Abstract
Lupus nephritis (LN) is one of the most severe and more common organ manifestations of the autoimmune disease, systemic lupus erythematosus. Ferroptosis, a novel type of programmed cell death, so far its role in LN remains uncertain. In the present study, we explored the role of ferroptosis in LN and its relationship with the immune response. The GSE112943 LN dataset was downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus database. Ferroptosis-Related Genes (FRGs) that drive, suppress or mark ferroptosis were retrieved from the public FerrDb database. The gene expression matrix of the GSE112943 dataset was analyzed with the “limma” package in R to obtain differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between LN and healthy samples. Subsequently, the crossover genes between DEGs and FRGs were identified as differentially expressed ferroptosis-related genes (DE-FRGs). Protein–protein interaction (PPI) network analysis, visualization, and identification of hub lupus nephritis ferroptosis-related genes (LN-FRGs) were performed with STRING and Cytoscape, while their Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways were determined with the clusterProfiler package. Immune cell infiltration was calculated with CIBERSORT. The relationship between hub LN-FRGs and immune-infiltrated cells in LN was determined by Pearson correlation. A total of 96 DE-FRGs and 8 hub LN-FRGs (KRAS, PIK3CA, EGFR, MAPK14, SRC, MAPK3, VEGFA, and ATM) were identified. GO and KEGG functional classification indicated these genes enrichment in apoptotic process, programmed cell death, autophagy-animal, FoxO signaling pathway, relaxin signaling pathway, and VEGF signaling pathway. Infiltration matrix analysis of immune cells showed abundant Monocytes and M0/M1/M2 macrophages in LN kidney tissues. Correlation analysis revealed 8 hub LN-FRGs associated with immune-infiltrated cells in LN. In summary, overproduction of ROS and abnormal infiltration of immune cells would be implicated in the LN caused by ferroptosis. 8 hub lupus nephritis ferroptosis-related genes (LN-FRGs) which might be good biomarkers of ferroptosis in LN were identified in this study. These findings point to the immune response playing an important role in LN caused by ferroptosis via mutual regulation between hub LN-FRGs and immune-infiltrated cells.
Subject terms: Nephrology, Rheumatology
Introduction
Lupus nephritis (LN) is one of the most severe and more common organ manifestations of the autoimmune disease, systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), as well as a form of glomerulonephritis1. Over the past decades, the understanding of the pathogenesis and characteristics of LN has improved considerably. However, LN remains the leading cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with SLE, despite greater understanding and more targeted treatment protocols2,3. LN is commonly treated with immunosuppressive drugs, such as glucocorticoids and cyclophosphamide or mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). Unfortunately, conventional immunosuppressive therapy is not effective in all patients, moreover, the toxic side effects of the drugs should not be underestimated4–6. Therefore, early & accurate diagnosis and identification of targeted therapeutic targets are crucial for LN.
Cell death has been suggested as a critical contributor to the pathogenesis of LN7. There is growing evidence that programmed cell death, including apoptosis, NETosis, and autophagy aggravates the progression of LN within their effects8–10. In recent years, Ferroptosis, a novel type of programmed cell death, has begun to be increasingly studied. Ferroptosis is driven by lethal lipid peroxidation (the result of an imbalance in cellular metabolism and redox homeostasis) and can be inhibited either by direct blockade of lipid peroxidation or by depletion of iron, in addition to growing evidence of a potential physiological role for ferroptosis in tumor suppression and immunity11. Cellular studies have shown that both DPEP1 and CHMP1A are important regulators of a single pathway (ferroptosis) and contribute to the development of kidney disease by altering cellular iron transport12. One study found that GPX4 dysfunction reduced the sensitivity of mice to acute tubular necrosis (ATN) during acute kidney injury (AKI), while Nec-1f. was found to be a solid inhibitor of RIPK1 and a weak inhibitor of ferroptosis13. Zhang et al. found that ferroptosis contributes to the progression of Autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) and that ferroptosis inhibitors may be a new strategy for the treatment of ADPKD14. Mitophagy is a key cellular homeostatic mechanism that is activated early during AKI, and there is an important link between Mitophagy and ferroptosis15. However, so far it seems that the role of ferroptosis in LN has never been mentioned.
To investigate whether ferroptosis is involved in the progression of LN, we collected microarray data from the GEO database of kidney tissue from LN patients and healthy individuals. Subsequently, we screened LN differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and hub genes associated with ferroptosis by bioinformatics methods and performed immuno-infiltration analysis to analyze their correlation. In summary, there were 96 Differentially Expressed Ferroptosis-Related Genes (DE-FRGs), 8 hub lupus nephritis ferroptosis-related genes (LN-FRGs) that were identified as potential ferroptosis-related target biomarkers for LN.
Materials and methods
Data collection and acquisition
The Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO; www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/)16 database was used to search gene microarray data of LN kidney samples. The GSE11294317 dataset, containing 7 healthy (control group) and 14 LN (experimental group) kidney tissue samples were selected. Probes were converted to gene symbols according to the GPL10558 platform (Illumina HumanHT-12 V4.0 expression beadchip). Ferroptosis-Related Genes (FRGs) that drive, suppress, or mark ferroptosis were retrieved from the public FerrDb database (http://www.zhounan.org/ferrdb18. The final 258 FRGs obtained after removing duplicate genes were used for subsequent analysis.
Identification of differentially expressed ferroptosis-related genes (DE-FRGs)
The gene expression matrix of the GSE112943 dataset was analyzed with the “limma” package in R to obtain DEGs between LN and healthy samples. Briefly, |log2 fold change (FC)|> 1 and P < 0.05 were set as the selection criteria for DEGs. Subsequently, the crossover genes between DEGs and FRGs were identified as differentially expressed ferroptosis-related genes (DE-FRGs).
Protein–protein interaction (PPI) network construction and module analysis
Interactions between different DE-FRGs were analyzed using the STRING database (http://string-db.org/19. PPI networks were constructed and visualized using Cytoscape software 3.9.1. (http://cytoscape.org/. 20 The most significant module was identified with the Cytoscape plug-in Molecular Complex Detection (MCODE) (version 2.0), which is used to identify densely connected regions by clustering a given network based on its topology21. Using the cytoHubba plugin, the overlap of the top 20 genes based on algorithms such as MCC, maximum neighborhood component (MNC), DNMC, Closeness, Degree, and edge percolated component (EPC) algorithms were identified as hub lupus nephritis ferroptosis-related genes (LN-FRGs).
Functional enrichment of DE-FRGs and hub LN-FRGs
The clusterProfiler package in R was used to identify the Gene Ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG)22–24 pathways characterizing DE-FRGs and hub LN-FRGs, as well as to explore their potential biological processes, cellular components, molecular functions, and important signaling pathways. A minimum gene set of 5 and a maximum gene set of 5000 were chosen. P < 0.05 and false detection rate < 0.1 were considered statistically significant.
Evaluation of subtype distribution among immune-infiltrated cells
CIBERSORT was shown to transform a normalized gene expression matrix into the composition of 22 immune cell types based on a deconvolution algorithm25. Here, CIBERSORT was employed to calculate the composition of immune cells in LN and healthy samples. The algorithm employed the LM22 signature and 1000 permutations. Given P < 0.05, 14 LN and 7 healthy samples were selected for further analysis.
Correlation and differential analysis of immune-infiltrated cells
For the assessment of the correlation between different immune cells, Pearson correlation coefficient was obtained from the sample data screened by CIBERSORT, P < 0.05. A rank sum test was used to compare the LN group with the control group.
Correlation between hub LN-FRGs and immune-infiltrated cells in LN
Pearson correlation matrix analysis was performed on the GSE112943 immune infiltrating cell profile analyzed by CIBERSORT and the gene expression profile of this dataset. Correlations between hub LN-FRGs and immune infiltrating cells were determined using Pearson correlation coefficients (r) > 0.6 and P < 0.05.
Results
Identification of DE-FRGs in LN
ThE GSE112943 dataset containing gene expression profiles of 7 healthy and 14 LN kidney biopsy tissue samples was retrieved from the GEO database. After standardization of microarray results, 7226 DEGs were identified; they included 5671 upregulated and 1555 downregulated genes (Fig. 1A,B). To explore FRGs differentially expressed in the LN, 258 FRGs were retrieved from FerrDb, a database of regulators, markers, and diseases involved in ferroptosis. A total of 96 FRGs were identified as DE-FRGs after taking the crossover of DEGs and FRGs (Fig. 1C). The expression of the 96 DE-FRGs in the dataset GSE112943 was shown in Fig. 1D.
PPI network construction, module analysis, and hub LN-FRGs identification
PPI analysis of DE-FRGs was based on the STRING database and results were visualized using Cytoscape (Fig. 2A). The MCODE plug-in identified the most densely connected regions (19 nodes and 146 edges) in the PPI network (Fig. 2B). With the 6 algorithms of the Cytoscape plugin cytoHubba, we calculated the top 20 genes (Table 1). Subsequently, the top 8 intersecting genes analyzed based on the MCC, DNMC, MNC, Degree, Closeness, and EPC algorithms were selected as the hub LN-FRGs, which included KRAS, PIK3CA, EGFR, MAPK14, SRC, MAPK3, VEGFA, and ATM (Fig. 2C). Notably, all these hub LN-FRGs were upregulated in patients with LN. The details about the 8 hub LN-FRGs were shown in Table 2.
Table 1.
MCC | DNMC | MNC | Degree | EPC | Closeness | Overlap |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ATM | ATM | ATG7 | ATG7 | ATM | ATG7 | ATM |
EGFR | BRD4 | ATM | ATM | CAV1 | ATM | EGFR |
FBXW7 | CAV1 | CAV1 | CAV1 | EGFR | CAV1 | KRAS |
HIF1A | CD44 | EGFR | EGFR | FBXW7 | EGFR | MAPK14 |
HSPA5 | EGFR | HIF1A | HIF1A | HIF1A | HIF1A | MAPK3 |
JUN | FBXW7 | HSPA5 | HSPA5 | HSPA5 | HSPA5 | PIK3CA |
KEAP1 | KRAS | JUN | JUN | JUN | JUN | SRC |
KRAS | MAPK14 | KEAP1 | KEAP1 | KEAP1 | KEAP1 | VEGFA |
MAPK1 | MAPK3 | KRAS | KRAS | KRAS | KRAS | |
MAPK14 | NF2 | MAPK1 | MAPK1 | MAPK1 | MAPK1 | |
MAPK3 | NOX4 | MAPK14 | MAPK14 | MAPK14 | MAPK14 | |
MTOR | NRAS | MAPK3 | MAPK3 | MAPK3 | MAPK3 | |
NFE2L2 | PIK3CA | MTOR | MTOR | MTOR | MTOR | |
NRAS | RB1 | NFE2L2 | NFE2L2 | NFE2L2 | NFE2L2 | |
PIK3CA | SRC | PIK3CA | PIK3CA | PIK3CA | PIK3CA | |
RB1 | TXNIP | SIRT1 | SIRT1 | RB1 | SIRT1 | |
SIRT1 | VEGFA | SRC | SRC | SIRT1 | SRC | |
SRC | WIPI1 | TLR4 | TLR4 | SRC | TLR4 | |
TLR4 | YWHAE | TXNRD1 | TXNRD1 | TLR4 | VEGFA | |
VEGFA | ZEB1 | VEGFA | VEGFA | VEGFA | XBP1 |
Table 2.
Gene Symbol | Description | Function |
---|---|---|
VEGFA | vascular endothelial growth factor A | Growth factor active in angiogenesis, vasculogenesis and endothelial cell growth. Induces endothelial cell proliferation, promotes cell migration, inhibits apoptosis and induces permeabilization of blood vessels |
ATM | ATM serine/threonine kinase | Serine/threonine protein kinase which activates checkpoint signaling upon double strand breaks (DSBs), apoptosis and genotoxic stresses such as ionizing ultraviolet A light (UVA), thereby acting as a DNA damage sensor |
PIK3CA | phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit alpha | PIP3 plays a key role by recruiting PH domain-containing proteins to the membrane, including AKT1 and PDPK1, activating signaling cascades involved in cell growth, survival, proliferation, motility and morphology |
EGFR | epidermal growth factor receptor | Receptor tyrosine kinase binding ligands of the EGF family and activating several signaling cascades to convert extracellular cues into appropriate cellular responses |
KRAS | GTPase KRAS | Ras proteins bind GDP/GTP and possess intrinsic GTPase activity. Plays an important role in the regulation of cell proliferation |
MAPK3 | Mitogen-activated protein kinase 3,namly ERK1 | Serine/threonine kinase which acts as an essential component of the MAP kinase signal transduction pathway |
MAPK14 | Mitogen-activated protein kinase 14, namely p38 | Serine/threonine kinase which acts as an essential component of the MAP kinase signal transduction pathway. MAPK14 is one of the four p38 MAPKs which play an important role in the cascades of cellular responses evoked by extracellular stimuli such as proinflammatory cytokines or physical stress leading to direct activation of transcription factors |
SRC | Proto-oncogene tyrosine-protein kinase SRC | Non-receptor protein tyrosine kinase which is activated following engagement of many different classes of cellular receptors including immune response receptors, integrins and other adhesion receptors, receptor protein tyrosine kinases, G protein- coupled receptors as well as cytokine receptors |
Functional Enrichment of DE-FRGs and hub LN-FRGs
To predict the biological function of DE-FRGs, we performed functional enrichment analysis. GO analysis revealed that DE-FRGs were enriched mainly in cellular response to chemical stimulus, apoptotic process, programmed cell death, response to oxidative stress and response to reactive oxygen species (ROS) (Fig. 3A); whereas KEGG pathway analysis indicated DE-FRGs were significantly enriched in Autophagy-animal, proteoglycans in cancer, FoxO signaling pathway, and NOD-like receptor signaling pathway (Fig. 3B). GO analysis indicated that hub LN-FRGs were significantly enriched in peptidyl-serine phosphorylation, apoptotic process, cell death, cellular response to reactive oxygen species and regulation of reactive oxygen species metabolic process (Fig. 4A); whereas KEGG pathway analysis indicated hub LN-FRGs were significantly enriched in relaxin signaling pathway, VEGF signaling pathway, and EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor resistance (Fig. 4B). The results of the functional enrichment analysis obtained for either A or B showed that these LN genes are associated with programmed cell death or ROS.
Distribution of immune-infiltrated cells
The microarray was screened using the CIBERSORT inverse convolution method with P < 0.05, resulting in 7 healthy kidney tissues and 14 LN kidney tissue groups on the heatmap. Monocytes, M0 macrophages, M1 macrophages, and M2 macrophages were all more abundant in kidney tissues of patients with LN than in healthy controls, while T cells follicular helper, Dendritic cells resting, Eosinophils, and Neutrophils were less expressed in the kidney tissue of LN patients than in the healthy control group (Fig. 5A). Figure 5B details the distribution of 22 immune cells in each sample.
Correlation and differential analysis of immune-infiltrated cells
A positive correlation was detected between CD8 T cells and Dendritic cells activated (r = 0.80), CD8 T cells and Eosinophils (r = 0.80), CD4 naive T cells and γδ T cells (r = 0.74), M1 macrophages and CD4 naive T cells (r = 0.71), as well as Eosinophils and activated dendritic cells (r = 0.94) (Fig. 6A). Instead, a negative correlation was detected between CD4 naive T cells and CD4 memory resting T cells (r = −0.72), CD4 memory resting T cells and γδ T cells (r = −0.67), NK cells resting and Mast cells resting (r = −0.68), T cells regulator (Tregs) and γδ T cells (r = −0.60), as well as Mast cells resting and Mast cells activated (r = −0.63) (Fig. 6A).
Differences in immune infiltrating cells between the kidney tissues of healthy and LN patients were visualized by a violin chart, with statistically significant differences at P < 0.05. Monocytes, M1 macrophages, and M2 macrophages were all differentially elevated in the kidney tissues of LN patients, whereas T cells follicular helper, Dendritic cells resting, Eosinophils, and Neutrophils (Fig. 6B).
Correlation between hub LN-FRGs and immune-infiltrated cells in LN
The relationship between hub LN-FRGs and immune-infiltrated cells in LN, which differed between LN and control samples, was evaluated by Pearson correlation (Fig. 7). Mast cells activated displayed a negative correlation with KRAS (r = −0.60). Monocytes exhibited a positive correlation with EGFR (r = 0.62). M0 macrophages displayed a negative correlation with EGFR (r = −0.70). NK cells activated showed a positive correlation with MAPK14 (r = 0.68). Neutrophils exhibited a positive correlation with MAPK14 (r = 0.71). CD4 memory activated T cells displayed a negative correlation with MAPK3 (r = −0.74). M0 macrophages exhibited a positive correlation with MAPK3 (r = 0.62). M0 macrophages displayed a positive correlation with VEGFA (r = 0.58). Therefore, these genes were strongly correlated with immune-infiltrated cells in LN.
Discussion
The pathogenesis of LN is a form of glomerulonephritis that results from the interaction of multiple factors, including environmental and genetic factors1. In the present study, a total of 96 DE-FRGs were found to be significantly expressed in LN kidneys, while 8 hub LN-FRGs were also identified, but the extent to which they are involved in the pathogenesis of LN remains to be further investigated. Functional enrichment analysis of GO terms showed that DE-FRGs were mainly enriched in apoptotic process, programmed cell death and ROS. KEGG pathway analysis indicated that the DE-FRGs were mainly enriched in autophagy-animal. Within the PPI network of DE-FRGs, 8 (KRAS, PIK3CA, EGFR, MAPK14, SRC, MAPK3, VEGFA, and ATM) out of 96 genes had high scores in the 6 algorithms of cytoHubba. GO terms analysis showed that these 8 genes were highly enriched in apoptotic process, cell death and ROS, as well as KEGG that were relaxin signaling pathway and VEGF signaling pathway. Genetic association studies have determined multiple mechanisms regarding the pathogenesis of lupus nephritis, including genetic variants related to alterations in programmed cell death and defects in immune clearance of programmed cell death debris26. Although the mechanism of LN has not been fully elucidated, abnormal programmed cell death (e.g. apoptotic process) acts as an important role in its pathogenesis27. Since autophagy is essential in maintaining renal cell metabolism and organelle homeostasis, upregulation of autophagic activity may play a role in lupus nephritis to protect and limit kidney injury28. Due to the antifibrotic effect of relaxin in an experimental model of chronic kidney disease, it is hypothesized that relaxin may be able to improve the progression of LN29,30. VEGF has been shown to be a marker of disease activity in SLE and LN31. Both these GO terms and the results of the KEGG pathway suggest that the DE-FRGs or hub LN-FRGs identified in this study may be involved in the progression of LN via the above-mentioned approach.
Overproduction of reactive oxygen species (ROS) in LN has been demonstrated, and inhibition of ROS production reduces the inflammatory response and reduces kidney damage32,33. Excessive production of ROS and down-regulation of antioxidant system components also predispose to ferroptosis34. p66shc belongs to the SRC homology and collagen A (ShcA) family, a protein associated with ROS generation and capable of induced intracellular ROS production35. Thus, SRC may influence the process of ferroptosis by causing an imbalance in the antioxidant system or overproduction of ROS, then participating in the pathogenesis of LN. It has been shown that PIK3CA, an inhibitor of PI3Kα, blocks ferroptosis cell death36, but its role in LN has never been reported and further studies are still needed. Somatic mutations in some genes, including KRAS, may contribute to the intractability of SLE37, and in addition, somatic mutations in KRAS cause pediatric Rosai-Dorfman syndrome and SLE38. However, as a driver in ferroptosis, the role of KRAS in LN is still unknown, and more studies are necessary to confirm whether it is involved in LN through ferroptosis. It has been shown that a gene associated with DNA damage repair, serine/threonine kinase ATM, was significantly under-expressed in SLE39. ATM inhibition rescues ferroptosis by increasing the expression of iron regulatory factors involved in iron storage and export, rather than the typical DNA damage pathway40. However, further studies are needed to investigate how ATM functions in LN by regulating ferroptosis.
A hallmark of LN is immune cell infiltration. It has been shown that ferroptosis-catalyzed oxide species can also enhance protein- and autoantibody-induced inflammatory transcription factors, leading to the increased matrix, cytokine/chemokine production, and immune cell infiltration, resulting in subsequent increased glomerular permeability and tubulointerstitial inflammation and renal failure interactions41. Inefficient clearance of dead cells by dendritic cells and macrophages may lead to disruption of tolerance and result in LN, in part because they provide autoantigens that become components of the immune complexes deposited in the kidney 42. Vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGFA), a marker of ferroptosis43, has been shown to be highly expressed in the kidney and urine in patients with LN44, which suggests that VEGFA may be involved in the pathogenesis of LN through ferroptosis. Furthermore, in the present study, VEGFA was positively correlated with Macrophage M0, thus it is hypothesized that VEGFA decreases the efficiency of Macrophage clearance of ferroptosis cells, which may cause disruption of immune tolerance and lead to LN. In an early study, immunohistochemistry suggested increased EGFR expression in about 35% of LN patients45. Autoantibodies to the extracellular region of EGFR were identified in patients with SLE46. The involvement of EGFR in the pathogenesis of LN has been demonstrated47. In the present study, the level of monocytes infiltration was significantly higher in the kidney tissue of LN patients than in healthy controls. Meanwhile, EGFR was positively correlated with monocytes in this study, and it is speculated that EGFR may be implicated in the pathogenesis of LN through increased infiltration of monocytes, but whether monocytes are involved in the pathogenesis of LN caused by ferroptosis is unclear. In addition, EGFR was negatively correlated with macrophage M0 in the present study, which may be the result of increased EGFR leading to decreased macrophages and affecting their ability to clear ferroptosis cells, ultimately exacerbating LN.
Some studies have confirmed the involvement of MAPK pathway activation in the pathogenesis of LN48,49. Zhang et al. found that myeloid-derived suppressor cells activate p38(namely MAPK14)MAPK signaling by increasing the production of reactive oxygen species in lupus nephritis, which eventually induces podocyte damage50. It is therefore possible that MAPK14 may be implicated in LN pathogenesis by increasing the production of ROS to affect ferroptosis. Zhai et al. found that lipopolysaccharide (LPS) in bacteria could cause significant neutrophils infiltration in the glomeruli of LN, especially around the glomerular membrane zone, while Pyrrolidine dithiocarbamate (PDTC) reduced neutrophils infiltration and the severity of kidney injury by inhibiting NF-κB and p38 MAPK activity51. In the present study, MAPK14 (p38) was positively correlated with neutrophils, thus it is hypothesized that MAPK14 may jointly advance LN occurrence through neutrophils infiltration. It has been found that α2AP induces pro-inflammatory cytokine production in macrophages through the ERK1(namely MAPK3)/2 pathway52, and combined with the positive correlation between MAPK3 and Macrophage M0 in the present study, it is therefore hypothesized that MAPK3 can induce inflammation through macrophage activation thus leading to LN progression. Nevertheless, it remains uncertain how MAPK3 or MAPK14 mediates ferroptosis leading to LN through these immune infiltrating cells. Experiments using specifically conditioned immune cell knock-out with these LN-FRGs may help to unravel the potential mechanisms.
The present study presented also some limitations. First, it was based on the GEO database, which is a secondary mining and analysis database of previously published datasets. Hence, the experimental results may differ from the conclusions of previous experiments, most likely due to biased data analysis caused by the small sample size. Second, the CIBERSORT deconvolution algorithm is based on limited genetic data, which may lead to inaccurate results due to different disease predisposing factors and the plasticity of disease phenotypes. Nevertheless, our study may still provide compelling evidence for further research on the potential of the identified immune-infiltrated cells or immune-related genes in ferroptosis for the treatment and diagnosis of LN.
Conclusion
In summary, overproduction of ROS and abnormal infiltration of immune cells would be implicated in the LN caused by ferroptosis. 8 hub lupus nephritis ferroptosis-related genes (LN-FRGs) which might be good biomarkers of ferroptosis in LN were identified in this study; they include KRAS, PIK3CA, EGFR, MAPK14, SRC, MAPK3, VEGFA, and ATM. These findings point to the immune response playing an important role in LN caused by ferroptosis via mutual regulation between hub LN-FRGs and immune-infiltrated cells.
Acknowledgements
We would like to thank Editage (www.editage.cn) for English language editing.
Author contributions
WH participated in the design of the study, carried out the study,performed the statistical analysis, and drafted the manuscript. XC reviewed and edited the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
This work was support by Quanzhou City Science & Technology Program of China (No.2019C071R) and Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province (No.2020J01231).
Data availability
The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are available in the [GEO] repository, [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE112943].
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Anders HJ, et al. Lupus nephritis . Nat. Rev. Dis. Primers. 2020;6(1):7. doi: 10.1038/s41572-019-0141-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Croca SC, Rodrigues T, Isenberg DA. Assessment of a lupus nephritis cohort over a 30-year period. Rheumatology (Oxford) 2011;50(8):1424–1430. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/ker101. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Bernatsky S, et al. Mortality in systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;54(8):2550–2557. doi: 10.1002/art.21955. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Mejia-Vilet JM, et al. The lupus nephritis management renaissance. Kidney Int. 2022;101(2):242–255. doi: 10.1016/j.kint.2021.09.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Kostopoulou M, Pitsigavdaki S, Bertsias G. Lupus nephritis: Improving treatment options. Drugs. 2022;82(7):735–748. doi: 10.1007/s40265-022-01715-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kant S, et al. Advances in understanding of pathogenesis and treatment of immune-mediated kidney disease: A review. Am. J. Kidney Dis. 2022;79(4):582–600. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2021.07.019. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Yang F, et al. Programmed cell death pathways in the pathogenesis of systemic lupus erythematosus. J. Immunol. Res. 2019;2019:3638562. doi: 10.1155/2019/3638562. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Gupta S, Kaplan MJ. The role of neutrophils and NETosis in autoimmune and renal diseases. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 2016;12(7):402–413. doi: 10.1038/nrneph.2016.71. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Guo C, et al. Pathogenesis of lupus nephritis: RIP3 dependent necroptosis and NLRP3 inflammasome activation. J. Autoimmun. 2019;103:102286. doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2019.05.014. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Fu R, et al. Podocyte activation of NLRP3 inflammasomes contributes to the development of proteinuria in lupus nephritis. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017;69(8):1636–1646. doi: 10.1002/art.40155. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Jiang X, Stockwell BR, Conrad M. Ferroptosis: Mechanisms, biology and role in disease. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2021;22(4):266–282. doi: 10.1038/s41580-020-00324-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Guan Y, et al. A single genetic locus controls both expression of DPEP1/CHMP1A and kidney disease development via ferroptosis. Nat. Commun. 2021;12(1):5078. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-25377-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Tonnus W, et al. Dysfunction of the key ferroptosis-surveilling systems hypersensitizes mice to tubular necrosis during acute kidney injury. Nat. Commun. 2021;12(1):4402. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-24712-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Zhang X, et al. Ferroptosis promotes cyst growth in autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease mouse models. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2021;32(11):2759–2776. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2021040460. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Su, L., et al. Mitochondria ROS and mitophagy in acute kidney injury. Autophagy, 1–14 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 16.Edgar R, Domrachev M, Lash AE. Gene expression omnibus: NCBI gene expression and hybridization array data repository. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30(1):207–210. doi: 10.1093/nar/30.1.207. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Ko WC, et al. Gene expression profiling in the skin reveals strong similarities between subacute and chronic cutaneous lupus that are distinct from lupus nephritis. J. Invest Dermatol. 2021;141(12):2808–2819. doi: 10.1016/j.jid.2021.04.030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Zhou, N. and Bao, J. FerrDb: A manually curated resource for regulators and markers of ferroptosis and ferroptosis-disease associations. Database (Oxford), 2020 (2020). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 19.Franceschini A, et al. STRING v9.1: Protein-protein interaction networks, with increased coverage and integration. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41:D808–D815. doi: 10.1093/nar/gks1094. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Smoot ME, et al. Cytoscape 2.8: New features for data integration and network visualization. Bioinformatics. 2011;27(3):431–432. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq675. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Bandettini WP, et al. MultiContrast Delayed Enhancement (MCODE) improves detection of subendocardial myocardial infarction by late gadolinium enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance: A clinical validation study. J. Cardiovasc. Magn. Reson. 2012;14:83. doi: 10.1186/1532-429X-14-83. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Kanehisa M, Goto S. KEGG: Kyoto encyclopedia of genes and genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2000;28(1):27–30. doi: 10.1093/nar/28.1.27. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Kanehisa M. Toward understanding the origin and evolution of cellular organisms. Protein Sci. 2019;28(11):1947–1951. doi: 10.1002/pro.3715. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Kanehisa M, et al. KEGG: Integrating viruses and cellular organisms. Nucleic Acids Res. 2021;49(D1):D545–D551. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa970. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Newman AM, et al. Robust enumeration of cell subsets from tissue expression profiles. Nat. Methods. 2015;12(5):453–457. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3337. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Munroe ME, James JA. Genetics of lupus nephritis: Clinical implications. Semin. Nephrol. 2015;35(5):396–409. doi: 10.1016/j.semnephrol.2015.08.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Munoz LE, et al. The role of defective clearance of apoptotic cells in systemic autoimmunity. Nat. Rev. Rheumatol. 2010;6(5):280–289. doi: 10.1038/nrrheum.2010.46. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Podesta MA, Faravelli I, Ponticelli C. Autophagy in lupus nephritis: A delicate balance between regulation and disease. Autoimmun. Rev. 2022;21(8):103132. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2022.103132. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Hewitson TD, Ho WY, Samuel CS. Antifibrotic properties of relaxin: In vivo mechanism of action in experimental renal tubulointerstitial fibrosis. Endocrinology. 2010;151(10):4938–4948. doi: 10.1210/en.2010-0286. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Wolf VL, et al. Human recombinant relaxin-2 does not attenuate hypertension or renal injury but exacerbates vascular dysfunction in a female mouse model of SLE. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2019;317(2):H234–H242. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00174.2019. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Adhya Z, et al. Soluble TNF-R1, VEGF and other cytokines as markers of disease activity in systemic lupus erythematosus and lupus nephritis. Lupus. 2019;28(6):713–721. doi: 10.1177/0961203319845487. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Monteith AJ, et al. Defects in lysosomal maturation facilitate the activation of innate sensors in systemic lupus erythematosus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2016;113(15):E2142–E2151. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1513943113. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Sule, G., et al. Endoplasmic reticulum stress sensor IRE1alpha propels neutrophil hyperactivity in lupus. J. Clin. Invest., 131(7) (2021). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 34.Yan HF, et al. Ferroptosis: Mechanisms and links with diseases. Signal Transduct. Target Ther. 2021;6(1):49. doi: 10.1038/s41392-020-00428-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Cao W, et al. The Src homology and collagen A (ShcA) adaptor protein may participate in the pathogenesis of membranous lupus nephritis. Lupus. 2018;27(13):2014–2019. doi: 10.1177/0961203318796295. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Kang Y, et al. Cellular protection using Flt3 and PI3Kalpha inhibitors demonstrates multiple mechanisms of oxidative glutamate toxicity. Nat. Commun. 2014;5:3672. doi: 10.1038/ncomms4672. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Law SM, et al. A case of refractory systemic lupus erythematosus with monocytosis exhibiting somatic KRAS mutation. Inflamm. Regen. 2022;42(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s41232-022-00195-w. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Ragotte RJ, et al. The importance of considering monogenic causes of autoimmunity: A somatic mutation in KRAS causing pediatric Rosai-Dorfman syndrome and systemic lupus erythematosus. Clin. Immunol. 2017;175:143–146. doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2016.12.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Souliotis VL, et al. Defective DNA repair and chromatin organization in patients with quiescent systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis. Res. Ther. 2016;18(1):182. doi: 10.1186/s13075-016-1081-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Chen PH, et al. Kinome screen of ferroptosis reveals a novel role of ATM in regulating iron metabolism. Cell Death Differ. 2020;27(3):1008–1022. doi: 10.1038/s41418-019-0393-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Wlazlo E, et al. Iron metabolism: An under investigated driver of renal pathology in lupus nephritis. Front. Med. (Lausanne) 2021;8:643686. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2021.643686. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Tsai F, Perlman H, Cuda CM. The contribution of the programmed cell death machinery in innate immune cells to lupus nephritis. Clin. Immunol. 2017;185:74–85. doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2016.10.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Dixon SJ, et al. Pharmacological inhibition of cystine-glutamate exchange induces endoplasmic reticulum stress and ferroptosis. Elife. 2014;3:e02523. doi: 10.7554/eLife.02523. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Torres-Salido, M.T., et al., Urinary neuropilin-1: A predictive biomarker for renal outcome in lupus nephritis.Int. J. Mol. Sci., 20(18), (2019). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 45.Nakopoulou L, et al. Immunohistochemical study of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) in various types of renal injury. Nephrol. Dial Transpl. 1994;9(7):764–769. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Planque S, et al. Autoantibodies to the epidermal growth factor receptor in systemic sclerosis, lupus, and autoimmune mice. FASEB J. 2003;17(2):136–143. doi: 10.1096/fj.01-0847com. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Ma, T. K., McAdoo, S. P. and Tam, F. W. Targeting the tyrosine kinase signalling pathways for treatment of immune-mediated glomerulonephritis: From bench to bedside and beyond. Nephrol. Dial Transplant., 32(suppl_1): i129-i138 (2017). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 48.Yung S, Chan TM. Anti-dsDNA antibodies and resident renal cells–their putative roles in pathogenesis of renal lesions in lupus nephritis. Clin. Immunol. 2017;185:40–50. doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2016.09.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Nowling TK. Mesangial cells in lupus nephritis. Curr. Rheumatol. Rep. 2022;23(12):83. doi: 10.1007/s11926-021-01048-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Zhang D, et al. Myeloid-derived suppressor cells induce podocyte injury through increasing reactive oxygen species in lupus nephritis. Front. Immunol. 2018;9:1443. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01443. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Zhai JX, et al. PDTC attenuate LPS-induced kidney injury in systemic lupus erythematosus-prone MRL/lpr mice. Mol. Biol. Rep. 2012;39(6):6763–6771. doi: 10.1007/s11033-012-1501-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Kanno Y, et al. alpha2AP is associated with the development of lupus nephritis through the regulation of plasmin inhibition and inflammatory responses. Immun. Inflamm. Dis. 2020;8(3):267–278. doi: 10.1002/iid3.302. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The datasets generated and/or analysed during the current study are available in the [GEO] repository, [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/geo/query/acc.cgi?acc=GSE112943].