Skip to main content
Frontiers in Nutrition logoLink to Frontiers in Nutrition
. 2022 Oct 21;9:1017014. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.1017014

Effects of different cooking methods on volatile flavor compounds, nutritional constituents, and antioxidant activities of Clitocybe squamulosa

Hui Yuan 1, Lijing Xu 1,2,*, Mingchang Chang 1,3,*, Junlong Meng 1,3, Cuiping Feng 1,2, Xueran Geng 1,2, Yanfen Cheng 1,2, Zongqi Liu 1
PMCID: PMC9635447  PMID: 36337648

Abstract

To explore a scientific and reasonable cooking method for Clitocybe squamulosa, four cooking methods (boiling, steaming, microwaving, and frying) were applied to C. squamulosa, and the effects of different cooking methods on volatile flavor compounds, nutritional constituents, and antioxidant activities in C. squamulosa were systematically investigated. The results showed that 54, 53, 61, 63, and 49 volatile flavor compounds were detected in raw, boiled, steamed, microwaved, and fried samples, respectively. Large differences in volatile flavor compounds between the four cooking and raw samples were determined by using relative odor activity values (ROAV) and principal component analysis (PCA). In addition, steaming and microwaving could protect the nutrients of C. squamulosa, reduce losses during the cooking process and improve the color of cooked products compared to boiling and frying cooking methods. Meanwhile, cooking treatment exerted different effects on the antioxidant activity of C. squamulosa, and the antioxidant activity of C. squamulosa was the highest after microwave cooking treatment. This research can provide a theoretical basis for the cooking, processing and utilization of C. squamulosa and other wild edible fungi.

Keywords: Clitocybe squamulosa, cooking methods, volatile compounds, quality, antioxidant

Introduction

Clitocybe squamulosa, as a kind of “Yinpan” in “Taimo,” belongs to the family Tricholomataceae and genus Clitocyb. It is widely eaten as a wild edible fungus with medicinal and edible homology. It is one of the famous specialties of Shanxi Province, China, mainly growing on the ground in the mix of pine, spruce, and birch in Wutai Mountain, Xinzhou (1). Its fruiting bodies are rich in protein, amino acids, carbohydrates, minerals, and a variety of bioactive compounds, including polysaccharides, polyphenols, and flavonoids (2). Bioactive compounds have antioxidant (3, 4), antitumor (5), anti-inflammatory (6), hypoglycemic and hypolipidemic (7, 8) functions have been extensively reported. In addition, the sensory characteristics of edible fungi have also attracted attention. C. squamulosa has a unique flavor and is deeply loved by local residents. In recent years, with the promotion of the concept of “one meat, one vegetable, and one mushroom,” the market demand for edible fungi has increased rapidly (9). C. squamulosa, as a delicacy, has important cultural and commercial values. It is noteworthy that eating wild edible fungi without heating may result in serious safety hazards to human beings, and edible fungi must undergo different cooking treatments before people can eat them safely (10, 11), making it important to study the effect of cooking treatment on the quality of C. squamulosa.

China has a long cooking history and culture, including various cooking methods such as boiling, steaming, frying, grilling, smoking, etc. In recent years, with the fusion of Chinese and Western food cultures, new cooking methods have gradually emerged in the domestic market, such as microwave, vacuum low-temperature, and high-pressure cooking (12). Cooking plays an essential role in dietary quality attributes by not only disinfecting and sterilizing and improving the nutritional value but also improving the flavor, color and texture of food (13). However, the heat-transfer medium, cooking time, and cooking temperature of the cooking method in the ripening process are different, which will lead to different degrees of changes in the color, texture, flavor, and nutrients of food materials (14). These are closely related to the edible value of edible fungi. For instance, Liu et al. (15) evaluated the effects of four domestic cooking methods on the bioavailability of nutrients and antioxidant activity of Oudemansiella radicata. The results showed that when O. radicata was used as food material, steaming and microwaving which can improve the edible value of O. radicata to a greater extent were recommended. Mena García et al. (16) discovered that the phenolic compound concentrations of wild Boletus edulis mushroom were significantly decreased in all cooking treatments (confit, grill, roast, and marinade), and the antioxidant activities of DPPH and FRAP were reduced. In addition, the flavor, nutritional characteristics, and antioxidant activity of mushrooms may vary with the varieties and thermostability. For example, Selli et al. (17) found that the volatiles and key odorants of two edible fungi (Agaricus bisporus and Pleurotus ostreatus) differed significantly depending upon cooking method (boiling and oven cooking). Ng and Tan (18) studied the changes of in vitro antioxidant activity of five edible fungi (A. bisporus, Flammulina velutipes, Lentinula edodes, P. ostreatus, and Pleurotus eryngii) after being treated with different cooking methods (boiling, microwave, steam, and pressure). Among them, the antioxidant activity of pressure-cooked P. eryngii was the highest. In the meanwhile, the researchers further explored whether the antioxidant activity was significantly different due to the different types of mushrooms and cooking methods. The results showed that microwaving A. bisporus and F. velutipes, boiling Auricularia polytricha, and pressure-cooking L. edodes and Pleurotus sajor-caju yielded the best antioxidant activities (19). However, there remains a lack of systematic research into the effects of different cooking methods on the volatile flavor, nutritional content, and antioxidant activity of C. squamulosa.

Therefore, to find the scientific and reasonable processing and cooking methods of mushrooms, by taking C. squamulosa as the research object, the effects of boiling, steaming, microwaving, and frying on the flavor, color, nutrients, and antioxidant activity of C. squamulosa were compared. The purpose of this study was to select the most suitable cooking method for C. squamulosa and to provide a theoretical basis for the cooking, processing, and utilization of wild edible fungi.

Materials and methods

Materials

Clitocybe squamulosa was selected from Wutai Mountain in Shanxi Province, China, and provided by the Shanxi Edible Fungi Engineering Technology Research Center. C. squamulosa was identified by Hu and Wang (1, 2, 20, 21), and the complete fruiting body was selected as the experimental sample. C. squamulosa was washed with paper towels and freeze-dried for further processing in this study, before being randomly divided into five groups: raw and four cooking samples.

Cooking methods

Four different cooking methods were tested: boiling, steaming, microwaving, and frying (15).

Boiling: 50 g C. squamulosa could be boiled in 500 mL of boiling water on a hot plate at 100°C for 6 min.

Steaming: C. squamulosa (50 g) was placed into a steamer and steamed for 6 min at 100°C.

Microwaving: 50 g C. squamulosa was placed into a porcelain bowl filled with 100 mL of water and microwaved at 800 W for 2 min.

Frying: first, C. squamulosa could be placed in water at 37°C for 1 min, removed, and filter paper was used to absorb the excess water. Then, 50 mL of soybean oil was heated to 180°C in a temperature-controlled frying pan. Finally, 50 g C. squamulosa was added and fried for 2 min.

All cooking experiments were performed in triplicate. All samples were drained of water or oil on the surface with filter paper. At the same time, vacuum freeze drying was conducted before the determination of nutrient components and activity to prevent water interference in the determination.

Volatile flavor compound analysis

Headspace solid-phase microextraction-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis

The volatile flavor compounds of the raw and cooked samples of C. squamulosa were determined by headspace solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME) (Stable Flex, Supelco, Bellefonte, PA, USA) combined with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) (Trace ISQ, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) (22). The specific steps in these operations are described as follows:

Method: all samples were weighed, placed into 10 mL headspace bottles and heated at 80°C for 30 min. Then, the extraction head was pulled back and quickly inserted into the GC-MS injection port. The volatiles in C. squamulosa were desorbed at 250°C for 5 min and GC-MS determination and analysis.

Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis: the column used was a TG-5MS capillary column (30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 μm), with high purity helium (99.999%) as the carrier. The flow rate was 1.0 mL/min and the sample was injected without partial flow. The initial column temperature was maintained at 35°C for 3 min and then increased to 180°C at 5°C/min with a 3 min hold time. Finally, it was raised to 250°C at 10°C/min with a 5 min hold time. The MS electronic energy was 70 eV, the transmission line temperature was 250°C, the quadrupole temperature was 150°C, and the mass scanning range was 35 ≤ m/z ≤ 500.

The chemical components were determined by searching the NIST W8N08L standard spectral library, the retention index (RI) was determined using the C5-C30 n-alkanes (Sigma-Aldrich, Louis, MO, USA) as the standard, and the relative content of each aroma component was obtained according to the peak area normalization method.

Determination of relative odor activity values

The relative odor activity value (ROAV) method determines the key volatile flavor compounds in C. squamulosa (23). The ROAVmax of the compound that contributes the most to the overall flavor of the sample is defined as 100, and the ROAV of other compounds are calculated according to the following formula:

ROAViCiCmax×TmaxTi×100

where Ci and Ti are the relative percentage and odor threshold of each flavor compound, respectively; Cmax and Tmax denote the relative percentage and odor threshold of the flavor compound that contributes the most to the overall flavor, respectively. All components satisfy 0 < ROAV ≤ 100, and the larger the ROAV, the greater the component contribution to the overall flavor of the C. squamulosa samples. In the case of the ROAV ≥ 1, the compounds significantly affect the overall flavor of C. squamulosa and are considered as key volatile flavor compounds; when 0.1 ≤ ROAV < 1, the compounds exert a modifying effect on the overall flavor of C. squamulosa.

Color measurement

The changes in color between raw and cooked samples were evaluated by an automatic colorimeter (ColorQuest XE, HunterLab, Shanghai, China) (24). Standard whiteboards and blackboards were used for calibration, and nine sites on the pileus surface were randomly selected to measure and record the values of L*, a*, and b*, representing lightness, greenness/redness, and blueness/yellowness, respectively. Then the hue angle (H), a/b values (h), chroma (C*), and total color difference (ΔE) were calculated according to the following formula:

ΔE=(ΔL*+Δa*+Δb*)12C*=(a2*+b2*)12
H=arctanb*a*h=ab

Conventional nutrient analysis

The composition of ash, water, protein, and fat was analyzed according to standard official analysis methods (AOAC) (25). Then, the total carbohydrates and total energy were calculated based on the following formula (15):

Totalcarbohydrates(g)=100-(gash+gwater+gcrudeprotein+gcrudefat)
Totalenergy(kJ)=17×(gcrudeprotein+gtotalcarbohydrates)+ 37×(gcrudefat)

Amino acid analysis

Amino acids (AAS) in all samples were extracted following the method described in the Association of Official Analytical Chemists procedures (AOAC). The hydrolyzed amino acid (HAAS) contents of raw and cooked samples were determined using an amino acid auto-analyzer (Biochrom, Cambridge, UK) (26).

Bioactive compounds analysis

Polysaccharide content determination

The polysaccharide was extracted according to the method described by Guo et al. (2). The polysaccharide content was determined by the phenol-sulfuric acid method and using glucose (0–0.15 mg/mL) as a standard. The polysaccharide content was expressed as milligrams of glucose equivalent per gram mass of dry sample.

Total phenolic content determination

The total phenolic was extracted according to the method described by Deng et al. (27). The total phenolic content was determined by the Folin–Ciocalteu method and using gallic acid (0–600 μg/mL) as a standard. The total phenolic content was expressed as milligrams of gallic acid equivalent per gram mass of dry samples.

Flavonoid content determination

The flavonoid was extracted according to the method described by Liu et al. (28). The flavonoid content was determined by the sodium nitrite-aluminum nitrate colorimetric method and using rutin (0–2.5 μg/mL) as a standard (29). The flavonoid content was expressed as milligrams of rutin equivalent per gram mass of dry sample.

Antioxidant activities

Preparation of aqueous extract

The aqueous extract was prepared following the procedure described by Guo et al. (21) and Sharpe et al. (30) with some modifications. Briefly, all samples were pulverized and mixed with ultrapure water at a ratio of 1:30 (w/v). The mixture was extracted after 3.6 h in a water bath at 80°C and centrifuged at 5,000 rpm for 10 min, and the supernatant was collected. The obtained filtrate was concentrated on a rotary evaporator (IKA, China). Finally, vacuum freeze drying was performed. The dry samples were stored at 4°C for further analysis.

Determination of antioxidant activities

The DPPH, ABTS, and OH radical scavenging abilities of all samples were determined according to the methods of Pan et al. (31). The extracts were prepared into different mass concentration gradients (0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 mg/mL). The DPPH radical scavenging abilities of raw and cooked samples were determined according to the method of the DPPH Kit (Solarbio Science, Beijing, China). In short, the sample solution (0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 mg/ml) and reaction reagent were added to the 96-well plate in sequence, vortexed, and incubated at room temperature in the dark for 30 min, and the absorbance was measured at 515 nm. The ABTS radical scavenging abilities of raw and cooked samples were determined according to the method of the ABTS kit (Solarbio Science, Beijing, China). Briefly, 50 μL of sample solutions (0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 mg/mL) were added and then reaction reagent was added to the 96-well plate. After full mixing, the mixture was incubated at room temperature in the dark for 6 min, and the absorbance was measured at 405 nm. The OH radical scavenging abilities of raw and cooked samples were determined according to the method of the OH Kit (Solarbio Science, Beijing, China). Briefly, the reaction reagents were added to the 96-well plate in turn, vortexed, and placed in a constant temperature incubator at 37°C for 60 min, centrifuged at 10,000 rpm for 10 min, and the absorbance was measured at 536 nm. Notably, ascorbic acid (Vc) was used as a positive control for the DPPH, ABTS, and OH radical scavenging methods and the half inhibitory concentration (IC50) values for scavenging DPPH, ABTS, and OH radicals were calculated by linear regression analysis. A higher IC50 value corresponds to a lower antioxidant activity.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was conducted using the SPSS 20.0 software (IBM Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). All data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) and were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). Differences were considered significant at p < 0.05. Principal component analysis (PCA) was performed using JMP Pro 16.

Results and discussion

Effects of cooking methods on volatile flavor compounds of Clitocybe squamulosa

Headspace solid-phase microextraction-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis of Clitocybe squamulosa with different cooking methods

Table 1 lists the volatile flavor compounds identified using HS-SPME-GC-MS to study the effects of different cooking methods on volatile components of C. squamulosa. A total of 128 volatile components were identified in all samples, including alcohols, aldehydes, ketones, esters, acids, alkanes, heterocyclic, aromatic hydrocarbons, ethers, and others. Moreover, a total of 54, 53, 61, 63, and 49 volatile components were detected in raw, boiled, steamed, microwaved, and fried cooking samples, respectively, of which alcohols, aldehydes, esters, and ketones were the major chemical classes.

TABLE 1.

Relative contents of volatile compounds in C. squamulosa with different cooking methods.

English names RI Molecular formula Relative percentage (%)

CS BCS SCS MCS FCS
Alcohol Ethanol C2H6O 23.9
2,3-Butanediol C4H10O2 0.2
3-Methyl-1-butanol 708 C5H12O 0.36
1-Pentanol 750 C5H12O 0.2 0.15
Hexyl alcohol 799 C6H14O 0.21
1,2,6-hexanetriol 834 C6H14O3 0.14 0.6
2-Methylcyclohexanol 902 C7H14O 0.2
1-Octen-3-ol 982 C8H16O 1.15 25.35 2.15 2.54 32.99
Phenethyl alcohol 989 C8H10O 4.68 0.53 0.65 0.67 0.26
3-Heptanol, 6-methyl- 997 C8H18O 0.16
2-Heptanol, 6-methyl- 1024 C8H18O 1.6
2-Octyn-1-ol 1032 C8H14O 0.69 0.51 0.38
(Z)-5-Octen-1-ol 1036 C8H16O 0.2
5-Octyn-4-ol, 2-methyl- 1097 C9H16O 0.51
Trans-2-Octen-1-ol 1100 C8H16O 2.6 3.9
Alpha-Terpineol 1187 C10H18O 0.68
Rac-Isopinocampheol 1196 C10H18O 0.81
2-propyl-1-Heptanol 1197 C10H22O 0.2
2,4-Decadien-1-ol 1230 C10H18O 0.38
2-Undecen-1-ol, (2E)- 1298 C11H22O 0.7
1-Octanol, 2-butyl- 1460 C12H26O 0.8 0.11 0.27 0.13
1-Tridecanol 1523 C13H28O 0.15 0.6
Nonadecanol 1698 C19H40O 0.11 0.17
Isophytol 1826 C20H40O 0.3 0.19
11-Hexadecyn-1-ol 1853 C16H30O 0.22
Hexadecanol 1860 C16H34O4 0.29
Aldehyde Butanedial C4H6O2 0.5
Isovaleraldehyde 735 C5H10O 0.15 0.21
Valeraldehyde 802 C5H10O 0.15 0.28 0.42 0.19 0.2
Hexanal 867 C6H12O 0.81 2.76 3.31 1.92 1.57
Hexanal, 2-ethyl- 898 C8H16O 0.15
Methyl valeraldehyde 902 C6H12O 0.12 0.13
Decanal 902 C10H20O 0.97 0.72 0.46 0.14
Heptaldehyde 953 C7H14O 0.47 0.29 0.21 0.9
(E)-2-Octenal 979 C8H14O 0.24 0.39 0.27 0.23 0.22
octanal 995 C8H16O 0.93 0.43 0.55
Benzaldehyde 1004 C7H6O 0.44 0.37 0.39
(E)-2-Nonen-1-al 1068 C9H16O 0.17 0.15 2.5
1-Nonanal 1112 C9H18O 2.86 1.53 1.44
Undecan-4-olide 1306 C11H20O2 0.2
Ketones 2-Pyrrolidinone C4H7NO 1.15 1.84 1.13
2H-Pyran-2-one, 5,6-dihydro- 734 C5H6O2 1.66 2.48 2.4 1.66 0.82
2-Heptanone 948 C7H14O 0.61 2.25 4.3 3.25
3-Octanone 981 C8H16O 6.91 0.87 1.41 1.82 0.44
3-Octen-2-one 991 C8H14O 0.46 0.68 1.9 0.69
1-Octen-3-one 998 C8H14O 2.25 2.47 4.74 3.8 0.9
6-Undecanone 1321 C11H22O 0.21
2-Undecanone 1328 C11H22O 2.86 1.26 1.64
2-Dodecanone 1432 C12H24O 0.32 0.17 0.24 0.2
Methanone, dicyclohexyl- 1513 C13H22O 0.75 0.26 0.5
Geranylacetone 1524 C13H22O 0.39 0.31 1.42 0.12
Ester Butanoic acid, 4-hydroxy- C4H8O3 0.17 0.35 0.54
γ-Butyrolactone C4H6O2 0.2
δ-Valerolactone 689 C5H8O2 0.83 0.11
γ-Valerolactone 694 C5H8O2 0.16 0.8
Isoamyl nitrite 715 C5H11NO2 0.15 0.17
γ-Valerolactone 752 C5H8O2 0.86
4-Hexanolide 792 C6H10O2 1.23
DL-sec-Butyl acetate 814 C6H12O2 0.17
Dihydro-3-methyl-2(3H)-Furanone 840 C5H8O2 0.19
Isobutyl acetate 845 C6H12O2 0.31
Pentanoic acid, 2- methyl-, methyl ester 933 C7H14O2 0.35 0.15 0.5
Banana oil 941 C7H14O2 1.59 0.2
Isoamyl acetate 963 C7H14O2 2.31 0.39
Hexyl acetate 1018 C8H16O2 2.46 0.18
γ-Nonanolactone 1087 C9H16O2 3.53 1.5 1.43 1.25
Phenethyl acetate 1164 C10H12O2 2.13
Ethyl caprylate 1179 C10H20O2 0.64 0.33 0.1
3-octyl acetate 1182 C10H20O2 1.3
Isobutyl hexanoate 1186 C10H20O2 0.2 0.14
Hexanoic acid, pentyl ester 1276 C11H22O2 0.13
Isopentyl hexanoate 1286 C11H22O2 0.66 0.24 0.46 0.56
Hexanoic acid, 2-methylbutyl ester 1329 C11H22O2 0.22 0.19
Isovaleric acid, phenethyl ester 1498 C13H18O2 0.21
Butanoic acid, 2-ethylhexyl ester 1560 C12H24O2 0.8
Geranyl 3-methylbutanoate 1725 C15H26O2 0.16
2,2,4-trimethyl-1,3-pentanediol diisobutyrate 1867 C16H30O4 0.27 0.8 0.14
Acids Glycine, L-alanyl- C2H7NO2 0.25 0.4 0.27 0.34
DL-Homocysteine C4H9NO2S 3.7
Isobutyric acid C4H8O2 0.1
Isovaleric acid 734 C5H10O2 0.46 0.31 0.46 0.23 0.21
DL-2-Methylbutyric acid 736 C5H10O2 0.17
Acetic acid glacia 835 C2H4O2 3.32 4.57 2.38 4.71
2-Methylhexanoic acid 964 C7H14O2 0.14
4-Methyloctanoic acid 1126 C9H18O2 0.19
Alkanes Hexane 600 C6H14 3.2 1.46
1,3- dimethyl-, cis-Cyclopentane 700 C7H14 1.13
1-Chlorohexane 845 C6H13Cl 0.24
Octane, 3,5-dimethyl- 1000 C10H22 0.13 0.45
Undecane 1100 C11H24 0.65 0.29 0.42 1.41 0.48
Dodecane 1200 C12H26 2.39 1.32 1.23 1.6 0.97
Decane, 2-methyl- 1200 C12H26 0.15 0.21
Tetradecane 1400 C14H30 4.3 1.67 3.8 1.29 0.65
Tridecane, 3-methylene- 1400 C14H28 0.21
Undecane, 3-methyl- 1458 C12H24O 0.35 0.28 0.25
Pentadecane 1500 C15H32 1.29
Hexadecane 1600 C16H34 1.13 0.93 0.99 0.3
Heptadecane 1700 C17H36 0.43
Oxirane, 2-tetradecyl- 1861 C16H32O 0.27 0.6
Heneicosane 2100 C21H44 0.4
Heptacosane 2700 C27H56 0.28
Pyrazines 2,6-Dimethylpyrazine 843 C6H8N2 4.16 0.33 0.38
2,5-Dimethyl pyrazine 843 C6H8N2 0.25
2-Ethyl-5-methylpyrazine 954 C7H10N2 0.68
2,3,5-Trimethylpyrazine 954 C7H10N2 0.76
Pyrazine,2-ethyl-3,5-dimethyl- 1031 C8H12N2 0.49
Pyrazine,2-butyl-3-methyl- 1098 C9H14N2 0.44 0.11
Aromatic Ethylbenzene 890 C8H10 0.22 0.25
1,4-Xylene 921 C8H10 0.22 0.15 0.44
1,3-Xylene 925 C8H10 0.49
Ethylbenzene 926 C8H10 0.13 0.34
1,3,5,7-cyclooctatetraene 964 C8H8 1.15
Naphthalene 1196 C10H8 0.16 0.33 0.42 0.32 0.11
1-isopropyl-2-methylbenzene 1209 C10H14 0.17 0.7
7H-Benzocycloheptene 1280 C11H10 0.17 0.11
7-Tetradecene 1598 C14H28 0.23
Ethers Ethene, (2-methoxyethoxy)- 636 C5H10O2 4.49
N-Hexyl n-octyl ether 1631 C14H30O 0.6
1,1′-oxybis-Decane 1793 C20H42O 0.87
Octane, 1,1′-oxybis- 1877 C16H34O 0.15
Other Lenthionine C2H4S5 0.27 0.15
Trimethylamine C3H9N 2.54 2.4
Ammonium acetate C2H7NO2 3.33
Hexanenitrile 831 C6H11N 0.11 0.27
1H-Pyrrole,1,2,5-trimethyl- 934 C7H11N 0.5 0.12
2-Pentylfuran 1102 C9H14O 3.6 5.2 9.37 3.93 1.26
2-Dodecanone 1496 C12H24O 0.17 0.2
2a,3a-Epoxy-5a-androstan-17b-ol 1706 C19H30O2 0.12 0.7

CS, C. squamulosa; BCS, boiling-cooked C. squamulosa; SCS, steaming-cooked C. squamulosa; MCS, microwaving-cooked C. squamulosa; FCS, frying-cooked C. squamulosa.

Cooking methods altered the volatile flavor profiles of C. squamulosa. Briefly, esters were abundant in the saw sample, but large losses occurred during the cooking process. This may be attributed to the conversion of ester compounds into other substances as the result of thermal decomposition or the action of enzymes in the cooking process, such as degrading esters and producing alcohols and acids compounds (32). In addition, different cooking methods had different effects on alcohols, aldehydes and ketones in C. squamulosa. During high-temperature ripening, these compounds will be lost, but many new compounds will also be produced. This series of changes can be caused by the Maillard reaction, the interaction of amino acids or proteins with oxidized lipids, and the degradation of long-chain compounds during heating (22). Therefore, the flavors of C. squamulosa processed by different cooking methods are different, due to the comprehensive effect of a variety of volatile flavor compounds with different characteristics.

Alcohols, with a mild characteristic odor, are important volatile compounds in mushrooms (22). Among alcohols, 1-octene-3-ol is the key volatile component of edible fungi, also known as “mushroom alcohol,” which is mainly derived from the reaction of lipoxygenases in polyunsaturated fatty acids, and its stability is poor (33). In contrast, boiling and frying cooking have the greatest effect on alcohols, and the relative contents of 1-octene-3-ol in boiled and fried samples were 22.02 times and 28.69 times that of the raw sample, respectively. In addition, a large amount of ethanol is produced in the fried cooking sample, which has a mellow aroma and flavor.

Aldehydes and ketones are mainly derived from polyunsaturated fatty acid oxidation, amino acid degradation, and the Maillard reaction (2, 34). Due to the low odor threshold, they are more critical volatile compounds than alcohols, which will strongly affect the aroma of mushroom products. It is worth noting that all cooked samples show an increase in the content of aldehydes. The contents of hexanal, 1-nonanal and decanal are high. Among them, hexanal has the flavor of grass, 1-nonanal shows the flavor of rose and citrus and decanal has the aroma of fat (16), which increases the complexity of mushroom aroma. The relative contents of 1-nonanal and decanal in boiling samples are higher, and the content of hexanal in cooked samples is greater. The threshold of ketone is higher than that of aldehyde. Among the four cooking methods, microwaved samples retain ketones better and are more conducive to the formation of ketones. The contents of 1-octene-3-one, 2-heptanone, 2h-pyran-2-one, 5,6-dihydrogen, 3-octene-2-one, and 2-pyrrolidone are higher.

Key aroma component analysis of Clitocybe squamulosa after different cooking methods

The contribution of volatile flavor compounds to the overall aroma of the sample depends on the concentration and threshold (23). Through searching, a total of 33 volatile flavor components of aroma thresholds were found. ROAV values were calculated through the concentrations and thresholds of volatile flavor compounds (Table 2). In the raw samples, 10 compounds were screened out as the key volatile flavor components of C. squamulosa. After cooking, the boiled, steamed, microwaved, and fried samples contained 8, 17, 14, and 3 key flavor compounds, respectively. It is the differences between these flavor compounds that form their own unique volatile flavors under different cooking methods. Notably, in raw samples, 2,6-dimethylpyrazine was defined as the component that contributed the most to the overall flavor. However, among all the cooked samples, 1-octen-3-ol was defined as the component that contributed the most to the overall flavor. 1-octen-3-ol mainly has a mushroom flavor, so the mushroom flavor of C. squamulosa is better released after cooking. In addition, key flavor compounds were significantly increased after steaming and microwave cooking, especially aldehydes, including valeraldehyde, hexanal, (E)-2-octenal, benzaldehyde, octanal, 1-nonanal, (E)-2-nonen-1-al, decanal, and heptaldehyde, which mainly have fruit, almond, fat, and grass flavors (16).

TABLE 2.

Key volatile compounds in C. squamulosa with different cooking methods.

English names Odor threshold (μ g/kg) ROAV

CS BCS SCS MCS FCS
1-Octen-3-ol 1.00 47.55 100.00 100.00 100.00 100.00
Hexyl alcohol 5.60 1.55
Phenethyl alcohol 1000.00 0.19 0.00 0.03 0.03 0.00
1-Pentanol 5.00 1.86 1.18
Ethanol 100,000.00 0.00
Valeraldehyde 12 0.52 0.09 1.63 0.62 0.05
Hexanal 4.50 7.44 2.42 34.21 16.80 1.06
(E)-2-Octenal 3.00 3.31 0.51 4.19 3.02 0.22
Isovaleraldehyde 9 0.07 0.07
Benzaldehyde 3.00 0.58 4.86 0.39
octanal 3.40 1.08 4.98 0.49
1-Nonanal 1.10 10.26 64.69 51.54
(E)-2-Nonen-1-al 0.19 3.53 36.72 39.88
Decanal 3 1.28 11.16 6.04 0.14
Heptaldehyde 3.00 4.50 0.52
Butanedial 7.00 0.22
2-Heptanone 140 0.18 0.06 1.43 0.91
1-Octen-3-one 5.00 18.61 1.95 44.09 29.92 0.55
3-Octanone 28.00 10.20 0.12 2.34 2.56 0.05
2-Undecanone 7.00 16.89 0.71 10.90
Geranylacetone 10 0.15 1.44 5.59 0.04
Isobutyl acetate 66.00 0.19
Acetic acid glacia 22000.00 0.01 0.01 0.00 0.00
Isovaleric acid 400.00 0.05 0.00 0.05 0.02 0.00
Isobutyric acid 4100.00 0.00
Hexane 580.00 0.26 0.10
2-Methylpyrazine 60.00 0.21
2,6-Dimethylpyrazine 1.72 100.00 8.92 8.70
2-Ethyl-5-methylpyrazine 16.00 1.76
2,5-Dimethyl pyrazine 1.82 0.54
2,3,5-Trimethylpyrazine 400 0.07
2-Pentylfuran 6.00 24.81 3.42 72.64 25.79 0.64
Trimethylamine 2.40 49.22 39.37

CS, C. squamulosa; BCS, boiling-cooked C. squamulosa; SCS, steaming-cooked C. squamulosa; MCS, microwaving-cooked C. squamulosa; FCS, frying-cooked C. squamulosa. The odor thresholds were referenced from a book named odor threshold compilations of odor threshold values in air, water and other media (second enlarged and revised edition) or taken from references (23, 50).

Principal component analysis of volatile components

Principal component analysis was performed to visualize the underlying relationships between raw and four cooked samples. As shown in Figure 1, PC1 and PC2 accounted for 78.7% of the total variance. The score plot clearly compares the differences between raw and cooked samples. In addition, load plots were also performed to estimate the differences between samples. Samples could be divided into two groups: one represents the raw samples, steamed samples, and microwaved samples, and the other represents the boiled samples and fried samples. These results showed that the volatile components of C. squamulosa changed after cooking, and the choice of cooking technique exerted varying degrees of influence on thereon. Compared with the other two cooking methods, steaming and microwaving cooked can retain the original flavor and give unique flavor.

FIGURE 1.

FIGURE 1

Principal component analysis (PCA) scores and load plots of volatile flavor compounds under different cooking methods. CS, C. squamulosa; BCS, boiling-cooked C. squamulosa; SCS, steaming-cooked C. squamulosa; MCS, microwaving-cooked C. squamulosa; FCS, frying-cooked C. squamulosa.

Effects of cooking methods on the color of Clitocybe squamulosa

Color is the visual indicator used when judging the quality change of a foodstuff in the cooking process (35). It is the most intuitive indicator for evaluating the quality change in C. squamulosa. As shown in Table 3, the different heating principles, heating temperatures, and times of different cooking methods led to varying degrees of changes in the color characteristics of C. squamulosa. Specifically, boiled samples showed the highest brightness (L* value), and fried samples showed the lowest L* value, which may be attributed to the strong Maillard reaction that occurs during frying (36). The a* values of raw and cooked samples are all positive, indicating that mushrooms belong to the red variety. There is no significant difference between the boiled, steamed, and raw samples, and the microwave and fried samples were significantly lower (in terms of a* value) than the raw samples. The b* value observed in boiled and steamed samples is higher, and the b* value observed in microwave samples is closest to that of raw samples. The hue angle (H) is used to describe the changes in mushroom color, and values between 0 and 90 indicate that the color of C. squamulosa is between yellow, and the larger the value is, the more yellow the color (37). During the different cooking methods, the difference between the hue angle of the microwave and raw samples is minimized. Chroma (C*) is an index that describes the color intensity and visual characteristics related to color (22). The higher the saturation value, the brighter the color intensity. In contrast, boiling and steaming cooked samples have the highest C* values. The larger the a/b values (h) are, the darker the color is. Among them, the h values of fried samples are the highest, and there is no significant difference between steamed cooked and raw samples. The total color (ΔE) difference of the microwaved samples is the smallest.

TABLE 3.

Effects of different cooking methods on color in C. squamulosa.

Cooking methods L* a* b* C* H h E*
CS 28.6 ± 0.76d 9.74 ± 1.19a 11.54 ± 1.53b 15.13 ± 1.69b 49.79 ± 3.54d 0.85 ± 0.10a
BCS 36.86 ± 1.20a 9.17 ± 0.54ab 16.32 ± 1.65a 18.73 ± 1.51a 60.57 ± 2.65a 0.57 ± 0.06d 9.74 ± 1.76a
SCS 33.64 ± 1.02b 9.96 ± 1.06a 15.31 ± 1.17a 18.28 ± 1.41a 57.01 ± 2.20b 0.65 ± 0.06c 6.74 ± 1.48b
MFS 29.47 ± 0.60c 8.68 ± 0.99b 11.08 ± 1.44b 14.08 ± 1.68c 51.9 ± 1.89c 0.79 ± 0.05b 3.19 ± 1.42c
FCS 27.43 ± 1.09e 6.53 ± 0.73c 6.88 ± 0.76c 9.50 ± 0.95d 46.5 ± 2.64e 0.95 ± 0.09a 6.03 ± 2.35b

CS, C. squamulosa; BCS, boiling-cooked C. squamulosa; SCS, steaming-cooked C. squamulosa; MCS, microwaving-cooked C. squamulosa; FCS, frying-cooked C. squamulosa. Values represent the mean ± standard deviation, and different superscript lowercase letters denote significance (p < 0.05) in each column.

To summarize, the raw samples are yellowish-brown. The color of steamed and fried samples is darker, and the color of boiled samples is shown to be brighter. Microwave cooking can better maintain the primary color of C. squamulosa.

Effects of cooking methods on conventional nutrients of Clitocybe squamulosa

Table 4 lists the effects of conventional nutrients of raw samples and cooking treatment on their nutritional value. The conventional nutrient contents of C. squamulosa are different after use of different cooking methods. The carbohydrate contents of the boiled and microwaved samples were higher than that of the steamed, microwave, and raw samples. Moreover, the loss of protein, ash, and moisture content of microwaved samples are the lowest, followed by the steamed samples. This may be because the steaming temperature is relatively low, and the microwave cooking is faster, so various chemical reaction rates and reaction times are reduced (38). The steamed and microwaved samples are not in direct contact with water or oil, which also reduces the loss of protein, ash, and water. Boiled and fried samples have suffered significant loss of nutrients, which may be related to water or oil absorption during boiling or frying, which has a dilutive effect on other nutrients (39). It is worth noting that the temperature can be as high as 180°C during frying, leading to severe oxidation of protein and fat and deterioration of mushroom quality (40). As the heating temperature of the water boiling, steaming, and microwave cooking methods is low, excessive oxidation can be avoided.

TABLE 4.

Effects of different cooking methods on conventional nutrient components in C. squamulosa.

Nutrient component CS BCS SCS MCS FCS
Energy (kJ/100 g) 1536.28 ± 3.82c 1.467.26 ± 4.99e 1518.65 ± 1.25d 1553.34 ± 4.55b 1890.03 ± 4.82a
Protein (g/100 g) 39.56 ± 0.16a 34.68 ± 0.44c 37.1 ± 0.16b 37.69 ± 0.75b 30.35 ± 0.99d
Fat (g/100 g) 9.70 ± 0.24b 7.74 ± 0.35d 8.89 ± 0.07c 9.08 ± 0.09c 22.93 ± 0.32a
Carbohydrate (g/100 g) 29.34 ± 0.45d 34.78 ± 0.12a 32.87 ± 0.17b 33.92 ± 0.98ab 30.63 ± 0.92c
Ash (g/100 g) 10.69 ± 0.20a 9.09 ± 0.12b 10.44 ± 0.13a 9.37 ± 0.19b 6.97 ± 0.25c
Moisture (g/100 g) 10.40 ± 0.27b 13.81 ± 0.29a 10.67 ± 0.06b 9.90 ± 0.27c 9.06 ± 0.25d

CS, C. squamulosa; BCS, boiling-cooked C. squamulosa; SCS, steaming-cooked C. squamulosa; MCS, microwaving-cooked C. squamulosa; FCS, frying-cooked C. squamulosa. Values represent the mean ± standard deviation, and different superscript lowercase letters denote significance (p < 0.05) in each row.

Effects of cooking methods on the hydrolytic amino acids in Clitocybe squamulosa

The nutritional value and flavor of edible fungi are closely related to the type and content of amino acids, especially essential amino acids and flavoring amino acids (41). The differences in hydrolytic amino acid content in C. squamulosa with different cooking methods are listed in Table 5; in raw samples and cooked samples, the Arg content was significantly higher, followed by Glu and Asp, which together represent 32.64, 33.37, 32.42, 31.80, and 32.58% of the total amino acids in raw samples, boiled, steamed, microwaved, and fried samples. Among them, Arg is a functional essential amino acid that plays a vital role in hormone release, neurotransmission and maintenance of blood pressure, cell division and wound healing (42). In addition, Glu, Asp, Phe, Ala, Gly, and Tyr are all aromatic amino acids, which together represent 36.26, 37.40, 36.48, 36.02, and 37.11% of the total amino acids in raw samples, boiling, steaming, microwaved and frying cooked samples. These amino acids affect the flavor of C. squamulosa.

TABLE 5.

Effects of different cooking methods on the hydrolytic amino acids in C. squamulosa.

Amino acid (g/100 g) CS BCS SCS MCS FCS
Thr 1.69 ± 0.08a 1.51 ± 0.00b 1.60 ± 0.05ab 1.36 ± 0.05c 1.30 ± 0.06c
Val 1.84 ± 0.19a 1.54 ± 0.03cd 1.78 ± 0.13ab 1.59 ± 0.14bc 1.34 ± 0.02d
Met 0.67 ± 0.01a 0.58 ± 0.01c 0.62 ± 0.02b 0.57 ± 0.03c 0.53 ± 0.01d
Ile 1.58 ± 0.17a 1.39 ± 0.06ab 1.48 ± 0.12a 1.35 ± 0.16ab 1.17 ± 0.04b
Leu 2.44 ± 0.24a 2.09 ± 0.06ab 2.29 ± 0.20ab 2.02 ± 0.24b 1.56 ± 0.21c
Phe 1.22 ± 0.04a 1.25 ± 0.04a 1.25 ± 0.09a 1.10 ± 0.09b 1.13 ± 0.01ab
Lys 2.02 ± 0.08a 1.99 ± 0.02a 1.99 ± 0.09a 1.81 ± 0.26ab 1.69 ± 0.06b
Asp 2.85 ± 0.06a 2.61 ± 0.02c 2.74 ± 0.03b 2.27 ± 0.05d 2.17 ± 0.04f
Ser 1.55 ± 0.05a 1.36 ± 0.02b 1.47 ± 0.05a 1.30 ± 0.02bc 1.23 ± 0.07c
Glu 2.99 ± 0.02a 3.05 ± 0.09a 2.91 ± 0.09a 2.64 ± 0.30b 2.43 ± 0.07b
Gly 1.93 ± 0.11a 1.73 ± 0.04b 1.87 ± 0.02a 1.62 ± 0.01c 1.46 ± 0.04d
Ala 1.72 ± 0.05a 1.58 ± 0.02c 1.65 ± 0.02ab 1.46 ± 0.06d 1.33 ± 0.07e
Cys 0.88 ± 0.05a 0.86 ± 0.00ab 0.89 ± 0.02a 0.87 ± 0.01ab 0.83 ± 0.00b
Tyr 1.21 ± 0.05a 1.00 ± 0.01bc 1.17 ± 0.06a 1.07 ± 0.07b 0.96 ± 0.01c
His 1.13 ± 0.04a 1.04 ± 0.02b 1.10 ± 0.01a 0.99 ± 0.02c 0.90 ± 0.01d
Arg 4.89 ± 0.20a 4.23 ± 0.10b 4.65 ± 0.02a 4.06 ± 0.04b 3.73 ± 0.21c
Pro 2.27 ± 0.01a 2.18 ± 0.03b 2.30 ± 0.03a 2.11 ± 0.03c 1.79 ± 0.02d
Essential amino acids (EAA) 11.45 10.34 11.02 9.81 8.72
Non-essential amino acids (NEAA) 21.41 19.63 20.76 18.40 16.84
Umami amino acids (UAA) 11.92 11.21 11.59 10.16 9.49
Total amino acids (TAA) 32.87 29.97 31.77 28.21 25.57

CS, C. squamulosa; BCS, boiling-cooked C. squamulosa; SCS, steaming-cooked C. squamulosa; MCS, microwaving-cooked C. squamulosa; FCS, frying-cooked C. squamulosa. Values represent the mean ± standard deviation, and different superscript lowercase letters denote significance (p < 0.05) in each row.

Cooking temperature and time affect the rate of protein degradation, resulting in changes in the amino acid content (43). Compared with the raw samples, all cooking treatments resulted from decreased amino acid contents, and the degree of loss caused by different cooking methods was different. In terms of the total amount of amino acids, the order of their content is: raw > steamed > boiled > microwave > fried. Fried samples lost the most, which was possibly due to increasing degree of oxidation caused by the high temperature and oil, followed by microwaved and boiled samples. Microwave cooking is prone to thermal degradation, deformation, polymerization, and other reactions, leading to the loss of amino acids from the food (44). Boiled cooking readily causes a loss of amino acids in the soup. Thus, steamed cooking preserves the content of amino acid better than the other three cooking methods.

Effects of cooking methods on bioactive compounds of Clitocybe squamulosa

The effects of cooking methods on the bioactive compounds of C. squamulosa are listed in Table 6. The polysaccharide content is shown to be higher, and the total phenol and flavonoid contents are lower. However, the four cooking treatments all decrease the amounts of bioactive compounds therein, but the extent of this loss is different. The difference in cooking conditions of all samples is undoubtedly the main reason for the difference in bioactive compound content. Among the four cooking methods, fried cooking lost the most, followed by boiled cooking. Steam cooking demonstrated a minimal loss of polysaccharides and microwave cooking showed minimal losses of total phenolics and flavonoids. The reason may be that different degrees of damage to the cell wall are caused by different heat-transfer media and cooking temperatures (45). For example, during the boiling process, the water content increases, the tissue was softened to make it easy for water-soluble compounds to dissolve in the soup (46). During the frying process, the oil covers the cell surface, hindering the extraction of bioactive compounds (46).

TABLE 6.

Effects of different cooking methods on bioactive compounds contents in C. squamulosa.

Bioactive compounds CS BCS SCS MCS FCS
Polysaccharide (mg/g) 129.76 ± 0.67a 91.46 ± 0.88d 106.78 ± 0.88b 101.45 ± 0.67c 62.93 ± 0.58e
Total phenolic (mg/g) 4.29 ± 0.28a 3.56 ± 0.01d 4.11 ± 0.01c 4.17 ± 0.02b 3.47 ± 0.03e
Flavonoids (mg/g) 15.00 ± 0.28a 13.78 ± 0.01b 14.55 ± 0.01b 14.94 ± 0.02b 12.69 ± 0.03c

CS, C. squamulosa; BCS, boiling-cooked C. squamulosa; SCS, steaming-cooked C. squamulosa; MCS, microwaving-cooked C. squamulosa; FCS, frying-cooked C. squamulosa. Values represent the mean ± standard deviation, and different superscript lowercase letters denote significance (p < 0.05) in each row.

Effects of cooking methods on the antioxidant activity in Clitocybe squamulosa

The effects of cooking methods on the antioxidant activity of C. squamulosa were evaluated by DPPH, ABTS, and OH radical scavenging capacity (Figures 2A–F). The antioxidant activities for all measured concentrations of C. squamulosa extracts were dose-dependent, however, with a different extent. The DPPH, ABTS, and OH radical scavenging activities of the microwaved sample extract were greater than those of the raw sample and the other three cooked samples, but lower than that of the positive control (Vc). The IC50 values of the DPPH, ABTS, and OH radical scavenging activities of the microwaved sample were 0.20, 0.22, and 0.32 mg/mL, respectively. Compared with other cooking methods, microwave-cooked samples exhibited superior antioxidant activity, which may be attributed to the high contents of total phenols, polysaccharides, and flavonoids in microwaved samples. Of course, these were related not only to the content of bioactive components in mushrooms, but also to other components related to antioxidant activity therein (47). The IC50 values of ABTS radical scavenging activities between the steamed samples and raw samples were not statistically significant (p < 0.05). The IC50 values of the OH radical scavenging activities of the fried samples were significantly lower than that of the raw samples. Previous studies have found a positive correlation between bioactive compounds and antioxidant activity (48), therefore, after cooking, the enhanced antioxidant activity of C. squamulosa may be ascribed to the destruction of covalent bonds during heating, allowing cells to release more active ingredients (49).

FIGURE 2.

FIGURE 2

Effects of cooking methods on antioxidant activity of extracts from C. squamulosa. (A) DPPH radical scavenging activity. (B) ABTS radical scavenging activity. (C) OH radical scavenging activity. (D) IC50 value of DPPH radical. (E) IC50 value of ABTS radical. (F) IC50 value of OH radical. CS, C. squamulosa; BCS, boiling-cooked C. squamulosa; SCS, steaming-cooked C. squamulosa; MCS, microwaving-cooked C. squamulosa; FCS, frying-cooked C. squamulosa. Each value represents the mean ± SD (n = 3) and different lowercase letters denote statistical significance (p < 0.05).

Conclusion

The effects of different cooking methods on the volatile flavor compounds and nutritional constituents, and antioxidant activities of C. squamulosa were investigated by boiling, steaming, microwaving, and frying. From the perspective of volatile compounds, after cooking treatment, the lipids of C. squamulosa were lost to a significant extent, but new alcohol and acid compounds were produced, and the quantity and content of alcohols, aldehydes and ketones increased. Based on ROAV values and PCA, steaming and microwave cooking can improve the flavor of C. squamulosa. From a color difference and nutritional content perspective, each cooking treatment resulted in positive color changes, with microwave cooking closest to the color of raw samples. Among all samples, steamed and microwaved C. squamulosa had a higher nutrient content. An antioxidant capacity analysis found that microwave-cooked samples showed the highest antioxidant activity. Comprehensive analysis found that steaming and microwave cooking were more suitable for cooking C. squamulosa.

In the diet, the nutritional value of food is not only related to how it is cooked, but also related to the digestion and absorption of nutrients by the body. During digestion, the nutritional value contained in the food is transmitted to the parts needed by the body, providing energy for the human body and maintaining health. Exploring the effects of different cooking methods on the nutritional value and volatile flavor of food is crucial to basic research in the early stage. In the later stage, attention should also be paid to the degree of digestion and absorption of food nutrients in the human body after use of different cooking methods. Therefore, the further to explore the digestion and absorption of C. squamulosa by the human body during the digestion after use of different cooking methods, the samples should also be subjected to in vitro simulated digestion tests. Then, the effects of different cooking methods on the quality of C. squamulosa were comprehensively evaluated. This provides a theoretical basis for people to choose appropriate cooking methods and provides a reference for the cooking and processing of other edible fungi.

Data availability statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.

Author contributions

HY: conceptualization, methodology, formal analysis, data curation, and writing-original draft. ZL: data curation and software. LX: resources, methodology, investigation, and writing-review. MC: resources and funding acquisition. JM, CF, XG, and YC: resources, conceptualization, formal analysis, and supervision. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank all the members of the research group for their cooperation in the laboratory.

Funding

This study was financially supported by the Shanxi Provincial Basic Research and Development Project (202103021224127) and the Youth Project of Basic Research Program in Shanxi (20210302124071). This study was also funded by the Research Project Supported by Shanxi Scholarship Council of China (2022-096).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

  • 1.Hu HZ. Investigation on Edible and Medicinal Fungi and “Taimo” in Wutai Mountain. Jilin: Jilin Agricultural Universal; (2020). 2020.000309 10.27163/d.cnki.gjlnu [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Guo DD, Lei JY, He C, Peng ZJ, Liu RZ, Pan X, et al. In vitro digestion and fermentation by human fecal microbiota of polysaccharides from Clitocybe squamulose. Int J Biol Macromol. (2022) 208:343–55. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.03.126 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Si J, Meng G, Wu Y, Ma HF, Cui BK, Dai YC. Medium composition optimization, structural characterization, and antioxidant activity of exopolysaccharides from the medicinal mushroom Ganoderma lingzhi. Int J Biol Macromol. (2019) 124:1186–96. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.11.274 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bach F, Zielinski AAF, Helm CV, Maciel GM, Pedro AC, Stafussa AP, et al. Bio Compounds of edible mushrooms: in vitro antioxidant and antimicrobial activities. LWT. (2019) 107:214–20. 10.1016/j.lwt.2019.03.017 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Pathak MP, Pathak K, Saikia R, Gogoi U, Ahmad MZ, Patowary P, et al. Immunomodulatory effect of mushrooms and their bioactive compounds in cancer: a comprehensive review. Biomed Pharmacother. (2022) 149:112901. 10.1016/j.biopha.2022.112901 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Sillapachaiyaporn C, Chuchawankul S, Nilkhet S, Moungkote N, Sarachana T, Ung AT, et al. Ergosterol isolated from cloud ear mushroom (Auricularia polytricha) attenuates bisphenol a-induced Bv2 microglial cell inflammation. Food Res Int. (2022) 157:111433. 10.1016/j.foodres.2022.111433 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Yang Y, Lin L, Zhao M, Yang X. The hypoglycemic and hypolipemic potentials of Moringa oleifera leaf polysaccharide and polysaccharide-flavonoid complex. Int J Biol Macromol. (2022) 210:518–29. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2022.04.206 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Reis FS, Martins A, Vasconcelos MH, Morales P, Ferreira ICFR. Functional foods based on extracts or compounds derived from mushrooms. Trends Food Sci Technol. (2017) 66:48–62. 10.1016/j.tifs.2017.05.010 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.CEFA. Analysis of 2019 National Edible Fungi Statistical Survey. Lianyungang: CEFA; (2021). p. 104–10. [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Tan Y, Zeng NK, Xu B. Chemical profiles and health-promoting effects of porcini mushroom (Boletus edulis): a narrative review. Food Chem. (2022) 390:133199. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.133199 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Jaworska G, Pogon K, Skrzypczak A, Bernas E. Composition and antioxidant properties of wild mushrooms Boletus edulis and Xerocomus badius prepared for consumption. J Food Sci Technol. (2015) 52:7944–53. 10.1007/s13197-015-1933-x [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Lozano-Castellon J, Rocchetti G, Vallverdu-Queralt A, Illan M, Torrado-Prat X, Lamuela-Raventos RM, et al. New vacuum cooking techniques with extra-virgin olive oil show a better phytochemical profile than traditional cooking methods: a foodomics study. Food Chem. (2021) 362:130194. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.130194 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.da Silva FLF, de Lima JPS, Melo LS, da Silva YSM, Gouveia ST, Lopes GS, et al. Comparison between boiling and vacuum cooking (Sous-Vide) in the bioaccessibility of minerals in bovine liver samples. Food Res Int. (2017) 100:566–71. 10.1016/j.foodres.2017.07.054 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Cilla A, Bosch L, Barberá R, Alegría A. Effect of processing on the bioaccessibility of bioactive compounds – a review focusing on carotenoids, minerals, ascorbic acid, tocopherols and polyphenols. J Food Compos Anal. (2018) 68:3–15. 10.1016/j.jfca.2017.01.009 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Liu Y, Li Y, Ke Y, Li C, Zhang Z, Liu A, et al. Processing of four different cooking methods of Oudemansiella radicata: effects on in vitro bioaccessibility of nutrients and antioxidant activity. Food Chem. (2021) 337:128007. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.128007 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Mena García M, Paula VB, Olloqui ND, García DF, Combarros-Fuertes P, Estevinho LM, et al. Effect of different cooking methods on the total phenolic content, antioxidant activity and sensory properties of wild Boletus edulis mushroom. Int J Gastron Food Sci. (2021) 26:100416. [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Selli S, Guclu G, Sevindik O, Kelebek H. Variations in the key aroma and phenolic compounds of champignon (Agaricus bisporus) and oyster (Pleurotus ostreatus) mushrooms after two cooking treatments as elucidated by Gc–Ms-O and Lc-Dad-Esi-Ms/Ms. Food Chem. (2021) 354:129576. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.129576 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Ng ZX, Tan WC. Impact of optimised cooking on the antioxidant activity in edible mushrooms. J Food Sci Technol. (2017) 54:4100–11. 10.1007/s13197-017-2885-0 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ng ZX, Rosman NF. In vitro digestion and domestic cooking improved the total antioxidant activity and carbohydrate-digestive enzymes inhibitory potential of selected edible mushrooms. J Food Sci Technol. (2019) 56:865–77. 10.1007/s13197-018-3547-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Wang SR, Chang MC, Li G, Meng JL, Feng CF, Xu LJ, et al. The Key Technology of Shanxi Taimo Mushroom Resources Development. Jinzhong: Shanxi Agricultural University; (2021). [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Guo DD, Lei JY, Xu LJ, Cheng YF, Feng CP, Meng JM, et al. Two novel polysaccharides from Clitocybe squamulosa: their isolation, structures, and bioactivities. Front Nutr. (2022) 9:934769. 10.3389/fnut.2022.934769 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Xun W, Wang GY, Zhang YJ, Liao GZ, Ge CR. Analysis of flavor-related compounds in four edible wild mushroom soups. Microchem J. (2020) 159:105548. 10.1016/j.microc.2020.105548 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Zhang H, Huang D, Pu D, Zhang Y, Chen H, Sun B, et al. Multivariate relationships among sensory attributes and volatile components in commercial dry porcini mushrooms (Boletus edulis). Food Res Int. (2020) 133:109112. 10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109112 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Kulapichitr F, Borompichaichartkul C, Fang M, Suppavorasatit I, Cadwallader KR. Effect of post-harvest drying process on chlorogenic acids, antioxidant activities and Cie-Lab Color of Thai Arabica green coffee beans. Food Chem. (2022) 366:130504. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2021.130504 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.AOAC. Association of Official Analytical Chemists: Official Methods of Analysis. (Vol. 1). Washington DC: AOAC; (1990). p. 69–90. [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Motta C, Castanheira I, Gonzales GB, Delgado I, Torres D, Santos M, et al. Impact of cooking methods and malting on amino acids content in amaranth, buckwheat and Quinoa. J Food Compos Anal. (2019) 76:58–65. 10.1016/j.jfca.2018.10.001 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Deng LZ, Xiong CH, Pei YP, Zhu ZQ, Zheng X, Zhang Y, et al. Effects of various storage conditions on total phenolic, carotenoids, antioxidant capacity, and color of dried apricots. Food Control. (2022) 136:108846. 10.1016/j.foodcont.2022.108846 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Liu XM, Liu Y, Shan CH, Yang XQ, Zhang Q, Xu N, et al. Effects of five extraction methods on total content, composition, and stability of flavonoids in Jujube. Food Chem X. (2022) 14:100287. 10.1016/j.fochx.2022.100287 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Shraim AM, Ahmed TA, Rahman MM, Hijji YM. Determination of total flavonoid content by aluminum chloride assay: a critical evaluation. LWT. (2021) 150:111932. 10.1016/j.lwt.2021.111932 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Sharpe E, Farragher-Gnadt AP, Igbanugo M, Huber T, Michelotti JC, Milenkowic A, et al. Comparison of antioxidant activity and extraction techniques for commercially and laboratory prepared extracts from six mushroom species. J Agr Food Res. (2021) 4:100130. 10.1016/j.jafr.2021.100130 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Pan X, Xu L, Meng J, Chang M, Cheng Y, Geng X, et al. Ultrasound-assisted deep eutectic solvents extraction of polysaccharides from Morchella importuna: optimization, physicochemical properties, and bioactivities. Front Nutr. (2022) 9:912014. 10.3389/fnut.2022.912014 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Wei CK, Ni ZJ, Thakur K, Liao AM, Huang JH, Wei ZJ. Aromatic effects of immobilized enzymatic oxidation of chicken fat on flaxseed (Linum usitatissimum L.) derived maillard reaction products. Food Chem. (2020) 306:125560. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.125560 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Zhuang J, Xiao Q, Feng T, Huang Q, Ho CT, Song S. Comparative flavor profile analysis of four different varieties of boletus mushrooms by instrumental and sensory techniques. Food Res Int. (2020) 136:109485. 10.1016/j.foodres.2020.109485 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Dermiki M, Phanphensophon N, Mottram DS, Methven L. Contributions of non-volatile and volatile compounds to the umami taste and overall flavour of shiitake mushroom extracts and their application as flavour enhancers in cooked minced meat. Food Chem. (2013) 141:77–83. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2013.03.018 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Argyropoulos D, Khan MT, Müller J. Effect of air temperature and pre-treatment on color changes and texture of dried Boletus edulis mushroom. Dry Technol. (2011) 29:1890–900. 10.1080/07373937.2011.594194 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Shams R, Singh J, Dash KK, Dar AH. Comparative study of freeze drying and cabinet drying of button mushroom. Appl Food Res. (2022) 2:100084. 10.1016/j.afres.2022.100084 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Chatham LA, Howard JE, Juvik JA. A natural colorant system from corn: flavone-anthocyanin copigmentation for altered hues and improved shelf life. Food Chem. (2020) 310:125734. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.125734 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Chin L, Therdthai N, Ratphitagsanti W. Effect of conventional and microwave cooking conditions on quality and antioxidant activity of Chinese Kale (Brassica Alboglabra). Appl Food Res. (2022) 2:100079. 10.1016/j.afres.2022.100079 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Tang D, Wang R, He X, Chen X, Huo X, Lu X, et al. Comparison of the Edible quality of liquid egg with different cooking methods and their antioxidant activity after in vitro digestion. Food Res Int. (2021) 140:110013. 10.1016/j.foodres.2020.110013 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Banerjee S, Sahu CK. A short review on vacuum frying-a promising technology for healthier and better fried foods. Int J Nutrit Health Sci. (2017) 1:68–71. [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Sa AGA, Pacheco MTB, Moreno YMF, Carciofi BAM. Cold-pressed sesame seed meal as a protein source: effect of processing on the protein digestibility, amino acid profile, and functional properties. J Food Compos Anal. (2022) 111:104634. 10.1016/j.jfca.2022.104634 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Mohanty B, Mahanty A, Ganguly S, Sankar TV, Chakraborty K, Rangasamy A, et al. Amino acid compositions of 27 food fishes and their importance in clinical nutrition. J Amino Acids. (2014) 2014:269797. 10.1155/2014/269797 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Sissons J, Davila M, Du X. Sautéing and roasting effect on free amino acid profiles in portobello and shiitake mushrooms, and the effect of mushroom-and cooking-related volatile aroma compounds on meaty flavor enhancement. Int J Gastron Food Sci. (2022) 28:100550. 10.1016/j.ijgfs.2022.100550 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Khattab RY, Arntfield SD, Nyachoti CM. Nutritional quality of legume seeds as affected by some physical treatments, part 1: protein quality evaluation. LWT. (2009) 42:1107–12. 10.1016/j.lwt.2009.02.008 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Lemos MA, Aliyu MM, Hungerford G. Influence of cooking on the levels of bioactive compounds in purple majesty potato observed via chemical and spectroscopic means. Food Chem. (2015) 173:462–7. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.10.064 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Mehmood A, Zeb A. Effects of different cooking techniques on bioactive contents of leafy vegetables. Int J Gastron Food Sci. (2020) 22:100246. 10.1016/j.ijgfs.2020.100246 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Wan FC, Feng CF, Luo KY, Cui WY, Xia ZH, Cheng AW. Effect of steam explosion on phenolics and antioxidant activity in plants: a review. Trends Food Sci Tech. (2022) 124:13–24. 10.1016/j.tifs.2022.04.003 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.Skrovankova S, Sumczynski D, Mlcek J, Jurikova T, Sochor J. Bioactive compounds and antioxidant activity in different types of berries. Int J Mol Sci. (2015) 16:24673–706. 10.3390/ijms161024673 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Yao L, Fan L, Duan Z. Effect of different pretreatments followed by hot-air and far-infrared drying on the bioactive compounds, physicochemical property and microstructure of mango slices. Food Chem. (2020) 305:125477. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.125477 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Qiu D, Duan R, Wang Y, He Y, Li C, Shen X, et al. Effects of different drying temperatures on the profile and sources of flavor in semi-dried golden pompano (Trachinotus ovatus). Food Chem. (2023) 401:134112. 10.1016/j.foodchem.2022.134112 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in this study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.


Articles from Frontiers in Nutrition are provided here courtesy of Frontiers Media SA

RESOURCES