Abstract
Background
The SARS-CoV-2 variant of concern Omicron was first detected in Italy in November 2021.
Aim
To comprehensively describe Omicron spread in Italy in the 2 subsequent months and its impact on the overall SARS-CoV-2 circulation at population level.
Methods
We analyse data from four genomic surveys conducted across the country between December 2021 and January 2022. Combining genomic sequencing results with epidemiological records collated by the National Integrated Surveillance System, the Omicron reproductive number and exponential growth rate are estimated, as well as SARS-CoV-2 transmissibility.
Results
Omicron became dominant in Italy less than 1 month after its first detection, representing on 3 January 76.9–80.2% of notified SARS-CoV-2 infections, with a doubling time of 2.7–3.3 days. As of 17 January 2022, Delta variant represented < 6% of cases. During the Omicron expansion in December 2021, the estimated mean net reproduction numbers respectively rose from 1.15 to a maximum of 1.83 for symptomatic cases and from 1.14 to 1.36 for hospitalised cases, while remaining relatively stable, between 0.93 and 1.21, for cases needing intensive care. Despite a reduction in relative proportion, Delta infections increased in absolute terms throughout December contributing to an increase in hospitalisations. A significant reproduction numbers’ decline was found after mid-January, with average estimates dropping below 1 between 10 and 16 January 2022.
Conclusion
Estimates suggest a marked growth advantage of Omicron compared with Delta variant, but lower disease severity at population level possibly due to residual immunity against severe outcomes acquired from vaccination and prior infection.
Keywords: omicron, doubling time, prevalence, genomic survey, SARS–CoV–2, COVID–19
Key public health message.
What did you want to address in this study?
Less than 1 month after first being detected in Italy in November 2021, the Omicron variant became the most prevalent SARS CoV-2 variant in the country. We wished to understand how quickly Omicron spread in Italy and how transmissible the new variant is.
What have we learnt from this study?
Between December 2021 and January 2022, the Omicron emergence caused a marked and rapid increase in SARS-CoV-2 infections and an increase in COVID-19 cases while a lower increase in hospitalisations was observed, and intensive care use remained stable.
What are the implications of your findings for public health?
Our estimates indicate that the Omicron variant disseminates faster in the population than the Delta variant. Among those who get infected, a higher proportion has no symptoms and fewer require intensive care, possibly because by the time Omicron became dominant, many people were already protected from severe disease by vaccination or earlier infections with other variants.
Introduction
The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variant of concern (VOC) Omicron (Phylogenetic Assignment of Named Global Outbreak (Pango) lineage designation: B.1.1.529), characterised by a large number of mutations in the spike gene, has shown a marked growth advantage over pre-circulating lineages, causing a major upsurge of cases in multiple countries from November 2021 onwards [1]. As Europe was transitioning rapidly from Delta (Pango lineage: B.1.617.2) to Omicron dominance, data on presence and proportion of VOCs among SARS-CoV-2 infections across distinct geographical contexts and over time supported assessments of the current and potential short-term implications for public health.
Here, we robustly assess the temporal expansion of Omicron variant in Italy by analysing data collected during four rapid genomic surveys conducted in the country between 6 December 2021 and 17 January 2022. Results are combined with data gathered by the Italian Integrated Surveillance System with the aim of estimating the impact of the Omicron spread on the upsurge of SARS-CoV-2 transmission and of hospital admissions.
Methods
Genomic surveys and sequencing
Genomic surveys were conducted on 6 and 20 December 2021, and on 3 and 17 January 2022. The initiative involved all 19 Regions and two Autonomous Provinces (APs) of Italy and was coordinated by the National Public Health Institute (Istituto Superiore di Sanità, ISS), in collaboration with the Ministry of Health, the Bruno Kessler Foundation, and 120 laboratories distributed across the country.
On the dates of the surveys, random samples were selected in each Region/AP among infections diagnosed with a real-time reverse-transcription PCR (RT-PCR). The sample size was calculated to enable the detection of circulating SARS-CoV-2 variants with a proportion of at least 5% within each of four macro-areas (North-East, North-West, Centre, and South/Islands) with a 2% precision (Supplementary Material section 1). Samples were subjected to whole genome sequencing (WGS) as the gold standard method for variant detection. Alternatively, results from Sanger or next generation sequencing (NGS) of the whole or partial S-gene were collected. Sequences with insufficient quality for variant assignment were discarded from the analysis.
Assessments of Omicron proportion over time
To robustly assess the temporal expansion of Omicron, the proportion of this variant was estimated in each Region/AP using two alternative approaches. The first used Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) under the assumption of independence in proportion across Regions/APs and surveys. The second fitted a generalised linear mixed model (GLMM) assuming a random intercept and a random slope for each Region/AP; the independent variable was the day when the survey took place (Supplementary Material section 2). A binomial distribution for the identified number of Omicron sequences was assumed in both approaches. The procedures were replicated on data aggregated by macro-area.
Estimation of doubling time and net reproduction number
The approximate number of Omicron cases in each Region/AP over time was obtained by multiplying the estimated local proportion from the surveys by the corresponding number of cases notified to the Italian Integrated Surveillance System. Estimates obtained for the first three survey dates were aggregated at the national level and fitted with an exponential curve having growth rate r. The latter was used to estimate the doubling time of Omicron as T = log(2)/r and the net reproduction number as R = 1 + r × GT, where GT represents the average generation time. In the absence of estimates of GT for Omicron, we considered values between 4 and 8 days, covering a range of estimates for previous lineages [2-6] (Supplementary Material section 3). The same procedure was applied to data collected during the first two surveys only for sensitivity analysis.
Analysis of epidemiological surveillance data
The upsurge of SARS-CoV-2 transmission in Italy due to the Omicron spread was additionally evaluated by estimating daily SARS-CoV-2 net R values using data collected by the Italian Integrated Surveillance System [7]. Separate estimates were obtained from the time series of symptomatic cases by date of symptom onset (sym; Rsym ), and from the time series of patients admitted to hospital (hos, Rhos ) and to intensive care units (ICU; RICU ) by date of admission. Estimates of the net reproduction numbers are based on the assumption that the Omicron generation time is comparable to that of pre-circulating strains [2,8,9]. The same generation time was assumed to compute reproduction numbers from time series of symptomatic cases, hospitalisations, and ICU admissions. Methodological details are described in the Supplementary Material section 4. Additional information on data routinely collected within the Italian Integrated Surveillance System and applied case definitions can be found in an earlier report [7].
Results
On 6 December 2021, 2,241 samples were collected and 2,127 successfully sequenced. Of these, four harboured Omicron (0.2% of samples), 2,121 Delta (99.7%, Table 1), and two had B.1.640 and Q.4 viruses respectively (0.1%, Table 1). Omicron was only found in Northern Italy (Emilia-Romagna, Lombardy, and Veneto). Estimates of the national proportion of Omicron among circulating variants of SARS-CoV-2 ranged on average from 0.5% to 1.8% (Table 2).
Table 1. Results of genomic surveys conducted across all 21 participating Regions/Autonomous Provinces, Italy, December 2021 (n = 4,266 analysed sequences).
MACRO-AREA | REGIONa | 6 December 2021 | 20 December 2021 | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Number of | CONFIRMED CASES | Number of | CONFIRMED CASES | ||||||||||||||
LABs | RT-PCR POSITIVE | SEQUENCED SAMPLES | ANALYSED SAMPLES | Delta | Omicron | LABs | RT-PCR POSITIVE | SEQUENCED SAMPLES | ANALYSED SAMPLES | Delta | Omicron | ||||||
N | %b | N | %b | N | %b | N | %b | ||||||||||
SOUTH/ ISLANDS |
ABR | 2 | 89 | 55 | 55 | 55 | NA | 0 | NA | 2 | 179 | 63 | 62 | 52 | 83.9 | 10 | 16.1 |
APU | 11 | 53 | 53 | 53 | 53 | NA | 0 | NA | 11 | 59 | 57 | 57 | 44 | NA | 13 | NA | |
BAS | 2 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 7 | NA | 0 | NA | 2 | 131 | 10 | 10 | 5 | NA | 5 | NA | |
CAL | 4 | 224 | 45 | 39 | 39 | NA | 0 | NA | 4 | 475 | 80 | 71 | 69 | 97.2 | 2 | 2.8 | |
CAM | 3 | 150 | 150 | 140 | 140 | 100.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 3 | 1,770 | 134 | 131 | 114 | 87.0 | 17 | 13.0 | |
MOL | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | NA | 0 | NA | 1 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 6 | NA | 1 | NA | |
SAR | 10 | 223 | 30 | 30 | 30 | NA | 0 | NA | 10 | 338 | 31 | 30 | 25 | NA | 5 | NA | |
SIC | 4 | 209 | 159 | 159 | 159 | 100.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 5 | 354 | 246 | 246 | 203 | 82.5 | 43 | 17.5 | |
TOTAL SOUTH | 37 | 956 | 500 | 484 | 484 | 100.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 38 | 3,313 | 628 | 614 | 518 | 84.4 | 96 | 15.6 | |
CENTRE | LAZ | 5 | 515 | 511 | 435c | 434 | 99.8 | 0 | 0.0 | 6 | 362 | 339 | 318d | 262 | 82.4 | 55 | 17.3 |
MAR | 5 | 62 | 62 | 62 | 62 | 100.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 5 | 92 | 68 | 67 | 63 | 94.0 | 4 | 6.0 | |
TUS | 3 | 155 | 73 | 71 | 71 | 100.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 3 | 260 | 84 | 84 | 42 | 50.0 | 42 | 50.0 | |
UMB | 4 | 164 | 44 | 44 | 44 | 100.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 4 | 498 | 68 | 68 | 24 | 35.3 | 44 | 64.7 | |
TOTAL CENTRE | 17 | 896 | 690 | 612 | 611 | 99.8 | 0 | 0.0 | 18 | 1,212 | 559 | 537 | 391 | 72.8 | 145 | 27.0 | |
NORTH-EAST | BOL | 1 | 61 | 58 | 58 | 58 | NA | 0 | NA | 1 | 94 | 45 | 45 | 43 | NA | 2 | NA |
TRE | 1 | 15 | 15 | 14 | 14 | NA | 0 | NA | 1 | 17 | 17 | 17 | 13 | NA | 4 | NA | |
EMI | 3 | 106 | 106 | 106 | 105 | 99.1 | 1 | 0.9 | 3 | 133 | 133 | 133 | 111 | 83.5 | 22 | 16.5 | |
FRI | 6 | 377 | 150 | 146 | 146 | 100.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 6 | 254 | 60 | 59 | 54 | NA | 5 | NA | |
VEN | 12 | 234 | 234 | 234 | 232 | 99.1 | 2 | 0.9 | 12 | 219 | 219 | 219 | 201 | 91.8 | 18 | 8.2 | |
TOTAL NORTH-EAST | 23 | 793 | 563 | 558 | 555 | 99.5 | 3 | 0.5 | 23 | 717 | 474 | 473 | 422 | 89.2 | 51 | 10.8 | |
NORTH-WEST | AOV | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3c | 2 | NA | 0 | NA | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 3 | NA | 2 | NA |
LIG | 9 | 247 | 57 | 53 | 53 | NA | 0 | NA | 10 | 610 | 52 | 48 | 42 | NA | 6 | NA | |
LOM | 16 | 346 | 332 | 324 | 323 | 99.7 | 1 | 0.3 | 16 | 460 | 350 | 339 | 202 | 59.6 | 137 | 40.4 | |
PIE | 11 | 96 | 96 | 93 | 93 | 100.0 | 0 | 0.0 | 11 | 126 | 126 | 123 | 98 | 79.7 | 25 | 20.3 | |
TOTAL NORTH-WEST | 37 | 692 | 488 | 473 | 471 | 99.6 | 1 | 0.2 | 38 | 1,201 | 533 | 515 | 345 | 67.0 | 170 | 33.0 | |
TOTAL ITALY | 114 | 3,337 | 2,241 | 2,127c | 2,121 | 99.7 | 4 | 0.2 | 117 | 6,443 | 2,194 | 2,139d | 1,676 | 78.4 | 462 | 21.6 |
AP: Autonomous Province; Delta: Pango lineage B.1.617.2; labs: laboratories; NA: non applicable (the sample size is less than 60); Omicron: Pango lineage B.1.1.529; Pango: Phylogenetic Assignment of Named Global Outbreak; RT-PCR: real-time reverse-transcription PCR.
a ABR: Abruzzo; AOV: Aosta valley; APU: Apulia; BAS: Basilicata; BOL: AP Bolzano; CAL: Calabria; CAM: Campania; EMI: Emilia-Romagna; FRI: Friuli Venezia Giulia; LAZ: Lazio; LIG: Liguria; LOM: Lombardy; MAR: Marche; MOL: Molise; PIE: Piedmont; SAR: Sardinia; SIC: Sicily; TRE: AP Trento; TUS: Tuscany; UMB: Umbria; VEN: Veneto.
b Percentages represent the fraction of confirmed infections over the total analysed samples.
c Lazio notified one B.1.640 sequence and Aosta valley one Q.4 sequence.
d Lazio notified one B.1.640 sequence.
Table 2. National level estimates from surveys data for the Omicron proportion, exponential growth rate, doubling time and net reproduction number, Italy, 6 December 2021–17 January 2022.
Parameters | GLMM | MCMC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Applied to regional data | Applied to macro-area data | Applied to regional data | Applied to macro-area data | ||
Mean (95% CrI) | Mean (95% CrI) | Mean (95% CrI) | Mean (95% CrI) | ||
National
proportion (%) |
6 December 2021 | 1.6 (1.3–2.1) | 1.8 (1.4–2.2) | 1.4 (0.9–2.1) | 0.5 (0.2–0.9) |
20 December 2021 | 20.0 (18.4–21.6) | 20.6 (18.9–22.2) | 21.5 (19.7–23.5) | 21.5 (19.8– 23.2) | |
3 January 2022 | 78.4 (76.8–79.9) | 76.9 (75.4–78.5) | 80.2 (78.6–81.9) | 80.1 (78.6–81.5) | |
17 January 2022 | 97.8 (97–98.5) | 97.7 (96.9–98.4) | 94.6 (93.6–95.6) | 94.6 (93.6–95.5) | |
r (days − 1) | 0.23 (0.17–0.29) | 0.23 (0.17–0.28) | 0.22 (0.16–0.28) | 0.26 (0.18–0.35) | |
T (days) | 3.1 (2.44–4.00) | 3.13 (2.46–4.05) | 3.27 (2.51–4.29) | 2.73 (2.01–3.79) | |
R if GT = 4 days | 1.91 (1.69–2.14) | 1.90 (1.68–2.13) | 1.86 (1.65–2.10) | 2.04 (1.73–2.38) | |
R if GT = 6 days | 2.37 (2.04–2.71) | 2.35 (2.03–2.69) | 2.30 (1.97–2.65) | 2.56 (2.10–3.07) | |
R if GT = 8 days | 2.82 (2.39–3.28) | 2.80 (2.37–3.26) | 2.73 (2.29–3.21) | 3.08 (2.46–3.76) |
CrI: credible interval; GLMM: generalised linear mixed model; GT: generation time; MCMC: Markov Chain Monte Carlo; Omicron: Phylogenetic Assignment of Named Global Outbreak (Pango) lineage B.1.1.529; r: growth rate of Omicron infections; R: net reproduction number; T: doubling time.
On 20 December 2021, 2,194 samples were collected and 2,139 successfully sequenced; 462 resulted Omicron (21.6%) and 1,676 Delta (78.4%) positive; one sequence was associated with B.1.640 (0.0%, Table 1). Omicron was detected in all Regions/APs, and it was the predominant variant in Umbria (Central Italy). Estimates of the national proportion ranged on average from 20% to 21.5% (Table 2).
By 3 January 2022 (2,632 samples, 2,571 successfully sequenced), Omicron had become largely dominant in the country, being confirmed in 2,058 (80.0%, Table 3) sequences (Delta: 512 sequences, 19.9%; B.1.639: 1 sequence, 0.1%). Estimates of the national proportion of Omicron ranged on average from 76.9% to 80.2% (Table 2).
Table 3. Results of genomic surveys conducted across all 21 participating Regions/Autonomous Provinces, Italy, January 2021 (n = 4,948 analysed sequences).
MACRO-AREA | REGIONa | 3 January 2022 | 17 January 2022 | ||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Number of | CONFIRMED CASES | Number of | CONFIRMED CASES | ||||||||||||||
LABS | RT-PCR POSITIVE | SEQUENCED SAMPLES | ANALYSED SAMPLES | Delta | Omicron | LABS | RT-PCR POSITIVE | SEQUENCED SAMPLES | ANALYSED SAMPLES | Delta | Omicron | ||||||
N | %b | N | %b | N | %b | N | %b | ||||||||||
SOUTH/ ISLANDS |
ABR | 2 | 1,990 | 117 | 117 | 26 | 22.2 | 91 | 77.8 | 2 | 1,521 | 40 | 40 | 3 | NA | 37 | NA |
APU | 11 | 76 | 74 | 74 | 6 | 8.1 | 68 | 91.9 | 11 | 37 | 37 | 37 | 0 | NA | 37 | NA | |
BAS | 2 | 535 | 11 | 11 | 0 | NA | 11 | NA | 2 | 482 | 9 | 9 | 0 | NA | 9 | NA | |
CAL | 4 | 1,073 | 40 | 35 | 10 | NA | 25 | NA | 3 | 1,693 | 45 | 30 | 1 | NA | 29 | NA | |
CAM | 3 | 9,802 | 221 | 213 | 62 | 29.1 | 151 | 70.9 | 3 | 4,331 | 227 | 220 | 20 | 9.1 | 200 | 90.9 | |
MOL | 1 | 46 | 46 | 46 | 1 | NA | 45 | NA | 1 | 32 | 11 | 11 | 0 | NA | 11 | NA | |
SAR | 10 | 1,237 | 54 | 54 | 9 | NA | 45 | NA | 10 | 1,576 | 52 | 52 | 2 | NA | 50 | NA | |
SIC | 5 | 1,807 | 274 | 274 | 58 | 21.2 | 216 | 78.8 | 5 | 841 | 207 | 207 | 27 | 13.0 | 180 | 87.0 | |
TOTAL SOUTH | 38 | 16,566 | 837 | 824 | 172 | 20.9 | 652 | 79.1 | 37 | 10,513 | 628 | 606 | 53 | 8.7 | 553 | 91.3 | |
CENTRE | LAZ | 4 | 407 | 345 | 301 | 44 | 14.6 | 257 | 85.4 | 5 | 529 | 529 | 461 | 17 | 3.7 | 444 | 96.3 |
MAR | 5 | 82 | 50 | 50 | 9 | 18.0 | 41 | 82.0 | 5 | 76 | 48 | 48 | 1 | NA | 47 | NA | |
TUS | 3 | 276 | 139 | 139 | 15 | 10.8 | 124 | 89.2 | 3 | 312 | 156 | 156 | 1 | 0.6 | 155 | 99.4 | |
UMB | 5 | 1,036 | 91 | 90 | 6 | 6.7 | 84 | 93.3 | 4 | 541 | 48 | 48 | 0 | NA | 48 | NA | |
TOTAL CENTRE | 17 | 1,801 | 625 | 580 | 74 | 12.8 | 506 | 87.2 | 17 | 1,458 | 781 | 713 | 19 | 2.7 | 694 | 97.3 | |
NORTH-EAST | BOL | 1 | 371 | 24 | 24c | 10 | NA | 13 | NA | 1 | 281 | 40 | 40d | 3 | NA | 36 | NA |
TRE | 1 | 26 | 26 | 25 | 6 | NA | 19 | NA | 1 | 23 | 23 | 18 | 3 | NA | 15 | NA | |
EMI | 3 | 131 | 131 | 131 | 27 | 20.6 | 104 | 79.4 | 3 | 197 | 197 | 193 | 2 | 1.0 | 191 | 99.0 | |
FRI | 8 | 422 | 96 | 96 | 34 | 35.4 | 62 | 64.6 | 8 | 201 | 70 | 67 | 2 | 3.0 | 65 | 97.0 | |
VEN | 13 | 316 | 316 | 316 | 107 | 33.9 | 209 | 66.1 | 13 | 179 | 179 | 179 | 8 | 4.5 | 171 | 95.5 | |
TOTAL NORTH-EAST | 26 | 1,266 | 593 | 592 | 184 | 31.1 | 407 | 68.8 | 26 | 881 | 509 | 497 | 18 | 3.6 | 478 | 96.2 | |
NORTH-WEST | AOV | 1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | NA | 1 | NA | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | NA | 5 | NA |
LIG | 8 | 815 | 30 | 30 | 7 | NA | 23 | NA | 12 | 2,496 | 45 | 45 | 2 | NA | 43 | NA | |
LOM | 16 | 443 | 443 | 443 | 50 | 11.3 | 393 | 88.7 | 16 | 396 | 396 | 392 | 18 | 4.6 | 374 | 95.4 | |
PIE | 14 | 101 | 101 | 99 | 23 | 23.2 | 76 | 76.8 | 15 | 122 | 122 | 119 | 4 | 3.4 | 115 | 96.6 | |
TOTAL NORTH-WEST | 39 | 1,362 | 577 | 575 | 82 | 14.3 | 493 | 85.7 | 44 | 3,019 | 568 | 561 | 24 | 4.3 | 537 | 95.7 | |
TOTAL ITALY | 120 | 20,995 | 2,632 | 2,571c | 512 | 19.9 | 2,058 | 80.0 | 124 | 15,781 | 2,486 | 2,377d | 114 | 4.8 | 2,262 | 95.2 |
AP: Autonomous Province; Delta: Pango lineage B.1.617.2; labs: laboratories; NA: non applicable (the sample size is less than 60); Omicron: Pango lineage B.1.1.529; Pango: Phylogenetic Assignment of Named Global Outbreak; RT-PCR: real-time reverse-transcription PCR.
a ABR: Abruzzo; AOV: Aosta valley; APU: Apulia; BAS: Basilicata; BOL: AP Bolzano; CAL: Calabria; CAM: Campania; EMI: Emilia-Romagna; FRI: Friuli Venezia Giulia; LAZ: Lazio; LIG: Liguria; LOM: Lombardy; MAR: Marche; MOL: Molise; PIE: Piedmont; SAR: Sardinia; SIC: Sicily; TRE: AP Trento; TUS: Tuscany; UMB: Umbria; VEN: Veneto.
b Percentages represent the fraction of confirmed infections over the total analysed samples. They are reported as NA when the sample size is less than 60.
c AP Bolzano notified one B.1.639 sequence.
d AP Bolzano notified one B.1.639 sequence.
As of 17 January 2022 (2,486 samples, 2,377 successfully sequenced), Omicron has outcompeted all other circulating strains in the country, being confirmed in 2,262 (95.2%, Table 3) sequences (Delta: 114 sequences, 4.8%; B.1.639: one sequence, 0.0%). Estimates of the national proportion ranged on average from 94.6% to 97.8% (Table 2).
Results for the four surveys are reported in Figure 1, and in Tables 1 and 3. Corresponding proportion estimates are reported in Table 2.
By using proportion estimates retrieved for the first three dates, we estimated an average daily exponential growth rate r for new Omicron infections of 0.22–0.26 days − 1, corresponding to an average doubling time of 2.7–3.3 days and reproduction numbers in the range 1.86–2.04 and 2.73–3.08, when a generation time of 4 and 8 days was assumed respectively (Table 2). Similar estimates were obtained when the exponential growth was fitted on the first two surveys only (Supplementary Table S2).
We note that, despite the decrease in Delta proportion, the average total number of estimated Delta cases also increased in the observation period from 9,336–9,458 on 6 December 2021, to 13,455–15,701 on 3 January 2022 (Supplementary Table S1 and Figure 2). In the subsequent period, Delta cases decreased to 1,844–4,521 on 17 January.
The impact of Omicron expansion on the overall SARS-CoV-2 circulation was quantified by estimating reproduction numbers from the time series of cases recorded by the Italian Integrated Surveillance System. We found that Rsym increased from 1.15 (95% credible interval (CrI): 1.15–1.15) on 6 December 2021 to a peak of 1.83 (95%CrI: 1.83–1.84) on 28 December (Figure 3). Rhos increased from 1.14 (95%CrI: 1.12–1.18) on 6 December 2021, to a peak of 1.36 (95%CrI: 1.33–1.38) on 29 December 2021. In contrast, RICU did not show a clear temporal trend throughout December 2021, with mean estimates ranging between 0.93 and 1.21.
However, a progressive decline of all reproduction numbers was observed in the first weeks of 2022, yielding their mean estimates under the epidemic threshold of 1 between 10 and 16 January.
Discussion
Omicron was first identified in Italy in the second half of November 2021 [10]. Four genomic surveys were successively conducted to evaluate the progressive spread of the variant in the country. The presented results show that Omicron variant (BA.1 subvariant at that time) became dominant across the Italian territory in less than 1 month, significantly increasing SARS-CoV-2 transmission.
Our estimates for the doubling time (2.7–3.3 days) are in agreement with those obtained in other countries [11,12]. The reproduction number associated to the Omicron variant under the transmissibility conditions existing in Italy in December may be in the range of 1.8–3.1. This estimate is compatible with values of Rsym around 1.8 observed on 28 December 2021, when the replacement of Delta by Omicron was not complete and before various control measures (introduced on 24 and 30 December [13,14]) and behaviour change had a chance to significantly affect transmission. Notably, changes in contact patterns due to the Christmas holidays may have had an effect that is hard to quantify.
The selective advantage of Omicron over Delta may be explained by increased transmissibility, partial immune escape, or a combination of both [15]. Early evidence from statistical analysis of reinfections and breakthrough infections suggested a marked capability of escape from natural and vaccine-acquired immunity [11,16-19]. However, further efforts are needed to quantify the relative transmissibility of Omicron compared with Delta, and its inherent capacity to cause severe disease, which is key to evaluate potential changes in COVID-19 burden potentially led by this and the progressive waning of immunity.
The lower increase of reproduction numbers associated to hospital admissions and the stable value of those from ICU admissions may suggest, under the epidemiological conditions observed in late 2021, a reduced severity of Omicron compared with Delta. However, while only partially protected against infection, individuals who received at least two vaccine doses were substantially protected against severe outcomes [20,21]. It is therefore likely that the lower disease severity observed in populations during the Omicron wave can be partially ascribed to the protection conferred by vaccination and/or prior infection [22,23], explaining the large decoupling between identified cases and hospitalised individuals.
Marked changes in the ascertainment rate of SARS-CoV-2 infections may have also occurred during the study period due to the brisk increase of identified cases and the consequent saturation of the testing system, the reduced likelihood of test-seeking given the infection, and the possible increase of voluntary testing in preparation for gatherings during Christmas and New Year’s holidays [24]. On the other hand, the widespread transmission of Omicron observed throughout January 2022 could have inflated the number of patients admitted to hospital and ICU with a positive test for SARS-CoV-2 infection but with a different primary reason for hospitalisation. Changes in the ascertainment rate of SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 patients should have a limited impact on the estimated proportion of circulating lineages, and on the growth rate of Omicron infections. However, they may have affected estimates of the reproduction number from different data sources during the replacement of pre-circulating linages by Omicron. All these factors prevented us to quantify the relative risk of hospitalisation and of ICU admission for Omicron compared with Delta.
Of note, we estimate that the total number of Delta cases increased over December 2021, suggesting that a considerable fraction of hospital patients recorded in early January could be attributed to Delta. As such, continued monitoring of Delta proportion among severe cases was recommended.
The four daily surveys were based on relatively small sample sizes and, despite the randomisation of sampling for genomic sequencing, biases due to the presence of large clusters of cases in a region cannot be excluded. Moreover, estimates of the net reproduction numbers are based on the assumption that the Omicron generation time is comparable to that of pre-circulating strains, as suggested by recent estimates for the Italian context [8,9].
Efforts combining genomic and epidemiological surveillance for tracking circulating variants and analysing epidemiological trends at the population level are of the utmost importance to support public health responses and improve system preparedness for future epidemic threats.
Ethical statement
Ethical approval for sequencing SARS-CoV-2 genomes on clinical samples was obtained by ISS (ref. PRE BIO CE n.26259, July 29, 2020).
Funding statement
SM, PPe, GG, and FR acknowledge funding from EU grant 874850 MOOD (catalogued as MOOD 000). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Supplementary Data
Conflict of interest: MA has received research funding from Seqirus. The funding is not related to COVID-19. All other authors declare no competing interest.
Authors’ contributions: PS, ATP, SB, GR, PPe, SM conceived the study. PPo, FT, MM wrote the first draft of the manuscript. AM, FT, PPo, MM, GG analyzed the data. VdA, AZ, CMG, MA, VM contributed to interpreting model results. AM, MSS, FM, DP, AB, FR, LA, ADM and the members of the Italian Integrated Surveillance of COVID-19 Study Group collected the epidemiological data. The members of the Genomic SARS-CoV-2 National Surveillance Working Group collected the samples and sequenced the RNA for the molecular typing. All authors revised critically the study and the results.
References
- 1.European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC). Assessment of the further emergence and potential impact of the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant of concern in the context of ongoing transmission of the Delta variant of concern in the EU/EEA, 18th update. Stockholm: ECDC; December 2021. Available from: https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/sites/default/files/documents/covid–19–assessment–further–emergence–omicron–18th–risk–assessment–december–2021.pdf
- 2. Cereda D, Manica M, Tirani M, Rovida F, Demicheli V, Ajelli M, et al. The early phase of the COVID–19 epidemic in Lombardy, Italy. Epidemics. 2021;37:100528. 10.1016/j.epidem.2021.100528 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3. Volz E, Mishra S, Chand M, Barrett JC, Johnson R, Geidelberg L, et al. Assessing transmissibility of SARS–CoV–2 lineage B.1.1.7 in England. Nature. 2021;593(7858):266–9. 10.1038/s41586-021-03470-x [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4. Griffin J, Casey M, Collins Á, Hunt K, McEvoy D, Byrne A, et al. Rapid review of available evidence on the serial interval and generation time of COVID–19. BMJ Open. 2020;10(11):e040263. 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040263 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5. Hu S, Wang W, Wang Y, Litvinova M, Luo K, Ren L, et al. Infectivity, susceptibility, and risk factors associated with SARS–CoV–2 transmission under intensive contact tracing in Hunan, China. Nat Commun. 2021;12(1):1533. 10.1038/s41467-021-21710-6 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6. Kremer C, Ganyani T, Chen D, Torneri A, Faes C, Wallinga J, et al. Authors’ response: Estimating the generation interval for COVID–19 based on symptom onset data. Euro Surveill. 2020;25(29):2001269. 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.29.2001269 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7. Pezzotti P, Punzo O, Bella A, Del Manso M, Urdiales AM, Fabiani M, et al. The challenges of the outbreak: the Italian COVID–19 integrated surveillance system. Eur J Public Health. 2020;30(Supplement_5);ckaa165.356. 10.1093/eurpub/ckaa165.356 [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 8. Manica M, Litvinova M, De Bellis A, Guzzetta G, Mancuso P, Vicentini M, et al. Estimation of the incubation period and generation time of SARS–CoV–2 Alpha and Delta variants from contact tracing data. arXiv.2203.07063. 2022. Mar 11. 10.48550/arXiv.2203.07063 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 9. Manica M, De Bellis A, Guzzetta G, Mancuso P, Vicentini M, Venturelli F, et al. Reggio Emilia COVID-19 Working Group . Intrinsic generation time of the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant: An observational study of household transmission. Lancet Reg Health Eur. 2022;19:100446. 10.1016/j.lanepe.2022.100446 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Monitoraggio delle varianti del virus SARS–CoV–2 di interesse in sanità pubblica in Italia [Monitoring of SARS-CoV-2 variants of public health interest in Italy]. [Accessed 21 Jan 2022]. Available from: https://www.epicentro.iss.it/coronavirus/sars–cov–2–monitoraggio–varianti
- 11.Ferguson N. Report 49: Growth and immune escape of the Omicron SARS–CoV–2 variant of concern in England. Imperial College London; 2021 Dec. [Accessed 19 Jan 2022]. Available from: http://spiral.imperial.ac.uk/handle/10044/1/93038
- 12. Grabowski F, Kochańczyk M, Lipniacki T. The Spread of SARS-CoV-2 Variant Omicron with a Doubling Time of 2.0-3.3 Days Can Be Explained by Immune Evasion. Viruses. 2022;14(2):294. 10.3390/v14020294 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Official Gazette of the Italian Republic. Decree of Italian President of Council of Ministers of 24 December 2021. Italian. [Accessed 7 Oct 2021]. Available from: https://www.gazzettaufficiale.it/eli/id/2021/12/24/21G00244/sg
- 14.Official Gazette of the Italian Republic. Decree of Italian President of Council of Ministers of 30 December 2021. Italian. [Accessed 7 October 2021]. Available from: https://www.gazzettaufficiale.it/eli/id/2021/12/30/21G00258/sg
- 15. Willett BJ, Grove J, MacLean OA, Wilkie C, De Lorenzo G, Furnon W, et al. PITCH Consortium. COVID-19 Genomics UK (COG-UK) Consortium . SARS-CoV-2 Omicron is an immune escape variant with an altered cell entry pathway. Nat Microbiol. 2022;7(8):1161-79. 10.1038/s41564-022-01143-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16. Rössler A, Riepler L, Bante D, von Laer D, Kimpel J. SARS-CoV-2 Omicron Variant Neutralization in Serum from Vaccinated and Convalescent Persons. N Engl J Med. 2022;386(7):698-700. 10.1056/NEJMc2119236 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17. Pearson CAB, Silal SP, Li MWZ, Dushoff J, Bolker BM, Abbott S, et al. Bounding the levels of transmissibility & immune evasion of the Omicron variant in South Africa. MedRxiv. . 10.1101/2021.12.19.21268038 [DOI]
- 18. Planas D, Saunders N, Maes P, Guivel-Benhassine F, Planchais C, Buchrieser J, et al. Considerable escape of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron to antibody neutralization. Nature. 2022;602(7898):671-5. 10.1038/s41586-021-04389-z [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19. Menegale F, Manica M, Zardini A, Guzzetta G, Marziano V, d’Andrea V, et al. Waning of SARS–CoV–2 vaccine–induced immunity: A systematic review and secondary data analysis. medRxiv. 2022.07.04.22277225; doi: 10.1101/2022.07.04.22277225 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 20. Kirsebom FCM, Andrews N, Stowe J, Toffa S, Sachdeva R, Gallagher E, et al. COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness against the omicron (BA.2) variant in England. Lancet Infect Dis. 2022;22(7): S1473–3099(22)00309–7. 10.1016/S1473-3099(22)00309-7 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21. Björk J, Bonander C, Moghaddassi M, Rasmussen M, Malmqvist U, Inghammar M, et al. COVID–19 vaccine effectiveness against severe disease from SARS–CoV–2 Omicron BA.1 and BA.2 subvariants–surveillance results from southern Sweden, December 2021 to March 2022. Euro Surveill. 2022;27(18):2200322. 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2022.27.18.2200322 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22. Davies MA, Kassanjee R, Rousseau P, Morden E, Johnson L, Solomon W, et al. Outcomes of laboratory–confirmed SARS–CoV–2 infection in the Omicron–driven fourth wave compared with previous waves in the Western Cape Province, South Africa. Trop Med Int Health. 2022;27(6):564–73. 10.1111/tmi.13752 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23. Lauring AS, Tenforde MW, Chappell JD, Gaglani M, Ginde AA, McNeal T, et al. Influenza and Other Viruses in the Acutely Ill (IVY) Network . Clinical severity of, and effectiveness of mRNA vaccines against, covid–19 from omicron, delta, and alpha SARS–CoV–2 variants in the United States: prospective observational study. BMJ. 2022;376:e069761. 10.1136/bmj-2021-069761 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24. Marziano V, Guzzetta G, Menegale F, Sacco C, Petrone D, Urdiales AM, et al. The decline of COVID–19 severity and lethality over two years of pandemic. medRxiv 2022.07.01.22277137; doi: 10.1101/2022.07.01.22277137 [DOI]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.