Abstract
Background
Gut microbes were closely related to women’s health. Previous studies reported that the gut microbes of premenopausal women were different from those of postmenopausal women. However, little was known about the relationship between gut microbiota dysbiosis and menopausal syndrome (MPS). The aim of this study was to explore the relationship between MPS and gut microbes.
Methods
Patients with MPS (P group, n = 77) and healthy women (H group, n = 24) at menopause were recruited in this study. The stool specimen and clinical parameters (demographic data, follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH), estradiol (E2), et al) of participants’ were collected. We evaluated the differences in gut microbes by 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequencing. We used LEfSe to identify gut microbes with varying abundances in different groups. The Spearman correlation coefficients of clinical parameters and gut microbes were calculated. PICRUSt was used to predict the potential KEGG Ortholog functional profiles of microbial communities.
Results
The abundance of 14 species differed substantially between the MPS and menopausal healthy women (LDA significance threshold > 2.0) according to LEfSe analysis. Using Spearman’s correlation analysis, it was discovered that E2 had a positive correlation with Aggregatibacter segnis, Bifidobacterium animalis, Acinetobacter guillouiae (p < 0.05, these three species were enriched in menopausal healthy women), while FSH and LH had a negative correlation with them (p < 0.05). KEGG level3 metabolic pathways relevant to cardiovascular disease and carbohydrate metabolism were enriched in the MPS (p < 0.05), according to functional prediction by PICRUST and analyzed by Dunn test.
Conclusion
There was gut microbiota dysbiosis in MPS, which is reflected in the deficiency of the abundance of Aggregatibacter segnis, Bifidobacterium animalis and Acinetobacter guillouiae related to the level of sex hormones. In MPS individuals, species with altered abundances and unique functional pathways were found.
Supplementary Information
The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12905-022-02029-w.
Keywords: Menopausal syndrome, Gut microbes, 16S ribosomal RNA gene sequencing, Gut microbiota dysbiosis, Functional prediction
Background
During the menopause transition, women usually experience a progressive change in ovarian activity and a physiologic deterioration of hypothalamic-pituitary-ovarian axis function associated with fluctuating hormone levels [1], which cause menopausal syndrome (MPS). Hot flashes, night sweats, sleep disturbances, sexual dysfunction, mood disorders, and other symptoms are problematic symptoms experienced by women with MPS [2]. Menopausal symptoms affect 69.5% to 80% of women at menopause [3, 4]. Menopausal symptoms not only have a detrimental impact on one’s quality of life, but may also link patients to cardiovascular disease, diabetes, osteoporosis, and breast cancer [5–8]. As a result, the prevention and treatment of MPS demand more attention.
More and more studies showed that the gut microbes are closely related to health and disease. Gut microbes are regarded as one of the organs of human body. The intestine is colonized with 1013–1014 bacteria mainly residing in the lumen and in the mucus [9]. Gut dysbiosis is involved in many female reproductive and endocrine diseases, such as endometriosis [10], polycystic ovary syndrome [11], obesity and sexual precocious puberty [12], et al. Endometriosis is a chronic inflammatory disease, which is estrogen dependent. Gut microbes participate in the metabolism of estrogen in blood. The gut microbiota regulates estrogens through secretion of β-glucuronidase, an enzyme that deconjugates estrogens into their active forms [13]. The gut microbes in patients with endometriosis may have a large number of β- Glucuronidase producing bacteria, which may lead to increased levels of estrogen metabolites, leading to endometriosis [13]. Endometriosis is common in premenopausal women, and the disease may be mediated by high estrogen levels [14].
During menopause and postmenopause a variety of negative health outcomes may occur from the depletion of circulating estrogen. Premenopausal and postmenopausal women have different gut microbes [15]. A study showed that the gut microbiota community in menopausal women changed after isoflavones supplementation [16], which are plant-derived phytoestrogens. Another study showed that the level of estrogen metabolites in urine was positively correlated with the diversity of gut microbiota [17]. Osteoporosis develops as a result of continuous hypoestrogenemia. The gut microbiota has been found to interfere with hormone secretion, estrogen levels, metabolism and immune function, all of which influence bone metabolism [18, 19]. Numerous menopause-related symptoms and signs are derived as a result of lack of estrogen production. However, the link between gut microbiota and MPS was still poorly characterized. As a result, little was known regarding the link between gut dysbiosis and MPS. Furthermore, it remained unexplored how and which gut microbes may influence the key pathophysiological processes in MPS.
In order to study the taxonomic and functional features of the gut microbes in menopausal women, we conducted 16S ribosomal RNA (16S rRNA) gene sequencing and functional prediction analysis on the gut microbes of stool specimen taken from patients with MPS and healthy controls. Characterization of the compositional and functional features of the gut microbes in menopausal women helps us comprehend its involvement in women’s health, and hence the importance of gut microbes regulation in menopausal women’s health. We aim to provide potential techniques for the prevention and treatment of MPS.
Methods
Study participants
This study was a case-control study that included patients with menopausal syndrome (P group) and healthy women at menopause (H group). The Medical Ethics Committee of the Guangzhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine First Affiliated Hospital approved this study (NO.ZYYECK【2020】021). From June 2020 to October 2021, we recruited females aged 40–60 to perform the domestic modified Kupperman index (KI) score (Additional file 1) test at our hospital. All participants were informed about the study’s purpose and given written informed consent.
Participants in the P group must satisfy the following criteria: (1) female, 40–60 years old; (2) have at least one of these autonomic nerve changes (hot flashes, night sweats, insomnia, irritability, and other symptoms) and menstrual disorders (two consecutive cycle length changes > 7 days in 10 months); (3) have a domestic modified KI score > 15 points.
Participants in the H group must meet the following requirements: (1) female, 40–60 years old; (2) with a domestic modified KI score < 15 points and no hot flashes.
The following were the exclusion criteria: (1) have unexplained irregular vaginal bleeding; (2) have used sex hormones within 3 months; (3) have antibiotics within 2 weeks; (4) have a history of severe, progressive, or uncontrolled cardiac, hepatic, renal, mental, or hematological diseases.
A total of 101 out of 1253 women who participated in the survey from June 2020 to October 2021 were included in the analysis to investigate the gut microbes of two groups after the exclusion of women who were aged under 40 years and over 60 years (n = 806), meet the exclusion criteria and refused toparticipate (n = 366). Lastly, we included 77 patients with menopausal syndrome (P group) and 24 healthy women at menopause (H group).
Data collection
The Guangzhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine First Affiliated Hospital used a survey (Additional file 1) and a physical examination to collect data on demographic characteristics, medical history, menstrual history, height, weight, body mass index (BMI), waist circumstance (WC), hip, waist hip ratio (WHR), and blood pressure. Participants were given a fecal collection kit and instructed to collect their feces within 1 week after their visit. Within 4 h of collection, feces samples were collected and sent to the hospital for examination. The samples were kept at − 80 °C until they were processed. After 8 hours of fasting, the H group had their blood obtained to check for follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH), and estradiol (E2). After an 8-hour fast, the P group was required to have blood obtained and a bone mineral density (BMD) test. FSH, LH, E2, total cholesterol (CHOL), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL), triglycerides (TG), fasting blood glucose (Glu), and fasting insulin (INS) are some of the blood test indications. The participants’ serum test results and BMD (dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, DXA) testing room results were obtained from hospital laboratories and BMD (dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, DXA) testing room, respectively.
Diagnostic criteria of menopausal syndrome
Clinical manifestations, followed by sex hormone levels, are used to diagnose MPS. Diagnostic criteria referred to the Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinical Guidelines [20]. The following are the diagnostic criteria: (1) menstrual disorders are the first clinical symptoms of perimenopause; (2) vasomotor symptoms are primarily hot flashes; (3) may have one or more additional symptoms such as mental disorder (anxiety, depression, or insomnia), urogenital atrophy, cardiovascular symptoms (chest tightness or palpitations), skin and body changes (itchy skin, obesity), and osteoporosis; (4) FSH>10 IU/L indicates decreased ovarian reserve; amenorrhea, FSH>40 IU/L and E2<10-20pg/mL indicates ovarian failure.
DNA extraction and PCR amplication
The HiPure Bacterial DNA Kit was used to extract bacterial genomic DNA (Megan, China). Using agarose gel electrophoresis and Qubit, the quality and quantity of the DNA was detected (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). After premixing using NEBnext-Ultra-II-Q5-Master-Mix, the V3-V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene was amplified (NEB, USA).
Illumina sequencing
Agilent 2200 Tape Station and Qubit® were used to assess the final library product (Life Technologies, USA). The first batch of samples was sequenced on the Miseq (Illumina, USA) platform at with pair-end 250 bp, whereas the second batch was sequenced on the NovaSeq (Illumina, USA) platform at with pair-end 250 bp.
Data analysis
The mean with SD was showed for normally distributed parameters, and p values were calculated using a student’s t-test; for not normally distributed parameters, the median with IQR (P25, P75) was showed, and p values were calculated using the Mann-Whitney U test. Counts were used to represent categorical variables, and the Chi-square test was used to obtain the p value. Statistical significance was defined as a value of p < 0.05.
Using the qiime tools import program, raw data FASTQ files were imported into a format that could be used by the QIIME2 system. To obtain the feature table of amplicon sequence variant (ASV), demultiplexed sequences from each sample were quality filtered and trimmed, de-noised, merged, and then the chimeric sequences were identified and removed using the QIIME2 dada2 plugin [21]. To generate the taxonomy table, the QIIME2 feature-classifier plugin was used to align ASV sequences to a pre-trained GREENGENES 13_8 99% database (trimmed to the V3-V4 region bound by the 338F/806R primer pair) [22]. The core-diversity plugin in QIIME2 was used to calculate diversity metrics. Wilcoxon calculated feature-level alpha diversity indices, such as Chao1 and Shannon diversity index, to estimate microbial diversity within a single sample. To study the structural variation of microbial communities among samples, researchers used beta diversity distance measurements and Bray Curtis, which were then visualized using principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) [23]. LEfSe was used to identify bacteria with varying abundances in different samples and groups [24] Clinical parameters and microbial species Spearman correlation coefficients were calculated and displayed as heat maps. The R program heatmap package is mostly used to generate the correlation heat map. PICRUSt was also used to predict the potential KEGG Ortholog functional profiles of microbial communities [25]. After getting the functional annotation, the Dunn test (R program dunn.test package) was performed to see if there were any significant differences between groups in the microbial community prediction function. A statistically significant value of p < 0.05 was used. The online sketching website was used to implement all visualizations (https://www.bioincloud.tech).
Results
Clinical characteristics of participants
In terms of age (p = 0.051), menopausal status (p = 0.798), BMI (p = 0.771), WHR (p = 0.243), SBP (p = 0.701), DBP (p = 0.127), hypertension, or diabetes (all p > 0.05), there was no significant difference between the P and H groups, indicating that the influence of gut microbiota caused by age, nutritional status, hypertension, or diabetes could be excluded (Table 1) However, the P groups had higher FSH and LH values, whereas the E2 levels were lower (all p < 0.05).
Table 1.
Parameters | H n = 24 |
P n = 77 |
p value |
---|---|---|---|
Age (years) | 47.88 ± 3.04 | 49.55 ± 3.77 | 0.051 |
Menopausal state n(%) | |||
Premenopausal | 18 (66.67%) | 47 (61.04%) | 0.798 |
Postmenopausal | 8 (33.33%) | 30 (38.96%) | |
BMI (kg/m2) | 22.55 ± 1.26 | 22.43 ± 2.36 | 0.771 |
WHR | 0.82 ± 0.04 | 0.81 ± 0.05 | 0.243 |
SBP (mmHg) | 114.42 ± 11.52 | 116.00 ± 16.85 | 0.701 |
DBP (mmHg) | 74.42 ± 6.15 | 77.42 ± 11.37 | 0.127 |
Hypertension, n (%) | 0 (0.00%) | 3 (3.90%) | 1.000 |
Diabetes, n (%) | 0 (0.00%) | 1 (1.30%) | 1.000 |
FSH (IU/L) | 7.91 (4.80, 24.54) | 68.46 (54.93, 85.64) | <0.05* |
LH (IU/L) | 5.45 (4.42, 15.84) | 37.33 (28.33, 52.27) | <0.05* |
E2 (pmol/L) | 216.5 (109.42, 381.90) | 51.65 (32.23, 77.47) | <0.05* |
For normally distributed parameters, the mean was showed ±SD, and p values were calculated using a student’s t-test and for not normally distributed parameters, the median with IQR (P25,P75) was showed, and the p value was calculated using Mann-Whitney U test. Categorical variables are represented by counts, and p value was calculated using Chi-square test
H healthy controls, P Patients with MPS, BMI body mass index, WHR waist hip ratio, SBP systolic blood pressure, DBP diastolic blood pressure, FSH follicle stimulating hormone, LH luteinizing hormone, E2 estradiol
*p < 0.05
Analysis of gut microbiota diversity
In an analysis of gut microbial diversity, no significant differences were found between P (n = 77) and H group (n = 24). The sequencing depths were examined by plotting the rarefaction curve of richness (ggplot2) (Additional file 2). Each group’s curve was found to be near saturation, indicating that the sequencing depth was adequate. The abundance and diversity of microbial communities, as measured by Chao1 and Shannon index, were reflected in Alpha diversity. Between the two groups, there was no significant difference in Chao1 (Wilcoxon, p = 0.167) or Shannon index (Wilcoxon, p = 0.432) (Fig. 1A-B). Bray curtis calculated beta diversity, which is an indicator of microbial community composition. P group had no significant difference from H group (PERMANOVA, p = 0.204) (Fig. 1C), according to principal coordinate analysis (PCoA).
Gut microbiota composition and difference analysis
In the P (n = 77) and H (n = 24) groups, a total of 43 phyla, 281 genera, and 163 species were identified (Additional file 3). At the phylum and genus level, the top 20 average relative abundance of microbiota were showed (Fig. 2A-B). Using LEfSe analysis, we compared the gut microbiota compositions in two groups. LEfSe analysis detected 14 species with varying abundances: In the P group, Bifidobacterium adolescentis, Bifidobacterium longum, Bacteroides ovatus, Lactobacillus ruminis, Veillonella dispar, and Eubacterium biforme showed greater enrichment, whereas in H group, Corynebacterium stationis, Bifidobacterium animalis, Bacteroides coprophilus, Clostridium celatum, Ruminococcus albus, Helicobacter rodentium, Aggregatibacter segnis, Acinetobacter guillouiae were more abundant (LDA significance threshold > 2.0; Fig. 2C-D). In conclusion, we identified different species in two groups, indicating a significant different composition of the gut microbiota between the P and H group.
Associations between clinical parameters and gut microbiome
We explored the correlation between clinical parameters and species abundance using Spearman’s correlation analysis (Fig. 3). It was discovered that E2 had a positive correlation with Aggregatibacter segnis, Bifidobacterium animalis and Acinetobacter guillouiae, while FSH and LH had a negative correlation with these three species. E2 had the strongest positive correlation with Acinetobacter guillouiae (r = 0.253, p = 0.018), followed by Aggregatibacter segnis and Bifidobacterium animalis. FSH (r = − 0.302, p = 0.004) and LH (r = − 0.276, p = 0.009) had the strongest negative correlations with Bifidobacterium animalis, followed by Aggregatibacter segnis and Acinetobacter guillouiae. Meanwhile, Aggregatibacter segnis, Bifidobacterium animalis, and Acinetobacter guillouiae were found enriching in the H group (LDA significance threshold > 2.0; Fig. 2C-D). The domestic modified KI scores was found to be positively correlated with Ruminococcus torques, Blautia obeum and Butyricicoccus pullicaecorum, while negatively correlated with Lactobacillus delbrueckii. The hot flash (HF) symptom scores was found to be positively related to Ruminococcus torques, while negatively related to Clostridium cocleatum. BMI, WHR, Glu, INS, CHOL, LDL, TG, and BMD were also correlated with species abundance. As a result, the clinical parameters were found to be correlated with the composition of the gut microbiome.
Functional alternation of gut microbiota
Gut microbial functions were predicted by PICRUST in our study, of which the profiles revealed significant alterations in two groups. We constructed functional profiles for each sample using microbial KEGG Ortholog pathways. 8 KEGG level2 pathways (p < 0.05; Table 2) and 50 KEGG level3 pathways (p < 0.05; Additional file 4) enriched in the P group, were found to be significantly higher than in H group. Circulatory system, carbohydrate metabolism, digestive system, cell motility, signal transduction, folding, sorting and degradation, infectious disease, and biosynthesis of other secondary metabolites had more abundance in the P group than in the H group. Importantly, metabolic pathways related to cardiovascular disease and carbohydrate metabolism were enriched in the P group (p < 0.05; Table 3), indicating that the incidence of cardiovascular disease, obesity, diabetes and other related diseases may increase after women enter menopause.
Table 2.
Feature | Expression | Z | p value adjusted |
---|---|---|---|
Circulatory system | P>H | −2.138 | 0.016* |
Carbohydrate metabolism | P>H | −1.995 | 0.023* |
Digestive system | P>H | −2.130 | 0.017* |
Cell motility | P>H | 2.019 | 0.022* |
Signal transduction | P>H | 1.939 | 0.026* |
Folding, sorting and degradation | P>H | 2.290 | 0.011* |
Infectious disease: viral | P>H | 2.098 | 0.018* |
Biosynthesis of other secondary metabolites | P>H | −1.723 | 0.042* |
The Dunn test was used to analyze whether the microbial community prediction function was significantly different between groups. Z, tests statistic of Dunn test
*p < 0.05
Table 3.
Feature | Expression | Z | p value adjusted |
---|---|---|---|
Adrenergic signaling in cardiomyocytes | P>H | − 2.023 | 0.022* |
Cardiac muscle contraction | P>H | − 1.947 | 0.026* |
Dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) | P>H | −1.727 | 0.042* |
Arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy | P>H | −2.079 | 0.019* |
Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) | P>H | −1.823 | 0.034* |
Calcium signaling pathway | P>H | −2.023 | 0.022* |
cAMP signaling pathway | P>H | −2.047 | 0.02* |
Carbohydrate digestion and absorption | P>H | −2.011 | 0.022* |
Fructose and mannose metabolism | P>H | −2.162 | 0.015* |
Galactose metabolism | P>H | −2.138 | 0.016* |
Pentose and glucuronate interconversions | P>H | −2.513 | 0.006* |
Insulin secretion | P>H | −2.023 | 0.022* |
NOD-like receptor signaling pathway | P>H | 1.939 | 0.026* |
The Dunn test was used to analyze whether the microbial community prediction function was significantly different between groups. Z, tests statistic of Dunn test
*p < 0.05
Discussion
The findings showed that the gut microbiome composition was altered in MPS patients: the abundance of 14 species differed significantly between MPS patients and menopausal healthy women. We found underlying and intriguing relationships between gut microbe composition and function and MPS. It was discovered that E2 had a positive correlation with Aggregatibacter segnis, Bifidobacterium animalis, and Acinetobacter guillouiae (these three species were enriched in menopausal healthy women), while FSH and LH had a positive correlation with them. The domestic modified KI score, HF symptom score, BMI, WHR, Glu, INS, CHOL, LDL, TG and BMD were also correlated with species abundance. Functionally, the MPS was enriched in metabolic pathways related to cardiovascular disease and carbohydrate metabolism, implying that the incidence of cardiovascular disease, obesity, diabetes, and other related diseases may rise at menopause.
Ovarian function declines as women enter menopause, and the ovaries produce less estrogen, so the level of estradiol in the blood drops and the level of FSH rises. Estrogens and other female hormones play a key role in regulating the gut microbiome’s composition [26, 27]. Premenopausal women’s estrogen levels are usually higher than postmenopausal women’s. A previous study found that pre-menopausal and post-menopausal women had significantly different estrogen levels and hormone secretion, which could be linked to changes in the gut microbiome [28, 29]. Our study showed that patients with MPS had lower levels of estradiol, higher levels of FSH and LH, and a significantly different gut microbiota composition than menopausal healthy women. These changes suggested that estrogen levels, FSH, and LH may have an effect on gut microbiota composition.
Estrogen has been showed to influence the gut microbiome, and gut microbiome also had a significant impact on estrogen levels [30, 31]. We found that three bacteria species (Aggregatibacter segnis, Bifidobacterium animalis, and Acinetobacter guillouiae) were enriched in menopausal healthy women, and E2 had a positive correlation with them, while FSH and LH had a negative correlation with them. Bifidobacterium_animalis is considered a probiotic that can improve abdominal obesity [32], inflammation, oxidative stress, blood lipids, blood sugar and vascular endothelial function in patients with metabolic syndrome [33]. Aggregatibacter segnis and Acinetobacter guillouiae are primarily related with inflammation and infections [34, 35]. Changes in sex hormone levels may be caused by a decrease of Bifidobacterium animalis in MPS. Previous studies found that most gut microbiome showed an increase of β-glucuronidase enzyme activity [36]. β-glucuronidase could inactivate estrogen by blocking its binding to glucuronic acid, thus increasing the amount of estrogen in the body [37]. The gut microbiota with a positive correlation with the E2 may have an increase of β-glucuronidase enzyme activity to increase the amount of estrogen in the body.
The decline in estrogen result in MPS with vasomotor symptoms (hot flash), sleep disturbances and insomnia, adverse mood, vulvovaginal atrophy, sexual dysfunction, et al. [38]. This is in line with menopausal hormone therapy’s rapid resolution of MPS. A new vaginal cream containing visnadine (0.30%), prenylflavonoids (0.10%) and bovine colostrum (1%) was able to ameliorate both vaginal health and sexual quality [39]. Because prenylflavonoids exert similar effect as estrogen [40], visnadine ameliorate female sexual arousal disorder [41] and bovine colostrum relieve vaginal dryness [42]. Menopause symptoms not only have a detrimental impact on one’s quality of life, but may also link patients to cardiovascular disease, diabetes, osteoporosis, and breast cancer [5–8]. The decline in estrogen is also a serious threat to physiological activities and correlates with diseases such as type 2 diabetes [43], obesity [44], cardiovascular disease [45] and osteoporosis [46].
Changes in estrogen and gut microbiota in patients with MPS are consistent with functional predictions. Estrogen plays a leading role in the causes of female obesity [47]. Estrogen binding to its receptor can regulate glucose and lipid metabolism in a variety of ways. Disturbances in these metabolic pathways would contribute to the development of metabolic syndrome in post-menopausal women, as well as an increased risk of cardiovascular disease [48, 49]. In estrogen-deficient rats, MPS can be alleviated by maintaining gut microbial diversity [50]. Current studies have suggested the potentially strong association between gut microbiota, bone remodeling and bone metabolic diseases [51]. Gut microbiota disorders may cause increased gut permeability and trigger activation of key inflammatory pathways for inducing bone loss in sex steroid-deficient mice [52]. Probiotics have shown a positive effect on the management of healthy bone [53]. A previous study showed that a high-fat/carbohydrate diet programmed the gut microbiota to be predominated by Firmicutes (Clostridium), Prevotella and Methanobrevibacter but deficient in beneficial genera/species such as Bacteroides, Bifidobacterium, Lactobacillus and Akkermansia [54]. Bifidobacterium animalis abundance decreased in MPS, and metabolic pathways related to cardiovascular disease and carbohydrate metabolism were enriched in the MPS, according to our findings. Altering the gut microbiota in MPS patients may have therapeutic effects as well as reducing the risk of long-term chronic disease, according to our speculation.
Conclusion
In conclusion, we discovered taxonomic signatures associated with MPS in the gut microbes and predicted their function. We propose a hypothesis about how the gut microbiome affects menopausal women based on our findings. In MPS, our findings revealed a dysbiosis of the gut microbiome. In menopausal women, Bifidobacterium animalis is likely to be a beneficial gut microbiota. The gut microbiota may produce β-glucuronidase, which increases estrogen levels in the body. MPS was found to be particularly rich in metabolic pathways related to cardiovascular disease and carbohydrate metabolism, implying that the incidence of cardiovascular disease, obesity, diabetes, and other related diseases rises as women approach menopause. In patients with MPS, altering the gut microbiota could have therapeutic effects as well as reducing the risk of long-term chronic disease. Nevertheless, several limitations of the study should be taken into account: first of all, the sample size is limited; second, more research is needed to determine whether probiotics and fecal transplantation are preferentially used to prevent potential risks in postmenopausal women; third, future multiomic studies with a larger longitudinal cohort, as well as animal model experiments, will be required to verify our findings and gain a better understanding towards the underlying mechanisms of gut microbiota in MPS. The findings of the gut microbiome study provide not only new insights into disease mechanisms, but also novel therapies to help women feel better after menopause.
Supplementary Information
Acknowledgments
The authors sincerely thank the clinicians and the participants who were enrolled in this study.
Abbreviations
- MPS
Menopausal syndrome
- 16S rRNA
16S ribosomal RNA
- P group
Patients with menopausal syndrome
- H group
Healthy women at menopause
- BMI
Body mass index
- WC
Waist circumstance
- WHR
Waist hip ratio
- SBP
Systolic blood pressure
- DBP
Diastolic blood pressure
- FSH
Follicle stimulating hormone
- LH
Luteinizing hormone
- E2
Estradiol
- BMD
Bone mineral density
- CHOL
Total cholesterol
- HDL
High-density lipoprotein cholesterol
- LDL
Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol
- TG
Triglycerides
- Glu
Fasting blood glucose
- INS
Fasting insulin
- L1-L4
BMD of the 1st to 4th lumbar vertebrae
- LNF
BMD of the left neck of femur
- LH ip
BMD of the left hip
- KI
Kupperman index
- HF
Hot flash symptom score (a component of the domestic modified KI Score)
Authors’ contributions
This project was conceived and designed by Y.Q.L, Y.Z1 (Ying Zhou), and Y.X.Z. The project was managed by Y.Q.L, Y.X.Z, and Y.Z1. Clinical diagnosis was performed by Y.Z1. Y.Q.L, Y.M.H, and J.T.L were in charge of collecting the samples and administering the questionnaires to the participants. Y.Q.L, T.M and J.Y.L contributed to metagenomic data analysis. The manuscript was written by Y.Q.L. The manuscript was drafted with the help of Y.Z1, Y.M.H, Y.Z2 (Yun Zong), J.T.L, M.Z, and P.X.Y. The final version of the manuscript was approved by all authors.
Funding
This work was supported by the innovation and strengthening hospital project of Guangzhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine First Affiliated Hospital (2019IIT17) and City school (hospital) joint funding project (202102010400). The funding bodies played no role in the design of the study and collection, analysis, and interpretation of data and in writing the manuscript.
Availability of data and materials
The datasets generated for this study can be found in NCBI with accession code SRA: PRJNA858179 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/?term=PRJNA858179).
Declarations
Ethics approval and consent to participate
The Medical Ethics Committee of the Guangzhou University of Traditional Chinese Medicine First Affiliated Hospital approved this study (NO.ZYYECK【2020】021). All participants were informed about the study’s purpose and given written informed consent.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Gava G, Orsili I, Alvisi S, Mancini I, Seracchioli R, Meriggiola MC. Cognition, mood and sleep in menopausal transition: the role of menopause hormone therapy. Medicina-Lithuania. 2019;55(10):668. doi: 10.3390/medicina55100668. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Sussman M, Trocio J, Best C, Mirkin S, Bushmakin AG, Yood R, et al. Prevalence of menopausal symptoms among mid-life women: findings from electronic medical records. BMC Womens Health. 2015;15:58. doi: 10.1186/s12905-015-0217-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Yisma E, Eshetu N, Ly S, Dessalegn B. Prevalence and severity of menopause symptoms among perimenopausal and postmenopausal women aged 30-49 years in Gulele sub-city of Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. BMC Womens Health. 2017;17:124. doi: 10.1186/s12905-017-0484-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Li RX, Ma M, Xiao XR, Xu Y, Chen XY, Li B. Perimenopausal syndrome and mood disorders in perimenopause: prevalence, severity, relationships, and risk factors. Medicine (Baltimore) 2016;95:e4466. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000004466. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Thurston RC. Vasomotor symptoms: natural history, physiology, and links with cardiovascular health. Climacteric. 2018;21:96–100. doi: 10.1080/13697137.2018.1430131. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Miller VM, JMK, Files JA, Joyner MJ, Kapoor E, Moyer AM, Rocca WA, Faubion SS. What’s in a name: are menopausal“hot flashes” a symptom of menopause or a manifestation of neurovascular dysregulation? Menopause. 2018;25:700–703. doi: 10.1097/GME.0000000000001065. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Biglia N, AC, Gambacciani M, Lello S, Maffei S, Nappi RE. Vasomotor symptoms in menopause: a biomarker of cardiovascular disease risk and other chronic diseases? Climacteric. 2017;20:306–312. doi: 10.1080/13697137.2017.1315089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Crandall CJ, Aragaki A, Cauley JA, Manson JE, LeBlanc E, Wallace R, et al. Associations of menopausal vasomotor symptoms with fracture incidence. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015;100(2):524–34. doi: 10.1210/jc.2014-3062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Johansson ME, Sjövall H, Hansson GC. The gastrointestinal mucus system in health and disease. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;10(6):352–361. doi: 10.1038/nrgastro.2013.35. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Ata B, Yildiz S, Turkgeldi E, Brocal VP, Dinleyici EC, Moya A, Urman B. The Endobiota study: comparison of vaginal, cervical and gut microbiota between women with stage 3/4 endometriosis and healthy controls. Sci Rep. 2019;9(1):2204. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-39700-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Han Q, Wang J, Li W, Chen ZJ, Du Y. Androgen-induced gut dysbiosis disrupts glucolipid metabolism and endocrinal functions in polycystic ovary syndrome. Microbiome. 2021;9(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s40168-021-01046-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Bo T, Liu M, Tang L, Lv J, Wen J, Wang D. Effects of high-fat diet during childhood on precocious puberty and gut microbiota in mice. Front Microbiol. 2022;13:930747. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.930747. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Baker JM, Al-Nakkash L, Herbst-Kralovetz MM. Estrogen-gut microbiome axis: physiological and clinical implications. Maturitas. 2017;103:45–53. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2017.06.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Laschke MW, Menger MD. The gut microbiota: a puppet master in the pathogenesis of endometriosis? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;215(1):68.e1–68.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2016.02.036. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Zhao H, Chen J, Li X, Sun Q, Qin P, Wang Q. Compositional and functional features of the female premenopausal and postmenopausal gut microbiota. FEBS Lett. 2019;593(18):2655–2664. doi: 10.1002/1873-3468.13527. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Guadamuro L, Azcarate-Peril MA, Tojo R, Mayo B, Delgado S. Use of high throughput amplicon sequencing and ethidium monoazide dye to track microbiota changes in an equol-producing menopausal woman receiving a long-term isoflavones treatment. AIMS Microbiol. 2019;5(1):102–116. doi: 10.3934/microbiol.2019.1.102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Fuhrman BJ, Feigelson HS, Flores R, Gail MH, Xu X, Ravel J, et al. Associations of the fecal microbiome with urinary estrogens and estrogen metabolites in postmenopausal women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014;99(12):4632–4640. doi: 10.1210/jc.2014-2222. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Li L, Rao S, Cheng Y, Zhuo X, Deng C, Xu N, et al. Microbial osteoporosis: the interplay between the gut microbiota and bones via host metabolism and immunity. Microbiologyopen. 2019;8(8):e00810. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 19.Ma S, Qin J, Hao Y, Shi Y, Fu L. Structural and functional changes of gut microbiota in ovariectomized rats and their correlations with altered bone mass. Aging-Us. 2020;12(11):10736–10753. doi: 10.18632/aging.103290. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.M-J X. Obstetrics and gynecology clinical guidelines. Golden Shield Press; 2015. [Google Scholar]
- 21.Callahan BJ, McMurdie PJ, Rosen MJ, Han AW, Johnson AJ, Holmes SP. DADA2: high-resolution sample inference from Illumina amplicon data. Nat Methods. 2016;13:581–583. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.3869. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Bokulich NA, Kaehler BD, Rideout JR, Dillon M, Bolyen E, Knight R, et al. Optimizing taxonomic classification of marker-gene amplicon sequences with QIIME 2's q2-feature-classifier plugin. Microbiome. 2018;6:90. doi: 10.1186/s40168-018-0470-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Vázquez-Baeza Y, Pirrung M, Gonzalez A, Knight R. EMPeror: a tool for visualizing high-throughput microbial community data. Gigascience. 2013;2:16. doi: 10.1186/2047-217X-2-16. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Segata N, Izard J, Waldron L, Gevers D, Miropolsky L, Garrett WS, et al. Metagenomic biomarker discovery and explanation. Genome Biol. 2011;12:R60. doi: 10.1186/gb-2011-12-6-r60. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Langille MG, Zaneveld J, Caporaso JG, McDonald D, Knights D, Reyes JA, et al. Predictive functional profiling of microbial communities using 16S rRNA marker gene sequences. Nat Biotechnol. 2013;31:814–821. doi: 10.1038/nbt.2676. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Koren O, Goodrich JK, Cullender TC, Spor A, Laitinen K, Backhed HK, et al. Host remodeling of the gut microbiome and metabolic changes during pregnancy. Cell. 2012;150(3):470–480. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2012.07.008. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Mueller S, Saunier K, Hanisch C, Norin E, Alm L, Midtvedt T, et al. Differences in fecal microbiota in different European study populations in relation to age, gender, and country: a cross-sectional study. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006;72(2):1027–1033. doi: 10.1128/AEM.72.2.1027-1033.2006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Zhu J, Liao M, Yao Z, Liang W, Li Q, Liu J, et al. Breast cancer in postmenopausal women is associated with an altered gut metagenome. Microbiome. 2018;6:136. doi: 10.1186/s40168-018-0515-3. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Brusselaers N, Maret-Ouda J, Konings P, El-Serag HB, Lagergren J. Menopausal hormone therapy and the risk of esophageal and gastric cancer. Int J Cancer. 2017;140(7):1693–1699. doi: 10.1002/ijc.30588. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Huang G, Xu J, Lefever DE, Glenn TC, Nagy T, Guo TL. Genistein prevention of hyperglycemia and improvement of glucose tolerance in adult non-obese diabetic mice are associated with alterations of gut microbiome and immune homeostasis. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2017;332:138–148. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2017.04.009. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Flores R, Shi J, Fuhrman B, Xu X, Veenstra TD, Gail MH, et al. Fecal microbial determinants of fecal and systemic estrogens and estrogen metabolites: a cross-sectional study. J Transl Med. 2012;10:253. doi: 10.1186/1479-5876-10-253. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Pedret A, Valls RM, Calderon-Perez L, Llaurado E, Companys J, Pla-Paga L, et al. Effects of daily consumption of the probiotic Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis CECT 8145 on anthropometric adiposity biomarkers in abdominally obese subjects: a randomized controlled trial. Int J Obes. 2019;43(9):1863–1868. doi: 10.1038/s41366-018-0220-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Bernini LJ, Colado Simao AN, de Souza AHB, Alfieri DF, Segura LG, Costa GN, et al. Effect of Bifidobacterium lactis HN019 on inflammatory markers and oxidative stress in subjects with and without the metabolic syndrome. Br J Nutr. 2018;120(6):645–652. doi: 10.1017/S0007114518001861. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Nemec A, Musilek M, Sedo O, De Baere T, Maixnerova M, van der Reijden TJK, et al. Acinetobacter bereziniae sp nov and Acinetobacter guillouiae sp nov., to accommodate Acinetobacter genomic species 10 and 11, respectively. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2010;60:896–903. doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.013656-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Revest M, Egmann G, Cattoir V, Tattevin P. HACEK endocarditis: state-of-the-art. Expert Rev Anti-Infect Ther. 2016;14(5):523–530. doi: 10.1586/14787210.2016.1164032. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Beaud D, Tailliez P, Anba-Mondoloni J. Genetic characterization of the beta-glucuronidase enzyme from a human intestinal bacterium, Ruminococcus gnavus. Microbiol Sgm. 2005;151:2323–2330. doi: 10.1099/mic.0.27712-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Shen R-L, Dang X-Y, Dong J-L, Hu X-Z. Effects of oat beta-Glucan and barley beta-Glucan on fecal characteristics, intestinal microflora, and intestinal bacterial metabolites in rats. J Agric Food Chem. 2012;60(45):11301–11308. doi: 10.1021/jf302824h. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Santoro N, Epperson CN, Mathews SB. Menopausal symptoms and their management. Endocrinol Metab Clin N Am. 2015;44(3):497. doi: 10.1016/j.ecl.2015.05.001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Laganà AS, Vitale SG, Stojanovska L, Lambrinoudaki I, Apostolopoulos V, Chiofalo B, et al. Preliminary results of a single-arm pilot study to assess the safety and efficacy of visnadine, prenylflavonoids and bovine colostrum in postmenopausal sexually active women affected by vulvovaginal atrophy. Maturitas. 2018;109:78–80. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2017.12.015. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Schaefer O, Hümpel M, Fritzemeier KH, Bohlmann R, Schleuning WD. 8-Prenyl naringenin is a potent ERalpha selective phytoestrogen present in hops and beer. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2003;84:359–360. doi: 10.1016/s0960-0760(03)00050-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Caruso S, Mauro D, Cariola M, Fava V, Rapisarda AMC, Cianci A. Randomized crossover study investigating daily versus on-demand vulvar Visnadine spray in women affected by female sexual arousal disorder. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2018;34:110–114. doi: 10.1080/09513590.2017.1354366. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Nappi RE, Cagnacci A, Becorpi AM, Nappi C, Paoletti AM, Busacca M, et al. Monurelle biogel® vaginal gel in the treatment of vaginal dryness in postmenopausal women. Climacteric. 2017;20:467–475. doi: 10.1080/13697137.2017.1335703. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Mauvais-Jarvis F, Manson JE, Stevenson JC, Fonseca VA. Menopausal hormone therapy and type 2 diabetes prevention: evidence, mechanisms, and clinical implications. Endocr Rev. 2017;38(3):173–188. doi: 10.1210/er.2016-1146. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Chao P-Y, Chiang T-I, Chang IC, Tsai F-L, Lee H-H, Hsieh K, et al. Amelioration of estrogen-deficiency-induced obesity by Ocimum gratissimum. Int J Med Sci. 2017;14(9):896–901. doi: 10.7150/ijms.19933. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Virani SS, Alonso A, Benjamin EJ, Bittencourt MS, Callaway CW, Carson AP, et al. Heart disease and stroke Statistics-2020 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2020;141(9):E139–E596. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000757. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Li L, Wang Z. Ovarian Aging and Osteoporosis. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2018;1086:199–215. doi: 10.1007/978-981-13-1117-8_13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Leeners B, Geary N, Tobler PN, Asarian L. Ovarian hormones and obesity. Hum Reprod Update. 2017;23(3):300–321. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmw045. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Lizcano F, Guzmán G. Estrogen deficiency and the origin of obesity during menopause. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:757461. doi: 10.1155/2014/757461. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Nair AR, Pillai AJ, Nair N. Cardiovascular changes in menopause. Curr Cardiol Rev. 2021;17:e230421187681. doi: 10.2174/1573403X16666201106141811. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Park S, Kim DS, Kang ES, Kim DB, Kang S. Low-dose brain estrogen prevents menopausal syndrome while maintaining the diversity of the gut microbiomes in estrogen-deficient rats. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2018;315(1):E99–E109. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00005.2018. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Collins FL, Rios-Arce ND, Schepper JD, Parameswaran N, McCabe LR. The potential of probiotics as a therapy for osteoporosis. Microbiol Spectr. 2017;5(4):10. doi: 10.1128/microbiolspec.BAD-0015-2016. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Li J-Y, Chassaing B, Tyagi AM, Vaccaro C, Luo T, Adams J, et al. Sex steroid deficiency-associated bone loss is microbiota dependent and prevented by probiotics. J Clin Investig. 2016;126(6):2049–2063. doi: 10.1172/JCI86062. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Takimoto T, Hatanaka M, Hoshino T, Takara T, Tanaka K, Shimizu A, et al. Effect of Bacillus subtilis C-3102 on bone mineral density in healthy postmenopausal Japanese women: a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial. Biosci Microbiota Food Health. 2018;37(4):87–96. doi: 10.12938/bmfh.18-006. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Amabebe E, Robert FO, Agbalalah T, Orubu ESF. Microbial dysbiosis-induced obesity: role of gut microbiota in homoeostasis of energy metabolism. Br J Nutr. 2020;123(10):1127–1137. doi: 10.1017/S0007114520000380. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The datasets generated for this study can be found in NCBI with accession code SRA: PRJNA858179 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sra/?term=PRJNA858179).