweig V. Circumsporozoite protein is required for development of malaria sporozoites in mosquitoes. Nature. 1997;385:336–340. doi: 10.1038/385336a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Paskewitz S M, Brown M R, Collins F H, Lea A O. Ultrastructural localization of phenoloxidase in the midgut of refractory Anopheles gambiae and association of the enzyme with encapsulated Plasmodium cynomolgi. J Parasitol. 1989;75:594–600. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Pelayo, R., G. Silva-Escobedo, R. Valdez-Espinoza, C. Juarez-Villanueva, C. Ramos, C. Gonzalez-Bonilla, and R. Santana. Prevalence of antibodies to circumsporozoite proteins of Plasmodium vivax in military personnel in Mexico. Submitted for publication.
  • 20.Ramasamy M S, Kulasekera R, Wanniarachchi I C, Srikrishnara K A, Ramasamy R. Interactions of human malaria parasites, Plasmodium vivax and P. falciparum, with the midgut of Anopheles mosquitoes. Med Vet Entomol. 1997;11:290–296. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2915.1997.tb00409.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Ramsey J M, Salinas E, Rodriguez M H, Beaudoin R L. Effects of transmission-blocking immunity on Plasmodium vivax infections in Anopheles albimanus populations. J Parasitol. 1994;80:88–92. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Rodriguez M H, Loyola E G. Situación epidemiológica actual y perspectivas de la investigación entomológica en México. In: Ibañez S, editor. Memorias IV Simposio Nacional de Entomología Médica y Veterinaria. Mexico City, Mexico: Sociedad Mexicana de Entomología; 1989. pp. 15–40. [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Rosenberg R, Wirtz R A, Lanar D E, Sattabongkot J, Hall T, Waters A P, Prasittisuk C. Circumsporozoite protein heterogeneity in the human malaria parasite Plasmodium vivax. Science. 1989;245:308–316. doi: 10.1126/science.2672336. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Stata Corporation. Stata statistical software: release 5.0. College Station, Tex: Stata Corporation; 1997. [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Vernick K D, Fujioka H, Seeley D C, Tandler B, Aikawa M, Miller L H. Plasmodium gallinaceum: a refractory mechanism of ookinete killing in the mosquito Anopheles gambiae. Exp Parasitol. 1995;80:583–595. doi: 10.1006/expr.1995.1074. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Villarreal, C., J. I. Arredondo-Jimenez, A. Ulloa, and M. H. Rodriguez. Colonization of Anopheles pseudopunctipennis from Mexico. J. Am. Mosq. Control Assoc., in press. [PubMed]

Articles from Infection and Immunity are provided here courtesy of American Society for Microbiology (ASM)

RESOURCES