Skip to main content
NCBI home page
Nature Communications logoLink to Nature Communications
. 2022 Nov 11;13:6861. doi: 10.1038/s41467-022-34615-9

Enantioselective synthesis of N-alkylindoles enabled by nickel-catalyzed C-C coupling

Lun Li 1,#, Jiangtao Ren 1,2,#, Jingjie Zhou 1, Xiaomei Wu 1, Zhihui Shao 1,2,✉, Xiaodong Yang 1,✉, Deyun Qian 1,✉
PMCID: PMC9652415  PMID: 36369422

Abstract

Enantioenriched N-alkylindole compounds, in which nitrogen is bound to a stereogenic sp3 carbon, are an important entity of target molecules in the fields of biological, medicinal, and organic chemistry. Despite considerable efforts aimed at inventing methods for stereoselective indole functionalization, straightforward access to a diverse range of chiral N-alkylindoles in an intermolecular catalytic fashion from readily available indole substrates remains an ongoing challenge. In sharp contrast to existing C–N bond-forming strategies, here, we describe a modular nickel-catalyzed C–C coupling protocol that couples a broad array of N-indolyl-substituted alkenes with aryl/alkenyl/alkynyl bromides to produce chiral N-alkylindole adducts in single regioisomeric form, in up to 91% yield and 97% ee. The process is amenable to proceed under mild conditions and exhibit broad scope and high functional group compatibility. Utility is highlighted through late-stage functionalization of natural products and drug molecules, preparation of chiral building blocks.

Subject terms: Synthetic chemistry methodology, Asymmetric synthesis, Stereochemistry

Enantioenriched N-alkylindole compounds, in which nitrogen is bound to a stereogenic sp3 carbon, are target molecules in the fields of biological, medicinal, and organic chemistry. Here the authors show a nickel-catalyzed C-C coupling protocol to synthesize these molecules from N-indolylsubstituted alkenes.

Introduction

Enantioenriched indole derivatives are of great interest in pharmaceutical science and organic chemistry1–4. Particularly, the indole core is one of the most frequent N-heterocyclic fragment featured in FDA-approved drugs5. Therefore, different methods have been designed for the construction of chiral indole scaffolds6–9. The most typical functionalizations of indoles take place at the C3 positions, due to their innate nucleophilicity10,11. In contrast, the development of techniques involving a stereocenter adjacent to the nitrogen, an essential structural motif imbedded in many biologically active molecules (Fig. 1A)12–16, remains a great challenge, presumably owing to the attenuated nucleophilicity of the nitrogen atom (Fig. 1B). To this end, a few powerful C-N bond-forming approaches have been developed to access chiral N-alkylindoles (Fig. 1B). However, these transformations often rely on the enantioselective intramolecular addition of prefunctionalized indole substrates17–19, or intermolecular N-alkylation (mostly N-allylation) of indoles with C3-blocking substituents20–25 or electron-withdrawing groups26–33. Moreover, indirect methods using indole precursors such as indolines or aryl hydrazines were also developed to obtain high regio- and enantioselectivity34–36. Recently, the Vilotijevic and Buchwald groups demonstrated elegant works using N-modificated strategy to engage N-silyl indoles and N-(benzoyloxy)indoles in C-N bond-forming reactions, respectively37,38. Despite these remarkable advances, a general, modular and selective synthesis of enantioenriched N-alkylindoles is in crucial demand, particularly if the substrates and catalysts are readily available39,40.

Fig. 1. Representative chiral N-alkylindole derivatives and strategies for catalytic enantioselective synthesis of N-alkylindoles.

Fig. 1

Open in a new tab

A Representative biologically active chiral N-alkylindole derivatives; B Existing C–N bond-forming methods to access chiral N-alkylindole derivatives; C C–C bond-forming strategy to access chiral N-alkylindole derivatives; D This work: catalytic, modular, unified coupling of α-N-alkyl-Ni species.

New strategic bond-forming reactions would offer a complementary protocol to existing C-N bond-forming process and an opportunity to explore currently inaccessible chemical space. In this regard, the enantioselective coupling of an α-N-alkyl metal species or an α-N-alkyl radical species represents a straightforward strategy to the synthesis of chiral alkylindoles (Fig. 1C)41,42. However, forging a C–C bond asymmetrically at the position α to the indole nitrogen remains elusive43–45. Recently, the Melchiorre43 and Davidson44 groups independently reported impressive works using photoredox chemistry to engage indole-derived α-N-alkyl radical intermediates in N-alkylindole synthesis, despite limited substrate scope and enantioselectivity (Fig. 1C, right). Moreover, in the the case, a leaving group (-CO2H or DHP) is necessary for the generation of an α-N-alkyl radical. In contrast, there have been no reports on generation and coupling of indole-derived α-N-alkyl metal species. The enantioselective Ni-catalyzed reductive coupling of olefins with electrophiles represents an attractive utilization of in-situ generated alkyl-Ni species46–52. We wondered whether this reductive coupling strategy could be harness to access chiral N-alkylindoles. However, catalytic enantioselective reductive coupling of N-alkenyl indoles faces several challenges. First, current asymmetric reductive coupling is largely limited to the use of liner alkyl–Ni intermediates46–58. Catalytic enantioselective coupling of branched alkyl–Ni intermediates generated from hydronickellation of olefins remains elusive59–63. Moreover, modulation of the site-selectivity pattern across differently substituted N-alkenyl indoles is unknown. In addition, the propensity of N-alkenyl polymerization and reduction is possible64–67.

As a part of our interest in chiral alkylamine-bearing molecules25,68, here, we show a catalytic enantioselective coupling of in-situ generated α-N-alkyl nickel species with aryl/alkenyl/alkynyl bromides, analogous to the C(sp3)–C(sp2)/C(sp) cross-coupling reaction, enabling a unified method toward structually diverse chiral N-alkylindoles in high yields and ee’s (Fig. 1D). By employing mild conditions, this modular, unified fragment coupling provides practical advantages in reaction efficiency, functional group compatibility, as well as substrate availability and scope, which would be broadly useful yet mechanistically orthogonal to established N-alkylation processes. In particular, application in late-stage diversifcation of many natural products and drug molecules demonstrates its utility in accelerating access to N-alkylated drug-like complexity.

Results

Reaction discovery and investigations

By the use of 4-bromophenylacetone as the coupling partner, we firstly examined the reaction of N-vinylindole 1a, representing a class of nucleophiles that has previously been unexploited in asymmetric nickel-catalyzed reactions although has been widely utilized as monomers for the synthesis of polymeric materials64,69. Upon investigating a series of reaction parameters (Table 1 and Supplementary Tables 1–6), we discovered that running of the cross-coupling partners at 40 °C for 20 h in the presence of NiCl2•DME, commercially available (S,S)-diphenyl-Box ligand (L*1), a hydride source (diethoxy-methylsilane), and a base (KF) provides the desired product in 36% yield and 79% enantiomeric excess (ee) as a single isomer (entry 1). Compared to L*1, employing bis-oxazoline analogs L*2-L*4 bearing alkyl substitutents (R) almost did not produce 3a. Moreover, the isopropylidene bridge of L*1 proved to be essential, as L*5 with gem-H could not afford the product. Inferior results were found with other chiral nitrogen-based ligands, such as pyridine-oxazoline (Pybox) and 2,2-bis(2-oxazoline) (Bi-Ox) ligands (entries 3–4). Further solvent screening indicated 1,2-dimethoxyethane was superior to other solvents, producing 3a in good yield and ee under room temperature (entry 5). Interestingly, the mixed solvent (DME/DCE) turned out as the best solvent to obtain both high yield and high enantioselectivity (entries 5–7), thus indicating the subtle interplay of reagents and solvents in this case. In addition, use of other nickel salts, NiBr2•DME resulted in higher ee (entry 8), while NiI2•xH2O gave the best result (entry 9).

Table 1.

Summary of the effects of crucial reaction parametersa

graphic file with name 41467_2022_34615_Taba_HTML.gif
Entry Variant Yield (%) ee (%)b
1 L* = L*1 36 79
2 L* = L*2, L*3, L*4, or L*5 trace n.d.
3 L* = L*6 34 16
4 L* = L*7 62 58
5 L* = L*1, DME as solvent, rt 80 81
6 L* = L*1, DCE as solvent, rt 16 88
7 L* = L*1, DME/DCE (3:1) as solvent, rt 82 86
8 NiBr2•DME as Ni-Cat. vs. entry 7 78 88
9 NiI2•xH2O as Ni-Cat. vs. entry 7 81 (77)c 92
Open in a new tab

aSee the SI for experimental details; all reactions were carried out in 0.2 mmol scale with respect to 1a; corrected 1H NMR yields using CH2Br2 as an internal standard were reported. bThe enantiomeric excesses (ee’s) were determined by HPLC analysis. cIsolated yield is shown in the parenthesis. L* chiral ligand; DME 1,2-dimethoxyethane; DCE 1,2-dichloroethane, rt room temperature; h hour; n.d. not detected.

Reaction scope

The generality of this catalytic enantioselective method is broad (Fig. 2). Concerning the aryl bromide, the reaction proceeded smoothly with a wide array of substrates to provide the corresponding products in moderate to high yields with universally high enantioselectivities. Notably, electron-deficient or electron-rich arenes were amenable coupling partners, in which the substituent could be placed at para and meta position. A variety of functionalities such as a nitrile (2b), trifluoromethyls (2c, 2p, 2r), esters (2d, 2m, 2q), halides (2f, 2 g, 2n, 2o), ethers (2i, 2j) were all readily accommodated. Despite the ability of nickel complex to activated aryl chlorides, our approach could tolerate Ar-Cl groups (2f, 2o). In particular, sensitive functional groups including easily reduced ketone (2a) and aldehyde (2e), and triflate (2k) and boronic acid pinacol ester (2l) commonly used for cross-coupling, all remained intact under the standard reaction conditions. Furthermore, the pharmaceutically important heterocycle–pyridine (2r) was compatible as well.

Fig. 2. Scope of enantioselective synthesis of N-benzyl and N-allylic indoles enabled by Ni-catalyzed C(sp3)-C(sp2) coupling reactions.

Fig. 2

Open in a new tab

Conditions: aAll reactions were carried out with NiI2•xH2O (10 mol%), ligand L*1 (15 mol%), 1 (0.40 mmol), 2 (0.80 mmol), (OEt)2MeSiH (0.48 mmol), KF (0.60 mmol) and DME/DCE (3:1, 2.0 mL) at room temperature for 20 h; bDME as solvent, (OEt)2MeSiH (0.72 mmol), KF (0.88 mmol), 48 h.

Next, we sought to survey the influence of the N-vinylindole variants that could be used in the catalytic hydroarylation event. Delightfully, a diverse array of functional groups were suitable at different positions on the benzene ring of the indole, including a 6-methoxy (3s), 6-fluoro (3t), 6-cyano (3u), and 5-methyl (3v) substituent. It is worth noting that alkyl group at the C3-position of the indole scaffold was accommodated, delivering the corresponding product 3w in moderate yield but with excellent enantioselectivity, which is difficult to obtain employing previous CuH catalysis38. In addition, carbazole-derived substrate afforded the desired N-alkylated product in moderate yield and enantioselectivity (3x). Gratifyingly, a diverse set of more sterically hindered (Z)-N-alkenyl indoles were also successfully transformed utilizing this method, and the corresponding N-alkylindoles were readily prepared in useful yields with good levels of enantioselectivity (3y-3dd). However, (E)-N-alkenyl indoles performed lower reactivity and slightly lower enantioselectivity than their Z isomers (e.g., 3y: 19%, 84% ee vs. 41%, 87% ee). The isomerization of Z-N-alkenyl substrate to its E isomer was observed during the reaction process, and over 40% of the E/Z mixture could be recovered after the reaction (Supplementary Method 1.6). Of note, the C–C bond-forming event occurs regioselectively at the carbon α to the nitrogen of indoles, even in the presence of other directing groups such as amide (3z-3bb), ester (3cc), and aryl (3dd). Especially, this modular reaction could be applied to prepare important serotonin reuptake inhibitor derivatives with good efficiency and enantioselectivities (3z-3bb, 81–92% ee’s).

In addition to aryl bromides, vinyl bromides were incorporated as well in this reaction, leading to structually diverse chiral N-allyl indoles 4a-4f in 35–60% yields with 73–95% ee values. Remarkably, this modular alkenylation complements previously established metal-catalyzed indole N-allylations in that di- and trisubstituted allylic products bearing aryl and alkyl groups are readily accessed27,29,31,70,71.

Besides the C(sp2) bromides, this catalytic C-C bond-forming reaction was also viable for C(sp) bromides–bromoalkynes 5. While the above standard conditions with ligand L*1 resulted in poor enantiocontrol for the C(sp3)-C(sp) coupling (e.g., 6a: 28% yield, 55% ee), delightfully, the reaction selectivity could be significantly improved by further optimization efforts (see Supplementary Table 7). As shown in Fig. 3, the treatment of bromoalkynes 5 and N-alkenylindoles 1 with 10 mol% NiI2 as the catalyst, 15 mol% L*8 as the ligand at 0 °C could yield the corresponding chiral N-propargyl indoles 6 in mostly good yields (25–89%) and high levels of enantioselectivity (ee values of 80–97%). A variety of N-alkenyl indoles substituted at the 4-position (6b), 5-position (6c-6g), 6-position (6h-6j), and 7-position (6k, 6l) each underwent efficient hydroalkynylation to provide the corresponding products with uniformly high enantioselectivities. Of note, alkyl group at the C3-position of the indole scaffold was demonstrated being tolerated again (6m). With regard to medicinal chemistry applications, the generation of product 6g demonstrates tolerance of a pinacol boronate subunit under the conditions of catalytic enantioselective alkynylation. Additionally, more sterically hindered cis-β-substituted N-alkenyl indoles also successfully underwent C(sp3)-C(sp) bond-formation to deliever compounds 6o and 6p, respectively, as single regioisomers with reasonable yields and good enantioselectivities. Similar to the C(sp3)-C(sp2) coupling, the reaction reactivity and stereoselectivity was influenced by the Z and E configuration of N-alkenyl indoles (e.g., 6o).

Fig. 3. Scope of enantioselective synthesis of N-propargyl indoles enabled by Ni-catalyzed C(sp3)-C(sp) coupling reactions.

Fig. 3

Open in a new tab

Conditions: a All reactions were carried out with NiI2 (10 mol%), ligand L*8 (15 mol%), 1 (0.10 mmol), 5 (0.25 mmol), (OEt)2MeSiH (0.30 mmol), KF (0.30 mmol) and DME (0.25 mL) at 0 °C for 36 h; b NiI2·xH2O instead of NiI2; c MeCN instead of DME; d Pybox ligand (S,S)-L*17 instead of L*8, K3PO4 instead of KF, 40 °C, 24 h (see SI for details). TIPS = triisopropylsilyl; TBS = t-butyldimethylsilyl.

Beyond the TIPS-substituted ethynyl bromide 5a, TBS- and 3° alkyl-substituted ethynyl bromides 5b-5c proved to be viable coupling partners in this system, affording the desired indole adducts (6q-6r) in 47–74% yields with excellent enantioselectivities. However, ethynyl bromides with less steric hindered alkyl and aryl substitutents delivered inferior results (e.g., R3 = n-Bu: no reaction; R3 = Ph: 26% yield, 50% ee). In addition, it should be noted that the current L*8-ligated nickel catalysis could be expanded to enable the synthesis of chiral N-benzyl and N-allylic indoles in high enantioselectivities (e.g., 3a’ and 4e’).

Synthetic applications

More importantly, the present method could be applied in late-stage diversification of complex drug molecules and natural products72. As depicted in Fig. 4, aryl bromides derived from complexe bioactive molecules canagliflozin derivative, an antidiabetic drug (7a), indomethacin, a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (7b), and vitamin E, an antioxidant (7c), coupled with N-vinylindole 1a in good yields and stereoselectivities, thus revealing the appeal that our approach might have for lead generation protocols in drug discovery. Furthermore, aryl bromides or N-alkenyl indoles bearing multiple stereocenters originated from vitamin E (7c), D-galactopyanose (7d), and citronellal (7e) were all viable substrates, affording potentially valuable N-alkyl adducts in synthetically useful yields and high diastereoselectivity. To further showcase the robustness and synthetic utility of the method, the catalytic enantioselective synthesis of N-benzyl indole 7a on a gram scale was carried out with similar efficiency (Supplementary Method 1.7).

Fig. 4. Late-stage diversification of drug molecules and natural products.

Fig. 4

Open in a new tab

Conditions: All reactions were carried out with NiI2•xH2O (10 mol%), ligand L*1 (15 mol%), 1a or citronellal-derived 1u (0.40 mmol), drugs- or ntural products-derived 2 (0.80 mmol), (OEt)2MeSiH (0.48 or 0.72 mmol), KF (0.60 or 0.88 mmol) and DME/DCE (3:1, 2.0 mL) at room temperature for 20 or 48 h.

Notably, the alkynyl group on the chiral N-propargyl indoles prodvided a useful and versatile handle for derivatizations (Fig. 5). For eaxmple, desilylation of 6a provided the enantioenriched terminal alkyne 8, which subsequently underwent the Sonogashira coupling to afford the aryl-substituted alkynye product 9. Terminal alkyne 8 underwent a click reaction to give chiral triazole 10. Reduction of 8 with Lindlar Pd and H2 afforded chiral N-allylic indole 11, while reduction of 6a with DIBAL-H produced chiral vinylsilyl compound 12.

Fig. 5. Derivatizations of chiral N-propargyl indoles.

Fig. 5

Open in a new tab

Desilylation and alkynyl reduction of compound 6a; Sonogashira coupling, [3 + 2] cycloaddition, and hydrogenation of compound 8. DIBAL-H = diisobutylaluminum hydride; Lindlar Pd = Pd/BaSO4; CuTc = copper(I) thiophene-2-carboxylate.

Mechanistic studies

To gain insight into the mechanism and origin of selectivity, a series of experiments well conducted. Generally, the reductive coupling process consists of π-bond insertion into L*Ni−H species, oxidative addition of the resulting L*Ni-alkyl intermediate, and reductive elimination to form product and the L*Ni-H catalyst46–63. Take the reductive coupling of N-alkenyl indoles with aryl halides as an example, competition experiments were performed to compare the reactivity between different aryl halides, indicating that (i) electron-deficent aryl bromide is more reactive than an electron-rich one (Fig. 6a–i), and (ii) aryl bromide is more reactive than aryl iodide (Fig. 6a–ii). In fact, a competing reductive hydrodehalogenation event was observed when an aryl iodide was uesd as the electrophile (Fig. 6a–iii)73,74, suggesting it is disadvantaged for the final product formation that oxidative addition of L*Ni complex prior to generation of L*Ni-alkyl intermediate. Next, the reductive coupling of 1a was chosen for kinetic studies, and the reaction progress was monitored by 19F and 1H NMR. Initial rate experiments disclosed that the reaction was zero-order in N-alkenyl indole, first-order in catalyst and aryl bromide, and fractional-order in diethoxymethylsilane (Fig. 6b, see also Supplementary Method 1.9.1). Moreover, Hammett studies were also performed to evaluate the influence that electronic variation of the aryl electrophiles had on the rate of hydroarylation (Fig. 6c)75,76. As a result, a variety of para-substituted aryl bromides reacted with N-vinylindole 1a at different rates, indicating that electronic variation of the aryl electrophile had a remarkable impact on the rate of N-vinylindole hydroarylation. A linear relationship was further observed through a Hammett plot. The positive slope (ρ = 0.67) suggests negative charge accumulation in the turnover-determining transition state, which is stabilized by electron-withdrawing substituents. Taken together, the above results reveal that oxidative addition is most likely the turnover-limiting step.

Fig. 6. Mechanistic experiments.

Fig. 6

Open in a new tab

a Competition experiments ([N] = N-indolyl); b Initial rate experiments; c Hammett study for the formation of 3 versus the corresponding σ value (k = reaction rate).

Furthermore, a linear correlation was observed by nonlinear effect studies on the enantiomeric composition of chiral ligand L*1 and N-alkylindole product 3o (Fig. 7a), which is consistent with a ligated nickel catalyst being of a monomeric nature. To identify the enantiodetermining step of the N-vinylindole hydroarylation reaction, we next investigated linear free energy relationships (LFERs) between the Hammett electronic parameters of various para-substituted aryl bromides and the enantioselectivities of the corresponding products (Fig. 7b)77,78. A linear correlation was observed with para-substituted aryl bromides as enantioselectivity increased with the introduction of electron-withdrawing groups (ρ = 1.07): 56% ee and 92% ee were observed for 4-methoxyphenyl bromide (σ = −0.27) and 4-acetylphenyl bromide (σ = 0.50), respectively, implying that the enantioselectivity of the process is not solely under catalyst control. In addition, the silane did essentially not affect the enantioselectivity of the reaction. On the basis of these results, oxidative addition is most likely the enantiodetermining step.

Fig. 7. Further mechanistic experiments.

Fig. 7

Open in a new tab

a Nonlinear effect study; b Hammett plot for the enantiomeric ratio (er) of hydroarylation products using para-substituted aryl bromides.

As shown in Fig. 8, a more complete description of the proposed mechanism is outlined. The syn-hydrometallation of an L*Ni-H species into an N-alkenyl indole would form alkyl-Ni(I) species (B). Subsequently, the selective oxidative addition between a particular isomer of the alkyl-Ni(I) species and the bromide (2, 5) would ultimately generate a single alkyl-Ni(III)-R enantiomer (C), because this step would be both the turnover-determining step and the enantio-determining step in the presence of a chiral ligand (L*1, L*8). In particular, the favored enantioselective transition state TS-C would lead to the major enantiomeric product, owing to steric interations with the ligand phenyl substituents (TS-C’). Then, stereospecific reductive elimination would afford the desired product (3, 4, 6, 7) and regenerate the active nickel hydride species (A). Alternatively, the competitive alkyl-Ni homolysis process was also possible53,55,62,79.

Fig. 8. Possible reaction pathway.

Fig. 8

Open in a new tab

The selective oxidative addition is proposed to be both the turnover-determining step and the enantio-determining step. [N] = N-indolyl; TS = transition state.

In summary, we have developed a nickel-catalyzed enantioselective, modular coupling of indole-based N-alkyl-Ni fragments with C(sp2)/C(sp) bromides. By the use of easily accessible and stable indole-derived alkenes as nucleophiles, this protocol enables streamlined preparation of enantioenriched N-alkylindole molecules under mild conditions, with previously inaccessible functional group tolerance and chemical space. Application in late-stage diversification of several complex drug molecules and natural products as well as chiral syntheses demonstrates its potential utility in the synthesis of valuable chiral N-alkylated bioactive compounds.

Methods

General procedure for the enantioselective synthesis of N-benzyl and N-allylic indoles

To an oven-dried 8.0 mL Teflon-screw cap test tube containing a magnetic stir was charged with NiI2•xH2O (16.8 mg, 10 mol%) and ligand L*1 (20.2 mg, 15 mol%) under an N2 atmosphere using glove-box techniques. Subsequently, anhydrous DME (1.5 mL) was added, and the mixture was stirred for 15 min at room temperature. Next, KF (35.0 mg, 0.60 mmol, 1.5 equiv.), N-alkenyl indole 1 (0.40 mmol, 1.0 equiv), aryl/alkenyl bromide 2 (0.80 mmol, 2.0 equiv.), DCE (0.5 mL), and (OEt)2MeSiH (78.0 uL, 0.48 mmol, 1.2 equiv.) were sequentially added. Then the tube was sealed with airtight electrical tapes and removed from the glove box and stirred at room temperature for 20–48 h. After that, the reaction mixture was diluted with saturated NH4Cl (aq., 1.0 mL) and EtOAc (5.0 mL). The aqueous phase was extracted with EtOAc (2 × 5.0 mL) and the combined organic phases were concentrated. The crude mixture was purified by flash column chromatography on silica gel using a mixture of PE/EtOAc as eluent to obtain the desired product 3, 4, 7.

General procedure for the enantioselective synthesis of N-propargyl indoles

To an oven-dried 12 mL Teflon-screw cap test tube containing a magnetic stir was charged with NiI2 (3.1 mg, 10 mol%) and ligand L*8 (7.7 mg, 15 mol%) under a nitrogen N2 atmosphere using glove-box techniques. Subsequently, anhydrous DME (0.25 mL) was added, and the mixture was stirred for 30 min at room temperature. Next, KF (17.4 mg, 0.30 mmol, 3.0 equiv), N-alkenyl indole 1 (0.10 mmol, 1.0 equiv), alkynyl bromide 5 (0.25 mmol, 2.5 equiv), and (OEt)2MeSiH (43.0 µL, 0.30 mmol, 3.0 equiv.) were sequentially added. Then the tube was sealed with airtight electrical tapes and removed from the glove box and stirred at 0 °C for 36 h. After that, the reaction mixture was diluted with saturated NH4Cl (aq., 1.0 mL) and EtOAc (5.0 mL). The aqueous phase was extracted with EtOAc (2 × 5.0 mL) and the combined organic phases were concentrated. The crude mixture was purified by flash column chromatography on silica gel using a mixture of PE/EtOAc as eluent to obtain the desired product 6.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information (14.1MB, pdf)

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant nos. 22101250, 22171240, 21861042), National Key R&D, Program of China (2019YFE0109200), Yunling Scholar of Yunnan Province, and Yunnan University (start-up grant to D.Q., CZ21623201) for financial support. We thank Advanced Analysis and Measurement Center of Yunnan University for the sample testing service.

Author contributions

D.Q. directed the enantioselective synthesis of N-benzyl and N-allyl indoles; Z.S. directed the enantioselective synthesis of N-propargyl indoles; X.Y. directed some experiments on the enantioselective synthesis of N-benzyl indoles; L.L. and J.R. optimized the reaction conditions, conducted the control experiments, evaluated the scope of the reaction and applied this reaction to the diversification of the natural products and drugs; J.Z. and X.W. helped to evaluate the scope of the reaction; D.Q. wrote the manuscript.

Peer review

Peer review information

Nature Communications thanks the anonymous reviewers for their contribution to the peer review of this work.

Data availability

The data relating to the materials and methods, experimental procedures, mechanism research, NMR spectra, and HPLC spectra are available in the Supplementary Information. All other data are available from the authors upon request.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interest.

Footnotes

Publisher’s note Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

These authors contributed equally: Lun Li, Jiangtao Ren.

Contributor Information

Zhihui Shao, Email: zhihui_shao@hotmail.com.

Xiaodong Yang, Email: xdyang@ynu.edu.cn.

Deyun Qian, Email: dyqian@ynu.edu.cn.

Supplementary information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1038/s41467-022-34615-9.

References

  • 1.Gul W, Hamann MT. Indole alkaloid marine natural products: an established source of cancer drug leads with considerable promise for the control of parasitic, neurological and other diseases. Life Sci. 2005;78:442–453. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2005.09.007. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Kochanowska-Karamyan AJ, Hamann MT. Marine indole alkaloids: potential new drug leads for the control of depression and anxiety. Chem. Rev. 2010;110:4489–4497. doi: 10.1021/cr900211p. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Sravanthi TV, Manju SL. Indoles: a promising scaffold for drug development. Eur. J. Pharm. Sci. 2016;91:1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.ejps.2016.05.025. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Singh PT, Singh MO. Recent progress in biological activities of indole and indole alkaloids. Mini-Rev. Med. Chem. 2018;18:9–25. doi: 10.2174/1389557517666170807123201. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Vitaku E, Smith DT, Njardarson JT. Analysis of the structural diversity, substitution patterns, and frequency of nitrogen heterocycles among U.S. FDA approved pharmaceuticals. J. Med. Chem. 2014;57:10257–10274. doi: 10.1021/jm501100b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Bandini M, Eichholzer A. Catalytic functionalization of indoles in a new dimension. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009;48:9608–9644. doi: 10.1002/anie.200901843. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Dalpozzo R. Strategies for the asymmetric functionalization of indoles: an update. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2015;44:742–778. doi: 10.1039/c4cs00209a. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 8.Trubitsõn D, Kanger T. Enantioselective catalytic synthesis of N-alkylated indoles. Symmetry. 2020;12:1184. [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Chen J-B, Jia Y-X. Recent progress in transition-metal-catalyzed enantioselective indole functionalizations. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2017;15:3550–3567. doi: 10.1039/c7ob00413c. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Lakhdar S, et al. Nucleophilic reactivities of indoles. J. Org. Chem. 2006;71:9088–9095. doi: 10.1021/jo0614339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Otero N, Mandado M, Mosquera RA. Nucleophilicity of indole derivatives: activating and deactivating effects based on proton affinities and electron density properties. J. Phys. Chem. A. 2007;111:5557–5562. doi: 10.1021/jp0708953. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.D’Ambra TE, et al. Conformationally restrained analogs of pravadoline: nanomolar potent, enantioselective, (aminoalkyl)indole agonists of the cannabinoid receptor. J. Med. Chem. 1992;35:124–135. doi: 10.1021/jm00079a016. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Mahaney PE, et al. Synthesis and activity of a new class of dual acting norepinephrine and serotonin reuptake inhibitors: 3-(1H-indol-1-yl)-3-arylpropan-1-amines. Biorg. Med. Chem. 2006;14:8455–8466. doi: 10.1016/j.bmc.2006.08.039. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Fernandez LS, et al. Flinderoles A−C: antimalarial bis-indole alkaloids from flindersia species. Org. Lett. 2009;11:329–332. doi: 10.1021/ol802506n. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Gehling VS, et al. Discovery, design, and synthesis of indole-based EZH2 inhibitors. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2015;25:3644–3649. doi: 10.1016/j.bmcl.2015.06.056. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Vaswani RG, et al. Identification of (R)-N-((4-Methoxy-6-methyl-2-oxo-1,2-dihydropyridin-3-yl)methyl)-2-methyl-1-(1-(1-(2,2,2-trifluoroethyl)piperidin-4-yl)ethyl)-1H-indole-3-carboxamide (CPI-1205), a Potent and Selective Inhibitor of Histone Methyltransferase EZH2, Suitable for Phase I Clinical Trials for B-Cell Lymphomas. J. Med. Chem. 2016;59:9928–9941. doi: 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.6b01315. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Bandini M, Eichholzer A, Tragni M, Umani-Ronchi A. Enantioselective phase-transfer-catalyzed intramolecular aza-michael reaction: effective route to pyrazino-indole compounds. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2008;47:3238–3241. doi: 10.1002/anie.200705685. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Cai Q, Zheng C, You S-L. Enantioselective intramolecular Aza-Michael additions of indoles catalyzed by chiral phosphoric acids. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2010;49:8666–8669. doi: 10.1002/anie.201003919. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Ye K-Y, Cheng Q, Zhuo C-X, Dai L-X, You S-L. An Iridium(I) N-heterocyclic carbene complex catalyzes asymmetric intramolecular allylic amination reactions. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2016;55:8113–8116. doi: 10.1002/anie.201603266. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 20.Kainz QM, et al. Asymmetric copper-catalyzed C-N cross-couplings induced by visible light. Science. 2016;351:681–684. doi: 10.1126/science.aad8313. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 21.Arredondo V, Hiew SC, Gutman ES, Premachandra IDUA, Van Vranken DL. Enantioselective palladium-catalyzed carbene insertion into the N−H bonds of aromatic heterocycles. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017;56:4156–4159. doi: 10.1002/anie.201611845. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 22.Chen M, Sun J. Catalytic Asymmetric N-Alkylation of Indoles and Carbazoles through 1,6-Conjugate Addition of Aza-para-quinone Methides. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017;56:4583–4587. doi: 10.1002/anie.201701947. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 23.Cai Y, Gu Q, You S-L. Chemoselective N–H functionalization of indole derivatives via the Reissert-type reaction catalyzed by a chiral phosphoric acid. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2018;16:6146–6154. doi: 10.1039/c8ob01863d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 24.Allen JR, Bahamonde A, Furukawa Y, Sigman MS. Enantioselective N-alkylation of indoles via an intermolecular Aza-Wacker-type reaction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019;141:8670–8674. doi: 10.1021/jacs.9b01476. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 25.Wang Y, Wang S, Shan W, Shao Z. Direct asymmetric N-propargylation of indoles and carbazoles catalyzed by lithium SPINOL phosphate. Nat. Commun. 2020;11:226. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-13886-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 26.Enders D, Wang C, Raabe G. Enantioselective synthesis of 3H-Pyrrolo[1,2-a]indole-2-carbaldehydes via an organocatalytic domino Aza-Michael/Aldol condensation reaction. Synthesis. 2009;2009:4119–4124. [Google Scholar]
  • 27.Stanley LM, Hartwig JF. Iridium-Catalyzed Regio- and Enantioselective N-Allylation of Indoles. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009;48:7841–7844. doi: 10.1002/anie.200904338. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 28.Hong L, Sun W, Liu C, Wang L, Wang R. Asymmetric Organocatalytic N-Alkylation of Indole-2-carbaldehydes with α,β-Unsaturated Aldehydes: One-Pot Synthesis of Chiral Pyrrolo[1,2-a]indole-2-carbaldehydes. Chem. Eur. J. 2010;16:440–444. doi: 10.1002/chem.200902638. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 29.Trost BM, Osipov M, Dong G. Palladium-catalyzed dynamic kinetic asymmetric transformations of vinyl aziridines with nitrogen heterocycles: rapid access to biologically active pyrroles and indoles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010;132:15800–15807. doi: 10.1021/ja1071509. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 30.Huang L, Wei Y, Shi M. Asymmetric substitutions of O-Boc-protected Morita–Baylis–Hillman adducts with pyrrole and indole derivatives. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2012;10:1396–1405. doi: 10.1039/c1ob06671d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 31.Chen L-Y, et al. Enantioselective direct functionalization of indoles by Pd/sulfoxide-phosphine-catalyzed N-allylic alkylation. Org. Lett. 2015;17:1381–1384. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.5b00077. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 32.Mukherjee S, Shee S, Poisson T, Besset T, Biju AT. Enantioselective N-heterocyclic carbene-catalyzed cascade reaction for the synthesis of pyrroloquinolines via N–H functionalization of indoles. Org. Lett. 2018;20:6998–7002. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.8b02820. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 33.Yang X, et al. Enantioselective indole N–H functionalization enabled by addition of carbene catalyst to indole aldehyde at remote site. ACS Catal. 2019;9:10971–10976. [Google Scholar]
  • 34.Liu W-B, Zhang X, Dai L-X, You S-L. Asymmetric N-allylation of indoles through the iridium-catalyzed allylic alkylation/oxidation of indolines. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012;51:5183–5187. doi: 10.1002/anie.201200649. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 35.Chen Q-A, Chen Z, Dong VM. Rhodium-catalyzed enantioselective hydroamination of alkynes with indolines. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015;137:8392–8395. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b05200. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 36.Xu K, Gilles T, Breit B. Asymmetric synthesis of N-allylic indoles via regio- and enantioselective allylation of aryl hydrazines. Nat. Commun. 2015;6:7616. doi: 10.1038/ncomms8616. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 37.Zi Y, Lange M, Schultz C, Vilotijevic I. Latent nucleophiles in lewis base catalyzed enantioselective N-allylations of N-heterocycles. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019;58:10727–10731. doi: 10.1002/anie.201903392. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 38.Ye Y, Kim S-T, Jeong J, Baik M-H, Buchwald SL. CuH-catalyzed enantioselective alkylation of indole derivatives with ligand-controlled regiodivergence. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019;141:3901–3909. doi: 10.1021/jacs.8b11838. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 39.Sevov CS, Zhou J, Hartwig JF. Iridium-catalyzed, intermolecular hydroamination of unactivated alkenes with indoles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014;136:3200–3207. doi: 10.1021/ja412116d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 40.Bartoszewicz A, Matier CD, Fu GC. Enantioconvergent alkylations of amines by alkyl electrophiles: copper-catalyzed nucleophilic substitutions of racemic α-halolactams by indoles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2019;141:14864–14869. doi: 10.1021/jacs.9b07875. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 41.Cherney AH, Kadunce NT, Reisman SE. Enantioselective and enantiospecific transition-metal-catalyzed cross-coupling reactions of organometallic reagents to construct C–C bonds. Chem. Rev. 2015;115:9587–9652. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00162. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 42.Choi J, Fu GC. Transition metal-catalyzed alkyl-alkyl bond formation: another dimension in cross-coupling chemistry. Science. 2017;356:eaaf7230. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf7230. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 43.Gandolfo E, Tang X, Raha Roy S, Melchiorre P. Photochemical asymmetric nickel-catalyzed acyl cross-coupling. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019;58:16854–16858. doi: 10.1002/anie.201910168. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 44.Pezzetta C, Bonifazi D, Davidson RWM. Enantioselective synthesis of N-benzylic heterocycles: a nickel and photoredox dual catalysis approach. Org. Lett. 2019;21:8957–8961. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.9b03338. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 45.Lavernhe R, Alexy EJ, Zhang H, Stoltz BM. Palladium-catalyzed enantioselective decarboxylative allylic alkylation of acyclic α-N-pyrrolyl/indolyl ketones. Org. Lett. 2020;22:4272–4275. doi: 10.1021/acs.orglett.0c01303. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 46.Wang Z, Yin H, Fu GC. Catalytic enantioconvergent coupling of secondary and tertiary electrophiles with olefins. Nature. 2018;563:379–383. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0669-y. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 47.Zhou F, Zhang Y, Xu X, Zhu S. NiH-catalyzed remote asymmetric hydroalkylation of alkenes with racemic α-bromo amides. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019;58:1754–1758. doi: 10.1002/anie.201813222. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 48.He S-J, et al. Nickel-catalyzed enantioconvergent reductive hydroalkylation of olefins with α-heteroatom phosphorus or sulfur alkyl electrophiles. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020;142:214–221. doi: 10.1021/jacs.9b09415. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 49.Bera S, Mao R, Hu X. Enantioselective C(sp3)–C(sp3) cross-coupling of non-activated alkyl electrophiles via nickel hydride catalysis. Nat. Chem. 2021;13:270–277. doi: 10.1038/s41557-020-00576-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 50.Wang X-X, Lu X, Li Y, Wang J-W, Fu Y. Recent advances in nickel-catalyzed reductive hydroalkylation and hydroarylation of electronically unbiased alkenes. Sci. China Chem. 2020;63:1586–1600. [Google Scholar]
  • 51.He Y, Chen J, Jiang X, Zhu S. Enantioselective NiH-catalyzed reductive hydrofunctionalization of alkenes. Chin. J. Chem. 2022;40:651–661. [Google Scholar]
  • 52.Zhang Z, Bera S, Fan C, Hu X. Streamlined alkylation via nickel-hydride-catalyzed hydrocarbonation of alkenes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022;144:7015–7029. doi: 10.1021/jacs.1c13482. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 53.He Y, Liu C, Yu L, Zhu S. Enantio- and regioselective NiH-catalyzed reductive hydroarylation of vinylarenes with aryl iodides. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2020;59:21530–21534. doi: 10.1002/anie.202010386. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 54.Yang Z-P, Fu GC. Convergent catalytic asymmetric synthesis of esters of chiral dialkyl carbinols. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2020;142:5870–5875. doi: 10.1021/jacs.0c01324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 55.Jiang X, et al. Nickel-catalysed migratory hydroalkynylation and enantioselective hydroalkynylation of olefins with bromoalkynes. Nat. Commun. 2021;12:3792. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-24094-9. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 56.Liu J, Gong H, Zhu S. Nickel-catalyzed, regio- and enantioselective benzylic alkenylation of olefins with alkenyl bromide. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021;60:4060–4064. doi: 10.1002/anie.202012614. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 57.Shi L, Xing L-L, Hu W-B, Shu W. Regio- and enantioselective Ni-catalyzed formal hydroalkylation, hydrobenzylation, and hydropropargylation of acrylamides to α-tertiary amides. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021;60:1599–1604. doi: 10.1002/anie.202011339. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 58.Sun S-Z, et al. Enantioselective deaminative alkylation of amino acid derivatives with unactivated olefins. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2022;144:1130–1137. doi: 10.1021/jacs.1c12350. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 59.Cuesta-Galisteo S, Schörgenhumer J, Wei X, Merino E, Nevado C. Nickel-catalyzed asymmetric synthesis of α-arylbenzamides. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2021;60:1605–1609. doi: 10.1002/anie.202011342. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 60.Qian D, Bera S, Hu X. Chiral alkyl amine synthesis via catalytic enantioselective hydroalkylation of enecarbamates. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2021;143:1959–1967. doi: 10.1021/jacs.0c11630. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 61.Wang J-W, et al. Catalytic asymmetric reductive hydroalkylation of enamides and enecarbamates to chiral aliphatic amines. Nat. Commun. 2021;12:1313. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-21600-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 62.He Y, Song H, Chen J, Zhu S. NiH-catalyzed asymmetric hydroarylation of N-acyl enamines to chiral benzylamines. Nat. Commun. 2021;12:638. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-20888-5. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 63.Wang S, et al. Enantioselective access to chiral aliphatic amines and alcohols via Ni-catalyzed hydroalkylations. Nat. Commun. 2021;12:2771. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-22983-7. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 64.Maki Y, Mori H, Endo T. Xanthate-mediated controlled radical polymerization of N-vinylindole derivatives. Macromolecules. 2007;40:6119–6130. [Google Scholar]
  • 65.Nakabayashi K, Mori H. Recent progress in controlled radical polymerization of N-vinyl monomers. Eur. Polym. J. 2013;49:2808–2838. [Google Scholar]
  • 66.Rainka MP, Aye Y, Buchwald SL. Copper-catalyzed asymmetric conjugate reduction as a route to novel β-azaheterocyclic acid derivatives. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA. 2004;101:5821–5823. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0307764101. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 67.Sorensen, C. C. & Leibfarth, F. A. Stereoselective helix-sense-selective cationic polymerization of N-vinylcarbazole using chiral lewis acid catalysis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 144, 8487–8492 (2022). [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
  • 68.Wu X, Ren J, Shao Z, Yang X, Qian D. Transition-metal-catalyzed asymmetric couplings of α-aminoalkyl fragments to access chiral alkylamines. ACS Catal. 2021;11:6560–6577. [Google Scholar]
  • 69.Rattanangkool E, Vilaivan T, Sukwattanasinitt M, Wacharasindhu S. An atom-economic approach for vinylation of indoles and phenols using calcium carbide as acetylene surrogate. Eur. J. Org. Chem. 2016;2016:4347–4353. [Google Scholar]
  • 70.Kim SW, Schempp TT, Zbieg JR, Stivala CE, Krische MJ. Regio- and enantioselective iridium-catalyzed n-allylation of indoles and related azoles with racemic branched alkyl-substituted allylic acetates. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2019;58:7762–7766. doi: 10.1002/anie.201902799. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 71.Sun M, Liu M, Li C. Rhodium-catalyzed chemodivergent regio- and enantioselective allylic alkylation of indoles. Chem. Eur. J. 2021;27:3457–3462. doi: 10.1002/chem.202004613. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 72.Cernak T, Dykstra KD, Tyagarajan S, Vachal P, Krska SW. The medicinal chemist’s toolbox for late stage functionalization of drug-like molecules. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2016;45:546–576. doi: 10.1039/c5cs00628g. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 73.Lipshutz BH, Tomioka T, Pfeiffer SS. Mild and selective reductions of aryl halides catalyzed by low-valent nickel complexes. Tetrahedron Lett. 2001;42:7737–7740. [Google Scholar]
  • 74.Alonso F, Beletskaya IP, Yus M. Metal-mediated reductive hydrodehalogenation of organic halides. Chem. Rev. 2002;102:4009–4092. doi: 10.1021/cr0102967. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 75.Hammett LP. The effect of structure upon the reactions of organic compounds. benzene derivatives. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1937;59:96–103. [Google Scholar]
  • 76.Hansch C, Leo A, Taft RW. A survey of Hammett substituent constants and resonance and field parameters. Chem. Rev. 1991;91:165–195. [Google Scholar]
  • 77.Jensen KH, Sigman MS. Evaluation of catalyst acidity and substrate electronic effects in a hydrogen bond-catalyzed enantioselective reaction. J. Org. Chem. 2010;75:7194–7201. doi: 10.1021/jo1013806. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 78.Bandar JS, Pirnot MT, Buchwald SL. Mechanistic studies lead to dramatically improved reaction conditions for the Cu-catalyzed asymmetric hydroamination of olefins. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015;137:14812–14818. doi: 10.1021/jacs.5b10219. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 79.Gutierrez O, Tellis JC, Primer DN, Molander GA, Kozlowski MC. Nickel-catalyzed cross-coupling of photoredox-generated radicals: uncovering a general manifold for stereoconvergence in nickel-catalyzed cross-couplings. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2015;137:4896–4899. doi: 10.1021/ja513079r. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

Supplementary Information (14.1MB, pdf)

Data Availability Statement

The data relating to the materials and methods, experimental procedures, mechanism research, NMR spectra, and HPLC spectra are available in the Supplementary Information. All other data are available from the authors upon request.

Articles from Nature Communications are provided here courtesy of Nature Publishing Group

RESOURCES