Phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) is a tumor suppressor gene on chromosome 10q23.31, and is a member of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling cascade influencing cell growth and survival,1 metabolic regulation,2 and maintenance of genomic integrity.3 Germline variants in the PTEN gene lead to an overgrowth phenotype and a spectrum of cancer predisposition syndromes collectively referred to as PTEN hamartoma tumor syndrome (PHTS).4 Phenotypic manifestations of these syndromes include macrocephaly, developmental delay, autism spectrum disorder, hamartomas, vascular malformations, gastrointestinal polyps, and thyroid nodules.5 Alterations in PTEN may place individuals at increased risk for developing thyroid cancer (in childhood or adulthood), as well as breast, endometrial, colorectal, kidney, and skin cancer later in life.6
PHTS is classically considered an autosomal dominant condition. Here we describe a child with PTEN constitutional mosaicism identified by deep sequencing and a woman with PTEN mosaicism whose pathogenic variant was discovered with close analysis of next generation sequencing (NGS). Table 1 summarizes these cases and seven cases previously reported.
TABLE 1.
PMID | CHOP case 1 |
UPenn case 2 |
Gammon et al. 23240978 |
Pritchard et al. 23619277 |
Salo-Mullen et al. 24609522 |
Golas et al. 31062505 |
Golas et al. 31062505 |
Goldenberg et al. 31796102 |
Rofes et al. 35102303 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PTEN variant | c.1003C>T, p.R335* | c.697C>T, p.R233* | c.966_967delinsG, p.Asn323Metfs*21 | c.767_768del, p.Glu256Valfs*41 | Partial deletion (exons 6-9) | 10q23.1q23.3 del (6 Mb) | 10q23.1q23.3 del (4.4 Mb) | c.970dup, p.(Asp324Glyfs*3) | c.331T>C, p.(Trp111Arg) |
Blood VAF | 20% | 5.6% | <10% | 1.7% | ~47% | Not reported | <10% | 3.5% | 22.5% |
Tumor VAF | 49% | 45% | N/A | ~50% (dysplastic gangliocytoma) | 30% (glioneuronal hamartoma) | N/A *sperm 5.7% | |||
Age at evaluation (years) | 3 | 41 | 20 | 40 | 43 | 16 | 15 | 11 | 53 |
Family history | Son with known PHTS | Daughter: CS, thyroid goiter Mother: endometrial cancer Father: melanoma |
No | Nephew: macrocephaly, speech delay Aunt: breast cancer |
Mother: colorectal polyps Paternal grandfather: colorectal polyps |
Paternal grandmother: breast cancer Paternal grandfather: pancreatic cancer Maternal grandmother: thyroid cancer |
None | None | |
Major criteria | |||||||||
Adult lhermitteduclos disease (cerebellar dysplastic gangliocytoma) | x | ||||||||
Macrocephaly (≥97 percentile) | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | x | |
Macular pigmentation of glans penis | x | x | |||||||
Multiple mucocutaneous lesions (trichilemmomas (≥3), acral keratoses (≥3), mucocutaneous neuromas (≥3), oral papillomas) | x | x | x | ||||||
Breast cancer | x | x (DCIS) | |||||||
Endometrial cancer (epithelial) | |||||||||
Thyroid cancer (follicular) | |||||||||
Gastrointestinal hamartomas | x | x | x | x | |||||
Minor criteria | |||||||||
Autism spectrum disorder | x | x | |||||||
Intellectual disability (IQ ≤75) | |||||||||
Colon cancer | |||||||||
Esophageal glycogenic acanthosis (≥3) | |||||||||
Lipomas | x | x | |||||||
Fibromas | x | x | |||||||
Renal cell carcinoma | |||||||||
Testicular lipomatosis | |||||||||
Thyroid structural lesions (e.g., adenoma, goiter) | x | x | |||||||
Vascular anomalies | x | ||||||||
Other | Hashimoto's thyroiditis | Neuroendocrine pancreatic tumor, later developed metastatic breast cancer | Mild intellectual disability | Central and peripheral nervous system hamartomas | |||||
Met clinical criteria for testing | x | x | x | x | x | x |
CASE 1
A 3-year-old boy was referred to oncology for lipofibromatosis. A lipofibroma of the right neck was resected at age 15 months. At age 3 he developed a mass on his thigh, which was resected and had similar pathology. Somatic and germline genetic testing was performed. NGS revealed the pathogenic variant PTEN (c.1003C>T, p.Arg335*) with variant allele fraction (VAF) of 20% in the normal specimen and 49% in tumor. His history was also notable for autism and macrocephaly.
CASE 2
A 41-year-old woman with macrocephaly and history of breast cancer was referred for genetic evaluation given PHTS diagnosed in her son with a pathogenic nonsense variant in PTEN (c.697C>T, p.Arg233*). Her genetic testing, including targeted Sanger sequencing of exon 7 of the PTEN gene, was negative.
She first had a NGS hereditary cancer panel sent with a diagnosis of invasive ductal carcinoma at age 38. Two years later she was re-referred to genetics due to oligometastasis. The commercial genetics laboratory reviewed her original NGS and confirmed that the familial PTEN variant was present at a 5.6% allelic frequency in over 2500 reads in the patient's germline testing (reportable cutoff of 10%). Somatic testing of the patient's breast cancer detected the pathogenic PTEN variant at a VAF of 45%.
DISCUSSION
Constitutional mosaicism is caused by postzygotic variant changes during embryonic development; thus, only a fraction of cells in an individual are affected. Reliable detection requires high analytic sensitivity and reporting of variants at low allelic frequency. Even with deep sequencing, reassessing reporting cutoffs may be indicated. PTEN mosaicism has been previously reported in seven patients, four of whom met criteria for testing based on the Tan et al.7 guidelines, and two demonstrated full penetrance (Table 1).8
These cases highlight the need for clinical judgment and sensitive testing when faced with a high index of suspicion for a PHTS-like phenotype in both the pediatric and adult population. Close attention must be paid to somatic testing results that may suggest underlying mosaicism.
Footnotes
INFORMED CONSENT
All human subjects provided informed consent.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare no potential conflict of interest.
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions.
REFERENCES
- 1.Li J, Yen C, Liaw D, et al. PTEN, a putative protein tyrosine phosphatase gene mutated in human brain, breast, and prostate cancer. Science. 1997;275(5308):1943–1947. doi: 10.1126/science.275.5308.1943 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Chen CY, Chen J, He L, Stiles BL. PTEN: tumor suppressor and metabolic regulator. Front Endocrinol. 2018;9:338. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2018.00338 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Hou SQ, Ouyang M, Brandmaier A, Hao H, Shen WH. PTEN in the maintenance of genome integrity: from DNA replication to chromosome segregation. Bioessays. 2017;39(10). doi: 10.1002/bies.201700082 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Eng C. PTEN: one gene, many syndromes. Hum Mutat. 2003;22(3): 183–198. doi: 10.1002/humu.10257 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Yehia L, Keel E, Eng C. The clinical spectrum of PTEN mutations. Annu Rev Med. 2020;71:103–116. doi: 10.1146/annurev-med-052218-125823 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Tan MH, Mester JL, Ngeow J, Rybicki LA, Orloff MS, Eng C. Lifetime cancer risks in individuals with germline PTEN mutations. Clin Cancer Res. 2012;18(2):400–407. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-2283 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Tan MH, Mester J, Peterson C, et al. A clinical scoring system for selection of patients for PTEN mutation testing is proposed on the basis of a prospective study of 3042 probands. Am J Hum Genet. 2011;88(1): 42–56. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2010.11.013 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Rofes P, Teulé Á, Feliubadaló L, et al. Mosaicism in PTEN-new case and comment on the literature. Eur J Hum Genet. 2022;30:641–644. doi: 10.1038/s41431-022-01052-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions.