Skip to main content
G3: Genes | Genomes | Genetics logoLink to G3: Genes | Genomes | Genetics
. 2022 Sep 26;12(11):jkac260. doi: 10.1093/g3journal/jkac260

Genomic novelty within a “great speciator” revealed by a high-quality reference genome of the collared kingfisher (Todiramphus chloris collaris)

Chad M Eliason 1,2,, Taylor Hains 3, Jenna McCullough 4, Michael J Andersen 5, Shannon J Hackett 6,7
Editor: M Baldwin
PMCID: PMC9635628  PMID: 36156134

Abstract

Islands are natural laboratories for studying patterns and processes of evolution. Research on island endemic birds has revealed elevated speciation rates and rapid phenotypic evolution in several groups (e.g. white-eyes, Darwin’s finches). However, understanding the evolutionary processes behind these patterns requires an understanding of how genotypes map to novel phenotypes. To date, there are few high-quality reference genomes for species found on islands. Here, we sequence the genome of one of Ernst Mayr’s “great speciators,” the collared kingfisher (Todiramphus chloris collaris). Utilizing high molecular weight DNA and linked-read sequencing technology, we assembled a draft high-quality genome with highly contiguous scaffolds (scaffold N50 = 19 Mb). Based on universal single-copy orthologs, we estimated a gene space completeness of 96.6% for the draft genome assembly. The population demographic history analyses reveal a distinct pattern of contraction and expansion in population size throughout the Pleistocene. Comparative genomic analysis of gene family evolution revealed that species-specific and rapidly expanding gene families in the collared kingfisher (relative to other Coraciiformes) are mainly involved in the ErbB signaling pathway and focal adhesion. Todiramphus kingfishers are a species-rich group that has become a focus of speciation research. This draft genome will be a platform for future taxonomic, phylogeographic, and speciation research in the group. For example, target genes will enable testing of changes in sensory structures associated with changes in vision and taste genes across kingfishers.

Keywords: sensory systems, comparative genomics, Aves

Introduction

Islands offer unique opportunities to study evolution in action in natural populations owing to their discrete geographical boundaries and well-characterized geologic histories (Losos and Ricklefs 2009). As such, islands have been key to studying several evolutionary paradigms, such as the paradox of the “great speciators” (Diamond and Mayr 1976), the Theory of Island Biogeography (MacArthur and Wilson 1967), and adaptive radiation (Losos and Ricklefs 2009). Early research focused primarily on biogeographic and phenotypic aspects of species (Wallace 1881; Mayr 1963; Mayr and Diamond 2001). More recently, researchers have begun to leverage genomic data to study evolutionary patterns and processes on islands. For example, Cornetti et al. (2015) studied white-eye genomes and found that this island clade harbors high rates of nucleotide substitutions, gene duplications, and positive selection relative to other bird clades. A recent study extended this work using target capture to shed light on the origins of biodiversity/lineages in white-eyes (Gwee et al. 2020). The phenotypes evolve rapidly on islands (Millien 2006), often in tandem with speciation rates (Cardoso and Mota 2008; Rabosky et al. 2013). Yet, few studies have characterized the genomes of focal clades known to show rapid rates of phenotypic evolution (e.g. Almén et al. 2016).

Kingfishers have rapidly evolving brains (Eliason et al. 2021), colorful plumages (Moyle et al. 2007), and diverse foraging behaviors (Woodall 1991, 2016). The collared kingfisher (Todiramphus chloris) is one of the most widespread of the “great speciators” (Mayr and Diamond 2001), an evolutionary lineage with an ability to rapidly form new taxa across insular geographies despite their propensity to disperse. Recently, the 50 subspecies comprising the T. chloris species complex, which ranged >16,000 km from the Red Sea to Polynesia (Fry 1992), were split into at least 10 different species (depending on taxonomic authority) by Andersen et al. (2015). This new appreciation for species-level diversity within Todiramphus has highlighted this genus as having elevated speciation rates relative to background rates within the order Coraciiformes (Andersen et al. 2018; McCullough et al. 2019). Recent work shows that these elevated speciation rates are associated with dispersal into island systems of Wallacea and the South Pacific (Andersen et al. 2018), as well as rapid rates of brain shape evolution (Eliason et al. 2021). However, the evolutionary processes underpinning these patterns remain unclear. For example, are changes in brain shape causally linked to the speciation process, or is speciation driven by changes in chromosomal architecture that also influence brain shape diversity as a by-product? To answer these and other questions about evolutionary processes driving speciation, a high-quality Todiramphus reference genome is needed.

Here, we present a high-quality draft genome of the collared kingfisher (T. chloris collaris). Even in its more narrowly circumscribed species limits, T. chloris has a wide distribution from the coasts of the Red Sea to northwestern New Guinea. Across its range, it is delineated into 14 subspecies, all with disjunct distributions. Todiramphus chloris collaris is an island-dwelling subspecies found throughout the Philippine Archipelago (Andersen et al. 2015). We further integrate these data with existing avian genomes and use a comparative genomics approach to test the hypothesis that islands are associated with genomic novelty in the collared kingfisher relative to other closely related coraciiform species.

Materials and methods

Genome sequencing

We used frozen liver tissue of a collared kingfisher (T. chloris collaris) voucher collected in 1992 from Sibuyan Island and accessioned at the Field Museum, specimen number FMNH 358326. We extracted DNA using standard protocols for high molecular weight DNA extraction (10X Genomics, CA), resulting in a concentration of 10.5 ng/µl of DNA. We constructed the library with the 10X Genomics Genome and Gel Bead Kit v2. We sequenced the genome on a paired-end 150 lane of a HiSeq 4000 at the Roy J. Carver Biotechnology Center at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign.

Genome assembly

We assembled the genome using 10X Supernova (Weisenfeld et al. 2017) with default options. To fill gaps in the reference genome, we used the ABySS Sealer program (Paulino et al. 2015) with default options and 2 different kmer lengths (k = 64, 96). We further assessed genome completeness using BUSCO v. 5 (Manni et al. 2021) and by aligning our draft genome assembly to 2 related species in the Afroaves clade with high-quality chromosome-level assemblies available on GenBank (Supplementary Table 1): Abyssinian ground-hornbill (Bucorvus abyssinicus) and a more closely related coraciiform species, northern carmine bee-eater (Merops nubicus). We then used the JupiterPlot pipeline (code available at https://github.com/JustinChu/JupiterPlot; accessed 2022 September 26) to visualize scaffold sizes and synteny.

Repeat annotation

We used RepeatModeler v. 1.0.11 (Smit and Hubley 2008) to identify repetitive elements within the genome based on the NCBI database. We located 172 repeat families and used this as an input for our downstream genome annotation pipeline (see below). We further masked repeats using this de novo set of annotations with RepeatMasker v. 4.0.1 (Smit et al. 2013), in addition to those for the chicken (using the “-species = chicken” argument in RepeatMasker). More than 98% of the repeats in chicken were also identified de novo in the collared kingfisher using RepeatModeler, with 21% novel repeat content in the collared kingfisher relative to chicken.

Gene annotation

We used ortholog-based annotation implemented in GeMoMa (Keilwagen et al. 2018). We used 4 high-quality genome annotations to infer genes in the collared kingfisher: budgerigar (Melopsittacus undulatus), Anna’s hummingbird (Calypte anna), golden eagle (Aquila chrysaetos), and chicken (Gallus gallus) (see Supplementary Table 1). These species were chosen based on availability of a high-quality annotation as well as their phylogenetic proximity to kingfishers. Finally, we filtered predictions using the GAF function, resulting in a final protein dataset (GFF file) of 16,539 genes with an average length of 17.7 kb and a BUSCO score of 93.0% [(S: 74.8%, D: 18.2%), F: 1.0%, M: 6.0%, n = 8,338]. To functionally annotate this set of putative protein transcripts, we used the rbh function in mmseqs2 (Steinegger and Söding 2017) to blast to the uniprot set of genes (The UniProt Consortium 2021), converted uniprot IDs to gene names, and used this set of gene names in downstream enrichment analyses (see below).

Population demographic history

We aligned cleaned reads to the reference genome using BWA-MEM (Li 2013). We used pairwise sequentially Markovian coalescent (PSMC) v. 0.6.5 (Li and Durbin 2011) to infer population demographic history using parameters from a previous study on bird genomes (Nadachowska-Brzyska et al. 2015). To plot effective population sizes (Ne) as a function of time, we used published R code (Liu and Hansen 2016) to input data into R with a generation time of 4.8 years (IUCN 2021) and a mutation rate of 2.23 × 10−8 mutations per generation. This mutation rate estimate was based on a molecular substitution rate of 0.11 mutations per million years for Alcedo atthis (Lanfear et al. 2010), a branch length of 24 My for this lineage (Prum et al. 2015), and a generation time of ∼5 years. We accounted for uncertainty by running 100 bootstrap PSMC estimates based on resampling of 100-bp genomic regions (Li and Durbin 2011).

Protein evolution

We used OrthoFinder v. 2.5.2 (Emms and Kelly 2019) to infer gene families and CAFE v. 4.2.1 (Han et al. 2013) to uncover trends in gene family evolution and test our hypothesis that the collared kingfisher has elevated genomic novelty associated with island-living. We used curated genome annotations (Feng et al. 2020) for 4 coraciiform species (Halcyon senegalensis, Chloroceryle aenea, Ceyx cyanopectus, and Todus mexicanus) as well as 2 outgroups (Taeniopygia guttata and C. anna) (see Supplementary Table 1 for details). Outgroup species were added to the coraciiform timetree (McCullough et al. 2019) based on divergence estimates in Prum et al. (2015). We attempted to account for gene annotation error using the caferror.py function in CAFE. This algorithm optimizes likelihoods by estimating assembly error for each species and then infers the final rate of gene family evolution based on these estimates. For the final set of genes estimated to be undergoing significant innovation in the branch leading to the collared kingfisher, we obtained functional annotations using InterProScan v. 5.47–82.0 (Jones et al. 2014) and performed enrichment analyses using both putative gene names in STRING (Szklarczyk et al. 2021) as well as GO terms in Revigo (http://revigo.irb.hr; accessed 2022 September 26).

Results

Genome assembly

We obtained a total of 68X read coverage (95.9 Gb total data) with paired-end 150-bp reads. The assembly comprised 15,043 scaffolds greater than 1 kb in size, with a final assembly size of 1.13 Gb and an estimated genome size of 1.40 Gb based on kmer analysis. The contig N50 was 155 kb and the scaffold N50 was 19 Mb. We found 96.6% complete single-copy genes relative to the BUSCO v. 5 aves_odb10 database [BUSCO score: C: 96.6% (S: 94.7%, D: 1.9%), F: 0.7%, M: 2.7%, n: 8,338], suggesting that the draft genome is mostly complete. Most scaffolds were highly contiguous and mapped to single chromosomes in related species (Fig. 1). In only a few cases did individual kingfisher scaffolds map to multiple chromosomes (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1.

Genome assembly consistency plots between the collared kingfisher and (a) Abyssinian ground-hornbill and (b) northern carmine bee-eater. Unlabeled segments depict kingfisher scaffolds (right side of circle) comprising 75% of the genome, with regions closer than 100 kb considered contiguous. Labeled segments indicate chromosomes in the existing reference genomes. Note few inversions, near chromosome-level scaffold sizes, and generally one-to-one mapping between scaffolds and chromosomes.

Population demographics

We found fluctuations in effective population size (Ne) through the Quaternary Period, including a dip at 100 kya and a global maximum population size at ∼1 Mya. There was a substantial decline in Ne into the present (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2.

Fig. 2.

Population demographic history of the collared kingfisher inferred from PSMC analysis of the new draft genome. The bold line shows mean population sizes through time, and transparent lines depict uncertainty as 100 bootstraps based on resampling of genomic scaffolds. We used a generation time of 4.8 years and a mutation rate of 2.23 × 10−8 substitutions per generation (see Materials and Methods for details). Inset shows range of Todiramphus chloris collaris (dark green), along with sampling location of specimen (circle) and broader T. chloris species range (light green, range extends further west but is not shown).

Gene family evolution

OrthoFinder identified potential orthologous genes shared between the collared kingfisher and the other 6 bird genomes (Fig. 3b). Clustering of gene families revealed 14,325 shared orthogroups comprising 99,576 total genes (98.3% of the total 101,265 genes across the 7 genomes; 96.7% for the collared kingfisher only). We found that 4,899 orthogroups were present in all species and 259 were orthogroups present in only a single species. The collared kingfisher had 2.5% genes in unique, species-specific orthogroups (zebra finch was the highest at 3.8%). CAFE analysis identified gene family expansions (i.e. increases in the rates of gain of gene families per orthogroup) in hummingbird, finch, and collared kingfisher and contractions in the other species (Fig. 3a). In collared kingfisher, we found 287 new orthogroups (489 genes) and 294 lost orthogroups (352 genes) relative to the most recent common ancestor (MRCA) with the woodland kingfisher (H. senegalensis). GO term clustering analyses revealed that gene families significantly expanded in Todiramphus include those involved in immune response, metabolism, and signaling (Fig. 3c). The additional enriched protein terms in Todiramphus include collagen and ATP binding (see https://github.com/celiason/Todiramphus_Genome for STRING protein network). Two genes involved in bitter taste perception, TAS2R7 and TAS2R40, are also estimated to be novel in the collared kingfisher relative to other species within its respective order, Coraciiformes.

Fig. 3.

Fig. 3.

Genomic novelty in the collared kingfisher. a) Based on a total of 14325 gene families estimated with OrthoFinder, phylogeny shows the number of orthologous gene families significantly expanded (plus signs) and contracted (minus signs) for each branch (numbers below branches) using CAFE. Numbers below branches and branch colors correspond to direction (red: positive, blue: negative) of average net gain in number of genes per family. b) Upset plot showing overlap in orthogroups among species (vertical bars) and total orthogroups for each species (horizontal bars, species order the same as in a). For visualization purposes, overlaps <450 are not shown. c) Gene function network produced from 118 unique GO terms in Revigo for genes expanded in the collared kingfisher relative to its MRCA. Lines show semantic overlap among GO terms, and colors represent clusters of GO terms with similar gene functions.

Discussion

We present a high-quality draft genome assembly for the collared kingfisher, an island-dwelling “great speciator” and member of a rapidly radiating genus of kingfishers. The assembly has high contig (N50 contig = 155 kb) and scaffold sizes (N50 scaffold = 19 Mb). Although the contigs are shorter owing to sequencing methodology (Illumina short-read sequencing vs PacBio long-read sequencing), the scaffold N50 meets the criteria for a “high-quality” reference genome according to the Vertebrate Genomes Project guidelines (https://vertebrategenomesproject.org; accessed 2022 September 26). The high BUSCO score (>96%) further suggests that the assembly is largely complete and on par with existing high-quality reference genomes (Feng et al. 2020). Todiramphus chloris is one of the “great speciators” (Diamond and Mayr 1976), distributed widely across the Indo-Pacific with phenotypically differentiated and geographically separated forms. Although other avian clades have received greater attention, including Zosterops white-eyes (Cornetti et al. 2015; Gwee et al. 2020; Manthey et al. 2020) and Darwin’s Finches (Petren et al. 2005; Almén et al. 2016; Chaves et al. 2016), Todiramphus kingfishers could provide a distinct picture into avian diversification dynamics on islands due to evolutionary variation of dispersal abilities (e.g. migratory Todiramphus sanctus and sedentary T. chloris) and its phylogenetic position as a clade of nonpasserine birds. This genome thus sets the stage for future work on speciation mechanisms in the Todiramphus genus to give a broader understanding of avian speciation mechanisms on islands. For example, it will facilitate the study of chromosomal architecture evolution to test the hypothesis that the observed increased speciation rates in Todiramphus kingfishers (Andersen et al. 2018) are associated with chromosomal inversions.

The current population estimate for the T. chloris species complex based on statistical modeling is 8.8 million individuals (Callaghan et al. 2021), with a minimum estimate of 91k individuals. Our estimate of 50k individuals could differ because we are estimating effective population sizes (Ne) rather than absolute population size, or because we focus on an island subspecies within Todiramphus chloris rather than the whole species complex that is more broadly distributed across southeast Asia to eastern New Guinea (Fig. 2, Andersen et al. 2015). Other kingfisher species endemic to the Philippine Archipelago have estimated population sizes ranging from 63k (Ceyx argentatus) to ∼100k (106k for Ceyx melanurus, 109k for Todiramphus winchelli) (Callaghan et al. 2021). Todiramphus chloris collaris is estimated to have split from other T. chloris species around ∼100 kya (Andersen et al. 2015). Therefore, the fluctuations in Ne shown in our PSMC result after this time are expected to be unique to this lineage, whereas fluctuations prior to this divergence are expected to track one another (Cahill et al. 2016). Indeed, divergence time estimates for crown Todiramphus are <1 Mya (McCullough et al. 2019), and the elevated population sizes inferred ∼1 Mya likely reflect the widespread distribution of the T. chloris species complex (Andersen et al. 2015). Nadachowska-Brzyska et al. (2015) found a general pattern of decreases in Ne at the start of the last glacial period ∼115 kya across all birds. The pattern we find in the collared kingfisher differs in that we show an expansion in population size starting ∼100 kya (Fig. 2). This difference could be due either to difficulties with estimating population sizes from genomic data (e.g. stemming from difficulties with parameter selection in PSMC analyses, including mutation rates and generation times, or conflation of population size with historical changes in population structure) (Mather et al. 2020), increased land area on islands during glacial maxima (Heaney 1985), or that T. chloris collaris speciation in the Philippine Archipelago is less affected by paleoclimatic changes than other bird species. The changes in climate rather than just land bridges/connectivity through the Pleistocene/late Pliocene have recently been associated with allopatric splits between Philippine bird species (Hosner et al. 2014), and others have found similar results in Philippine rodents (Kyriazis et al. 2017). We anticipate that these results and further sampling of genome-inferred population demographics within Todiramphus will continue to inform and refine our understanding of avian diversification in the Philippines.

Given the locomotor, reproductive, and sensory challenges associated with navigating and surviving on islands, innovation in sensory genes might be critical to insular taxa. We found an expansion in the number of genes per gene family in Todiramphus relative to other kingfisher and coraciiform lineages (Fig. 3a). This was irrespective of variation in assembly quality (e.g. see Supplementary Table 2), as we accounted for this variation in the CAFE program (Han et al. 2013). Gene families that were expanded in Todiramphus include those involved in ion transport, immune system function, metabolism, immune system function, and signaling (Fig. 3c). Immune system genes are known to evolve rapidly across birds (Shultz and Sackton 2019). Novel pathogens on islands might select for attenuated immune response (Matson 2006) and differences in immune system genes compared to mainland species in birds (Armstrong et al. 2018). In addition to novel pathogen landscapes, climate unpredictability and limited ability to migrate off of islands during food shortages have been proposed to explain the reduced metabolic rates in insular birds (Noakes et al. 2013). This could potentially explain the expansion in metabolic genes in the collared kingfisher (Fig. 3). Dietary diversity is a hallmark of kingfishers, with diets and foraging modes ranging from gleaning for insects, to digging for worms and plunge-diving for fish (Woodall 1991; Fry 1992). Thus, it is not surprising that we find significant expansion in the G protein-coupled receptor family (Fig. 3c), specifically genes involved in vision (OPN1LW), olfaction (OR5AN1, OR14I1, OR10AG1, OR14J1), and taste perception (TAS2R7, TAS2R40; see https://github.com/celiason/Todiramphus_Genome for annotations). Taste perception in birds has been underappreciated, but recent work on evolutionary shifts in taste receptor genes (Baldwin et al. 2014; Zhao et al. 2015) hints at their biological relevance. Taken together, our results highlight potential targets for further work in functional and comparative genomics on the sensory abilities and immune system function of Todiramphus kingfishers. Expanding our comparative genomics approach to closely related Todiramphus and other kingfisher species could shed light on genetic mechanisms of evolutionary change associated with island living.

Supplementary Material

jkac260_Supplementary_Data

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Erica Zanle, Isabel Distefano, and Lauren Mellenthin for help with DNA preps and lab work.

Funding

This work was partially funded by grants from the National Science Foundation (NSF EP 2112468 to CME and SJH; NSF EP 2112467 to MJA).

Conflicts of interest

None declared.

Author contributions

SJH prepared DNA for sequencing. CME designed and performed research. TH helped with bioinformatic analyses. All authors wrote the manuscript.

Contributor Information

Chad M Eliason, Grainger Bioinformatics Center, Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago, IL 60605, USA; Negaunee Integrative Research Center, Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago, IL 60605, USA.

Taylor Hains, Department of Ecology and Evolution, Committee on Evolutionary Biology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.

Jenna McCullough, Department of Biology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA.

Michael J Andersen, Department of Biology, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA.

Shannon J Hackett, Negaunee Integrative Research Center, Field Museum of Natural History, Chicago, IL 60605, USA; Department of Ecology and Evolution, Committee on Evolutionary Biology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637, USA.

Data Availability

All data for this project are available publicly at NCBI under BioProject Accession PRJNA851081, including raw Illumina reads (SRA SRR21604398) and the genome contig assembly (WGS JANVCC000000000). All scripts for genome analyses are publicly available at https://github.com/celiason/Todiramphus_Genome.

Supplemental material is available at G3 online.

Literature cited

  1. Almén MS, Lamichhaney S, Berglund J, Grant BR, Grant PR, Webster MT, Andersson L.. Adaptive radiation of Darwin’s finches revisited using whole genome sequencing. Bioessays. 2016;38(1):14–20. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. Andersen MJ, McCullough JM, Mauck IWM, Smith BT, Moyle RG.. A phylogeny of kingfishers reveals an Indomalayan origin and elevated rates of diversification on oceanic islands. J Biogeogr. 2018;170(566):269–281. [Google Scholar]
  3. Andersen MJ, Shult HT, Cibois A, Thibault J-C, Filardi CE, Moyle RG.. Rapid diversification and secondary sympatry in Australo-Pacific kingfishers (Aves: Alcedinidae: Todiramphus). R Soc Open Sci. 2015;2(2):140375. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  4. Armstrong C, Richardson DS, Hipperson H, Horsburgh GJ, Küpper C, Percival-Alwyn L, Clark M, Burke T, Spurgin LG.. Genomic associations with bill length and disease reveal drift and selection across island bird populations. Evol Lett. 2018;2(1):22–36. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  5. Baldwin MW, Toda Y, Nakagita T, O'Connell MJ, Klasing KC, Misaka T, Edwards SV, Liberles SD.. Evolution of sweet taste perception in hummingbirds by transformation of the ancestral umami receptor. Science. 2014;345(6199):929–933. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  6. Cahill JA, Soares AER, Green RE, Shapiro B.. Inferring species divergence times using pairwise sequential Markovian coalescent modelling and low-coverage genomic data. Phil Trans R Soc B. 2016;371(1699):20150138. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  7. Callaghan CT, Nakagawa S, Cornwell WK.. Global abundance estimates for 9,700 bird species. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2021;118(21):e2023170118. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  8. Cardoso GC, Mota PG.. Speciational evolution of coloration in the genus Carduelis. Evolution. 2008;62(4):753–762. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  9. Chaves JA, Cooper EA, Hendry AP, Podos J, De León LF, Raeymaekers JAM, MacMillan WO, Uy JAC.. Genomic variation at the tips of the adaptive radiation of Darwin’s finches. Mol Ecol. 2016;25(21):5282–5295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  10. Cornetti L, Valente LM, Dunning LT, Quan X, Black RA, Hébert O, Savolainen V.. The genome of the “Great Speciator” provides insights into bird diversification. Genome Biol Evol. 2015;7(9):2680–2691. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  11. Diamond JM, Mayr E.. Species-area relation for birds of the Solomon Archipelago. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1976;73(1):262–266. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  12. Eliason CM, McCullough JM, Andersen MJ, Hackett SJ.. Accelerated brain shape evolution is associated with rapid diversification in an avian radiation. Am Nat. 2021;197(5):576–591. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  13. Emms DM, Kelly S.. OrthoFinder: phylogenetic orthology inference for comparative genomics. Genome Biol. 2019;20(1):238. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  14. Feng S, Stiller J, Deng Y, Armstrong J, Fang Q, Reeve AH, Xie D, Chen G, Guo C, Faircloth BC, et al. Dense sampling of bird diversity increases power of comparative genomics. Nature. 2020;587(7833):252–257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  15. Fry CH. Kingfishers, Bee-Eaters & Rollers. Princeton (NJ: ): Princeton University Press; 1992. [Google Scholar]
  16. Gwee CY, Garg KM, Chattopadhyay B, Sadanandan KR, Prawiradilaga DM, Irestedt M, Lei F, Bloch LM, Lee JG, Irham M, et al. Phylogenomics of white-eyes, a “great speciator”, reveals Indonesian archipelago as the center of lineage diversity. eLife. 2020;9:e62765. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  17. Han MV, Thomas GWC, Lugo-Martinez J, Hahn MW.. Estimating gene gain and loss rates in the presence of error in genome assembly and annotation using CAFE 3. Mol Biol Evol. 2013;30(8):1987–1997. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  18. Heaney L. Zoogeographic evidence for Middle and Late Pleistocene land bridges to the Philippine Islands. Mod Quat Res SE Asia. 1985;9:127–143. [Google Scholar]
  19. Hosner PA, Sánchez-González LA, Peterson AT, Moyle RG.. Climate-driven diversification and Pleistocene refugia in Philippine birds: evidence from phylogeographic structure and paleoenvironmental niche modeling. Evolution. 2014;68(9):2658–2674. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  20. Jones P, Binns D, Chang H-Y, Fraser M, Li W, McAnulla C, McWilliam H, Maslen J, Mitchell A, Nuka G, et al. InterProScan 5: genome-scale protein function classification. Bioinformatics. 2014;30(9):1236–1240. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  21. Keilwagen J, Hartung F, Paulini M, Twardziok SO, Grau J.. Combining RNA-seq data and homology-based gene prediction for plants, animals and fungi. BMC Bioinform. 2018;19(189). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  22. Kyriazis CC, Bates JM, Heaney LR.. Dynamics of genetic and morphological diversification in an incipient intra-island radiation of Philippine rodents (Muridae: Bullimus). J Biogeogr. 2017;44(11):2585–2594. [Google Scholar]
  23. Lanfear R, Welch JJ, Bromham L.. Watching the clock: studying variation in rates of molecular evolution between species. Trends Ecol Evol. 2010;25(9):495–503. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  24. Li H, Durbin R.. Inference of human population history from individual whole-genome sequences. Nature. 2011;475(7357):493–496. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  25. Li H. Aligning sequence reads, clone sequences and assembly contigs with BWA-MEM. arXiv [q-bio.GN]. 2013. 10.5061/dryad.0618v. [DOI]
  26. Liu S, Hansen MM. Data from: PSMC (pairwise sequentially Markovian coalescent) analysis of RAD (restriction site associated DNA) sequencing data. Mol Ecol Resour. 2016;17(4):631–641. [DOI] [PubMed]
  27. Losos JB, Ricklefs RE.. Adaptation and diversification on islands. Nature. 2009;457(7231):830–836. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  28. MacArthur RH, Wilson EO.. The Theory of Island Biogeography. Princeton (NJ: ): Princeton University Press; 1967. [Google Scholar]
  29. Manni M, Berkeley MR, Seppey M, Simão FA, Zdobnov EM.. BUSCO update: novel and streamlined workflows along with broader and deeper phylogenetic coverage for scoring of eukaryotic, prokaryotic, and viral genomes. Mol Biol Evol. 2021;38(10):4647–4654. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  30. Manthey JD, Oliveros CH, Andersen MJ, Filardi CE, Moyle RG.. Gene flow and rapid differentiation characterize a rapid insular radiation in the southwest Pacific (Aves: Zosterops). Evolution. 2020;74(8):1788–1803. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  31. Mather N, Traves SM, Ho SYW.. A practical introduction to sequentially Markovian coalescent methods for estimating demographic history from genomic data. Ecol Evol. 2020;10(1):579–589. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  32. Matson KD. Are there differences in immune function between continental and insular birds? Proc Biol Sci. 2006;273(1599):2267–2274. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  33. Mayr E, Diamond JM.. The Birds of Northern Melanesia: Speciation, Ecology & Biogeography. New York (NY): Oxford University Press; 2001. [Google Scholar]
  34. Mayr E. Animal Species and Evolution. Cambridge (MA: ): Belknap Press; 1963. [Google Scholar]
  35. McCullough JM, Moyle RG, Smith BT, Andersen MJ.. A Laurasian origin for a pantropical bird radiation is supported by genomic and fossil data (Aves: Coraciiformes). Proc Biol Sci. 2019;286(1910):20190122. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  36. Millien V. Morphological evolution is accelerated among island mammals. PLoS Biol. 2006;4(10):e321. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  37. Moyle RG, Fuchs J, Pasquet E, Marks BD.. Feeding behavior, toe count, and the phylogenetic relationships among alcedinine kingfishers (Alcedininae). J Avian Biol. 2007;38(3):317–326. [Google Scholar]
  38. Nadachowska-Brzyska K, Li C, Smeds L, Zhang G, Ellegren H.. Temporal dynamics of avian populations during pleistocene revealed by whole-genome sequences. Curr Biol. 2015;25(10):1375–1380. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  39. Noakes MJ, Smit B, Wolf BO, McKechnie AE.. Thermoregulation in African Green Pigeons (Treron calvus) and a re-analysis of insular effects on basal metabolic rate and heterothermy in columbid birds. J Comp Physiol B. 2013;183(7):969–982. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  40. Paulino D, Warren RL, Vandervalk BP, Raymond A, Jackman SD, Birol I.. Sealer: a scalable gap-closing application for finishing draft genomes. BMC Bioinform. 2015;16:230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  41. Petren K, Grant PR, Grant BR, Keller LF.. Comparative landscape genetics and the adaptive radiation of Darwin’s finches: the role of peripheral isolation. Mol Ecol. 2005;14(10):2943–2957. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  42. Prum RO, Berv JS, Dornburg A, Field DJ, Townsend JP, Lemmon EM, Lemmon AR.. A comprehensive phylogeny of birds (Aves) using targeted next-generation DNA sequencing. Nature. 2015;526(7574):569–573. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  43. Rabosky DL, Santini F, Eastman J, Smith SA, Sidlauskas B, Chang J, Alfaro ME.. Rates of speciation and morphological evolution are correlated across the largest vertebrate radiation. Nat Commun. 2013;4:1958. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  44. Shultz AJ, Sackton TB.. Immune genes are hotspots of shared positive selection across birds and mammals. eLife. 2019;8:e41815. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  45. Smit AFA, Hubley R, Green P. RepeatMasker Open-4.0. 2013. http://www.repeatmasker.org/.
  46. Smit AFA, Hubley R. RepeatModeler Open-1.0. 2008. http://www.repeatmasker.org/.
  47. Steinegger M, Söding J.. MMseqs2 enables sensitive protein sequence searching for the analysis of massive data sets. Nat Biotechnol. 2017;35(11):1026–1028. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  48. Szklarczyk D, Gable AL, Nastou KC, Lyon D, Kirsch R, Pyysalo S, Doncheva NT, Legeay M, Fang T, Bork P, et al. The STRING database in 2021: customizable protein–protein networks, and functional characterization of user-uploaded gene/measurement sets. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49(D1):D605–D612. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  49. The UniProt Consortium. UniProt: the universal protein knowledgebase in 2021. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49:D480–D489. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  50. Wallace AR. Island Life. New York (NY): Harper & Brothers; 1881. [Google Scholar]
  51. Weisenfeld NI, Kumar V, Shah P, Church DM, Jaffe DB.. Direct determination of diploid genome sequences. Genome Res. 2017;27(5):757–767. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  52. Woodall PF. Family Acedinidae (Kingfishers). In: del Hoyo J, Elliott A, Sargatal J, Christie DA, de Juana E. Handbook of the Birds of the World Alive. Barcelona: Lynx Edicions; 2016. [Google Scholar]
  53. Woodall PF. Morphometry, diet and habitat in the kingfishers (Aves: Alcedinidae). J Zool. 1991;223(1):79–90. [Google Scholar]
  54. Zhao H, Li J, Zhang J.. Molecular evidence for the loss of three basic tastes in penguins. Curr Biol. 2015;25(4):R141–R142. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

jkac260_Supplementary_Data

Data Availability Statement

All data for this project are available publicly at NCBI under BioProject Accession PRJNA851081, including raw Illumina reads (SRA SRR21604398) and the genome contig assembly (WGS JANVCC000000000). All scripts for genome analyses are publicly available at https://github.com/celiason/Todiramphus_Genome.

Supplemental material is available at G3 online.


Articles from G3: Genes|Genomes|Genetics are provided here courtesy of Oxford University Press

RESOURCES