Skip to main content
PLOS ONE logoLink to PLOS ONE
. 2022 Nov 16;17(11):e0276766. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276766

Severe COVID-19 in pregnancy has a distinct serum profile, including greater complement activation and dysregulation of serum lipids

Marie Altendahl 1, Thalia Mok 1, Christine Jang 1, Seungjun Yeo 2, Austin Quach 2, Yalda Afshar 1,*
Editor: Catherine Mounier3
PMCID: PMC9668183  PMID: 36383608

Abstract

Background

Pregnancies complicated by Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) are at an increased risk of severe morbidity due to physiologic changes in immunologic, cardiovascular, and respiratory function. There is little is known about how severity of COVID-19 changes protein and metabolite expression in pregnancy.

Objective

This study aims to investigate the pathophysiology behind various clinical trajectories in pregnant patients diagnosed with COVID-19 using multi-omics profiling.

Study design

This is a prospective cohort study of 30 pregnant patients at a single tertiary care center. Participants were categorized by severity of COVID-19 disease (control, asymptomatic, mild/moderate, or severe). Maternal serum samples underwent LC-MS-based multiomics analysis for profiling of proteins, lipids, electrolytes, and metabolites. Linear regression models were used to assess how disease severity related to analyte levels. Reactome pathway enrichment analysis was conducted on differential analytes.

Results

Of 30 participants, 25 had confirmed diagnosis of COVID-19 (6 asymptomatic (one post-infection), 13 mild/moderate (all post-infection), 6 severe), and 5 participants were controls. Severe COVID-19 was associated with distinct profiles demonstrating significant proteomic and lipidomic signatures which were enriched for annotations related to complement and antibody activity. (FDR < 0.05). Downregulated analytes were not significantly enriched but consisted of annotation terms related to lipoprotein activity (FDR > 0.2). Post-infection mild/moderate COVID-19 did not have significantly altered serum protein, metabolite, or lipid metabolite levels compared to controls.

Conclusions

Pregnancies with severe COVID-19 demonstrate greater inflammation and complement activation and dysregulation of serum lipids. This altered multiomic expression provides insight into the pathophysiology of severe COVID-19 in pregnancy and may serve as potential indicators for adverse pregnancy outcomes.

Introduction

In December 2019, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) began spreading, rapidly leading to a global pandemic [1, 2]. Pregnant persons are considered a high-risk population during infectious disease outbreaks as they have increased susceptibility to infections and its sequelae due to the physiological changes of pregnancy [2, 3]. The clinical presentation of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in pregnancy is variable and can range in severity from asymptomatic to critical illness with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), multiorgan failure, and in some cases, death [1, 2, 4]. It has been demonstrated that pregnancy is associated with an increased risk for more severe COVID-19 disease, requiring ICU admission or mechanical ventilation [1, 2, 4]. Though it is unclear what leads to the differentiation of disease severity in pregnant persons with SARS-CoV-2 infection, we hypothesize that greater inflammation and immunologic dysfunction contribute to more severe disease.

Multi-omics research is uncovering distinct metabolic and proteomic serum compositions based on COVID-19 severity and elucidating mechanisms driving immunologic dysfunction seen in severe COVID-19 [5, 6]. Su et al. found that moderate and severe COVID-19 cases have significantly elevated inflammation and a large decrease in blood nutrients compared to those with mild disease [6]. Investigating protein and metabolite expression in COVID-19 using multi-omics provides insight into the pathophysiology of COVID-19 and into biochemical parameters with the potential to identify patients at greatest risk for developing COVID-19 complications.

Little is known about how the severity of COVID-19 changes biochemical expression in the serum of pregnant people. Alterations in protein expression during pregnancy may increase the risk for development of increased COVID-19 severity. This study aims to investigate the pathophysiology behind various clinical trajectories in pregnant patients diagnosed with COVID-19 by using multiomics profiling. Investigation of multiomic expression in pregnant participants with COVID-19 will further our understanding of the pathophysiology of COVID-19 in pregnancy and may serve to elucidate potential indicators for adverse pregnancy outcomes.

Materials and methods

Pregnant people with COVID-19 infection were actively enrolled at the University of California, Los Angeles between October 1st, 2020 and February 28th, 2021 through a prospective cohort study evaluating maternal and neonatal outcomes of pregnancies with COVID-19 infection. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (UCLA IRB# 20–000579). After patient was identified, participants underwent screening and eligible participants were contacted by a study coordinator by phone or email. Verbal or email consented was obtained. Confirmed COVID-19 infection was defined as being SARS-CoV-2 positive by nasopharyngeal RT-PCR. Eligibility for the study included participants >13 years old, pregnant at the time of enrollment, with necessary clinical data and biospecimen collection during pregnancy. Healthy pregnant controls without COVID-19 infection, defined as a negative SARS-CoV-2 positive nasopharyngeal RT-PCR test, were concurrently recruited.

Demographic and clinical data

Baseline demographic, clinical data, and clinical labs (ie. IL-6, ferritin, D-dimer) were collected via electronic medical record review. COVID-19 severity was categorized as asymptomatic, mild, moderate, or severe based on the NIH guidelines [7]. Asymptomatic illness is defined as patients who tested positive for COVID-19 but have no symptoms. Mild illness includes individuals who have symptoms of COVID-19, but do not have shortness of breath or abnormal chest imaging. Moderate illness is defined as individuals who have symptoms or imaging consistent with lower respiratory disease, but oxygen saturations remain ≥94% on room air. Severe illness is defined as SpO2 <94% on room air, PaO2/FiO2 <300 mm Hg, a respiratory rate >30 breaths/min, or lung infiltrates >50% or any individual with respiratory failure, septic shock, or multiple organ dysfunction secondary to COVID-19 [8].

Biospecimen collection and processing

Peripheral blood specimens were obtained from consented patients at the time of study enrollment, as close to diagnosis of acute COVID-19 infection as possible. 2-3mL of blood were drawn from participants and collected in a red top tube without any anticoagulants and preservatives. The tube was centrifuged and spun at 1500rpm for 10 minutes in room temperature. Using a pipette, aliquots of 500uL of serum were drawn out of tube without disrupting the bottom red blood cell layer. The cryovial tubes were labeled with corresponding IDs and time of collection to store in biobank. The serum cryovials were stored in the -80-degree freezer for analyses. Of the 267 available samples, 31 serum samples were chosen based on COVID-19 severity (control, asymptomatic, mild/moderate, and severe) for analyses. Each sample was from a unique participant.

LC-MS biochemical analysis

Protein, lipid, and small molecule multiomic analysis of serum samples was performed by a commercial research laboratory (Dalton Bioanalytics Inc., Los Angeles, CA). Briefly, after randomization 100 microliters of each serum sample were spiked with internal standards, denatured in an ammonium bicarbonate buffered methanol solution, digested with trypsin, precipitated with ethanol and acetonitrile, and clarified by high-speed centrifugation. The extracted supernatant was analyzed on a liquid chromatography mass spectrometry instrument. Mixed mode RP-HILIC liquid chromatography and high-resolution mass spectrometry was employed for relative quantification of biochemicals in the sample preparations. MS1 data was collected for quantification in both positive and negative ion modes. Ions were identified via matching of data dependent MS2 spectra to proteomic, lipidomic, and metabolomic mass spectral libraries, and filtered on conventional match score thresholds. Identifications were used for calibration of MS1 data and for label free quantification of peak intensities by matching identifications between runs (MBR) based on m/z and retention time using in-house software.

Statistical analysis

Serum samples underwent multiomic profiling however a single outlier sample was omitted from further analysis likely due to mis-injection (technical error). Relative intensities were log10 transformed and statistically corrected for the technical effects run order and extraction efficiency (average internal standard intensity). The peak areas for multiple analyte ionic forms were averaged into molecule-level relative quantities (e.g. peptides into a protein, lipid species into lipid isomers, etc.). These molecule-wise relative quantities were used for downstream data analysis.

Participant demographic and clinical characteristics were clustered based on pairwise correlation distance to identify potentially important associations. The serum multiome was subsequently screened for differential associations by COVID-19 severity using unadjusted and adjusted linear regression models (age, race, and gestational age at COVID-19 diagnosis / draw). Proteins nominally associated with severe COVID-19 (p < 0.05) were tested for enrichment of functional annotations using DAVID enrichment analysis [9]. Kolmogorov–Smirnov testing was used to test for differential enrichment of specific lipid classes.

Results

Of the 31 serum samples collected, 30 samples were included in the analysis, as one sample was identified as an outlier and excluded from analysis. 25 participants were SARS-CoV-2 positive and five were gestational-age matched healthy pregnant participants serving as controls. Of those with COVID-19 infection, 6 were asymptomatic, 13 had mild or moderate severity, and 6 had severe disease. Table 1 describes the demographics and clinical characteristics of all participants. 2 participants did not deliver within the University of California, Los Angeles Health system and thus were missing birthing outcome variables such as gestational age at delivery. The average maternal age of participants was 32.7 years old (19–41 years, SD 5.01). Participants with severe COVID-19 were more likely to be Hispanic (p = 0.018) and obese (p = 0.011). Besides obesity, there were no significant differences in presence of maternal comorbidities by COVID-19 severity or in controls (p> 0.05). With respect to clinical characteristics of COVID-19 infection, there were no significant differences in trimester of infection (p = 0.06). 2 participants were diagnosed in the first trimester, 13 in the second trimester, and 11 in the third trimester. Of the 19 participants with symptomatic COVID-19, the most reported symptoms were cough (10/19, 52.6%), shortness of breath (9/19, 47.4%), myalgias (9/19, 47.4%), and nasal congestion (8/19, 42.1%). Those with mild or moderate disease were more likely to endorse headache, anosmia/ageusia, and nasal congestion, whereas those with severe disease were more likely to endorse shortness of breath. Of the participants with severe illness, 6 required O2, 2 were intubated, 2 developed ARDS, 1 required extra corporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Additional clinical characteristics of participants with severe COVID-19 are described in Table 2. No participants died secondary to complications from COVID-19.

Table 1. Demographic and clinical characteristics categorized by severity of COVID-19 infection.

Characteristic N Asymptomatic (n = 6) Mild/Moderate (n = 13) Severe (n = 6) Control (n = 5) p-value
Maternal age 30 31.8 ± 7.1 34.3 ± 3.2 29.5 ± 5.4 33.8 ± 5.2 0.250
Mean ± SD (Range) (22–41) (28–39) (19–33) (28–40)
Gestational age at delivery 28 39.6 ± 0.9 39.3 ± 0.7 37.1 ± 5.3 38 ± 2.3 0.228
Mean ± SD (Range) (38.1–40.6) (37.3–40.3) (29.4–41.4) (34.3–39.9)
Race/Ethnicity, n (%) 30 0.018*
Asian 0 (0.0) 3 (23.1) 0 (0.0) 1 (20.0)
Black 1 (16.7) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)
White 1 (16.7) 5 (38.5) 1 (16.7) 4 (80.0)
Hispanic 2 (33.3) 1 (7.7) 5 (83.3) 0 (0.0)
Other 2 (33.3) 4 (30.8) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)
Maternal Comorbidities, n (%)
Obesity 30 0 (0.0) 2 (15.4) 4 (66.7) 0 (0.0) 0.011*
Chronic HTN 30 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) N/A
Asthma 30 0 (0.0) 1 (7.7) 1 (16.7) 0 (0.0) 0.621
Anemia 30 1 (16.7) 1 (7.7) 2 (33.3) 1 (20.0) 0.574
Thyroid dysfunction 30 1 (16.7) 1 (7.7) 1 (16.7) 1 (20.0) 0.881
Infection other than COVID-19  30 3 (50.0) 5 (38.5) 3 (50.0) 0 (0.0) 0.280
Obstetric Outcomes, n (%)
Gestational HTN 30 0 (0.0) 3 (23.1) 2 (33.3) 1 (20.0) 0.523
Pre-eclampsia 30 0 (0.0) 2 (15.4) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0.423
Gestational diabetes 30 0 (0.0) 3 (23.1) 2 (33.3) 0 (0.0) 0.286
Trimester of Infection, n (%) 25 0.062
First trimester 0 (0.0) 2 (15.4) 0 (0.0) N/A
Second trimester 1 (16.7) 9 (69.2) 3 (50.0) N/A
Third trimester 5 (83.3) 2 (15.4) 3 (50.0) N/A
COVID-19 Symptoms, n (%)
Cough 25 0 (0.0) 5 (38.5) 5 (83.3) N/A 0.013*
Fever 25 0 (0.0) 1 (7.7) 2 (33.3) N/A 0.163
Shortness of breath 25 0 (0.0) 3 (23.1) 6 (100.0) N/A 0.001**
Myalgia 25 0 (0.0) 5 (38.5) 4 (66.7) N/A 0.053
Headache 25 0 (0.0) 6 (46.2) 0 (0.0) N/A 0.026*
Anosmia/ageusia 25 0 (0.0) 3 (23.1) 0 (0.0) N/A 0.207
Nasal congestion 25 0 (0.0) 8 (61.5) 0 (0.0) N/A 0.004**

Infection other than COVID-19 included: HIV, hepatitis C, herpes simplex virus, chlamydia trachomatis, allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis, group B strep and diagnosis of urinary tract infection or chorioamnionitis. Two participants did not deliver at UCLA, thus gestational age at delivery was only available for twenty-eight participants.

*p-value <0.05

**p-value <0.01.

Table 2. Demographic and clinical characteristics of cohort with severe COVID-19 (n = 6).

Characteristic Patient 1 Patient 2 Patient 3 Patient 4 Patient 5 Patient 6
Maternal age 33 19 33 29 33 30
Gestational age (weeks) at delivery N/A 41.4 37.9 39.6 N/A 29.4
Maternal Comorbidities
Obesity 0 1 1 1 0 1
Chronic HTN 0 0 0 0 0 0
Asthma 0 0 1 0 0 0
Anemia 0 0 0 0 1 1
Thyroid dysfunction 0 0 0 0 0 1
Infection other than COVID-19  1 0 1 1 0 0
Obstetric Outcomes
Gestational HTN 0 1 1 0 0 0
Pre-eclampsia 0 0 0 0 0 0
Gestational diabetes 1 0 1 0 0 0
Trimester of COVID-19 Infection 2 3 2 3 3 2
COVID-19 Symptoms
Cough 1 1 1 1 1 0
Fever 0 0 0 1 1 0
Shortness of breath 1 1 1 1 1 1
Myalgia 1 0 1 1 1 0
Headache 0 0 0 0 0 0
Anosmia/ageusia 0 0 0 0 0 0
Nasal congestion 0 0 0 0 0 0
COVID-19 Complications
O2 Saturation <94% 1 1 1 1 1 1
Supplemental O2 Required 1 1 1 1 1 1
Intubation 1 0 0 0 0 1
ARDS 0 0 0 1 0 1
ICU Admission 1 1 0 1 0 1
ECMO 0 0 0 0 0 1
Inflammatory Markers
IL-6 N/A 2.2 N/A 3.9 N/A 53.5
D-dimer 0.81 0.84 0.39 1.06 0.84 2.04
Ferritin 584 77 76 250 63 145

Precipitous changes in maternal serum were seen in those with severe COVID-19 infection in pregnancy. Principal components analysis shows a clear separation of severe cases versus all others (Fig 1A). Of the 496 serum proteins measured, 87 proteins were significantly associated with severe COVID-19, with 40 increased and 47 decreased in severe infections (FDR < 0.05, Fig 1B, Table 3, S1 Table). Of the 467 measured lipids, 136 lipids were associated with severe COVID-19, with 51 increased and 85 decreased (FDR < 0.05, Table 3). Upregulated lipid classes were enriched for diacylglycerols (DG), triacylglycerols (TG), fatty acids (FA), and phosphatidylethanolamines (PE), whereas downregulated lipids were enriched for phosphatidylcholine classes such as phosphatidylcholines (PC), lysophosphatidylcholines (LysoPC), plasmenyl phosphatidylcholines (Plasmenyl-PC), plasmanyl phosphatidylcholines (Plasmanyl-PC), plasmenyl phosphatidylethanolamines (Plasmenyl-PE), (FDR < 0.05, Table 3). Of the 122 metabolites/compounds measured, 19 were associated with severe COVID-19, with 10 increased and 9 decreased (FDR < 0.05, Table 3). The most significant associations are listed in Table 3 (full data, S1 Table). A joint metabolite-protein Reactome pathway enrichment analysis revealed that upregulated analytes were enriched for annotations related to ‘Complement cascade’, ‘Signaling by the B Cell Receptor (BCR)’, ‘Fc epsilon receptor (FCERI) signaling’, and ‘FCGR activation’ (FDR < 0.05, Fig 2, S2 Table). Downregulated analytes were not significantly enriched for annotations but consisted of annotation terms such as ‘Plasma lipoprotein assembly, remodeling, and clearance’ (FDR = 0.30).

Fig 1.

Fig 1

a. Principal components analysis showing clear separation of severe COVID-19 cases versus all others. b. Volcano plot illustrating proteins altered in severe SARS-CoV-2 positive pregnancies. c. COVID-19 severity associations.

Table 3. Top proteins and metabolites with the greatest associations in pregnant participants with severe COVID-19.

Analyte Type Beta FDR
PC 16:0_17:0 lipid -1.70 8.6E-08
Transthyretin protein -0.29 5.5E-05
Alkenyl-DG P-18:1_20:5 lipid 0.27 3.3E-04
Alpha-1-antichymotrypsin protein 0.29 3.6E-04
C3/C5 convertase protein 0.18 3.6E-04
1-Linoleoyl Glycerol compound 0.55 3.6E-04
Plasmenyl-PC P-16:0_16:0 lipid -0.26 3.6E-04
DG 18:2_20:3 lipid 0.33 3.6E-04
Retinol-binding protein 4 protein -0.29 4.2E-04
LysoPC 20:0 lipid -0.33 4.2E-04
PC 15:1_20:2 lipid -0.30 4.4E-04
Plasmanyl-PC O-16:0_18:3 lipid -0.86 6.4E-04
PC 20:4_22:5 lipid -0.33 6.4E-04
Plasmenyl-PC P-20:0_14:1 lipid -0.34 6.4E-04
Plasmanyl-PC O-20:0_12:2 lipid -2.34 6.4E-04
Plasmenyl-PC P-16:0_18:2 lipid -0.82 6.4E-04
Alkenyl-DG P-18:0_20:5 lipid 0.25 7.6E-04
Monoolein compound 0.75 7.6E-04
Phospholipase A2 group XV protein -0.25 7.8E-04
Gelsolin protein -0.18 8.2E-04

Fig 2.

Fig 2

a. Top enriched Reactome pathways. b. Severe COVID-19 pathway enrichment.

Post-infection mild/moderate COVID-19 patients did not have significantly altered serum protein or compound levels compared to controls. We found significant associations with COVID-19 severity however these were largely driven by the severe cases—when excluding the severe cases, there were much fewer significant associations, however the consistency associations before and after exclusion of severe cases was moderately correlated (cor = 0.48). The addition of the adjustment variables maternal age, race, obesity, and age at gestation to the severe COVID-19 models reduced the strength of their associations but remained concordant with unadjusted model (cor>0.87). These findings support that severe COVID-19 in pregnancy is associated with substantial changes in proteomic and lipidomic serum expression, distinguishing them from those with asymptomatic and mild/moderate disease.

Considering the limited statistical power of our study (severe cases n = 6 of 30), we sought independent external validation. We compared our findings to the results of Overmyer et al. another multiomic study of COVID-19 to assess agreement between pregnant mothers and severe COVID-19 in the general population [5]. Taking the intersecting biomolecules between our studies, we find a moderate agreement between our COVID-19 severity associations and theirs (cor = 0.43, p = 6e-20, S1 Fig). Top concordant hits include the downregulated Albumin and upregulated Complement 9.

Rather than building a predictive model from biochemicals measurable using specialized LC-MS instrumentation we instead sought to assess the viability of utilizing clinical parameters to build a predictor of severe COVID-19 supported by our study. By using a signed simple average of scaled Albumin (general liver marker), C-reactive protein (acute phase inflammatory marker), and Apolipoprotein A1 (major HDL particle component), this composite measure performed better than the individual markers (AUC for Albumin = 92%, APOA1 = 91%, CRP = 92%, composite = 98%). Independent follow-up using clinical absolute measurements of Albumin, HDLC, and CRP should verify this finding and evaluate whether these markers can serve as a predictive prognostic marker of severe COVID-19 infection prior to patient progression.

Comment

Principle findings

The purpose of this study was to identify metabolic and proteomic differences seen in pregnancies with and without COVID-19 and evaluate for metabolic and proteomic differences between severity of COVID-19 infection. Our findings demonstrated that pregnant persons with post-infection mild/moderate COVID-19 infection had multiomic profiles like controls, but those with asymptomatic infection and more so severe disease demonstrated distinct changes in metabolite and protein expression. We identified the biochemicals that were significantly upregulated/downregulated in pregnant participants with severe COVID-19 compared to those with less severe COVID-19. Among the upregulated biochemicals were acute phase response proteins, serine protease inhibitors (SERPINs), complement factors, and acylglycerols. Of downregulated biochemicals, a subset was related to lipid metabolism such as apolipoproteins and phosphatidylcholines. These findings emphasize that pregnancies with severe COVID-19 exhibit greater inflammation and complement activation, with altered lipid metabolism.

Results in the context of what is known

COVID-19 severity and death secondary to COVID-19 is strongly associated with uncontrolled immune responses, termed “cytokine storm” [10, 11]. Upon entry into respiratory epithelia via the ACE2 receptor, SARS-COV-2 triggers a proinflammatory response through pathogenic Th1 cells and interferons [10, 11]. In severe cases, massive release of inflammatory cytokines results in lymphopenia, thrombosis, and mononuclear cell infiltration in various tissues throughout the body [1012]. Non-pregnant patients with severe COVID-19 have been found to have greater levels of IL-2, IL-6, IL-7, IL-10, IP-10, MCP-1, TNF-α, macrophage inflammatory protein 1 alpha, and granulocyte-CSF than those with mild and moderate infections [11, 13]. The observation of a marked inflammatory response in severe COVID-19 infection has also been described in pregnancy [14]. Our study demonstrates similar findings with pregnancies with severe COVID-19 displaying proteomic signature and altered metabolites associated with increased inflammation. This further supports the hypothesis that the dysregulated immune response following SARS-CoV-2 infection plays a primary role in development of severe disease, both in the pregnant and non-pregnant population.

An important driver of inflammation is the complement system, which initiates phagocytosis, chemotaxis, leukocyte activation, and release of inflammatory mediators [15]. Zinellu & Mangoni found that C3 and C4 concentrations were significantly decreased, indicating increased complement activation, in patients with more severe COVID-19 in the non-pregnant population and that increased complement activation was significantly associated with greater mortality [15]. Additionally, a proteomic study correlating expression with COVID-19 severity demonstrated that out of 93 differentially expressed proteins 50 belonged to activation of the complement system, platelet degranulation, and macrophage function [16]. We similarly showed that pregnant participants with severe COVID-19 had upregulation of C3/C5 convertase, complement component C2, complement component C9, and complement C1q subcomponent subunit C, indicating increased complement activation. Our findings suggest that severe COVID-19 disease states in pregnancy is characterized by complement activation, like that of the non-pregnant population. The upregulation of complement activation may contribute to the vulnerability pregnant patients have for disease complications as complement activation in pregnancy is associated with poorer maternal outcomes [17, 18]. Measurement of complement activation in pregnancies affected by COVID-19 may indicate disease severity and possibly identify patients at greatest risk for poorer pregnancy-related outcomes. Earlier identification and intervention through treatments targeting complement activation may decrease risk of developing adverse sequelae associated with severe COVID-19 disease in pregnancy.

In our cohort of pregnant participants with severe COVID-19, altered lipid metabolism, specifically changes in apolipoproteins and phosphatidylcholines, was identified, suggesting its role in the pathophysiology of development of severe disease. Prior multiomic studies of COVID-19 outside of pregnancy have also demonstrated similar associations with metabolic changes and alterations in lipid mediators. The downregulation of choline and its derivatives along with the dysregulation of various apolipoproteins were demonstrated to be more strongly associated with severe cases of COVID-19 compared to non-severe cases [13, 16]. Wu et al. similarly found decreased levels of phosphatidylcholines in fatal COVID-19 cases. In our cohort of pregnant participants with COVID-19, phosphatidylcholines and apolipoproteins were significantly downregulated in pregnancies with severe COVID-19, supporting the findings of alternative studies but specifically in the pregnant population [8]. The downregulation of apolipoproteins and phosphatidylcholines may be related to altered lipid metabolism, and there are previous reports that these biochemical differences have been observed prior to severe COVID-19 infection [19]. This dysregulation in lipid metabolism appears to play an important role in development of severe infection and based on our study findings may serve as an early marker for progression to severe disease. When including apolipoprotein A1 in a predictive model for predictor of severe COVID-19 disease with serum lbumin and CRP, we found that this composite measure performed better in identification of severe disease than the individual markers. Further studies should be performed to evaluate the validity of these clinical lab parameters and determine whether they may serve a role as a predictive surrogate marker, allowing for earlier intervention and attempt to decrease progression of disease.

Clinical implications. Pregnant patients are often excluded from research studies. As such, there was a significant lack of knowledge on how COVID-19 effects the inflammatory and metabolic profile in pregnant patients. Our study shows that severe COVID-19 in pregnancy results in greater inflammation, complement activation and dysregulation of serum lipids, like the general population. As such, pregnant patients with COVID-19 should be managed similarly to their non-pregnant counterparts.

Research implications. We provide serum inflammatory and metabolic profiles in pregnant participants with COVID-19 using multiomic profiling with substantial implications for future mechanistic studies. Severe COVID was associated with dramatic proteomic and lipidomic changes, whereas Asymptomatic infections exhibited few significant changes compared to controls. Post-infection mild/moderate COVID-19 did not have significantly altered serum protein or compound levels compared to controls. Our study further elucidates the inflammatory and metabolic changes observed in severe COVID-19.

Limitations

Limitations of this study include the relatively small sample sizes which may have prevented detection of smaller effect size associations. Only asymptomatic were collected during infection, mild and moderate cases were sample, resulting in lack of coverage of the effects of mild and moderate infection. By examining and analyzing other types of biospecimen, such as whole blood, plasma, or placental samples, we can further corroborate and provide robust data that supports our results. Higher BMI and associated comorbidities can also affect metabolomic profile making it challenging to differentiate which biochemicals changes are caused by obesity and which are caused by and predictive of severe COVID-19 [16]. There are opportunities for future studies to assess whether these signatures precede infection and might serve as risk biomarkers prior to actual infection. Furthermore, the specimens were collected in an era before vaccination was available and pre-Omicron. However, the strength is the untargeted screening of complete metabolites, proteins, and lipids for association with COVID-19 severity.

Conclusions

To summarize, we find that there are dramatic lipidomic and proteomic changes that are associated with maternal COVID-19 severity. They appear to be associated with increased inflammation, e.g. immunoglobulins, acute phase response, SERPINs, and dysregulated lipid metabolism e.g. apolipoproteins, phosphatidylcholines, and acylglycerols, which have been observed in studies of COVID-19 severity in non-pregnant populations. Given the clear similarities observed in the metabolomic profiles and suggested underlying pathophysiology of COVID-19 infection in the pregnant and non-pregnant population, we emphasize the importance of caring for pregnant patients with COVID-19 with similar protocols as non-pregnant patients. The inclusion of pregnant people in mechanistic, therapeutic, and vaccine studies should be at the forefront of clinical considerations to improve health for pregnant people.

Supporting information

S1 Table. Differential gene expression by all modeling schema.

(XLSX)

S2 Table. Pathway enrichment.

(XLSX)

S1 Fig. Quality control.

(PDF)

Acknowledgments

We are indebted to the pregnant study participants for participation in our study.

Paper presentations: Findings from this paper were presented at the 41st annual Society for Maternal Fetal Medicine, Orlando, FL USA (January 31st–February 5th, 2022)

Data Availability

All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.

Funding Statement

Funding by Carolyn L. Kuckein Student Research Fellowship to M.A. and National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, K12 HD000849 to Y.A. Funding sources were not involved in study design, data collection, analysis and interpretation, writing of manuscript, or the decision to submit the findings of this study for publication.

References

  • 1.Altendahl M, Afshar Y, de St Maurice A, Fajardo V, Chu A. Perinatal Maternal-Fetal/Neonatal Transmission of COVID-19: A Guide to Safe Maternal and Neonatal Care in the Era of COVID-19 and Physical Distancing. Neoreviews. 2020. Dec;21(12):e783–94. doi: 10.1542/neo.21-12-e783 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Overton EE, Goffman D, Friedman AM. The Epidemiology of COVID-19 in Pregnancy. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2022. Mar;65(1):110–22. doi: 10.1097/GRF.0000000000000674 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.Dashraath P, Wong JLJ, Lim MXK, Lim LM, Li S, Biswas A, et al. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic and pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020. Jun;222(6):521–31. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.03.021 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Nana M, Nelson-Piercy C. COVID-19 in pregnancy. Clin Med. 2021. Sep;21(5):e446–50. doi: 10.7861/clinmed.2021-0503 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.Overmyer KA, Shishkova E, Miller IJ, Balnis J, Bernstein MN, Peters-Clarke TM, et al. Large-Scale Multi-omic Analysis of COVID-19 Severity. Cell Syst. 2021. Jan;12(1):23–40.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.cels.2020.10.003 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 6.Su Y, Chen D, Yuan D, Lausted C, Choi J, Dai CL, et al. Multi-Omics Resolves a Sharp Disease-State Shift between Mild and Moderate COVID-19. Cell. 2020. Dec;183(6):1479–1495.e20. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.10.037 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.Clinical Spectrum of SARS-CoV-2 Infection [Internet]. NIH COVID-19 Treatment Guidelines. 2021. Available from: https://www.covid19treatmentguidelines.nih.gov/overview/clinical-spectrum/
  • 8.Wu Z, McGoogan JM. Characteristics of and Important Lessons From the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Outbreak in China: Summary of a Report of 72 314 Cases From the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. JAMA. 2020. Apr;323(13):1239–42. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.2648 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 9.Huang DW, Sherman BT, Lempicki RA. Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources. Nat Protoc. 2009;4(1):44–57. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2008.211 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Hu B, Huang S, Yin L. The cytokine storm and COVID-19. J Med Virol. 2021. Jan;93(1):250–6. doi: 10.1002/jmv.26232 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 11.Mulchandani R, Lyngdoh T, Kakkar AK. Deciphering the COVID-19 cytokine storm: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Clin Invest. 2021. Jan;51(1):e13429. doi: 10.1111/eci.13429 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.Garcia-Beltran WF, Lam EC, Astudillo MG, Yang D, Miller TE, Feldman J, et al. COVID-19-neutralizing antibodies predict disease severity and survival. Cell. 2021. Jan;184(2):476–488.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.12.015 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 13.Chen Y-M, Zheng Y, Yu Y, Wang Y, Huang Q, Qian F, et al. Blood molecular markers associated with COVID-19 immunopathology and multi-organ damage. EMBO J. 2020. Dec;39(24):e105896. doi: 10.15252/embj.2020105896 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 14.Foo S-S, Cambou MC, Mok T, Fajardo VM, Jung KL, Fuller T, et al. The systemic inflammatory landscape of COVID-19 in pregnancy: Extensive serum proteomic profiling of mother-infant dyads with in utero SARS-CoV-2. Cell reports Med. 2021. Nov;2(11):100453. doi: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2021.100453 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Zinellu A, Mangoni AA. Serum Complement C3 and C4 and COVID-19 Severity and Mortality: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis With Meta-Regression. Vol. 12, Frontiers in immunology. 2021. p. 696085. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.696085 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 16.Shen B, Yi X, Sun Y, Bi X, Du J, Zhang C, et al. Proteomic and Metabolomic Characterization of COVID-19 Patient Sera. Cell. 2020. Jul;182(1):59–72.e15. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2020.05.032 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 17.Teirilä L, Heikkinen-Eloranta J, Kotimaa J, Meri S, Lokki AI. Regulation of the complement system and immunological tolerance in pregnancy. Semin Immunol. 2019. Oct;45:101337. doi: 10.1016/j.smim.2019.101337 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 18.Pierik E, Prins JR, van Goor H, Dekker GA, Daha MR, Seelen MAJ, et al. Dysregulation of Complement Activation and Placental Dysfunction: A Potential Target to Treat Preeclampsia? Front Immunol. 2019;10:3098. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.03098 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 19.Masana L, Correig E, Ibarretxe D, Anoro E, Arroyo JA, Jericó C, et al. Low HDL and high triglycerides predict COVID-19 severity. Sci Rep. 2021. Mar;11(1):7217. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-86747-5 [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Decision Letter 0

Catherine Mounier

29 Jul 2022

PONE-D-22-11635Severe COVID-19 in pregnancy has a distinct serum profile, including greater complement activation and dysregulation of serum lipidsPLOS ONE

Dear Dr. Afshar,

Thank you for submitting your manuscript to PLOS ONE. After careful consideration, we feel that it has merit but does not fully meet PLOS ONE’s publication criteria as it currently stands. Therefore, we invite you to submit a revised version of the manuscript that addresses the points raised during the review process. More specifically, you need to provide a more precise clinical picture of your patients concerning the severity of the disease. In addition,  the concentrations of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 (IgM and IgG) as well as a cytokine profil need to be presented.

Please submit your revised manuscript by Sep 12 2022 11:59PM. If you will need more time than this to complete your revisions, please reply to this message or contact the journal office at plosone@plos.org. When you're ready to submit your revision, log on to https://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/ and select the 'Submissions Needing Revision' folder to locate your manuscript file.

Please include the following items when submitting your revised manuscript:

  • A rebuttal letter that responds to each point raised by the academic editor and reviewer(s). You should upload this letter as a separate file labeled 'Response to Reviewers'.

  • A marked-up copy of your manuscript that highlights changes made to the original version. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Revised Manuscript with Track Changes'.

  • An unmarked version of your revised paper without tracked changes. You should upload this as a separate file labeled 'Manuscript'.

If you would like to make changes to your financial disclosure, please include your updated statement in your cover letter. Guidelines for resubmitting your figure files are available below the reviewer comments at the end of this letter.

If applicable, we recommend that you deposit your laboratory protocols in protocols.io to enhance the reproducibility of your results. Protocols.io assigns your protocol its own identifier (DOI) so that it can be cited independently in the future. For instructions see: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/submission-guidelines#loc-laboratory-protocols. Additionally, PLOS ONE offers an option for publishing peer-reviewed Lab Protocol articles, which describe protocols hosted on protocols.io. Read more information on sharing protocols at https://plos.org/protocols?utm_medium=editorial-email&utm_source=authorletters&utm_campaign=protocols.

We look forward to receiving your revised manuscript.

Kind regards,

Catherine Mounier

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found at

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf  and

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

2. Please provide additional details regarding participant consent. In the ethics statement in the Methods and online submission information, please ensure that you have specified what type you obtained (for instance, written or verbal, and if verbal, how it was documented and witnessed). If your study included minors, state whether you obtained consent from parents or guardians. If the need for consent was waived by the ethics committee, please include this information.

3. Thank you for stating the following in the Competing Interests section:

“AQ and SY are co-founders of, are employed by, and own stock in Dalton Bioanalytics Inc. All other authors report no conflict of interest.”

Please confirm that this does not alter your adherence to all PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials, by including the following statement: "This does not alter our adherence to  PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.” (as detailed online in our guide for authors http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/competing-interests).  If there are restrictions on sharing of data and/or materials, please state these. Please note that we cannot proceed with consideration of your article until this information has been declared.

Please include your updated Competing Interests statement in your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

4. Please include captions for your Supporting Information files at the end of your manuscript, and update any in-text citations to match accordingly. Please see our Supporting Information guidelines for more information: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/supporting-information

[Note: HTML markup is below. Please do not edit.]

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Partly

**********

2. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: N/A

**********

3. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #1: Yes

Reviewer #2: No

**********

5. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Severe COVID-19 in pregnancy has a distinct serum profile, including greater complement activation and dysregulation of serum lipids investigated the pathophysiology behind various clinical trajectories in pregnant patients diagnosed with COVID-19 using multi-omics profiling. The information contained in the manuscript is timely and makes a significant contribution to the body of literature related to the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly by presenting data from a less-studies population – pregnant persons. The manuscript is generally well-written; therefore, my comments/suggestions/questions are minimal.

Line 78: include (ARDS) after syndrome as this acronym is used later in the manuscript

Line 109: Healthy pregnant controls without COVID-19...

Line 114: moderate, or severe

Lines 125-126: This section could be revised for clarity. It’s a bit wordy and repetitious. Sentences should begin with numbers (i.e., 31 different serum samples). Were 2 samples collected? If so, why weren’t comparisons made? Were samples collected from more than 31 COVID-positive participants and the ones used here randomly selected? If so, how many and how was the selection made?

Line 152-158: verb tense changes and paragraph begins with a number.

Line 160: What do you mean by available subject variables? COVID / draw?

Line 169: A total of 30 participants… There are also several places where number format is incorrection in this section.

Line 177: COVID-19 severity. There are other areas of inconsistency with this term. Please double check

Line 189-190: I am not sure what this sentence is trying to say. It seems something is missing.

Line 236: I think this sentence is confusing, especially considering whether two samples were collected from participants and whether the samples were compared. If you only looked at one sample, the differences might be a better word than changes. Also, differences between pregnancies with and without COVID-19.

Table 1: There are 7 individuals in Race/Ethnicity for the Asymptomatic Group; Why is Gestational Age for 28 participants?

One last comment: Phosphatidylcholine concentrations change during pregnancy due to increased de novo synthesis in the maternal liver. In general, levels increase, particularly in the 2nd trimester, so trimester of measurement may matter. Additionally, infection, inflammation, etc. lead to sequestration of choline in the liver and alteration of the serum levels. I think acknowledging this in the discussion is important, especially as this study is specific to pregnant women and the Severe group was more likely to be obese.

Reviewer #2: The impact of COVID-19 on pregnancy is an important topic that needs close attention and thorough study. Thus the selection of the topic is of paramount importance. In the present study, the authors tried to evaluate the changes in the plasma proteins and lipids in those who are pregnant and having COVID-18 infection.

After measuring all the parameters, the authors concluded that Pregnancies with severe COVID-19 demonstrate greater inflammation and complement activation and dysregulation of serum lipids. This altered multiomic expression provides insight into the pathophysiology of severe COVID-19 in pregnancy - but did not provide information about cytokines profile, range of D-die=mer and ferritin levels.

Some of the issues are:

1. THe number of patients studied is small for a disease like COVID-19.

2. Definition of severity of COVID-19 need to be provided-such as clinical picture, oxygens aturation levels, cytokines levels, and other

3. In all the study population, authors could have measured concentrations of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 -both IgM and IgG levels, how these titers correspond with the clinical picture and other clinical and lab parameters.

4. In a study of this type it is mandatory to measure plasma cytokines profile (TNF, IL6, MIF, IL-4 and IL-10) and correlate the same to the clinical picture, antibody titers and outcome of the infection.

5. If it is possible measurement of Treg and Teff cells would have been helpful.

Without these indices, the study becomes a routine clinical study with little insight into the disease pathobiology.

**********

6. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #1: No

Reviewer #2: No

**********

[NOTE: If reviewer comments were submitted as an attachment file, they will be attached to this email and accessible via the submission site. Please log into your account, locate the manuscript record, and check for the action link "View Attachments". If this link does not appear, there are no attachment files.]

While revising your submission, please upload your figure files to the Preflight Analysis and Conversion Engine (PACE) digital diagnostic tool, https://pacev2.apexcovantage.com/. PACE helps ensure that figures meet PLOS requirements. To use PACE, you must first register as a user. Registration is free. Then, login and navigate to the UPLOAD tab, where you will find detailed instructions on how to use the tool. If you encounter any issues or have any questions when using PACE, please email PLOS at figures@plos.org. Please note that Supporting Information files do not need this step.

PLoS One. 2022 Nov 16;17(11):e0276766. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276766.r002

Author response to Decision Letter 0


22 Sep 2022

Point-by-Point Response:

Journal Requirements:

When submitting your revision, we need you to address these additional requirements.

1. Please ensure that your manuscript meets PLOS ONE's style requirements, including those for file naming. The PLOS ONE style templates can be found a https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=wjVg/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_main_body.pdf

https://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/file?id=ba62/PLOSOne_formatting_sample_title_authors_affiliations.pdf

Thank you. Confirmed.

2. Please provide additional details regarding participant consent. In the ethics statement in the Methods and online submission information, please ensure that you have specified what type you obtained (for instance, written or verbal, and if verbal, how it was documented and witnessed). If your study included minors, state whether you obtained consent from parents or guardians. If the need for consent was waived by the ethics committee, please include this information.

We added more detail in the material and methods. “Pregnant people with COVID-19 infection were actively enrolled at the University of California, Los Angeles between October 1st, 2020 and February 28th, 2021 through a prospective cohort study evaluating maternal and neonatal outcomes of pregnancies with COVID-19 infection. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (UCLA IRB# 20-000579). After patient was identified, participants underwent screening and eligible participants were contacted by a study coordinator by phone or email. Verbal or email consented was obtained. Confirmed COVID-19 infection was defined as being SARS-CoV-2 positive by nasopharyngeal RT-PCR. Eligibility for the study included participants >13 years old, pregnant at the time of enrollment, with necessary clinical data and biospecimen collection during pregnancy. Healthy pregnant controls without COVID-19 infection, defined as a negative SARS-CoV-2 positive nasopharyngeal RT-PCR test, were concurrently recruited.”

3. Thank you for stating the following in the Competing Interests section:

“AQ and SY are co-founders of, are employed by, and own stock in Dalton Bioanalytics Inc. All other authors report no conflict of interest.” Please confirm that this does not alter your adherence to all PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials, by including the following statement: "This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.” (as detailed online in our guide for authors http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/competing-interests). If there are restrictions on sharing of data and/or materials, please state these. Please note that we cannot proceed with consideration of your article until this information has been declared. Please include your updated Competing Interests statement in your cover letter; we will change the online submission form on your behalf.

Thank you. We added: “we have no problems with sharing the data for this publication” on behalf of AQ and SY to the cover letter.

4. Please include captions for your Supporting Information files at the end of your manuscript, and update any in-text citations to match accordingly. Please see our Supporting Information guidelines for more information: http://journals.plos.org/plosone/s/supporting-information.

Done.

Reviewers' comments:

Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #1: Severe COVID-19 in pregnancy has a distinct serum profile, including greater complement activation and dysregulation of serum lipids investigated the pathophysiology behind various clinical trajectories in pregnant patients diagnosed with COVID-19 using multi-omics profiling. The information contained in the manuscript is timely and makes a significant contribution to the body of literature related to the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly by presenting data from a less-studies population – pregnant persons. The manuscript is generally well-written; therefore, my comments/suggestions/questions are minimal.

Thank you so much for the summary and the thoughtful comments and revisions throughout. We agree that pregnant persons are less studied, and we believe that with incorporation of your edits we have made the manuscript stronger.

Line 78: include (ARDS) after syndrome as this acronym is used later in the manuscript

Done. Thank you. Updated: “The clinical presentation of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in pregnancy is variable and can range in severity from asymptomatic to critical illness with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), multiorgan failure, and in some cases, death”

Line 109: Healthy pregnant controls without COVID-19...

Corrected. Updated: “Healthy pregnant controls without COVID-19 infection, defined as a negative SARS-CoV-2 positive nasopharyngeal RT-PCR test, were concurrently recruited.”

Line 114: moderate, or severe

Edited as recommended. Updated: “COVID-19 severity was categorized as asymptomatic, mild, moderate, or severe based on the NIH guidelines”

Lines 125-126: This section could be revised for clarity. It’s a bit wordy and repetitious. Sentences should begin with numbers (i.e., 31 different serum samples). Were 2 samples collected? If so, why weren’t comparisons made? Were samples collected from more than 31 COVID-positive participants and the ones used here randomly selected? If so, how many and how was the selection made?

Updated: “Peripheral blood specimens were obtained from consented patients at the time of study enrollment, as close to diagnosis of acute COVID-19 infection as possible… Of the 267 available samples, 31 serum samples were chosen based on COVID-19 severity (control, asymptomatic, mild/moderate, and severe) for analyses. Each sample was from a unique participant.”

Line 152-158: verb tense changes and paragraph begins with a number.

Thank you. We edited to improve the language. Updated: “Serum samples underwent multiomic profiling however a single outlier sample was omitted from further analysis likely due to mis-injection (technical error). Relative intensities were log10 transformed and statistically corrected for the technical effects run order and extraction efficiency (average internal standard intensity).”

Line 160: What do you mean by available subject variables? COVID / draw?

Updated: “Participant demographic and clinical characteristics were clustered based on pairwise correlation distance to identify potentially important associations.”

Line 169: A total of 30 participants… There are also several places where number format is incorrection in this section.

We are unsure what exactly this means but made sure on revision that all numbers consistent throughout the paper and we kept formatting consistent. We hope this helps ameliorate this issue.

Line 177: COVID-19 severity. There are other areas of inconsistency with this term. Please double check

Thank you for catching this consistency. Updated all “COVID” to COVID-19

Line 189-190: I am not sure what this sentence is trying to say. It seems something is missing.

“Precipitous changes in maternal serum were seen in those with severe COVID-19 infection in pregnancy.”

Line 236: I think this sentence is confusing, especially considering whether two samples were collected from participants and whether the samples were compared. If you only looked at one sample, the differences might be a better word than changes. Also, differences between pregnancies with and without COVID-19.

Updated: “The purpose of this study was to identify metabolic and proteomic differences seen in pregnancies with and without COVID-19 and evaluate for metabolic and proteomic differences between severity of COVID-19 infection. “

Table 1: There are 7 individuals in Race/Ethnicity for the Asymptomatic Group; Why is Gestational Age for 28 participants?

Updated table, “2 participants did not deliver within the University of California, Los Angeles Health system and thus were missing birthing outcome variables such as gestational age at delivery.”

One last comment: Phosphatidylcholine concentrations change during pregnancy due to increased de novo synthesis in the maternal liver. In general, levels increase, particularly in the 2nd trimester, so trimester of measurement may matter. Additionally, infection, inflammation, etc. lead to sequestration of choline in the liver and alteration of the serum levels. I think acknowledging this in the discussion is important, especially as this study is specific to pregnant women and the Severe group was more likely to be obese.

Thank you for this important clarifying point and comment. We totally agree and appreciate the gestational age changes as well as the BMI correlation and as such we control for both of these parameters in the models we present. This is a very important clinically relevant modifier and hence built into our model. You will see that new models that are included consider these changes and are detailed below:

lm1: severeCOVID

lm1b: severeActiveCOVID

lm2a: severeCOVID + age + race

lm2b: severeCOVID + age + race + covid_ga_w + BMI_delivery

lm2c: severeCOVID + age + race + covid_ga_w + med_cond___obesity

lm3: covid_severity_recent

lm4: covid_severity_recent [excluding severe cases] {basically asymptomatic vs non- and post-infection controls}

lm5: covid_status [excluding COVID within 6 weeks of sampling] {basically post-infection mild/moderate vs controls}

Reviewer #2: The impact of COVID-19 on pregnancy is an important topic that needs close attention and thorough study. Thus the selection of the topic is of paramount importance. In the present study, the authors tried to evaluate the changes in the plasma proteins and lipids in those who are pregnant and having COVID-18 infection.

Thank you. We agree that pregnant people are understudied and we are thrilled to use this technology, LC-MS, metabolomics, proteomics, and lipidomics, in this population which would supplement the vast work on cytokines and antibody response in pregnant patients.

After measuring all the parameters, the authors concluded that Pregnancies with severe COVID-19 demonstrate greater inflammation and complement activation and dysregulation of serum lipids. This altered multiomic expression provides insight into the pathophysiology of severe COVID-19 in pregnancy - but did not provide information about cytokines profile, range of D-dimer and ferritin levels.

Our focus is on metabolomics, proteomics, and lipidomics. We discuss below that cytokine measurement is not possible by LC-MS which was the focus of this paper. The measurement of cytokines is generally well below the limits of detection for untargeted, undepleted plasma proteomics experiments (~nanomolar) due to low concentration (~picomolar) and interference of high abundance species (e.g. serum albumin). Even with specialized affinity immuno-capture techniques, limits of detection are in the high picomolar range [Stenken, J. A., & Poschenrieder, A. J. (2015). Bioanalytical chemistry of cytokines–a review. Analytica chimica acta, 853, 95-115.]. Thus, alternative approaches (e.g. immunoassays) are better suited for cytokine measurement. The targets of interest to the reviewer were not detected (ferritin, TNF, IL6, , MIF, IL4, IL10, D-dimer) likely because they are too low in concentration (~picomolar). We did measure fibrinogen chains A, B and G (coagulation/D-dimer related) but these were not associated with COVID-19 status in our study. All this data is available in Supplemental Table 1.

Some of the issues are:

1. THe number of patients studied is small for a disease like COVID-19.

We agree that having more patients would be great and our cohort has grown significantly. However, to be able to do a single run of LC-MS for each sample costs $2,500 per sample (just for running the sample, no analysis, and no personnel). The cost of the experimental run for this paper was close to $75,000 USD. We believe work like ours with deep phenotyping in Supplemental Tables and clinical correlates (Table 1-2) that we provide are ripe for other researchers to continue to ask more focused questions after we provide an -omics tools here for analysis.

2. Definition of severity of COVID-19 need to be provided-such as clinical picture, oxygens aturation levels, cytokines levels, and other

COVID-19 severity is standardized by the US FDA and IDSA, among others. We use the standardized definitions throughout. Tables 1 and 2 include details of the clinical characteristics.

3. In all the study population, authors could have measured concentrations of antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 -both IgM and IgG levels, how these titers correspond with the clinical picture and other clinical and lab parameters.

Briefly here and answered in more detail below. IgG and IgM constant heavy chains are found in the data; however, we realize that the reviewer is likely looking for g/L absolute quant and we only have relative intensity, which is what is done with LC-MS The relative quant for those heavy constant chains are already reported in the results table. The objective here was not related to antibody responses and focus on proteomics, metabolomics, and lipidomics.

4. In a study of this type it is mandatory to measure plasma cytokines profile (TNF, IL6, MIF, IL-4 and IL-10) and correlate the same to the clinical picture, antibody titers and outcome of the infection.

To answer both comment #3 and #4 which recommend the study of antibodies (#3) and cytokines (#4) these are very interesting molecular mechanistic questions that many groups (including us) are tackling and have published on (see below work that our group has done on antibodies and cytokines):

Our publications on this topic

Cambou MC, , et al. J Infect Dis. 2022 Sep 9. PMID: 36082433

Matsui Y, et al. JCI Insight. 2022 Jun 22;7(12): PMID: 35579965.

Foo SS, et al. Cell Rep Med. 2021 Nov 16; PMID: 34723226

Collaborators/others publications on this topic

Atyeo C, et al Cell. 2021 PMID: 33476549; PMCID: PMC7755577.

Flannery DD, et al. JAMA Pediatr. 2021 Jun 1. PMID: 33512440; PMCID: PMC7846944.

Edlow AG, et al. JAMA Netw Open. 2020 Dec 1: 33351086; PMCID: PMC7756241.

However, the objective in this paper and in our paper was the novelty that it is not related to the SARS-CoV2 antibody response, as we have surrogate of immunoglobulin already measured in our .xls presented but this is NOT specific to SARS CoV2 and we did not feel was relevant, rather we use a novel technology and methodology capable of profiling proteins, lipids, electrolytes, metabolites, drugs, environmental chemicals, and other molecules in a single assay.

We agree that plasma cytokines and COVID-19 profiles are interesting as they correlate to clinical picture and outcomes. Our study team has investigated this and some work has been published here (Foo SS, Cambou MC, Mok T, et al. Cell Rep Med. 2021 Nov 16;2(11):100453. 2021 Oct 27. PMID: 34723226; PMCID: PMC8549189.). However, our objective and methodology are not focused on cytokine evaluation as this requires a very different methodology and here we are interested in something aside from cytokines that have been well studied using proteomic, lipidomics, and metabolomics. The measurement of cytokines is generally well below the limits of detection for untargeted, undepleted plasma proteomics experiments (~nanomolar) due to low concentration (~picomolar) and interference of high abundance species (e.g. serum albumin). Even with specialized affinity immuno-capture techniques, limits of detection are in the high picomolar range [Stenken, J. A., & Poschenrieder, A. J. (2015). Bioanalytical chemistry of cytokines–a review. Analytica chimica acta, 853, 95-115.]. Thus, alternative approaches (e.g. immunoassays) are better suited for cytokine measurement.

5. If it is possible measurement of Treg and Teff cells would have been helpful.

The study of immune populations of Treg and Teff cells are interesting, but not the focus of this work and actually require a different source material than we used. They require the peripheral mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from heparinized the whole blood isolated, versus the heparinized blood (serum) used in our experimental design to ask what the changes at the level of the proteins, metabolomics, and lipids are The laboratories of Drs. Nardy-Gomez, Franco, Collier, and many others have published on this population in pregnant populations with COVID-1

Hsieh LE, et al. J Reprod Immunol. 2022 Feb;149:103464. doi: 10.1016/j.jri.2021.103464. Epub 2021 Dec 11. PMID: 34953325; PMCID: PMC8665650.

Garcia-Flores V, et al. Nat Commun. 2022 Jan 18;13(1):320. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-27745-z. PMID: 35042863; PMCID: PMC8766450.

Attachment

Submitted filename: response to reviewers.docx

Decision Letter 1

Catherine Mounier

13 Oct 2022

Severe COVID-19 in pregnancy has a distinct serum profile, including greater complement activation and dysregulation of serum lipids

PONE-D-22-11635R1

Dear Dr. Afshar,

We’re pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been judged scientifically suitable for publication and will be formally accepted for publication once it meets all outstanding technical requirements.

Within one week, you’ll receive an e-mail detailing the required amendments. When these have been addressed, you’ll receive a formal acceptance letter and your manuscript will be scheduled for publication.

An invoice for payment will follow shortly after the formal acceptance. To ensure an efficient process, please log into Editorial Manager at http://www.editorialmanager.com/pone/, click the 'Update My Information' link at the top of the page, and double check that your user information is up-to-date. If you have any billing related questions, please contact our Author Billing department directly at authorbilling@plos.org.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please notify them about your upcoming paper to help maximize its impact. If they’ll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team as soon as possible -- no later than 48 hours after receiving the formal acceptance. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information, please contact onepress@plos.org.

Kind regards,

Catherine Mounier

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Additional Editor Comments (optional):

Reviewers' comments:

Reviewer's Responses to Questions

Comments to the Author

1. If the authors have adequately addressed your comments raised in a previous round of review and you feel that this manuscript is now acceptable for publication, you may indicate that here to bypass the “Comments to the Author” section, enter your conflict of interest statement in the “Confidential to Editor” section, and submit your "Accept" recommendation.

Reviewer #2: All comments have been addressed

**********

2. Is the manuscript technically sound, and do the data support the conclusions?

The manuscript must describe a technically sound piece of scientific research with data that supports the conclusions. Experiments must have been conducted rigorously, with appropriate controls, replication, and sample sizes. The conclusions must be drawn appropriately based on the data presented.

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

3. Has the statistical analysis been performed appropriately and rigorously?

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

4. Have the authors made all data underlying the findings in their manuscript fully available?

The PLOS Data policy requires authors to make all data underlying the findings described in their manuscript fully available without restriction, with rare exception (please refer to the Data Availability Statement in the manuscript PDF file). The data should be provided as part of the manuscript or its supporting information, or deposited to a public repository. For example, in addition to summary statistics, the data points behind means, medians and variance measures should be available. If there are restrictions on publicly sharing data—e.g. participant privacy or use of data from a third party—those must be specified.

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

5. Is the manuscript presented in an intelligible fashion and written in standard English?

PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so please note any specific errors here.

Reviewer #2: Yes

**********

6. Review Comments to the Author

Please use the space provided to explain your answers to the questions above. You may also include additional comments for the author, including concerns about dual publication, research ethics, or publication ethics. (Please upload your review as an attachment if it exceeds 20,000 characters)

Reviewer #2: Authors have addressed majority of the questions.

THe only surprise is that cytokines data is not available that would have been interesting. Agreed that others have published this data but it would be interesting if cytokines data is correlated with the other measuremetns done by the authors.

**********

7. PLOS authors have the option to publish the peer review history of their article (what does this mean?). If published, this will include your full peer review and any attached files.

If you choose “no”, your identity will remain anonymous but your review may still be made public.

Do you want your identity to be public for this peer review? For information about this choice, including consent withdrawal, please see our Privacy Policy.

Reviewer #2: Yes: Undurti N Das

**********

Acceptance letter

Catherine Mounier

20 Oct 2022

PONE-D-22-11635R1

Severe COVID-19 in pregnancy has a distinct serum profile, including greater complement activation and dysregulation of serum lipids

Dear Dr. Afshar:

I'm pleased to inform you that your manuscript has been deemed suitable for publication in PLOS ONE. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now with our production department.

If your institution or institutions have a press office, please let them know about your upcoming paper now to help maximize its impact. If they'll be preparing press materials, please inform our press team within the next 48 hours. Your manuscript will remain under strict press embargo until 2 pm Eastern Time on the date of publication. For more information please contact onepress@plos.org.

If we can help with anything else, please email us at plosone@plos.org.

Thank you for submitting your work to PLOS ONE and supporting open access.

Kind regards,

PLOS ONE Editorial Office Staff

on behalf of

Dr. Catherine Mounier

Academic Editor

PLOS ONE

Associated Data

    This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

    Supplementary Materials

    S1 Table. Differential gene expression by all modeling schema.

    (XLSX)

    S2 Table. Pathway enrichment.

    (XLSX)

    S1 Fig. Quality control.

    (PDF)

    Attachment

    Submitted filename: response to reviewers.docx

    Data Availability Statement

    All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.


    Articles from PLOS ONE are provided here courtesy of PLOS

    RESOURCES