Skip to main content
Synthetic and Systems Biotechnology logoLink to Synthetic and Systems Biotechnology
. 2022 Oct 9;7(4):1187–1188. doi: 10.1016/j.synbio.2022.10.003

Enhancing methanol biotransformation for overproducing fatty acid derivatives

Xiangyin Chen 1,1, Jiaming Yu 1,1, Lixin Zhang 1,
PMCID: PMC9646754  PMID: 36381298

Excess amount of CO2 in the atmosphere is one of the major causes of the greenhouse effect and global warming [1]. CO2, a promising feedstock for bio-refinery, its efficient utilization is challenging due to its stable structure and low energy state [2,3]. However, small energetic compounds like methanol become a bridge and bond of efficient CO2 transformation [4,5]. Therefore, methanol biotransformation via microbial cell factories will pave the way for sustainable production of value-added chemicals.

Methanol metabolism is a complex and tightly regulated process, which generates toxic intermediate formaldehyde to hinder cell growth. Although artificial methanol metabolism could be achieved in model microbes such as Escherichia coli [[6], [7], [8]], the limited cell growth is far behind bio-productions. Alternatively, harnessing native methylotrophs could help methanol biotransformation toward high-level productions of high-value chemicals. Recently, Yongjin Zhou et al. reported the engineering of methylotrophic yeasts for efficient production of fatty acid derivatives from sole methanol [9,10].

First, Ogataea polymorpha is engineered to produce free fatty acids (FFA) by blocking β-oxidation via deleting fatty acyl-CoA synthase gene FAA1 [9]. However, this faa1Δ strain failed to survive in methanol medium though it generated 983 mg/L of FFA from 20 g/L glucose. Rational metabolic rewiring to enhance the supply of cofactor and precursors, as well as methanol metabolism, failed in restoring the growth of faa1Δ strain from methanol. Then adaptive laboratory evolution (ALE) successfully obtained mutants with efficient cell growth and FFA production from sole methanol. Genome sequencing identified the mutation of two key genes, LPL1 (putative lipase) and IZH3 (membrane protein related to zinc metabolism), which were essential for restoring cell growth of faa1Δ strain in methanol and significantly increased the tolerance of wild-type strain against 50 g/L of methanol. Lipidomics revealed the deficiency in phospholipids hemostasis of faa1Δ strain, and the decreased levels of phosphatidylcholine (PC) and phosphatidyl-ethanolamine (PE) damaged peroxisomes. The leaked formaldehyde led to cell death via necrosis. Finally, the transcriptome-guided metabolic rewiring achieved a high level of FFA accumulation (up to 15.9 g/L) from sole methanol [9].

In the other study, Zhou et al. has reported engineering Pichia pastoris for high-level production of fatty acids and fatty alcohols from sole methanol [10]. Interestingly, disruption of fatty acyl-CoA synthase (faa1Δ, faa2Δ) did not result in cell growth deficiency, despite a slight growth inhibition with increased levels of formaldehyde and reactive oxygen species. This observation suggested that P. pastoris was more robust than O. polymorpha in the overproduction of FFA from methanol. Further enhancing the supply of precursor acetyl-CoA and cofactor NADPH (overexpressing gene MmACL, ScIDP2, BbXFPK, CkPTA), and fine-tuning methanol metabolism (overexpressing gene DAS2) enabled up to 23.4 g/L of FFA in fed-batch fermentations. Finally, a metabolic transforming strategy was developed to enable 2.0 g/L fatty alcohol from sole methanol, which avoids labor-intensive and time-consuming genetic manipulation [10].

The different behaviors between O. polymorpha and P. pastoris on bio-productions of FFA from sole methanol, suggest there was a big difference in methanol metabolism among various methylotrophic yeasts. Systematical mining of genome sequences may help to identify other key genes in regulating methanol metabolism, requiring to construct a better model to describe methanol toxicity during bio-productions (Fig. 1). The high-level production of fatty acid derivatives from sole methanol showed the strong potential of methanol biotransformation to value-added products for industrial applications.

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Enhancing methanol biotransformation for efficient productions of fatty acid derivatives. In O. polymorpha, overproduction of FFA strain resulted in cell death in a methanol medium. Adaptive laboratory evolution (ALE) and rational metabolic engineering enabled 15.9 g/L FFA from sole methanol. While FFA overproducing P. pastoris survived well in methanol and the global metabolic rewiring improved the production of FFA and fatty alcohols. Further systematically analyzing these two methylotrophic yeasts may help elucidate the molecule mechanism of methanol metabolism and toxicity.

Declaration of competing interest

Nothing declared.

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge the financial support from the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2020YFA0907800), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grants 31720103901). This work was also supported by the Open Project Funding of the State Key Laboratory of Bioreactor Engineering, and the 111 Project (B18022).

Footnotes

Peer review under responsibility of KeAi Communications Co., Ltd.

References

  • 1.Hepburn C., Adlen E., Beddington J., Carter E.A., Fuss S., Mac Dowell N., et al. The technological and economic prospects for CO2 utilization and removal. Nature. 2019;575:87–97. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-1681-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Grim R.G., Huang Z., Guarnieri M.T., Ferrell J.R., Tao L., Schaidle J.A. Transforming the carbon economy: challenges and opportunities in the convergence of low-cost electricity and reductive CO2 utilization. Energy Environ Sci. 2020;13:472–494. [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Lai N., Luo Y., Fei P., Hu P., Wu H. One stone two birds: biosynthesis of 3-hydroxypropionic acid from CO2 and syngas-derived acetic acid in Escherichia coli. Synth Syst Biotechnol. 2021;6:144–152. doi: 10.1016/j.synbio.2021.06.003. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Urakawa A. Mind the gaps in CO2-to-methanol. Nature Catalysis. 2021;4:447–448. [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Zhou Y.J., Kerkhoven E.J., Nielsen J. Barriers and opportunities in bio-based production of hydrocarbons. Nat Energy. 2018;3:925–935. [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Chen Y.H., Jung H.W., Tsuei C.Y., Liao J.C. Converting Escherichia coli to a synthetic methylotroph growing solely on methanol. Cell. 2020;182:933–946. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.07.010. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Sanford P.A., Woolston B.M. Synthetic or natural? Metabolic engineering for assimilation and valorization of methanol. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2022;74:171–179. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2021.12.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Woolston B.M., Roth T., Kohale I., Liu D.R., Stephanopoulos G. Development of a formaldehyde biosensor with application to synthetic methylotrophy. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2018;115:206–215. doi: 10.1002/bit.26455. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Gao J., Li Y., Yu W., Zhou Y.J. Rescuing yeast from cell death enables overproduction of fatty acids from sole methanol. Nature Metabolism. 2022;4:932–943. doi: 10.1038/s42255-022-00601-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Cai P., Wu X., Deng J., Gao L., Shen Y., Yao L., et al. Methanol biotransformation toward high-level production of fatty acid derivatives by engineering the industrial yeast Pichia pastoris. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2022;119 doi: 10.1073/pnas.2201711119. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Synthetic and Systems Biotechnology are provided here courtesy of KeAi Publishing

RESOURCES