Abstract
Many pathogens synthesize inositol phosphorylceramide (IPC) as the major sphingolipid (SL), differing from the mammalian host where sphingomyelin (SM) or more complex SLs predominate. The divergence between IPC synthase and mammalian SL synthases has prompted interest as a potential drug target. However, in the trypanosomatid protozoan Leishmania, cultured insect stage promastigotes lack de novo SL synthesis (Δspt2-) and SLs survive and remain virulent, as infective amastigotes salvage host SLs and continue to produce IPC. To further understand the role of IPC, we generated null IPCS mutants in Leishmania major (Δipcs−). Unexpectedly and unlike fungi where IPCS is essential, Δipcs− was remarkably normal in culture and highly virulent in mouse infections. Both IPCS activity and IPC were absent in Δipcs− promastigotes and amastigotes, arguing against an alternative route of IPC synthesis. Notably, salvaged mammalian SM was highly abundant in purified amastigotes from both WT and Δipcs−, and salvaged SLs could be further metabolized into IPC. SM was about 7-fold more abundant than IPC in WT amastigotes, establishing that SM is the dominant amastigote SL, thereby rendering IPC partially redundant. These data suggest that SM salvage likely plays key roles in the survival and virulence of both WT and Δipcs− parasites in the infected host, confirmation of which will require the development of methods or mutants deficient in host SL/SM uptake in the future. Our findings call into question the suitability of IPCS as a target for chemotherapy, instead suggesting that approaches targeting SM/SL uptake or catabolism may warrant further emphasis.
Keywords: trypanosomatid protozoan parasite, sphingolipids, inositol phosphorylceramide, lipid remodeling, lipid salvage, infectivity and virulence
Abbreviations: DAG, diacylglycerol; ESI/MS, electrospray ionization MS; EtN, ethanolamine; IPC, inositol phosphorylceramide; IPCS, IPC synthase; MS, mass spectrometry; NBD-Cer, 6-((N-(7-Nitrobenz-2-Oxa-1,3-Diazol-4-yl)amino)hexanoyl)Sphingosine; PC, phosphatidylcholine; PE, phosphatidylethanolamine; PI, phosphatidylinositol; SB, sphingoid base; SL, sphingolipid; SM, sphingomyelin
Leishmaniasis is often considered a neglected tropical disease. Currently, it is estimated that there are more than 1.7 billion people at risk and nearly 12 million people with symptomatic disease, ranging from mild cutaneous infections to severe disfiguring or lethal forms, with upward of 50,000 deaths annually (1, 2, 3, 4). Remarkably, the great majority of infections are undiagnosed and/or asymptomatic, suggesting that well more than 100 million people may harbor parasites (3, 5). Persistent asymptomatic infections constitute a double edged sword; while serving as a reservoir for transmission and/or reactivation by stress or immunosuppression, persistent parasites are known to mediate strong protective concomitant immunity against disease pathology (3, 5, 6, 7). Leishmania have two distinct growth stages, a promastigote stage in the sand fly vector and an intracellular amastigote stage residing within cellular endocytic pathways in the mammalian host (4). While the promastigote stage is readily cultured in the laboratory and amenable to molecular techniques, amastigotes require the use of macrophage infection systems or infections of animal models replicating key aspects of human disease.
While progress has been achieved in new chemotherapeutic strategies, many are not yet implemented clinically and resistance to several promising agents has already been observed (8, 9, 10). One pathway potentially offering important drug targets is that of sphingolipid (SL) synthesis (11, 12, 13). SLs are a diverse class of lipids that function in apoptosis, cell signaling, and membrane structure, and these pathways have been targeted for therapies against a wide range of diseases including cancer, multiple sclerosis, and infectious diseases (14, 15, 16, 17, 18). SLs differ in the nature of the head groups, as well as the composition of the hydrophobic ceramide anchor, in different tissues and species. Unlike mammalian cells that primarily synthesize sphingomyelin (SM) and complex glycosphingolipids, Leishmania synthesize inositol phosphorylceramide (IPC) as their primary SL (19), as do other protozoa, fungi, and plants (11, 20, 21).
This divergence has prompted scrutiny of IPC synthase (IPCS) as a drug target, where in fungi it is essential and repression causes decreased growth and virulence along with increased susceptibility to acidic environments (22, 23). IPC is formed when IPCS converts ceramide and phosphatidylinositol (PI) to IPC and diacylglycerol (DAG). The related trypanosomatid parasite Trypanosoma brucei encodes four SL synthases (SLSs), collectively mediating synthesis of SM, ethanolamine (EtN) phosphorylceramide, and IPC; inducible RNAi knockdowns of the entire locus were lethal, although the contribution of the individual genes/activities was not further dissected (24). Leishmania IPCS has been pursued as a drug target by analogy of findings from pathogenic fungi as well as its divergence from mammalian SM synthases (25). Aureobasidin A, a known inhibitor of yeast IPCS, inhibits parasite growth at high concentrations, probably off-target from IPCS inhibition (25), but other candidate inhibitors have been advanced (26, 27, 28, 29, 30).
Notably, the biological requirement for Leishmania IPCS has not been addressed in vivo. That Leishmania could differ from other organisms was first suggested by the fact that Leishmania major null mutants lacking the first enzyme in de novo SL synthesis, serine palmitoyl transferase (Δspt2-) completely lacked all SLs, yet remain viable in log phase culture (31, 32). Subsequent studies in promastigotes showed that SL catabolism was used to generate EtN, whose provision to Δspt2- parasites rescued a defect in differentiation to infective metacyclic parasites (33). While Δspt2- was fully infective in animal models, it continued to synthesize IPC, presumably by salvage of potential precursor SL components from the host cell (34, 35, 36). Several routes could be envisaged; sphingoid bases (SBs, also called long-chain bases) or ceramide precursors could be salvaged directly or mammalian SLs could be acquired and catabolized for resynthesis as IPC SLs. As all routes ultimately require IPCS for parasite IPC synthesis, we sought to generate Δipcs− null mutants if possible and to explore their impact on IPC synthesis and/or metabolism and virulence in animal models. Surprisingly, our data show convincingly IPCS was not essential, with SM salvage in WT cells rendering it the dominant amastigote SL as well as serving as the source of amastigote IPC. These findings likely account for the dispensability of IPCS in animal infections, potentially dampening enthusiasm for IPCS as a useful drug target in this parasite.
Results
Targeted replacement of L. major IPCS
The L. major genome is primarily diploid albeit with occasional aneuploidy, and typically two rounds of gene replacement are required to generate null mutants of single copy genes (37). Targeting constructs containing resistance markers to G418 (NEO) or nourseothricin (SAT) were designed to successively replace the IPCS ORF precisely by homologous gene replacement (Fig. 1A). To alleviate concerns about lethality of IPCS deficiency, we focused on the culturable promastigote stage where SLs are not required in any capacity in the presence of EtN (31, 32, 33). A secondary effect of IPCS deficiency could be ceramide accumulation, which can be toxic (38), and we also performed transfections in the presence of myriocin (an inhibitor of de novo SL synthesis) to potentially ameliorate this.
Heterozygous (IPCS/IPCS::ΔNEO) and homozygous null mutants (IPCS::ΔSAT/IPCS::ΔNEO; referred to as Δipcs−) were readily obtained and confirmed by PCR tests to lack the IPCS coding region, accompanied by the expected planned replacements (analysis of the double homozygous replacement is shown in Fig. 1B). An episomal expression vector (pXG-BSD-IPCS) was used to restore IPCS expression, yielding the line Δipcs−/+IPCS (Fig. 1, A and B). The recovery of Δipcs− clonal lines was readily accomplished with good efficiencies, regardless of EtN or myriocin treatment, and these showed no strong growth defects. Numerous transfectant lines were obtained and authenticated with similar phenotypes, and in this work, results from one representative set of KO and IPCS-restored pair are shown.
IPCS activity is lost in Δipcs− promastigotes
Enzymatic assays with promastigote microsomes were performed by evaluating the conversion of PI and 6-((N-(7-Nitrobenz-2-Oxa-1,3-Diazol-4-yl)amino)hexanoyl)Sphingosine (NBD-Cer) to NBD-IPC, after TLC separation and quantitative fluoroscopy (Figs. 2A and S1A). High levels of NBD-IPC were generated in complete reactions bearing microsomes, NBD-Cer, and PI, and this product was sensitive to PI-PLC digestion as expected. We purified and confirmed the presumptive NBD-IPC from the TLC plate by mass spectrometry (MS)1. Consistent with prior studies, addition of 20 μM aureobasidin A showed little inhibition of the in vitro reaction (26). Little or no product was obtained if PI or NBD-Cer were omitted, if phosphatidylcholine (PC) replaced PI or if microsomes were omitted or previously heat inactivated. These data confirmed our ability to assay IPCS, with the predicted enzymatic properties (Figs. 2A and S2A).
We compared the IPCS activity of WT, Δipcs−, or Δipcs−/+IPCS parasite microsomes (Figs. 2B and S1B). As expected, Δipcs− showed no detectable activity, while Δipcs−/+IPCS showed about 50% more than WT (p < 0.001).
Δipcs− promastigotes lack IPC
MS was used to evaluate lipids present in whole cell extracts of WT, Δipcs−, and Δipcs−/+IPCS promastigotes (Fig. 3, A–C). In WT, two ion peaks at m/z 778.6 and 806.6 corresponding to [M – H]- ions of d16:1/18:0- and d18:1/18:0–IPC, respectively, were seen, as described previously (32, 34, 39). Consistent with the genetic deletion of IPCS, these IPC ions were undetectable in Δipcs− promastigotes. IPC levels were restored in the Δipcs−/+IPCS promastigotes, albeit only partially to about 50% WT levels (Fig. 3C).
Together with the results from enzymatic assays, these data established that Leishmania IPCS is the sole source of IPCS enzymatic activity or IPC.
As predicted, IPC precursor d16:1/18:0-ceramide (m/z 536.6) levels were elevated in the Δipcs− promastigotes (Fig. 3B) relative to WT cells (Fig. 3A). Curiously, this ceramide peak did not decrease noticeably in Δipcs−/+IPCS, despite restoration of IPC levels (Fig. 3C). Small variations in the levels of phosphatidylethanolamine (PE) ions of m/z 726.6 (p18:0/18:2-PE) and 728.6 (p18:0/18:1-PE) were seen, but the levels of other lipids identified by MS such as ions at m/z 849 (e18:0/18:1-PI) and 863 (18:0/18:1-PI) did not appear to change in either Δipcs− or Δipcs−/+IPCS promastigotes (Fig. 3, A–C). The causes of these minor changes were not pursued further.
Δipcs− promastigotes remain viable and form metacyclics
As promastigotes in vitro, Δipcs− grew somewhat slower than WT, with a doubling time of 9.0 ± 0.7 versus 7.7 ± 0.4 h for WT (mean ± 1 SD, n = 3), reaching a stationary phase density of about 70% WT (p < 0.05; Fig. 4A). Upon entry into stationary phase, a small percentage of nonviable cells emerged, as judged by propidium iodide exclusion (Fig. 4B). Since Δipcs− promastigotes should retain SLs capable of generating EtN (33), we suspected that provision of EtN would have no effect on stationary phase viability, which proved correct (Fig. S2, A and B). Restoration of IPCS expression in the Δipcs−/+IPCS line returned growth and viability to WT (Fig. 4, A and B).
Upon entry into stationary phase, Leishmania promastigotes differentiate to an infective metacyclic form that can be purified by lectin or density gradient methods (40). Δipcs− showed a small reduction in metacyclics relative to WT or the Δipcs−/+IPCS control (5.7 ± 2.7 % in Δipcs− versus 11.4 ± 7.1 % in WT or 10.4 ± 5.1% in Δipcs−/+IPCS; mean ± SD, n = 2; Fig. S2C; these differences were not statistically significant).
Δipcs− promastigotes are hypersusceptible to exogenous SBs
Accumulation of ceramide, SBs, or their phosphorylated forms is toxic to most eukaryotic cells (38). This suggested that in the absence of further metabolism by IPCS, addition of exogenous SBs would likely lead to excess toxic ceramide or SB levels in Δipcs−. Accordingly, daily addition of 2 μM 3-keto-dihydrosphingosine, dihydrosphingosine, or C17 phytosphingosine resulted in death of Δipcs− parasites (Fig. 4C), which was rescued in Δipcs−/+IPCS. For cultures receiving C17 phytosphingosine, MS confirmed synthesis of phytoceramide (Fig. S3).
Leishmania Δipcs− promastigotes are susceptible to extreme pH but not temperature stress
IPCS deficient Cryptococcus neoformans is susceptible to pH but not temperature stress (22), and we obtained similar results for L. major Δipcs− promastigotes. At pH 4.0, the WT, Δipcs−, and Δipcs−/+IPCS lines all died, while at pH 5.0, Δipcs− grew much slower than WT or Δipcs−/+IPCS (Fig. 4D). At pH 5.5 and above, no significant differences were seen amongst the three lines (Table S2). Temperature stress was tested at 30 °C and 33 °C with no significant effects on the relative growth of WT, Δipcs−, and Δipcs−/+IPCS lines (Fig. S2D); at 37 °C, all cells died.
Δipcs− defects are not reversed by DAG
The IPCS product DAG also functions as a messenger in multiple signaling pathways mediated by PKC. Leishmania lack a known PKC, although it has been suggested that other kinases may fulfill similar roles (41). We tested the ability of exogenous DAG to rescue the growth or viability reductions seen in Δipcs− promastigotes by adding DAG daily to cultures. However, with two separate supplementations (0.2 or 2 μM), no improvement was observed (Fig. S2, E and F), suggesting that DAG deficiency did not contribute to Δipcs− phenotypes. While we did not confirm DAG uptake by parasites here, that exogenous DAG is accessible to Leishmania was shown previously, as a brief 30 min exposure to 250 nM DAGs resulted in stimulation of transferrin endocytosis (41).
Δipcs− promastigotes are rounded but lipid bodies and acidocalcisomes are unchanged
In Δspt2− promastigotes, SL deficiency causes changes in cell rounding, acidocalcisomes, and lipid bodies (33, 34). In Δipcs−, a small increase in rounded cells was observed (21.6 ± 0.6% versus 7.4 ± 2.0% for WT or 8.9 ± 3.0% for Δipcs−/+IPCS, 2 replicates; p < 0.02 for comparisons of the mutant versus the other two lines). WT and Δipcs− appeared similar by 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole staining of acidocalcisomes/polyphosphates or Nile Red O staining for lipid accumulation and lipid bodies (Fig. S4).
Δipcs− remain fully virulent in mouse infections
To test the key question of whether IPCS is essential for virulence, we infected susceptible BALB/c or γ-interferon KO C57BL/6 mice with 1 × 105 metacyclic promastigotes. Unexpectedly, the Δipcs− infections progressed significantly faster than those of WT or Δipcs−/+IPCS, which were similar (a representative experiment is shown in Fig. 5 and combined data from four experiments are shown in Fig. S5A). Limiting dilution assays at key time points showed that regardless of genotype, lesions of similar sizes had similar parasite numbers (Fig. S5B), establishing that increased lesion size reflected increased parasite numbers primarily. These data show that if anything, Δipcs− was unexpectedly somewhat hypervirulent.
Δipcs− amastigotes lack IPC
To eliminate the possibility that amastigotes elaborated an alternative IPCS activity, parasites were inoculated into susceptible mice and purified from similarly sized lesions after 1 to 2 months. Lipids were then extracted for analysis by electrospray ionization MS (ESI/MS) in the negative ion mode. High amounts of background signal complicated interpretations of full scan spectra (Fig. S6), which was overcome by employing linked scan spectra using precursor ion scan of m/z 241 specific for detection of [M – H]- ions of PI and IPC lipids (39, 42). These scans showed abundant IPC species (ions of m/z 778.6, 806.6, and 808.6) in purified WT amastigotes, as seen previously (Figs. 6A and S7, A and G) (34). In Δipcs− amastigotes, only trace signals in the relevant m/z regions spanning the IPC m/z peaks of 778, 806, and 808 were evident, in four separate purified preparations (Figs. 6B and S1, C, E, H, and I). These peaks were considered background, first by virtue of their low signal/noise ratio (values <3 are considered noise and <10 insufficient for quantitation (43)) and secondly, a lack of the expected natural isotope pattern for real peaks (44). In contrast, these criteria validate the assigned IPC peaks in the WT purified amastigotes or infected tissues. The abundance of other lipid species did not appear to change consistently or significantly (Figs. S6–S8). No significant differences were seen in amastigotes purified from BALB/c or γ-IFN KO (γKO) C57BL/6 mice (Figs. S6–S8).
Thus, purified Δipcs− amastigotes lack detectable IPC, and the ability of Δipcs− L. major to survive and induce pathology is not dependent on its presence.
WT amastigotes contain abundant host-derived SM
Previous studies showed that L. major Δspt2- parasites lacking the key enzyme for de novo SB synthesis nonetheless showed high levels of IPC within infected animals, suggesting that Leishmania amastigotes have the ability to salvage host SLs (34, 45). We examined this more directly by MS in purified amastigotes from both WT and Δipcs− parasites, which revealed high levels of ions corresponding to SM (Figs. 7, A, B and S8). While in many mammalian tissues the most abundant form of SM is d18:1/18:0 (46), in our preparations the most abundant SM was d18:1/16:0 (Figs. 7 and S8). This agrees with earlier findings that d18:1/16:0-SM is the most abundant in macrophage preparations commonly used in the study of Leishmania, including thioglycolate-elicited peritoneal, bone marrow–derived, or RAW.264.7 macrophages (47, 48) (Table S3). SM quantitation was achieved by measuring the ratio of the peak height of the [M + Na]+ ion of d18:1/16:0-SM (m/z 725.7) to that of a spike-in control d18:1/12:0-SM (m/z 669.5) (Fig. 7, A–C). SM in WT infected mouse tissue was found to be about 1.3 times that of the purified Δipcs− amastigotes from two preparations (the increase was not statistically significant).
These data suggested that the levels of salvaged mammalian SM were remarkably high in purified amastigotes. However, purified amastigotes typically are contaminated by host material, which can be readily visualized in lipid extracts from total infected footpad lesions where the mouse tissue contributions dominate (Fig. 7C). We preferred this control instead of uninfected mouse footpads, which lack the extensive infiltration of immune cell types with differing lipid profiles within infected lesions. We sought an estimate of the degree of host contamination of our purified amastigotes, a goal challenged by the complexity of the samples and mix of overlapping and unique lipids between Leishmania and mouse. Qualitatively, the host contamination was relatively minor, as it can be seen by the relative decrease of diverse PC species in purified amastigotes versus the whole WT infected tissue (Fig. 7, A and B versus C). We estimated a relative loss of mouse lipids to be about 16-fold, based on the major PC species, such as 34:1-, 34:2-, 36:2-, 36:4-, 38:6-, and 40:6-PC (Fig. 7; ranging from 9-fold–26-fold). This was consistent with the 9-fold decreased levels of IPC seen in infected tissues relative to purified amastigotes (Fig. 6, A and C; calculated relative to the prominent 18:0/20:4-PI peak at m/z 885.8). Notwithstanding some caution that the ion (m/z 885) is a suitable internal control, the data clearly suggest that most of the SM in purified amastigote preparations must originate from the parasite itself rather than contaminating host material.
Salvaged SM and not IPC is the predominant SL in amastigotes
To corroborate the findings aforementioned, we evaluated the relative amounts of IPC and SM in WT amastigotes, where IPC is quite abundant (34). We employed a spike-in approach where non-endogenous standards expected to have similar MS ionization behavior were added to each sample, titrating the amounts in pilot studies until a similar peak height was obtained with the biological species of interest (34). The amastigote preparations were spiked with 10 nmol N-Lauryl SM and 2 nmol dipalmitoyl PI, followed by positive or negative ion ESI/MS (Fig. 8). For IPC, the amastigote IPC species peak heights sum to about 90% of that of the PI standard, while the amastigote SM peak height was about 130% of the SM standard (Fig. 8), suggesting the relative amounts of IPC:SM was 1:7 in the purified amastigotes. As noted earlier, only small changes in this value could be attributed to host contamination, and thus, SM is likely the dominant SL in WT amastigotes. While this assay could not be applied to Δipcs− amastigotes, the similar levels of SM in these relative to WT SM must likewise dominate in the mutant (Figs. 7, A and B and S8)
WT amastigotes contain IPC with mammalian-like ceramide anchors
The two promastigote IPC ions at m/z 778.6 and 806.6 have d16:1/18:0-Cer and d18:1/18:0-Cer backbones, respectively (32, 39, 47). In contrast, amastigotes showed three IPC species, two of the same m/z as in promastigotes but additionally one of m/z of 808.6; the m/z 806 and 808 were more abundant in amastigotes and the m/z 778 was greater in promastigotes (Fig. 6; (34)). To further explore their origins, we employed ESI/MS to determine the structures.
For the [M – H]- ion of IPC at m/z 778.6, the MS2 spectra from both amastigotes and promastigotes contain a peak at m/z 598 resulting from the loss of inositol (Fig. 9A). MS3 on m/z 598 originated from amastigotes (Fig. 9B) yielded ions of m/z 360 and 342, arising from loss of 16:0-FA as acid and ketene, respectively, together with ion of m/z 255 representing a 16:0 fatty acid carboxylate anion, leading to a final structure of d18:1/16:0-IPC. In contrast, MS3 on m/z 598 originated from promastigotes (Fig. 9C) yielded ions of m/z 332 and 314 arising from loss of 18:0-FA as acid and ketene, respectively, together with the 18:0 fatty acid carboxylate anion ion at m/z 283, resulting in assignment of a d16:1/18:0-IPC structure (32, 39). Interestingly and unlike promastigotes, the amastigote IPC ion of m/z 778.6 contains the same ceramide backbone as the abundant salvaged mammalian SM (Fig. 7).
For the amastigote IPC m/z 806.6 species, the MS2 spectrum contained the ion m/z 626 arising from loss of inositol (Fig. 9A), which was further dissociated (MS3) to ions of m/z 360 and 342 by loss of 18:0-FA as ketene and acid, respectively. The spectrum also contained the ion of m/z 283, representing a 18:0 fatty acid carboxylate anion (Fig. 9D). The combined structural information led to define the d18:1/18:0-IPC structure, which is identical to that previously determined for the promastigote IPC (m/z 806.6) (32). Finally, MS2 on the unique amastigote IPC ion of m/z 808.6 gave rise to an ion of m/z 628 (loss of inositol) (Fig. 9A), which was further dissociated (MS3) to ions of m/z 362 and 344 by loss of 18:0-FA as ketene and acid, respectively, along with the 18:0 carboxylate anion of m/z 283 (Fig. 9E). These results readily defined a d18:0/18:0-IPC structure.
The aforementioned structural information of IPCs from amastigote and promastigote (summarized in Fig. 9A) indicates that IPC synthesis in amastigotes may arise following salvage and further metabolism, with two unique ceramide anchors not seen in promastigote IPCs and is considered further in the discussion.
Discussion
Here, we characterized IPC synthesis by L. major across the infectious cycle and through genetic deletion established a surprising lack of impact of IPC and IPCS KOs on parasite biology and virulence in susceptible mouse infections. Our data suggest that this likely reflects extensive salvage of host SLs including SM. We consider these findings in the context of SL uptake and metabolism and their consequences toward efforts to target parasite SL metabolism in chemotherapy.
Minimal impact of IPCS deletion on promastigotes in vitro
In contrast to other eukaryotic microbes, IPCS-null (Δipcs−) parasites could be readily obtained (Fig. 1), which as promastigotes appeared nearly normal, with only small differences in cell shape, growth, and viability (Fig. 4, A and B). Δipcs− promastigotes lacked IPCS enzymatic activity (Figs. 2 and S1) and both promastigotes and amastigotes lacked IPC (Figs. 3 and 6), ruling out alternatives sources of IPC synthesis across the infectious cycle. We also confirmed that endogenously synthesized IPCS was insensitive to aureobasidin A (Fig. 2), as seen with recombinant enzyme and mitigating a role for hypothetical IPCS-interacting proteins (26, 49). In all studies, ectopic re-expression of IPCS restored IPC synthesis and all other phenotypes tested (Figure 3, Figure 4, Figure 5). IPCS activity consumes ceramide and PI to yield IPC and DAG; however, the health of Δipcs− suggests that perturbations of these substrates in this context likely has little deleterious effect during the infectious cycle. Provision of high levels of exogenous DAG had little effect on Δipcs− but feeding SBs proved toxic, presumably due to excessive accumulation of SBs and/or ceramide in the absence of further metabolism, as seen in Leishmania and fungi (38, 50). Δipcs− was strongly inhibited relative to WT when grown at pH 5 (Fig. 4D); however, this effect was largely ameliorated at pH 5.5 or above (Table S2). This is consistent with the survival of Δipcs− in animal infections (Fig. 5), as the L. major parasitophorous vacuole has a pH of 5.4 (51) which would only weakly impact Δipcs−. In these properties, Leishmania differs significantly from C. neoformans, where IPCS is essential and IPCS-deficient organisms are hypersusceptible to pH stress through an absence of DAG signaling (22).
Minimal impact of IPCS deletion on virulence and pathology
Distinct from other eukaryotic microbes, Δipcs− L. major showed no defects in virulence as revealed by their ability to survive and induce progressive pathology when inoculated into susceptible mice (Figs. 5 and S4A), consistent with the findings in vitro with promastigotes where there was little change in properties expected to play significant role in amastigotes. In fact, lesion pathology was somewhat enhanced in the Δipcs−, as was the parasite burden (Figs. 5 and S5).
Given the relative health and virulence of amastigotes lacking IPC, the question of why Leishmania continue to synthesize it at all now arises. Perhaps rather than contributing to bulk SL levels or metabolism, specific recognition of IPC by host defenses could contribute to Leishmania pathology in some circumstances not tested here. Several studies have reported interactions between Leishmania and host ceramide impacting macrophage survival of the related species Leishmania donovani (52, 53). We did observe somewhat higher levels of ceramides in purified amastigotes relative to infected host tissue (Fig. S6), and speculatively, the modest hypervirulence seen with L. major Δipcs− might arise from this.
Abundant salvage leads to predominance of SM over IPC in WT Leishmania amastigotes: A potential role in virulence
Leishmania promastigotes can survive perfectly well without any cellular SLs (31, 32), raising the possibility that the amastigote stage could likewise lack a requirement for SLs. However, Leishmania species are known to take up a variety of host lipids (54, 55, 56), and perhaps potential amastigote stage SL requirements could be satisfied through uptake and metabolism of host SLs. MS analysis of purified amastigotes showed high levels of host SM in both WT and Δipcs−, with SM estimated to be about 7-fold more abundant than parasite IPC (estimated previously to be present at about 108 molecules/amastigote) (34). Thus, host SM represents by far the most abundant salvaged SL within the parasite, even in WT amastigotes where it greatly predominates over IPC. This ‘redundancy’ suggests that loss of IPC in Δipcs− might confer only a slight reduction in total SLs, which might have little effect or be ameliorated by a small increase in SM salvage.
That amastigotes salvage high levels of host SLs could be taken as evidence that these are required for parasite survival and virulence in the mammalian host, especially given that most eukaryotes require SL. However, given promastigotes ability to survive without SLs, potentially amastigotes could do likewise. To test this definitively, some approach where SL acquisition is disrupted chemically or by genetic mutation would be most informative, but at present, none of these tools are available in Leishmania. We favor the hypothesis that like lipid salvage generally, SL acquisition is likely to play a key role in virulence (54, 57, 58).
Metabolism of salvaged host SLs by Leishmania amastigotes
While the majority of acquired SM remains intact in amastigotes, that further metabolism of acquired host SLs leading to parasite IPC synthesis occurs is mandated by the fact that de novo SB synthesis is shut down in amastigotes, a finding recapitulated in Δspt2- amastigotes lacking serine palmitoyl transferase (32, 34). Not only are IPC levels maintained in amastigotes but amastigotes also bear two IPCs with ceramide anchors not seen in promastigotes (d18:1/16:0-IPC and d18:0/18:0-IPC), with alterations in relative abundance as well (Fig. 9).
Several studies of murine host macrophages show that they elaborate a spectrum of SLs bearing anchors that could serve as a source for those present in amastigote IPC (47, 48) (Table S3; a summary of these data is presented in Fig. 10). It can be seen that potential donors for the three amastigote IPC ceramide anchors can be found in both host SM and ceramides or even through various SBs and ceramide synthesis (Fig. 10; the shading is based on the amastigote IPC anchor structures). Other SL possibilities may include host glucosylceramides, which were not considered further here.
Focusing first on SM donors because of the massive uptake of host d18:1/16:0-SM, one potential route is through the potent sphingomyelinase/IPC ceramidase activity encoded by Leishmania ISCL (45, 57, 59, 60) (Fig. 10). Alternatively (and not exclusively), an ISCL-independent route could involve salvage of mammalian SBs or ceramides with related anchors directly (Fig. 10). Both routes are challenged by the a priori expectation that the ratio of the various amastigote IPC anchors would be expected to mirror that of the salvaged SL forms, from either ISCL-dependent or ISCL-independent routes. However, while amastigote d18:1/16:0 IPC is the least abundant IPC isoform, constituting less than 20% of total IPC, d18:1/16:0 SM is by far more abundant than other isoforms, constituting more than 80%, in either the parasite or the host (47, 48) (Figs. 7, S1, and Table S3). Factors that could contribute to these differences include differences in relative uptake of different SMs or ceramides, preferential salvage of host ceramides rather than ISCL-mediated degradation of SMs, or intrinsic differences in these activities with SMs or ceramides of differing anchor structure, for which there is currently little knowledge. Alternatively, an ad hoc hypothesis postulates there are two pools/routes of SL uptake, one emphasizing the abundant d18:1/16:0 SM and the other more broadly acting across different IPC or ceramide anchor classes feeding into IPC synthesis (Fig. 10). Future studies will be required to address these interesting questions.
Interestingly and unlike de novo SL or IPC synthesis, the ISCL SMase activity is localized to the parasite mitochondrion where it is required for Leishmania virulence, albeit with some variation amongst parasite species or hosts (45, 59). Beyond bulk catabolism, the fungal orthologs of ISCL play roles in mitochondrial metabolism, replication, and SL signaling (61, 62). Currently the molecular mechanism(s) by which SM or other SLs are acquired or partitioned into various metabolic pathways by Leishmania amastigotes is unknown, and unfortunately, genetic approaches have been uninformative since no Leishmania mutants lacking SLs entirely have emerged.
Implications of the relative ‘insignificance’ of IPCS to chemotherapy
We did not anticipate that IPC or IPCS would not be essential at any point in the Leishmania infectious cycle, unlike pathogenic fungi where essential IPCS shows considerable potential as a validated drug target. In this respect, our data do not provide much optimism for IPCS as a drug target in the Leishmania parasite. While the yeast IPCS inhibitor aureobasidin A inhibits Leishmania growth or infectivity at relatively high concentrations (>10 μM) (25, 63), this was considered ‘off-target’ as the susceptibility was unchanged when tested against L. major Δspt2- mutants completely lacking SLs (25). Off-target effects were also observed in the related kinetoplastid parasite Trypanosoma cruzi and the apicomplexan parasite Toxoplasma gondii (64, 65). Most importantly, all data show that aureobasidin A is inactive against recombinant IPCS from trypanosomes and Leishmania, (25, 26) as well as microsomal Leishmania IPCS activity (this work, Fig. 2). Whether new candidate inhibitors showing activity against cultured parasites (26, 27, 28, 29) act ‘on target’ against Leishmania IPCS remain to be seen, although the health of the Δipcs− mutant suggest this may be unlikely. In vitro, IPCS inhibitors may act synergistically with other compounds1, although whether this extends to the in vivo situation with abundant SL salvage remains to be seen, in Leishmania or other pathogens known to take up host lipids.
Our studies thus provide a new perspective on Leishmania SL pathways, emphasizing the role of SM salvage from the host cell over de novo synthesis by the amastigote stage and additionally raising many interesting questions that will require further study. Instead, our findings suggest that agents inhibiting SL uptake or catabolism in Leishmania may have more promise as an avenue for chemotherapy.
Experimental procedures
Molecular constructs
Molecular constructs containing 610 bp of 5′ flanking (PCR amplified from WT genomic DNA by primers SMB 2590 and 2591; Table S1 contain the sequences of all oligonucleotides used) and 665 bp of 3′ flanking (amplified by primers SMB 2592 and 2593) sequence flanking the IPCS ORF were joined by fusion PCR to the ORF for the selectable markers NEO (amplified by primers SMB2586 and 2587) or SAT (amplified by primers SMB 2588 and 2589). These constructs (pGEM T Easy-IPCS::ΔNEO, B5810, or pGEM T Easy-IPCS::ΔSAT, B6075) were linearized by digestion with EcoRI to expose the homologous ends prior to electroporation. To restore IPCS expression, the IPCS coding region (Lm35.4990) was amplified by PCR using the primers SMB 3259 and 3260 and inserted into the pXG expression vector (66, 67) yielding pXG-BSD-IPCS (B6235). All constructs were confirmed by sequencing.
Leishmania culture and transfection
L. major (LV39 clone 5, Rho/SU/59/P) was grown in M199 media supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum, 12 mM NaHCO3, 0.1 mM adenine, 7.6 mM hemin, 2 μg/ml biopterin, 20 μM folic acid, 1× RPMI vitamin mix, 2 mM glutamine, 25 mM Hepes pH 6.8, 50 U/ml penicillin, and 50 μg/ml streptomycin (68). Cell density was measured using a coulter counter (Becton Dickinson) and viability was determined by flow cytometry (Becton Dickinson) after staining with 5 μg/ml propidium iodide. In some experiments, supplements were added as indicated or the pH was altered as shown in Table S1 and Mes or citrate buffers. Metacyclic cells were prepared by density purification or negative selection with peanut agglutinin, as described (40).
Transfections were performed by electroporation as previously described (69). To replace the first IPCS allele, transfection with the IPCS:: ΔNEO targeting fragment was performed; due to some media/serum concerns at the time these studies were undertaken, we had difficulty recovering transfectant colonies by our usual plating procedures. Thus, after electroporation and a 24 h recovery period in three separate pools, clonal lines were obtained by limiting dilution in M199 medium containing 10 μg/ml neomycin and 500 μM EtN. The authenticity of several putative heterozygous transfectants (IPCS/IPCS:: ΔNEO) was confirmed by PCR. Correct integration was confirmed by using primers outside the flanking region and inside the drug marker (SMB2598/2600 5′Flank and SMB2608/2827 3′Flank). Several independent clonal lines were inoculated into susceptible BALB/c mice (107 parasites/footpad) and recovered after 1 month; such lines are referred to as M1 passage. Two such lines (WA and WB) were then transfected with the IPCS:: ΔSAT targeting fragment, resistant cells obtained following growth in 8 μg/ml neomycin and 100 μg/ml nourseothricin, and clonal lines obtained by limiting dilution. The authenticity of potential homozygous Δipcs−-null mutants (formally IPCS:: ΔNEO/IPCS:: ΔSAT) was confirmed by PCR as described previously using primers SMB 2598/2601 (5′ flank) and SMB 2609/2827 (3′ Flank). Several lines were inoculated into BALB/c mice as before. IPCS expression was restored in several Δipcs− M1 transfectants (WAB, WAD, and WAE) by transfection with pXG-BSD-IPCS (B6235) to generate ipcs:: ΔNEO/ipcs:: ΔSAT/+pXG-IPCS, referred to as Δipcs−/+IPCS. As all transfectant and add-back lines showed similar behavior in preliminary tests, detailed studies are presented only for clone WAD (Δipcs−) or WADB (Δipcs−/+IPCS) unless otherwise stated.
Microsomal preparation and enzyme assays
Microsomes were prepared by washing 4 × 108 promastigotes in PBS and homogenized by sonication in buffer (50 mM Mes, 50 mM Bis-Tris pH 6.25, 10 mM EDTA, 100 mM NaCl, 250 mM sucrose, 300 nM aprotinin, 1 mM benzamidine, 1 μg/ml chymostatin and pepstatin, 10 μM E64 and leupeptin, and 10 mM NaF). Debris was removed by centrifugation at 1000g for 10 min and the supernatant was then centrifuged at 100,000g for 90 min. The pellet was resuspended in minimal amounts of buffer (5 mM MES, 5 mM Bis-Tris pH 6.25, 1 mM EDTA, 100 mM NaCl, 15 % glycerol, 300 nM aprotinin, 1 mM benzamidine, 1 μg/ml chymostatin and pepstatin, 10 μM E64 and leupeptin, and 1 mM NaF) with sonication, then flash frozen. Protein content was determined by bicinchoninic acid assay using bovine serum albumin standards.
Enzyme assays were performed in 100 μl IPCS assay buffer (100 mM Mes, 100 mM Bis-Tris pH 6.25, 5 mM EDTA, 100 mM NaCl, 300 nM aprotinin, 1 mM benzamidine, 1 μg/ml chymostatin and pepstatin, 10 μM E64 and leupeptin, and 1 mM NaF). Lipid substrates were dried by speedvac prior to resuspension is assay buffer, using 625 pmol of L-α-PI from soy and 250 pmol of NBD-C6-Ceramide unless otherwise indicated. Twenty-five micrograms of microsomal protein was added to the reactions which were incubated at 28 °C for 60 min and terminated with 500 μl of 50 mM HCl in methanol. Where indicated, aureobasidin A was added to a final concentration of 20 μM. Lipids were extracted with 1.5 ml of chloroform and 463 μl of 1M NaCl. Samples were vortexed and centrifuged at 1500g for 5 min. The upper phase was re-extracted with 750 μl of chloroform:methanol (43:7) and the combined lower phases were dried by nitrogen stream. Samples were resuspended in 50 μl of chloroform:methanol (2:1) and 5 μl were loaded on predeveloped Baker Si-250-PA 60 A silica gel TLC plates and developed using chloroform:methanol:water:ammonium hydroxide (28%)/65:30:3:2/v:v:v:v. Images were developed using Fuji FLA-5000 phosphoimager.
Lipid extraction
Promastigotes were collected from 100 ml cultures and lesion amastigotes were harvested as described (70). SLs from log phase promastigotes or amastigotes were extracted using a modified Folch extraction. First, 2 × 108 cells were resuspended in 1.5 ml 25 mM Sodium Fluoride with 2 ml Methanol and sonicated. Next, 4 ml of chloroform was added; samples were vortexed and centrifuged at 1800g for 15 min. The upper phase was re-extracted with 2.5 ml of chloroform:methanol (43:7), vortexed, and centrifuged. Combined lower phases were back extracted with 2 ml of 50 mM sodium fluoride and 2 ml of methanol, vortexed, and centrifuged. The lower phase was dried by nitrogen stream and extracted again with chloroform:methanol:50 mM sodium fluoride (4:2:1), vortexed, and centrifuged. The lower phase was again dried by nitrogen stream and resuspended in 1 ml of chloroform:methanol (1:1) for analysis by MS.
MS
ESI/MS analyses were performed on a Thermo Scientific triple stage quadrupole Vantage EMR mass spectrometer with Xcalibur operating system. Lipid extracts (10 μl each injection) were injected to the HESI-II probe in a Thermo Scientific Ion Max ion source by a built-in syringe pump, which delivered a constant flow of methanol at 20 μl/min. The mass spectrometer was tuned to unit mass resolution, and the heated capillary temperature was set to 280 °C. The electrospray needle was set at 4.0 kV and 3.5 kV for positive-ion and negative-ion modes operation, respectively, and the skimmer was at ground potential. The mass resolution of both Q1 and Q3 was set at 0.6 Da at half peak height to obtain the product ion scan, precursor ion scan, and neutral loss scan mass spectra, using a collision energy of 30 to 40 eV with target gas of Ar (1.3 mtorr) in the rf-only second quadrupole (Q2). The mass spectra were accumulated in the profile mode. Significant peaks were assigned based on signal to noise ratio to assess significance or quantitation (43) and evaluated for natural isotope patterns (44).
Mouse virulence
Mouse handling and experimental procedures were carried out in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the United States National Institutes of Health. Animal studies were approved by the Animal Studies Committee at Washington University (protocol #20-0396) in accordance with the Office of Laboratory Animal Welfare's guidelines and the Association for Assessment and Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care International.
Briefly, BALB/c or γ-IFN KO C57BL/6 mice (γKO) were infected with 105 metacyclics purified by gradient centrifugation (40) and footpad lesion swelling measured weekly. At key points, parasites were enumerated by limiting dilution assays (71) or lesions were excised for purification of amastigotes as described previously (34).
Statistical analysis
Statistical analysis was performed indicated using GraphPad Prism version 9.4.1 (GraphPad Software Inc).
Data availability
All relevant data are included with this article or online supporting information.
Supporting information
This article contains supporting information available online (Tables S1–S3; Figs. S1–S8; (34, 47, 48, 72, 73)).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest with the contents of this article.
Acknowledgments
We thank the members of our laboratory and Kai Zhang (Texas Tech University, Lubbock) for helpful discussions and providing access to MS data of purified WT amastigotes for confirmation of the results presented here. This manuscript was submitted posthumously on behalf of John Turk.
Author contributions
P. N. K., F. F. H., and S. M. B. conceptualization; F. M. K., P. N. K., S. M. H., and F. F. H. investigation; J. T. and S. M. B., resources; F. M. K., P. N. K., and S. M. B. writing–original draft; F. M. K. and S. M. B. writing–review & editing; S. M. B. supervision; S. M. B. project administration; J. T. and S. M. B. funding acquisition.
Funding and additional information
Supported by NIH Grant AI31078 to S. M. B and the Division of Infectious Diseases, Washington University (F. M. K). The Mass Spectrometry Resource of Washington University is supported by NIH grants P30DK020579, P30DK056341, and P41GM103422. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.
Edited by Dennis Voelker
Footnotes
Lipid species abbreviations follow those recommended by the Lipid Maps consortium (www.lipidmaps.org/).
Data not shown.
Supporting information
References
- 1.Alvar J., Velez I.D., Bern C., Herrero M., Desjeux P., Cano J., et al. Leishmaniasis worldwide and global estimates of its incidence. PLoS One. 2012;7 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0035671. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Pigott D.M., Bhatt S., Golding N., Duda K.A., Battle K.E., Brady O.J., et al. Global distribution maps of the leishmaniases. Elife. 2014;3 doi: 10.7554/eLife.02851. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Banuls A.L., Bastien P., Pomares C., Arevalo J., Fisa R., Hide M. Clinical pleiomorphism in human leishmaniases, with special mention of asymptomatic infection. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2011;17:1451–1461. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03640.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Herwaldt B.L. Leishmaniasis. Lancet. 1999;354:1191–1199. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)10178-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Mannan S.B., Elhadad H., Loc T.T.H., Sadik M., Mohamed M.Y.F., Nam N.H., et al. Prevalence and associated factors of asymptomatic leishmaniasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Parasitol. Int. 2021;81 doi: 10.1016/j.parint.2020.102229. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.WHO Control of the leishmaniases: WHO expert committee on the control of leishmaniases. World Health Organ. Tech. Rep. 2010;949:1–186. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Singh O.P., Hasker E., Sacks D., Boelaert M., Sundar S. Asymptomatic Leishmania infection: a new challenge for Leishmania control. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2014;58:1424–1429. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciu102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Croft S.L., Sundar S., Fairlamb A.H. Drug resistance in leishmaniasis. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2006;19:111–126. doi: 10.1128/CMR.19.1.111-126.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.den Boer M., Argaw D., Jannin J., Alvar J. Leishmaniasis impact and treatment access. Clin. Microbiol. Infect. 2011;17:1471–1477. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2011.03635.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Sangshetti J.N., Khan F.A.K., Kulkarni A.K., Arote R., Patil R.H. Antileishmanial drug discovery: comprehensive review of the last 10 years. R. Soc. Chem. 2015;5:32376–32415. [Google Scholar]
- 11.Zhang K., Bangs J.D., Beverley S.M. Sphingolipids in parasitic protozoa. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2010;688:238–248. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-6741-1_17. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Mina J.G.M., Denny P.W. Everybody needs sphingolipids, right! Mining for new drug targets in protozoan sphingolipid biosynthesis. Parasitology. 2018;145:134–147. doi: 10.1017/S0031182017001081. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Guan X.L., Maser P. Comparative sphingolipidomics of disease-causing trypanosomatids reveal unique lifecycle- and taxonomy-specific lipid chemistries. Sci. Rep. 2017;7 doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-13931-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Oskouian B., Saba J.D. Cancer treatment strategies targeting sphingolipid metabolism. Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2010;688:185–205. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-6741-1_13. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Koeller C.M., Heise N. The sphingolipid biosynthetic pathway is a potential target for chemotherapy against chagas disease. Enzyme Res. 2011;2011 doi: 10.4061/2011/648159. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Suzuki E., Tanaka A.K., Toledo M.S., Levery S.B., Straus A.H., Takahashi H.K. Trypanosomatid and fungal glycolipids and sphingolipids as infectivity factors and potential targets for development of new therapeutic strategies. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2008;1780:362–369. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2007.09.009. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Hannun Y.A., Obeid L.M. Sphingolipids and their metabolism in physiology and disease. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2018;19:175–191. doi: 10.1038/nrm.2017.107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Megyeri M., Riezman H., Schuldiner M., Futerman A.H. Making sense of the yeast sphingolipid pathway. J. Mol. Biol. 2016;428:4765–4775. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2016.09.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Kaneshiro E.S., Jayasimhulu K., Lester R.L. Characterization of inositol lipids from Leishmania donovani promastigotes: identification of an inositol sphingophospholipid. J. Lipid Res. 1986;27:1294–1303. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Harrison P.J., Dunn T.M., Campopiano D.J. Sphingolipid biosynthesis in man and microbes. Nat. Prod. Rep. 2018;35:921–954. doi: 10.1039/c8np00019k. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Pinneh E.C., Stoppel R., Knight H., Knight M.R., Steel P.G., Denny P.W. Expression levels of inositol phosphorylceramide synthase modulate plant responses to biotic and abiotic stress in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS One. 2019;14 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0217087. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Luberto C., Toffaletti D.L., Wills E.A., Tucker S.C., Casadevall A., Perfect J.R., et al. Roles for inositol-phosphoryl ceramide synthase 1 (IPC1) in pathogenesis of C. neoformans. Genes Dev. 2001;15:201–212. doi: 10.1101/gad.856001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Heidler S.A., Radding J.A. Inositol phosphoryl transferases from human pathogenic fungi. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2000;1500:147–152. doi: 10.1016/s0925-4439(99)00097-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Sutterwala S.S., Hsu F.F., Sevova E.S., Schwartz K.J., Zhang K., Key P., et al. Developmentally regulated sphingolipid synthesis in African trypanosomes. Mol. Microbiol. 2008;70:281–296. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2008.06393.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Denny P.W., Shams-Eldin H., Price H.P., Smith D.F., Schwarz R.T. The protozoan inositol phosphorylceramide synthase: a novel drug target that defines a new class of sphingolipid synthase. J. Biol. Chem. 2006;281:28200–28209. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M600796200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Sevova E.S., Goren M.A., Schwartz K.J., Hsu F.F., Turk J., Fox B.G., et al. Cell-free synthesis and functional characterization of sphingolipid synthases from parasitic trypanosomatid protozoa. J. Biol. Chem. 2010;285:20580–20587. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.127662. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Figueiredo J.M., Dias W.B., Mendonca-Previato L., Previato J.O., Heise N. Characterization of the inositol phosphorylceramide synthase activity from Trypanosoma cruzi. Biochem. J. 2005;387:519–529. doi: 10.1042/BJ20041842. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Mina J.G., Mosely J.A., Ali H.Z., Denny P.W., Steel P.G. Exploring Leishmania major inositol phosphorylceramide synthase (LmjIPCS): insights into the ceramide binding domain. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2011;9:1823–1830. doi: 10.1039/c0ob00871k. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Mina J.G., Mosely J.A., Ali H.Z., Shams-Eldin H., Schwarz R.T., Steel P.G., et al. A plate-based assay system for analyses and screening of the Leishmania major inositol phosphorylceramide synthase. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2010;42:1553–1561. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2010.06.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Norcliffe J.L., Mina J.G., Alvarez E., Cantizani J., de Dios-Anton F., Colmenarejo G., et al. Identifying inhibitors of the Leishmania inositol phosphorylceramide synthase with antiprotozoal activity using a yeast-based assay and ultra-high throughput screening platform. Sci. Rep. 2018;8:3938. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-22063-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Denny P.W., Goulding D., Ferguson M.A., Smith D.F. Sphingolipid-free Leishmania are defective in membrane trafficking, differentiation and infectivity. Mol. Microbiol. 2004;52:313–327. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2003.03975.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Zhang K., Showalter M., Revollo J., Hsu F.F., Turk J., Beverley S.M. Sphingolipids are essential for differentiation but not growth in Leishmania. EMBO J. 2003;22:6016–6026. doi: 10.1093/emboj/cdg584. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Zhang K., Pompey J.M., Hsu F.F., Key P., Bandhuvula P., Saba J.D., et al. Redirection of sphingolipid metabolism toward de novo synthesis of ethanolamine in Leishmania. EMBO J. 2007;26:1094–1104. doi: 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601565. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Zhang K., Hsu F.F., Scott D.A., Docampo R., Turk J., Beverley S.M. Leishmania salvage and remodelling of host sphingolipids in amastigote survival and acidocalcisome biogenesis. Mol. Microbiol. 2005;55:1566–1578. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.2005.04493.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Ali H.Z., Harding C.R., Denny P.W. Endocytosis and sphingolipid scavenging in Leishmania mexicana amastigotes. Biochem. Res. Int. 2011;2012 doi: 10.1155/2012/691363. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Winter G., Fuchs M., McConville M.J., Stierhof Y.D., Overath P. Surface antigens of Leishmania mexicana amastigotes: characterization of glycoinositol phospholipids and a macrophage-derived glycosphingolipid. J. Cell Sci. 1994;107:2471–2482. doi: 10.1242/jcs.107.9.2471. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Cruz A., Coburn C.M., Beverley S.M. Double targeted gene replacement for creating null mutants. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1991;88:7170–7174. doi: 10.1073/pnas.88.16.7170. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Hannun Y.A., Obeid L.M. The ceramide-centric universe of lipid-mediated cell regulation: stress encounters of the lipid kind. J. Biol. Chem. 2002;277:25847–25850. doi: 10.1074/jbc.R200008200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Hsu F.F., Turk J., Zhang K., Beverley S.M. Characterization of inositol phosphorylceramides from Leishmania major by tandem mass spectrometry with electrospray ionization. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2007;18:1591–1604. doi: 10.1016/j.jasms.2007.05.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Spath G.F., Beverley S.M. A lipophosphoglycan-independent method for isolation of infective Leishmania metacyclic promastigotes by density gradient centrifugation. Exp. Parasitol. 2001;99:97–103. doi: 10.1006/expr.2001.4656. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Subramanya S., Mensa-Wilmot K. Diacylglycerol-stimulated endocytosis of transferrin in trypanosomatids is dependent on tyrosine kinase activity. PLoS One. 2010;5 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0008538. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Hsu F.F., Turk J. Characterization of phosphatidylinositol, phosphatidylinositol-4-phosphate, and phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate by electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry: a mechanistic study. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2000;11:986–999. doi: 10.1016/S1044-0305(00)00172-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Currie L.A. Nomenclature in evaluation of analytical methods including detection and quantification capabilities (IUPAC Recommendations 1995) Pure Appl. Chem. 1995;67:1699–1723. [Google Scholar]
- 44.Smith R.M. 2nd ed. John Wiley & Sons; Inc., Hoboken, New Jersey: 2004. Understanding Mass Spectra. A Basic Approach. [Google Scholar]
- 45.Zhang O., Wilson M.C., Xu W., Hsu F.F., Turk J., Kuhlmann F.M., et al. Degradation of host sphingomyelin is essential for Leishmania virulence. PLoS Pathog. 2009;5 doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000692. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Hsu F.F., Turk J. Structural determination of sphingomyelin by tandem mass spectrometry with electrospray ionization. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. 2000;11:437–449. doi: 10.1016/S1044-0305(99)00150-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Dennis E.A., Deems R.A., Harkewicz R., Quehenberger O., Brown H.A., Milne S.B., et al. A mouse macrophage lipidome. J. Biol. Chem. 2010;285:39976–39985. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M110.182915. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Raetz C.R., Garrett T.A., Reynolds C.M., Shaw W.A., Moore J.D., Smith D.C., Jr., et al. Kdo2-Lipid A of Escherichia coli, a defined endotoxin that activates macrophages via TLR-4. J. Lipid Res. 2006;47:1097–1111. doi: 10.1194/jlr.M600027-JLR200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Sato K., Noda Y., Yoda K. Kei1: a novel subunit of inositolphosphorylceramide synthase, essential for its enzyme activity and Golgi localization. Mol. Biol. Cell. 2009;20:4444–4457. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E09-03-0235. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Zhang O., Hsu F.F., Xu W., Pawlowic M., Zhang K. Sphingosine kinase A is a pleiotropic and essential enzyme for Leishmania survival and virulence. Mol. Microbiol. 2013;90:489–501. doi: 10.1111/mmi.12378. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Spath G.F., Schlesinger P., Schreiber R., Beverley S.M. A novel role for Stat1 in phagosome acidification and natural host resistance to intracellular infection by Leishmania major. PLoS Pathog. 2009;5 doi: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000381. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Ghosh S., Bhattacharyya S., Das S., Raha S., Maulik N., Das D.K., et al. Generation of ceramide in murine macrophages infected with Leishmania donovani alters macrophage signaling events and aids intracellular parasitic survival. Mol. Cell Biochem. 2001;223:47–60. doi: 10.1023/a:1017996609928. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Ghosh S., Bhattacharyya S., Sirkar M., Sa G.S., Das T., Majumdar D., et al. Leishmania donovani suppresses activated protein 1 and NF-kappaB activation in host macrophages via ceramide generation: involvement of extracellular signal-regulated kinase. Infect. Immun. 2002;70:6828–6838. doi: 10.1128/IAI.70.12.6828-6838.2002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Zhang K. Balancing de novo synthesis and salvage of lipids by Leishmania amastigotes. Curr. Opin. Microbiol. 2021;63:98–103. doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2021.07.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.McConville M.J., Naderer T. Metabolic pathways required for the intracellular survival of Leishmania. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 2011;65:543–561. doi: 10.1146/annurev-micro-090110-102913. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Schneider P., Rosat J.P., Ransijn A., Ferguson M.A., McConville M.J. Characterization of glycoinositol phospholipids in the amastigote stage of the protozoan parasite Leishmania major. Biochem. J. 1993;295:555–564. doi: 10.1042/bj2950555. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Xu W., Xin L., Soong L., Zhang K. Sphingolipid degradation by Leishmania major is required for its resistance to acidic pH in the mammalian host. Infect. Immun. 2011;79:3377–3387. doi: 10.1128/IAI.00037-11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Zhang K., Beverley S.M. Phospholipid and sphingolipid metabolism in Leishmania. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 2010;170:55–64. doi: 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2009.12.004. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Pillai A.B., Xu W., Zhang O., Zhang K. Sphingolipid degradation in Leishmania (Leishmania) amazonensis. PLoS Negl. Trop. Dis. 2012;6 doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0001944. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Zhang O., Xu W., Balakrishna Pillai A., Zhang K. Developmentally regulated sphingolipid degradation in Leishmania major. PLoS One. 2012;7 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0031059. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Matmati N., Hassan B.H., Ren J., Shamssedine A.A., Jeong E., Shariff B., et al. Yeast sphingolipid phospholipase gene ISC1 regulates the spindle checkpoint by a CDC55-dependent mechanism. Mol. Cell Biol. 2020;40 doi: 10.1128/MCB.00340-19. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Spincemaille P., Matmati N., Hannun Y.A., Cammue B.P., Thevissen K. Sphingolipids and mitochondrial function in budding yeast. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 2014;1840:3131–3137. doi: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2014.06.015. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Tanaka A.K., Valero V.B., Takahashi H.K., Straus A.H. Inhibition of Leishmania (Leishmania) amazonensis growth and infectivity by aureobasidin A. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2007;59:487–492. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkl518. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Salto M.L., Bertello L.E., Vieira M., Docampo R., Moreno S.N., de Lederkremer R.M. Formation and remodeling of inositolphosphoceramide during differentiation of Trypanosoma cruzi from trypomastigote to amastigote. Eukaryot. Cell. 2003;2:756–768. doi: 10.1128/EC.2.4.756-768.2003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Alqaisi A.Q.I., Mbekeani A.J., Llorens M.B., Elhammer A.P., Denny P.W. The antifungal Aureobasidin A and an analogue are active against the protozoan parasite Toxoplasma gondii but do not inhibit sphingolipid biosynthesis - Corrigendum. Parasitology. 2018;145:156. doi: 10.1017/S0031182017000877. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Goyard S., Beverley S.M. Blasticidin resistance: a new independent marker for stable transfection of Leishmania. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 2000;108:249–252. doi: 10.1016/s0166-6851(00)00210-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Ha D.S., Schwarz J.K., Turco S.J., Beverley S.M. Use of the green fluorescent protein as a marker in transfected Leishmania. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 1996;77:57–64. doi: 10.1016/0166-6851(96)02580-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Goyard S., Segawa H., Gordon J., Showalter M., Duncan R., Turco S.J., et al. An in vitro system for developmental and genetic studies of Leishmania donovani phosphoglycans. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 2003;130:31–42. doi: 10.1016/s0166-6851(03)00142-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Kapler G.M., Coburn C.M., Beverley S.M. Stable transfection of the human parasite Leishmania major delineates a 30-kilobase region sufficient for extrachromosomal replication and expression. Mol. Cell Biol. 1990;10:1084–1094. doi: 10.1128/mcb.10.3.1084. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Akopyants N.S., Matlib R.S., Bukanova E.N., Smeds M.R., Brownstein B.H., Stormo G.D., et al. Expression profiling using random genomic DNA microarrays identifies differentially expressed genes associated with three major developmental stages of the protozoan parasite Leishmania major. Mol. Biochem. Parasitol. 2004;136:71–86. doi: 10.1016/j.molbiopara.2004.03.002. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Titus R.G., Marchand M., Boon T., Louis J.A. A limiting dilution assay for quantifying Leishmania major in tissues of infected mice. Parasite Immunol. 1985;7:545–555. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3024.1985.tb00098.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Fang J., Ruiz F.A., Docampo M., Luo S., Rodrigues J.C., Motta L.S., et al. Overexpression of a Zn2+-sensitive soluble exopolyphosphatase from Trypanosoma cruzi depletes polyphosphate and affects osmoregulation. J Biol Chem. 2007;282:32501–32510. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M704841200. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Madeira da Silva L., Beverley S.M. Expansion of the target of rapamycin (TOR) kinase family and function in Leishmania shows that TOR3 is required for acidocalcisome biogenesis and animal infectivity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107:11965–11970. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1004599107. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
All relevant data are included with this article or online supporting information.