Keywords: respiratory complex I, metformin, BAY 87-2243, EVP 4593, IACS-010759, complex I inhibitors, cancer therapy
Abstract
Inhibition of respiratory complex I (CI) is becoming a promising anti-cancer strategy, encouraging the design and the use of inhibitors, whose mechanism of action, efficacy and specificity remain elusive. As CI is a central player of cellular bioenergetics, a finely tuned dosing of targeting drugs is required to avoid side effects. We compared the specificity and mode of action of CI inhibitors metformin, BAY 87-2243 and EVP 4593 using cancer cell models devoid of CI. Here we show that both BAY 87-2243 and EVP 4593 were selective, while the antiproliferative effects of metformin were considerably independent from CI inhibition. Molecular docking predictions indicated that the high efficiency of BAY 87-2243 and EVP 4593 may derive from the tight network of bonds in the quinone binding pocket, although in different sites. Most of the amino acids involved in such interactions are conserved across species and only rarely found mutated in human. Our data make a case for caution when referring to metformin as a CI-targeting compound, and highlight the need for dosage optimization and careful evaluation of molecular interactions between inhibitors and the holoenzyme.
1. Introduction
Respiratory complex I (NADH:ubiquinone oxidoreductase; EC 1.6.5.3; CI) is a ubiquitous enzyme that constitutes the entry site of electrons coming from NADH in the mitochondrial respiratory chain. This process is coupled with proton translocation, thus contributing to the generation of the electrochemical gradient necessary for mitochondrial ATP production [1]. Owing to its pivotal contribution in controlling cell metabolism, adaptation to hypoxia and susceptibility to apoptosis, CI has been recognized as an essential player during tumour progression, metastasis formation and resistance to chemotherapy (reviewed in [2]). In particular, its derangement or inhibition has shown to slow down tumour growth, confining aggressive tumours into a low proliferative state and providing a temporal window for additional therapeutic intervention [3–7]. Hence, this enzyme has emerged as an attractive druggable target for cancer treatment, and several CI inhibitors have been proposed as possible therapeutic agents in different experimental preclinical settings [2,5,8–11]. Within the plethora of CI inhibitors, the biguanide metformin is the most widely investigated, being already used in clinical practice in the treatment of type 2 diabetes (T2D). Several in vitro and in vivo studies highlight the action of this drug in preventing tumour progression [4,12–15], while epidemiological data on T2D patients and observational studies link the use of metformin with lower incidence of neoplastic disease (reviewed in [16–18]). However, meta-analyses of clinical data revealed a heterogeneous patient response to metformin, depending on tumor type and stage [19,20] and conflicting results emerge also from completed clinical trials [21–30]. Further, recent studies showed CI-independent antiproliferative effects of metformin [31,32] and identified additional mitochondrial targets [32–35], posing the need for optimization of the biguanide doses for each tumour type and prompting the development of more specific compounds. Among the large group of repurposed or newly discovered molecules, BAY 87-2243 has shown to arrest cell proliferation in non-small cell lung cancer cells [36], to induce cell death in melanoma cells [37,38], thus preventing tumour growth in vivo [36–38] and to increase sensitivity to radiotherapy in squamous cell carcinoma [39]. Lastly, quinazoline-based compounds such as EVP 4593, originally identified as Nuclear Factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NF-κB) inhibitor, have been recently recognized to target specifically CI [40] and to strongly suppress tumour growth in colon cancer xenografts in association with vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibition [41].
Despite the demonstrated antitumorigenic properties of these molecules and the advances in the development of new CI inhibitors, none of them is currently used in clinical practice and several open issues remain. First, the studies conducted so far did not consider the possible effects of the compounds on molecular targets different from CI, which poses the question of their specificity. Second, the inhibitors efficacy as antineoplastic agents has been determined in a limited number of cancer models, neglecting that it might depend on the tumour type and its metabolic status. Lastly, the mechanisms behind the effects of these molecules have rarely been dissected, most often associating their antiproliferative effect to apoptotic cell death [42,43]. In this frame, the recent release of high-resolution structures of mammalian CI in different conformations [44] encourages the investigation of the interactions between inhibitors and the enzyme at the atomic level, allowing to gain insights on their specificity and mode of action in a fast and cost-effective manner.
We here evaluated the antiproliferative potential and the effective concentrations of three CI inhibitors, namely metformin, EVP 4593 and BAY 87-2243, in cell lines representative of aggressive ovarian cancer, colon cancer and melanoma. By exploiting unique CI deficient cell models, we demonstrated a highly non-specific effect of metformin uncommon to the other inhibitors. Molecular docking analyses revealed that EVP 4593 and BAY 87-2243 form a tight network of interactions in the quinone binding site, although involving different residues, possibly explaining the difference in efficiency between the two inhibitors.
2. Material and methods
2.1. Cell lines generation, maintenance and treatments
Human ovarian cancer cell line SKOV3 and murine melanoma cell line B16-F10 were purchased from ATCC (#HTB-77; #CRL-6475, Manassas, VA, USA). Human colorectal cancer cell line HCT116 was authenticated using AMPFISTRIdentifiler kit (Applied Biosystem #4322288) and its STR profile corresponded to the putative background. Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) was sequenced by Sanger sequencing as previously described [45], to ensure wild-type genotype. The results are available upon request. NDUFS3 knockout cells, referred as SKOV3−/−, HCT116−/− and B16-F10−/−, were generated by genome editing as previously reported [7,45,46]. Briefly, CRISPR/Cas9 system was used to introduce a frameshift mutation in NDUFS3 gene in SKOV3 human cell line and Ndufs3 gene in B16-F10 murine cell line, using exon 2 targeting guide TGTCAGACCACGGAATGATG and exon 3 targeting guide TTGTGGGTCACATCACTCCG, respectively. Instead, zinc finger endonuclease system was used to obtain HCT116 NDUFS3 knockout. Plasmids containing cDNA of NDUFS3-targeted zinc finger endonucleases (Sigma-Aldrich #CKOZFND15186) were purified and transcribed in vitro. The pool of zinc finger endonucleases mRNAs was transfected into 70% confluent HCT116 cells. The resulting heterozygous clones were subjected to a subsequent second transfection with NDUFS3 zinc finger pool and led to the selection of homozygous frameshift NDUFS3 mutants [7].
Cells were grown in high-glucose Dulbecco's Modified Eagle's Medium (DMEM) plus sodium pyruvate (Euroclone #ECB7501L), supplemented with 10% FBS South America origin EU Approved (Euroclone #ECS5000L), 2 mM l-glutamine (Euroclone #ECB3000D), 1% penicillin/streptomycin (Euroclone #ECB3001D) and 50 µg ml−1 uridine (Sigma-Aldrich #U3003), in an incubator at 37°C with a humidified atmosphere at 5% CO2. EVOS M5000 Imaging System (ThermoFisher Scientific #AMF5000) was used for cell lines monitoring.
2.2. Compounds
We tested the following CI inhibitors:1,1-dimethylbiguanide hydrochloride (metformin, Sigma-Aldrich #D150959), N4-[2-(4-phenoxyphenyl) ethyl]-4,6-quinazolinediamine (EVP 4593, Sigma-Aldrich #SML0579), 1-cyclopropyl-4-(4-[(5-methyl-3-{3-[4-(trifluoromethoxy) phenyl]-1,2,4-oxadiazol-5-yl)-1H-pyrazol-1-yl)methyl]pyridin- 2-yl) piperazine (BAY 87-2243, Sigma-Aldrich #SML2384) and IACS-010759 (SelleckChem #S8731). Metformin was directly dissolved at the indicated concentration in growth medium. EVP 4593, BAY 87-2243 and IACS-010759 were dissolved in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO, Sigma-Aldrich #D2650) to generate a 42 mM, 3.8 mM and 10 mM stock solution, respectively, that were stored at −20°C. Prior to each experiment, all the three drugs were freshly dissolved in the medium to reach the indicated final concentration. For each treatment, the final concentration of DMSO in the medium was calculated (less than or equal to 0.1%) and was used as vehicle control in the untreated condition (referred as UT).
2.3. Cell growth and morphology evaluation
Cell proliferation and morphology were assessed using the Incucyte Live-imaging System (Sartorius) and proliferation was quantified through time-lapse image acquisition and metrics application.
Briefly, 2.5 × 103 SKOV3/well, 2 × 103 HCT116/well and 1 × 103 B16-F10/well were seeded in 96-well plates in high-glucose DMEM and incubated overnight to allow cells attachment. For specificity assays, NDUFS3 wild-type and knockout cells were seeded simultaneously, and the same confluence mask was applied for subsequent analysis. Treatment with CI inhibitors (metformin, EVP 4593, IACS-010759 and BAY 87-2243) started 24 h after seeding, and the plate was placed in Incucyte for 72 h at 37°C with a humidified atmosphere at 5% CO2. Images (4/well) were captured at 10× magnification with 2 h intervals. Cell growth was evaluated by Incucyte system phase contrast software (confluence metrics), which provides an occupied area average (% of confluence) per image/per well. For data in electronic supplementary material, figures S1 and S2, the analysis was performed using % of confluence metric per scan normalized on treatment starting point (time 0). For data in figures 1 and 2, the percentage of cell confluence normalized on time 0 for each inhibitor's treatment was subsequently normalized to untreated control. At least three replicate experiments were performed for each treatment condition.
2.4. Apoptotic cell death evaluation
Apoptosis upon drug treatments was determined using the Incucyte Caspase-3/7 green dye (Sartorius #4440). Cells (SKOV3, HCT116 and B16-F10) were seeded in a 96-wells plate in high glucose DMEM, as described above. Drugs were added after 24 h, in presence of 5 µM Incucyte Caspase-3/7 green dye following the manufacturer's protocol. Then, the plate was placed in Incucyte for 72 h and images (4/well) were captured at 10× magnification with 2 h intervals, both in phase contrast and fluorescent green channel. For each cell line, staurosporine (100 nM, Sigma-Aldrich #S4400) treatment was performed as a positive control. For each experimental condition, the masks for fluorescent objects identification were set by the Incucyte integrated analysis software. Total and green positive cells were counted at 10× magnification in three fields of view per condition, and data are expressed as percentage of apoptotic cells [(number of green cells/number of total cells) × 100].
2.5. Microrespirometry
Mitochondrial respiration was measured using the protocol described for the Seahorse XFe Cell Mito Stress Test Kit (Agilent #103015-100) following the manufacturer instructions. Briefly, 12 × 103 cells/well (SKOV3, HCT116) and 8 × 103 (B16-F10) were seeded in 80 µl of DMEM medium into XFe96 cell culture plates and incubated for 48 h (HCT116) and for 24 h (SKOV3, B16-F10) at 37°C and 5% CO2. Complete growth medium was replaced with 180 µl of XF medium (Agilent #103575-100) supplemented with 10 mM glucose, 1 mM sodium pyruvate, 2 mM l-glutamine, at pH 7.4. For temperature and pH equilibration, cells were incubated at 37°C for 30 min. Three oxygen consumption rate (OCR) baseline measurements were followed by injection of either vehicle or different concentrations of CI-inhibitors and subsequent measurements; 1 µM oligomycin, carbonyl cyanide-p-trifluoromethoxyphenylhydrazone (FCCP), 1 µM rotenone and 1 µM antimycin A were sequentially added to each well. FCCP concentrations were previously optimized by titration and were 0.5 µM for SKOV3, 0.75 µM for HCT116 and 1 µM for B16-F10, respectively. At the end of the assay, medium was removed and sulforhodamine B (SRB) assay was performed to determine protein content for normalization. Briefly, plates were incubated with 10% trichloroacetic acid (TCA) for 1 h at 4°C to fix the cells. Five washes in water were carried out. Once the plates were dry, proteins were stained by incubation with 0.4% SRB for 30 min at RT. SRB was solubilized with 10 mM Tris and absorbance at 560 nm was determined using a Victor2 plate reader (Perkin-Elmer). Data (pmol min−1) were normalized to blank corrected SRB absorbance.
2.6. Mitochondrial ATP synthesis rate assay
The rate of mitochondrial ATP synthesis was measured in digitonin-permeabilized CI competent cells by using a luciferin/luciferase assay as previously described with minor modifications [47]. Chemiluminescence was determined as a function of time with a luminometer (Sirius L Tube, Titertek-Berthold, Pforzheim, Germany). After trypsinization, cells (10 × 106 ml−1) were suspended in a buffer containing 150 mM KCl, 25 mM Tris–HCl, 2 mM EDTA (ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid), 0.1% bovine serum albumin, 10 mM potassium phosphate, 0.1 mM MgCl2, pH 7.4, kept at room temperature for 15 min, then incubated with 50 µg ml−1 digitonin until 90–100% of cells were positive to Trypan Blue staining. Aliquots of 3 × 105 permeabilized cells were incubated in the same buffer in the presence of the adenylate kinase inhibitor P1,P5-di(adenosine-5′) pentaphosphate (0.1 mM, Sigma-Aldrich #A2754) and 10 µl of the luciferin/luciferase assay reagent (Sigma-Aldrich #FLAAM-5VL). Then, ATP synthesis rate was determined after the sequential addition of the following substrates and inhibitors. First, 0.9 mM sodium malate (Sigma-Aldrich #M1125), 0.9 mM sodium pyruvate (Sigma-Aldrich #P2256) and 0.09 mM ADP (Sigma-Aldrich #A2754) were added to determine ATP synthesis via CI for at least 30 s after injections. Then, CI inhibitors were added at the optimized concentrations that completely suppress maximal respiration previously determined by titration with Seahorse. Subsequently, 2 µg ml−1 rotenone and 10 mM succinate were provided to determine CII-driven ATP synthesis without any interference of possible residual activity derived from CI. The chemiluminescence signal was calibrated with an internal ATP standard after the addition of 1 µM oligomycin. The rates of the ATP synthesis were normalized to protein content and the citrate synthase (CS) activity.
2.7. Molecular docking
Among the recently released high-resolution CI ovine structures [44] we focused on three of them: one for the initial step of the catalytic cycle (PDB ID 6ZKI), in which a molecule of decyl-ubiquinone is indeed present in the shallow quinone binding site (Q-site), the second in the close conformation corresponding to the quinone reduction step (PDB ID 6ZKC), in which a molecule of decyl-ubiquinone was solved in both the shallow and the deep Q-sites, and one of the rotenone inhibited structures (PDB ID 6ZKK) in which a single rotenone molecule is found in the deep Q-site. Docking calculations were conducted in two stages: in the first benchmark redocking stage the ligand (i.e. rotenone or decyl-ubiquinone) present in some selected structures of ovine CI were removed and the ability of the selected protocol to restore the proper binding pose was tested. In the second stage, EVP 4593 and BAY 87-2243 were docked to the Q-site with the aim of obtaining new information regarding the structure–function relationship of these inhibitors and their different behaviour. CI structures used for the docking calculations where treated as follows: hydrogen atoms were added by using the addh tool available in the UCSF Chimera suite [48], the atomic charges were assigned by using the AMBER ff14SB force field [49], and the proteins were oriented so that they could contain the Q site within a parallelepiped box of the smallest possible size. The charges for the [Fe4S4] clusters were assigned according to Na et al. [50]. The ligand charges were assigned by using the AM1-BCC method [51]. Ligands that were not present in the selected structures were generated with UCSF Chimera and minimized through 1000 step of steepest descent and 100 steps of conjugate gradient using the same software. The analysis of the Q site channel was performed by using the MOLEonline web server [52,53]. The docking calculations were performed by using AutoDock Vina 1.0 [54] with default parameters. The analysis of the results was made by using UCSF Chimera and LigPlot [55].
2.8. Multiple sequence alignment
Multiple sequence alignment was performed as previously reported [56]. Briefly, all of the reviewed non-redundant eukaryotic protein sequences from ND1, NDUFS2 (49 kDa in ovine CI) and NDUFS7 (PSST in ovine CI) were downloaded from UniProtKB (https://www.uniprot.org/help/uniprotkb, accessed on 15 May 2022). Ovine 49 kDa and PSST sequences were obtained by 6ZKC, 6ZKI and 6ZKK structures used for molecular docking analyses. Fragment sequences were eliminated obtaining a final number of aligned sequences of 159 for ND1, 24 for NDUFS2 and 18 for NDUFS7. Sequences were aligned using Clustal Omega v:1.2.4 (https://www.ebi.ac.uk/Tools/msa/clustalo/, accessed on 15th May 2022) with the default parameters. Numbering of nuclear subunits does not consider the mitochondrial translocation sequence (MTS). Ovine sequences were set as reference for numbering and consensus sequences and percentages of identity were calculated for each alignment by using Jalview v:2.11.1.4 [57]. Amino acids were considered conserved if their sequence identity surpassed the conservation threshold of 70%. Data are reported in electronic supplementary material, table S1.
2.9. Genetic variations search
In order to identify variants in MT-ND1, NDUFS2 and NDUFS7 potentially affecting EVP 4593 and BAY 87-2243 interactions in the Q-site, we exploited Ensembl data sources (GRCh38.p13; Ensembl IDs: MT-ND1—ENSG00000198888; NDUFS2—ENST00000367993.7; NDUFS7—ENST00000233627.14). In particular, dbSNP (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/snp/) was interrogated to find already reported variations, while ClinVar (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/) was used for variants of clinical significance. Somatic variants within the Q-site already associated with cancer were annotated via COSMIC (https://cancer.sanger.ac.uk/cosmic) search. When available, the minor allele frequency (MAF) relative to each variant was determined by frequencies reported in dbSNP, exploiting pipelines and databases containing exomes and genomic sequences such as ALFA, 8.3KJPN, KOREAN population from KRGDB, HGDP, MGP and others. Also, GnomAD/ExAC database (https://gnomad.broadinstitute.org/), that contains large-scale sequencing data obtained from specific diseases and population genetic studies, was consulted to interpret human genetic variations. Frequencies of mtDNA variants are referred to the revised Cambridge Reference Sequence (rCRS, Accession Number NC 012920.1) and were reported according to the human mtDNA variation databases Mitomap (https://www.mitomap.org/MITOMAP) and Helix (https://www.helix.com/pages/mitochondrial-variant-database). Non-synonymous variants and their relative frequencies are reported in tables 1 and 2.
Table 1.
Nucleotide change | Aa change (−MTS/+MTS) | MAF % (n. variants/total samples) | Source(s) | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|
NDUFS2 | ||||
c.278G > A | p.G60D/p.G93D | not available | COSMIC: COSV100917583 | Adenocarcinoma (prostate) |
c.421T > G | p.Y108D/p.Y141D | not available | COSMIC: COSV100917488 | Adenocarcinoma (rectum) |
c.422A > G | p.Y108C/p.Y141C | not available | dbSNP: rs1665635198 | ClinVar associated phenotypes: CI deficiency |
c.589A > G | p.M164V/p.M197V | GnomAD: 0.000008 (2/250266) | dbSNP: rs771341018 | |
ExAC: 0.000008 (1/120184) | ||||
c.591G > A | p.M164I/p.M197I | ALFA: 0.00000 (0/10680) | dbSNP: rs763812241 | |
ALSPAC: 0.0000 (0/3854) | ||||
TWINSUK: 0.0003 (1/3708) | ||||
c.601T > G | p.F168V/p.F201V | not available | COSMIC: COSV100917478 | endometrioid carcinoma |
NDUFS7 | ||||
c.239G > T | p.W46L/p.W80L | not available | COSMIC: COSV99282674 | malignant melanoma |
c.256C > G | p.L52V/p.L86V | not available | dbSNP: rs758518373 | |
c.268G > T | p.A56S/p.A90S | not available | COSMIC: COSV52041570 | ductal carcinoma (pancreas) |
c.268G > A | p.A56T/p.A90T | not available | dbSNP: rs781725082 | |
c.268G > C | p.A56P/p.A90P | ExAC: 0.000008 (1/117774) | dbSNP: rs781725082 | |
c.269C > A | p.A56D/p.A90D | not available | COSMIC: COSV52039157 | transitional cell carcinoma (bladder) |
c.269C > T | p.A56V/p.A90V | not available | dbSNP: rs1226932595 | |
c.289G > C | p.A63P/p.A97P | not available | COSMIC: COSV99282661 | adenocarcinoma (colon) |
c.290C > G | p.A63G/p.A97G | ALFA: 0.00000 (0/11862) | dbSNP: rs1049352982 | |
c.291del | p.A63-/p.A97- | not available | dbSNP: rs1217004108 | |
c.327_328delinsGG | p.F76V/p.F110V | not available | COSMIC: COSV52040183 | serous carcinoma (ovary) |
c.328_329insGA | p.F76*/p.F110* | not available | dbSNP: rs1404463155 | |
c.339_348del | p.A81-/p.A115- | GnomAD (exome): 0.000024 (6/249810) | dbSNP: rs777504868 | |
GnomAD: 0.000029 (4/140246) | ||||
ExAC: 0.000034 (4/119062) | ||||
TOPMed: 0.000026 (7/264690) | ||||
ALFA: 0.00000 (0/14050) |
Table 2.
Nucleotide change | Aa change | MAF % (n. variants/total samples) | Source(s) | Notes |
---|---|---|---|---|
MT-ND1 | ||||
m.3368T > C | p.M21T | Mitomap: 0.035 (20/56895) | dbSNP: rs1603218920 | |
Helix: 0.037 (72/195983) | ||||
m.3376G > A | p.E24K | Mitomap: 0.000 (0/56895) | dbSNP: rs397515612 | associated diseases: LHON, MELAS |
m.3377A > G | p.E24G | not available | COSMIC: COSV104670687 | malignant melanoma |
m.3380G > A | p.R25Q | Mitomap: 0.005 (3/56895) | dbSNP: rs1603218926 | endometrioid carcinoma |
COSMIC: COSV62293468 | ClinVar-associated phenotypes: MELAS | |||
m.3388C > A | p.L28M | Mitomap: 0.046 (26/56895) | dbSNP: rs387906730 | ClinVar-associated phenotypes: LS, SNHL |
Helix: 0.117 (230/195983) | Haplogroups: U5a1a1i, H2a2b1a1, H2a2b1a, R8 | |||
m.3407G > A | p.R34H | Mitomap: 0.002 (1/56895) | dbSNP: rs1603218938 | |
m.3918G > C | p.E204D | Mitomap: 0.000 (0/56895) | dbSNP: rs28357972 | |
Helix: 0.001 (1/195983) | ||||
m.4126C > A | p.R274* | not available | dbSNP: rs28461785 |
2.10. Statistical analyses
GraphPad v8 (GraphPad Software Inc., San Diego, CA, USA) was used to create plots and to perform statistical tests, as indicated in figure legends. Data are expressed as averages of at least three independent experiments and standard error of the mean (s.e.m.) is represented by error bars, unless explicitly indicated.
3. Results
3.1. Metformin and EVP 4593 exert CI-independent antiproliferative effect on cancer cells
To investigate the specificity of three CI targeting compounds, namely metformin, EVP 4593 and BAY 87-2243, we exploited unique cancer cell models lacking CI previously generated by knocking out the core subunit gene NDUFS3. In detail, we used ovarian carcinoma SKOV3 cells [45], colorectal cancer HCT116 [7] and murine melanoma B16-F10 [46] as representative of neoplasias in which metformin has shown contrasting data [23,30,58–60]. These models have been previously characterized in terms of bioenergetics and CI stability [7,45,46]. To investigate whether the three inhibitors may display CI-independent antiproliferative effects, growth of NDUFS3−/− cells (SKOV3−/−, HCT116−/−, B16-F10−/−) was analysed upon treatment at concentrations earlier determined in in vitro experimental settings [37,41,42]. Metformin reduced cell growth of all NDUFS3−/− models in most of the tested conditions (figure 1a; electronic supplementary material, figure S1a), suggesting that its antiproliferative ability is considerably mediated by CI-independent mechanisms. While HCT116−/− and SKOV3−/− displayed reduced cell growth with all the tested concentrations, B16-F10−/− cell proliferation was reduced only at high metformin concentrations (10–20 mM) (figure 1a; electronic supplementary material, figure S1a), suggesting that the drug's CI-independent action on cell proliferation may depend on tissue or species origin. On the other hand, EVP 4593 treatment showed similar effects in all three cell lines, causing the reduction of NDUFS3−/− cell growth at 20 µM in SKOV3 and B16-F10, and at 10–20 µM in HCT116 (figure 1b; electronic supplementary material, figure S1b), revealing CI-independent antiproliferative action only at high concentrations. Finally, CI-deficient cancer cell growth was unaffected by BAY 87-2243 (figure 1c; electronic supplementary material, figure S1c), indicating that under the tested conditions the compound displays no CI-independent antiproliferative effects. Hence, when comparing CI-independent effects, it appears clear that metformin and EVP 4593 decrease cancer cell growth also via mechanisms unrelated to CI (figure 1d), a phenomenon that may depend on the inhibitors' concentration and cancer background.
3.2. Apoptosis is triggered by inhibitor concentrations associated with CI-independent antiproliferative effects
Targeting CI has been proposed as a potential therapy for several cancers, particularly those commonly relying on oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS) for energy production. Therefore, CI-competent cells (NDUFS3+/+) were treated with the same concentrations of the three inhibitors. Metformin induced a dose-dependent decrease in cell proliferation, with a reduction of cell growth after 72 h of 58–90% in SKOV3, 46–77% in HCT116 and 24–62% in B16-F10 (figure 2a; electronic supplementary material, figure S2a). A similar effect was observed with EVP 4593 (2.5–20 µM), which after 72 h induced a decrease in cell proliferation of 49–62% in SKOV3, 52–74% in HCT116 and 66–84% in B16-F10 (figure 2b; electronic supplementary material, figure S2b). Conversely, BAY 87-2243 caused a modest, although significant, antiproliferative action even at the highest concentration applied (1 µM), reducing cell growth after 72 h treatment by 38%, 20% and 28%, in SKOV3, HCT116 and B16-F10, respectively (figure 2c; electronic supplementary material, figure S2c). Moreover, EVP 4593 and BAY 87-2243 induced a consistent and significantly higher block of cell proliferation in CI-competent cells compared to their CI-defective counterparts, indicating that such antiproliferative effect is mainly mediated by CI inhibition, while metformin showed this behaviour only in B16-F10 cells (figure 2d–f).
To understand whether the observed antiproliferative effect is a result of cell death, we next evaluated the presence of morphologically altered dying cells and caspase 3/7 activation in real time upon treatments. A small number of dying cells was observed with either the tested BAY 87-2243 concentrations or with lower doses of EVP 4593 (2.5 µM) and metformin (2.5 mM), whereas a higher percentage of cell death was found when treatments with 20 µM EVP 4593 and 20 mM metformin were carried out (figure 3a–c). Activation of caspase 3/7 in these conditions indicated the triggering of apoptosis by exposure to high concentrations of EVP 4593 and metformin (figure 3d–f). In particular, 2.5 mM metformin for 72 h induced apoptotic cell death either comparable to the untreated control (HCT116 and B16-F10) or in a relatively small portion of the cells (2.8% in SKOV3), while 20 mM metformin markedly induced apoptosis in all cell models (figure 3g). Similarly, a modest percentage of dead cells was observed after 72 h treatment with 2.5 µM EVP 4593, whereas 20 µM concentration of the drug caused a pronounced apoptotic cell death, ranging from 24.6% in SKOV3 to 77.6% in HCT116 (figure 3g). Lastly, apoptosis was observed in a very low percentage of cells treated with BAY 87-2243 (figure 3g), the only inhibitor for which CI-specific antiproliferative action was determined regardless of the concentrations used (figure 1c,d). Of note, apoptosis was triggered at the same metformin and EVP 4593 concentrations for which CI-independent effects were observed, suggesting that CI-specific antiproliferative action are most likely either cytostatic or related to other types of cell death.
3.3. Titration of inhibitors reveals that metformin-induced apoptosis does not depend on CI inhibition
The apoptotic cell death observed upon treatment with high doses of the compounds may derive from overdosage or from their inhibitory activity on molecular targets other than CI, as highlighted by the reduced cell proliferation in CI-defective cells. Hence, to identify the lowest concentrations of the three inhibitors that completely abolish CI-dependent respiration, we measured oxygen consumption rate (OCR) upon titration in CI-competent cells and validated our data using the potent and specific CI inhibitor IACS-010759 as a reference compound [9]. Independently from the cell model, acute injection of metformin (1 mM–50 mM) marginally affected OCR, inducing a 25–35% decrease of basal respiration only at the highest concentration (electronic supplementary material, figure S3a). This is due to the fact that metformin is a hydrophilic compound requiring internalization mediated by organic cation transporters (OCTs) [61]. Indeed, pre-incubation with increasing concentrations of metformin for 24 h was able to reduce both basal and maximal OCR (electronic supplementary material, figure S3b). Basal OCR was abolished by 2 mM metformin in HCT116 and SKOV3 cells and 10 mM in B16-F10 cells (electronic supplementary material, figure S3a). However, at these concentrations maximal respiration was still detectable, while it was abolished only when cells were pre-incubated with 50 mM metformin (electronic supplementary material, figure S3a). Interestingly, the concentrations commonly used in the literature (10 mM and 20 mM) were unable to completely suppress maximal mitochondrial respiration, while still being able to trigger apoptotic cell death (figure 3g), indicating that the latter phenotype is probably largely caused by a CI-independent activity of the inhibitor. On the other hand, EVP 4593 titration revealed that 100 nM was the lowest concentration able to fully curb mitochondrial respiration in SKOV3 and HCT116, while 200 nM was required in B16-F10 (electronic supplementary material, figure S3c). Hence, the apoptotic cell death observed with high concentrations of EVP 4593 was probably due to an overdosage. Lastly, we identified 1 µM as the lowest concentration of BAY 87-2243 that completely inhibited mitochondrial respiration in HCT116 and SKOV3 cells, while B16-F10 were less sensitive to this inhibitor, requiring 20 µM to suppress maximal OCR (electronic supplementary material, figure S3d). Similar to BAY 87-2243, the reference compound IACS-010759 abolished OCR at the concentration of 1 µM in SKOV3 and HCT116 and of 5 µM in B16-F10 (electronic supplementary material, figure S3e). Interestingly, concentrations that effectively inhibited mitochondrial respiration varied greatly, with IC50 ranging from 225 to 1341 µM for metformin, from 0.12 to 7 µM for BAY 87-2243 and from 11 to 30 nM for EVP 4593, with the IC50 for the reference compound IACS-010759 ranging from 134 nM to 872 nM (figure 4a). To further validate our results, we determined the ability of permeabilized cells to synthetize ATP specifically via CI, or via CII, or upon inhibition of CI using the three compounds, as well as IACS-010759. Similar to the reference compound, optimized concentrations of EVP 5493 and BAY 87-2243 were able to strongly inhibit CI-driven ATP synthesis in all the investigated cell models, while cells treated with 50 mM metformin still retained most of their CI-driven ATP synthesis with a percentage of inhibition ranging from 44% to 61% (figure 4b). Moreover, while cells incubated with optimized concentrations of EVP 5493, BAY 87-2293 and IACS-010759 showed a similar CII-driven ATP synthesis, this was reduced in presence of metformin (figure 4b), indicating that this molecule may interfere also with CII activity, as previously reported [35].
Next, we aimed to identify the most specific CI inhibitor with efficient antiproliferative activity. Since metformin resulted the least specific and less effective CI inhibitor and considering that the dosage required for the abolishment of maximal respiration in our models was associated with CI-independent antiproliferative mechanisms, we excluded the drug from further investigations. Then, we determined cell growth upon treatment with optimized concentrations of EVP 4593 (100 nM for SKOV3 and HCT116, and 200 nM for B16-F10) and BAY 87-2243 (20 µM for B16-F10), with the aim to determine whether they maintained an antiproliferative action. At these newly defined concentrations, the two investigated inhibitors, as well as IACS-010759, reduced cell proliferation of NDUFS3+/+ cells only, without affecting their CI-defective isogenic counterparts (figure 4c–e and electronic supplementary material, figure S4). Moreover, the massive apoptotic cell death observed in cells treated with 20 µM EVP 4593 was not detected with the optimized concentration (figure 4f), supporting the idea that specific CI inhibition may not induce cytotoxicity, but mainly slows down cell growth. Finally, the comparison between antiproliferative effect revealed that IACS-010759 and EVP 4593 are more effective than BAY 87-2243 in human SKOV3 and HCT116 cells, while in murine B16-F10 cells the three molecules are comparable (figure 4g).
Overall, these data show that metformin is not a CI specific inhibitor and that it prevents cancer cells proliferation by hitting also other intracellular targets, while EVP 4593 and BAY 87-2243 resulted highly specific, but effective at different concentrations.
3.4. Molecular docking predicts differential binding for EVP 4593 and BAY 87-2243 to the Q-site of CI
In order to understand whether the different efficiency of EVP 4593 and BAY 87-2243 may depend on the structural determinants of their interactions in the Q-site of CI, we performed a docking analysis exploiting the recently released high resolution structures of ovine CI [44]. We decided to focus on the Q-site, considering that, as several other inhibitors, EVP 4593 and BAY 87-2243 are supposed to bind into the worm like channel formed by ovine subunits PSST (NDUFS7 in human CI), 49 kDa (NDUFS2 in human CI) and ND1 [36,40,44,62–65]. The analysis with MOLEonline showed that the Q-site assumes different shapes depending on the conformation of the CI itself and on the bound molecule(s) (figure 5a). Indeed, in the case of the quinone reduction step (6ZKC, figure 5a central panel), the channel is wide open in both the shallow and the deep sites. On the other hand, in the case of the initial step of the catalytic cycle (6ZKI, figure 5a, left panel) and in the rotenone inhibited form (6ZKK, figure 5a, right panel), the channel narrows considerably at the deep and at the shallow site, respectively. Moreover, in the initial step of the catalytic cycle (6ZKI), the deep site is no longer in contact with Tyr108 (49 kDa), that is the residue supposed to pass the electron received from the N2 [Fe4S4] cluster located at the end of the iron–sulfur cluster chain starting on the top of the CI side arm.
Based on the results of the redocking stage and the conformations adopted by the Q-site channel (electronic supplementary material, figure S5a), we decided to use only the structure of CI in the quinone reduction step (6ZKC) for docking and characterization of the intermolecular interactions of EVP 4593 and BAY 87-2243. Considering the different chemical groups composing the two inhibitors, a different behaviour in the interaction with the Q-site was expected. Indeed, the EVP 4593 best docking pose is located in the deep site of the channel, similar to that observed for rotenone and decyl-ubiquinone (figure 5b and electronic supplementary material, figure S5b,c). The binding pose is stabilized by the formation of one H-bond between EVP 4593 quinazoline nitrogen N1 and Tyr108 (49 kDa) Oζ. Moreover, the EVP 4593 amino group bound to the quinazoline moiety is very close to His59 (49 kDa) Nδ1 in a geometry unsuitable for hydrogen bond formation. The docking program does not allow for the optimization of the geometry of the protein, but the formation of an additional H-bond may be hypothesized (figure 5b). Finally, EVP 4593 binding pose is stabilized by π-stacking interactions between Phe168 (49 kDa) and Phe76 (PSST) and the EVP 4593 oxydibenzene moiety at the opposite side of the quinazoline group. Conversely, BAY 87-2243 best binding pose is found in the central part of the Q-site channel, in direct contact with the shallow site together with a large portion of the region between the latter and the deep site (figure 5c and electronic supplementary material, figure S5b,c). BAY 87-2243 inserts into the Q-site using its cyclopropyl terminal, localized in the proximity of Thr49 (PSST) and Met60 (PSST), while the trifluoromethyl end is located in the vicinity of the aliphatic part of Asp51 (ND1) side chain and Phe224 (ND1). The binding pose is stabilized by a H-bond between the oxygen atom of BAY 87-2243 oxadiazole moiety and the Arg274 (ND1) Nω2 atom, together with a perpendicular π-stacking interaction between the BAY 87-2243 pyridinic ring and Phe168 (49 kDa) and a parallel π-stacking between the phenyl moiety bound to the oxadiazole moiety of the inhibitor and the already mentioned Phe224 (ND1). However, the largest part of the intermolecular interactions between BAY 87-2243 and the Q-site channel are van der Waals contacts and the stabilization of the binding pose appears to be mainly due to shape complementarity. This result is in agreement with the binding pose of a similar compound (IACS-2858) recently co-solved with murine CI [66], where BAY 87-2243 and IACS-010759 have been superimposed and minimized on IACS-2858 structure.
Overall, these data suggest that the higher efficacy of EVP 4593 compared to BAY 87-2243 may reside in their different interaction mode with the Q-site of respiratory CI, where EVP 4593 forms a tighter network of interactions at the level of the deep site, resembling the interactions made by the substrate mimetic decyl-ubiquinone or the classic specific CI inhibitor rotenone.
3.5. Variants mapping within the inhibitor-binding Q-site that may affect inhibitors efficiency occur at low frequency in the human population
Interestingly, EVP 4593 showed a similar IC50 range in all the investigated cell lines (figure 4b), while BAY 87-2243 was 50-fold less efficient in murine B16-F10 cells (IC50 = 7 µM) compared to human models (IC50 = 115–171 nM) (figure 4a). We hypothesized such difference may result from changes in the residues interacting with BAY 87-2243 between human and murine CI. Hence, we investigated the conservation of the amino acids predicted to bind EVP 4593 and BAY 87-2243 in the deep and shallow Q-sites, respectively (electronic supplementary material, table S1). The deep Q-site presented 8/10 conserved amino acids predicted to interact with EVP 4593 and all of them are identical in human, mouse and ovine reference sequences, in agreement with the similar IC50 found in the different cell models. The shallow Q-site showed 13/16 conserved amino acids predicted to interact with BAY 87-2243. All residues are identical in human, mouse and ovine reference sequences, with the only remarkable exception of Thr21(ND1), which is found in mouse and ovine sequences, but corresponds to a methionine in human. This amino acid was conserved in primates, clearly indicating that it has been recently acquired during evolution and may concur to the stabilization of BAY 87-2243 in the shallow Q-site, possibly due to its higher hydrophobicity and propensity to form van der Waals interactions.
We also considered that the amino acids predicted to interact with EVP 4593 and BAY 87-2243 may be subjected to physiological genetic variation and/or somatic mutational events, whose identification could potentially steer therapeutic decisions within the context of personalized therapy. Therefore, we performed a search for variants in the three genes, namely MT-ND1, NDUFS2 and NDUFS7, with the aim to gauge whether genetic changes possibly affecting the molecular interactions that EVP 4593 and BAY 87-2243 form in the Q-site may be frequent events. We extracted six variants for NDUFS2 and 13 for NDUFS7 (table 1), while MT-ND1 analysis identified a total of eight variants (table 2). Where available, MAFs of the germline nuclear variants were less than 1% with the respect to the general population; MT-ND1 variants had frequencies less than 0.1%, and COSMIC variants were also rare somatic events.
These results suggest that EVP 4593 and BAY 87-2243 may be potentially used on a large scale, as their binding sites do not suffer from a high genetic variability within the population or at a somatic level.
4. Discussion
In this work, we compared the antiproliferative effects of three CI inhibitors which have been proposed as anti-cancer agents, namely metformin, BAY 87-2243 and EVP 4593, in different cancer cell models and investigated the interactions of those specific for CI at the atomic levels in the Q binding site. To this aim, we exploited unique cell models in which the genetic ablation of NDUFS3 induces the almost complete disassembly of CI (residual activity of less than 10%) with a selective degradation of the structural modules N, Q and proximal P [7,46], thus destroying the Q-site in which most CI inhibitors bind. In these cells, we demonstrated that the antiproliferative effects of metformin and EVP 4593 at concentrations commonly used in in vitro experiments [4,33,41] are mainly due to CI-independent mechanisms and are associated with triggering of apoptosis. Further, in syngeneic CI-competent cancer models (NDUFS3+/+) we found that metformin treatment induces apoptosis at concentrations at which CI is not fully inhibited, indicating that the antiproliferative effects of this drug result also from the inhibition of other targets. These data are in line with recent studies in which metformin has been shown to curb other metabolic pathways such as gluconeogenesis from lactate and glycerol [32] and fatty acid oxidation [67], or to target other mitochondrial enzymes, such as F1Fo ATP synthase [33] and glycerophosphate dehydrogenase (mGPDH) [32,34,35]. Moreover, the recent release of mammalian CI structures binding IM1761092, a more complex and hydrophobic phenformin derivative that has a higher inhibitory activity on CI, revealed that biguanides are able to bind at least three sites in deactive CI explaining the non-competitive behaviour of these molecules [68], but also raising questions regarding their specificity and potency. Importantly, our results can contribute to explain the conflicting data obtained in clinical trials on the use of metformin as an anti-cancer drug for different neoplasias [20–23,27,29,30,60], which may express diverse levels of additional yet unknown molecular targets.
On the contrary, 20 µM EVP 4593 stimulates apoptosis most likely because of an overdosage of the compound. In particular, in our models EVP 4593 is able to completely suppress mitochondrial respiration in a concentration range of 100–200 nM, thus 100–200 times lower than the doses usually employed in literature in vitro [40,41]. Indeed, when appropriate amounts of EVP 4593 were used, the compound was highly selective for CI and did not trigger massive apoptosis. Hence, the cytotoxic effect shown by EVP 4593 overdosage may be related to other molecular targets than CI. In this frame, it is important to note that this compound has only recently been recognized as a CI-targeting molecule [40] and was initially considered as a high-affinity antagonist of the NF-κB pathway [69,70]. Whether such inhibition secondarily derives from the block of CI activity or is due to a direct targeting of NF-κB remains to be elucidated. For human cancer cells, SKOV3 and HCT116, the highest concentration of BAY 87-2243 used in the literature (1 µM) was the minimal amount suppressing mitochondrial respiration, thus already optimal for further experiments. Hence, both EVP 4593 and BAY 87-2243 resulted highly specific CI inhibitors and slowed down cancer cell proliferation without being generally cytotoxic when used at appropriate concentrations, in accordance with previous reports [36,37,71]. This supports their use as adjuvant agents that may open a therapeutic window for other interventions, although the molecular mechanism(s) reducing cell proliferation remains to be elucidated. In this context, it is important to note that, with the aim to define optimal concentrations, the CI inhibitor specificity should be evaluated also in the preclinical in vivo testing, possibly by comparing the antiproliferative effect between CI competent and CI knockout cancer models, in analogy to the experiments performed in this work. Our data pave the way for relevant considerations on the potential side effects derived by the use of inhibitors of such a ubiquitous and pivotal enzyme as CI in cancer treatment. Of note, inherited genetic defects of structural subunits or assembly factors of CI are etiological of mitochondriopathies, ranging from severe neuromuscular disorders such as Leigh syndrome, mitochondrial encephalopathy, lactic acidosis and stroke-like episodes (MELAS) syndrome and hypertrophic cardiomyopathies to mitochondrially inherited or recessive forms of optic atrophy (reviewed in [72]). Indeed, targeting CI by some classic inhibitors (i.e. rotenone, MPP+ or paraquat) has been demonstrated to promote the occurrence of neurodegenerative disorders such as Parkinson disease [73]. Moreover, such inhibitors have been reported to stimulate reactive oxygen species production, which are well-known modulator of tumour progression and aggressiveness [74]. With respect to this, we never observed an increase of cell proliferation in all the investigated models and for all tested conditions, indicating that reactive oxygen species production may not be relevant in the mechanism of action of EVP 4593, BAY 87-2243 and metformin at the concentrations that fully inhibit CI. Hence, a well-tolerated and precise dosage of CI-specific inhibitors is particularly advisable to avoid detrimental side effects which may involve the nervous system, as well as cardiac and skeletal muscles, or increase tumour progression and aggressiveness.
Noteworthy, EVP 4593 and BAY 87-2243 completely suppress mitochondrial respiration at different concentrations in human cells derived from ovarian and colorectal cancer, unlike in murine melanoma cells. Although tumour type, mutational burden or metabolic peculiarities of cells may not be ruled out in explaining such difference, modifications at the level of the Q-site among species may represent the most plausible determinant of the phenomenon. Indeed, the docking calculations predict EVP 4593 to bind the deep Q-site, similarly to classic CI inhibitors rotenone and piericidin A, while the shallow Q-site should harbour BAY 87-2243, whose binding is mainly due to van der Waals interactions and size complementarity, in a region characterized by hydrophilic residues [75]. Whether such difference in the binding site may affect the ability of these inhibitors to compete with quinone remains an open question. Lastly, it is important to note that substitutions of single critical amino acids may affect the IC50 of these inhibitors [66], as in the case of here shown Thr21 found in murine and ovine ND1 which is substituted by a methionine in human cells, possibly rendering the latter more sensitive to BAY 87-2243. However, the analysis of germline or somatic variants inducing amino acids substitutions in the shallow and deep Q-site showed that genetic variability is very low at these regions, supporting the use of EVP 4593 and BAY 87-2243 on a large set of oncological patients.
To conclude, this is the first comparative work on the effects of three CI inhibitors proposed as potential anti-cancer molecules, namely metformin, EVP 4593 and BAY 87-2243. We here highlight the importance of detailed investigations on the properties of these compounds, in particular exploiting appropriate cell models, such as CI-defective cancer cells generated in different backgrounds in order to optimize effective doses avoiding the inhibition of off-target molecular players. Moreover, we show that functional analyses combined with molecular docking provide structural insights on the mechanism of action of CI inhibitors that eventually may help the drug design process. Given the accumulation of somatic mtDNA mutations in human cancers, which may affect the specificity of such inhibitors, this combined approach could be helpful in a personalized medicine perspective.
Contributor Information
Francesco Musiani, Email: francesco.musiani@unibo.it.
Anna Maria Porcelli, Email: annamaria.porcelli@unibo.it.
Giuseppe Gasparre, Email: giuseppe.gasparre3@unibo.it.
Data accessibility
The datasets analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding authors on reasonable request. Materials are available upon request. Data are provided as compressed folders and available at this link https://site.unibo.it/mitobb/it/downloads
Supplementary material is available online [76].
Authors' contributions
I.K.: conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, funding acquisition, methodology, project administration, resources, supervision, validation, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing; B.C.: data curation, formal analysis, investigation, visualization, writing—review and editing; M.S.: data curation, formal analysis, investigation, visualization, writing—review and editing; S.M.: data curation, formal analysis, investigation, writing—review and editing; A.F.: investigation, writing—review and editing; M.D.L.: data curation, formal analysis, investigation, writingoriginal draft, writing—review and editing; M.I.: investigation, writing—review and editing; E.L.: investigation, writing—review and editing; D.T.: investigation, writing—review and editing; H.R.N.: resources, writing—review and editing; A.G.: methodology, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing; F.M.: conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, funding acquisition, investigation, methodology, resources, software, supervision, validation, visualization, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing; A.M.P.: data curation, funding acquisition, project administration, resources, supervision, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing; L.I.: conceptualization, data curation, formal analysis, methodology, project administration, supervision, validation, visualization, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing; G.G.: conceptualization, data curation, funding acquisition, project administration, resources, supervision, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing.
All authors gave final approval for publication and agreed to be held accountable for the work performed therein.
Conflict of interest declaration
We declare we have no competing interests.
Funding
The research leading to these results has received funding from Associazione Italiana Ricerca sul Cancro (AIRC) under IG 2019–ID. 22921 project—P.I. Gasparre G. and partly under IG 2020–ID. 24494 project—P.I. A.M.P. This work was also supported by EU H2020 Marie Curie project TRANSMIT GA 722605 to A.M.P. and by Ministero dell'Istruzione, dell'Università e della Ricerca RFO2019 to F.M.; S.M. was supported by an AIRC fellowship for Italy ‘Love Design'. We thank Fondazione del Monte (Bologna, Italy) for financial support to Porcelli A.M.P. finalized to the acquisition of Seahorse XFe96. We thank Fondazione Cassa di Risparmio in Bologna (Italy) for the financial support to I.K. finalized to the acquisition of EVOS M5000.
References
- 1.Kampjut D, Sazanov LA. 2022. Structure of respiratory complex Ian emerging blueprint for the mechanism. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 74, 102350. ( 10.1016/j.sbi.2022.102350) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Leone G, Abla H, Gasparre G, Porcelli AM, Iommarini L. 2018. The oncojanus paradigm of respiratory complex I. Genes 9, 243. ( 10.3390/genes9050243) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Park JS, et al. 2009. A heteroplasmic, not homoplasmic, mitochondrial DNA mutation promotes tumorigenesis via alteration in reactive oxygen species generation and apoptosis. Hum. Mol. Genet. 18, 1578-1589. ( 10.1093/hmg/ddp069) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Wheaton WW, et al. 2014. Metformin inhibits mitochondrial complex I of cancer cells to reduce tumorigenesis. eLife 3, e02242. ( 10.7554/eLife.02242) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Heishima K, et al. 2021. Petasin potently inhibits mitochondrial complex I-based metabolism that supports tumor growth and metastasis. J. Clin. Invest. 131, e139933. ( 10.1172/JCI139933) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Iommarini L, et al. 2014. Different mtDNA mutations modify tumor progression in dependence of the degree of respiratory complex I impairment. Hum. Mol. Genet. 23, 1453-1466. ( 10.1093/hmg/ddt533) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Kurelac I, et al. 2019. Inducing cancer indolence by targeting mitochondrial Complex I is potentiated by blocking macrophage-mediated adaptive responses. Nat. Commun. 10, 903. ( 10.1038/s41467-019-08839-1) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Ashton TM, McKenna WG, Kunz-Schughart LA, Higgins GS. 2018. Oxidative phosphorylation as an emerging target in cancer therapy. Clin. Cancer Res. Off. J. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. 24, 2482-2490. ( 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-3070) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Molina JR, et al. 2018. An inhibitor of oxidative phosphorylation exploits cancer vulnerability. Nat. Med. 24, 1036-1046. ( 10.1038/s41591-018-0052-4) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Baccelli I, et al. 2019. Mubritinib targets the electron transport chain complex I and reveals the landscape of OXPHOS dependency in acute myeloid leukemia. Cancer Cell 36, 84-99.e8. ( 10.1016/j.ccell.2019.06.003) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Luna Yolba R, Visentin V, Hervé C, Chiche J, Ricci J-E, Méneyrol J, Paillasse MR, Alet N. 2021. EVT-701 is a novel selective and safe mitochondrial complex 1 inhibitor with potent anti-tumor activity in models of solid cancers. Pharmacol. Res. Perspect. 9, e00854. ( 10.1002/prp2.854) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Gui DY, et al. 2016. Environment dictates dependence on mitochondrial complex I for NAD+ and aspartate production and determines cancer cell sensitivity to metformin. Cell Metab. 24, 716-727. ( 10.1016/j.cmet.2016.09.006) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Wu X, et al. 2019. Metformin inhibits progression of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma by acting directly on carcinoma-initiating cells. Cancer Res. 79, 4360-4370. ( 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-18-3525) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Boukalova S, et al. 2016. Mitochondrial targeting of metformin enhances its activity against pancreatic cancer. Mol. Cancer Ther. 15, 2875-2886. ( 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-15-1021) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Andrzejewski S, Gravel S-P, Pollak M, St-Pierre J. 2014. Metformin directly acts on mitochondria to alter cellular bioenergetics. Cancer Metab. 2, 12. ( 10.1186/2049-3002-2-12) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Pernicova I, Korbonits M. 2014. Metformin–mode of action and clinical implications for diabetes and cancer. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 10, 143-156. ( 10.1038/nrendo.2013.256) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Heckman-Stoddard BM, DeCensi A, Sahasrabuddhe VV, Ford LG. 2017. Repurposing metformin for the prevention of cancer and cancer recurrence. Diabetologia 60, 1639-1647. ( 10.1007/s00125-017-4372-6) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Morales DR, Morris AD. 2015. Metformin in cancer treatment and prevention. Annu. Rev. Med. 66, 17-29. ( 10.1146/annurev-med-062613-093128) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Coyle C, Cafferty FH, Vale C, Langley RE. 2016. Metformin as an adjuvant treatment for cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann. Oncol. Off. J. Eur. Soc. Med. Oncol. 27, 2184-2195. ( 10.1093/annonc/mdw410) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Wan G, Sun X, Li F, Wang X, Li C, Li H, Yu X, Cao F. 2018. Survival benefit of metformin adjuvant treatment for pancreatic cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cell. Physiol. Biochem. Int. J. Exp. Cell. Physiol. Biochem. Pharmacol. 49, 837-847. ( 10.1159/000493214) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Roy S, Malone S, Grimes S, Morgan SC. 2021. Impact of concomitant medications on biochemical outcome in localised prostate cancer treated with radiotherapy and androgen deprivation therapy. Clin. Oncol. R. Coll. Radiol. G. B. 33, 181-190. ( 10.1016/j.clon.2020.09.005) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Pimentel I, et al. 2019. A phase II randomized clinical trial of the effect of metformin versus placebo on progression-free survival in women with metastatic breast cancer receiving standard chemotherapy. Breast Edinb. Scotl. 48, 17-23. ( 10.1016/j.breast.2019.08.003) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Brown JR, et al. 2020. Phase II clinical trial of metformin as a cancer stem cell-targeting agent in ovarian cancer. JCI Insight 5, 133247. ( 10.1172/jci.insight.133247) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Bilusic M, et al. 2022. A randomized phase 2 study of bicalutamide with or without metformin for biochemical recurrence in overweight or obese prostate cancer patients (BIMET-1). Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 1-6. ( 10.1038/s41391-022-00492-y) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Chak A, et al. 2015. Metformin does not reduce markers of cell proliferation in esophageal tissues of patients with Barrett's esophagus. Clin. Gastroenterol. Hepatol. Off. Clin. Pract. J. Am. Gastroenterol. Assoc. 13, 665-672.e1–4. ( 10.1016/j.cgh.2014.08.040) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Gutkind JS, et al. 2021. Inhibition of mTOR signaling and clinical activity of metformin in oral premalignant lesions. JCI Insight 6, 147096. ( 10.1172/jci.insight.147096) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Skinner H, et al. 2021. Addition of metformin to concurrent chemoradiation in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer: the NRG-LU001 phase 2 randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol. 7, 1324-1332. ( 10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.2318) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Lee CG, et al. 2021. Effect of metformin and lifestyle interventions on mortality in the diabetes prevention program and diabetes prevention program outcomes study. Diabetes Care 44, 2775-2782. ( 10.2337/dc21-1046) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Marrone KA, et al. 2018. A randomized phase II study of metformin plus paclitaxel/carboplatin/bevacizumab in patients with chemotherapy-naïve advanced or metastatic nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer. The Oncologist 23, 859-865. ( 10.1634/theoncologist.2017-0465) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Zheng Y, Zhu J, Zhang H, Liu Y, Sun H. 2019. Metformin plus first-line chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in the treatment of epithelial ovarian cancer: a prospective open-label pilot trial. Cancer Chemother. Pharmacol. 84, 1349-1357. ( 10.1007/s00280-019-03963-7) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Blandino G, et al. 2012. Metformin elicits anticancer effects through the sequential modulation of DICER and c-MYC. Nat. Commun. 3, 865. ( 10.1038/ncomms1859) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Madiraju AK, et al. 2018. Metformin inhibits gluconeogenesis via a redox-dependent mechanism in vivo. Nat. Med. 24, 1384-1394. ( 10.1038/s41591-018-0125-4) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Bridges HR, Jones AJY, Pollak MN, Hirst J. 2014. Effects of metformin and other biguanides on oxidative phosphorylation in mitochondria. Biochem. J. 462, 475-487. ( 10.1042/BJ20140620) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Thakur S, et al. 2018. Metformin targets mitochondrial glycerophosphate dehydrogenase to control rate of oxidative phosphorylation and growth of thyroid cancer in vitro and in vivo. Clin. Cancer Res. Off. J. Am. Assoc. Cancer Res. 24, 4030-4043. ( 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-3167) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Pecinova A, Drahota Z, Kovalcikova J, Kovarova N, Pecina P, Alan L, Zima M, Houstek J, Mracek T. 2017. Pleiotropic effects of biguanides on mitochondrial reactive oxygen species production. Oxid. Med. Cell. Longev. 2017, 7038603. ( 10.1155/2017/7038603) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Ellinghaus P, et al. 2013. BAY 87-2243, a highly potent and selective inhibitor of hypoxia-induced gene activation has antitumor activities by inhibition of mitochondrial complex I. Cancer Med. 2, 611-624. ( 10.1002/cam4.112) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Schöckel L, et al. 2015. Targeting mitochondrial complex I using BAY 87-2243 reduces melanoma tumor growth. Cancer Metab. 3, 11. ( 10.1186/s40170-015-0138-0) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Basit F, et al. 2017. Mitochondrial complex I inhibition triggers a mitophagy-dependent ROS increase leading to necroptosis and ferroptosis in melanoma cells. Cell Death Dis. 8, e2716. ( 10.1038/cddis.2017.133) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Helbig L, Koi L, Brüchner K, Gurtner K, Hess-Stumpp H, Unterschemmann K, Baumann M, Zips D, Yaromina A. 2014. BAY 87-2243, a novel inhibitor of hypoxia-induced gene activation, improves local tumor control after fractionated irradiation in a schedule-dependent manner in head and neck human xenografts. Radiat. Oncol. Lond. Engl. 9, 207. ( 10.1186/1748-717X-9-207) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Krishnathas R, Bonke E, Dröse S, Zickermann V, Nasiri HR. 2017. Identification of 4-N-[2-(4-phenoxyphenyl)ethyl]quinazoline-4,6-diamine as a novel, highly potent and specific inhibitor of mitochondrial complex I. MedChemComm 8, 657-661. ( 10.1039/c6md00655h) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Marciano R, Prasad M, Ievy T, Tzadok S, Leprivier G, Elkabets M, Rotblat B. 2019. High-throughput screening identified compounds sensitizing tumor cells to glucose starvation in culture and VEGF inhibitors in vivo. Cancers 11, 156. ( 10.3390/cancers11020156) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Orecchioni S, et al. 2015. The biguanides metformin and phenformin inhibit angiogenesis, local and metastatic growth of breast cancer by targeting both neoplastic and microenvironment cells. Int. J. Cancer 136, E534-E544. ( 10.1002/ijc.29193) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Tsai J-J, Pan P-J, Hsu F-T. 2017. Regorafenib induces extrinsic and intrinsic apoptosis through inhibition of ERK/NF-κB activation in hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Oncol. Rep. 37, 1036-1044. ( 10.3892/or.2016.5328) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Kampjut D, Sazanov LA. 2020. The coupling mechanism of mammalian respiratory complex I. Science 370, eabc4209. ( 10.1126/science.abc4209) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.De Luise M, et al. 2022. Inducing respiratory complex I impairment elicits an increase in PGC1α in ovarian cancer. Sci. Rep. 12, 8020. ( 10.1038/s41598-022-11620-y) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.D'Angelo L, et al. 2021. NDUFS3 depletion permits complex I maturation and reveals TMEM126A/OPA7 as an assembly factor binding the ND4-module intermediate. Cell Rep. 35, 109002. ( 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109002) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Ghelli A, et al. 2013. The cytochrome b p.278Y>C mutation causative of a multisystem disorder enhances superoxide production and alters supramolecular interactions of respiratory chain complexes. Hum. Mol. Genet. 22, 2141-2151. ( 10.1093/hmg/ddt067) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Pettersen EF, Goddard TD, Huang CC, Couch GS, Greenblatt DM, Meng EC, Ferrin TE. 2004. UCSF Chimera–a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. J. Comput. Chem. 25, 1605-1612. ( 10.1002/jcc.20084) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Maier JA, Martinez C, Kasavajhala K, Wickstrom L, Hauser KE, Simmerling C. 2015. ff14SB: improving the accuracy of protein side chain and backbone parameters from ff99SB. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 11, 3696-3713. ( 10.1021/acs.jctc.5b00255) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Na S, Jurkovic S, Friedrich T, Koslowski T. 2018. Charge transfer through a fragment of the respiratory complex I and its regulation: an atomistic simulation approach. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. PCCP 20, 20 023-20 032. ( 10.1039/c8cp02420k) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Jakalian A, Jack DB, Bayly CI. 2002. Fast, efficient generation of high-quality atomic charges. AM1-BCC model: II. Parameterization and validation. J. Comput. Chem. 23, 1623-1641. ( 10.1002/jcc.10128) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Sehnal D, Svobodová Vařeková R, Berka K, Pravda L, Navrátilová V, Banáš P, Ionescu C-M, Otyepka M, Koča J. 2013. MOLE 2.0: advanced approach for analysis of biomacromolecular channels. J. Cheminformatics 5, 39. ( 10.1186/1758-2946-5-39) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Pravda L, Sehnal D, Toušek D, Navrátilová V, Bazgier V, Berka K, Svobodová Vareková R, Koca J, Otyepka M. 2018. MOLEonline: a web-based tool for analyzing channels, tunnels and pores (2018 update). Nucleic Acids Res. 46, W368-W373. ( 10.1093/nar/gky309) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Trott O, Olson AJ. 2010. AutoDock Vina: improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading. J. Comput. Chem. 31, 455-461. ( 10.1002/jcc.21334) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Wallace AC, Laskowski RA, Thornton JM. 1995. LIGPLOT: a program to generate schematic diagrams of protein-ligand interactions. Protein Eng. 8, 127-134. ( 10.1093/protein/8.2.127) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Musiani F, Rigobello L, Iommarini L, Carelli V, Degli Esposti M, Ghelli AM. 2022. New insights on rotenone resistance of complex I induced by the m.11778G>A/MT-ND4 mutation associated with Leber's hereditary optic neuropathy. Mol. Basel Switz. 27, 1341. ( 10.3390/molecules27041341) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Waterhouse AM, Procter JB, Martin DMA, Clamp M, Barton GJ. 2009. Jalview Version 2–a multiple sequence alignment editor and analysis workbench. Bioinforma. Oxf. Engl. 25, 1189-1191. ( 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp033) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Martin MJ, Hayward R, Viros A, Marais R. 2012. Metformin accelerates the growth of BRAF V600E-driven melanoma by upregulating VEGF-A. Cancer Discov. 2, 344-355. ( 10.1158/2159-8290.CD-11-0280) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Higurashi T, et al. 2016. Metformin for chemoprevention of metachronous colorectal adenoma or polyps in post-polypectomy patients without diabetes: a multicentre double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 17, 475-483. ( 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00565-3) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Zell JA, et al. 2020. A phase IIa trial of metformin for colorectal cancer risk reduction among individuals with history of colorectal adenomas and elevated body mass index. Cancer Prev. Res. Phila. Pa 13, 203-212. ( 10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-18-0262) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Emami Riedmaier A, Fisel P, Nies AT, Schaeffeler E, Schwab M. 2013. Metformin and cancer: from the old medicine cabinet to pharmacological pitfalls and prospects. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 34, 126-135. ( 10.1016/j.tips.2012.11.005) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Bridges HR, et al. 2020. Structure of inhibitor-bound mammalian complex I. Nat. Commun. 11, 5261. ( 10.1038/s41467-020-18950-3) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Baradaran R, Berrisford JM, Minhas GS, Sazanov LA. 2013. Crystal structure of the entire respiratory complex I. Nature 494, 443-448. ( 10.1038/nature11871) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Zickermann V, Wirth C, Nasiri H, Siegmund K, Schwalbe H, Hunte C, Brandt U. 2015. Structural biology. Mechanistic insight from the crystal structure of mitochondrial complex I. Science 347, 44-49. ( 10.1126/science.1259859) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Grba DN, Blaza JN, Bridges HR, Agip A-NA, Yin Z, Murai M, Miyoshi H, Hirst J. 2022. Cryo-electron microscopy reveals how acetogenins inhibit mitochondrial respiratory complex I. J. Biol. Chem. 298, 101602. ( 10.1016/j.jbc.2022.101602) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Chung I, Serreli R, Cross JB, Di Francesco ME, Marszalek JR, Hirst J. 2021. Cork-in-bottle mechanism of inhibitor binding to mammalian complex I. Sci. Adv. 7, eabg4000. ( 10.1126/sciadv.abg4000) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Lord SR, et al. 2020. Transcriptomic analysis of human primary breast cancer identifies fatty acid oxidation as a target for metformin. Br. J. Cancer 122, 258-265. ( 10.1038/s41416-019-0665-5) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Bridges HR, Blaza JN, Yin Z, Chung I, Pollak MN, Hirst J. 2022. Structural basis of mammalian respiratory complex I inhibition by medicinal biguanides. bioRxiv. ( 10.1101/2022.08.09.503333) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
- 69.Tobe M, Isobe Y, Tomizawa H, Nagasaki T, Takahashi H, Fukazawa T, Hayashi H. 2003. Discovery of quinazolines as a novel structural class of potent inhibitors of NF-kappa B activation. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 11, 383-391. ( 10.1016/s0968-0896(02)00440-6) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Choi S, Kim JH, Roh E-J, Ko M-J, Jung J-E, Kim H-J. 2006. Nuclear factor-kappaB activated by capacitative Ca2+ entry enhances muscarinic receptor-mediated soluble amyloid precursor protein (sAPPalpha) release in SH-SY5Y cells. J. Biol. Chem. 281, 12 722-12 728. ( 10.1074/jbc.M601018200) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Sica V, et al. 2019. Lethal poisoning of cancer cells by respiratory chain inhibition plus dimethyl α-ketoglutarate. Cell Rep. 27, 820-834.e9. ( 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.03.058) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Fernandez-Vizarra E, Zeviani M. 2021. Mitochondrial disorders of the OXPHOS system. FEBS Lett. 595, 1062-1106. ( 10.1002/1873-3468.13995) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Betarbet R, Sherer TB, MacKenzie G, Garcia-Osuna M, Panov AV, Greenamyre JT. 2000. Chronic systemic pesticide exposure reproduces features of Parkinson's disease. Nat. Neurosci. 3, 1301-1306. ( 10.1038/81834) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Cheung EC, Vousden KH. 2022. The role of ROS in tumour development and progression. Nat. Rev. Cancer 22, 280-297. ( 10.1038/s41568-021-00435-0) [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Fedor JG, Jones AJY, Di Luca A, Kaila VRI, Hirst J. 2017. Correlating kinetic and structural data on ubiquinone binding and reduction by respiratory complex I. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 12 737-12 742. ( 10.1073/pnas.1714074114) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Kurelac I, et al. 2022. NDUFS3 knockout cancer cells and molecular docking reveal specificity and mode of action of anticancer respiratory complex I inhibitors. Figshare. ( 10.6084/m9.figshare.c.6268366) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Citations
- Kurelac I, et al. 2022. NDUFS3 knockout cancer cells and molecular docking reveal specificity and mode of action of anticancer respiratory complex I inhibitors. Figshare. ( 10.6084/m9.figshare.c.6268366) [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed]
Data Availability Statement
The datasets analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding authors on reasonable request. Materials are available upon request. Data are provided as compressed folders and available at this link https://site.unibo.it/mitobb/it/downloads
Supplementary material is available online [76].