Abstract
Purpose
To investigate radiomics based on DWI (diffusion-weighted imaging) for predicting 1-year ischemic stroke recurrence.
Methods
A total of 1,580 ischemic stroke patients were enrolled in this retrospective study conducted from January 2018 to April 2021. Demographic and clinical characteristics were compared between recurrence and non-recurrence groups. On DWI, lesions were segmented using a 2D U-Net automatic segmentation network. Further, radiomics feature extraction was done using the segmented mask matrix on DWI and the corresponding ADC map. Additionally, radiomics features were extracted. The study participants were divided into a training cohort (n = 157, 57 recurrence patients, and 100 non-recurrence patients) and a test cohort (n = 846, 28 recurrence patients, 818 non-recurrence patients). A sparse representation feature selection model was performed to select features. Further classification was accomplished using a recurrent neural network (RNN). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve values was obtained for model performance.
Results
A total of 1,003 ischemic stroke patients (682 men and 321 women; mean age: 65.90 ± 12.44 years) were included in the final analysis. About 85 patients (8.5%) recurred in 1 year, and patients in the recurrence group were older than the non-recurrence group (P = 0.003). The stroke subtype was significantly different between recurrence and non-recurrence groups, and cardioembolic stroke (11.3%) and large artery atherosclerosis patients (10.3%) showed a higher recurrence percentage (P = 0.005). Secondary prevention after discharge (statins, antiplatelets, and anticoagulants) was found significantly different between the two groups (P = 0.004). The area under the curve (AUC) of clinical-based model and radiomics-based model were 0.675 (95% CI: 0.643–0.707) and 0.779 (95% CI: 0.750–0.807), respectively. With an AUC of 0.847 (95% CI: 0.821–0.870), the model that combined clinical and radiomic characteristics performed better.
Conclusion
DWI-based radiomics could help to predict 1-year ischemic stroke recurrence.
Keywords: stroke, recurrence, radiology, magnetic resonance imaging, diffusion
Introduction
Stroke remains a leading cause of high disability rate and mortality in the world, accounting for 9–20% of around 10 million strokes that occur each year (1, 2). About 80% of all stroke cases are caused by ischemic stroke (3). According to previous studies, recurrent stroke rates in the western country ranged from 10 to 17% (4). Higher stroke recurrence was reported in Asian populations, ranging from 11.2 to 18.9% in China and Japan (4, 5). One-year recurrence rate was reported in a systematic review and meta-analysis ranged from 5.7 to 17.7% (6).
Studies suggested that a higher risk of disability, dementia, and mortality are associated with recurrent stroke comparing first-time stroke, which might indicate the failure of medical therapy (7–9). Trends and risks of stroke recurrence (10), secondary stroke prevention strategies (4, 11), and demographic characteristics (2) that were evaluated in stroke patients have all been examined in previous studies. Some studies reported laboratory tests, such as peripheral immune cells including neutrophil and lymphocyte counts, infection (12), genetic variants (13), and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels (14), were associated with stroke recurrence. In addition, to predict recurrence, artery stenosis, atherosclerotic plaque features, and artery wall change were studied (5, 15–18). Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) plays an important role in the diagnosis and prognosis of ischemic stroke. However, few studies focused on ischemic stroke lesions based on imaging in predicting stroke recurrence (19, 20). Only a few low-order features of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), such as lesion number and presence of lesions, were assessed.
Radiomics is an emerging non-invasive method of extracting high-throughput quantitative features for predicting important clinical outcomes. A previous study demonstrated that radiomics features based on DWI showed good performance in predicting clinical functional outcomes in ischemic stroke patients (3). A recent study that enrolled 522 acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients showed that the clinical-radiomics model outperformed individual clinical or radiomics models in predicting AIS outcomes (21). To the best of our knowledge, no studies explored the stroke recurrence risk using radiomics features based on DWI. Therefore, we sought to explore DWI-based radiomics for predicting stroke recurrence in 1 year.
Methods
Study population
From January 2018 to April 2021, patients with first-ever ischemic stroke were enrolled in this retrospective study. This study was conducted at our stroke center. The retrospective study had approval from the Institutional Ethics Committee of our hospital (approval number: 2022-013-01 K). Moreover, patients provided written informed consent before MRI examinations. The study was performed in accordance with the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments.
The exclusion criteria were as follows:
Patients with cerebral hemorrhage, traumatic brain injury, previous neurological or psychiatric disorder, cerebral tumor, a history of substance abuse, severe MRI artifacts, a contradiction to MR examination, inability to extract effective features due to the too mall lesions size (<50 voxels), or lost to follow-up were excluded from the study.
The demographic and clinical characteristics were recorded, including age, sex, smoking, drinking, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes mellitus, atrial fibrillation, the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score on admission, Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment (TOAST) stroke subtype classification (22), secondary prevention after discharge (antiplatelets, anticoagulants, or statins), a territory of circulation (anterior, posterior, both anterior and posterior), and modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at 90 days. The study flow chart is shown in Figure 1.
Outcome assessments
A recurrent ischemic stroke was defined as a new sudden focal neurological deficit occurring at any time after discharge and confirmed on DWI. In all cases with event recurrence, the date of ischemic event recurrence was ascertained by face-to-face interviews or telephone interviews and confirmed by a review of hospital records. A consensus choice regarding stroke progression or recurrence was made after a thorough examination of these outcome events by one stroke neurologist and one neuroradiologist.
MR acquisition
On scanner 1, an MRI was obtained (EXCITE HD 1.5 T MRI; GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, WI, USA) comprising a 16-channel head/neck coil; and scanner 2 (uMR780 3.0 T MRI; United Imaging Healthcare, Shanghai, China) was equipped with a 24-channel head/neck coil. The detailed scan parameter includes axial fluid-attenuated inversion recovery, DWI including apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps, and T2-weighted and T1-weighted sequences (Supplementary Table e-1). All patients underwent MRI scans within 72 h of symptom onset.
Segmentation of infarction lesions and image preprocessing
First, we randomly selected 100 patients. With ITK-SNAP (http://www.itk-snap.org), infarction lesions were manually segmented by two senior radiologists. Slice-by-slice stacking of DWI images by one neuroradiologist defined the 3D volume of interest of each infarct lesion. Then, we trained 2D U-Net automatic segmentation network on the manually segmented 100 volumes (23, 24). We further segmented all cases based on the trained segmentation network model. Radiomics features were extracted from the ADC map using the segmented mask matrix on corresponding DWI (Figure 2). GitHub (https://github.com/wuguoqingfudan/stroke-segmentation.git) received the automatic segmentation code. In addition, we randomly selected 100 participants segmented by an experienced neuroradiologist and tested the performance of automatic segmentation using the DICE coefficient.
We randomly selected 100 cases from the testing set and calculated the DICE coefficient between the radiologist's annotation results and the network's automatic segmentation results. Before the process of training and testing the network-based image segmentation, image intensity parameters were normalized to 0–1 using window width and window level. Before radiomics feature extraction, we deleted the partial segmentation area (pixel < 20), which is hard to reflect texture features of infarct lesions.
Radiomics feature extraction and selection
First, intensity- and texture-related features were extracted from the ADC map in the image domain. Second, these features were extracted using wavelet domain images generated by performing an 8-wavelet transform on the origin images. Feature extraction was performed on the MATLAB software (MathWorks) (25) and referenced literature (26). The Supplementary Table e-2 provided more information about the extracted features.
A sparse representation feature selection model was used to select a small number of high discriminative features to reduce the redundancy of extracted features.
The equation feature selection model was as follows:
(27).
Where, l∈Rm represents the label of the training sample,m represents the number of the training sample, represents the set of features of the training sample, η represents the control parameter of sparse representation, and the absolute values of the coefficient w corresponding to the importance of features. When w is obtained, the key features can be selected by simple threshold comparison.
Data distribution and classification
The study participants were divided into two cohorts, that is, the training cohort and the testing cohort. Further classification was accomplished using a recurrent neural network (RNN) (28). Due to the significant difference in the proportion of positive and negative samples in our study [85 recurrences vs 918 non-recurrences, the proportion was consistent with some previous studies (10, 20)], we used a weighted cross-entropy loss function to optimize the network. Furthermore, we constructed the training cohort with an under-sampling approach in terms of model training data. The training cohort included 57 recurrence patients and 100 non-recurrence patients. The remaining 846 patients were included in the test cohort to confirm the classification's accuracy. The Adam optimizer was used for in-network training, with the learning rate set to 0.0001 and the batch size set to 10. Figure 3 depicts the data distribution. PyTorch was used to create the suggested model. The entire training was carried out on a computer with an Intel Xeon Gold 6128 CPU with 64 GB RAM and an Nvidia TITAN Xp (12 GB).
Statistical analysis
All the statistical analyses were performed with SPSS (version 23.0, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Continuous variables with normal distribution were represented by mean ± standard deviation, non-normally distributed variables by median (interquartile range), and classification variables by frequency (%). We used the Student t-test or the Mann–Whitney U test for continuous and the χ2 test for categorical dependent variables (or Fisher's exact test where appropriate) between recurrence and non-recurrence groups.
The receiver-operative curve (ROC) was performed to compare the performance of clinical characteristics and the selected radiomics features in the evaluation of stroke recurrence. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was constructed by plotting the true-positive rate against the false-positive rate for different binary classification thresholds of the predictors. All P-values were calculated using two-tailed tests, and P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. In addition, we compared the performance of each model using the Delong test. The decision curve analysis (DCV) was implemented to assess the clinical value of the predictive models.
Results
Demographic and clinical characteristics
The final study enrolled 1,003 patients (682 men and 321 women; mean age: 65.90 ± 12.44 years) with acute ischemic stroke. The following factors led to the exclusion of 577 patients: cerebral hemorrhage (n = 21); (2) traumatic brain injury (n = 7); (3) previous neurological or psychiatric disorder (n = 163); (4) severe MRI artifacts (n = 17); (5) contradiction to MR examination (n = 9); (6) lost to follow-up (n = 280); and (7) inability to extract effective features (n = 80). The final analysis included 1003 patients (mean age: 65.90 ± 12.44). The clinical and demographic characteristics are summarized in Table 1. Of the 1,003 patients, 85 patients (8.5%) recurred in 1 year, and recurrence stroke patients were older than non-recurrence stroke patients (P = 0.003). The stroke subtype was a significant difference between recurrence and non-recurrence groups, and cardioembolic stroke showed a higher recurrence percentage in our study (P = 0.005). Secondary prevention after discharge was found significantly different between the two groups. Statins and anticoagulants showed higher recurrence in secondary prevention after discharge in our study (P = 0.004 and P = 0.02, respectively). There were no significant differences in gender, smoking, drinking, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes mellitus, atrial fibrillation, circulation territory, and NIHSS at admission and mRS at 90 days between non-recurrence and recurrence stroke patients (all P > 0.05).
Table 1.
Variables |
Non-recurrence (n = 918, 91.5%) |
Recurrence (n = 85, 8.5%) |
P | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Age | / | 65.55 ± 12.35 | 69.74 ± 12.79 | 0.003 |
Gender | Male | 626 (91.8%) | 56 (8.2%) | 0.662 |
Female | 292 (91.0%) | 29 (9.0%) | ||
Smoking | 578 (92.5%) | 47 (7.5%) | 0.163 | |
Yes | 340 (89.9%) | 38 (10.1%) | ||
Drinking | 791 (91.0%) | 78 9.0%) | 0.147 | |
Yes | 127 (94.8%) | 7 (5.2%) | ||
Hypertension | 296 (90.5%) | 31 (9.5%) | 0.426 | |
Yes | 622 (92.0%) | 54 (8.0%) | ||
Hyperlipidemia | 662 (91.2%) | 64 (8.8%) | 0.530 | |
Yes | 256 (92.4%) | 21 (7.6%) | ||
Diabetes mellitus | 596 (91.3%) | 57 (8.7%) | 0.693 | |
Yes | 322 (92.0%) | 28 (8.0%) | ||
Atrial fibrillation | 817 (91.8%) | 73 (8.2%) | 0.385 | |
Yes | 101 (89.4%) | 12 (10.6%) | ||
Stroke subtype (TOAST) | Large artery atherosclerosis | 488 (89.7%) | 56 (10.3%) | 0.024 |
Cardioembolic stroke | 71 (88.8%) | 9 (11.3%) | ||
Small artery occlusion | 280 (94.0%) | 18 (6.0%) | ||
Other cause | 13 (100.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | ||
Undetermined cause | 66 (97.1%) | 2 (2.9%) | ||
Circulation territory | Anterior | 629 (91.4%) | 59 (8.6%) | 0.602 |
Posterior | 263 (92.3%) | 22 (7.7%) | ||
Both | 26 (86.7%) | 4 (13.3%) | ||
Statins after discharge | 350 (94.9%) | 19 (5.1%) | 0.004 | |
Yes | 568 (89.6%) | 66 (10.4%) | ||
Antiplatelets after discharge | 92 (86.8%) | 14 (13.2%) | 0.064 | |
Yes | 826 (92.1%) | 71 (7.9%) | ||
Anticoagulants after discharge | 881 (92.0%) | 77 (8.0%) | 0.047 | |
Yes | 37 (82.2%) | 8 (17.8%) | ||
NIHSS at admission | / | 3 (1,4) | 3 (1,4) | 0.792 |
mRS at 90 days | / | 1 (0,2) | 1 (0,1) | 0.908 |
Symptom onset to DWI scan time (hours) | / | 33.56 ± 65.09 | 39.89 ± 60.25 | 0.721 |
The bold values indicate the value of p less than 0.05.
Difference of stroke subtype in stroke recurrence
Table 2 provides a summary of the demographic and clinical traits of the three primary non-recurrence and recurrence stroke subtypes. The mean interval time between the first stroke and stroke recurrence was 167.11 ± 100.08 days.
Table 2.
Variables | Large artery atherosclerosis | Small artery occlusion | Cardioembolic stroke | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Non-recurrence (n = 488, 89.7%) | Recurrence (n = 56, 10.3%) | P | Non-recurrence (n = 280, 94.0%) | Recurrence (n = 18, 6.0%) | P | Non-recurrence (n = 71, 88.7%) | Recurrence (n = 9, 11.3%) | P | ||
Age | / | 65.57 ± 12.09 | 69.73 ± 13.16 | 0.016 | 63.80 ± 12.25 | 73.39 ± 8.60 | < 0.001 | 73.21 ± 11.048 | 64.44 ± 15.88 | 0.036 |
Gender | Male | 330 (90.9%) | 33 (9.1%) | 0.191 | 202 (93.5%) | 14 (6.5%) | 0.787 | 42 (85.7%) | 7 (14.3%) | 0.470 |
Female | 158 (87.3%) | 23 (12.7%) | 78 (95.1) | 4 (4.9%) | 29 (93.5) | 2 (6.5%) | ||||
Smoking | No | 319 (90.9%) | 32 (9.1%) | 0.223 | 234 (93.6%) | 16 (95.8%) | 0.747 | 51 (94.4%) | 3 (5.6%) | 0.052 |
Yes | 169 (87.6%) | 24 (12.4%) | 46 (6.4%) | 2 (4.2%) | 20 (76.9%) | 6 (23.1) | ||||
Drinking | No | 419 (89.1%) | 51 (10.9%) | 0.281 | 162 (93.1%) | 12 (95.2%) | 0.462 | 66 (88.0%) | 9 (12.0) | >0.999 |
Yes | 69 (93.2%) | 5 (6.8%) | 118 (6.9%) | 6 (4.8%) | 5 (100.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | ||||
Hypertension | No | 158 (88.8%) | 20 (11.2%) | 0.614 | 92 (93.9%) | 6 (6.1%) | 0.967 | 18 (78.3%) | 5 (23.7%) | 0.111 |
Yes | 330 (90.2%) | 36 (9.8%) | 188 (94.0%) | 12 (6.0%) | 53 (93.0%) | 4 (7.0%) | ||||
Hyperlipidemia | No | 342 (88.8%) | 43 (11.2%) | 0.296 | 212 94.2%) | 13 (5.8%) | 0.778 | 56 (88.9%) | 7 (11.1%) | >0.999 |
Yes | 146 (91.8%) | 13 (8.2%) | 68 (93.2%) | 5 (6.8%) | 15 (88.2%) | 2 (11.8%) | ||||
Diabetes mellitus | No | 328 (88.9%) | 41 (11.1%) | 0.363 | 174 (94.1%) | 11 (5.9%) | 0.930 | 54 (93.1%) | 4 (6.9%) | 0.105 |
Yes | 160 (91.4%) | 15 (8.6%) | 106 (93.8%) | 7 (6.2%) | 17 (77.3%) | 5 (22.7%) | ||||
Atrial fibrillation | No | 453 (91.1%) | 44 (8.9%) | 0.001 | 274 (93.8%) | 18 (6.2%) | >0.999 | 21 (70.0%) | 9 (30.0%) | < 0.001 |
Yes | 35 (74.5%) | 12 (25.5%) | 6 (100.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 50 (100.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | ||||
Statins after discharge | No | 185 (94.4%) | 11 (5.6%) | 0.007 | 109 (96.5%) | 4 (92.4%) | 0.157 | 22 (84.6%) | 4 (15.4%) | 0.462 |
Yes | 303 (87.1%) | 45 (12.9%) | 171 (3.5%) | 14 (7.6%) | 49 (90.7%) | 5 (9.3%) | ||||
Antiplatelets after discharge | No | 38 (80.9%) | 9 (19.1%) | 0.045 | 14 (82.4%) | 3 (17.6%) | 0.074 | 24 (96.0%) | 1 (4.0%) | 0.260 |
Yes | 450 (90.5%) | 47 (9.5%) | 266 (94.7%) | 15 (5.3%) | 47 (85.5%) | 8 (14.5%) | ||||
Anticoagulants after discharge | No | 476 (90.8%) | 48 (9.2%) | < 0.001 | 278 (93.9%) | 18 (6.1%) | >0.999 | 52 (85.2%) | 9 (14.8%) | 0.160 |
Yes | 12 (60.0%) | 8 (40.0%) | 2 (100.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | 19 (100.0%) | 0 (0.0%) | ||||
NIHSS | / | 3 (2, 5) | 3 (1, 4) | 0.298 | 2 (1, 3) | 2 (1, 4) | 0.192 | 4 (2, 7) | 2 (2, 5) | 0.433 |
mRS at 90 days | / | 1 (0, 2) | 1 (0, 2) | 0.687 | 0 (0, 1) | 0 (0, 1) | 0.921 | 0 (0, 2) | 0 (0, 0) | 0.252 |
TOAST, Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment; NIHSS, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale. The bold values indicate the value of p less than 0.05.
Large artery atherosclerosis
Of the 544 large artery atherosclerosis (LAA) patients (362 men and 181 women; mean age: 65.99 ± 12.26 years), 56 (10.3%) patients were found to have a recurrence in 1 year, and recurrence stroke patients were also older than non-recurrence stroke patients (P = 0.016). After discharge, stroke patients who did not use antiplatelets had a higher rate of recurrence than those who did (P = 0.045). On the contrary, stroke recurrence was found more in stroke patients using statins and anticoagulants after discharge than those without using statins (P = 0.007) and anticoagulants (P < 0.001). Atrial fibrillation showed more recurrence of stroke in LAA stroke patients (P = 0.001). Gender, smoking, drinking, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes mellitus, NIHSS at admission, and mRS at 90 days were not found significant differences between the non-recurrence and recurrence stroke patients (all P > 0.05).
Small artery occlusion
Our research found 298 patients (216 men and 82 women; mean age: 64.38 ± 12.27 years) with small artery occlusion (SAO). Of the 298 SAO patients, 18 (6.0%) patients were found to have a recurrence in 1 year, recurrence stroke patients were also older than non-recurrence stroke patients (P < 0.001). Gender, smoking, drinking, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes mellitus, atrial fibrillation, NIHSS at admission, and mRS at 90 days were not found significant differences between the non-recurrence and recurrence stroke patients (all P > 0.05).
Cardioembolic stroke
Our study found a total of 80 cardioembolic stroke patients (49 men and 31 women; mean age: 72.22 ± 11.89 years). Nine patients (11.3%) out of the 80 patients had a recurrence within a year. Out of these, recurrence stroke patients were younger than non-recurrence stroke patients (P = 0.036). Atrial fibrillation showed more non-recurrence stroke in cardioembolic stroke patients (P < 0.001). Gender, smoking, drinking, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes mellitus, NIHSS at admission, and mRS at 90 days were not found significant differences between the non-recurrence and recurrence stroke patients (all P > 0.05).
The performance of segmentation of infarction
The DICE coefficient between the radiologist's annotation results and the network's automatic segmentation results is 0.886.
Radiomics feature extraction and selection
A total of 513 radiomics features were extracted, including intensity-related features (18), texture features (39), and wavelet features [8 × (18 + 39)]. Finally, a total of 100 features were selected using a sparse representation feature selection model, that is, clinical characteristics (n = 6), image domain features (n = 8), and wavelet domain features (n = 86) (more feature selection was shown in the Supplementary Table e-3).
Performance of prediction model
Figure 4 and Table 3 show the performance of the clinical and radiomics-based prediction model. The area under the curve (AUC) of the clinical-based model and radiomics-based models were 0.675 (0.643–0.707) and 0.779 (0.750–0.807), respectively. With an AUC of 0.847 (0.821–0.870), the model that incorporated both clinical and radiomic characteristics outperformed the model that only used clinical characteristics. The combined model presented showed better than clinical-based model (P = 0.001) and radiomics-based model (P = 0.2), and radiomics-based model was better than clinics-based model (P = 0.01). The combination model had the highest net benefit compared with both the other models (Figure 5).
Table 3.
AUC (95% CI) | Accuracy | Sensitivity | Specificity | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Clinical | 0.675 (0.643-0.707) | 0.670 | 0.536 | 0.675 |
Radiomics | 0.779 (0.750-0.807) | 0.792 | 0.679 | 0.796 |
Clinical+ radiomics | 0.847 (0.821-0.870) | 0.833 | 0.750 | 0.836 |
Discussion
Our study shows that a radiomics prediction model based on stroke infarction lesions derived from the ADC map can accurately predict ischemic stroke recurrence. In this study, we used a 2D U-Net automatic segmentation network based on manually segmented volumes to implement infarction automatic segmentation. In addition, a sparse representation feature selection model was performed to select a small number of high-resolution features to construct the robust prediction model.
A recent study showed that DWI-positive infarction lesion was associated with higher recurrent risk in patients with minor ischemic stroke (MIS) and transient ischemic attack (TIA) (20). Previous studies indicated that large artery atherosclerosis and infarction number were independent predictors of 1-year stroke recurrence with TIA or MIS. Multiple acute infarctions are usually related to embolic pathogenesis (29, 30), which could indicate a relatively unstable cause associated with higher recurrence (31, 32). The majority of patients with a single acute lacunar infarction have pathological changes like fibrinoid necrosis, lipohyalinosis, or other unknown changes. We hypothesized that different stroke subtypes with different pathologic mechanisms could contribute to different recurrent risks. Radiomics can convert medical images into high-throughput quantitative features, mainly comprising histogram and texture features, which have been widely applied in predicting clinical prognosis, pathological grading, and response to treatment (3). The ischemic cascade, which included the production of reactive oxygen species, the release of glutamate, the buildup of intracellular calcium, and the induction of inflammatory processes, is the name given to the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying ischemic stroke. A previous study showed that the texture features based on DWI were closely related to edema after cerebral infarction (33).
In terms of clinical and demographic characteristics, it is not surprising that recurrence stroke patients were older than non-recurrence patients. Different stroke subtypes presented significantly different stroke recurrence incidences. LAA and cardioembolic stroke showed higher recurrence compared to the other subtypes in this study, which was in accordance with the previous study (34). We further analyzed the risk factors of different stroke subtypes in predicting stroke recurrence. After discharge secondary prevention such as statins, anticoagulants, and antiplatelets showed significant differences between recurrent and non-recurrent stroke patients in our study. Antiplatelets could effectively reduce the risk of stroke recurrence in LAA stroke patients. A previous study also demonstrated that less antiplatelet at discharge was associated with a higher recurrence rate (20). Another study showed that there was no evidence of heterogeneity in the effects of antiplatelet therapy by the presence of DWI-positive infarctions vs. absence on the risk of any recurrent stroke (19). Patients with non-recurrence and recurrent strokes did not have significantly different antiplatelet levels, which may be related to the disease's heterogeneity (14). However, the multivariate regression analysis clinical prediction model had a poor performance in our study, with an AUC of 0.675.
In a previous study, imaging parameters (LAA and positive neuroimaging findings) were associated with a higher risk of recurrent stroke rather than clinical characteristics (20). In their study, DWI-positive lesion was associated with higher recurrent risk in patients with transient ischemic attacks. Radiomics based on medical imaging has been extensively used to predict prognosis, pathological type, response to treatment, and so on (35–37). Our previous study investigated the clinical radiomics nomogram for predicting ischemic stroke prognosis with good performance (3). Radiomics extracts high throughput quantitative features by combining radiology and machine learning, which can reflect the heterogeneity of lesions. Few studies explored radiomics based on DWI to predict stroke recurrence. Our study demonstrated that the DWI-based radiomics model could predict stroke recurrence with good performance. Stroke may present with or without underlying arterial pathologies because of the heterogeneity of stroke (14). Recent research demonstrated that lesions on DWI were indicators of microvascular occlusive events that were predisposing to microvessel rupture (19).
This study randomly selected 100 volumes by manual annotation and then used 2D U-net architecture to implement infarction lesions automatic segmentation, which was a recommended and efficient segmentation technique (24). 2D U-net convolutional neural networks for automated segmentation, an “end to end” segmentation method with robust accuracy performance, apply what is known as long-skip connections to directly connect opposing layers from contracting to the expanding paths (23, 38). A total of 513 radiomics features were extracted, including texture, intensity-related features, and wavelet features. However, a large amount of redundancy existed in the extracted features. A sparse representation feature selection model was used in our study to reduce redundancy and the risk of overfitting in subsequent classification, which was reported to apply in a previous study (27). In our study, the classification process involved RNN. RNN based on recursive connection is powerful in modeling temporal dynamics and learning appropriate feature representations (28). RNN model has demonstrated application with good performance in various medical tasks including genomic analysis, medical diagnosis, and recognizing patterns in sequential data (39). RNN can further improve the classification performance of the network by making the neurons in the hidden layer communicate with each other by storing the output results (24, 40).
Limitations
There were several limitations in this research. First, due to a loss of follow-up cases in our retrospective study, potential selection bias was unavoidable. Second, we did not keep track of medication details after discharge; instead, we only kept track of whether the patients had taken their medications. Finally, our radiomic-based prediction model performed well in predicting stroke recurrence. However, the corresponding clinical implications of each feature were unclear, and further exploration is needed. Nevertheless, these encouraging results provide a noninvasive method for predicting ischemic stroke recurrence.
Conclusion
In conclusion, we found that the radiomics-based DWI prediction model performed well in terms of predicting stroke recurrence. Our robust prediction performance was aided by machine learning and deep learning algorithms such as U-net architecture automatic segmentation, sparse representation feature selection, and RNN classification.
Data availability statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.
Ethics statement
The local institutional committee on human research approved the retrospective study and waived the requirement for written informed consent due to its retrospective nature.
Author contributions
YZ and BS designed this study. YS and JZ conducted the study and collected important data. HW drafted the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Funding
This research was funded by Natural Science Foundation of Minhang Hospital, Fudan University (2022MHBJ04 and 2022MHPY04).
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Glossary
Abbreviations
- ADC
apparent diffusion coefficient
- AIS
acute ischemic stroke
- AUC
area under the curve
- DWI
diffusion-weighted imaging
- LAA
large artery atherosclerosis patients
- MRI
magnetic resonance imaging
- mRS
modified Rankin Scale
- NIHSS
National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale
- RNN
recurrent neural network
- SAO
small artery occlusion
- TOAST
Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2022.1012896/full#supplementary-material
References
- 1.Shi Z, Li J, Zhao M, Peng W, Meddings Z, Jiang T, et al. Quantitative histogram analysis on intracranial atherosclerotic plaques: a high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging study. Stroke. (2020) 51:2161–9. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.029062 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Yuan K, Chen J, Xu P, Zhang X, Gong X, Wu M, et al. A nomogram for predicting stroke recurrence among young adults. Stroke. (2020) 51:1865–7. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.029740 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Wang H, Sun Y, Ge Y, Wu PY, Lin J, Zhao J, et al. A clinical-radiomics nomogram for functional outcome predictions in ischemic stroke. Neurol Ther. (2021) 10:819–32. 10.1007/s40120-021-00263-2 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Park HK, Kim BJ, Han MK, Park JM. K., Kang SJ, Lee JG, et al. One-year outcomes after minor stroke or high-risk transient ischemic attack: korean multicenter stroke registry analysis. Stroke. (2017) 48:2991–8. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.018045 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Lu M, Peng P, Cui Y, Qiao H, Li D, Cai J, et al. Association of progression of carotid artery wall volume and recurrent transient ischemic attack or stroke: a magnetic resonance imaging study. Stroke. (2018) 49:614–20. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.019422 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Kolmos M, Christoffersen L, Kruuse C. Recurrent ischemic stroke - a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. (2021) 30:105935. 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.105935 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Skoog I, Madsen TE. Risk of recurrent stroke: the critical need for continued efforts in secondary prevention. Neurology. (2021) 98:133–44. 10.1212/WNL.0000000000013116 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Skajaa N, Adelborg K, Horváth-Puhó E, Rothman KJ, Henderson VW, Thygesen LC. Risks of stroke recurrence and mortality after first and recurrent strokes in denmark: a nationwide registry study. Neurology. (2021) 98:e329–42. 10.1212/WNL.0000000000013118 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Lee KJ, Kim BJ, Han MK, Kim JT, Choi KH, Shin DI, et al. Effect of heart rate on stroke recurrence and mortality in acute ischemic stroke with atrial fibrillation. Stroke. (2020) 51:162–9. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.026847 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Flach C, Muruet W, Wolfe CDA, Bhalla A, Douiri A. Risk and secondary prevention of stroke recurrence: a population-base cohort study. Stroke. (2020) 51:2435–44. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.028992 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Fukuoka Y, Hosomi N, Hyakuta T, Omori T, Ito Y, Uemura J, et al. Effects of a disease management program for preventing recurrent ischemic stroke. Stroke. (2019) 50:705–12. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.020888 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Xu J, Yalkun G, Wang M, Wang A, Wangqin R, Zhang X, et al. impact of infection on the risk of recurrent stroke among patients with acute ischemic stroke. Stroke. (2020) 51:2395–403. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.029898 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Fernandez-Cadenas I, Mendioroz M, Giralt D, Nafria C, Garcia E. C., et al. GRECOS project (genotyping recurrence risk of stroke): the use of genetics to predict the vascular recurrence after stroke. Stroke. (2017) 48:1147–53. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.014322 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Hosomi N, Kitagawa K, Nagai Y, Nakagawa Y, Aoki S, Nezu T. T., et al. Desirable low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels for preventing stroke recurrence: a post hoc analysis of the j-stars study (Japan statin treatment against recurrent stroke). Stroke. (2018) 49:865–71. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.018870 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Prabhakaran S, Liebeskind DS, Cotsonis G, Nizam A, Feldmann E, Sangha RS, et al. Predictors of early infarct recurrence in patients with symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic disease. Stroke. (2021) 52:1961–6. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.032676 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Kim HJ, Choi EH, Chung JW, Kim JH, Kim YS, Seo WK, et al. Luminal and wall changes in intracranial arterial lesions for predicting stroke occurrence. Stroke. (2020) 51:2495–504. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.030012 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Ran Y, Wang Y, Zhu M, Wu X. A. Malhotra higher plaque burden of middle cerebral artery is associated with recurrent ischemic stroke: a quantitative magnetic resonance imaging study. Stroke. (2020) 51:659–62. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.028405 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Yaghi S, Havenon A, Rostanski S, Kvernland A, Mac Grory B, Furie KL, et al. Carotid stenosis and recurrent ischemic stroke: a post-hoc analysis of the POINT trial. Stroke. (2021) 52:2414–7. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.121.034089 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Wiegertjes K, Dinsmore L, Drever J, Hutchison A, Stephen J, Valdes Hernandez MC, et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging lesions and risk of recurrent stroke after intracerebral haemorrhage. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. (2021) 92:950–5. 10.1136/jnnp-2021-326116 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Jing J, Suo Y, Wang A, Zuo Y, Jiang Y, Liu L, et al. Investigatorsdagger, imaging parameters predict recurrence after transient ischemic attack or minor stroke stratified by ABCD(2) score. Stroke. (2021) 52:2007–15. 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.032424 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Zhou Y, Wu D, Yan S, Xie Y, Zhang S, Lv W, et al. Feasibility of a clinical-radiomics model to predict the outcomes of acute ischemic stroke. Korean J Radiol. (2022) 23:811. 10.3348/kjr.2022.0160 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Boulouis G, Bricout N, Benhassen W, Ferrigno M, Turc G, Bretzner M, et al. White matter hyperintensity burden in patients with ischemic stroke treated with thrombectomy. Neurology. (2019) 93:e1498–506. 10.1212/WNL.0000000000008317 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Norman B, Pedoia V, Majumdar S. Use of 2D U-net convolutional neural networks for automated cartilage and meniscus segmentation of knee MR imaging data to determine relaxometry and morphometry. Radiology. (2018) 288:177–85. 10.1148/radiol.2018172322 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Qi D, Hao C, Lequan Y, Lei Z, Jing Q, Defeng W, et al. Automatic detection of cerebral microbleeds from mr images via 3D convolutional neural networks. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. (2016) 35:1182–95. 10.1109/TMI.2016.2528129 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Yu J, Shi Z, Lian Y, Li Z, Liu T, Gao Y, et al. Noninvasive IDH1 mutation estimation based on a quantitative radiomics approach for grade II glioma. Eur Radiol. (2017) 27:3509–22. 10.1007/s00330-016-4653-3 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Vallieres M, Freeman CR, Skamene SR, El Naqa I. A radiomics model from joint FDG-PET and MRI texture features for the prediction of lung metastases in soft-tissue sarcomas of the extremities. Phys Med Biol. (2015) 60:5471–96. 10.1088/0031-9155/60/14/5471 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Wu G, Chen Y, Wang Y, Yu J, Lv X, Ju X, et al. Sparse representation-based radiomics for the diagnosis of brain tumors. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. (2018) 37:893–905. 10.1109/TMI.2017.2776967 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Zhang P, Xue J, Lan C, Zeng W, Gao Z, Zheng N. EleAtt-RNN: adding attentiveness to neurons in recurrent neural networks. IEEE Trans Image Process. (2019) 29:1061–73. 10.1109/TIP.2019.2937724 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Kang DW, Chalela JA, Ezzeddine MA, Warach S. Association of ischemic lesion patterns on early diffusion-weighted imaging with TOAST stroke subtypes. Arch Neurol. (2003) 60:1730–4. 10.1001/archneur.60.12.1730 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Wong KS, Gao S, Chan YL, Hansberg T, Lam WW, Droste DW, et al. Mechanisms of acute cerebral infarctions in patients with middle cerebral artery stenosis: a diffusion-weighted imaging and microemboli monitoring study. Annals Neurol. (2002) 52:74–81. 10.1002/ana.10250 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Amarenco P, Lavallee PC, Labreuche J, Albers GW, Bornstein NM, Canhao P, et al. One-year risk of stroke after transient ischemic attack or minor stroke. N Engl J Med. (2016) 374:1533–42. 10.1056/NEJMoa1412981 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Jing J, Meng X, Zhao X, Liu L, Wang A, Pan Y, et al. Dual antiplatelet therapy in transient ischemic attack and minor stroke with different infarction patterns: subgroup analysis of the chance randomized clinical trial. JAMA Neurol. (2018) 75:711–9. 10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.0247 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Jiang L, Zhang C, Wang S, Ai Z, Shen T, Zhang H, et al. MRI radiomics features from infarction and cerebrospinal fluid for prediction of cerebral edema after acute ischemic stroke. Front Aging Neurosci. (2022) 14:782036. 10.3389/fnagi.2022.782036 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Ryu WS, Schellingerhout D, Hong KS, Jeong SW, Jang MU, Park MS, et al. White matter hyperintensity load on stroke recurrence and mortality at 1 year after ischemic stroke. Neurology. (2019) 93:e578–89. 10.1212/WNL.0000000000007896 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Gillies RJ, Kinahan PE, Hricak H. Radiomics: images are more than pictures, they are data. Radiology. (2016) 278:563–77. 10.1148/radiol.2015151169 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Bickelhaupt S, Jaeger PF, Laun FB, Lederer W, Daniel H, Kuder TA, et al. Radiomics based on adapted diffusion kurtosis imaging helps to clarify most mammographic findings suspicious for cancer. Radiology. (2018) 287:761–70. 10.1148/radiol.2017170273 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Bonekamp D, Kohl S, Wiesenfarth M, Schelb P, Radtke JP, Gotz M, et al. Radiomic machine learning for characterization of prostate lesions with MRI: comparison to ADC values. Radiology. (2018) 289:128–37. 10.1148/radiol.2018173064 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.AlGhamdi M, Abdel-Mottaleb M, Collado-Mesa F. DU-Net: Convolutional network for the detection of arterial calcifications in mammograms. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. (2020) 39:3240–9. 10.1109/TMI.2020.2989737 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Choi KS, Choi SH, Jeong B. Prediction of IDH genotype in gliomas with dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion MR imaging using an explainable recurrent neural network. Neuro Oncol. (2019) 21:1197–209. 10.1093/neuonc/noz095 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Gadjimuradov F, Benkert T, Nickel MD, Maier A. Robust partial Fourier reconstruction for diffusion-weighted imaging using a recurrent convolutional neural network. Magn Reson Med. (2022) 87:2018–33. 10.1002/mrm.29100 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.