Skip to main content
Journal of General Internal Medicine logoLink to Journal of General Internal Medicine
letter
. 2022 Nov 10;38(3):835–839. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07882-x

The Prevalence, Severity, and Impact of Post-COVID Persistent Fatigue, Post-Exertional Malaise, and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome

Mayssam Nehme 1,, Francois Chappuis 2,3, Laurent Kaiser 4,5,6, Frederic Assal 2,7, Idris Guessous 1,2
PMCID: PMC9648889  PMID: 36357723

BACKGROUND

Fatigue is common after viral infections, including SARS-CoV-2.1 Our purpose was to report the prevalence and impact of persistent fatigue 6 months after SARS-CoV-2 infection, considering post-exertional malaise2 and criteria for chronic fatigue syndrome.3

METHODS

Since March 2020, individuals tested for SARS-CoV-2 at the Geneva University Hospitals outpatient testing center benefit from remote ambulatory follow-up (COVICARE).1 This study included all individuals tested between March 2020 and December 2020 and whose follow-up was at 6 months or more after their test date.

Follow-up included questions about the prevalence of symptoms (yes/no) and their severity using a Likert scale (mild, moderate, or severe). Fatigue was assessed using the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) scale and the Chalder fatigue scale.4 The Chalder fatigue scale was scored using the 4-item Likert and the bimodal scoring schemes. A score of ≥ 4 on bimodal scoring indicated severe fatigue. The DePaul brief questionnaire5 was used to identify post-exertional malaise and criteria for chronic fatigue syndrome. The Sheehan Disability Scale was used to assess functional impairment. Reduced work capacity was defined as missing days off work or having a reduced productivity on the Sheehan disability scale. Comorbidities were considered present if pre-existing prior to SARS-CoV-2 infection. Statistical analysis included descriptive comparisons of percentages using chi-square tests and Student’s t test.

RESULTS

Overall, 5515 individuals participated in this study (response rate 70.7%), with 5406 participants at 6 months or more after their test date. A total of 1497 (27.7%) participants had a documented positive SARS-CoV-2 test and were ultimately included in the study. The median time for follow-up was 225 days (interquartile range 207–398). Respectively, fatigue was reported by 17.2%, post-exertional malaise by 8.2%, and the presence of criteria for chronic fatigue syndrome by 1.1% of SARS-CoV-2-positive individuals, compared to 8.9%, 3.5%, and 0.5% of SARS-CoV-2-negative individuals. Characteristics are presented in Table 1.

Table 1.

Baseline Characteristics of SARS-CoV-2-Positive Participants at 6 Months or More After Their Infection (n = 1497)

No fatigue (n = 1239) Fatigue (n = 258) Total (n = 1497) P value
n (%) n (%) n (%)
Age categories 0.271
  Below 40 505 (40.8) 102 (39.5) 607 (40.5)
  40–59 565 (45.6) 129 (50.0) 694 (46.4)
  60 and above 169 (13.6) 27 (10.5) 196 (13.1)
Sex < 0.001
  Male 566 (45.6) 82 (31.8) 645 (43.2)
  Female 673 (54.4) 176 (68.2) 847 (56.8)
Education 0.124
  Primary 47 (4.7) 10 (4.9) 57 (4.8)
  Apprenticeship 108 (10.9) 20 (9.9) 128 (10.7)
  Secondary 125 (12.6) 35 (17.2) 160 (13.4)
  Tertiary 643 (64.9) 117 (57.6) 760 (63.7)
  Other 55 (5.6) 15 (7.4) 70 (5.9)
  Prefer not to answer 12 (1.2) 6 (3.0) 18 (1.5)
Profession 0.588
  None 88 (8.9) 15 (7.4) 103 (8.6)
  Unskilled workers 39 (3.9) 5 (2.5) 44 (3.7)
  Skilled workers 153 (15.5) 40 (19.7) 193 (16.2)
  High-grade skilled workers 255 (25.8) 58 (28.6) 313 (26.2)
  Professional managers 284 (28.7) 52 (25.6) 336 (28.2)
  Other 159 (16.1) 30 (14.8) 189 (15.8)
  Prefer not to answer 12 (1.2) 3 (1.5) 15 (1.3)
Civil status 0.151
  Single 200 (17.9) 47 (18.2) 247 (18)
  In couple, not married 258 (23.1) 73 (28.3) 331 (24.1)
  Married or registered partnership 546 (48.9) 107 (41.5) 653 (47.5)
  Divorced or separated 98 (8.8) 28 (10.9) 126 (9.2)
  Widowed 11 (1.0) 1 (0.4) 12 (0.9)
  Other 3 (0.3) 2 (0.8) 5 (0.4)
  Have children 704 (63.1) 157 (60.9) 861 (62.7) 0.505
Living status 0.023
  Alone 195 (17.5) 52 (20.2) 247 (18.0)
  Single parent with children 55 (4.9) 21 (8.1) 76 (5.5)
  In couple, without children 258 (23.1) 56 (21.7) 314 (22.9)
  In couple, with children 503 (45.1) 95 (36.8) 598 (43.6)
  Cohabitation with other people 104 (9.3) 34 (13.2) 138 (10.1)
Work situation 0.002
  Salaried 815 (73.2) 186 (72.1) 1,001 (73)
  Retired 86 (7.7) 11 (4.3) 97 (7.1)
  Student or training 80 (7.2) 19 (7.4) 99 (7.2)
  Independent worker 52 (4.7) 11 (4.3) 63 (4.6)
  Homemaker 23 (2.1) 5 (1.9) 28 (2)
  Unemployed 25 (2.2) 15 (5.8) 40 (2.9)
  Disability 7 (0.6) 7 (2.7) 14 (1.0)
  Other 25 (2.2) 4 (1.6) 29 (2.1)
Contract situation < 0.001
  Short-term contract 85 (9.2) 26 (12.4) 111 (9.8)
  Long-term contract 655 (71.2) 167 (79.9) 822 (72.8)
  Subsidized contract 1 (0.1) 1 (0.5) 2 (0.2)
  Training 19 (2.1) 2 (1.0) 21 (1.9)
  Not concerned 40 (4.3) 9 (4.3) 49 (4.3)
  Other 120 (13.0) 4 (1.9) 124 (11.0)
Work activity 0.047
  Not working 21 (2.2) 4 (1.8) 25 (2.1)
  Less than 30% 22 (2.3) 4 (1.8) 26 (2.2)
  30–49% 33 (3.4) 7 (3.2) 40 (3.4)
  50–79% 103 (10.6) 38 (17.3) 141 (11.9)
  80–99% 172 (17.8) 48 (21.8) 220 (18.5)
  100% 608 (62.7) 115 (52.3) 723 (60.8)
  Prefer not to answer 10 (1.0) 4 (1.8) 14 (1.2)
Smoking status 0.142
  Non-smoker 715 (59.6) 145 (56.2) 860 (59.0)
  Ex-smoker 315 (26.3) 68 (26.4) 383 (26.3)
  Current smoker 141 (11.8) 36 (14.0) 177 (12.1)
  Prefer not to answer 28 (2.3) 9 (3.5) 37(2.5)
Activity level < 0.001
  None 143 (11.9) 58 (22.5) 201 (13.8)
  Partial 605 (50.5) 145 (56.2) 750 (51.5)
  Full physical activity 438 (36.5) 51 (19.8) 489 (33.6)
  Prefer not to answer 13 (1.1) 4 (1.6) 17 (1.2)
Vaccination status 0.001
  No vaccination 171 (14.6) 19 (7.4) 190 (13.3)
  Partially vaccinated (1 dose) 212 (18.1) 60 (23.3) 272 (19.0)
  Fully vaccinated (at least 2 doses) 782 (63.1) 177 (68.6) 959 (64.1)
  Prefer not to answer 8 (0.7) 2 (0.8) 10 (0.7)
Hospitalization 62 (5.3) 22 (8.8) 84 (5.9) 0.086
Reinfection 120 (9.7) 29 (11.2) 149 (10.0) 0.448
BMI (kg/m2) 0.063
  Below 18.5 33 (3.0) 7 (2.9) 40 (3.0)
  18.5–24.9 579 (53.5) 132 (53.9) 711 (53.6)
  25–29.9 265 (24.5) 74 (30.2) 339 (25.5)
  30–34.9 183 (16.9) 25 (10.2) 208 (15.7)
  35 and above 22 (2.0) 7 (2.9) 29 (2.2)
Symptoms at testing 0.002
  Pauci-symptomatic 219 (23.7) 26 (13.5) 245 (21.9)
  Have several symptoms 707 (76.3) 167 (86.5) 874 (78.1)
Comorbidities
  None 665 (53.7) 115 (44.6) 780 (52.1) 0.012
  Obesity or overweight 159 (12.8) 32 (12.4) 191 (12.8) 0.504
  Hypertension 81 (6.5) 16 (6.2) 97 (6.5) 0.168
  Diabetes 18 (1.5) 7 (2.7) 25 (1.7) 0.164
  Respiratory disease 31 (2.5) 9 (3.5) 40 (2.7) 0.455
  Cardiovascular disease 24 (1.9) 6 (2.3) 30 (2.0) 0.540
  Headache disorders 107 (8.6) 30 (11.6) 137 (9.2) < 0.001
  Chronic pain or fibromyalgia 5 (0.4) 4 (1.6) 9 (0.6) 0.028
  Hyperthyroidism 5 (0.4) 3 (1.2) 8 (0.5) 0.054
  Hypothyroidism 22 (1.8) 8 (3.1) 30 (2.0) 0.029
  Anemia 18 (1.5) 8 (3.1) 26 (1.7) 0.020
  Chronic fatigue 13 (1.0) 6 (2.3) 19 (1.3) 0.046
  Cognitive disorders 25 (2.0) 3 (1.2) 28 (1.9) 0.395
  Sleep disorders 78 (6.3) 20 (7.8) 98 (6.5) 0.361
  Depression 29 (2.3) 9 (3.5) 38 (2.5) 0.542
  Anxiety 41 (3.3) 12 (4.7) 53 (3.5) 0.990
  Irritable bowel syndrome 40 (3.2) 9 (3.5) 49 (3.3) 0.309
  Rheumatologic disorders 49 (4.0) 6 (2.3) 55 (3.7) 0.727
  Tendinitis 25 (2.0) 8 (3.1) 33 (2.2) 0.022

Out of SARS-CoV-2-positive participants with fatigue (n = 258), 35.3% had moderate to severe limitations on the ECOG scale, and 83.0% had a score ≥ 4 on the Chalder fatigue scale. The Chalder fatigue scale revealed a mean score of 19 out of 33, SD 5.4, and a mean score of 6.7 out of 11, SD 3.3 using bimodal scoring. After adjusting for age and sex, 47.7% of SARS-CoV-2-positive individuals with fatigue at 6 months or more had the frequency and severity criteria for post-exertional malaise, and 6.2% had criteria for chronic fatigue syndrome.

Individuals had a higher prevalence of insomnia, cognitive impairment, headaches, generalized pain, functional impairment, reduced work capacity, and decreased physical activity, after SARS-CoV-2 infection. The prevalence of these sequelae was adjusted for age and sex and was increasingly higher with severe fatigue, with post-exertional malaise, or when criteria for chronic fatigue syndrome were present (Fig. 1).

Figure 1.

Figure 1

The prevalence of newly developed insomnia, cognitive impairment, headache, generalized pain, and functional and physical impairment stratified by fatigue severity including post-exertional malaise and criteria for chronic fatigue syndrome in SARS-CoV-2-positive individuals at 6 months or more after their infection (n = 1497)*. Prevalence is adjusted for age and sex. Only newly reported symptoms and sequelae after SARS-CoV-2 infection were included in this analysis. Severe fatigue is defined as a Chalder fatigue scale score ≥ 4. The DePaul brief questionnaire evaluated the frequency and severity of symptoms characterizing post-exertional malaise including heaviness or drowsiness after exercise, pain, fatigue, and exhaustion after minimal effort, as well as the time required for recovery. Using a Likert scale, a score of 2 or more on the frequency (5 questions) and severity (5 questions) of symptoms indicated post-exertional malaise. If recovery required more than 14 h after minimal physical or mental activity, the questionnaire was positive for chronic fatigue syndrome.

DISCUSSION

Fatigue is the most common and persistent post-COVID symptom. The spectrum of fatigue severity in post-COVID individuals ranges from feeling tired to having severe fatigue, post-exertional malaise, or criteria for chronic fatigue syndrome with an increasing impact on health, functional capacity, and physical activity.

Almost half of individuals experiencing fatigue at 6 months after the infection had post-exertional malaise, and 6.2% had criteria for chronic fatigue syndrome, prompting physicians to consider pacing as a management option, in the absence of other treatment options at this stage. SARS-CoV-2 infection was positively associated with fatigue and post-exertional malaise. Results showed that individuals with fatigue were more likely to be vaccinated. This was partially explained by the baseline distribution as older individuals and those with more comorbidities were more likely to get vaccinated.

Results compare to recent reviews showing an overlap between post-COVID condition and chronic fatigue syndrome.6 Our study graded post-COVID fatigue by severity in correlation with functional capacity, and showed the high prevalence of post-exertional malaise.

Limitations include the self-reported nature of this follow-up with individuals infected in 2020 and follow-up in 2021, lacking comparisons to individuals infected with other variants. Additionally, this study considered having received at least 2 doses as full vaccination, a concept that continues to evolve with time.

Physicians, employers, and insurance companies should address fatigue on a spectrum, accounting for the correlated functional impairment, decreased activity levels, and potentially poorer quality of life.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the CoviCare study team for their ongoing contribution to the research and clinical work of post-COVID patients at the Geneva University Hospitals: Delphine S. Courvoisier, Frederic Lador, Lamyae Benzakour, Matteo Coen, Ivan Guerreiro, Gilles Allali, Christophe Graf, Jean-Luc Reny, Silvia Stringhini, Hervé Spechbach, Frederique Jacquerioz, Julien Salamun, Guido Bondolfi, Dina Zekry, Paola M. Soccal, Riccardo Favale, Stéphane Genevay, Kim Lauper, Philippe Meyer, Nana Kwabena Poku, Agathe Py, Basile N. Landis, Thomas Agoritsas, Marwène Grira, José Sandoval, Julien Ehrsam, Simon Regard, Camille Genecand, and Aglaé Tardin.

Funding

Private Foundation of the Geneva University Hospitals, Leenaards foundation

Declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they do not have a conflict of interest.

Statement

We confirm that the manuscript has been read and approved by all named authors and that there are no other persons who satisfied the criteria for authorship but are not listed. We further confirm that this work has been conducted with the ethical approval of the Cantonal Research Ethics Commission of Geneva, Switzerland, and that the approvals are acknowledged within the manuscript.

Footnotes

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

References

  • 1.Nehme M, Braillard O, Chappuis F, Courvoisier DS, Guessous I. Prevalence of symptoms more than seven months after diagnosis of symptomatic COVID-19 in an outpatient setting. Ann Intern Med. 2021. 10.7326/M21-0878. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 2.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases (NCEZID), Division of High-Consequence Pathogens and Pathology (DHCPP). https://www.cdc.gov/me-cfs/healthcare-providers/clinical-care-patients-mecfs/treating-most-disruptive-symptoms.html. Access 20 Mar 2022.
  • 3.Institute of Medicine of the National Academies. Beyond myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome: redefining an illness. Report Brief, February 2015. [PubMed]
  • 4.Chalder T, Berelowitz G, Pawlikowska T, Watts L, Wessely S, Wright D, Wallace EP. Development of a fatigue scale. J Psychosom Res. 1993;37(2):147-53. 10.1016/0022-3999(93)90081-p. [DOI] [PubMed]
  • 5.Cotler J, Holtzman C, Dudun C, Jason LA. A brief questionnaire to assess post-exertional malaise. Diagnostics (Basel). 2018;8(3):66. 10.3390/diagnostics8030066. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 6.Wong TL, Weitzer DJ. Long COVID and myalgic encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome (ME/CFS)-a systemic review and comparison of clinical presentation and symptomatology. Medicina (Kaunas). 2021;57(5):418. Published 2021 Apr 26. 10.3390/medicina57050418. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]

Articles from Journal of General Internal Medicine are provided here courtesy of Society of General Internal Medicine

RESOURCES