Abstract
More and more patients suffer from multifactorial neurodegenerative diseases, such as age-related macular degeneration (AMD). However, their pathological mechanisms are still poorly understood, which complicates the development of effective therapies. To improve treatment of multifactorial diseases, cell-based gene therapy can be used to increase the expression of therapeutic factors. To date, there is no approved therapy for dry AMD, including late-stage geographic atrophy. We present a treatment option for dry AMD that transfers the brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) gene into retinal pigment epithelial (RPE) cells by electroporation using the plasmid-based Sleeping Beauty (SB) transposon system. ARPE-19 cells and primary human RPE cells were co-transfected with two plasmids encoding the SB100X transposase and the transposon carrying a BDNF transcription cassette. We demonstrated efficient expression and secretion of BDNF in both RPE cell types, which were further increased in ARPE-19 cell cultures exposed to hydrogen peroxide. BDNF-transfected cells exhibited lower apoptosis rates and stimulated neurite outgrowth in human SH-SY5Y cells. This study is an important step in the development of a cell-based BDNF gene therapy that could be applied as an advanced therapy medicinal product to treat dry AMD or other degenerative retinal diseases.
Keywords: RPE cells, BDNF, Sleeping Beauty transposon system, non-viral transfection, cell-based additive gene therapy, neurodegenerative retinal diseases, AMD
1. Introduction
Our ageing society increasingly battles neurodegenerative diseases that are complex and difficult to treat. Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) affects people over the age of 60 and impairs the central retina, leading to severe vision loss. It is considered the leading cause of blindness, and meta-analyses have shown that AMD is expected to increase to 288 million patients worldwide by 2040 [1] and will affect 77 million people in Europe by 2050 [2]. AMD is multifactorial, with age, smoking, and genetic predisposition being identified as risk factors. Clinically, three stages are distinguished: early, intermediate, and late (advanced) AMD, which is divided into geographic atrophy (GA, dry AMD) and choroidal neovascularization (CNV, wet/neovascular AMD). Wet AMD accounts for a much smaller percentage of the disease and is reasonably treatable by repeated intravitreal injections of anti-VEGF drugs [3]. In contrast, dry AMD, which is characterized by progressive atrophy of photoreceptor cells, retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) cells, and choriocapillaris, has no approved therapy to date, but several therapies being clinically tested at the moment. These clinical trials involve the complement system using the C3 inhibitor pegcetacoplan [4] or the C5 inhibitor avacincaptad pegol [5], the visual cycle using the deuterated vitamin A derivate ALK-001 [6], cell-based therapies using human embryonic stem cell-derived RPE cells [7,8], and neuroprotection using elamipretide [9,10].
In addition to the above clinical trials, gene therapy is another promising approach to treat retinal diseases. As the eye is a small, enclosed organ with a blood-retinal barrier, small amounts of genetic material can be administered into the eye without triggering a systemic immune response. The first gene therapy for ophthalmology was approved in 2017: voretigene neparvovec-rzyl (Luxturna®) is used to treat retinitis pigmentosa patients with a bi-allelic mutation in the RPE65 gene [11,12]. To treat advanced AMD, several gene therapeutics are currently in clinical trials: GT005 [13] is used for the treatment of GA and is a recombinant adeno-associated viral (AAV) vector that encodes human complement factor I (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03846193, NCT04437368, and NCT04566445); AAVCAGsCD59 is tested for both dry and wet AMD (NCT03144999 and NCT03585556) and expresses a soluble form of the membrane regulatory protein CD59. Viral vectors encoding other anti-angiogenic factors are also being tested for the treatment of wet AMD. These include RGX-314 (NCT03066258, NCT03999801, NCT04514653, NCT04704921, and NCT04832724), ADVM-022 (NCT03748784 and NCT04645212), and RetinoStat (NCT01301443 and NCT01678872) [14].
Advanced neovascular AMD has also been treated with a single intravitreal injection of a non-integrating adenoviral (Ad) vector encoding pigment epithelium-derived factor (PEDF) [15]. Data from this phase I clinical trial indicated that high-dose administration of AdPEDF.11 resulted in anti-angiogenic activity that persisted for several months without causing severe inflammation or serious adverse events. PEDF belongs to the family of non-inhibitory serpins and was purified for the first time from the conditioned medium of human RPE (hRPE) cells [16,17]. It is a multifunctional protein that has anti-angiogenic, anti-oxidative, and neurotrophic properties, among others [18].
On the basis of the above data, we previously developed a cell-based gene therapy approach in which the human PEDF gene is introduced ex vivo into pigment epithelial cells [19]. Our aim was to use these genetically modified cells as a continuous source of PEDF to generate an enhanced anti-angiogenic milieu. Our subsequent in vitro and in vivo studies have shown that transplantation of these PEDF-secreting cells into the eye significantly reduced pathological endothelial cell growth and neovascularization induced by laser or alkali burn [20,21,22]. Genes were introduced into the pigment epithelial cells by electroporation using the Sleeping Beauty (SB) transposon system [23], and protein secretion was found to be sustained and stable [24,25,26]. The two-component SB transposon system is transferred as a plasmid construct, making its manufacturing simple and inexpensive. The use of the SB transposon system supports stable integration and long-term expression of the therapeutic gene. In addition, it enables genomic insertion of transgenes in an almost random manner [27], which enhances the safety of this system in human applications.
Our current study uses brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), rather than PEDF. BDNF belongs to the nerve growth factor (NGF) superfamily along with NGF, neurotrophin-3, and neurotrophin-4/5, and exerts its effects through the high affinity receptor tropomyosin-related kinase B (TrkB) and the common low affinity receptor p75 neurotrophin receptor (p75NTR) [28]. BDNF is highly expressed in the brain [29,30,31,32] and is also detectable in the eye [33,34], where it is produced in retinal ganglion cells (RGCs), amacrine cells, and Müller cells [35,36]. The initially synthesized pre-pro-BDNF precursor is processed to pro-BDNF (~32 kDa), whose cleavage of the N-terminal pro-domain releases the mature BDNF (~13 kDa) [37]. BDNF affects neuronal development, growth, and survival and is important for neurogenesis, synaptogenesis, and synaptic plasticity [38,39]. Decreased BDNF levels are associated with Parkinson’s (PD) and Alzheimer’s (AD) diseases [40,41] and have also been detected in the serum, aqueous humor, and lacrimal fluid of patients with diabetic retinopathy, AMD, and glaucoma [42,43,44]. In vivo models of AD, acute optic nerve injury, and experimental glaucoma demonstrated the neuroprotective effects of virally administered BDNF by attenuating behavioral deficits, preventing neuron loss, and increasing RGC survival, respectively [45,46,47,48]. Most recently, AAV2-based BDNF gene therapy has been used in a phase I clinical trial to investigate whether it can slow or prevent cell loss in the brain of patients with AD and mild cognitive impairment (NCT05040217).
Based on the previously established cell-based PEDF gene therapy, we have developed a protocol for efficient transfer of the human BDNF gene into the RPE cell line ARPE-19 and into primary hRPE cells using the SB transposon system. We demonstrate that the genetic modification is efficient and stable, and that the transfected cells secrete sufficient amounts of BDNF, resulting in a reduced apoptosis rate and inducing neurite outgrowth in co-cultured SH-SY5Y cells. In addition, transfected ARPE-19 cells exposed to hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) showed more BDNF expression and BDNF secretion than cells not exposed to H2O2.
2. Results
2.1. Sleeping Beauty Transposon-Mediated Delivery of the Human BDNF Gene into the ARPE-19 Cell Line
The SB100X transposase and BDNF transposon were provided on separate plasmids to regulate and optimize the transposase-to-transposon ratio during electroporation. Optimal transposition efficiency was determined based on BDNF gene expression and BDNF protein secretion for plasmid ratios ranging from 1:1 to 1:24 at a constant total plasmid amount of 0.5 µg. BDNF was detected by immunoblotting in its glycosylated precursor form (pro-BDNF, ~32 kDa) and in the post-translationally cleaved mature form (~13 kDa, Figure 1a). Signal intensities increased with increasing plasmid ratios, starting at 0.05 ± 0.02 for the non-transfected ARPE-19 cultures and 0.26 ± 0.17 to 0.98 ± 0.42 for ratios of 1:1 to 1:12. The ratios 1:16 to 1:24 had the highest signal intensities, which were 7.6, 7.1, and 6.4 times higher, respectively, than the value of the ratio 1:1 (Figure 1a). This gradual increase was also observed at the level of gene expression. Starting from a value of 2.17 ± 0.98 at the 1:1 ratio, the highest BDNF expression levels were seen at ratios of 1:16 to 1:24. Here, relative BDNF expression was increased 6.9-, 6.0-, and 7.0-fold, respectively (Figure 1b). ELISA-based quantification revealed a baseline secretion of 44.8 ± 14.2 pg BDNF/h/106 cells in non-transfected ARPE-19 cultures. Transfection with a 1:1 plasmid ratio resulted in an 8.3-fold higher BDNF secretion (370.5 ± 240.1 pg/h/106 cells), which further increased with increasing plasmid ratios (1728 ± 1225 pg/h/106 cells at a 1:12 ratio). Highest BDNF secretion rates were observed in cultures transfected with plasmid ratios ranging from 1:16 to 1:24: they showed 7.0-, 5.3-, and 7.4-fold higher secretion compared with cultures transfected with the 1:1 ratio (Figure 1c). Because the highest expression and secretion levels and, more importantly, the least variation were observed at a ratio of 1:16, all subsequent ARPE-19 transfections were performed with this ratio, corresponding to 0.03 µg of SB100X transposase plasmid and 0.47 µg of BDNF transposon plasmid.
Repeated experiments were performed with an initial number of 5 × 104 ARPE-19 cells. Cultures were terminated 21.0 ± 0.58 days after transfection to determine BDNF gene expression and BDNF protein secretion in each non-transfected and transfected approach. Western blot analysis showed an 8.0-fold increase in BDNF signal intensity in transfected cells compared to non-transfected cells. Highest variation was observed in the first experiment with minimum and maximum values of 0.65 and 2.81, respectively (Figure 2a). At transcriptional level, transfected cells showed a 19.4-fold increase in total BDNF expression compared to endogenous BDNF expression. The largest differences between total and endogenous BDNF gene expression were observed in experiments 3, 4, 6, and 7 (Figure 2b). ELISA-based quantification of BDNF secretion was consistent with the results observed for BDNF gene expression. Transfected cells secreted an average of 871.9 ± 483.8 pg BDNF/h/106 cells, a 48.0-fold increase compared to 18.17 ± 7.189 pg/h/106 cells in non-transfected cells. The highest increase in BDNF secretion was observed in experiments 3, 4, and 6; however, the largest differences between individual transfections within an experiment were also found here (Figure 2c). The average copy number of the BDNF transgene in the transfected ARPE-19 cultures was 1.31 ± 0.32 compared to the ddPCR-derived estimate of 0.15 ± 0.07 in non-transfected cultures and ranged from 0.58 copies in experiment 5 to 1.87 copies in experiment 6 (Figure 2d).
2.2. Proliferation and Cell Viability of BDNF-Transfected ARPE-19 Cell Cultures
Starting from an initial seeding of 2 × 104 ARPE-19 cells, BDNF+ cultures showed the strongest proliferation rate during a cultivation period of 12 days. After three days, the number of living cells in the BDNF+ cultures were 10.8% higher than in the non-transfected ARPE-19 cultures (Co−) and 36.7% higher than in the cultures exposed only to the electric field (Co+). At the end of cultivation, the difference was 16.5% and 73.5%, respectively, and the percentage of living cells relative to total cells in the different cultures was 79.0% for the two control cultures and 85.0% for the BDNF+ cultures (Figure 3a). A luminescence-based viability assay also showed the highest number of living cells in the BDNF+ cultures. After 12 days, the relative luminescence of BDNF+ cultures was 1.3- and 1.8-fold higher than that of Co− cultures and Co+ cultures, respectively, whose values were again 1.4-fold lower than those of Co- cultures (Figure 3b). Treatment with 150 µM H2O2 for 24 h resulted in a different proliferation behavior. Immediately after H2O2 exposure, the number of living cells was 4.7% to 7.7% lower in BDNF+ cultures than in control cultures. After eight days, the difference increased to 18.5% and 22.3% compared to Co+ and Co- cells, respectively. The percentage of living cells relative to total cells in the different cultures ranged from 90.9% to 91.5% (Figure 3c). Comparison of BDNF expression in BDNF+ cultures without and with H2O2 treatment showed increasing values for cultures with H2O2, ranging from a ratio of 1.4 at day 2 (16.04 ± 7.99 w/o H2O2 versus 23.16 ± 13.86 with H2O2) to 1.8 at day 8 (23.41 ± 7.09 versus 41.40 ± 12.19, Figure 3d). BDNF secretion was 386.2 ± 113.6 pg/h/106 cells at day 2 and increased to 668.3 ± 145.9 at day 4 and 1324 ± 326.8 at day 8 for BDNF+ cultures without H2O2 and from 458.0 ± 226.7 pg/h/106 cells to 1672 ± 643.7 and 1875 ± 1155 for BDNF+ cultures with H2O2, corresponding to 1.2-, 2.5-, and 1.4-fold higher BDNF secretion, respectively, for cultures after H2O2 exposure (Figure 3d). ARPE-19 control cultures secreted an average of 23.65 ± 17.41 pg BDNF/h/106 cells (data not shown). H2O2 treatment also altered the BAX/BCL2 expression ratio in the BDNF+ cultures: immediately after treatment, it increased to 2.06 and was 1.6-fold higher than in the cultures without H2O2 exposure. Subsequently, the BAX/BCL2 expression ratio decreased in the cultures with H2O2 exposure (1.44 at day 4, 1.07 at day 8), whereas it increased in the cultures without H2O2 exposure (1.14 at day 4, 1.51 at day 8, Figure 3e).
Non-stressed BDNF+ ARPE-19 cultures showed a lower apoptosis rate with a total of 2.67% non-viable cells divided into 0.23 ± 0.07% early apoptotic (EA), 1.62 ± 0.20% late apoptotic (LA), and 0.82 ± 0.26% necrotic (N) cells. This corresponded to a 25.8% lower value compared to non-stressed control cultures, which had a total of 3.60% non-viable cells divided into 0.42 ± 0.07% EA, 2.28 ± 0.23% LA, and 0.90 ± 0.12% N cells. BDNF+ cultures treated with 150 µM H2O2 for 24 h also exhibited a lower percentage of non-viable cells (3.02% total, divided into 0.26 ± 0.09% EA, 1.94 ± 0.60% LA, and 0.82 ± 0.18% N cells) than the non-transfected cultures treated with H2O2 (3.57% total, divided into 0.33 ± 0.11% EA, 2.08 ± 0.53% LA, and 1.16 ± 0.35% N cells), although less pronounced (Figure 4).
2.3. Neurite Outgrowth in SH-SY5Y Cells Co-Cultured with BDNF-Transfected ARPE-19 Cells
Using an in vitro co-culture model, we demonstrated that BDNF+ ARPE-19 cells secrete sufficient amounts of recombinant BDNF to trigger neurite outgrowth and elongation in non-stressed and oxidatively stressed SH-SY5Y neuroblastoma cell cultures. Pretreatment of SH-SY5Y cells with 150 µM H2O2 for 24 h, to mimic an in vitro AMD disease model, induced oxidative stress through the generation of reactive oxygen species and resulted in reduced cell numbers compared to the non-stressed SH-SY5Y cell cultures (Figure 5). In co-cultures with BDNF+ ARPE-19 cells, BDNF was detected at concentrations of 927.1 ± 501.7 pg/mL and 2241 ± 1075 pg/mL after 48 h and 96 h, respectively. BDNF levels in co-cultures with non-transfected ARPE-19 cells were decreased 43- to 59-fold (21.50 ± 4.818 pg/mL at 48 h, 38.24 ± 9.664 pg/mL BDNF at 96 h). In SH-SY5Y cell cultures without co-cultivation, BDNF levels were 12.93 ± 0.973 pg/mL after 48 h and 13.55 ± 1.553 pg/mL after 96 h (data not shown).
Co-culturing SH-SY5Y cells with BDNF+ ARPE-19 cells had a positive effect on neurite outgrowth under both non-stress and oxidative stress conditions: after 48 h, non-stressed SH-SY5Y cells showed a mean neurite length of 28.37 ± 23.48 µm, whereas SH-SY5Y cells without ARPE-19 cells or co-cultured with non-transfected ARPE-19 cells showed a mean neurite length of 24.37 ± 15.37 µm and 25.58 ± 18.45 µm, respectively. After 96 h, the mean neurite length in SH-SY5Y cells co-cultured with BDNF+ cells further increased to 30.27 ± 21.54 µm, compared to 25.02 ± 14.62 µm (SH-SY5Y cells alone) and 23.35 ± 16.34 µm (SH-SY5Y plus non-transfected ARPE-19 cells, Figure 6a). Neurite outgrowth was more pronounced in the oxidatively stressed SH-SY5Y cell cultures and increased 1.5- to 1.8-fold compared to the non-stressed SH-SY5Y cultures. Again, co-cultivation with BDNF+ ARPE-19 cells showed the longest SH-SY5Y neurites (50.37 ± 49.08 µm after 48 h, 55.36 ± 54.92 µm after 96 h). The neurite lengths of SH-SY5Y cells without co-cultivation were 41.07 ± 35.07 µm and 38.23 ± 29.97 µm after 48 and 96 h, respectively. In SH-SY5Y cells co-cultured with non-transfected ARPE-19 cells, neurite lengths of 40.74 ± 33.20 µm (48 h) and 41.83 ± 37.18 µm (96 h) were measured (Figure 6a). Within the non-stressed SH-SY5Y cultures, the number of neurites per cell increased from 0.86 (without ARPE-19 cells) and 0.82 (with non-transfected ARPE-19 cells) to 0.98 when co-cultivated with BDNF+ ARPE-19 cells after a cultivation time of 48 h. For oxidatively stressed SH-SY5Y cell cultures, the corresponding values were 1.99 (without ARPE-19 cells), 1.53 (with non-transfected ARPE-19 cells), and 2.17 (with BDNF+ ARPE-19 cells, Figure 6b). However, after a cultivation time of 96 h, no increase in the number of neurites per cell was observed in either non-stressed or oxidatively stressed SH-SY5Y cells cultured with BDNF+ ARPE-19 cells (data not shown). In addition, SH-SY5Y cells showed no significant difference in the expression of the neurotrophic receptor tyrosine kinase 2 (NTRK2, encoding the TrkB receptor) gene when cultivated in the presence of H2O2 (Figure 6c).
2.4. Sleeping Beauty Transposon-Mediated Delivery of the Human BDNF Gene into Primary Human RPE Cells
Transposition efficiency in primary hRPE cells was determined by BDNF expression and BDNF secretion for plasmid ratios of 1:1 to 1:24 at a constant total plasmid amount of 0.5 µg. BDNF expression increased with increasing plasmid ratio, although to a lesser extent than observed in ARPE-19 cells. The highest expression levels were determined at plasmid ratios of 1:2, 1:4, 1:8, and 1:24; however, the highest variation was also observed at these ratios. Plasmid ratios ranging from 1:12 to 1:20 showed expression values between 1.70 ± 0.95 (1:16) and 1.86 ± 0.93 (1:20, Figure 7a). The results of BDNF secretion were consistent with those of BDNF expression. ELISA-based quantification revealed a baseline secretion of 48.4 ± 27.7 pg BDNF/h/106 cells in non-transfected hRPE cell cultures. In the transfected hRPE cell cultures, the mean BDNF secretion was approximately twice as high, with the lowest value of 93.37 ± 47.68 pg/h/106 cells for the 1:2 ratio and the highest value of 128.9 ± 99.53 pg/h/106 cells for the 1:24 ratio (Figure 7b). Subsequent experiments were performed with a plasmid ratio of 1:16 (0.03 µg SB100X transposase plasmid and 0.47 µg BDNF transposon plasmid), because the results for both BDNF expression and BDNF secretion varied more slightly.
Repeated experiments with two to eight individual transfections and one or two non-transfected controls were performed with an initial number of 5 ×104 or 1 × 105 hRPE cells, depending on the number of cells available. Cultures were terminated 22 days after transfection to analyze BDNF gene expression and BDNF protein secretion in each approach. Transfected cells showed a 2-fold increase in total BDNF expression compared with endogenous BDNF expression, with no striking differences between the single experiments (Figure 8a). ELISA-based quantification of BDNF secretion almost matched the results observed for BDNF gene expression. Transfected cells secreted an average of 123.0 ± 108.5 pg BDNF/h/106 cells into the medium, a 2.2-fold increase compared with 55.14 ± 38.07 pg/h/106 cells for non-transfected cells. The highest increase was observed in experiment 3 with a mean BDNF secretion of 384.3 ± 207.9 pg/h/106 cells for BDNF+ cells, which was 5.0-, 4.6-, and 2.4-fold higher than the mean BDNF secretion in experiments 1, 2, and 4, respectively (Figure 8b). After a cultivation period of seven months, long-term cultures of transfected primary hRPE cells showed a mean BDNF secretion of 140.5 pg/h/106 cells, which was 1.8-fold higher than the secretion rate of the corresponding non-transfected cells (data not shown).
2.5. Neurite Outgrowth in SH-SY5Y Cells Co-Cultured with BDNF-Transfected Primary Human RPE Cells
In co-cultures with BDNF+ hRPE cells, BDNF was detected at a concentration of 17.27 ± 1.984 pg/mL after 48 h, which was only slightly higher than in co-cultures with non-transfected hRPE cells (14.87 ± 1.662 pg/mL) and SH-SY5Y cells without co-culturing (12.56 ± 1.909 pg/mL, data not shown). Co-culturing with primary hRPE cells had a positive effect on neurite outgrowth of SH-SY5Y cells under both non-stress and oxidative stress conditions. Non-stressed SH-SY5Y cells without co-culturing showed a mean neurite length of 26.14 ± 15.97 µm compared to 31.81 ± 21.94 µm and 29.16 ± 20.00 µm for SH-SY5Y cells co-cultured with non-transfected and BDNF-transfected hRPE cells, respectively. However, neurite outgrowth was slightly more pronounced in the co-cultures with non-transfected cells than in the co-cultures with BDNF+ cells (Figure 9a). An overall 1.2- to 1.5-fold increase in neurite outgrowth was observed in the oxidatively stressed SH-SY5Y cultures. Here, co-culturing with BDNF+ hRPE cells showed the longest SH-SY5Y neurites (42.99 ± 31.98 µm), which were 32% and 13% longer than the neurites of SH-SY5Y cells without co-culturing (32.52 ± 24.49 µm) and co-cultured with non-transfected hRPE cells (38.01 ± 29.34 µm, Figure 9a), respectively. These results were also reflected in the number of neurites per cell. In oxidatively stressed SH-SY5Y cultures, an increase from 1.69 (without co-cultivation) and 1.89 (co-cultivated with non-transfected hRPE cells) to 2.25 (co-cultivated with BDNF+ hRPE cells) was observed. For non-stressed SH-SY5Y cultures, the corresponding values were 1.00 (without hRPE cells), 2.02 (with non-transfected hRPE cells), and 1.27 (with BDNF+ hRPE cells, Figure 9b).
3. Discussion
The non-viral SB transposon system enables efficient and sustained transgene transfer. It circumvents potential side effects associated with virus-based gene transfer, such as immunogenicity described for adenoviruses and the increased risk of insertional mutagenesis characterizing retroviruses and lentiviruses. The hyperactive SB100X transposase ensures efficient and stable integration of the BDNF transgene-encoding transposon into the genome of RPE cells. However, excessive amount of SB100X transposase decreases transposition efficiency [49]. For this reason, we needed to optimize the transposase-to-transposon ratio. In ARPE-19 cells, BDNF gene expression and BDNF protein secretion continuously increased. This increase reached a steady state at a ratio of 1:16, corresponding to concentrations of 0.03 µg SB100X transposase plasmid and 0.47 µg BDNF transposon plasmid. These results were comparable to those for the PEDF transposon plasmid from our previous studies, in which PEDF secretion was approximately constant over a range of 1:16 to 1:36 [24]. However, in primary hRPE cells, the increase in the ratio of SB100X transposase to BDNF transposon was not as obvious. Here, the steady state was already reached at a ratio of 1:8, and the decision to use the ratio of 1:16 for subsequent experiments was based on the results with the lowest standard deviation. In another study, a cytotoxic effect was demonstrated with high and long-lasting expression of the SB transposase. This effect, however, could be avoided by only short-term and dose-controlled transient expression of the transposase [50]. Our approach also involves dose-regulated and transient expression of the SB100X transposase, which we have already shown in previous studies to be undetectable at the latest 28 days after transfection [24].
In contrast to retroviruses and lentiviruses or piggyBac transposon-based genomic integration [51], SB100X-mediated integration is nearly random and shows no increased tendency to integrate into coding genomic segments. We previously reported a similar result for the integration profile of pigment epithelial cells [22,25], suggesting that the close-to-random integration is reproducible. The average transposon copy numbers of the BDNF-transfected ARPE-19 cell cultures were lower than those described for SB-mediated transfection of CAR T cells [52]. The values of the individual transfected ARPE-19 cultures were different (minimum: 0.65; maximum: 1.76), which could be due to the number of genomically integrated BDNF gene copies or the percentage of cells initially transfected. We previously showed that SB100X-based transfer of the PEDF transgene into ARPE-19 cells resulted in an initial transfection efficiency of 24% to 32% [24].
The SB transposon system was introduced into the RPE cells by electroporation. The outcome of electroporation, i.e., cell viability and transfection efficiency, depends on several parameters, such as the strength of the electric field and pulse duration as well as the composition and conductivity of the electroporation buffer [53,54]. Sherba and colleagues showed that Mg2+-based buffers increased cell viability. They hypothesized that magnesium has an effect on viability after electroporation due to its role in activating ATPase membrane ion channels [55]. In our study, the components of buffer R used for the Neon Transfection System are not known. However, in terms of clinical application, an electroporation buffer with a known composition is mandatory. Higher transfection efficiency can be achieved by increasing electroporation parameters, but this is associated with cell loss, i.e., lower cell survival after transfection [56,57,58]. Repeated electroporation could also lead to higher transgene expression. In addition to the stress caused by a second electroporation, it may also require additional passaging of the cells. Repeated passages are not beneficial for the uniform morphology of primary RPE cells, as they lead to pigment loss, a less pronounced hexagonal shape, multi-layering, and variations in cell size [59]. Another option is to use more plasmid DNA, but this is also critical, both in terms of cell viability [56,60] and clinical application. Excess plasmid DNA that is not integrated must be removed from the genetically modified cells prior to their use in patients. A fourth option is to use smaller plasmids, as transfection efficiency is inversely proportional to plasmid size [61,62]. One example is the plasmid free of antibiotic resistance markers (pFAR), which was shown to double the number of transfected cells and more than double the amount of secreted PEDF when combined with SB100X transposase [26]. In addition to higher efficiency, the pFAR miniplasmid system offers an improved safety profile; by eliminating the antibiotic resistance gene normally required for efficient plasmid production, some safety risks in clinical use are avoided.
BDNF used in this study supports neuronal cell differentiation and maturation and promotes neuronal survival and growth [63,64], possibly through interaction with the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway mediated by glycogen synthase kinase-3 beta (GSK-3β) [65]. Furthermore, the neuroprotective effect of BDNF was also demonstrated in vivo in hypoxic ischemic brain injury [66,67]. In addition to its effects on neuronal cells, BDNF increased proliferation and expression of cell cycle regulatory proteins in porcine uterine luminal epithelial cells [68], promoted proliferation and expression of proliferation-related genes in bovine granulosa cells [69], and supported regeneration of alveolar epithelium [70]. We observed that BDNF+ ARPE-19 cultures had higher proliferation and cell viability rates than non-transfected cultures, whereas treatment with H2O2 resulted in a lower proliferation rate. A possible explanation for this could be the boosted metabolism of BDNF-transfected cells in the context of increased expression and secretion of BDNF (see Figure 3d). Ogura and colleagues showed that subtoxic levels of H2O2 (treatment with 1-1000 µM for 30 min) induced BDNF expression in rat pheochromocytoma (PC12) cells [71]. With regard to transplantation of the transfected cells into the eye as a continuous BDNF delivery system, increased proliferation is undesirable and would raise biosafety concerns. It is important to note that this increased proliferation was only observed in the metabolically active ARPE-19 cells, but not in the actual cells to be transplanted, namely the less metabolically active primary hRPE cells.
The overall goal of our gene therapy approach is to protect neuronal/sensory cells in patients suffering from degenerative retinal diseases such as dry AMD. The characteristics of dry AMD range from lipofuscin deposition and drusen formation to degeneration of photoreceptors and the RPE triggered by immune activation, inflammation, and oxidative stress. These mechanisms are all linked to the RPE. Many different therapeutic approaches are currently being pursued, including antioxidants, anti-inflammatory agents, complement inhibitors, retinal implants, and gene and cell-based therapies [72]. The latter aim not only to replace the degenerated RPE but also to support the surrounding cells and tissues. Nowadays, these therapies mainly focus on the transplantation of stem cell-derived RPE cells, which are used in early stages of clinical trials. Their use can overcome earlier challenges, such as providing sufficient quantities of RPE cells (reviewed in [73]). Additional expression of BDNF in the eye is expected to exert protective effects. In several in vivo models, BDNF was already shown to protect RGCs and reduce vision loss [74,75]. BDNF and its receptor TrkB are naturally expressed in RPE cells [76] and play a critical role in RPE differentiation and survival [77]. Inana and colleagues recently demonstrated that phagocytic function was significantly reduced in primary RPE cultures from AMD donor eyes and that BDNF could restore this dysfunction [78]. Patients with dry AMD had lower aqueous humor BNDF concentrations, which correlated with a decrease in outer retinal thickness [43]. In another study of patients with dry AMD, thinning of the RGC layer was observed [79]. However, neurons in human retinas with dry AMD are able to remodel and form new synaptic complexes by sprouting processes [80].
Neuroprotection aims to reduce apoptosis in order to halt the progression of GA. In our approach, this is achieved by transplanting BDNF-transfected cells into the eye, more specifically into the subretinal space. The fact that the highest number of SH-SY5Y cells was found in the BDNF+ approaches at the end of co-cultivation with H2O2 exposure may indicate that the secreted BDNF protects the SH-SY5Y cells from apoptosis. However, this effect was not observed after a cultivation time of 48 h or in the approaches without H2O2 treatment (data not shown). To analyze the neuroprotective function of BDNF-transfected cells, we used an adapted version of the in vitro bioassay model described by Chen and Foldvari [81]. Transfected RPE cells were co-cultured with SH-SY5Y cells, a human neuroblastoma cell line that was used to study neurodegenerative diseases such as PD and AD [82,83]. Since oxidative stress contributes to the pathological processes of AMD, SH-SY5Y cells were pre-incubated with culture medium containing H2O2 to mimic oxidatively damaged neuronal cells. Initial experiments showed that approximately 50% of cultured SH-SY5Y cells survived at a concentration of 150 µM H2O2 (LC50). This reduced cell number resulted in increased SH-SY5Y neurite outgrowth in the co-culture experiments with H2O2 than in the co-culture experiments without oxidative stress. Expression of the receptor TrkB, which is required for BDNF action, was not affected by this H2O2 treatment (see Figure 6c).
Regarding apoptosis, a higher number of annexin V/propidium iodide (PI)-stained cells, and an increased BAX/BCL2 ratio are known biochemical indicators. H2O2 is a commonly used agent to induce these processes [84,85], which in turn can be counteracted by neuroprotective factors. In the absence of H2O2, BDNF+ ARPE-19 cell cultures already showed significantly reduced numbers of early and late apoptotic cells, with a discrepancy to the values of non-transfected control cultures in the range of 1%. The protective effect of BDNF was also observed after treatment with 150 µM H2O2 but was not as pronounced. This could be due to the robustness of the ARPE-19 cell line and the relatively low H2O2 concentration, which was, however, chosen analogously to the other experiments. In addition, H2O2-treated BDNF+ ARPE-19 cultures showed an increased BAX/BCL2 gene expression ratio immediately after H2O2 exposure, which decreased with increasing cultivation time, whereas in non-treated BDNF+ cultures the BAX/BCL2 gene expression ratio slightly increased. This opposite effect could be explained by the continuously increased BDNF expression detected in BDNF+ cultures after H2O2 exposure.
In both non-stressed and H2O2-stressed SH-SY5Y cells, significant prolongation of neurites occurred after 48 and 96 h of co-cultivation with BDNF+ ARPE-19 cells. Here, we demonstrated that BDNF exhibits neuroprotective effects at concentrations as low as approximately 1 ng/mL. Other studies described effects on neurite outgrowth at BDNF concentrations ranging from 3.75 to 10.4 ng/mL [81] as well as 50 ng/mL [86], although in the latter study the experiments were performed in serum-free medium. We also determined the number of neurites and related it to the number of SH-SY5Y cells. We found that after 48 h of cultivation, the number of neurites per cell was significantly increased in co-cultures with BDNF+ ARPE-19 cells. However, this effect decreased and was no longer observed after 96 h of co-culture (data not shown). A possible explanation could be that BDNF first promotes the formation of neurites and then their length growth. The culture medium was not changed during co-cultivation, so the amount of available nutrients decreased while metabolites accumulated. This may also have resulted in the promotion of length growth of existing neurites rather than the formation of new neurites. In primary hRPE cells, significantly increased neurite outgrowth was observed only in the co-cultures of BDNF+ cells with H2O2-stressed SH-SY5Y cells. This is apparently due to the low concentration of secreted BDNF, which was only slightly higher than in the corresponding control cultures. Based on the results of BDNF+ ARPE-19 cells, a more pronounced neuroprotective effect can be assumed for primary hRPE cells when transfection efficiency is increased, because transfection efficiency correlates with the amount of BDNF secreted. Despite all this, careful determination of the appropriate protein concentration is essential to ensure an effective and long-term effect of BDNF gene therapy. In addition to mature BDNF, pro-BDNF was also detected in the culture supernatants. Pro-BDNF has the opposite effect to mature BDNF: it induces apoptosis and inhibits proliferation [87,88,89]. Moreover, several studies have shown that excessive BDNF concentration led to downregulation of the high-affinity receptor TrkB [90,91,92]. However, another study in a rat glaucoma model showed that moderate overexpression of BDNF restored normal TrkB levels and did not cause downregulation [48].
The results show that SB100X-transfected RPE cells secrete increased amounts of BDNF. The BDNF-transfected cells are functional: their protective effect was demonstrated by increasing the BAX/BCL2 ratio, decreasing the apoptosis rate, and inducing neuronal outgrowth. This study is an important first step toward the development of a pigment epithelial cell-based BDNF gene therapy that could be used as an advanced therapy medicinal product (ATMP) for the treatment of neurodegenerative eye diseases. ATMPs are a novel class of innovative and complex biological products. Positive non-clinical results are an important prerequisite for their further development towards a clinically applicable and compliant product. Our next steps are to transfer the functional assays to a retina-related experimental setup, such as an ex vivo retinal organ co-culture model, and to characterize the transfected primary human RPE cells immunohistochemically before using them in appropriate transplantation experiments, e.g., to investigate the molecular mechanism of the effects of BDNF in vivo.
4. Materials and Methods
4.1. Plasmid Constructs
The pT2-CMV-BDNF/EGFP transposon plasmid (pT2-B, Figure 10) is based on pT2/HB (Addgene plasmid #26556). The eukaryotic expression cassette is flanked by inverted terminal repeats (ITRs) and contains the cDNA of the human BDNF gene (Ensembl Gene ID: ENSG00000176697), which is under control of the cytomegalovirus (CMV) promoter and fused to a C-terminal 6× histidine-tag. Co-translation of the enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) is enabled by the pIRES-EGFP-vector-derived synthetic intron (IVS) and an internal ribosomal entry site (IRES) [93]. First, a BDNF-including sequence was amplified from the cDNA of primary hRPE cells (bdnf-F: 5′-CAT TGA GCT CGC TGA AGT TGG CTT CCT AGC-3′ and bdnf-R: 5′-ACT GTT TCC CTT CTG GTC ATG GAC ATG TCC-3′). The PCR fragment was purified using the QIAquick PCR Purification Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s protocol and applied in a second PCR for amplification of the BDNF cDNA extended by the sequences for the restriction enzymes NheI (n-nhe-bdnf: 5′-caa gct ggc tag cca ccA TGA CCA TCC TTT TCC TTA CTA TGG-3′) and NotI (c-not-bdnf: 5′-atg ggg ccc tgc ggc cgc TCT TCC CCT TTT AAT GGT CAA TGT AC-3′). The purified PCR fragment was introduced into the pT2-CMV-PEDF/EGFP transposon plasmid [24] via NheI/NotI-mediated cloning. The resulting pT2-B transposon plasmid was propagated in an E. coli K-12 strain, purified using appropriate plasmid purification kits (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), and characterized by sequencing (Eurofins Genomics, Ebersberg, Germany).
4.2. Cell Line Cultivation
ARPE-19 cells (ATCC CRL-2302) were maintained in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM)/F12 (PAN-Biotech, Aidenbach, Germany) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; PAN-Biotech, Aidenbach, Germany), 80 U/mL penicillin and 80 µg/mL streptomycin (Pen/Strep; Merck, Darmstadt, Germany), and 2.5 µg/mL amphotericin B (AmphoB; Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere of 95% air and 5% CO2. Medium was changed twice a week. Cells were passaged weekly using 0.05% trypsin-EDTA (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) at a ratio of 1:10.
SH-SY5Y cells (ATCC CRL-2266) were maintained in a 1:1 ratio of Eagle’s Minimum Essential Medium (EMEM; LGC Standards, Wesel, Germany) and Ham’s F12 (PAN-Biotech, Aidenbach, Germany) supplemented with 10% FBS and Pen/Strep at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere of 95% air and 5% CO2. Medium was changed twice a week. Cells were passaged biweekly using 0.05% trypsin-EDTA and seeded at a density of 12,500 cells/cm2.
4.3. Isolation and Cultivation of Primary Human RPE Cells
Human eyes from 15 donors (67.4 ± 10.6 years of age, nine males and six females) were obtained from the Aachen Cornea Bank (Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen). Eyes were removed 29.9 ± 17.3 h postmortem, after informed consent was obtained in accord with the Declaration of Helsinki protocols. The procedures for the collection and the use of human samples were approved by the Ethics Committee at the RWTH Aachen Faculty of Medicine (reference number: EK 290/18). Isolation of primary hRPE cells was performed as previously described [94]. Briefly, after separation of the anterior segment, vitreous and retina were removed. The posterior eyecup was filled twice with 1 ml DMEM/F12 supplemented with 10% FBS, Pen/Strep, and AmphoB. Cells were harvested twice by gently brushing the RPE with a fire-polished curved glass Pasteur pipette and transferred into a Petri dish. The cell suspension of each eye globe was carefully resuspended and seeded into three wells of a 24-well cell culture plate, each filled up to 1 ml with DMEM/F12 supplemented with 10% FBS, Pen/Strep, and AmphoB. Primary hRPE cell cultures were maintained at 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere of 95% air and 5% CO2 until confluence was reached. Medium was changed twice a week.
4.4. Electroporation of ARPE-19 Cells and Primary Human RPE Cells
Electroporations were performed with the Neon Transfection System using the 10 µl Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) as already described [24,25]. For ARPE-19 cells, two pulses with a voltage of 1,350 V and a width of 20 ms were applied. For primary hRPE cells, two pulses of 1,100 V and 20 ms were used. 1 × 105 ARPE-19 cells or 5 × 104 primary hRPE cells were resuspended in 11 µl buffer R and combined with 2 µl of purified plasmid mixture containing the SB100X transposase plasmid and the BDNF transposon plasmid at a total concentration of 0.5 µg. Each experiment also included controls with electric field application but without plasmid DNA. Transfected ARPE-19 cells were released into 6-well cell culture plates containing 3 ml of DMEM/F12 supplemented with 10% FBS, but without antibiotics and antimycotics. Transfected primary hRPE cells were transferred into 48-well cell cultures plates containing 0.5 ml of DMEM/F12 supplemented with 10% FBS. Pen/Strep and AmphoB were added with the first medium exchange three days after electroporation.
4.5. SDS-PAGE and Western Blot Analysis
BDNF secretion was assayed in control and BDNF-transfected cell cultures. For ARPE-19 cells, 10 µl of supernatant was directly analyzed. For primary hRPE cells, His-tagged BDNF was purified by Ni-NTA metal-affinity chromatography (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) as already described [24]: 900 µl of supernatant was mixed with 30 µl of 50% Ni-NTA slurry and 300 µl of 4x incubation buffer. After agitation for 1 h at room temperature (RT), Ni-NTA resin was pelleted by centrifugation, washed twice with 1x incubation buffer, incubated with 30 µl of elution buffer for 20 min at RT, and again pelleted by centrifugation. Supernatants were mixed with an equal volume of 2x SDS sample buffer [95], heated for 5 min at 95 °C, and separated on a 15% SDS-polyacrylamide gel or a Mini-PROTEAN TGX Stain-Free Protein Gel (Any kD; Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA). Stain-Free imaging enabled detection of the total protein content after electrophoresis using the ChemiDoc Imaging System together with the Image Lab software 6.1.0 (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA). After transfer onto a 0.45 µm pore size nitrocellulose membrane (Merck) using the semi-dry transfer system (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA), blots were blocked with 3% BSA/Tris-buffered saline (TBS) for 1 h at RT, incubated overnight at 4 °C with anti-BDNF antibodies (rabbit polyclonal, 1:500 diluted in 3% BSA/TBS; Abcam, Cambridge, UK), followed by 1 h at RT with horseradish peroxidase-conjugated anti-rabbit antibodies (goat polyclonal, 1:2000 diluted in 10% milk powder/TBS; Abcam, Cambridge, UK). BDNF bands were visualized by chemiluminescence and evaluated using the ChemiDoc Imaging System or the LAS-3000 Imaging System (FujiFilm, Tokyo, Japan) together with the open-source image processing program ImageJ (Rasband, W.S., ImageJ, U.S. NIH, https://imagej.nih.gov/ij/index.html (accessed on 26 August 2022)).
4.6. BDNF ELISA
BDNF secretion was quantified in cultures of control and BDNF-transfected cells after incubation for a defined time in a defined volume of medium. Supernatants were analyzed using the Human Free BDNF Quantikine ELISA Kit (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. For quantification as a function of the cell number, cells were trypsinized with 0.05% trypsin-EDTA and counted. Counting of ARPE-19 cells was performed using the CASY Cell Counter TT (Roche, Basel, Switzerland). Primary hRPE cells were mixed with trypan blue solution and counted using a hemocytometer.
4.7. Real-Time Quantitative PCR
Total RNA was isolated using the RNeasy Mini Kit together with the RNase-free DNase Set (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Reverse transcription was performed using the Reverse Transcription System (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) was performed on a LightCycler 1.2 Instrument using the LightCycler FastStart DNA Master SYBR Green I kit (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. For RPE cells, cDNA samples were run in duplicate using the primers endBDNF (F: 5′-CTT CTT GTG TAT GTA CAT TGA CC-3′, R: 5′-CTT AAC TGA ATA ATT TAC CCT GTT ATG-3′; RefSeq: NM_170735.6), totalBDNF (F: 5′-CGT GTG TGA CAG TAT TAG TGA GTG G-3′, R: 5′-GAC CTT TTC AAG GAC TGT GAC C-3′), BAX (F: 5′-GGG GAG CAG CCC AGA GG-3′, R: 5′-CGA TCC TGG ATG AAA CCC TGA-3′; RefSeq: NM_138761.4), and BCL2 (F: 5′-GTG TGT GGA GAG CGT CAA CC-3′, R: 5′-TAC AGT TCC ACA AAG GCA TCC CAG-3′; RefSeq: NM_000633.3). For SH-SY5Y cells, cDNA samples were run in triplicate using the primers NTRK2 (F: 5′-TGG ATG CAT ATC GTG CTC CG-3′, R: 5′-GTG CTT GGT TCA GCT CTT GC-3′ [96]; RefSeq: NM_001291937.2). Glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH; F: 5′-ATC CCA TCA CCA TCT TCC AG-3′, R: 5′-ATG AGT CCT TCC ACG ATA CC-3′; RefSeq: NM_002046.3) was used as internal control gene. Reactions were performed using diluted cDNA and a primer concentration of 0.25 µM (0.50 µM for NTRK2). Thermal cycler conditions were as follows: initial denaturation at 95 °C for 10 min, followed by 50 cycles of denaturation at 95 °C for 10 s, annealing at 62 °C for 7 s (60 °C/8 s for NTRK2), and elongation at 72 °C for 15 s. Melting curve analysis confirmed the amplification specificity of each primer pair. Data were processed with LightCycler software 5.0 (Roche, Basel, Switzerland) and analyzed using the comparative CT (2−ΔΔCT) method, which describes relative gene expression [97].
4.8. Droplet Digital PCR
Genomic DNA (gDNA) was isolated using the QIAamp DNA Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) according to the manufacturer’s protocol for cultured cells. To get rid of the transposon donor plasmids that did not serve as substrates for the transposition reactions and were therefore present as plasmid DNA in the gDNA samples, we digested 0.15 µg of gDNA with 20 units of DpnI (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA)—specific for Dam methylated DNA—overnight. To ensure uniform distribution of DNA molecules in the droplets, the magnetic bead-purified DNA was fragmented with CviQI (New England Biolabs, Ipswich, MA, USA) at RT for 2 h. 2 µl of the 30 µl digest was used for ddPCR with ddPCR Supermix for Probes (No dUTP) (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s recommendations. Primers and probes specific for the right inverted repeat of the SB transposon were: 5′-GAA TGT GAT GAA AGA AAT AAA-3′, 5-AGT TTA CAT ACA CCT TAG CC-3′, and RIR_FAM_BH1 5′FAM-TGG TGA TCC TAA CTG ACC TAA GAC AGG-BHQ1-3′. The human genome was quantified by a single copy gene (RPP30)-specific amplicon using the following primers: 5′-CTG TCT CCA CAA GTC CGC-3′, 5′-GGT TAA CTA CAG CTC CCA GC-3′, and the probe 5′-HEX-TGG ACC TGC GAG CGG GTT CTG ACC-BHQ1-3′. The cycling conditions for multiplex PCR were as follows: 95 °C for 10 min, 40 cycles of 94 °C for 30 s, 53 °C for 30 s, and 60 °C for 40 s, and 88 °C for 10 min. Droplet generation and counting were performed using the QX200 Droplet Digital PCR System (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA). Copy number analysis was performed using QuantaSoft Analysis Pro software (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hercules, CA, USA).
4.9. Cell Proliferation Assay
Non-transfected ARPE-19 cells, ARPE-19 cells exposed to the electric field without plasmid DNA, and BDNF-transfected ARPE-19 cells were seeded into 6-well cell culture plates at an initial density of 2 × 104 cells. Medium was changed daily, and cell proliferation was analyzed at the indicated time points. To analyze cell proliferation under oxidative stress conditions, ARPE-19 cells were exposed to 150 µM H2O2 for 24 h one day after starting the cultures. Thereafter, the medium containing H2O2 was replaced with normal medium, and cell proliferation was analyzed at the indicated days. Cells were trypsinized with 0.05% trypsin-EDTA and counted using the CASY Cell Counter TT. Cell viability was determined by the CellTiter-Glo Luminescent Cell Viability Assay (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) according to the manufacturer’s protocol.
4.10. Annexin V/Propidium Iodide Assay
The rate of apoptosis was determined in ARPE-19 cells using the APC Annexin V Apoptosis Detection Kit with PI (BioLegend, San Diego, CA, USA). The assay is based on fluorochrome-labeled annexin V and propidium iodide (PI) to distinguish between early apoptotic, late apoptotic, and necrotic cells. Non-transfected and BDNF-transfected ARPE-19 cells were seeded into 24-well cell culture plates at a density of 1.2 × 105 cells. After 96 h, cells were either treated with 150 µM H2O2 for 24 h or left untreated. Cells were stained as described in the manufacturer’s protocol and analyzed using the BD FACSCanto II flow cytometer along with BD FACSDiva software v9.0 (BD, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA).
4.11. Co-Culture Model and Neurite Outgrowth Quantitation
Co-cultivation of transfected ARPE-19 cells with SH-SY5Y cells was adapted based on the two-layer, contact-independent bioassay model described by Chen and Foldvari [81]. ARPE-19 cells at 15,000/insert were seeded into 1.0-µm polyethylene terephthalate 24-well hanging cell culture inserts (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) and cultivated in appropriate cell culture plates for 48 h. At the same time, SH-SY5Y cells at 80,000/well were cultivated in separate 24-well cell culture plates on 12 mm glass coverslips pre-coated with human recombinant biolaminin (BioLamina, Sundbyberg, Sweden) at 0.55 μg/cm2 for 48 h (non-stressed cells) or for 24 h followed by incubation with medium containing 150 µM H2O2 for another 24 h (oxidatively stressed SH-SY5Y cells). Thereafter, cell culture media were removed and the ARPE-19 containing inserts were transferred to the wells containing the SH-SY5Y cells. Co-cultures were initiated using defined volumes (inserts: 0.5 mL; wells: 1.0 mL) of a 1:1 ratio of EMEM and Ham’s F12 supplemented with 10% FBS and Pen/Strep and maintained for 48 h or 96 h. SH-SY5Y cells alone and co-cultures containing non-transfected ARPE-19 cells were used as controls.
SH-SY5Y neurite outgrowth was evaluated by fixing the cells with 4% paraformaldehyde in phosphate buffered saline (PBS; 137 mM NaCl, 1.5 mM KH2PO4, 8.3 mM Na2HPO4, 2.7 mM KCl, pH 6.8) for 20 min at RT. After blocking with 10% FBS, 1% bovine serum albumin, and 0.1% Triton X-100 in PBS (pH 7.1) for 40 min at RT, 1x NorthernLights 493-conjugated mouse monoclonal anti-neuron-specific beta-III tubulin antibodies (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, MN, USA) in PBS were added for 3 h at RT in the dark. Cells were counterstained with 1 µg/mL 4′,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (DAPI; Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) in PBS for 15 min at RT in the dark. Imaging was performed using a Nikon A1-Ti2-N-STORM confocal laser scanning microscope (Nikon Europe, Amsterdam, Netherlands) with ×63 oil immersion objective. Five pictures (cultures with non-stressed SH-SY5Y cells) and seven to ten pictures (cultures with oxidatively stressed SH-SY5Y cells) of 2048 × 2048 pixels up to 5530 × 5530 pixels for large neurons were captured from the four replicates of each culture condition after 48 h and 96 h. Images were converted to TIF format using NIS-Elements Viewer (Nikon Europe, Amsterdam, The Netherlands). Monochrome images were created for each channel and merged into RGB overlay images scaled to 8 bits (Figure 11a). To measure neurites, 8-bit grayscale images (Figure 11b) were analyzed using Simple Neurite Tracer [98], a free software plugin distributed by Fiji-ImageJ (https://imagej.net/software/fiji/ (accessed on 26/8/2022)), by defining the beginning–starting from the outer line of the nucleus–and the end of each neurite. The software calculated the length of the neurite by tracing a path between the two points (Figure 11c). Neurite length was displayed in pixels and converted to µm using a ratio of 0.1 µm per pixel, with the main trunk and outgoing branches for each neurite added up to the total length of the neurite (Figure 11d). This procedure was performed for all neurites in an image. Note that neurite outgrowths of less than 2 µm were not considered. The Cell Counter plugin (Fiji-ImageJ, https://imagej.net/software/fiji/ (accessed on 26 August 2022)) was used to determine the number of cells per image. All images were processed using the same settings.
4.12. Statistical Analysis
Statistical analyses were performed according to the tests indicated within the figure legends using GraphPad Prism software 9.1.1 (GraphPad, La Jolla, CA, USA) or IBM SPSS Statistics software 27.0 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA).
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by the Confocal Microscope Facility and the Flow Cytometry Facility, core facilities of the Interdisciplinary Center for Clinical Research (IZKF) Aachen within the Faculty of Medicine at RWTH Aachen University. The authors thank Anne Freialdenhoven, Antje Schiefer, Anna Dobias (Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen), and Nathalie Steinke (Flow Cytometry Facility, IZKF Aachen, RWTH Aachen University) for excellent technical assistance and the Aachen Cornea Bank (Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital RWTH Aachen) for collaboration in the experimental use of human donor eyes. Parts of the results shown here are part of the doctoral theses of Larissa Mattern and Katrin Otten.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, Z.I. (Zsuzsanna Izsvák), Z.I. (Zoltán Ivics), G.T. and S.J.; methodology, L.M., K.O., C.M. and S.J.; validation, L.M., K.O., C.M. and S.J.; formal analysis, L.M., C.M. and S.J.; investigation, L.M., K.O., C.M., M.F. and S.J.; resources, Z.I. (Zsuzsanna Izsvák), Z.I. (Zoltán Ivics) and P.W.; data curation, S.J.; writing—original draft preparation, S.J.; writing—review and editing, L.M., K.O., C.M., M.F., Z.I. (Zsuzsanna Izsvák), Z.I. (Zoltán Ivics), P.W., G.T. and S.J.; visualization, L.M. and S.J.; supervision, Z.I. (Zsuzsanna Izsvák), Z.I. (Zoltán Ivics), P.W., G.T. and S.J.; project administration, S.J.; funding acquisition, S.J. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Institutional Review Board Statement
The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethics Committee at the RWTH Aachen Faculty of Medicine (reference number: EK 290/18).
Informed Consent Statement
Human donor tissues were collected after informed consent was obtained in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.
Data Availability Statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors upon request.
Conflicts of Interest
Zsuzsanna Izsvák and Zoltán Ivics are co-inventors on several Sleeping Beauty-related patents.
Funding Statement
This research was funded by the Helmut-Ecker-Stiftung (Ingolstadt, Germany). Larissa Mattern was awarded a PhD scholarship by the Deutsche Ophthalmologische Gesellschaft.
Footnotes
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
References
- 1.Wong W.L., Su X., Li X., Cheung C.M., Klein R., Cheng C.Y., Wong T.Y. Global prevalence of age-related macular degeneration and disease burden projection for 2020 and 2040: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Glob. Health. 2014;2:e106–e116. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(13)70145-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Li J.Q., Welchowski T., Schmid M., Mauschitz M.M., Holz F.G., Finger R.P. Prevalence and incidence of age-related macular degeneration in Europe: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2020;104:1077–1084. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2019-314422. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Parravano M., Costanzo E., Scondotto G., Trifiro G., Virgili G. Anti-VEGF and Other Novel Therapies for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration: An Update. BioDrugs. 2021;35:673–692. doi: 10.1007/s40259-021-00499-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Liao D.S., Grossi F.V., El Mehdi D., Gerber M.R., Brown D.M., Heier J.S., Wykoff C.C., Singerman L.J., Abraham P., Grassmann F., et al. Complement C3 Inhibitor Pegcetacoplan for Geographic Atrophy Secondary to Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Randomized Phase 2 Trial. Ophthalmology. 2020;127:186–195. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2019.07.011. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 5.Jaffe G.J., Westby K., Csaky K.G., Mones J., Pearlman J.A., Patel S.S., Joondeph B.C., Randolph J., Masonson H., Rezaei K.A. C5 Inhibitor Avacincaptad Pegol for Geographic Atrophy Due to Age-Related Macular Degeneration: A Randomized Pivotal Phase 2/3 Trial. Ophthalmology. 2021;128:576–586. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2020.08.027. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Saad L., Washington I. Can Vitamin A be Improved to Prevent Blindness due to Age-Related Macular Degeneration, Stargardt Disease and Other Retinal Dystrophies? Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 2016;854:355–361. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-17121-0_47. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Da Cruz L., Fynes K., Georgiadis O., Kerby J., Luo Y.H., Ahmado A., Vernon A., Daniels J.T., Nommiste B., Hasan S.M., et al. Phase 1 clinical study of an embryonic stem cell-derived retinal pigment epithelium patch in age-related macular degeneration. Nat. Biotechnol. 2018;36:328–337. doi: 10.1038/nbt.4114. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Kashani A.H., Uang J., Mert M., Rahhal F., Chan C., Avery R.L., Dugel P., Chen S., Lebkowski J., Clegg D.O., et al. Surgical Method for Implantation of a Biosynthetic Retinal Pigment Epithelium Monolayer for Geographic Atrophy: Experience from a Phase 1/2a Study. Ophthalmol. Retin. 2020;4:264–273. doi: 10.1016/j.oret.2019.09.017. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Allingham M.J., Mettu P.S., Cousins S.W. Phase 1 Clinical Trial of Elamipretide in Intermediate Age-Related Macular Degeneration and High-Risk Drusen. Ophthalmol. Sci. 2022;2:100095. doi: 10.1016/j.xops.2021.100095. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Mettu P.S., Allingham M.J., Cousins S.W. Phase 1 Clinical Trial of Elamipretide in Dry Age-Related Macular Degeneration and Noncentral Geographic Atrophy. Ophthalmol. Sci. 2022;2:100086. doi: 10.1016/j.xops.2021.100086. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Patel U., Boucher M., de Leseleuc L., Visintini S. CADTH Issues in Emerging Health Technologies. CADTH; Ottawa, ON, Canada: 2016. Voretigene Neparvovec: An Emerging Gene Therapy for the Treatment of Inherited Blindness; pp. 1–11. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Maguire A.M., Bennett J., Aleman E.M., Leroy B.P., Aleman T.S. Clinical Perspective: Treating RPE65-Associated Retinal Dystrophy. Mol. Ther. 2021;29:442–463. doi: 10.1016/j.ymthe.2020.11.029. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Ellis S., Buchberger A., Holder J., Orhan e., Hughes J. GT005, a gene therapy for the treatment of dry age-related macular degeneration (AMD) Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2020;61:2295. [Google Scholar]
- 14.Campochiaro P.A., Lauer A.K., Sohn E.H., Mir T.A., Naylor S., Anderton M.C., Kelleher M., Harrop R., Ellis S., Mitrophanous K.A. Lentiviral Vector Gene Transfer of Endostatin/Angiostatin for Macular Degeneration (GEM) Study. Hum. Gene Ther. 2017;28:99–111. doi: 10.1089/hum.2016.117. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Campochiaro P.A., Nguyen Q.D., Shah S.M., Klein M.L., Holz E., Frank R.N., Saperstein D.A., Gupta A., Stout J.T., Macko J., et al. Adenoviral vector-delivered pigment epithelium-derived factor for neovascular age-related macular degeneration: Results of a phase I clinical trial. Hum. Gene Ther. 2006;17:167–176. doi: 10.1089/hum.2006.17.167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Tombran-Tink J., Johnson L.V. Neuronal differentiation of retinoblastoma cells induced by medium conditioned by human RPE cells. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 1989;30:1700–1707. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Tombran-Tink J., Chader G.G., Johnson L.V. PEDF: A pigment epithelium-derived factor with potent neuronal differentiative activity. Exp. Eye Res. 1991;53:411–414. doi: 10.1016/0014-4835(91)90248-D. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Becerra S.P., Dass C.R., Yabe T., Crawford S.E. Pigment epithelium-derived factor: Chemistry, structure, biology, and applications. J. Biomed. Biotechnol. 2012;2012:830975. doi: 10.1155/2012/830975. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Thumann G., Stöcker M., Maltusch C., Salz A.K., Barth S., Walter P., Johnen S. High efficiency non-viral transfection of retinal and iris pigment epithelial cells with pigment epithelium-derived factor. Gene Ther. 2010;17:181–189. doi: 10.1038/gt.2009.124. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Johnen S., Djalali-Talab Y., Kazanskaya O., Möller T., Harmening N., Kropp M., Izsvak Z., Walter P., Thumann G. Antiangiogenic and Neurogenic Activities of Sleeping Beauty-Mediated PEDF-Transfected RPE Cells In Vitro and In Vivo. Biomed. Res. Int. 2015;2015:863845. doi: 10.1155/2015/863845. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Kuerten D., Johnen S., Harmening N., Souteyrand G., Walter P., Thumann G. Transplantation of PEDF-transfected pigment epithelial cells inhibits corneal neovascularization in a rabbit model. Graefes. Arch. Clin. Exp. Ophthalmol. 2015;253:1061–1069. doi: 10.1007/s00417-015-2954-x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Hernandez M., Recalde S., Garcia-Garcia L., Bezunartea J., Miskey C., Johnen S., Diarra S., Sebe A., Rodriguez-Madoz J.R., Pouillot S., et al. Preclinical Evaluation of a Cell-Based Gene Therapy Using the Sleeping Beauty Transposon System in Choroidal Neovascularization. Mol. Ther. Methods Clin. Dev. 2019;15:403–417. doi: 10.1016/j.omtm.2019.10.013. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Mates L., Chuah M.K., Belay E., Jerchow B., Manoj N., Acosta-Sanchez A., Grzela D.P., Schmitt A., Becker K., Matrai J., et al. Molecular evolution of a novel hyperactive Sleeping Beauty transposase enables robust stable gene transfer in vertebrates. Nat. Genet. 2009;41:753–761. doi: 10.1038/ng.343. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Johnen S., Izsvak Z., Stöcker M., Harmening N., Salz A.K., Walter P., Thumann G. Sleeping Beauty transposon-mediated transfection of retinal and iris pigment epithelial cells. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2012;53:4787–4796. doi: 10.1167/iovs.12-9951. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Thumann G., Harmening N., Prat-Souteyrand C., Marie C., Pastor M., Sebe A., Miskey C., Hurst L.D., Diarra S., Kropp M., et al. Engineering of PEDF-Expressing Primary Pigment Epithelial Cells by the SB Transposon System Delivered by pFAR4 Plasmids. Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids. 2017;6:302–314. doi: 10.1016/j.omtn.2017.02.002. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Pastor M., Johnen S., Harmening N., Quiviger M., Pailloux J., Kropp M., Walter P., Ivics Z., Izsvak Z., Thumann G., et al. The Antibiotic-free pFAR4 Vector Paired with the Sleeping Beauty Transposon System Mediates Efficient Transgene Delivery in Human Cells. Mol. Ther. Nucleic Acids. 2018;11:57–67. doi: 10.1016/j.omtn.2017.12.017. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Izsvak Z., Hackett P.B., Cooper L.J., Ivics Z. Translating Sleeping Beauty transposition into cellular therapies: Victories and challenges. Bioessays. 2010;32:756–767. doi: 10.1002/bies.201000027. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Levy Y.S., Gilgun-Sherki Y., Melamed E., Offen D. Therapeutic potential of neurotrophic factors in neurodegenerative diseases. BioDrugs. 2005;19:97–127. doi: 10.2165/00063030-200519020-00003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Ernfors P., Wetmore C., Olson L., Persson H. Identification of cells in rat brain and peripheral tissues expressing mRNA for members of the nerve growth factor family. Neuron. 1990;5:511–526. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(90)90090-3. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Hofer M., Pagliusi S.R., Hohn A., Leibrock J., Barde Y.A. Regional distribution of brain-derived neurotrophic factor mRNA in the adult mouse brain. EMBO J. 1990;9:2459–2464. doi: 10.1002/j.1460-2075.1990.tb07423.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Phillips H.S., Hains J.M., Laramee G.R., Rosenthal A., Winslow J.W. Widespread expression of BDNF but not NT3 by target areas of basal forebrain cholinergic neurons. Science. 1990;250:290–294. doi: 10.1126/science.1688328. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Gall C.M., Gold S.J., Isackson P.J., Seroogy K.B. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor and neurotrophin-3 mRNAs are expressed in ventral midbrain regions containing dopaminergic neurons. Mol. Cell. Neurosci. 1992;3:56–63. doi: 10.1016/1044-7431(92)90009-Q. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Bennett J.L., Zeiler S.R., Jones K.R. Patterned expression of BDNF and NT-3 in the retina and anterior segment of the developing mammalian eye. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 1999;40:2996–3005. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Germana A., Sanchez-Ramos C., Guerrera M.C., Calavia M.G., Navarro M., Zichichi R., Garcia-Suarez O., Perez-Pinera P., Vega J.A. Expression and cell localization of brain-derived neurotrophic factor and TrkB during zebrafish retinal development. J. Anat. 2010;217:214–222. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2010.01268.x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Seki M., Nawa H., Fukuchi T., Abe H., Takei N. BDNF is upregulated by postnatal development and visual experience: Quantitative and immunohistochemical analyses of BDNF in the rat retina. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2003;44:3211–3218. doi: 10.1167/iovs.02-1089. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Telegina D.V., Kolosova N.G., Kozhevnikova O.S. Immunohistochemical localization of NGF, BDNF, and their receptors in a normal and AMD-like rat retina. BMC Med. Genom. 2019;12:48. doi: 10.1186/s12920-019-0493-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Foltran R.B., Diaz S.L. BDNF isoforms: A round trip ticket between neurogenesis and serotonin? J. Neurochem. 2016;138:204–221. doi: 10.1111/jnc.13658. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Park H., Poo M.M. Neurotrophin regulation of neural circuit development and function. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2013;14:7–23. doi: 10.1038/nrn3379. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Kowianski P., Lietzau G., Czuba E., Waskow M., Steliga A., Morys J. BDNF: A Key Factor with Multipotent Impact on Brain Signaling and Synaptic Plasticity. Cell. Mol. Neurobiol. 2018;38:579–593. doi: 10.1007/s10571-017-0510-4. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Ng T.K.S., Ho C.S.H., Tam W.W.S., Kua E.H., Ho R.C. Decreased Serum Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor (BDNF) Levels in Patients with Alzheimer’s Disease (AD): A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2019;20:257. doi: 10.3390/ijms20020257. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Wang Y., Liu H., Du X.D., Zhang Y., Yin G., Zhang B.S., Soares J.C., Zhang X.Y. Association of low serum BDNF with depression in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Park. Relat. Disord. 2017;41:73–78. doi: 10.1016/j.parkreldis.2017.05.012. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Ola M.S., Nawaz M.I., El-Asrar A.A., Abouammoh M., Alhomida A.S. Reduced levels of brain derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) in the serum of diabetic retinopathy patients and in the retina of diabetic rats. Cell. Mol. Neurobiol. 2013;33:359–367. doi: 10.1007/s10571-012-9901-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Inanc Tekin M., Sekeroglu M.A., Demirtas C., Tekin K., Doguizi S., Bayraktar S., Yilmazbas P. Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor in Patients With Age-Related Macular Degeneration and Its Correlation With Retinal Layer Thicknesses. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2018;59:2833–2840. doi: 10.1167/iovs.18-24030. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Shpak A.A., Guekht A.B., Druzhkova T.A., Kozlova K.I., Gulyaeva N.V. Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor in Patients with Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma and Age-related Cataract. Curr. Eye Res. 2018;43:224–231. doi: 10.1080/02713683.2017.1396617. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 45.Jiao S.S., Shen L.L., Zhu C., Bu X.L., Liu Y.H., Liu C.H., Yao X.Q., Zhang L.L., Zhou H.D., Walker D.G., et al. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor protects against tau-related neurodegeneration of Alzheimer’s disease. Transl. Psychiatry. 2016;6:e907. doi: 10.1038/tp.2016.186. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Osborne A., Khatib T.Z., Songra L., Barber A.C., Hall K., Kong G.Y.X., Widdowson P.S., Martin K.R. Neuroprotection of retinal ganglion cells by a novel gene therapy construct that achieves sustained enhancement of brain-derived neurotrophic factor/tropomyosin-related kinase receptor-B signaling. Cell Death Dis. 2018;9:1007. doi: 10.1038/s41419-018-1041-8. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Chiha W., Bartlett C.A., Petratos S., Fitzgerald M., Harvey A.R. Intravitreal application of AAV-BDNF or mutant AAV-CRMP2 protects retinal ganglion cells and stabilizes axons and myelin after partial optic nerve injury. Exp. Neurol. 2020;326:113167. doi: 10.1016/j.expneurol.2019.113167. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Wojcik-Gryciuk A., Gajewska-Wozniak O., Kordecka K., Boguszewski P.M., Waleszczyk W., Skup M. Neuroprotection of Retinal Ganglion Cells with AAV2-BDNF Pretreatment Restoring Normal TrkB Receptor Protein Levels in Glaucoma. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020;21:6262. doi: 10.3390/ijms21176262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Grabundzija I., Irgang M., Mates L., Belay E., Matrai J., Gogol-Döring A., Kawakami K., Chen W., Ruiz P., Chuah M.K., et al. Comparative analysis of transposable element vector systems in human cells. Mol. Ther. 2010;18:1200–1209. doi: 10.1038/mt.2010.47. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Galla M., Schambach A., Falk C.S., Maetzig T., Kuehle J., Lange K., Zychlinski D., Heinz N., Brugman M.H., Gohring G., et al. Avoiding cytotoxicity of transposases by dose-controlled mRNA delivery. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011;39:7147–7160. doi: 10.1093/nar/gkr384. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Gogol-Döring A., Ammar I., Gupta S., Bunse M., Miskey C., Chen W., Uckert W., Schulz T.F., Izsvak Z., Ivics Z. Genome-wide Profiling Reveals Remarkable Parallels Between Insertion Site Selection Properties of the MLV Retrovirus and the piggyBac Transposon in Primary Human CD4(+) T Cells. Mol. Ther. 2016;24:592–606. doi: 10.1038/mt.2016.11. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Querques I., Mades A., Zuliani C., Miskey C., Alb M., Grueso E., Machwirth M., Rausch T., Einsele H., Ivics Z., et al. A highly soluble Sleeping Beauty transposase improves control of gene insertion. Nat. Biotechnol. 2019;37:1502–1512. doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0291-z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Djuzenova C.S., Zimmermann U., Frank H., Sukhorukov V.L., Richter E., Fuhr G. Effect of medium conductivity and composition on the uptake of propidium iodide into electropermeabilized myeloma cells. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1996;1284:143–152. doi: 10.1016/S0005-2736(96)00119-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Yao S., Rana S., Liu D., Wise G.E. Electroporation optimization to deliver plasmid DNA into dental follicle cells. Biotechnol. J. 2009;4:1488–1496. doi: 10.1002/biot.200900039. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 55.Sherba J.J., Hogquist S., Lin H., Shan J.W., Shreiber D.I., Zahn J.D. The effects of electroporation buffer composition on cell viability and electro-transfection efficiency. Sci. Rep. 2020;10:3053. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-59790-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 56.Zhang Z., Qiu S., Zhang X., Chen W. Optimized DNA electroporation for primary human T cell engineering. BMC Biotechnol. 2018;18:4. doi: 10.1186/s12896-018-0419-0. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Gibot L., Montigny A., Baaziz H., Fourquaux I., Audebert M., Rols M.P. Calcium Delivery by Electroporation Induces In Vitro Cell Death through Mitochondrial Dysfunction without DNA Damages. Cancers. 2020;12:425. doi: 10.3390/cancers12020425. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Polajzer T., Jarm T., Miklavcic D. Analysis of damage-associated molecular pattern molecules due to electroporation of cells in vitro. Radiol. Oncol. 2020;54:317–328. doi: 10.2478/raon-2020-0047. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Wiencke A.K., Kiilgaard J.F., Nicolini J., Bundgaard M., Ropke C., La Cour M. Growth of cultured porcine retinal pigment epithelial cells. Acta Ophthalmol. Scand. 2003;81:170–176. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0420.2003.00030.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Chopra S., Ruzgys P., Maciulevičius M., Jakutavičiūtė M., Šatkauskas S. Investigation of Plasmid DNA Delivery and Cell Viability Dynamics for Optimal Cell Electrotransfection In Vitro. Appl. Sci. 2020;10:6070. doi: 10.3390/app10176070. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Kreiss P., Cameron B., Rangara R., Mailhe P., Aguerre-Charriol O., Airiau M., Scherman D., Crouzet J., Pitard B. Plasmid DNA size does not affect the physicochemical properties of lipoplexes but modulates gene transfer efficiency. Nucleic Acids Res. 1999;27:3792–3798. doi: 10.1093/nar/27.19.3792. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Chabot S., Orio J., Schmeer M., Schleef M., Golzio M., Teissie J. Minicircle DNA electrotransfer for efficient tissue-targeted gene delivery. Gene Ther. 2013;20:62–68. doi: 10.1038/gt.2011.215. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 63.Schmidt N., Schulze J., Warwas D.P., Ehlert N., Lenarz T., Warnecke A., Behrens P. Long-term delivery of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) from nanoporous silica nanoparticles improves the survival of spiral ganglion neurons in vitro. PLoS ONE. 2018;13:e0194778. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0194778. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 64.Geissler C., Blumenstock M., Gabrielpillai J., Guchlerner L., Stover T., Diensthuber M. Simultaneous treatment with pentoxifylline does not adversely affect the neurotrophic effects of brain-derived neurotrophic factor on spiral ganglion neurons. Neuroreport. 2021;32:1134–1139. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0000000000001701. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 65.Yang J.W., Ru J., Ma W., Gao Y., Liang Z., Liu J., Guo J.H., Li L.Y. BDNF promotes the growth of human neurons through crosstalk with the Wnt/beta-catenin signaling pathway via GSK-3beta. Neuropeptides. 2015;54:35–46. doi: 10.1016/j.npep.2015.08.005. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 66.Rosenblum S., Smith T.N., Wang N., Chua J.Y., Westbroek E., Wang K., Guzman R. BDNF Pretreatment of Human Embryonic-Derived Neural Stem Cells Improves Cell Survival and Functional Recovery After Transplantation in Hypoxic-Ischemic Stroke. Cell Transpl. 2015;24:2449–2461. doi: 10.3727/096368914X679354. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 67.Ahn S.Y., Sung D.K., Chang Y.S., Sung S.I., Kim Y.E., Kim H.J., Lee S.M., Park W.S. BDNF-Overexpressing Engineered Mesenchymal Stem Cells Enhances Their Therapeutic Efficacy against Severe Neonatal Hypoxic Ischemic Brain Injury. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021;22:11395. doi: 10.3390/ijms222111395. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 68.Lim W., Bae H., Bazer F.W., Song G. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor improves proliferation of endometrial epithelial cells by inhibition of endoplasmic reticulum stress during early pregnancy. J. Cell. Physiol. 2017;232:3641–3651. doi: 10.1002/jcp.25834. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 69.Chen S., Wang F., Liu Z., Zhao Y., Jiang Y., Chen L., Li C., Zhou X. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor promotes proliferation and progesterone synthesis in bovine granulosa cells. J. Cell. Physiol. 2019;234:8776–8787. doi: 10.1002/jcp.27536. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 70.Paris A.J., Hayer K.E., Oved J.H., Avgousti D.C., Toulmin S.A., Zepp J.A., Zacharias W.J., Katzen J.B., Basil M.C., Kremp M.M., et al. STAT3-BDNF-TrkB signalling promotes alveolar epithelial regeneration after lung injury. Nat. Cell Biol. 2020;22:1197–1210. doi: 10.1038/s41556-020-0569-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 71.Ogura Y., Sato K., Kawashima K., Kobayashi N., Imura S., Fujino K., Kawaguchi H., Nedachi T. Subtoxic levels of hydrogen peroxide induce brain-derived neurotrophic factor expression to protect PC12 cells. BMC Res. Notes. 2014;7:840. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-7-840. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 72.Cabral de Guimaraes T.A., Daich Varela M., Georgiou M., Michaelides M. Treatments for dry age-related macular degeneration: Therapeutic avenues, clinical trials and future directions. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2022;106:297–304. doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2020-318452. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 73.Kashani A.H. Stem cell-derived retinal pigment epithelium transplantation in age-related macular degeneration: Recent advances and challenges. Curr. Opin. Ophthalmol. 2022;33:211–218. doi: 10.1097/ICU.0000000000000838. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 74.Domenici L., Origlia N., Falsini B., Cerri E., Barloscio D., Fabiani C., Sanso M., Giovannini L. Rescue of retinal function by BDNF in a mouse model of glaucoma. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e115579. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0115579. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 75.Feng L., Chen H., Yi J., Troy J.B., Zhang H.F., Liu X. Long-Term Protection of Retinal Ganglion Cells and Visual Function by Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor in Mice With Ocular Hypertension. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2016;57:3793–3802. doi: 10.1167/iovs.16-19825. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 76.Hackett S.F., Friedman Z., Freund J., Schoenfeld C., Curtis R., DiStefano P.S., Campochiaro P.A. A splice variant of trkB and brain-derived neurotrophic factor are co-expressed in retinal pigmented epithelial cells and promote differentiated characteristics. Brain Res. 1998;789:201–212. doi: 10.1016/S0006-8993(97)01440-6. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 77.Liu Z.Z., Zhu L.Q., Eide F.F. Critical role of TrkB and brain-derived neurotrophic factor in the differentiation and survival of retinal pigment epithelium. J. Neurosci. 1997;17:8749–8755. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.17-22-08749.1997. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 78.Inana G., Murat C., An W., Yao X., Harris I.R., Cao J. RPE phagocytic function declines in age-related macular degeneration and is rescued by human umbilical tissue derived cells. J. Transl. Med. 2018;16:63. doi: 10.1186/s12967-018-1434-6. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 79.Yenice E., Sengun A., Soyugelen Demirok G., Turacli E. Ganglion cell complex thickness in nonexudative age-related macular degeneration. Eye. 2015;29:1076–1080. doi: 10.1038/eye.2015.86. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 80.Sullivan R.K., Woldemussie E., Pow D.V. Dendritic and synaptic plasticity of neurons in the human age-related macular degeneration retina. Investig. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2007;48:2782–2791. doi: 10.1167/iovs.06-1283. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 81.Chen D.W., Foldvari M. In vitro bioassay model for screening non-viral neurotrophic factor gene delivery systems for glaucoma treatment. Drug Deliv. Transl. Res. 2016;6:676–685. doi: 10.1007/s13346-016-0324-9. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 82.Rahimmi A., Peluso I., Rajabi A., Hassanzadeh K. miR-185 and SEPT5 Genes May Contribute to Parkinson’s Disease Pathophysiology. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2019;2019:5019815. doi: 10.1155/2019/5019815. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 83.Arslan M.E., Turkez H., Mardinoglu A. In vitro neuroprotective effects of farnesene sesquiterpene on alzheimer’s disease model of differentiated neuroblastoma cell line. Int. J. Neurosci. 2021;131:745–754. doi: 10.1080/00207454.2020.1754211. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 84.Zhang L., Wang Y. Tauroursodeoxycholic Acid Alleviates H2O2-Induced Oxidative Stress and Apoptosis via Suppressing Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress in Neonatal Rat Cardiomyocytes. Dose-Response. 2018;16:1559325818782631. doi: 10.1177/1559325818782631. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 85.Cheng Y.C., Chen P.Y., Way T.D., Cheng C.L., Huang Y.P., Hsia T.C., Chou Y.C., Peng S.F. Pre-Treatment of Pterostilbene Enhances H2O2-induced Cell Apoptosis Through Caspase-dependent Pathway in Human Keratinocyte Cells. In Vivo. 2021;35:833–843. doi: 10.21873/invivo.12324. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 86.Encinas M., Iglesias M., Llecha N., Comella J.X. Extracellular-regulated kinases and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase are involved in brain-derived neurotrophic factor-mediated survival and neuritogenesis of the neuroblastoma cell line SH-SY5Y. J. Neurochem. 1999;73:1409–1421. doi: 10.1046/j.1471-4159.1999.0731409.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 87.Teng H.K., Teng K.K., Lee R., Wright S., Tevar S., Almeida R.D., Kermani P., Torkin R., Chen Z.Y., Lee F.S., et al. ProBDNF induces neuronal apoptosis via activation of a receptor complex of p75NTR and sortilin. J. Neurosci. 2005;25:5455–5463. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5123-04.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 88.Liu S., Guo W., Zhou H., Tang L., Feng S., Zhong J.H., Zhou X.F. proBDNF inhibits the proliferation and migration of OLN93 oligodendrocytes. Mol. Med. Rep. 2018;18:3809–3817. doi: 10.3892/mmr.2018.9407. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 89.Yang B., Wang L., Nie Y., Wei W., Xiong W. proBDNF expression induces apoptosis and inhibits synaptic regeneration by regulating the RhoA-JNK pathway in an in vitro post-stroke depression model. Transl. Psychiatry. 2021;11:578. doi: 10.1038/s41398-021-01667-2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 90.Frank L., Ventimiglia R., Anderson K., Lindsay R.M., Rudge J.S. BDNF down-regulates neurotrophin responsiveness, TrkB protein and TrkB mRNA levels in cultured rat hippocampal neurons. Eur. J. Neurosci. 1996;8:1220–1230. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.1996.tb01290.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 91.Knusel B., Gao H., Okazaki T., Yoshida T., Mori N., Hefti F., Kaplan D.R. Ligand-induced down-regulation of Trk messenger RNA, protein and tyrosine phosphorylation in rat cortical neurons. Neuroscience. 1997;78:851–862. doi: 10.1016/S0306-4522(96)00616-1. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 92.Chen H., Weber A.J. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor reduces TrkB protein and mRNA in the normal retina and following optic nerve crush in adult rats. Brain Res. 2004;1011:99–106. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2004.03.024. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 93.Stöcker M., Tur M.K., Sasse S., Krussmann A., Barth S., Engert A. Secretion of functional anti-CD30-angiogenin immunotoxins into the supernatant of transfected 293T-cells. Protein. Expr. Purif. 2003;28:211–219. doi: 10.1016/S1046-5928(02)00709-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 94.Johnen S., Harmening N., Marie C., Scherman D., Izsvak Z., Ivics Z., Walter P., Thumann G. Electroporation-Based Genetic Modification of Primary Human Pigment Epithelial Cells using the Sleeping Beauty Transposon System. J. Vis. Exp. 2021;168:e61987. doi: 10.3791/61987. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 95.Laemmli U.K. Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature. 1970;227:680–685. doi: 10.1038/227680a0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 96.Thomson A.C., Schuhmann T., de Graaf T.A., Sack A.T., Rutten B.P.F., Kenis G. The Effects of Serum Removal on Gene Expression and Morphological Plasticity Markers in Differentiated SH-SY5Y Cells. Cell. Mol. Neurobiol. 2021;42:1829–1839. doi: 10.1007/s10571-021-01062-x. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 97.Schmittgen T.D., Livak K.J. Analyzing real-time PCR data by the comparative C(T) method. Nat. Protoc. 2008;3:1101–1108. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2008.73. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 98.Longair M.H., Baker D.A., Armstrong J.D. Simple Neurite Tracer: Open source software for reconstruction, visualization and analysis of neuronal processes. Bioinformatics. 2011;27:2453–2454. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr390. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
Associated Data
This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.
Data Availability Statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors upon request.